1
Empowering Leadership and Employee Attitudes, Behaviors, and Well-Being: Enabling, or Burdening? Definition: supports the development of self- management and self-leadership skills by providing employees with power and responsibility Sometimes associated with positive organizational outcomes: increased job satisfaction and commitment, intrinsic motivation, and performance … But not always! Sometimes, there seems to be a burdening effect : for instance, after a point, very high levels of empowering leadership can lower employee performance (curvilinear relationship) à Why? For whom? Under what conditions? More research is needed! Empowering Leadership Self-determination theory: says the best “type” of motivation is autonomous motivation – it is associated with positive employee outcomes Autonomous motivation comes from the satisfaction of three basic needs, the most important one being the need for autonomy Empowering leaders in particular may provide autonomy-supportive work environment, which should increase autonomous motivation and, in turn, lead to greater extra-role behavior, well- being and lower turnover intention However, this may depend on follower personality: employees who are proactive and have high self- efficacy may benefit from a high degree of autonomy more than those who are not. Background Research Model Improved understanding of empowering leadership (enabling and burdening effects) Knowledge of the effects of empowering leadership on well-being, stress, burnout The roles that self-efficacy and personality characteristics play in this relationship Improved management and organizational environment, and performance Contributions Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø L. (2014). Empowering Leadership: Construct Clarification, Conceptualization, and Validation of a New Scale. The Leadership Quarterly,25(3), 487-511. Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A Motivational Basis of Performance and Well-Being in Two Work Settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068. Cheong, M., Spain, S. M., Yammarino, F. J., & Yun, S. (2016). Two Faces of Empowering Leadership: Enabling and Burdening. The Leadership Quarterly,27(4), 602-616. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice. The Academy of Management Review,13(3), 471. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need Satisfaction, Motivation, and Well- Being in the Work Organizations of a Former Eastern Bloc Country: A Cross-Cultural Study of Self-Determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,27(8), 930-942. Dewettinck, K., & Ameijde, M. V. (2011). Linking Leadership Empowerment Behaviour to Employee Attitudes and Behavioural Intentions. Personnel Review,40(3), 284-305. Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2017). Self-Efficacy and Psychological Ownership Mediate the Effects of Empowering Leadership on Both Good and Bad Employee Behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,24(4), 466-478. Kim, H., & Stoner, M. (2008). Burnout and Turnover Intention Among Social Workers: Effects of Role Stress, Job Autonomy and Social Support. Administration in Social Work,32(3), 5-25. Lee, S., Cheong, M., Kim, M., & Yun, S. (2017). Never Too Much? The Curvilinear Relationship Between Empowering Leadership and Task Performance. Group & Organization Management,42(1), 11-38. Morgeson, F. P., Delaney-Klinger, K., & Hemingway, M. A. (2005). The Importance of Job Autonomy, Cognitive Ability, and Job- Related Skill for Predicting Role Breadth and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,90(2), 399-406. Pearce, C. L., Sims Jr, H. P., Cox, J. F., Ball, G., Schnell, E., Smith, K. A., & Trevino, L. (2003). Transactors, Transformers and Beyond: A Multi-Method Development of a Theoretical Typology of Leadership. Measuring Business Excellence,7(3), 273-307. Raub, S., & Robert, C. (2010). Differential Effects of Empowering Leadership on In-Role and Extra-Role Employee Behaviors: Exploring the Role of Psychological Empowerment and Power Values. Human Relations,63(11), 1743-1770. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement. Academy of Management Journal,53(1), 107-128. References Online questionnaire (Time 1 and Time 2) Sample: employees from various organizations Measures: instruments with Likert-type scales Control variables: age, gender, organizational tenure, personality variables Methods What are the effects of an empowering leader on subordinate motivation, extra-role behavior, well-being, and turnover intention, and does subordinate personality matter? Research Question Proposal defense Data collection: contact company representatives to request permission for data collection Run preliminary statistical analyses Collect data at Time 2 Run subsequent statistical analyses Next Steps Anna Conides (MSc Candidate, Management), and Dr. Alexandra Panaccio (Supervisor) H1a: Enabling EL will promote autonomous motivation in subordinates H1b: The enabling aspect of EL will result in increased extra-role behaviors through enhanced autonomous motivation H1c: The enabling aspect of EL will result in greater well-being through enhanced autonomous motivation H1d: The enabling aspect of EL will result in decreased turnover intention through enhanced autonomous motivation H2a: Burdening EL will promote controlled motivation in subordinates H2b: The burdening aspect of EL will result in decreased extra-role behaviors through the experience of controlled motivation H2c: The burdening aspect of EL will result in lesser well-being through the experience of controlled motivation H2d: The burdening aspect of EL will result in increased turnover intention through the experience of controlled motivation H3a: The relationship between leadership and motivation will be moderated by perceived self-efficacy and proactive personality H3b: Mediating effect will be strengthened by an increase in moderator Hypotheses Empowering Leadership (Enabling/ Burdening) Motivation (Autonomous/ Controlled) Well-being Extra-Role Behavior Turnover Intention Proactive Personality Self-Efficacy Autonomy Competence Relatedness Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000)

