50
End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

End of Life Decisions:2015 Evidence Based

Update

Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Page 2: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The speaker does not have any personal, institutional or financial relationship with any health care lobbying or industry organization.

I do not take honorariums from or represent the position of such groups.

We are all mortal.

1820 Chovin MERIAN - Memento Mori-Physician.

Page 3: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Terminal CareHospicePalliative CareEuthanasia-PassiveWithholding TreatmentResuscitation Orders

Physician Patient RelationsAttitude of Health PersonnelEthics, Medical or NursingPopulation groups (race, ethnicity)Patient participationInformed consentDecision makingSocial WorkReligion (all)

EnglishStudies/trialsMetaAnalysisAdult

Hypothetical VignettesN <50I favor N>200, multicenter,

multivariate-corrected studies.

Most studies more than 10 years are discarded.

Usable studies300

42,00083,000

Page 4: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

OVERVIEW

Epidemiology of end of life decisions Physician Factors Patient Religion and Values Family Factors

Clinician-patient-family communicationEthics ConsultationGrief

Page 5: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Epidemiology of End of Life Decisions

Page 6: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

What % of US deaths are preceded by withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining

treatment?

1.Less than 20%2.Less than 40%3.About half 4.60 to 80%5.More than 80%

Page 7: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

How Common are Limited Treatment Plans at the End of

Life?

2.4 Million US deaths/ year. ~2.1 Million deaths under health care.

Excludes homicides, car accidents, etc.

~1.8 Million deaths/ year under a plan that includes decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment.

Court involvement/legal risks are small. Since 1976: ~150 appellate court decisions,

two criminal cases (excluding euthanasia).

Page 8: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

The Moral and Legal Consensus on Choices about Life Supporting

Treatments

Patients have a right to refuse any medical treatment regardless of whether they are "terminal" or “curable.”There is no difference between stopping a treatment or not starting or using for a trial and then stopping it if is not

not benefiting a patient.Decisionally incapable persons do not lose the right to have any treatment decision made.Tube feedings are a life-sustaining treatment.

Page 9: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Medicare Site of Death.

Average age of 286,000 decedents is 81.9. 42% enrolled in hospice. JAMA 2013;209:470

Page 10: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Hospital Practice Variation

Standardized early DNR rates vary. Lower in Non-profit hospitals 8.6 v 14.6%. Lower in large hospitals 11.1 v 15%. Lower in teaching hosp 9.5 v 13.7%. Lower in urban hospitals 12 v 26%.

Acad Emerg Med 2013;20:381-7. 367 hospitals, Califor, 9.5 million pts > 65, 2—2-2010. Multiple regression.

The difference between High end-of-life intensity and Low end- of-life intensity hospitals is not due to more starting of life sustaining treatment but because Low intensity hospitals propose LST as a time-limited-trial with pre-identified clinical benchmark for withdrawing to ensure its accountability.

Intensive Care Med 2012;38:1886-96. Two hospitals one high, one low treatment, 173 patients over 65, interviews of 4 attendings, staff and families

Page 11: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Hospital Practice Variation Post-stroke DNR: 3.5 fold!

Stroke 2014;45:822-7. 2005-2011, >50 yo, 355 hospitals, 252,368 CVAs. DNR adjusted for severity of disease.

Page 12: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Practice variation: Blood cancer v solid tumors

Cancer 2014;120;1572-8. 1 hosp, all pts dying of adv CA, 113 heme & 713 solid.

Page 13: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Clinician Death Anxiety

Page 14: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Clinician Death Anxiety & Terminal Care

MDs with death anxiety: • Treat more aggressively.• Less tolerant of clinical uncertainty.• Like elderly patients less.• Greater interest in specialties.

Psychol Rep 1998;83:123-8.

1/3 of MDs are uncomfortable discussing terminal care with patients 1/10 after discussing these issues with family.Arch Int Med 1990:150:653-58. See also CMAJ 2000;163:1255-9.

Doctors, nurses, SWs with higher fear of death less likely to:

• Disclose prognosis P. <004

• Assist in selecting proxy decisionmaker P< .000

• Collaborate with team on advance planning P<.003

Death Studies 2007;31:563-72. N= 135, one institution.19902007

1998 2011

A six day HCW course in how to face and cope with death anxiety,• Decreased burnout.• Decreased death anxiety.• Improved job satisfaction, esp in relationships with eol patients.

J Palll Care 20111;27:287-95.

