Upload
carlosmandopinto
View
317
Download
6
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1/31/2011 1
Angelo Baggini*, Franco Bua** * Università degli Studi di Bergamo, [email protected]
** ECD Engineering Consulting and Design, Pavia, [email protected]
Standard EN 50464-1 European standardisation for transformer losses reduction
LEONARDO ENERGY
2
Standardisation evolution
1992 CENELEC: HD 428, HD 538
1998 CEI 14-13 + dry type
2001 CE mandate to CENELEC
2005 (25.1) CENELEC TC 14 WG21
2006 positive vote EN50464-1
2007 CEI EN 50464-1 (CEI 14-34)
LEONARDO ENERGY
3 approx Reduced CEI 14-13 Normal CEI 14-13
Evolution – HD428
Rated power (kVA) No load losses (W) Load losses (W)
A’ B’ C’ A B C
100 320 260 210 1.750 2.150 1.475
160 460 375 300 2.350 3.100 2.000
250 650 530 425 3.250 4.200 2.750
400 930 750 610 4.600 6.000 3.850
630 (4%) 1.300 1.030 860 6.500 8.400 5.400
630 (6%) 1.200 940 800 6.750 8.700 5.600
1000 1.700 1.400 1.100 10.500 13.000 9.500
1600 2.600 2.200 1.700 17.000 20.000 14.000
2500 3.800 3.200 2.500 26.500 32.000 22.000
LEONARDO ENERGY
4
Evolution – HD428
NO Load losses - National standards
Rated power (kVA)
No
loa
d losses (
W)
LEONARDO ENERGY
5
Evolution – HD428
No load losses – National standards
Rated power (kVA)
No
lo
ad
lo
sse
s (
W)
LEONARDO ENERGY
6
Evolution – HD428
load losses – National standards
Rated power (kVA)
loa
d losses (
W)
LEONARDO ENERGY
7
Evolution – HD428
load losses – National standards
Rated power (kVA)
loa
d losses (
W)
LEONARDO ENERGY
8
HD538 Vn(kV) Sn (kVA) Load losses (W) No load losses (W) Vcc (%)
12,0
100 2000 440
4
160 2700 610
250 3500 820
400 4900 1150
630 7300 1500
630 7600 1370
6 1000 10000 2000
1600 14000 2800
2500 21000 4300
24,0
250 3800 880
6
400 5500 1200
630 7800 1650
1000 11000 2300
1600 16000 3100
2500 23000 5000
LEONARDO ENERGY
9
HD538
Rated
voltage
(kV)
Rated power
(kVA)
Load losses
(W), thermal
class A
Load losses
(W), Thermal
class E
Load losses
(W), Thermal
class B
Load losses
(W), Thermal
class F
Load losses
(W), Thermal
class H
No load
losses (W) Vcc (%)
12,0
100 1700 1800 1850 1950 2100 340
4
160 2300 2450 2500 2650 2800 460
250 3000 3200 3250 3450 3700 620
400 4300 4600 4650 4900 5250 880
630 6400 6800 6900 7300 7800 1150
1000 8800 9300 9500 10000 10700 1560
6 1600 12700 13400 13600 14300 15300 2200
2500 19000 20000 20200 21200 22700 3300
24,0
250 3300 3500 3550 3800 4050 670
6
400 4800 5100 5200 5500 5900 940
630 6900 7350 7450 7850 8400 1270
1000 9600 10200 10350 10900 11700 1750
1600 14000 14800 15000 15800 16900 2400
2500 20000 21000 21300 22400 24000 3800
German standard DIN 42523
LEONARDO ENERGY
10
EN 50464-1
Loss reduction
Alignement with energy label
“mobile” classes
Sound levels indipendent from
no load losses
LEONARDO ENERGY
11
Sn (kVA) No load losses (W)
Vcc (%) E0 D0 C0 B0 A0
50 190 145 125 110 90
4
100 320 260 210 180 145
160 460 375 300 260 210
250 650 530 425 360 300
315 770 630 520 440 360
400 930 750 610 520 430
500 1100 880 720 610 510
630 1300 1030 860 730 600
630 1200 940 800 680 560
6
800 1400 1150 930 800 650
1000 1700 1400 1100 940 770
1250 2100 1750 1350 1150 950
1600 2600 2200 1700 1450 1200
2000 3100 2700 2100 1800 1450
2500 3500 3200 2500 2150 1750 EN
50
46
4-1
A’ B’ C’
LEONARDO ENERGY
12
Sn (kVA)
Load losses (W)
Vcc (%) Dk Ck BK Ak
50 1350 1100 875 750
4
100 2150 1750 1475 1250
160 3100 2350 2000 1700
250 4200 3250 2750 2350
315 5000 3900 3250 2800
400 6000 4600 3850 3250
500 7200 5500 4600 3900
630 8400 6500 5400 4600
630 8700 6750 5600 4800
6
800 10500 8400 7000 6000
1000 13000 10500 9000 7600
1250 16000 13500 11000 9500
1600 20000 17000 14000 12000
2000 26000 21000 18000 15000
2500 32000 26500 22000 18500 EN
50
46
4-1
A B C
LEONARDO ENERGY
13
Energy optimisation: selection criteria
2 strategies:
Minimum total losses
Working point with best efficiency *
* Usually load factor equal to 40–50%
)( 20 kr
r
PxPxP
xP
rx
10
