37
EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges Prof. Dr. Sebastian Dullien FMM Summer School 2.8.2019

EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

EMU reforms: Achievement andchallenges

Prof. Dr. Sebastian Dullien

FMM Summer School 2.8.2019

Page 2: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Programme

1. Introduction

2. A look back: Causes for the euro-zone crisis

3. Pre-2017 reforms of the euro-area

4. Reform debates and progress since 2018

5. Conclusions

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 2

Page 3: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Introduction

• Hope 2017: Window of opportunity for reform in Germany and France

• A number of new reformproposals

• But: Delay because of delayed governmentformation

• Decisions at euro summit in December 2018

• In parallel: Growing conflictwith Italian government

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 3

Page 4: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

THE DIABOLIC SEVEN: CAUSES FORTHE EURO-ZONE CRISIS

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 4

Page 5: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

The diabolic seven: Causes for theeuro-zone crisis

1. Excessive deficits in some countries (Greece!)

2. Problems in the banking sector

3. Doom-loop between sovereigns and banks

4. Self-fulfilling market panics

5. Boom-Bust cycles in the periphery

6. Structural divergence of competitiveness

7. Loss of legitimacy because of dismal economicperformance/feeling of political impotence

02.08.2019 5

Page 6: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

The crisis causes

• In some countries (especially Greece) budget deficits were excessive

1. Excessive deficits in some countries (Greece!)

2. Problems in the banking sector

3. Doom-loop between sovereigns and banks

4. Self-fulfilling market panics

5. Boom-Bust cycles in the periphery

6. Structural divergence of competitiveness

7. Loss of legitimacy because of dismal economic performance/feeling of political impotence

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 6

Crisis cause #1: Excessive deficits in some countries

Page 7: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

The crisis causes

• Lax regulation and excessive creditgrowth led to problems in a number of countries– During the US subprime crisis (2007-9)

• Germany, France, Ireland, Belgium, Netherlands

– Later, during the euro crisis• Spain, Greece, Cyprus

1. Excessive deficits in some countries (Greece!)

2. Problems in the banking sector

3. Doom-loop between sovereigns and banks

4. Self-fulfilling market panics

5. Boom-Bust cycles in the periphery

6. Structural divergence of competitiveness

7. Loss of legitimacy because of dismal economic performance/feeling of political impotence

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 7

Crisis cause #2: Problems in the banking sector

Page 8: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

The crisis causes

1. Excessive deficits in some countries (Greece!)

2. Problems in the banking sector

3. Doom-loop between sovereigns and banks

4. Self-fulfilling market panics

5. Boom-Bust cycles in the periphery

6. Structural divergence of competitiveness

7. Loss of legitimacy because of dismal economic performance/feeling of political impotence

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 8

Crisis cause #2: Problems in the banking sector

Page 9: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

The crisis causes

1. Excessive deficits in some countries (Greece!)

2. Problems in the banking sector

3. Doom-loop between sovereigns and banks

4. Self-fulfilling market panics

5. Boom-Bust cycles in the periphery

6. Structural divergence of competitiveness

7. Loss of legitimacy because of dismal economic performance/feeling of political impotence

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 9

Crisis cause #3: Doom-loop between banks and sovereigns

Balance sheet

problems in bankingsector

Expectationsof expensive

bail-out programmes

Doubts aboutsovereign

debtsustainability

Bond pricesfall, interest

rates rise

Banks haveto write

down bondholdings

Page 10: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Bank problems, sovereign debtsustainability and monetary integration

• Monetary integration makes problems in bankingsector worse

– With national oversight: External effects of insufficientoversight are not taken into account

– Financial market integration leads to bigger banks• Concentration (Krugman‘s argument)

• For smaller countries: lager market

• „Too big to save“ becomes more likely

02.08.2019 10

Page 11: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

The crisis causes

• Without lender-of-last-resort: Danger of self-fulfilling debt crises (Obstfeld 1996, Cole/Kehoe 1996)

• With intermediate debt levels, multiple equilibria are possible:– If investors believe in solvency, interest rates

remain low and country remains solvent

– If investors doubt solvency, interest rate increases and country might be pushed intoinsolvency

• Lender-of-last-resort can solve this problem

• EMU has introduced „original sin“ through theback door

1. Excessive deficits in some countries (Greece!)

2. Problems in the banking sector

3. Doom-loop between sovereigns and banks

4. Self-fulfilling market panics

5. Boom-Bust cycles in the periphery

6. Structural divergence of competitiveness

7. Loss of legitimacy because of dismal economic performance/feeling of political impotence

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 11

Crisis cause #4: Self-fulfilling market panics

Page 12: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Crisis cause #5: Boom-and-bust-cycles