Page 15: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Patient’ and Relative’ Agreement on P't’s Treatment

PreferencesFamily more aggressive than patient.Family estimate of pt’s preference not improved by living will, improved by talk.

Arch Int Med 2001;161:421-30.

J Pain & Sympt Manag 2005;30:498-509.

Fam & Patient

Disagree

Family more aggressive

If you were demented and need an amputa-tion to live, would you want?

33% 100%

Respirator in perm coma?

33% 63%

Tube Feed’g in dementia?

24% 83%

What are the implications of doctors feeling more comfortable talking with family than with the

patient?

Page 16: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Patients’ Religion(and why it matters to MDs)

Page 17: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Religion and Preferences for Life-Prolonging Care

88%: religion somewhat/very important.

47%: spiritual needs minimally/not at all supported by religious community

72%: spiritual needs minimally/not at all supported by medical system.

Religiousness associated with wanting all measures to extend life (OR 2., 95% CI=1.1-3.6).

J Clin Onc 2007;25:555-60. 230 CA pts. See also Palliat & Supportive Care 2006; 4:407-17.

Page 18: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Religious Coping* and Use of Life-Prolonging Care

High religious coping associated with More use of respirators (11 vs 4%;

P=.04). More intensive care during last week of

life (14 vs 4%; P=.03). Same use of hospice (71 v 73%; P=.66).

JAMA 2009;301:1140-7. Prospective multivariate analysis, 7 hospitals across US, 345 adults with advanced cancer followed to death, median survival 122 days.

*Religious coping: I seek God’s love and care, etc.

Page 19: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

How Does Spiritual Care From Medical Team Affect Medical Care Received and EOL Quality Of

Life.

Patients whose spiritual needs were supported by medical team received 3.5 X more hospice care compared to those not supported (P = .003).

High religious coping patients whose spiritual needs were supported were 5X more likely to receive hospice (P = .004) and a fifth as likely to receive aggressive care (P = .02) in comparison with those not supported.

Spiritual support from the medical team associated with higher QOL near death (20.0 v 17.3, P = .007).

Spiritual support from pastoral care visits associated with higher QOL near death (20 v 18, P = .003).

J Clin Onc 2010;28:445-52. Prospective, multisite, multivariate regression study of 343 patients with advanced cancer. Median 116 days to death. Patient-rated support of spiritual needs by the medical team. Measured receipt of pastoral care services.

J Clin Onc 2007;25:555-60 and J Pall Med 2006;9:646-57 have similar finding on QoL.

Page 20: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Religious Support and Intensive Care Deaths

Patients saying that religious/spiritual needs were inadequately supported

less likely to receive a week or more of hospice (54% vs 73%; P = .01) more likely to die in an ICU (5.1% vs 1.0%, P = .03). Among minorities and high religious coping patients, those reporting

poorly supported religious/spiritual needs received more ICU care (11.3% vs 1.2%, P = .03; 13.1% vs 1.6%, P = .02, less likely to have > 1 week of hospice (43.% vs 75.3%, P = .01;

45.3% vs 73.1%, P = .007) increased ICU deaths (11.2% vs 1.2%, P = .03 and 7.7% vs 0.6%,

P = .009).

EOL costs higher when patients said their spiritual needs were inadequately supported ($4947 vs $2833, P = .03), particularly among

minorities ($6533 vs $2276, P = .02) and high religious copers ($6344 vs $2431, P = .005).

Cancer 2011;117:5383-91. Prospective, multisite, 339 advanced CA patients accrued from outpatient setting and followed until death. Spiritual care measured by patients' reports that health team supported their spiritual needs.

Page 21: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

An Answer?

Patients with high spiritual support from religious

communities

Less hospice AOR 0.37; P=.002

More aggressive EoL treatment

AOR 2.62; P=.02

More ICU deaths AOR 5.22; P=.004.

Among patients supported by religious communities AND receiving spiritual

support from medical team.

More hospice use AOR 2.37; P =.04

Less aggressive interventions

AOR 0.23; P=.02

Fewer ICU deaths AOR 0.19; P=.02

JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 24;173(12):1109-17.

Page 22: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Who should offer religious support?

The patients own spiritual community is most effective! JAMA Inter Med 2013;173:1109017.

J Pastoral Care & Counseling. 2013; 67(3-4):3-. 233 consecutive hospitalized pts received a proposal of spiritual support randomly by chaplain or by nurses by random assignment. One hospital, single variable.

