382
FTCC PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR STUDENT SUCCESS FTCC Performance Measures for Student Success 2014 FTCC Performance Measures for Student Success Performance Measures 2015 FTCC Performance Measures for Student Success Performance Measures 2013 Critical Success Performance Measure 2012 Critical Success Performance Measure 2011 Critical Success Performance Measure 2010 Critical Success Performance Measure 2009 Critical Success Performance Measure 2008 Critical Success Performance Measure End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors-Performance Measures and Standards FTCC End-of-Year Report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance Measures and Standards Reported July 2011 for (2009-2010) FTCC End-of-Year Report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance Measures and Standards Reported June 2008 for (2006-2007) FTCC End-of-Year Report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance Measures and Standards Reported June 2009 for (2007-2008) FTCC End-of-Year Report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance Measures and Standards Reported July 2010 for (2008-2009) FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance Measures and Standards Reported June 2007 for (2005-2006)

End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

FTCC PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR STUDENT SUCCESS

FTCC Performance Measures for Student Success

2014 FTCC Performance Measures for

Student Success Performance Measures

2015 FTCC Performance Measures for

Student Success Performance Measures

2013 Critical Success Performance Measure 2012 Critical Success Performance Measure

2011 Critical Success Performance Measure 2010 Critical Success Performance Measure

2009 Critical Success Performance Measure 2008 Critical Success Performance Measure

End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical

Success Factors-Performance Measures and Standards

FTCC End-of-Year Report on NCCCS Critical

Success Factors Performance Measures and

Standards Reported July 2011 for (2009-2010)

FTCC End-of-Year Report on NCCCS Critical

Success Factors Performance Measures and

Standards Reported June 2008 for (2006-2007)

FTCC End-of-Year Report on NCCCS Critical

Success Factors Performance Measures and

Standards Reported June 2009 for

(2007-2008)

FTCC End-of-Year Report on NCCCS Critical

Success Factors Performance Measures and

Standards Reported July 2010 for

(2008-2009)

FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical

Success Factors Performance Measures and

Standards Reported June 2007 for

(2005-2006)

Page 2: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

MEASURES forSTUDENT SUCCESS

2015 PERFORMANCE

Page 3: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

Page 4: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

2015 PERFORMANCE MEASURES for STUDENT SUCCESS June 2015 NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM Dr. R Scott Ralls, President Jennifer Haygood, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer RESEARCH & PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Bill Schneider, Associate Vice President Courtney Burns, National Reporting Coordinator Dr. Kristen Corbell, Program Evaluation Director Alexis Lockett, Research Assistant Christina Oxendine, Education Research Analyst

6/2/15

CONTENTS

Introduction  2

June 2015 Performance Summary 3A. Basic Skills Student Progress  5

B. GED Diploma Passing Rate  6

TABLE A. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2013‐2014 7 

TABLE B. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014

C. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level English Courses  9

D. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level Math Courses  10

TABLE C. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2013‐2014

11TABLE D. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2013‐2014

E. First Year Progression  12

TABLE E. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2013 COHORT   13

F. Curriculum Student Completion  14

TABLE F. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2008 COHORT  15

G. Licensure and Certification Passing Rate  16

TABLE G. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014 17

H. College Transfer Performance  18

TABLE H. COLLEGE TRANSFER PERFORMANCE, 2012‐2013 COMMUNITY COLLEGESTUDENTS

19

Appendix – Additional Performance Measure Tables   21

TABLE A1‐A2. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL  22

TABLE B1. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL  25

TABLE C1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2013‐2014 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION 

26

TABLE C2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISHCOURSES, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY AGE

27

TABLE D1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATHCOURSES, 2013‐2014 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION

28

TABLE D2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATHCOURSES, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY CREDIT MATH COURSE 

29

TABLE E1. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2013 COHORT ‐ BY ETHNICITY ANDGENDER 

31

TABLE F1‐F2. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2008 COHORT ‐ BYPROGRAM AREA 

32

TABLE F3. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2008 COHORT ‐ BY ENROLLMENT TYPE 34

TABLE F4. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2008 COHORT ‐ BY ETHNICITY AND GENDER 35

TABLE G1. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY EXAM(AVIATION, BLET)

36

TABLE G2. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY EXAM(DENTAL HYGIENE, MASSAGE & BODY WORK, NUC. MED. TECH.) 37

TABLE G3. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY EXAM(OPTICIANRY, RADIATION THERAPY, RADIOGRAPHY, REAL ESTATE SALES)

38

TABLE G4. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2014 ‐ BY EXAM(COSMETIC ARTS)

39

TABLE G5. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2014 ‐ BY EXAM (DETENTION OFFICER, EMT, EMT‐I, EMT‐P)

40

TABLE G6. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2014 ‐ BY EXAM (PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASST., NURSING, VET. MED.TECH.)  

41

1

Page 5: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Introduction  The Performance Measures for Student Success Report is the North Carolina Community College System’s major accountability document. This annual performance report is based on data compiled from the previous year and serves to inform colleges and the public on the performance of our 58 community colleges.  

In 1993, the State Board of Community Colleges began monitoring performance data on specific measures to ensure public accountability for programs and services. In 1998, the General Assembly directed the State Board to review past performance measures and define standards to ensure programs and services offered by community colleges in North Carolina were of sufficient quality.  

In 2010, President Scott Ralls established a Performance Measures Committee to develop new performance‐based student success measures to go into effect in 2013. The Committee was led by two community college presidents, Dr. Dennis Massey of Pitt Community College and Dr. Molly Parkhill of Blue Ridge Community College. The Committee was comprised of college presidents, vice‐presidents, faculty, and directors from a diverse group of colleges representing various areas of expertise.  

After a year of researching, drafting, and soliciting feedback from college faculty and staff on potential measures, the Committee formally presented the following eight measures to the State Board:  

Basic Skills Student Progress  Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level English Courses 

First Year Progression  Licensure and Certification Passing Rate 

GED Diploma Passing Rate 

Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level Math Courses 

Curriculum Student Completion 

College Transfer Performance  

In November 2011, the State Board formally approved the Performance Measures. These measures were then submitted to the General Assembly in March 2012 and later adopted in June 2012 through Section 8.5 of S.L. 2012‐142.  

As the revised performance measures were being finalized, attention was turned to developing recommendations for incorporating performance into colleges’ regular formula budget allocations. In May 2012, President Ralls appointed a team of college presidents to a Performance Funding Committee to develop a performance funding model. This committee was led by State Board Chairman K. Ray Bailey and Garret Hinshaw, President of Catawba Valley Community College.  

One of the outcomes of this committee was the establishment of system‐wide baseline and excellence levels for each measure. The committee recommended using consistent, statistically‐defined levels to promote transparency, simplicity, and objectivity. This utilization of the levels is a departure from the System’s historical use of “standards.”  

Based on three years of historical data (if available) for each measure, the baseline levels were set two standard deviations below the system mean, and the excellence levels were set one standard deviation above the system mean. These levels remain static for three years and will be reset in the 2016 Report.  

The performance summary on the following page provides each college with an overview of its results as compared to its peers. Color indicators represent various levels of performance within each measure:  

Met or exceeded the excellence level   Above the baseline level, but below the college avg 

Above the college avg, but below the excellence level  Below the baseline level 

   

2

Page 6: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

June 2015 Performance Summary

Met or Exceeded Excellence Level

Above College Avg, Below Excellence

Above Baseline Level, Below Average

Below Baseline Level

A. BASIC 

SKILLS 

PROGRESS

B. GED 

PASS RATE

C. DEV ENG 

SUBSEQ 

SUCCESS

D. DEV MATH 

SUBSEQ 

SUCCESS

E. YEAR 

ONE 

PROGRESS

F. CURR 

COMPLET‐

ION RATE

G. 

LICENSURE 

PASS RATE

H. 

TRANSFER 

PERFORM

System Excellence Level 51.2% 82.0% 74.9% 75.4% 74.6% 45.6% 91.7% 93.8%

System Baseline 20.6% 49.3% 45.2% 47.5% 53.2% 28.6% 71.0% 71.2%

Average College Percentage 45.1% 79.4% 62.4% 63.6% 67.1% 43.4% 83.3% 87.7%

System Totals (All Students) 44.8% 78.2% 63.4% 63.0% 67.1% 42.9% 84.6% 88.3%

Alamance CC  37.2% 71.6% 65.3% 57.1% 73.8% 43.3% 80.0% 89.5% 0 3 5 0

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  53.3% 79.2% 69.8% 58.7% 71.8% 41.2% 85.7% 92.1% 1 4 3 0

Beaufort County CC  43.2% 67.7% 36.7% 69.7% 54.5% 41.4% 89.1% 91.3% 0 3 4 1

Bladen CC  59.8% 81.3% 42.4% 54.4% 56.7% 37.6% 78.3% 72.7% 1 1 5 1

Blue Ridge CC  36.1% 89.4% 65.9% 60.2% 68.5% 46.1% 82.7% 89.2% 2 3 3 0

Brunswick CC  58.1% 76.5% 67.2% 73.5% 73.8% 35.9% 81.8% 82.6% 1 3 4 0

Caldwell CC & TI  44.1% 80.6% 68.5% 66.1% 70.4% 43.0% 79.2% 84.2% 0 4 4 0

Cape Fear CC  43.3% 77.8% 62.9% 65.6% 70.2% 50.0% 92.8% 85.0% 2 3 3 0

Carteret CC  42.3% 90.9% 57.0% 70.2% 65.0% 39.5% 79.9% 88.7% 1 2 5 0

Catawba Valley CC  46.0% 86.0% 82.8% 76.9% 76.3% 40.0% 81.8% 91.3% 4 2 2 0

Central Carolina CC  53.6% 70.7% 58.1% 81.8% 67.1% 47.8% 93.6% 81.9% 4 1 3 0

Central Piedmont CC  49.8% 81.8% 76.9% 63.3% 69.8% 41.0% 87.3% 87.5% 1 4 3 0

Cleveland CC  55.5% 80.0% 66.9% 65.8% 61.2% 38.0% 84.9% 90.5% 1 5 2 0

Coastal Carolina CC  52.4% 83.3% 73.6% 67.8% 78.0% 51.7% 91.0% 95.1% 5 3 0 0

College of The Albemarle  43.8% 77.7% 61.1% 67.2% 68.2% 48.1% 90.8% 93.2% 1 4 3 0

Craven CC  49.3% 95.3% 66.5% 62.0% 73.2% 40.8% 75.0% 90.6% 1 4 3 0

Davidson County CC  53.8% 86.0% 69.2% 59.6% 73.7% 42.3% 87.0% 88.5% 2 4 2 0

Durham TCC  42.1% 79.7% 56.0% 63.4% 61.6% 36.5% 88.1% 91.3% 0 3 5 0

Edgecombe CC  64.5% 69.3% 58.2% 43.6% 52.6% 40.9% 87.2% 93.6% 1 2 3 2

Fayetteville TCC  38.7% 90.8% 54.1% 61.0% 50.2% 38.1% 86.8% 90.4% 1 2 4 1

Forsyth TCC  53.1% 79.7% 65.4% 57.8% 73.1% 41.6% 89.4% 90.7% 1 5 2 0

Gaston College  40.4% 83.9% 66.4% 62.3% 74.9% 42.9% 92.6% 84.0% 3 1 4 0

Guilford TCC  28.4% 86.3% 52.9% 60.9% 63.0% 44.0% 85.9% 86.9% 1 2 5 0

Halifax CC  47.4% 48.1% 73.9% 50.0% 61.4% 48.4% 79.5% 88.0% 1 3 3 1

Haywood CC  46.6% 84.2% 60.0% 52.7% 66.0% 43.8% 69.0% 86.0% 1 2 4 1

Isothermal CC  45.1% 80.6% 78.5% 60.3% 70.7% 43.6% 86.9% 90.2% 1 5 2 0

James Sprunt CC  67.6% 81.8% 56.6% 56.9% 73.6% 47.3% 80.7% 85.0% 2 2 4 0

Johnston CC  44.6% 55.2% 76.1% 61.1% 74.1% 48.1% 82.4% 83.5% 2 1 5 0

Lenoir CC  50.5% 81.4% 56.0% 53.8% 60.6% 45.7% 77.7% 88.9% 1 3 4 0

Martin CC  49.2% 75.4% 48.8% 77.3% 62.7% 41.7% 69.0% 83.3% 1 1 5 1

Mayland CC  40.0% 81.8% 59.6% 78.7% 68.9% 53.5% 77.1% 84.2% 2 2 4 0

McDowell TCC  42.4% 87.5% 62.2% 72.7% 66.7% 40.5% 89.5% 83.9% 1 2 5 0

Mitchell CC  43.1% 86.8% 61.8% 63.5% 65.1% 44.5% 81.1% 89.1% 1 2 5 0

Montgomery CC  50.0% 94.1% 72.9% 36.1% 70.3% 52.1% 100.0% 78.6% 3 3 1 1

Nash CC  38.7% 58.2% 56.7% 72.6% 65.5% 42.1% 77.7% 89.4% 0 2 6 0

Pamlico CC  47.9% 87.5% 50.0% 73.7% 76.7% 56.5% 92.3% 100.0% 5 2 1 0

Piedmont CC  38.2% 79.3% 63.4% 62.6% 78.3% 38.8% 66.2% 88.2% 1 2 4 1

Pitt CC  40.9% 68.4% 64.1% 57.6% 60.7% 43.5% 85.3% 85.2% 0 3 5 0

Randolph CC  26.5% 72.7% 75.2% 68.0% 71.6% 39.3% 80.7% 85.6% 1 2 5 0

Richmond CC  48.4% 79.8% 70.5% 69.4% 68.8% 39.3% 72.3% 79.2% 0 5 3 0

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  18.2% 55.6% 50.6% 83.3% 67.0% 44.8% 75.0% 89.3% 1 2 4 1

Robeson CC  45.3% 94.6% 51.0% 54.4% 39.2% 34.9% 82.1% 94.2% 2 1 4 1

Rockingham CC  40.0% 89.7% 55.6% 60.6% 66.5% 38.6% 74.4% 89.7% 1 1 6 0

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  32.9% 79.2% 63.2% 58.1% 60.7% 40.7% 82.6% 85.9% 0 1 7 0

Sampson CC  45.6% 87.9% 40.7% 46.4% 70.6% 45.2% 88.0% 76.8% 1 4 1 2

Sandhills CC  30.7% 68.7% 60.9% 63.0% 70.0% 40.7% 87.8% 90.1% 0 3 5 0

South Piedmont CC  47.6% 72.3% 55.7% 66.3% 60.1% 43.4% 78.0% 92.4% 0 4 4 0

Southeastern CC  51.3% 65.6% 66.7% 68.5% 48.7% 40.2% 78.1% 78.0% 1 2 4 1

Southwestern CC  58.6% 82.4% 62.7% 62.4% 67.3% 43.0% 88.7% 95.8% 3 3 2 0

Stanly CC  49.4% 83.8% 73.5% 80.1% 66.9% 48.4% 80.4% 89.7% 3 3 2 0

Surry CC  42.1% 92.9% 72.3% 69.5% 76.5% 47.4% 89.5% 92.5% 3 4 1 0

Tri‐County CC  31.6% 82.5% 72.7% 47.8% 71.9% 39.7% 67.9% 89.1% 1 3 3 1

Vance‐Granville CC  34.6% 78.1% 62.3% 63.9% 62.7% 39.8% 80.8% 88.1% 0 2 6 0

Wake TCC  49.0% 75.3% 49.5% 60.6% 67.9% 40.4% 91.8% 91.5% 1 3 4 0

Wayne CC  67.5% 80.4% 63.6% 62.4% 70.0% 52.3% 87.0% 84.8% 2 4 2 0

Western Piedmont CC  17.9% 80.2% 65.6% 72.1% 71.0% 49.9% 86.4% 85.7% 1 5 1 1

Wilkes CC  47.5% 92.2% 65.6% 70.5% 75.8% 45.8% 85.6% 87.0% 3 4 1 0

Wilson CC  51.2% 77.3% 59.3% 62.5% 68.3% 43.0% 86.7% 88.4% 1 3 4 0

Note: Color indicators are based on the precise percentages and not the rounded percentages as displayed

Met or Exceed

ed 

Excellence Level

Below Baselin

e Level

Below College

 Average,

Above Baselin

e Level

Below Excellence Level,

Above College

 Average

3

Page 7: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

4

Page 8: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

A. Basic Skills Student Progress  Purpose  

To ensure adults with low literacy skills are progressing academically toward basic skill attainment necessary for employment and self‐sufficiency 

 Description  

Percentage of students who progress as defined by an educational functioning level. 

 Methodology  

Denominator: Basic skills students attempting 60 or more contact hours during program year. Excludes High Adult Secondary Education initial placements.  

Numerator: Basic skills students attempting 60 or more contact hours during program year, who complete the program year at a higher educational functioning level. Excludes high adult secondary education initial placements.  

Note: Initial placement is set by the first NRS approved test(s) taken during the program year. The initial placement is the lowest Educational Functioning Level of the tests given within 3 days of the first test of the program year. A pre‐test is considered if it occurs up to 90 days prior to the program year and the test code and component match the test code and component of the one having the lowest EFL of the first test(s) in the program year.   

 Source  

LEIS annual data file 

 Details  

To be included in this measure student had to have been enrolled in a class during the Basic Skills/College and Career Readiness program year (July 1 – June 30), have accumulated 60 or more total contact hours across all classes enrolled, and not have an initial placement of High Adult Secondary Education. Initial placement is based upon the National Reporting System (NRS) guidelines of being the lowest Educational Functioning Level of the first NRS approved test(s) taken during the program year.  Colleges received credit for all students who tested at a higher Educational Functioning Level at any point of the Basic Skills/College and Career Readiness program year (July 1 – June 30) in the same test and component that set the initial placement.  Colleges are also given credit for students who test at Adult Secondary Education Low, are an Adult High School student, and meet the federal and state assessment policy guidelines for moving up an educational functioning level to Adult Secondary Education High. 

 Excellence level: 51.2%  

Baseline level: 20.6% 

   

5

Page 9: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B. GED Diploma Passing Rate  Purpose  

To ensure quality GED preparation and high levels of GED attainment 

 Description  

Percentage of students taking at least one GED test during a program year who receive a GED diploma during the program year.  

 Methodology  

Denominator: GED students with an Initial placement of Low Adult Secondary Education or High Adult Secondary Education who take at least one GED test during the program year (July 1 – June 30) and have 12 or more total contact hours.  

Numerator: GED students with an Initial placement of Low Adult Secondary Education or High Adult Secondary Education who take at least one GED test during the program year (July 1 – June 30), and have 12 or more total contact hours, and receive a GED diploma 

 Source  

LEIS Annual Data file Oklahoma Scoring GED test files 

 Details  

Denominator:  Students must meet the following criteria:  

Included in the LEIS annual file 

Have an initial placement of Adult Secondary Education Low (ASEL) or Adult Secondary Education High (ASEH) 

Have accumulated at least 12 total contact hours during the program year 

Taken at least one GED test during the program year (July 1 – June 30)  

 

Numerator:   All students from the denominator who receive a GED diploma during the program year (July 1 – June 30). Credit is given to the college where the student received the 12 or more contact hours and not the location the GED test was taken. 

 Excellence level: 82.0%  

Baseline level: 49.3% 

   

6

Page 10: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE A. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2013‐2014 TABLE B. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014

Excellence: 51.2% Excellence: 82.0%

Baseline: 20.6% Baseline: 49.3%

13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12

System Totals  44,230 19,821 44.8% 42% 41% System Totals  6,241 4,881 78.2% 72% 70%

Alamance CC  939 349 37.2% 25% 31% Alamance CC  81 58 71.6% 81% 73%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 845 450 53.3% 46% 40% Asheville‐Buncombe TC 284 225 79.2% 51% 54%

Beaufort County CC  241 104 43.2% 36% 38% Beaufort County CC  31 21 67.7% 60% 83%

Bladen CC  189 113 59.8% 51% 45% Bladen CC  48 39 81.3% 65% 63%

Blue Ridge CC  388 140 36.1% 34% 36% Blue Ridge CC  94 84 89.4% 61% 66%

Brunswick CC  298 173 58.1% 50% 47% Brunswick CC  102 78 76.5% 48% 37%

Caldwell CC & TI  549 242 44.1% 46% 42% Caldwell CC & TI  124 100 80.6% 72% 65%

Cape Fear CC  1,161 503 43.3% 38% 31% Cape Fear CC  135 105 77.8% 70% 79%

Carteret CC  182 77 42.3% 24% 27% Carteret CC  55 50 90.9% 79% 92%

Catawba Valley CC  620 285 46.0% 38% 37% Catawba Valley CC  107 92 86.0% 75% 68%

Central Carolina CC  1,458 782 53.6% 54% 55% Central Carolina CC  225 159 70.7% 70% 69%

Central Piedmont CC  3,920 1,953 49.8% 53% 50% Central Piedmont CC  351 287 81.8% 80% 75%

Cleveland CC  256 142 55.5% 56% 60% Cleveland CC  20 16 80.0% 87% 74%

Coastal Carolina CC  443 232 52.4% 49% 38% Coastal Carolina CC  66 55 83.3% 65% 64%

College of The Albema 438 192 43.8% 46% 48% College of The Albema 103 80 77.7% 72% 58%

Craven CC  400 197 49.3% 34% 32% Craven CC  64 61 95.3% 73% 50%

Davidson County CC  1,002 539 53.8% 52% 56% Davidson County CC  121 104 86.0% 76% 73%

Durham TCC  1,228 517 42.1% 40% 37% Durham TCC  79 63 79.7% 71% 65%

Edgecombe CC  603 389 64.5% 48% 51% Edgecombe CC  179 124 69.3% 76% 75%

Fayetteville TCC  2,264 877 38.7% 34% 33% Fayetteville TCC  98 89 90.8% 86% 83%

Forsyth TCC  1,731 919 53.1% 51% 49% Forsyth TCC  118 94 79.7% 75% 76%

Gaston College  547 221 40.4% 36% 37% Gaston College  112 94 83.9% 75% 77%

Guilford TCC  2,935 834 28.4% 30% 27% Guilford TCC  175 151 86.3% 67% 70%

Halifax CC  228 108 47.4% 45% 48% Halifax CC  181 87 48.1% 49% 55%

Haywood CC  133 62 46.6% 50% 41% Haywood CC  101 85 84.2% 77% 49%

Isothermal CC  355 160 45.1% 22% 29% Isothermal CC  72 58 80.6% 84% 69%

James Sprunt CC  136 92 67.6% 69% 58% James Sprunt CC  33 27 81.8% 81% 70%

Johnston CC  561 250 44.6% 38% 46% Johnston CC  29 16 55.2% 68% 82%

Lenoir CC  853 431 50.5% 47% 45% Lenoir CC  204 166 81.4% 66% 68%

Martin CC  254 125 49.2% 32% 38% Martin CC  57 43 75.4% 86% 67%

Mayland CC  508 203 40.0% 40% 41% Mayland CC  77 63 81.8% 80% 79%

McDowell TCC  243 103 42.4% 36% 38% McDowell TCC  56 49 87.5% 76% 71%

Mitchell CC  450 194 43.1% 41% 41% Mitchell CC  53 46 86.8% 91% 90%

Montgomery CC  200 100 50.0% 41% 43% Montgomery CC  34 32 94.1% 77% 73%

Nash CC  336 130 38.7% 26% 34% Nash CC  55 32 58.2% 66% 70%

Pamlico CC  119 57 47.9% 39% 28% Pamlico CC  16 14 87.5% 83% 53%

Piedmont CC  380 145 38.2% 38% 40% Piedmont CC  92 73 79.3% 73% 72%

Pitt CC  867 355 40.9% 43% 44% Pitt CC  98 67 68.4% 69% 68%

Randolph CC  661 175 26.5% 42% 35% Randolph CC  44 32 72.7% 69% 76%

Richmond CC  880 426 48.4% 47% 47% Richmond CC  119 95 79.8% 66% 63%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  137 25 18.2% 14% 13% Roanoke‐Chowan CC  18 10 55.6% 63% 72%

Robeson CC  1,148 520 45.3% 42% 35% Robeson CC  37 35 94.6% 96% 81%

Rockingham CC  230 92 40.0% 45% 56% Rockingham CC  58 52 89.7% 68% 77%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  1,115 367 32.9% 32% 37% Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  120 95 79.2% 71% 64%

Sampson CC  663 302 45.6% 50% 49% Sampson CC  33 29 87.9% 90% 82%

Sandhills CC  648 199 30.7% 27% 26% Sandhills CC  83 57 68.7% 63% 61%

South Piedmont CC  947 451 47.6% 47% 48% South Piedmont CC  159 115 72.3% 72% 75%

Southeastern CC  593 304 51.3% 45% 45% Southeastern CC  224 147 65.6% 74% 84%

Southwestern CC  278 163 58.6% 49% 51% Southwestern CC  102 84 82.4% 75% 81%

Stanly CC  362 179 49.4% 50% 43% Stanly CC  37 31 83.8% 76% 72%

Surry CC  518 218 42.1% 42% 37% Surry CC  98 91 92.9% 88% 95%

Tri‐County CC  117 37 31.6% 24% 27% Tri‐County CC  40 33 82.5% 76% 79%

Vance‐Granville CC  812 281 34.6% 44% 40% Vance‐Granville CC  196 153 78.1% 76% 74%

Wake TCC  4,206 2,063 49.0% 35% 38% Wake TCC  550 414 75.3% 68% 60%

Wayne CC  963 650 67.5% 70% 67% Wayne CC  168 135 80.4% 74% 72%

Western Piedmont CC  661 118 17.9% 23% 21% Western Piedmont CC  86 69 80.2% 76% 67%

Wilkes CC  590 280 47.5% 47% 45% Wilkes CC  64 59 92.2% 95% 91%

Wilson CC  441 226 51.2% 44% 58% Wilson CC  75 58 77.3% 71% 74%

STUDENTSCOMPLETING 

LEVELSTUDENTS PASSING

% PASSING% COMPLETING

7

Page 11: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

8

Page 12: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

C. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level English Courses  Purpose  

To ensure remedial English and reading coursework prepares students to succeed in credit‐bearing English courses 

 Description  

Percentage of previous developmental English and/or reading students who successfully complete a credit English course with a grade of “C” or better upon the first attempt.   

 Methodology  

Denominator: All students enrolling in their first credit English course during an academic year who also enrolled in a developmental English and/or reading course during the same or previous academic year.  Does not include students who do not attend the class i.e. transfer credits, credit by exam or reported grades of ‘NA’ and ‘NS’.  

Numerator: All students earning a grade of “C” or better in their first credit English course during an academic year who enrolled in a developmental English and/or reading course in the same or previous academic year. Does not include students who do not attend the class (ie transfer credit, credit by exam, etc). 

 Source  

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file 

 Details  

Denominator:  Students must meet one of the following criteria: Enrolled in their first credit English course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental English or Reading course during the previous reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college.  

OR  

Enrolled in their first credit English course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental English or Reading course during the same reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college. The student’s developmental English or Reading course semester must be equal to or precede their first credit English course.  

 

Not eligible for this measure are students who complete developmental English course by exam, placement or transfer.  

Numerator: All students from the denominator who earned a grade of “C” or better in their first credit English course during the reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer).  The first credit English course evaluated cannot be a lab section. First credit English course is based on any course with prefix “ENG” and course number greater than 099. When multiple English courses are enrolled in during the same semester, the lowest numbered course will be evaluated. 

 Excellence level: 74.9%  

Baseline level: 45.2%    

9

Page 13: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

D. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level Math Courses  Purpose  

To ensure remedial math coursework prepares students to succeed in credit‐bearing math courses 

 Description  

Percentage of previous developmental math students who successfully complete a credit math course with a “C” or better upon the first attempt. 

 Methodology  

Denominator: All students enrolling in their first credit math course during an academic year who also enrolled in a developmental math course during the same or previous academic year.  Does not include students who do not attend the class i.e. transfer credits, credit by exam or reported grades of ‘NA’ and ‘NS’.  

Numerator: All students earning a “C” or better in their first credit math course during an academic year who enrolled in a developmental math course in the same or previous academic year. Does not include students who do not attend the class (ie transfer credit, credit by exam, etc). 

 Source  

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file 

 Details  

Denominator: Students must meet one of the following criteria:  

Enrolled in their first credit Math course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental Math course during the previous reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college.  

OR  

Enrolled in their first credit Math course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental Math course during the same reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college. The student’s developmental Math course semester must be equal to or precede their first credit Math course.  

 

Not eligible for this measure are students who complete developmental Math course by exam, placement or transfer.  

Numerator: All students from the denominator who earned a grade of “C” or better in their first credit Math course during the reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer).  The first credit Math course evaluated cannot be a lab section. First credit Math course is based on any course with prefix “MAT” and course number greater than 099. When multiple Math courses are enrolled in during the same semester, the lowest numbered course will be evaluated. 

 Excellence level: 75.4%  

Baseline level: 47.5%  

    

10

Page 14: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Excellence: 74.9% Excellence: 75.4%

Baseline: 45.2% Baseline: 47.5%

13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10

System Totals  17,455 11,066 63.4% 64% 65% 65% 66% System Totals  16,315 10,275 63.0% 64% 64% 66% 66%

Alamance CC  352 230 65.3% 72% 67% 69% 71% Alamance CC  387 221 57.1% 63% 63% 63% 66%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 461 322 69.8% 63% 61% 66% 43% Asheville‐Buncombe TC 693 407 58.7% 56% 65% 62% 59%

Beaufort County CC  158 58 36.7% 69% 65% 79% 61% Beaufort County CC  132 92 69.7% 57% 51% 63% 67%

Bladen CC  85 36 42.4% 53% 52% 46% 60% Bladen CC  79 43 54.4% 51% 61% 68% 62%

Blue Ridge CC  135 89 65.9% 69% 71% 77% 82% Blue Ridge CC  133 80 60.2% 72% 78% 82% 71%

Brunswick CC  58 39 67.2% 69% 74% 76% 71% Brunswick CC  98 72 73.5% 84% 60% 68% 64%

Caldwell CC & TI  270 185 68.5% 62% 65% 64% 63% Caldwell CC & TI  277 183 66.1% 65% 72% 71% 75%

Cape Fear CC  761 479 62.9% 66% 63% 64% 67% Cape Fear CC  660 433 65.6% 60% 59% 63% 64%

Carteret CC  86 49 57.0% 69% 72% 68% 60% Carteret CC  121 85 70.2% 71% 68% 73% 69%

Catawba Valley CC  319 264 82.8% 75% 75% 69% 78% Catawba Valley CC  373 287 76.9% 62% 56% 61% 60%

Central Carolina CC  234 136 58.1% 64% 61% 61% 70% Central Carolina CC  154 126 81.8% 69% 71% 81% 76%

Central Piedmont CC  1,923 1,478 76.9% 78% 78% 79% 76% Central Piedmont CC  1,559 987 63.3% 65% 72% 71% 69%

Cleveland CC  181 121 66.9% 71% 73% 66% 76% Cleveland CC  219 144 65.8% 61% 69% 69% 73%

Coastal Carolina CC  341 251 73.6% 66% 70% 83% 70% Coastal Carolina CC  646 438 67.8% 63% 63% 81% 71%

College of The Albema 126 77 61.1% 62% 61% 68% 63% College of The Albema 177 119 67.2% 69% 75% 79% 76%

Craven CC  155 103 66.5% 60% 50% 62% 73% Craven CC  263 163 62.0% 63% 72% 74% 73%

Davidson County CC  315 218 69.2% 68% 61% 58% 62% Davidson County CC  218 130 59.6% 64% 64% 64% 67%

Durham TCC  425 238 56.0% 53% 56% 56% 60% Durham TCC  317 201 63.4% 68% 68% 66% 68%

Edgecombe CC  316 184 58.2% 63% 51% 51% 66% Edgecombe CC  275 120 43.6% 35% 43% 44% 50%

Fayetteville TCC  1,034 559 54.1% 55% 65% 63% 60% Fayetteville TCC  652 398 61.0% 54% 60% 65% 58%

Forsyth TCC  889 581 65.4% 67% 64% 66% 62% Forsyth TCC  637 368 57.8% 62% 54% 52% 50%

Gaston College  366 243 66.4% 75% 74% 71% 75% Gaston College  409 255 62.3% 72% 70% 66% 73%

Guilford TCC  1,177 623 52.9% 51% 53% 60% 67% Guilford TCC  889 541 60.9% 65% 67% 69% 59%

Halifax CC  165 122 73.9% 67% 66% 66% 64% Halifax CC  110 55 50.0% 64% 65% 68% 59%

Haywood CC  125 75 60.0% 73% 71% 65% 71% Haywood CC  129 68 52.7% 59% 69% 59% 62%

Isothermal CC  246 193 78.5% 75% 67% 69% 70% Isothermal CC  136 82 60.3% 71% 76% 68% 79%

James Sprunt CC  129 73 56.6% 65% 62% 71% 77% James Sprunt CC  109 62 56.9% 57% 57% 50% 66%

Johnston CC  285 217 76.1% 79% 80% 75% 72% Johnston CC  234 143 61.1% 66% 58% 65% 77%

Lenoir CC  175 98 56.0% 59% 50% 55% 66% Lenoir CC  119 64 53.8% 50% 43% 48% 40%

Martin CC  43 21 48.8% 66% 61% 56% 31% Martin CC  22 17 77.3% 78% 79% 69% 72%

Mayland CC  57 34 59.6% 67% 64% 63% 70% Mayland CC  61 48 78.7% 65% 69% 76% 64%

McDowell TCC  37 23 62.2% 81% 81% 75% 84% McDowell TCC  66 48 72.7% 83% 87% 89% 86%

Mitchell CC  241 149 61.8% 66% 65% 63% 63% Mitchell CC  197 125 63.5% 66% 60% 55% 63%

Montgomery CC  48 35 72.9% 73% 79% 75% 86% Montgomery CC  36 13 36.1% 36% 32% 36% 43%

Nash CC  231 131 56.7% 56% 53% 54% 51% Nash CC  343 249 72.6% 74% 72% 76% 76%

Pamlico CC  12 6 50.0% 60% 50% 73% 64% Pamlico CC  19 14 73.7% 79% 91% 75% 58%

Piedmont CC  131 83 63.4% 71% 62% 63% 69% Piedmont CC  163 102 62.6% 68% 71% 64% 73%

Pitt CC  755 484 64.1% 65% 71% 63% 61% Pitt CC  422 243 57.6% 53% 44% 53% 60%

Randolph CC  153 115 75.2% 72% 76% 75% 80% Randolph CC  297 202 68.0% 75% 66% 77% 62%

Richmond CC  220 155 70.5% 62% 66% 71% 66% Richmond CC  252 175 69.4% 64% 64% 68% 58%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  77 39 50.6% 58% 60% 50% 55% Roanoke‐Chowan CC  54 45 83.3% 80% 90% 74% 86%

Robeson CC  241 123 51.0% 53% 53% 54% 62% Robeson CC  171 93 54.4% 51% 56% 61% 65%

Rockingham CC  126 70 55.6% 57% 56% 59% 60% Rockingham CC  193 117 60.6% 65% 71% 74% 75%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  446 282 63.2% 68% 69% 64% 71% Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  339 197 58.1% 68% 67% 67% 73%

Sampson CC  113 46 40.7% 37% 50% 51% 59% Sampson CC  97 45 46.4% 41% 66% 55% 51%

Sandhills CC  338 206 60.9% 63% 62% 57% 62% Sandhills CC  246 155 63.0% 59% 55% 59% 59%

South Piedmont CC  203 113 55.7% 59% 63% 61% 67% South Piedmont CC  98 65 66.3% 61% 51% 62% 56%

Southeastern CC  90 60 66.7% 51% 55% 38% 46% Southeastern CC  54 37 68.5% 88% 75% 69% 79%

Southwestern CC  134 84 62.7% 56% 63% 63% 67% Southwestern CC  170 106 62.4% 71% 67% 59% 64%

Stanly CC  155 114 73.5% 70% 67% 75% 68% Stanly CC  271 217 80.1% 80% 72% 72% 73%

Surry CC  231 167 72.3% 66% 65% 66% 75% Surry CC  187 130 69.5% 72% 65% 66% 62%

Tri‐County CC  33 24 72.7% 73% 76% 75% 71% Tri‐County CC  67 32 47.8% 43% 39% 53% 68%

Vance‐Granville CC  260 162 62.3% 59% 59% 54% 59% Vance‐Granville CC  108 69 63.9% 55% 54% 60% 58%

Wake TCC  1,003 496 49.5% 52% 55% 55% 54% Wake TCC  1,368 829 60.6% 64% 64% 57% 62%

Wayne CC  247 157 63.6% 65% 63% 67% 63% Wayne CC  245 153 62.4% 60% 66% 65% 57%

Western Piedmont CC  189 124 65.6% 61% 66% 67% 70% Western Piedmont CC  147 106 72.1% 70% 70% 80% 76%

Wilkes CC  241 158 65.6% 70% 56% 65% 61% Wilkes CC  193 136 70.5% 76% 76% 66% 78%

Wilson CC  108 64 59.3% 63% 46% 41% 54% Wilson CC  224 140 62.5% 74% 72% 72% 72%

STUDENTS SUCCESSES% SUCCESSFUL

TABLE C. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN 

COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2013‐2014

TABLE D. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN 

COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2013‐2014

STUDENTS SUCCESSES% SUCCESSFUL

11

Page 15: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

E. First Year Progression  Purpose  

To ensure first‐year students reach an academic momentum point that helps predict future credential completion 

 Description  

Percentage of first‐time fall credential‐seeking students attempting at least twelve hours within their first academic year who successfully complete (“P”, “C” or better) at least twelve of those hours  

 Methodology  

Denominator: A fall cohort of credential‐seeking students (program code A, D, C) enrolled in curriculum courses at a college for the first time after high school graduation. Must attempt at least twelve hours (including developmental and withdraw) within the first year fall, spring, and summer semesters.  Includes those dually enrolled previously at the same institution and excludes students previously enrolled at another college. Does not include students who do not attend the class i.e. transfer credits, credit by exam or reported grades of ‘NA’ and ‘NS’.  

Numerator: Those within the cohort above who complete at least twelve hours (including developmental) with a “P”, “C” or better within the first year. 

 Source  

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file National Student Clearinghouse 

 Details  

Denominator:  Students must meet one of the following criteria:  

The fall semester is first enrollment term dating back to fall of 2001 and no previous post‐secondary enrollment as verified from the National Student Clearinghouse before the start date of the fall semester. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C 

Graduated from high school before the beginning of the fall semester. 

Attempt at least twelve hours during the first academic year (Fall, Spring, and Summer). Hours attempted include developmental hours and any class in which the student earns a standard letter grade, except for “Credit by Exam”, “Transfer”, “NA”, or “NS”. 

 

OR  

Previous dual enrollment student 

The fall semester is first post‐secondary enrollment term following high school graduation from the same college they were Dual enrolled. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C 

Attempt at least twelve hours during the first academic year (Fall, Spring, and Summer). Hours attempted include developmental hours and any class in which the student earns a standard letter grade, except for “Credit by Exam” , “Transfer” , “NA”, or “NS”. 

 

Numerator:  All students from the denominator who successfully complete with a grade of ‘P’,‘C’ or better at least twelve hours within the first year. 

 Excellence level: 74.6%  

Baseline level: 53.2% 

   

12

Page 16: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE E. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2013 COHORT

Excellence: 74.6%

Baseline: 53.2%

13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10

System Totals  38,260 31,488 21,119 67.1% 68% 68% 67% 67%

Alamance CC  773 661 488 73.8% 69% 69% 71% 52%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 808 616 442 71.8% 72% 72% 68% 61%

Beaufort County CC  321 277 151 54.5% 63% 60% 57% 58%

Bladen CC  192 171 97 56.7% 51% 54% 55% 64%

Blue Ridge CC  400 321 220 68.5% 68% 75% 83% 83%

Brunswick CC  268 237 175 73.8% 76% 72% 68% 75%

Caldwell CC & TI  521 419 295 70.4% 69% 68% 67% 72%

Cape Fear CC  1,690 1,482 1,040 70.2% 70% 72% 72% 71%

Carteret CC  246 180 117 65.0% 55% 69% 64% 63%

Catawba Valley CC  777 666 508 76.3% 69% 70% 70% 73%

Central Carolina CC  644 544 365 67.1% 68% 65% 68% 68%

Central Piedmont CC  3,364 2,563 1,789 69.8% 72% 70% 69% 67%

Cleveland CC  475 389 238 61.2% 62% 64% 63% 69%

Coastal Carolina CC  796 667 520 78.0% 74% 72% 83% 57%

College of The Albema 447 371 253 68.2% 71% 71% 66% 69%

Craven CC  447 351 257 73.2% 69% 67% 69% 71%

Davidson County CC  658 559 412 73.7% 80% 74% 71% 79%

Durham TCC  776 550 339 61.6% 62% 61% 59% 60%

Edgecombe CC  352 293 154 52.6% 58% 53% 54% 65%

Fayetteville TCC  1,907 1,502 754 50.2% 59% 59% 64% 60%

Forsyth TCC  1,471 1,218 890 73.1% 72% 69% 67% 72%

Gaston College  1,116 932 698 74.9% 73% 77% 74% 77%

Guilford TCC  2,002 1,645 1,036 63.0% 63% 65% 67% 62%

Halifax CC  239 197 121 61.4% 66% 59% 60% 60%

Haywood CC  260 212 140 66.0% 75% 69% 57% 67%

Isothermal CC  262 229 162 70.7% 68% 68% 65% 71%

James Sprunt CC  171 144 106 73.6% 69% 76% 73% 58%

Johnston CC  728 644 477 74.1% 76% 71% 75% 73%

Lenoir CC  489 414 251 60.6% 66% 66% 64% 70%

Martin CC  102 83 52 62.7% 64% 72% 50% 61%

Mayland CC  180 148 102 68.9% 63% 74% 72% 79%

McDowell TCC  150 120 80 66.7% 56% 70% 72% 67%

Mitchell CC  627 507 330 65.1% 72% 69% 67% 70%

Montgomery CC  107 91 64 70.3% 84% 76% 63% 85%

Nash CC  518 461 302 65.5% 61% 63% 65% 47%

Pamlico CC  43 30 23 76.7% 86% 61% 77% 75%

Piedmont CC  227 184 144 78.3% 75% 74% 68% 71%

Pitt CC  1,449 1,272 772 60.7% 64% 66% 64% 67%

Randolph CC  571 479 343 71.6% 70% 70% 69% 70%

Richmond CC  380 298 205 68.8% 74% 73% 74% 73%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  113 97 65 67.0% 67% 67% 70% 58%

Robeson CC  479 352 138 39.2% 47% 49% 54% 60%

Rockingham CC  434 346 230 66.5% 72% 69% 65% 64%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  1,175 988 600 60.7% 60% 62% 60% 65%

Sampson CC  206 180 127 70.6% 81% 69% 74% 76%

Sandhills CC  720 597 418 70.0% 69% 66% 70% 64%

South Piedmont CC  420 283 170 60.1% 64% 61% 65% 74%

Southeastern CC  258 228 111 48.7% 53% 60% 56% 61%

Southwestern CC  279 214 144 67.3% 73% 74% 67% 61%

Stanly CC  406 350 234 66.9% 75% 68% 64% 69%

Surry CC  553 490 375 76.5% 66% 71% 73% 73%

Tri‐County CC  141 128 92 71.9% 67% 77% 65% 68%

Vance‐Granville CC  662 485 304 62.7% 70% 64% 62% 67%

Wake TCC  3,592 2,977 2,020 67.9% 72% 67% 67% 50%

Wayne CC  708 603 422 70.0% 72% 73% 72% 71%

Western Piedmont CC  432 373 265 71.0% 75% 72% 76% 76%

Wilkes CC  504 462 350 75.8% 75% 74% 72% 69%

Wilson CC  224 208 142 68.3% 69% 66% 67% 55%

% SUCCESSFULCOHORT

12 HOURS 

ATTEMPTED

12 HOURS 

SUCCESSFULLY 

COMPLETED 

13

Page 17: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

F. Curriculum Completion  Purpose  

To ensure student completion and persistence toward a post‐secondary credential  

 Description  

Percentage of first‐time fall credential‐seeking students who graduate, transfer, or are still enrolled with 36 hours after six years  

 Methodology  

Denominator: A fall cohort of credential‐seeking students (program code A, D, C) enrolled in curriculum courses at a college for the first time after high school graduation. Includes those dually enrolled previously at the same institution and excludes students previously enrolled at another college.  

Numerator: Those within the cohort above who by the fall that occurs six years after original cohort designation either graduate (A, D, or C), transfer to a four year institution, or are still enrolled during that seventh fall semester previously completing 36 non‐developmental hours. 

 Source  

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file National Student Clearinghouse 

 Details  

Denominator:  Students must meet one of the following criteria:  

The fall semester is first enrollment term dating back to fall of 2001 and no previous post‐secondary enrollment as verified from the National Student Clearinghouse before the start date of the fall semester. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C 

Graduated from high school before the beginning of the fall semester.  

OR  

Previous dual enrollment student 

The fall semester is first post‐secondary enrollment term following high school graduation. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C  

Numerator:   All students from the denominator who achieve at least one of the following:   

Graduation‐ Graduated from a North Carolina community college credential program (A, D, C) at any point from the start of their first fall term and up till 6th fall term afterward.  

OR  

Transfer‐ Transferred into a 4‐year college as archived in the National Student Clearinghouse database on or before the 6th fall after original cohort term.   

OR  

Persistence‐ Still enrolled during the 6th fall term and successfully completing at least 36 non‐developmental credits prior to the 6th fall term. Successful credit completion is based on grades of C or better. 

 Excellence level: 45.6%  

Baseline level: 28.6%   

14

Page 18: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F. CURRICULUM COMPLETION, FALL 2008 COHORT

Excellence: 45.6%

Baseline: 28.6%

2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004

System Totals  35,465 25% 25% 25% 27% 27% 15% 15% 14% 10% 12% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 15,231 42.9% 43% 41% 39% 40%

Alamance CC  765 27% 30% 29% 27% 26% 12% 12% 9% 7% 13% 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 331 43.3% 46% 40% 37% 41%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 746 26% 32% 29% 29% 28% 12% 10% 8% 8% 11% 3% 3% 3% 2% 1% 307 41.2% 44% 40% 39% 39%

Beaufort County CC  249 27% 29% 35% 28% 28% 11% 14% 10% 12% 11% 3% 5% 3% 1% 4% 103 41.4% 48% 48% 42% 43%

Bladen CC  194 23% 20% 18% 21% 17% 13% 14% 19% 7% 13% 2% 3% 1% 2% 4% 73 37.6% 38% 38% 31% 34%

Blue Ridge CC  373 28% 25% 20% 23% 18% 16% 15% 12% 12% 12% 2% 4% 1% 2% 3% 172 46.1% 44% 33% 37% 33%

Brunswick CC  290 22% 28% 27% 24% 25% 13% 10% 13% 7% 14% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 104 35.9% 40% 40% 33% 41%

Caldwell CC & TI  600 28% 32% 30% 30% 26% 12% 13% 14% 9% 11% 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 258 43.0% 48% 46% 43% 40%

Cape Fear CC  1410 32% 28% 30% 24% 27% 16% 16% 17% 14% 14% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 705 50.0% 48% 49% 40% 43%

Carteret CC  266 26% 23% 25% 23% 27% 12% 13% 13% 9% 12% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 105 39.5% 38% 41% 35% 41%

Catawba Valley CC  863 22% 23% 25% 27% 22% 14% 12% 12% 11% 14% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 345 40.0% 38% 40% 41% 37%

Central Carolina CC  609 33% 34% 28% 28% 31% 12% 10% 8% 8% 12% 3% 1% 2% 2% 2% 291 47.8% 46% 37% 39% 45%

Central Piedmont CC  2625 18% 15% 16% 15% 15% 21% 23% 18% 19% 19% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 1077 41.0% 40% 37% 36% 35%

Cleveland CC  482 24% 24% 20% 23% 21% 11% 12% 10% 7% 8% 2% 1% 2% 3% 3% 183 38.0% 37% 33% 34% 33%

Coastal Carolina CC  896 28% 28% 26% 26% 26% 22% 22% 18% 19% 21% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 463 51.7% 51% 45% 48% 48%

College of The Albema 430 30% 31% 26% 28% 26% 17% 14% 20% 15% 15% 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% 207 48.1% 47% 47% 44% 43%

Craven CC  539 20% 21% 20% 17% 17% 18% 21% 21% 17% 23% 3% 2% 2% 5% 3% 220 40.8% 44% 43% 39% 42%

Davidson County CC  631 30% 32% 35% 36% 32% 10% 11% 11% 5% 8% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 267 42.3% 45% 50% 44% 42%

Durham TCC  584 18% 16% 15% 21% 17% 17% 21% 21% 16% 18% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 213 36.5% 39% 38% 39% 37%

Edgecombe CC  286 22% 28% 16% 15% 19% 16% 15% 12% 13% 13% 2% 3% 3% 2% 3% 117 40.9% 47% 31% 31% 34%

Fayetteville TCC  1434 16% 16% 18% 19% 17% 20% 18% 19% 14% 18% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 547 38.1% 37% 38% 37% 37%

Forsyth TCC  1330 26% 26% 25% 24% 20% 14% 16% 15% 14% 14% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 553 41.6% 45% 42% 41% 37%

Gaston College  1061 26% 24% 22% 21% 25% 13% 11% 13% 10% 9% 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 455 42.9% 38% 37% 35% 37%

Guilford TCC  2119 23% 22% 24% 21% 20% 19% 19% 16% 12% 16% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 932 44.0% 43% 43% 35% 38%

Halifax CC  256 30% 27% 21% 20% 21% 16% 17% 15% 9% 10% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 124 48.4% 46% 39% 32% 33%

Haywood CC  276 35% 41% 29% 36% 28% 7% 9% 8% 6% 8% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 121 43.8% 52% 38% 43% 39%

Isothermal CC  321 28% 25% 27% 27% 24% 13% 13% 11% 8% 10% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 140 43.6% 39% 39% 37% 35%

James Sprunt CC  188 37% 39% 37% 44% 42% 9% 9% 8% 5% 10% 1% 3% 3% 1% 2% 89 47.3% 50% 48% 49% 53%

Johnston CC  682 34% 32% 33% 38% 42% 12% 13% 8% 8% 10% 1% 3% 3% 2% 2% 328 48.1% 48% 44% 48% 54%

Lenoir CC  446 27% 30% 27% 28% 27% 15% 12% 13% 13% 14% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 204 45.7% 46% 43% 42% 45%

Martin CC  108 26% 27% 21% 19% 23% 14% 16% 18% 10% 10% 2% 3% 5% 4% 3% 45 41.7% 47% 44% 31% 36%

Mayland CC  230 44% 48% 42% 31% 34% 9% 6% 6% 6% 5% 0% 1% 1% 1% 2% 123 53.5% 54% 49% 37% 41%

McDowell TCC  242 29% 27% 26% 31% 38% 8% 7% 7% 4% 6% 4% 1% 3% 4% 1% 98 40.5% 36% 36% 39% 45%

Mitchell CC  551 29% 23% 17% 22% 27% 13% 16% 14% 11% 16% 3% 2% 2% 3% 3% 245 44.5% 42% 33% 37% 46%

Montgomery CC  146 45% 36% 44% 40% 32% 8% 5% 5% 5% 4% 0% 4% 1% 2% 3% 76 52.1% 44% 50% 46% 40%

Nash CC  430 26% 26% 18% 20% 21% 12% 13% 9% 12% 16% 4% 5% 3% 4% 1% 181 42.1% 44% 29% 37% 37%

Pamlico CC  62 47% 43% 57% 55% 64% 6% 8% 4% 7% 1% 3% 4% 0% 0% 0% 35 56.5% 55% 61% 62% 65%

Piedmont CC  327 26% 32% 36% 40% 41% 10% 15% 7% 5% 7% 2% 0% 4% 2% 2% 127 38.8% 47% 47% 46% 50%

Pitt CC  1115 26% 26% 25% 28% 26% 15% 15% 17% 15% 15% 3% 5% 4% 5% 3% 485 43.5% 46% 46% 48% 44%

Randolph CC  428 25% 28% 31% 26% 25% 11% 11% 9% 5% 15% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 168 39.3% 42% 42% 34% 41%

Richmond CC  328 23% 26% 20% 22% 22% 14% 14% 13% 11% 13% 3% 2% 2% 4% 1% 129 39.3% 43% 35% 37% 37%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  125 26% 25% 34% 25% 20% 16% 16% 12% 12% 13% 3% 1% 2% 2% 1% 56 44.8% 42% 48% 39% 35%

Robeson CC  450 22% 24% 23% 22% 25% 10% 11% 12% 10% 11% 3% 4% 3% 2% 3% 157 34.9% 39% 38% 34% 39%

Rockingham CC  420 25% 29% 33% 23% 32% 12% 11% 12% 11% 9% 2% 3% 3% 2% 5% 162 38.6% 43% 48% 36% 46%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  1126 25% 22% 21% 20% 20% 14% 13% 11% 11% 11% 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% 458 40.7% 37% 35% 34% 34%

Sampson CC  208 29% 29% 23% 29% 27% 14% 14% 13% 13% 8% 2% 4% 3% 4% 3% 94 45.2% 47% 39% 45% 38%

Sandhills CC  760 24% 23% 23% 22% 24% 14% 15% 15% 14% 13% 2% 4% 1% 5% 4% 309 40.7% 42% 39% 39% 41%

South Piedmont CC  458 29% 27% 32% 24% 20% 12% 13% 12% 7% 12% 2% 1% 3% 3% 3% 199 43.4% 41% 47% 32% 36%

Southeastern CC  311 24% 24% 28% 26% 26% 14% 19% 11% 7% 13% 2% 2% 3% 2% 4% 125 40.2% 44% 42% 35% 43%

Southwestern CC  314 32% 36% 35% 36% 35% 9% 7% 9% 8% 8% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 135 43.0% 44% 47% 46% 44%

Stanly CC  465 34% 28% 36% 38% 39% 12% 9% 8% 8% 7% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 225 48.4% 39% 46% 47% 46%

Surry CC  475 32% 31% 31% 26% 27% 13% 14% 11% 10% 12% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 225 47.4% 47% 44% 39% 42%

Tri‐County CC  146 32% 24% 22% 27% 24% 8% 6% 7% 9% 13% 0% 3% 3% 1% 1% 58 39.7% 33% 33% 36% 38%

Vance‐Granville CC  793 25% 23% 22% 21% 21% 13% 12% 11% 11% 8% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 316 39.8% 37% 34% 34% 32%

Wake TCC  2669 18% 18% 16% 18% 18% 19% 21% 20% 16% 19% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% 1077 40.4% 42% 39% 38% 40%

Wayne CC  627 31% 30% 27% 26% 26% 19% 18% 19% 18% 16% 2% 3% 3% 2% 1% 328 52.3% 51% 49% 46% 44%

Western Piedmont CC  433 39% 35% 34% 32% 32% 9% 10% 9% 6% 9% 2% 4% 3% 3% 2% 216 49.9% 49% 46% 41% 43%

Wilkes CC  546 28% 29% 30% 29% 32% 16% 10% 12% 6% 11% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 250 45.8% 41% 44% 37% 44%

Wilson CC  221 28% 23% 27% 25% 24% 14% 15% 10% 10% 11% 1% 3% 3% 2% 2% 95 43.0% 41% 40% 37% 37%

% TRANSFER, NOT 

GRADUATE

% GRADUATE, TRANSFER, OR 

RETAINED

COHORT

% GRADUATE% RETAINED, NOT GRADUATE 

OR TRANSFERGRAD 

TRAN 

RET

15

Page 19: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

G. Licensure and Certification Passing Rate  Purpose  

To ensure programmatic coursework prepares students to competently practice in their chosen profession 

 Description  

Aggregate institutional passing rate of first time test‐takers on licensure and certification exams.  Exams included in this measure are state mandated exams which candidates must pass before becoming active practitioners.   

 Methodology  

Denominator: All licensure and certification exams taken for the first time during the licensure agency’s most recent reporting year.  Only includes state mandated exams which candidates must pass before becoming active practitioners.  

Numerator: Licensure and certification exams passed on first attempt during the licensure agency’s most recent reporting year.   

 Source  

American Registry of Radiologic Technologists Nuclear Medicine Technology Exam Radiation Therapy Exam Radiography Exam  

Council of Interstate Testing Dental Hygiene Exam  

Federal Aviation Administration Airframe Exam General Exam Power Plant Exam  

NC Board of Cosmetic Art Examiners Apprentice Exam Cosmetology Exam Cosmetology Instructor Exam Esthetician Exam Manicurist Exam 

NC Board of Massage & Bodywork TherapyMassage & Body Work Therapist  

NC Board of Nursing Practical Nursing Exam Registered Nursing Exam  

NC Board of Opticians Opticianry Exam  

NC Board of Physical Therapy Examiners Physical Therapist Assistant Exam  

NC Department of Justice, Criminal Justice Standards Division Basic Law Enforcement Training (BLET) Exam 

NC Department of Justice Sheriff’s Standards Division Detention Officer  

NC Office of Emergency Medical Services EMT Exam EMTI‐I Exam EMT‐P Exam  

NC Real Estate Commission Provisional Real Estate Broker  

NC Veterinary Medical Board Veterinary Medicine Technology Exam 

 

 Details  

The number of first‐time test‐takers and the number passing were provided to the System Office by agencies issuing the license or certification and validated by the colleges. Depending on the exam, data may be provided on a fiscal or calendar year. Exams include Aviation‐General, Aviation‐Airframe, Aviation ‐ Power Plant, BLET, Real Estate Sales, Cosmetic Arts‐Apprentice, Cosmetology, Esthetician, Cosmetic Arts‐Instructor, Manicurist, Dental Hygiene, Opticianry, Nuclear Medical Technician, Radiation Therapy, Radiography, Physical Therapist Assistant, 

Practical Nursing, Registered Nursing, Veterinary Medical Technician, EMT, EMT‐I, EMT‐P, Massage & Body Work Therapist, and Detention Officer. 

 Excellence level: 91.7%  

Baseline level: 71.0%  

   

16

Page 20: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014

Excellence: 91.7%

Baseline: 71.0%13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10

System Totals  11,713 9,906 84.6% 85% 86% 87% 86%

Alamance CC  235 188 80.0% 82% 80% 76% 88%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 413 354 85.7% 87% 90% 95% 89%

Beaufort County CC  119 106 89.1% 85% 77% 71% 86%

Bladen CC  92 72 78.3% 69% 72% 76% 81%

Blue Ridge CC  168 139 82.7% 87% 92% 91% 81%

Brunswick CC  143 117 81.8% 78% 85% 83% 91%

Caldwell CC & TI  250 198 79.2% 78% 83% 82% 85%

Cape Fear CC  442 410 92.8% 91% 90% 91% 96%

Carteret CC  134 107 79.9% 84% 78% 80% 83%

Catawba Valley CC  198 162 81.8% 80% 85% 83% 77%

Central Carolina CC  296 277 93.6% 86% 85% 85% 83%

Central Piedmont CC  424 370 87.3% 91% 92% 84% 92%

Cleveland CC  166 141 84.9% 87% 88% 87% 80%

Coastal Carolina CC  268 244 91.0% 91% 94% 92% 94%

College of The Albema 131 119 90.8% 89% 83% 89% 74%

Craven CC  256 192 75.0% 80% 86% 90% 88%

Davidson County CC  192 167 87.0% 89% 92% 88% 92%

Durham TCC  295 260 88.1% 87% 91% 96% 89%

Edgecombe CC  117 102 87.2% 78% 86% 90% 86%

Fayetteville TCC  554 481 86.8% 88% 91% 92% 96%

Forsyth TCC  358 320 89.4% 93% 93% 94% 92%

Gaston College  312 289 92.6% 91% 93% 93% 88%

Guilford TCC  512 440 85.9% 87% 88% 92% 94%

Halifax CC  88 70 79.5% 83% 86% 78% 76%

Haywood CC  113 78 69.0% 79% 77% 86% 79%

Isothermal CC  175 152 86.9% 81% 76% 77% 77%

James Sprunt CC  88 71 80.7% 84% 81% 79% 88%

Johnston CC  261 215 82.4% 82% 84% 88% 81%

Lenoir CC  480 373 77.7% 77% 80% 78% 84%

Martin CC  42 29 69.0% 64% 69% 74% 71%

Mayland CC  109 84 77.1% 77% 81% 83% 85%

McDowell TCC  114 102 89.5% 90% 90% 88% 92%

Mitchell CC  159 129 81.1% 87% 90% 85% 84%

Montgomery CC  8 8 100.0% 89% 94% 85% 83%

Nash CC  202 157 77.7% 73% 75% 83% 77%

Pamlico CC  13 12 92.3% 81% 100% 90% 46%

Piedmont CC  68 45 66.2% 73% 75% 78% 76%

Pitt CC  300 256 85.3% 87% 91% 90% 85%

Randolph CC  176 142 80.7% 82% 86% 83% 87%

Richmond CC  65 47 72.3% 67% 83% 91% 97%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  76 57 75.0% 74% 75% 86% 72%

Robeson CC  151 124 82.1% 90% 78% 78% 72%

Rockingham CC  133 99 74.4% 68% 79% 82% 84%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  380 314 82.6% 84% 79% 82% 85%

Sampson CC  92 81 88.0% 85% 80% 79% 85%

Sandhills CC  246 216 87.8% 87% 93% 84% 89%

South Piedmont CC  132 103 78.0% 85% 83% 86% 86%

Southeastern CC  114 89 78.1% 75% 75% 80% 82%

Southwestern CC  133 118 88.7% 92% 92% 95% 95%

Stanly CC  184 148 80.4% 88% 87% 86% 89%

Surry CC  172 154 89.5% 92% 97% 92% 93%

Tri‐County CC  81 55 67.9% 80% 88% 87% 70%

Vance‐Granville CC  182 147 80.8% 88% 92% 90% 87%

Wake TCC  451 414 91.8% 91% 92% 94% 91%

Wayne CC  246 214 87.0% 83% 80% 80% 74%

Western Piedmont CC  103 89 86.4% 94% 95% 92% 84%

Wilkes CC  188 161 85.6% 86% 81% 86% 85%

Wilson CC  113 98 86.7% 72% 82% 75% 89%

NUMBER OF TEST 

TAKERSNUMBER PASSING

AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASSING RATE

17

Page 21: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

H. College Transfer Performance  Purpose  

To ensure the academic success of community college students at a four‐year university or college  

Description  

Among community college associate degree completers and those who have completed 30 or more credit hours who transfer to a four‐year university or college, the percentage who earn a GPA of 2.00 or better after two consecutive semesters within the academic year at the transfer institution.   

Methodology  

Denominator: Students with an associate degree or at least 30 articulated transfer credits enrolled during the fall and spring semesters at a four‐year institution who were enrolled at a community college during the previous academic year.  Only includes North Carolina based four‐year institutions and four‐year institutions which the individual community college has an articulated transfer agreement.  

Numerator: Students included in the denominator who have earned a GPA of 2.00 or better aggregated over the fall and spring semesters at the transfer institution.  

Note: Community colleges are allowed to supplement data with results from out of state institutions which they have articulation agreements.  

Source  

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file National Student Clearinghouse UNC‐General Administration Participating NC independent colleges and universities including Barton College, Belmont Abbey College, Brevard College, Campbell University, Catawba College, Chowan University, Elon University, Gardner‐Webb University, Greensboro College, Guilford College, Mars Hill College, Meredith College, Methodist University, Montreat College, N.C. Wesleyan College, Pfeiffer University, Queens University of Charlotte, Salem College, and Shaw University 

 

Details  

UNC‐GA matched the records of community college students receiving an associate degree during the academic year or accumulating at least 30 articulated college transfer credit hours against subsequent fall and spring UNC system student records to determine transfer enrollment at a North Carolina public university and first year academic performance.  UNCGA provided aggregate totals of transfer students who did or did not attain GPAs equal or greater than 2.00 in their first academic year.    

Additional lists of students based on National Student Clearinghouse matches were sent to participating independent colleges and universities.  These colleges and universities returned files identifying whether or not students attained GPAs equal or greater than 2.00 in their first academic year.  

Data from these sources were combined to determine the overall percentage of transfers with a GPA equal or greater than 2.00 after two semesters.    

Excellence level: 93.8%  

Baseline level: 71.2%  

18

Page 22: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE H. COLLEGE TRANSFER PERFORMANCE, 2012‐2013 COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS

Excellence: 93.8%

Baseline: 71.2%Students % ≥ 2.00 Students % ≥ 2.00 Students # ≥ 2.00 % ≥ 2.00 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  5,090 87% 4,669 90% 9,759 8,617 88.3% 88% 88% 87% 87%

Alamance CC  75 87% 77 92% 152 136 89.5% 88% 91% 93% 85%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 200 89% 181 96% 381 351 92.1% 93% 95% 92% 95%

Beaufort County CC  28 89% 41 93% 69 63 91.3% 91% 93% 98% 92%

Bladen CC  34 71% 10 80% 44 32 72.7% 73% 80% 78% 66%

Blue Ridge CC  47 91% 36 86% 83 74 89.2% 91% 99% 93% 95%

Brunswick CC  48 83% 38 82% 86 71 82.6% 86% 88% 92% 82%

Caldwell CC & TI  93 80% 128 88% 221 186 84.2% 85% 88% 89% 92%

Cape Fear CC  253 85% 306 85% 559 475 85.0% 87% 86% 89% 85%

Carteret CC  21 100% 41 83% 62 55 88.7% 89% 85% 87% 92%

Catawba Valley CC  117 88% 137 94% 254 232 91.3% 90% 94% 88% 94%

Central Carolina CC  52 77% 64 86% 116 95 81.9% 92% 91% 95% 86%

Central Piedmont CC  651 84% 480 92% 1,131 990 87.5% 85% 87% 86% 89%

Cleveland CC  67 91% 49 90% 116 105 90.5% 90% 84% 77% 86%

Coastal Carolina CC  105 96% 80 94% 185 176 95.1% 92% 90% 87% 90%

College of The Albema 59 86% 59 100% 118 110 93.2% 84% 87% 90% 93%

Craven CC  41 88% 55 93% 96 87 90.6% 89% 91% 80% 91%

Davidson County CC  86 84% 97 93% 183 162 88.5% 88% 89% 84% 92%

Durham TCC  112 89% 84 94% 196 179 91.3% 90% 94% 96% 89%

Edgecombe CC  26 92% 21 95% 47 44 93.6% 86% 94% 76% 71%

Fayetteville TCC  162 88% 150 93% 312 282 90.4% 88% 88% 90% 86%

Forsyth TCC  196 90% 157 91% 353 320 90.7% 89% 89% 85% 90%

Gaston College  125 83% 113 85% 238 200 84.0% 85% 85% 76% 83%

Guilford TCC  295 85% 238 89% 533 463 86.9% 86% 85% 92% 85%

Halifax CC  14 79% 11 100% 25 22 88.0% 91% 70% 76% 83%

Haywood CC  21 95% 22 77% 43 37 86.0% 87% 97% 88% 92%

Isothermal CC  61 93% 31 84% 92 83 90.2% 94% 90% 82% 82%

James Sprunt CC  24 88% 16 81% 40 34 85.0% 85% 95% 84% 89%

Johnston CC  105 84% 83 83% 188 157 83.5% 87% 83% 83% 84%

Lenoir CC  53 92% 55 85% 108 96 88.9% 87% 89% 85% 82%

Martin CC  8 75% 4 * 12 10 83.3% 60% 100% * 80%

Mayland CC  7 57% 12 100% 19 16 84.2% 96% 88% 100% 82%

McDowell TCC  15 93% 16 75% 31 26 83.9% 79% 83% 82% 89%

Mitchell CC  93 85% 72 94% 165 147 89.1% 88% 88% 82% 86%

Montgomery CC  2 * 12 75% 14 11 78.6% 100% 93% 71% 80%

Nash CC  60 82% 53 98% 113 101 89.4% 90% 85% 86% 91%

Pamlico CC  6 100% 3 * 9 9 100.0% 100% 80% * *

Piedmont CC  33 91% 18 83% 51 45 88.2% 75% 74% 91% 65%

Pitt CC  229 86% 142 84% 371 316 85.2% 87% 89% 89% 84%

Randolph CC  49 80% 62 90% 111 95 85.6% 93% 82% 93% 91%

Richmond CC  22 77% 50 80% 72 57 79.2% 91% 95% 74% 95%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  11 100% 17 82% 28 25 89.3% 94% * 60% 100%

Robeson CC  34 91% 35 97% 69 65 94.2% 86% 71% 90% 82%

Rockingham CC  28 89% 40 90% 68 61 89.7% 83% 96% 90% 87%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  114 83% 142 88% 256 220 85.9% 87% 84% 62% 79%

Sampson CC  41 66% 28 93% 69 53 76.8% 77% 76% 80% 95%

Sandhills CC  76 87% 96 93% 172 155 90.1% 84% 88% 89% 86%

South Piedmont CC  20 85% 46 96% 66 61 92.4% 93% 88% 85% 92%

Southeastern CC  35 77% 24 79% 59 46 78.0% 88% 84% 78% 70%

Southwestern CC  32 94% 88 97% 120 115 95.8% 91% 94% 96% 93%

Stanly CC  41 90% 56 89% 97 87 89.7% 90% 90% 96% 93%

Surry CC  44 93% 63 92% 107 99 92.5% 89% 85% 92% 91%

Tri‐County CC  19 89% 27 89% 46 41 89.1% 92% 78% 82% 86%

Vance‐Granville CC  57 84% 61 92% 118 104 88.1% 83% 90% 95% 88%

Wake TCC  661 89% 389 96% 1,050 961 91.5% 90% 92% 92% 91%

Wayne CC  58 90% 87 82% 145 123 84.8% 90% 83% 88% 87%

Western Piedmont CC  62 84% 85 87% 147 126 85.7% 86% 85% 84% 85%

Wilkes CC  46 83% 54 91% 100 87 87.0% 84% 90% 86% 90%

Wilson CC  16 88% 27 89% 43 38 88.4% 97% 90% 79% 89%

*Less than 5 ('11,'12,'13), Less than 10 ('09,'10)

2012‐2013 TOTALASSOC DEGREE RECIPENT30 OR MORE  HOURS % ≥ 2.00

19

Page 23: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

20

Page 24: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Appendix – Additional Performance Measure Tables 

21

Page 25: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE A1. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL

Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress

System Totals  4,709 19% 4,851 50% 8,534 54% 9,354 47% 3,847 44%

Alamance CC  68 43% 147 33% 241 42% 142 23% 50 34%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 151 11% 51 61% 135 69% 172 66% 54 63%

Beaufort County CC  25 36% 43 30% 80 56% 61 51% 13 15%

Bladen CC  14 29% 29 62% 34 53% 24 67% 72 74%

Blue Ridge CC  59 8% 20 65% 58 71% 60 62% 27 26%

Brunswick CC  133 23% 23 87% 32 88% 19 79% 65 94%

Caldwell CC & TI  128 18% 53 70% 113 65% 125 50% 67 37%

Cape Fear CC  146 20% 92 42% 134 45% 369 55% 168 55%

Carteret CC  27 15% 39 36% 39 41% 49 53% 13 77%

Catawba Valley CC  78 12% 89 58% 110 69% 130 55% 31 39%

Central Carolina CC  146 21% 150 59% 232 63% 238 66% 188 60%

Central Piedmont CC  188 13% 241 50% 698 62% 558 63% 297 57%

Cleveland CC  15 33% 47 51% 58 53% 76 58% 41 63%

Coastal Carolina CC  17 41% 65 58% 133 59% 149 45% 45 53%

College of The Albema 45 27% 59 42% 130 53% 125 49% 62 31%

Craven CC  28 61% 68 46% 108 57% 102 47% 20 35%

Davidson County CC  72 35% 171 58% 269 60% 266 50% 98 56%

Durham TCC  66 23% 145 41% 170 45% 178 35% 52 15%

Edgecombe CC  70 16% 91 71% 171 77% 182 70% 58 55%

Fayetteville TCC  168 13% 249 39% 356 40% 667 43% 285 52%

Forsyth TCC  199 11% 154 60% 341 77% 498 56% 126 44%

Gaston College  12 50% 80 39% 131 37% 114 38% 76 46%

Guilford TCC  275 13% 303 34% 415 35% 422 37% 110 10%

Halifax CC  14 14% 22 41% 40 53% 55 62% 77 32%

Haywood CC  31 6% 8 25% 27 74% 29 66% 13 69%

Isothermal CC  76 33% 41 73% 83 41% 74 38% 37 62%

James Sprunt CC  9 78% 11 64% 23 87% 36 64% 24 42%

Johnston CC  26 73% 94 50% 137 45% 111 36% 23 17%

Lenoir CC  88 19% 157 55% 214 64% 169 63% 81 31%

Martin CC  47 36% 35 69% 57 51% 89 49% 21 43%

Mayland CC  98 20% 57 65% 86 66% 189 26% 43 40%

McDowell TCC  65 20% 20 60% 35 54% 60 50% 26 27%

Mitchell CC  110 11% 41 49% 84 54% 58 36% 21 48%

Montgomery CC  24 17% 13 38% 31 65% 55 58% 13 46%

Nash CC  58 9% 48 38% 85 60% 66 36% 23 9%

Pamlico CC  17 53% 31 48% 27 56% 27 44% 7 29%

Piedmont CC  23 48% 46 63% 74 43% 164 38% 49 14%

Pitt CC  93 29% 83 57% 223 49% 228 36% 49 39%

Randolph CC  86 17% 96 36% 136 36% 99 25% 30 23%

Richmond CC  79 41% 145 47% 239 53% 233 48% 53 32%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  25 4% 26 27% 44 25% 32 9% 9 22%

Robeson CC  148 22% 139 55% 289 56% 263 52% 79 32%

Rockingham CC  5 60% 31 52% 79 44% 77 30% 14 50%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  45 20% 93 37% 230 36% 211 20% 55 13%

Sampson CC  110 18% 138 62% 143 59% 141 49% 13 38%

Sandhills CC  160 19% 44 48% 74 54% 189 25% 63 24%

South Piedmont CC  45 38% 131 44% 163 55% 159 55% 71 20%

Southeastern CC  101 12% 54 56% 125 64% 167 63% 136 52%

Southwestern CC  38 26% 18 89% 35 77% 86 62% 39 62%

Stanly CC  22 32% 55 49% 54 65% 92 64% 71 48%

Surry CC  70 10% 68 53% 106 45% 117 31% 38 45%

Tri‐County CC  53 2% 11 55% 18 83% 18 61% 9 33%

Vance‐Granville CC  93 12% 148 33% 218 42% 228 40% 74 26%

Wake TCC  201 17% 273 56% 669 47% 562 35% 260 26%

Wayne CC  38 87% 115 70% 179 72% 234 76% 163 67%

Western Piedmont CC  274 3% 26 23% 106 26% 81 25% 43 60%

Wilkes CC  122 19% 71 58% 111 59% 139 42% 58 43%

Wilson CC  85 13% 53 83% 102 73% 90 46% 44 55%

ADULT BASIC AND SECONDARY EDUCATION

BEGINNING ABE LITERACYBEGINNING BASIC 

EDUCATION

LOW INTERMEDIATE 

BASIC EDUCATION

HIGH INTERMEDIATE 

BASIC EDUCATION

LOW ADULT SECONDARY 

EDUCATION

22

Page 26: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE A2. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL

Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress

System Totals  1,584 47% 1,127 61% 2,140 59% 3,026 49% 2,476 45% 2,163 16%

Alamance CC  15 60% 150 37% 48 60% 27 63% 49 22% 1 *

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 9 89% 33 88% 54 72% 73 59% 68 54% 44 14%

Beaufort County CC  . . 1 * 2 * 1 * 4 * 2 *

Bladen CC  . . . . 2 * 9 33% 2 * 1 *

Blue Ridge CC  2 * 10 60% 26 46% 33 21% 42 26% 40 0%

Brunswick CC  1 * 1 * 4 * 5 100% 8 100% 4 *

Caldwell CC & TI  2 * 5 60% 10 40% 14 50% 15 40% 16 0%

Cape Fear CC  9 0% 10 50% 49 61% 55 47% 57 26% 50 10%

Carteret CC  . . 9 67% 2 * 2 * 2 * . .

Catawba Valley CC  7 43% 11 82% 25 52% 52 37% 44 41% 43 7%

Central Carolina CC  31 45% 36 61% 70 71% 119 66% 128 47% 119 20%

Central Piedmont CC  206 40% 147 69% 363 56% 448 48% 341 48% 391 24%

Cleveland CC  . . . . 4 * 3 * 2 * 6 50%

Coastal Carolina CC  1 * 1 * 2 * 9 56% 8 63% 13 46%

College of The Albema . . . . 1 * 2 * 6 50% 6 17%

Craven CC  7 100% 3 * 12 50% 18 39% 19 53% 15 0%

Davidson County CC  3 * 6 100% 20 75% 38 55% 35 54% 24 13%

Durham TCC  34 88% 46 76% 97 68% 162 53% 131 45% 118 16%

Edgecombe CC  2 * 7 100% 10 70% 7 86% . . . .

Fayetteville TCC  14 50% 30 60% 91 48% 117 43% 127 38% 125 14%

Forsyth TCC  21 62% 23 78% 99 61% 153 45% 74 57% 22 5%

Gaston College  . . 3 * 18 72% 34 68% 28 64% 28 4%

Guilford TCC  226 27% 131 45% 256 37% 293 31% 252 25% 197 8%

Halifax CC  . . 10 80% 6 100% 1 * 2 * 1 *

Haywood CC  1 * 2 * 3 * 9 44% 5 20% 5 0%

Isothermal CC  2 * 2 * 7 86% 12 67% 14 36% 7 14%

James Sprunt CC  2 * . . 2 * 9 100% 10 100% 10 20%

Johnston CC  3 * 7 43% 41 56% 68 37% 34 50% 15 47%

Lenoir CC  17 35% 14 50% 26 54% 34 62% 21 43% 23 0%

Martin CC  . . . . . . 2 * 2 * 1 *

Mayland CC  1 * 3 * 5 80% 9 56% 6 83% 11 36%

McDowell TCC  . . 2 * 10 70% 17 59% 4 * 4 *

Mitchell CC  3 * 7 86% 17 88% 34 76% 31 68% 41 37%

Montgomery CC  4 * 3 * 16 75% 19 63% 11 45% 9 11%

Nash CC  3 * 4 * 5 80% 20 60% 11 73% 8 0%

Pamlico CC  . . . . 1 * 1 * 2 * 1 *

Piedmont CC  . . 6 33% 5 0% 4 * 7 14% 2 *

Pitt CC  5 80% 7 71% 23 65% 47 32% 52 44% 56 13%

Randolph CC  82 30% 28 25% 39 23% 30 10% 15 0% 19 0%

Richmond CC  1 * 7 86% 30 90% 48 52% 18 44% 25 12%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  . . . . . . 1 * . . . .

Robeson CC  18 56% 18 56% 52 48% 92 36% 27 30% 23 17%

Rockingham CC  . . 1 * 2 * 7 43% 9 22% 5 0%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  24 71% 53 68% 78 63% 129 47% 89 33% 36 0%

Sampson CC  2 * 8 75% 28 36% 36 28% 30 33% 14 14%

Sandhills CC  . . 7 57% 21 57% 26 46% 26 31% 33 24%

South Piedmont CC  3 * 14 64% 52 63% 97 67% 108 50% 93 27%

Southeastern CC  . . . . 3 * 4 * 1 * 2 *

Southwestern CC  2 * 3 * 7 100% 18 61% 19 47% 13 8%

Stanly CC  3 * 7 71% 3 * 26 12% 9 44% 18 22%

Surry CC  4 * 15 93% 26 62% 32 59% 23 61% 17 59%

Tri‐County CC  . . 1 * 2 * . . 4 * 1 *

Vance‐Granville CC  9 44% 30 30% 6 67% 4 * 1 * . .