Deviation fromtrend growth

tTypical national business cycleprior to euro

Typical national business cycleafter the euro

Spain 2007

Spain 2012

Germany 2003

Germany 2016

• Euro introduction prolonged and deepened cycle asnational monetary policy was not available todampen cycle anymore

Page 13: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

The crisis causes

1. Excessive deficits in some countries (Greece!)

2. Problems in the banking sector

3. Doom-loop between sovereigns and banks

4. Self-fulfilling market panics

5. Boom-Bust cycles in the periphery

6. Structural divergence of competitiveness

7. Loss of legitimacy because of dismal economic performance/feeling of political impotence

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 13

Crisis cause #6: Structuraldivergence of competitiveness

Page 14: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

The crisis causes

• Trust in the EU has eroded in many countries– Feeling is that EU/euro framework is forcing

policies onto countries which are not wanted (and possibly not good)

• Populists have gained in many countries

• Danger: Interaction of populism & financial markets– Imagine populists promising a euro in/out

referendum come close to power

– This could trigger outflow of bank deposits

– No proper tool available to counteract outflows

1. Excessive deficits in some countries (Greece!)

2. Problems in the banking sector

3. Doom-loop between sovereigns and banks

4. Self-fulfilling market panics

5. Boom-Bust cycles in the periphery

6. Structural divergence of competitiveness

7. Loss of legitimacy because of dismal economic performance/feeling of political impotence

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 14

Crisis cause #7: Interaction of political/financial market crisis

Page 15: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

The crisis causes

1. Excessive deficits in some countries (Greece!)

2. Problems in the banking sector

3. Doom-loop between sovereigns and banks

4. Self-fulfilling market panics

5. Boom-Bust cycles in the periphery

6. Structural divergence of competitiveness

7. Loss of legitimacy because of dismal economic performance/feeling of political impotence

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 15

Crisis cause #7: Interaction of political/financial market crisis

Page 16: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Trust in the EU seems to be relatedwith economic performance: Greece

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 16

Page 17: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Trust in the EU seems to be related

with economic performance: Italy

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 17

Page 18: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Trust in the EU seems to be related

with economic performance: Spain

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 18

Page 19: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Problems of legitimacy

People were promised…

• …improved living standards

• …more jobs

• …creation of policy space at EU level to replace policyspace lost at national level

• No transfer union (in theNorth)

People perceive outcome as..

• …stagnating living standards

• …high unemployment

• …the troika implementing„neoliberal“ reforms againstdemocratic will

• …forced transfers to theSouth

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 19

Page 20: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

In order to counter these feelings

• Euro area needs to prevent replay of last crisis• Euro area needs to rekindle growth and job creation• Euro area needs to show a social face• Euro area needs to strengthen democratic rule and push

back intergovernmentalism• Overall, thus EMU/EU will be able to provide protection

of the „European way of life“

• These measures might not win back all populist voters, but potentially those from the left

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 20

Page 21: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

PRE-2017 REFORMS OF THE EURO-AREA

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 21

Page 22: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Euro area reforms so far

• Six Pack/Two Pack

– Limiting deficits and debt

– Preventive and corrective arm of SGP; macroeconomicimbalance procedure

• Fiscal compact

• ESM and OMT

• Banking union (but only partial)

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 22

Page 23: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Which problems were tackled by past reforms?

Six Pack Two Pack Fiscalcompact

ESM & OMT

Banking union

Excessive deficits + + +

Problems in thebanking sector

?

Doom-loop betweenbanks and sovereigns

?

Self-fulfilling fiscal crisis +

Boom-bust-cycles ?

Divergingcompetitiveness

?

Loss of legitimacybecause of dismalgrowth performance

Unresolved/partly resolved problems

02.08.2019 23

Unresolved/partly resolved problems

Completely unadressed

Page 24: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

So, despite the reforms, euro-area architecture still seems fragile

02.08.2019 24

Page 25: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

REFORM DEBATES AND PROGRESSSINCE 2017

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 25

Page 26: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Reform proposals since 2017 (I): EU Commission‘s „Saint Nicholas“-package

• Turn ESM into „European Monetary Fund“ & fiscalbackstop of banking union

• Bring fiscal compact into EU treaties

• (Small) budget element for Begrenztes Haushaltselement zur Konjunkturstabilisierung & „Förderung von Reformen“

• Merge positions of president of eurogroup and vice president of EU Commission into a „European Minister of Economy and Finance“