Page 23: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Family Factors in Decisionmaking

Page 24: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Family ICU Distress 2001-~2005A Focus on Milieu

More anxiety when:

• Acute illness

• Lack of regular MD-RN meetings

• Lack of room reserved for meetings with relatives.Crit Care Med 2001;29:1893-7. Prosp study, 43 French ICUs (6 peds), 637 pts, 920 relatives. Similar data in US, see. Crit Care Med 2008;36:1722-8.

46% Conflict with med staff (complaints of disregarding primary caregiver in tx discussions, miscommunication, unprofessional behavior).

48%: Valued clergy.

27%: Wanted better space for meetings.

48%: Preferred attending MD as info source.Crit Care Med 2001;29:197-201. 6 AHC ICUs. Tape audit.

See also Chest 2005;127:1775-83.

2001

2005

Page 25: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Family ICU Distress 2005 - 2009A Shift to Focus on Caregiver

Psychiatry

35% depressed

69% relatives had symptoms of anxiety. (Caregivers who saw loved one with delirium 2X as likely to have generalized anxiety.) (p < 0.04 after multivariate adjust).

J Pall Med 2007;10:1083-92. 200 caregivers of patients with terminal CA.) .

2007

2005

Patients with Advanced CA with Children

↑ panic disorder (OR=5.41)

↑ desire for aggressive tx vs palliative care (OR=1.77)

↓ advance care planning (e.g., DNR) (OR,=0.44)

↓ quality of life in the last week of life (P=.007).

Spousal caregivers with dependent children had more major depression (OR 4.5) and generalized anxiety disorder (OR= 4).

Cancer 2009;115:399-409, 6 hospitals, prosp, 668 pts

4.5% Major Depression 27%3.5 General Anxiety 108 Panic 104 Complicated

Grief/PTSD5

J Clin Onc 2005;23:6899-907. 200 caregivers of

advanced CA pts .

Crit Care Med 2008;36:1722-8. 1 AHC, 41

caregivers.

20082009

Page 26: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Family ICU Distress in ICUs 2010

2010

PTSD: 10-19%. Depression: 14-24%

Correlates of aboveKnowing patient for shorter time

PTSD, P = .003 Depression, P = .04

Discord between fam' DM prefs v their DM roles

PTSD, P=.005 Depression, P= .05

Chest 2010;137:280-7. Prosp, multivar, 226 families

57% mod to severe traumatic stress

80% borderline anxiety

70% borderline depression.

>80% mod to severe fatigue, sadness, fear

More severe symptoms:

Younger age, female, and non-white relative.

Young patient was only variable associated with symptom severity.

Despite symptoms, most relatives coping at and functioning at high levels during the ICU experience.

Crit Care Med 2010;38:1078-85. Prospective, cross-sectional study, 3 ICUs at 1 AHC. 74 relatives 74 patients at high risk for dying after ICU stay >72 hrs on vent.

Page 27: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Clinician-patient-family communication

Disclosing PrognosisFamily Meetings

Page 28: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

MDs Readily Provide Qualitative Terminal News; Withhold

Quantitative Data

Qualitative info.Is it bad, doc?

80% want 66% ask. 88% given

20% do not want. 22% ask for it. 61% given!!

Quantitative info.How long will I live?

53% want 66% ask for it

55% given.

46% do not want 2% ask for it. 4% given.

Health Comm 2002;14;221-241. N=351 (a 24% return to a single mailing of pts registered with Mich Am Can Soc. Oversamples breast cancer.)

Educated, sicker, fearful, and acceptance of death want more information.

Page 29: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Quantitative Data for CPR decisions

Of patients who undergo inpatient CPR, 4 in 10 will have a return of spontaneous circulation,

1 in 10 will survive to hospital dismissal.

Of patients who are successfully resuscitated and discharged, 1 in 4 survive more than 5 years.(More favorable for healthy baseline status, younger age, witnessed arrest, initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation, CPR <10 minutes).

The American Journal of Medicine 2010; 123:4–9. See also New Engl J Med 2009;361:22-31

Page 30: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

The “Chicago Hope” Effect: Deformed Consent

All Chicago Hope, ER, and Rescue CPRs 94-95: 67% survive to discharge.

N Engl J Med 1996;334:1578-82.

Patient’s/surrogates’ prediction of survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest with CPR averaged 72%

The higher the prediction of survival, the greater the frequency of preference for full code status (P = .012).