Wake TCC  785 53% 168 68% 228 72% 379 63% 353 60% 321 49%

Wayne CC  11 82% 12 83% 69 78% 60 38% 42 45% 40 15%

Western Piedmont CC  5 40% 11 45% 25 36% 25 32% 20 25% 24 4%

Wilkes CC  2 * 12 100% 29 86% 23 78% 13 62% 9 44%

Wilson CC  2 * 2 * 8 88% 29 52% 15 27% 11 36%

* Less than 5 students

ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE

LOW INTERMEDIATE 

ESLADVANCED ESL

BEGINNING ESL 

LITERACYHIGH BEGINNING ESL

HIGH INTERMEDIATE 

ESLLOW BEGINNING ESL

23

Page 27: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

24

Page 28: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE B1. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL

Students Passing 12‐13 11‐12 Students Passing 12‐13 11‐12

System Totals  3870 75% 68% 66% 2371 83% 78% 74%

Alamance CC  58 67% 81% 70% 23 83% 79% 76%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 143 75% 41% 61% 141 84% 61% 50%

Beaufort County CC  22 64% 64% 71% 9 78% 43% 100%

Bladen CC  17 65% 59% 39% 31 90% 69% 79%

Blue Ridge CC  40 85% 54% 58% 54 93% 76% 77%

Brunswick CC  64 70% 39% 38% 38 87% 71% 33%

Caldwell CC & TI  73 78% 68% 61% 51 84% 79% 72%

Cape Fear CC  94 74% 67% 74% 41 85% 75% 89%

Carteret CC  39 90% 70% 91% 16 94% 87% 93%

Catawba Valley CC  56 82% 73% 62% 51 90% 76% 71%

Central Carolina CC  139 73% 65% 66% 86 66% 78% 74%

Central Piedmont CC  216 77% 77% 61% 135 89% 82% 86%

Cleveland CC  10 90% 78% 50% 10 70% 100% 92%

Coastal Carolina CC  42 86% 59% 53% 24 79% 76% 81%

College of The Albema 75 71% 71% 58% 28 96% 73% 59%

Craven CC  33 94% 60% 30% 31 97% 83% 76%

Davidson County CC  83 88% 72% 69% 38 82% 82% 81%

Durham TCC  53 77% 60% 55% 26 85% 86% 75%

Edgecombe CC  142 66% 77% 77% 37 81% 69% 67%

Fayetteville TCC  70 91% 83% 79% 28 89% 90% 88%

Forsyth TCC  73 82% 73% 73% 45 76% 78% 81%

Gaston College  72 78% 75% 69% 40 95% 77% 85%

Guilford TCC  110 82% 58% 64% 65 94% 77% 77%

Halifax CC  119 47% 42% 55% 62 50% 59% 56%

Haywood CC  41 78% 81% 38% 60 88% 71% 82%

Isothermal CC  44 82% 81% 61% 28 79% 88% 84%

James Sprunt CC  29 79% 88% 69% 4 * 50% *

Johnston CC  14 43% 66% 77% 15 67% 76% 91%

Lenoir CC  132 83% 64% 64% 72 79% 71% 77%

Martin CC  45 76% 90% 68% 12 75% 73% 64%

Mayland CC  62 82% 77% 79% 15 80% 91% 77%

McDowell TCC  47 85% 74% 67% 9 100% 85% 81%

Mitchell CC  33 79% 89% 89% 20 100% 94% 93%

Montgomery CC  24 96% 76% 72% 10 90% 81% 75%

Nash CC  36 50% 58% 71% 19 74% 83% 68%

Pamlico CC  5 80% 78% 55% 11 91% 100% *

Piedmont CC  69 74% 71% 72% 23 96% 82% 72%

Pitt CC  56 66% 61% 64% 42 71% 82% 75%

Randolph CC  34 74% 63% 75% 10 70% 84% 77%

Richmond CC  76 80% 62% 61% 43 79% 70% 65%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  10 60% 65% 64% 8 50% 62% 86%

Robeson CC  24 100% 94% 76% 13 85% 100% 87%

Rockingham CC  35 86% 67% 75% 23 96% 75% 81%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  69 75% 63% 58% 51 84% 80% 73%

Sampson CC  16 81% 90% 76% 17 94% 90% 89%

Sandhills CC  68 62% 58% 64% 15 100% 70% 56%

South Piedmont CC  95 74% 69% 76% 64 70% 79% 73%

Southeastern CC  95 58% 74% 86% 129 71% 74% 81%

Southwestern CC  60 82% 72% 80% 42 83% 83% 84%

Stanly CC  19 84% 72% 73% 18 83% 82% 70%

Surry CC  76 93% 83% 94% 22 91% 95% 95%

Tri‐County CC  21 71% 71% 76% 19 95% 82% 86%

Vance‐Granville CC  138 77% 74% 69% 58 81% 81% 85%

Wake TCC  286 66% 59% 52% 264 86% 77% 68%

Wayne CC  122 81% 72% 67% 46 78% 80% 83%

Western Piedmont CC  54 74% 74% 59% 32 91% 80% 74%

Wilkes CC  52 92% 93% 89% 12 92% 100% 100%

Wilson CC  40 73% 56% 64% 35 83% 78% 76%

* Less than 5 students

LOW ADULT SECONDARY EDUCATION HIGH ADULT SECONDARY EDUCATION

25

Page 29: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE C1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2013‐2014 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION

% SUCCESSFUL

13‐14

System Totals  17455 17% 27% 20% 6% 14% 16% 0% 63%

Alamance CC  352 20% 26% 19% 4% 5% 26% 0% 65%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 461 19% 31% 19% 6% 14% 10% 0% 70%

Beaufort County CC  158 6% 16% 15% 14% 18% 31% 1% 37%

Bladen CC  85 16% 18% 8% 11% 34% 13% 0% 42%

Blue Ridge CC  135 19% 26% 21% 7% 10% 15% 1% 66%

Brunswick CC  58 12% 24% 31% 3% 10% 19% 0% 67%

Caldwell CC & TI  270 13% 32% 24% 5% 8% 19% 0% 69%

Cape Fear CC  761 11% 30% 22% 9% 22% 6% 0% 63%

Carteret CC  86 19% 23% 15% 9% 22% 12% 0% 57%

Catawba Valley CC  319 39% 29% 16% 3% 5% 8% 1% 83%

Central Carolina CC  234 9% 26% 23% 6% 11% 25% 0% 58%

Central Piedmont CC  1923 26% 33% 17% 5% 14% 4% 0% 77%

Cleveland CC  181 18% 31% 18% 0% 18% 15% 0% 67%

Coastal Carolina CC  341 30% 28% 16% 4% 6% 16% 0% 74%

College of The Albema 126 21% 25% 16% 3% 12% 24% 0% 61%

Craven CC  155 15% 30% 21% 6% 15% 13% 0% 66%

Davidson County CC  315 37% 19% 13% 3% 24% 4% 0% 69%

Durham TCC  425 16% 24% 16% 7% 12% 25% 0% 56%

Edgecombe CC  316 14% 23% 21% 3% 28% 10% 1% 58%

Fayetteville TCC  1034 19% 18% 17% 8% 19% 18% 1% 54%

Forsyth TCC  889 18% 28% 19% 6% 10% 18% 0% 65%

Gaston College  366 13% 31% 22% 8% 9% 16% 0% 66%

Guilford TCC  1177 11% 21% 21% 8% 21% 18% 0% 53%

Halifax CC  165 23% 28% 22% 4% 9% 13% 0% 74%

Haywood CC  125 14% 26% 21% 10% 8% 22% 0% 60%

Isothermal CC  246 26% 37% 15% 4% 11% 7% 0% 78%

James Sprunt CC  129 14% 25% 18% 9% 9% 26% 0% 57%

Johnston CC  285 28% 34% 14% 2% 14% 7% 0% 76%

Lenoir CC  175 11% 28% 17% 8% 14% 22% 0% 56%

Martin CC  43 14% 26% 9% 9% 23% 19% 0% 49%

Mayland CC  57 14% 30% 16% 2% 25% 14% 0% 60%

McDowell TCC  37 14% 41% 8% 3% 8% 27% 0% 62%

Mitchell CC  241 12% 24% 25% 10% 13% 16% 0% 62%

Montgomery CC  48 21% 29% 23% 6% 4% 17% 0% 73%

Nash CC  231 13% 23% 20% 3% 15% 24% 1% 57%

Pamlico CC  12 17% 8% 25% 8% 8% 33% 0% 50%

Piedmont CC  131 22% 30% 11% 1% 14% 22% 0% 63%

Pitt CC  755 20% 29% 15% 5% 4% 26% 0% 64%

Randolph CC  153 27% 31% 18% 7% 12% 6% 0% 75%

Richmond CC  220 19% 36% 15% 3% 5% 20% 1% 70%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  77 5% 18% 27% 4% 30% 8% 8% 51%

Robeson CC  241 5% 22% 25% 7% 24% 17% 1% 51%

Rockingham CC  126 9% 21% 26% 11% 19% 13% 2% 56%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  446 21% 26% 16% 6% 18% 13% 0% 63%

Sampson CC  113 9% 19% 13% 17% 17% 26% 0% 41%

Sandhills CC  338 7% 25% 29% 7% 12% 20% 0% 61%

South Piedmont CC  203 17% 25% 14% 6% 24% 14% 0% 56%

Southeastern CC  90 12% 33% 21% 9% 10% 13% 1% 67%

Southwestern CC  134 16% 27% 19% 5% 14% 18% 0% 63%

Stanly CC  155 28% 26% 19% 0% 9% 17% 0% 74%

Surry CC  231 9% 26% 37% 5% 8% 14% 0% 72%

Tri‐County CC  33 30% 33% 9% 3% 21% 3% 0% 73%

Vance‐Granville CC  260 9% 26% 27% 12% 7% 19% 0% 62%

Wake TCC  1003 4% 19% 26% 11% 17% 23% 0% 49%

Wayne CC  247 10% 27% 27% 7% 10% 19% 0% 64%

Western Piedmont CC  189 23% 28% 15% 3% 3% 27% 2% 66%

Wilkes CC  241 20% 27% 19% 3% 6% 24% 2% 66%

Wilson CC  108 14% 31% 15% 6% 19% 16% 0% 59%

OtherA B C D F WATTEMPT

26

Page 30: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE C2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY AGE

Attempt  % Successful Attempt  % Successful Attempt  % Successful

System Totals  4032 68% 5855 61% 7568 62%

Alamance CC  54 67% 137 60% 161 70%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 96 76% 164 68% 201 69%

Beaufort County CC  14 36% 44 32% 100 39%

Bladen CC  8 50% 28 46% 49 39%

Blue Ridge CC  35 69% 43 58% 57 70%

Brunswick CC  11 73% 30 63% 17 71%

Caldwell CC & TI  80 75% 103 65% 87 67%

Cape Fear CC  245 69% 259 59% 257 61%

Carteret CC  16 56% 29 55% 41 59%

Catawba Valley CC  123 82% 116 84% 80 83%

Central Carolina CC  41 61% 76 70% 117 50%

Central Piedmont CC  550 79% 662 76% 711 77%

Cleveland CC  51 78% 51 57% 79 66%

Coastal Carolina CC  80 68% 101 76% 160 75%

College of The Albema 25 64% 55 56% 46 65%

Craven CC  44 59% 40 68% 71 70%

Davidson County CC  42 55% 85 69% 188 72%

Durham TCC  62 69% 124 56% 239 53%

Edgecombe CC  46 46% 77 64% 193 59%

Fayetteville TCC  83 48% 251 53% 700 55%

Forsyth TCC  205 73% 333 63% 351 63%

Gaston College  55 75% 152 60% 159 70%

Guilford TCC  218 60% 387 49% 572 53%

Halifax CC  50 76% 46 65% 69 78%

Haywood CC  29 76% 45 53% 51 57%

Isothermal CC  86 84% 80 70% 80 81%

James Sprunt CC  20 60% 37 62% 72 53%

Johnston CC  68 79% 112 79% 105 71%

Lenoir CC  33 45% 64 55% 78 62%

Martin CC  6 33% 12 50% 25 52%

Mayland CC  13 77% 25 44% 19 68%

McDowell TCC  7 57% 12 75% 18 56%

Mitchell CC  60 60% 84 58% 97 66%

Montgomery CC  15 73% 14 71% 19 74%

Nash CC  38 45% 80 63% 113 57%

Pamlico CC  2 * 3 * 7 57%

Piedmont CC  27 67% 54 65% 50 60%

Pitt CC  228 72% 261 61% 266 61%

Randolph CC  39 74% 44 77% 70 74%

Richmond CC  38 79% 84 68% 98 69%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  13 54% 24 54% 40 48%

Robeson CC  25 48% 85 44% 131 56%

Rockingham CC  57 56% 42 60% 27 48%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  101 65% 118 61% 227 63%

Sampson CC  20 50% 41 34% 52 42%

Sandhills CC  93 65% 110 63% 135 57%

South Piedmont CC  55 62% 71 56% 77 51%

Southeastern CC  13 69% 51 76% 26 46%

Southwestern CC  52 63% 39 59% 43 65%

Stanly CC  25 84% 40 65% 90 74%

Surry CC  93 77% 84 67% 54 72%

Tri‐County CC  7 71% 7 43% 19 84%

Vance‐Granville CC  88 70% 81 64% 91 53%

Wake TCC  271 57% 376 42% 356 51%

Wayne CC  46 65% 83 64% 118 63%

Western Piedmont CC  68 72% 76 58% 45 69%

Wilkes CC  46 50% 86 64% 109 73%

Wilson CC  16 44% 37 73% 55 55%

* Less than 5 students

22 AND OLDER18 AND YOUNGER 19 TO 21

27

Page 31: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE D1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2013‐2014 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION

% SUCCESSFUL

13‐14

System Totals  16315 18% 24% 21% 8% 12% 17% 0% 63%

Alamance CC  387 18% 20% 19% 5% 8% 29% 0% 57%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 693 14% 24% 20% 7% 15% 19% 0% 59%

Beaufort County CC  132 18% 27% 24% 8% 10% 13% 0% 70%

Bladen CC  79 16% 20% 18% 4% 19% 23% 0% 54%

Blue Ridge CC  133 13% 23% 25% 8% 13% 19% 1% 60%

Brunswick CC  98 34% 18% 21% 3% 8% 15% 0% 73%

Caldwell CC & TI  277 24% 25% 17% 7% 7% 20% 0% 66%

Cape Fear CC  660 20% 25% 20% 6% 15% 13% 0% 66%

Carteret CC  121 18% 30% 22% 6% 12% 12% 0% 70%

Catawba Valley CC  373 17% 28% 32% 7% 5% 11% 0% 77%

Central Carolina CC  154 32% 30% 19% 4% 2% 12% 0% 82%

Central Piedmont CC  1559 16% 23% 24% 10% 18% 8% 0% 63%

Cleveland CC  219 23% 24% 19% 8% 9% 17% 1% 66%

Coastal Carolina CC  646 25% 25% 18% 8% 8% 15% 1% 68%

College of The Albema 177 17% 24% 27% 8% 7% 18% 0% 67%

Craven CC  263 14% 25% 22% 10% 13% 16% 0% 62%

Davidson County CC  218 15% 19% 26% 11% 12% 17% 0% 60%

Durham TCC  317 26% 24% 14% 8% 12% 16% 0% 63%

Edgecombe CC  275 11% 19% 14% 5% 27% 21% 3% 44%

Fayetteville TCC  652 15% 24% 22% 8% 13% 18% 0% 61%

Forsyth TCC  637 18% 20% 20% 8% 11% 23% 0% 58%

Gaston College  409 18% 23% 21% 9% 11% 18% 0% 62%

Guilford TCC  889 23% 22% 16% 9% 17% 13% 0% 61%

Halifax CC  110 6% 25% 19% 10% 10% 30% 0% 50%

Haywood CC  129 14% 22% 16% 7% 9% 32% 0% 53%

Isothermal CC  136 7% 23% 30% 9% 11% 20% 0% 60%

James Sprunt CC  109 16% 18% 23% 8% 14% 21% 0% 57%

Johnston CC  234 19% 25% 18% 11% 16% 12% 0% 61%

Lenoir CC  119 11% 13% 29% 10% 9% 27% 0% 54%

Martin CC  22 18% 41% 18% 9% 9% 5% 0% 77%

Mayland CC  61 36% 28% 15% 7% 11% 3% 0% 79%

McDowell TCC  66 53% 5% 15% 0% 0% 23% 5% 73%

Mitchell CC  197 8% 29% 26% 11% 8% 17% 0% 63%

Montgomery CC  36 8% 6% 22% 31% 11% 22% 0% 36%

Nash CC  343 22% 31% 20% 5% 11% 12% 0% 73%

Pamlico CC  19 32% 21% 21% 0% 21% 5% 0% 74%

Piedmont CC  163 26% 18% 18% 10% 12% 16% 0% 63%

Pitt CC  422 15% 22% 20% 7% 6% 30% 0% 58%

Randolph CC  297 22% 26% 20% 10% 8% 13% 0% 68%

Richmond CC  252 22% 28% 19% 6% 1% 23% 0% 69%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  54 20% 44% 19% 6% 7% 2% 2% 83%

Robeson CC  171 14% 20% 20% 12% 23% 10% 0% 54%

Rockingham CC  193 11% 30% 20% 9% 7% 24% 0% 61%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  339 14% 22% 22% 9% 12% 21% 0% 58%

Sampson CC  97 8% 20% 19% 14% 12% 27% 0% 46%

Sandhills CC  246 16% 23% 24% 7% 9% 22% 0% 63%

South Piedmont CC  98 15% 27% 24% 10% 16% 7% 0% 66%

Southeastern CC  54 19% 33% 17% 9% 9% 13% 0% 69%

Southwestern CC  170 21% 26% 16% 9% 10% 19% 0% 62%

Stanly CC  271 31% 32% 17% 0% 7% 13% 0% 80%

Surry CC  187 11% 29% 29% 9% 4% 18% 0% 70%

Tri‐County CC  67 22% 13% 12% 3% 33% 16% 0% 48%

Vance‐Granville CC  108 18% 22% 24% 5% 10% 21% 0% 64%

Wake TCC  1368 16% 24% 21% 10% 11% 19% 0% 61%

Wayne CC  245 13% 24% 25% 10% 7% 21% 0% 62%

Western Piedmont CC  147 27% 26% 19% 7% 0% 20% 0% 72%

Wilkes CC  193 24% 26% 20% 10% 2% 13% 5% 70%

Wilson CC  224 13% 26% 23% 8% 17% 13% 0% 63%

A B C D F W OtherATTEMPT

28

Page 32: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE D2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY CREDIT MATH COURSE

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  2559 68% 611 59% 5721 65% 851 58% 262 59% 3349 62% 1928 55% 1023 68%

Alamance CC  142 65% 2 * 65 65% 77 40% 0 * 38 45% 37 38% 26 85%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 277 68% 8 63% 185 61% 51 51% 0 * 153 44% 15 40% 4 *

Beaufort County CC  51 67% 10 50% 20 80% 0 * 0 * 19 79% 0 * 32 69%

Bladen CC  0 * 0 * 50 44% 5 60% 0 * 16 75% 1 * 7 71%

Blue Ridge CC  0 * 3 * 77 56% 10 80% 0 * 13 62% 18 50% 12 92%

Brunswick CC  0 * 0 * 31 81% 3 * 4 * 20 80% 34 62% 6 67%

Caldwell CC & TI  87 77% 5 60% 119 56% 20 55% 0 * 0 * 45 78% 0 *

Cape Fear CC  60 75% 88 61% 183 63% 0 * 30 53% 0 * 202 65% 97 73%

Carteret CC  0 * 0 * 20 70% 3 * 0 * 27 81% 35 49% 36 81%

Catawba Valley CC  77 79% 13 85% 182 75% 61 70% 0 * 14 93% 20 90% 6 83%

Central Carolina CC  0 * 7 71% 77 90% 6 50% 0 * 10 100% 10 60% 44 75%

Central Piedmont CC  234 81% 38 39% 407 66% 0 * 46 72% 655 59% 173 52% 6 67%

Cleveland CC  0 * 10 50% 136 67% 8 50% 0 * 50 70% 13 62% 2 *

Coastal Carolina CC  56 61% 13 54% 151 62% 25 64% 0 * 318 75% 66 58% 17 71%

College of The Albema 48 77% 1 * 0 * 11 45% 0 * 100 64% 9 67% 8 75%

Craven CC  46 41% 14 86% 0 * 13 54% 0 * 166 69% 24 46% 0 *

Davidson County CC  0 * 8 63% 99 62% 0 * 57 54% 44 66% 6 33% 4 *

Durham TCC  35 63% 16 81% 75 56% 97 60% 0 * 9 89% 68 69% 17 65%

Edgecombe CC  11 36% 12 42% 145 42% 4 * 0 * 70 33% 0 * 33 76%

Fayetteville TCC  330 62% 0 * 86 67% 19 74% 0 * 199 57% 16 38% 2 *

Forsyth TCC  165 65% 18 28% 181 72% 0 * 58 47% 165 47% 13 38% 37 38%

Gaston College  0 * 21 71% 144 69% 60 62% 2 * 0 * 174 55% 8 88%

Guilford TCC  139 70% 33 21% 348 64% 53 42% 0 * 87 67% 114 65% 115 53%

Halifax CC  62 52% 0 * 24 54% 0 * 0 * 18 33% 0 * 5 80%

Haywood CC  0 * 0 * 111 50% 0 * 0 * 0 * 3 * 13 92%

Isothermal CC  41 76% 0 * 59 54% 14 50% 0 * 12 50% 9 56% 1 *

James Sprunt CC  61 46% 0 * 34 71% 2 * 0 * 0 * 12 67% 0 *

Johnston CC  0 * 4 * 85 59% 5 60% 0 * 102 66% 37 51% 0 *

Lenoir CC  20 45% 30 53% 0 * 2 * 0 * 67 57% 0 * 0 *

Martin CC  11 82% 0 * 0 * 1 * 0 * 5 80% 0 * 5 60%

Mayland CC  0 * 0 * 51 75% 3 * 0 * 7 100% 0 * 0 *

McDowell TCC  0 * 3 * 55 73% 1 * 0 * 0 * 1 * 6 67%

Mitchell CC  18 56% 3 * 118 64% 14 57% 0 * 35 66% 9 67% 0 *

Montgomery CC  0 * 4 * 28 36% 1 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 *

Nash CC  0 * 42 64% 184 73% 0 * 0 * 0 * 113 73% 4 *

Pamlico CC  0 * 0 * 13 69% 0 * 0 * 6 83% 0 * 0 *

Piedmont CC  22 77% 0 * 52 46% 0 * 13 92% 0 * 18 56% 58 67%

Pitt CC  101 66% 0 * 36 78% 0 * 18 50% 237 54% 0 * 30 33%

Randolph CC  6 83% 6 83% 204 63% 15 47% 0 * 14 93% 0 * 52 83%

Richmond CC  0 * 0 * 210 70% 0 * 1 * 0 * 38 61% 3 *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  35 83% 0 * 0 * 3 * 0 * 16 81% 0 * 0 *

Robeson CC  41 54% 15 60% 54 46% 2 * 0 * 48 58% 5 60% 6 83%

Rockingham CC  27 70% 5 40% 2 * 20 70% 0 * 58 69% 0 * 81 51%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  28 64% 7 86% 161 57% 47 49% 0 * 0 * 93 59% 3 *

Sampson CC  25 84% 0 * 22 59% 0 * 0 * 28 21% 22 23% 0 *

Sandhills CC  0 * 14 79% 173 64% 6 50% 0 * 0 * 46 54% 7 71%

South Piedmont CC  0 * 0 * 73 66% 12 67% 0 * 0 * 12 75% 0 *

Southeastern CC  0 * 0 * 12 83% 7 57% 0 * 30 67% 1 * 4 *

Southwestern CC  7 71% 5 100% 103 62% 11 64% 0 * 18 56% 8 38% 18 67%

Stanly CC  0 * 6 67% 240 81% 0 * 14 79% 0 * 11 64% 0 *

Surry CC  64 70% 4 * 44 73% 38 79% 0 * 23 52% 8 63% 6 67%

Tri‐County CC  0 * 1 * 41 37% 0 * 0 * 1 * 0 * 22 68%

Vance‐Granville CC  30 77% 2 * 0 * 35 60% 0 * 25 44% 6 67% 10 80%

Wake TCC  107 70% 96 52% 347 64% 77 57% 0 * 306 77% 332 37% 103 78%

Wayne CC  70 76% 11 64% 26 46% 8 75% 0 * 91 54% 15 67% 24 67%

Western Piedmont CC  0 * 14 71% 93 76% 0 * 19 53% 5 80% 16 69% 0 *

Wilkes CC  23 78% 13 92% 97 70% 0 * 0 * 10 60% 11 64% 39 64%

Wilson CC  2 * 6 100% 188 61% 1 * 0 * 14 57% 9 56% 4 *

* Less than 5 students

MAT‐161 MAT‐171 OTHERMAT‐115 MAT‐121 MAT‐140 MAT‐151 MAT‐155

29

Page 33: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

30

Page 34: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE E1. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2013 COHORT ‐ BY ETHNICITY AND GENDER  

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  4,104 54% 3,429 48% 9,184 76% 8,476 70% 1,609 73% 1,283 68% 1,846 71% 1,547 65%

Alamance CC  59 66% 56 50% 235 80% 179 71% 54 80% 28 75% 30 87% 20 80%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 24 63% 28 46% 262 77% 223 67% 20 75% 15 80% 19 68% 25 88%

Beaufort County CC  59 49% 46 37% 90 63% 64 55% 4 * 5 100% 5 40% 4 *

Bladen CC  38 42% 17 47% 50 60% 30 67% 3 * 4 * 17 88% 12 42%

Blue Ridge CC  9 44% 7 14% 136 75% 112 66% 20 75% 11 55% 15 80% 11 55%

Brunswick CC  22 77% 14 71% 84 76% 82 67% 13 92% 9 89% 8 63% 5 80%

Caldwell CC & TI  8 38% 15 47% 188 69% 159 74% 10 70% 8 75% 17 71% 14 86%

Cape Fear CC  116 51% 97 49% 515 80% 529 67% 51 63% 62 73% 59 76% 53 77%

Carteret CC  15 47% 0 * 81 79% 57 51% 7 71% 5 80% 7 71% 6 50%

Catawba Valley CC  29 66% 30 63% 237 81% 243 75% 33 67% 25 68% 36 94% 33 67%

Central Carolina CC  85 60% 61 51% 170 73% 128 69% 36 69% 29 76% 15 73% 20 65%

Central Piedmont CC  459 61% 375 56% 479 80% 530 71% 233 80% 164 69% 178 78% 145 70%

Cleveland CC  57 49% 45 33% 151 65% 111 68% 7 71% 6 83% 8 88% 4 *

Coastal Carolina CC  59 81% 50 70% 229 79% 195 75% 35 80% 47 79% 33 91% 19 79%

College of The Albema 48 56% 50 42% 125 75% 113 76% 7 57% 10 70% 8 88% 10 70%

Craven CC  55 71% 29 52% 99 85% 99 67% 17 82% 10 70% 26 81% 16 69%

Davidson County CC  28 61% 39 49% 241 77% 181 78% 20 70% 13 77% 16 75% 21 67%

Durham TCC  112 53% 120 34% 67 82% 88 70% 53 72% 36 78% 35 86% 39 67%

Edgecombe CC  123 49% 70 33% 58 71% 28 71% 7 71% 5 60% 1 * 1 *

Fayetteville TCC  342 37% 319 35% 294 69% 204 61% 86 51% 74 58% 108 55% 75 55%

Forsyth TCC  162 70% 143 55% 340 78% 359 75% 67 73% 50 72% 45 80% 52 81%

Gaston College  69 64% 38 66% 378 79% 308 73% 33 67% 29 76% 44 91% 33 67%

Guilford TCC  315 57% 320 44% 265 76% 371 70% 89 69% 90 68% 90 78% 105 63%

Halifax CC  54 48% 31 61% 52 71% 29 76% 6 50% 0 * 16 63% 8 50%

Haywood CC  0 * 2 * 98 63% 100 70% 0 * 1 * 4 * 3 *

Isothermal CC  25 76% 19 58% 81 74% 81 68% 5 80% 5 80% 5 60% 8 75%

James Sprunt CC  27 59% 28 64% 35 97% 31 65% 12 83% 10 70% 1 * 0 *

Johnston CC  65 57% 64 64% 208 83% 174 74% 50 86% 28 68% 32 75% 23 52%

Lenoir CC  87 49% 76 57% 92 65% 122 64% 10 70% 14 86% 7 71% 6 50%

Martin CC  7 86% 7 57% 14 64% 9 44% 1 * 2 * 26 62% 17 59%

Mayland CC  0 * 1 * 62 73% 41 56% 2 * 4 * 30 77% 8 75%

McDowell TCC  2 * 2 * 54 72% 46 72% 7 43% 0 * 4 * 4 *

Mitchell CC  43 53% 33 39% 202 76% 137 60% 39 59% 18 61% 17 76% 18 61%

Montgomery CC  15 73% 7 57% 23 61% 36 78% 4 * 2 * 0 * 4 *

Nash CC  108 51% 54 46% 131 74% 108 76% 14 86% 7 100% 22 64% 17 59%

Pamlico CC  5 100% 10 60% 6 50% 8 100% 0 * 0 * 1 * 0 *

Piedmont CC  22 82% 35 74% 63 78% 45 78% 6 100% 7 71% 2 * 4 *

Pitt CC  210 50% 217 42% 142 75% 179 65% 17 59% 21 71% 297 70% 189 64%

Randolph CC  16 56% 16 44% 208 79% 136 63% 30 70% 34 74% 21 71% 18 89%

Richmond CC  62 68% 49 63% 69 74% 52 65% 6 100% 2 * 32 72% 26 62%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  42 48% 22 68% 18 83% 12 100% 2 * 1 * 0 * 0 *

Robeson CC  48 35% 36 31% 40 65% 26 65% 3 * 5 40% 112 31% 82 34%

Rockingham CC  33 39% 21 52% 130 68% 116 71% 11 73% 11 82% 10 80% 14 71%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  127 43% 102 35% 346 70% 263 64% 54 70% 40 70% 27 56% 29 59%

Sampson CC  33 58% 12 25% 44 75% 30 77% 31 87% 16 75% 6 83% 8 63%

Sandhills CC  73 62% 59 53% 186 81% 163 67% 34 82% 24 75% 35 60% 23 65%

South Piedmont CC  24 29% 8 13% 100 67% 73 62% 25 72% 21 67% 17 65% 15 47%

Southeastern CC  34 24% 32 25% 66 55% 66 68% 5 80% 4 * 10 50% 11 36%

Southwestern CC  1 * 3 * 96 67% 79 67% 8 100% 8 75% 10 40% 9 78%

Stanly CC  32 44% 22 59% 150 67% 98 74% 6 67% 4 * 19 79% 19 58%

Surry CC  5 60% 8 13% 218 79% 196 78% 20 80% 28 64% 8 63% 7 100%

Tri‐County CC  1 * 0 * 55 80% 55 60% 1 * 1 * 8 88% 5 100%

Vance‐Granville CC  98 53% 67 43% 158 68% 94 76% 21 71% 9 67% 15 80% 23 48%

Wake TCC  349 55% 290 55% 680 79% 941 68% 190 71% 159 57% 188 78% 180 69%

Wayne CC  87 62% 62 53% 186 73% 173 77% 41 80% 31 65% 13 54% 10 60%

Western Piedmont CC  10 30% 14 64% 166 74% 119 66% 12 92% 8 50% 20 95% 24 75%

Wilkes CC  3 * 19 53% 192 81% 204 77% 16 69% 15 53% 6 67% 7 43%

Wilson CC  63 56% 32 53% 39 87% 41 76% 15 73% 8 50% 5 100% 5 100%

* Less than 5 students

OTHER MALEOTHER FEMALEAFRICAN‐AMER 

FEMALE

AFRICAN‐

AMERIC MALE

HISPANIC 

FEMALEHISPANIC MALE

CAUCASIAN 

FEMALE

CAUCASIAN 

MALE

31

Page 35: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F1. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2008 COHORT ‐ BY PROGRAM AREA

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  364 45% 17,169 42% 97 42% 4,867 40% 589 42% 1,106 45%

Alamance CC  12 25% 312 42% 5 40% 135 44% 26 42% 18 44%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 0 * 285 47% 0 * 66 41% 0 * 20 30%

Beaufort County CC  3 * 120 37% 0 * 32 44% 1 * 1 *

Bladen CC  3 * 94 41% 0 * 27 22% 0 * 16 44%

Blue Ridge CC  7 29% 201 46% 1 * 42 45% 0 * 7 57%

Brunswick CC  17 24% 156 35% 1 * 31 26% 0 * 0 *

Caldwell CC & TI  5 40% 367 43% 0 * 86 41% 0 * 5 20%

Cape Fear CC  29 48% 854 51% 4 * 92 42% 33 36% 34 38%

Carteret CC  2 * 96 41% 0 * 33 24% 13 62% 0 *

Catawba Valley CC  15 40% 490 40% 1 * 92 36% 21 57% 14 21%

Central Carolina CC  7 71% 146 48% 3 * 80 54% 11 36% 3 *

Central Piedmont CC  15 27% 1,709 43% 0 * 293 39% 61 26% 39 31%

Cleveland CC  0 * 202 35% 1 * 80 30% 5 40% 23 65%

Coastal Carolina CC  0 * 644 48% 0 * 49 39% 0 * 21 71%

College of The Albema 8 25% 231 45% 0 * 51 33% 3 * 12 83%

Craven CC  0 * 358 38% 0 * 42 43% 1 * 1 *

Davidson County CC  1 * 231 35% 15 20% 94 41% 1 * 7 57%

Durham TCC  0 * 318 33% 0 * 80 30% 0 * 9 56%

Edgecombe CC  0 * 112 30% 0 * 51 33% 1 * 8 38%

Fayetteville TCC  5 40% 742 37% 6 0% 248 40% 26 23% 49 33%

Forsyth TCC  7 86% 401 45% 9 44% 222 43% 31 35% 35 49%

Gaston College  0 * 502 40% 1 * 196 45% 5 40% 22 50%

Guilford TCC  13 54% 1,048 41% 5 20% 318 43% 59 39% 56 32%

Halifax CC  0 * 97 38% 0 * 39 41% 5 40% 3 *

Haywood CC  26 54% 73 40% 0 * 30 40% 10 90% 10 60%

Isothermal CC  0 * 113 52% 0 * 40 38% 11 45% 18 28%

James Sprunt CC  14 29% 44 48% 0 * 21 43% 2 * 22 68%

Johnston CC  13 23% 341 43% 0 * 85 53% 9 67% 40 43%

Lenoir CC  14 50% 222 47% 2 * 51 39% 6 17% 1 *

Martin CC  8 25% 21 33% 0 * 24 33% 0 * 15 60%

Mayland CC  21 57% 46 52% 0 * 32 28% 0 * 31 55%

McDowell TCC  3 * 82 34% 2 * 40 28% 9 56% 19 53%

Mitchell CC  1 * 298 43% 1 * 86 40% 1 * 16 63%

Montgomery CC  17 65% 34 47% 0 * 30 37% 18 56% 7 29%

Nash CC  0 * 201 39% 1 * 60 33% 11 27% 23 35%

Pamlico CC  5 100% 10 40% 1 * 7 71% 0 * 16 69%

Piedmont CC  3 * 94 28% 3 * 44 34% 17 47% 21 62%

Pitt CC  5 0% 570 40% 8 50% 162 36% 16 50% 58 38%

Randolph CC  0 * 179 35% 0 * 80 41% 59 41% 7 29%

Richmond CC  0 * 152 32% 0 * 46 28% 0 * 3 *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  0 * 41 22% 0 * 27 59% 0 * 13 77%

Robeson CC  1 * 212 23% 0 * 67 33% 0 * 48 42%

Rockingham CC  1 * 187 37% 1 * 62 44% 0 * 14 29%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  2 * 416 43% 10 70% 218 39% 1 * 56 48%

Sampson CC  13 54% 103 39% 0 * 28 61% 0 * 7 14%

Sandhills CC  16 13% 293 51% 0 * 87 38% 0 * 0 *

South Piedmont CC  0 * 207 30% 1 * 91 42% 20 35% 13 46%

Southeastern CC  7 43% 171 32% 4 * 24 50% 1 * 21 67%

Southwestern CC  0 * 166 36% 0 * 34 44% 13 54% 1 *

Stanly CC  0 * 146 45% 0 * 80 50% 9 44% 10 90%

Surry CC  8 38% 159 58% 0 * 88 45% 13 46% 20 50%

Tri‐County CC  0 * 77 35% 0 * 15 53% 0 * 7 43%

Vance‐Granville CC  0 * 177 46% 0 * 196 38% 0 * 65 35%

Wake TCC  0 * 1,682 41% 10 70% 303 38% 34 29% 78 44%

Wayne CC  23 52% 321 50% 0 * 107 47% 2 * 9 33%

Western Piedmont CC  3 * 241 47% 0 * 39 49% 11 55% 7 43%

Wilkes CC  11 36% 283 45% 0 * 48 38% 13 23% 16 6%

Wilson CC  0 * 91 37% 1 * 36 36% 0 * 11 36%

* Less than 5 students

CONSTRUCTION 

TECHNOLOGIES

AGRICULTURAL AND 

NATURAL RES TECHARTS AND SCIENCES

BIOLOGICAL AND 

CHEMICAL TECH

BUSINESS 

TECHNOLOGIES

COMMERCIAL AND 

ARTISTIC PROD TECH

32

Page 36: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F2. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2007 COHORT ‐ BY PROGRAM AREA

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  991 41% 2,640 69% 891 38% 5,570 37% 1,181 42%

Alamance CC  0 * 51 69% 30 33% 159 40% 17 47%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 39 26% 67 79% 12 17% 237 29% 20 25%

Beaufort County CC  12 25% 18 89% 13 38% 39 26% 10 60%

Bladen CC  0 * 7 100% 15 13% 32 31% 0 *

Blue Ridge CC  7 43% 23 100% 7 43% 54 37% 24 25%

Brunswick CC  2 * 16 63% 5 80% 61 34% 1 *

Caldwell CC & TI  10 50% 20 100% 3 * 50 36% 54 33%

Cape Fear CC  77 53% 53 87% 51 33% 133 47% 50 48%

Carteret CC  0 * 22 95% 0 * 90 26% 10 40%

Catawba Valley CC  30 43% 38 92% 22 32% 96 29% 44 32%

Central Carolina CC  41 29% 119 48% 31 42% 142 47% 26 58%

Central Piedmont CC  93 30% 77 66% 23 48% 226 34% 89 33%

Cleveland CC  4 * 14 100% 51 43% 89 33% 13 23%

Coastal Carolina CC  15 60% 42 90% 7 100% 101 50% 17 94%

College of The Albema 13 38% 17 100% 15 53% 80 50% 0 *

Craven CC  17 53% 33 70% 13 15% 57 44% 17 29%

Davidson County CC  15 33% 86 60% 4 * 131 49% 46 30%

Durham TCC  11 18% 71 55% 8 38% 62 44% 25 32%

Edgecombe CC  2 * 37 70% 4 * 60 47% 11 36%

Fayetteville TCC  23 35% 49 92% 12 17% 233 34% 41 34%

Forsyth TCC  52 42% 102 78% 28 36% 355 25% 88 43%

Gaston College  46 39% 96 60% 24 58% 143 38% 26 19%

Guilford TCC  75 36% 139 73% 33 33% 220 46% 153 50%

Halifax CC  3 * 28 93% 27 37% 38 50% 16 63%

Haywood CC  11 73% 15 80% 9 33% 80 28% 12 50%

Isothermal CC  5 60% 10 90% 23 48% 94 30% 7 71%

James Sprunt CC  1 * 9 56% 10 60% 63 38% 2 *

Johnston CC  2 * 50 90% 10 50% 77 48% 55 38%

Lenoir CC  13 31% 26 65% 14 64% 78 42% 19 37%

Martin CC  0 * 16 63% 2 * 17 35% 5 60%

Mayland CC  12 83% 21 86% 10 90% 56 41% 1 *

McDowell TCC  0 * 27 59% 19 32% 32 44% 9 44%

Mitchell CC  23 48% 35 71% 0 * 88 38% 2 *

Montgomery CC  2 * 10 90% 0 * 24 46% 4 *

Nash CC  18 33% 29 93% 26 31% 61 48% 0 *

Pamlico CC  0 * 8 50% 0 * 15 40% 0 *

Piedmont CC  0 * 43 51% 37 38% 64 36% 1 *

Pitt CC  34 44% 102 88% 23 35% 114 43% 23 22%

Randolph CC  1 * 15 100% 7 14% 60 42% 20 20%

Richmond CC  17 65% 52 62% 10 50% 48 42% 0 *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  0 * 10 70% 7 43% 27 41% 0 *

Robeson CC  0 * 26 92% 10 30% 86 44% 0 *

Rockingham CC  5 40% 18 100% 27 48% 104 26% 1 *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  31 39% 35 100% 43 28% 279 29% 35 49%

Sampson CC  1 * 8 100% 13 23% 35 49% 0 *

Sandhills CC  35 49% 197 34% 2 * 95 31% 35 34%

South Piedmont CC  3 * 59 81% 1 * 61 57% 2 *

Southeastern CC  9 56% 29 69% 14 29% 30 33% 1 *

Southwestern CC  10 70% 24 88% 5 40% 56 38% 5 20%

Stanly CC  25 40% 35 77% 12 50% 147 42% 1 *

Surry CC  11 27% 24 88% 10 30% 129 31% 13 54%

Tri‐County CC  0 * 13 85% 11 36% 20 20% 3 *

Vance‐Granville CC  4 * 61 80% 24 33% 244 28% 22 45%

Wake TCC  76 24% 264 41% 23 35% 150 40% 49 47%

Wayne CC  11 55% 50 94% 17 24% 64 50% 23 43%

Western Piedmont CC  22 23% 40 78% 16 13% 53 64% 1 *

Wilkes CC  20 65% 49 69% 10 40% 72 43% 24 58%

Wilson CC  2 * 5 100% 8 50% 59 47% 8 63%

* Less than 5 students

PUBLIC SERVICE 

TECHNOLOGIES

TRANSPORT SYSTEMS 

TECHNOLOGIES

ENGINEERING 

TECHNOLOGIESHEALTH SCIENCES

INDUSTRIAL 

TECHNOLOGIES

33

Page 37: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F3. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2008 COHORT ‐ BY ENROLLMENT TYPE

Students Success Students Success

System Totals  23,645 47% 11,820 34%

Alamance CC  518 49% 247 31%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 512 44% 234 36%

Beaufort County CC  185 44% 64 33%

Bladen CC  149 40% 45 31%

Blue Ridge CC  186 60% 187 32%

Brunswick CC  226 35% 64 38%

Caldwell CC & TI  447 46% 153 34%

Cape Fear CC  1,100 53% 310 40%

Carteret CC  135 44% 131 35%

Catawba Valley CC  623 44% 240 28%

Central Carolina CC  420 50% 189 43%

Central Piedmont CC  1,467 47% 1,158 33%

Cleveland CC  289 45% 193 28%

Coastal Carolina CC  408 66% 488 40%

College of The Albema 276 56% 154 34%

Craven CC  300 46% 239 34%

Davidson County CC  317 50% 314 34%

Durham TCC  293 46% 291 26%

Edgecombe CC  210 43% 76 34%

Fayetteville TCC  957 39% 477 37%

Forsyth TCC  875 46% 455 33%

Gaston College  760 48% 301 30%

Guilford TCC  1,489 46% 630 39%

Halifax CC  178 52% 78 41%

Haywood CC  195 50% 81 30%

Isothermal CC  235 49% 86 30%

James Sprunt CC  151 51% 37 32%

Johnston CC  495 52% 187 37%

Lenoir CC  370 50% 76 26%

Martin CC  84 39% 24 50%

Mayland CC  143 58% 87 46%

McDowell TCC  151 45% 91 33%

Mitchell CC  358 49% 193 37%

Montgomery CC  85 62% 61 38%

Nash CC  319 46% 111 31%

Pamlico CC  49 61% 13 38%

Piedmont CC  188 45% 139 30%

Pitt CC  885 48% 230 28%

Randolph CC  304 44% 124 27%

Richmond CC  183 43% 145 35%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  98 47% 27 37%

Robeson CC  317 36% 133 33%

Rockingham CC  276 41% 144 35%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  766 45% 360 32%

Sampson CC  163 50% 45 29%

Sandhills CC  513 44% 247 33%

South Piedmont CC  199 49% 259 39%

Southeastern CC  269 39% 42 45%

Southwestern CC  228 45% 86 38%

Stanly CC  297 55% 168 38%

Surry CC  387 50% 88 34%

Tri‐County CC  87 44% 59 34%

Vance‐Granville CC  498 44% 295 33%

Wake TCC  1,592 47% 1,077 31%

Wayne CC  465 54% 162 49%

Western Piedmont CC  345 56% 88 27%

Wilkes CC  443 50% 103 28%

Wilson CC  187 43% 34 41%

* Less than 5 students

FULL‐TIME PART‐TIME

34

Page 38: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F4. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2008 COHORT ‐ BY ETHNICITY AND GENDER  

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  4,752 41% 3,526 34% 11,887 47% 10,680 42% 808 44% 725 44% 1,637 46% 1,388 42%

Alamance CC  107 41% 61 31% 290 48% 205 42% 39 33% 14 43% 28 50% 21 52%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 21 33% 15 7% 305 45% 327 38% 21 43% 12 42% 24 63% 21 43%

Beaufort County CC  57 46% 17 59% 90 43% 72 38% 0 * 2 * 0 * 0 *

Bladen CC  46 39% 29 17% 52 42% 36 42% 2 * 0 * 17 53% 11 27%

Blue Ridge CC  8 75% 0 * 170 48% 162 44% 10 40% 9 44% 8 38% 2 *

Brunswick CC  24 50% 19 26% 108 44% 118 28% 3 * 10 40% 5 20% 3 *

Caldwell CC & TI  10 40% 17 18% 282 45% 244 41% 5 60% 6 33% 13 62% 23 39%

Cape Fear CC  136 40% 107 32% 505 59% 549 48% 15 60% 24 54% 33 45% 41 41%

Carteret CC  18 33% 10 30% 141 45% 78 31% 5 60% 5 40% 6 33% 3 *

Catawba Valley CC  50 36% 48 33% 340 43% 308 38% 17 53% 19 37% 42 45% 39 38%

Central Carolina CC  81 47% 47 40% 227 50% 155 46% 17 35% 22 36% 33 64% 27 56%

Central Piedmont CC  475 34% 361 33% 633 46% 703 41% 111 44% 104 40% 125 54% 113 51%

Cleveland CC  82 28% 46 39% 180 34% 155 45% 0 * 4 * 10 60% 3 *

Coastal Carolina CC  91 48% 51 49% 332 52% 274 51% 37 51% 47 60% 29 52% 35 54%

College of The Albema 47 55% 29 55% 200 45% 125 48% 5 40% 4 * 12 58% 8 38%

Craven CC  84 38% 48 48% 167 44% 190 37% 13 23% 13 46% 12 58% 12 42%

Davidson County CC  31 23% 42 31% 287 49% 227 37% 11 18% 5 80% 18 56% 10 60%

Durham TCC  165 35% 117 25% 79 43% 101 43% 18 39% 11 55% 49 33% 44 48%

Edgecombe CC  135 45% 64 31% 51 47% 27 37% 3 * 0 * 0 * 2 *

Fayetteville TCC  398 40% 205 28% 353 46% 208 32% 75 43% 44 39% 93 33% 58 31%

Forsyth TCC  170 35% 142 32% 487 48% 419 40% 28 32% 28 43% 28 46% 28 43%

Gaston College  93 29% 43 35% 458 44% 338 44% 19 42% 16 44% 56 55% 38 45%

Guilford TCC  392 47% 359 33% 493 48% 569 43% 53 42% 54 43% 105 58% 94 46%

Halifax CC  75 49% 60 45% 74 46% 40 55% 1 * 0 * 2 * 4 *

Haywood CC  0 * 0 * 127 39% 125 50% 2 * 3 * 7 43% 3 *

Isothermal CC  13 31% 26 38% 152 48% 116 43% 5 40% 2 * 0 * 0 *

James Sprunt CC  29 52% 30 37% 62 50% 56 52% 5 20% 2 * 0 * 3 *

Johnston CC  60 50% 88 40% 267 52% 211 45% 14 57% 15 53% 13 54% 14 57%

Lenoir CC  93 40% 67 30% 132 52% 126 52% 5 20% 10 60% 5 60% 8 38%

Martin CC  29 59% 20 40% 32 28% 27 41% 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 *

Mayland CC  0 * 16 31% 83 51% 118 60% 0 * 7 57% 0 * 5 20%

McDowell TCC  7 57% 11 18% 106 45% 100 40% 0 * 5 40% 6 33% 0 *

Mitchell CC  38 32% 24 21% 232 48% 204 45% 18 50% 12 58% 9 44% 14 36%

Montgomery CC  20 45% 5 20% 46 57% 68 51% 3 * 2 * 2 * 0 *

Nash CC  82 41% 44 32% 130 51% 125 36% 11 45% 8 38% 14 43% 16 50%

Pamlico CC  14 36% 17 82% 16 38% 11 64% 0 * 0 * 1 * 2 *

Piedmont CC  73 37% 61 51% 107 35% 72 35% 0 * 4 * 5 60% 4 *

Pitt CC  221 45% 176 31% 332 53% 316 39% 7 43% 13 62% 32 38% 18 50%

Randolph CC  21 48% 19 16% 194 44% 152 37% 20 50% 8 13% 7 14% 7 14%

Richmond CC  66 50% 39 33% 124 35% 66 38% 2 * 0 * 20 45% 11 27%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  43 44% 35 40% 20 40% 21 52% 1 * 0 * 1 * 4 *

Robeson CC  65 49% 40 28% 54 43% 52 42% 6 17% 5 40% 149 28% 79 32%

Rockingham CC  36 25% 35 20% 196 43% 127 43% 6 50% 6 17% 10 30% 0 *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  131 40% 86 40% 439 44% 395 36% 18 44% 18 50% 22 55% 17 41%

Sampson CC  41 59% 27 30% 62 45% 54 37% 11 64% 7 57% 3 * 3 *

Sandhills CC  125 38% 74 30% 245 47% 215 41% 22 36% 12 42% 39 41% 28 25%

South Piedmont CC  63 35% 38 53% 213 47% 104 38% 13 62% 7 29% 12 42% 8 38%

Southeastern CC  51 27% 53 42% 98 43% 82 46% 0 * 1 * 16 38% 10 20%

Southwestern CC  0 * 0 * 159 45% 112 42% 3 * 1 * 21 33% 16 38%

Stanly CC  41 37% 29 38% 212 50% 157 52% 0 * 3 * 7 43% 14 57%

Surry CC  4 * 10 70% 216 50% 209 42% 11 73% 13 62% 8 50% 4 *

Tri‐County CC  0 * 2 * 65 38% 69 36% 1 * 2 * 3 * 3 *

Vance‐Granville CC  161 43% 171 28% 217 41% 183 45% 9 44% 13 38% 19 58% 20 45%

Wake TCC  237 39% 203 33% 575 46% 713 38% 78 33% 76 26% 405 46% 382 39%

Wayne CC  96 52% 61 31% 201 58% 201 52% 11 73% 14 71% 27 52% 16 44%

Western Piedmont CC  16 31% 29 24% 174 58% 153 48% 8 63% 2 * 22 50% 29 45%

Wilkes CC  11 36% 21 24% 240 48% 252 48% 7 43% 0 * 4 * 8 25%

Wilson CC  69 39% 32 47% 55 40% 58 45% 3 * 1 * 0 * 2 *

* Less than 5 students

OTHER FEMALE OTHER MALEAFRICAN‐AMER 

FEMALE

AFRICAN‐

AMERIC MALE

CAUCASIAN 

FEMALE

CAUCASIAN 

MALE

HISPANIC 

FEMALEHISPANIC MALE

35

Page 39: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G1. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST TEST

13‐14 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 13‐14 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 13‐14 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 13‐14 13‐14 12‐13

System Totals  31 97% 93% * 100% 98% 34 97% 100% * 100% 98% 32 97% 91% * 96% 100% 1,582 82% 83%

Alamance CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 33 76% 85%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 51 88% 83%

Beaufort County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 12 83% 88%

Bladen CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9 78% 67%

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 19 95% 96%

Brunswick CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 26 88% 100%

Caldwell CC & TI  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 20 50% 56%

Cape Fear CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 96 88% 75%

Carteret CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 18 61% 83%

Catawba Valley CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 29 48% 84%

Central Carolina CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 49 96% 81%

Central Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 36 92% 87%

Cleveland CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 24 83% 92%

Coastal Carolina CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 39 69% 75%

College of The Albemarle  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 27 78% 100%

Craven CC  8 100% 85% * * 100% 9 100% 100% * * 100% 11 100% 82% * * 100% 37 70% 76%

Davidson County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 23 96% 93%

Durham TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 32 88% 85%

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 45 87% 84%

Forsyth TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 50 74% 92%

Gaston College  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 44 95% 90%

Guilford TCC  16 100% 100% * 100% 100% 19 95% 100% * 100% 100% 15 100% 96% * 95% 100% 29 66% 86%

Halifax CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 12 75% 50%

Haywood CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 15 60% 65%

Isothermal CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 17 88% 72%

James Sprunt CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 21 76% 69%

Johnston CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 31 90% 94%

Lenoir CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 18 72% 61%

Martin CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 7 29% 43%

Mayland CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 15 67% 56%

McDowell TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 19 89% 100%

Mitchell CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 39 74% 80%

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 40%

Nash CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 30 80% 92%

Pamlico CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 17 41% *

Pitt CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 40 95% 87%

Randolph CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 45 80% 71%

Richmond CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 12 58% 78%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 43 91% 94%

Rockingham CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 33 82% 91%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 43 84% 89%

Sampson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 13 85% 30%

Sandhills CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 31 97% 86%

South Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 20 70% 78%

Southeastern CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 24 71% 60%

Southwestern CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 10 80% 100%

Stanly CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 29 90% 95%

Surry CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 38 92% 93%

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 8 38% 75%

Vance‐Granville CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 23 96% 82%

Wake TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 58 91% 90%

Wayne CC  7 86% 100% * * * 6 100% * * * * 6 83% * * * * 24 92% 96%

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 33 91% 97%

Wilkes CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 42 81% 75%

Wilson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 24 88% 79%

*Less than 5 ('12,'13,'14), Less than 10 ('09,'10,'11)

% PASSING

BLET

% PASSING % PASSING% PASSING

AVIATION ‐ GENERAL AVIATION ‐ AIRFRAME AVIATION ‐ POWER PLANT

36

Page 40: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G2. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST

13‐14 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 13‐14 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 13‐14 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10

System Totals  205 93% 92% 92% 84% 91% 210 90% 90% 88% 93% 26 85% 77% 80% 80% 81%

Alamance CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 15 100% 88% 94% 94% 90% 6 100% 100% 83% * * * * * *

Beaufort County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Bladen CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Brunswick CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  * * * * * 22 100% 100% 60% 100% 10 80% 67% 67% * 64%

Cape Fear CC  9 89% 75% 100% 82% 100% * * * * * * * *

Carteret CC  * * * * * 10 90% * 100% 85% * * * * *

Catawba Valley CC  19 95% 100% 100% 94% 94% * * * * * * * * *

Central Carolina CC  10 90% 90% 88% 82% 100% 4 * * * * * * * * *

Central Piedmont CC  28 96% 100% 100% 84% 96% * * * * * * * * *

Cleveland CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  9 100% 94% 91% 86% 90% 18 100% 89% 73% * * * * * *

College of The Albemarle  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Craven CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Davidson County CC  * * * * * 16 88% 82% 80% * * * * * *

Durham TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  20 100% 88% 92% 75% 100% 27 81% 54% * * * * * * *

Forsyth TCC  11 100% 100% 82% 82% * 12 92% 83% 100% 95% * * * * *

Gaston College  * * * * * 4 * 100% 100% 90% * * * * *

Guilford TCC  24 100% 90% 85% 85% 97% 1 * * * * * * * * *

Halifax CC  12 83% * 95% 77% 75% * * * * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * * * * 4 * 82% * * * * * * *

Isothermal CC  * * * * * 16 88% 80% * * * * * * *

James Sprunt CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Johnston CC  * * * * * 7 100% * 70% * 3 * * 80% * *

Lenoir CC  * * * * * 2 * * * * * * * * *

Martin CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  * * * * * 17 88% * * * * * * * *

McDowell TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pamlico CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pitt CC  * * * * * 5 100% 100% 100% 100% 13 92% 82% 83% * 92%

Randolph CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Rockingham CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Sampson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Sandhills CC  * * * * * 7 86% 100% 92% 90% * * * * *

South Piedmont CC  * * * * * 12 83% 96% 76% 91% * * * * *

Southeastern CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Southwestern CC  * * * * * 5 80% 100% 91% * * * * * *

Stanly CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Surry CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * 1 * 100% * * * * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wake TCC  15 87% 82% 83% 100% 79% 10 100% 100% * 100% * * * * *

Wayne CC  33 79% 95% 90% 76% 82% * * * * * * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * * 4 * 91% * * * * * * *

Wilson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12,'13,'14), Less than 10 ('09,'10)

% PASSING % PASSING

DENTAL HYGIENE MASSAGE & BODY WORK

% PASSING

NUC. MED. TECH.

37

Page 41: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G3. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013‐2014 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST TEST

13‐14 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 13‐14 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 13‐14 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 13‐14 13‐14 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10

System Totals  5 80% 75% 70% 26 92% 88% 84% 96% 76% 301 94% 94% 97% 96% 99% 354 62% 61% 75% 82% 80%

Alamance CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  * * * * * * * * 14 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * * * * 84%

Beaufort County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Bladen CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 * * * * *

Brunswick CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * 16 75% 54% 75% * 88%

Caldwell CC & TI  * * * * * * * * 10 90% * 100% 91% * * * * * *

Cape Fear CC  * * * * * * * * 16 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 10 80% * * * 83%

Carteret CC  * * * * * * * * 10 100% 94% 94% 94% 100% 22 50% 8% * * 33%

Catawba Valley CC  * * * * * * * * 7 100% * 100% * * * * * * *

Central Carolina CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * 9 89% * * * 70%

Central Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * 47 70% 85% 85% 90% 95%

Cleveland CC  * * * * * * * * 12 83% 84% 100% 100% * * * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

College of The Albemarle  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Craven CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * 18 22% 12% 67% * *

Davidson County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Durham TCC  5 80% 75% 70% * * * * * * * * * * 49 69% 73% 75% 96% 84%

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * * * * 19 74% 64% 94% 94% 100% 1 * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  * * * * * * * * 17 100% 100% 95% 94% 100% * * * * *

Forsyth TCC  * * * 6 100% 100% 86% * * 12 100% 89% 100% 95% 100% * * * * *

Gaston College  * * * * * * * * * * * * * 11 45% 71% * * *

Guilford TCC  * * * * * * * * 15 87% 100% * * * 40 65% 45% 67% 76% 86%

Halifax CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Isothermal CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

James Sprunt CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Johnston CC  * * * * * * * * 25 96% 100% 100% 100% 100% 8 25% 55% 38% * *

Lenoir CC  * * * * * * * * 4 * * 100% * * 1 * * * * *

Martin CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

McDowell TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * 17 65% * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pamlico CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pitt CC  * * * 20 90% 83% 95% 100% 72% 18 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 7 86% 50% * * *

Randolph CC  * * * * * * * * 6 100% 60% 76% 100% 100% 9 67% * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * 2 * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * * * * * * 9 78% 100% 100% * * * * * * *

Rockingham CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  * * * * * * * * 18 100% 100% 100% 94% 100% 22 64% 56% 75% * *

Sampson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Sandhills CC  * * * * * * * * 9 89% 90% 100% * 100% 15 33% * * * *

South Piedmont CC  * * * * * 60% * * * * * * * * * * * *

Southeastern CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Southwestern CC  * * * * * * * * 9 100% 100% 92% 91% 100% 13 62% 50% 100% * *

Stanly CC  * * * * * * * * 13 100% 100% 100% 93% 94% 7 43% 71% 80% * *

Surry CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  * * * * * * * * 20 85% 95% 100% 96% 97% * * * * *

Wake TCC  * * * * * * * * 31 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * * * * *

Wayne CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * 8 75% * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * * * * * 7 100% * * * * 20 75% 88% 60% 83% *

Wilson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12,'13,'14), Less than 10 ('09,'10,'11)

OPTICIANRY

% PASSING % PASSING

REAL ESTATE SALES

% PASSING % PASSING

RADIOGRAPHYRADIATION THERAPY

38

Page 42: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G4. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2014 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST

'14 '14 '13 '12 '14 '14 '13 '12 '14 '14 '13 '12 '14 '14 '13 '12 '14 '14 '13 '12

System Totals  151 94% 90% 88% 676 93% 89% 86% 169 93% 91% 89% 27 78% 68% 90% 126 79% 77% 87%

Alamance CC  6 100% 60% 71% 10 90% 76% 79% * * * * * * 100%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  * 86% * 22 95% 100% 100% 10 100% 93% 100% * * * * 71% *

Beaufort County CC  * * 11 91% * 56% * * 5 80% * * 5 100% *

Bladen CC  1 * * * 11 100% 75% 73% * * * * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  12 92% 100% 100% 7 100% 90% 90% 3 * 100% * 1 * * * * 100%

Brunswick CC  2 * 100% * 10 90% 86% 60% 9 100% * * * * * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  10 100% 86% 64% 10 100% * 86% * * * * 6 100% 60% 78%

Cape Fear CC  19 100% 100% 81% 25 88% 90% 73% 16 88% 100% 100% * * 6 83% * 100%

Carteret CC  3 * * * 13 92% 93% 83% 5 60% 100% * * 100% * * *

Catawba Valley CC  * * 13 100% 100% 100% * * * * * *

Central Carolina CC  8 88% 86% 80% 46 89% 76% 78% 17 94% 100% 88% 9 100% 100% 100% * 38% 100%

Central Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * *

Cleveland CC  2 * 100% 90% 13 92% 100% 82% 3 * * * 2 * * 5 80% * 100%

Coastal Carolina CC  * * 26 92% 92% 93% * * * * * 3 * 88%

College of The Albema 14 93% 100% 100% 7 100% 100% 80% * * * * * * 100%

Craven CC  3 * 50% 100% 9 56% 83% 71% 12 83% 83% 78% * * 7 71% 78% 100%

Davidson County CC  * * * 25 96% 93% 96% 9 89% 77% 87% * * * * *

Durham TCC  * * * * 15 100% 93% 88% * * * *

Edgecombe CC  * * * 12 100% 82% 75% 3 * * * * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  * * 15 93% 100% 92% 16 88% 100% 88% * * 27 89% 74% *

Forsyth TCC  * * * * * * * * * *

Gaston College  * * 24 96% 88% 72% 1 * * * * * *

Guilford TCC  4 * * * 13 100% 93% 92% * * * * * * *

Halifax CC  * * * 4 * * * * * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * 16 94% 80% 100% * * * * * *

Isothermal CC  13 100% 100% * 8 100% 100% 90% * * * * 3 * 89% *

James Sprunt CC  2 * * * 4 * * 43% * * * * * 1 * * *

Johnston CC  * * 93% 16 94% 94% 83% * * 4 * * * 5 80% * 100%

Lenoir CC  10 80% 100% 100% 10 70% * 75% 5 100% * * 1 * * * 30 57% 75% 60%

Martin CC  * * 9 100% * * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  4 * * * 10 90% 90% 86% * * * * * 3 * 100% *

McDowell TCC  2 * * * 17 88% 86% 100% 6 100% 100% 100% * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  * * 26 92% 100% 96% * 80% 71% * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  2 * * * 11 82% * 90% * * 2 * * 1 * * *

Pamlico CC  1 * * 2 * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  1 * * * 11 82% * 67% * * * * * * * *

Pitt CC  * * * * * * * * * *

Randolph CC  1 * * * 12 92% 100% 82% * * * * 2 * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * * * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  1 * * 1 * * 0% * * * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * 24 92% 79% 93% * * * * * * *

Rockingham CC  2 * * * 11 91% 92% 100% * * * * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  6 100% 90% 67% 38 95% 95% 90% 15 100% 83% 94% * * * 6 100% * 80%

Sampson CC  * * 10 100% 82% 100% * * 2 * * * * *

Sandhills CC  12 92% * 93% 9 89% 85% 78% * * * * * * * 93%

South Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * *

Southeastern CC  * * * 7 100% 100% * * * * * * * * *

Southwestern CC  * * 15 100% 95% 96% * * * * 2 * 100%

Stanly CC  4 * 100% * 22 86% 93% 96% 3 * * 83% 1 * * * 14 79% * *

Surry CC  * * 22 100% 92% 96% * * * * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * * 9 89% 86% 80% 2 * * * * * * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  6 83% * 93% 5 80% 81% 80% * * * * * * * 100%

Wake TCC  * * 25 96% 84% 95% 19 95% 88% 83% * * * * *

Wayne CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wilson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*Less than 5

COSMETIC ARTS

APPRENTICE COSMETOLOGY ESTHETICIAN

% PASSING% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING

INSTRUCTOR

% PASSING

MANICURIST

39

Page 43: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G5. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2014 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST TEST

'14 '14 '13 '14 '14 '13 '12 '11 '10 '14 '14 '13 '12 '11 '10 '14 '14 '13 '12 '11 '10

System Totals  658 97% 95% 3,150 78% 79% 79% 82% 85% 340 70% 66% 64% 66% 67% 562 91% 94% 91% 90% 80%

Alamance CC  30 93% 95% 89 74% 77% 67% 77% 97% * * 71% 42% 45% 9 78% 100% 87% * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 40 100% 98% 74 78% 89% 84% 94% 88% 48 67% 79% 67% 88% 82% 23 100% 97% 95% 100% 89%

Beaufort County CC  * 88% 14 79% 76% 50% 41% 69% 2 * * 47% 20% * 8 100% * * * *

Bladen CC  * * 24 67% 71% 59% 83% 79% 12 67% 13% 69% 63% 81% 9 67% 85% * 74% 63%

Blue Ridge CC  * * 61 74% 80% 89% 90% 92% 17 88% * * 73% 61% 16 69% * 90% * *

Brunswick CC  * * 31 65% 69% 87% 93% 93% 11 55% 55% 44% 70% 62% * * 100% * *

Caldwell CC & TI  * * 98 64% 70% 81% 75% 87% * * * 50% 60% 24 83% 90% 71% 82% 85%

Cape Fear CC  46 96% 98% 104 92% 99% 90% 91% 95% 11 91% 94% 100% 55% 87% 9 100% 100% 100% 100% *

Carteret CC  * * 16 75% 88% 67% 68% 75% * * 42% * 64% 13 92% * * * *

Catawba Valley CC  28 100% * 49 78% 70% 76% 81% 75% 6 83% * 81% 83% 80% 8 100% 100% 91% * *

Central Carolina CC  19 100% 100% 23 96% 78% 59% 71% 67% * * * * 67% 6 67% * 100% * *

Central Piedmont CC  * * 215 88% 92% 94% 91% 95% * * * * * 13 100% * * * *

Cleveland CC  7 100% 89% 47 74% 75% 77% 84% 81% * * * 50% 44% 13 100% 94% 96% 93% 88%

Coastal Carolina CC  22 95% 100% 80 95% 97% 97% 98% 97% 14 93% 100% 100% * 92% 8 100% 100% 100% 100% 85%

College of The Albema 5 100% 95% 32 91% 84% 77% 84% 79% 5 60% 77% 60% 76% 40% * 100% * 75% 100%

Craven CC  8 100% 100% 37 57% 68% 75% 89% 73% * * 68% * * 8 100% * 83% * *

Davidson County CC  * 96% 20 75% 92% 98% 93% 95% 6 67% 90% 100% 60% 94% 16 81% 94% 89% 100% 83%

Durham TCC  * * 96 94% 94% 94% 99% 94% 13 92% 100% 100% 82% 73% 8 100% 100% 100% * 56%

Edgecombe CC  13 92% 86% 19 68% 67% 70% * * 3 * 17% * * * 9 100% * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  67 100% 97% 150 82% 90% 92% 93% 99% * * * * * 34 94% 91% 91% 100% 100%

Forsyth TCC  * * 104 84% 89% 91% 90% 88% 5 100% 86% 100% * * 8 100% 100% * * *

Gaston College  9 100% 100% 87 90% 82% 82% 88% 88% 8 100% 80% 100% * * 5 100% 100% 100% 100% 92%

Guilford TCC  57 96% 97% 139 86% 90% 87% 91% 94% 14 86% 77% 95% 83% * 9 100% 94% 95% 100% 100%

Halifax CC  15 93% 100% 10 60% 100% * 69% 71% * * * * 36% * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * 41 73% 90% 81% 85% 81% 8 88% * 71% 71% 79% * 100% * * *

Isothermal CC  24 96% 100% 25 92% 71% 56% 61% 67% 11 36% 20% 43% 33% * 7 86% * * * *

James Sprunt CC  6 83% 88% 24 79% 83% 67% 65% 76% 3 * * * * * * * 83% * *

Johnston CC  * * 84 76% 66% 68% 82% 73% 16 69% 88% * * 67% 31 90% 87% 100% 100% 77%

Lenoir CC  8 100% 100% 210 73% 74% 78% 72% 85% 62 68% 60% 57% 68% 71% 92 93% 95% 99% 88% 90%

Martin CC  * * 4 * 76% 71% 67% 73% * 18% 67% * * 2 * 70% * * *

Mayland CC  5 100% 100% 21 48% 35% 54% 57% 75% 1 * * 33% * * * * * * 63%

McDowell TCC  * * 10 80% 64% 68% 68% 80% * * * * * 5 60% 100% 78% 83% *

Mitchell CC  * * 53 77% 84% 83% 72% 80% * * 80% * 71% 2 * * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * 8 100% * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  16 100% 100% 28 39% 48% 71% 70% 88% 12 42% 60% 29% * * 5 80% 88% 59% 78% 47%

Pamlico CC  * * 9 89% 85% * 90% * 1 * 83% * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * 10 90% 60% 48% 76% 71% * * * * * 1 * 71% 88% * *

Pitt CC  46 96% 94% 57 61% 76% 73% 65% 81% 9 44% * * * * 6 100% 93% 82% * 72%

Randolph CC  9 100% 100% 55 65% 74% 77% 75% 81% * 86% * * * * * * * *

Richmond CC  * * 13 46% 42% 62% * 100% * 63% * * * * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * 46 80% 79% 81% 80% 82% 3 * * 75% * * 11 73% 100% * * *

Robeson CC  12 100% 94% 31 68% 92% 50% 46% 62% 6 17% 40% * 73% 43% * 100% * * 92%

Rockingham CC  * * 37 51% 57% 70% 78% 69% 1 * * * * * 3 * 83% 75% 70% *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  37 97% 94% 124 70% 72% 61% 72% 85% * * 80% 57% 73% 13 77% 88% 88% 84% 61%

Sampson CC  * * 14 71% 69% 17% * 73% * * * * * 9 89% * 88% * 85%

Sandhills CC  30 97% 100% 65 80% 72% 89% 79% 82% * * * * * 10 100% 94% 88% * 91%

South Piedmont CC  * * 49 69% 77% 75% 87% 83% * * * * * 8 88% 100% 100% * *

Southeastern CC  * * 12 75% 58% 49% 78% 63% 4 * 57% 50% 63% 65% 1 * 89% * * *

Southwestern CC  17 100% * 20 90% 100% 81% 97% 96% 6 100% * * * * 7 100% 100% 100% * 100%

Stanly CC  * * 49 55% 65% 69% 73% 83% * * * * * 15 93% * 82% 92% *

Surry CC  19 100% 100% * 91% 96% 89% 98% * * * * * * 100% 100% 100% 100%

Tri‐County CC  * * 42 62% 63% 87% 80% 75% 5 60% 50% * * * 1 * 100% * 80% *

Vance‐Granville CC  7 100% 100% 47 64% 93% 85% 86% 76% * * * * * 22 73% 89% 75% 73% 78%

Wake TCC  * * 176 87% 90% 90% 94% 92% * * 83% 86% 92% 15 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Wayne CC  10 100% 100% 81 90% 57% 48% 57% 57% 16 63% 75% 33% * * 7 100% * 91% * *

Western Piedmont CC  * 100% 22 91% 94% 100% * 79% * * * * * 15 93% 100% * * *

Wilkes CC  36 100% 100% 38 76% 81% 89% 88% 75% 1 * 57% 57% * 82% 15 93% 100% 100% * *

Wilson CC  10 80% 15% 26 69% 62% 59% 74% 87% * * * * * 3 * * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12,'13,'14), Less than 10 ('09,'10)

EMT‐P

% PASSING% PASSING

DETENTION OFFICER EMT EMT‐I

% PASSING % PASSING

40

Page 44: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G6. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2014 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST TEST

'14 '14 '13 '12 '11 '10 '14 '14 '13 '12 '11 '10 '14 '14 '13 '12 '11 '10 '14 '14 '13 '12 '11 '10

System Totals  138 88% 92% 91% 88% 84% 734 93% 94% 95% 94% 97% 2,126 87% 85% 94% 90% 87% 50 98% 100% 100% 95% 96%

Alamance CC  * * * * * * * * * * 58 81% 86% 96% 76% 83% * * * * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  * * * * * 19 84% 87% 87% 98% 97% 84 80% 73% 94% 92% 89% 7 100% 100% 100% 100% 93%

Beaufort County CC  * * * * * 19 89% 83% 100% 95% 100% 43 91% 90% 97% 94% 89% * * * * *

Bladen CC  * * * * * 15 93% 96% 94% 92% 100% 11 91% 67% 92% 85% * * * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * * * * * * * 30 90% 83% 89% 94% 71% * * * * *

Brunswick CC  * * * * * 20 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 18 89% 88% 100% 80% 100% * * * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  11 100% 100% 94% 81% 73% * * * * * 29 100% 100% 100% 95% 91% * * * * *

Cape Fear CC  * * * * * 26 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 49 100% 93% 100% 98% 98% * * * * *

Carteret CC  * * * * * 6 100% 100% * 70% * 18 100% 94% 100% 93% 100% * * * * *

Catawba Valley CC  * * * * * * * * * * 39 79% 69% 96% 88% 73% * * * * *

Central Carolina CC  * * * * * 46 89% 89% 82% 80% 87% 24 100% 94% 100% 96% 100% 26 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Central Piedmont CC  23 87% 96% 90% 91% 75% * * * * * 62 87% 92% 86% 65% 86% * * * * *

Cleveland CC  * * * * * 16 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 22 82% 94% 94% 88% * * * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  * * * * * 17 94% 100% 100% 94% 95% 32 91% 88% 100% 83% 93% * * * * *

College of The Albemarle  * * * * * 18 100% 100% 100% 94% 92% 23 100% 93% 100% 97% 97% * * * * *

Craven CC  11 82% * 82% * * 18 89% 95% 100% 100% 100% 60 82% 92% 98% 95% 84% * * * * *

Davidson County CC  * * * * * 18 94% 93% 88% 100% 100% 59 85% 76% 93% 85% 92% * * * * *

Durham TCC  * * * * * 18 94% 96% 100% 100% 94% 59 88% 79% 87% 95% 92% * * * * *

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * 11 100% 100% 100% * * 27 96% 84% 90% * * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  13 92% 83% 93% 92% 91% 49 86% 91% 97% 94% 92% 74 74% 77% 86% 95% 90% * * * * *

Forsyth TCC  * * * * * 63 97% 98% 100% 100% 97% 87 94% 96% 99% 96% 94% * * * * *

Gaston College  * * * * * 46 100% 96% 100% 100% 97% 56 95% 94% 98% 98% 86% 17 94% 100% 100% 80% 93%

Guilford TCC  16 100% 100% 100% * 91% 17 76% 95% 95% 100% 100% 84 79% 74% 91% 89% 89% * * * * *

Halifax CC  * * * * * 13 92% 100% 92% 100% * 22 68% 87% 89% 89% * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * * * * * * * * * 29 48% 69% 65% * 68% * * * * *

Isothermal CC  * * * * * 32 81% 92% 96% 93% 97% 19 89% 81% 96% 100% * * * * * *

James Sprunt CC  * * * * * 9 100% 89% 100% 80% 100% 18 89% 89% 100% 95% 93% * * * * *

Johnston CC  * * * * * * * * * * 31 94% 96% 95% 75% 86% * * * * *

Lenoir CC  * * * * * 11 100% 100% 100% * * 16 100% 86% 100% 92% 77% * * * * *

Martin CC  20 75% 79% 64% 77% 82% * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  * * * * * * 100% 100% 100% 100% 33 85% 81% 87% 96% 96% * * * * *

McDowell TCC  * * * * * 37 97% 93% 97% 93% 100% 18 83% 100% 93% 89% * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  * * * * * * * * * * 22 100% 96% 100% 97% 90% * * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * 97% 94% 100% 83% * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  19 100% 100% 100% 93% 83% 19 89% 72% 100% 95% * 57 84% 76% 83% 90% * * * * * *

Pamlico CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * 28 64% 75% 95% 71% 81% * * * * *

Pitt CC  * * * * * * * * * * 79 89% 89% 91% 86% 93% * * * * *

Randolph CC  * * * * * * * * * * 37 97% 100% 100% 100% 95% * * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * * 13 69% 76% 82% 91% 94% 25 96% 66% 95% 93% 98% * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * * * * * 100% 14 57% 67% 94% 95% 50% * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * * * 8 88% 100% * * * 18 83% 94% 100% 91% 92% * * * * *

Rockingham CC  * * * * * 26 88% 75% 80% 81% 97% 20 75% 41% 92% 80% 89% * * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  * * * * * 10 100% 100% 100% 94% 100% 48 83% 80% 98% 100% 84% * * * * *

Sampson CC  * * * * * 15 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 29 90% 100% 91% 100% 88% * * * * *

Sandhills CC  * * * * * 13 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 45 98% 89% 100% 92% 87% * * * * *

South Piedmont CC  * * * * * 13 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 30 83% 81% 87% * 84% * * * * *

Southeastern CC  * * * * * 25 88% 96% 100% 100% 100% 41 73% 77% 94% 89% 100% * * * * *

Southwestern CC  9 100% 91% 100% 90% 100% * * * * * 20 75% 83% 94% 94% 86% * * * * *

Stanly CC  * * * * * * * * * * 27 100% 93% 97% 90% 100% * * * * *

Surry CC  16 63% 75% 86% * 80% 16 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 61 85% 84% 100% 96% 88% * * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * * * * * * 13 85% 95% 89% 92% 84% * * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  * * * * * 1 * 90% 92% 93% 100% 51 88% 86% 98% 89% 79% * * * * *

Wake TCC  * * * * * * * * * * 102 95% 89% 95% 90% 89% * * * * *

Wayne CC  * * * * * 13 100% 100% 100% 94% 100% 35 86% 81% 89% 93% 90% * * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * 33 76% 88% 100% 100% 86% * * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * * * * * * * 25 92% 100% 100% 85% 90% * * * * *

Wilson CC  * * * * * 18 100% 100% 100% 80% 100% 32 94% 84% 87% 88% 86% * * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12,'13,'14), Less than 10 ('09,'10)

PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASST.

% PASSING

VET. MED. TECH.PRACTICAL NURSING REGISTERED NURSING

% PASSING% PASSING % PASSING

41

Page 45: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

MEASURES forSTUDENT SUCCESS

2014 PERFORMANCE

Page 46: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

Page 47: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

2014 PERFORMANCE

MEASURES for STUDENT SUCCESS

April 2014

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

Dr. R Scott Ralls, President

Dr. Sharon Morrissey, Executive VP for Programs & Chief Academic Officer

RESEARCH & PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Bill Schneider, Associate Vice President

Dr. Kristen Corbell, Research Projects Coordinator

Joann Ingoglia, Compliance Coordinator

Dr. Kinge Mbella, Education Research Analyst

5/12/14

CONTENTS

Introduction  2

April 2014 Performance Summary  3

A. Basic Skills Student Progress 5

B. GED Diploma Passing Rate 6

TABLE A. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2012‐2013 7 

TABLE B. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013

C. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level English Courses 9

D. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level Math Courses 10

TABLE C. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2012‐2013

11TABLE D. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2012‐2013

E. First Year Progression 12

TABLE E. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2012 COHORT   13

F. Curriculum Student Completion 14

TABLE F. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2006 COHORT  15

G. Licensure and Certification Passing Rate 16

TABLE G. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013 17

H. College Transfer Performance 18

TABLE H. COLLEGE TRANSFER PERFORMANCE, 2011‐2012 COMMUNITY COLLEGESTUDENTS

19

Appendix – Additional Performance Measure Tables   21

TABLE A1‐A2. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL  22

TABLE B1. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL  25

TABLE C1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2012‐2013 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION 

26

TABLE C2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISHCOURSES, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY AGE

27

TABLE D1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATHCOURSES, 2012‐2013 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION

28

TABLE D2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATHCOURSES, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY CREDIT MATH COURSE 

29

TABLE E1. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2012 COHORT ‐ BY ETHNICITY ANDGENDER 

31

TABLE F1‐F2. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2007 COHORT ‐ BYPROGRAM AREA 

32

TABLE F3. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2007 COHORT ‐ BY ENROLLMENT TYPE 34

TABLE F4. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2007 COHORT ‐ BY ETHNICITY AND GENDER 35

TABLE G1. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY EXAM(AVIATION, BLET)

36

TABLE G2. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY EXAM(DENTAL HYGIENE, MASSAGE & BODY WORK, NUC. MED. TECH.) 37

TABLE G3. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY EXAM(OPTICIANRY, RADIATION THERAPY, RADIOGRAPHY, REAL ESTATE SALES)

38

TABLE G4. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013 ‐ BY EXAM(COSMETIC ARTS)

39

TABLE G5. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013 ‐ BY EXAM (DETENTION OFFICER, EMD, EMT)

40

TABLE G6. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013 ‐ BY EXAM (PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASST., NURSING, VET. MED.TECH.)  

41

1

Page 48: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Introduction 

The Performance Measures for Student Success Report is the North Carolina Community College System’s major accountability document. This annual performance report is based on data compiled from the previous year and serves to inform colleges and the public on the performance of our 58 community colleges. 

In 1993, the State Board of Community Colleges began monitoring performance data on specific measures to ensure public accountability for programs and services. In 1998, the General Assembly directed the State Board to review past performance measures and define standards to ensure programs and services offered by community colleges in North Carolina were of sufficient quality. 

In 2010, President Scott Ralls established a Performance Measures Committee to develop new performance‐based student success measures to go into effect in 2013. The Committee was led by two community college presidents, Dr. Dennis Massey of Pitt Community College and Dr. Molly Parkhill of Blue Ridge Community College. The Committee was comprised of college presidents, vice‐presidents, faculty, and directors from a diverse group of colleges representing various areas of expertise. 

After a year of researching, drafting, and soliciting feedback from college faculty and staff on potential measures, the Committee formally presented the following eight measures to the State Board: 

Basic Skills Student Progress

Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐LevelEnglish Courses

First Year Progression

Licensure and Certification Passing Rate

GED Diploma Passing Rate

Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐LevelMath Courses

Curriculum Student Completion

College Transfer Performance

In November 2011, the State Board formally approved the Performance Measures. These measures were then submitted to the General Assembly in March 2012 and later adopted in June 2012 through Section 8.5 of S.L. 2012‐142. 

As the revised performance measures were being finalized, attention was turned to developing recommendations for incorporating performance into colleges’ regular formula budget allocations. In May 2012, President Ralls appointed a team of college presidents to a Performance Funding Committee to develop a performance funding model. This committee was led by State Board Chairman K. Ray Bailey and Garret Hinshaw, President of Catawba Valley Community College. 

One of the outcomes of this committee was the establishment of system‐wide “baselines” and “goals” for each measure. The committee recommended using consistent, statistically‐defined baselines and goals to promote transparency, simplicity, and objectivity. This utilization of baselines and goals is a departure from the System’s historical use of “standards.” 

Based on three years of historical data (if available) for each measure, baselines were set two standard deviations below the system mean, and the goals were set one standard deviation above the system mean. These baselines and goals remain static for three years and will be reset in the 2016 Report. 

The performance summary on the following page provides each college with an overview of its results as compared to its peers. Color indicators represent various levels of performance within each measure: 

Met or exceeded the goal   Above the baseline, but below the college average  

Above the college average, but below the goal   Below the baseline 

2

Page 49: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

April 2014 Performance Summary

Met or Exceeded Goal

Above College Avg, Below Goal

Above Baseline, Below Avg

Below Baseline

A. BASIC 

SKILLS 

PROGRESS

B. GED 

PASS RATE

C. DEV ENG 

SUBSEQ 

SUCCESS

D. DEV MATH 

SUBSEQ 

SUCCESS

E. YEAR 

ONE 

PROGRESS

F. CURR 

COMPLET‐

ION RATE

G. 

LICENSURE 

PASS RATE

H. 

