Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF
POLYMER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CONCISE THIRD EDITION
B I C E N T E N N I A L
B I C E N T E N N I A L
T H E W I L E Y B I C E N T E N N I A L - K N O W L E D G E FOR G E N E R A T I O N S
P (^}ach generation has its unique needs and aspirations. When Charles Wiley first opened his small printing shop in lower Manhattan in 1807, it was a generation of boundless potential searching for an identity. And we were there, helping to define a new American literary tradition. Over half a century later, in the midst of the Second Industrial Revolution, it was a generation focused on building the future. Once again, we were there, supplying the critical scientific, technical, and engineering knowledge that helped frame the world. Throughout the 20th Century, and into the new millennium, nations began to reach out beyond their own borders and a new international community was born. Wiley was there, expanding its operations around the world to enable a global exchange of ideas, opinions, and know-how.
For 200 years, Wiley has been an integral part of each generation's journey, enabling the flow of information and understanding necessary to meet their needs and fulfill their aspirations. Today, bold new technologies are changing the way we live and learn. Wiley will be there, providing you the must-have knowledge you need to imagine new worlds, new possibilities, and new opportunities.
Generations come and go, but you can always count on Wiley to provide you the knowledge you need, when and where you need it!
W I L L I A M J . P E S C E P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F EXECUTIVE OFFICER
P E T E R B O D T H W I L E Y C H A I R M A N D F T H E B O A R D
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF
POLYMER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
CONCISE THIRD EDITION
i l C E N T E N N I A L
1 8 O 7
©WILEY 2 O O 7
3 I C E N T E N N I A L
Wiley-Interscience A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication
Copyright © 2007 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., I l l River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permission.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
For general information on our other products and services or for technical support, please contact our Customer Care Department within the United State at (800) 762-2974, outside the United States at (317) 572-3993 or fax (317) 572-4002.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic format. For more information about Wiley products, visit our web site at www.wiley.com.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data:
Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology, concise/[edited by] Herman F. Mark. p. cm.
"This compact desk reference contains all of the subjects covered in the 12 main volumes of t he . . . 3rd edition of the Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology and the Consice encyclopedia of polymer science and engineering."
Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-470-04610-4 (cloth) ISBN-10: 0-470-04610-4 (cloth) I. Plastics-Encyclopedias. 2. Polymers-Encyclopedias. 3. Polymerization-Encyclopedias. I. Mark, H. F. (Herman Francis), 1895-1992. II. Title: Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology, concise.
TP1110.E48 2007 668.903-dc22
2006040638
Printed in the United States of America
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
PREFACE
This compact desk reference contains all of the subjects covered in the 12 volumes of the world-renowned 3rd Edi-tion of'the Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology. The articles have been condensed by professional science writers, reviewed for accuracy by the original authors or their colleagues, and updated where necessary. This dis-tillation, skillfully prepared to retain the key data, ta-bles, and factual matter of the original, is a complete and self-contained encyclopedia. It is designed to serve as a ready-reference guide for students, scientists, engineers, and technologists seeking answers to questions on any as-pect of polymer science and engineering.
This one million word version, like the ten million word larger work, provides both SI and common units, carefully selected key references for each article, and hundreds of tables, charts, figures, and graphs. Coverage includes every important sector, such as: polymeric materials, natural and synthetic; polymer properties, i.e. molecular, chemical, physical, electrical, mechanical, thermal and biological properties, morphology, compatibility, and stability; synthesis and reactions; characterization and analytical methods; physical processes; engineering; polymer processing; product fabrication; test methods; uses in adhesives, coatings, films, fibers, elastomers,
plastics composites, and occurrence in natural materials; historical perspective; and economics.
Although specific reference to the articles in the origi-nal work is not always made, it should be understood that further details, specific bibliographic citations, and much wider coverage of any subject may be obtained by referring to the 12-volume edition.
The editors have also carefully preserved the tradition of citing related articles in the text (see and see also ci-tations), as well as secondary entries or cross references which cite the synonym or entry term where a subject can be located. An Index of key terms provides further access to the contents where desired.
The complete edition of the Encyclopedia has been called a "landmark publication" and a "milestone in poly-mer science." This concise version presents the essence of this monumental work in a useful daily tool compa-rable to a handbook or dictionary from which the com-prehensive, authoritative, and lucidly written data be-come instantly available. Every effort has been made by the editors to provide a work that is unsurpassed in quality and accuracy. We hope we have succeeded and that this work will serve your reference needs for years to come.
CONTRIBUTORS
Alaa S. Abd-El-Aziz, The University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Mani-toba, Canada, Metal-containing polymers
Volker Abetz, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany, Block copolymers, Ternary triblock
W. Wade Adams, Air Force Research Laboratory, Materials Research Society, Boston, Massachusetts, Rigid-rod polymers
H. Ade, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, X-ray microscopy
Rigoberto C. Advincula, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, Polymer brushes
S. Al-Malaika, Aston University, Birmingham, England, U.K., Stabilization
R. D. Allen, IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California, Lithographic resists
Michael W. Allsopp, Independent PVC Technology Consultant, Heswall, Wirral, England, Vinyl chloride polymers
R. Amin-Sanayei, Atofina Chemicals Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsyl-vania, Vinylidene fluoride polymers
Eric J. Amis, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Combinatorial methods for polymer sci-ence
James H. Andrews, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, Ohio, Nonlinear optical properties
Steve Andrzejewski, Equistar Chemicals, A Lyondell Company, Houston, Texas, Rotational molding
Anthony Anton, E. I. du Font de Nemours & Company, Inc., Wilm-ington, Delaware, Polyamides, Fibers
Bruce A. Armitage, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Penn-sylvania, Polynucleotides
V. Arrighi, School ofEngineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot- Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, Miscibility
R. Auzely, Centre de Recherches sur les Macromolecules Vegetales, Affiliated with Joseph Fourier University. Grenoble (France), Greno-ble Cedex 9, France, Polysaccharides
NeilAyres, Department of Polymer Science, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, Water-soluble polymers
Darlene M. Back, The Dow Chemical Company, Piscataway, New Jersey, Ethylene oxide polymers
Bennett R. Baird, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, Polyamides, Fibers
Richard W. Baker, Membrane Technology & Research, Inc., Menlo Park, California, Membrane technology
Edward Balizer, U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center, West Bethesda, Maryland, Acoustic properties
George Barany, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Polypeptide synthesis, Solid-phase method
Christopher Barner-Kowollik, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, Copolymerization
Edward G. Bartick, Counterterrrorism and Forensic Science Re-search Unit, FBI Academy, Quantico, Virginia, Forensic analysis
D. C. Bassett, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom, Morphology
Catia Bastioli, Novamont SpA, Novara, Piedmont, Italy, Starch Subhadeep Basu, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mas-
sachusetts, Molecular recognition in dendrimers W. F. Beach, Alpha Metals, Bridgewater, New Jersey, Xylylene poly-
mers Sam Belcher, Consultant, Moscow, Ohio, Blow molding V. A. Beloshenko, Donetsk Physics and Technology Institute of the
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Donetsk, Ukraine, Solid-state extrusion
L. S. Benee, Pfizer Ltd, Kent, United Kingdom, Smart materials, Microgels
Elizabeth Benham, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, Kingwood, Texas, Ethylene polymers, HDPE
Noelie R. Bertoniere, Southern Regional Research Center, USDA, Cellulose
D. E. Beyer, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, Vinylidene chloride polymers
Y. E. Beygelzimer, Donetsk Physics and Technology Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Donetsk, Ukraine, Solid-state extrusion
Jozef Bicerano, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, Glass transition
N. C. Billingham, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom, Degradation
Kurt Binder, Institut für Physik, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, Germany, Phase transformation
Wolfgang H. Binder, Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Melamine— formaldehyde resins
Frank D. Blum, University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, Missouri, Silane coupling agents
B. Blümich, Institut für Technische Chemie und Makromolekulare Chemie, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Worringer-weg, Aachen, Germany, Nuclear magnetic resonance
John E. Boliek, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, Fibers, Elastomeric
Uwe Borchert, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, Poly-mer vesicles
Sara C. Bourke, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Injection molding
John W. Bozzelli, Midland, Michigan, Injection molding Mark Bradley, University of Southampton, Southampton, United
Kingdom, Polymer-supported reagents Wim Bras, Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
Dubble & European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble Cedex, France, Synchrotron radiation
David Briggs, University of Nottingham, University Park, Notting-ham, United Kingdom, Styrene-butadiene copolymers
B. J . Briscoe, Imperial College, London, UK, Surface mechanical damage and wear of polymers
Witold Brostow, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, Mechanical performance of plastics
R. Malcolm Brown, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, Cellulose
Yefim Brun, Waters Corporation, Milford, Massachusetts, Chro-matography, HPLC
Daniel J. Brunelle, GE Global Research, Schenectady, New York, Polycarbonates
Andreas J. Brunner, Center for Nondestructive Testing, EMPA, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research, Dübendorf, Switzerland, Nondestructive testing
Robert G. Bryant, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, Polyimides
Fredric L. Buchholz, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, Superabsorbent polymers
Matthew Butts, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, Silicones
Ying Cai, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, Photopolymerization, Free radical
F. J. Balta Calleja, Institute de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Madrid, Spain, Hardness