Chest 2011;139:802-9. Interviews of 100 patients or their surrogates in an MICU.

19% of pts knew prognosis after CPR. When informed of prognosis, 37% of living wills were changed.

J Crit Care 2005;20:26-34. A 325-bed hospital 82 pts with living wills on admission.

Page 31: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Awareness of terminal illness, discussions with MDs and treatment plans and outcomes.

Being aware of terminal illness: 1.6 X as likely to get preferred tx.

Discussing EOL wishes with MD: 2 X as likely to get preferred tx.

Being aware & discuss with MD: 3.5 X as likely to get preferred tx.

(44% of pts who knew they were terminally ill had no talk with MD!)

J Clin Onc 2010;28:1203-8. 7 hospitals. 325 pts with advanced cancer. Preferences assessed a median of 125 days before death. Multivariate analysis (function, survival time, demographics, discussions, awareness of term condition)

.003

of Terminal Condition

Page 32: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Dr: This asymptomatic pt has 4-6 months to live.

When would you discuss hospice?

65%: discuss prognosis now.

44%: discuss DNR (Most would wait for sx/no more tx to offer.

26%: discuss hospice.

21%: discuss site of death.

Non-cancer Mds more likely than cancer MDs to discuss DNR status, hospice, and preferred site of death now (all P < .001).

Cancer 2010;998-1006. Nat survey 4074 MDs txing CA pt. Multi var.

But oncologists say refusal of pall care to accept chemo pts is a barrier to referrals, so they wait. J Clin Onc 2012;30:4380-6

Page 33: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Patient with less than 6 months to live: What have you been told?

53% had discussed hospice with MD.

Patients with more severe pain, dyspnea or a greater desire for palliative care were

no more likely to have discussed hospice than those with less severe symptoms (23 v 19% p=.31)

Arch Int Med 2009;169:954-62. 1517 pt with stage IV (metastatic) lung CA, multicenter, multivar.

Page 34: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

What happens when a terminally ill patient comes to a family conference?

Patient presence was associated with More discussions of goals of care (P=0.009)

Less communication of prognosis (P=0.004) and symptoms dying patients may have (P<0.001).

Journal of Pain & Symptom Management. 2013;46:536-45. Data collected right after 140 consecutive family conferences. 91%: solid tumors, median age: 59 yo. Patients participated in 49% of FCs.

Page 35: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Treatment, discussions and acceptance of death

Number of Aggress Interventions

Family and pts having end of life discussions vs those not having discussions

• Accept terminal (53 v 29% P< .001)

• Value comfort over life extension (84 v 74% p<.001)

• Against ICU death (63 v 28% P<.001)

• JAMA 2008;300:1665-73.

Page 36: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

End of Life Treatment Discussions and Last Week Costs, Quality of Death, Quality of

Bereavement

End of life discussions: ↓ Ventilation (1.6 v 11.0%)↓ CPR (.8 v 6.7%)↓ ICU admit (4.1 v 12.4%)↓ 46% Last week $ tx. (P=.002). No higher depression or worry. Earlier hospice enrollment.

More Aggressive Care↓ Quality of life (6.4 v 4.6)↑ Depression in bereaved caregivers JAMA 2008;300:1665-73. Arch Int Med 2009;169:480-8. US. 6-hosp prosp, longit cohort multivar. Pts with advanced CA and their caregivers (n = 332 dyads), 2002-2008. Patients followed from to death, (median 4.4 months, caregivers 6.5 months p death). A third had EOL discussions..

Page 37: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

How does patient being present change eol care planning conferences?

More likely discussed

Pts goals for tx 97 v 83% .009

Less likely discussed

Prognosis 83 v 61% .004

Nutrition/hydration 62 v 47 .06

Terminal sx 44 v 16% .0003

Pain Sympt management 2013;46:536-45. 140 consecutive conf

Page 38: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

What is Hope-Full Disclosure? i.e., Addressing the Paradox of ‘How do we

Faithfully Be with a Loved One who is Dying?”

Patients want doctors to Be knowledgeable and realistic,

Offer up to date treatment (90%) (goals, continuity, not illusions, abandonment and do-nots)

Say that pain will be controlled (87%). Provide an opportunity to ask questions

Patients lose hope if Doctor appears nervous or uncomfortable (91%) Gives prognosis to family before the patient (87%) Uses euphemisms (82%)

J Clin Onc 2005;23:1278-1288. 126 pts with metastatic cancer seeing 30 oncologists.