TRANSFER 

PERFORM

System Goal 51.2% 82.0% 74.9% 75.4% 74.6% 45.6% 91.7% 93.8%

System Baseline 20.6% 49.3% 45.2% 47.5% 53.2% 28.6% 71.0% 71.2%

Average College Percentage 41.3% 73.6% 64.4% 64.4% 68.3% 43.6% 83.3% 87.8%

System Totals (All Students) 42.0% 71.7% 64.3% 63.6% 68.3% 43.0% 85.0% 87.8%

Alamance CC  24.5% 80.5% 72.3% 63.2% 69.3% 45.8% 82.2% 87.5% 1 3 4 0

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  45.8% 51.5% 63.0% 55.8% 72.1% 44.3% 87.2% 92.5% 0 5 3 0

Beaufort County CC  36.0% 60.0% 69.1% 57.0% 63.0% 47.7% 85.5% 91.5% 1 3 4 0

Bladen CC  50.7% 64.9% 53.3% 50.9% 51.4% 37.5% 69.5% 72.9% 0 1 5 2

Blue Ridge CC  34.4% 61.1% 68.9% 71.8% 67.5% 43.6% 86.5% 90.8% 0 5 3 0

Brunswick CC  50.1% 48.5% 68.5% 84.3% 76.0% 40.0% 78.3% 86.4% 2 2 3 1

Caldwell CC & TI  46.3% 71.8% 62.3% 65.4% 69.4% 47.6% 78.4% 85.4% 1 3 4 0

Cape Fear CC  37.7% 69.9% 65.9% 59.8% 69.7% 47.6% 91.0% 87.5% 1 3 4 0

Carteret CC  24.3% 78.9% 68.6% 71.2% 54.7% 38.0% 83.9% 89.4% 0 5 3 0

Catawba Valley CC  38.4% 74.7% 75.5% 62.0% 69.2% 38.4% 79.7% 89.6% 1 3 4 0

Central Carolina CC  53.9% 69.7% 63.6% 68.6% 68.2% 45.7% 85.6% 91.5% 2 3 3 0

Central Piedmont CC  52.9% 79.5% 78.2% 65.1% 71.7% 39.8% 91.5% 85.3% 2 4 2 0

Cleveland CC  56.0% 87.1% 71.1% 60.7% 61.8% 36.7% 86.5% 90.2% 2 3 3 0

Coastal Carolina CC  48.6% 64.9% 66.1% 63.3% 74.1% 51.4% 91.5% 92.2% 1 5 2 0

College of The Albemarle  45.7% 71.6% 62.3% 69.3% 71.2% 46.9% 89.1% 83.7% 1 4 3 0

Craven CC  33.7% 72.7% 60.1% 63.2% 69.4% 44.2% 79.7% 89.4% 0 3 5 0

Davidson County CC  52.1% 76.1% 67.6% 63.8% 80.0% 44.9% 88.8% 87.8% 2 5 1 0

Durham TCC  40.3% 71.2% 52.7% 67.7% 62.2% 38.9% 87.5% 90.0% 0 3 5 0

Edgecombe CC  47.6% 75.9% 62.5% 34.6% 57.8% 46.9% 77.8% 86.0% 1 2 4 1

Fayetteville TCC  33.7% 85.7% 55.0% 54.3% 59.5% 36.7% 88.1% 88.5% 1 2 5 0

Forsyth TCC  50.8% 74.9% 66.9% 61.6% 72.4% 45.2% 93.2% 88.7% 1 6 1 0

Gaston College  35.9% 75.5% 74.6% 71.7% 72.7% 38.4% 91.2% 85.4% 0 5 3 0

Guilford TCC  29.9% 67.3% 50.8% 64.7% 63.2% 43.5% 86.5% 85.9% 0 2 6 0

Halifax CC  45.5% 48.5% 66.7% 64.2% 65.7% 46.2% 83.3% 90.9% 1 4 2 1

Haywood CC  49.7% 77.1% 73.2% 59.4% 75.1% 51.8% 79.1% 86.8% 2 3 3 0

Isothermal CC  22.0% 83.7% 74.9% 71.0% 67.8% 38.6% 81.3% 94.2% 2 2 4 0

James Sprunt CC  68.7% 80.6% 64.7% 56.8% 68.7% 50.3% 84.2% 84.6% 2 4 2 0

Johnston CC  38.4% 68.4% 78.6% 65.6% 76.2% 47.9% 81.7% 87.1% 3 1 4 0

Lenoir CC  47.5% 66.1% 59.1% 49.7% 65.8% 46.0% 77.3% 87.4% 1 1 6 0

Martin CC  31.9% 86.4% 65.6% 77.8% 64.4% 46.6% 64.4% 60.0% 3 1 2 2

Mayland CC  40.4% 80.2% 66.7% 65.3% 63.3% 54.4% 76.6% 96.3% 2 3 3 0

McDowell TCC  35.8% 76.4% 81.1% 83.1% 56.1% 35.6% 89.7% 79.4% 2 2 4 0

Mitchell CC  41.4% 90.8% 65.7% 66.3% 72.2% 41.6% 86.8% 87.9% 1 6 1 0

Montgomery CC  41.1% 77.4% 73.2% 36.2% 84.1% 44.2% 88.9% 100.0% 2 4 1 1

Nash CC  25.7% 66.2% 56.3% 73.6% 61.4% 44.0% 73.1% 90.0% 0 3 5 0

Pamlico CC  38.8% 82.6% 60.0% 78.9% 86.1% 54.7% 81.0% 100.0% 5 0 3 0

Piedmont CC  38.0% 73.3% 71.3% 68.4% 75.1% 46.6% 72.7% 75.0% 2 2 4 0

Pitt CC  42.8% 69.3% 65.0% 53.0% 64.5% 45.6% 87.3% 86.6% 0 4 4 0

Randolph CC  42.0% 69.4% 71.8% 75.1% 70.1% 41.6% 81.9% 92.9% 0 5 3 0

Richmond CC  47.3% 65.5% 62.4% 63.8% 73.5% 42.7% 67.4% 90.9% 0 3 4 1

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  14.3% 63.3% 58.3% 80.0% 67.2% 42.2% 73.8% 93.8% 1 1 5 1

Robeson CC  41.8% 95.7% 53.3% 51.2% 47.3% 38.6% 89.7% 86.4% 1 2 4 1

Rockingham CC  45.0% 67.6% 56.9% 65.4% 72.1% 43.3% 68.0% 82.5% 0 3 4 1

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  31.8% 70.5% 67.8% 67.9% 60.2% 37.4% 83.6% 87.0% 0 3 5 0

Sampson CC  50.5% 90.2% 36.7% 41.2% 81.0% 47.0% 85.2% 76.8% 3 2 1 2

Sandhills CC  26.6% 62.7% 62.7% 58.7% 68.9% 41.8% 86.6% 83.7% 0 2 6 0

South Piedmont CC  47.0% 72.2% 59.5% 61.1% 64.0% 41.2% 84.8% 92.8% 0 3 5 0

Southeastern CC  44.9% 73.6% 50.9% 88.4% 52.6% 43.7% 74.8% 87.7% 1 3 3 1

Southwestern CC  49.0% 75.4% 55.6% 70.7% 73.2% 44.3% 91.8% 91.4% 1 6 1 0

Stanly CC  50.4% 76.1% 70.3% 80.0% 74.9% 38.8% 88.3% 89.8% 2 5 1 0

Surry CC  42.1% 87.5% 65.8% 71.9% 66.2% 46.9% 91.5% 88.8% 2 5 1 0

Tri‐County CC  24.2% 75.6% 72.9% 42.6% 66.7% 33.1% 79.5% 92.1% 0 3 4 1

Vance‐Granville CC  43.6% 76.1% 59.0% 55.1% 70.2% 37.1% 88.3% 82.9% 0 4 4 0

Wake TCC  35.1% 68.3% 51.7% 63.6% 71.6% 42.2% 90.6% 90.1% 0 3 5 0

Wayne CC  69.8% 74.0% 64.7% 60.3% 71.9% 51.3% 83.1% 90.1% 2 4 2 0

Western Piedmont CC  23.0% 76.4% 61.4% 70.0% 75.5% 48.5% 94.4% 85.5% 3 2 3 0

Wilkes CC  47.1% 94.7% 70.0% 76.2% 74.6% 40.6% 86.4% 84.0% 2 4 2 0

Wilson CC  43.6% 71.3% 62.8% 73.5% 69.4% 41.1% 72.3% 97.1% 1 3 4 0

Note: Color indicators are based on the precise percentages and not the rounded percentages as displayed

Met or Exceed

ed Goal

Below Baselin

e

Below College

 Average,

Above Baselin

e

Below Goal,

Above College

 Average

3

Page 50: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

4

Page 51: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

A. Basic Skills Student Progress

Purpose 

To ensure adults with low literacy skills are progressing academically toward basic skill attainment necessary for employment and self‐sufficiency 

Description 

Percentage of students who progress as defined by an educational functioning level. 

Methodology 

Denominator: Basic skills students attempting 60 or more contact hours during program year. Excludes High Adult Secondary Education initial placements. 

Numerator: Basic skills students attempting 60 or more contact hours during program year, who complete the program year at a higher educational functioning level. Excludes high adult secondary education initial placements. 

Note: Initial placement is set by the first NRS approved test(s) taken during the program year. The initial placement is the lowest Educational Functioning Level of the tests given within 3 days of the first test of the program year. A pre‐test is considered if it occurs up to 90 days prior to the program year and the test code and component match the test code and component of the one having the lowest EFL of the first test(s) in the program year.   

Source 

LEIS annual data file 

Details 

To be included in this measure student had to have been enrolled in a class during the Basic Skills/College and Career Readiness program year (July 1 – June 30), have accumulated 60 or more total contact hours across all classes enrolled, and not have an initial placement of High Adult Secondary Education. Initial placement is based upon the National Reporting System (NRS) guidelines of being the lowest Educational Functioning Level of the first NRS approved test(s) taken during the program year.  Colleges received credit for all students who tested at a higher Educational Functioning Level at any point of the Basic Skills/College and Career Readiness program year (July 1 – June 30) in the same test and component that set the initial placement.  Colleges are also given credit for students who test at Adult Secondary Education Low, are an Adult High School student, and meet the federal and state assessment policy guidelines for moving up an educational functioning level to Adult Secondary Education High. 

Goal: 51.2% 

Baseline: 20.6% 

5

Page 52: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B. GED Diploma Passing Rate

Purpose 

To ensure quality GED preparation and high levels of GED attainment 

Description 

Percentage of students taking at least one GED test during a program year who receive a GED diploma during the program year.  

Methodology 

Denominator: GED students with an Initial placement of Low Adult Secondary Education or High Adult Secondary Education who take at least one GED test during the program year (July 1 – June 30) and have 12 or more total contact hours. 

Numerator: GED students with an Initial placement of Low Adult Secondary Education or High Adult Secondary Education who take at least one GED test during the program year (July 1 – June 30), and have 12 or more total contact hours, and receive a GED diploma 

Source 

LEIS Annual Data file Oklahoma Scoring GED test files 

Details 

Denominator:  Students must meet the following criteria: 

Included in the LEIS annual file 

Have an initial placement of Adult Secondary Education Low (ASEL) or Adult Secondary Education High (ASEH) 

Have accumulated at least 12 total contact hours during the program year 

Taken at least one GED test during the program year (July 1 – June 30) 

Numerator:   All students from the denominator who receive a GED diploma during the program year (July 1 – June 30). Credit is given to the college where the student received the 12 or more contact hours and not the location the GED test was taken. 

Goal: 82.0% 

Baseline: 49.3% 

6

Page 53: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE A. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2012‐2013 TABLE B. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013

Goal: 51.2% Goal: 82.0%

Baseline: 20.6% Baseline: 49.3%

12‐13 11‐12 12‐13 11‐12

System Totals  56,629 23,781 42.0% 41% System Totals  8,641 6,199 71.7% 70%

Alamance CC  1,261 309 24.5% 31% Alamance CC  195 157 80.5% 73%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 866 397 45.8% 40% Asheville‐Buncombe TC 408 210 51.5% 54%

Beaufort County CC  383 138 36.0% 38% Beaufort County CC  35 21 60.0% 83%

Bladen CC  203 103 50.7% 45% Bladen CC  74 48 64.9% 63%

Blue Ridge CC  488 168 34.4% 36% Blue Ridge CC  113 69 61.1% 66%

Brunswick CC  337 169 50.1% 47% Brunswick CC  132 64 48.5% 37%

Caldwell CC & TI  712 330 46.3% 42% Caldwell CC & TI  202 145 71.8% 65%

Cape Fear CC  1,529 577 37.7% 31% Cape Fear CC  173 121 69.9% 79%

Carteret CC  251 61 24.3% 27% Carteret CC  57 45 78.9% 92%

Catawba Valley CC  834 320 38.4% 37% Catawba Valley CC  249 186 74.7% 68%

Central Carolina CC  1,883 1,014 53.9% 55% Central Carolina CC  277 193 69.7% 69%

Central Piedmont CC  5,614 2,970 52.9% 50% Central Piedmont CC  337 268 79.5% 75%

Cleveland CC  402 225 56.0% 60% Cleveland CC  31 27 87.1% 74%

Coastal Carolina CC  599 291 48.6% 38% Coastal Carolina CC  97 63 64.9% 64%

College of The Albema 560 256 45.7% 48% College of The Albema 162 116 71.6% 58%

Craven CC  478 161 33.7% 32% Craven CC  55 40 72.7% 50%

Davidson County CC  1,419 740 52.1% 56% Davidson County CC  155 118 76.1% 73%

Durham TCC  1,403 565 40.3% 37% Durham TCC  153 109 71.2% 65%

Edgecombe CC  691 329 47.6% 51% Edgecombe CC  137 104 75.9% 75%

Fayetteville TCC  2,862 965 33.7% 33% Fayetteville TCC  223 191 85.7% 83%

Forsyth TCC  2,144 1,089 50.8% 49% Forsyth TCC  215 161 74.9% 76%

Gaston College  925 332 35.9% 37% Gaston College  212 160 75.5% 77%

Guilford TCC  3,603 1,076 29.9% 27% Guilford TCC  208 140 67.3% 70%

Halifax CC  288 131 45.5% 48% Halifax CC  167 81 48.5% 55%

Haywood CC  159 79 49.7% 41% Haywood CC  35 27 77.1% 49%

Isothermal CC  450 99 22.0% 29% Isothermal CC  98 82 83.7% 69%

James Sprunt CC  281 193 68.7% 58% James Sprunt CC  31 25 80.6% 70%

Johnston CC  887 341 38.4% 46% Johnston CC  95 65 68.4% 82%

Lenoir CC  1,019 484 47.5% 45% Lenoir CC  171 113 66.1% 68%

Martin CC  320 102 31.9% 38% Martin CC  66 57 86.4% 67%

Mayland CC  654 264 40.4% 41% Mayland CC  101 81 80.2% 79%

McDowell TCC  288 103 35.8% 38% McDowell TCC  106 81 76.4% 71%

Mitchell CC  635 263 41.4% 41% Mitchell CC  131 119 90.8% 90%

Montgomery CC  258 106 41.1% 43% Montgomery CC  53 41 77.4% 73%

Nash CC  373 96 25.7% 34% Nash CC  68 45 66.2% 70%

Pamlico CC  147 57 38.8% 28% Pamlico CC  23 19 82.6% 53%

Piedmont CC  503 191 38.0% 40% Piedmont CC  120 88 73.3% 72%

Pitt CC  1,127 482 42.8% 44% Pitt CC  153 106 69.3% 68%

Randolph CC  1,058 444 42.0% 35% Randolph CC  62 43 69.4% 76%

Richmond CC  980 464 47.3% 47% Richmond CC  206 135 65.5% 63%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  230 33 14.3% 13% Roanoke‐Chowan CC  30 19 63.3% 72%

Robeson CC  1,227 513 41.8% 35% Robeson CC  46 44 95.7% 81%

Rockingham CC  369 166 45.0% 56% Rockingham CC  111 75 67.6% 77%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  1,184 376 31.8% 37% Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  363 256 70.5% 64%

Sampson CC  652 329 50.5% 49% Sampson CC  51 46 90.2% 82%

Sandhills CC  713 190 26.6% 26% Sandhills CC  118 74 62.7% 61%

South Piedmont CC  1,079 507 47.0% 48% South Piedmont CC  176 127 72.2% 75%

Southeastern CC  911 409 44.9% 45% Southeastern CC  125 92 73.6% 84%

Southwestern CC  386 189 49.0% 51% Southwestern CC  179 135 75.4% 81%

Stanly CC  486 245 50.4% 43% Stanly CC  88 67 76.1% 72%

Surry CC  696 293 42.1% 37% Surry CC  96 84 87.5% 95%

Tri‐County CC  120 29 24.2% 27% Tri‐County CC  41 31 75.6% 79%

Vance‐Granville CC  1,272 555 43.6% 40% Vance‐Granville CC  247 188 76.1% 74%

Wake TCC  4,863 1,706 35.1% 38% Wake TCC  835 570 68.3% 60%

Wayne CC  1,328 927 69.8% 67% Wayne CC  169 125 74.0% 72%

Western Piedmont CC  838 193 23.0% 21% Western Piedmont CC  178 136 76.4% 67%

Wilkes CC  743 350 47.1% 45% Wilkes CC  94 89 94.7% 91%

Wilson CC  658 287 43.6% 58% Wilson CC  108 77 71.3% 74%

STUDENTSCOMPLETING 

LEVELSTUDENTS PASSING

% PASSING% COMPLETING

7

Page 54: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

8

Page 55: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

C. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level English Courses

Purpose 

To ensure remedial English and reading coursework prepares students to succeed in credit‐bearing English courses 

Description 

Percentage of previous developmental English and/or reading students who successfully complete a credit English course with a grade of “C” or better upon the first attempt.

Methodology 

Denominator: All students enrolling in their first credit English course during an academic year who also enrolled in a developmental English and/or reading course during the same or previous academic year.  Does not include students who do not attend the class i.e. transfer credits, credit by exam or reported grades of ‘NA’ and ‘NS’. 

Numerator: All students earning a grade of “C” or better in their first credit English course during an academic year who enrolled in a developmental English and/or reading course in the same or previous academic year. Does not include students who do not attend the class (ie transfer credit, credit by exam, etc). 

Source 

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file 

Details 

Denominator:  Students must meet one of the following criteria: Enrolled in their first credit English course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental English or Reading course during the previous reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college. 

OR 

Enrolled in their first credit English course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental English or Reading course during the same reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college. The student’s developmental English or Reading course semester must be equal to or precede their first credit English course.  

Not eligible for this measure are students who complete developmental English course by exam, placement or transfer. 

Numerator: All students from the denominator who earned a grade of “C” or better in their first credit English course during the reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer).  The first credit English course evaluated cannot be a lab section. First credit English course is based on any course with prefix “ENG” and course number greater than 099. When multiple English courses are enrolled in during the same semester, the lowest numbered course will be evaluated. 

Goal: 74.9% 

Baseline: 45.2% 

9

Page 56: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

D. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level Math Courses

Purpose 

To ensure remedial math coursework prepares students to succeed in credit‐bearing math courses 

Description 

Percentage of previous developmental math students who successfully complete a credit math course with a “C” or better upon the first attempt. 

Methodology 

Denominator: All students enrolling in their first credit math course during an academic year who also enrolled in a developmental math course during the same or previous academic year.  Does not include students who do not attend the class i.e. transfer credits, credit by exam or reported grades of ‘NA’ and ‘NS’. 

Numerator: All students earning a “C” or better in their first credit math course during an academic year who enrolled in a developmental math course in the same or previous academic year. Does not include students who do not attend the class (ie transfer credit, credit by exam, etc). 

Source 

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file 

Details 

Denominator: Students must meet one of the following criteria: 

Enrolled in their first credit Math course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental Math course during the previous reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college. 

OR 

Enrolled in their first credit Math course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental Math course during the same reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college. The student’s developmental Math course semester must be equal to or precede their first credit Math course.  

Not eligible for this measure are students who complete developmental Math course by exam, placement or transfer. 

Numerator: All students from the denominator who earned a grade of “C” or better in their first credit Math course during the reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer).  The first credit Math course evaluated cannot be a lab section. First credit Math course is based on any course with prefix “MAT” and course number greater than 099. When multiple Math courses are enrolled in during the same semester, the lowest numbered course will be evaluated. 

Goal: 75.4% 

Baseline: 47.5% 

10

Page 57: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Goal: 74.9% Goal: 75.4%

Baseline: 45.2% Baseline: 47.5%

12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  17,785 11,436 64.3% 65% 65% 66% 66% System Totals  16,612 10,562 63.6% 64% 66% 66% 65%

Alamance CC  372 269 72.3% 67% 69% 71% 72% Alamance CC  419 265 63.2% 63% 63% 66% 69%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 427 269 63.0% 61% 66% 43% 56% Asheville‐Buncombe TC 650 363 55.8% 65% 62% 59% 56%

Beaufort County CC  81 56 69.1% 65% 79% 61% 61% Beaufort County CC  86 49 57.0% 51% 63% 67% 66%

Bladen CC  105 56 53.3% 52% 46% 60% 68% Bladen CC  114 58 50.9% 61% 68% 62% 71%

Blue Ridge CC  148 102 68.9% 71% 77% 82% 76% Blue Ridge CC  124 89 71.8% 78% 82% 71% 71%

Brunswick CC  108 74 68.5% 74% 76% 71% 59% Brunswick CC  127 107 84.3% 60% 68% 64% 68%

Caldwell CC & TI  273 170 62.3% 65% 64% 63% 67% Caldwell CC & TI  347 227 65.4% 72% 71% 75% 72%

Cape Fear CC  756 498 65.9% 63% 64% 67% 62% Cape Fear CC  677 405 59.8% 59% 63% 64% 63%

Carteret CC  86 59 68.6% 72% 68% 60% 61% Carteret CC  132 94 71.2% 68% 73% 69% 53%

Catawba Valley CC  359 271 75.5% 75% 69% 78% 74% Catawba Valley CC  413 256 62.0% 56% 61% 60% 63%

Central Carolina CC  184 117 63.6% 61% 61% 70% 67% Central Carolina CC  185 127 68.6% 71% 81% 76% 70%

Central Piedmont CC  1,850 1,446 78.2% 78% 79% 76% 77% Central Piedmont CC  1,311 853 65.1% 72% 71% 69% 67%

Cleveland CC  194 138 71.1% 73% 66% 76% 75% Cleveland CC  219 133 60.7% 69% 69% 73% 72%

Coastal Carolina CC  360 238 66.1% 70% 83% 70% 74% Coastal Carolina CC  529 335 63.3% 63% 81% 71% 70%

College of The Albema 146 91 62.3% 61% 68% 63% 63% College of The Albema 153 106 69.3% 75% 79% 76% 83%

Craven CC  138 83 60.1% 50% 62% 73% 61% Craven CC  296 187 63.2% 72% 74% 73% 78%

Davidson County CC  327 221 67.6% 61% 58% 62% 75% Davidson County CC  240 153 63.8% 64% 64% 67% 69%

Durham TCC  427 225 52.7% 56% 56% 60% 63% Durham TCC  356 241 67.7% 68% 66% 68% 65%

Edgecombe CC  200 125 62.5% 51% 51% 66% 71% Edgecombe CC  208 72 34.6% 43% 44% 50% 59%

Fayetteville TCC  949 522 55.0% 65% 63% 60% 57% Fayetteville TCC  687 373 54.3% 60% 65% 58% 60%

Forsyth TCC  816 546 66.9% 64% 66% 62% 61% Forsyth TCC  580 357 61.6% 54% 52% 50% 49%

Gaston College  422 315 74.6% 74% 71% 75% 69% Gaston College  414 297 71.7% 70% 66% 73% 72%

Guilford TCC  1,239 629 50.8% 53% 60% 67% 65% Guilford TCC  1,144 740 64.7% 67% 69% 59% 58%

Halifax CC  156 104 66.7% 66% 66% 64% 64% Halifax CC  106 68 64.2% 65% 68% 59% 60%

Haywood CC  127 93 73.2% 71% 65% 71% 59% Haywood CC  128 76 59.4% 69% 59% 62% 65%

Isothermal CC  171 128 74.9% 67% 69% 70% 65% Isothermal CC  193 137 71.0% 76% 68% 79% 72%

James Sprunt CC  170 110 64.7% 62% 71% 77% 78% James Sprunt CC  125 71 56.8% 57% 50% 66% 74%

Johnston CC  285 224 78.6% 80% 75% 72% 84% Johnston CC  270 177 65.6% 58% 65% 77% 74%

Lenoir CC  186 110 59.1% 50% 55% 66% 72% Lenoir CC  149 74 49.7% 43% 48% 40% 51%

Martin CC  61 40 65.6% 61% 56% 31% 35% Martin CC  63 49 77.8% 79% 69% 72% 52%

Mayland CC  57 38 66.7% 64% 63% 70% 51% Mayland CC  49 32 65.3% 69% 76% 64% 79%

McDowell TCC  53 43 81.1% 81% 75% 84% 87% McDowell TCC  65 54 83.1% 87% 89% 86% 79%

Mitchell CC  338 222 65.7% 65% 63% 63% 55% Mitchell CC  270 179 66.3% 60% 55% 63% 60%

Montgomery CC  41 30 73.2% 79% 75% 86% 87% Montgomery CC  47 17 36.2% 32% 36% 43% 52%

Nash CC  192 108 56.3% 53% 54% 51% 48% Nash CC  258 190 73.6% 72% 76% 76% 74%

Pamlico CC  5 3 60.0% 50% 73% 64% 67% Pamlico CC  19 15 78.9% 91% 75% 58% 63%

Piedmont CC  136 97 71.3% 62% 63% 69% 73% Piedmont CC  133 91 68.4% 71% 64% 73% 77%

Pitt CC  791 514 65.0% 71% 63% 61% 62% Pitt CC  460 244 53.0% 44% 53% 60% 57%

Randolph CC  216 155 71.8% 76% 75% 80% 74% Randolph CC  253 190 75.1% 66% 77% 62% 81%

Richmond CC  266 166 62.4% 66% 71% 66% 69% Richmond CC  235 150 63.8% 64% 68% 58% 69%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  72 42 58.3% 60% 50% 55% 29% Roanoke‐Chowan CC  65 52 80.0% 90% 74% 86% 87%

Robeson CC  246 131 53.3% 53% 54% 62% 71% Robeson CC  205 105 51.2% 56% 61% 65% 69%

Rockingham CC  160 91 56.9% 56% 59% 60% 64% Rockingham CC  243 159 65.4% 71% 74% 75% 73%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  656 445 67.8% 69% 64% 71% 65% Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  436 296 67.9% 67% 67% 73% 66%

Sampson CC  147 54 36.7% 50% 51% 59% 60% Sampson CC  114 47 41.2% 66% 55% 51% 60%

Sandhills CC  354 222 62.7% 62% 57% 62% 65% Sandhills CC  201 118 58.7% 55% 59% 59% 52%

South Piedmont CC  148 88 59.5% 63% 61% 67% 61% South Piedmont CC  113 69 61.1% 51% 62% 56% 58%

Southeastern CC  116 59 50.9% 55% 38% 46% 69% Southeastern CC  69 61 88.4% 75% 69% 79% 71%

Southwestern CC  151 84 55.6% 63% 63% 67% 67% Southwestern CC  184 130 70.7% 67% 59% 64% 59%

Stanly CC  192 135 70.3% 67% 75% 68% 65% Stanly CC  275 220 80.0% 72% 72% 73% 68%

Surry CC  199 131 65.8% 65% 66% 75% 73% Surry CC  153 110 71.9% 65% 66% 62% 69%

Tri‐County CC  59 43 72.9% 76% 75% 71% 76% Tri‐County CC  61 26 42.6% 39% 53% 68% 67%

Vance‐Granville CC  251 148 59.0% 59% 54% 59% 61% Vance‐Granville CC  136 75 55.1% 54% 60% 58% 58%

Wake TCC  921 476 51.7% 55% 55% 54% 50% Wake TCC  1,342 854 63.6% 64% 57% 62% 64%

Wayne CC  323 209 64.7% 63% 67% 63% 63% Wayne CC  239 144 60.3% 66% 65% 57% 53%

Western Piedmont CC  210 129 61.4% 66% 67% 70% 79% Western Piedmont CC  210 147 70.0% 70% 80% 76% 75%

Wilkes CC  233 163 70.0% 56% 65% 61% 65% Wilkes CC  143 109 76.2% 76% 66% 78% 69%

Wilson CC  129 81 62.8% 46% 41% 54% 49% Wilson CC  189 139 73.5% 72% 72% 72% 70%

STUDENTS SUCCESSES% SUCCESSFUL

TABLE C. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN 

COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2012‐2013

TABLE D. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN 

COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2012‐2013

STUDENTS SUCCESSES% SUCCESSFUL

11

Page 58: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

E. First Year Progression

Purpose 

To ensure first‐year students reach an academic momentum point that helps predict future credential completion 

Description 

Percentage of first‐time fall credential‐seeking students attempting at least twelve hours within their first academic year who successfully complete (“P”, “C” or better) at least twelve of those hours  

Methodology 

Denominator: A fall cohort of credential‐seeking students (program code A, D, C) enrolled in curriculum courses at a college for the first time after high school graduation. Must attempt at least twelve hours (including developmental and withdraw) within the first year fall, spring, and summer semesters.  Includes those dually enrolled previously at the same institution and excludes students previously enrolled at another college. Does not include students who do not attend the class i.e. transfer credits, credit by exam or reported grades of ‘NA’ and ‘NS’. 

Numerator: Those within the cohort above who complete at least twelve hours (including developmental) with a “P”, “C” or better within the first year. 

Source 

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file National Student Clearinghouse 

Details 

Denominator:  Students must meet one of the following criteria: 

The fall semester is first enrollment term dating back to fall of 2001 and no previous post‐secondary enrollment as verified from the National Student Clearinghouse before the start date of the fall semester. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C 

Graduated from high school before the beginning of the fall semester. 

Attempt at least twelve hours during the first academic year (Fall, Spring, and Summer). Hours attempted include developmental hours and any class in which the student earns a standard letter grade, except for “Credit by Exam”, “Transfer”, “NA”, or “NS”. 

OR 

Previous dual enrollment student 

The fall semester is first post‐secondary enrollment term following high school graduation from the same college they were Dual enrolled. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C 

Attempt at least twelve hours during the first academic year (Fall, Spring, and Summer). Hours attempted include developmental hours and any class in which the student earns a standard letter grade, except for “Credit by Exam” , “Transfer” , “NA”, or “NS”. 

Numerator:  All students from the denominator who successfully complete with a grade of ‘P’,‘C’ or better at least twelve hours within the first year. 

Goal: 74.6% 

Baseline: 53.2% 

12

Page 59: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE E. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2012 COHORT

Goal: 74.6%

Baseline: 53.2%

12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  38,812 32,826 22,425 68.3% 68% 67% 67% 68%

Alamance CC  765 655 454 69.3% 69% 71% 52% 68%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 1,004 809 583 72.1% 72% 68% 61% 60%

Beaufort County CC  287 243 153 63.0% 60% 57% 58% 67%

Bladen CC  207 185 95 51.4% 54% 55% 64% 56%

Blue Ridge CC  399 305 206 67.5% 75% 83% 83% 85%

Brunswick CC  269 233 177 76.0% 72% 68% 75% 62%

Caldwell CC & TI  749 673 467 69.4% 68% 67% 72% 72%

Cape Fear CC  1,661 1,469 1,024 69.7% 72% 72% 71% 70%

Carteret CC  295 225 123 54.7% 69% 64% 63% 65%

Catawba Valley CC  845 721 499 69.2% 70% 70% 73% 66%

Central Carolina CC  643 531 362 68.2% 65% 68% 68% 71%

Central Piedmont CC  2,978 2,314 1,660 71.7% 70% 69% 67% 69%

Cleveland CC  428 369 228 61.8% 64% 63% 69% 71%

Coastal Carolina CC  791 644 477 74.1% 72% 83% 57% 79%

College of The Albema 464 378 269 71.2% 71% 66% 69% 72%

Craven CC  425 350 243 69.4% 67% 69% 71% 72%

Davidson County CC  585 494 395 80.0% 74% 71% 79% 57%

Durham TCC  796 613 381 62.2% 61% 59% 60% 60%

Edgecombe CC  376 315 182 57.8% 53% 54% 65% 59%

Fayetteville TCC  1,902 1,609 957 59.5% 59% 64% 60% 41%

Forsyth TCC  1,645 1,360 985 72.4% 69% 67% 72% 73%

Gaston College  1,107 947 688 72.7% 77% 74% 77% 74%

Guilford TCC  2,404 2,096 1,325 63.2% 65% 67% 62% 64%

Halifax CC  328 289 190 65.7% 59% 60% 60% 62%

Haywood CC  278 229 172 75.1% 69% 57% 67% 67%

Isothermal CC  353 317 215 67.8% 68% 65% 71% 70%

James Sprunt CC  219 201 138 68.7% 76% 73% 58% 68%

Johnston CC  705 622 474 76.2% 71% 75% 73% 75%

Lenoir CC  429 395 260 65.8% 66% 64% 70% 74%

Martin CC  106 90 58 64.4% 72% 50% 61% 65%

Mayland CC  167 139 88 63.3% 74% 72% 79% 78%

McDowell TCC  177 155 87 56.1% 70% 72% 67% 71%

Mitchell CC  618 492 355 72.2% 69% 67% 70% 71%

Montgomery CC  123 107 90 84.1% 76% 63% 85% 66%

Nash CC  483 428 263 61.4% 63% 65% 47% 59%

Pamlico CC  86 72 62 86.1% 61% 77% 75% 81%

Piedmont CC  258 213 160 75.1% 74% 68% 71% 67%

Pitt CC  1,519 1,377 888 64.5% 66% 64% 67% 68%

Randolph CC  533 471 330 70.1% 70% 69% 70% 72%

Richmond CC  369 321 236 73.5% 73% 74% 73% 77%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  143 116 78 67.2% 67% 70% 58% 70%

Robeson CC  549 469 222 47.3% 49% 54% 60% 63%

Rockingham CC  430 348 251 72.1% 69% 65% 64% 67%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  1,133 961 579 60.2% 62% 60% 65% 66%

Sampson CC  203 179 145 81.0% 69% 74% 76% 78%

Sandhills CC  746 643 443 68.9% 66% 70% 64% 65%

South Piedmont CC  360 253 162 64.0% 61% 65% 74% 69%

Southeastern CC  278 251 132 52.6% 60% 56% 61% 68%

Southwestern CC  307 261 191 73.2% 74% 67% 61% 63%

Stanly CC  426 362 271 74.9% 68% 64% 69% 68%

Surry CC  368 317 210 66.2% 71% 73% 73% 76%

Tri‐County CC  172 153 102 66.7% 77% 65% 68% 76%

Vance‐Granville CC  693 568 399 70.2% 64% 62% 67% 67%

Wake TCC  3,339 2,815 2,016 71.6% 67% 67% 50% 64%

Wayne CC  676 572 411 71.9% 73% 72% 71% 69%

Western Piedmont CC  447 387 292 75.5% 72% 76% 76% 78%

Wilkes CC  522 496 370 74.6% 74% 72% 69% 67%

Wilson CC  244 219 152 69.4% 66% 67% 55% 73%

% SUCCESSFULCOHORT

12 HOURS 

ATTEMPTED

12 HOURS 

SUCCESSFULLY 

COMPLETED 

13

Page 60: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

F. Curriculum Completion

Purpose 

To ensure student completion and persistence toward a post‐secondary credential  

Description 

Percentage of first‐time fall credential‐seeking students who graduate, transfer, or are still enrolled with 36 hours after six years  

Methodology 

Denominator: A fall cohort of credential‐seeking students (program code A, D, C) enrolled in curriculum courses at a college for the first time after high school graduation. Includes those dually enrolled previously at the same institution and excludes students previously enrolled at another college. 

Numerator: Those within the cohort above who by the fall that occurs six years after original cohort designation either graduate (A, D, or C), transfer to a four year institution, or are still enrolled during that seventh fall semester previously completing 36 non‐developmental hours. 

Source 

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file National Student Clearinghouse 

Details 

Denominator:  Students must meet one of the following criteria: 

The fall semester is first enrollment term dating back to fall of 2001 and no previous post‐secondary enrollment as verified from the National Student Clearinghouse before the start date of the fall semester. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C 

Graduated from high school before the beginning of the fall semester. 

OR 

Previous dual enrollment student 

The fall semester is first post‐secondary enrollment term following high school graduation. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C 

Numerator:   All students from the denominator who achieve at least one of the following: 

Graduation‐ Graduated from a North Carolina community college credential program (A, D, C) at any point from the start of their first fall term and up till 6th fall term afterward. 

OR 

Transfer‐ Transferred into a 4‐year college as archived in the National Student Clearinghouse database on or before the 6th fall after original cohort term. 

OR 

Persistence‐ Still enrolled during the 6th fall term and successfully completing at least 36 non‐developmental credits prior to the 6th fall term. Successful credit completion is based on grades of C or better. 

Goal: 45.6% 

Baseline: 28.6% 

14

Page 61: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F. CURRICULUM COMPLETION, FALL 2007 COHORT

Goal: 45.6%

Baseline: 28.6%

2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003

System Totals  32,307 25% 25% 27% 27% 27% 15% 14% 10% 12% 11% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 13,879 43.0% 41% 39% 40% 39%

Alamance CC  742 30% 29% 27% 26% 29% 12% 9% 7% 13% 11% 3% 2% 3% 3% 4% 340 45.8% 40% 37% 41% 44%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 715 32% 29% 29% 28% 24% 10% 8% 8% 11% 10% 3% 3% 2% 1% 2% 317 44.3% 40% 39% 39% 36%

Beaufort County CC  214 29% 35% 28% 28% 31% 14% 10% 12% 11% 6% 5% 3% 1% 4% 6% 102 47.7% 48% 42% 43% 43%

Bladen CC  176 20% 18% 21% 17% 25% 14% 19% 7% 13% 9% 3% 1% 2% 4% 3% 66 37.5% 38% 31% 34% 37%

Blue Ridge CC  392 25% 20% 23% 18% 19% 15% 12% 12% 12% 11% 4% 1% 2% 3% 2% 171 43.6% 33% 37% 33% 31%

Brunswick CC  240 28% 27% 24% 25% 32% 10% 13% 7% 14% 8% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 96 40.0% 40% 33% 41% 41%

Caldwell CC & TI  614 32% 30% 30% 26% 18% 13% 14% 9% 11% 12% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 292 47.6% 46% 43% 40% 34%

Cape Fear CC  1,256 28% 30% 24% 27% 26% 16% 17% 14% 14% 11% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 598 47.6% 49% 40% 43% 40%

Carteret CC  255 23% 25% 23% 27% 30% 13% 13% 9% 12% 13% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 97 38.0% 41% 35% 41% 45%

Catawba Valley CC  910 23% 25% 27% 22% 25% 12% 12% 11% 14% 10% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% 349 38.4% 40% 41% 37% 37%

Central Carolina CC  541 34% 28% 28% 31% 26% 10% 8% 8% 12% 8% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 247 45.7% 37% 39% 45% 36%

Central Piedmont CC  2,567 15% 16% 15% 15% 12% 23% 18% 19% 19% 17% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1021 39.8% 37% 36% 35% 31%

Cleveland CC  335 24% 20% 23% 21% 22% 12% 10% 7% 8% 9% 1% 2% 3% 3% 5% 123 36.7% 33% 34% 33% 37%

Coastal Carolina CC  703 28% 26% 26% 26% 27% 22% 18% 19% 21% 20% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 361 51.4% 45% 48% 48% 48%

College of The Albema 407 31% 26% 28% 26% 25% 14% 20% 15% 15% 14% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 191 46.9% 47% 44% 43% 41%

Craven CC  496 21% 20% 17% 17% 19% 21% 21% 17% 23% 22% 2% 2% 5% 3% 2% 219 44.2% 43% 39% 42% 44%

Davidson County CC  530 32% 35% 36% 32% 38% 11% 11% 5% 8% 10% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 238 44.9% 50% 44% 42% 49%

Durham TCC  535 16% 15% 21% 17% 14% 21% 21% 16% 18% 20% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 208 38.9% 38% 39% 37% 36%

Edgecombe CC  209 28% 16% 15% 19% 19% 15% 12% 13% 13% 9% 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 98 46.9% 31% 31% 34% 29%

Fayetteville TCC  1,257 16% 18% 19% 17% 19% 18% 19% 14% 18% 17% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 461 36.7% 38% 37% 37% 38%

Forsyth TCC  1,225 26% 25% 24% 20% 19% 16% 15% 14% 14% 14% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 554 45.2% 42% 41% 37% 35%

Gaston College  1,062 24% 22% 21% 25% 23% 11% 13% 10% 9% 11% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 408 38.4% 37% 35% 37% 37%

Guilford TCC  1,880 22% 24% 21% 20% 18% 19% 16% 12% 16% 17% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 817 43.5% 43% 35% 38% 37%

Halifax CC  234 27% 21% 20% 21% 22% 17% 15% 9% 10% 10% 2% 3% 2% 3% 1% 108 46.2% 39% 32% 33% 33%

Haywood CC  274 41% 29% 36% 28% 31% 9% 8% 6% 8% 5% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 142 51.8% 38% 43% 39% 37%

Isothermal CC  329 25% 27% 27% 24% 32% 13% 11% 8% 10% 6% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 127 38.6% 39% 37% 35% 41%

James Sprunt CC  185 39% 37% 44% 42% 45% 9% 8% 5% 10% 7% 3% 3% 1% 2% 1% 93 50.3% 48% 49% 53% 53%

Johnston CC  570 32% 33% 38% 42% 42% 13% 8% 8% 10% 8% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 273 47.9% 44% 48% 54% 52%

Lenoir CC  383 30% 27% 28% 27% 33% 12% 13% 13% 14% 13% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% 176 46.0% 43% 42% 45% 49%

Martin CC  131 27% 21% 19% 23% 24% 16% 18% 10% 10% 6% 3% 5% 4% 3% 6% 61 46.6% 44% 31% 36% 37%

Mayland CC  239 48% 42% 31% 34% 31% 6% 6% 6% 5% 7% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 130 54.4% 49% 37% 41% 39%

McDowell TCC  191 27% 26% 31% 38% 23% 7% 7% 4% 6% 4% 1% 3% 4% 1% 2% 68 35.6% 36% 39% 45% 29%

Mitchell CC  519 23% 17% 22% 27% 20% 16% 14% 11% 16% 12% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 216 41.6% 33% 37% 46% 36%

Montgomery CC  163 36% 44% 40% 32% 34% 5% 5% 5% 4% 7% 4% 1% 2% 3% 2% 72 44.2% 50% 46% 40% 42%

Nash CC  443 26% 18% 20% 21% 21% 13% 9% 12% 16% 10% 5% 3% 4% 1% 3% 195 44.0% 29% 37% 37% 33%

Pamlico CC  53 43% 57% 55% 64% 42% 8% 4% 7% 1% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 3% 29 54.7% 61% 62% 65% 44%

Piedmont CC  268 32% 36% 40% 41% 28% 15% 7% 5% 7% 6% 0% 4% 2% 2% 2% 125 46.6% 47% 46% 50% 37%

Pitt CC  870 26% 25% 28% 26% 25% 15% 17% 15% 15% 15% 5% 4% 5% 3% 3% 397 45.6% 46% 48% 44% 44%

Randolph CC  368 28% 31% 26% 25% 27% 11% 9% 5% 15% 14% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 153 41.6% 42% 34% 41% 43%

Richmond CC  300 26% 20% 22% 22% 25% 14% 13% 11% 13% 10% 2% 2% 4% 1% 4% 128 42.7% 35% 37% 37% 38%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  161 25% 34% 25% 20% 21% 16% 12% 12% 13% 16% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 68 42.2% 48% 39% 35% 40%

Robeson CC  360 24% 23% 22% 25% 29% 11% 12% 10% 11% 8% 4% 3% 2% 3% 3% 139 38.6% 38% 34% 39% 40%

Rockingham CC  411 29% 33% 23% 32% 28% 11% 12% 11% 9% 9% 3% 3% 2% 5% 4% 178 43.3% 48% 36% 46% 41%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  1,138 22% 21% 20% 20% 24% 13% 11% 11% 11% 10% 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 426 37.4% 35% 34% 34% 37%

Sampson CC  168 29% 23% 29% 27% 28% 14% 13% 13% 8% 10% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 79 47.0% 39% 45% 38% 40%

Sandhills CC  589 23% 23% 22% 24% 27% 15% 15% 14% 13% 10% 4% 1% 5% 4% 3% 246 41.8% 39% 39% 41% 40%

South Piedmont CC  354 27% 32% 24% 20% 29% 13% 12% 7% 12% 6% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 146 41.2% 47% 32% 36% 38%

Southeastern CC  323 24% 28% 26% 26% 29% 19% 11% 7% 13% 8% 2% 3% 2% 4% 1% 141 43.7% 42% 35% 43% 38%

Southwestern CC  280 36% 35% 36% 35% 33% 7% 9% 8% 8% 7% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 124 44.3% 47% 46% 44% 42%

Stanly CC  384 28% 36% 38% 39% 42% 9% 8% 8% 7% 7% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2% 149 38.8% 46% 47% 46% 50%

Surry CC  580 31% 31% 26% 27% 29% 14% 11% 10% 12% 13% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 272 46.9% 44% 39% 42% 44%

Tri‐County CC  148 24% 22% 27% 24% 30% 6% 7% 9% 13% 9% 3% 3% 1% 1% 3% 49 33.1% 33% 36% 38% 43%

Vance‐Granville CC  696 23% 22% 21% 21% 22% 12% 11% 11% 8% 9% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 258 37.1% 34% 34% 32% 33%

Wake TCC  2,199 18% 16% 18% 18% 20% 21% 20% 16% 19% 19% 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 929 42.2% 39% 38% 40% 41%

Wayne CC  663 30% 27% 26% 26% 26% 18% 19% 18% 16% 19% 3% 3% 2% 1% 2% 340 51.3% 49% 46% 44% 46%

Western Piedmont CC  400 35% 34% 32% 32% 33% 10% 9% 6% 9% 11% 4% 3% 3% 2% 3% 194 48.5% 46% 41% 43% 47%

Wilkes CC  441 29% 30% 29% 32% 35% 10% 12% 6% 11% 7% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 179 40.6% 44% 37% 44% 44%

Wilson CC  231 23% 27% 25% 24% 22% 15% 10% 10% 11% 11% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 95 41.1% 40% 37% 37% 36%

% TRANSFER, NOT 

GRADUATE

% GRADUATE, TRANSFER, OR 

RETAINED

COHORT

% GRADUATE% RETAINED, NOT GRADUATE 

OR TRANSFERGRAD 

TRAN 

RET

15

Page 62: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

G. Licensure and Certification Passing Rate

Purpose 

To ensure programmatic coursework prepares students to competently practice in their chosen profession 

Description 

Aggregate institutional passing rate of first time test‐takers on licensure and certification exams.  Exams included in this measure are state mandated exams which candidates must pass before becoming active practitioners.   

Methodology 

Denominator: All licensure and certification exams taken for the first time during the licensure agency’s most recent reporting year.  Only includes state mandated exams which candidates must pass before becoming active practitioners. 

Numerator: Licensure and certification exams passed on first attempt during the licensure agency’s most recent reporting year.   

Source 

American Registry of Radiologic Technologists Nuclear Medicine Technology Exam Radiation Therapy Exam Radiography Exam 

Council of Interstate Testing Dental Hygiene Exam 

Federal Aviation Administration Airframe Exam General Exam Power Plant Exam 

NC Board of Cosmetic Art Examiners Apprentice Exam Cosmetology Exam Cosmetology Instructor Exam Esthetician Exam Manicurist Exam 

NC Board of Massage & Bodywork TherapyMassage & Body Work Therapist 

NC Board of Nursing Practical Nursing Exam Registered Nursing Exam 

NC Board of Occupational Therapy Occupational Therapist Assistant* 

NC Board of Opticians Opticianry Exam 

NC Board of Physical Therapy Examiners Physical Therapist Assistant Exam 

NC Department of Justice, Criminal Justice Standards Division Basic Law Enforcement Training (BLET) Exam 

NC Department of Justice Sheriff’s Standards Division Detention Officer 

NC Office of Emergency Medical Services EMD Exam EMT Exam EMTI‐I Exam EMT‐P Exam 

NC Real Estate Commission Provisional Real Estate Broker 

NC Veterinary Medical Board Veterinary Medicine Technology Exam 

* Based on availability, results are not included in this year’s report

Details 

The number of first‐time test‐takers and the number passing were provided to the System Office by agencies issuing the license or certification and validated by the colleges. Depending on the exam, data may be provided on a fiscal or calendar year. Exams include Aviation‐General, Aviation‐Airframe, Aviation ‐ Power Plant, BLET, Real Estate Sales, Cosmetic Arts‐Apprentice, Cosmetology, Esthetician, Cosmetic Arts‐Instructor, Manicurist, Dental Hygiene, Opticianry, Nuclear Medical Technician, Radiation Therapy, Radiography, Physical Therapist Assistant, 

Practical Nursing, Registered Nursing, Veterinary Medical Technician, EMD, EMT, EMT‐I, EMT‐P, Occupational Therapist Assistant, Massage & Body Work Therapist, and Detention Officer. 

Goal: 91.7% 

Baseline: 71.0% 

16

Page 63: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013

Goal: 91.7%

Baseline: 71.0%12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  11,460 9,739 85.0% 86% 87% 86% 86%

Alamance CC  185 152 82.2% 80% 76% 88% 86%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 446 389 87.2% 90% 95% 89% 93%

Beaufort County CC  117 100 85.5% 77% 71% 86% 85%

Bladen CC  118 82 69.5% 72% 76% 81% 83%

Blue Ridge CC  126 109 86.5% 92% 91% 81% 82%

Brunswick CC  115 90 78.3% 85% 83% 91% 85%

Caldwell CC & TI  148 116 78.4% 83% 82% 85% 84%

Cape Fear CC  391 356 91.0% 90% 91% 96% 95%

Carteret CC  143 120 83.9% 78% 80% 83% 79%

Catawba Valley CC  197 157 79.7% 85% 83% 77% 71%

Central Carolina CC  312 267 85.6% 85% 85% 83% 86%

Central Piedmont CC  341 312 91.5% 92% 84% 92% 91%

Cleveland CC  200 173 86.5% 88% 87% 80% 78%

Coastal Carolina CC  258 236 91.5% 94% 92% 94% 88%

College of The Albema 183 163 89.1% 83% 89% 74% 84%

Craven CC  236 188 79.7% 86% 90% 88% 83%

Davidson County CC  268 238 88.8% 92% 88% 92% 88%

Durham TCC  295 258 87.5% 91% 96% 89% 85%

Edgecombe CC  108 84 77.8% 86% 90% 86% 88%

Fayetteville TCC  530 467 88.1% 91% 92% 96% 94%

Forsyth TCC  340 317 93.2% 93% 94% 92% 89%

Gaston College  328 299 91.2% 93% 93% 88% 89%

Guilford TCC  490 424 86.5% 88% 92% 94% 89%

Halifax CC  66 55 83.3% 86% 78% 76% 70%

Haywood CC  110 87 79.1% 77% 86% 79% 86%

Isothermal CC  134 109 81.3% 76% 77% 77% 79%

James Sprunt CC  76 64 84.2% 81% 79% 88% 88%

Johnston CC  262 214 81.7% 84% 88% 81% 92%

Lenoir CC  511 395 77.3% 80% 78% 84% 87%

Martin CC  87 56 64.4% 69% 74% 71% 87%

Mayland CC  107 82 76.6% 81% 83% 85% 84%

McDowell TCC  117 105 89.7% 90% 88% 92% 88%

Mitchell CC  159 138 86.8% 90% 85% 84% 84%

Montgomery CC  36 32 88.9% 94% 85% 83% 84%

Nash CC  171 125 73.1% 75% 83% 77% 86%

Pamlico CC  21 17 81.0% 100% 90% 46% 75%

Piedmont CC  55 40 72.7% 75% 78% 76% 89%

Pitt CC  292 255 87.3% 91% 90% 85% 86%

Randolph CC  144 118 81.9% 86% 83% 87% 88%

Richmond CC  89 60 67.4% 83% 91% 97% 86%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  42 31 73.8% 75% 86% 72% 83%

Robeson CC  145 130 89.7% 78% 78% 72% 77%

Rockingham CC  125 85 68.0% 79% 82% 84% 92%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  409 342 83.6% 79% 82% 85% 81%

Sampson CC  88 75 85.2% 80% 79% 85% 87%

Sandhills CC  224 194 86.6% 93% 84% 89% 87%

South Piedmont CC  151 128 84.8% 83% 86% 86% 69%

Southeastern CC  135 101 74.8% 75% 80% 82% 78%

Southwestern CC  122 112 91.8% 92% 95% 95% 88%

Stanly CC  171 151 88.3% 87% 86% 89% 79%

Surry CC  200 183 91.5% 97% 92% 93% 92%

Tri‐County CC  88 70 79.5% 88% 87% 70% 72%

Vance‐Granville CC  214 189 88.3% 92% 90% 87% 84%

Wake TCC  466 422 90.6% 92% 94% 91% 92%

Wayne CC  172 143 83.1% 80% 80% 74% 90%

Western Piedmont CC  108 102 94.4% 95% 92% 84% 91%

Wilkes CC  169 146 86.4% 81% 86% 85% 82%

Wilson CC  119 86 72.3% 82% 75% 89% 81%

NUMBER OF TEST 

TAKERSNUMBER PASSING

AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASSING RATE

17

Page 64: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

H. College Transfer Performance

Purpose 

To ensure the academic success of community college students at a four‐year university or college 

Description 

Among community college associate degree completers and those who have completed 30 or more credit hours who transfer to a four‐year university or college, the percentage who earn a GPA of 2.00 or better after two consecutive semesters within the academic year at the transfer institution.  

Methodology 

Denominator: Students with an associate degree or at least 30 articulated transfer credits enrolled during the fall and spring semesters at a four‐year institution who were enrolled at a community college during the previous academic year.  Only includes North Carolina based four‐year institutions and four‐year institutions which the individual community college has an articulated transfer agreement. 

Numerator: Students included in the denominator who have earned a GPA of 2.00 or better aggregated over the fall and spring semesters at the transfer institution. 

Note: Community colleges are allowed to supplement data with results from out of state institutions which they have articulation agreements. 

Source 

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file National Student Clearinghouse UNC‐General Administration Participating NC independent colleges and universities including Barton College, Belmont Abbey College, Brevard College, Campbell University, Catawba College, Chowan University, Davidson College, Elon University, Gardner‐Webb University, Guilford College, Mars Hill College, Meredith College, Methodist University, Mount Olive College, Montreat College, N.C. Wesleyan College, Pfeiffer University, Queens University of Charlotte, Salem College, and Shaw University 

Details 

Lists of students enrolled receiving an associate degree during that academic year and those who had accumulated at least 30 articulated college transfer credit hours data were sent to UNCGA.  These lists were matched against subsequent fall and spring UNC system student records to determine transfer enrollment at a North Carolina public university and first year academic performance.  UNCGA provided aggregate totals of transfer students who did or did not attain GPAs equal or greater than 2.00 in their first academic year. Detailed reports containing the data associated with this measure can be accessed at http://www.northcarolina.edu/ira/ir/analytics/tsp.htm.  The relative reports are First‐Year UNC Academic Performance of YEAR Community College Associate Degree Recipients and First‐Year UNC Academic Performance of YEAR Community College Students with at Least 30 Semester Hours of Community College Coursework.  Note: As of 4/9/14, the publically accessible reports have not been updated with the most recent data.   

Additional lists of students based on National Student Clearinghouse matches were sent to participating independent colleges and universities.  These colleges and universities returned files identifying whether or not students attained GPAs equal or greater than 2.00 in their first academic year. 

Data from these sources were combined to determine the overall percentage of transfers with a GPA equal or greater than 2.00 after two semesters.   

Goal: 93.8% 

Baseline: 71.2% 

18

Page 65: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE H. COLLEGE TRANSFER PERFORMANCE, 2011‐2012 COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS

Goal: 93.8%

Baseline: 71.2%Students % ≥ 2.00 Students % ≥ 2.00 Students # ≥ 2.00 % ≥ 2.00 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  4,978 86% 4,329 90% 9,307 8,173 87.8% 88% 87% 87%

Alamance CC  65 85% 79 90% 144 126 87.5% 91% 93% 85%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 154 90% 140 95% 294 272 92.5% 95% 92% 95%

Beaufort County CC  21 81% 26 100% 47 43 91.5% 93% 98% 92%

Bladen CC  38 71% 21 76% 59 43 72.9% 80% 78% 66%

Blue Ridge CC  28 93% 37 89% 65 59 90.8% 99% 93% 95%

Brunswick CC  25 88% 56 86% 81 70 86.4% 88% 92% 82%

Caldwell CC & TI  124 81% 123 90% 247 211 85.4% 88% 89% 92%

Cape Fear CC  273 85% 285 89% 558 488 87.5% 86% 89% 85%

Carteret CC  18 94% 29 86% 47 42 89.4% 85% 87% 92%

Catawba Valley CC  158 89% 92 90% 250 224 89.6% 94% 88% 94%

Central Carolina CC  51 88% 67 94% 118 108 91.5% 91% 95% 86%

Central Piedmont CC  557 82% 421 90% 978 834 85.3% 87% 86% 89%

Cleveland CC  77 90% 46 91% 123 111 90.2% 84% 77% 86%

Coastal Carolina CC  118 90% 127 94% 245 226 92.2% 90% 87% 90%

College of The Albema 74 81% 49 88% 123 103 83.7% 87% 90% 93%

Craven CC  61 90% 71 89% 132 118 89.4% 91% 80% 91%

Davidson County CC  73 79% 83 95% 156 137 87.8% 89% 84% 92%

Durham TCC  112 87% 97 94% 209 188 90.0% 94% 96% 89%

Edgecombe CC  19 95% 38 82% 57 49 86.0% 94% 76% 71%

Fayetteville TCC  182 86% 113 92% 295 261 88.5% 88% 90% 86%

Forsyth TCC  200 83% 171 95% 371 329 88.7% 89% 85% 90%

Gaston College  118 84% 87 87% 205 175 85.4% 85% 76% 83%

Guilford TCC  334 84% 233 88% 567 487 85.9% 85% 92% 85%

Halifax CC  17 88% 16 94% 33 30 90.9% 70% 76% 83%

Haywood CC  30 93% 23 78% 53 46 86.8% 97% 88% 92%

Isothermal CC  49 96% 54 93% 103 97 94.2% 90% 82% 82%

James Sprunt CC  18 78% 21 90% 39 33 84.6% 95% 84% 89%

Johnston CC  88 85% 83 89% 171 149 87.1% 83% 83% 84%

Lenoir CC  59 86% 68 88% 127 111 87.4% 89% 85% 82%

Martin CC  4 * 1 * 5 3 60.0% 100% * 80%

Mayland CC  17 94% 10 100% 27 26 96.3% 88% 100% 82%

McDowell TCC  16 75% 18 83% 34 27 79.4% 83% 82% 89%

Mitchell CC  82 82% 83 94% 165 145 87.9% 88% 82% 86%

Montgomery CC  5 100% 4 * 9 9 100.0% 93% 71% 80%

Nash CC  68 90% 42 90% 110 99 90.0% 85% 86% 91%

Pamlico CC  9 100% 2 * 11 11 100.0% 80% * *

Piedmont CC  29 79% 15 67% 44 33 75.0% 74% 91% 65%

Pitt CC  207 85% 158 89% 365 316 86.6% 89% 89% 84%

Randolph CC  50 92% 48 94% 98 91 92.9% 82% 93% 91%

Richmond CC  17 94% 49 90% 66 60 90.9% 95% 74% 95%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  7 100% 9 89% 16 15 93.8% * 60% 100%

Robeson CC  27 78% 32 94% 59 51 86.4% 71% 90% 82%

Rockingham CC  29 83% 34 82% 63 52 82.5% 96% 90% 87%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  138 86% 92 88% 230 200 87.0% 84% 62% 79%

Sampson CC  35 66% 34 88% 69 53 76.8% 76% 80% 95%

Sandhills CC  70 83% 77 84% 147 123 83.7% 88% 89% 86%

South Piedmont CC  28 82% 41 100% 69 64 92.8% 88% 85% 92%

Southeastern CC  35 86% 30 90% 65 57 87.7% 84% 78% 70%

Southwestern CC  40 93% 65 91% 105 96 91.4% 94% 96% 93%

Stanly CC  47 85% 61 93% 108 97 89.8% 90% 96% 93%

Surry CC  63 87% 44 91% 107 95 88.8% 85% 92% 91%

Tri‐County CC  19 95% 19 89% 38 35 92.1% 78% 82% 86%

Vance‐Granville CC  33 82% 37 84% 70 58 82.9% 90% 95% 88%

Wake TCC  566 89% 314 92% 880 793 90.1% 92% 92% 91%

Wayne CC  56 88% 96 92% 152 137 90.1% 83% 88% 87%

Western Piedmont CC  66 88% 79 84% 145 124 85.5% 85% 84% 85%

Wilkes CC  56 84% 63 84% 119 100 84.0% 90% 86% 90%

Wilson CC  18 100% 16 94% 34 33 97.1% 90% 79% 89%

*Less than 5 ('11,'12), Less than 10 ('09,'10)

2011‐2012 TOTALASSOCIATE DEGREE RECIPENT30 OR MORE SEMESTER HOURS % ≥ 2.00

19

Page 66: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

20

Page 67: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Appendix – Additional Performance Measure Tables

21

Page 68: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE A1. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL

Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress

System Totals  5,448 18% 6,260 47% 10,981 52% 13,053 48% 5,340 32%

Alamance CC  58 19% 148 26% 291 25% 272 23% 71 13%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 163 7% 31 55% 108 55% 163 60% 77 60%

Beaufort County CC  63 19% 94 34% 84 40% 91 57% 22 23%

Bladen CC  16 38% 26 54% 34 50% 38 58% 62 56%

Blue Ridge CC  57 9% 32 72% 81 57% 77 45% 32 9%

Brunswick CC  133 26% 27 78% 32 78% 37 84% 84 57%

Caldwell CC & TI  126 7% 55 47% 126 58% 202 65% 96 48%

Cape Fear CC  161 11% 109 35% 219 47% 446 47% 246 50%

Carteret CC  34 21% 32 38% 63 22% 52 27% 24 50%

Catawba Valley CC  120 18% 116 54% 163 57% 140 51% 46 22%

Central Carolina CC  218 18% 204 65% 262 72% 396 76% 194 61%

Central Piedmont CC  249 20% 332 57% 1,151 65% 1,147 60% 377 43%

Cleveland CC  22 36% 77 44% 117 57% 76 71% 70 70%

Coastal Carolina CC  30 30% 92 55% 150 57% 182 49% 90 29%

College of The Albema 39 13% 96 47% 164 54% 151 59% 83 28%

Craven CC  31 32% 83 34% 128 46% 121 38% 22 14%

Davidson County CC  90 36% 239 61% 377 64% 401 49% 130 33%

Durham TCC  58 36% 193 40% 204 45% 226 39% 86 23%

Edgecombe CC  79 20% 93 70% 224 54% 231 48% 49 35%

Fayetteville TCC  213 14% 311 29% 509 34% 867 40% 388 41%

Forsyth TCC  201 11% 180 56% 536 71% 619 54% 122 39%

Gaston College  42 29% 129 39% 206 32% 235 41% 138 42%

Guilford TCC  292 11% 369 33% 549 37% 517 45% 163 12%

Halifax CC  22 18% 20 55% 73 68% 86 66% 76 11%

Haywood CC  28 7% 20 55% 19 53% 56 64% 8 50%

Isothermal CC  58 7% 59 36% 94 31% 109 24% 50 26%

James Sprunt CC  23 70% 38 82% 48 90% 79 80% 43 30%

Johnston CC  69 22% 199 47% 196 51% 167 45% 50 8%

Lenoir CC  98 26% 167 43% 228 60% 228 64% 96 16%

Martin CC  39 23% 34 50% 60 42% 142 23% 34 35%

Mayland CC  106 23% 74 66% 113 66% 252 29% 55 33%

McDowell TCC  63 19% 16 44% 40 53% 80 40% 41 32%

Mitchell CC  107 12% 50 44% 139 57% 123 31% 32 31%

Montgomery CC  27 26% 16 38% 29 48% 74 39% 25 28%

Nash CC  90 16% 84 21% 73 33% 78 41% 33 18%

Pamlico CC  24 58% 35 51% 36 39% 27 30% 18 0%

Piedmont CC  20 55% 70 41% 99 49% 202 42% 83 6%

Pitt CC  103 13% 110 45% 285 54% 326 44% 74 34%

Randolph CC  137 23% 178 45% 212 46% 235 50% 43 33%

Richmond CC  75 43% 125 51% 268 53% 311 47% 86 41%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  39 15% 71 20% 57 18% 40 5% 11 9%

Robeson CC  196 15% 184 45% 272 49% 251 53% 170 50%

Rockingham CC  28 32% 63 60% 68 51% 101 53% 55 18%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  43 9% 89 36% 247 32% 309 29% 119 12%

Sampson CC  114 26% 140 64% 152 57% 135 55% 19 16%

Sandhills CC  151 11% 62 34% 86 42% 217 19% 67 30%

South Piedmont CC  49 22% 129 46% 194 58% 183 60% 76 21%

Southeastern CC  158 26% 188 61% 188 56% 223 52% 124 19%

Southwestern CC  30 7% 23 70% 56 66% 133 69% 80 19%

Stanly CC  28 43% 57 53% 89 60% 115 59% 125 46%

Surry CC  107 11% 91 40% 161 57% 151 44% 38 34%

Tri‐County CC  50 2% 19 42% 19 58% 16 31% 6 33%

Vance‐Granville CC  117 20% 215 43% 344 56% 391 45% 120 33%

Wake TCC  204 14% 154 36% 619 36% 670 27% 412 9%

Wayne CC  81 88% 203 74% 224 70% 376 75% 181 64%

Western Piedmont CC  271 1% 49 43% 152 32% 155 33% 75 39%

Wilkes CC  117 10% 77 52% 120 58% 202 48% 95 31%

Wilson CC  81 9% 83 63% 143 69% 123 67% 48 31%

ADULT BASIC AND SECONDARY EDUCATION

BEGINNING ABE LITERACYBEGINNING BASIC 

EDUCATION

LOW INTERMEDIATE 

BASIC EDUCATION

HIGH INTERMEDIATE 

BASIC EDUCATION

LOW ADULT SECONDARY 

EDUCATION

22

Page 69: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE A2. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL

Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress

System Totals  1,327 46% 2,022 49% 2,647 56% 3,270 45% 2,787 40% 2,200 16%

Alamance CC  23 48% 197 29% 79 27% 35 40% 59 19% 9 0%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 15 80% 43 74% 49 57% 88 61% 66 42% 62 19%

Beaufort County CC  . . . . . . 5 60% 6 0% 3 *

Bladen CC  . . 1 * 3 * 13 31% 5 40% 2 *

Blue Ridge CC  12 58% 6 50% 18 67% 55 31% 43 30% 55 7%

Brunswick CC  . . 1 * 3 * 3 * 4 * 2 *

Caldwell CC & TI  2 * 6 67% 18 56% 28 46% 31 52% 19 0%

Cape Fear CC  3 * 10 20% 48 44% 76 39% 51 41% 49 22%

Carteret CC  . . 10 10% 7 14% 1 * 4 * . .

Catawba Valley CC  4 * 15 27% 30 40% 54 28% 72 33% 49 8%

Central Carolina CC  22 55% 33 42% 89 56% 182 53% 140 30% 134 16%

Central Piedmont CC  230 41% 164 78% 430 68% 547 51% 463 54% 417 23%

Cleveland CC  . . 1 * 3 * 8 13% 4 * 17 47%

Coastal Carolina CC  . . 1 * 4 * 16 69% 13 54% 19 42%

College of The Albema . . . . 3 * 5 20% 8 38% 5 0%

Craven CC  29 17% 7 29% 11 18% 9 33% 10 20% 15 7%

Davidson County CC  6 67% 10 90% 23 83% 40 33% 41 51% 61 21%

Durham TCC  19 68% 38 71% 103 68% 168 51% 149 39% 115 10%

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  24 54% 42 64% 88 49% 109 36% 107 32% 122 7%

Forsyth TCC  49 63% 24 71% 91 57% 160 33% 105 42% 22 18%

Gaston College  . . 4 * 9 33% 35 49% 51 53% 34 3%

Guilford TCC  241 27% 143 46% 282 32% 383 31% 274 32% 255 13%

Halifax CC  1 * 3 * 1 * . . 4 * 2 *

Haywood CC  1 * 3 * 6 100% 4 * 7 29% 7 43%

Isothermal CC  7 0% 5 0% 6 17% 6 17% 12 25% 3 *

James Sprunt CC  2 * 4 * 8 63% 13 54% 11 82% 8 13%

Johnston CC  5 40% 4 * 48 46% 60 35% 28 14% 20 20%

Lenoir CC  11 45% 19 84% 41 44% 51 47% 28 64% 34 26%

Martin CC  . . . . 2 * 2 * 4 * 3 *

Mayland CC  . . 5 80% 4 * 9 67% 9 78% 27 19%

McDowell TCC  1 * 1 * 16 56% 10 50% 7 29% 5 20%

Mitchell CC  2 * 16 81% 19 84% 45 56% 46 52% 50 42%

Montgomery CC  4 * 15 87% 19 58% 26 35% 11 45% 10 10%

Nash CC  . . . . 1 * . . 1 * 1 *

Pamlico CC  . . . . . . 1 * 4 * . .

Piedmont CC  6 33% 2 * 9 67% 9 22% 1 * 2 *

Pitt CC  20 60% 13 54% 42 55% 49 51% 57 39% 46 15%

Randolph CC  9 56% 11 82% 56 55% 54 50% 62 50% 44 2%

Richmond CC  3 * 10 60% 19 68% 38 34% 26 35% 19 11%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  1 * . . . . . . 1 * . .

Robeson CC  11 45% 9 33% 41 56% 46 28% 18 28% 8 0%

Rockingham CC  3 * 2 * 2 * 14 57% 6 67% 15 27%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  16 44% 41 68% 74 54% 113 43% 69 35% 50 22%

Sampson CC  . . 9 89% 31 65% 16 50% 22 36% 10 20%

Sandhills CC  3 * 5 80% 21 62% 39 41% 31 45% 21 33%

South Piedmont CC  7 71% 21 76% 70 63% 98 46% 125 56% 97 19%

Southeastern CC  1 * . . 3 * 5 80% 4 * . .

Southwestern CC  1 * 1 * 11 73% 24 46% 13 23% 14 29%

Stanly CC  1 * 5 40% 8 75% 27 41% 15 33% 13 0%

Surry CC  3 * 16 63% 26 62% 41 54% 30 60% 31 23%

Tri‐County CC  . . . . . . 3 * 1 * 3 *

Vance‐Granville CC  10 40% 34 35% 17 76% 5 20% 5 20% . .

Wake TCC  559 48% 963 41% 485 57% 275 53% 325 21% 93 37%

Wayne CC  18 100% 22 95% 84 65% 59 61% 44 45% 36 8%

Western Piedmont CC  6 100% 6 67% 28 64% 29 34% 15 20% 26 0%

Wilkes CC  1 * 17 88% 38 95% 42 71% 19 79% 15 33%

Wilson CC  2 * 4 * 20 40% 37 30% 20 45% 21 5%

* Less than 5 students

ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE

LOW INTERMEDIATE 

ESLADVANCED ESL

BEGINNING ESL 

LITERACYHIGH BEGINNING ESL

HIGH INTERMEDIATE 

ESLLOW BEGINNING ESL

23

Page 70: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

24

Page 71: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE B1. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL

12‐13 Students 12‐13 Passing 11‐12 12‐13 Students 12‐13 Passing 11‐12

System Totals  5285 68% 66% 3504 78% 74%

Alamance CC  118 81% 70% 77 79% 76%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 187 41% 61% 221 61% 50%

Beaufort County CC  28 64% 71% 7 43% 100%

Bladen CC  29 59% 39% 45 69% 79%

Blue Ridge CC  79 54% 58% 34 76% 77%

Brunswick CC  94 39% 38% 38 71% 33%

Caldwell CC & TI  136 68% 61% 66 79% 72%

Cape Fear CC  113 67% 74% 60 75% 89%

Carteret CC  27 70% 91% 30 87% 93%

Catawba Valley CC  119 73% 62% 130 76% 71%

Central Carolina CC  181 65% 66% 96 78% 74%

Central Piedmont CC  155 77% 61% 182 82% 86%

Cleveland CC  18 78% 50% 13 100% 92%

Coastal Carolina CC  63 59% 53% 34 76% 81%

College of The Albema 113 71% 58% 49 73% 59%

Craven CC  25 60% 30% 30 83% 76%

Davidson County CC  90 72% 69% 65 82% 81%

Durham TCC  87 60% 55% 66 86% 75%

Edgecombe CC  121 77% 77% 16 69% 67%

Fayetteville TCC  134 83% 79% 89 90% 88%

Forsyth TCC  126 73% 73% 89 78% 81%

Gaston College  114 75% 69% 98 77% 85%

Guilford TCC  107 58% 64% 101 77% 77%

Halifax CC  104 42% 55% 63 59% 56%

Haywood CC  21 81% 38% 14 71% 82%

Isothermal CC  57 81% 61% 41 88% 84%

James Sprunt CC  25 88% 69% 6 50% *

Johnston CC  70 66% 77% 25 76% 91%

Lenoir CC  126 64% 64% 45 71% 77%

Martin CC  51 90% 68% 15 73% 64%

Mayland CC  79 77% 79% 22 91% 77%

McDowell TCC  86 74% 67% 20 85% 81%

Mitchell CC  81 89% 89% 50 94% 93%

Montgomery CC  37 76% 72% 16 81% 75%

Nash CC  45 58% 71% 23 83% 68%

Pamlico CC  18 78% 55% 5 100% *

Piedmont CC  98 71% 72% 22 82% 72%

Pitt CC  93 61% 64% 60 82% 75%

Randolph CC  43 63% 75% 19 84% 77%

Richmond CC  125 62% 61% 81 70% 65%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  17 65% 64% 13 62% 86%

Robeson CC  33 94% 76% 13 100% 87%

Rockingham CC  99 67% 75% 12 75% 81%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  200 63% 58% 163 80% 73%

Sampson CC  30 90% 76% 21 90% 89%

Sandhills CC  74 58% 64% 44 70% 56%

South Piedmont CC  118 69% 76% 58 79% 73%

Southeastern CC  91 74% 86% 34 74% 81%

Southwestern CC  127 72% 80% 52 83% 84%

Stanly CC  50 72% 73% 38 82% 70%

Surry CC  59 83% 94% 37 95% 95%

Tri‐County CC  24 71% 76% 17 82% 86%

Vance‐Granville CC  179 74% 69% 68 81% 85%

Wake TCC  419 59% 52% 416 77% 68%

Wayne CC  125 72% 67% 44 80% 83%

Western Piedmont CC  113 74% 59% 65 80% 74%

Wilkes CC  70 93% 89% 24 100% 100%

Wilson CC  34 56% 64% 74 78% 76%

* Less than 5 students

LOW ADULT SECONDARY EDUCATION HIGH ADULT SECONDARY EDUCATION

25

Page 72: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE C1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2012‐2013 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION

% SUCCESSFUL

12‐13

System Totals  17785 18% 26% 20% 6% 13% 16% 1% 64%

Alamance CC  372 21% 34% 17% 4% 3% 21% 0% 72%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 427 19% 28% 17% 7% 15% 16% 0% 63%

Beaufort County CC  81 10% 31% 28% 7% 12% 11% 0% 69%

Bladen CC  105 9% 25% 20% 10% 20% 17% 0% 53%

Blue Ridge CC  148 18% 24% 26% 7% 8% 16% 0% 69%

Brunswick CC  108 8% 28% 32% 7% 18% 6% 0% 69%

Caldwell CC & TI  273 21% 22% 19% 3% 11% 24% 0% 62%

Cape Fear CC  756 14% 30% 22% 6% 20% 8% 0% 66%

Carteret CC  86 22% 28% 19% 3% 8% 10% 9% 69%

Catawba Valley CC  359 36% 28% 12% 6% 7% 12% 0% 75%

Central Carolina CC  184 10% 31% 22% 9% 9% 18% 0% 64%

Central Piedmont CC  1850 27% 32% 19% 5% 14% 2% 1% 78%

Cleveland CC  194 35% 24% 12% 1% 12% 16% 0% 71%

Coastal Carolina CC  360 29% 22% 15% 5% 10% 19% 0% 66%

College of The Albema 146 21% 23% 18% 8% 13% 17% 0% 62%

Craven CC  138 9% 31% 20% 6% 25% 9% 0% 60%

Davidson County CC  327 30% 25% 13% 6% 14% 13% 0% 68%

Durham TCC  427 9% 24% 19% 9% 12% 26% 0% 53%

Edgecombe CC  200 16% 23% 24% 3% 28% 7% 0% 63%

Fayetteville TCC  949 17% 20% 17% 9% 19% 17% 0% 55%

Forsyth TCC  816 21% 27% 19% 4% 9% 20% 0% 67%

Gaston College  422 21% 33% 21% 4% 6% 11% 4% 75%

Guilford TCC  1239 13% 19% 18% 5% 21% 23% 0% 51%

Halifax CC  156 26% 26% 15% 7% 13% 13% 0% 67%

Haywood CC  127 15% 30% 28% 8% 5% 9% 6% 73%

Isothermal CC  171 27% 31% 16% 4% 10% 11% 0% 75%

James Sprunt CC  170 26% 22% 17% 7% 10% 18% 0% 65%

Johnston CC  285 26% 31% 22% 6% 8% 3% 5% 79%

Lenoir CC  186 11% 31% 17% 10% 9% 20% 2% 59%

Martin CC  61 23% 34% 8% 5% 11% 18% 0% 66%

Mayland CC  57 21% 28% 18% 9% 16% 9% 0% 67%

McDowell TCC  53 13% 51% 17% 2% 4% 13% 0% 81%

Mitchell CC  338 12% 26% 27% 6% 9% 17% 2% 66%

Montgomery CC  41 10% 41% 22% 10% 7% 10% 0% 73%

Nash CC  192 13% 23% 21% 7% 13% 24% 0% 56%

Pamlico CC  5 0% 20% 40% 20% 0% 20% 0% 60%

Piedmont CC  136 23% 31% 18% 4% 6% 19% 0% 71%

Pitt CC  791 17% 27% 21% 5% 10% 20% 0% 65%

Randolph CC  216 28% 31% 13% 6% 14% 9% 0% 72%

Richmond CC  266 18% 27% 17% 4% 11% 21% 2% 62%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  72 10% 29% 19% 4% 21% 15% 1% 58%

Robeson CC  246 7% 25% 22% 11% 18% 18% 0% 53%

Rockingham CC  160 6% 27% 24% 8% 11% 25% 0% 57%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  656 32% 23% 13% 5% 14% 13% 0% 68%

Sampson CC  147 6% 14% 16% 20% 12% 32% 0% 37%

Sandhills CC  354 5% 27% 31% 5% 14% 18% 0% 63%

South Piedmont CC  148 17% 30% 13% 7% 24% 9% 0% 59%

Southeastern CC  116 11% 14% 26% 7% 21% 22% 0% 51%

Southwestern CC  151 14% 25% 17% 9% 20% 15% 0% 56%

Stanly CC  192 28% 24% 19% 0% 8% 22% 0% 70%

Surry CC  199 10% 25% 32% 11% 12% 12% 0% 66%

Tri‐County CC  59 39% 20% 14% 2% 22% 3% 0% 73%

Vance‐Granville CC  251 11% 23% 25% 6% 9% 26% 0% 59%

Wake TCC  921 7% 17% 28% 10% 11% 20% 7% 52%

Wayne CC  323 10% 31% 23% 8% 11% 16% 0% 65%

Western Piedmont CC  210 22% 30% 10% 2% 5% 32% 0% 61%

Wilkes CC  233 21% 32% 17% 5% 7% 18% 0% 70%

Wilson CC  129 13% 27% 22% 4% 25% 9% 0% 63%

OtherA B C D F WATTEMPT

26

Page 73: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE C2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY AGE

Attempt  % Successful Attempt  % Successful Attempt  % Successful

System Totals  4521 69% 5539 61% 7725 64%

Alamance CC  100 75% 128 71% 144 72%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 85 60% 140 59% 202 67%

Beaufort County CC  12 67% 30 63% 39 74%

Bladen CC  16 81% 30 63% 59 41%

Blue Ridge CC  52 65% 36 58% 60 78%

Brunswick CC  34 82% 49 63% 25 60%

Caldwell CC & TI  78 69% 85 53% 110 65%

Cape Fear CC  243 68% 241 65% 272 65%

Carteret CC  26 73% 25 64% 35 69%

Catawba Valley CC  146 82% 103 62% 110 79%

Central Carolina CC  45 64% 51 59% 88 66%

Central Piedmont CC  456 83% 653 74% 741 79%

Cleveland CC  49 65% 60 75% 85 72%

Coastal Carolina CC  93 66% 82 51% 185 73%

College of The Albema 27 59% 60 63% 59 63%

Craven CC  36 58% 40 60% 62 61%

Davidson County CC  94 81% 90 60% 143 64%

Durham TCC  49 63% 128 47% 250 54%

Edgecombe CC  23 65% 50 64% 127 61%

Fayetteville TCC  122 50% 202 56% 625 56%

Forsyth TCC  195 68% 260 65% 361 68%

Gaston College  125 80% 140 69% 157 75%

Guilford TCC  196 54% 393 49% 650 51%

Halifax CC  47 72% 35 74% 74 59%

Haywood CC  40 83% 49 69% 38 68%

Isothermal CC  49 76% 46 74% 76 75%

James Sprunt CC  30 63% 37 51% 103 70%

Johnston CC  75 80% 99 79% 111 77%

Lenoir CC  43 65% 59 54% 84 60%

Martin CC  5 80% 20 65% 36 64%

Mayland CC  22 73% 21 62% 14 64%

McDowell TCC  19 89% 8 63% 26 81%

Mitchell CC  127 66% 91 57% 120 72%

Montgomery CC  3 * 14 71% 24 71%

Nash CC  52 75% 57 47% 83 51%

Pamlico CC  0 * 1 * 4 *

Piedmont CC  24 67% 51 71% 61 74%

Pitt CC  236 72% 276 64% 279 59%

Randolph CC  63 75% 68 72% 85 69%

Richmond CC  70 64% 81 49% 115 70%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  10 70% 15 53% 47 57%

Robeson CC  29 62% 86 47% 131 56%

Rockingham CC  75 60% 46 50% 39 59%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  214 71% 165 66% 277 66%

Sampson CC  39 36% 49 33% 59 41%

Sandhills CC  114 74% 120 57% 120 58%

South Piedmont CC  37 73% 56 54% 55 56%

Southeastern CC  29 69% 42 45% 45 44%

Southwestern CC  67 63% 35 43% 49 55%

Stanly CC  60 70% 53 72% 79 70%

Surry CC  64 61% 76 63% 59 75%

Tri‐County CC  13 77% 19 84% 27 63%

Vance‐Granville CC  68 68% 79 53% 104 58%

Wake TCC  229 55% 322 44% 370 56%

Wayne CC  96 69% 103 63% 124 63%

Western Piedmont CC  70 70% 60 50% 80 63%

Wilkes CC  70 66% 83 71% 80 73%

Wilson CC  30 80% 41 51% 58 62%

* Less than 5 students

22 AND OLDER18 AND YOUNGER 19 TO 21

27

Page 74: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE D1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2012‐2013 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION

% SUCCESSFUL

12‐13

System Totals  16612 19% 24% 21% 8% 11% 17% 0% 64%

Alamance CC  419 14% 30% 20% 9% 6% 22% 0% 63%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 650 12% 23% 22% 8% 15% 21% 0% 56%