Frank A. Cangelosi, Cytec Industries, Stamford, Connecticut, UV stabilizers
Adam S. Cantor, 3M Healthcare Markets, St. Paul, Minnesota, Pressure-sensitive adhesives
Gary J. Capone, Solutia, Inc., Decatur, Alabama, Acrylic fibers G. Carotenuto, Institute of Composite and Biomedical Materi-
als, National Research Council, Piazzale Tecchio, Napoli, Italy, Nanocomposites, Metal-filled
James Cella, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, Silicones
John C. Chadwick, Dutch Polymer Institute, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands, Ziegler-natta catalysts
Henri Chanzy, CNRS-CERMAV, Grenoble, France, Cellulose Roger Chapman, Warwick Innovation Limited, Leicester, United
Kingdom, Nonwoven fabrics, Staple fibers
VII
viii CONTRIBUTORS
Richard P. Chartoff, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, Ther-mal analysis of polymers
Mahesh Chaubal, Drugdel.com, Columbia, Maryland, Controlled release technology
K. K. Chawla, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, Composite foams
Si-Xue Cheng, Department of Chemistry Wuhan University, Singapore, Liquid Crystalline polymers, Main-chain
Stephen Z. D. Cheng, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, Semicrystalline polymers
Chorng-Shyan Chern, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, Microemulsion polymerization
T. T. Peter Cheung, Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, Oklahoma, Cyclopentadiene and dicyclopentadiene
Y. Wilson Cheung, Polyolefins R&D, The Dow Chemical Company, Freeport, Texas, Ethylene copolymers
B. Z. Chowdhry, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom, Smart materials, Microgels
John R. Christoe, CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology, Belmount, Victoria, Australia, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF)
C. C. Chu, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, Sutures Hoe H. Chuah, Shell Chemical Company, Houston, Texas,
Poly(trimethylene terephthalate) Tai-Shung Chung, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular En-
gineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Liquid crys-talline polymers, Main-chain
Edward D. Cohen, Technical Consultant, Fountain Hills, Arizona, Coating methods, Survey
Martin P. Cohen, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Akron, Ohio, Rubber chemicals
Anthony R. Cooper, Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Los Altos, California, Micromechanical properties
Michelle L. Coote, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, Copolymerization
Cajetan F. Cordeiro, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, Pennsylvania, Vinyl acetate polymers
Katrina Cornish, United States Department of Agriculture, Agri-cultural Research Service, Western Regional Research Center, Albany, California, Rubber, Guayule
J. M. G. Cowie, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, Miscibility
Alfred J. Crosby, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Combinatorial methods for polymer sci-ence
Bill M. Culbertson, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, Dental applications
Mark D. Dadmun, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, Nanocomposites, Polymer-clay
Larry R. Dalton, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, Electrooptical applications
Alberto D'Amore, The Second University of Naples—SUN, Aversa, Italy, Composite materials
Leonard H. Davis, Cytec Industries, Stamford, Connecticut, UV stabilizers
Thomas P. Davis, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, Copolymerization
John V. Dawkins, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom, Chromatography, Size exclusion
P. T. DeLassus, University of Texas-Pan American, Valparaiso, Chile, Vinylidene chloride polymers
D. E. Demco, Institut für Technische Chemie und Makromolekulare Chemie, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Worringer-weg, Aachen, Germany, Nuclear magnetic resonance
Mehmet Demirors, Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, Styrene-butadiene copolymers
Morton Denn, The Levich Institute City College of the City University of New York, New York, Processing, Modeling
Stacy A. Denney, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, Fibers, Elastomeric
Ron J. Denning, CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology, Belmount, Victoria, Australia, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF)
Joseph M. DeSimone, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Critical phase polymerizations
Martin Dexter, Ciba Specialty Chemicals, Tarrytown, New York, Antioxidants
Pradeep K. Dhal, GelTex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., A Gen-zyme General Business, Waltham, Massachusetts, Polymeric drugs
Ali Dhinojwala, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, Adsorption Sushil N. Dhoot, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, Bar-
rier polymers Phillip T. Dodge, Equistar Chemicals, A Lyondell Company,
Houston, Texas, Rotational molding Abraham J. Domb, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem,
Jerusalem, Israel, Biodegradable polymers, Medical applications Joseph Dooley, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan,
Coextrusion Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, Coat-
ing methods, Powder TECHNOLOGY E. Drent, Shell International Chemicals B.V., Amsterdam, Nether-
lands, Polyketones Richard M. D'Sidocky, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company,
Akron, Ohio, Rubber chemicals Etienne Duguet, Institut de Chimie de la Matiere Condensee de Bor-
deaux, CNRS & Universite des Sciences et Technologies de Bordeaux, Pessac, France, Intercalation polymerization
Manfred Dunky, Dynea Austria GmbH, Krems an der Donau, Aus-tria, Melamine-formaldehyde resins
Kenneth L. Dunlap, Bayer Corporation, New Martinsville, West Virginia, Phosgene
Anthony J. East, Consultant, Madison, New Jersey, Polyesters, Thermoplastic
Sina Ebnesajjad, DuPont Fluoro Products, Wilmington, Delaware, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF)
Ronald K. Eby, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, Rigid-rod poly-mers
Tirtsa Ehrenfroind, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel, Biodegradable polymers, Medical applications
G. W. Ehrenstein, University of Erlangen -Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany, Fractography
B. E. Eichinger, Accelrys, Inc., San Diego, California, Molecular modeling
M. Jamal El-Hibri, BP Amoco Polymers, Inc., Alpharetta, Georgia, Polysulfones
Royce Ennis, Consultant, Silsbee, Texas, Ethylene polymers, Chlorosulfonated
Paquita E. Erazo-Majewicz, Hercules Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, Cellulose ethers
David J. Evans, CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology, Belmount, Victoria, Australia, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF)
Aviva Ezra, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel, Biodegradable polymers, Medical applications
Raymond S. Farinato, Cytec Industries, Stamford, Connecticut, Acrylamide polymers
Jeffry J. Fedderly, U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center, West Bethesda, Maryland, Acoustic properties
A. Flores, Institute de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Madrid, Spain, Hardness
Stephan Förster, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, Polymer vesicles
Ivan Fortelny, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, Polymer blends
Frank Fowler, SUNY, Stony Brook, New York, Diacetylene and tri-acetylene polymers
Benny D. Freeman, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, Barrier polymers
Alfred D. French, Southern Regional Research Center, USDA, Cellulose
Barbara J. Furches, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, Test methods
S. K. Gaggar, GE Plastics, Technology Center, Washington, West Virginia, Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene polymers
I. Yu. Galaev, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, Biotechnology appli-cations
Nicola Galaffu, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, Polymer-supported reagents
Vassilios Galiatsatos, Equistar Chemicals, L.P., Cincinnati, Ohio, Optical properties
J. Gallini, E. I. du Pont de Nemours, & Company, Inc., Richmond, Virginia, Polyamides, Aromatic
CONTRIBUTORS ix
Erik Grann Gammelgaard, FiberVisions, Varde, Denmark, Olefin fibers
Subhash V. Gangal, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, Perfluormated polymers, Polytetrafluoro-ethylene
Fabio Garbassi, EniChem SpA Research Center, Novara, Italy, En-gineering thermoplastics, Overview
Jerry D. Gargulak, LignoTech USA, Inc., Rothchild, Wisconsin, Lignin
Ehud Gazit, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, Packaging, Flexible A. N. Gent, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, Adhesion D. S. Gibbs, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan,
Vinylidene chloride polymers Gregory Gillette, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New
York, Silicones Gary M. Gladysz, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos,
New Mexico, Composite foams Wolfgang Glasser, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univer-
sity, Cellulose Veronica Glattauer, CSIRO Molecular and Health Technologies,
Parkville, Victoria, Australia, Collagen Furman E. Glenn, DuPont Dow Elastomers L.L.C., Louisville,
Kentucky, Chloroprene polymers Jeffrey Gotro, Ablestik Laboratories, Rancho Dominguez, Califor-
nia, Thermosets Michael C. Grady, DuPont Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
Latex technology Vera-Maria Graubner, Technische Universität München, Garch-
ing, Germany, Telechelic polymers Charles A. Gray, Cabot Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, Car-
bon black Derek Gray, Pulp and Paper Research Centre, McGill University,
Canada, Cellulose Robert L. Gray, Cytec Industries, Stamford, Connecticut, UV
stabilizers Andreas Greiner, Universität Marburg, Germany, Light-emitting
diodes Werner Grootaert, Dyneon, 3M Company, Oakdale, Minneosta,
Fluorocarbon elastomers Martin J. Guest, Polyolefins R&D, The Dow Chemical Company,
Freeport, Texas, Ethylene copolymers Dirk M. Guldi, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana,
Nanocomposites, Layer-by-layer assembly Edgar B. Gutoff, Consulting Chemical Engineer, Brookline, Mas-
sachusetts, Coating methods, Survey Charles M. Guttman, NIST Polymers Division, Gaithersburg,
Maryland, Mass spectrometry Kimberly A. Guzan, Youngstown State University, Youngstown,
Ohio, Nonlinear optical properties Erwin Hack, Center for Nondestructive Testing, EMPA, Swiss Fed-
eral Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research, Dübendorf, Switzerland, Nondestructive testing
N. Hadjichristidis, University of Athens, Athens, Greece, Graft copolymers
G. R. Hamed, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, Adhesion I. W. Hamley, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, Barrier
polymers Tom P. Hanschen, 3M Company, St. Paul, Minnesota, Films,
Orientation J. S. Harrison, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia,
Piezoelectric polymers Bradley R. Hart, University of California, Irvine, California, Molec-
ularly imprinted polymersHill Kazuyuki Hattori, Kitami Institute of Technology, Japan, Cellulose Patricia A. Heiden, Michigan Technological University, Houghton,
Michigan, Wood composites Scott Heitzman, Sun Chemical Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio,
Colorants Carin A. Heifer, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, Conforma-
tion and conguration H. Henning Winter, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mas-
sachusetts, Gel point Steven Henning, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Akron,
Ohio, Butadiene polymers Hideyuki Higashimura, Sumitomo Chemical Company Ltd.,
Tsukuba, Japan, Oxidative polymerization
David J. T. Hill, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queens-land, Australia, Radiation chemistry of polymers
W. D. Hinsberg, IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California, Lithographic resists
Andreas Hirsch, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Henkestraße, Erlangen, Germany, Nanocomposites, Layer-by-layer assembly