Empowering Leadership Research Question Methods · 2019. 11. 27. · Linking Leadership Empowerment Behaviour to Employee Attitudes and Behavioural Intentions. Personnel Review,40(3),

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

EmpoweringLeadershipandEmployeeAttitudes,Behaviors,andWell-Being:Enabling,orBurdening?

• Definition:supportsthedevelopmentofself-managementandself-leadershipskillsbyprovidingemployeeswithpowerandresponsibility

• Sometimesassociatedwithpositiveorganizationaloutcomes:increasedjobsatisfactionandcommitment,intrinsicmotivation,andperformance…

• Butnotalways!Sometimes,thereseemstobeaburdeningeffect :forinstance,afterapoint,veryhighlevelsofempoweringleadershipcanloweremployeeperformance(curvilinearrelationship)

àWhy?Forwhom?Underwhatconditions?Moreresearchisneeded!

EmpoweringLeadership

• Self-determinationtheory:saysthebest“type”ofmotivationisautonomousmotivation– itisassociatedwithpositiveemployeeoutcomes

• Autonomousmotivationcomesfromthesatisfactionofthreebasicneeds,themostimportantonebeingtheneedforautonomy

• Empoweringleadersinparticularmayprovideautonomy-supportiveworkenvironment,whichshouldincreaseautonomousmotivationand,inturn,leadtogreaterextra-rolebehavior,well-beingandlowerturnoverintention

• However,thismaydependonfollowerpersonality:employeeswhoareproactiveandhavehighself-efficacymaybenefitfromahighdegreeofautonomymorethanthosewhoarenot.

Background

ResearchModel

• Improvedunderstandingofempoweringleadership(enablingandburdeningeffects)