Beaufort County CC  86 12% 19% 27% 10% 6% 27% 0% 57%

Bladen CC  114 11% 23% 18% 10% 10% 30% 0% 51%

Blue Ridge CC  124 24% 28% 19% 6% 12% 10% 0% 72%

Brunswick CC  127 34% 24% 27% 2% 10% 4% 0% 84%

Caldwell CC & TI  347 22% 23% 20% 8% 7% 20% 0% 65%

Cape Fear CC  677 17% 24% 20% 8% 16% 16% 0% 60%

Carteret CC  132 18% 30% 23% 9% 5% 10% 5% 71%

Catawba Valley CC  413 12% 21% 29% 12% 12% 13% 0% 62%

Central Carolina CC  185 17% 32% 19% 14% 4% 14% 0% 69%

Central Piedmont CC  1311 18% 23% 25% 9% 19% 7% 0% 65%

Cleveland CC  219 17% 26% 17% 9% 11% 19% 0% 61%

Coastal Carolina CC  529 24% 23% 17% 6% 14% 16% 0% 63%

College of The Albema 153 18% 29% 22% 3% 10% 17% 0% 69%

Craven CC  296 17% 23% 23% 5% 18% 14% 0% 63%

Davidson County CC  240 16% 22% 25% 9% 13% 15% 0% 64%

Durham TCC  356 25% 28% 15% 6% 13% 13% 0% 68%

Edgecombe CC  208 5% 10% 20% 10% 33% 22% 0% 35%

Fayetteville TCC  687 15% 22% 17% 13% 13% 20% 0% 54%

Forsyth TCC  580 19% 23% 19% 7% 8% 23% 0% 62%

Gaston College  414 18% 29% 25% 7% 7% 14% 1% 72%

Guilford TCC  1144 24% 23% 18% 7% 13% 15% 0% 65%

Halifax CC  106 15% 23% 26% 8% 8% 20% 0% 64%

Haywood CC  128 13% 23% 23% 10% 5% 21% 5% 59%

Isothermal CC  193 29% 16% 26% 8% 6% 15% 0% 71%

James Sprunt CC  125 18% 15% 24% 10% 10% 24% 0% 57%

Johnston CC  270 19% 26% 21% 8% 10% 9% 7% 66%

Lenoir CC  149 11% 15% 23% 8% 11% 30% 1% 50%

Martin CC  63 30% 30% 17% 3% 11% 8% 0% 78%

Mayland CC  49 20% 18% 27% 14% 14% 4% 2% 65%

McDowell TCC  65 57% 9% 17% 0% 3% 14% 0% 83%

Mitchell CC  270 21% 23% 23% 8% 8% 17% 1% 66%

Montgomery CC  47 11% 13% 13% 17% 9% 38% 0% 36%

Nash CC  258 31% 26% 17% 4% 6% 16% 0% 74%

Pamlico CC  19 21% 26% 32% 5% 16% 0% 0% 79%

Piedmont CC  133 23% 24% 21% 11% 10% 11% 0% 68%

Pitt CC  460 13% 20% 20% 12% 7% 29% 0% 53%

Randolph CC  253 34% 24% 18% 8% 8% 9% 0% 75%

Richmond CC  235 15% 24% 25% 11% 7% 17% 2% 64%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  65 32% 32% 15% 3% 11% 3% 3% 80%

Robeson CC  205 15% 23% 13% 12% 17% 20% 0% 51%

Rockingham CC  243 21% 24% 20% 6% 7% 21% 0% 65%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  436 25% 23% 20% 7% 10% 15% 0% 68%

Sampson CC  114 8% 14% 19% 25% 9% 25% 0% 41%

Sandhills CC  201 13% 25% 20% 9% 9% 23% 0% 59%

South Piedmont CC  113 10% 24% 27% 8% 20% 11% 0% 61%

Southeastern CC  69 26% 41% 22% 3% 6% 3% 0% 88%

Southwestern CC  184 14% 34% 23% 5% 11% 13% 0% 71%

Stanly CC  275 27% 36% 17% 0% 7% 13% 0% 80%

Surry CC  153 12% 29% 31% 6% 10% 12% 0% 72%

Tri‐County CC  61 10% 16% 16% 8% 21% 28% 0% 43%

Vance‐Granville CC  136 20% 19% 16% 10% 4% 32% 0% 55%

Wake TCC  1342 17% 25% 22% 8% 9% 17% 2% 64%

Wayne CC  239 11% 20% 29% 14% 7% 19% 0% 60%

Western Piedmont CC  210 23% 30% 16% 3% 0% 26% 0% 70%

Wilkes CC  143 24% 29% 22% 7% 4% 13% 0% 76%

Wilson CC  189 21% 27% 25% 10% 10% 7% 0% 74%

A B C D F W OtherATTEMPT

28

Page 75: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE D2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY CREDIT MATH COURSE

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  2878 69% 667 62% 5227 66% 613 59% 203 55% 4046 60% 1974 57% 991 69%

Alamance CC  149 68% 1 * 103 67% 53 53% 0 * 34 44% 49 55% 30 80%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 257 66% 26 46% 41 76% 16 56% 0 * 285 45% 21 57% 4 *

Beaufort County CC  39 41% 6 67% 3 * 0 * 0 * 21 86% 0 * 17 53%

Bladen CC  11 91% 2 * 58 40% 8 50% 0 * 26 46% 1 * 8 75%

Blue Ridge CC  0 * 7 86% 76 74% 7 71% 0 * 22 59% 6 83% 6 67%

Brunswick CC  0 * 1 * 53 87% 2 * 0 * 30 93% 38 74% 3 *

Caldwell CC & TI  123 70% 10 80% 128 58% 8 50% 0 * 0 * 77 71% 0 *

Cape Fear CC  51 90% 90 69% 203 63% 0 * 27 48% 0 * 230 47% 76 64%

Carteret CC  3 * 0 * 38 66% 1 * 0 * 37 68% 41 71% 12 92%

Catawba Valley CC  113 76% 18 61% 171 51% 38 53% 0 * 41 78% 18 72% 14 50%

Central Carolina CC  3 * 6 33% 108 75% 3 * 0 * 22 59% 0 * 42 64%

Central Piedmont CC  197 80% 44 48% 319 72% 0 * 36 58% 598 60% 116 55% 0 *

Cleveland CC  0 * 5 100% 105 56% 9 78% 0 * 84 64% 8 50% 8 50%

Coastal Carolina CC  41 66% 10 90% 148 55% 18 39% 0 * 265 66% 29 69% 18 78%

College of The Albema 47 77% 0 * 0 * 4 * 0 * 86 65% 10 70% 6 83%

Craven CC  58 60% 31 71% 0 * 9 67% 0 * 156 67% 42 45% 0 *

Davidson County CC  14 79% 0 * 148 66% 4 * 23 39% 35 60% 0 * 15 80%

Durham TCC  38 76% 19 84% 80 74% 79 70% 0 * 18 44% 113 59% 9 78%

Edgecombe CC  12 50% 0 * 57 44% 0 * 0 * 109 20% 0 * 29 66%

Fayetteville TCC  309 61% 0 * 85 51% 17 59% 0 * 240 50% 27 22% 9 89%

Forsyth TCC  206 72% 23 48% 71 75% 0 * 36 56% 192 49% 6 33% 46 63%

Gaston College  0 * 39 67% 139 73% 34 65% 0 * 0 * 184 72% 18 83%

Guilford TCC  195 72% 66 27% 336 65% 58 47% 0 * 249 71% 85 65% 155 67%

Halifax CC  58 50% 0 * 29 83% 1 * 0 * 14 79% 0 * 4 *

Haywood CC  0 * 0 * 113 58% 0 * 0 * 0 * 9 56% 6 100%

Isothermal CC  101 73% 0 * 46 63% 8 75% 0 * 30 80% 1 * 7 43%

James Sprunt CC  79 51% 0 * 38 63% 0 * 0 * 0 * 8 88% 0 *

Johnston CC  0 * 4 * 117 72% 4 * 0 * 120 65% 25 40% 0 *

Lenoir CC  18 50% 14 64% 0 * 6 33% 0 * 111 49% 0 * 0 *

Martin CC  29 79% 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 22 73% 0 * 12 83%

Mayland CC  0 * 0 * 34 59% 3 * 0 * 9 78% 3 * 0 *

McDowell TCC  0 * 5 80% 54 81% 1 * 0 * 2 * 1 * 2 *

Mitchell CC  23 65% 13 62% 128 70% 17 59% 0 * 71 69% 18 44% 0 *

Montgomery CC  0 * 6 33% 29 41% 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 12 25%

Nash CC  0 * 22 45% 152 81% 0 * 2 * 0 * 78 69% 4 *

Pamlico CC  0 * 2 * 5 100% 0 * 0 * 10 80% 0 * 0 *

Piedmont CC  25 68% 0 * 42 71% 0 * 10 70% 0 * 15 53% 41 71%

Pitt CC  101 70% 0 * 44 61% 0 * 12 25% 276 47% 0 * 27 48%

Randolph CC  12 92% 0 * 166 66% 3 * 0 * 18 72% 1 * 53 98%

Richmond CC  0 * 0 * 180 64% 0 * 18 50% 0 * 32 75% 5 40%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  44 80% 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 20 85% 0 * 0 *

Robeson CC  34 47% 15 53% 77 48% 6 33% 0 * 59 56% 11 55% 3 *

Rockingham CC  51 69% 3 * 6 83% 17 71% 0 * 72 75% 0 * 94 54%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  41 78% 15 73% 193 64% 41 56% 0 * 0 * 146 73% 0 *

Sampson CC  36 50% 0 * 29 38% 1 * 0 * 47 34% 1 * 0 *

Sandhills CC  16 88% 12 83% 121 62% 0 * 0 * 0 * 49 37% 2 *

South Piedmont CC  0 * 0 * 69 64% 18 56% 0 * 0 * 26 58% 0 *

Southeastern CC  0 * 0 * 24 83% 3 * 0 * 30 87% 3 * 9 100%

Southwestern CC  13 69% 11 73% 115 66% 3 * 0 * 11 82% 5 60% 26 88%

Stanly CC  0 * 13 85% 239 80% 0 * 8 75% 0 * 15 73% 0 *

Surry CC  51 75% 1 * 41 80% 23 74% 0 * 23 52% 11 55% 3 *

Tri‐County CC  10 50% 1 * 30 37% 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 18 50%

Vance‐Granville CC  35 66% 2 * 1 * 30 53% 0 * 52 52% 9 44% 7 29%

Wake TCC  159 70% 70 66% 293 66% 57 56% 0 * 340 76% 356 44% 67 81%

Wayne CC  45 76% 17 41% 20 45% 2 * 0 * 110 64% 26 38% 19 68%

Western Piedmont CC  0 * 25 80% 123 63% 0 * 26 77% 15 80% 21 81% 0 *

Wilkes CC  28 68% 8 75% 46 93% 0 * 5 60% 20 75% 0 * 34 68%

Wilson CC  3 * 4 * 153 73% 1 * 0 * 14 93% 3 * 11 64%

* Less than 5 students

MAT‐161 MAT‐171 OTHERMAT‐115 MAT‐121 MAT‐140 MAT‐151 MAT‐155

29

Page 76: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT “BLANK” 

30

Page 77: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE E1. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2012 COHORT ‐ BY ETHNICITY AND GENDER  

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  4,450 59% 3,673 52% 9,773 76% 8,690 70% 1,324 77% 1,026 70% 2,143 71% 1,734 63%

Alamance CC  72 72% 49 49% 215 72% 191 72% 47 70% 31 58% 30 70% 20 65%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 32 69% 29 52% 363 79% 285 66% 29 90% 24 54% 27 78% 20 65%

Beaufort County CC  59 53% 36 50% 80 76% 55 62% 4 * 1 * 3 * 5 40%

Bladen CC  31 39% 24 33% 54 61% 42 48% 1 * 2 * 21 62% 10 60%

Blue Ridge CC  7 57% 0 * 132 77% 122 60% 17 76% 7 29% 9 78% 9 67%

Brunswick CC  15 73% 20 65% 89 82% 82 73% 3 * 5 80% 10 70% 9 78%

Caldwell CC & TI  25 48% 35 60% 274 74% 278 69% 19 74% 9 56% 15 60% 18 67%

Cape Fear CC  124 58% 109 56% 543 73% 521 70% 35 83% 36 78% 61 77% 40 60%

Carteret CC  12 42% 8 25% 105 53% 64 53% 10 70% 6 83% 11 73% 9 67%

Catawba Valley CC  32 66% 36 53% 264 78% 257 67% 31 74% 28 75% 39 56% 34 50%

Central Carolina CC  76 53% 57 63% 172 73% 130 73% 32 78% 32 63% 19 68% 13 62%

Central Piedmont CC  398 69% 380 54% 490 82% 449 70% 164 80% 154 78% 142 80% 137 72%

Cleveland CC  59 51% 41 37% 139 70% 103 62% 5 100% 6 100% 9 67% 7 71%

Coastal Carolina CC  61 64% 60 58% 204 78% 215 76% 34 82% 38 79% 19 79% 13 46%

College of The Albema 40 60% 40 48% 143 78% 116 75% 11 64% 7 57% 11 73% 10 80%

Craven CC  42 71% 41 44% 104 78% 95 64% 16 81% 10 60% 22 86% 20 75%

Davidson County CC  20 75% 30 67% 222 83% 168 77% 15 87% 13 77% 14 86% 12 92%

Durham TCC  174 60% 121 41% 87 74% 84 68% 50 74% 27 78% 33 64% 37 73%

Edgecombe CC  126 61% 81 38% 62 73% 30 73% 3 * 6 50% 5 60% 0 *

Fayetteville TCC  448 59% 373 50% 267 72% 217 56% 79 66% 59 64% 93 70% 73 51%

Forsyth TCC  175 65% 162 54% 392 80% 426 77% 80 76% 38 71% 42 69% 45 60%

Gaston College  78 62% 55 62% 413 77% 293 71% 25 72% 27 70% 37 76% 19 79%

Guilford TCC  463 59% 468 47% 372 74% 417 70% 71 75% 57 72% 122 70% 126 68%

Halifax CC  108 54% 65 71% 48 69% 48 77% 4 * 1 * 10 70% 5 80%

Haywood CC  2 * 0 * 120 83% 84 69% 1 * 2 * 9 78% 9 56%

Isothermal CC  33 52% 22 45% 130 78% 99 66% 8 63% 13 77% 6 33% 6 83%

James Sprunt CC  47 60% 29 59% 69 78% 34 71% 8 88% 9 67% 3 * 0 *

Johnston CC  53 53% 61 52% 228 85% 193 79% 30 87% 23 74% 23 78% 11 55%

Lenoir CC  82 52% 83 47% 105 80% 95 79% 10 70% 10 60% 3 * 7 43%

Martin CC  20 55% 16 69% 11 64% 9 67% 1 * 0 * 23 70% 10 60%

Mayland CC  0 * 1 * 34 59% 56 63% 8 63% 2 * 20 70% 18 67%

McDowell TCC  7 71% 4 * 69 55% 61 56% 4 * 4 * 6 67% 0 *

Mitchell CC  45 67% 30 40% 195 81% 167 68% 19 84% 9 56% 15 80% 12 75%

Montgomery CC  18 72% 2 * 37 92% 44 84% 3 * 1 * 1 * 0 *

Nash CC  103 50% 54 50% 101 69% 115 67% 10 70% 10 80% 20 70% 15 60%

Pamlico CC  7 43% 19 84% 17 88% 23 96% 0 * 1 * 2 * 3 *

Piedmont CC  29 69% 39 74% 72 85% 59 66% 2 * 2 * 4 * 6 67%

Pitt CC  89 52% 87 44% 60 78% 47 79% 5 100% 4 * 605 72% 480 58%

Randolph CC  26 65% 19 42% 218 69% 146 72% 16 81% 21 95% 14 71% 11 64%

Richmond CC  76 66% 46 63% 87 77% 72 79% 4 * 4 * 22 82% 10 100%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  50 58% 27 63% 25 88% 8 88% 2 * 1 * 1 * 0 *

Robeson CC  77 42% 51 37% 61 56% 32 72% 9 67% 4 * 155 50% 80 35%

Rockingham CC  30 57% 29 72% 149 79% 118 70% 5 60% 4 * 7 43% 6 83%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  123 43% 73 37% 356 70% 285 60% 42 76% 30 57% 24 54% 28 54%

Sampson CC  30 77% 21 71% 57 82% 24 79% 24 92% 17 88% 2 * 4 *

Sandhills CC  89 63% 73 42% 184 81% 179 69% 36 83% 10 60% 49 69% 23 61%

South Piedmont CC  28 61% 12 75% 114 70% 61 52% 13 62% 6 100% 16 44% 3 *

Southeastern CC  43 47% 34 32% 86 59% 60 67% 3 * 2 * 14 36% 9 33%

Southwestern CC  0 * 3 * 112 75% 101 73% 11 73% 5 40% 16 69% 13 85%

Stanly CC  28 61% 18 83% 182 80% 92 70% 7 71% 3 * 17 65% 15 87%

Surry CC  3 * 12 33% 130 68% 143 66% 8 75% 10 80% 6 100% 5 40%

Tri‐County CC  0 * 0 * 74 73% 63 57% 2 * 0 * 8 75% 4 *

Vance‐Granville CC  135 56% 76 59% 189 80% 109 74% 15 87% 12 75% 15 80% 17 71%

Wake TCC  318 64% 274 54% 658 81% 858 72% 183 74% 148 63% 190 83% 186 70%

Wayne CC  85 55% 74 59% 178 84% 169 69% 27 85% 12 75% 10 90% 17 76%

Western Piedmont CC  24 58% 14 64% 163 81% 129 64% 6 100% 5 80% 22 100% 24 92%

Wilkes CC  10 50% 11 55% 228 79% 215 73% 10 80% 11 73% 4 * 7 71%

Wilson CC  63 57% 39 51% 40 80% 52 88% 7 86% 7 71% 7 43% 4 *

* Less than 5 students

OTHER MALEOTHER FEMALEAFRICAN‐AMER 

FEMALE

AFRICAN‐

AMERIC MALE

HISPANIC 

FEMALEHISPANIC MALE

CAUCASIAN 

FEMALE

CAUCASIAN 

MALE

31

Page 78: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F1. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2007 COHORT ‐ BY PROGRAM AREA

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  299 50% 15,186 42% 101 51% 4,711 40% 512 41% 1,023 48%

Alamance CC  7 29% 210 56% 6 83% 166 36% 10 50% 26 50%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 3 * 275 47% 0 * 74 43% 0 * 16 25%

Beaufort County CC  0 * 104 41% 0 * 24 58% 1 * 2 *

Bladen CC  0 * 88 42% 0 * 25 24% 0 * 14 43%

Blue Ridge CC  0 * 208 45% 3 * 47 23% 0 * 10 50%

Brunswick CC  12 58% 120 48% 0 * 34 38% 0 * 0 *

Caldwell CC & TI  4 * 318 52% 0 * 71 52% 1 * 3 *

Cape Fear CC  19 37% 747 48% 4 * 111 40% 31 32% 29 52%

Carteret CC  0 * 98 42% 0 * 44 39% 9 56% 1 *

Catawba Valley CC  15 33% 487 36% 0 * 124 31% 34 35% 18 44%

Central Carolina CC  4 * 150 44% 0 * 82 39% 13 54% 8 88%

Central Piedmont CC  14 29% 1,706 42% 0 * 310 36% 54 33% 39 28%

Cleveland CC  0 * 120 27% 0 * 66 32% 2 * 14 71%

Coastal Carolina CC  0 * 486 50% 1 * 57 37% 2 * 10 80%

College of The Albema 7 14% 231 39% 0 * 32 31% 1 * 14 71%

Craven CC  0 * 332 42% 0 * 51 49% 0 * 0 *

Davidson County CC  2 * 154 44% 7 14% 75 36% 0 * 12 25%

Durham TCC  0 * 271 41% 6 33% 77 31% 1 * 0 *

Edgecombe CC  0 * 35 40% 0 * 30 50% 0 * 0 *

Fayetteville TCC  0 * 649 30% 8 50% 214 49% 31 39% 36 33%

Forsyth TCC  11 55% 401 46% 11 36% 192 41% 28 43% 39 51%

Gaston College  1 * 547 33% 5 60% 203 42% 10 40% 24 58%

Guilford TCC  8 63% 891 41% 3 * 320 44% 54 46% 50 30%

Halifax CC  0 * 94 41% 0 * 41 39% 5 80% 1 *

Haywood CC  25 32% 87 57% 0 * 25 44% 7 71% 7 86%

Isothermal CC  1 * 111 43% 0 * 35 37% 12 17% 10 30%

James Sprunt CC  5 40% 51 49% 0 * 19 42% 4 * 18 61%

Johnston CC  7 14% 281 42% 0 * 65 65% 13 38% 30 43%

Lenoir CC  10 60% 186 41% 2 * 39 31% 8 50% 1 *

Martin CC  15 47% 20 45% 0 * 30 37% 0 * 16 63%

Mayland CC  28 71% 56 38% 0 * 31 68% 0 * 40 45%

McDowell TCC  5 20% 79 29% 0 * 18 39% 8 63% 17 41%

Mitchell CC  0 * 216 50% 0 * 74 45% 0 * 11 64%

Montgomery CC  14 43% 33 36% 0 * 46 37% 16 38% 0 *

Nash CC  0 * 210 42% 0 * 66 29% 0 * 22 36%

Pamlico CC  1 * 10 40% 0 * 13 69% 0 * 13 85%

Piedmont CC  0 * 67 46% 0 * 50 40% 12 50% 28 50%

Pitt CC  6 50% 435 41% 8 75% 144 43% 14 29% 54 43%

Randolph CC  0 * 148 45% 2 * 69 32% 39 38% 6 17%

Richmond CC  0 * 110 35% 0 * 44 39% 0 * 8 63%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  0 * 52 33% 2 * 43 53% 0 * 14 50%

Robeson CC  0 * 170 28% 0 * 55 35% 0 * 43 63%

Rockingham CC  3 * 192 42% 0 * 44 34% 5 40% 17 29%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  0 * 392 42% 10 40% 258 33% 0 * 47 45%

Sampson CC  13 85% 93 37% 0 * 17 29% 0 * 7 86%

Sandhills CC  11 55% 209 56% 0 * 57 46% 0 * 0 *

South Piedmont CC  0 * 149 30% 0 * 79 42% 14 43% 6 33%

Southeastern CC  0 * 190 39% 6 50% 13 38% 0 * 31 58%

Southwestern CC  1 * 111 46% 1 * 42 38% 4 * 6 67%

Stanly CC  0 * 119 36% 0 * 48 38% 14 21% 9 67%

Surry CC  11 36% 246 58% 0 * 88 36% 12 42% 17 41%

Tri‐County CC  1 * 65 38% 0 * 13 38% 0 * 0 *

Vance‐Granville CC  0 * 138 42% 0 * 175 35% 0 * 69 41%

Wake TCC  0 * 1,347 44% 13 31% 284 41% 26 35% 66 53%

Wayne CC  26 62% 343 48% 0 * 110 43% 0 * 7 71%

Western Piedmont CC  4 * 221 41% 1 * 58 59% 8 38% 9 33%

Wilkes CC  5 60% 224 38% 1 * 54 37% 9 78% 11 55%

Wilson CC  0 * 103 40% 1 * 35 40% 0 * 17 47%

* Less than 5 students

CONSTRUCTION 

TECHNOLOGIES

AGRICULTURAL AND 

NATURAL RES TECHARTS AND SCIENCES

BIOLOGICAL AND 

CHEMICAL TECH

BUSINESS 

TECHNOLOGIES

COMMERCIAL AND 

ARTISTIC PROD TECH

32

Page 79: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F2. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2007 COHORT ‐ BY PROGRAM AREA

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  861 38% 2,193 74% 732 46% 5,529 35% 1,082 40%

Alamance CC  1 * 69 59% 29 59% 197 38% 21 24%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 22 50% 83 77% 24 33% 200 31% 18 33%

Beaufort County CC  6 33% 20 95% 11 36% 37 46% 0 *

Bladen CC  0 * 6 100% 23 17% 20 35% 0 *

Blue Ridge CC  10 40% 17 100% 7 57% 67 36% 21 43%

Brunswick CC  0 * 15 60% 0 * 59 15% 0 *

Caldwell CC & TI  7 43% 25 84% 6 100% 126 19% 53 60%

Cape Fear CC  60 42% 36 92% 35 51% 131 47% 53 49%

Carteret CC  0 * 11 55% 1 * 83 29% 4 *

Catawba Valley CC  30 37% 41 80% 25 56% 91 30% 45 51%

Central Carolina CC  16 56% 80 46% 29 45% 135 47% 24 46%

Central Piedmont CC  86 35% 56 77% 24 42% 178 31% 100 18%

Cleveland CC  2 * 13 92% 30 37% 72 39% 14 50%

Coastal Carolina CC  8 50% 30 83% 12 92% 83 45% 14 71%

College of The Albema 9 22% 25 100% 16 69% 72 58% 0 *

Craven CC  17 47% 22 82% 11 55% 38 42% 24 33%

Davidson County CC  5 80% 77 58% 5 60% 141 38% 52 62%

Durham TCC  12 50% 69 59% 9 44% 66 20% 16 31%

Edgecombe CC  1 * 33 79% 12 75% 90 34% 3 *

Fayetteville TCC  21 38% 52 96% 6 50% 206 32% 30 23%

Forsyth TCC  55 36% 94 83% 21 67% 297 31% 76 58%

Gaston College  46 37% 75 65% 16 38% 118 36% 17 18%

Guilford TCC  77 40% 103 75% 41 37% 198 40% 135 45%

Halifax CC  0 * 29 86% 17 47% 30 37% 10 40%

Haywood CC  6 50% 14 86% 3 * 84 40% 16 69%

Isothermal CC  5 20% 25 96% 23 35% 99 26% 8 13%

James Sprunt CC  0 * 15 73% 5 60% 61 48% 7 43%

Johnston CC  0 * 46 91% 8 63% 75 56% 45 9%

Lenoir CC  8 38% 28 71% 11 64% 60 45% 28 61%

Martin CC  1 * 9 56% 0 * 28 54% 7 43%

Mayland CC  14 64% 21 95% 10 70% 38 34% 1 *

McDowell TCC  0 * 24 50% 13 31% 21 29% 6 50%

Mitchell CC  19 32% 39 54% 0 * 159 26% 1 *

Montgomery CC  0 * 14 79% 0 * 32 50% 5 80%

Nash CC  31 42% 37 81% 17 24% 60 55% 0 *

Pamlico CC  0 * 5 20% 0 * 10 30% 0 *

Piedmont CC  0 * 33 67% 29 34% 48 46% 0 *

Pitt CC  26 35% 73 88% 12 42% 92 45% 0 *

Randolph CC  0 * 12 100% 9 56% 58 34% 25 40%

Richmond CC  15 13% 60 67% 8 50% 54 39% 1 *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  0 * 15 67% 10 10% 25 32% 0 *

Robeson CC  0 * 15 93% 0 * 73 44% 0 *

Rockingham CC  3 * 23 91% 20 65% 104 36% 0 *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  23 22% 30 100% 29 45% 307 31% 42 21%

Sampson CC  0 * 8 88% 6 50% 24 54% 0 *

Sandhills CC  29 34% 145 32% 0 * 115 30% 23 22%

South Piedmont CC  3 * 43 84% 3 * 48 33% 9 33%

Southeastern CC  13 46% 24 83% 7 29% 33 36% 0 *

Southwestern CC  16 56% 26 81% 0 * 65 26% 6 33%

Stanly CC  28 25% 35 77% 5 20% 126 35% 0 *

Surry CC  9 11% 34 88% 21 33% 123 30% 19 32%

Tri‐County CC  0 * 10 100% 16 13% 33 12% 7 29%

Vance‐Granville CC  8 75% 36 86% 16 56% 243 26% 11 18%

Wake TCC  67 22% 71 85% 17 53% 272 28% 36 39%

Wayne CC  11 64% 72 88% 12 33% 64 50% 18 17%

Western Piedmont CC  20 30% 30 73% 6 50% 42 64% 1 *

Wilkes CC  15 20% 33 67% 6 17% 60 35% 23 48%

Wilson CC  0 * 7 100% 0 * 58 34% 7 57%

* Less than 5 students

PUBLIC SERVICE 

TECHNOLOGIES

TRANSPORT SYSTEMS 

TECHNOLOGIES

ENGINEERING 

TECHNOLOGIESHEALTH SCIENCES

INDUSTRIAL 

TECHNOLOGIES

33

Page 80: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F3. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2007 COHORT ‐ BY ENROLLMENT TYPE

Students Success Students Success

System Totals  20,708 48% 11,599 33%

Alamance CC  469 55% 273 31%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 494 50% 221 32%

Beaufort County CC  147 55% 67 31%

Bladen CC  115 44% 61 25%

Blue Ridge CC  189 52% 203 36%

Brunswick CC  175 46% 65 23%

Caldwell CC & TI  467 51% 147 38%

Cape Fear CC  934 52% 322 34%

Carteret CC  150 45% 105 29%

Catawba Valley CC  613 43% 297 28%

Central Carolina CC  369 49% 172 39%

Central Piedmont CC  1,147 48% 1,420 33%

Cleveland CC  210 43% 125 26%

Coastal Carolina CC  358 63% 345 39%

College of The Albema 250 54% 157 36%

Craven CC  239 50% 257 39%

Davidson County CC  253 62% 277 29%

Durham TCC  265 43% 270 35%

Edgecombe CC  133 50% 76 41%

Fayetteville TCC  816 39% 441 32%

Forsyth TCC  795 48% 430 39%

Gaston College  760 45% 302 23%

Guilford TCC  1,420 46% 460 35%

Halifax CC  153 48% 81 42%

Haywood CC  175 62% 99 34%

Isothermal CC  238 38% 91 40%

James Sprunt CC  132 55% 53 40%

Johnston CC  437 49% 133 44%

Lenoir CC  303 47% 80 44%

Martin CC  88 50% 43 40%

Mayland CC  149 56% 90 52%

McDowell TCC  125 40% 66 27%

Mitchell CC  318 48% 201 31%

Montgomery CC  91 52% 72 35%

Nash CC  325 50% 118 27%

Pamlico CC  26 73% 27 37%

Piedmont CC  142 54% 126 38%

Pitt CC  681 49% 189 32%

Randolph CC  225 45% 143 36%

Richmond CC  173 50% 127 32%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  105 49% 56 30%

Robeson CC  297 41% 63 29%

Rockingham CC  297 48% 114 30%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  705 43% 433 29%

Sampson CC  126 50% 42 38%

Sandhills CC  397 44% 192 38%

South Piedmont CC  152 55% 202 31%

Southeastern CC  246 41% 77 52%

Southwestern CC  200 47% 80 38%

Stanly CC  225 49% 159 25%

Surry CC  455 54% 125 22%

Tri‐County CC  95 38% 53 25%

Vance‐Granville CC  325 47% 371 28%

Wake TCC  1,239 50% 960 32%

Wayne CC  479 54% 184 45%

Western Piedmont CC  309 51% 91 40%

Wilkes CC  330 47% 111 21%

Wilson CC  177 44% 54 31%

* Less than 5 students

FULL‐TIME PART‐TIME

34

Page 81: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F4. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2007 COHORT ‐ BY ETHNICITY AND GENDER  

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  4,325 40% 3,027 34% 10,902 47% 9,217 43% 676 45% 569 37% 1,869 43% 1,644 42%

Alamance CC  97 37% 44 30% 305 51% 215 43% 27 52% 16 44% 17 59% 21 48%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 31 29% 19 32% 288 49% 298 43% 20 55% 14 7% 21 43% 24 50%

Beaufort County CC  59 53% 22 36% 68 60% 58 31% 3 * 1 * 1 * 2 *

Bladen CC  43 37% 27 30% 43 44% 34 35% 0 * 0 * 20 40% 8 38%

Blue Ridge CC  12 67% 7 14% 176 46% 164 40% 9 44% 11 45% 5 40% 8 50%

Brunswick CC  20 30% 21 48% 98 43% 79 41% 4 * 5 20% 0 * 9 44%

Caldwell CC & TI  10 20% 16 38% 300 49% 252 46% 4 * 1 * 17 53% 14 57%

Cape Fear CC  100 39% 84 27% 429 50% 500 47% 10 70% 14 71% 67 51% 52 71%

Carteret CC  10 60% 5 40% 113 43% 100 31% 4 * 6 33% 7 14% 10 40%

Catawba Valley CC  56 32% 46 24% 400 38% 287 43% 20 35% 13 46% 48 50% 40 25%

Central Carolina CC  81 33% 42 36% 202 51% 155 52% 23 39% 10 20% 13 38% 15 40%

Central Piedmont CC  515 38% 378 31% 606 45% 643 42% 98 36% 86 35% 125 40% 116 42%

Cleveland CC  62 35% 43 42% 123 38% 86 35% 0 * 3 * 8 25% 8 25%

Coastal Carolina CC  68 38% 46 57% 257 51% 216 50% 34 53% 30 57% 27 74% 25 52%

College of The Albema 64 47% 39 51% 174 47% 95 48% 5 40% 2 * 20 30% 8 50%

Craven CC  67 42% 35 23% 139 50% 155 45% 13 38% 9 22% 47 57% 31 35%

Davidson County CC  28 54% 43 37% 234 46% 176 47% 13 31% 5 20% 14 50% 17 29%

Durham TCC  135 33% 53 32% 65 54% 87 46% 8 38% 14 29% 98 39% 75 35%

Edgecombe CC  72 51% 49 41% 55 51% 24 42% 3 * 1 * 4 * 0 *

Fayetteville TCC  329 39% 188 27% 321 45% 176 31% 49 43% 31 39% 94 34% 69 30%

Forsyth TCC  160 38% 125 30% 422 49% 390 48% 32 44% 31 42% 33 55% 32 53%

Gaston College  89 36% 46 22% 411 42% 275 37% 22 23% 16 31% 115 38% 88 40%

Guilford TCC  316 43% 279 30% 401 51% 556 44% 29 59% 37 35% 130 43% 132 45%

Halifax CC  81 46% 33 36% 59 56% 54 46% 0 * 0 * 3 * 0 *

Haywood CC  0 * 2 * 155 56% 103 49% 2 * 4 * 4 * 0 *

Isothermal CC  29 24% 19 26% 169 46% 97 33% 4 * 3 * 6 50% 2 *

James Sprunt CC  28 36% 27 37% 63 67% 48 54% 0 * 7 43% 0 * 4 *

Johnston CC  56 48% 62 24% 252 58% 148 43% 13 46% 11 36% 15 53% 13 23%

Lenoir CC  83 29% 40 33% 111 44% 130 62% 1 * 0 * 6 67% 8 50%

Martin CC  34 47% 24 38% 36 50% 27 56% 0 * 0 * 6 50% 0 *

Mayland CC  0 * 22 73% 80 55% 122 52% 0 * 4 * 0 * 8 75%

McDowell TCC  0 * 7 14% 96 35% 72 39% 0 * 1 * 2 * 8 25%

Mitchell CC  53 36% 23 43% 236 46% 163 39% 12 33% 5 20% 14 29% 13 38%

Montgomery CC  22 45% 11 45% 70 49% 51 37% 4 * 0 * 0 * 4 *

Nash CC  91 38% 52 35% 143 52% 112 45% 6 33% 8 38% 19 37% 12 42%

Pamlico CC  10 60% 17 76% 13 8% 10 70% 0 * 3 * 0 * 0 *

Piedmont CC  44 41% 72 49% 74 49% 68 44% 3 * 0 * 3 * 4 *

Pitt CC  164 49% 105 32% 281 52% 252 42% 11 45% 0 * 30 57% 23 35%

Randolph CC  17 41% 9 33% 175 43% 116 42% 13 38% 22 36% 8 38% 8 25%

Richmond CC  71 49% 40 30% 100 43% 53 42% 4 * 1 * 23 39% 8 38%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  67 42% 48 44% 26 38% 16 44% 0 * 0 * 2 * 2 *

Robeson CC  55 45% 34 41% 41 46% 41 44% 4 * 4 * 127 33% 54 31%

Rockingham CC  43 47% 42 48% 176 36% 137 50% 3 * 0 * 3 * 5 20%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  136 38% 54 22% 514 39% 346 37% 23 48% 18 17% 31 48% 16 38%

Sampson CC  41 39% 13 38% 55 53% 42 55% 6 50% 6 33% 0 * 3 *

Sandhills CC  89 34% 44 27% 219 49% 158 43% 10 20% 0 * 37 43% 24 42%

South Piedmont CC  66 29% 20 40% 147 48% 77 39% 14 50% 4 * 17 41% 9 44%

Southeastern CC  57 40% 47 38% 102 49% 86 43% 0 * 1 * 18 39% 12 42%

Southwestern CC  2 * 0 * 131 53% 97 40% 2 * 2 * 28 29% 15 27%

Stanly CC  27 44% 25 20% 176 39% 120 37% 2 * 0 * 14 50% 17 65%

Surry CC  9 33% 14 57% 236 53% 275 43% 13 54% 18 39% 10 30% 5 40%

Tri‐County CC  0 * 1 * 83 34% 53 30% 0 * 2 * 6 33% 2 *

Vance‐Granville CC  120 30% 174 37% 187 42% 157 37% 11 45% 17 24% 16 44% 14 43%

Wake TCC  195 37% 149 28% 425 46% 425 44% 62 47% 50 32% 411 44% 482 43%

Wayne CC  112 49% 63 25% 212 63% 156 46% 14 71% 15 33% 48 56% 43 51%

Western Piedmont CC  14 57% 19 37% 181 43% 138 54% 1 * 7 57% 18 61% 22 50%

Wilkes CC  18 50% 14 29% 197 40% 190 44% 5 60% 0 * 6 33% 0 *

Wilson CC  67 33% 44 43% 51 51% 56 43% 3 * 0 * 7 43% 0 *

* Less than 5 students

OTHER FEMALE OTHER MALEAFRICAN‐AMER 

FEMALE

AFRICAN‐

AMERIC MALE

CAUCASIAN 

FEMALE

CAUCASIAN 

MALE

HISPANIC 

FEMALEHISPANIC MALE

35

Page 82: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G1. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST TEST % PASSING

12‐13 12‐13 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 12‐13 12‐13 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 12‐13 12‐13 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 12‐13 12‐13

System Totals  44 93% 100% 98% 98% 38 100% 100% 98% 100% 44 91% 96% 100% 100% 1,563 83%

Alamance CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 20 85%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 47 83%

Beaufort County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 17 88%

Bladen CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 12 67%

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 23 96%

Brunswick CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 6 100%

Caldwell CC & TI  * * * * * * * * * * * * 18 56%

Cape Fear CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 97 75%

Carteret CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 18 83%

Catawba Valley CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 31 84%

Central Carolina CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 31 81%

Central Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 30 87%

Cleveland CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 25 92%

Coastal Carolina CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 40 75%

College of The Albemarle  * * * * * * * * * * * * 11 100%

Craven CC  20 85% * 100% 100% 15 100% * 100% 100% 17 82% * 100% * 29 76%

Davidson County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 46 93%

Durham TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 33 85%

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 38 84%

Forsyth TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 65 92%

Gaston College  * * * * * * * * * * * * 52 90%

Guilford TCC  18 100% 100% 100% 96% 19 100% 100% 100% 100% 23 96% 95% 100% 100% 43 86%

Halifax CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 14 50%

Haywood CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 17 65%

Isothermal CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 18 72%

James Sprunt CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 13 69%

Johnston CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 34 94%

Lenoir CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 18 61%

Martin CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 14 43%

Mayland CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 9 56%

McDowell TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 16 100%

Mitchell CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 35 80%

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 5 40%

Nash CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 24 92%

Pamlico CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pitt CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 52 87%

Randolph CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 34 71%

Richmond CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 18 78%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 33 94%

Rockingham CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 23 91%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 54 89%

Sampson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 10 30%

Sandhills CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 28 86%

South Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 23 78%

Southeastern CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 20 60%

Southwestern CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 5 100%

Stanly CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 40 95%

Surry CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 42 93%

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 12 75%

Vance‐Granville CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 38 82%

Wake TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 48 90%

Wayne CC  6 100% * * * 4 * * * * 4 * * * * 26 96%

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 31 97%

Wilkes CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 48 75%

Wilson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 29 79%

*Less than 5 ('12,'13), Less than 10 ('09,'10,'11)

BLET

% PASSING % PASSING% PASSING

AVIATION ‐ GENERAL AVIATION ‐ AIRFRAME AVIATION ‐ POWER PLANT

36

Page 83: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G2. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST

12‐13 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 12‐13 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 12‐13 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  176 92% 92% 84% 91% 92% 196 90% 88% 93% 22 77% 80% 80% 81% 85%

Alamance CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 17 88% 94% 94% 90% 94% 6 100% 83% * * * * * *

Beaufort County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Bladen CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Brunswick CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  * * * * * 10 100% 60% 100% 9 67% 67% * 64% 83%

Cape Fear CC  8 75% 100% 82% 100% 100% * * * * * * *

Carteret CC  * * * * * 2 * 100% 85% * * * * *

Catawba Valley CC  15 100% 100% 94% 94% 95% * * * * * * * *

Central Carolina CC  10 90% 88% 82% 100% 100% 4 * * * * * * * *

Central Piedmont CC  26 100% 100% 84% 96% 85% * * * * * * * *

Cleveland CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  16 94% 91% 86% 90% 90% 28 89% 73% * * * * * *

College of The Albemarle  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Craven CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Davidson County CC  * * * * * 17 82% 80% * * * * * *

Durham TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  25 88% 92% 75% 100% 89% 13 54% * * * * * * *

Forsyth TCC  7 100% 82% 82% * * 6 83% 100% 95% * * * * *

Gaston College  * * * * * 6 100% 100% 90% * * * * *

Guilford TCC  21 90% 85% 85% 97% 89% * * * * * * * *

Halifax CC  * 95% 77% 75% 93% * * * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * * * * 11 82% * * * * * * *

Isothermal CC  * * * * * 10 80% * * * * * * *

James Sprunt CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Johnston CC  * * * * * 3 * 70% * 2 * 80% * * *

Lenoir CC  * * * * * 4 * * * * * * * *

Martin CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

McDowell TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pamlico CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pitt CC  * * * * * 8 100% 100% 100% 11 82% 83% * 92% *

Randolph CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Rockingham CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Sampson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Sandhills CC  * * * * * 5 100% 92% 90% * * * * *

South Piedmont CC  * * * * * 23 96% 76% 91% * * * * *

Southeastern CC  * * * * * 1 * * * * * * * *

Southwestern CC  * * * * * 5 100% 91% * * * * * *

Stanly CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Surry CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * 6 100% * * * * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wake TCC  11 82% 83% 100% 79% 100% 17 100% * 100% * * * * *

Wayne CC  20 95% 90% 76% 82% 95% * * * * * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * * 11 91% * * * * * * *

Wilson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12,'13), Less than 10 ('09,'10,'11)

NUC. MED. TECH.

% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING

DENTAL HYGIENE MASSAGE & BODY WORK

37

Page 84: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G3. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012‐2013 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST TEST

12‐13 12‐13 11‐12 12‐13 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 12‐13 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 12‐13 12‐13 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  12 75% 70% 24 88% 84% 96% 76% 97% 295 94% 97% 96% 99% 97% 233 61% 75% 82% 80% 72%

Alamance CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  * * * * * * * 13 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * * * 84% 85%

Beaufort County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Bladen CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 3 * * * * *

Brunswick CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 13 54% 75% * 88% 74%

Caldwell CC & TI  * * * * * * * 1 * 100% 91% * * * * * * *

Cape Fear CC  * * * * * * * 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 2 * * * 83% *

Carteret CC  * * * * * * * 18 94% 94% 94% 100% 100% 13 8% * * 33% 46%

Catawba Valley CC  * * * * * * * 4 * 100% * * * 3 * * * * *

Central Carolina CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 1 * * * 70% *

Central Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 60 85% 85% 90% 95% 90%

Cleveland CC  * * * * * * * 19 84% 100% 100% * 100% * * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

College of The Albemarle  * * * * * * * * * * * * 4 * * * * *

Craven CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 17 12% 67% * * 45%

Davidson County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Durham TCC  12 75% 70% * * * * * * * * * * 37 73% 75% 96% 84% 73%

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * * * 11 64% 94% 94% 100% 100% * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  * * * * * * * 16 100% 95% 94% 100% 100% * * * * *

Forsyth TCC  * * 6 100% 86% * * * 19 89% 100% 95% 100% 100% * * * * *

Gaston College  * * * * * * * * * * * * 7 71% * * * *

Guilford TCC  * * * * * * * 9 100% * * * * 22 45% 67% 76% 86% 71%

Halifax CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Isothermal CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 1 * * * * *

James Sprunt CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Johnston CC  * * * * * * * 24 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 11 55% 38% * * *

Lenoir CC  * * * * * * * 4 * 100% * * * * * * * *

Martin CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

McDowell TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 1 * * * * 81%

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pamlico CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pitt CC  * * 18 83% 95% 100% 72% 100% 23 100% 100% 100% 94% 100% 6 50% * * * *

Randolph CC  * * * * * * * 15 60% 76% 100% 100% 89% * * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * * * * * 10 100% 100% * * * * * * * *

Rockingham CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  * * * * * * * 17 100% 100% 94% 100% 94% 9 56% 75% * * *

Sampson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Sandhills CC  * * * * * * * 10 90% 100% * 100% 100% 1 * * * * *

South Piedmont CC  * * * 60% * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Southeastern CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Southwestern CC  * * * * * * * 9 100% 92% 91% 100% * 6 50% 100% * * *

Stanly CC  * * * * * * * 12 100% 100% 93% 94% 86% 7 71% 80% * * *

Surry CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 1 * * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  * * * * * * * 22 95% 100% 96% 97% 100% * * * * *

Wake TCC  * * * * * * * 27 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * * * * *

Wayne CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * 8 88% 60% 83% * *

Wilson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12,'13), Less than 10 ('09,'10,'11)

OPTICIANRY

% PASSING % PASSING

REAL ESTATE SALES

% PASSING % PASSING

RADIOGRAPHYRADIATION THERAPY

38

Page 85: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G4. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST

'13 '13 '12 '13 '13 '12 '13 '13 '12 '13 '13 '12 '13 '13 '12

System Totals  145 90% 88% 684 89% 86% 193 91% 89% 22 68% 90% 116 77% 87%

Alamance CC  5 60% 71% 25 76% 79% * * * 100%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 7 86% * 10 100% 100% 15 93% 100% * * 7 71% *

Beaufort County CC  * 4 * 56% * * * *

Bladen CC  * * 8 75% 73% * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  8 100% 100% 10 90% 90% 6 100% * * * 100%

Brunswick CC  7 100% * 7 86% 60% 2 * 1 * * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  7 86% 64% 4 * 86% * * 10 60% 78%

Cape Fear CC  15 100% 81% 21 90% 73% 18 100% 100% * * 100%

Carteret CC  4 * * 15 93% 83% 5 100% * 100% * *

Catawba Valley CC  * 7 100% 100% * * *

Central Carolina CC  7 86% 80% 59 76% 78% 13 100% 88% 7 100% 100% 8 38% 100%

Central Piedmont CC  * * * * *

Cleveland CC  6 100% 90% 14 100% 82% 2 * * 2 * * 100%

Coastal Carolina CC  * 25 92% 93% * * * 8 88%

College of The Albema 11 100% 100% 9 100% 80% * * * 100%

Craven CC  8 50% 100% 12 83% 71% 6 83% 78% * 9 78% 100%

Davidson County CC  * * 30 93% 96% 13 77% 87% * * *

Durham TCC  * * 14 93% 88% * *

Edgecombe CC  1 * * 11 82% 75% 3 * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  * 21 100% 92% 23 100% 88% * 23 74% *

Forsyth TCC  * * * * *

Gaston College  * 26 88% 72% * * *

Guilford TCC  1 * * 15 93% 92% * * * *

Halifax CC  1 * * 2 * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * 15 80% 100% * * 2 *

Isothermal CC  7 100% * 9 100% 90% * 1 * 9 89% *

James Sprunt CC  2 * * 2 * 43% * * * 1 * *

Johnston CC  2 * 93% 17 94% 83% * 4 * * * 100%

Lenoir CC  8 100% 100% 2 * 75% 2 * * 2 * * 20 75% 60%

Martin CC  * 4 * * * * *

Mayland CC  3 * * 10 90% 86% * * * 7 100% *

McDowell TCC  3 * * 14 86% 100% 6 100% 100% * * * *

Mitchell CC  * 21 100% 96% 5 80% 71% 1 * *

Montgomery CC  * * * * *

Nash CC  3 * * 3 * 90% * * * *

Pamlico CC  2 * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  1 * * 4 * 67% * * * * *

Pitt CC  * * * * *

Randolph CC  1 * * 16 100% 82% * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * 4 * 0% * * * *

Robeson CC  * * 14 79% 93% * * * *

Rockingham CC  * * 12 92% 100% * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  10 90% 67% 58 95% 90% 23 83% 94% * * 4 * 80%

Sampson CC  1 * 11 82% 100% * 1 * * *

Sandhills CC  4 * 93% 13 85% 78% * * * * 93%

South Piedmont CC  * * * * *

Southeastern CC  * * 7 100% * * * * * *

Southwestern CC  * 22 95% 96% * * 5 100%

Stanly CC  6 100% * 30 93% 96% 2 * 83% * * 3 * *

Surry CC  * 13 92% 96% * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * 7 86% 80% 2 * * 1 * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  4 * 93% 16 81% 80% * 2 * * * 100%

Wake TCC  * 25 84% 95% 33 88% 83% * * *

Wayne CC  * * * * * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * * * * *

Wilson CC  * * * * * * * *

*Less than 5

COSMETIC ARTS

APPRENTICE COSMETOLOGY ESTHETICIAN

% PASSING% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING

INSTRUCTOR

% PASSING

MANICURIST

39

Page 86: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G5. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST

'13 '13 '13 '13 '12 '11 '10 '13 '13 '12 '11 '10 '09 '13 '13 '12 '11 '10 '09 '13 '13 '12 '11 '10 '09

System Totals  653 95% 9 100% 89% * 88% 2,919 79% 79% 82% 85% 83% 329 66% 64% 66% 67% 64% 625 94% 91% 90% 80% 71%

Alamance CC  19 95% * * * * 70 77% 67% 77% 97% 93% * 71% 42% 45% 73% 10 100% 87% * * 50%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 57 98% * * * * 61 89% 84% 94% 88% 95% 38 79% 67% 88% 82% 84% 30 97% 95% 100% 89% *

Beaufort County CC  16 88% * * * * 17 76% 50% 41% 69% 88% 1 * 47% 20% * 42% * * * * *

Bladen CC  * * * * * 35 71% 59% 83% 79% * 15 13% 69% 63% 81% * 13 85% * 74% 63% *

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * * 40 80% 89% 90% 92% 75% * * 73% 61% * * 90% * * *

Brunswick CC  * * * * * 29 69% 87% 93% 93% 84% 11 55% 44% 70% 62% 80% 4 * 100% * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  * * * * * 44 70% 81% 75% 87% 81% * * 50% 60% * 20 90% 71% 82% 85% 77%

Cape Fear CC  41 98% * * * * 77 99% 90% 91% 95% 94% 16 94% 100% 55% 87% * 15 100% 100% 100% * 89%

Carteret CC  * * * * * 41 88% 67% 68% 75% 81% * 42% * 64% 53% 4 * * * * *

Catawba Valley CC  * * * * * 54 70% 76% 81% 75% 60% 1 * 81% 83% 80% 55% 23 100% 91% * * *

Central Carolina CC  21 100% * * * * 50 78% 59% 71% 67% 76% * * * 67% * 4 * 100% * * 36%

Central Piedmont CC  * * * * * 118 92% 94% 91% 95% 94% * * * * * * * * * *

Cleveland CC  18 89% * * * * 65 75% 77% 84% 81% 71% * * 50% 44% 59% 18 94% 96% 93% 88% 100%

Coastal Carolina CC  16 100% * * * * 70 97% 97% 98% 97% 91% 5 100% 100% * 92% * 8 100% 100% 100% 85% *

College of The Albema 19 95% * * * * 67 84% 77% 84% 79% 79% 13 77% 60% 76% 40% 62% 6 100% * 75% 100% *

Craven CC  10 100% * * * * 19 68% 75% 89% 73% 75% 1 * 68% * * * * 83% * * *

Davidson County CC  24 96% * * * * 51 92% 98% 93% 95% 99% 10 90% 100% 60% 94% * 17 94% 89% 100% 83% 50%

Durham TCC  * * * * * 99 94% 94% 99% 94% 87% 16 100% 100% 82% 73% 94% 9 100% 100% * 56% 67%

Edgecombe CC  7 86% * * * * 21 67% 70% * * 93% 6 17% * * * * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  72 97% * * * * 134 90% 92% 93% 99% 90% * * * * * 32 91% 91% 100% 100% 100%

Forsyth TCC  * * * * * 91 89% 91% 90% 88% 95% 7 86% 100% * * * 9 100% * * * *

Gaston College  23 100% * * * * 66 82% 82% 88% 88% 85% 5 80% 100% * * * 10 100% 100% 100% 92% 70%

Guilford TCC  36 97% * * * * 112 90% 87% 91% 94% 88% 13 77% 95% 83% * 80% 17 94% 95% 100% 100% *

Halifax CC  9 100% * * * * 10 100% * 69% 71% 69% * * * 36% * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * * * * 21 90% 81% 85% 81% 82% * 71% 71% 79% * 12 100% * * * *

Isothermal CC  7 100% * * * * 21 71% 56% 61% 67% 64% 5 20% 43% 33% * 53% * * * * *

James Sprunt CC  8 88% * * * * 18 83% 67% 65% 76% 69% * * * * * 4 * 83% * * *

Johnston CC  * * * * * 94 66% 68% 82% 73% 81% 16 88% * * 67% * 30 87% 100% 100% 77% 93%

Lenoir CC  10 100% * * * * 255 74% 78% 72% 85% 93% 63 60% 57% 68% 71% 77% 88 95% 99% 88% 90% 72%

Martin CC  * * * * * 34 76% 71% 67% 73% 93% 11 18% 67% * * * 10 70% * * * *

Mayland CC  10 100% * * * * 20 35% 54% 57% 75% 82% 1 * 33% * * * * * * 63% *

McDowell TCC  * * * * * 22 64% 68% 68% 80% 83% * * * * * 11 100% 78% 83% * *

Mitchell CC  * * * * * 62 84% 83% 72% 80% 69% 2 * 80% * 71% * 4 * * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  8 100% * * * * 52 48% 71% 70% 88% 81% 5 60% 29% * * * 16 88% 59% 78% 47% 64%

Pamlico CC  * * * * * 13 85% * 90% * 71% 6 83% * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * 15 60% 48% 76% 71% * * * * * * 7 71% 88% * * *

Pitt CC  31 94% * * * * 33 76% 73% 65% 81% 47% * * * * * 14 93% 82% * 72% *

Randolph CC  9 100% * * * * 34 74% 77% 75% 81% 84% 7 86% * * * * * * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * * 12 42% 62% * 100% 80% 8 63% * * * 64% 1 * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * 19 79% 81% 80% 82% 73% * 75% * * * 7 100% * * * *

Robeson CC  18 94% * * * * 25 92% 50% 46% 62% 78% 10 40% * 73% 43% 65% 5 100% * * 92% *

Rockingham CC  * * * * * 54 57% 70% 78% 69% 88% 1 * * * * * 6 83% 75% 70% * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  34 94% * * * * 123 72% 61% 72% 85% 70% 1 * 80% 57% 73% 65% 24 88% 88% 84% 61% 72%

Sampson CC  * * * * * 13 69% 17% * 73% 85% * * * * * * 88% * 85% *

Sandhills CC  28 100% * * * * 60 72% 89% 79% 82% 80% 1 * * * * * 18 94% 88% * 91% *

South Piedmont CC  * * * * * 47 77% 75% 87% 83% 66% * * * * * 14 100% 100% * * *

Southeastern CC  * * * * * 33 58% 49% 78% 63% 60% 7 57% 50% 63% 65% * 9 89% * * * *

Southwestern CC  * * * * * 17 100% 81% 97% 96% 89% * * * * * 13 100% 100% * 100% *

Stanly CC  * * * * * 31 65% 69% 73% 83% 76% * * * * * * 82% 92% * *

Surry CC  24 100% * * * * 33 91% 96% 89% 98% 95% * * * * * 18 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * 19 63% 87% 80% 75% 71% 12 50% * * * * 7 100% * 80% * *

Vance‐Granville CC  11 100% * * * * 29 93% 85% 86% 76% 83% * * * * 31% 19 89% 75% 73% 78% 70%

Wake TCC  * * * * * 149 90% 90% 94% 92% 96% * 83% 86% 92% 79% 23 100% 100% 100% 100% *

Wayne CC  7 100% * * * * 42 57% 48% 57% 57% 83% 8 75% 33% * * * 3 * 91% * * *

Western Piedmont CC  14 100% 9 100% 89% * 84% 17 94% 100% * 79% 95% * * * * * 5 100% * * * *

Wilkes CC  33 100% * * * * 32 81% 89% 88% 75% 81% 7 57% 57% * 82% * 8 100% 100% * * *

Wilson CC  13 15% * * * * 29 62% 59% 74% 87% 71% * * * * * * * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12,'13), Less than 10 ('09,'10,'11)

DETENTION  EMD EMT EMT‐I EMT‐P

% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING % PASSING

40

Page 87: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G6. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2013 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST TEST

'13 '13 '12 '11 '10 '09 '13 '13 '12 '11 '10 '09 '13 '13 '12 '11 '10 '09 '13 '13 '12 '11 '10 '09

System Totals  123 92% 91% 88% 84% 89% 840 94% 95% 94% 97% 96% 2,087 85% 94% 90% 87% 89% 68 100% 100% 95% 96% 100%

Alamance CC  * * * * * * * * * * 36 86% 96% 76% 83% 89% * * * * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  * * * * * 39 87% 87% 98% 97% 100% 79 73% 94% 92% 89% 88% 20 100% 100% 100% 93% *

Beaufort County CC  * * * * * 23 83% 100% 95% 100% 100% 39 90% 97% 94% 89% 88% * * * * *

Bladen CC  * * * * * 23 96% 94% 92% 100% 100% 12 67% 92% 85% * * * * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * * * * * * * 36 83% 89% 94% 71% 80% * * * * *

Brunswick CC  * * * * * 18 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 17 88% 100% 80% 100% 94% * * * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  13 100% 94% 81% 73% 100% * * * * * 12 100% 100% 95% 91% 85% * * * * *

Cape Fear CC  * * * * * 24 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 45 93% 100% 98% 98% 100% * * * * *

Carteret CC  * * * * * 6 100% * 70% * 93% 17 94% 100% 93% 100% 100% * * * * *

Catawba Valley CC  * * * * * * * * * * 59 69% 96% 88% 73% 78% * * * * *

Central Carolina CC  * * * * * 54 89% 82% 80% 87% 97% 16 94% 100% 96% 100% 93% 27 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Central Piedmont CC  28 96% 90% 91% 75% 82% * * * * * 79 92% 86% 65% 86% 89% * * * * *

Cleveland CC  * * * * * 15 100% 100% 100% 100% * 16 94% 94% 88% * * * * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  * * * * * 16 100% 100% 94% 95% 100% 26 88% 100% 83% 93% 94% * * * * *

College of The Albemarle  * * * * * 16 100% 100% 94% 92% 100% 27 93% 100% 97% 97% 100% * * * * *

Craven CC  * 82% * * * 20 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 53 92% 98% 95% 84% 81% * * * * *

Davidson County CC  * * * * * 14 93% 88% 100% 100% 78% 46 76% 93% 85% 92% 87% * * * * *

Durham TCC  * * * * * 23 96% 100% 100% 94% * 52 79% 87% 95% 92% 93% * * * * *

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * 17 100% 100% * * * 31 84% 90% * * * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  12 83% 93% 92% 91% 75% 47 91% 97% 94% 92% 89% 74 77% 86% 95% 90% 98% * * * * *

Forsyth TCC  * * * * * 60 98% 100% 100% 97% 85% 70 96% 99% 96% 94% 83% * * * * *

Gaston College  * * * * * 49 96% 100% 100% 97% 100% 63 94% 98% 98% 86% 91% 21 100% 100% 80% 93% 100%

Guilford TCC  16 100% 100% * 91% 100% 21 95% 95% 100% 100% 92% 104 74% 91% 89% 89% 87% * * * * *

Halifax CC  * * * * * 7 100% 92% 100% * * 23 87% 89% 89% * * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * * * * * * * * * 32 69% 65% * 68% 91% * * * * *

Isothermal CC  * * * * * 25 92% 96% 93% 97% 96% 21 81% 96% 100% * * * * * * *

James Sprunt CC  * * * * * 9 89% 100% 80% 100% 100% 19 89% 100% 95% 93% 94% * * * * *

Johnston CC  * * * * * * * * * 100% 25 96% 95% 75% 86% 100% * * * * *

Lenoir CC  * * * * * 7 100% 100% * * * 28 86% 100% 92% 77% 90% * * * * *

Martin CC  14 79% 64% 77% 82% * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  * * * * * 21 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 26 81% 87% 96% 96% 84% * * * * *

McDowell TCC  * * * * * 29 93% 97% 93% 100% 100% 16 100% 93% 89% * * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  * * * * * * * * * * 28 96% 100% 97% 90% 94% * * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * * * * 31 97% 94% 100% 83% 93% * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  17 100% 100% 93% 83% 100% 18 72% 100% 95% * * 25 76% 83% 90% * * * * * * *

Pamlico CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * 28 75% 95% 71% 81% 88% * * * * *

Pitt CC  * * * * * * * * * * 96 89% 91% 86% 93% 86% * * * * *

Randolph CC  * * * * * * * * * * 28 100% 100% 100% 95% 100% * * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * * 21 76% 82% 91% 94% 94% 29 66% 95% 93% 98% 91% * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * * * * 100% 100% 12 67% 94% 95% 50% 92% * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * * * 13 100% * * * * 17 94% 100% 91% 92% 67% * * * * *

Rockingham CC  * * * * * 12 75% 80% 81% 97% 96% 17 41% 92% 80% 89% 87% * * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  * * * * * 12 100% 100% 94% 100% 100% 40 80% 98% 100% 84% 84% * * * * *

Sampson CC  * * * * * 22 100% 100% 100% 97% 100% 30 100% 91% 100% 88% 82% * * * * *

Sandhills CC  * * * * * 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 44 89% 100% 92% 87% 89% * * * * *

South Piedmont CC  * * * * * 12 100% 100% 67% 100% 94% 32 81% 87% * 84% 53% * * * * *

Southeastern CC  * * * * * 28 96% 100% 100% 100% 97% 30 77% 94% 89% 100% 100% * * * * *

Southwestern CC  11 91% 100% 90% 100% * * * * * 100% 29 83% 94% 94% 86% 90% * * * * *

Stanly CC  * * * * * * * * * * 40 93% 97% 90% 100% 70% * * * * *

Surry CC  12 75% 86% * 80% * 14 100% 100% 100% 96% 100% 44 84% 100% 96% 88% 95% * * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * * * * * * 21 95% 89% 92% 84% 75% * * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  * * * * * 30 90% 92% 93% 100% 86% 43 86% 98% 89% 79% 88% * * * * *

Wake TCC  * * * * * * * * * * 133 89% 95% 90% 89% 92% * * * * *

Wayne CC  * * * * * 15 100% 100% 94% 100% 100% 37 81% 89% 93% 90% 95% * * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * 32 88% 100% 100% 86% 85% * * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * * * * * * * 22 100% 100% 85% 90% 64% * * * * *

Wilson CC  * * * * * 17 100% 100% 80% 100% 100% 31 84% 87% 88% 86% 91% * * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12,'13), Less than 10 ('09,'10,'11)

PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASST.

% PASSING

VET. MED. TECH.PRACTICAL NURSING REGISTERED NURSING

% PASSING% PASSING % PASSING

41

Page 88: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

MEASURES forSTUDENT SUCCESS

2013

PERFORMANCE

NORTH CAROLINA

Page 89: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 90: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

2013 PERFORMANCE MEASURES for STUDENT SUCCESS

July 2013

NORTH CAROLINACOMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

Dr. R Scott Ralls, President

Dr. Sharon Morrissey, Executive VP for Programs & Chief Academic Officer

RESEARCH & PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Bill Schneider, Associate VP

Dr. Kristen Corbell, Research Projects Coordinator

Joann Ingoglia, Compliance Coordinator

Dr. Kinge Mbella, Education Research Analyst

CONTENTS 

Introduction  2 

July 2013 Performance Summary  3 

A. Basic Skills Student Progress 5 

B. GED Diploma Passing Rate 6 

TABLE A. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2011‐2012 TABLE B. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2011‐2012 

C. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level English Courses  9

D. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level Math Courses 10

TABLE C. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2011‐2012 TABLE D. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2011‐2012 

11 

E. First Year Progression 12

TABLE E. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2011 COHORT 13 

F. Curriculum Student Completion 14

TABLE F. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2006 COHORT  15 

G. Licensure and Certification Passing Rate 16

TABLE G. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2011‐2012  17 

H. College Transfer Performance 18

TABLE H. COLLEGE TRANSFER PERFORMANCE, 2010‐11 COMMUNITY COLLEGESTUDENTS 

19 

Appendix – Additional Performance Measure Tables  21

TABLE A1‐A2. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL  22 

TABLE B1. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL  25 

TABLE C1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2011‐2012 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION 

26 

TABLE C2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY AGE 

27 

TABLE D1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2011‐2012 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION 

28 

TABLE D2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY CREDIT MATH COURSE 

29 

TABLE E1. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2011 COHORT ‐ BY ETHNICITY AND GENDER 

31 

TABLE F1‐F2. CURRICULUM STUDENT COMPLETION, FALL 2006 COHORT ‐ BY PROGRAM AREA 

32 

TABLE G1. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY EXAM (BLET, DENTAL HYGIENE, MASSAGE & BODY WORK, NUC. MED. TECH.) 

34 

 TABLE G2. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY EXAM (OPTICIANRY, RADIATION THERAPY, RADIOGRAPHY, REAL ESTATE SALES) 

35 

TABLE G3. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012 ‐ BY EXAM (COSMETIC ARTS – APPRENTICE, COSMETOLOGY, ESTHETICIAN, INSTRUCTOR, MANICURIST)

36 

TABLE G4. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012 ‐ BY EXAM (EMD, EMT, EMT‐I, EMT‐P) 

37 

TABLE G5. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012 ‐ BY EXAM (OCC THERAPIST ASST., PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASST., PRACTICAL NURSING, REGISTERED NURSING, VET. MED. TECH.) 

38 

1

Page 91: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Introduction 

The Performance Measures for Student Success Report is the North Carolina Community College System’s major accountability document. This annual performance report is based on data compiled from the previous year and serves to inform colleges and the public on the performance of our 58 community colleges. 

In 1993, the State Board of Community Colleges began monitoring performance data on specific measures to ensure public accountability for programs and services. In 1998, the General Assembly directed the State Board to review past performance measures and define standards to ensure programs and services offered by community colleges in North Carolina were of sufficient quality.  

In 2010, President Scott Ralls established a Performance Measures Committee to develop new performance‐based student success measures to go into effect in 2013. The Committee was led by two community college presidents, Dr. Dennis Massey of Pitt Community College and Dr. Molly Parkhill of Blue Ridge Community College. The Committee was comprised of college presidents, vice‐presidents, faculty, and directors from a diverse group of colleges representing various areas of expertise. 

After a year of researching, drafting, and soliciting feedback from college faculty and staff on potential measures, the Committee formally presented the following eight measures to the State Board. 

Basic Skills Student Progress*

Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐LevelEnglish Courses

First Year Progression

Licensure and Certification Passing Rate

GED Diploma Passing Rate*

Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐LevelMath Courses

Curriculum Student Completion

College Transfer Performance

In November 2011, the State Board formally approved the Performance Measures.  These measures were then submitted to the General Assembly in March 2012 and later adopted in June 2012 through Section 8.5 of S.L. 2012‐142. 

As the revised performance measures were being finalized, attention was turned to developing recommendations for incorporating performance into colleges’ regular formula budget allocations. In May 2012, President Ralls appointed a team of college presidents to a Performance Funding Committee to develop a performance funding model.  This committee was led by State Board Chairman K. Ray Bailey and Garret Hinshaw, President of Catawba Valley Community College. 

One of the outcomes of this committee was the establishment of system‐wide “baselines” and “goals” for each measure. The committee recommended using consistent, statistically‐defined baselines and goals to promote transparency, simplicity, and objectivity. This utilization of baselines and goals is a departure from the System’s historical use of “standards.” 

Based on three years of historical data (if available) for each measure, baselines were set two standard deviations below the system mean, and the goals were set one standard deviation above the system mean. These baselines and goals remain static for three years and will be reset in the 2016 Report.   

This 2013 edition is the inaugural report utilizing the new measures, goals, and baselines. 

The performance summary on the following page provides each college with an overview of its results as compared to its peers.   Color indicators represent various levels of performance within each measure:  

Met or exceeded the goal Above the baseline, but below the college average

Above the college average, but below the goal Below the baseline

*Basic Skills Student Progress and GED Diploma Pass Rates are not performance funding components this year

2

Page 92: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

July 2013 Performance Summary

Met or Exceeded Goal

Above College Avg, Below Goal

Above Baseline, Below Avg

Below Baseline

A. BASIC 

SKILLS 

PROGRESS

B. GED 

PASS RATE

C. DEV ENG 

SUBSEQ 

SUCCESS

D. DEV MATH 

SUBSEQ 

SUCCESS

E. YEAR 

ONE 

PROGRESS

F. CURR 

COMPLET‐

ION RATE

G. 

LICENSURE 

PASS RATE

H. 

TRANSFER 

PERFORM

System Goal 51.2% 82.0% 74.9% 75.4% 74.6% 45.6% 91.7% 93.8%System Baseline 20.6% 49.3% 45.2% 47.5% 53.2% 28.6% 71.0% 71.2%Average College Percentage 41.0% 71.1% 63.7% 64.8% 67.8% 41.6% 85.2% 87.6%

System Totals (All Students) 41.5% 69.6% 64.5% 64.1% 67.7% 41.1% 86.4% 88.0%Alamance CC  30.8% 72.9% 66.9% 62.9% 69.0% 39.6% 80.5% 90.8% 0 4 4 0

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  39.6% 53.7% 61.3% 65.4% 71.6% 40.3% 89.7% 94.9% 1 3 4 0

Beaufort County CC  38.2% 82.5% 65.4% 51.3% 60.3% 48.0% 77.3% 93.3% 2 2 4 0

Bladen CC  45.1% 63.4% 52.1% 61.0% 53.8% 38.1% 72.0% 79.7% 0 1 7 0

Blue Ridge CC  36.0% 65.6% 70.6% 77.9% 75.2% 32.7% 91.8% 98.6% 4 1 3 0

Brunswick CC  46.6% 36.9% 73.8% 59.6% 72.1% 40.2% 85.5% 87.8% 0 5 2 1

Caldwell CC & TI  41.7% 65.5% 65.3% 71.8% 68.2% 46.2% 82.7% 87.9% 1 5 2 0

Cape Fear CC  30.6% 79.2% 63.5% 59.3% 72.0% 49.0% 90.2% 85.7% 1 3 4 0

Carteret CC  27.4% 91.9% 71.9% 68.1% 68.7% 40.6% 78.1% 84.8% 1 3 4 0

Catawba Valley CC  36.9% 67.6% 75.0% 56.3% 69.7% 40.0% 84.9% 93.7% 1 2 5 0

Central Carolina CC  55.2% 69.1% 60.6% 70.8% 65.3% 37.5% 84.5% 91.2% 1 2 5 0

Central Piedmont CC  49.8% 75.1% 77.8% 71.5% 70.4% 36.7% 92.3% 87.1% 2 4 2 0

Cleveland CC  59.8% 73.9% 73.4% 68.9% 64.4% 32.6% 87.6% 84.2% 1 4 3 0

Coastal Carolina CC  37.9% 64.4% 70.0% 62.7% 72.4% 45.1% 94.3% 90.1% 1 4 3 0

College of The Albemarle  48.4% 58.2% 61.0% 75.4% 71.1% 47.2% 82.5% 87.0% 1 3 4 0

Craven CC  31.9% 50.0% 49.6% 72.1% 66.5% 42.5% 86.0% 90.8% 0 4 4 0

Davidson County CC  56.4% 73.3% 61.2% 64.1% 74.2% 49.6% 92.4% 88.6% 3 3 2 0

Durham TCC  36.6% 65.0% 56.0% 68.5% 60.7% 38.2% 91.1% 94.1% 1 2 5 0

Edgecombe CC  51.3% 75.2% 51.0% 42.9% 53.3% 30.7% 85.9% 94.3% 2 2 3 1

Fayetteville TCC  32.6% 82.6% 64.8% 60.4% 58.7% 38.3% 91.3% 87.9% 1 3 4 0

Forsyth TCC  48.8% 75.9% 63.7% 53.6% 68.6% 42.2% 92.9% 88.6% 1 5 2 0

Gaston College  37.3% 76.9% 74.4% 69.8% 76.5% 36.5% 93.4% 85.1% 2 3 3 0

Guilford TCC  26.5% 70.3% 52.8% 66.6% 64.8% 43.2% 88.4% 85.3% 0 3 5 0

Halifax CC  48.4% 55.1% 66.5% 65.3% 58.7% 38.9% 86.1% 69.6% 0 4 3 1

Haywood CC  40.9% 48.9% 70.8% 69.5% 69.2% 38.0% 77.2% 97.1% 1 3 3 1

Isothermal CC  28.9% 69.0% 66.9% 75.5% 68.5% 39.3% 76.2% 89.7% 1 3 4 0

James Sprunt CC 57 8% 70 0% 62 2% 57 1% 75 8% 47 9% 80 9% 94 6% 4 0 4 0

Met or Exceed

ed Goal

Below Baselin

e

Below College

 Average,

Above Baselin

e

Below Goal,

Above College

 Average

James Sprunt CC  57.8% 70.0% 62.2% 57.1% 75.8% 47.9% 80.9% 94.6% 4 0 4 0

Johnston CC  45.7% 81.8% 80.5% 58.0% 71.3% 44.1% 83.5% 83.2% 1 4 3 0

Lenoir CC  44.8% 67.7% 50.5% 43.1% 66.2% 42.9% 80.2% 88.7% 0 3 4 1

Martin CC  38.2% 67.1% 60.9% 78.6% 72.4% 43.5% 69.4% 100.0% 2 2 3 1

Mayland CC  40.8% 78.7% 64.3% 68.6% 74.5% 49.1% 81.3% 87.5% 1 4 3 0

McDowell TCC  38.3% 70.9% 81.4% 86.7% 70.3% 36.4% 90.2% 83.3% 2 2 4 0

Mitchell CC  41.1% 90.3% 65.1% 60.2% 68.8% 32.7% 90.3% 88.0% 1 5 2 0

Montgomery CC  42.6% 72.7% 79.3% 31.7% 75.6% 50.0% 94.1% 93.3% 4 3 0 1

Nash CC  33.6% 70.1% 52.6% 72.4% 62.7% 29.5% 75.0% 85.1% 0 1 7 0

Pamlico CC  28.1% 53.3% 50.0% 91.3% 60.5% 61.3% 100.0% 80.0% 3 0 5 0

Piedmont CC  40.3% 71.7% 62.4% 71.1% 73.8% 46.5% 74.6% 73.8% 1 3 4 0

Pitt CC  44.1% 68.1% 70.8% 44.1% 66.0% 46.0% 91.4% 88.9% 1 4 2 1

Randolph CC  34.6% 75.8% 76.3% 66.0% 70.1% 42.0% 86.2% 82.2% 1 5 2 0

Richmond CC  46.8% 63.2% 65.8% 64.3% 73.5% 34.7% 83.3% 94.5% 1 3 4 0

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  13.1% 72.2% 60.2% 90.0% 66.7% 47.5% 74.5% * 2 1 3 1

Robeson CC  35.1% 80.6% 52.9% 56.3% 49.0% 37.8% 77.9% 71.0% 0 1 5 2

Rockingham CC  56.0% 76.7% 56.4% 70.6% 69.0% 47.6% 79.5% 96.1% 3 3 2 0

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  37.2% 63.9% 69.4% 67.0% 61.9% 35.0% 79.2% 84.4% 0 2 6 0

Sampson CC  49.0% 82.1% 50.0% 66.3% 68.8% 38.8% 80.5% 75.7% 1 3 4 0

Sandhills CC  26.0% 60.6% 61.6% 54.6% 65.8% 39.5% 92.6% 87.8% 1 1 6 0

South Piedmont CC  48.1% 74.9% 62.5% 51.4% 60.8% 47.4% 82.8% 88.0% 1 3 4 0

Southeastern CC  45.0% 84.2% 55.4% 75.3% 60.2% 42.2% 75.2% 84.4% 1 3 4 0

Southwestern CC  50.8% 81.5% 63.0% 66.8% 74.1% 46.8% 92.4% 93.6% 2 5 1 0

Stanly CC  42.8% 71.8% 67.5% 72.4% 68.4% 46.3% 87.2% 89.9% 1 7 0 0

Surry CC  37.1% 94.5% 65.2% 64.8% 71.2% 44.2% 97.0% 85.1% 2 3 3 0

Tri‐County CC  27.3% 79.1% 76.4% 38.6% 77.5% 32.8% 87.7% 77.8% 2 2 3 1

Vance‐Granville CC  40.2% 73.6% 58.6% 54.4% 63.8% 34.4% 92.0% 90.1% 1 2 5 0

Wake TCC  38.5% 60.1% 54.7% 63.9% 67.3% 39.1% 91.6% 91.9% 0 2 6 0

Wayne CC  66.5% 71.9% 63.3% 66.4% 73.3% 48.8% 79.6% 83.2% 2 3 3 0

Western Piedmont CC  20.8% 67.0% 66.3% 69.8% 71.8% 45.7% 95.4% 85.4% 2 3 3 0

Wilkes CC  44.6% 91.3% 56.1% 75.7% 73.6% 43.9% 81.4% 90.2% 2 4 2 0

Wilson CC  58.2% 74.5% 46.2% 72.2% 65.8% 39.5% 81.7% 90.2% 1 3 4 0

Note: Basic Skills Student Progress and GED Diploma Pass Rates are not performance funding components this yearNote: Color indicators are based on the precise percentages and not the rounded percentages as displayed* Less than 5 students

3

Page 93: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

4

Page 94: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

A. Basic Skills Student Progress

Purpose 

To ensure adults with low literacy skills are progressing academically toward basic skill attainment necessary for employment and self‐sufficiency 

Description 

Percentage of students who progress as defined by an educational functioning level. 

Methodology 

Denominator:  Basic skills students attempting 60 or more contact hours during program year. Excludes ASEH initial placements. 

Numerator:  Basic skills students attempting 60 or more contact hours during program year, who complete the program year at a higher educational functioning level. Excludes high adult secondary education initial placements. 

Note: Pre‐test is considered if it occurs up to 90 days prior to program year. 

Source 

LEIS annual data file 

Details 

To be included in this measure, students have to be enrolled in a class during the Basic Skills/College and Career Readiness program year (July 1 – June 30), have accumulated 60 or more total contact hours across all classes enrolled, and not have an initial placement of High Adult Secondary Education. Initial placement is based upon the National Reporting System (NRS) guidelines of being the lowest Educational Functioning Level of the first NRS approved test(s) taken during the program year.  Colleges received credit for all students who tested at a higher Educational Functioning Level at the end of the Basic Skills/College and Career Readiness program year (July 1 – June 30) in the same test and component that set the initial placement.  Colleges are also given credit for students who test at Adult Secondary Education Low, are an Adult High School student, and meet the federal and state assessment policy guidelines for moving up an educational functioning level to Adult Secondary Education High. 

Goal: 51.2% 

Baseline: 20.6% 

Note: This measure is not a performance funding component this year 

5

Page 95: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B. GED Diploma Passing Rate

Purpose 

To ensure quality GED preparation and high levels of GED attainment 

Description 

Percentage of students taking at least one GED test during a program year who receive a GED diploma during the program year. 

Methodology 

Denominator: GED students with an entering Educational Functioning Level of ASEL or ASEH who take at least one GED test during the program year (July 1 – June 30) and have 12 or more total contact hours. 

Numerator: GED students with an entering Educational Functioning Level of ASEL or ASEH who take at least one GED test during the program year (July 1 – June 30), and have 12 or more total contact hours, and receive a GED diploma. 

Source 

LEIS Annual Data file Oklahoma Scoring GED test files 

Details 

Denominator:  Students must meet one of the following criteria: 

Included in the LEIS annual file 

Have an initial placement of Adult Secondary Education Low (ASEL) or Adult Secondary Education High (ASEH) 

Have accumulated at least 12 total contact hours during the program year (July 1 – June 30) 

Taken at least one GED test during the program year (July 1 – June 30) 

Numerator:   All students from the denominator who receive a GED diploma during the program year (July 1 – June 30). Credit is given to the college where the student received the 12 or more contact hours and not the location the GED test was taken. 