Drahomira Hlavatä, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, Polymer blends
David Hoagland, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, Polyelectrolytes
Jamie K. Hobbs, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, Crystallization kinetics
Geoffrey Holden, Holden Polymer Consulting, Inc., Prescott, Arizona, Elastomers, Thermoplastic
S. Randall Holmes-Farley, GelTex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., A Gen-zyme General Business, Waltham, Massachusetts, Polymeric drugs
Zdenek Horak, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, Polymer blends
B. A. Howell, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, Vinylidene chloride polymers
Shaw Ling Hsu, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, Vibrational spectroscopy
Sun-Yi Huang, Cytec Industries, Stamford, Connecticut, Acry-lamide polymers
Samuel M. Hudson, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, Chitin and chitosan
Anders Hult, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, Hy-perbranched polymers
J. S. Humphrey, Atofina Chemicals Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, Vinylidene fluoride polymers
Mickey G. Huson, CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology, Belmount, Victoria, Australia, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF)
H. Iatrou, University of Athens, Athens, Greece, Graft copolymers Daniel D. Imeokparia, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland,
Michigan, Cellular materials P. C. Innis, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia,
Intelligent polymer systems Jennifer Irvin, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Divi-
sion (NAWCWD), China Lake, California, Electrically active polymers
Michael Jaffe, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey, Liq-uid crystalline polymers, Main-chain
Dennis J. Jakiela, Cytec Industries, Stamford, Connecticut, UV stabilizers
Marc L. Janssens, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, Flammability
Jacek Jarzynski, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, Acoustic properties
David W. Jenkins, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, Chitin and chitosan
Julie L. P. Jessop, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, Photopoly-merization, Free radical
Hao Jiang, Anteon Company, Dayton, Ohio, Rigid-rod polymers Charles A. Jones, HI, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Critical phase polymerizations Leslie N. Jones, CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology, Belmount,
Victoria, Australia, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF) Peter Kamarchik, Jr., Schoff Associates, Allison Park, Pennsylva-
nia, Rheological measurements Mantana Kanchanasopa, The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, Pennsylvania, Crystallinity determination David L. Kaplan, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, Silk Alamgir Karim, National Institute of Standards and Technol-
ogy, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Combinatorial methods for polymer science
Gabor Kaszas, Rubber Division, Bayer Inc., Sarnia, Ontario, Canada, Carbocationic polymerization
Hans-Henning Kausch, ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, Fracture
Thomas R. Keenan, Knox Gelatine, Inc., Sioux City, Iowa, Gelatin Steffen Kelch, Deutsches Wollforschungsinstitut, Aachen,
Germany, Shape-memory polymers Maartje F. Kemmere, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eind-
hoven, the Netherlands, Ultrasound-induced radical polymerization
x CONTRIBUTORS
Rachid Kerboua, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, Silicones
Ronald E. Kerby, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, Den-tal applications
Michael Kerns, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Akron, Ohio, Butadiene polymers
Jos T. F. Keurentjes, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eind-hoven, the Netherlands, Ultrasound-induced radical polymerization
K. Khait, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, Recycling, Plastics
Rajesh Khare, Accelrys, Inc., San Diego, California, Molecular mod-eling
Kristi L. Kiick, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, Genetic methods of polymer synthesis
Joon-Seop Kim, Chosun University, Kwangju, Republic of Korea, Ionomers
Roswell E. King, III, Ciba Specialty Chemicals, Tarrytown, New York, Antioxidants
William Klingensmith, Akron Rubber Consulting, Akron, Ohio, Rubber compounding
Harm-Anton Klok, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lau-sanne, Switzerland, Polypeptide synthesis, Ring-opening polymer-ization of α-amino acid ΛΓ-carboxyanhydrides
Bert Klumperman, Eindhoven University, Eindhoven, The Nether-lands, Living radical polymerization
Nancy Kneib-Cordonier, The University of Minnesota, Minneapo-lis, Minnesota, Polypeptide synthesis, Solid-phase method
Shiro Kobayashi, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Enzymatic poly-merization
Jeffrey T. Koberstein, Columbia University, New York, New York, Surface properties
Jan Kolarik, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, Polymer blends
Peter W. Kopf, TIAX, LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Phenolic resins
William J. Koros, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, TRansport properties
Nicholas A. Kotov, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Nanocomposites, Layer-by-layer assembly
Michal Y. Krasko, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel, Biodegradable polymers, Medical applications
Martijn W. A. Kuijpers, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eind-hoven, the Netherlands, Ultrasound-induced radical polymerization
D. M. Kulich, GE Plastics, Technology Center, Washington, West Virginia, Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene polymers
Anna Kultys, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland, Sulfur-containing polymers
Neeraj Kumar, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Is-rael, Biodegradable polymers, Medical applications
Neeraj Kumar, University ofTennessee Health Science Center, Mem-phis, Tennessee, Controlled release technology
Jay Friedrich Kanzler, Bausch and Lomb Inc., Rochester, New York, Hydrogels
Stuart A. Kushon, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Polynucleotides
Yakov Kutsovsky, Cabot Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, Carbon black
Peter R. Lamb, CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology, Belmount, Vic-toria, Australia, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF)
Stuart E. Lebo, Jr., LignoTech USA, Inc., Rothchild, Wisconsin, Lignin
Christine M. Lee, Unilever Research US, Edgewater, New Jersey, Langmuir-blodgett films
Gilbert Lee, U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center, West Bethesda, Maryland, Acoustic properties
Jean-Marc Lefebvre, Universite des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France, Nanocomposites, Polymer-clay
Reko Leino, AboAkademi University, Abo, Finland, Single-Site cat-alysts
John Leman, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, Silicones
Andreas Lendlein, Deutsches Wollforschungsinstitut, Aachen, Ger-many, Shape-memory polymers
Alan J. Lesser, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, Fatigue
Larry Lewis, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, Silicones
Christopher Y. Li, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Acoustic properties
Richard Lieberman, Basell R&D Center, Elkton, Maryland, Propy-lene polymers
David W. Lipp, Cytec Industries, Stamford, Connecticut, Acry-lamide polymers
Robert B. Login, Sybron Chemicals Inc., ΛΓ-vinylamide polymers D. J. Lohse, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company,
Annandale, New Jersey, Graft copolymers Detlef Lötzsch, Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Poly-
merforschung, Berlin-Adlershof, Germany, Thermochromic polymers
Andrew B. Lowe, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Uni-versity of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, Water-soluble polymers
V. Lowry, GE Plastics, Technology Center, Washington, West Virginia, Acrylonitrile—butadiene-styrene polymers
Daoqiang Lu, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, Conductive polymer composites
Shijian Luo, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, Con-ductive polymer composites
Richard E. Lyon, W. J. Hughes Technical Center, Federal Aviation Administration, Atlantic City Airport, New Jersey, Flammability
Peter X. Ma, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Tissue engineering
W. A. MacDonald, DuPont Teijin Films UK Limited, Wilton, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom, Polyester films
William C. Madden, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, TRansport properties
Duane Mahan, Equistar Chemicals, A Lyondell Company, Houston, Texas, Rotational molding
Khaled Mahmud, Cabot Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, Carbon black
Ravi Kumar N. V. Majeti, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany, Controlled release technology
Thomas G. Majewicz, Hercules Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, Cellu-lose ethers
Michael Malanga, Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, Syndiotactic polystyrene
Arif A. Mamedov, Nomadics, Inc., Stillwater, Oklahoma, Nanocom-posites, Layer-by-layer assembly
W. Harry Mandeville, GelTex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., A Gen-zyme General Business, Waltham, Massachusetts, Polymeric drugs
Ian Manners, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Injection molding
Norma Maraschin, Equistar Chemicals, LP, Cincinnati, Ohio, Ethylene polymers, LDPE
J. E. Mark, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, Elasticity, Rubber-like
Maurice J. Marks, The Dow Chemical Company, Freeport, Texas, Epoxy resins
F. L. Marten, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, Pennsylvania, Vinyl alcohol polymers
James C. Massen, JCM Consulting, Mooresville, North Carolina, Acrylic fibers
Toshio Masuda, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Acetylenic poly-mers, Substituted
Kozo Matsumoto, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Polycarbosilanes B. Mattiasson, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, Biotechnology ap-
plications Wayne L. Mattice, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, Confor-
mation and conguration Laurent M. Matuana, Michigan State University, East Lansing,
Michigan, Wood composites Krzysztof Matyjaszewski, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, Copolymerization Jimmy W. Mays, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge,
Tennessee, Ionic liquids, Polymerization in K. Mazeau, Centre de Recherches sur les Macromolecules Vegetales,
Affiliated with Joseph Fourier University. Grenoble (France), Greno-ble Cedex 9, France, Polysaccharides
Edward McBride, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, Ethylene-acrylic elastomers
CONTRIBUTORS xi
Charles L. McCormick, Department of Polymer Science, Univer-sity of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, Water-soluble polymers
Max McDaniel, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, Kingwood, Texas, Ethylene polymers, HDPE
Gregory B. McKenna, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, Yield and crazing in polymers
Donal McNally, Ticona, Summit, New Jersey, Ethylene-norbornene copolymers
Timothy J. McNally, LignoTech USA, Inc., Rothchild, Wisconsin, Lignin
Elizabeth Meehan, Polymer Laboratories Limited, Shropshire, United Kingdom, Chromatography, Size exclusion
Kevin P. Menard, University of North Texas Materials Science De-partment, Denton, Texas, Dynamic mechanical analysis
Carson Meredith, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, Combinatorial methods for polymer science
Keith A. Mesch, Rohm and Haas Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, Heat stabilizers
Goerg H. Michler, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Merseburg, Germany, Micromechanical properties
Keith R. Millington, CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology, Belmount, Victoria, Australia, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF)