2 PPx k 0/ PPr k
LEONARDO ENERGY
14
Economic optimum
Present cost of:
the installed transformer (transformer cost and
installation costs)
No load and load losses
EN
50
46
4-1
kTl PBPACC 0
LEONARDO ENERGY
15
Economic optimum
c
r
Le F
S
ShCB
2
ced FCCA 876012
where:
Cd is the pu cost of demanded power (€/kW)
Ce is the energy cost (€/kWh)
Fc actualization factor
SL is the apparent power of load (kVA)
Sr is the rated power of the transformer (kVA)
h are the equivalent hours at the power SL
LEONARDO ENERGY
16
Cod. Annual consumption
(kWh)
Maximum power
(kW)
Number of hours
per year
Ic 160.000 100 1.600
Id 1.250.000 500 2.500
Ie 2.000.000 500 4.000
If 10.000.000 2.500 4.000
Ig 24.000.000 4.000 6.000
Ih 50.000.000 10.000 5.000
Ii 70.000.000 10.000 7.000
Standard industrial users - Eurostat
Economic optimum
LEONARDO ENERGY
17
Standard consumer
Maximum demand (kW)
N° of transformers
Rated power (kVA)
Ic 100 1,00 160
Id 500 1,00 630
Ie 500 1,00 630
If 2500 3,00 1000
Ig 4000 2,00 2500
Ih 10000 5,00 2500
Ii 10000 5,00 2500
NOTES:
- 9,0cos at maximum demand
- oversized by 20%
Economic optimum - Hypotesis
• Energy cost: EUROSTAT excluding VAT
• demanded power according with the Italian tarif
• Foreseen life 10 years
• PF = 0,9
• oversizing 20%
LEONARDO ENERGY
19
A e B
For different industrial users
Economic optimum
Eurostat code A (€/kW) B (€/kW)
Ic 9113,56 785,43
Id 8452,79 1832,27
Ie 8182,79 2835,76
If 7515,78 2873,30
Ig 6684,48 3522,17
Ih 6350,54 2784,54
Ii 6030,81 3696,49
LEONARDO ENERGY
20
Economic optimum - Hypothesis
Ref. case:
E0DK (ex “Normal Losses” CEI 14-13 - A’A HD 428)
Alterantives:
Oversized E0DK
D0BK (approx. ex “Reduced losses” CEI 14-13 - B’C HD 428)
Oversized D0BK
C0BK (ex C’C HD 428)
B0AK
A0AK
LEONARDO ENERGY
21
E0DK (ex “perdite normali” A’A)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Ic Id Ie If Ig Ih Ii
Purchasing cost Capitalised cost of losses
LEONARDO ENERGY
22
oversized E0DK *
-10.000,00
0,00
10.000,00
20.000,00
30.000,00
40.000,00
50.000,00
Ic Id Ie If
€
Total Ow ning Cost normal losses Total Ow ning Cost oversized Savings
E0DK base Savings
(* e
x pe
rdite
nor
mal
i ove
rsiz
ed A
’A)
TO
C (
€)
LEONARDO ENERGY
23
D0BK *
E0DK base Savings
*circ
a ex
“pe
rdite
rid
otte
” C
EI 1
4-13
- B
’C H
D 4
28
TO
C (
€)
LEONARDO ENERGY
24
D0BK *
*app
rox.
ex
“per
dite
rid
otte
” C
EI 1
4-13
- B
’C H
D 4
28
-25000,00
-20000,00
-15000,00
-10000,00
-5000,00
0,00
5000,00
Ic Id Ie If Ig Ih Ii
€
Purchase cost increase Capitalised cost of losses savings TOC savings
LEONARDO ENERGY
25
oversized D0BK *
E0DK base Savings
*app
rox
ex
“per
dite
rid
otte
” C
EI 1
4-13
- B
’C H
D 4
28 o
vers
ized
-20.000,00
0,00
20.000,00
40.000,00
60.000,00
Ic Id Ie If
€
Total Owning Cost "normal losses"
Total Owning Cost "reduced losses" + oversizing
Savings
TO
C (
€)
LEONARDO ENERGY
26
C0BK *
E0DK base Savings
*ex
C’C
HD
428
-50.000,00
0,00
50.000,00
100.000,00
150.000,00
Ic Id Ie If Ig Ih Ii
€
Total Owning Cost "normal losses" Total Owning Cost C-C' Savings
TO
C (
€)
LEONARDO ENERGY
-100.000,00
-50.000,00
0,00
50.000,00
100.000,00
150.000,00
Ic Id Ie If Ig Ih Ii
€
Total Owning Cost "normal losses" Total Owning Cost D-D' Savings
B0AK
E0DK base Savings
TO
C (
€)
LEONARDO ENERGY
A0AK
-100.000,00
-50.000,00
0,00
50.000,00
100.000,00
150.000,00
Ic Id Ie If Ig Ih Ii
€
Total Owning Cost "normal losses" Total Owning Cost A0-Ak Savings
TO
C (
€)
Savings E0DK base
LEONARDO ENERGY
TOC saving comparison
-30,0%
-25,0%
-20,0%
-15,0%
-10,0%
-5,0%
0,0%
5,0%
10,0%
15,0%
20,0%
Ic Id Ie If Ig Ih Ii
TOC savings using a " reduced losses transformer TOC savings using a C0-Bk t ransf ormer TOC savings using a B0-Ak transformer TOC savings using a Ao-Ak transformerE0DK base D0BK C0BK B0AK A0AK
LEONARDO ENERGY
Payback comparisons
D0BK C0BK B0AK A0AK
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
14,0
16,0
Ic Id Ie If Ig Ih Ii
years
Reduced losses Co-Bk Bo-Ak Ao-Ak