Goal: 82.0% 

Baseline: 49.3% 

Note: This measure is not a performance funding component this year 

6

Page 96: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Goal: 51.2% Goal: 82.0%

Baseline: 20.6% % COMPLETING Baseline: 49.3% % PASSING

11‐12 11‐12

System Totals  51,825 21,486 41.5% System Totals  8,504 5,921 69.6%

Alamance CC  994 306 30.8% Alamance CC  181 132 72.9%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 808 320 39.6% Asheville‐Buncombe TC 430 231 53.7%

Beaufort County CC  364 139 38.2% Beaufort County CC  40 33 82.5%

Bladen CC  182 82 45.1% Bladen CC  71 45 63.4%

Blue Ridge CC  480 173 36.0% Blue Ridge CC  154 101 65.6%

Brunswick CC  337 157 46.6% Brunswick CC  84 31 36.9%

Caldwell CC & TI  756 315 41.7% Caldwell CC & TI  220 144 65.5%

Cape Fear CC  1,230 376 30.6% Cape Fear CC  173 137 79.2%

Carteret CC  208 57 27.4% Carteret CC  62 57 91.9%

Catawba Valley CC  699 258 36.9% Catawba Valley CC  296 200 67.6%

Central Carolina CC  2,010 1,109 55.2% Central Carolina CC  298 206 69.1%

Central Piedmont CC  4,730 2,356 49.8% Central Piedmont CC  385 289 75.1%

Cleveland CC  373 223 59.8% Cleveland CC  23 17 73.9%

Coastal Carolina CC  570 216 37.9% Coastal Carolina CC  87 56 64.4%

College of The Albema 595 288 48.4% College of The Albema 134 78 58.2%

Craven CC  407 130 31.9% Craven CC  40 20 50.0%

Davidson County CC  1,350 761 56.4% Davidson County CC  161 118 73.3%

Durham TCC  1,395 511 36.6% Durham TCC  117 76 65.0%

Edgecombe CC  686 352 51.3% Edgecombe CC  145 109 75.2%

Fayetteville TCC  2,586 843 32.6% Fayetteville TCC  201 166 82.6%

Forsyth TCC  1,982 967 48.8% Forsyth TCC  228 173 75.9%

Gaston College  897 335 37.3% Gaston College  186 143 76.9%

Guilford TCC  3,163 839 26.5% Guilford TCC  182 128 70.3%

Halifax CC  318 154 48.4% Halifax CC  98 54 55.1%

Haywood CC  193 79 40.9% Haywood CC  45 22 48.9%

Isothermal CC  384 111 28.9% Isothermal CC  155 107 69.0%

James Sprunt CC  225 130 57.8% James Sprunt CC  40 28 70.0%

Johnston CC  665 304 45.7% Johnston CC  88 72 81.8%

Lenoir CC  990 444 44.8% Lenoir CC  158 107 67.7%

Martin CC  330 126 38.2% Martin CC  70 47 67.1%

Mayland CC  564 230 40.8% Mayland CC  108 85 78.7%

McDowell TCC  266 102 38.3% McDowell TCC  55 39 70.9%

Mitchell CC  492 202 41.1% Mitchell CC  103 93 90.3%

Montgomery CC  272 116 42.6% Montgomery CC  44 32 72.7%

Nash CC  265 89 33.6% Nash CC  87 61 70.1%

Pamlico CC  135 38 28.1% Pamlico CC  15 8 53.3%

Piedmont CC  447 180 40.3% Piedmont CC  99 71 71.7%

Pitt CC  1,088 480 44.1% Pitt CC  160 109 68.1%

Randolph CC  817 283 34.6% Randolph CC  66 50 75.8%

Richmond CC  921 431 46.8% Richmond CC  258 163 63.2%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  222 29 13.1% Roanoke‐Chowan CC  18 13 72.2%

Robeson CC  1,471 516 35.1% Robeson CC  36 29 80.6%

Rockingham CC  350 196 56.0% Rockingham CC  150 115 76.7%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  1,053 392 37.2% Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  368 235 63.9%

Sampson CC  645 316 49.0% Sampson CC  56 46 82.1%

Sandhills CC  654 170 26.0% Sandhills CC  137 83 60.6%

South Piedmont CC  909 437 48.1% South Piedmont CC  191 143 74.9%

Southeastern CC  813 366 45.0% Southeastern CC  120 101 84.2%

Southwestern CC  423 215 50.8% Southwestern CC  135 110 81.5%

Stanly CC  568 243 42.8% Stanly CC  78 56 71.8%

Surry CC  499 185 37.1% Surry CC  110 104 94.5%

Tri‐County CC  128 35 27.3% Tri‐County CC  43 34 79.1%

Vance‐Granville CC  1,302 524 40.2% Vance‐Granville CC  212 156 73.6%

Wake TCC  4,308 1,658 38.5% Wake TCC  707 425 60.1%

Wayne CC  1,221 812 66.5% Wayne CC  196 141 71.9%

Western Piedmont CC  903 188 20.8% Western Piedmont CC  233 156 67.0%

Wilkes CC  708 316 44.6% Wilkes CC  69 63 91.3%

Wilson CC  474 276 58.2% Wilson CC  98 73 74.5%

Note: Basic Skills Student Progress and GED Diploma Pass Rates are not performance funding components this year

TABLE A. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2011‐2012 TABLE B. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2011‐2012

STUDENTSCOMPLETING 

LEVELSTUDENTS PASSING

7

Page 97: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

8

Page 98: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

C. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level English Courses

Purpose 

To ensure remedial English and reading coursework prepares students to succeed in credit‐bearing English courses 

Description 

Percentage of previous developmental English and/or reading students who successfully complete a credit English course with a grade of “P”, “C” or better upon the first attempt. 

Methodology 

Denominator: All students enrolling in their first credit English course during an academic year who also enrolled in a developmental English and/or reading course during the same or previous academic year.  Does not include students who do not attend the class i.e. transfer credits, credit by exam or reported grades of ‘NA’ and ‘NS’. 

Numerator: All students earning a grade of “P”, “C  or better in their first credit English course during an academic year who enrolled in a developmental English and/or reading course in the same or previous academic year. Does not include students who do not attend the class (ie transfer credit, credit by exam, etc). 

Source 

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file 

Details 

Denominator:  Students must meet one of the following criteria: Enrolled in their first credit English course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental English or Reading course during the previous reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college. 

OR 

Enrolled in their first credit English course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental English or Reading course during the same reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college. The student’s developmental English or Reading course semester must be equal to or precede their first credit English course.  

Not eligible for this measure are students who complete developmental English course by exam, placement or transfer. 

Numerator: All students from the denominator who earned a grade of “P”, “C”, or better in their first credit English course during the reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer).  The first credit English course evaluated cannot be a lab section. First credit English course is based on any course with prefix “ENG” and course number greater than 099. When multiple English courses are enrolled in during the same semester, the lowest numbered course will be evaluated. 

Goal: 74.9% 

Baseline: 45.2% 

9

Page 99: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

D. Developmental Student Success Rate in College‐Level Math Courses

Purpose 

To ensure remedial math coursework prepares students to succeed in credit‐bearing math courses 

Description 

Percentage of previous developmental math students who successfully complete a credit math course with a “C” or better upon the first attempt. 

Methodology 

Denominator: All students enrolling in their first credit math course during an academic year who also enrolled in a developmental math course during the same or previous academic year.  Does not include students who do not attend the class i.e. transfer credits, credit by exam or reported grades of ‘NA’ and ‘NS’. 

Numerator: All students earning a “P”, “C”, or better in their first credit math course during an academic year who enrolled in a developmental math course in the same or previous academic year. Does not include students who do not attend the class (ie transfer credit, credit by exam, etc). 

Source 

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file 

Details 

Denominator: Students must meet one of the following criteria: 

Enrolled in their first credit math course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental math course during the previous reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college. 

OR 

Enrolled in their first credit math course during the reporting year and enrolled in a developmental math course during the same reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer) at the same college. The student’s developmental math course semester must be equal to or precede their first credit math course.  

Not eligible for this measure are students who complete developmental Math course by exam, placement or transfer. 

Numerator: All students from the denominator who earned a grade of “P”, “C” or better in their first credit math course during the reporting year (Fall/Spring/Summer).  The first credit math course evaluated cannot be a lab section. First credit math course is based on any course with prefix “MAT” and course number greater than 099. When multiple math courses are enrolled in during the same semester, the lowest numbered course will be evaluated. 

Goal: 75.4% 

Baseline: 47.5% 

10

Page 100: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Goal: 74.9% Goal: 75.4%

Baseline: 45.2% Baseline: 47.5%

11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  18,511 11,942 64.5% 65% 66% 66% System Totals  16,974 10,888 64.1% 66% 66% 65%

Alamance CC  411 275 66.9% 69% 71% 72% Alamance CC  480 302 62.9% 63% 66% 69%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 395 242 61.3% 66% 43% 56% Asheville‐Buncombe TC 463 303 65.4% 62% 59% 56%

Beaufort County CC  107 70 65.4% 79% 61% 61% Beaufort County CC  117 60 51.3% 63% 67% 66%

Bladen CC  121 63 52.1% 46% 60% 68% Bladen CC  146 89 61.0% 68% 62% 71%

Blue Ridge CC  153 108 70.6% 77% 82% 76% Blue Ridge CC  136 106 77.9% 82% 71% 71%

Brunswick CC  80 59 73.8% 76% 71% 59% Brunswick CC  109 65 59.6% 68% 64% 68%

Caldwell CC & TI  320 209 65.3% 64% 63% 67% Caldwell CC & TI  337 242 71.8% 71% 75% 72%

Cape Fear CC  816 518 63.5% 64% 67% 62% Cape Fear CC  675 400 59.3% 63% 64% 63%

Carteret CC  89 64 71.9% 68% 60% 61% Carteret CC  141 96 68.1% 73% 69% 53%

Catawba Valley CC  444 333 75.0% 69% 78% 74% Catawba Valley CC  458 258 56.3% 61% 60% 63%

Central Carolina CC  203 123 60.6% 61% 70% 67% Central Carolina CC  168 119 70.8% 81% 76% 70%

Central Piedmont CC  1,872 1,457 77.8% 79% 76% 77% Central Piedmont CC  1,388 993 71.5% 71% 69% 67%

Cleveland CC  192 141 73.4% 66% 76% 75% Cleveland CC  228 157 68.9% 69% 73% 72%

Coastal Carolina CC  367 257 70.0% 83% 70% 74% Coastal Carolina CC  533 334 62.7% 81% 71% 70%

College of The Albema 164 100 61.0% 68% 63% 63% College of The Albema 191 144 75.4% 79% 76% 83%

Craven CC  137 68 49.6% 62% 73% 61% Craven CC  290 209 72.1% 74% 73% 78%

Davidson County CC  361 221 61.2% 58% 62% 75% Davidson County CC  304 195 64.1% 64% 67% 69%

Durham TCC  411 230 56.0% 56% 60% 63% Durham TCC  311 213 68.5% 66% 68% 65%

Edgecombe CC  261 133 51.0% 51% 66% 71% Edgecombe CC  184 79 42.9% 44% 50% 59%

Fayetteville TCC  969 628 64.8% 63% 60% 57% Fayetteville TCC  565 341 60.4% 65% 58% 60%

Forsyth TCC  848 540 63.7% 66% 62% 61% Forsyth TCC  700 375 53.6% 52% 50% 49%

Gaston College  497 370 74.4% 71% 75% 69% Gaston College  411 287 69.8% 66% 73% 72%

Guilford TCC  1,391 735 52.8% 60% 67% 65% Guilford TCC  1,180 786 66.6% 69% 59% 58%

Halifax CC  158 105 66.5% 66% 64% 64% Halifax CC  121 79 65.3% 68% 59% 60%

Haywood CC  106 75 70.8% 65% 71% 59% Haywood CC  118 82 69.5% 59% 62% 65%

Isothermal CC  163 109 66.9% 69% 70% 65% Isothermal CC  188 142 75.5% 68% 79% 72%

James Sprunt CC  164 102 62.2% 71% 77% 78% James Sprunt CC  98 56 57.1% 50% 66% 74%

Johnston CC  338 272 80.5% 75% 72% 84% Johnston CC  264 153 58.0% 65% 77% 74%

Lenoir CC  210 106 50.5% 55% 66% 72% Lenoir CC  130 56 43.1% 48% 40% 51%

Martin CC  69 42 60.9% 56% 31% 35% Martin CC  42 33 78.6% 69% 72% 52%

Mayland CC  28 18 64.3% 63% 70% 51% Mayland CC  35 24 68.6% 76% 64% 79%

McDowell TCC  59 48 81.4% 75% 84% 87% McDowell TCC  75 65 86.7% 89% 86% 79%

Mitchell CC  381 248 65.1% 63% 63% 55% Mitchell CC  246 148 60.2% 55% 63% 60%

Montgomery CC  58 46 79.3% 75% 86% 87% Montgomery CC  63 20 31.7% 36% 43% 52%

Nash CC  190 100 52.6% 54% 51% 48% Nash CC  297 215 72.4% 76% 76% 74%

Pamlico CC  14 7 50.0% 73% 64% 67% Pamlico CC  23 21 91.3% 75% 58% 63%

Piedmont CC  157 98 62.4% 63% 69% 73% Piedmont CC  180 128 71.1% 64% 73% 77%

Pitt CC  627 444 70.8% 63% 61% 62% Pitt CC  558 246 44.1% 53% 60% 57%

Randolph CC  207 158 76.3% 75% 80% 74% Randolph CC  244 161 66.0% 77% 62% 81%

Richmond CC  325 214 65.8% 71% 66% 69% Richmond CC  207 133 64.3% 68% 58% 69%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  108 65 60.2% 50% 55% 29% Roanoke‐Chowan CC  70 63 90.0% 74% 86% 87%

Robeson CC  293 155 52.9% 54% 62% 71% Robeson CC  190 107 56.3% 61% 65% 69%

Rockingham CC  156 88 56.4% 59% 60% 64% Rockingham CC  235 166 70.6% 74% 75% 73%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  581 403 69.4% 64% 71% 65% Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  460 308 67.0% 67% 73% 66%

Sampson CC  146 73 50.0% 51% 59% 60% Sampson CC  95 63 66.3% 55% 51% 60%

Sandhills CC  430 265 61.6% 57% 62% 65% Sandhills CC  262 143 54.6% 59% 59% 52%

South Piedmont CC  168 105 62.5% 61% 67% 61% South Piedmont CC  144 74 51.4% 62% 56% 58%

Southeastern CC  101 56 55.4% 38% 46% 69% Southeastern CC  93 70 75.3% 69% 79% 71%

Southwestern CC  173 109 63.0% 63% 67% 67% Southwestern CC  187 125 66.8% 59% 64% 59%

Stanly CC  212 143 67.5% 75% 68% 65% Stanly CC  210 152 72.4% 72% 73% 68%

Surry CC  204 133 65.2% 66% 75% 73% Surry CC  196 127 64.8% 66% 62% 69%

Tri‐County CC  72 55 76.4% 75% 71% 76% Tri‐County CC  70 27 38.6% 53% 68% 67%

Vance‐Granville CC  261 153 58.6% 54% 59% 61% Vance‐Granville CC  147 80 54.4% 60% 58% 58%

Wake TCC  795 435 54.7% 55% 54% 50% Wake TCC  1,335 853 63.9% 57% 62% 64%

Wayne CC  316 200 63.3% 67% 63% 63% Wayne CC  277 184 66.4% 65% 57% 53%

Western Piedmont CC  258 171 66.3% 67% 70% 79% Western Piedmont CC  258 180 69.8% 80% 76% 75%

Wilkes CC  244 137 56.1% 65% 61% 65% Wilkes CC  136 103 75.7% 66% 78% 69%

Wilson CC  130 60 46.2% 41% 54% 49% Wilson CC  205 148 72.2% 72% 72% 70%

STUDENTS SUCCESSES% SUCCESSFUL

TABLE C. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN 

COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2011‐2012

TABLE D. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN 

COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2011‐2012

STUDENTS SUCCESSES% SUCCESSFUL

11

Page 101: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

E.  First Year Progression  Purpose  

To ensure first‐year students reach an academic momentum point that helps predict future credential completion 

 Description  

Percentage of first‐time fall credential‐seeking students attempting at least twelve hours within their first academic year who successfully complete (“P”, “C” or better) at least twelve of those hours. 

 Methodology  

Denominator: A fall cohort of credential‐seeking students (program code A, D, C) enrolled in curriculum courses at a college for the first time after high school graduation. Must attempt at least twelve hours (including developmental and withdraw) within the first year fall, spring, and summer semesters.  Includes those dually enrolled previously at the same institution and excludes students previously enrolled at another college. Does not include students who do not attend the class i.e. transfer credits, credit by exam or reported grades of ‘NA’ and ‘NS’.  

Numerator: Those within the cohort above who complete at least twelve hours (including developmental) with a “P”, “C” or better within the first year. 

 Source  

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file National Student Clearinghouse 

 Details  

Denominator:  Students must meet one of the following criteria:  

The fall semester is first enrollment term dating back to fall of 2001 and no previous post‐secondary enrollment as verified from the National Student Clearinghouse before the start date of the fall semester. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C 

Graduated from high school before the beginning of the fall semester. 

Attempt at least twelve hours during the first academic year (Fall, Spring, and Summer). Hours attempted include developmental hours and any class in which the student earns a standard letter grade, except for “Credit by Exam”, “Transfer”, “NA”, and “NS”. 

 

OR  

Previous dual enrollment student 

The fall semester is first post‐secondary enrollment term following high school graduation from the same college they were Dual enrolled. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C 

Attempt at least twelve hours during the first academic year (Fall, Spring, and Summer). Hours attempted include developmental hours and any class in which the student earns a standard letter grade, except for “Credit by Exam”, “Transfer”, “NA”, and “NS”. 

 

Numerator:  All students from the denominator who successfully complete with a grade of ‘P’,‘C’ or better at least twelve hours within the first year. 

 Goal: 74.6%  Baseline: 53.2% 

   

12

Page 102: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE E. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2011 COHORT

Goal: 74.6%

Baseline: 53.2%

11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  40,003 34,174 23,143 67.7% 67% 67% 68%

Alamance CC  806 680 469 69.0% 71% 52% 68%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 1,013 845 605 71.6% 68% 61% 60%

Beaufort County CC  318 277 167 60.3% 57% 58% 67%

Bladen CC  219 210 113 53.8% 55% 64% 56%

Blue Ridge CC  426 307 231 75.2% 83% 83% 85%

Brunswick CC  282 240 173 72.1% 68% 75% 62%

Caldwell CC & TI  738 655 447 68.2% 67% 72% 72%

Cape Fear CC  1,589 1,402 1,009 72.0% 72% 71% 70%

Carteret CC  303 252 173 68.7% 64% 63% 65%

Catawba Valley CC  927 823 574 69.7% 70% 73% 66%

Central Carolina CC  640 536 350 65.3% 68% 68% 71%

Central Piedmont CC  2,777 2,138 1,506 70.4% 69% 67% 69%

Cleveland CC  562 483 311 64.4% 63% 69% 71%

Coastal Carolina CC  788 664 481 72.4% 83% 57% 79%

College of The Albema 571 485 345 71.1% 66% 69% 72%

Craven CC  516 406 270 66.5% 69% 71% 72%

Davidson County CC  732 621 461 74.2% 71% 79% 57%

Durham TCC  628 499 303 60.7% 59% 60% 60%

Edgecombe CC  426 362 193 53.3% 54% 65% 59%

Fayetteville TCC  1,782 1,550 910 58.7% 64% 60% 41%

Forsyth TCC  1,857 1,567 1,075 68.6% 67% 72% 73%

Gaston College  1,192 1,014 776 76.5% 74% 77% 74%

Guilford TCC  2,271 2,015 1,305 64.8% 67% 62% 64%

Halifax CC  296 259 152 58.7% 60% 60% 62%

Haywood CC  360 315 218 69.2% 57% 67% 67%

Isothermal CC  398 349 239 68.5% 65% 71% 70%

James Sprunt CC  209 190 144 75.8% 73% 58% 68%

Johnston CC  792 721 514 71.3% 75% 73% 75%

Lenoir CC  514 476 315 66.2% 64% 70% 74%

Martin CC  138 127 92 72.4% 50% 61% 65%

Mayland CC  234 184 137 74.5% 72% 79% 78%

McDowell TCC  204 175 123 70.3% 72% 67% 71%

Mitchell CC  689 622 428 68.8% 67% 70% 71%

Montgomery CC  104 90 68 75.6% 63% 85% 66%

Nash CC  571 515 323 62.7% 65% 47% 59%

Pamlico CC  45 38 23 60.5% 77% 75% 81%

Piedmont CC  334 279 206 73.8% 68% 71% 67%

Pitt CC  1,273 1,165 769 66.0% 64% 67% 68%

Randolph CC  592 505 354 70.1% 69% 70% 72%

Richmond CC  409 339 249 73.5% 74% 73% 77%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  138 120 80 66.7% 70% 58% 70%

Robeson CC  478 416 204 49.0% 54% 60% 63%

Rockingham CC  489 419 289 69.0% 65% 64% 67%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  1,210 1,052 651 61.9% 60% 65% 66%

Sampson CC  244 221 152 68.8% 74% 76% 78%

Sandhills CC  741 632 416 65.8% 70% 64% 65%

South Piedmont CC  374 240 146 60.8% 65% 74% 69%

Southeastern CC  357 314 189 60.2% 56% 61% 68%

Southwestern CC  316 278 206 74.1% 67% 61% 63%

Stanly CC  509 450 308 68.4% 64% 69% 68%

Surry CC  454 403 287 71.2% 73% 73% 76%

Tri‐County CC  229 204 158 77.5% 65% 68% 76%

Vance‐Granville CC  795 699 446 63.8% 62% 67% 67%

Wake TCC  3,191 2,565 1,727 67.3% 67% 50% 64%

Wayne CC  706 626 459 73.3% 72% 71% 69%

Western Piedmont CC  457 415 298 71.8% 76% 76% 78%

Wilkes CC  522 497 366 73.6% 72% 69% 67%

Wilson CC  268 243 160 65.8% 67% 55% 73%

% SUCCESSFULCOHORT

12 HOURS 

ATTEMPTED

12 HOURS 

SUCCESSFULLY 

COMPLETED 

13

Page 103: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

F.  Curriculum {ǘdzŘŜƴǘ CompƭŜǘƛƻƴ  Purpose  

To ensure student completion and persistence toward a post‐secondary credential  

 Description  

Percentage of first‐time fall credential‐seeking students who graduate, transfer, or are still enrolled with 36 hours after six years. 

 Methodology  

Denominator: A fall cohort of credential‐seeking students (program code A, D, C) enrolled in curriculum courses at a college for the first time after high school graduation.  Includes those dually enrolled previously at the same institution and excludes students previously enrolled at another college.  

Numerator: Those within the cohort above who by the fall that occurs six years after original cohort designation either graduate (A, D, or C), transfer to a four year institution, or are still enrolled during that sixth fall semester previously completing 36 non‐developmental hours. 

 Source  

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file National Student Clearinghouse 

 Details  

Denominator:  Students must meet one of the following criteria:  

The fall semester is first enrollment term dating back to fall of 2001 and no previous post‐secondary enrollment as verified from the National Student Clearinghouse before the start date of the fall semester. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C 

Graduated from high school before the beginning of the fall semester.  

OR  

Previous dual enrollment student 

The fall semester is first post‐secondary enrollment term following high school graduation. 

Academic program code begins with A, D, or C  

Numerator:   All students from the denominator who achieve at least one of the following:   

Graduation‐ Graduated from a North Carolina community college credential program (A, D, C) at any point from the start of their first fall term and up till 6th fall term afterward.  

OR  

Transfer‐ Transferred into a 4‐year college as archived in the National Student Clearinghouse database on or before the 6th fall after original cohort term.   

OR  

Persistence‐ Still enrolled during the 6th fall term and successfully completing at least 36 non‐developmental credits prior to the 6th fall term.  Successful credit completion is based on grades of C or better. 

 Goal: 45.6%  Baseline: 28.6%   

14

Page 104: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F. CURRICULUM {¢¦59b¢ /OMPLETION, FA[[ нллс /hIhw¢

Goal: 45.6%

Baseline: 28.6%

2006 2005 2004 2003 2006 2005 2004 2003 2006 2005 2004 2003 2006 2005 2004 2003

System Totals  27,131 25% 27% 27% 27% 14% 10% 12% 11% 2% 2% 2% 2% 11,162 41.1% 39% 40% 39%

Alamance CC  727 29% 27% 26% 29% 9% 7% 13% 11% 2% 3% 3% 4% 288 39.6% 37% 41% 44%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 593 29% 29% 28% 24% 8% 8% 11% 10% 3% 2% 1% 2% 239 40.3% 39% 39% 36%

Beaufort County CC  100 35% 28% 28% 31% 10% 12% 11% 6% 3% 1% 4% 6% 48 48.0% 42% 43% 43%

Bladen CC  189 18% 21% 17% 25% 19% 7% 13% 9% 1% 2% 4% 3% 72 38.1% 31% 34% 37%

Blue Ridge CC  355 20% 23% 18% 19% 12% 12% 12% 11% 1% 2% 3% 2% 116 32.7% 37% 33% 31%

Brunswick CC  169 27% 24% 25% 32% 13% 7% 14% 8% 1% 2% 1% 1% 68 40.2% 33% 41% 41%

Caldwell CC & TI  598 30% 30% 26% 18% 14% 9% 11% 12% 3% 4% 3% 3% 276 46.2% 43% 40% 34%

Cape Fear CC  1,020 30% 24% 27% 26% 17% 14% 14% 11% 3% 2% 2% 2% 500 49.0% 40% 43% 40%

Carteret CC  234 25% 23% 27% 30% 13% 9% 12% 13% 3% 3% 3% 3% 95 40.6% 35% 41% 45%

Catawba Valley CC  802 25% 27% 22% 25% 12% 11% 14% 10% 3% 3% 2% 3% 321 40.0% 41% 37% 37%

Central Carolina CC  795 28% 28% 31% 26% 8% 8% 12% 8% 2% 2% 2% 3% 298 37.5% 39% 45% 36%

Central Piedmont CC  1,824 16% 15% 15% 12% 18% 19% 19% 17% 3% 2% 2% 2% 670 36.7% 36% 35% 31%

Cleveland CC  386 20% 23% 21% 22% 10% 7% 8% 9% 2% 3% 3% 5% 126 32.6% 34% 33% 37%

Coastal Carolina CC  819 26% 26% 26% 27% 18% 19% 21% 20% 1% 2% 2% 1% 369 45.1% 48% 48% 48%

College of The Albema 352 26% 28% 26% 25% 20% 15% 15% 14% 2% 1% 1% 2% 166 47.2% 44% 43% 41%

Craven CC  487 20% 17% 17% 19% 21% 17% 23% 22% 2% 5% 3% 2% 207 42.5% 39% 42% 44%

Davidson County CC  339 35% 36% 32% 38% 11% 5% 8% 10% 3% 3% 2% 2% 168 49.6% 44% 42% 49%

Durham TCC  414 15% 21% 17% 14% 21% 16% 18% 20% 2% 2% 2% 2% 158 38.2% 39% 37% 36%

Edgecombe CC  114 16% 15% 19% 19% 12% 13% 13% 9% 3% 2% 3% 2% 35 30.7% 31% 34% 29%

Fayetteville TCC  1,078 18% 19% 17% 19% 19% 14% 18% 17% 2% 3% 2% 2% 413 38.3% 37% 37% 38%

Forsyth TCC  652 25% 24% 20% 19% 15% 14% 14% 14% 2% 2% 3% 2% 275 42.2% 41% 37% 35%

Gaston College  717 22% 21% 25% 23% 13% 10% 9% 11% 2% 3% 2% 3% 262 36.5% 35% 37% 37%

Guilford TCC  1,672 24% 21% 20% 18% 16% 12% 16% 17% 3% 2% 2% 3% 722 43.2% 35% 38% 37%

Halifax CC  221 21% 20% 21% 22% 15% 9% 10% 10% 3% 2% 3% 1% 86 38.9% 32% 33% 33%

Haywood CC  255 29% 36% 28% 31% 8% 6% 8% 5% 2% 2% 1% 2% 97 38.0% 43% 39% 37%

Isothermal CC  285 27% 27% 24% 32% 11% 8% 10% 6% 1% 2% 1% 2% 112 39.3% 37% 35% 41%

James Sprunt CC  117 37% 44% 42% 45% 8% 5% 10% 7% 3% 1% 2% 1% 56 47.9% 49% 53% 53%

Johnston CC  227 33% 38% 42% 42% 8% 8% 10% 8% 3% 2% 2% 2% 100 44.1% 48% 54% 52%

Lenoir CC  294 27% 28% 27% 33% 13% 13% 14% 13% 3% 3% 4% 3% 126 42.9% 42% 45% 49%

Martin CC  108 21% 19% 23% 24% 18% 10% 10% 6% 5% 4% 3% 6% 47 43.5% 31% 36% 37%

Mayland CC  212 42% 31% 34% 31% 6% 6% 5% 7% 1% 1% 2% 0% 104 49.1% 37% 41% 39%

McDowell TCC  217 26% 31% 38% 23% 7% 4% 6% 4% 3% 4% 1% 2% 79 36.4% 39% 45% 29%

Mitchell CC  446 17% 22% 27% 20% 14% 11% 16% 12% 2% 3% 3% 3% 146 32.7% 37% 46% 36%

Montgomery CC  166 44% 40% 32% 34% 5% 5% 4% 7% 1% 2% 3% 2% 83 50.0% 46% 40% 42%

Nash CC  112 18% 20% 21% 21% 9% 12% 16% 10% 3% 4% 1% 3% 33 29.5% 37% 37% 33%

Pamlico CC  75 57% 55% 64% 42% 4% 7% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 46 61.3% 62% 65% 44%

Piedmont CC  258 36% 40% 41% 28% 7% 5% 7% 6% 4% 2% 2% 2% 120 46.5% 46% 50% 37%

Pitt CC  798 25% 28% 26% 25% 17% 15% 15% 15% 4% 5% 3% 3% 367 46.0% 48% 44% 44%

Randolph CC  352 31% 26% 25% 27% 9% 5% 15% 14% 2% 3% 2% 2% 148 42.0% 34% 41% 43%

Richmond CC  245 20% 22% 22% 25% 13% 11% 13% 10% 2% 4% 1% 4% 85 34.7% 37% 37% 38%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  181 34% 25% 20% 21% 12% 12% 13% 16% 2% 2% 1% 2% 86 47.5% 39% 35% 40%

Robeson CC  402 23% 22% 25% 29% 12% 10% 11% 8% 3% 2% 3% 3% 152 37.8% 34% 39% 40%

Rockingham CC  410 33% 23% 32% 28% 12% 11% 9% 9% 3% 2% 5% 4% 195 47.6% 36% 46% 41%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  866 21% 20% 20% 24% 11% 11% 11% 10% 2% 3% 3% 3% 303 35.0% 34% 34% 37%

Sampson CC  134 23% 29% 27% 28% 13% 13% 8% 10% 3% 4% 3% 3% 52 38.8% 45% 38% 40%

Sandhills CC  509 23% 22% 24% 27% 15% 14% 13% 10% 1% 5% 4% 3% 201 39.5% 39% 41% 40%

South Piedmont CC  388 32% 24% 20% 29% 12% 7% 12% 6% 3% 3% 3% 3% 184 47.4% 32% 36% 38%

Southeastern CC  289 28% 26% 26% 29% 11% 7% 13% 8% 3% 2% 4% 1% 122 42.2% 35% 43% 38%

Southwestern CC  310 35% 36% 35% 33% 9% 8% 8% 7% 3% 1% 1% 2% 145 46.8% 46% 44% 42%

Stanly CC  365 36% 38% 39% 42% 8% 8% 7% 7% 2% 2% 1% 2% 169 46.3% 47% 46% 50%

Surry CC  491 31% 26% 27% 29% 11% 10% 12% 13% 2% 2% 3% 2% 217 44.2% 39% 42% 44%

Tri‐County CC  134 22% 27% 24% 30% 7% 9% 13% 9% 3% 1% 1% 3% 44 32.8% 36% 38% 43%

Vance‐Granville CC  720 22% 21% 21% 22% 11% 11% 8% 9% 2% 2% 2% 2% 248 34.4% 34% 32% 33%

Wake TCC  1,564 16% 18% 18% 20% 20% 16% 19% 19% 3% 2% 3% 2% 612 39.1% 38% 40% 41%

Wayne CC  592 27% 26% 26% 26% 19% 18% 16% 19% 3% 2% 1% 2% 289 48.8% 46% 44% 46%

Western Piedmont CC  385 34% 32% 32% 33% 9% 6% 9% 11% 3% 3% 2% 3% 176 45.7% 41% 43% 47%

Wilkes CC  362 30% 29% 32% 35% 12% 6% 11% 7% 2% 2% 2% 2% 159 43.9% 37% 44% 44%

Wilson CC  205 27% 25% 24% 22% 10% 10% 11% 11% 3% 2% 2% 3% 81 39.5% 37% 37% 36%

% TRANSFER, NOT 

GRADUATE

% GRADUATE, TRANSFER, OR 

RETAINED

COHORT

% GRADUATE% RETAINED, NOT 

GRADUATE OR TRANSFERGRAD 

TRAN 

RET

15

Page 105: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

G.  Licensure and Certification Passing Rate  Purpose  

To ensure programmatic coursework prepares students to competently practice in their chosen profession 

 Description  

Aggregate institutional passing rate of first time test‐takers on licensure and certification exams.  Exams included in this measure are state mandated exams which candidates must pass before becoming active practitioners.   

 Methodology  

Denominator: All licensure and certification exams taken for the first time during the licensure agency’s most recent reporting year.  Only includes state mandated exams which candidates must pass before becoming active practitioners.  

Numerator: Licensure and certification exams passed on first attempt during the licensure agency’s most recent reporting year.    

Note: Passing rates for individual exams will be provided for informational purposes only.  

 Source  

American Board of Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. 

Occupational Therapist Assistant  

American Registry of Radiologic Technologists 

Nuclear Medicine Technology Exam 

Radiation Therapy Exam 

Radiography Exam  

Council of Interstate Testing 

Dental Hygiene Exam  

DL Roope Administrators 

Apprentice Exam 

Cosmetology Exam 

Cosmetology Instructor Exam 

Esthetician Exam 

Manicurist Exam  

Federal Aviation Administration 

Airframe Exam (Starting in 2014) 

General Exam (Starting in 2014) 

Power Plant Exam (Starting in 2014)  

Federation of State Massage Therapy Boards  

Massage & Body Work Therapist   

NC Board of Opticians 

Opticianry Exam  

NC Board of Physical Therapy Examiners 

Physical Therapist Assistant Exam  

NC Board of Nursing 

Practical Nursing Exam 

Registered Nursing Exam  

NC Dept of Justice, Criminal Justice Standards Division 

Basic Law Enforcement Training (BLET) Exam  

NC Dept of Justice Sheriff’s Standards Division  

Detention Officer (Starting in 2014)  

NC Office of Emergency Medical Services  

EMD Exam 

EMT Exam 

EMTI‐I Exam 

EMT‐P Exam   

NC Real Estate Commission 

Provisional Real Estate Broker  

NC Veterinary Medical Board 

Veterinary Medicine Technology Exam

Details  

The number of first‐time test‐takers and the number passing were provided to the System Office by agencies issuing the license or certification and validated by the colleges. Depending on the exam, data may be provided on a fiscal or calendar year. Exams include Aviation‐General, Aviation‐Airframe, Aviation ‐ Power Plant, BLET,  , 

Cosmetic Arts‐Apprentice, Cosmetic Arts‐Instructor, Cosmetology, Dental Hygiene,  Detention Officer, EMD, EMT, EMT‐I, EMT‐P, Esthetician, Manicurist, Massage & Body Work Therapist, Nuclear Medical Technician, Occupational Therapist Assistant, Opticianry, Physical Therapist Assistant, Practical Nursing, Radiation Therapy, Radiography, Real Estate Broker, Registered Nursing, and Veterinary Medical Technician. 

 Goal: 91.7%  Baseline: 71.0%  

   

16

Page 106: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2011‐2012

Goal: 91.7%

Baseline: 71.0%11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  10,815 9,349 86.4% 87% 86% 86%

Alamance CC  215 173 80.5% 76% 88% 86%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 427 383 89.7% 95% 89% 93%

Beaufort County CC  128 99 77.3% 71% 86% 85%

Bladen CC  93 67 72.0% 76% 81% 83%

Blue Ridge CC  122 112 91.8% 91% 81% 82%

Brunswick CC  131 112 85.5% 83% 91% 85%

Caldwell CC & TI  220 182 82.7% 82% 85% 84%

Cape Fear CC  408 368 90.2% 91% 96% 95%

Carteret CC  151 118 78.1% 80% 83% 79%

Catawba Valley CC  225 191 84.9% 83% 77% 71%

Central Carolina CC  284 240 84.5% 85% 83% 86%

Central Piedmont CC  428 395 92.3% 84% 92% 91%

Cleveland CC  177 155 87.6% 87% 80% 78%

Coastal Carolina CC  245 231 94.3% 92% 94% 88%

College of The Albema 160 132 82.5% 89% 74% 84%

Craven CC  221 190 86.0% 90% 88% 83%

Davidson County CC  225 208 92.4% 88% 92% 88%

Durham TCC  348 317 91.1% 96% 89% 85%

Edgecombe CC  85 73 85.9% 90% 86% 88%

Fayetteville TCC  400 365 91.3% 92% 96% 94%

Forsyth TCC  308 286 92.9% 94% 92% 89%

Gaston College  319 298 93.4% 93% 88% 89%

Guilford TCC  404 357 88.4% 92% 94% 89%

Halifax CC  72 62 86.1% 78% 76% 70%

Haywood CC  92 71 77.2% 86% 79% 86%

Isothermal CC  147 112 76.2% 77% 77% 79%

James Sprunt CC  68 55 80.9% 79% 88% 88%

Johnston CC  273 228 83.5% 88% 81% 92%

Lenoir CC  439 352 80.2% 78% 84% 87%

Martin CC  49 34 69.4% 74% 71% 87%

Mayland CC  107 87 81.3% 83% 85% 84%

McDowell TCC  123 111 90.2% 88% 92% 88%

Mitchell CC  165 149 90.3% 85% 84% 84%

Montgomery CC  34 32 94.1% 85% 83% 84%

Nash CC  184 138 75.0% 83% 77% 86%

Pamlico CC  5 5 100.0% 90% 46% 75%

Piedmont CC  67 50 74.6% 78% 76% 89%

Pitt CC  245 224 91.4% 90% 85% 86%

Randolph CC  123 106 86.2% 83% 87% 88%

Richmond CC  78 65 83.3% 91% 97% 86%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  55 41 74.5% 86% 72% 83%

Robeson CC  136 106 77.9% 78% 72% 77%

Rockingham CC  112 89 79.5% 82% 84% 92%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  366 290 79.2% 82% 85% 81%

Sampson CC  82 66 80.5% 79% 85% 87%

Sandhills CC  189 175 92.6% 84% 89% 87%

South Piedmont CC  151 125 82.8% 86% 86% 69%

Southeastern CC  157 118 75.2% 80% 82% 78%

Southwestern CC  145 134 92.4% 95% 95% 88%

Stanly CC  179 156 87.2% 86% 89% 79%

Surry CC  165 160 97.0% 92% 93% 92%

Tri‐County CC  57 50 87.7% 87% 70% 72%

Vance‐Granville CC  188 173 92.0% 90% 87% 84%

Wake TCC  403 369 91.6% 94% 91% 92%

Wayne CC  142 113 79.6% 80% 74% 90%

Western Piedmont CC  87 83 95.4% 92% 84% 91%

Wilkes CC  102 83 81.4% 86% 85% 82%

Wilson CC  104 85 81.7% 75% 89% 81%

NUMBER OF TEST 

TAKERSNUMBER PASSING

AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASSING RATE

17

Page 107: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

H.  College Transfer Performance  Purpose  

To ensure the academic success of community college students at a four‐year university or college 

 Description  

Among community college associate degree completers and those who have completed 30 or more credit hours who transfer to a four‐year university or college, the percentage who earn a GPA of 2.00 or better after two consecutive semesters within the academic year at the transfer institution. 

 Methodology  

Denominator: Students with an associate degree or at least 30 articulated transfer credits enrolled during the fall and spring semesters at a four‐year institution who were enrolled at a community college during the previous academic year.  Only includes North Carolina based four‐year institutions and four‐year institutions which the individual community college has an articulated transfer agreement.  

Numerator: Students included in the denominator who have earned a GPA of 2.00 or better aggregated over the fall and spring semesters at the transfer institution.  

Note: The System Office will work with private colleges to collect performance data and community colleges will have to supplement data with results from out of state institutions which they have articulation agreements. 

 Source  

Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file National Student Clearinghouse UNC‐General Administration Participating NC Independent Colleges and Universities including Barton College, Campbell University, Catawba College, Chowan University, Gardner‐Webb University, Mars Hill College, Meredith College, Methodist University, and Mount Olive College  Note: This list will expand in the 2014 report   

 Details  

Lists of community college students enrolled during the academic year who received an associate degree during that year and those who had accumulated at least 30 articulated college transfer credit hours data were sent to UNCGA.  These lists were matched against subsequent fall and spring UNC system student records to determine transfer enrollment at a North Carolina public university and first year academic performance.  UNC‐GA uses this data to generate detailed reports by community college, which can be accessed at http://www.northcarolina.edu/ira/ir/analytics/tsp.htm.  The First‐Year UNC Academic Performance of YEAR Community College Associate Degree Recipients and First‐Year UNC Academic Performance of YEAR Community College Students with at Least 30 Semester Hours of Community College Coursework were used for this measure.  Data from D.4. Percent of Students with End‐of‐Year GPA=>2.00 in these reports were combined to determine the overall percentage of transfers with a GPA equal or greater than 2.00 after two semesters at the university.   

 Goal: 93.8%  Baseline: 71.2%  

   

18

Page 108: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE H. COLLEGE TRANSFER PERFORMANCE, 2010‐11 COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS

Goal: 93.8%

Baseline: 71.2%Students % ≥ 2.00 Students % ≥ 2.00 Students # ≥ 2.00 % ≥ 2.00 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  5,469 87% 3,284 89% 8,753 7,705 88.0% 87% 87%

Alamance CC  106 92% 68 90% 174 158 90.8% 93% 85%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 140 94% 96 96% 236 224 94.9% 92% 95%

Beaufort County CC  28 89% 17 100% 45 42 93.3% 98% 92%

Bladen CC  50 80% 24 79% 74 59 79.7% 78% 66%

Blue Ridge CC  45 98% 28 100% 73 72 98.6% 93% 95%

Brunswick CC  47 87% 35 89% 82 72 87.8% 92% 82%

Caldwell CC & TI  139 88% 92 88% 231 203 87.9% 89% 92%

Cape Fear CC  411 84% 258 88% 669 573 85.7% 89% 85%

Carteret CC  51 86% 28 82% 79 67 84.8% 87% 92%

Catawba Valley CC  165 94% 105 93% 270 253 93.7% 88% 94%

Central Carolina CC  54 89% 37 95% 91 83 91.2% 95% 86%

Central Piedmont CC  590 86% 319 89% 909 792 87.1% 86% 89%

Cleveland CC  65 83% 36 86% 101 85 84.2% 77% 86%

Coastal Carolina CC  156 90% 76 91% 232 209 90.1% 87% 90%

College of The Albema 62 87% 30 87% 92 80 87.0% 90% 93%

Craven CC  84 92% 35 89% 119 108 90.8% 80% 91%

Davidson County CC  70 87% 44 91% 114 101 88.6% 84% 92%

Durham TCC  125 93% 63 97% 188 177 94.1% 96% 89%

Edgecombe CC  18 94% 17 94% 35 33 94.3% 76% 71%

Fayetteville TCC  163 88% 126 88% 289 254 87.9% 90% 86%

Forsyth TCC  170 86% 110 93% 280 248 88.6% 85% 90%

Gaston College  128 83% 60 90% 188 160 85.1% 76% 83%

Guilford TCC  341 84% 198 88% 539 460 85.3% 92% 85%

Halifax CC  25 68% 21 71% 46 32 69.6% 76% 83%

Haywood CC  21 100% 14 93% 35 34 97.1% 88% 92%

Isothermal CC  49 90% 29 90% 78 70 89.7% 82% 82%

James Sprunt CC  22 91% 15 100% 37 35 94.6% 84% 89%

Johnston CC  115 83% 52 83% 167 139 83.2% 83% 84%

Lenoir CC  70 87% 45 91% 115 102 88.7% 85% 82%

Martin CC  3 * 4 * 7 7 100.0% * 80%

Mayland CC  8 88% 8 88% 16 14 87.5% 100% 82%

McDowell TCC  17 82% 13 85% 30 25 83.3% 82% 89%

Mitchell CC  80 85% 62 92% 142 125 88.0% 82% 86%

Montgomery CC  8 88% 7 100% 15 14 93.3% 71% 80%

Nash CC  70 86% 31 84% 101 86 85.1% 86% 91%

Pamlico CC  4 * 1 * 5 4 80.0% * *

Piedmont CC  26 77% 16 69% 42 31 73.8% 91% 65%

Pitt CC  247 88% 167 90% 414 368 88.9% 89% 84%

Randolph CC  31 77% 14 93% 45 37 82.2% 93% 91%

Richmond CC  25 96% 30 93% 55 52 94.5% 74% 95%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  2 * 1 * 3 * * 60% 100%

Robeson CC  37 73% 25 68% 62 44 71.0% 90% 82%

Rockingham CC  32 94% 19 100% 51 49 96.1% 90% 87%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  122 82% 96 88% 218 184 84.4% 62% 79%

Sampson CC  42 79% 28 71% 70 53 75.7% 80% 95%

Sandhills CC  107 88% 73 88% 180 158 87.8% 89% 86%

South Piedmont CC  13 85% 12 92% 25 22 88.0% 85% 92%

Southeastern CC  65 82% 31 90% 96 81 84.4% 78% 70%

Southwestern CC  63 94% 46 93% 109 102 93.6% 96% 93%

Stanly CC  35 86% 34 94% 69 62 89.9% 96% 93%

Surry CC  66 85% 48 85% 114 97 85.1% 92% 91%

Tri‐County CC  17 76% 10 80% 27 21 77.8% 82% 86%

Vance‐Granville CC  48 92% 33 88% 81 73 90.1% 95% 88%

Wake TCC  530 92% 235 93% 765 703 91.9% 92% 91%

Wayne CC  71 83% 42 83% 113 94 83.2% 88% 87%

Western Piedmont CC  83 86% 54 85% 137 117 85.4% 84% 85%

Wilkes CC  85 87% 47 96% 132 119 90.2% 86% 90%

Wilson CC  22 91% 19 89% 41 37 90.2% 79% 89%

*Less than 5 ('11), Less than 10 ('09‐'10)

2010‐2011 TOTALASSOCIATE DEGREE RECIPENT30 OR MORE SEMESTER HOURS % ≥ 2.00

19

Page 109: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

   

20

Page 110: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Appendix – Additional Performance Measure Tables  

  

21

Page 111: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE A1. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL

Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress

System Totals  5,657 16% 5,748 45% 9,800 51% 12,497 48% 5,261 31%

Alamance CC  44 23% 104 26% 184 35% 206 31% 65 22%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 155 5% 36 47% 95 66% 151 64% 78 36%

Beaufort County CC  75 17% 92 47% 96 48% 68 51% 20 5%

Bladen CC  20 10% 17 35% 29 45% 43 65% 49 47%

Blue Ridge CC  68 1% 24 58% 74 61% 97 58% 35 20%

Brunswick CC  137 27% 25 92% 39 79% 23 87% 103 39%

Caldwell CC & TI  119 5% 50 32% 129 54% 227 60% 125 36%

Cape Fear CC  160 4% 98 30% 176 31% 371 45% 236 25%

Carteret CC  33 9% 40 20% 39 46% 58 29% 23 43%

Catawba Valley CC  113 4% 96 52% 125 56% 128 51% 52 10%

Central Carolina CC  247 17% 199 64% 305 74% 378 66% 298 58%

Central Piedmont CC  212 15% 285 54% 931 62% 1,070 57% 373 37%

Cleveland CC  21 10% 69 52% 106 63% 106 67% 49 71%

Coastal Carolina CC  41 34% 93 45% 144 42% 175 35% 54 33%

College of The Albema 44 25% 95 48% 153 54% 180 57% 96 36%

Craven CC  44 27% 54 37% 106 35% 115 37% 25 12%

Davidson County CC  89 37% 234 74% 300 61% 423 59% 153 42%

Durham TCC  60 40% 159 28% 223 30% 238 36% 71 15%

Edgecombe CC  91 36% 105 65% 183 57% 222 55% 72 24%

Fayetteville TCC  254 15% 318 24% 528 38% 762 38% 297 40%

Forsyth TCC  221 8% 197 54% 422 68% 563 54% 119 36%

Gaston College  49 12% 91 43% 216 30% 274 47% 149 36%

Guilford TCC  272 8% 380 23% 538 31% 471 34% 144 9%

Halifax CC  23 26% 27 59% 82 66% 130 52% 52 19%

Haywood CC  34 9% 15 20% 34 53% 53 57% 28 32%

Isothermal CC  83 13% 24 42% 52 27% 100 43% 68 22%

James Sprunt CC  18 67% 26 62% 38 92% 56 75% 62 10%

Johnston CC  104 21% 111 42% 141 57% 138 67% 37 27%

Lenoir CC  106 15% 178 43% 195 56% 231 58% 86 19%

Martin CC  43 16% 41 46% 69 48% 118 38% 41 29%

Mayland CC  99 17% 69 58% 114 63% 203 38% 51 27%

McDowell TCC  60 3% 18 67% 33 58% 87 54% 24 13%

Mitchell CC  91 11% 45 60% 106 51% 101 27% 21 33%

Montgomery CC  20 15% 14 50% 39 64% 81 44% 27 33%

Nash CC  64 9% 54 43% 52 31% 47 60% 24 17%

Pamlico CC  19 26% 39 46% 34 24% 30 17% 9 11%

Piedmont CC  28 46% 54 44% 79 51% 212 42% 56 7%

Pitt CC  131 13% 96 52% 263 51% 330 45% 89 37%

Randolph CC  123 15% 138 40% 144 47% 175 41% 56 23%

Richmond CC  72 40% 111 50% 259 51% 270 45% 90 43%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  47 6% 60 13% 65 22% 43 9% 7 0%

Robeson CC  236 17% 238 37% 351 48% 335 46% 172 15%

Rockingham CC  36 31% 50 64% 71 68% 121 60% 51 41%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  61 15% 84 43% 179 47% 266 35% 118 8%

Sampson CC  110 25% 143 69% 126 54% 163 47% 17 53%

Sandhills CC  166 12% 57 26% 94 27% 177 21% 80 39%

South Piedmont CC  52 31% 134 44% 158 61% 172 65% 79 15%

Southeastern CC  136 32% 174 52% 189 56% 216 54% 89 9%

Southwestern CC  36 3% 25 56% 87 51% 172 69% 51 20%

Stanly CC  22 14% 62 50% 105 53% 149 52% 151 30%

Surry CC  81 10% 43 42% 101 49% 116 41% 27 33%

Tri‐County CC  53 8% 15 27% 15 73% 23 39% 9 33%

Vance‐Granville CC  138 20% 205 37% 311 52% 448 45% 135 24%

Wake TCC  200 17% 146 38% 460 45% 555 25% 350 13%

Wayne CC  98 76% 191 65% 211 69% 358 73% 196 53%

Western Piedmont CC  292 4% 55 42% 176 23% 178 21% 104 34%

Wilkes CC  130 15% 74 38% 109 65% 197 43% 86 48%

Wilson CC  76 12% 71 68% 117 64% 97 76% 32 31%

ADULT BASIC AND SECONDARY EDUCATION

BEGINNING ABE LITERACYBEGINNING BASIC 

EDUCATION

LOW INTERMEDIATE 

BASIC EDUCATION

HIGH INTERMEDIATE 

BASIC EDUCATION

LOW ADULT SECONDARY 

EDUCATION

22

Page 112: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE A2. BASIC SKILLS STUDENT PROGRESS, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL

Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress Students Progress

System Totals  1,501 47% 1,460 55% 2,316 56% 2,890 45% 2,528 39% 1,962 15%

Alamance CC  74 46% 162 30% 53 34% 34 53% 53 13% 14 0%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 26 58% 25 68% 43 70% 72 26% 77 30% 50 10%

Beaufort County CC  * * 2 * 3 * 1 * 7 0%

Bladen CC  * 1 * 3 * 18 39% 1 * 1 *

Blue Ridge CC  10 50% 8 75% 26 38% 38 37% 47 30% 53 2%

Brunswick CC  * * 3 * 1 * 2 * 3 *

Caldwell CC & TI  2 * 2 * 21 57% 35 31% 31 52% 15 0%

Cape Fear CC  11 45% 16 50% 39 31% 38 32% 54 35% 29 10%

Carteret CC  * 7 0% 4 * * 4 * *

Catawba Valley CC  6 33% 9 67% 28 61% 44 32% 45 49% 52 6%

Central Carolina CC  16 75% 33 85% 133 64% 163 57% 130 52% 108 6%

Central Piedmont CC  273 32% 111 73% 297 66% 412 48% 402 50% 364 23%

Cleveland CC  1 * 3 * 4 * 3 * 2 * 9 22%

Coastal Carolina CC  4 * 16 31% 9 44% 10 50% 17 29% 7 0%

College of The Albemarle  * * 1 * 7 57% 7 57% 12 17%

Craven CC  6 33% 7 71% 15 20% 11 27% 13 8% 11 9%

Davidson County CC  6 83% 5 60% 22 55% 30 67% 31 58% 56 4%

Durham TCC  48 63% 43 70% 119 56% 173 49% 137 39% 124 11%

Edgecombe CC  1 * 1 * 3 * 6 17% * 2 *

Fayetteville TCC  26 27% 27 41% 67 42% 92 27% 107 30% 108 13%

Forsyth TCC  35 66% 24 79% 86 57% 152 43% 100 39% 63 25%

Gaston College  5 40% 3 * 15 47% 22 59% 34 53% 39 3%

Guilford TCC  224 33% 101 44% 229 43% 329 24% 244 28% 231 11%

Halifax CC  * 1 * 1 * * 2 * *

Haywood CC  2 * 1 * 5 60% 5 80% 12 50% 2 *

Isothermal CC  * 1 * 9 33% 17 29% 18 33% 11 27%

James Sprunt CC  1 * 1 * 6 100% 7 86% 5 100% 5 0%

Johnston CC  3 * 4 * 30 70% 49 39% 21 29% 27 0%

Lenoir CC  15 80% 22 77% 43 51% 53 53% 40 33% 20 10%

Martin CC  * 1 * 4 * 7 86% 2 * 4 *

Mayland CC  * 1 * 1 * 7 43% 7 29% 5 60%

McDowell TCC  * 2 * 9 56% 16 44% 9 44% 8 25%

Mitchell CC  3 * 8 75% 31 77% 29 72% 22 64% 34 26%

Montgomery CC  9 67% 9 56% 20 55% 23 35% 16 38% 14 0%

Nash CC  1 * 4 * 2 * 5 20% 3 * 9 22%

Pamlico CC  1 * 1 * 1 * * * *

Piedmont CC  3 * 2 * 6 17% 5 80% 2 * *

Pitt CC  14 79% 19 68% 27 78% 44 48% 39 49% 36 31%

Randolph CC  4 * 6 83% 32 34% 46 46% 39 38% 54 6%

Richmond CC  3 * 8 63% 27 56% 53 43% 18 44% 10 10%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * *

Robeson CC  5 80% 15 60% 27 52% 41 32% 15 20% 1 *

Rockingham CC  * * 2 * 11 64% 2 * 5 20%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  33 64% 42 64% 68 60% 91 45% 60 42% 51 6%

Sampson CC  1 * 9 89% 22 45% 15 33% 18 56% 21 5%

Sandhills CC  1 * 7 86% 14 57% 25 52% 21 67% 12 0%

South Piedmont CC  1 * 15 73% 52 63% 100 48% 80 45% 66 20%

Southeastern CC  1 * * 4 * 1 * 2 * *

Southwestern CC  * 3 * 7 57% 20 50% 13 69% 9 22%

Stanly CC  1 * 8 63% 14 43% 19 37% 24 46% 13 15%

Surry CC  1 * 3 * 20 60% 45 44% 30 47% 32 22%

Tri‐County CC  2 * 2 * 1 * 2 * 4 * 2 *

Vance‐Granville CC  7 43% 34 44% 17 53% 1 * 4 * 2 *

Wake TCC  596 51% 596 50% 512 56% 311 55% 364 25% 71 37%

Wayne CC  5 80% 9 89% 29 76% 44 68% 43 67% 36 33%

Western Piedmont CC  3 * 4 * 20 55% 31 52% 21 29% 19 5%

Wilkes CC  7 86% 13 85% 22 77% 34 62% 18 72% 17 24%

Wilson CC  4 * 5 100% 9 100% 40 88% 15 47% 8 0%

* Less than 5 students

ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE

LOW INTERMEDIATE 

ESLADVANCED ESL

BEGINNING ESL 

LITERACYHIGH BEGINNING ESL

HIGH INTERMEDIATE 

ESLLOW BEGINNING ESL

23

Page 113: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

   

24

Page 114: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE B1. GED DIPLOMA PASSING RATE, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY PLACEMENT LEVEL

Students Passing Students Passing

System Totals  4902 66% 3602 74%

Alamance CC  89 70% 92 76%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 150 61% 280 50%

Beaufort County CC  24 71% 16 100%

Bladen CC  28 39% 43 79%

Blue Ridge CC  93 58% 61 77%

Brunswick CC  72 38% 12 33%

Caldwell CC & TI  127 61% 93 72%

Cape Fear CC  116 74% 57 89%

Carteret CC  34 91% 28 93%

Catawba Valley CC  99 62% 197 71%

Central Carolina CC  185 66% 113 74%

Central Piedmont CC  163 61% 222 86%

Cleveland CC  10 50% 13 92%

Coastal Carolina CC  51 53% 36 81%

College of The Albema 83 58% 51 59%

Craven CC  23 30% 17 76%

Davidson County CC  107 69% 54 81%

Durham TCC  60 55% 57 75%

Edgecombe CC  124 77% 21 67%

Fayetteville TCC  118 79% 83 88%

Forsyth TCC  143 73% 85 81%

Gaston College  95 69% 91 85%

Guilford TCC  92 64% 90 77%

Halifax CC  64 55% 34 56%

Haywood CC  34 38% 11 82%

Isothermal CC  99 61% 56 84%

James Sprunt CC  39 69% 1 *

Johnston CC  56 77% 32 91%

Lenoir CC  111 64% 47 77%

Martin CC  56 68% 14 64%

Mayland CC  82 79% 26 77%

McDowell TCC  39 67% 16 81%

Mitchell CC  62 89% 41 93%

Montgomery CC  36 72% 8 75%

Nash CC  49 71% 38 68%

Pamlico CC  11 55% 4 *

Piedmont CC  74 72% 25 72%

Pitt CC  107 64% 53 75%

Randolph CC  44 75% 22 77%

Richmond CC  140 61% 118 65%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  11 64% 7 86%

Robeson CC  21 76% 15 87%

Rockingham CC  114 75% 36 81%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  220 58% 148 73%

Sampson CC  29 76% 27 89%

Sandhills CC  75 64% 62 56%

South Piedmont CC  124 76% 67 73%

Southeastern CC  77 86% 43 81%

Southwestern CC  84 80% 51 84%

Stanly CC  45 73% 33 70%

Surry CC  68 94% 42 95%

Tri‐County CC  29 76% 14 86%

Vance‐Granville CC  147 69% 65 85%

Wake TCC  354 52% 353 68%

Wayne CC  138 67% 58 83%

Western Piedmont CC  112 59% 121 74%

Wilkes CC  54 89% 15 100%

Wilson CC  11 64% 87 76%

* Less than 5 students

LOW ADULT SECONDARY EDUCATION HIGH ADULT SECONDARY EDUCATION

25

Page 115: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE C1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2011‐2012 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION

% SUCCESSFUL

11‐12

System Totals  18511 18% 27% 19% 0% 6% 12% 16% 1% 65%

Alamance CC  411 17% 31% 18% 0% 6% 4% 23% 0% 67%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 395 15% 28% 18% 0% 7% 15% 17% 0% 61%

Beaufort County CC  107 17% 29% 20% 0% 12% 11% 11% 0% 65%

Bladen CC  121 18% 22% 12% 0% 7% 14% 27% 0% 52%

Blue Ridge CC  153 10% 28% 33% 0% 5% 11% 0% 13% 71%

Brunswick CC  80 10% 36% 28% 0% 9% 13% 5% 0% 74%

Caldwell CC & TI  320 22% 28% 15% 0% 3% 10% 22% 0% 65%

Cape Fear CC  816 17% 27% 19% 0% 8% 20% 9% 0% 63%

Carteret CC  89 19% 36% 17% 0% 2% 4% 15% 7% 72%

Catawba Valley CC  444 24% 33% 18% 0% 5% 7% 12% 0% 75%

Central Carolina CC  203 9% 31% 20% 0% 6% 8% 26% 0% 61%

Central Piedmont CC  1872 27% 33% 18% 0% 5% 13% 3% 1% 78%

Cleveland CC  192 27% 34% 13% 0% 1% 10% 15% 0% 73%

Coastal Carolina CC  367 23% 30% 17% 0% 5% 7% 18% 0% 70%

College of The Albema 164 12% 26% 23% 0% 9% 10% 21% 0% 61%

Craven CC  137 18% 18% 13% 0% 14% 19% 18% 0% 50%

Davidson County CC  361 20% 25% 16% 0% 4% 20% 15% 0% 61%

Durham TCC  411 9% 28% 19% 0% 7% 13% 24% 0% 56%

Edgecombe CC  261 13% 20% 18% 0% 9% 28% 11% 0% 51%

Fayetteville TCC  969 19% 26% 20% 0% 8% 13% 14% 0% 65%

Forsyth TCC  848 17% 28% 18% 0% 5% 7% 24% 0% 64%

Gaston College  497 23% 34% 18% 0% 4% 8% 9% 4% 74%

Guilford TCC  1391 14% 22% 17% 0% 4% 21% 21% 0% 53%

Halifax CC  158 23% 23% 20% 0% 8% 11% 15% 0% 66%

Haywood CC  106 14% 30% 26% 0% 8% 7% 10% 4% 71%

Isothermal CC  163 14% 33% 20% 0% 9% 9% 15% 0% 67%

James Sprunt CC  164 11% 30% 21% 0% 6% 7% 24% 0% 62%

Johnston CC  338 29% 30% 21% 0% 5% 5% 0% 9% 80%

Lenoir CC  210 7% 21% 22% 0% 10% 11% 19% 10% 50%

Martin CC  69 13% 17% 30% 0% 12% 19% 9% 0% 61%

Mayland CC  28 32% 18% 14% 0% 11% 14% 4% 7% 64%

McDowell TCC  59 24% 41% 17% 0% 3% 2% 14% 0% 81%

Mitchell CC  381 14% 28% 23% 0% 6% 10% 18% 1% 65%

Montgomery CC  58 12% 43% 24% 0% 3% 7% 10% 0% 79%

Nash CC  190 7% 20% 26% 0% 5% 13% 29% 0% 53%

Pamlico CC  14 7% 7% 36% 0% 7% 14% 21% 7% 50%

Piedmont CC  157 27% 21% 14% 0% 4% 7% 14% 13% 62%

Pitt CC  627 24% 30% 16% 0% 5% 5% 19% 0% 71%

Randolph CC  207 31% 29% 15% 0% 3% 16% 4% 0% 76%

Richmond CC  325 16% 31% 18% 0% 2% 8% 23% 2% 66%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  108 12% 24% 24% 0% 5% 21% 13% 1% 60%

Robeson CC  293 8% 28% 17% 0% 8% 10% 29% 0% 53%

Rockingham CC  156 7% 21% 28% 0% 13% 10% 21% 0% 56%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  581 34% 22% 13% 0% 4% 19% 8% 0% 69%

Sampson CC  146 12% 21% 18% 0% 6% 11% 33% 0% 50%

Sandhills CC  430 11% 23% 28% 0% 7% 13% 19% 0% 62%

South Piedmont CC  168 18% 29% 15% 0% 7% 19% 11% 0% 63%

Southeastern CC  101 11% 23% 22% 0% 2% 20% 23% 0% 55%

Southwestern CC  173 16% 30% 17% 0% 8% 13% 16% 0% 63%

Stanly CC  212 21% 32% 15% 0% 6% 7% 20% 0% 67%

Surry CC  204 5% 26% 34% 0% 12% 10% 12% 0% 65%

Tri‐County CC  72 42% 24% 11% 0% 6% 14% 4% 0% 76%

Vance‐Granville CC  261 7% 25% 27% 0% 9% 11% 21% 0% 59%

Wake TCC  795 7% 21% 26% 0% 10% 9% 20% 6% 55%

Wayne CC  316 11% 33% 19% 0% 9% 9% 18% 0% 63%

Western Piedmont CC  258 23% 31% 12% 0% 4% 2% 28% 0% 66%

Wilkes CC  244 14% 22% 20% 0% 9% 6% 29% 0% 56%

Wilson CC  130 7% 25% 15% 0% 8% 22% 24% 0% 46%

OtherA B C P D F WATTEMPT

26

Page 116: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE C2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL ENGLISH COURSES, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY AGE

Attempt  % Successful Attempt  % Successful Attempt  % Successful

System Totals  4463 68% 5712 60% 8336 66%

Alamance CC  102 70% 118 64% 191 68%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 88 60% 137 58% 170 65%

Beaufort County CC  22 86% 31 61% 54 59%

Bladen CC  8 50% 49 43% 64 59%

Blue Ridge CC  44 59% 59 71% 50 80%

Brunswick CC  22 82% 28 79% 30 63%

Caldwell CC & TI  96 64% 95 57% 129 73%

Cape Fear CC  229 68% 254 58% 333 65%

Carteret CC  22 73% 27 67% 40 75%

Catawba Valley CC  158 77% 132 70% 154 77%

Central Carolina CC  33 67% 59 61% 111 59%

Central Piedmont CC  476 80% 647 74% 749 80%

Cleveland CC  46 85% 45 71% 101 69%

Coastal Carolina CC  77 66% 104 60% 186 77%

College of The Albema 33 64% 53 58% 78 62%

Craven CC  23 39% 44 52% 70 51%

Davidson County CC  125 66% 103 54% 133 62%

Durham TCC  65 46% 118 50% 228 62%

Edgecombe CC  32 66% 73 51% 156 48%

Fayetteville TCC  130 67% 223 58% 616 67%

Forsyth TCC  201 64% 282 59% 365 67%

Gaston College  115 82% 186 68% 196 76%

Guilford TCC  240 54% 399 48% 752 55%

Halifax CC  32 78% 49 55% 77 69%

Haywood CC  26 69% 32 69% 48 73%

Isothermal CC  49 78% 49 59% 65 65%

James Sprunt CC  24 83% 43 42% 97 66%

Johnston CC  76 82% 125 82% 137 78%

Lenoir CC  53 64% 65 32% 92 55%

Martin CC  10 40% 26 54% 33 73%

Mayland CC  6 67% 7 43% 15 73%

McDowell TCC  18 89% 6 83% 35 77%

Mitchell CC  102 60% 111 59% 168 72%

Montgomery CC  12 92% 22 68% 24 83%

Nash CC  58 64% 57 46% 75 49%

Pamlico CC  0 * 8 50% 6 50%

Piedmont CC  38 63% 46 50% 73 70%

Pitt CC  161 71% 222 75% 244 67%

Randolph CC  63 81% 61 74% 83 75%

Richmond CC  65 72% 89 61% 171 66%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  16 56% 28 43% 64 69%

Robeson CC  43 49% 91 48% 159 57%

Rockingham CC  56 68% 35 51% 65 49%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  183 72% 152 58% 246 75%

Sampson CC  27 67% 55 45% 64 47%

Sandhills CC  141 72% 126 51% 163 61%

South Piedmont CC  45 78% 55 58% 68 56%

Southeastern CC  15 87% 45 53% 41 46%

Southwestern CC  56 63% 47 49% 70 73%

Stanly CC  69 67% 50 74% 93 65%

Surry CC  63 63% 78 67% 63 65%

Tri‐County CC  21 76% 17 71% 34 79%

Vance‐Granville CC  77 55% 80 50% 104 68%

Wake TCC  181 52% 289 54% 325 57%

Wayne CC  93 67% 106 56% 117 68%

Western Piedmont CC  74 76% 71 58% 113 65%

Wilkes CC  97 54% 69 52% 78 63%

Wilson CC  26 38% 34 50% 70 47%

* Less than 5 students

22 AND OLDER18 AND YOUNGER 19 TO 21

27

Page 117: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE D1. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2011‐2012 ‐ GRADE DISTRIBUTION

% SUCCESSFUL

11‐12

System Totals  16974 19% 25% 20% 0% 8% 10% 16% 1% 64%

Alamance CC  480 15% 25% 23% 0% 7% 5% 25% 0% 63%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 463 16% 27% 22% 0% 6% 12% 16% 0% 65%

Beaufort County CC  117 7% 21% 23% 0% 12% 16% 21% 0% 51%

Bladen CC  146 12% 29% 19% 0% 10% 12% 17% 0% 61%

Blue Ridge CC  136 19% 35% 24% 0% 5% 6% 0% 11% 78%

Brunswick CC  109 21% 21% 17% 0% 12% 22% 6% 0% 60%

Caldwell CC & TI  337 24% 26% 21% 0% 4% 7% 18% 0% 72%

Cape Fear CC  675 15% 23% 21% 0% 8% 15% 18% 0% 59%

Carteret CC  141 22% 27% 19% 0% 7% 9% 11% 5% 68%

Catawba Valley CC  458 10% 21% 25% 0% 15% 13% 16% 0% 56%

Central Carolina CC  168 14% 29% 28% 0% 14% 6% 10% 0% 71%

Central Piedmont CC  1388 20% 28% 23% 0% 10% 14% 5% 0% 72%

Cleveland CC  228 22% 27% 19% 0% 5% 6% 20% 0% 69%

Coastal Carolina CC  533 21% 21% 20% 0% 11% 10% 16% 0% 63%

College of The Albema 191 21% 28% 26% 0% 5% 4% 16% 0% 75%

Craven CC  290 28% 26% 18% 0% 6% 7% 15% 0% 72%

Davidson County CC  304 21% 23% 20% 0% 8% 11% 17% 0% 64%

Durham TCC  311 34% 23% 12% 0% 6% 9% 16% 0% 68%

Edgecombe CC  184 8% 16% 20% 0% 9% 27% 22% 0% 43%

Fayetteville TCC  565 16% 23% 21% 0% 10% 10% 20% 0% 60%

Forsyth TCC  700 15% 20% 19% 0% 10% 9% 28% 0% 54%

Gaston College  411 18% 31% 20% 0% 5% 6% 11% 7% 70%

Guilford TCC  1180 26% 24% 17% 0% 6% 12% 15% 0% 67%

Halifax CC  121 21% 23% 21% 0% 9% 9% 17% 0% 65%

Haywood CC  118 24% 25% 20% 0% 2% 3% 22% 3% 69%

Isothermal CC  188 20% 25% 31% 0% 6% 3% 15% 0% 76%

James Sprunt CC  98 19% 13% 24% 0% 11% 4% 26% 2% 57%

Johnston CC  264 18% 22% 17% 0% 13% 8% 0% 21% 58%

Lenoir CC  130 10% 15% 18% 0% 15% 12% 28% 2% 43%

Martin CC  42 26% 26% 26% 0% 5% 17% 0% 0% 79%

Mayland CC  35 17% 23% 29% 0% 0% 20% 6% 6% 69%

McDowell TCC  75 71% 13% 3% 0% 1% 0% 12% 0% 87%

Mitchell CC  246 20% 21% 20% 0% 10% 11% 17% 2% 60%

Montgomery CC  63 5% 8% 19% 0% 21% 10% 38% 0% 32%

Nash CC  297 23% 28% 21% 0% 7% 8% 12% 0% 72%

Pamlico CC  23 43% 30% 17% 0% 0% 4% 4% 0% 91%

Piedmont CC  180 23% 27% 21% 0% 8% 3% 8% 9% 71%

Pitt CC  558 9% 17% 18% 0% 12% 8% 35% 0% 44%

Randolph CC  244 24% 23% 19% 0% 9% 13% 13% 0% 66%

Richmond CC  207 17% 23% 24% 0% 8% 10% 17% 1% 64%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  70 29% 39% 23% 0% 0% 0% 9% 1% 90%

Robeson CC  190 18% 23% 16% 0% 8% 16% 19% 0% 56%

Rockingham CC  235 26% 28% 17% 0% 7% 7% 15% 0% 71%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  460 21% 27% 18% 0% 8% 13% 12% 0% 67%

Sampson CC  95 14% 23% 29% 0% 14% 5% 15% 0% 66%

Sandhills CC  262 15% 22% 18% 0% 10% 10% 25% 0% 55%

South Piedmont CC  144 9% 27% 15% 0% 18% 20% 10% 0% 51%

Southeastern CC  93 20% 39% 16% 0% 4% 6% 14% 0% 75%

Southwestern CC  187 25% 20% 22% 0% 6% 12% 15% 0% 67%

Stanly CC  210 19% 28% 26% 0% 7% 7% 14% 0% 72%

Surry CC  196 10% 26% 29% 0% 14% 5% 16% 0% 65%

Tri‐County CC  70 17% 13% 9% 0% 7% 26% 29% 0% 39%

Vance‐Granville CC  147 17% 23% 14% 0% 9% 14% 22% 0% 54%

Wake TCC  1335 17% 27% 20% 0% 8% 9% 16% 3% 64%

Wayne CC  277 19% 25% 22% 0% 11% 4% 19% 0% 66%

Western Piedmont CC  258 28% 26% 16% 0% 5% 3% 22% 0% 70%

Wilkes CC  136 21% 29% 25% 0% 7% 1% 17% 0% 76%

Wilson CC  205 22% 29% 20% 0% 7% 10% 11% 0% 72%

OtherA B C P D F WATTEMPT

28

Page 118: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE D2. DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENT SUCCESS RATE IN COLLEGE‐LEVEL MATH COURSES, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY CREDIT MATH COURSE

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  3109 72% 665 63% 5178 64% 558 60% 195 56% 4234 61% 1947 58% 1078 69%

Alamance CC  174 67% 2 * 109 51% 66 56% 0 * 39 62% 44 57% 46 89%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 180 81% 16 69% 6 83% 7 71% 0 * 208 57% 42 38% 4 *

Beaufort County CC  53 43% 9 89% 0 * 0 * 0 * 24 38% 2 * 29 66%

Bladen CC  16 63% 2 * 76 61% 4 * 0 * 26 54% 0 * 22 73%

Blue Ridge CC  0 * 13 62% 74 81% 12 92% 0 * 15 67% 14 100% 8 38%

Brunswick CC  0 * 0 * 69 61% 5 80% 0 * 14 50% 21 57% 0 *

Caldwell CC & TI  119 77% 8 75% 63 59% 8 63% 0 * 0 * 136 73% 3 *

Cape Fear CC  47 79% 97 61% 184 57% 0 * 29 48% 0 * 257 56% 61 70%

Carteret CC  16 81% 0 * 33 52% 0 * 0 * 35 71% 36 64% 20 90%

Catawba Valley CC  140 75% 20 40% 179 49% 22 59% 0 * 59 54% 21 29% 17 41%

Central Carolina CC  0 * 9 44% 109 79% 6 67% 0 * 32 56% 0 * 11 64%

Central Piedmont CC  219 82% 44 57% 301 76% 0 * 42 57% 644 70% 133 59% 5 40%

Cleveland CC  6 83% 10 70% 95 67% 7 57% 0 * 89 69% 9 100% 12 58%

Coastal Carolina CC  60 78% 10 60% 168 60% 22 18% 0 * 219 66% 39 54% 15 67%

College of The Albema 69 65% 0 * 0 * 0 * 2 * 103 83% 10 70% 7 71%

Craven CC  62 87% 24 88% 0 * 2 * 0 * 168 66% 30 67% 4 *

Davidson County CC  17 76% 6 100% 206 62% 9 89% 11 55% 35 69% 5 20% 15 60%

Durham TCC  33 94% 16 88% 69 72% 70 57% 0 * 14 64% 98 63% 11 64%

Edgecombe CC  0 * 3 * 76 39% 1 * 0 * 75 40% 0 * 29 59%

Fayetteville TCC  278 69% 0 * 54 69% 14 79% 0 * 192 49% 22 18% 5 60%

Forsyth TCC  297 70% 31 52% 82 46% 0 * 23 48% 220 35% 6 50% 41 56%

Gaston College  0 * 32 53% 111 83% 25 52% 2 * 201 67% 22 59% 18 89%

Guilford TCC  178 80% 55 44% 298 69% 51 51% 0 * 304 64% 89 74% 205 62%

Halifax CC  54 50% 0 * 30 97% 4 * 0 * 20 35% 0 * 13 92%

Haywood CC  0 * 2 * 104 67% 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 10 100%

Isothermal CC  111 77% 0 * 37 73% 8 88% 0 * 22 68% 0 * 10 70%

James Sprunt CC  62 58% 0 * 24 54% 0 * 0 * 0 * 9 44% 3 *

Johnston CC  0 * 5 100% 141 57% 4 * 0 * 88 59% 24 38% 2 *

Lenoir CC  21 81% 9 78% 0 * 3 * 0 * 96 31% 0 * 1 *

Martin CC  20 80% 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 17 76% 0 * 5 80%

Mayland CC  0 * 0 * 28 68% 1 * 0 * 3 * 3 * 0 *

McDowell TCC  0 * 3 * 64 86% 3 * 0 * 1 * 0 * 4 *

Mitchell CC  45 78% 7 43% 83 52% 14 43% 0 * 81 63% 16 63% 0 *

Montgomery CC  0 * 5 20% 45 31% 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 13 38%

Nash CC  0 * 22 59% 188 77% 0 * 3 * 0 * 80 64% 4 *

Pamlico CC  0 * 4 * 3 * 0 * 0 * 14 93% 0 * 2 *

Piedmont CC  32 75% 0 * 53 70% 0 * 11 64% 0 * 30 70% 54 72%

Pitt CC  164 53% 0 * 50 50% 0 * 26 42% 287 38% 0 * 30 50%

Randolph CC  9 67% 2 * 149 67% 3 * 0 * 30 43% 3 * 48 73%

Richmond CC  0 * 0 * 170 59% 0 * 10 100% 0 * 22 91% 5 60%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  54 91% 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 16 88% 0 * 0 *

Robeson CC  32 81% 12 58% 109 50% 2 * 0 * 22 50% 8 38% 5 80%

Rockingham CC  69 75% 0 * 1 * 12 42% 0 * 0 * 92 66% 61 77%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  42 90% 27 74% 203 67% 25 52% 0 * 89 56% 67 69% 7 57%

Sampson CC  25 88% 0 * 29 41% 0 * 0 * 38 68% 3 * 0 *

Sandhills CC  19 63% 7 86% 146 51% 7 71% 0 * 0 * 75 53% 8 63%

South Piedmont CC  0 * 0 * 106 56% 7 57% 0 * 0 * 31 35% 0 *

Southeastern CC  0 * 1 * 27 74% 12 75% 0 * 46 72% 4 * 3 *

Southwestern CC  10 60% 2 * 109 64% 3 * 0 * 17 53% 11 73% 35 77%

Stanly CC  0 * 13 54% 185 75% 0 * 4 * 0 * 8 75% 0 *

Surry CC  75 55% 0 * 42 76% 26 81% 0 * 27 63% 11 64% 14 64%

Tri‐County CC  3 * 1 * 48 33% 0 * 0 * 0 * 0 * 14 57%

Vance‐Granville CC  48 63% 4 * 4 * 27 56% 0 * 46 46% 8 63% 10 40%

Wake TCC  141 66% 90 60% 236 67% 57 67% 0 * 390 77% 357 45% 64 77%

Wayne CC  84 70% 16 88% 20 35% 6 33% 0 * 106 60% 20 80% 25 88%

Western Piedmont CC  0 * 21 62% 147 67% 0 * 28 64% 36 81% 25 80% 1 *

Wilkes CC  23 78% 4 * 53 79% 0 * 4 * 22 64% 0 * 30 83%

Wilson CC  2 * 1 * 182 73% 3 * 0 * 4 * 4 * 9 44%

* Less than 5 students

MAT‐161 MAT‐171 OTHERMAT‐115 MAT‐121 MAT‐140 MAT‐151 MAT‐155

29

Page 119: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

   

30

Page 120: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE E1. FIRST YEAR PROGRESSION, FALL 2011 COHORT ‐ BY ETHNICITY AND GENDER  

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  4,999 58% 3,667 49% 10,791 76% 9,004 69% 1,172 76% 948 69% 1,986 72% 1,599 66%

Alamance CC  92 64% 57 49% 228 72% 197 66% 41 93% 20 70% 24 75% 21 81%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 48 54% 23 48% 355 78% 320 69% 23 57% 17 65% 33 82% 26 73%

Beaufort County CC  56 64% 34 32% 98 68% 76 55% 2 * 1 * 5 100% 5 60%

Bladen CC  57 44% 31 35% 54 67% 38 63% 0 * 5 40% 16 69% 9 44%

Blue Ridge CC  7 43% 3 * 132 80% 111 69% 13 85% 13 92% 12 83% 16 69%

Brunswick CC  19 63% 21 62% 91 84% 86 63% 3 * 5 60% 7 86% 8 75%

Caldwell CC & TI  26 46% 40 50% 262 71% 281 70% 10 70% 8 50% 18 83% 10 70%

Cape Fear CC  118 60% 97 63% 527 76% 508 71% 41 88% 19 74% 44 77% 48 73%

Carteret CC  15 73% 7 43% 120 77% 93 60% 3 * 6 67% 4 * 4 *

Catawba Valley CC  58 60% 36 58% 308 78% 262 61% 28 82% 24 79% 51 80% 56 66%

Central Carolina CC  74 45% 48 58% 181 73% 129 65% 42 79% 34 62% 16 69% 12 67%

Central Piedmont CC  406 65% 335 54% 419 81% 475 74% 112 71% 113 61% 140 79% 138 78%

Cleveland CC  79 51% 49 49% 180 72% 147 68% 5 80% 5 60% 11 64% 7 57%

Coastal Carolina CC  67 69% 46 57% 254 75% 211 74% 36 78% 20 60% 23 70% 7 71%

College of The Albema 70 71% 49 49% 197 76% 135 71% 3 * 9 100% 16 75% 6 33%

Craven CC  62 60% 37 51% 118 80% 120 61% 6 67% 14 79% 26 65% 23 65%

Davidson County CC  38 63% 39 54% 291 72% 187 81% 19 89% 15 80% 18 89% 14 71%

Durham TCC  125 51% 95 43% 76 72% 79 65% 24 71% 31 65% 44 84% 25 72%

Edgecombe CC  160 53% 93 39% 58 67% 39 67% 0 * 3 * 8 63% 0 *

Fayetteville TCC  452 53% 284 39% 325 73% 184 66% 85 74% 58 66% 111 67% 51 53%

Forsyth TCC  257 61% 208 52% 436 76% 438 69% 69 75% 54 80% 49 73% 56 73%

Gaston College  78 71% 54 56% 430 83% 334 72% 30 83% 27 70% 31 90% 30 77%

Guilford TCC  491 61% 391 51% 365 77% 409 67% 66 68% 59 63% 125 77% 109 66%

Halifax CC  79 63% 63 35% 37 84% 32 63% 0 * 2 * 30 60% 15 67%

Haywood CC  2 * 3 * 157 75% 126 63% 5 60% 6 67% 8 75% 8 50%

Isothermal CC  27 56% 14 57% 163 72% 115 67% 9 89% 9 78% 4 * 8 75%

James Sprunt CC  72 76% 29 55% 53 81% 26 77% 4 * 3 * 1 * 2 *

Johnston CC  73 48% 76 50% 272 80% 202 73% 37 78% 19 84% 25 72% 17 76%

Lenoir CC  95 56% 85 42% 134 73% 126 81% 13 69% 7 71% 8 88% 8 63%

Martin CC  41 71% 21 81% 19 79% 16 63% 3 * 0 * 21 67% 6 67%

Mayland CC  1 * 0 * 81 77% 72 71% 1 * 0 * 18 78% 9 89%

McDowell TCC  3 * 2 * 96 69% 63 71% 4 * 2 * 3 * 2 *

Mitchell CC  77 52% 48 40% 282 78% 143 69% 27 67% 12 75% 21 67% 12 75%

Montgomery CC  9 33% 7 57% 28 86% 35 83% 4 * 2 * 0 * 4 *

Nash CC  105 53% 72 46% 152 70% 127 70% 9 67% 18 78% 19 53% 13 62%

Pamlico CC  4 * 4 * 21 52% 7 86% 0 * 0 * 1 * 0 *

Piedmont CC  55 60% 37 62% 92 79% 83 80% 6 100% 2 * 4 * 0 *

Pitt CC  142 65% 78 45% 137 78% 119 69% 9 100% 14 64% 344 70% 322 60%

Randolph CC  24 58% 10 60% 208 77% 127 65% 18 67% 14 71% 71 69% 33 61%

Richmond CC  82 63% 65 74% 87 78% 53 72% 3 * 6 100% 23 74% 20 85%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  45 64% 40 63% 17 76% 12 67% 2 * 1 * 2 * 1 *