Roger J. Mortimer, Department of Chemistry, Loughborough Uni-versity, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom, Nanocom-posites, Metal-filled
S. E. Moulton, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, Intelligent polymer systems
Eldridge M. Mount, III, EMMOUNT Technologies, Fairport, New York, Films, Manufacture
W. P. Mul, Shell International Chemicals B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, Polyketones
Daniel G. Mullen, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Polypeptide synthesis, Solid-phase method
Marcus Müller, Institut für Physik, Johannes Gutenberg Univer-sität, Mainz, Germany, Phase transformation
Terry N. Myers, Atofina Chemicals, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, Initiators, Free-radical
Bruce Nauman, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, Flash devolatilization
E. Bruce Nauman, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, Bulk and solution polymerizations reactors
Hildeberto Nava, Reichhold Chemicals, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, Polyesters, Unsaturated
Thomas X. Neenan, GelTex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., A Genzyme Gen-eral Business, Waltham, Massachusetts, Polymeric drugs
Jürg Neuenschwander, Center for Nondestructive Testing, EMPA, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research, Dübendorf, Switzerland, Nondestructive testing
James A, Newell, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey, Carbon fibers
Thomas H. Newman, Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, Syndiotactic polystyrene
L. Nicolais, Institute of Composite and Biomedical Materials, Na-tional Research Council, Piazzale Tecchio, Napoli, Italy, Nanocom-posites, Metal-filled
Aizhen Niu, Nankai University, Tianjin, China, Laser light scatter-ing
Ryoji Nomura, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Acetylenic poly-mers, Substituted
Jacobus W. M. Noordermeer, DSM Elastomers, R&D, Geleen, the Netherlands, Ethylene-propylene elastomers
Oskar Nuyken, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany, Telechelic polymers
B. E. Obi, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, Vinyli-dene chloride polymers
Paul A. O'Connell, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, Yield and crazing in polymers
Fumio Ohama, Unitika Corporation Ltd., Japan, Polyarylates Kunio Oka, Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, Japan, Polysilanes Yoshitsugu Oono, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Sta-
tistical thermodynamics Z. Ounaies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond,
Virginia, Piezoelectric polymers Michael J. Owen, Dow Corning Corporation, Midland, Michigan,
Release agents
Daniel W. Pack, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, Gene-delivery polymers
Skip Palenik, Microtrace, Elgin, Illinois, Forensic analysis Robert J. Palmer, Du Pont de Nemours International S.A., Geneva,
Switzerland, Polyamides, Plastics Richard A. Pethrick, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland,
United Kingdom, Characterization of polymers Francis P. Petrocelli, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown,
Pennsylvania, Vinyl acetate polymers Ha. Q. Pham, The Dow Chemical Company, Freeport, Texas, Epoxy
resins David G. Phillips, CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology, Belmount,
Victoria, Australia, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF) Anthony P. Pierlot, CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology,
Belmount, Victoria, Australia, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF) Peter P. Pintauro, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland,
Ohio, Polyphosphazenes S. Pispas, University of Athens, Athens, Greece, Graft copolymers M. Pitsikalis, University of Athens, Athens, Greece, Graft copolymers Riccardo Po, EniChem SpA Research Center, Novara, Italy, Engi-
neering thermoplastics, Overview Thomas J. Podlas, Hercules Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, Cellulose
ethers J. C. Poler, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, North Carolina,
Atomic force microscopy Malcolm Polk, Georgia Institute of Technology, Decatur, Georgia,
High performance fibers Stefan Polowinski, Technical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland,
Template polymerization Maurizio Prato, Universitä di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, Trieste,
Italy, Nanocomposites, Layer-by-layer assembly Duane Priddy, Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan,
Styrene polymers R. Bruce Prime, IBM (retired) I Prime Thermosets.com, San Jose,
California, Thermosets Judit E. Puskas, The University of Western Ontario, London,
Ontario, Canada, Carbocationic polymerization Marek Pyda, Chemical Sciences Division of Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Syndiotactic polystyrene Marek Pyda, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, Syndio-
tactic polystyrene J. P. Queslel, Manufacture Michelin, CERL - GPA, Clermont Fer-
rand CedexFrance, Elasticity, Rubber-like Roderic P. Quirk, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, Anionic
polymerization Jürgen P. Rabe, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany, Den-
dronized polymers Michael Rachita, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Akron,
Ohio, Butadiene polymers Suresh Rajaraman, GE Silicones, Waterford, New York, Silicones Andrzej Rajca, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, Mag-
netic polymers Bruce A. Ramsay, Polyferm Canada, Ontario, Canada, Poly(3-
hydroxyalkanoates) Juliana A. Ramsay, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada,
Poly(3-hydroxyalkanoates) John A M. Ramshaw, CSIRO Molecular and Health Technologies,
Parkville, Victoria, Australia, Collagen Ashwin Rao, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, Adsorption F. Raue, University of Erlangen - Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany,
Fractography Chris Rauwendaal, Rauwendaal Extrusion Engineering, Inc., Los
Altos Hills, California, Extrusion Glen Reese, Kosa, Charlotte, North Carolina, Polyesters, Fibers Stephanie Rey, Institut de Chimie de la Matiere Condensee de Bor-
deaux, CNRS & Universite des Sciences et Technologies de Bordeaux, Pessac, France, Intercalation polymerization
Steve R. Reznek, Cabot Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, Car-bon black
Douglas S. Richart, D.S. Richart Associates, Reading, Pennsylva-nia, Coating methods, Powder TECHNOLOGY
M. Rinaudo, Centre de Recherches sur les Macromolecules Vigatales, Affiliated with Joseph Fourier University. Grenoble (France), Greno-ble Cedex 9, France, Polysaccharides
John A Rippon, CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology, Belmount, Victoria, Australia, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF)
xii CONTRIBUTORS
Helmut Ritter, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany, Cyclodextrin
Josepha Maria Merida Robles, Institut de Chimie de la Matiere Condensee de Bordeaux, CNRS & Universite des Sciences et Tech-nologies de Bordeaux, Pessac, France, Intercalation polymerization
Brendan Rodgers, ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Baytown, Texas, Rubber compounding
Vincent M. Rotello, Department of Chemistry, University of Mas-sachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, Molecular self-assembly
Slawomir Rubinsztajn, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, Silicones
James Runt, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, Crystallinity determination
Ian M. Russell, CSIRO Textile and Fibre Technology, Belmount, Victoria, Australia, Vinyl fluoride polymers (PVF)
S. L. Sakellarides, BP Corporation, Naperville, Illinois, Polyethylene naphthalate) (PEN)
Britto S. Sandanaraj, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, Molecular recognition in dendrimers
A. Sezai Sarac, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, Electropolymerization
Florian Schattenmann, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, Silicones
D. A. Schiraldi, Case Western Reserve University, Spartanburg, South Carolina, Atomic force microscopy
A. Dieter Schlüter, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, Den-dronized polymers
William W. Schloman, Jr., Department of Chemistry, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, Rubber, Guayule
Robert L. Schmitt, The Dow Chemical Company, Piscataway, New Jersey, Ethylene oxide polymers
Clifford K. Schoff, Schoff Associates, Allison Park, Pennsylvania, Rheological measurements
Holger Schönherr, University of Twente, Enschede, the Nether-lands, Scanning force microscopy
Laurier L. Schramm, Saskatchewan Research Council, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, Chromatography, Size exclusion
John L. Schultz, Wilmington, Delaware, Structural representation of polymers
William H. Scouten, University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas, Chro-matography, Affinity
Alec B. Scranton, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, Photopoly-merization, Cationic
Norma D. Searle, Chemical Consultant, Deerfield Beach, Florida, Weathering
Arno Seeboth, Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Polymer-forschung, Berlin-Adlershof, Germany, Thermochromic polymers
Robert W. Seymour, Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport, Tennesse, Cyclohexanedimethanol polyesters
Timothy D. Shaffer, ExxonMobil, Baytown, Texas, Butyl rubber Kenneth J. Shea, University of California, Irvine, California,
Molecularly imprinted polymers Michael C. Shelton, Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport,
Tennessee, Cellulose esters, Inorganic Yutaka Shirahama, Unitika America Corporation, Georgetown,
Kentucky, Polyarylates Antonin Sikora, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy
of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, Polymer blends
Sindee L. Simon, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, Aging, Physical
D. M. Simpson, Exxon Mobil Chemical Company, Baytown, Texas, Ethylene polymers, LLDPE
Ram Prakash Singh, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India, Drag reduction; Mechanical performance of plastics
S. K. Sinha, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Surface mechanical damage and wear of polymers
Vishal Sipani, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, Photopolymer-ization, Cationic
Anil K. Sircar, University of Dayton (retired), Dayton, Ohio, Ther-mal analysis of polymers
Robert V. Slone, Rohm and Haas Company, Spring House, Pennsylvania, Acrylic ester polymers
A. A. Smaardijk, Shell International Chemicals B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, Polyketones
Archie P. Smith, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Combinatorial methods for polymer sci-ence
Thomas W. Smith, Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport, Tennesse, Cyclohexanedimethanol polyesters
Ronald S. Smorada, Versacore Industrial Corporation, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, Nonwoven fabrics, Spunbonded
M. J. Snowden, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom, Smart materials, Microgels
Joao B. P. Soares, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Fractionation
L. H. Sperling, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, Inter-penetrating polymer networks
Judith Stein, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, Silicones
R. Stepien, GE Plastics, Technology Center, Washington, West Virginia, Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene polymers
E. S. Stevens, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, En-vironmentally degradable plastics
Constantine Stewart, Basell R&D Center, Elkton, Maryland, Propylene polymers
Mark E. Stewart, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, Uni-versity of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, Barrier polymers
William G. Stobby, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, Cellular materials
Joseph A. Stretanski, Cytec Industries, Stamford, Connecticut, UV stabilizers
Kyung W. Suh, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, Cellular materials