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 26

Page 27: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

New reform proposals (II): 14 GER-FR economists‘ paper

• Common deposit insurance• Backstop for Banking Union

at ESM• Capital market union• New rules for government

bonds in banks‘ balancesheets („concentrationcharge“)

• Creation of safe assets in banking system („ESBies“)

• Facilitating debtrestructruing („single limbaggregation“)

• Automatic maturityextension for junior bondswhen ESM programme istriggered

• Reform of fiscal rules:expenditure path & juniorbonds for excessivespending

• Reform of ESM: Enable ESM to act without IMK

• New credit line at ESM• Fiscal capacity for €-area:

Unemployment Reinsurance

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 27

Page 28: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

New reform proposals (III): Macron‘s vision

• Eurozone budget– Several percent of GDP

– Investments and joint projects such as European universities, research

– Financing through tax revenue

– Controlled by the EP

• Euro finance minister

• Increased cooperation in the realms of foreign andsecurity policy, refugees, and external borders

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 28

Page 29: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

New reform proposals (IV): Meseberg declaration

• Reform of ESM: Move into EU-treaty, more technicalcompetence

• New credit line at the ESM

• Eurozone budget to promote „competitiveness andconvergence “

• European Unemployment Stabilization Fund

• Facilitating debt restructruing („single limbaggregation“)

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 29

Page 30: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Scholz‘s proposal for a „European Unemployment (Re-)Insurance“

• Basic idea:

– Each country contributes into national compartments

– In crisis times, money is paid out

– If compartment is empty, countries can borrow from othercompartments

• Unclear whether there would be transfer elements(as in Dullien/von Weizsäcker 2018)

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 30

Page 31: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Decisions taken at euro summit in December 2018

• Facilitating debt restructruing („single limbaggregation“)

• ESM Reform

• ESM as Backstop for Banking Union

• Fiscal capacity for „competitiveness andconvergence“

• Roadmap for negotiations of common European deposit insurance scheme

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 31

Page 32: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 32

Macron • Fiskal Compact intoEU law

• Euro financeminister

• ESM reform• ESM as Backstop

for banking union• Completion capital market

union

• Eurozone budget• Technology- and growth

policy• Harmonisation of

corporate tax

• Single limb aggregationfor debt restructuring

• Common depositinsurance

• ESM credit with ex-anteconditionality

• Unemploymentreinsurance

• Expenditure path instead of deficit rules

• Junior government bonds forexcessive debt

• Automatic maturityextension for juniorbonds in case of ESM loan

• Introduction of „Esbies“

as safe asset

Bold: Decisions taken at eurosummit in December 2018

Page 33: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

EVALUATING THE REFORMS

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 33

Page 34: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Reform proposals and causes for crisisBisherige Reformen

Nikolaus-Paket

14 Ökonomen Macron Meseberg BeschlüsseDezember `18

Excessive deficits ++ Expenditure rules withexpenditure path

Excessive debt level ? New expenditure ruleswith junior debt

Single limbaggregation

Single limbaggregation

Problems in the bankingsector

? Completion of banking union

Completion of bankingunion

Completion of banking union

Completion of banking union

Backstop forbanking union

Doom-loop betweenbanks and sovereigns

? Completion of banking union

Completion of bankingunion; Concentration

charge for governmentbonds; Esbies

Completion of banking union

Completion of banking union

Self-fulfilling fiscal crisis +

Boom-bust-cycles ? Capital market union

Capital market union Eurozone budget Eurozone budget, European

unemploymentReinsurance

Divergingcompetitiveness

? Technology- andgrowth policy

European investments

Marginal budget

Loss of legitimacybecause of dismal growthperformance

Euro financeminister; euro

taxes; technologyand growth policy

Taxharmonisation;

taxation of digital companies

02.08.2019

Page 35: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Conclusions

• The first round of reforms (since 2009) has madeeuro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain

• Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

– there is only a road-map for the common depositinsurance

– the euro-budget will be marginal and only as part of themultiannual financial framework (EU budget)

– there is no proper fiscal stabilization function

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 35

Page 36: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

Open Question: How will the newEuropean Commission act?

• Ursula von der Leyen has made boldpromises, includingpushing a European UnemploymentReinsurance

• Will she be willing/ableto deliver?

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 36

Page 37: EMU reforms: Achievement and challenges•The first round of reforms (since 2009) has made euro-zone more resilient, yet vulnerabilities remain •Progress since 2017 has been disappointing

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOURATTENTION

02.08.2019 Prof. Dullien 37