Robeson CC  82 45% 40 35% 56 61% 24 46% 9 44% 2 * 129 54% 74 45%

Rockingham CC  47 47% 57 58% 158 78% 131 68% 10 90% 7 57% 4 * 5 80%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  120 47% 105 42% 402 69% 306 63% 44 68% 27 67% 29 66% 19 74%

Sampson CC  43 58% 17 53% 79 70% 28 71% 20 85% 10 80% 12 75% 12 75%

Sandhills CC  95 51% 70 43% 205 76% 160 71% 23 87% 14 64% 41 63% 24 58%

South Piedmont CC  30 50% 20 40% 113 71% 45 51% 12 75% 6 33% 5 80% 9 56%

Southeastern CC  69 51% 40 25% 91 69% 82 70% 4 * 0 * 14 71% 13 77%

Southwestern CC  0 * 2 * 139 77% 88 70% 7 100% 3 * 23 74% 16 56%

Stanly CC  27 56% 20 30% 207 78% 129 62% 8 75% 14 71% 19 58% 26 69%

Surry CC  8 75% 11 45% 181 76% 145 66% 17 88% 16 88% 16 69% 9 33%

Tri‐County CC  0 * 0 * 104 85% 89 69% 0 * 0 * 8 100% 2 *

Vance‐Granville CC  166 55% 88 36% 215 73% 163 72% 18 89% 16 69% 24 58% 9 56%

Wake TCC  305 58% 326 46% 641 77% 700 68% 133 71% 100 65% 184 79% 176 71%

Wayne CC  106 65% 75 57% 186 80% 178 78% 27 78% 22 68% 15 73% 17 76%

Western Piedmont CC  20 70% 17 41% 169 74% 154 71% 6 67% 10 80% 20 80% 19 74%

Wilkes CC  16 56% 8 50% 243 76% 197 73% 13 62% 16 81% 4 * 0 *

Wilson CC  74 61% 40 43% 61 85% 42 69% 6 50% 8 75% 4 * 8 63%

* Less than 5 students

OTHER MALEOTHER FEMALEAFRICAN‐AMER 

FEMALE

AFRICAN‐

AMERIC MALE

HISPANIC 

FEMALEHISPANIC MALE

CAUCASIAN 

FEMALE

CAUCASIAN 

MALE

31

Page 121: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F1. CURRICULUM {¢¦59b¢ COMPLETION, FALL 2006 COHORT ‐ BY PROGRAM AREA

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  282 49% 11,620 40% 65 49% 4,170 38% 413 43% 1,007 44%

Alamance CC  9 67% 164 48% 7 14% 191 36% 19 32% 30 47%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 0 * 206 42% 2 * 87 31% 0 * 21 48%

Beaufort County CC  2 * 37 30% 0 * 10 50% 0 * 2 *

Bladen CC  0 * 98 40% 0 * 23 43% 0 * 13 15%

Blue Ridge CC  5 20% 190 32% 1 * 52 19% 0 * 10 40%

Brunswick CC  7 29% 76 45% 0 * 24 25% 0 * 0 *

Caldwell CC & TI  8 63% 250 52% 0 * 75 45% 0 * 5 20%

Cape Fear CC  27 59% 563 48% 4 * 119 39% 13 46% 39 46%

Carteret CC  7 71% 84 42% 0 * 39 23% 10 50% 0 *

Catawba Valley CC  14 36% 379 35% 0 * 105 38% 23 48% 15 40%

Central Carolina CC  10 30% 143 43% 0 * 114 44% 23 22% 7 57%

Central Piedmont CC  11 9% 1,090 41% 0 * 235 29% 47 26% 47 36%

Cleveland CC  0 * 149 30% 3 * 75 36% 0 * 24 29%

Coastal Carolina CC  0 * 573 41% 0 * 65 40% 0 * 15 53%

College of The Albema 0 * 193 40% 0 * 43 37% 3 * 9 67%

Craven CC  0 * 318 40% 1 * 53 47% 0 * 3 *

Davidson County CC  0 * 108 50% 3 * 44 52% 2 * 6 67%

Durham TCC  0 * 240 38% 0 * 71 44% 0 * 3 *

Edgecombe CC  0 * 17 53% 0 * 16 38% 0 * 3 *

Fayetteville TCC  3 * 562 32% 3 * 196 42% 10 20% 24 50%

Forsyth TCC  2 * 201 46% 5 80% 112 46% 11 73% 20 35%

Gaston College  0 * 382 34% 0 * 127 45% 0 * 24 42%

Guilford TCC  8 13% 741 40% 3 * 278 44% 42 36% 47 40%

Halifax CC  0 * 101 37% 0 * 37 24% 6 67% 1 *

Haywood CC  30 43% 57 40% 0 * 23 30% 5 80% 7 71%

Isothermal CC  0 * 82 46% 0 * 42 38% 9 56% 20 35%

James Sprunt CC  10 60% 24 50% 0 * 11 27% 4 * 7 43%

Johnston CC  4 * 69 48% 0 * 19 47% 3 * 22 27%

Lenoir CC  6 33% 130 43% 3 * 45 27% 4 * 0 *

Martin CC  10 80% 19 42% 0 * 28 36% 0 * 7 29%

Mayland CC  31 48% 35 46% 0 * 25 24% 0 * 31 45%

McDowell TCC  0 * 67 25% 0 * 29 28% 8 50% 18 61%

Mitchell CC  0 * 177 40% 4 * 60 35% 1 * 14 36%

Montgomery CC  12 58% 28 32% 0 * 50 38% 12 83% 7 29%

Nash CC  0 * 34 32% 0 * 24 38% 0 * 4 *

Pamlico CC  3 * 8 25% 0 * 17 59% 0 * 22 86%

Piedmont CC  2 * 36 42% 4 * 64 34% 14 43% 23 43%

Pitt CC  0 * 335 44% 7 57% 155 49% 16 38% 39 23%

Randolph CC  0 * 73 44% 6 50% 73 45% 37 38% 9 33%

Richmond CC  0 * 95 28% 0 * 38 34% 0 * 8 13%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  0 * 34 38% 0 * 43 44% 1 * 35 60%

Robeson CC  0 * 184 30% 0 * 42 31% 0 * 56 46%

Rockingham CC  0 * 179 49% 0 * 50 30% 3 * 17 41%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  1 * 278 39% 3 * 235 32% 0 * 32 44%

Sampson CC  6 33% 68 32% 0 * 16 44% 0 * 2 *

Sandhills CC  3 * 154 46% 0 * 63 40% 0 * 1 *

South Piedmont CC  0 * 139 38% 0 * 84 40% 9 22% 37 43%

Southeastern CC  8 38% 147 37% 2 * 20 30% 0 * 40 35%

Southwestern CC  0 * 97 46% 1 * 66 36% 9 78% 4 *

Stanly CC  0 * 99 33% 0 * 51 43% 15 47% 12 83%

Surry CC  12 25% 197 52% 0 * 69 51% 5 60% 11 64%

Tri‐County CC  1 * 55 35% 0 * 29 17% 0 * 7 57%

Vance‐Granville CC  0 * 278 28% 0 * 108 41% 0 * 61 49%

Wake TCC  0 * 912 41% 3 * 192 29% 23 43% 47 40%

Wayne CC  19 53% 316 50% 0 * 86 38% 1 * 7 43%

Western Piedmont CC  7 86% 139 50% 0 * 40 38% 11 45% 14 14%

Wilkes CC  4 * 156 46% 0 * 38 26% 14 43% 11 64%

Wilson CC  0 * 54 37% 0 * 44 25% 0 * 7 57%

* Less than 5 students

CONSTRUCTION 

TECHNOLOGIES

AGRICULTURAL AND 

NATURAL RES TECHARTS AND SCIENCES

BIOLOGICAL AND 

CHEMICAL TECH

BUSINESS 

TECHNOLOGIES

COMMERCIAL AND 

ARTISTIC PROD TECH

32

Page 122: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE F2. CURRICULUM {¢¦59b¢ COMPLETION, FALL 2006 COHORT ‐ BY PROGRAM AREA

Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success Students Success

System Totals  720 36% 1,964 73% 726 39% 5,103 34% 1,005 40%

Alamance CC  1 * 78 51% 32 41% 180 31% 16 31%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 28 25% 75 73% 18 11% 141 32% 15 33%

Beaufort County CC  5 60% 15 87% 5 40% 22 36% 2 *

Bladen CC  0 * 4 * 8 13% 42 36% 1 *

Blue Ridge CC  6 17% 8 100% 6 33% 60 37% 17 35%

Brunswick CC  2 * 15 73% 0 * 42 33% 0 *

Caldwell CC & TI  8 25% 32 97% 2 * 146 32% 72 33%

Cape Fear CC  46 48% 45 98% 18 44% 97 43% 49 57%

Carteret CC  0 * 20 65% 1 * 67 34% 6 67%

Catawba Valley CC  40 45% 41 88% 34 71% 92 39% 59 19%

Central Carolina CC  26 42% 116 38% 112 14% 201 39% 43 58%

Central Piedmont CC  64 25% 75 59% 15 40% 163 28% 77 22%

Cleveland CC  5 40% 9 89% 21 43% 76 29% 19 26%

Coastal Carolina CC  5 80% 34 85% 8 75% 90 41% 29 76%

College of The Albema 13 38% 8 100% 11 82% 70 59% 1 *

Craven CC  15 13% 22 91% 15 60% 41 41% 19 16%

Davidson County CC  9 22% 56 64% 0 * 87 33% 23 74%

Durham TCC  13 23% 23 57% 11 18% 44 36% 6 33%

Edgecombe CC  0 * 15 67% 6 33% 51 12% 6 17%

Fayetteville TCC  15 33% 60 95% 0 * 162 42% 35 14%

Forsyth TCC  24 46% 63 75% 16 44% 173 21% 25 44%

Gaston College  29 34% 46 74% 19 21% 72 18% 12 25%

Guilford TCC  65 29% 118 71% 46 33% 183 46% 141 49%

Halifax CC  4 * 14 64% 19 53% 27 41% 12 25%

Haywood CC  7 29% 17 76% 6 50% 88 23% 15 47%

Isothermal CC  7 14% 23 91% 9 44% 83 24% 0 *

James Sprunt CC  0 * 4 * 4 * 50 44% 3 *

Johnston CC  0 * 14 100% 5 100% 62 34% 29 31%

Lenoir CC  16 31% 23 61% 6 50% 45 49% 15 53%

Martin CC  0 * 11 55% 0 * 28 43% 3 *

Mayland CC  16 81% 11 91% 12 100% 44 32% 7 57%

McDowell TCC  1 * 33 55% 8 38% 41 32% 10 40%

Mitchell CC  29 14% 28 57% 0 * 133 20% 0 *

Montgomery CC  2 * 13 69% 0 * 38 61% 4 *

Nash CC  2 * 14 64% 17 6% 17 6% 0 *

Pamlico CC  0 * 9 44% 0 * 15 47% 1 *

Piedmont CC  0 * 35 71% 30 53% 50 44% 0 *

Pitt CC  28 39% 71 83% 14 50% 114 39% 16 25%

Randolph CC  0 * 16 100% 13 46% 105 33% 20 30%

Richmond CC  11 27% 46 43% 6 17% 41 49% 0 *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  4 * 15 60% 9 44% 39 44% 1 *

Robeson CC  0 * 34 91% 0 * 85 32% 0 *

Rockingham CC  1 * 33 100% 26 65% 98 35% 0 *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  21 48% 23 100% 14 43% 229 24% 30 23%

Sampson CC  0 * 6 100% 6 33% 30 37% 0 *

Sandhills CC  17 35% 54 61% 0 * 183 27% 34 35%

South Piedmont CC  0 * 54 87% 0 * 59 49% 4 *

Southeastern CC  6 33% 26 100% 11 27% 28 43% 1 *

Southwestern CC  11 27% 37 78% 2 * 79 38% 4 *

Stanly CC  21 52% 52 85% 7 29% 107 36% 1 *

Surry CC  7 43% 23 74% 15 40% 133 27% 19 26%

Tri‐County CC  0 * 15 47% 3 * 23 30% 0 *

Vance‐Granville CC  4 * 36 86% 20 30% 200 26% 13 23%

Wake TCC  54 31% 63 78% 26 35% 217 30% 27 48%

Wayne CC  8 63% 34 82% 18 28% 74 50% 29 34%

Western Piedmont CC  12 50% 50 62% 8 25% 100 38% 1 *

Wilkes CC  11 18% 40 63% 8 50% 56 25% 24 75%

Wilson CC  1 * 9 100% 0 * 80 36% 9 78%

* Less than 5 students

PUBLIC SERVICE 

TECHNOLOGIES

TRANSPORT SYSTEMS 

TECHNOLOGIES

ENGINEERING 

TECHNOLOGIESHEALTH SCIENCES

INDUSTRIAL 

TECHNOLOGIES

33

Page 123: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G1. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY EXAM

TESTED TESTED TESTED TESTED

11‐12 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 11‐12 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 11‐12 11‐12 10‐11 11‐12 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  1,407 84% 85% 87% 87% 227 92% 84% 91% 92% 146 88% 93% 25 80% 80% 81% 85%

Alamance CC  22 91% 86% 83% 81% * * * * * * * * * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 62 85% 96% 92% 98% 16 94% 94% 90% 94% 6 83% * * * * *

Beaufort County CC  23 83% 78% 79% 88% * * * * * * * * * *

Bladen CC  8 38% * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  13 92% 90% 89% 86% * * * * * * * * * *

Brunswick CC  23 74% 69% 76% 80% * * * * * * * * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  25 76% 68% 70% 86% * * * * 5 60% 100% 6 67% * 64% 83%

Cape Fear CC  93 73% 79% 84% 85% 11 100% 82% 100% 100% * * * * *

Carteret CC  14 93% 87% 85% 76% * * * * 6 100% 85% * * * *

Catawba Valley CC  20 70% 71% 88% 67% 15 100% 94% 94% 95% * * * * * *

Central Carolina CC  30 97% 95% 93% 91% 8 88% 82% 100% 100% 2 * * * * * *

Central Piedmont CC  22 95% 100% 100% 95% 29 100% 84% 96% 85% * * * * * *

Cleveland CC  13 85% 84% 89% 63% * * * * * * * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  33 76% 79% 87% 74% 11 91% 86% 90% 90% 11 73% * * * * *

College of The Albema 38 68% 100% 100% 96% * * * * * * * * * *

Craven CC  26 92% 90% 88% 87% * * * * * * * * * *

Davidson County CC  34 82% 80% 79% 83% * * * * 5 80% * * * * *

Durham TCC  63 90% 94% 89% 88% * * * * * * * * * *

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  32 78% 84% 84% 100% 26 92% 75% 100% 89% * * 2 * * * *

Forsyth TCC  40 78% 95% 91% 87% 11 82% 82% * * 8 100% 95% * * * *

Gaston College  47 98% 90% 90% 87% * * * * 17 100% 90% * * * *

Guilford TCC  36 89% 96% 92% 93% 27 85% 85% 97% 89% * * * * * *

Halifax CC  13 62% 64% 73% 67% 20 95% 77% 75% 93% * * * * * *

Haywood CC  6 67% 75% 72% 85% * * * * 2 * * * * * *

Isothermal CC  9 44% 74% 76% 96% * * * * * * * * * *

James Sprunt CC  * * * 94% * * * * * * * * * *

Johnston CC  33 100% 95% 94% 94% * * * * 10 70% * 5 80% * * *

Lenoir CC  17 88% 77% 89% 89% * * * * 3 * * * * * *

Martin CC  * 81% * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  14 100% 82% 86% 92% * * * * * * * * * *

McDowell TCC  15 93% * * 93% * * * * * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  39 90% 88% 88% 88% * * * * * * * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * 94% 71% * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  35 80% 87% 95% 100% * * * * * * * * * *

Pamlico CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pitt CC  42 95% 97% 93% 90% * * * * 11 100% 100% 12 83% * 92% *

Randolph CC  33 91% 82% 84% 87% * * * * * * * * * *

Richmond CC  * 83% 100% * * * * * * * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Robeson CC  44 89% 89% 84% 85% * * * * * * * * * *

Rockingham CC  31 74% 88% 72% 95% * * * * * * * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  62 69% 82% 84% 95% * * * * * * * * * *

Sampson CC  14 86% 65% 91% 91% * * * * * * * * * *

Sandhills CC  7 43% 67% 89% 88% * * * * 25 92% 90% * * * *

South Piedmont CC  25 92% 90% 83% 89% * * * * 17 76% 91% * * * *

Southeastern CC  19 68% * 60% 82% * * * * * * * * * *

Southwestern CC  9 100% 100% 93% 94% * * * * 11 91% * * * * *

Stanly CC  16 88% 83% 80% 82% * * * * * * * * * *

Surry CC  38 97% 84% 92% 90% * * * * * * * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  32 91% 92% 91% 95% * * * * * * * * * *

Wake TCC  42 86% 95% 91% 88% 23 83% 100% 79% 100% 3 * 100% * * * *

Wayne CC  10 100% 95% 97% 94% 30 90% 76% 82% 95% * * * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  39 92% 89% 87% 98% * * * * * * * * * *

Wilkes CC  29 72% 91% 95% 94% * * * * 4 * * * * * *

Wilson CC  17 94% 72% 75% 89% * * * * * * * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12), Less than 10 ('09‐'11)

% PASSING

NUC. MED. TECH.

% PASSING

BLET MASSAGE & BODY WORK

% PASSING

DENTAL HYGIENE

% PASSING

34

Page 124: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G2. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2011‐2012 ‐ BY EXAM

TESTED TESTED TESTED TESTED

11‐12 11‐12 10‐11 11‐12 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 11‐12 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 11‐12 11‐12 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09

System Totals  5 40% * 37 84% 96% 76% 97% 305 97% 96% 99% 97% 172 75% 82% 80% 72%

Alamance CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  * * * * * * 19 100% 100% 100% 100% * * 84% 85%

Beaufort County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Bladen CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * * * * * * * 3 * * * *

Brunswick CC  * * * * * * * * * * 12 75% * 88% 74%

Caldwell CC & TI  * * * * * * 7 100% 91% * * * * * *

Cape Fear CC  * * * * * * 18 100% 100% 100% 93% 3 * * 83% *

Carteret CC  * * * * * * 18 94% 94% 100% 100% 2 * * 33% 46%

Catawba Valley CC  * * * * * * 11 100% * * * 2 * * * *

Central Carolina CC  * * * * * * * * * * 3 * * 70% *

Central Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * 39 85% 90% 95% 90%

Cleveland CC  * * * * * * 16 100% 100% * 100% * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

College of The Albemarle  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Craven CC  * * * * * * * * * * 9 67% * * 45%

Davidson County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Durham TCC  5 40% * * * * * * * * * 20 75% 96% 84% 73%

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * * 18 94% 94% 100% 100% * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  * * * * * * 20 95% 94% 100% 100% * * * *

Forsyth TCC  * * 7 86% * * * 20 100% 95% 100% 100% * * * *

Gaston College  * * * * * * * * * * 2 * * * *

Guilford TCC  * * * * * * * * * * 30 67% 76% 86% 71%

Halifax CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Isothermal CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

James Sprunt CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Johnston CC  * * * * * * 23 100% 100% 100% 100% 8 38% * * *

Lenoir CC  * * * * * * 7 100% * * * * * * *

Martin CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

McDowell TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  * * * * * * * * * * 1 * * * 81%

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pamlico CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Pitt CC  * * 20 95% 100% 72% 100% 28 100% 100% 94% 100% 4 * * * *

Randolph CC  * * * * * * 17 76% 100% 100% 89% * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * * * * 8 100% * * * * * * *

Rockingham CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  * * * * * * 15 100% 94% 100% 94% 8 75% * * *

Sampson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Sandhills CC  * * * * * * 9 100% * 100% 100% * * * *

South Piedmont CC  * * 10 60% * * * * * * * * * * *

Southeastern CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Southwestern CC  * * * * * * 12 92% 91% 100% * 10 100% * * *

Stanly CC  * * * * * * 6 100% 93% 94% 86% 5 80% * * *

Surry CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  * * * * * * 17 100% 96% 97% 100% * * * *

Wake TCC  * * * * * * 16 100% 100% 100% 100% * * * *

Wayne CC  * * * * * * * * * * 1 * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * * * * * * * 10 60% 83% * *

Wilson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12), Less than 10 ('09‐'11)

OPTICIANRY

% PASSING % PASSING

REAL ESTATE SALES

% PASSING % PASSING

RADIOGRAPHYRADIATION THERAPY

35

Page 125: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G3. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012 ‐ BY EXAM

TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST

'12 '12 '11 '10 '09 '12 '12 '11 '10 '09 '12 '12 '11 '10 '09 '12 '12 '11 '10 '09 '12 '12 '11 '10 '09

System Totals  194 95% 96% 96% 96% 724 93% 94% 95% 92% 166 95% 96% 84% 85% 39 90% 67% 81% 85% 125 89% 85% 79% 89%

Alamance CC  7 86% 100% * 91% 19 79% 87% * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 4 * * * * 16 100% * * * 18 100% 100% 79% * 1 * * * * 11 100% * 70% *

Beaufort County CC  * * * * 8 75% * 100% * * * * * 1 * * * * 2 * * * *

Bladen CC  1 * * * * 11 73% * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  11 100% * 100% 100% 10 100% * * * 4 * * * * * * * * 5 100% * * *

Brunswick CC  3 * * * * 5 100% 88% * * * * * * 2 * * * * * * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  11 82% 100% * * 7 86% * * * * * * * * * * * 4 * * * *

Cape Fear CC  31 90% 81% 100% 100% 30 97% 92% * 100% 11 100% 100% * * * * * * * * * *

Carteret CC  4 * * * * 6 100% 100% * * * * * * 5 100% * * * * * * *

Catawba Valley CC  * * * * 11 100% 100% * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Central Carolina CC  10 90% 100% 100% 93% 55 87% 91% 91% * 8 88% 100% 79% 83% 5 100% * * 83% * * * 92%

Central Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Cleveland CC  10 100% * * * 11 82% 100% * * 4 * * * * * * * * * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  * * * * 27 100% 97% 95% 94% * * * * 4 * * * * 6 100% * * *

College of The Albema 9 100% * * 95% 5 80% * * * * * * * * * * * 1 * * * *

Craven CC  5 100% * * 92% 14 71% 100% * * 9 100% * * * * * * * * * * *

Davidson County CC  2 * * * * 28 96% 100% 96% 100% 15 93% 100% * * * * * * * * * *

Durham TCC  * * * * * * * * 15 93% * * * * * * * * * * *

Edgecombe CC  1 * * * * 8 75% * * * 3 * * * * 1 * * * * 1 * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  * * * * 35 97% 96% 100% * 16 100% 100% * * * * * * 27 89% * * *

Forsyth TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Gaston College  * * * * 18 89% * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Guilford TCC  4 * * * * 13 92% 100% 93% 91% * * * * * * * * * * * *

Halifax CC  2 * * * * 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * * * 10 100% 100% 100% * * 83% * * * * * * 3 * * * *

Isothermal CC  3 * 100% * * 20 100% * * 100% * * * * * * * * 6 100% * * *

James Sprunt CC  1 * * * * 7 57% * * * * * * * 4 * * * * 6 83% * * *

Johnston CC  15 93% 100% * 100% 18 94% 94% * * * * * * 4 * * * * * * * *

Lenoir CC  9 100% 100% 91% 92% 8 75% * * * 3 * * * * 1 * * * * 19 79% 62% * *

Martin CC  * * * * 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  2 * * * * 7 100% 90% * 80% 1 * * * * * * * * * * * *

McDowell TCC  3 * * * * 15 100% 100% * * 5 100% * * * 2 * * * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  * * * * 26 96% 95% * 100% 7 86% * * * * * * * * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  1 * * * * 10 100% * * * * * * * * * * * 5 60% * * *

Pamlico CC  * * * * 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  3 * * * * 9 89% * * * * * * * 1 * * * * * * * *

Pitt CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Randolph CC  1 * * * * 11 100% * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * 5 0% * * * * * * * * * * * 4 * * * *

Robeson CC  1 * * * * 15 100% 81% * * * * * * * * * * * * 73% *

Rockingham CC  2 * * * * 10 100% * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  6 100% 94% 93% * 40 95% 91% 98% 96% 18 94% 100% 100% 89% 3 * * * 89% 4 * * * 79%

Sampson CC  * * * * 7 100% * * * * * * * 1 * * * * * * * *

Sandhills CC  15 93% 82% * * 17 100% 77% * * * * * * 1 * * * * 3 * * * *

South Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Southeastern CC  1 * * * * 1 * * * * 2 * * * * * * * * * * * *

Southwestern CC  * * * * 23 100% 100% 94% 79% * * * * * * * * * * * *

Stanly CC  1 * * * 100% 46 96% 93% * 85% 5 100% * * * 3 * * * * 15 93% 85% * *

Surry CC  * * * * 27 96% 100% 100% 100% * * * * * * * * * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * * * * 14 86% 94% * * 4 * * * * * * * * 3 * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  15 100% 93% * * 15 93% 88% 95% * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wake TCC  * * * * 19 100% * * * 18 94% 100% 90% * * * * * * * * *

Wayne CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Wilson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12), Less than 10 ('09‐'11)

COSMETIC ARTS

APPRENTICE COSMETOLOGY ESTHETICIAN

% PASSING% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING

INSTRUCTOR

% PASSING

MANICURIST

36

Page 126: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G4. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012 ‐ BY EXAM

TESTE TESTE TESTE TESTE

'12 '12 '11 '10 '09 '12 '12 '11 '10 '09 '12 '12 '11 '10 '09 '12 '12 '11 '10 '09

System Totals  9 89% * 88% * 3,154 79% 82% 85% 83% 436 64% 66% 67% 64% 598 91% 90% 80% 71%

Alamance CC  * * * * 89 67% 77% 97% 93% 7 71% 42% 45% 73% 15 87% * * 50%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  * * * * 82 84% 94% 88% 95% 27 67% 88% 82% 84% 22 95% 100% 89% *

Beaufort County CC  * * * * 24 50% 41% 69% 88% 19 47% 20% * 42% * * * *

Bladen CC  * * * * 27 59% 83% 79% * 13 69% 63% 81% * 3 * 74% 63% *

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * 27 89% 90% 92% 75% 2 * 73% 61% * 10 90% * * *

Brunswick CC  * * * * 38 87% 93% 93% 84% 9 44% 70% 62% 80% 6 100% * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  * * * * 64 81% 75% 87% 81% 3 * 50% 60% * 35 71% 82% 85% 77%

Cape Fear CC  * * * * 111 90% 91% 95% 94% 7 100% 55% 87% * 12 100% 100% * 89%

Carteret CC  * * * * 58 67% 68% 75% 81% 19 42% * 64% 53% 2 * * * *

Catawba Valley CC  * * * * 82 76% 81% 75% 60% 16 81% 83% 80% 55% 23 91% * * *

Central Carolina CC  * * * * 59 59% 71% 67% 76% * * 67% * 8 100% * * 36%

Central Piedmont CC  * * * * 244 94% 91% 95% 94% * * * * * * * *

Cleveland CC  * * * * 69 77% 84% 81% 71% * 50% 44% 59% 23 96% 93% 88% 100%

Coastal Carolina CC  * * * * 73 97% 98% 97% 91% 9 100% * 92% * 25 100% 100% 85% *

College of The Albemarle  * * * * 39 77% 84% 79% 79% 15 60% 76% 40% 62% 2 * 75% 100% *

Craven CC  * * * * 44 75% 89% 73% 75% 22 68% * * * 6 83% * * *

Davidson County CC  * * * * 51 98% 93% 95% 99% 9 100% 60% 94% * 19 89% 100% 83% 50%

Durham TCC  * * * * 126 94% 99% 94% 87% 7 100% 82% 73% 94% 16 100% * 56% 67%

Edgecombe CC  * * * * 20 70% * * 93% 1 * * * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  * * * * 90 92% 93% 99% 90% * * * * 45 91% 100% 100% 100%

Forsyth TCC  * * * * 101 91% 90% 88% 95% 5 100% * * * 2 * * * *

Gaston College  * * * * 90 82% 88% 88% 85% 10 100% * * * 11 100% 100% 92% 70%

Guilford TCC  * * * * 129 87% 91% 94% 88% 21 95% 83% * 80% 20 95% 100% 100% *

Halifax CC  * * * * 3 * 69% 71% 69% 1 * * 36% * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * * * 31 81% 85% 81% 82% 14 71% 71% 79% * * * * *

Isothermal CC  * * * * 50 56% 61% 67% 64% 7 43% 33% * 53% 2 * * * *

James Sprunt CC  * * * * 15 67% 65% 76% 69% 4 * * * * 6 83% * * *

Johnston CC  * * * * 97 68% 82% 73% 81% * * 67% * 20 100% 100% 77% 93%

Lenoir CC  * * * * 188 78% 72% 85% 93% 82 57% 68% 71% 77% 83 99% 88% 90% 72%

Martin CC  * * * * 21 71% 67% 73% 93% 12 67% * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  * * * * 24 54% 57% 75% 82% 6 33% * * * * * 63% *

McDowell TCC  * * * * 22 68% 68% 80% 83% * * * * 9 78% 83% * *

Mitchell CC  * * * * 47 83% 72% 80% 69% 5 80% * 71% * * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  * * * * 35 71% 70% 88% 81% 21 29% * * * 17 59% 78% 47% 64%

Pamlico CC  * * * * 2 * 90% * 71% * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * 27 48% 76% 71% * * * * * 8 88% * * *

Pitt CC  * * * * 30 73% 65% 81% 47% * * * * 11 82% * 72% *

Randolph CC  * * * * 44 77% 75% 81% 84% * * * * * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * 21 62% * 100% 80% * * * 64% 3 * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * 21 81% 80% 82% 73% 8 75% * * * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * * 48 50% 46% 62% 78% 1 * 73% 43% 65% * * 92% *

Rockingham CC  * * * * 23 70% 78% 69% 88% * * * * 8 75% 70% * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  * * * * 124 61% 72% 85% 70% 5 80% 57% 73% 65% 17 88% 84% 61% 72%

Sampson CC  * * * * 12 17% * 73% 85% 2 * * * * 8 88% * 85% *

Sandhills CC  * * * * 45 89% 79% 82% 80% 1 * * * * 8 88% * 91% *

South Piedmont CC  * * * * 48 75% 87% 83% 66% * * * * 11 100% * * *

Southeastern CC  * * * * 35 49% 78% 63% 60% 24 50% 63% 65% * 1 * * * *

Southwestern CC  * * * * 32 81% 97% 96% 89% 1 * * * * 7 100% * 100% *

Stanly CC  * * * * 42 69% 73% 83% 76% * * * * 11 82% 92% * *

Surry CC  * * * * 26 96% 89% 98% 95% * * * * 11 100% 100% 100% 100%

Tri‐County CC  * * * * 15 87% 80% 75% 71% * * * * 2 * 80% * *

Vance‐Granville CC  * * * * 20 85% 86% 76% 83% * * * 31% 20 75% 73% 78% 70%

Wake TCC  * * * * 168 90% 94% 92% 96% 6 83% 86% 92% 79% 9 100% 100% 100% *

Wayne CC  * * * * 31 48% 57% 57% 83% 6 33% * * * 11 91% * * *

Western Piedmont CC  9 89% * 84% * 15 100% * 79% 95% * * * * * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * 28 89% 88% 75% 81% 7 57% * 82% * 8 100% * * *

Wilson CC  * * * * 27 59% 74% 87% 71% 2 * * * * 2 * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12), Less than 10 ('09‐'11)

EMD EMT EMT‐I EMT‐P

% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING % PASSING

37

Page 127: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

TABLE G5. LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION PASSING RATE, 2012 ‐ BY EXAM

TESTE TESTE TEST TEST TEST

'12 '12 '11 '10 '12 '12 '11 '10 '09 '12 '12 '11 '10 '09 '12 '12 '11 '10 '09 '12 '12 '11 '10 '09

System Totals  55 100% 100% 92% 137 91% 88% 84% 89% 771 95% 94% 97% 96% 2,001 94% 90% 87% 89% 82 100% 95% 96% 100%

Alamance CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 56 96% 76% 83% 89% * * * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  * * * * * * * 39 87% 98% 97% 100% 80 94% 92% 89% 88% 24 100% 100% 93% *

Beaufort County CC  * * * * * * * 16 100% 95% 100% 100% 35 97% 94% 89% 88% * * * *

Bladen CC  * * * * * * * 18 94% 92% 100% 100% 12 92% 85% * * * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 37 89% 94% 71% 80% * * * *

Brunswick CC  * * * * * * * 20 100% 100% 100% 100% 13 100% 80% 100% 94% * * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  * * * 18 94% 81% 73% 100% * * * * 35 100% 95% 91% 85% * * * *

Cape Fear CC  18 100% 100% 87% * * * * 15 100% 100% 100% 100% 48 100% 98% 98% 100% * * * *

Carteret CC  * * * * * * * 4 * 70% * 93% 13 100% 93% 100% 100% * * * *

Catawba Valley CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 45 96% 88% 73% 78% * * * *

Central Carolina CC  * * * * * * * 50 82% 80% 87% 97% 15 100% 96% 100% 93% 31 100% 100% 100% 100%

Central Piedmont CC  * * * 20 90% 91% 75% 82% * * * * 74 86% 65% 86% 89% * * * *

Cleveland CC  * * * * * * * 13 100% 100% 100% * 18 94% 88% * * * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  * * * * * * * 19 100% 94% 95% 100% 27 100% 83% 93% 94% * * * *

College of The Albemarle  * * * * * * * 20 100% 94% 92% 100% 31 100% 97% 97% 100% * * * *

Craven CC  * * * 11 82% * * * 11 100% 100% 100% 100% 64 98% 95% 84% 81% * * * *

Davidson County CC  * * * * * * * 16 88% 100% 100% 78% 46 93% 85% 92% 87% * * * *

Durham TCC  20 100% * * * * * * 13 100% 100% 94% * 63 87% 95% 92% 93% * * * *

Edgecombe CC  * * * * * * * 12 100% * * * 20 90% * * * * * * *

Fayetteville TCC  * * * 14 93% 92% 91% 75% 35 97% 94% 92% 89% 58 86% 95% 90% 98% * * * *

Forsyth TCC  * * * * * * * 44 100% 100% 97% 85% 70 99% 96% 94% 83% * * * *

Gaston College  * * * * * * * 48 100% 100% 97% 100% 49 98% 98% 86% 91% 27 100% 80% 93% 100%

Guilford TCC  * * * 18 100% * 91% 100% 19 95% 100% 100% 92% 87 91% 89% 89% 87% * * * *

Halifax CC  * * * * * * * 12 92% 100% * * 19 89% 89% * * * * * *

Haywood CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 26 65% * 68% 91% * * * *

Isothermal CC  * * * * * * * 26 96% 93% 97% 96% 24 96% 100% * * * * * *

James Sprunt CC  * * * * * * * 12 100% 80% 100% 100% 13 100% 95% 93% 94% * * * *

Johnston CC  * * * * * * * * * * 100% 40 95% 75% 86% 100% * * * *

Lenoir CC  * * * * * * * 5 100% * * * 14 100% 92% 77% 90% * * * *

Martin CC  * * * 14 64% 77% 82% * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mayland CC  * * * * * * * 15 100% 100% 100% 100% 38 87% 96% 96% 84% * * * *

McDowell TCC  * * * * * * * 37 97% 93% 100% 100% 15 93% 89% * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 40 100% 97% 90% 94% * * * *

Montgomery CC  * * * * * * * 34 94% 100% 83% 93% * * * * * * * *

Nash CC  * * * 19 100% 93% 83% 100% 11 100% 95% * * 30 83% 90% * * * * * *

Pamlico CC  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 19 95% 71% 81% 88% * * * *

Pitt CC  17 100% 100% 95% * * * * * * * * 70 91% 86% 93% 86% * * * *

Randolph CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 17 100% 100% 95% 100% * * * *

Richmond CC  * * * * * * * 17 82% 91% 94% 94% 37 95% 93% 98% 91% * * * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * * * * * * * * * 100% 100% 17 94% 95% 50% 92% * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 19 100% 91% 92% 67% * * * *

Rockingham CC  * * * * * * * 25 80% 81% 97% 96% 13 92% 80% 89% 87% * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  * * * * * * * 22 100% 94% 100% 100% 42 98% 100% 84% 84% * * * *

Sampson CC  * * * * * * * 16 100% 100% 97% 100% 22 91% 100% 88% 82% * * * *

Sandhills CC  * * * * * * * 20 100% 100% 100% 96% 38 100% 92% 87% 89% * * * *

South Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * 10 100% 67% 100% 94% 30 87% * 84% 53% * * * *

Southeastern CC  * * * * * * * 24 100% 100% 100% 97% 50 94% 89% 100% 100% * * * *

Southwestern CC  * * * 9 100% 90% 100% * * * * 100% 31 94% 94% 86% 90% * * * *

Stanly CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 29 97% 90% 100% 70% * * * *

Surry CC  * * * 14 86% * 80% * 12 100% 100% 96% 100% 37 100% 96% 88% 95% * * * *

Tri‐County CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 19 89% 92% 84% 75% * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  * * * * * * * 26 92% 93% 100% 86% 43 98% 89% 79% 88% * * * *

Wake TCC  * * * * * * * * * * * 99 95% 90% 89% 92% * * * *

Wayne CC  * * * * * * * 18 100% 94% 100% 100% 35 89% 93% 90% 95% * * * *

Western Piedmont CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 24 100% 100% 86% 85% * * * *

Wilkes CC  * * * * * * * * * * * 16 100% 85% 90% 64% * * * *

Wilson CC  * * * * * * * 17 100% 80% 100% 100% 39 87% 88% 86% 91% * * * *

*Less than 5 ('12), Less than 10 ('09‐'11)

OCC THERAPIST ASST.

% PASS

PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASST.

% PASSING

VET. MED. TECH.PRACTICAL NURSING REGISTERED NURSING

% PASSING% PASSING % PASSING

38

Page 128: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

 

39

Page 129: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Critical Success Factors

2012

Page 130: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

Page 131: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

CONTENTS 

INTRODUCTION 

2011 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY 

B: PASSING RATES ON LICENSURE & CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS 

CHART B1. AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASS RATE AND NUMBER OF EXAMS WITH A PASS RATE < 70%  

CHART B2. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS    (AVIATION – GENERAL, AVIATION – AIRFRAME, AVIATION ‐ POWER PLANT, BLET, REAL ESTATE SALES) 

CHART B3. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS(COSMETIC ARTS – APPRENTICE, COSMETOLOGY, ESTHETICIAN, INSTRUCTOR, MANICURIST)   

CHART B4. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS  (DENTAL HYGIENE, OPTICIANRY, NUC. MED. TECH., RADIATION THERAPY, RADIOGRAPHY) 

CHART B5. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS  (PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASST., PRACTICAL NURSING, REGISTERED NURSING, VET. MED. TECH.)  

CHART B6. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS(EMD, EMT, EMT‐I, EMT‐P) 

C: PERFORMANCE OF COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS 

CHART C. PERCENT OF COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS WITH A GPA OF > = 2.0 AFTER TWO SEMESTERS AT A UNC INSTITUTION 

D. PASSING RATES OF STUDENTS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES

CHART D. PASSING RATES OF STUDENTS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES

E. SUCCESS RATES OF DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENTS IN SUBSEQUENTCOLLEGE‐LEVEL COURSES

CHART E. PERFORMANCE OF DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENTS IN SUBSEQUENT COLLEGE‐LEVEL COURSES 

F. SATISFACTION OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS AND NON‐COMPLETERS

CHART F. SATISFACTION OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS AND NON‐COMPLETERS

G. CURRICULUM STUDENT RETENTION, GRADUATION, AND TRANSFER

CHART G. CURRICULUM STUDENT RETENTION, GRADUATION AND TRANSFER

H. CLIENT SATISFACTION WITH CUSTOMIZED TRAINING

CHART H. CLIENT SATISFACTION WITH CUSTOMIZED TRAINING

2012 Critical Success Factors Report

July 2012

North Carolina Community College System 

Dr. R Scott Ralls, President 

Kennon Briggs, Executive VP & Chief of Staff 

Research & Performance Management 

Bill Schneider, Associate VP 

Kristen Corbell, Research Projects Coordinator 

Joann Ingoglia, Compliance Coordinator 

Page 132: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

INTRODUCTION  The Critical Success Factors Report is the North Carolina Community College System’s major accountability document. This annual performance report is based on data compiled from the previous year and serves to inform colleges and the public on the performance of our 58 community colleges.  In 1993, the State Board of Community Colleges began monitoring performance data on specific measures to ensure public accountability for programs and services. In 1998, the General Assembly directed the State Board to review past performance measures and define standards to ensure programs and services offered by community colleges in North Carolina were of sufficient quality.   The State Board of Community Colleges and the General Assembly approved twelve performance measures for accountability in 1999.   Later in 2007, the General Assembly approved the reduction of performance measures to the following eight:  

A. Progress of Basic Skills Students (Measure not included this year, as authorized by Section 8.6 of S.L. 2012‐142)  B. Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations C. Performance of College Transfer Students D. Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses E. Success Rates of Developmental Students in Subsequent College‐Level Courses F. Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non‐Completers G. Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation, and Transfer H. Client Satisfaction with Customized Training  Colleges receive Recognition of Exceptional Institutional Performance if they meet or exceed all performance measures, have no licensure exams with a passing rate of less than 70%, and college transfer students perform at a level equal to or above native UNC system students.  The chart below shows by year the number of colleges who have met the standard for the individual performance measures, the number of colleges who have met all performance standards, and the number of colleges receiving Recognition of Exceptional Institutional Performance. 

 In 2010, President Scott Ralls appointed members of a Performance Measures Committee to review the current performance measures and recommend changes to the State Board of Community Colleges.  These changes were approved by the State Board in 2011 and the General Assembly in 2012.  The new measures and associated data will be reported in the 2013 report.   

45 4448

57 56 5753

26

11

47

37

47

58 58 5856

24

11

45 46 47

52

57

52

58

26

12

4743

4853

58

48

58

27

16

PM B PM C PM D PM E PM F PM G PM H Meeting All Standards

Exceptional Institutional Performance

2009 2010 2011 2012

Page 133: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

2011 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

Met Standard

Did not meet exceptional

Did not meet standard AGG <70%

Standard 80% 0 83%/88% 75% 80% 90% 65% 90%

System Totals 87% 88% 80% 87% 96% 67% 95%

Meeting Standard 47 36 43/28 48 53 58 48 58

Alamance CC  75% 1 93% 85% 94% 96% 69% 95% 6/7

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  95% 0 92% 87% 89% 97% 72% 95% 7/7 *

Beaufort County CC  70% 2 97% 88% 90% 99% 67% 94% 6/7

Bladen CC  78% 1 79% 89% 91% 96% 63% 98% 4/7

Blue Ridge CC  91% 0 95% 83% 90% 99% 68% 92% 7/7 *

Brunswick CC  89% 0 93% 72% 82% 93% 66% 93% 6/7

Caldwell CC & TI  83% 1 90% 86% 90% 95% 71% 99% 7/7

Cape Fear CC  93% 1 89% 81% 81% 97% 71% 94% 7/7

Carteret CC  82% 1 82% 68% 84% 99% 67% 92% 5/7

Catawba Valley CC  86% 0 89% 77% 91% 96% 75% 94% 7/7 *

Central Carolina CC  84% 0 94% 81% 93% 91% 67% 92% 7/7 *

Central Piedmont CC  82% 1 85% 73% 86% 96% 63% 90% 5/7

Cleveland CC  88% 1 71% 74% 86% 95% 64% 93% 4/7

Coastal Carolina CC  95% 0 88% 84% 92% 98% 70% 96% 7/7 *

College of The Albemarle  88% 0 90% 79% 94% 95% 67% 91% 7/7 *

Craven CC  92% 0 80% 79% 85% 91% 69% 99% 6/7

Davidson County CC  91% 1 85% 85% 79% 93% 66% 91% 6/7

Durham TCC  96% 0 97% 73% 86% 92% 62% 97% 5/7

Edgecombe CC  89% 0 75% 80% 76% 98% 62% 96% 4/7

Fayetteville TCC  93% 0 89% 80% 86% 92% 66% 95% 7/7 *

Forsyth TCC  94% 0 84% 90% 89% 92% 67% 97% 7/7

Gaston College  94% 0 80% 80% 90% 96% 67% 91% 6/7

Guilford TCC  92% 0 90% 80% 83% 95% 68% 93% 7/7 *

Halifax CC  82% 1 77% 77% 90% 98% 65% 95% 6/7

Haywood CC  89% 0 87% 84% 93% 97% 66% 93% 7/7

Isothermal CC  78% 2 84% 84% 88% 97% 64% 91% 5/7

James Sprunt CC 79% 1 83% 83% 88% 99% 71% 100% 6/7

G. STUDENT 

PERSISTENCE

H. TRAINING 

SATISFACTIONSTANDARDS 

MET / 

STANDARDS 

APPLICABLE

B. LICENSURE 

EXAMSC. TRANSFER 

PERFORM

D. DEV 

GRADES

E. DEV IN 

CREDIT

F. STUDENT 

SATISFACTION

James Sprunt CC  79% 1 83% 83% 88% 99% 71% 100% 6/7

Johnston CC  87% 0 81% 78% 88% 98% 72% 96% 6/7

Lenoir CC  78% 2 84% 81% 85% 94% 64% 96% 5/7

Martin CC  72% 1 *** 72% 82% 98% 63% 94% 3/6

Mayland CC  84% 1 100% 77% 90% 100% 71% 94% 7/7

McDowell TCC  87% 1 85% 85% 98% 99% 67% 100% 7/7

Mitchell CC  85% 0 86% 85% 91% 95% 66% 95% 7/7

Montgomery CC  94% 0 76% 93% 85% 94% 67% 96% 6/7

Nash CC  82% 0 86% 97% 85% 99% 66% 95% 7/7

Pamlico CC  89% 0 *** 71% 87% 97% 68% 99% 5/6

Piedmont CC  78% 0 90% 77% 87% 98% 65% 94% 6/7

Pitt CC  84% 1 90% 79% 91% 96% 74% 94% 7/7

Randolph CC  84% 0 93% 89% 89% 93% 69% 95% 7/7 *

Richmond CC  92% 0 73% 92% 92% 98% 71% 94% 6/7

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  86% 0 *** 85% 75% 97% 62% 96% 4/6

Robeson CC  71% 1 86% 79% 85% 93% 68% 98% 6/7

Rockingham CC  81% 0 91% 83% 92% 96% 66% 95% 7/7 *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  82% 1 86% 61% 78% 96% 61% 91% 4/7

Sampson CC  91% 0 79% 82% 85% 98% 70% 95% 6/7

Sandhills CC  87% 0 90% 83% 86% 98% 65% 95% 7/7 *

South Piedmont CC  85% 1 82% 81% 81% 91% 65% 93% 6/7

Southeastern CC  83% 1 78% 75% 80% 97% 67% 96% 6/7

Southwestern CC  95% 0 96% 86% 80% 97% 67% 99% 7/7 *

Stanly CC  87% 0 95% 86% 96% 99% 71% 96% 7/7 *

Surry CC  95% 0 93% 86% 89% 98% 72% 97% 7/7 *

Tri‐County CC  86% 0 83% 73% 77% 97% 69% 95% 5/7

Vance‐Granville CC  89% 0 95% 91% 89% 98% 66% 96% 7/7 *

Wake TCC  94% 0 90% 76% 84% 95% 68% 96% 7/7 *

Wayne CC  77% 1 88% 86% 95% 99% 67% 98% 6/7

Western Piedmont CC  96% 0 87% 96% 97% 97% 73% 95% 7/7

Wilkes CC  84% 0 87% 84% 93% 97% 70% 97% 7/7

Wilson CC  77% 0 80% 72% 85% 97% 68% 98% 4/7

*Met all measures and exceptional standard on licensure exams and transfer student performance *** Less than 10 studentsNote: Measure A (Basic Skills Student Progress) has been removed this year due to reporting innacuracies

Page 134: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B: PASSING RATES ON LICENSURE & CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS 

Description The percentage of first‐time test takers passing an examination required for North Carolina licensure or certification prior to practicing the profession. A licensure requirement for an occupation is one that is required by state statute for an individual to work in that occupation. Certification is generally voluntary but may be required by employers or an outside accrediting agency. Purely voluntary examinations are not reported. 

Source The number of first‐time test‐takers and the number passing were provided to the System Office by agencies issuing the license or certification and validated by the colleges. Depending on the exam, data may be provided on a fiscal or calendar year. The institutional passing rate was calculated by dividing the total number of first‐time test takers passing for all reported examinations by the total number of persons who sat for the exam for the first time.  For privacy and statistical validity, no examination data are reported when the number of first‐time test takers was fewer than 10. 

System Standard 80% of first‐time test takers will pass examinations required for North Carolina licensure or certification. 

Exceptional Institutional Performance Standard The college will have no exam with a passing rate less than 70% 

Results For 2010‐11, 47 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 70% to a high of 96%. The aggregate result for the system was 87%.  In addition, there were 36 colleges with no exam with a passing rate less than 70%.  

86% 86% 86% 87%

2007‐08

2008‐09

2009‐10

2010‐11

Aggregate Exam Results

STANDARD (80%)

90%

89%

83%

94%

95%

94%

90%

85%

65%

75%

96%

92%

85%

92% 97%

96%

89%

83%

64%

71%

96%

95%

84%

91%

99%

97%

87%

85%

67%

80%

96%

94% 96%

84%

96%

94%

90%

82%

66%

90%

COS ARTS ‐

APPREN

TICE

COS ARTS ‐

COSM

ETOLO

GY

COS ARTS ‐

ESTH

ETICIAN

DEN

TAL 

HYG

IENE

RADIOGRAPHY

PRACTICAL 

NURSING

REG

ISTERED

 NURSING

EMT

EMT‐I

EMT‐P

Individual Exam Results with at least 100 Test‐Takers

2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 2010‐11

Page 135: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B1. 2010‐2011 AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASSING RATE AND NUMBER OF EXAMS WITH A PASSING RATE < 70%

10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  9373 8158 87% 86% 86% 86% 25 28 29 35

Alamance CC  175 131 75% 88% 86% 80% 1 1 1 0

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 347 329 95% 89% 93% 95% 0 0 0 0

Beaufort County CC  118 83 70% 86% 85% 77% 2 1 1 1

Bladen CC  91 71 78% 81% 83% 90% 1 1 0 0

Blue Ridge CC  121 110 91% 81% 82% 90% 0 1 0 0

Brunswick CC  96 85 89% 91% 85% 74% 0 1 0 3

Caldwell CC & TI  231 191 83% 85% 84% 79% 1 2 0 2

Cape Fear CC  300 279 93% 96% 95% 93% 1 0 0 0

Carteret CC  117 96 82% 83% 79% 84% 1 1 1 1

Catawba Valley CC  176 151 86% 77% 71% 84% 0 0 3 1

Central Carolina CC  288 242 84% 83% 86% 83% 0 2 1 1

Central Piedmont CC  300 246 82% 92% 91% 93% 1 0 0 0

Cleveland CC  186 163 88% 80% 78% 74% 1 1 2 3

Coastal Carolina CC  201 190 95% 94% 88% 90% 0 0 0 0

College of The Albema 146 128 88% 74% 84% 80% 0 1 1 2

Craven CC  98 90 92% 88% 83% 91% 0 0 0 0

Davidson County CC  209 190 91% 92% 88% 83% 1 0 1 0

Durham TCC  263 253 96% 89% 85% 88% 0 1 1 1

Edgecombe CC  38 34 89% 86% 88% 80% 0 0 0 1

Fayetteville TCC  361 336 93% 96% 94% 90% 0 0 0 0

Forsyth TCC  316 297 94% 92% 89% 93% 0 0 0 0

Gaston College  191 179 94% 88% 89% 88% 0 0 0 1

Guilford TCC  400 368 92% 94% 89% 87% 0 0 0 0

Halifax CC  67 55 82% 76% 70% 67% 1 1 2 1

Haywood CC  79 70 89% 79% 86% 79% 0 1 0 1

Isothermal CC  114 89 78% 77% 79% 82% 2 1 2 1

James Sprunt CC  70 55 79% 88% 88% 85% 1 0 1 1

Johnston CC  223 194 87% 81% 92% 92% 0 1 0 0

Lenoir CC  380 297 78% 84% 87% 90% 2 0 0 0

Martin CC  69 50 72% 71% 87% 66% 1 0 0 1

Mayland CC  98 82 84% 85% 84% 78% 1 1 0 1

McDowell TCC  124 108 87% 92% 88% 93% 1 0 0 0

Mitchell CC  162 137 85% 84% 84% 85% 0 0 1 0

Montgomery CC  33 31 94% 83% 84% 84% 0 0 0 1

Nash CC  145 119 82% 77% 86% 78% 0 1 1 0

Pamlico CC  19 17 89% 46% 75% 53% 0 0 0 1

Piedmont CC  63 49 78% 76% 89% 96% 0 0 0 0

Pitt CC  161 136 84% 85% 86% 86% 1 0 1 0

Randolph CC  99 83 84% 87% 88% 86% 0 0 0 0

Richmond CC  63 58 92% 97% 86% 88% 0 0 1 0

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  59 51 86% 72% 83% 95% 0 1 0 0

Robeson CC  91 65 71% 72% 77% 78% 1 2 2 0

Rockingham CC  119 96 81% 84% 92% 89% 0 1 0 0

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  332 272 82% 85% 81% 80% 1 1 1 2

Sampson CC  56 51 91% 85% 87% 91% 0 0 0 1

Sandhills CC  186 161 87% 89% 87% 88% 0 0 0 0

South Piedmont CC  97 82 85% 86% 69% 82% 1 0 2 0

Southeastern CC  120 99 83% 82% 78% 78% 1 2 1 1

Southwestern CC  124 118 95% 95% 88% 89% 0 0 0 1

Stanly CC  149 130 87% 89% 79% 81% 0 0 0 1

Surry CC  110 105 95% 93% 92% 76% 0 0 0 1

Tri‐County CC  58 50 86% 70% 72% 80% 0 0 0 1

Vance‐Granville CC  187 167 89% 87% 84% 89% 0 0 1 1

Wake TCC  409 383 94% 91% 92% 90% 0 0 0 0

Wayne CC  153 118 77% 74% 90% 86% 1 1 0 1

Western Piedmont CC  26 25 96% 84% 91% 92% 0 0 0 0

Wilkes CC  76 64 84% 85% 82% 81% 0 0 1 0

Wilson CC  70 54 77% 89% 81% 88% 0 0 0 0

*Excludes Real Estate exam, BLET exam,  and exams with less than 10 test‐takers

Note: Real Estate and BLET exams are not included in the aggregate results

NUMBER OF EXAMS WITH A RATE <70% *NUMBER OF 

TEST TAKERS

NUMBER 

PASSING

AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASSING RATE

Page 136: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B2. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2010‐2011

TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST

10‐11 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  39 100% 98% 98% 100% 34 100% 98% 100% 100% 28 96% 100% 100% 100% 1762 85% 87% 87% 86% 177 82% 80% 72% 71%

Alamance CC  14 86% 83% 81% 88% * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  49 96% 92% 98% 99% 2 * 84% 85% 67%

Beaufort County CC  18 78% 79% 88% 79% * *

Bladen CC  8 * 1 * *

Blue Ridge CC  31 90% 89% 86% 94% 2 * * * *

Brunswick CC  35 69% 76% 80% 69% 9 * 88% 74% 66%

Caldwell CC & TI  25 68% 70% 86% 65%

Cape Fear CC  52 79% 84% 85% 89% 4 * 83% * 90%

Carteret CC  23 87% 85% 76% 77% 9 * 33% 46% 76%

Catawba Valley CC  34 71% 88% 67% 44% 1 * * *

Central Carolina CC  38 95% 93% 91% 84% 3 * 70% * 30%

Central Piedmont CC  23 100% 100% 95% 94% 58 90% 95% 90% 85%

Cleveland CC  55 84% 89% 63% 69% 3 * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  34 79% 87% 74% 84%

College of The Albemarle  23 100% 100% 96% 92% * *

Craven CC  3 * 100% 100% 1 * 100% 100% * 5 * 100% * * 21 90% 88% 87% 96% 6 * * 45% 71%

Davidson County CC  60 80% 79% 83% 83% * *

Durham TCC  48 94% 89% 88% * 27 96% 84% 73% 81%

Edgecombe CC  * * *

Fayetteville TCC  44 84% 84% 100% 93% *

Forsyth TCC  77 95% 91% 87% 91% 1 * * * *

Gaston College  50 90% 90% 87% 89% 2 * * * 71%

Guilford TCC  31 100% 100% 96% 100% 29 100% 100% 100% 100% 21 95% 100% 100% 100% 25 96% 92% 93% 94% 21 76% 86% 71% 71%

Halifax CC  22 64% 73% 67% 66% * *

Haywood CC  16 75% 72% 85% 80%

Isothermal CC  19 74% 76% 96% 71% *

James Sprunt CC  94% 100%

Johnston CC  41 95% 94% 94% 96% 1 * * * *

Lenoir CC  31 77% 89% 89% 88% * *

Martin CC  16 81% * * * *

Mayland CC  22 82% 86% 92% * *

McDowell TCC  9 * * 93% 100%

Mitchell CC  33 88% 88% 88% 74% * 81% 77%

Montgomery CC  7 * 94% 71% 69%

Nash CC  15 87% 95% 100% 96% * *

Pamlico CC 

Piedmont CC 

Pitt CC  79 97% 93% 90% 92% 4 * * * *

Randolph CC  44 82% 84% 87% 86% * * *

Richmond CC  12 83% 100%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC 

Robeson CC  63 89% 84% 85% 80% 2 * * * *

Rockingham CC  32 88% 72% 95% 83%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  56 82% 84% 95% 94% * * 100%

Sampson CC  49 65% 91% 91% *

Sandhills CC  43 67% 89% 88% 93%

South Piedmont CC  31 90% 83% 89% 87% *

Southeastern CC  6 * 60% 82% * * *

Southwestern CC  17 100% 93% 94% 88% 5 * * * 87%

Stanly CC  24 83% 80% 82% 60% 2 * * 91%

Surry CC  58 84% 92% 90% 88% * 9%

Tri‐County CC  9 * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  26 92% 91% 95% 90% *

Wake TCC  37 95% 91% 88% 90% * 65%

Wayne CC  5 * * 4 * * 2 * * 38 95% 97% 94% 89% 2 * * *

Western Piedmont CC  46 89% 87% 98% 96%

Wilkes CC  35 91% 95% 94% 91% 12 83% * * *

Wilson CC  39 72% 75% 89% 90%

*Less than 10 test takers

Note: Real Estate and BLET exams are not included in the aggregate results

% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING % PASSING% PASSING

AVIATION ‐ GENERAL AVIATION ‐ AIRFRAME AVIATION ‐ POWER PLANT BLET REAL ESTATE SALES

Page 137: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B3. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2011

TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST

'11 '11 '10 '09 '08 '11 '11 '10 '09 '08 '11 '11 '10 '09 '08 '11 '11 '10 '09 '08 '11 '11 '10 '09 '08

System Totals  241 96% 96% 96% 90% 634 94% 95% 92% 89% 157 96% 84% 85% 83% 15 67% 81% 85% 83% 95 85% 79% 89% 84%

Alamance CC  10 100% * 91% 15 87% * *

Asheville‐Buncombe  5 * * 9 * * 11 100% 79% * * * * 8 * 70% * *

Beaufort County CC  2 * * 9 * 100% * * 1 * * *

Bladen CC  * 4 * * * *

Blue Ridge CC  4 * 100% 100% 100% 9 * * * * 6 * * * 100% 1 * * 100% 4 * * * *

Brunswick CC  1 * * * 17 88% * * * 1 * * * * * 1 * *

Caldwell CC & TI  20 100% * * 100% 7 * * * * 7 * * *

Cape Fear CC  16 81% 100% 100% 94% 25 92% * 100% * 16 100% * * 81% * * 81% 2 * * * *

Carteret CC  6 * * * * 10 100% * * * 9 * * * 100% * 100% *

Catawba Valley CC  * 12 100% * *

Central Carolina CC  13 100% 100% 93% 86% 57 91% 91% * 100% 11 100% 79% 83% 81% 1 * * 83% 81% 2 * * 92% *

Central Piedmont CC  * * * *

Cleveland CC  7 * * * 93% 14 100% * * * 7 * * * * 5 * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  33 97% 95% 94% 85% * 3 * * * *

College of The Albem 9 * * 95% 94% 4 * * * 3 * *

Craven CC  7 * * 92% 94% 12 100% * * * 3 * * * *

Davidson County CC  3 * * * 23 100% 96% 100% 90% 14 100% * * 80% * * 80%

Durham TCC  5 * *

Edgecombe CC  7 * * * * 2 * * * * * 2 * *

Fayetteville TCC  23 96% 100% 83% 13 100% * 9 *

Forsyth TCC 

Gaston College  * *

Guilford TCC  2 * * * * 10 100% 93% 91% 100%

Halifax CC  2 * * * 2 * * * *

Haywood CC  18 100% 100% * 64% 12 83% * * * * * *

Isothermal CC  10 100% * * * 5 * * 100% * 6 * * *

James Sprunt CC  4 * * * * 6 * * * * * *

Johnston CC  19 100% * 100% * 16 94% * * * 3 * *

Lenoir CC  21 100% 91% 92% 100% 3 * * * * 4 * * 92% * * 92% 13 62% * * *

Martin CC  2 * * 4 * * * * *

Mayland CC  6 * * 10 90% * 80% * 1 * * * 1 * * * *

McDowell TCC  1 * * * * 12 100% * * * 2 * * * * * * *

Mitchell CC  40 95% * 100% 95% 6 * * * * 1 * * * * *

Montgomery CC 

Nash CC  1 * * 7 * * *

Pamlico CC  2 * * * 5 * * * *

Piedmont CC  4 * 9 * * 1 * *

Pitt CC 

Randolph CC  6 * * 5 *

Richmond CC 

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  3 * * * * *

Robeson CC  * * * 16 81% * * * 5 * 73% *

Rockingham CC  7 * * * 100% 5 * * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  16 94% 93% 100% 35 91% 98% 96% 93% 14 100% 100% 89% * 89% * 7 * 79% 82%

Sampson CC  4 * * * * 7 * * * * 1 * * 3 * *

Sandhills CC  11 82% * * * 13 77% * * * 4 * * * * * * * *

South Piedmont CC 

Southeastern CC  5 * * * * 5 * * * 3 * * * * * *

Southwestern CC  26 100% 94% 79% 94% 3 * *

Stanly CC  * 100% 94% 30 93% * 85% 91% 6 * * * * 1 * * * * 13 85% * *

Surry CC  13 100% 100% 100% 100%

Tri‐County CC  16 94% * * 91% * * * * * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  15 93% * * 91% 17 88% 95% * 80% *

Wake TCC  6 * 10 100% 90%

Wayne CC 

Western Piedmont CC 

Wilkes CC  *

Wilson CC 

*Less than 10 test takers

COSMETIC ARTS

APPRENTICE COSMETOLOGY ESTHETICIAN

% PASSING% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING

INSTRUCTOR

% PASSING

MANICURIST

Page 138: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B4. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2010‐2011

TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST

10‐11 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  199 84% 91% 92% 94% 6 * * * * 15 80% 81% 85% 92% 27 96% 76% 97% 83% 347 96% 99% 97% 95%

Alamance CC 

Asheville‐Buncombe  16 94% 90% 94% 100% 24 100% 100% 100% 100%

Beaufort County CC 

Bladen CC 

Blue Ridge CC 

Brunswick CC 

Caldwell CC & TI  7 * 64% 83% * 11 91% * * *

Cape Fear CC  11 82% 100% 100% * 25 100% 100% 93% 90%

Carteret CC  16 94% 100% 100% 100%

Catawba Valley CC  16 94% 94% 95% * 4 * * * 91%

Central Carolina CC  11 82% 100% 100%

Central Piedmont CC 25 84% 96% 85% 100%

Cleveland CC  21 100% * 100% 93%

Coastal Carolina CC  14 86% 90% 90% 95%

College of The Albemarle 

Craven CC 

Davidson County CC 

Durham TCC  6 * * * *

Edgecombe CC  18 94% 100% 100% 100%

Fayetteville TCC  20 75% 100% 89% 87% 1 * * * * 34 94% 100% 100% 100%

Forsyth TCC  11 82% * * 100% 5 * * * * 19 95% 100% 100% 91%

Gaston College 

Guilford TCC  27 85% 97% 89% 87%

Halifax CC  13 77% 75% 93%

Haywood CC 

Isothermal CC 

James Sprunt CC 

Johnston CC  * * 22 100% 100% 100% 100%

Lenoir CC  4 * * *

Martin CC 

Mayland CC 

McDowell TCC 

Mitchell CC 

Montgomery CC 

Nash CC 

Pamlico CC 

Piedmont CC 

Pitt CC  7 * 92% * 86% 14 100% 72% 100% 84% 21 100% 94% 100% 100%

Randolph CC  12 100% 100% 89% 100%

Richmond CC 

Roanoke‐Chowan CC 

Robeson CC  8 * * *

Rockingham CC 

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  17 94% 100% 94% 92%

Sampson CC 

Sandhills CC  9 * 100% 100% 100%

South Piedmont CC  8 * * *

Southeastern CC 

Southwestern CC  14 86% 100% * 86%

Stanly CC  14 93% 94% 86% 95%

Surry CC 

Tri‐County CC 

Vance‐Granville CC  28 96% 97% 100% 100%

Wake TCC  10 100% 79% 100% 100% 26 100% 100% 100% 93%

Wayne CC  25 76% 82% 95% 91%

Western Piedmont CC 

Wilkes CC 

Wilson CC 

*Less than 10 test takers

% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING % PASSING

DENTAL HYGIENE OPTICIANRY RADIOGRAPHYNUC. MED. TECH. RADIATION THERAPY

% PASSING

Page 139: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B5. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2011

TEST TEST TEST TEST

'11 '11 '10 '09 '08 '11 '11 '10 '09 '08 '11 '11 '10 '09 '08 '11 '11 '10 '09 '08

System Totals  89 88% 84% 89% 83% 881 94% 97% 96% 94% 2109 90% 87% 89% 90% 42 95% 96% 100% 98%

Alamance CC  34 76% 83% 89% 95%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  40 98% 97% 100% 95% 86 92% 89% 88% 95% 10 100% 93% * *

Beaufort County CC  20 95% 100% 100% 95% 35 94% 89% 88% 92%

Bladen CC  12 92% 100% 100% 86% 13 85% * * *

Blue Ridge CC  34 94% 71% 80% 87%

Brunswick CC  21 100% 100% 100% 100% 15 80% 100% 94% 60%

Caldwell CC & TI  16 81% 73% 100% 89% 39 95% 91% 85% 88%

Cape Fear CC  27 100% 100% 100% 100% 60 98% 98% 100% 100%

Carteret CC  10 70% * 93% 93% 14 93% 100% 100% *

Catawba Valley CC  40 88% 73% 78% 88%

Central Carolina CC  41 80% 87% 97% 93% 26 96% 100% 93% 100% 22 100% 100% 100% 100%

Central Piedmont CC 23 91% 75% 82% 90% 98 65% 86% 89% 92%

Cleveland CC  17 100% 100% * 17 88%

Coastal Carolina CC  18 94% 95% 100% 100% 23 83% 93% 94% 92%

College of The Albemarle  17 94% 92% 100% 100% 31 97% 97% 100% 92%

Craven CC  14 100% 100% 100% 85% 22 95% 84% 81% 92%

Davidson County CC  18 100% 100% 78% 60 85% 92% 87% 86%

Durham TCC  18 100% 94% * 100% 44 95% 92% 93% 95%

Edgecombe CC 

Fayetteville TCC  12 92% 91% 75% 90% 47 94% 92% 89% 89% 79 95% 90% 98% 88%

Forsyth TCC  56 100% 97% 85% 94% 98 96% 94% 83% 92%

Gaston College  38 100% 97% 100% 97% 49 98% 86% 91% 95% 10 80% 93% 100% 92%

Guilford TCC  91% 100% 100% 18 100% 100% 92% 96% 97 89% 89% 87% 91%

Halifax CC  14 100% 18 89%

Haywood CC  9 * 68% 91% 86%

Isothermal CC  27 93% 97% 96% 97% 19 100%

James Sprunt CC  10 80% 100% 100% 89% 19 95% 93% 94% 64%

Johnston CC  * 100% 100% 53 75% 86% 100% 100%

Lenoir CC  9 * * * * 24 92% 77% 90% 97%

Martin CC  13 77% 82% * 0.8

Mayland CC  18 100% 100% 100% 89% 25 96% 96% 84% 94%

McDowell TCC  44 93% 100% 100% 88% 19 89%

Mitchell CC  38 97% 90% 94% 95%

Montgomery CC  26 100% 83% 93% 90%

Nash CC  15 93% 83% 100% 70% 19 95% 31 90%

Pamlico CC 

Piedmont CC  28 71% 81% 88% 95%

Pitt CC  70 86% 93% 86% 77%

Randolph CC  13 100% 95% 100% 95%

Richmond CC  11 91% 94% 94% 100% 45 93% 98% 91% 88%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  4 * 100% 100% 94% 19 95% 50% 92% 100%

Robeson CC  23 91% 92% 67% 83%

Rockingham CC  26 81% 97% 96% 93% 20 80% 89% 87% 100%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  16 94% 100% 100% 80% 27 100% 84% 84% 100%

Sampson CC  16 100% 97% 100% 100% 18 100% 88% 82% 100%

Sandhills CC  13 100% 100% 96% 100% 49 92% 87% 89% 84%

South Piedmont CC  15 67% 100% 94% 81% 84% 53% 95%

Southeastern CC  23 100% 100% 97% 18 89% 100% 100% 100%

Southwestern CC  10 90% 100% 67% 8 * * 100% * 17 94% 86% 90% 96%

Stanly CC  40 90% 100% 70% 91%

Surry CC  80% 20 100% 96% 100% 89% 25 96% 88% 95% 73%

Tri‐County CC  12 92% 84% 75% 90%

Vance‐Granville CC  28 93% 100% 86% 97% 44 89% 79% 88% 100%

Wake TCC  109 90% 89% 92% 89%

Wayne CC  18 94% 100% 100% 100% 42 93% 90% 95% 81%

Western Piedmont CC  25 100% 86% 85% 88%

Wilkes CC  26 85% 90% 64% 85%

Wilson CC  15 80% 100% 100% 26 88% 86% 91%

Foothills Nursing Consortium** 55 93% 95% 100% 83%

NEWH Nursing Consortium*** 69 91% 98% 97% 95% 106 91% 75% 90% 91%

Region A Nursing Consortium**** 38 95% 73% 86% 91%

*Less than 10 test takers ** Cleveland, Isothermal, McDowell ***Nash, Edgecomb, Wilson, Halifax ****Haywood, Southwestern, Tri‐County

PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASST.

% PASSING

VET. MED. TECH.PRACTICAL NURSING REGISTERED NURSING

% PASSING% PASSING % PASSING

Page 140: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B6. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2011

TEST TEST TEST TEST

'11 '11 '10 '09 '08 '11 '11 '10 '09 '08 '11 '11 '10 '09 '08 '11 '11 '10 '09 '08

System Totals  1 * 88% * 81% 3322 82% 85% 83% 85% 463 66% 67% 64% 65% 629 90% 80% 71% 75%

Alamance CC  83 77% 97% 93% 84% 26 42% 45% 73% 7 * * 50% 72%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  81 94% 88% 95% 96% 25 88% 82% 84% * 32 100% 89% * 80%

Beaufort County CC  41 41% 69% 88% 47% 10 20% 42%

Bladen CC  24 83% 79% * 100% 19 63% 81% * 93% 19 74% 63% * 75%

Blue Ridge CC  52 90% 92% 75% 84% 11 73% 61% * 80% * * *

Brunswick CC  29 93% 93% 84% 96% 10 70% 62% 80% * 1 * * 36%

Caldwell CC & TI  57 75% 87% 81% 66% 18 50% 60% * * 49 82% 85% 77% *

Cape Fear CC  91 91% 95% 94% 92% 11 55% 87% * * 16 100% * 89% *

Carteret CC  38 68% 75% 81% 95% 6 * 64% 53% 60% 8 * * * *

Catawba Valley CC  84 81% 75% 60% 85% 12 83% 80% 55% 8 * * *

Central Carolina CC  * 93 71% 67% 76% 67% 2 * 67% * * 9 * 36% *

Central Piedmont CC  154 91% 95% 94% 97%

Cleveland CC  73 84% 81% 71% 90% 10 50% 44% 59% 50% 15 93% 88% 100% 52%

Coastal Carolina CC  84 98% 97% 91% 92% 9 * 92% * * 17 100% 85% * 79%

College of The Albemarle  49 84% 79% 79% 84% 21 76% 40% 62% 41% 12 75% 100% 65%

Craven CC  27 89% 73% 75% 89% 4 * * * * * *

Davidson County CC  60 93% 95% 99% 92% 15 60% 94% * * 16 100% 83% 50% 70%

Durham TCC  164 99% 94% 87% 91% 17 82% 73% 94% 64% 9 * 56% 67% 83%

Edgecombe CC  7 * * 93% * 2 * 30%

Fayetteville TCC  100% 91 93% 99% 90% 91% * 81% 32 100% 100% 100% 96%

Forsyth TCC  115 90% 88% 95% 93% 5 * * * 7 * * *

Gaston College  77 88% 88% 85% 88% 1 * * * 16 100% 92% 70% 68%

Guilford TCC  128 91% 94% 88% 85% 23 83% * 80% * 14 100% 100% *

Halifax CC  13 69% 71% 69% 72% 5 * 36% * *

Haywood CC  20 85% 81% 82% 79% 14 71% 79% * 6 *

Isothermal CC  28 61% 67% 64% 68% 12 33% 53% 7 * * *

James Sprunt CC  17 65% 76% 69% 100% 5 * * 9 * * *

Johnston CC  83 82% 73% 81% 83% 67% 27 100% 77% 93% 92%

Lenoir CC  161 72% 85% 93% 92% 69 68% 71% 77% 83% 72 88% 90% 72% 72%

Martin CC  48 67% 73% 93% 66% 2 * *

Mayland CC  28 57% 75% 82% 84% * 52% 9 * 63%

McDowell TCC  * 22 68% 80% 83% 90% * * 24 83% *

Mitchell CC  69 72% 80% 69% 85% 8 * 71% 100% *

Montgomery CC  7 * * * *

Nash CC  * 54 70% 88% 81% 81% * 18 78% 47% 64% *

Pamlico CC  10 90% * 71% 40% 2 * * *

Piedmont CC  21 76% 71% * 95% *

Pitt CC  40 65% 81% 47% 91% * * * 9 * 72%

Randolph CC  63 75% 81% 84% 82% * * * *

Richmond CC  * 7 * 100% 80% 64% * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  30 80% 82% 73% * 3 * * *

Robeson CC  28 46% 62% 78% 79% 11 73% 43% 65% * 92% * *

Rockingham CC  51 78% 69% 88% 81% 10 70% * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  142 72% 85% 70% 65% 14 57% 73% 65% 61% 44 84% 61% 72% 75%

Sampson CC  * 7 * 73% 85% 92% * * 85% 63%

Sandhills CC  78 79% 82% 80% 81% 3 * * * * 6 * 91% * *

South Piedmont CC  69 87% 83% 66% 78% * * 5 * * * 83%

Southeastern CC  45 78% 63% 60% 67% 19 63% 65% * * 2 * * *

Southwestern CC  34 97% 96% 89% 92% 6 * * 73% 6 * 100% *

Stanly CC  33 73% 83% 76% 85% * 12 92% * *

Surry CC  35 89% 98% 95% 80% 57% 17 100% 100% 100%

Tri‐County CC  15 80% 75% 71% 68% * * * 15 80% * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  44 86% 76% 83% 95% 31% 37% 11 73% 78% 70%

Wake TCC  211 94% 92% 96% 96% 14 86% 92% 79% 71% 23 100% 100% 90%

Wayne CC  44 57% 57% 83% 80% 5 * * 8 * * 61%

Western Piedmont C 1 * 84% * 86% 79% 95% 100% *

Wilkes CC  40 88% 75% 81% 72% 8 * 82% * 2 * *

Wilson CC  23 74% 87% 71% 86% 6 * * * *

*Less than 10 test takers

EMD EMT EMT‐I EMT‐P

% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING % PASSING

Page 141: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 142: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

C: PERFORMANCE OF COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS 

Description Of students transferring to a university with an associate degree or 24 articulated college transfer credit hours, the percentage who have a GPA equal or greater than 2.00 after two semesters at the university. 

Source Lists of students enrolled in 2009‐2010 receiving an associate degree during that academic year and those who had accumulated at least 24 articulated college transfer credit hours data were sent to UNCGA.  These lists were matched against fall 2010 and spring 2011 UNC system student records to determine transfer enrollment at a North Carolina public university and first year academic performance.  Detailed reports by community college can be accessed at http://www.northcarolina.edu/ira/ir/analytics/tsp.htm.  Two reports for each college were accessed from this site for this measure: First‐Year UNC Academic Performance of 2009‐10 Community College Associate Degree Recipients and First‐Year UNC Academic Performance of 2009‐10 Community College Students with at Least 24 Semester Hours of Community College Coursework.  Data from D.4. Percent of Students with End‐of‐Year GPA=>2.00 in these reports were combined to determine the overall percentage of transfers with a GPA equal or greater than 2.00 after two semesters at the university.  Community colleges are allowed to supplement this data with acquired performance data from private and out‐of‐state institutions that is consistent with the methodology employed by the UNCGA in calculating the data for transfer to public universities.  

System Standard 83% of students transferring to a university with an associate degree or 24 articulated college transfer credit hours will have a GPA equal to or greater than 2.00 after two semesters at the university. 

Exceptional Institutional Performance Standard Meet or exceed the aggregate performance of native UNC sophomores and juniors, which is 88% for this year. 

Results For 2010‐11, 43 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 71% to a high of 100%. The aggregate result for the system was 88%.  In addition, there were 28 colleges whose percentage equaled or exceeded the percentage of native UNC sophomores and juniors with a GPA greater than 2.00 (88%).  

90% 90%

85% 86%88% 87%88% 88%

83%85% 85% 86%

90% 90%86% 86% 87% 87%

89%91%

87% 87% 88% 88%

ASSOCIATE DEGREE RECIPIENTS

NATIVEUNC JUNIORS

24 OR MORE TRANSFER CREDITS 

AT CC

NATIVE UNC SOPHOMORES

COMMUNITY COLLEGE 

AGGREGATE

NATIVEUNC AGGREGATE

University Students with a GPA equal or greater than 2.00

2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 2010‐11 STANDARD (83%)

Page 143: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

C. PERCENT OF 2009‐10 COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS WITH A GPA OF ≥ 2.0 AFTER TWO SEMESTERS AT A UNC INSTITUTION

Students % ≥ 2.00 Students % ≥ 2.00 Students % ≥ 2.00 08‐09 07‐08* 06‐07*

System Totals  6270 87% 3210 89% 9480 88% 87% 85% 88%

Alamance CC 142 91% 66 97% 208 93% 85% 81% 94%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC  157 92% 96 94% 253 92% 97% 92% 95%

Beaufort County CC  ** 44 95% 21 100% 65 97% 91% 83% 70%

Bladen CC 47 79% 14 79% 61 79% 69% 81% 78%

Blue Ridge CC  ** 45 96% 32 94% 77 95% 97% 89% 88%

Brunswick CC  ** 43 91% 26 96% 69 93% 82% 80% 87%

Caldwell CC & TI 148 87% 105 93% 253 90% 91% 84% 90%

Cape Fear CC 393 90% 216 88% 609 89% 85% 83% 86%

Carteret CC 26 81% 8 *** 34 82% 94% 91% 90%

Catawba Valley CC 193 90% 87 86% 280 89% 92% 93% 88%

Central Carolina CC  ** 79 94% 55 95% 134 94% 87% 87% 87%

Central Piedmont CC  ** 792 84% 415 88% 1207 85% 88% 87% 90%

Cleveland CC  ** 118 78% 69 58% 187 71% 88% 81% 77%

Coastal Carolina CC  ** 180 87% 60 90% 240 88% 90% 89% 92%

College of The Albema 67 91% 33 88% 100 90% 95% 85% 87%

Craven CC 84 79% 40 83% 124 80% 93% 86% 86%

Davidson County CC    85 86% 52 85% 137 85% 89% 83% 90%

Durham TCC 129 96% 43 98% 172 97% 89% 89% 96%

Edgecombe CC 20 80% 12 67% 32 75% 69% 77% 71%

Fayetteville TCC  ** 212 87% 135 93% 347 89% 85% 82% 88%

Forsyth TCC 183 81% 111 87% 294 84% 88% 89% 82%

Gaston College  ** 166 78% 81 83% 247 80% 85% 89% 89%

Guilford TCC 368 89% 173 91% 541 90% 85% 82% 83%

Halifax CC 22 77% 8 *** 30 77% 87% 100% 72%

Haywood CC 41 88% 30 87% 71 87% 91% 78% 94%

Isothermal CC  ** 81 88% 36 75% 117 84% 81% 89% 96%

James Sprunt CC 17 82% 6 *** 23 83% 89% 100% 77%

Johnston CC 110 82% 47 79% 157 81% 86% 79% 85%

Lenoir CC 63 81% 37 89% 100 84% 85% 85% 84%

Martin CC 4 75% *** 4 *** 82% *** ***

Mayland CC  ** 11 100% 35 100% 46 100% 74% 75% 93%

McDowell TCC  ** 18 89% 15 80% 33 85% 92% 78% 95%

Mitchell CC  ** 102 84% 60 88% 162 86% 87% 81% 87%

Montgomery CC 12 83% 5 *** 17 76% 80% *** ***

Nash CC 50 86% 38 87% 88 86% 93% 84% 93%

Pamlico CC 3 *** *** 3 *** *** *** ***

Piedmont CC 29 86% 11 100% 40 90% 66% 90% 84%

Pitt CC 218 89% 117 91% 335 90% 85% 87% 87%

Randolph CC 67 91% 36 97% 103 93% 90% 90% 93%

Richmond CC 37 70% 22 77% 59 73% 93% 87% 74%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC    7 *** *** 7 *** 100% *** 83%

Robeson CC 49 86% 23 87% 72 86% 78% 76% 85%

Rockingham CC  ** 44 91% 23 91% 67 91% 89% 95% 85%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC    126 86% 56 88% 182 86% 76% 84% 86%

Sampson CC  ** 48 81% 15 73% 63 79% 96% 77% 74%

Sandhills CC 115 87% 71 94% 186 90% 85% 79% 83%

South Piedmont CC    23 83% 10 80% 33 82% 90% 92% 56%

Southeastern CC 58 79% 25 76% 83 78% 73% 93% 86%

Southwestern CC 67 96% 61 97% 128 96% 94% 96% 95%

Stanly CC  ** 55 93% 22 100% 77 95% 89% 75% 84%

Surry CC  ** 90 92% 61 93% 151 93% 91% 90% 87%

Tri‐County CC  ** 26 85% 15 80% 41 83% 86% 94% 94%

Vance‐Granville CC    51 92% 22 100% 73 95% 87% 89% 86%

Wake TCC 554 89% 185 92% 739 90% 91% 84% 89%

Wayne CC 86 88% 58 88% 144 88% 87% 87% 92%

Western Piedmont CC  ** 148 86% 63 90% 211 87% 89% 88% 89%

Wilkes CC  ** 104 87% 35 89% 139 87% 86% 92% 89%

Wilson CC 13 77% 12 83% 25 80% 84% 75% 53%

* Did not include AAS students prior to 2008‐09

** Includes data from private colleges and universities.

***Less than 10 students

2009‐2010 TOTALASSOCIATE DEGREE RECIPENT24 OR MORE SEMESTER HOURS % ≥ 2.00

Page 144: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

D: PASSING RATES OF STUDENTS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES 

Description The percentage of developmental course completers in English, reading or mathematics completing with a grade of "C" or better. 