Nam P. Suh, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Cambridge, Massachusetts, Microcellular plastics
Graham Swift, BP Chemicals, Naperville, Illinois, Acrylic (and methacrylic) acid polymers
Graham Swift, GS Polymer Consultants, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Biodegradable polymers and plastics in landfill sites
Monir Tabatabai, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany, Cyclodextrin
Daniel R. Talham, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, Langmuir-blodgett films
Klaus Tauer, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Golm, Germany, Heterophase polymerization
Yves Termonia, E. I. du Pont de Nemours, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, Modeling of polymer processing and properties
S. Thayumanavan, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, Molecular recognition in dendrimers
Raymond J. Thibault, Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, Molecular self-assembly
Curt Thies, Thies Technology, Inc., Henderson, Nevada, Methacrylic ester polymers
Richard W. Thomas, Ciba Specialty Chemicals, Tarrytown, New York, Antioxidants
James L. Throne, Sherwood Technologies, Inc., Dunedin, Florida, Thermoforming
D. B. Todd, Polymer Processing Institute, Newark, New Jersey, Plas-tics processing
Addy H. Tsou, ExxonMobil, Baytown, Texas, Butyl rubber Harvey Tung, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan,
Coextrusion Albin F. Turbak, Falcon Consultants, Inc., New York and University
of Georgia, Sandy Springs, Georgia, High performance fibers S. Richard Turner, Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport,
Tennesse, Cyclohexanedimethanol polyesters Henri Ulrich, Consultant, Guilford, Connecticut, Isocyanate-
derived polymers Hiroshi Uyama, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Enzymatic poly-
merization Paul R. Van Tassel, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan,
Biomolecules at interfaces Philipp Vana, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, Copoly-
merization G. A. Vaughan, Exxon Mobil Chemical Company, Baytown, Texas,
Ethylene polymers, LLDPE Giovanni Vianello, European Vinyls Corporation (IT) (retired),
Vinyl chloride polymers David Vietti, Rohm and Haas Company, Woodstock, Illinois,
Polysulfides
CONTRIBUTORS xiii
Tyrone L. Vigo, (Deceased) U.S. Department of Agriculture, New York, High performance fibers
Walter H. Waddell, ExxonMobil Chemical Co., Baytown, Texas, Fillers
Bruce Wade, Solutia, Inc., Springfield, Massachusetts, Vinyl acetal polymers
Brian L. Wadey, BASF Corporation, Mount Olive, New Jersey, Plasticizers
H. D. Wagner, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel, Pack-aging, Flexible
Phillip J. Wakelyn, The National Cotton Council of America, Washington, District of Columbia, Cotton
G. G. Wallace, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, Intelligent polymer systems
G. M. Wallraff, IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California, Lithographic resists
Meng-Jiao Wang, Cabot Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, Carbon blacks
Eric Paul Wasserman, Dow Chemical Company, Piscataway, New Jersey, Antifoaming agents
Robert N. Webb, ExxonMobil, Baytown, Texas, Butyl rubber William D. Weber, Arch Chemicals, East Providence, Rhode Island,
Electronic packaging Christoph Weder, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland,
Ohio, Light-emitting diodes Edward D. Weil, Polytechnic University (Ng), Brooklyn, New York,
Flame retardancy Shari A. Weinberg, BP Amoco Polymers, Inc., Alpharetta, Georgia,
Polysulfones Jeffrey Wengrovius, GE Silicones, Waterford, New York, Silicones Jerome A. Werkmeister, CSIRO Molecular and Health Technolo-
gies, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, Collagen R. A. Wessling, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan,
Vinylidene chloride polymers Andrew K. Whittaker, The University of Queensland, Brisbane,
Queensland, Australia, Radiation chemistry of polymers Denyce Wicht, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York,
Silicones Zeno W. Wicks Jr., Cytec Industries, Stanford, Connecticut, Alkyd
resins Zeno W. Wicks Jr., Consultant, Louisville, Kentucky, Coatings; Ure-
thane coatings James Wicksted, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater,
Oklahoma, Nanocomposites, Layer-by-layer assembly David M. Wiles, Plastichem Consulting, Victoria, British Columbia,
Canada, Biodegradable polymers and plastics in landfill sites Richard Wilkins, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne,
United Kingdom, Controlled release formulation, Agricultural Edward S. Wilks, E. I. Du Pont de Nemours, Hockessin, Delaware,
Structural representation of polymers Graham Williams, University of Wales, Swansea, United Kingdom,
Dielectric relaxation J. G. Williams, Imperial College of Science, Technology and
Medicine, London, U.K., Fracture
Laurence L. Williams, Cytec Industries, Stanford, Connecticut, Alkyd resins
C. P. Wong, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, Con-ductive polymer composites
Janet S. S. Wong, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, Scratch behavior of polymers
Christina Darkangelo Wood, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, Silicones
Calvin Woodings, Calvin Woodings Consulting Ltd., Warwickshire, United Kingdom, Cellulose fibers, Regenerated
John Woods, Loctite Corporation, Rocky Hill, Connecticut, Polycyanoacrylates
Jeffrey J. Wooster, The Dow Chemical Company, Freeport, Texas, Packaging, Flexible
Allan T. Worm, Dyneon, 3M Company, Oakdale, Minneosta, Fluoro-carbon elastomers
Chi Wu, University of Science and Technology of China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, He fei, Anhui, China, Laser light scattering
Michael M. Wu, BP Chemicals, Naperville, Illinois, Acrylic (and methacrylic) acid polymers
Yun-Tai Wu, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, Ethylene—acrylic elastomers
Bernhard Wunderlich, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Ten-nessee and Chemical Sciences Division of Oak Ridge National Lab-oratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Thermodynamic properties of poly-mers
Carl J. Wust, FiberVisions, Covington, Georgia, Olefin fibers Ryszard Wycisk, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio,
Polyphosphazenes M. Xanthos, Polymer Processing Institute, Newark, New Jersey,
Plastics processing Yusuf Yagci, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, Turkey,
Telechelic polymers Gary, Yeager, General Electric Company, Schenectady, New York,
Polyethers, Aromatic Albert F. Yee, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Impact
resistance E. M. Yorkgitis, 3M Company, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, Adhe-
sive compounds Raymond A. Young, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin,
Vegetable fibers Peter Zarras, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Divi-
sion (NAWCWD), China Lake, California, Electrically active polymers
Mauro Zarrelli, Italian Aerospace Research Center, Capua, Italy, Composite materials
Rudolf Zentel, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany, Ferroelectric liquid crystalline elastomers
Hongwei Zhang, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, Ionic liquids, Polymerization in
Zhong Zhao, Guilford Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland, Polyanhydrides
Karen Zrebiec, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, Ohio, Photorefraction
CONVERSION FACTORS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND UNIT SYMBOLS
SI Units (Adopted 1960)
The International System of Units (abbreviated SI), is implemented throughout the world. This measurement system is a modernized version of the MKSA (meter, kilogram, second, ampere) system, and its details are published and controlled by an international treaty organization (The International Bureau of Weights and Measures) (1).
SI units are divided into three classes:
BASE UNITS
length mass time electric current thermodynamic temperature* amount of substance luminous intensity
meter* (m) kilogram (kg) second (s) ampere (A) kelvin (K) mole (mol) candela (cd)
SUPPLEMENTARY UNITS
plane angle solid angle
radian (rad) steradian (sr)
DERIVED UNITS AND OTHER ACCEPTABLE UNITS
These units are formed by combining base units, supplementary units, and other derived units (2-4). Those derived units having special names and symbols are marked with an asterisk in the list below.
'The spellings "metre" and "litre" are preferred by ASTM; however, "-er" is used in the Encyclopedia. 'Wide use is made of Celsius temperature (i) defined by
t = T-T0
where T is the thermodynamic temperature, expressed in kelvin, and To = 273.15 K by definition. A temperature interval may be expressed in degrees Celsius as well as in kelvin.
XV
xvi FACTORS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS
Quantity
* absorbed dose acceleration * activity (of a radionuclide) area
concentration (of amount of substance) current density density, mass density dipole moment (quantity) *dose equivalent * electric capacitance * electric charge, quantity of electricity
electric charge density * electric conductance electric field strength electric flux density *electric potential, potential difference,
electromotive force * electric resistance * energy, work, quantity of heat
energy density "force
* frequency
heat capacity, entropy heat capacity (specific), specific entropy
heat-transfer coefficient * illuminance "inductance linear density luminance * luminous flux magnetic field strength "magnetic flux "magnetic flux density molar energy molar entropy, molar heat capacity moment of force, torque momentum permeability permittivity "power, heat flow rate, radiant flux
Unit
gray meter per second squared becquerel square kilometer square hectometer square meter mole per cubic meter ampere per square meter kilogram per cubic meter coulomb meter sievert farad coulomb coulomb per cubic meter Siemens volt per meter coulomb per square meter volt
ohm megajoule kilojoule joule electronvoltt kilowatt-hourt joule per cubic meter kilonewton newton megahertz hertz joule per kelvin joule per kilogram kelvin watt per square meter kelvin lux henry kilogram per meter candela per square meter lumen ampere per meter weber tesla joule per mole joule per mole kelvin newton meter kilogram meter per second henry per meter farad per meter kilowatt watt
Symbol
Gy m/s2
Bq km2
hm2
m2
mol/m3
A/m2
kg/m3
C m Sv F C C/m3
S V/m C/m2
V
Ω MJ kJ J eVt kW-ht J/m3
kN N MHz Hz J/K J/(kg-K)
W/(m2-K) lx H kg/m cd/m2
lm A/m Wb T J/mol J/(mol-K) N-m kg-m/s H/m F/m kW W
Acceptable equivalent
J/kg
1/s
ha (hectare)
g/L; mg/cm3
J/kg C/V A-s
A/V
W/A
V/A
N-m
kg-m/s2
1/s
lm/m2
Wb/A
cd-sr
V-s Wb/m2
J/s
tThis non-SI unit is recognized by the CIPM as having to be retained because of practical importance or use in specialized fields (1).
FACTORS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS XVII
Quantity Unit
watt per square meter megapascal kilopascal pascal decibel joule per kilogram cubic meter per kilogram newton per meter watt per meter kelvin meter per second kilometer per hour pascal second millipascal second square meter per second square millimeter per second cubic meter cubic diameter cubic centimeter 1 per meter 1 per centimeter
Symbol
W/m2
MPa kPa Pa dB J/kg m3/kg N/m W/(m-K) m/s km/h Pas mPa-s m2/s mm2/s m3
dm3
cm3
m-1
cm-1
Acceptable equivalent
N/m2
L (liter) (5) mL
power density, heat flux density, irradiance *pressure, stress
sound level specific energy specific volume surface tension thermal conductivity velocity
viscosity, dynamic
viscosity, kinematic
volume
wave number
In addition, there are 16 prefixes used to indicate order of magnitude, as follows
Multiplication factor
1018
1015
1012
109
106
103
102
10 lo-1
io-2
io-3
io-6
io-9
io-12
IO"15
io-18
Prefix
exa peta tera giga mega kilo hecto deka deci centi milli micro nano pico femto atto
Symb
E P T G M k h° daa
d° c" m μ n P f a
Note
"Although hecto, deka, deci, and centi are SI prefixes, their use should be avoided except for SI unit-multiples for area and volume and nontechnical use of centimeter, as for body and clothing measurement.