Focus on finding consensus on patient’s values rather than on most empowered family member’s preference.

J Crit Care 2006;21: 294-304. 51 clinician-family ICU conferences from 4 hospitals

Page 39: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Family Satisfaction with EoL Conferences

Family spoke 30%, MDs 70%% Family speaking time correlated with

Perceived quality of MD information, MD listening, MD understanding of issues, Meeting needs, and Conflict resolution.

Crit Care Med 2004;32:1284-88. Tapes of 51 meetings with 51 families, 214 relatives, 4 hospitals, 36 MDs. 111 potential meetings, 36 families excluded because of MD pref. 46% of approached families consented to taping. Mean meeting time 32 min SD=15 min.

See also Arch Int Med 2004;164:1999-2004.

So, LISTEN UP!

Page 40: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Family meeting tips

Accommodate extended families.Include family clergy in preference to hospital chaplains (consider pre-contact with clergy).Minimize staff in room.Sit down.Take time.Private space.Give a business card with your cell phone on it when the situation is close to death.

Page 41: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

The intergenerational gift between dying persons and their

caregivers.

A dying person shows

caregiver how to face death.

The caregivers learn how to face death &

teach the next generation how to care for a dying loved one.

The next generation learns how to care for a dying person.

On death

Page 42: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Ethics Consultations

Page 43: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Admission ICU Goal/Prognosis Meetings

Multidiscip conf to discuss goals, expectations, milestones, & time frames for ICU tx. F/u to discuss palliative care when goals not met.Reduced LOS from (2 to 11) days to (2 to 6) days, P>.01 [interquartile range].Earlier access to palliative careNo increased ICU mortality.

Amer J Med 2000;109:469-75. 530 consecutive adult med ICU AHC pts.

See also Eur J Cancer 2007;43:316-22.

Page 44: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Mid-Course ICU Ethics Consults

RNs could unilaterally ask for ethics consults if they saw unaddressed ethics issues

Hospital days (-2.95, P = .01) ICU days (-1.44, P = .03) Vent days (-1.7 days, P = .03) Mortality: no difference. Consultations regarded favorably Prosp, RCT, adult ICUs, 7 hospitals, N=551. JAMA

2003;290:1166-72.

Same as Peds/Adult ICU study Crit Care Med 2000; 28:3920-4.

Page 45: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Mid-Course ICU Ethics Consults

Mandatory ethics consultation after 96 hours of respirator treatment (v historical control or optional ethics consults) More decisions to forgo life-support and

reduced LOS. Crit Care Med 1998;26:252-9. Prospective, controlled study, N=99. Recent historical

control. Standard prompts on decisions and communication. Action strategies suggested.

Page 46: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Let the RNs into the Process

RNs less likely than MDs to say Families well informed about advantages

and limitations of further therapy (89% vs. 99%; p < .003)

Ethics issues discussed well in the team (59% vs. 92%; p < .0003)

Ethical issues discussed well with family (79% vs. 91%; p < .0002)

Crit Care Med 2001;29:658-64. Cross-section survey; 31 US peds hosp. See also Chest 2005;127:1775-83.

Page 47: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Summary on ICU Ethics Consults

Mandatory or routine interventions better.Lead to more effective use of palliative

care plans without increasing mortality.Financial impact: Some cost savings but

primary value-added effect is by increasing available ICU bed days by decreasing ICU use for people who will not survive.

Health Affairs 2005;24:961-71.

Page 48: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Hospice enrollement

Page 49: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Hospice Reduces Deaths of Caregivers During First 18

months of Widowhood

Short hospice stays (<3 days) associated with more depression in caregivers if the caregiver: has previous depression

(p<.01) spouse of decedent (p<.01) overwhelming caregiver

burdens (p<.04) Am J Geriatr Psych 2006;14:264-9. 3 yr longit.

175 family caregivers of patients with terminal cancer who enrolled in 1 hospice 1999-2001. 13 months follow-up.

Soc Sci & Medicine 2003;57:465-75. Risk adjusted, retro 30,838 in hospice matched to 30,838 couples without hospice care drawn from 200,000 sample.

OR .9 OR .95

Late Hospice Enrollment

Page 50: End of Life Decisions: 2015 Evidence Based Update Steven Miles, MD; University of Minnesota 2/9/15

Slides available [email protected]

Slides may be used without further permission.

Steven Miles MD