Source  At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file which is uploaded to the NCCCS Data Warehouse.  Grade data in the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II Universe was extracted by filtering “Course Prefix” equal to “ENG;MAT;RED”,  “Course Number” less than “100”, and Reporting Term equal to “201003;201101;201102” and analyzed based on data in the fields “Letter Grade” and “College Letter Grade”.   While all grades were extracted for analysis, only grades that equated to “A”,”B”,”C”,”D”, or “F” were counted as completers.  Since colleges use different letter grades with multiple meanings, it was imperative to make sure all of the other, withdrawal, and incomplete grades were meaning the same thing across colleges for adequate comparisons. Thus, a survey was sent to colleges asking them to define the grades we have questions about. Additionally, the student handbook at each college was used to further help in the definitions when needed. Then each college letter grade was mapped to a consistent definition of letter grades. Other grades include those that equate to withdraw, incomplete, audit, transfer credit, etc. Results were shared and verified with institutions to ensure proper grade mapping.  

Standard 75% of developmental course completers in English, reading or mathematics will complete with a grade "C" or better. 

Results For 2010‐11, 48 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 61% to a high of 97%. The aggregate result for the system was 80%.   

84% 83% 83% 86%79% 83% 81% 83%

74% 77% 74% 76% 77% 80% 78% 80%

Reading

2007‐08

Reading

2008‐09

Reading

2009‐10

Reading

2010‐11

English

2007‐08

English

2008‐09

English

2009‐10

English

2010‐11

Math

2007‐08

Math

2008‐09

Math

2009‐10

Math

2010‐11

Total

2007‐08

Total

2008‐09

Total

2009‐10

Total

2010‐11

Developmental Course Grades

C or BETTER FAIL OTHER GRADES STANDARD (75%)

Page 145: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

D. PASSING RATES OF STUDENTS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES, 2010‐2011

10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  31997 25484 86% 83% 83% 84% 74711 59332 83% 81% 83% 79% 105944 81023 76% 74% 77% 74% 212652 165839 80% 78% 80% 77%

Alamance CC  869 702 91% 91% 1199 974 89% 83% 89% 88% 2493 1975 81% 76% 79% 80% 4561 3651 85% 81% 83% 83%

Asheville‐Buncombe  726 581 96% 94% 95% 97% 1588 1168 90% 93% 93% 92% 1969 1358 81% 82% 88% 90% 4283 3107 87% 88% 91% 92%

Beaufort County CC  355 217 93% 94% 93% 91% 482 318 95% 94% 94% 98% 689 408 81% 85% 78% 77% 1526 943 88% 90% 86% 87%

Bladen CC  329 227 93% 93% 92% 95% 637 420 90% 91% 90% 92% 1053 764 87% 83% 83% 88% 2019 1411 89% 87% 87% 90%

Blue Ridge CC  245 234 90% 88% 83% 79% 400 388 85% 84% 88% 83% 692 677 79% 74% 70% 73% 1337 1299 83% 79% 77% 76%

Brunswick CC  12 11 64% * 85% 293 263 64% 81% 72% 71% 588 553 76% 87% 79% 84% 893 827 72% 85% 77% 80%

Caldwell CC & TI  543 391 84% 86% 87% 95% 984 754 92% 91% 90% 80% 1631 1229 83% 82% 83% 76% 3158 2374 86% 85% 85% 81%

Cape Fear CC  1982 1613 79% 79% 78% 76% 3494 2719 81% 77% 82% 83% 5476 4332 81% 78% 80% 80%

Carteret CC  81% 593 524 55% 70% 67% 59% 910 831 77% 87% 90% 91% 1503 1355 68% 80% 84% 83%

Catawba Valley CC  762 644 89% 83% 80% 78% 1539 1268 86% 85% 83% 84% 2603 2125 68% 73% 71% 71% 4904 4037 77% 78% 76% 75%

Central Carolina CC  683 418 87% 89% 93% 89% 990 683 83% 83% 86% 86% 1469 942 77% 79% 74% 71% 3142 2043 81% 83% 82% 79%

Central Piedmont CC 2892 2664 79% 76% 77% 80% 7412 6779 78% 80% 77% 81% 7957 7200 66% 67% 64% 71% 18261 16643 73% 74% 70% 76%

Cleveland CC  86% 79% 89% 1508 1155 70% 82% 87% 92% 1452 1170 77% 81% 83% 81% 2960 2325 74% 82% 83% 84%

Coastal Carolina CC  420 418 87% 88% 87% 89% 566 557 91% 90% 87% 86% 2167 2151 81% 83% 80% 80% 3153 3126 84% 85% 82% 82%

College of The Albem 399 323 77% 77% 90% 86% 651 531 89% 89% 94% 92% 1538 1161 75% 81% 81% 83% 2588 2015 79% 82% 85% 85%

Craven CC  83% 1112 986 81% 80% 73% 65% 1653 1386 78% 70% 71% 75% 2765 2372 79% 74% 72% 72%

Davidson County CC  82% 77% 82% 842 606 90% 86% 79% 68% 1720 1138 83% 74% 73% 63% 2562 1744 85% 80% 75% 67%

Durham TCC  1234 896 77% 72% 78% 67% 2711 2005 75% 74% 81% 78% 3279 2313 69% 70% 69% 64% 7224 5214 73% 72% 74% 68%

Edgecombe CC  1025 711 78% 82% 71% 88% 1649 1141 82% 81% 78% 73% 1771 1187 79% 74% 71% 73% 4445 3039 80% 79% 74% 77%

Fayetteville TCC  2501 2069 82% 72% 77% 72% 4153 3455 84% 79% 73% 69% 4874 3805 75% 71% 66% 62% 11528 9329 80% 74% 70% 66%

Forsyth TCC  1780 1367 91% 85% 83% 89% 3088 2290 91% 84% 82% 79% 3327 2523 88% 83% 84% 80% 8195 6180 90% 84% 83% 82%

Gaston College  863 698 86% 88% 82% 80% 2018 1639 80% 82% 83% 76% 2927 2325 79% 81% 81% 82% 5808 4662 80% 83% 82% 80%

Guilford TCC  4120 3216 87% 90% 75% 90% 7589 6027 84% 87% 77% 86% 9007 6871 73% 84% 78% 81% 20716 16114 80% 86% 77% 84%

Halifax CC  1049 769 81% 81% 87% 86% 918 643 72% 62% 59% 64% 1967 1412 77% 73% 69% 71%

Haywood CC  234 166 97% 92% 98% 87% 313 203 84% 77% 80% 52% 507 296 76% 57% 82% 56% 1054 665 84% 71% 85% 60%

Isothermal CC  230 165 88% 97% 90% 90% 696 541 93% 90% 91% 88% 1519 850 78% 80% 79% 80% 2445 1556 84% 86% 84% 83%

James Sprunt CC  325 272 89% 91% 92% 97% 358 287 90% 86% 82% 87% 717 589 77% 80% 81% 83% 1400 1148 83% 84% 84% 87%

Johnston CC  871 767 78% 84% 86% 88% 1353 1244 81% 90% 72% 72% 1119 932 73% 85% 68% 68% 3343 2943 78% 87% 74% 74%

Lenoir CC  641 450 86% 83% 83% 86% 1364 928 81% 78% 82% 81% 1588 1053 78% 80% 80% 83% 3593 2431 81% 80% 81% 83%

Martin CC  163 155 81% 79% 99% 92% 236 217 73% 65% 68% 61% 326 298 67% 71% 80% 89% 725 670 72% 71% 83% 79%

Mayland CC  87 59 86% 56% 59% 82% 207 154 84% 77% 81% 91% 261 191 69% 54% 71% 78% 555 404 77% 62% 72% 82%

McDowell TCC  49 39 79% 69% 80% 97% 227 182 82% 82% 95% 96% 427 311 88% 85% 90% 94% 703 532 85% 83% 91% 95%

Mitchell CC  87% 1157 915 87% 86% 83% 88% 1631 1298 84% 85% 81% 86% 2788 2213 85% 85% 82% 87%

Montgomery CC  77 61 90% 89% 68% 68% 206 180 91% 93% 81% 75% 212 200 97% 90% 78% 96% 495 441 93% 90% 77% 85%

Nash CC  344 231 96% 97% 81% 98% 553 375 95% 99% 80% 76% 1477 748 97% 97% 70% 71% 2374 1354 97% 97% 74% 75%

Pamlico CC  4 4 * 97% 44 43 77% 80% 82% 82% 93 85 69% 75% 67% 70% 141 132 71% 77% 73% 92%

Piedmont CC  301 248 81% 84% 83% 97% 563 500 82% 80% 75% 80% 926 728 71% 72% 75% 79% 1790 1476 77% 77% 76% 83%

Pitt CC  227 170 91% 2845 2166 86% 90% 91% 91% 3566 2704 72% 70% 69% 68% 6638 5040 79% 79% 77% 75%

Randolph CC  274 227 94% 98% 93% 90% 511 405 88% 88% 90% 93% 1134 791 88% 87% 95% 93% 1919 1423 89% 89% 93% 93%

Richmond CC  767 604 96% 94% 88% 88% 1133 828 89% 87% 83% 89% 1070 802 91% 85% 90% 89% 2970 2234 92% 88% 88% 89%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC 229 193 90% 81% 85% 80% 369 308 80% 68% 72% 75% 426 368 87% 73% 81% 65% 1024 869 85% 72% 79% 71%

Robeson CC  948 668 86% 86% 84% 78% 1665 1186 85% 86% 90% 85% 1719 1145 70% 71% 68% 84% 4332 2999 79% 80% 78% 73%

Rockingham CC  302 218 87% 86% 78% 77% 626 467 84% 87% 91% 84% 1495 1113 82% 78% 83% 83% 2423 1798 83% 81% 84% 82%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  543 499 73% 86% 79% 82% 1355 1221 67% 79% 74% 82% 3792 3085 56% 67% 74% 78% 5690 4805 61% 72% 75% 80%

Sampson CC  226 191 89% 93% 80% 92% 624 530 91% 93% 92% 90% 804 644 73% 74% 73% 73% 1654 1365 82% 84% 80% 81%

Sandhills CC  28 19 84% 85% 1331 1015 85% 84% 79% 81% 1775 1230 82% 73% 77% 77% 3134 2264 83% 78% 78% 80%

South Piedmont CC  494 459 85% 80% 80% 79% 525 451 73% 71% 71% 76% 1009 918 83% 78% 83% 82% 2028 1828 81% 77% 79% 80%

Southeastern CC  778 554 86% 84% 93% 79% 947 665 62% 75% 85% 74% 1309 814 79% 76% 81% 74% 3034 2033 75% 78% 86% 76%

Southwestern CC  207 159 84% 82% 82% 98% 607 478 85% 83% 79% 75% 734 554 89% 88% 85% 89% 1548 1191 86% 85% 83% 87%

Stanly CC  645 431 91% 93% 87% 86% 997 678 82% 85% 88% 92% 1642 1109 86% 88% 88% 90%

Surry CC  349 295 90% 93% 95% 98% 455 351 87% 67% 70% 71% 797 598 84% 90% 91% 84% 1601 1244 86% 84% 86% 83%

Tri‐County CC  * 187 173 83% 78% 85% 94% 278 243 67% 77% 94% 94% 465 416 73% 77% 90% 94%

Vance‐Granville CC  390 257 99% 94% 85% 84% 1366 890 94% 93% 83% 74% 1503 1068 88% 87% 85% 81% 3259 2215 91% 90% 84% 79%

Wake TCC  1471 1238 86% 84% 84% 88% 3272 2550 77% 74% 72% 77% 6963 5154 73% 71% 71% 72% 11706 8942 76% 73% 73% 76%

Wayne CC  523 396 91% 92% 92% 86% 1145 908 97% 93% 95% 94% 1800 1319 78% 79% 83% 85% 3468 2623 86% 86% 88% 88%

Western Piedmont C 422 342 99% 99% 91% 100% 977 798 98% 98% 92% 84% 1598 1113 94% 87% 78% 53% 2997 2253 96% 93% 84% 67%

Wilkes CC  367 295 87% 82% 84% 84% 1026 836 91% 87% 89% 86% 1142 830 76% 77% 77% 78% 2535 1961 84% 81% 81% 81%

Wilson CC  368 296 84% 85% 83% 90% 788 593 71% 75% 79% 80% 1049 819 69% 75% 70% 69% 2205 1708 72% 77% 75% 76%

*Less than 10 students

ENGLISH

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS 

PASSING

READING

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS 

PASSING

MATH

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS 

PASSING

TOTAL

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS 

PASSING

Page 146: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

E: SUCCESS RATE OF DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENTS IN SUBSEQUENT COLLEGE‐LEVEL COURSES 

Description Among developmental completers subsequently completing a college level English or mathematics course, the percentage passing the college level English or mathematics course with a grade of "D" or better. Specifically, the performance of those who took developmental English and/or reading courses and subsequently took college‐level English courses was assessed. Likewise, the performance of those who took developmental math courses and then took college‐level math courses was also assessed. 

Source  At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file which is uploaded to the NCCCS Data Warehouse.  Grade data in the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II Universe was extracted by filtering “Course Prefix” equal to “ENG;MAT”,  “Course Number” greater than or equal to “100”, and Reporting Term equal to “201003;201101;201102” and analyzed based on data in the fields “Letter Grade” and “College Letter Grade”.  Any students who had taken a credit course in the same subject area in “200803;200901;200902;200903;201001;201002” were removed from the file to leave only first time credit course students.  While all grades were extracted for analysis, only grades that equated to “A”,”B”,”C”,”D”, or “F” were counted  as completers.  These grades were matched to students who had previously taken developmental English, Reading, and/or Math courses for the terms “200803; 200901; 200902; 200903; 201001; 201002; 201003; 201101; 201102”. The same survey used in Performance Measure D was used to create a standardized grading system  across all colleges using the college letter grade, survey responses, and student 

handbook as needed. The standardized grades were then used in the final analysis. Results were shared and verified with institutions to ensure proper grade mapping.  

Standard 80% of college level English or mathematics course completers with previous developmental coursework will complete the college level English or mathematics course with a grade of "D" or better. 

Results For 2010‐11, 53 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 75% to a high of 98%. The aggregate result for the system was 87%.   

89% 86% 87% 85% 90% 88% 88% 88% 89% 87% 88% 87%

English

2007‐08

English

2008‐09

English

2009‐10

English

2010‐11

Math

2007‐08

Math

2008‐09

Math

2009‐10

Math

2010‐11

Total

2007‐08

Total

2008‐09

Total

2009‐10

Total

2010‐11

Previous Developmental Student Grades in College‐Level CoursesD or BETTER FAIL OTHER GRADES STANDARD (80%)

Page 147: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

E. PERFORMANCE OF DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENTS IN SUBSEQUENT COLLEGE‐LEVEL COURSES, 2010‐2011

10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  20884 17083 85% 87% 86% 89% 20397 16627 88% 88% 88% 90% 41281 33710 87% 88% 87% 89%

Alamance CC  577 461 93% 96% 97% 98% 644 476 95% 93% 96% 96% 1221 937 94% 95% 96% 97%

Asheville‐Buncombe  442 346 90% 60% 72% 82% 393 312 88% 81% 88% 88% 835 658 89% 67% 80% 86%

Beaufort County CC  130 118 91% 85% 85% 83% 123 91 89% 96% 90% 83% 253 209 90% 89% 87% 83%

Bladen CC  168 112 86% 92% 93% 98% 187 142 95% 96% 98% 95% 355 254 91% 93% 96% 97%

Blue Ridge CC  176 170 88% 92% 86% 88% 188 185 92% 79% 87% 94% 364 355 90% 86% 87% 91%

Brunswick CC  99 92 89% 74% 77% 90% 152 144 77% 78% 85% 80% 251 236 82% 77% 82% 83%

Caldwell CC & TI  392 303 87% 88% 92% 90% 387 318 92% 92% 92% 94% 779 621 90% 89% 92% 92%

Cape Fear CC  761 682 79% 78% 79% 79% 880 714 82% 79% 83% 86% 1641 1396 81% 79% 81% 81%

Carteret CC  113 103 82% 90% 87% 81% 146 134 86% 96% 92% 89% 259 237 84% 92% 90% 86%

Catawba Valley CC  493 393 94% 98% 88% 87% 641 511 88% 88% 89% 90% 1134 904 91% 94% 89% 89%

Central Carolina CC  267 208 90% 92% 90% 94% 235 202 96% 97% 92% 96% 502 410 93% 93% 91% 95%

Central Piedmont CC 1847 1768 87% 87% 89% 91% 1537 1438 84% 84% 86% 91% 3384 3206 86% 86% 88% 91%

Cleveland CC  271 219 82% 85% 83% 80% 356 295 89% 92% 97% 97% 627 514 86% 88% 91% 90%

Coastal Carolina CC  315 303 93% 91% 92% 97% 491 487 91% 90% 88% 90% 806 790 92% 90% 89% 93%

College of The Albem 195 153 93% 89% 93% 90% 246 217 95% 98% 99% 96% 441 370 94% 92% 96% 93%

Craven CC  197 178 78% 82% 85% 83% 334 285 89% 94% 93% 89% 531 463 85% 88% 91% 87%

Davidson County CC  430 360 74% 76% 83% 80% 344 270 86% 87% 85% 89% 774 630 79% 80% 84% 85%

Durham TCC  397 286 83% 88% 95% 93% 388 309 88% 86% 94% 89% 785 595 86% 87% 95% 91%

Edgecombe CC  406 290 79% 84% 83% 86% 355 238 73% 74% 81% 80% 761 528 76% 82% 82% 84%

Fayetteville TCC  862 725 83% 86% 79% 76% 748 595 90% 85% 88% 89% 1610 1320 86% 85% 83% 81%

Forsyth TCC  901 693 91% 89% 86% 91% 718 481 86% 84% 80% 84% 1619 1174 89% 87% 83% 88%

Gaston College  560 477 89% 89% 83% 81% 567 439 91% 91% 89% 89% 1127 916 90% 90% 86% 85%

Guilford TCC  1623 1285 79% 87% 83% 87% 1396 1190 86% 79% 81% 81% 3019 2475 83% 84% 82% 85%

Halifax CC  146 126 90% 87% 88% 90% 120 95 92% 91% 84% 86% 266 221 90% 88% 87% 88%

Haywood CC  125 95 92% 91% 86% 90% 97 65 94% 91% 83% 91% 222 160 93% 91% 85% 91%

Isothermal CC  267 224 84% 86% 82% 83% 172 143 94% 97% 92% 94% 439 367 88% 90% 87% 89%

James Sprunt CC  187 158 87% 95% 89% 94% 125 93 90% 93% 93% 95% 312 251 88% 95% 91% 95%

Johnston CC  394 348 88% 94% 92% 97% 303 243 88% 95% 79% 98% 697 591 88% 94% 87% 97%

Lenoir CC  251 173 87% 97% 87% 96% 187 130 83% 81% 87% 97% 438 303 85% 93% 87% 96%

Martin CC  81 68 72% 60% 80% 71% 72 65 92% 85% 91% 81% 153 133 82% 70% 84% 74%

Mayland CC  59 47 89% 95% 87% 86% 36 30 90% 90% 91% 93% 95 77 90% 94% 89% 89%

McDowell TCC  104 85 96% 94% 96% 100% 138 124 99% 98% 93% 100% 242 209 98% 96% 94% 100%

Mitchell CC  378 287 92% 86% 81% 85% 263 180 89% 89% 86% 90% 641 467 91% 87% 83% 89%

Montgomery CC  60 51 88% 95% 88% 98% 71 41 80% 80% 95% 92% 131 92 85% 89% 91% 95%

Nash CC  232 181 73% 85% 87% 86% 322 280 92% 95% 92% 89% 554 461 85% 91% 90% 87%

Pamlico CC  28 25 84% 88% * 95% 32 30 90% 75% * 94% 60 55 87% 82% 86% 95%

Piedmont CC  181 140 89% 97% 86% 96% 257 213 85% 94% 86% 93% 438 353 87% 96% 86% 95%

Pitt CC  672 503 90% 89% 93% 92% 670 492 92% 91% 89% 89% 1342 995 91% 89% 91% 90%

Randolph CC  260 233 85% 90% 86% 80% 333 288 92% 86% 93% 92% 593 521 89% 88% 90% 87%

Richmond CC  316 244 92% 86% 92% 92% 221 186 92% 89% 91% 95% 537 430 92% 87% 92% 93%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC 65 53 72% 77% 75% 79% 51 48 79% 90% 91% 87% 116 101 75% 80% 81% 82%

Robeson CC  358 251 85% 92% 95% 93% 283 219 85% 91% 92% 85% 641 470 85% 92% 94% 90%

Rockingham CC  206 152 88% 80% 86% 80% 348 279 94% 94% 97% 98% 554 431 92% 87% 94% 92%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  792 716 74% 89% 83% 83% 641 561 83% 93% 91% 87% 1433 1277 78% 91% 86% 84%

Sampson CC  158 118 80% 91% 94% 97% 116 90 92% 86% 96% 95% 274 208 85% 89% 95% 96%

Sandhills CC  483 358 82% 91% 87% 89% 267 201 93% 89% 76% 82% 750 559 86% 90% 83% 86%

South Piedmont CC  221 182 81% 86% 83% 82% 177 150 81% 79% 86% 82% 398 332 81% 84% 84% 82%

Southeastern CC  177 105 72% 73% 90% 88% 108 90 89% 88% 94% 91% 285 195 80% 77% 91% 89%

Southwestern CC  184 165 78% 85% 83% 86% 215 182 81% 87% 79% 82% 399 347 80% 86% 81% 85%

Stanly CC  225 198 94% 89% 96% 96% 256 202 97% 97% 97% 98% 481 400 96% 94% 96% 97%

Surry CC  249 214 90% 92% 90% 85% 249 210 89% 87% 93% 88% 498 424 89% 90% 92% 87%

Tri‐County CC  87 80 78% 80% 86% 80% 92 73 77% 75% 87% 96% 179 153 77% 77% 86% 89%

Vance‐Granville CC  281 225 89% 80% 86% 84% 189 149 89% 92% 94% 98% 470 374 89% 83% 89% 90%

Wake TCC  855 672 81% 86% 78% 83% 1385 1081 85% 90% 89% 91% 2240 1753 84% 88% 84% 87%

Wayne CC  361 277 95% 92% 89% 92% 289 219 95% 89% 86% 91% 650 496 95% 91% 88% 92%

Western Piedmont C 359 264 95% 96% 87% 98% 348 289 99% 94% 93% 98% 707 553 97% 95% 89% 98%

Wilkes CC  274 213 90% 84% 89% 84% 228 168 97% 98% 96% 95% 502 381 93% 90% 92% 89%

Wilson CC  186 127 76% 83% 84% 82% 280 245 89% 87% 90% 92% 466 372 85% 85% 88% 87%

% COMPLETERS PASSING

ENGLISH MATH TOTAL

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS PASSING

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS PASSING

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

Page 148: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

F: SATISFACTION OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS AND NON‐COMPLETERS 

Description The percentage of graduates and early‐leavers “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the overall quality of the college.  

Source Data was collected from a Completer Survey and a Non‐Completer Survey that were developed and administered at the individual colleges.  Many of the questions included on the surveys are required by the System Office, including a question on the “Overall quality of the college” with satisfaction options of “very satisfied”, “satisfied”, “dissatisfied”, and “very dissatisfied”.   Completer Surveys were administered to students graduating in the 2010‐2011 academic year.  Non‐Completer Surveys were administered to credential‐seeking students in Fall 2010 who were not enrolled in Fall 2011 and had not graduated.   Colleges are required to report a statistically valid response rate.  The overall satisfaction rates were calculated by dividing the total number of respondents “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the “Overall quality of the college” by the total number of question responses.   

Performance Standard 90% of exiting students will be “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the overall quality of the college. 

Results For 2010‐11, all 58 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 91% to a high of 100%. The aggregate result for the system was 96%. 

97% 97% 95% 94% 96% 96%

52% 50%

40% 41%49% 48%

45% 47%

54% 52%

48% 48%

Completers

2007‐08

Completers

2008‐09

Completers

2009‐10

Completers

2010‐11

Non‐Completers

2007‐08

Non‐Completers

2008‐09

Non‐Completers

2009‐10

Non‐Completers

2010‐11

Total

2007‐08

Total

2008‐09

Total

2009‐10

Total

2010‐11

Completer and Non‐Completer Satisfaction

VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED STANDARD (90%)

Page 149: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

F. SATISFACTION OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS AND NON‐COMPLETERS, 2010‐2011

10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  34674 18755 18064 50% 47% 97% 98% 97% 97% 86308 7754 7223 41% 52% 93% 93% 94% 95% 120982 26509 25287 48% 48% 96% 96% 96% 96%

Alamance CC  693 382 359 49% 48% 96% 98% 100% 100% 1350 137 128 41% 54% 95% 96% 93% 95% 2043 519 487 47% 49% 96% 97% 98% 98%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC1132 853 848 46% 52% 98% 98% 97% 99% 1995 314 258 42% 50% 92% 92% 95% 93% 3127 1167 1106 45% 52% 97% 96% 96% 97%

Beaufort County CC  188 142 134 57% 43% 100% 100% 100% 98% 168 30 29 72% 24% 97% 100% 93% 92% 356 172 163 60% 39% 99% 100% 99% 97%

Bladen CC  217 90 90 46% 49% 94% 100% 97% 94% 861 87 87 67% 31% 98% 87% 95% 94% 1078 177 177 56% 40% 96% 95% 96% 94%

Blue Ridge CC  305 296 273 47% 52% 99% 100% 99% 100% 400 43 40 28% 68% 95% 91% 89% 97% 705 339 313 45% 54% 99% 98% 97% 99%

Brunswick CC  213 106 105 50% 47% 96% 90% 94% 99% 458 49 48 44% 42% 85% 81% 85% 87% 671 155 153 48% 45% 93% 87% 91% 95%

Caldwell CC & TI  1057 351 346 45% 52% 97% 97% 97% 96% 1300 169 157 45% 43% 89% 88% 95% 94% 2357 520 503 45% 49% 95% 95% 97% 95%

Cape Fear CC  1722 1192 1069 54% 43% 97% 98% 99% 98% 2883 437 433 47% 51% 97% 97% 96% 96% 4605 1629 1502 52% 45% 97% 98% 98% 97%

Carteret CC  286 173 172 58% 42% 100% 100% 100% 99% 748 70 67 39% 57% 96% 91% 96% 95% 1034 243 239 53% 46% 99% 97% 99% 98%

Catawba Valley CC  897 767 692 34% 63% 97% 96% 97% 99% 1490 155 145 40% 56% 96% 94% 94% 88% 2387 922 837 35% 62% 96% 96% 97% 98%

Central Carolina CC  776 255 253 41% 54% 95% 97% 97% 98% 1656 190 171 42% 44% 85% 94% 98% 98% 2432 445 424 41% 50% 91% 96% 97% 98%

Central Piedmont CC  1198 300 299 43% 52% 95% 96% 98% 98% 8589 405 396 19% 78% 96% 99% 96% 97% 9787 705 695 29% 66% 96% 97% 97% 98%

Cleveland CC  506 284 278 50% 44% 94% 95% 96% 97% 326 37 34 47% 50% 97% 96% 96% 99% 832 321 312 50% 45% 95% 95% 96% 98%

Coastal Carolina CC  943 834 777 77% 20% 98% 98% 98% 98% 2576 427 369 70% 28% 98% 100% 97% 95% 3519 1261 1146 75% 23% 98% 98% 98% 97%

College of The Albema 448 179 173 39% 57% 96% 97% 96% 98% 890 113 102 35% 57% 92% 91% 95% 97% 1338 292 275 37% 57% 95% 96% 96% 98%

Craven CC  344 51 51 39% 53% 92% 98% 93% 97% 1749 136 119 37% 53% 90% 86% 91% 94% 2093 187 170 38% 53% 91% 91% 92% 96%

Davidson County CC  761 354 354 53% 43% 96% 99% 98% 98% 1520 152 145 43% 43% 87% 91% 90% 96% 2281 506 499 50% 43% 93% 97% 96% 97%

Durham TCC  675 351 334 37% 60% 97% 97% 97% 99% 2503 251 243 21% 63% 85% 90% 88% 95% 3178 602 577 31% 61% 92% 94% 92% 97%

Edgecombe CC  420 361 318 59% 38% 97% 93% 97% 97% 1542 160 154 79% 21% 100% 97% 97% 100% 1962 521 472 65% 33% 98% 94% 97% 98%

Fayetteville TCC  1044 864 858 43% 53% 96% 96% 99% 97% 3077 235 218 24% 54% 78% 84% 92% 88% 4121 1099 1076 39% 53% 92% 93% 97% 95%

Forsyth TCC  1414 468 452 42% 53% 94% 97% 95% 94% 3735 246 238 30% 59% 89% 89% 95% 92% 5149 714 690 38% 55% 92% 95% 95% 93%

Gaston College  1355 868 858 49% 49% 97% 97% 97% 98% 2794 192 175 39% 52% 91% 90% 95% 92% 4149 1060 1033 47% 49% 96% 95% 97% 97%

Guilford TCC  2136 778 759 42% 54% 96% 97% 96% 97% 6431 187 176 28% 60% 88% 87% 93% 88% 8567 965 935 39% 55% 95% 95% 95% 95%

Halifax CC  258 174 172 45% 54% 99% 99% 97% 99% 680 99 88 41% 55% 95% 98% 100% 91% 938 273 260 43% 54% 98% 99% 98% 96%

Haywood CC  422 167 163 61% 36% 96% 97% 96% 96% 318 35 34 68% 32% 100% 90% 96% 98% 740 202 197 62% 35% 97% 96% 96% 97%

Isothermal CC  435 212 208 67% 30% 98% 100% 99% 99% 950 150 124 65% 31% 95% 98% 98% 95% 1385 362 332 66% 30% 97% 99% 99% 98%

James Sprunt CC  445 110 107 54% 46% 100% 100% 95% 97% 649 65 65 46% 51% 97% 89% 95% 92% 1094 175 172 51% 48% 99% 94% 95% 95%

Johnston CC  697 431 408 46% 52% 98% 98% 99% 99% 615 71 70 60% 37% 97% 95% 91% 96% 1312 502 478 48% 50% 98% 98% 97% 98%

Lenoir CC  489 119 116 46% 49% 95% 95% 96% 95% 1174 44 41 63% 29% 93% 97% 100% 97% 1663 163 157 50% 44% 94% 96% 98% 96%

Martin CC  83 26 26 31% 65% 96% 93% 98% 92% 317 38 37 24% 76% 100% 92% 78% 91% 400 64 63 27% 71% 98% 92% 90% 91%

Mayland CC  201 79 79 73% 27% 100% 98% 97% 98% 264 43 43 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 465 122 122 83% 17% 100% 98% 97% 98%

McDowell TCC  352 335 327 55% 44% 99% 97% 97% 94% 477 48 44 68% 32% 100% 100% 100% 81% 829 383 371 56% 43% 99% 98% 98% 92%

Mitchell CC  395 150 143 44% 52% 97% 98% 98% 99% 1296 118 94 33% 60% 93% 89% 91% 91% 1691 268 237 40% 55% 95% 95% 96% 96%

Montgomery CC  178 58 58 59% 36% 95% 100% 100% 99% 220 39 39 26% 67% 92% 96% 92% 100% 398 97 97 45% 48% 94% 99% 98% 99%

Nash CC  367 163 160 57% 41% 98% 100% 97% 100% 2966 323 321 40% 59% 99% 97% 96% 100% 3333 486 481 46% 53% 99% 98% 97% 100%

Pamlico CC  89 70 70 59% 39% 97% 100% 96% 95% 148 26 26 65% 31% 96% 96% 90% 92% 237 96 96 60% 36% 97% 99% 95% 94%

Piedmont CC  506 161 159 65% 35% 99% 99% 98% 95% 331 30 29 48% 45% 93% 96% 100% 94% 837 191 188 62% 36% 98% 98% 99% 95%

Pitt CC  1079 518 508 45% 53% 98% 99% 98% 99% 3006 285 280 37% 56% 94% 97% 98% 100% 4085 803 788 42% 54% 96% 98% 98% 99%

Randolph CC  416 209 204 50% 46% 96% 99% 98% 98% 868 88 78 22% 62% 83% 84% 84% 98% 1284 297 282 42% 50% 93% 95% 93% 98%

Richmond CC  262 153 150 59% 40% 99% 95% 96% 100% 730 75 74 35% 61% 96% 92% 90% 100% 992 228 224 51% 47% 98% 94% 95% 100%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  150 150 146 60% 37% 97% 96% 96% 77% 278 30 30 67% 33% 100% 99% 100% 89% 428 180 176 61% 36% 97% 98% 97% 83%

Robeson CC  280 115 114 39% 58% 96% 96% 95% 97% 1085 114 108 19% 70% 89% 96% 95% 95% 1365 229 222 29% 64% 93% 96% 95% 96%

Rockingham CC  363 213 207 55% 43% 99% 98% 100% 99% 702 72 69 45% 43% 88% 94% 90% 89% 1065 285 276 53% 43% 96% 97% 98% 97%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  938 301 296 55% 43% 99% 98% 97% 96% 945 78 66 27% 59% 86% 98% 92% 95% 1883 379 362 50% 46% 96% 98% 95% 96%

Sampson CC  127 80 71 56% 44% 100% 100% 99% 97% 492 59 58 26% 69% 95% 100% 100% 83% 619 139 129 43% 55% 98% 100% 99% 94%

Sandhills CC  682 239 239 67% 32% 99% 99% 99% 100% 1379 133 126 46% 49% 95% 94% 94% 97% 2061 372 365 60% 38% 98% 98% 98% 99%

South Piedmont CC  384 210 206 34% 58% 92% 93% 93% 90% 1132 116 116 32% 57% 89% 84% 86% 72% 1516 326 322 33% 58% 91% 90% 92% 87%

Southeastern CC  221 190 186 40% 58% 98% 97% 96% 98% 751 77 77 13% 79% 92% 98% 94% 100% 972 267 263 32% 64% 97% 97% 96% 98%

Southwestern CC  442 222 220 66% 33% 99% 100% 99% 98% 776 93 91 52% 41% 92% 95% 97% 98% 1218 315 311 62% 35% 97% 98% 98% 98%

Stanly CC  580 419 370 65% 34% 99% 99% 98% 99% 340 39 39 46% 49% 95% 100% 96% 98% 920 458 409 63% 36% 99% 99% 97% 99%

Surry CC  454 251 248 65% 34% 99% 99% 97% 97% 1013 161 161 63% 35% 98% 96% 98% 97% 1467 412 409 64% 34% 98% 98% 97% 97%

Tri‐County CC  185 81 81 64% 35% 99% 100% 99% 97% 387 38 38 66% 29% 95% 98% 88% 97% 572 119 119 65% 33% 97% 99% 96% 97%

Vance‐Granville CC  467 244 232 42% 56% 99% 98% 100% 98% 617 59 52 31% 63% 94% 92% 92% 92% 1084 303 284 40% 58% 98% 96% 98% 96%

Wake TCC  2189 1314 1290 43% 54% 97% 98% 94% 95% 8800 490 410 30% 60% 90% 83% 93% 96% 10989 1804 1700 40% 55% 95% 95% 94% 95%

Wayne CC  542 486 454 63% 36% 99% 100% 100% 99% 1467 172 144 47% 51% 99% 97% 100% 100% 2009 658 598 59% 39% 99% 99% 100% 99%

Western Piedmont CC  558 387 377 46% 52% 98% 99% 97% 98% 393 46 44 41% 48% 89% 98% 91% 94% 951 433 421 45% 52% 97% 99% 96% 98%

Wilkes CC  412 214 213 57% 40% 98% 96% 98% 97% 887 92 92 60% 36% 96% 93% 92% 98% 1299 306 305 58% 39% 97% 95% 96% 97%

Wilson CC  296 205 204 57% 42% 99% 99% 98% 99% 814 86 83 27% 65% 92% 92% 98% 99% 1110 291 287 48% 48% 97% 97% 98% 99%

COMPLETERS NON‐COMPLETERS TOTAL

STUDEN

TS

SURVEYS % SATISFIED OR 

VERY SATISFIED

STUDEN

TS

SURVEYS % SATISFIED OR 

VERY SATISFIED

STUDEN

TS % SATISFIED OR 

VERY SATISFIED

% VER

SATISFIED

SATISFIED

% VER

SATISFIED

SATISFIED

% VER

SATISFIED

Q RESPONS E

Q RESPONSE

SATISFIED

SURVEYS

Q RESPONS E

Page 150: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

G: CURRICULUM STUDENT RETENTION, GRADUATION, AND TRANSFER  Description The percentage of fall credential‐seeking students who have graduated or are still enrolled at the same college, a university, or another community college one year later.  

Source At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file which is uploaded to the NCCCS Data Warehouse.  Student enrollment data in the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II Universe was extracted by filtering “Degree Type Desc” equal to “Associate;Certificate;Diploma” and “Reporting Term” equal to “201003”.   This fall 2010 list of students was matched against those with a “Date Graduated in Curriculum” between “07/01/2010” and “12/31/2011” to determine those graduating.  The fall 2010 list was also matched against those with “Reporting Term” equal to “201103” in either the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II or Con‐Ed Universe (with “Funding Code Area” equal to “03” or ”04”)to determine fall 2011 enrollments in either curriculum or occupational extension programs. Finally, the fall 2010 list was sent to the National Student Clearinghouse to identify those who transferred to a college or university outside of the NC community College System.  The combined data set was analyzed to determine which students from the fall 2010 list had “graduated”, “returned but did not graduate”, “transferred but did not graduate or return”, or “did not graduate, return, or transfer”.  

Performance Standard 65% of fall credential‐seeking students will graduate, remain enrolled at the same college, or transfer to a university or another community college one year later.  

Results For 2010‐11, 48 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 61% to a high of 75%. The aggregate result for the system was 67%. 

 

13% 14% 12%16%

49%51%

49%45%

7%7%

7% 6%

2007‐2008 2008‐2009 2009‐2010 2010‐2011

Students Graduating, Returning, or Transferring

TRANSFERRED, DID NOT GRADUATE OR RETURN

RETURNED, DID NOT GRADUATE

GRADUATED

STANDARD (65%)

Page 151: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

G. CURRICULUM STUDENT RETENTION, GRADUATON AND TRANSFER, 2010‐2011

10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 10‐11 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  217,128 16% 12% 14% 13% 45% 49% 51% 49% 6% 7% 7% 7% 67% 68% 72% 69%

Alamance CC  4,711 17% 12% 15% 14% 48% 52% 53% 52% 4% 5% 6% 5% 69% 69% 74% 71%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 5,456 20% 16% 17% 17% 46% 49% 50% 49% 7% 5% 5% 5% 72% 70% 72% 71%

Beaufort County CC  1,644 13% 11% 16% 16% 49% 50% 54% 52% 5% 5% 5% 5% 67% 66% 75% 73%

Bladen CC  1,753 13% 9% 11% 11% 45% 57% 57% 57% 5% 6% 6% 7% 63% 71% 74% 75%

Blue Ridge CC  2,073 16% 11% 12% 11% 48% 50% 51% 49% 4% 5% 6% 7% 68% 66% 69% 67%

Brunswick CC  1,175 18% 12% 15% 16% 44% 45% 48% 45% 4% 6% 8% 6% 66% 63% 71% 67%

Caldwell CC & TI  3,950 19% 14% 14% 11% 47% 49% 54% 53% 5% 6% 8% 9% 71% 69% 76% 73%

Cape Fear CC  8,670 18% 14% 15% 14% 46% 51% 52% 50% 7% 7% 8% 9% 71% 72% 75% 73%

Carteret CC  1,684 17% 13% 14% 14% 45% 50% 49% 53% 5% 5% 5% 6% 67% 67% 68% 73%

Catawba Valley CC  4,600 15% 10% 15% 13% 50% 53% 52% 51% 10% 7% 5% 6% 75% 70% 72% 70%

Central Carolina CC  4,278 22% 18% 21% 20% 40% 44% 44% 45% 6% 4% 5% 4% 67% 66% 70% 69%

Central Piedmont CC  18,346 15% 8% 8% 8% 40% 47% 49% 49% 7% 9% 10% 9% 63% 64% 67% 66%

Cleveland CC  2,935 16% 14% 16% 14% 41% 44% 46% 46% 6% 6% 6% 6% 64% 64% 68% 66%

Coastal Carolina CC  4,815 20% 16% 16% 17% 39% 45% 46% 45% 11% 9% 9% 9% 70% 69% 71% 71%

College of The Albema 2,397 14% 15% 15% 16% 45% 45% 48% 47% 7% 9% 7% 7% 67% 69% 70% 70%

Craven CC  3,168 16% 11% 12% 10% 43% 49% 48% 48% 10% 6% 8% 8% 69% 66% 68% 66%

Davidson County CC  3,871 18% 16% 16% 20% 44% 51% 52% 45% 4% 5% 5% 5% 66% 72% 73% 70%

Durham TCC  5,049 12% 9% 9% 10% 43% 48% 49% 49% 6% 10% 10% 8% 62% 66% 68% 67%

Edgecombe CC  3,262 11% 9% 13% 15% 45% 52% 57% 53% 6% 5% 4% 4% 62% 66% 74% 72%

Fayetteville TCC  8,525 12% 10% 11% 9% 47% 49% 52% 51% 6% 7% 8% 7% 66% 66% 71% 67%

Forsyth TCC  8,859 16% 14% 14% 13% 46% 50% 51% 50% 5% 6% 7% 7% 67% 69% 72% 70%

Gaston College  5,935 15% 12% 13% 11% 45% 50% 52% 51% 6% 6% 5% 5% 67% 67% 70% 67%

Guilford TCC  14,163 16% 9% 11% 10% 47% 51% 52% 50% 6% 8% 9% 8% 68% 68% 72% 68%

Halifax CC  1,636 19% 18% 20% 22% 42% 45% 47% 43% 4% 4% 5% 5% 65% 67% 72% 70%

Haywood CC  1,874 22% 19% 17% 17% 41% 45% 48% 46% 3% 5% 5% 6% 66% 69% 70% 69%

Isothermal CC  2,187 21% 15% 14% 15% 39% 51% 50% 46% 4% 4% 7% 6% 64% 70% 71% 67%

James Sprunt CC  1,152 28% 22% 24% 25% 41% 45% 47% 44% 3% 5% 4% 5% 71% 72% 75% 74%

Johnston CC  3,787 17% 13% 16% 17% 50% 50% 52% 49% 4% 8% 7% 7% 72% 72% 75% 73%

Lenoir CC  2,614 18% 16% 14% 17% 42% 49% 53% 49% 4% 5% 7% 7% 64% 70% 74% 73%

Martin CC  682 18% 10% 16% 11% 44% 46% 51% 51% 2% 6% 6% 6% 63% 62% 73% 68%

Mayland CC  957 27% 28% 27% 32% 39% 35% 41% 38% 4% 4% 4% 3% 71% 68% 72% 73%

McDowell TCC  1,221 27% 15% 19% 20% 36% 46% 44% 42% 4% 3% 4% 4% 67% 64% 67% 66%

Mitchell CC  2,961 15% 12% 13% 9% 46% 51% 53% 52% 5% 5% 5% 8% 66% 69% 71% 69%

Montgomery CC  724 30% 28% 25% 23% 34% 38% 44% 46% 2% 2% 3% 3% 67% 67% 72% 72%

Nash CC  2,572 14% 11% 12% 12% 48% 50% 53% 51% 4% 6% 7% 6% 66% 67% 72% 69%

Pamlico CC  395 34% 32% 32% 31% 31% 38% 38% 40% 3% 3% 5% 3% 68% 72% 75% 74%

Piedmont CC  2,033 20% 17% 23% 24% 40% 44% 43% 43% 5% 5% 5% 5% 65% 66% 71% 72%

Pitt CC  7,347 16% 12% 14% 15% 50% 53% 53% 52% 9% 8% 8% 8% 74% 73% 75% 75%

Randolph CC  2,425 14% 13% 13% 13% 49% 53% 54% 53% 5% 4% 5% 5% 69% 69% 72% 71%

Richmond CC  1,882 14% 13% 12% 13% 52% 49% 54% 53% 6% 5% 6% 5% 71% 68% 72% 71%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  738 11% 15% 20% 14% 48% 44% 47% 42% 3% 7% 7% 5% 62% 65% 74% 61%

Robeson CC  2,410 14% 11% 16% 14% 50% 49% 51% 49% 4% 7% 6% 5% 68% 66% 73% 68%

Rockingham CC  2,279 17% 14% 14% 14% 44% 51% 53% 50% 4% 5% 5% 5% 66% 70% 72% 69%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  6,570 15% 9% 13% 10% 42% 52% 51% 50% 5% 6% 6% 6% 61% 66% 70% 66%

Sampson CC  1,279 21% 17% 21% 22% 46% 49% 52% 48% 3% 4% 4% 5% 70% 70% 77% 75%

Sandhills CC  3,728 16% 12% 15% 10% 45% 49% 50% 51% 4% 5% 7% 7% 65% 65% 72% 68%

South Piedmont CC  2,250 19% 15% 16% 17% 43% 47% 51% 47% 3% 5% 7% 6% 65% 67% 74% 70%

Southeastern CC  1,731 16% 13% 14% 11% 42% 46% 52% 52% 9% 7% 8% 6% 67% 67% 74% 69%

Southwestern CC  2,032 22% 20% 17% 18% 42% 47% 49% 46% 3% 4% 5% 6% 67% 71% 71% 70%

Stanly CC  2,613 24% 18% 17% 19% 44% 46% 47% 47% 3% 5% 4% 4% 71% 69% 68% 70%

Surry CC  2,187 19% 17% 15% 14% 47% 48% 53% 52% 6% 5% 6% 6% 72% 70% 74% 72%

Tri‐County CC  1,052 17% 11% 17% 13% 47% 47% 46% 47% 6% 6% 8% 6% 69% 65% 71% 66%

Vance‐Granville CC  3,420 16% 16% 15% 11% 44% 42% 47% 52% 5% 5% 5% 5% 66% 62% 67% 68%

Wake TCC  16,748 11% 9% 8% 9% 49% 53% 52% 51% 8% 9% 10% 9% 68% 70% 70% 69%

Wayne CC  3,335 18% 14% 15% 14% 43% 49% 50% 50% 7% 6% 7% 9% 67% 69% 72% 73%

Western Piedmont CC  2,824 19% 15% 16% 17% 48% 52% 56% 53% 5% 4% 5% 5% 73% 72% 77% 75%

Wilkes CC  2,410 19% 14% 15% 15% 45% 50% 54% 51% 7% 5% 6% 6% 70% 69% 75% 72%

Wilson CC  1,754 18% 14% 16% 16% 41% 47% 49% 47% 9% 5% 6% 5% 68% 66% 71% 68%

% TRANSFER% GRADUATE% GRADUATE, TRANSFER, OR 

RETURNENROLLED% RETURN

Page 152: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

H: CLIENT SATISFACTION WITH CUSTOMIZED TRAINING  Description Percentage of clients receiving specialized training programs and services through Customized Training and Small Business Centers satisfied with training.  Source Surveys administered to clients receiving services through Customized Training Program projects and Business & Industry Support training activities, and from Small Business Centers were administered by colleges to determine level of satisfaction with training.  The data is submitted annually to the System Office at the end of the fiscal year.  Satisfaction for each of these surveys are based on a five point scale with satisfaction being based on the highest two points.  Performance Standard 90% of clients receiving specialized training programs and services through Customized Training and Small Business Centers will be satisfied with training.  Results For 2010‐11, all 58 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 90% to a high of 100%. The aggregate result for the system was 95%.  

94% 94% 95% 95%

2007‐2008 2008‐2009 2009‐2010 2010‐2011

Clients Satisfied with Training

STANDARD (90%)

Page 153: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

H. CLIENT SATISFIED WITH CUSTOMIZED TRAINING PROGRAM 2010‐2011

RESPONDENTS% EXCELLENT & 

VERY GOODRESPONDENTS

% EXCELLENT & 

VERY GOOD2010‐2011 2009‐2010 2008‐2009 2007‐2008

System Totals  36,723 95% 900 99% 95% 95% 94% 94%

Alamance CC  508 95% 12 100% 95% 95% 94% 95%

Asheville‐Buncombe TC 556 95% 31 100% 95% 93% 93% 94%

Beaufort County CC  393 93% 23 100% 94% 94% 96% 96%

Bladen CC  193 98% 7 100% 98% 98% 99% 99%

Blue Ridge CC  1,178 92% 18 100% 92% 97% 93% 93%

Brunswick CC  229 93% 4 100% 93% 96% 95% 92%

Caldwell CC & TI  320 99% 8 100% 99% 91% 92% 95%

Cape Fear CC  1,340 94% 30 100% 94% 95% 93% 94%

Carteret CC  336 92% 9 100% 92% 93% 87% 88%

Catawba Valley CC  791 94% 10 100% 94% 96% 92% 95%

Central Carolina CC  1,061 92% 14 100% 92% 97% 96% 96%

Central Piedmont CC  1,180 90% 44 98% 90% 91% 93% 93%

Cleveland CC  419 93% 14 100% 93% 92% 94% 96%

Coastal Carolina CC  1,482 96% 12 100% 96% 95% 94% 93%

College of The Albema 1,086 91% 7 100% 91% 92% 92% 90%

Craven CC  775 99% 6 100% 99% 97% 96% 100%

Davidson County CC  152 89% 30 100% 91% 93% 93% 91%

Durham TCC  672 97% 12 100% 97% 94% 93% 90%

Edgecombe CC  211 96% 7 86% 96% 96% 95% 98%

Fayetteville TCC  1,164 95% 8 100% 95% 92% 93% 96%

Forsyth TCC  1,195 97% 23 100% 97% 95% 96% 96%

Gaston College  554 90% 24 100% 91% 97% 93% 98%

Guilford TCC  593 93% 11 100% 93% 94% 95% 80%

Halifax CC  880 95% 4 75% 95% 100% 94% 96%

Haywood CC  498 93% 6 100% 93% 93% 95% 93%

Isothermal CC  392 91% 20 100% 91% 95% 96% 86%

James Sprunt CC  1,064 100% 9 100% 100% 100% 100% 99%

Johnston CC  1,058 96% 22 100% 96% 94% 95% 98%

Lenoir CC  375 96% 5 80% 96% 95% 94% 95%

Martin CC  480 94% 4 100% 94% 94% 95% 93%

Mayland CC  389 95% 9 78% 94% 95% 96% 96%

McDowell TCC  206 100% 9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Mitchell CC  465 94% 15 100% 95% 96% 93% 93%

Montgomery CC  465 95% 7 100% 96% 97% 93% 93%

Nash CC  927 95% 19 100% 95% 96% 92% 96%

Pamlico CC ** 147 99% 99% 99% 92% 87%

Piedmont CC  481 94% 3 100% 94% 93% 92% 93%

Pitt CC  883 94% 32 97% 94% 95% 90% 92%

Randolph CC  410 94% 41 100% 95% 92% 94% 97%

Richmond CC  645 94% 45 100% 94% 100% 96% 89%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  524 96% 3 100% 96% 95% 95% 93%

Robeson CC  942 98% 31 100% 98% 94% 95% 96%

Rockingham CC  248 95% 12 100% 95% 94% 91% 92%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  537 90% 29 100% 91% 92% 90% 93%

Sampson CC  253 95% 9 100% 95% 93% 83% 96%

Sandhills CC  1,059 95% 13 100% 95% 93% 96% 94%

South Piedmont CC  285 93% 11 100% 93% 94% 93% 94%

Southeastern CC  1,177 96% 1 100% 96% 93% 91% 92%

Southwestern CC  85 99% 6 100% 99% 94% 100% 100%

Stanly CC  359 96% 16 100% 96% 93% 92% 95%

Surry CC  545 97% 17 100% 97% 99% 98% 97%

Tri‐County CC  84 94% 18 100% 95% 94% 98% 94%

Vance‐Granville CC  713 96% 32 100% 96% 94% 93% 98%

Wake TCC  2,278 96% 14 100% 96% 96% 97% 97%

Wayne CC  500 98% 19 100% 98% 95% 95% 92%

Western Piedmont CC  313 95% 30 100% 95% 99% 97% 94%

Wilkes CC  354 97% 13 85% 97% 90% 96% 98%

Wilson CC  314 98% 12 100% 98% 97% 95% 95%

* Did not include Customized Training and Business & Industry Support prior to 2009‐10

** For customized training, Pamlico is in consortium with Craven CC

AGGREGATE % EXCELLENT & VERY GOOD*CUSTOMIZED TRAINING PROJ AND 

BUSINESS & INDUSTRY SUPPORT SMALL BUSINESS CENTERS

Page 154: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Critical Success Factors

2011

Page 155: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 156: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

CONTENTS 

INTRODUCTION 

2010‐2011 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY 

A: PROGRESS OF BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS 

CHART A. PROGRESS OF BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS 

B: PASSING RATES ON LICENSURE & CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS 

CHART B1. AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASS RATE AND NUMBER OF EXAMS WITH A PASS RATE < 70% 

CHART B2. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS    (AVIATION – GENERAL, AVIATION – AIRFRAME, AVIATION ‐ POWER PLANT, BLET, REAL ESTATE SALES) 

CHART B3. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS   (COSMETIC ARTS – APPRENTICE, COSMETOLOGY, ESTHETICIAN, INSTRUCTOR, MANICURIST) 

CHART B4. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS   (DENTAL HYGIENE, OPTICIANRY, NUC. MED. TECH., RADIATION THERAPY, RADIOGRAPHY) 

CHART B5. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS   (PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASST., PRACTICAL NURSING, REGISTERED NURSING, VET. MED. TECH.) 

CHART B6. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS   (EMD, EMT, EMT‐I, EMT‐P) 

C: PERFORMANCE OF COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS 

CHART C. PERCENT OF COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS WITH A GPA OF > = 2.0 AFTER TWO SEMESTERS AT A UNIVERSITY 

D. PASSING RATES OF STUDENTS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES

CHART D. PASSING RATES OF STUDENTS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES

E. SUCCESS RATES OF DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENTS IN SUBSEQUENT COLLEGE‐LEVELCOURSES

CHART E. PERFORMANCE OF DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENTS IN SUBSEQUENT COLLEGE‐LEVEL COURSES 

F. SATISFACTION OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS AND NON‐COMPLETERS

CHART F. SATISFACTION OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS AND NON‐COMPLETERS,

G. CURRICULUM STUDENT RETENTION, GRADUATION, AND TRANSFER

CHART G. CURRICULUM STUDENT RETENTION, GRADUATION AND TRANSFER

H. CLIENT SATISFACTION WITH CUSTOMIZED TRAINING

CHART H. CLIENT SATISFACTION WITH CUSTOMIZED TRAINING

2011 Critical Success Factors Report

June 2011

North Carolina Community College System 

Dr. R Scott Ralls, President 

Kennon Briggs, Executive VP & Chief of Staff 

Research & Performance Management 

Bill Schneider, Associate VP 

Jon Brasfield, Coordinator 

Vivian Barrett, Office Assistant 

Page 157: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 158: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

INTRODUCTION  The Critical Success Factors Report is the North Carolina Community College System’s major accountability document. This annual performance report serves to inform colleges and the public on the performance of our 58 community colleges.   In 1993, the State Board of Community Colleges began monitoring performance data on specific measures to ensure public accountability for programs and services. In 1998, the General Assembly directed the State Board to review past performance measures and define standards to ensure programs and services offered by community colleges in North Carolina were of sufficient quality.   The State Board of Community Colleges and the General Assembly approved twelve performance measures for accountability in 1999.   Later in 2007, the General Assembly approved the reduction of performance measures to the current eight:  A. Progress of Basic Skills Students B. Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations C. Performance of College Transfer Students D. Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses E. Success Rates of Developmental Students in Subsequent College‐Level Courses F. Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non‐Completers G. Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation, and Transfer H. Client Satisfaction with Customized Training  Colleges receive Recognition of Exceptional Institutional Performance if they meet or exceed all eight performance measures, have no licensure exams with a passing rate of less than 70%, and college transfer students perform at a level equal to or above native UNC system students.  The chart below shows by year the number of colleges who have met the standard for the individual performance measures, the number of colleges who have met all eight performance standards, and the number of colleges receiving Recognition of Exceptional Institutional Performance. 

 In 2010, President Scott Ralls appointed members of a Performance Measures Committee to review the current performance measures and recommend changes to the State Board of Community Colleges.  Once approved by the State Board and the General Assembly, these changes will be reflected in the 2013 report.

56

45 4448

57 56 5753

26

11

55

47

37

47

58 58 58 56

24

11

53

45 46 4752

5752

58

26

12

PM A PM B PM C PM D PM E PM F PM G PM H Meeting All Eight 

Standards

Exceptional Institutional Performance2009 2010 2011

Page 159: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 160: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

2010‐2011 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

AGG <70%

Standard 75% 80% 0 83%/87% 75% 80% 90% 65% 90%

System Totals 81% 86% 87% 78% 88% 96% 68% 95%

Meeting Standard 53 45 34 46/33 47 52 57 52 58

Alamance CC  84% 88% 1 85% 81% 95% 97% 69% 95% 8

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  81% 89% 0 97% 88% 67% 96% 70% 93% 7

Beaufort County CC  75% 86% 1 91% 90% 89% 100% 66% 94% 8

Bladen CC  83% 81% 1 69% 87% 93% 95% 71% 98% 7

Blue Ridge CC  75% 81% 1 97% 79% 86% 98% 66% 97% 8

Brunswick CC  95% 91% 1 82% 85% 77% 87% 63% 96% 4

Caldwell CC & TI  78% 85% 2 91% 85% 89% 95% 69% 91% 8

Cape Fear CC  76% 96% 0 85% 78% 79% 98% 72% 95% 7

Carteret CC  83% 83% 1 94% 80% 92% 97% 67% 93% 8

Catawba Valley CC  78% 77% 0 92% 78% 94% 96% 70% 96% 7

Central Carolina CC  77% 83% 2 87% 81% 93% 96% 66% 97% 8

Central Piedmont CC  95% 92% 0 88% 74% 86% 97% 64% 91% 6

Cleveland CC  69% 80% 1 88% 82% 88% 95% 64% 92% 6

Coastal Carolina CC  77% 94% 0 90% 85% 90% 98% 69% 95% 8*

College of The Albemarle  81% 74% 1 95% 82% 92% 96% 69% 92% 7

Craven CC  84% 88% 0 93% 74% 88% 91% 66% 97% 7

Davidson County CC  88% 92% 0 89% 80% 80% 97% 72% 93% 8*

Durham TCC  79% 89% 1 89% 72% 87% 94% 66% 94% 7

Edgecombe CC  76% 86% 0 69% 79% 82% 94% 66% 96% 7

Fayetteville TCC  89% 96% 0 85% 74% 85% 93% 66% 92% 7

Forsyth TCC  84% 92% 0 88% 84% 87% 95% 69% 95% 8*

Gaston College  90% 88% 0 85% 83% 90% 95% 67% 97% 8

Guilford TCC  78% 94% 0 85% 86% 84% 95% 68% 94% 8

Halifax CC  86% 76% 1 87% 73% 88% 99% 67% 100% 6

Haywood CC  72% 79% 1 91% 71% 91% 96% 69% 93% 5

Isothermal CC  83% 77% 1 81% 86% 90% 99% 70% 95% 6

James Sprunt CC  69% 88% 0 89% 84% 95% 94% 72% 100% 7

Johnston CC  82% 81% 1 86% 87% 94% 98% 72% 94% 8

Lenoir CC  76% 84% 0 85% 80% 93% 96% 70% 95% 8

Martin CC  81% 71% 0 82% 71% 70% 92% 62% 94% 3

Mayland CC  82% 85% 1 74% 62% 94% 98% 68% 95% 6

McDowell TCC  77% 92% 0 92% 83% 96% 98% 64% 100% 7

Mitchell CC  78% 84% 0 87% 85% 87% 95% 69% 96% 8*

Montgomery CC  75% 83% 0 80% 90% 89% 99% 67% 97% 7

Nash CC  69% 77% 1 93% 97% 91% 98% 67% 96% 6

Pamlico CC  79% 46% 0 77% 82% 99% 72% 99% 6 of 7

Piedmont CC  88% 76% 0 66% 77% 96% 98% 66% 93% 6

Pitt CC  81% 85% 0 85% 79% 89% 98% 73% 95% 8

Randolph CC  76% 87% 0 90% 89% 88% 95% 69% 92% 8*

Richmond CC  76% 97% 0 93% 88% 87% 94% 68% 100% 8*

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  76% 72% 1 100% 72% 80% 98% 65% 95% 6

Robeson CC  88% 72% 2 78% 80% 92% 96% 66% 94% 6

Rockingham CC  76% 84% 1 89% 81% 87% 97% 70% 94% 8

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  82% 85% 1 76% 72% 91% 98% 66% 92% 6

Sampson CC  80% 85% 0 96% 84% 89% 100% 70% 93% 8*

Sandhills CC  74% 89% 0 85% 78% 90% 98% 65% 93% 7

South Piedmont CC  94% 86% 0 90% 77% 84% 90% 67% 94% 8*

Southeastern CC  91% 82% 2 73% 75% 77% 97% 67% 94% 6

Southwestern CC  75% 95% 0 94% 85% 86% 98% 71% 94% 8*

Stanly CC  76% 89% 0 89% 88% 94% 99% 69% 93% 8*

Surry CC  85% 93% 0 91% 84% 90% 98% 70% 99% 8*

Tri‐County CC  80% 70% 1 86% 77% 77% 99% 65% 94% 6

Vance‐Granville CC  78% 87% 0 87% 90% 83% 96% 62% 94% 7

Wake TCC  80% 91% 0 91% 73% 88% 95% 70% 96% 7

Wayne CC  80% 74% 1 87% 86% 91% 99% 69% 95% 7

Western Piedmont CC  77% 84% 0 89% 93% 95% 99% 72% 99% 8*

Wilkes CC  83% 85% 0 86% 81% 90% 95% 69% 90% 8

Wilson TCC  81% 89% 0 84% 77% 85% 97% 66% 97% 8

*Met all measures and exceptional standard on licensure exams and transfer student performance

STANDARDS 

MET

A. BASIC 

SKILLS 

B. LICENSURE 

EXAMSC. TRANSFER

PERFORM

D. DEV 

GRADES

E. DEV IN

CREDIT

F. STUDENT 

SATISFACTION

G. STUDENT 

PERSISTENCE

H. TRAINING 

SATISFACTION

Page 161: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

 

A: PROGRESS OF BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS  Description The aggregate percentage of adult literacy students completing a level of literacy, progressing within a level of literacy, or completing a predetermined goal.  Source Data is submitted on an annual basis from each college into the Literacy Education Information System which is uploaded to the NCCCS Data Warehouse.  This data is extracted from the Data Warehouse’s Literacy‐College Universe using “Reporting Year” = “2010” and analyzed at the individual student level using the fields “Mover Higher (Y/N)”, Level Completed (Y/N)”, “Progressing (Y/N)”, and “Goal Completed (Y/N)” to determine student progression.      System Standard 75 % of adult literacy students will complete a level, progress within a level, or complete a predetermined goal.  Results For 2009‐10, 56 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 69% to a high of 95%. The aggregate result for the system was 81%.    

   

26%

6%

35%

14%

82% 84%

2007‐2008 2008‐2009 2009‐2010

Aggregate Adult Literacy Student Progression 

MET GOAL BUT DID NOT PROGRESS

PROGRESSED BUT DID NOT COMPLETE LEVEL

COMPLETED LEVEL BUT DID NOT GO TO NEXT

MOVED TO NEXT LEVEL

STANDARD (75%)

Page 162: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

IA. PROGRESS OF BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS, 2009‐2010

2009‐2010 A 2009‐2010 B 2008‐2009 2007‐2008

System Totals  146061 26% 6% 35% 14% 19% 81% 84% 82%

Alamance CC  2894 20% 10% 36% 18% 16% 84% 84% 89% 90%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  3795 32% 5% 34% 9% 19% 81% 81% 80% 81%

Beaufort County CC  909 29% 3% 39% 4% 25% 75% 75% 76% 75%

Bladen CC  768 23% 4% 40% 16% 17% 83% 83% 89% 76%

Blue Ridge CC  1543 27% 7% 37% 5% 25% 75% 75% 75% 83%

Brunswick CC  1187 22% 8% 39% 26% 5% 95% 95% 97% 90%

Caldwell CC & TI  2513 26% 6% 35% 9% 23% 77% 78% 86% 80%

Cape Fear CC  3862 18% 4% 39% 8% 31% 69% 76% 80% 77%

Carteret CC  795 18% 13% 36% 16% 17% 83% 83% 82% 78%

Catawba Valley CC  3370 29% 8% 32% 9% 22% 78% 78% 80% 87%

Central Carolina CC  4804 30% 6% 26% 8% 29% 71% 77% 82% 85%

Central Piedmont CC  12960 23% 2% 36% 34% 5% 95% 95% 95% 79%

Cleveland CC  893 25% 8% 34% 3% 31% 69% 69% 77% 71%

Coastal Carolina CC  4266 27% 4% 31% 13% 25% 75% 77% 77% 78%

College of The Albemarle  2397 23% 8% 40% 10% 19% 81% 81% 73% 91%

Craven CC  1500 24% 6% 38% 16% 16% 84% 84% 87% 88%

Davidson County CC  3054 36% 3% 30% 18% 12% 88% 88% 97% 95%

Durham TCC  4716 25% 4% 37% 13% 21% 79% 79% 79% 79%

Edgecombe CC  1977 24% 10% 35% 5% 26% 74% 76% 75% 76%

Fayetteville TCC  5731 24% 1% 33% 29% 13% 87% 89% 93% 91%

Forsyth TCC  6471 27% 2% 37% 16% 18% 82% 84% 90% 85%

Gaston College  3545 38% 7% 29% 15% 10% 90% 90% 85% 76%

Guilford TCC  7539 23% 3% 42% 9% 23% 77% 78% 84% 77%

Halifax CC  1332 21% 5% 40% 20% 14% 86% 86% 79% 79%

Haywood CC  1021 15% 6% 45% 5% 29% 71% 72% 81% 79%

Isothermal CC  1623 18% 10% 43% 13% 17% 83% 83% 86% 93%

James Sprunt CC  612 27% 9% 20% 12% 32% 68% 69% 81% 76%

Johnston CC  2068 22% 7% 43% 11% 18% 82% 82% 76% 76%

Lenoir CC  2325 29% 1% 37% 6% 27% 73% 76% 77% 76%

Martin CC  964 22% 6% 44% 10% 19% 81% 81% 80% 88%

Mayland CC  1275 29% 14% 33% 6% 18% 82% 82% 87% 86%

McDowell TCC  711 14% 12% 42% 9% 23% 77% 77% 82% 83%

Mitchell CC  2345 23% 8% 37% 9% 22% 78% 78% 81% 85%

Montgomery CC  576 23% 5% 34% 13% 25% 75% 71% 74% 75%

Nash CC  1396 16% 6% 42% 5% 31% 69% 69% 76% 77%

Pamlico CC  358 21% 9% 38% 11% 21% 79% 79% 80% 76%

Piedmont CC  1147 26% 7% 38% 18% 12% 88% 88% 92% 84%

Pitt CC  2341 30% 3% 38% 10% 20% 80% 81% 83% 75%

Randolph CC  1853 24% 7% 38% 6% 26% 74% 76% 78% 79%

Richmond CC  2247 29% 7% 34% 5% 25% 75% 76% 81% 76%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  654 13% 12% 42% 10% 24% 76% 76% 75% 73%

Robeson CC  2851 30% 2% 40% 17% 12% 88% 88% 84% 82%

Rockingham CC  1359 28% 8% 34% 6% 25% 75% 76% 81% 78%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  3455 20% 12% 30% 15% 22% 78% 82% 81% 79%

Sampson CC  978 27% 8% 39% 6% 20% 80% 80% 87% 81%

Sandhills CC  1541 19% 9% 27% 7% 38% 62% 74% 80% 82%

South Piedmont CC  2708 35% 10% 27% 22% 7% 93% 94% 97% 90%

Southeastern CC  1368 31% 7% 31% 23% 9% 91% 91% 76% 75%

Southwestern CC  1590 36% 2% 31% 7% 25% 75% 75% 78% 79%

Stanly CC  1804 23% 6% 37% 7% 26% 74% 76% 74% 83%

Surry CC  1776 25% 6% 34% 18% 16% 84% 85% 87% 85%

Tri‐County CC  430 17% 16% 40% 8% 20% 80% 80% 80% 79%

Vance‐Granville CC  2899 32% 12% 27% 7% 22% 78% 78% 83% 83%

Wake TCC  8019 31% 7% 31% 10% 20% 80% 80% 87% 85%

Wayne CC  2839 34% 3% 33% 10% 20% 80% 80% 81% 82%

Western Piedmont CC  2660 12% 15% 41% 9% 23% 77% 77% 76% 82%

Wilkes CC  1656 27% 4% 39% 13% 17% 83% 83% 88% 87%

Wilson TCC  1792 36% 5% 29% 10% 19% 81% 81% 83% 78%

A ‐ Based on analysis of student progress  data in the data warehouse B ‐ Based on automated reports provided to colleges following data submission

COMPOSITE PROGRESS MEASURETOTAL 

SERVED 

IN 

LITERACY

PROGRESSED 

BUT DID NOT 

COMPLETE 

LEVEL

MET GOAL 

BUT DID NOT 

PROGRESS

MOVED 

TO NEXT 

LEVEL

DID NOT 

MEET 

GOAL

COMPLETED 

LEVEL BUT 

DID NOT GO 

TO NEXT

Page 163: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B: PASSING RATES ON LICENSURE & CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS 

Description The percentage of first‐time test takers passing an examination required for North Carolina licensure or certification prior to practicing the profession. A licensure requirement for an occupation is one that is required by state statute for an individual to work in that occupation. Certification is generally voluntary but may be required by employers or an outside accrediting agency. Purely voluntary examinations are not reported. 

Source The number of first‐time test‐takers and the number passing were provided to the System Office by agencies issuing the license or certification and validated by the colleges. Depending on the exam, data may be provided on a fiscal or calendar year. The institutional passing rate was calculated by dividing the total number of first‐time test takers for all reported examinations by the total number of persons who sat for the exam for the first time.  For privacy and statistical validity, no examination data are reported when the number of first‐time test takers was fewer than 10. 

System Standard 80% of first‐time test takers will pass examinations required for North Carolina licensure or certification. 

Exceptional Institutional Performance Standard The college will have no exam with a passing rate less than 70% 

Results For 2009‐10, 45 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 46% to a high of 97%. The aggregate result for the system was 86%.  In addition, there were 34 colleges with no exam with a passing rate less than 70%.  