For a complete description of SI and its use the reader is referred to reference (4). A representative list of conversion factors from non-SI to SI units is presented herewith. Factors are given
to four significant figures. Exact relationships are followed by a dagger. A more complete list is given in the latest editions of ASTM and ANSI (documents 4,6).
xviii FACTORS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS
Conversion Factors to SI Units
To convert from
acre angstrom area astronomical unit atmosphere, standard bar barn barrel (42 U.S. liquid gallons) Bohr magneton (μβ) Btu (International Table) Btu (mean) Btu (thermochemical) bushel calorie (International Table) calorie (mean) calorie (thermochemical) centipoise centistokes cfm (cubic foot per minute) cubic inch cubic foot cubic yard curie debye degree (angle) denier (international)
dram (apothecaries') dram (avoirdupois) dram (U.S. fluid) dyne dyne/cm electronvolt erg fathom fluid ounce (U.S.) foot footcandle furlong gal gallon (U.S. dry) gallon (U.S. liquid) gallon per minute (gpm)
gauss gilbert gill (U.S.) grade grain
To
square meter (m2) meter (m) square meter (m2) meter (m) pascal (Pa) pascal (Pa) square meter (m2) cubic meter (m3) J/T joule (J) joule (J) joule (J) cubic meter (m3) joule (J) joule (J) joule (J) pascal second (Pas) square millimeter per second (mm2/s) cubic meter per second (m3/s) cubic meter (m3) cubic meter (m3) cubic meter (m3) becquerel (Bq) coulomb meter (C-m) radian (rad) kilogram per meter (kg/m) tex* kilogram (kg) kilogram (kg) cubic meter (m3) newton (N) newton per meter (N/m) joule (J) joule (J) meter (m) cubic meter (m3) meter (m) lux (lx) meter (m) meter per second squared (m/s2) cubic meter (m3) cubic meter (m3) cubic meter per second (m3/s) cubic meter per hour (m3/h) tesla (T) ampere (A) cubic meter (m3) radian kilogram (kg)
Multiply by
4.047 x 103
1.0 x 10"10t 1.0 x 102t 1.496 x 1011
1.013 x 105
1.0 x 105t 1.0 x 10-28t 0.1590 9.274 x 10-2 4
1.055 x 103
1.056 x 103
1.054 x 103
3.524 x 10"2
4.187 4.190 4.184* 1.0 x 10-3t l.Ot 4.72 x 10~4
1.639 x 10~5
2.832 x 10-2
0.7646 3.70 x 1010t 3.336 x 10"30
1.745 x 10-2
1.111 x l 0 ~ 7
0.1111 3.888 x 10"3
1.772 x 10"3
3.697 x 10"6
1.0 x 10~5t 1.0 x 10"3t 1.602 x 10"19
1.0 x 10"7t 1.829 2.957 x 10"5
0.3048t 10.76 2.012 x 10"2
1.0 x 10"2t 4.405 x 10-3
3.785 x 10"3
6.309 x 10"5
0.2271 1.0 x 10~4
0.7958 1.183 x 10"4
1.571 x 10"2
6.480 x 10-5
tExact. 'See footnote on p. VII.
FACTORS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS xix
To convert from
gram force per denier hectare horsepower (550 ft-lbf/s) horsepower (boiler) horsepower (electric) hundredweight (long) hundredweight (short) inch inch of mercury (32°F) inch of water (39.2°F) kilogram-force kilowatt hour kip knot (international) lambert league (British nautical) league (statute) light year liter (for fluids only) maxwell micron mil mile (statute) mile (U.S. nautical) mile per hour millibar millimeter of mercury (0°C) minute (angular) myriagram myriameter oersted ounce (avoirdupois) ounce (troy) ounce (U.S. fluid) ounce-force peck (U.S.) pennyweight pint (U.S. dry) pint (U.S. liquid) poise (absolute viscosity) pound (avoirdupois) pound (troy) poundal pound-force pound force per square inch (psi) quart (U.S. dry) quart (U.S. liquid) quintal rad rod roentgen second (angle)
To
newton per tex (N/tex) square meter (m2) watt (W) watt (W) watt (W) kilogram (kg) kilogram (kg) meter (m) pascal (Pa) pascal (Pa) newton (N) megajoule (MJ) newton (N) meter per second (m/S) candela per square meter (cd/m3) meter (m) meter (m) meter (m) cubic meter (m3) weber (Wb) meter (m) meter (m) meter (m) meter (m) meter per second (m/s) pascal (Pa) pascal (Pa) radian kilogram (kg) kilometer (km) ampere per meter (A/m) kilogram (kg) kilogram (kg) cubic meter (m3) newton (N) cubic meter (m3) kilogram (kg) cubic meter (m3) cubic meter (m3) pascal second (Pas) kilogram (kg) kilogram (kg) newton (N) newton (N) pascal (Pa) cubic meter (m3) cubic meter (m3) kilogram (kg) gray (Gy) meter (m) coulomb per kilogram (C/kg) radian (rad)
Multiply by
8.826 x 10"2
1.0 x 104t 7.457 x 102
9.810 x 103
7.46 x 102t 50.80 45.36 2.54 x 10"2t 3.386 x 103
2.491 x 102
9.807 3.6t 4.448 x 103
0.5144 3.183 x 103
5.559 x 103
4.828 x 103
9.461 x 1015
1.0 x 10"3t 1.0 x 10"8t 1.0 x 10"6t 2.54 x 10~5t 1.609 x 103
1.852 x 103t 0.4470 1.0 x 102
1.333 x 102+ 2.909 x 10"4
10 10 79.58 2.835 x 10-2
3.110 x l O - 2
2.957 x 10-5
0.2780 8.810 x lO"3
1.555 x 10-3
5.506 x 10"4
4.732 x 10"4
o.iot 0.4536 0.3732 0.1383 4.448 6.895 x 103
1.101 x 10-3
9.464 x 10"4
1.0 x 10"2t 1.0 x 10~2t 5.029 2.58 x lO"4
4.848 x 10~6t
tExact.
xx FACTORS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS
To convert from To Multiply by
section square meter (m2) 2.590 x 106
slug kilogram (kg) 14.59 spherical candle power lumen (lm) 12.57 square inch square meter (m2) 6.452 x 10~4
square foot square meter (m2) 9.290 x 10-2
square mile square meter (m2) 2.590 x 106
square yard square meter (m2) 0.8361 stere cubic meter (m3) 1.0* stokes (kinematic viscosity) (m2/s) square meter per second 1.0 x 10~4* tex kilogram per meter (kg/m) 1.0 x 10_6t
ton (long, 2240 pounds) kilogram (kg) 1.016 x 103
ton (metric) (tonne) kilogram (kg) 1.0 x 103* ton (short, 2000 pounds) kilogram (kg) 9.072 x 102
torr pascal (Pa) 1.333 x 102
unit pole weber (Wb) 1.257 x 10~7
yard meter (m) 0.9144*
tExact.
Abbreviations and Unit Symbols
Following is a list of common abbreviations and unit symbols used in the Encyclopedia. In general they agree with those listed in American National Standard Abbreviations for Use on Drawings and in Text (ANSI Yl.l) (6) and American National Standard Letter Symbols for Units in Science and Technology (ANSI Y10) (6). Also included is a list of acronyms for a number of private and government organizations as well as common industrial solvents, polymers, and other chemicals.
Rules for Writing Unit Symbols (4):
1. Unit symbols are printed in upright letters (roman) regardless of the type style used in the surrounding text.
2. Unit symbols are unaltered in the plural. 3. Unit symbols are not followed by a period except when used at the end of a sentence. 4. Letter unit symbols are generally printed lower-case (for example, cd for candela) unless the unit name
has been derived from a proper name, in which case the first letter of the symbol is capitalized (W, Pa). Prefixes and unit symbols retain their prescribed form regardless of the surrounding typography.
5. In the complete expression for a quantity, a space should be left between the numerical value and the unit symbol. For example, write 2.37 lm, not 2.371m, and 35 mm, not 35mm. When the quantity is used in an adjectival sense, a hyphen is often used, for example, 35-mm film. Exception: No space is left between the numerical value and the symbols of degree, minute, and second of plane angle, degree Celsius, and the percent sign.
6. No space is used between the prefix and unit symbol (for example, kg). 7. Symbols, not abbreviations, should be used for units. For example, use "A," not "amp," for ampere. 8. When multiplying unit symbols, use a raised dot:
N-m for newton meter
In the case of W · h, the dot may be omitted, thus:
Wh
An exception to this practice is made for computer printouts, automatic typewriter work, etc, where the raised dot is not possible, and a dot on the line may be used.