• Knowledgeoftheeffectsofempoweringleadershiponwell-being,stress,burnout

• Therolesthatself-efficacyandpersonalitycharacteristicsplayinthisrelationship

• Improvedmanagementandorganizationalenvironment,andperformance

Contributions

Amundsen,S.,&Martinsen,Ø L.(2014).EmpoweringLeadership:ConstructClarification,Conceptualization,andValidationofaNewScale. TheLeadershipQuarterly,25(3),487-511.Baard,P.P.,Deci,E.L.,&Ryan,R.M.(2004).IntrinsicNeedSatisfaction:AMotivationalBasisofPerformanceandWell-Being inTwoWorkSettings. JournalofAppliedSocialPsychology,34(10),2045-2068.Cheong,M.,Spain,S.M.,Yammarino,F.J.,&Yun,S.(2016).TwoFacesofEmpoweringLeadership:EnablingandBurdening. TheLeadershipQuarterly,27(4),602-616.Conger,J.A.,&Kanungo,R.N.(1988).TheEmpowermentProcess: IntegratingTheoryandPractice. TheAcademyofManagementReview,13(3),471.Deci,E.L.,Ryan,R.M.,Gagné,M.,Leone,D.R.,Usunov,J.,&Kornazheva,B.P.(2001).NeedSatisfaction,Motivation,andWell-BeingintheWorkOrganizationsofaFormerEasternBlocCountry:ACross-CulturalStudyofSelf-Determination. PersonalityandSocialPsychologyBulletin,27(8),930-942.Dewettinck,K.,&Ameijde,M.V.(2011).LinkingLeadershipEmpowermentBehaviourtoEmployeeAttitudesandBehaviouralIntentions. PersonnelReview,40(3),284-305.Kim,M.,&Beehr,T.A.(2017).Self-EfficacyandPsychologicalOwnershipMediatetheEffectsofEmpoweringLeadershiponBothGoodandBadEmployeeBehaviors. JournalofLeadership&Organizational Studies,24(4),466-478.Kim,H.,&Stoner,M.(2008).BurnoutandTurnoverIntentionAmongSocialWorkers:EffectsofRoleStress,JobAutonomyandSocialSupport. Administration inSocialWork,32(3), 5-25.Lee,S.,Cheong,M.,Kim,M.,&Yun,S.(2017).NeverTooMuch?TheCurvilinearRelationshipBetweenEmpoweringLeadershipandTaskPerformance.Group&OrganizationManagement,42(1),11-38.Morgeson,F.P.,Delaney-Klinger,K.,&Hemingway,M.A.(2005).TheImportanceofJobAutonomy,CognitiveAbility,andJob-RelatedSkillforPredictingRoleBreadthandJobPerformance. JournalofAppliedPsychology,90(2),399-406.Pearce,C.L.,SimsJr,H.P.,Cox,J.F.,Ball,G.,Schnell,E.,Smith,K.A.,&Trevino,L.(2003).Transactors,TransformersandBeyond:AMulti-MethodDevelopmentofaTheoreticalTypologyofLeadership.MeasuringBusinessExcellence,7(3),273-307.Raub,S.,&Robert,C.(2010).DifferentialEffectsofEmpoweringLeadershiponIn-RoleandExtra-RoleEmployeeBehaviors:ExploringtheRoleofPsychologicalEmpowermentandPowerValues. HumanRelations,63(11),1743-1770.Zhang,X.,&Bartol,K.M.(2010).LinkingEmpoweringLeadershipandEmployeeCreativity:TheInfluenceofPsychologicalEmpowerment,IntrinsicMotivation,andCreativeProcessEngagement. AcademyofManagementJournal,53(1),107-128.

References

• Onlinequestionnaire(Time1andTime2)• Sample:employeesfromvariousorganizations• Measures:instrumentswithLikert-typescales• Controlvariables:age,gender,organizational

tenure,personalityvariables

MethodsWhataretheeffectsofanempoweringleaderonsubordinatemotivation,extra-rolebehavior,well-being,andturnoverintention,anddoes

subordinatepersonalitymatter?

ResearchQuestion

• Proposaldefense• Datacollection:contactcompany

representativestorequestpermissionfordatacollection

• Runpreliminarystatisticalanalyses• CollectdataatTime2• Runsubsequentstatisticalanalyses

NextSteps

AnnaConides(MScCandidate,Management),andDr.AlexandraPanaccio(Supervisor)

H1a: Enabling ELwill promote autonomous motivation in subordinatesH1b: The enabling aspect of EL will result in increased extra-role behaviorsthrough enhanced autonomous motivationH1c: The enabling aspect of EL will result in greater well-being throughenhanced autonomous motivationH1d: The enabling aspect of EL will result in decreased turnover intentionthrough enhanced autonomous motivation

H2a: Burdening ELwill promote controlled motivation in subordinatesH2b: The burdening aspect of EL will result in decreased extra-role behaviorsthrough the experience of controlled motivationH2c: The burdening aspect of EL will result in lesser well-being through theexperience of controlled motivationH2d: The burdening aspect of EL will result in increased turnover intentionthrough the experience of controlled motivation

H3a: The relationship between leadership andmotivationwill bemoderatedby perceived self-efficacy and proactive personalityH3b: Mediating effect will be strengthened by an increase inmoderator

Hypotheses

EmpoweringLeadership(Enabling/Burdening)

Motivation(Autonomous/Controlled)

Well-being

Extra-RoleBehavior

TurnoverIntention

ProactivePersonality

Self-Efficacy

Autonomy Competence Relatedness

Self-DeterminationTheory(Deci&Ryan,2000)