9. When dividing unit symbols, use one of the following forms:
/ - 1 m
m/s or m-s or — s
FACTORS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS xxi
In no case should more than one slash be used in the same expression unless parentheses are inserted to avoid ambiguity. For example, write:
J/(mol-K) or J-mor^K"1 or (J/mol)/K
but not
J/mol/K
10. Do not mix symbols and unit names in the same expression. Write:
joules per kilogram or J/kg or Jkg~
but not joules/kilogram nor joules/kg nor joules-kg-1
ABBREVIATIONS AND UNITS
A A A a AATCC
ABS abs ac a-c ac-acac ACGIH
ACS AGA Ah AIChE AIME
AIP AISI ale Alk alk amt amu ANSI AO AOAC AOCS APHA API aq Ar ar-as-ASHRAE
ASM ASME
ASTM
at no. at wt
ampere anion (eg, HA) mass number atto (prefix for 10"18) American Association of Textile Chemists and
Colorists acrylonitrile—butadiene-styrene absolute alternating current, n. alternating current, adj. alicyclic acetylacetonate American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists American Chemical Society American Gas Association ampere hour American Institute of Chemical Engineers American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical,
and Petroleum Engineers American Institute of Physics American Iron and Steel Institute alcohol(ic) alkyl alkaline (not alkali) amount atomic mass unit American National Standards Institute atomic orbital Association of Official Analytical Chemists American Oil Chemists' Society American Public Health Association American Petroleum Institute aqueous aryl aromatic asymmetric(al) American Society of Heating, Refrigerating,
and Air Conditioning Engineers American Society for Metals American Society of Mechanical
Engineers American Society for Testing and
Materials atomic number atomic weight
av(g) AWS b
bbl bec BCT Be BET
bid Boc BOD bp Bq C °C
c-c c ca cd
CFR cgs CI cis-
cl cm cmil empd CNS CoA COD coml cp cph CPSC cryst cub D D-d d d d-
average American Welding Society bonding orbital barrel body-centered cubic body-centered tetragonal Baume Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (adsorption
equation) twice daily i-butyloxycarbonyl biochemical (biological) oxygen demand boiling point becquerel coulomb degree Celsius denoting attachment to carbon centi (prefix for 10~2) critical circa (approximately) candela; current density; circular
dichroism Code of Federal Regulations centimeter-gram-second Color Index isomer in which substituted groups are on
same side of double bond between C atoms carload centimeter circular mil compound central nervous system coenzyme A chemical oxygen demand commercial(ly) chemically pure close-packed hexagonal Consumer Product Safety Commission crystalline cubic debye denoting configurational relationship differential operator day; deci (prefix for 10"x) density dextro-, dextrorotatory
XXII FACTORS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS
da dB de d-c dec detd detn Di dia dil DIN dl-; DL-DMA DMF DMG DMSO DOD DOE DOT DP dp DPH dstl(d) dta (E)-€
e ECU ed. ED EDTA emf emu en eng EPA epr eq. esca
esp esr est(d) estn esu exp ext(d) F F f FAO
fee FDA FEA FHSA fob
fp FPC FRB frz G G
deka (prefix for 10"1) decibel direct current, n. direct current, adj. decompose determined determination didymium, a mixture of all lanthanons diameter dilute Deutsche Industrie Normen racemic dimethylacetamide dimethylformamide dimethyl glyoxime dimethyl sulfoxide Department of Defense Department of Energy Department of Transportation degree of polymerization dew point diamond pyramid hardness distill(ed) differential thermal analysis entgegen;opposed dielectric constant (unitless number) electron electrochemical unit edited, edition, editor effective dose ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid electromotive force electromagnetic unit ethylene diamine engineering Environmental Protection Agency electron paramagnetic resonance equation electron spectroscopy for chemical
analysis especially electron-spin resonance estimate(d) estimation electrostatic unit experiment, experimental extract(ed) farad (capacitance) faraday (96,487 C) femto (prefix for 10~15) Food and Agriculture Organization
(United Nations) face-centered cubic Food and Drug Administration Federal Energy Administration Federal Hazardous Substances Act free on board freezing point Federal Power Commission Federal Reserve Board freezing giga (prefix for 109) gravitational constant =
g (g) 8 gc gem-glc g-mol wt;
gmw GNP gpc GRAS grd Gy H h ha HB Hb hep hex HK hplc HRC HV hyd hyg Hz •'(eg.IV) i-IACS ibp IC ICC ICT ID ip IPS ir IRLG ISO ITS-90 IU IUPAC
IV iv J K k kg L L l-(1) LC50 LCAO lc LCD lcl LD50
LED
Hq
6.67 x 1011 N-m2/kg2
gram gas, only as in H20(g) gravitational acceleration gas chromatography geminal gas-liquid chromatography gram-molecular weight
gross national product gel-permeation chromatography Generally Recognized as Safe ground gray henry hour; hecto (prefix for 102) hectare Brinell hardness number hemoglobin hexagonal close-packed hexagonal Knoop hardness number high performance liquid chromatography Rockwell hardness (C scale) Vickers hardness number hydrated, hydrous hygroscopic hertz iso (eg, isopropyl) inactive (eg, t-methionine) International Annealed Copper Standard initial boiling point integrated circuit Interstate Commerce Commission International Critical Table inside diameter; infective dose intraperitoneal iron pipe size infrared Interagency Regulatory Liaison Group International Organization Standardization International Temperature Scale (NIST) International Unit International Union of Pure and Applied
Chemistry iodine value intravenous joule kelvin kilo (prefix for 103) kilogram denoting configurational relationship liter (for fluids only) (5) levo-, levorotatory liquid, only as in NH3(1) cone lethal to 50% of the animals tested linear combination of atomic orbitale liquid chromatography liquid crystal display less than carload lots dose lethal to 50% of the animals tested light-emitting diode liquid
FACTORS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS xxiii
1m In LNG log LOI LPG lx M M Mw
Mn
Mv
m m m-max MCA
MEK meq mfd mfg mfr MIBC MIBK MIC min mL MLD MO mo mol mol wt mp MR ms MSDS mxt ß N N N-n(asn^)
"(asBu"), n-
n n na NAS NASA
nat ndt neg NF NIH NIOSH
NIST
lumen logarithm (natural) liquefied natural gas logarithm (common) limiting oxygen index liquefied petroleum gas lux mega (prefix for 106); metal (as in MA) molar; actual mass weight-average mol wt number-average mol wt viscosity-average mol wt meter; milli (prefix for 10~3) molal meta maximum Chemical Manufacturers' Association
(was Manufacturing Chemists Association)
methyl ethyl ketone milliequivalent manufactured manufacturing manufacturer methyl isobutyl carbinol methyl isobutyl ketone minimum inhibiting concentration minute; minimum milliliter minimum lethal dose molecular orbital month mole molecular weight melting point molar refraction mass spectrometry material safety data sheet mixture micro (prefix for 10~6) newton (force) normal (concentration); neutron number denoting attachment to nitrogen index of refraction (for 20°C and
sodium light) normal (straight-chain
structure) neutron nano (prefix for 109) not available National Academy of Sciences National Aeronautics and Space Administra-
tion natural nondestructive testing negative National Formulary National Institutes of Health National Institute of Occupational Safety and
Health National Insti tute of Standards and
Technology (formerly National Bureau of Standards)
nmr NND no. NOI-(BN) NOS nqr NRC
NRI NSF NTA NTP
NTSB 0-0-
OD OPEC
o-phen OSHA
owf Ω P
P p-P P· Pa PEL
pd pH
phr p-i-n pmr p-n po POP pos pp. ppb ppm ppmv ppmwt PPO ppt(d) pptn Pr (no.) pt PVC pwd
py qv R (R> r rad RCRA rds ref.
nuclear magnetic resonance New and Nonofficial Drugs (AMA) number not otherwise indexed (by name) not otherwise specified nuclear quadruple resonance Nuclear Regulatory Commission;
National Research Council New Ring Index National Science Foundation nitrilotriacetic acid normal temperature and pressure (25° C and
101.3 kPa or 1 atm) National Transportation Safety Board denoting attachment to oxygen ortho outside diameter Organization of Petroleum Exporting Coun-
tries o-phenanthridine Occupational Safety and Health
Administration on weight of fiber ohm peta (prefix for 1015) pico (prefix for 10~12) para proton page pascal (pressure) personal exposure limit based on an 8-h expo-
sure potential difference negative logarithm of the effective
hydrogen ion concentration parts per hundred of resin (rubber) positive-intrinsic-negative proton magnetic resonance positive-negative per os (oral) polyoxypropylene positive pages parts per billion (109) parts per million (106) parts per million by volume parts per million by weight poly(phenyl oxide) precipitate(d) precipitation foreign prototype (number) point; part poly(vinyl chloride) powder pyridine quod vide (which see) univalent hydrocarbon radical rectus (clockwise configuration) precision of data radian; radius Resource Conservation and Recovery Act rate-determining step reference
xxiv FACTORS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS
rf r-f rh RI rms rpm rps RT RTECS
s(eg, Bus); sec-
S (S)-
s-s-s (s) SAE SAN sat(d) satn SBS sc SCF Sch sem SFs si sol sol soln soly sp s p g r sr std STP
sub SUs syn
radio frequency, n. radio frequency, adj. relative humidity Ring Index root-mean square rotations per minute revolutions per second room temperature Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical
Substances secondary (eg, secondary
butyl) Siemens sinister (counterclockwise configuration) denoting attachment to sulfur symmetric(al) second solid, only as in H2CKS) Society of Automotive Engineers styrene-acrylonitrile saturate(d) saturation styrene-butadiene-styrene subcutaneous self-consistent field; standard cubic feet Schultz number scanning electron microscope(y) Saybolt Furol seconds slightly soluble soluble solution solubility specific; species specific gravity steradian standard standard temperature and pressure (0°C and
101.3 kPa) sublime(s) Saybolt Universal seconds synthetic
Heg, Bu*), t -, tert-
T
t t TAPPI
TCC tex
Tg tga THF tic TLV trans -
TSCA TWA Twad UL USDA
USP uv V var vic-vol vs v sol W Wb Wh WHO
wk
yr (Z)-
tertiary (eg, tertiary butyl)
tera (prefix for 1012); tesla (magnetic flux den-sity)
metric ton (tonne) temperature Technical Association of the Pulp and
Paper Industry Tagliabue closed cup tex (linear density) glass-transition temperature thermogravimetric analysis tetrahydrofuran thin layer chromatography threshold limit value isomer in which substituted groups are on op-
posite sides of double bond between C atoms Toxic Substances Control Act time-weighted average Twaddell Underwriters' Laboratory United States Department
of Agriculture United States Pharmacopeia ultraviolet volt (emf) variable vicinal volume (not volatile) versus very soluble watt weber watt hour World Health Organization
(United Nations) week year zusammen; together; atomic
number
Non-SI (Unacceptable and Obsolete) Units Use
Ä at atm b bart bbl bhp Btu bu cal cfrn Ci cSt c/s cu D den dr dyn
angstrom atmosphere, technical atmosphere, standard barn bar barrel brake horsepower British thermal unit bushel calorie cubic foot per minute curie centistokes cycle per second cubic debye denier dram dyne
nm Pa Pa cm2
Pa m3
W J m3;L J m3/s Bq mm2/s Hz exponential form Cm tex kg N
*Όο not use bar (105 Pa) or millibar (102 Pa) because they are not SI units, and are accepted internationally only in special fields because of existing usage.
FACTORS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS xxv
Non-SI (Unacceptable and Obsolete) Units Use
dyn/cm erg eu op fc fl floz ft ft-lbf gf den G Gal gal Gb gpm
gr hp ihp in. in. Hg in. H 2 0 in.-lbf kcal kgf kilo L lb lbf mho mi MM mm Hg ηιμ mph
ß Oe oz ozf
n P ph psi psia psig qt °R rd sb SCF sq thm yd
dyne per centimeter erg entropy unit degree Fahrenheit footcandle footlambert fluid ounce foot foot pound-force gram-force per denier gauss gal gallon gilbert gallon per minute grain horsepower indicated horsepower inch inch of mercury inch of water inch pound-force kilo-calorie kilogram-force for kilogram lambert pound pound-force mho mile million millimeter of mercury millimicron miles per hour micron oersted ounce ounce-force poise poise phot pounds-force per square inch pounds-force per square inch absolute pounds-force per square inch gage quart degree Rankine rad stilb standard cubic foot square therm yard
mN/m J J/K °C;K lx lx m 3 ; L m J N/tex T m/s2
m 3 ; L A (m3/s); (m3/h) kg W W m Pa Pa J J N kg lx kg N S m M Pa nm km/h μιη A/m kg N P a s P a s lx Pa Pa Pa m 3 ; L K Gy lx m3
exponential form J
BIBLIOGRAPHY
T h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l B u r e a u of We igh t s a n d M e a s u r e s , B I P M (Pare de Sa in t -C loud , F r a n c e ) i s descr ibed i n Ref. 4. T h i s b u r e a u o p e r a t e s u n d e r t h e exclus ive superv i s ion of t h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l C o m m i t t e e for Weigh t s a n d M e a s u r e s (CIPM). Metric Editorial Guide (ANMC-78-1), l a t e s t ed., A m e r i c a n N a t i o n a l Me t r i c Counci l , 900 Mix Avenue , Su i t e 1 H a m d e n CT 0 6 5 1 4 - 5 1 0 6 , 1 9 8 1 . SI Units and Recommendations for the Use of Their Multiples and of Certain Other Units (ISO 1000-1992), A m e r i c a n N a t i o n a l S t a n d a r d s I n s t i t u t e , 25 W 4 3 r d St . , N e w York, 10036, 1992. B a s e d on I E E E / A S T M - S I - 1 0 Standard for Use of the International System of Units (SI): The Modern Metric System (Replaces A S T M E 3 8 0 a n d A N S I / I E E E S t d 268-1992) , A S T M I n t e r n a t i o n a l , Wes t Conshohocken , PA., 2002 . See also w w w . a s t m . o r g Fed. Reg., Dec. 10, 1976 (41 F R 36414) . For A N S I a d d r e s s , see Ref. 3 . See also www.ans i .o rg
A
ACETYLENIC POLYMERS, SUBSTITUTED
Polymerization of acetylene was first achieved by Natta and his co-workers using a Ti-based catalyst. The discovery of the metallic conductivity of doped polyacetylene stimu-lated research into the chemistry of polyacetylene, and now polyacetylene is recognized as one of the most important conjugated polymers.
In 1974 the first successful polymerization of substi-tuted acetylene was achieved when it was found that "Group 6" transition metals are quite active for the poly-merization of phenylacetylene to a polymer with molecular weight over 104. After this finding, there has been much effort to develop highly active catalysts, to tune the poly-mer properties, and also to precisely control the polymer structure. These energetic studies have produced a wide variety of polymers from acetylene derivatives including mono- and disubstituted acetylenes, α,ω-diynes, and 1,3-diacetylenes. The carbon-carbon alternating double bonds in main chains of these polymers provide an opportunity to obtain unique properties such as conductivity, nonlin-ear optical properties, magnetic properties, permeability, photo- and electroluminescent properties, and so on, which are not accessible from the corresponding vinyl polymers.
R1 R2
substituted polyacetylene
R3 R2 R2
-X- R'
poly(o£,(u-diyne) poly(diacetylene)
POLYMERIZATION CATALYSTS
A variety of transition metal catalysts have been found to polymerize substituted acetylenes. Effective catalysts range from Group 3 to Group 10 metals. Activity of cata-lysts greatly depends on monomer structure; therefore, it is quite important to recognize the characteristics of each catalyst.
Group 3 Transition Metals
Examples for the polymerization of substituted acetylenes with "Group 3" transition metals are rather limited. Ziegler-Natta catalysts based on Group 3 transition metals polymerize acetylene and its derivatives. High molecular weight polymers (Mn > 30,000) are available from aliphatic linear alkynes such as 1-hexyne and 1-pentyne. One of the characteristic points of these catalytic systems is the selective formation of cis-cisoidal polymers.
Group 5 Transition Metals
The most probable side reaction in the polymerization of acetylenes is cyclooligomerization that is well promoted by "Group 5" transition metals. The most convenient catalysts
are TaCl5 and NbCle. Both catalysts can polymerize disub-stituted acetylenes such as 3-octyne and 1-phenylpropyne.
Group 6 Transition Metals
This class is most widely employed because of their high ability to polymerize a wide range of substituted acetylenes. Metal halide catalysts, metal carbonyl cata-lysts, metal carbene catalysts, and metal alkylidene cat-alysts comprise the Group 6 transition metals.
Metal Halide Catalysts. M0CI5 and WC16, the most conve-nient "Group 6" transition metal catalysts, give high yields of polymers from various monosubstituted acetylenes, es-pecially from bulkily monosubstituted acetylenes.
Metal Carbonyl Catalysts. Mo or W hexacarbonyl alone cause no polymerization of acetylenes. However, upon uv irradiation in halogenated solvents such as CCI4, various substituted acetylenes readily polymerize with Mo and W hexacarbonyls. Cr(CO)6 as well as other "Group 7" metal carbonyls such as Mn2(CO)io and Re2(CO)io yield no active species under similar conditions.
Metal Carbene Catalysts. The first use of isolated single-component carbene catalysts showed that the Fischer and Casey carbenes polymerize phenylacetylene, tert-butylacetylene, and cyclooctyne in low yields.
Metal Alkylidyne Catalysts. Metal alkylidyne complexes such as (CO)4BrW=CC6H5 and (t-C4H90)3M(^C-n-C3H7
serve as catalysts for the polymerization of substituted acetylenes.
Group 8 Transition Metals
Iron-catalyzed polymerization of substituted acetylenes has a long history. Well-used iron catalysts have a gen-eral formula of Fe(acac)3-R„AlCl3_„, and they are read-ily prepared in situ. Fe(acac)3-(C2H5)3A1 is employed most frequently. This is a heterogeneous catalyst and is able to polymerize sterically unhindered terminal acetylenes such as n-alkyl-, sec-alkyl-, and phenylacetylenes. Although Fe catalysts cannot precisely control the polymerization, they show very high activity and often give very high molecular weight polymers.
Group 9 Transition Metals
A significant contribution to the chemistry of substituted polyacetylenes is based on the finding of excellent activity of Rh catalysts. The most characteristic feature of Rh cat-alysts is their very high activity for the polymerization of phenylacetylenes to give high molecular weight polymers with almost perfect stereoregularity (cis-transoidal). Fur-thermore, the excellent ability of Rh catalysts to tolerate
1
ACETYLENIC POLYMERS, SUBSTITUTED
Table 1. Rh Catalysts for the Polymerization of Substituted Acetylenes
Catalyst Catalyst
RhCl3-LiBH4
[(cod)RhCl]2
[(nbd)RhCl]2
(cod)Rh+B(C6H5)4 " -HSi(C2H5)3
(nbd)Rh+(dbn)2PF6 " (nbd)Rh(dbn)Cl
(cod)Rh+s
Kcod)Rh(SC6F5)]2
(cod)Rh(S03C6H4-p-CH3)(H20) [(nbd)Rh(acac)]2
(nbd)Rh+[(^6-C6H5)B-(C6H5)3] (nbd)C6H5C=CRh(P(C6H5)3)2
Knbd)RhOCH3]2-P(C6H5)3
[(nbd)RhCl]2-(C6H5)2C=C(C6H5)Li-P(C6H5)3
(nbd)(C6H5)2C=C(C6H5)Rh(P(C6H5)3)2
F e t
1 (cod)Rh< J a o -
J Fee
various functional groups including amino, hydroxyl, azo, radical groups, and so on allows the production of highly functionalized polymers. A variety of Rh catalysts have been developed (Table 1).
Group 10 Transition Metals
Group 10 transition-metal catalysts including Ni and Pd are generally not adequate for the polymerization of acetylenes because these catalysts tend to lead to the cyclooligomerization rather than the polymeriza-tion. Exceptional examples have been found by us-ing Ni(NCS)2P(C6H5)3 and [Pd(C=CR)2(P(C6H5)3)2] (R = Si(CH3)3, CH2OH, CH2N(CH3)2).
Ionic Catalysts
Preparation of polyacetylenes having satisfactory molecu-lar weights is impossible by ionic processes.
PRECISION POLYMERIZATION
Remarkable progress has been made in the development of excellent catalysts for living and stereospecific acety-lene polymerizations. The jr-conjugated polymers prepared by the sequential polymerization are strictly limited to polyacetylenes, except for only a few examples. Thus, synthesis of tailor-made conjugated macromolecules such as end-functionalized polymers, block copolymers, star-shaped polymers is possible only in the case of substituted acetylenes.
General
Diverse transition metals from Group 3 to Group 10 elements initiate the polymerization of substituted
acetylenes. Catalysts that achieve living polymerization, however, are quite limited, which contrasts to a wide vari-ety of living polymerization catalysts for vinyl monomers. The catalysts are classified into the following groups: (1) metal halide catalysts, (2) metal carbenes, and (3) Rh complexes. The structure of monomers undergoing living polymerization significantly depends on the type of cata-lyst. Thus, appropriate catalysts must be selected in order to synthesize well-defined polymers from the individual monomer.
Living Polymerization by Metal Halide Catalysts
Metal halide-based living polymerization catalysts possess a general formula of MOnClm-cocatalyst-ROH (M = Mo or W, n = 0 or 1, m = 5 or 4). The most striking feature of these catalysts is the ease in preparation. One can readily gener-ate these catalysts in situ just by mixing these three compo-nents. The living polymerization of substituted acetylenes has been achieved by using a Mo-based multicomponent catalyst.
Replacement of toluene with anisole as polymerization solvent remarkably improves the living nature, leading to both an increase in initiation efficiency and a decrease in polydispersity.
Living Polymerization by Single-Component Carbene Complexes
Much effort has been made to develop well-defined car-bene complexes for the living polymerization of substituted acetylenes as well as cyclic olefins. Soluble oligoacetylenes, (C2H2)„ (n = 3-9), are obtained by the reaction of acetylene with in the presence of quinuclidine. The living chain ends of these oligoacetylenes quantitatively react with pivalde-hyde to give oligomers having ieri-butyl groups a t both