86% 86% 86%

2007‐2008 2008‐2009 2009‐2010

Aggregate Exam Results

STANDARD (80%)

90%

89%

83%

94%

95%

94%

90%

85%

65%

75%

96%

92%

85%

92% 97%

96%

89%

83%

64%

71%

96%

95%

84%

91%

99%

97%

87%

85%

67%

80%

COS ARTS ‐

APPREN

TICE

COS ARTS ‐

COSM

ETOLO

GY

COS ARTS ‐

ESTH

ETICIAN

DEN

TAL 

HYG

IENE

RADIOGRAPHY

PRACTICAL 

NURSING

REG

ISTERED

 NURSING

EMT

EMT‐I

EMT‐P

Individual Exam Results with at least 100 Test‐Takers

2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10

Page 164: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B1. 2009‐2010 AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASS RATE AND NUMBER OF EXAMS WITH A PASS RATE < 70%

2009‐2010 2008‐2009 2007‐2008 2009‐2010 2008‐2009 2007‐2008

System Totals  10006 8643 86% 86% 86% 28 29 35

Alamance CC  138 121 88% 86% 80% 1 1 0

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  353 314 89% 93% 95% 0 0 0

Beaufort County CC  114 98 86% 85% 77% 1 1 1

Bladen CC  83 67 81% 83% 90% 1 0 0

Blue Ridge CC  169 137 81% 82% 90% 1 0 0

Brunswick CC  79 72 91% 85% 74% 1 0 3

Caldwell CC & TI  229 194 85% 84% 79% 2 0 2

Cape Fear CC  338 323 96% 95% 93% 0 0 0

Carteret CC  116 96 83% 79% 84% 1 1 1

Catawba Valley CC  225 173 77% 71% 84% 0 3 1

Central Carolina CC  253 209 83% 86% 83% 2 1 1

Central Piedmont CC  378 349 92% 91% 93% 0 0 0

Cleveland CC  175 140 80% 78% 74% 1 2 3

Coastal Carolina CC  227 214 94% 88% 90% 0 0 0

College of The Albemarle  232 172 74% 84% 80% 1 1 2

Craven CC  198 174 88% 83% 91% 0 0 0

Davidson County CC  228 210 92% 88% 83% 0 1 0

Durham TCC  326 290 89% 85% 88% 1 1 1

Edgecombe CC  44 38 86% 88% 80% 0 0 1

Fayetteville TCC  300 288 96% 94% 90% 0 0 0

Forsyth TCC  395 365 92% 89% 93% 0 0 0

Gaston College  249 220 88% 89% 88% 0 0 1

Guilford TCC  443 418 94% 89% 87% 0 0 0

Halifax CC  92 70 76% 70% 67% 1 2 1

Haywood CC  72 58 81% 86% 79% 1 0 1

Isothermal CC  115 89 77% 79% 82% 1 2 1

James Sprunt CC  82 72 88% 88% 85% 0 1 1

Johnston CC  248 200 81% 92% 92% 1 0 0

Lenoir CC  308 259 84% 87% 90% 0 0 0

Martin CC  41 29 71% 87% 66% 0 0 1

Mayland CC  94 80 85% 84% 78% 1 0 1

McDowell TCC  90 83 92% 88% 93% 0 0 0

Mitchell CC  143 120 84% 84% 85% 0 1 0

Montgomery CC  41 34 83% 84% 84% 0 0 1

Nash CC  69 53 77% 86% 78% 1 1 0

Pamlico CC  13 6 46% 75% 53% 0 0 1

Piedmont CC  107 81 76% 89% 96% 0 0 0

Pitt CC  181 153 85% 86% 86% 0 1 0

Randolph CC  90 78 87% 88% 86% 0 0 0

Richmond CC  69 67 97% 86% 88% 0 1 0

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  64 46 72% 83% 95% 1 0 0

Robeson CC  139 100 72% 77% 78% 2 2 0

Rockingham CC  98 82 84% 92% 89% 1 0 0

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  342 289 85% 81% 80% 1 1 2

Sampson CC  105 89 85% 87% 91% 0 0 1

Sandhills CC  167 148 89% 87% 88% 0 0 0

South Piedmont CC  110 95 86% 69% 82% 0 2 0

Southeastern CC  142 117 82% 78% 78% 2 1 1

Southwestern CC  102 97 95% 88% 89% 0 0 1

Stanly CC  97 86 89% 79% 81% 0 0 1

Surry CC  167 155 93% 92% 76% 0 0 1

Tri‐County CC  60 42 70% 72% 80% 1 0 1

Vance‐Granville CC  209 181 87% 84% 89% 0 1 1

Wake TCC  383 350 91% 92% 90% 0 0 0

Wayne CC  137 101 74% 90% 86% 1 0 1

Western Piedmont CC  73 61 84% 91% 92% 0 0 0

Wilkes CC  79 67 85% 82% 81% 0 1 0

Wilson CC  82 73 89% 81% 88% 0 0 0

*Excludes Real Estate exam, BLET exam,  and exams with les than 10 test‐takers

Note: Real Estate and BLET exams are not included in the aggregate results

NUMBER OF EXAMS WITH A RATE <70% *NUMBER OF 

TEST TAKERS

NUMBER 

PASSING

AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASSING RATE

Page 165: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B2. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2009‐2010

TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST

09‐10 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  47 98% 98% 100% 45 98% 100% 100% 50 100% 100% 100% 1816 87% 87% 86% 265 80% 72% 71%

Alamance CC  12 83% 81% 88% * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  78 92% 98% 99% 19 84% 85% 67%

Beaufort County CC  29 79% 88% 79% 1 * *

Bladen CC  *

Blue Ridge CC  37 89% 86% 94% 2 * * *

Brunswick CC  45 76% 80% 69% 16 88% 74% 66%

Caldwell CC & TI  33 70% 86% 65%

Cape Fear CC  85 84% 85% 89% 12 83% * 90%

Carteret CC  34 85% 76% 77% 15 33% 46% 76%

Catawba Valley CC  34 88% 67% 44% * *

Central Carolina CC  42 93% 91% 84% 10 70% * 30%

Central Piedmont CC  25 100% 95% 94% 62 95% 90% 85%

Cleveland CC  37 89% 63% 69% 1 * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  31 87% 74% 84%

College of The Albemarle  27 100% 96% 92% * *

Craven CC  29 100% 100% 29 100% 100% * 11 100% * * 25 88% 87% 96% 8 * 45% 71%

Davidson County CC  67 79% 83% 83% * *

Durham TCC  18 89% 88% * 37 84% 73% 81%

Edgecombe CC  5 * * *

Fayetteville TCC  31 84% 100% 93% *

Forsyth TCC  46 91% 87% 91% 2 * * *

Gaston College  42 90% 87% 89% 1 * * 71%

Guilford TCC  16 100% 96% 100% 15 100% 100% 100% 37 100% 100% 100% 39 92% 93% 94% 35 86% 71% 71%

Halifax CC  15 73% 67% 66% * *

Haywood CC  18 72% 85% 80%

Isothermal CC  21 76% 96% 71% *

James Sprunt CC  94% 100%

Johnston CC  32 94% 94% 96% 2 * * *

Lenoir CC  19 89% 89% 88% 2 * *

Martin CC  4 * * * 1 *

Mayland CC  14 86% 92% * *

McDowell TCC  9 * 93% 100%

Mitchell CC  52 88% 88% 74% 5 * 81% 77%

Montgomery CC  16 94% 71% 69%

Nash CC  22 95% 100% 96% * *

Pamlico CC 

Piedmont CC 

Pitt CC  61 93% 90% 92% 4 * * *

Randolph CC  31 84% 87% 86% 7 * * *

Richmond CC  14 100%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC 

Robeson CC  45 84% 85% 80% 3 * * *

Rockingham CC  58 72% 95% 83%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  62 84% 95% 94% 1 * * 100%

Sampson CC  35 91% 91% *

Sandhills CC  61 89% 88% 93%

South Piedmont CC  46 83% 89% 87% *

Southeastern CC  20 60% 82% * * *

Southwestern CC  29 93% 94% 88% 7 * * 87%

Stanly CC  46 80% 82% 60% * 91%

Surry CC  25 92% 90% 88% * 9%

Tri‐County CC  2 * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  35 91% 95% 90% *

Wake TCC  58 91% 88% 90% * 65%

Wayne CC  2 * 1 * 2 * 33 97% 94% 89% * *

Western Piedmont CC  54 87% 98% 96%

Wilkes CC  44 95% 94% 91% 5 * * *

Wilson CC  20 75% 89% 90%

*Less than 10 test takers

BLET

% PASSING

REAL ESTATE SALES

% PASSING

AVIATION ‐ GENERAL

% PASSING

AVIATION ‐ AIRFRAME

% PASSING

AVIATION ‐ POWER 

% PASSING

Page 166: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B3. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2010

TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST

2010 2010 2009 2008 2010 2010 2009 2008 2010 2010 2009 2008 2010 2010 2009 2008 2010 2010 2009 2008

System Totals  146 96% 96% 90% 389 95% 92% 89% 123 84% 85% 83% 27 81% 78% 50% 52 79% 89% 84%

Alamance CC  9 * 91% 7 * *

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  3 * 6 * 19 79% * * 10 70% * *

Beaufort County CC  1 * 11 100% * * *

Bladen CC  * 3 * * *

Blue Ridge CC  10 100% 100% 100% 5 * * * 3 * * 100% * 2 * * *

Brunswick CC  1 * * 6 * * * * * * *

Caldwell CC & TI  6 * * 100% 8 * * 1 * * 4 * *

Cape Fear CC  11 100% 100% 94% 9 * 100% * 8 * * 81% 2 * * 3 * * *

Carteret CC  2 * * * 5 * * * 4 * * 100% * *

Catawba Valley CC  * 2 * *

Central Carolina CC  12 100% 93% 86% 33 91% * 100% 14 79% 83% 81% 6 * * * 1 * 92% *

Central Piedmont CC  * * *

Cleveland CC  3 * * 93% 7 * * * 1 * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC  20 95% 94% 85% 2 * 1 * * *

College of The Albemarle  1 * 95% 94% * * *

Craven CC  4 * 92% 94% 4 * * * 4 * * *

Davidson County CC  2 * * 23 96% 100% 90% 7 * * 80% 1 *

Durham TCC  6 *

Edgecombe CC  6 * * * 7 * * 1 * *

Fayetteville TCC  13 100% 83% 3 *

Forsyth TCC 

Gaston College  * *

Guilford TCC  4 * * * 15 93% 91% 100% *

Halifax CC  * * 3 * * *

Haywood CC  11 100% * 64% 1 * * * *

Isothermal CC  3 * * * 6 * 100% * * * 1 * *

James Sprunt CC  5 * * * 6 * * * 1 * * * 2 *

Johnston CC  5 * 100% * 8 * * * 2 * *

Lenoir CC  11 91% 92% 100% 4 * * * * 92% 1 * 5 * * *

Martin CC  * 5 * * 3 * *

Mayland CC  3 * 4 * 80% * * 2 * * *

McDowell TCC  1 * * * 7 * * * 4 * * * * *

Mitchell CC  8 * 100% 95% 5 * * * * * * *

Montgomery CC 

Nash CC  4 * 2 * *

Pamlico CC  * * 1 * * *

Piedmont CC  4 * 1 *

Pitt CC 

Randolph CC  3 *

Richmond CC 

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  * 5 * * *

Robeson CC  1 * * * 7 * * * 11 73% *

Rockingham CC  2 * * 100% 3 * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  15 93% 100% 40 98% 96% 93% 15 100% 89% * * * 79% 82%

Sampson CC  1 * * * 4 * * * 2 * *

Sandhills CC  7 * * * 5 * * * 7 * * * 2 * * *

South Piedmont CC 

Southeastern CC  6 * * * 4 * * 1 * * 1 * * * *

Southwestern CC  18 94% 79% 94% *

Stanly CC  2 * 100% 94% 7 * 85% 91% 1 * * * 2 * * * *

Surry CC  16 100% 100% 100% *

Tri‐County CC  6 * * 91% 4 * * 1 * 80% 1 * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  8 * * 91% 22 95% * 80% 1 * *

Wake TCC  10 90%

Wayne CC 

Western Piedmont CC 

Wilkes CC  5 *

Wilson CC 

*Less than 10 test takers

MANICURIST

% PASSING

COSMETIC ARTS

APPRENTICE COSMETOLOGY ESTHETICIAN

% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING

INSTRUCTOR

% PASSING

Page 167: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B4. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2009‐2010

TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST

09‐10 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  217 91% 92% 94% 7 * * * 27 81% 85% 92% 33 76% 97% 83% 341 99% 97% 95%

Alamance CC 

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  20 90% 94% 100% 19 100% 100% 100%

Beaufort County CC 

Bladen CC 

Blue Ridge CC 

Brunswick CC 

Caldwell CC & TI  11 64% 83% * 6 * * *

Cape Fear CC  11 100% 100% * 22 100% 93% 90%

Carteret CC  16 100% 100% 100%

Catawba Valley CC  16 94% 95% * 7 * * 91%

Central Carolina CC  12 100% 100%

Central Piedmont CC  23 96% 85% 100%

Cleveland CC  7 * 100% 93%

Coastal Carolina CC  20 90% 90% 95%

College of The Albemarle 

Craven CC 

Davidson County CC 

Durham TCC  7 * * *

Edgecombe CC  21 100% 100% 100%

Fayetteville TCC  20 100% 89% 87% 3 * * * 22 100% 100% 100%

Forsyth TCC  7 * * 100% 6 * * * 32 100% 100% 91%

Gaston College 

Guilford TCC  31 97% 89% 87%

Halifax CC  16 75% 93%

Haywood CC 

Isothermal CC 

James Sprunt CC 

Johnston CC  * * 27 100% 100% 100%

Lenoir CC  8 * *

Martin CC 

Mayland CC 

McDowell TCC 

Mitchell CC 

Montgomery CC 

Nash CC 

Pamlico CC 

Piedmont CC 

Pitt CC  13 92% * 86% 18 72% 100% 84% 17 94% 100% 100%

Randolph CC  13 100% 89% 100%

Richmond CC 

Roanoke‐Chowan CC 

Robeson CC  8 * *

Rockingham CC 

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  18 100% 94% 92%

Sampson CC 

Sandhills CC  12 100% 100% 100%

South Piedmont CC  9 * *

Southeastern CC 

Southwestern CC  12 100% * 86%

Stanly CC  16 94% 86% 95%

Surry CC 

Tri‐County CC 

Vance‐Granville CC  31 97% 100% 100%

Wake TCC  19 79% 100% 100% 27 100% 100% 93%

Wayne CC  22 82% 95% 91%

Western Piedmont CC 

Wilkes CC 

Wilson CC 

*Less than 10 test takers

DENTAL HYGIENE

% PASSING

OPTICIANRY RADIOGRAPHYNUC. MED. TECH. RADIATION THERAPY

% PASSING % PASSING% PASSING % PASSING

Page 168: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B5. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2010

TEST TEST TEST TEST

2010 2010 2009 2008 2010 2010 2009 2008 2010 2010 2009 2008 2010 2010 2009 2008

System Totals  98 84% 89% 83% 893 97% 96% 94% 2263 87% 89% 90% 48 96% 100% 98%

Alamance CC  35 83% 89% 95%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  37 97% 100% 95% 85 89% 88% 95% 14 93% * *

Beaufort County CC  20 100% 100% 95% 46 89% 88% 92%

Bladen CC  11 100% 100% 86% 9 * * *

Blue Ridge CC  45 71% 80% 87%

Brunswick CC  19 100% 100% 100% 11 100% 94% 60%

Caldwell CC & TI  15 73% 100% 89% 33 91% 85% 88%

Cape Fear CC  19 100% 100% 100% 57 98% 100% 100%

Carteret CC  7 * 93% 93% 11 100% 100% *

Catawba Valley CC  70 73% 78% 88%

Central Carolina CC  31 87% 97% 93% 19 100% 93% 100% 19 100% 100% 100%

Central Piedmont CC  12 75% 82% 90% 84 86% 89% 92%

Cleveland CC  12 100% *

Coastal Carolina CC  19 95% 100% 100% 27 93% 94% 92%

College of The Albemarle  13 92% 100% 100% 31 97% 100% 92%

Craven CC  13 100% 100% 85% 55 84% 81% 92%

Davidson County CC  20 100% 78% 48 92% 87% 86%

Durham TCC  16 94% * 100% 51 92% 93% 95%

Edgecombe CC 

Fayetteville TCC  11 91% 75% 90% 36 92% 89% 89% 71 90% 98% 88%

Forsyth TCC  58 97% 85% 94% 124 94% 83% 92%

Gaston College  38 97% 100% 97% 63 86% 91% 95% 15 93% 100% 92%

Guilford TCC  11 91% 100% 100% 21 100% 92% 96% 101 89% 87% 91%

Halifax CC  20 90% 25 84%

Haywood CC  25 68% 91% 86%

Isothermal CC  39 97% 96% 97%

James Sprunt CC  18 100% 100% 89% 15 93% 94% 64%

Johnston CC  2 * 100% 100% 64 86% 100% 100%

Lenoir CC  8 * * * 22 77% 90% 97%

Martin CC  11 82% * 80%

Mayland CC  17 100% 100% 89% 24 96% 84% 94%

McDowell TCC  36 100% 100% 88%

Mitchell CC  40 90% 94% 95%

Montgomery CC  30 83% 93% 90%

Nash CC  12 83% 100% 70%

Pamlico CC 

Piedmont CC  27 81% 88% 95%

Pitt CC  56 93% 86% 77%

Randolph CC  19 95% 100% 95%

Richmond CC  16 94% 94% 100% 41 98% 91% 88%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  16 100% 100% 94% 24 50% 92% 100%

Robeson CC  25 92% 67% 83%

Rockingham CC  34 97% 96% 93% 19 89% 87% 100%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  14 100% 100% 80% 25 84% 84% 100%

Sampson CC  31 97% 100% 100% 25 88% 82% 100%

Sandhills CC  25 100% 96% 100% 47 87% 89% 84%

South Piedmont CC  18 100% 94% 81% 19 84% 53% 95%

Southeastern CC  37 100% 97% 29 100% 100% 100%

Southwestern CC  11 100% 100% 67% 6 * 100% * 22 86% 90% 96%

Stanly CC  34 100% 70% 91%

Surry CC  15 80% 23 96% 100% 89% 60 88% 95% 73%

Tri‐County CC  18 67% 75% 90%

Vance‐Granville CC  31 100% 86% 97% 42 79% 88% 100%

Wake TCC  75 89% 92% 89%

Wayne CC  13 100% 100% 100% 39 90% 95% 81%

Western Piedmont CC  21 86% 85% 88%

Wilkes CC  39 90% 64% 85%

Wilson CC  11 100% 100% 21 86% 91%

Foothills Nursing Consortium** 57 95% 100% 83%

NEWH Nursing Consortium*** 58 98% 97% 95% 122 75% 90% 91%

Region A Nursing Consortium**** 66 73% 86% 91%

*Less than 10 test takers ** Cleveland, Isothermal, McDowell ***Nash, Edgecomb, Wilson, Halifax ****Haywood, Southwestern, Tri‐County

PHYSICAL THERAPIST 

% PASSING

VET. MED. TECH.PRACTICAL NURSING REGISTERED NURSING

% PASSING% PASSING % PASSING

Page 169: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

B6. FIRST‐TIME PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2010

TEST TEST TEST TEST

2010 2010 2009 2008 2010 2010 2009 2008 2010 2010 2009 2008 2010 2010 2009 2008

System Totals  51 88% * 81% 3989 85% 83% 85% 559 67% 64% 65% 601 80% 71% 75%

Alamance CC  69 97% 93% 84% 11 45% 73% 7 * 50% 72%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  84 88% 95% 96% 38 82% 84% * 18 89% * 80%

Beaufort County CC  36 69% 88% 47% 42%

Bladen CC  28 79% * 100% 16 81% * 93% 16 63% * 75%

Blue Ridge CC  73 92% 75% 84% 23 61% * 80% 8 * * *

Brunswick CC  29 93% 84% 96% 13 62% 80% * * 36%

Caldwell CC & TI  109 87% 81% 66% 10 60% * * 26 85% 77% *

Cape Fear CC  172 95% 94% 92% 15 87% * * 9 * 89% *

Carteret CC  52 75% 81% 95% 11 64% 53% 60% 8 * * *

Catawba Valley CC  106 75% 60% 85% 15 80% 55% 9 * *

Central Carolina CC  6 * 88 67% 76% 67% 12 67% * * 36% *

Central Piedmont CC  259 95% 94% 97%

Cleveland CC  103 81% 71% 90% 16 44% 59% 50% 26 88% 100% 52%

Coastal Carolina CC  112 97% 91% 92% 13 92% * * 13 85% * 79%

College of The Albemarle  117 79% 79% 84% 55 40% 62% 41% 15 100% 65%

Craven CC  37 73% 75% 89% 7 * * * 5 * *

Davidson County CC  93 95% 99% 92% 16 94% * * 18 83% 50% 70%

Durham TCC  208 94% 87% 91% 22 73% 94% 64% 16 56% 67% 83%

Edgecombe CC  9 * 93% * 30%

Fayetteville TCC  100% 74 99% 90% 91% * 81% 47 100% 100% 96%

Forsyth TCC  160 88% 95% 93% 5 * * 3 * *

Gaston College  117 88% 85% 88% 4 * * 12 92% 70% 68%

Guilford TCC  171 94% 88% 85% 9 * 80% * 12 100% *

Halifax CC  17 71% 69% 72% 11 36% * *

Haywood CC  21 86% 82% 79% 14 79% *

Isothermal CC  61 67% 64% 68% 53% 5 * *

James Sprunt CC  33 76% 69% 100% * 2 * *

Johnston CC  97 73% 81% 83% 21 67% 22 77% 93% 92%

Lenoir CC  138 85% 93% 92% 59 71% 77% 83% 52 90% 72% 72%

Martin CC  15 73% 93% 66% 7 *

Mayland CC  28 75% 82% 84% * 52% 16 63%

McDowell TCC  7 * 35 80% 83% 90% * * *

Mitchell CC  69 80% 69% 85% 14 71% 100% 7 *

Montgomery CC  7 * 4 * *

Nash CC  * 32 88% 81% 81% * 19 47% 64% *

Pamlico CC  6 * 71% 40% 6 * *

Piedmont CC  68 71% * 95% 7 *

Pitt CC  58 81% 47% 91% 1 * * * 18 72%

Randolph CC  47 81% 84% 82% 8 * * * *

Richmond CC  * 12 100% 80% 64% * *

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  17 82% 73% * * 2 *

Robeson CC  61 62% 78% 79% 14 43% 65% * 12 92% * *

Rockingham CC  35 69% 88% 81% 5 * * *

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  148 85% 70% 65% 11 73% 65% 61% 56 61% 72% 75%

Sampson CC  * 26 73% 85% 92% 3 * * 13 85% 63%

Sandhills CC  50 82% 80% 81% 1 * * * 11 91% * *

South Piedmont CC  46 83% 66% 78% 9 * * 9 * * 83%

Southeastern CC  41 63% 60% 67% 17 65% * * 6 * *

Southwestern CC  23 96% 89% 92% * 73% 10 100% *

Stanly CC  30 83% 76% 85% * 5 * *

Surry CC  41 98% 95% 80% 57% 12 100% 100%

Tri‐County CC  20 75% 71% 68% 6 * * * 4 * * *

Vance‐Granville CC  51 76% 83% 95% 31% 37% 23 78% 70%

Wake TCC  214 92% 96% 96% 24 92% 79% 71% 14 100% 90%

Wayne CC  51 57% 83% 80% 7 * * 61%

Western Piedmont CC  38 84% * 86% 14 79% 95% 100% *

Wilkes CC  24 75% 81% 72% 11 82% * *

Wilson CC  47 87% 71% 86% * 3 * *

*Less than 10 test takers

EMD EMT EMT‐I EMT‐P

% PASSING % PASSING % PASSING % PASSING

Page 170: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

 

Page 171: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

C: PERFORMANCE OF COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS 

Description Of students transferring to a university with an associate degree or 24 articulated college transfer credit hours, the percentage who have a GPA equal or greater than 2.00 after two semesters at the university. 

Source Lists of students enrolled in 2008‐2009 receiving an associate degree during that academic year and those who had accumulated at least 24 articulated college transfer credit hours data were sent to UNCGA.  These lists were matched against fall 2009 and spring 2010 UNC system student records to determine transfer enrollment at a North Carolina public university and first year academic performance.  Detailed reports by community college can be accessed at http://www.northcarolina.edu/ira/ir/analytics/tsp.htm.  Two reports for each college were accessed from this site for this measure: First‐Year UNC Academic Performance of 2008‐09 Community College Associate Degree Recipients and First‐Year UNC Academic Performance of 2008‐09 Community College Students with at Least 24 Semester Hours of Community College Coursework.  Data from D.4. Percent of Students with End‐of‐Year GPA=>2.00 in these reports were combined to determine the overall percentage of transfers with a GPA equal or greater than 2.00 after two semesters at the university.  Community colleges are allowed to supplement this data with acquired performance data from private and out‐of‐state institutions that is consistent with the methodology employed by the UNCGA in calculating the data for transfer to public universities.  

System Standard 83% of students transferring to a university with an associate degree or 24 articulated college transfer credit hours will have a GPA equal to or greater than 2.00 after two semesters at the university. 

Exceptional Institutional Performance Standard Meet or exceed the aggregate performance of native UNC sophomores and juniors, which is 87% for this year. 

Results For 2009‐10, 46 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 66% to a high of 100%. The aggregate result for the system was 87%.  In addition, there were 33 colleges meeting or exceeding the aggregate performance of native UNC sophomores and juniors (87%).  

90% 90%

85% 86%88% 87%88% 88%

83%85% 85% 86%

90% 90%86% 86% 87% 87%

ASSOCIATE DEGREE RECIPIENTS

NATIVEUNC JUNIORS

24 OR MORE TRANSFER CREDITS AT CC

NATIVE UNC SOPHOMORES

COMMUNITY COLLEGE AGGREGATE

NATIVEUNC AGGREGATE

University Students with a GPA equal or greater than 2.00

2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 STANDARD (83%)

Page 172: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

C. PERCENT OF 2009‐10 COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS WITH A GPA OF > = 2.0 AFTER TWO SEMESTERS AT A UNIVERSITY

Students % ≥ 2.00 Students % ≥ 2.00 Students % ≥ 2.00 2008‐2009* 2007‐2008*

System Totals  6213 86% 2835 90% 9048 87% 85% 88%

Alamance CC 119 85% 64 86% 183 85% 81% 94%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC 150 96% 87 99% 237 97% 92% 95%

Beaufort County CC 39 90% 16 94% 55 91% 83% 70%

Bladen CC 49 71% 10 60% 59 69% 81% 78%

Blue Ridge CC 46 96% 21 100% 67 97% 89% 88%

Brunswick CC  ** 42 81% 25 84% 67 82% 80% 87%

Caldwell CC & TI 180 89% 55 95% 235 91% 84% 90%

Cape Fear CC  ** 456 84% 267 87% 723 85% 83% 86%

Carteret CC 41 93% 22 95% 63 94% 91% 90%

Catawba Valley CC 129 90% 59 97% 188 92% 93% 88%

Central Carolina CC  ** 90 83% 55 93% 145 87% 87% 87%

Central Piedmont CC  ** 880 87% 399 90% 1279 88% 87% 90%

Cleveland CC 57 86% 15 93% 72 88% 81% 77%

Coastal Carolina CC 150 90% 46 89% 196 90% 89% 92%

College of The Albemarle    67 94% 25 96% 92 95% 85% 87%

Craven CC 80 95% 33 88% 113 93% 86% 86%

Davidson County CC  ** 74 85% 31 97% 105 89% 83% 90%

Durham TCC 133 90% 50 86% 183 89% 89% 96%

Edgecombe CC  ** 17 65% 9 *** 26 69% 77% 71%

Fayetteville TCC  ** 219 87% 138 81% 357 85% 82% 88%

Forsyth TCC 182 85% 74 96% 256 88% 89% 82%

Gaston College  ** 149 83% 73 88% 222 85% 89% 89%

Guilford TCC 348 83% 133 91% 481 85% 82% 83%

Halifax CC 21 90% 10 80% 31 87% 100% 72%

Haywood CC 37 89% 16 94% 53 91% 78% 94%

Isothermal CC 35 86% 18 72% 53 81% 89% 96%

James Sprunt CC 25 92% 12 83% 37 89% 100% 77%

Johnston CC 100 85% 24 92% 124 86% 79% 85%

Lenoir CC  ** 92 84% 40 88% 132 85% 85% 84%

Martin CC 6 *** 5 *** 11 82% *** ***

Mayland CC 15 73% 8 *** 23 74% 75% 93%

McDowell TCC  ** 23 91% 1 *** 24 92% 78% 95%

Mitchell CC  ** 77 83% 59 92% 136 87% 81% 87%

Montgomery CC 5 *** 0 *** <10 Students *** *** ***

Nash CC  ** 52 94% 19 89% 71 93% 84% 93%

Pamlico CC <5 Students *** <5 Students *** <10 Students *** *** ***

Piedmont CC 36 69% 17 59% 53 66% 90% 84%

Pitt CC 225 84% 67 88% 292 85% 87% 87%

Randolph CC 41 88% 21 95% 62 90% 90% 93%

Richmond CC 51 90% 36 97% 87 93% 87% 74%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC 5 *** 5 *** 10 100% *** 83%

Robeson CC 48 75% 35 83% 83 78% 76% 85%

Rockingham CC  ** 46 89% 30 90% 76 89% 95% 85%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC 148 75% 63 79% 211 76% 84% 86%

Sampson CC  ** 18 100% 9 *** 27 96% 77% 74%

Sandhills CC 124 81% 44 93% 168 85% 79% 83%

South Piedmont CC 24 88% 7 *** 31 90% 92% 56%

Southeastern CC 84 73% 22 73% 106 73% 93% 86%

Southwestern CC 71 93% 50 96% 121 94% 96% 95%

Stanly CC  ** 46 89% 29 90% 75 89% 75% 84%

Surry CC  ** 116 89% 80 95% 196 91% 90% 87%

Tri‐County CC 33 85% 17 88% 50 86% 94% 94%

Vance‐Granville CC 57 88% 26 85% 83 87% 89% 86%

Wake TCC 571 90% 166 94% 737 91% 84% 89%

Wayne CC  ** 103 87% 72 88% 175 87% 87% 92%

Western Piedmont CC  ** 89 87% 79 92% 168 89% 88% 89%

Wilkes CC 80 85% 34 88% 114 86% 92% 89%

Wilson CC 12 83% 7 *** 19 84% 75% 53%

* Did not include AAS students prior to 2008‐09

** Includes data from private colleges and universities.

***Less than 10 students

2009‐2010 TOTALASSOCIATE DEGREE RECIPENT24 OR MORE SEMESTER HOURS % ≥ 2.00

Page 173: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

D: PASSING RATES OF STUDENTS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES 

Description The percentage of developmental course completers in English, reading or mathematics completing with a grade of "C" or better. 

Source  At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file which is uploaded to the NCCCS Data Warehouse.  Grade data in the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II Universe was extracted by filtering “Course Prefix” equal to “ENG;MAT;RED”,  “Course Number” less than “100”, and Reporting Term equal to “200903;201001;201002” and analyzed based on data in the fields “Letter Grade” and “College Letter Grade”.   While all grades were extracted for analysis, only grades that equated to “A”,”B”,”C”,”D”, or “F” were counted as completers. Other grades include those that equate to withdraw, incomplete, audit, transfer credit, etc. Results were shared and verified with institutions to ensure proper grade mapping.  

Standard 75% of developmental course completers in English, reading or mathematics will complete with a grade "C" or better. 

Results For 2009‐10, 47 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 62% to a high of 97%. The aggregate result for the system was 78%.   

84% 83% 83% 79% 83% 81%74% 77% 74% 77% 80% 78%

Reading

2007‐2008

Reading

2008‐2009

Reading

2009‐2010

English

2007‐2008

English

2008‐2009

English

2009‐2010

Math

2007‐2008

Math

2008‐2009

Math

2009‐2010

Total

2007‐2008

Total

2008‐2009

Total

2009‐2010

Developmental Course Grades

C or BETTER FAIL OTHER GRADES STANDARD (75%)

Page 174: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

D. PASSING RATES OF STUDENTS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES, 2009‐2010

09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  33196 26786 83% 83% 84% 73506 59124 81% 83% 79% 107617 83208 74% 77% 74% 214319 169118 78% 80% 77%

Alamance CC  1054 844 91% 1355 1125 83% 89% 88% 2839 2344 76% 79% 80% 5248 4313 81% 83% 83%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  717 591 94% 95% 97% 1520 1128 93% 93% 92% 1774 1270 82% 88% 90% 4011 2989 88% 91% 92%

Beaufort County CC  400 260 94% 93% 91% 485 329 94% 94% 98% 687 401 85% 78% 77% 1572 990 90% 86% 87%

Bladen CC  280 220 93% 92% 95% 590 414 91% 90% 92% 1080 807 83% 83% 88% 1950 1441 87% 87% 90%

Blue Ridge CC  236 232 88% 83% 79% 391 385 84% 88% 83% 811 805 74% 70% 73% 1438 1422 79% 77% 76%

Brunswick CC  10 8 * 85% 420 328 81% 72% 71% 831 661 87% 79% 84% 1261 997 85% 77% 80%

Caldwell CC & TI  640 490 86% 87% 95% 1126 924 91% 90% 80% 1795 1436 82% 83% 76% 3561 2850 85% 85% 81%

Cape Fear CC  1999 1629 79% 78% 76% 3385 2737 77% 82% 83% 5384 4366 78% 80% 80%

Carteret CC  81% 617 499 70% 67% 59% 846 712 87% 90% 91% 1463 1211 80% 84% 83%

Catawba Valley CC  943 792 83% 80% 78% 1739 1449 85% 83% 84% 2784 2294 73% 71% 71% 5466 4535 78% 76% 75%

Central Carolina CC  804 596 89% 93% 89% 830 634 83% 86% 86% 1459 850 79% 74% 71% 3093 2080 83% 82% 79%

Central Piedmont CC  2865 2637 76% 77% 80% 7324 6477 80% 77% 81% 8313 7209 67% 64% 71% 18502 16323 74% 70% 76%

Cleveland CC  489 408 86% 79% 89% 1222 970 82% 87% 92% 1694 1391 81% 83% 81% 3405 2769 82% 83% 84%

Coastal Carolina CC  519 442 88% 87% 89% 705 599 90% 87% 86% 2692 2230 83% 80% 80% 3916 3271 85% 82% 82%

College of The Albemarle  362 287 77% 90% 86% 648 536 89% 94% 92% 1454 1113 81% 81% 83% 2464 1936 82% 85% 85%

Craven CC  83% 1053 944 80% 73% 65% 1671 1411 70% 71% 75% 2724 2355 74% 72% 72%

Davidson County CC  389 333 82% 77% 82% 858 707 86% 79% 68% 1314 996 74% 73% 63% 2561 2036 80% 75% 67%

Durham TCC  1081 718 72% 78% 67% 2135 1506 74% 81% 78% 2957 1997 70% 69% 64% 6173 4221 72% 74% 68%

Edgecombe CC  1141 854 82% 71% 88% 1833 1350 81% 78% 73% 1890 1369 74% 71% 73% 4864 3573 79% 74% 77%

Fayetteville TCC  2592 1996 72% 77% 72% 3964 3133 79% 73% 69% 5673 4298 71% 66% 62% 12229 9427 74% 70% 66%

Forsyth TCC  1860 1471 85% 83% 89% 2831 2239 84% 82% 79% 3449 2646 83% 84% 80% 8140 6356 84% 83% 82%

Gaston College  868 725 88% 82% 80% 1799 1522 82% 83% 76% 3046 2501 81% 81% 82% 5713 4748 83% 82% 80%

Guilford TCC  3807 2569 90% 75% 90% 6659 4591 87% 77% 86% 7713 4465 84% 78% 81% 18179 11625 86% 77% 84%

Halifax CC  1192 887 81% 87% 86% 955 724 62% 59% 64% 2147 1611 73% 69% 71%

Haywood CC  186 138 92% 98% 87% 267 206 77% 80% 52% 445 311 57% 82% 56% 898 655 71% 85% 60%

Isothermal CC  257 208 97% 90% 90% 808 643 90% 91% 88% 1415 850 80% 79% 80% 2480 1701 86% 84% 83%

James Sprunt CC  357 308 91% 92% 97% 444 370 86% 82% 87% 729 576 80% 81% 83% 1530 1254 84% 84% 87%

Johnston CC  882 666 84% 86% 88% 1332 1032 90% 72% 72% 1030 735 85% 68% 68% 3244 2433 87% 74% 74%

Lenoir CC  639 485 83% 83% 86% 1337 934 78% 82% 81% 1639 1199 80% 80% 83% 3615 2618 80% 81% 83%

Martin CC  160 154 79% 99% 92% 165 149 65% 68% 61% 348 312 71% 80% 89% 673 615 71% 83% 79%

Mayland CC  97 88 56% 59% 82% 193 176 77% 81% 91% 271 242 54% 71% 78% 561 506 62% 72% 82%

McDowell TCC  49 42 69% 80% 97% 357 299 82% 95% 96% 633 473 85% 90% 94% 1039 814 83% 91% 95%

Mitchell CC  87% 1002 835 86% 83% 88% 1516 1218 85% 81% 86% 2518 2053 85% 82% 87%

Montgomery CC  102 72 89% 68% 68% 153 115 93% 81% 75% 250 241 90% 78% 96% 505 428 90% 77% 85%

Nash CC  343 230 97% 81% 98% 653 423 99% 80% 76% 1695 830 97% 70% 71% 2691 1483 97% 74% 75%

Pamlico CC  97% 70 65 80% 82% 82% 98 92 75% 67% 70% 168 157 77% 73% 92%

Piedmont CC  308 269 84% 83% 97% 715 617 80% 75% 80% 967 787 72% 75% 79% 1990 1673 77% 76% 83%

Pitt CC  2863 2321 90% 91% 91% 3517 2692 70% 69% 68% 6380 5013 79% 77% 75%

Randolph CC  261 216 98% 93% 90% 462 413 88% 90% 93% 1209 870 87% 95% 93% 1932 1499 89% 93% 93%

Richmond CC  639 536 94% 88% 88% 870 687 87% 83% 89% 851 672 85% 90% 89% 2360 1895 88% 88% 89%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  202 176 81% 85% 80% 450 383 68% 72% 75% 405 358 73% 81% 65% 1057 917 72% 79% 71%

Robeson CC  965 700 86% 84% 78% 1563 1132 86% 90% 85% 1824 1224 71% 68% 84% 4352 3056 80% 78% 73%

Rockingham CC  335 253 86% 78% 77% 659 517 87% 91% 84% 1584 1214 78% 83% 83% 2578 1984 81% 84% 82%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  594 520 86% 79% 82% 1362 1092 79% 74% 82% 4257 3141 67% 74% 78% 6213 4753 72% 75% 80%

Sampson CC  220 183 93% 80% 92% 573 500 93% 92% 90% 756 596 74% 73% 73% 1549 1279 84% 80% 81%

Sandhills CC  85% 1407 1000 84% 79% 81% 1748 1194 73% 77% 77% 3155 2194 78% 78% 80%

South Piedmont CC  540 503 80% 80% 79% 530 492 71% 71% 76% 949 879 78% 83% 82% 2019 1874 77% 79% 80%

Southeastern CC  911 650 84% 93% 79% 1069 694 75% 85% 74% 1461 916 76% 81% 74% 3441 2260 78% 86% 76%

Southwestern CC  236 181 82% 82% 98% 651 503 83% 79% 75% 636 512 88% 85% 89% 1523 1196 85% 83% 87%

Stanly CC  504 377 93% 87% 86% 962 684 85% 88% 92% 1466 1061 88% 88% 90%

Surry CC  408 352 93% 95% 98% 570 468 67% 70% 71% 968 729 90% 91% 84% 1946 1549 84% 86% 83%

Tri‐County CC  1 1 * 198 187 78% 85% 94% 280 258 77% 94% 94% 479 446 77% 90% 94%

Vance‐Granville CC  421 290 94% 85% 84% 1326 842 93% 83% 74% 1455 1043 87% 85% 81% 3202 2175 90% 84% 79%

Wake TCC  1255 1043 84% 84% 88% 3508 2651 74% 72% 77% 6913 4922 71% 71% 72% 11676 8616 73% 73% 76%

Wayne CC  549 419 92% 92% 86% 1288 988 93% 95% 94% 1710 1160 79% 83% 85% 3547 2567 86% 88% 88%

Western Piedmont CC  514 420 99% 91% 100% 1140 912 98% 92% 84% 1602 1186 87% 78% 53% 3256 2518 93% 84% 67%

Wilkes CC  298 213 82% 84% 84% 936 727 87% 89% 86% 1297 900 77% 77% 78% 2531 1840 81% 81% 81%

Wilson CC  423 351 85% 83% 90% 820 622 75% 79% 80% 1126 864 75% 70% 69% 2369 1837 77% 75% 76%

*Less than 10 students

ENGLISH

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS 

PASSING

READING

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS 

PASSING

MATH

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS 

PASSING

TOTAL

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS 

PASSING

Page 175: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

E: SUCCESS RATE OF DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENTS IN SUBSEQUENT COLLEGE‐LEVEL COURSES 

Description Among developmental completers subsequently completing a college level English or mathematics course, the percentage passing the college level English or mathematics course with a grade of "D" or better. Specifically, the performance of those who took developmental English and/or reading courses and subsequently took college‐level English courses was assessed. Likewise, the performance of those who took developmental math courses and then took college‐level math courses was also assessed. 

Source  At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file which is uploaded to the NCCCS Data Warehouse.  Grade data in the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II Universe was extracted by filtering “Course Prefix” equal to “ENG;MAT”,  “Course Number” less than or equal to “100”, and Reporting Term equal to “200903;201001;201002” and analyzed based on data in the fields “Letter Grade” and “College Letter Grade”.   While all grades were extracted for analysis, only grades that equated to “A”,”B”,”C”,”D”, or “F” were counted  as completers.  These grades were matched to students who had previously taken developmental English, Reading, and/or Math courses.  

Standard 80% of college level English or mathematics course completers with previous developmental coursework will complete the college level English or mathematics course with a grade of "D" or better. 

Results For 2009‐10, 52 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 67% to a high of 96%. The aggregate result for the system was 88%.   

89% 86% 87% 90% 88% 88% 89% 87% 88%

English

2007‐2008

English

2008‐2009

English

2009‐2010

Math

2007‐2008

Math

2008‐2009

Math

2009‐2010

Total

2007‐2008

Total

2008‐2009

Total

2009‐2010

Previous Developmental Student Grades in College‐Level Courses

D or BETTER FAIL OTHER GRADES STANDARD (80%)

Page 176: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

E. PERFORMANCE OF DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENTS IN SUBSEQUENT COLLEGE‐LEVEL COURSES, 2009‐2010

09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  28515 24098 87% 86% 89% 16251 13373 88% 88% 90% 45176 37862 88% 87% 89%

Alamance CC  507 424 96% 97% 98% 556 426 93% 96% 96% 1063 850 95% 96% 97%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  651 500 60% 72% 82% 331 242 81% 88% 88% 982 742 67% 80% 86%

Beaufort County CC  213 168 85% 85% 83% 117 92 96% 90% 83% 330 260 89% 87% 83%

Bladen CC  229 196 92% 93% 98% 147 112 96% 98% 95% 376 308 93% 96% 97%

Blue Ridge CC  181 177 92% 86% 88% 142 140 79% 87% 94% 323 317 86% 87% 91%

Brunswick CC  98 90 74% 77% 90% 112 93 78% 85% 80% 210 183 77% 82% 83%

Caldwell CC & TI  590 479 88% 92% 90% 288 236 92% 92% 94% 878 715 89% 92% 92%

Cape Fear CC  671 611 78% 79% 79% 570 481 79% 83% 86% 1241 1092 79% 81% 81%

Carteret CC  138 118 90% 87% 81% 108 80 96% 92% 89% 246 198 92% 90% 86%

Catawba Valley CC  744 645 98% 88% 87% 474 410 88% 89% 90% 1218 1055 94% 89% 89%

Central Carolina CC  425 342 92% 90% 94% 150 134 97% 92% 96% 575 476 93% 91% 95%

Central Piedmont CC  3214 3068 87% 89% 91% 1445 1339 84% 86% 91% 4659 4407 86% 88% 91%

Cleveland CC  363 313 85% 83% 80% 253 207 92% 97% 97% 616 520 88% 91% 90%

Coastal Carolina CC  379 294 91% 92% 97% 504 427 90% 88% 90% 883 721 90% 89% 93%

College of The Albemarle  352 272 89% 93% 90% 213 174 98% 99% 96% 565 446 92% 96% 93%

Craven CC  281 239 82% 85% 83% 272 218 94% 93% 89% 553 457 88% 91% 87%

Davidson County CC  330 315 76% 83% 80% 194 184 87% 85% 89% 524 499 80% 84% 85%

Durham TCC  712 580 88% 95% 93% 305 233 86% 94% 89% 1017 813 87% 95% 91%

Edgecombe CC  590 484 84% 83% 86% 196 144 74% 81% 80% 786 628 82% 82% 84%

Fayetteville TCC  1387 1147 86% 79% 76% 642 515 85% 88% 89% 2029 1662 85% 83% 81%

Forsyth TCC  1103 890 89% 86% 91% 613 416 84% 80% 84% 1716 1306 87% 83% 88%

Gaston College  883 776 89% 83% 81% 527 424 91% 89% 89% 1410 1200 90% 86% 85%

Guilford TCC  2157 1838 87% 83% 87% 1046 845 79% 81% 81% 3203 2683 84% 82% 85%

Halifax CC  289 259 87% 88% 90% 99 85 91% 84% 86% 388 344 88% 87% 88%

Haywood CC  128 106 91% 86% 90% 90 75 91% 83% 91% 218 181 91% 85% 91%

Isothermal CC  474 415 86% 82% 83% 233 197 97% 92% 94% 707 612 90% 87% 89%

James Sprunt CC  211 193 95% 89% 94% 123 104 93% 93% 95% 334 297 95% 91% 95%

Johnston CC  428 415 94% 92% 97% 165 164 95% 79% 98% 593 579 94% 87% 97%

Lenoir CC  650 521 97% 87% 96% 214 153 81% 87% 97% 864 674 93% 87% 96%

Martin CC  60 47 60% 80% 71% 37 33 85% 91% 81% 97 80 70% 84% 74%

Mayland CC  78 76 95% 87% 86% 28 21 90% 91% 93% 106 97 94% 89% 89%

McDowell TCC  131 119 94% 96% 100% 180 158 98% 93% 100% 311 277 96% 94% 100%

Mitchell CC  224 170 86% 81% 85% 168 139 89% 86% 90% 392 309 87% 83% 89%

Montgomery CC  70 64 95% 88% 98% 60 50 80% 95% 92% 130 114 89% 91% 95%

Nash CC  257 179 85% 87% 86% 275 244 95% 92% 89% 532 423 91% 90% 87%

Pamlico CC  17 16 88% * 95% 12 12 75% * 94% 29 28 82% 86% 95%

Piedmont CC  256 232 97% 86% 96% 157 138 94% 86% 93% 413 370 96% 86% 95%

Pitt CC  1040 827 89% 93% 92% 582 466 91% 89% 89% 1622 1293 89% 91% 90%

Randolph CC  233 217 90% 86% 80% 256 220 86% 93% 92% 489 437 88% 90% 87%

Richmond CC  400 308 86% 92% 92% 132 105 89% 91% 95% 532 413 87% 92% 93%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  165 153 77% 75% 79% 48 48 90% 91% 87% 213 201 80% 81% 82%

Robeson CC  846 665 92% 95% 93% 274 234 91% 92% 85% 1120 899 92% 94% 90%

Rockingham CC  293 240 80% 86% 80% 277 237 94% 97% 98% 570 477 87% 94% 92%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  636 548 89% 83% 83% 551 465 93% 91% 87% 1187 1013 91% 86% 84%

Sampson CC  279 227 91% 94% 97% 107 84 86% 96% 95% 386 311 89% 95% 96%

Sandhills CC  378 292 91% 87% 89% 220 164 89% 76% 82% 598 456 90% 83% 86%

South Piedmont CC  316 282 86% 83% 82% 113 90 79% 86% 82% 429 372 84% 84% 82%

Southeastern CC  438 334 73% 90% 88% 128 116 88% 94% 91% 566 450 77% 91% 89%

Southwestern CC  261 227 85% 83% 86% 194 164 87% 79% 82% 455 391 86% 81% 85%

Stanly CC  128 102 89% 96% 96% 158 137 97% 97% 98% 286 239 94% 96% 97%

Surry CC  290 255 92% 90% 85% 212 157 87% 93% 88% 502 412 90% 92% 87%

Tri‐County CC  80 75 80% 86% 80% 85 79 75% 87% 96% 165 154 77% 86% 89%

Vance‐Granville CC  485 401 80% 86% 84% 200 132 92% 94% 98% 685 533 83% 89% 90%

Wake TCC  1085 876 86% 78% 83% 919 739 90% 89% 91% 2004 1615 88% 84% 87%

Wayne CC  584 436 92% 89% 92% 227 142 89% 86% 91% 811 578 91% 88% 92%

Western Piedmont CC  713 600 96% 87% 98% 270 229 94% 93% 98% 983 829 95% 89% 98%

Wilkes CC  360 256 84% 89% 84% 180 158 98% 96% 95% 540 414 90% 92% 89%

Wilson CC  312 263 83% 84% 82% 204 189 87% 90% 92% 516 452 85% 88% 87%

% COMPLETERS 

PASSING

ENGLISH MATH TOTAL

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS 

PASSING

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

% COMPLETERS 

PASSING

ATTEM

PT

COMPLET

Page 177: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

F: SATISFACTION OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS AND NON‐COMPLETERS 

Description The percentage of graduates and early‐leavers “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the overall quality of the college.  

Source Data was collected from a Completer Survey and a Non‐Completer Survey that were developed and administered at the individual colleges.  Many of the questions included on the surveys are required by the System Office, including a question on the “Overall quality of the college” with satisfaction options of “very satisfied”, “satisfied”, “dissatisfied”, and “very dissatisfied”.   Completer Surveys were administered to students graduating in the 2009‐2010 academic year.  Non‐Completer Surveys were administered to credential‐seeking students in Fall 2009 who were not enrolled in Fall 2010 and had not graduated.   Colleges are required to report a statistically valid response rate.  The overall satisfaction rates were calculated by dividing the total number of respondents “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the “Overall quality of the college” by the total number of question responses.   

Performance Standard 90% of exiting students will be “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the overall quality of the college. 

Results For 2009‐10, 57 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 87% to a high of 100%. The aggregate result for the system was 96%. 

97% 97% 95% 94% 96% 96%

52%

40%

49%

45%

54%

48%

Completers

2007‐2008

Completers

2008‐2009

Completers

2009‐2010

Non‐

Completers

2007‐2008

Non‐

Completers

2008‐2009

Non‐

Completers

2009‐2010

Total

2007‐2008

Total

2008‐2009

Total

2009‐2010

Completer and Non‐Completer Satisfaction

VERY SATISFIED SATISFIED STANDARD (90%)

Page 178: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

F. SATISFACTION OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS AND NON‐COMPLETERS, 2009‐2010

09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  30451 17622 52% 45% 98% 97% 97% 70392 7212 40% 54% 93% 94% 95% 100843 24834 49% 48% 96% 96% 96%

Alamance CC  664 347 53% 45% 98% 100% 100% 1624 171 48% 48% 96% 93% 95% 2288 518 51% 46% 97% 98% 98%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  1017 577 48% 50% 98% 97% 99% 1789 276 42% 50% 92% 95% 93% 2806 853 46% 50% 96% 96% 97%

Beaufort County CC  212 166 61% 39% 100% 100% 98% 145 27 35% 65% 100% 93% 92% 357 193 57% 43% 100% 99% 97%

Bladen CC  101 101 49% 51% 100% 97% 94% 610 61 50% 37% 87% 95% 94% 711 162 49% 46% 95% 96% 94%

Blue Ridge CC  166 143 41% 59% 100% 99% 100% 345 37 31% 60% 91% 89% 97% 511 180 39% 60% 98% 97% 99%

Brunswick CC  179 105 45% 45% 90% 94% 99% 466 47 40% 40% 81% 85% 87% 645 152 44% 44% 87% 91% 95%

Caldwell CC & TI  584 266 52% 45% 97% 97% 96% 1141 89 46% 42% 88% 95% 94% 1725 355 51% 44% 95% 97% 95%

Cape Fear CC  1511 1249 54% 45% 98% 99% 98% 2509 328 43% 54% 97% 96% 96% 4020 1577 51% 47% 98% 98% 97%

Carteret CC  283 160 64% 36% 100% 100% 99% 696 68 44% 47% 91% 96% 95% 979 228 58% 39% 97% 99% 98%

Catawba Valley CC  727 521 33% 62% 96% 97% 99% 710 89 34% 60% 94% 94% 88% 1437 610 33% 62% 96% 97% 98%

Central Carolina CC  711 434 46% 50% 97% 97% 98% 1599 160 39% 55% 94% 98% 98% 2310 594 44% 52% 96% 97% 98%

Central Piedmont CC  1337 360 41% 54% 96% 98% 98% 7797 436 7% 92% 99% 96% 97% 9134 796 23% 74% 97% 97% 98%

Cleveland CC  494 266 59% 37% 95% 96% 97% 266 26 48% 48% 96% 96% 99% 760 292 58% 38% 95% 96% 98%

Coastal Carolina CC  839 685 76% 22% 98% 98% 98% 2230 273 73% 26% 100% 97% 95% 3069 958 75% 23% 98% 98% 97%

College of The Albemarle  558 296 54% 43% 97% 96% 98% 797 82 37% 54% 91% 95% 97% 1355 378 51% 45% 96% 96% 98%

Craven CC  297 53 38% 60% 98% 93% 97% 1435 84 25% 61% 86% 91% 94% 1732 137 31% 60% 91% 92% 96%

Davidson County CC  721 307 57% 42% 99% 98% 98% 928 96 45% 46% 91% 90% 96% 1649 403 54% 43% 97% 96% 97%

Durham TCC  575 285 45% 52% 97% 97% 99% 2091 240 22% 68% 90% 88% 95% 2666 525 34% 60% 94% 92% 97%

Edgecombe CC  353 334 66% 28% 93% 97% 97% 1188 121 73% 24% 97% 97% 100% 1541 455 68% 27% 94% 97% 98%

Fayetteville TCC  904 672 45% 52% 96% 99% 97% 2802 277 32% 52% 84% 92% 88% 3706 949 41% 52% 93% 97% 95%

Forsyth TCC  1214 437 37% 60% 97% 95% 94% 3245 194 34% 55% 89% 95% 92% 4459 631 36% 58% 95% 95% 93%

Gaston College  1072 710 45% 52% 97% 97% 98% 2685 290 32% 58% 90% 95% 92% 3757 1000 41% 54% 95% 97% 97%

Guilford TCC  1306 843 44% 53% 97% 96% 97% 4888 296 37% 50% 87% 93% 88% 6194 1139 42% 52% 95% 95% 95%

Halifax CC  273 167 55% 44% 99% 97% 99% 768 86 24% 74% 98% 100% 91% 1041 253 45% 54% 99% 98% 96%

Haywood CC  401 196 60% 37% 97% 96% 96% 514 51 55% 35% 90% 96% 98% 915 247 59% 37% 96% 96% 97%

Isothermal CC  362 163 81% 19% 100% 99% 99% 739 128 67% 30% 98% 98% 95% 1101 291 75% 24% 99% 99% 98%

James Sprunt CC  56 56 41% 59% 100% 95% 97% 445 70 46% 43% 89% 95% 92% 501 126 44% 50% 94% 95% 95%

Johnston CC  744 462 52% 46% 98% 99% 99% 708 76 64% 30% 95% 91% 96% 1452 538 54% 44% 98% 97% 98%

Lenoir CC  454 65 42% 53% 95% 96% 95% 1109 127 36% 61% 97% 100% 97% 1563 192 38% 58% 96% 98% 96%

Martin CC  59 30 24% 69% 93% 98% 92% 319 62 37% 55% 92% 78% 91% 378 92 33% 60% 92% 90% 91%

Mayland CC  407 256 67% 31% 98% 97% 98% 286 33 48% 52% 100% 100% 100% 693 289 64% 34% 98% 97% 98%

McDowell TCC  275 246 56% 41% 97% 97% 94% 459 46 68% 32% 100% 100% 81% 734 292 58% 40% 98% 98% 92%

Mitchell CC  343 184 44% 54% 98% 98% 99% 1059 100 30% 59% 89% 91% 91% 1402 284 39% 56% 95% 96% 96%

Montgomery CC  104 52 63% 37% 100% 100% 99% 111 25 52% 44% 96% 92% 100% 215 77 60% 39% 99% 98% 99%

Nash CC  430 163 55% 45% 100% 97% 100% 2061 321 41% 55% 97% 96% 100% 2491 484 46% 51% 98% 97% 100%

Pamlico CC  126 48 71% 29% 100% 96% 95% 161 28 52% 44% 96% 90% 92% 287 76 64% 35% 99% 95% 94%

Piedmont CC  577 158 68% 31% 99% 98% 95% 296 29 28% 68% 96% 100% 94% 873 187 62% 36% 98% 99% 95%

Pitt CC  1170 676 42% 57% 99% 98% 99% 2489 264 41% 56% 97% 98% 100% 3659 940 42% 56% 98% 98% 99%

Randolph CC  351 187 55% 44% 99% 98% 98% 793 87 32% 53% 84% 84% 98% 1144 274 48% 47% 95% 93% 98%

Richmond CC  308 214 58% 37% 95% 96% 100% 716 74 40% 52% 92% 90% 100% 1024 288 53% 41% 94% 95% 100%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  136 136 57% 40% 96% 96% 77% 331 205 36% 63% 99% 100% 89% 467 341 44% 54% 98% 97% 83%

Robeson CC  240 140 38% 57% 96% 95% 97% 1260 129 25% 71% 96% 95% 95% 1500 269 32% 64% 96% 95% 96%

Rockingham CC  379 249 69% 29% 98% 100% 99% 662 70 52% 42% 94% 90% 89% 1041 319 66% 31% 97% 98% 97%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  768 286 54% 44% 98% 97% 96% 1080 118 39% 59% 98% 92% 95% 1848 404 50% 48% 98% 95% 96%

Sampson CC  179 110 62% 38% 100% 99% 97% 440 54 21% 79% 100% 100% 83% 619 164 48% 52% 100% 99% 94%

Sandhills CC  565 348 57% 42% 99% 99% 100% 1407 141 43% 51% 94% 94% 97% 1972 489 53% 44% 98% 98% 99%

South Piedmont CC  322 195 40% 53% 93% 93% 90% 976 100 28% 56% 84% 86% 72% 1298 295 36% 54% 90% 92% 87%

Southeastern CC  233 233 48% 49% 97% 96% 98% 496 49 31% 67% 98% 94% 100% 729 282 45% 52% 97% 96% 98%

Southwestern CC  449 223 73% 26% 100% 99% 98% 681 79 54% 41% 95% 97% 98% 1130 302 68% 30% 98% 98% 98%

Stanly CC  484 389 63% 36% 99% 98% 99% 364 69 57% 43% 100% 96% 98% 848 458 62% 37% 99% 97% 99%

Surry CC  424 289 54% 45% 99% 97% 97% 1016 130 60% 36% 96% 98% 97% 1440 419 56% 42% 98% 97% 97%

Tri‐County CC  144 85 65% 35% 100% 99% 97% 381 42 69% 29% 98% 88% 97% 525 127 67% 33% 99% 96% 97%

Vance‐Granville CC  456 283 57% 40% 98% 100% 98% 1126 112 37% 55% 92% 92% 92% 1582 395 52% 44% 96% 98% 96%

Wake TCC  1831 868 42% 56% 98% 94% 95% 1988 196 27% 56% 83% 93% 96% 3819 1064 40% 56% 95% 94% 95%

Wayne CC  534 498 63% 37% 100% 100% 99% 1252 125 53% 43% 97% 100% 100% 1786 623 61% 39% 99% 100% 99%

Western Piedmont CC  401 310 49% 50% 99% 97% 98% 353 45 39% 59% 98% 91% 94% 754 355 48% 51% 99% 96% 98%

Wilkes CC  365 192 64% 32% 96% 98% 97% 790 90 61% 32% 93% 92% 98% 1155 282 63% 32% 95% 96% 97%

Wilson CC  276 148 48% 51% 99% 98% 99% 770 83 27% 66% 92% 98% 99% 1046 231 41% 56% 97% 98% 99%

COMPLETERS NON‐COMPLETERS TOTAL

STUDEN

TS

SURVEYS % SATISFIED OR 

VERY SATISFIED

STUDEN

TS

SURVEYS % SATISFIED OR 

VERY SATISFIED

STUDEN

TS % SATISFIED OR 

VERY SATISFIED

% VER

SATISFIED

SATISFIED

% VER

SATISFIED

SATISFIED

% VER

SATISFIED

SATISFIED

SURVEYS

Page 179: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

G: CURRICULUM STUDENT RETENTION, GRADUATION, AND TRANSFER 

Description The percentage of fall credential‐seeking students who have graduated or are still enrolled at the same college, a university, or another community college one year later. 

Source At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file which is uploaded to the NCCCS Data Warehouse.  Student enrollment data in the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II Universe was extracted by filtering “Curriculum Type Desc” equal to “Associate;Certificate;Diploma” and “Reporting Term” equal to “200903”.   This fall 2009 list of students was matched against those with a “Date Graduated in Curriculum” between “07/01/2009” and “12/31/2010” to determine those graduating.  The fall 2009 list was also matched against those with “Reporting Term” equal to “201003” in either the Data Warehouse’s Curriculum Student Info II or Con‐Ed Universe (with “Funding Code Area” equal to “03” or ”04”)to determine fall 2010 enrollments in either curriculum or occupational extension programs. Finally, the fall 2009 list was sent to the National Student Clearinghouse to identify those who transferred to a college or university outside of the NC community College System.  The combined data set was analyzed to determine which students from the fall 2009 list had had “graduated”, “returned but did not graduate”, “transferred but did not graduate or return”, or “did not graduate, return, or transfer”. 

Performance Standard 65% of fall credential‐seeking students will graduate, remain enrolled at the same college, or transfer to a university or another community college one year later. 

Results For 2009‐10, 52 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 62% to a high of 73%. The aggregate result for the system was 68%. 

13% 14% 12%

49%51%

49%

7%7%

7%

2007‐2008 2008‐2009 2009‐2010

Students Graduating, Returning, or Transferring

TRANSFERRED, DID NOT GRADUATE OR RETURN

RETURNED, DID NOT GRADUATE

GRADUATED

STANDARD (65%)

Page 180: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

G. CURRICULUM STUDENT RETENTION, GRADUATON AND TRANSFER, 2009‐2010

09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08 09‐10 08‐09 07‐08

System Totals  207,636 12% 14% 13% 49% 51% 49% 7% 7% 7% 68% 72% 69%

Alamance CC  4,607 12% 15% 14% 52% 53% 52% 5% 6% 5% 69% 74% 71%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  4,959 16% 17% 17% 49% 50% 49% 5% 5% 5% 70% 72% 71%

Beaufort County CC  1,676 11% 16% 16% 50% 54% 52% 5% 5% 5% 66% 75% 73%

Bladen CC  1,574 9% 11% 11% 57% 57% 57% 6% 6% 7% 71% 74% 75%

Blue Ridge CC  1,964 11% 12% 11% 50% 51% 49% 5% 6% 7% 66% 69% 67%

Brunswick CC  1,280 12% 15% 16% 45% 48% 45% 6% 8% 6% 63% 71% 67%

Caldwell CC & TI  3,947 14% 14% 11% 49% 54% 53% 6% 8% 9% 69% 76% 73%

Cape Fear CC  8,109 14% 15% 14% 51% 52% 50% 7% 8% 9% 72% 75% 73%

Carteret CC  1,617 13% 14% 14% 50% 49% 53% 5% 5% 6% 67% 68% 73%

Catawba Valley CC  4,597 10% 15% 13% 53% 52% 51% 7% 5% 6% 70% 72% 70%

Central Carolina CC  4,149 18% 21% 20% 44% 44% 45% 4% 5% 4% 66% 70% 69%

Central Piedmont CC  17,647 8% 8% 8% 47% 49% 49% 9% 10% 9% 64% 67% 66%

Cleveland CC  2,974 14% 16% 14% 44% 46% 46% 6% 6% 6% 64% 68% 66%

Coastal Carolina CC  4,641 16% 16% 17% 45% 46% 45% 9% 9% 9% 69% 71% 71%

College of The Albemarle  2,325 15% 15% 16% 45% 48% 47% 9% 7% 7% 69% 70% 70%

Craven CC  2,969 11% 12% 10% 49% 48% 48% 6% 8% 8% 66% 68% 66%

Davidson County CC  3,559 16% 16% 20% 51% 52% 45% 5% 5% 5% 72% 73% 70%

Durham TCC  4,607 9% 9% 10% 48% 49% 49% 10% 10% 8% 66% 68% 67%

Edgecombe CC  2,832 9% 13% 15% 52% 57% 53% 5% 4% 4% 66% 74% 72%

Fayetteville TCC  9,273 10% 11% 9% 49% 52% 51% 7% 8% 7% 66% 71% 67%

Forsyth TCC  8,084 14% 14% 13% 50% 51% 50% 6% 7% 7% 69% 72% 70%

Gaston College  5,875 12% 13% 11% 50% 52% 51% 6% 5% 5% 67% 70% 67%

Guilford TCC  12,738 9% 11% 10% 51% 52% 50% 8% 9% 8% 68% 72% 68%

Halifax CC  1,545 18% 20% 22% 45% 47% 43% 4% 5% 5% 67% 72% 70%

Haywood CC  1,631 19% 17% 17% 45% 48% 46% 5% 5% 6% 69% 70% 69%

Isothermal CC  2,039 15% 14% 15% 51% 50% 46% 4% 7% 6% 70% 71% 67%

James Sprunt CC  1,141 22% 24% 25% 45% 47% 44% 5% 4% 5% 72% 75% 74%

Johnston CC  3,464 13% 16% 17% 50% 52% 49% 8% 7% 7% 72% 75% 73%

Lenoir CC  2,536 16% 14% 17% 49% 53% 49% 5% 7% 7% 70% 74% 73%

Martin CC  651 10% 16% 11% 46% 51% 51% 6% 6% 6% 62% 73% 68%

Mayland CC  1,082 28% 27% 32% 35% 41% 38% 4% 4% 3% 68% 72% 73%

McDowell TCC  1,252 15% 19% 20% 46% 44% 42% 3% 4% 4% 64% 67% 66%

Mitchell CC  2,808 12% 13% 9% 51% 53% 52% 5% 5% 8% 69% 71% 69%

Montgomery CC  787 28% 25% 23% 38% 44% 46% 2% 3% 3% 67% 72% 72%

Nash CC  2,548 11% 12% 12% 50% 53% 51% 6% 7% 6% 67% 72% 69%

Pamlico CC  389 32% 32% 31% 38% 38% 40% 3% 5% 3% 72% 75% 74%

Piedmont CC  2,114 17% 23% 24% 44% 43% 43% 5% 5% 5% 66% 71% 72%

Pitt CC  6,351 12% 14% 15% 53% 53% 52% 8% 8% 8% 73% 75% 75%

Randolph CC  2,242 13% 13% 13% 53% 54% 53% 4% 5% 5% 69% 72% 71%

Richmond CC  1,705 13% 12% 13% 49% 54% 53% 5% 6% 5% 68% 72% 71%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  724 15% 20% 14% 44% 47% 42% 7% 7% 5% 65% 74% 61%

Robeson CC  2,465 11% 16% 14% 49% 51% 49% 7% 6% 5% 66% 73% 68%

Rockingham CC  2,247 14% 14% 14% 51% 53% 50% 5% 5% 5% 70% 72% 69%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  6,307 9% 13% 10% 52% 51% 50% 6% 6% 6% 66% 70% 66%

Sampson CC  1,269 17% 21% 22% 49% 52% 48% 4% 4% 5% 70% 77% 75%

Sandhills CC  3,509 12% 15% 10% 49% 50% 51% 5% 7% 7% 66% 72% 68%

South Piedmont CC  2,223 15% 16% 17% 47% 51% 47% 5% 7% 6% 67% 74% 70%

Southeastern CC  1,907 13% 14% 11% 46% 52% 52% 7% 8% 6% 67% 74% 69%

Southwestern CC  1,911 20% 17% 18% 47% 49% 46% 4% 5% 6% 71% 71% 70%

Stanly CC  2,612 18% 17% 19% 46% 47% 47% 5% 4% 4% 69% 68% 70%

Surry CC  2,408 17% 15% 14% 48% 53% 52% 5% 6% 6% 70% 74% 72%

Tri‐County CC  1,015 11% 17% 13% 47% 46% 47% 6% 8% 6% 65% 71% 66%

Vance‐Granville CC  3,838 16% 15% 11% 42% 47% 52% 5% 5% 5% 62% 67% 68%

Wake TCC  14,774 9% 8% 9% 53% 52% 51% 9% 10% 9% 70% 70% 69%

Wayne CC  3,135 14% 15% 14% 49% 50% 50% 6% 7% 9% 69% 72% 73%

Western Piedmont CC  2,907 15% 16% 17% 52% 56% 53% 4% 5% 5% 72% 77% 75%

Wilkes CC  2,407 14% 15% 15% 50% 54% 51% 5% 6% 6% 69% 75% 72%

Wilson CC  1,690 14% 16% 16% 47% 49% 47% 5% 6% 5% 66% 71% 68%

% TRANSFER% GRADUATE% GRADUATE, TRANSFER, 

OR RETURNENROLLED% RETURN

Page 181: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

H: CLIENT SATISFACTION WITH CUSTOMIZED TRAINING 

Description Percentage of clients receiving specialized training programs and services through Customized Training and Small Business Centers satisfied with training. 

Source Surveys administered to clients receiving services through Customized Training Program projects and Business & Industry Support training activities, and from Small Business Centers were administered by colleges to determine level of satisfaction with training.  The data is submitted annually to the System Office at the end of the fiscal year.  Satisfaction for each of these surveys are based on a five point scale with satisfaction being based on the highest two points. 

Performance Standard 90% of clients receiving specialized training programs and services through Customized Training and Small Business Centers will be satisfied with training. 

Results For 2009‐10, all 58 community colleges met this standard. The college results ranged from a low of 90% to a high of 100%. The aggregate result for the system was 95%. 

94% 94% 95%

2007‐2008 2008‐2009 2009‐2010

Clients Satisfied with Training

STANDARD (90%)

Page 182: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

H. CLIENT SATISFIED WITH CUSTOMIZED TRAINING, 2009‐2010

RESPONDENTS% EXCELLENT & 

VERY GOODRESPONDENTS

% EXCELLENT & 

VERY GOOD2009‐2010 2008‐2009 2007‐2008

System Totals  49,547 95% 645 99% 95% 94% 94%

Alamance CC  537 95% 32 91% 95% 94% 95%

Asheville‐Buncombe TCC  748 93% 20 100% 93% 93% 94%

Beaufort County CC  479 94% 4 100% 94% 96% 96%

Bladen CC  183 98% 5 100% 98% 99% 99%

Blue Ridge CC  7,598 97% 5 100% 97% 93% 93%

Brunswick CC  331 96% 6 100% 96% 95% 92%

Caldwell CC & TI  1,495 91% 6 100% 91% 92% 95%

Cape Fear CC  1,802 95% 8 100% 95% 93% 94%

Carteret CC  618 93% 93% 87% 88%

Catawba Valley CC  964 96% 13 100% 96% 92% 95%

Central Carolina CC  822 97% 16 100% 97% 96% 96%

Central Piedmont CC  1,738 90% 23 100% 91% 93% 93%

Cleveland CC  391 92% 6 83% 92% 94% 96%

Coastal Carolina CC  871 95% 2 100% 95% 94% 93%

College of The Albemarle  1,302 92% 3 100% 92% 92% 90%

Craven CC  1,023 97% 4 100% 97% 96% 100%

Davidson County CC  269 93% 2 100% 93% 93% 91%

Durham TCC  698 94% 12 100% 94% 93% 90%

Edgecombe CC  363 97% 6 83% 96% 95% 98%

Fayetteville TCC  1,583 91% 8 100% 92% 93% 96%

Forsyth TCC  1,218 95% 13 92% 95% 96% 96%

Gaston College  668 97% 16 100% 97% 93% 98%

Guilford TCC  637 94% 8 100% 94% 95% 80%

Halifax CC  1,198 100% 5 100% 100% 94% 96%

Haywood CC  462 93% 3 100% 93% 95% 93%

Isothermal CC  228 95% 9 100% 95% 96% 86%

James Sprunt CC  1,473 100% 27 100% 100% 100% 99%

Johnston CC  1,804 94% 25 96% 94% 95% 98%

Lenoir CC  876 95% 12 100% 95% 94% 95%

Martin CC  594 94% 3 100% 94% 95% 93%

Mayland CC  382 95% 2 100% 95% 96% 96%

McDowell TCC  475 100% 8 100% 100% 100% 100%

Mitchell CC  411 96% 17 100% 96% 93% 93%

Montgomery CC  525 97% 2 100% 97% 93% 93%

Nash CC  950 96% 4 100% 96% 92% 96%

Pamlico CC ** 73 99% 99% 92% 87%

Piedmont CC  462 92% 6 100% 93% 92% 93%

Pitt CC  931 95% 15 100% 95% 90% 92%

Randolph CC  460 92% 3 100% 92% 94% 97%

Richmond CC  193 99% 47 100% 100% 96% 89%

Roanoke‐Chowan CC  354 95% 4 100% 95% 95% 93%

Robeson CC  1,258 94% 19 100% 94% 95% 96%

Rockingham CC  386 94% 16 100% 94% 91% 92%

Rowan‐Cabarrus CC  564 92% 16 100% 92% 90% 93%

Sampson CC  577 93% 5 100% 93% 83% 96%

Sandhills CC  1,164 93% 8 100% 93% 96% 94%

South Piedmont CC  270 93% 7 100% 94% 93% 94%

Southeastern CC  1,440 94% 3 100% 94% 91% 92%

Southwestern CC  93 94% 13 100% 94% 100% 100%

Stanly CC  689 92% 21 100% 93% 92% 95%

Surry CC  158 99% 12 100% 99% 98% 97%

Tri‐County CC  231 94% 3 100% 94% 98% 94%

Vance‐Granville CC  414 94% 25 100% 94% 93% 98%

Wake TCC  2,916 96% 31 94% 96% 97% 97%

Wayne CC  429 95% 9 100% 95% 95% 92%

Western Piedmont CC  166 99% 29 100% 99% 97% 94%

Wilkes CC  325 90% 6 100% 90% 96% 98%

Wilson TCC  278 96% 12 100% 97% 95% 95%

* Did not include Customized Training and Business & Industry Support prior to 2009‐10

** For customized training, Pamlico is in consortium with Craven CC

AGGREGATE % EXCELLENT & VERY GOOD*CUSTOMIZED TRAINING AND 

BUSINESS & INDUSTRY SUPPORT SMALL BUSINESS CENTERS

Page 183: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

North Carolina Community College SystemResearch and Performance Management

July 2010

2010

CRITICAL

SUCCESS

FACTORS

FOR THE

NORTH CAROLINACOMMUNITY COLLEGESYSTEM

Twenty First Annual Report

Page 184: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 185: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

2010 CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS

FOR THE

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

Twenty First Annual Report

July 2010

Published by

North Carolina Community College System Dr. R Scott Ralls, President

Kennon Briggs Executive Vice President & Chief of Staff

Research & Performance Management

Dr. Soyoung C. Yim Coordinator for Research and Evaluation

Vivian Barrett Office Assistant

NC Community College System • Caswell Building • 200 W. Jones Street • Raleigh, NC Telephone: 919/807-7100 • Fax: 919/807-7164

Page 186: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 187: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

iii

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1

Core Indicators of Success .............................................................................................................................. 1

System Strategic Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 1

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS MATRIX ............................................................................................. 3

FACTOR I: CORE INDICATORS OF STUDENT SUCCESS ................................................................ 5

Measure A: Progress of Basic Skills Students ................................................................................................ 6

Measure B: Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations ....................................................... 8

Measure C: Performance of College Transfer Students ................................................................................ 20

Measure D: Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses ............................................................... 22

Measure E: Success Rate of Developmental Students in Subsequent College-Level Courses...................... 24

Measure F: Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-Completers ........................................................ 26

Measure G: Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation and Transfer .......................................................... 28

Measure H: Client Satisfaction with Customized Training…………………………………………………30

Summary of Core Indicators of Success ....................................................................................................... 32

EVALUATION OF PROGRESS ............................................................................................................... 37

FACTOR II: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................... 39

Measure A: Percentage of Employers Satisfied With NCCCS Training Programs ...................................... 40

Measure B: Percentage of College Tech Prep Students Enrolling in a Community College ........................ 44

Measure C: Number of Employers and Trainees Served by Customized Training ………………………...46

Measure D: Employment Status of Graduates ……………………………………………………………..48

Measure E: Employer Satisfaction with Graduates ………………………………………………………...51

Page 188: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

iv

FACTOR III: DIVERSE POPULATIONS’ LEARNING NEEDS.........................................................53

Measure A: Number and Percentage of Dropouts Annually Served by Basic Skills Programs ....................54

Measure B: Number of GEDs and AHSDs Awarded Compared to the Number of Dropouts Statewide .......................................................................................................................................................56

Measure C: Percentage of Basic Skills Students and Recent High School Graduates Enrolling in a Community College .......................................................................................................................................58

Measure D: Unduplicated Headcount in English as a Second Language (ESL) ...........................................60

Measure E: Number of Under-Represented Students Enrolled Per Category ...............................................62

Measure F: Percentage of Students Receiving Financial Aid and Amount of Aid Compared With Cost of Attendance ........................................................................................................................................63

Measure G: Percentage of Adult Population in Service Area Enrolled ........................................................65

Measure H: Goal Completion for Completers ……………………………………………………………..67

FACTOR IV: RESOURCES .....................................................................................................................69

Measure A: Percentage of College Libraries Meeting the ALA Standards ...................................................70

Measure B: Total Dollar Amount of Budget Transfers Between Program Areas Made by Community Colleges......................................................................................................................................71

Measure C: Average Nine-Month Faculty Salaries as a Percentage of SREB Average ................................72

Measure D: Retention Rate for Full-Time Faculty With Less than Five Years of Experience .....................74

Measure E: Number of Faculty and Staff Participating in Professional Development Activities .................75

Measure F: Percentage of Facilities Meeting the “Satisfactory” Building Condition ...................................77

Measure G: Ratio of Occupational Extension FTE Dollar Allotment to Curriculum FTE Dollar Allotment .......................................................................................................................................................78

FACTOR V: TECHNOLOGY ..................................................................................................................79

Measure A: Curriculum Unduplicated Headcount by Course Method of Instruction ...................................80

Measure B: Number of Colleges Connected to the North Carolina Information Highway ...........................81

Measure C: Number of Colleges Possessing the FCC License for Wireless Cable Systems ........................82

Measure D: Number of Courses and Programs Offered Via Telecourse, Wireless Cable, the Internet, Two-Way Video, etc. .....................................................................................................................................83

Measure E: Number of Courses Offered Through the NC Virtual Learning Community .............................84

Page 189: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR THE

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

Twenty First Annual Report

INTRODUCTION

First mandated by the North Carolina General Assembly in 1989 (S.L. 1989; C. 752; S. 80), the Critical Success Factors report has evolved into the major accountability document for the North Carolina Community College System. This twenty first annual report on the critical success factors is the result of a process undertaken to streamline and simplify accountability reporting by the community college system. The purpose of this report is twofold. First, this document is the means by which the community college system reports on performance measures, referred to as core indicators of success, for purposes of accountability and performance funding. Second, this document serves as an evaluation instrument for the System Strategic Plan.

Core Indicators of Success

In February 1999, the North Carolina State Board of Community Colleges adopted 12 performance measures for accountability. This action was taken in response to a mandate from the North Carolina General Assembly to review past performance measures and define standards of performance to ensure programs and services offered by community colleges in North Carolina were of sufficient quality. In the 2007 Session, the General Assembly approved modification to the North Carolina Performance Measures and Standards as adopted by the State Board of Community Colleges on March 16, 2007. As a result, the number of performance measures was reduced to 8.

System Strategic Plan

Under the leadership of former President H. Martin Lancaster, the North Carolina Community College System embarked on a strategic planning process in January 1998. The purpose of the process was to develop a strategic plan that would focus the efforts of the system on a set of strategic initiatives. The strategic plan is the vehicle that sets the strategic direction for the System and guides the development of the biennial budget requests.

The purpose of factors two through five of the Critical Success Factors is to monitor the progress of the system in achieving the objectives in the strategic plan and to report those achievements. The measures that comprise these factors are the evaluation of the strategic

Page 190: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

2

plan objectives. Unlike the measures comprising factor one, the measures included in factors two through five will change more frequently as new strategic plan objectives are developed. In addition, the measures in factors two through five are meant to be System measures, rather than individual college measures. When available, individual college data will be presented, but the intended focus of these measures is the success of the System in achieving some predefined level of achievement.

A matrix showing the factors and measures contained in the Critical Success Factors can be found on page 3.

Page 191: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS AND MEASURES, 2008-2009

3

Factor I: Core Indicatorsof StudentSuccess

A. Progress ofbasic skillsstudents

B. Passing rateson licensure &certificationexams

C. Performance ofcollege transferstudents

D. Developmentalcourse passingrates

E. Success ofdevelopmentalstudents incollege-levelcourses

F. Satisfaction ofprogram completers andnon-completers

G. Curriculumstudent retention,graduation andtransfer

H. Clientsatisfacton withcustomizedtraining

Factor II:WorkforceDevelopment

A. Percentage ofemployerssatisfied withNCCCS trainingprograms

B. Percentage ofCollege Tech Prepstudents enrollingin a communitycollege

C. Number ofemployers &trainees servedby variousCustomizedTraining programs

D. Employmentstatus of graduates

E. Employersatisfaction withgraduates

Factor III:DiversePopulations'Learning Needs

A. Number andpercentage ofdropoutsannually servedby basic skillsprograms

B. Number ofGEDs andAHSDs awardedcompared to thenumber ofdropoutsstatewide

C. Percentage ofbasic skillsstudents andrecent highschool graduatesenrolling in acommunitycollege

D. Unduplicatedheadcount inEnglish as aSecond Language(ESL)

E. Number ofunder-representedstudents enrolledper category

F. Percentage ofstudents receivingfinancial aid andamount of aidcompared withcost of attendance

G. Percentage ofadult population inservice areaenrolled

H. Goalcompletion forcompleters

Factor IV:Resources

A. Percentage ofcollege librariesmeeting ALAstandards

B. Total dollaramount of budgettransfers betweenprogram areasmade bycommunitycolleges

C. Averagefaculty salaries asa percentage ofSREBaverage

D. Retention ratefor full-timefaculty with lessthan five years ofexperience

E. Number offaculty and staffparticipating inprofessionaldevelopmentactivities

F. Percentage offacilities meetingsatisfactorybuildingcondition

G. Ratio ofoccupationalextension FTEdollar allotmentto curriculumFTE dollarallotment

Factor V:Technology

A. Curriculumunduplicatedheadcount by course method ofinstruction

B. Number ofcollegesconnected to theNorth CarolinaInformationHighway

C. Number ofcollegespossessing theFCC license forwireless cablesystems

D. Number ofcourses andprograms offeredvia telecourse,wireless cable,the Internet,two-way video,etc.

E. Number ofcourses offeredthrough the NCVirtual LearningCommunity

Page 192: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 193: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

5

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR I: CORE INDICATORS OF STUDENT SUCCESS

In 1993, the State Board of Community Colleges began monitoring performance data on specific measures identified in the Critical Success Factors report and in the Annual Program Review report. Standards of performance were established for measures that were identified as being critical to ensure public accountability for programs and services.

In 1998, the North Carolina General Assembly directed the State Board of Community Colleges to undertake a review of all performance measures and standards with the intent of ensuring stronger public accountability. Concurrently, the General Assembly directed the State Board of Community Colleges to develop a plan for the implementation of performance funding.

As a result of efforts undertaken by the community college system, a set of 12 performance measures of accountability was adopted in February 1999. Recognizing the importance of these measures in the System’s public accountability efforts, the System Planning Council decided to designate the 12 measures as the core indicators of student success and include them as the first factor of the Critical Success Factors report. In the 2007 Session, the North Carolina General Assembly approved modifications to the North Carolina Community College Performance Measures as adopted by the State Board of Community Colleges on March 16, 2007. As a result, the number of performance measures was reduced to eight (8).

System summary data on each measure are presented in the report along with individual college’s performance data. A table is presented at the end of the text section that summarizes, by measure, whether or not colleges met the performance standard. Any college not meeting a standard is required to submit to the State Board of Community Colleges an action plan for improving performance.

The Core Indicators of Student Success are:

A. Progress of Basic Skills Students

B. Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations

C. Performance of College Transfer Students

D. Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses

E. Success Rates of Developmental Students in Subsequent College-Level Courses

F. Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-Completers

G. Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation, and Transfer

H. Client Satisfaction with Customized Training

Page 194: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

6

CORE INDICATORS OF SUCCESS MEASURE A:

Progress of Basic Skills Students

Description/Definition—Basic skills students include all adult literacy students. Progress of basic skills students is a composite measure that includes the percent of students progressing within a level of literacy, the percent of students completing a level entered or a predetermined goal, and the percent of students completing the level entered and advancing to a higher level.

Methodology and Data Source—Data on basic skills students were collected by the college providing the instruction and entered into the Literacy Education Information System (LEIS). Data on the progression of basic skills students were submitted to the North Carolina Community College System Office annually. The data are compiled at the system office, and the composite measure and adjustment for each college were calculated.

Performance Standard—Standard for the progress of basic skills students is 75 percent for the composite measure. This measure is a required performance funding measure.

Results: For the year 2008-09, 55 community colleges met the required standard. The average composite measure for the system was 84 percent. The range in the composite progress measure was from a low of 73 percent to a high of 97 percent.

SYSTEM SUMMARY OF PERCENTAGES IN PROGRESS OF BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS

YEAR EXIT, NON-

COMPLETER PROGRESSING SAME LEVEL

COMPLETED A LEVEL

MOVED TO NEXT LEVEL

COMPOSITE MEASURE

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

19%

18%

20%

18%

16%

49%

52%

50%

50%

49%

9%

6%

6%

6%

6%

23%

24%

25%

27%

29%

81%

82%

80%

82%

84%

Page 195: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PROGRESS OF BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS, 2008-2009

Alamance CC 4,297 2,835 11% 55% 23% 11% 89%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 3,577 4% 42% 34% 20% 80%Beaufort County CC 1,905 1,007 4% 42% 30% 24% 76%Bladen CC 1,537 618 6% 51% 32% 11% 89%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 1,684 7% 37% 31% 25% 75%Brunswick CC 1,752 1,127 6% 68% 23% 3% 97%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 2,416 6% 49% 31% 14% 86%Cape Fear CC 7,862 3,619 4% 51% 24% 20% 80%Carteret CC 1,835 852 18% 43% 20% 18% 82%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 3,152 8% 42% 29% 20% 80%Central Carolina CC 5,340 4,827 7% 42% 33% 18% 82%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 14,037 2% 66% 27% 5% 95%Cleveland CC 3,203 976 8% 33% 36% 23% 77%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 4,315 4% 31% 42% 23% 77%College of The Albemarle 2,448 2,506 8% 43% 23% 27% 73%Craven CC 2,891 1,514 7% 51% 29% 13% 87%Davidson County CC 4,067 3,304 5% 50% 42% 3% 97%Durham TCC 4,860 4,814 4% 48% 27% 21% 79%Edgecombe CC 2,439 1,823 6% 38% 31% 25% 75%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 5,970 3% 68% 23% 7% 93%Forsyth TCC 7,466 6,576 3% 61% 26% 10% 90%Gaston College 5,240 3,297 7% 38% 40% 15% 85%Guilford TCC 10,908 6,855 3% 58% 23% 16% 84%Halifax CC 1,650 1,276 9% 46% 24% 21% 79%Haywood CC 1,947 842 4% 52% 25% 19% 81%Isothermal CC 2,386 1,790 7% 52% 27% 14% 86%James Sprunt CC 1,399 724 10% 34% 38% 19% 81%Johnston CC 4,391 1,873 6% 43% 27% 24% 76%Lenoir CC 3,655 2,213 2% 45% 30% 23% 77%Martin CC 893 886 5% 48% 27% 20% 80%Mayland CC 1,942 1,188 14% 44% 29% 13% 87%McDowell TCC 1,481 820 22% 36% 24% 18% 82%Mitchell CC 2,696 2,324 10% 48% 23% 19% 81%Montgomery CC 1,002 530 8% 44% 21% 26% 74%Nash CC 2,652 1,427 8% 45% 23% 24% 76%Pamlico CC 633 282 7% 46% 27% 20% 80%Piedmont CC 2,762 1,137 8% 56% 27% 8% 92%Pitt CC 6,459 2,277 6% 51% 26% 17% 83%Randolph CC 2,581 1,938 13% 40% 25% 22% 78%Richmond CC 2,171 2,186 8% 38% 34% 19% 81%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 615 8% 47% 20% 25% 75%Robeson CC 3,742 2,875 1% 50% 32% 16% 84%Rockingham CC 2,158 1,330 8% 37% 36% 19% 81%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 3,652 15% 49% 16% 19% 81%Sampson CC 1,927 1,124 8% 39% 40% 13% 87%Sandhills CC 3,928 1,640 14% 42% 24% 20% 80%South Piedmont CC 2,528 2,647 9% 56% 31% 3% 97%Southeastern CC 2,575 1,174 3% 41% 32% 24% 76%Southwestern CC 2,462 1,734 2% 37% 39% 22% 78%Stanly CC 2,683 1,710 7% 38% 29% 26% 74%Surry CC 3,495 1,736 6% 52% 29% 13% 87%Tri-County CC 1,158 472 18% 42% 19% 20% 80%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 2,890 14% 37% 31% 17% 83%Wake TCC 13,650 8,751 6% 47% 34% 13% 87%Wayne CC 3,615 2,915 5% 39% 36% 19% 81%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 2,731 15% 50% 11% 24% 76%Wilkes CC 3,042 1,635 6% 49% 33% 12% 88%Wilson TCC 2,144 1,829 3% 43% 36% 17% 83%

System Totals 221,096 146,870 6% 49% 29% 16% 84%

MOVED TO A HIGHER LEVEL

EXIT NON-COMPLETER

COMPOSITE PROGRESS MEASURE

INSTITUTION TOTAL SERVED IN LITERACY

COMPLETED A LEVEL

PROGRESSING SAME LEVEL

SYSTEMFTE

Source: LEIS, Data Warehouse 7

Page 196: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

8

CORE INDICATORS OF SUCCESS MEASURE B:

Passing Rates on Licensure & Certification Examinations

Description/Definition—The percentage of first-time test takers from community colleges passing an examination required for North Carolina licensure or certification prior to practicing the profession. A licensure requirement for an occupation is one that is required by state statute for an individual to work in that occupation. Certification is generally voluntary but may be required by employers or an outside accrediting agency. Purely voluntary examinations are not reported.

Methodology and Data Source—Data were collected by the Research and Performance Management section in the President’s Office of the North Carolina Community College System Office from the agencies issuing the license or certification. Examination data were reported only for those licensure/certification exams for which data were available from the licensure/certification agencies. The data for most examinations were reported on a fiscal year. However, the data on nursing, emergency medical technician, physical therapy assistant, and veterinary medicine technology were reported on a calendar year.

Passing rates were calculated by dividing the number of persons who successfully pass an examination the first time they take the exam by the number of persons who sat for the exam for the first time. An aggregate institutional passing rate was calculated by dividing the total number of first-time test takers for all reported examinations by the total number of persons who sat for the exam for the first time. For privacy and statistical validity, no examination data are reported when the number of first-time test takers was fewer than 10.

Performance Standard— Performance standard for the aggregate institutional passing rate is 80 percent. To be rated EIP (Exceptional Institutional Performance), a college cannot have any licensure/certification exams for which the college controls who was eligible to sit for the exam with a passing rate less than 70%.

Results— For the year 2008-09, 47 community colleges met or exceeded the aggregate institutional passing rate of 80 percent; 36 community colleges had no exam for which they controlled who took the exam with a passing rate less than 70%. System average of aggregate institutional passing rate was eighty-six percent (86%).

Page 197: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

9

PERCENTAGE OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS PASSING LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

(FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS ONLY)

FIELD NUMBER OF STUDENTS

TAKING EXAM % PASSING EXAM

Aviation Maintenance General 46 98% Airframe 49 100% Power Plant 32 100%

Basic Law Enforcement Training 1,552 87%

Cosmetic Arts Apprentice 244 96%

Cosmetology 391 92% Cosmetology Instructor 13 78% Manicurist Esthetics

82 158

89% 85%

Dental Hygiene 206 92%

Emergency Medical Technician (EMT)EMD EMT

* 3,492

* 83%

EMT-I 482 64% EMT-P 370 71%

Nursing RN 2,212 89% PN 863 96%

Opticianry * *

Physical Therapist Assistant 84 89%

Radiologic Technology Nuclear Medicine Technology 27 85% Radiation Therapy Technology 40 97% Radiography 341 97%

Real Estate Sales 375 72%

Veterinary Medical Technology 40 100%

*Number too small to report without violating students’ privacy.

Page 198: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASSING RATE AND NUMBER OF EXAMS WITH A PASSING RATE < 70%

*Excludes Real Estate exam, for the colleges do not control who sits for the exam. 10

INSTITUTIONTOTAL

FTE

TOTAL NUMBER OF

TEST TAKERS

TOTAL NUMBER PASSING

AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASSING RATE

NUMBER OF EXAMS WITH A

PASSING RATE < 70% *

Alamance CC 4,297 244 209 86% 1Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 362 337 93%Beaufort County CC 1,905 144 123 85% 1Bladen CC 1,537 46 38 83%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 137 112 82%Brunswick CC 1,752 114 97 85%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 219 183 84%Cape Fear CC 7,862 364 344 95%Carteret CC 1,835 163 129 79% 1Catawba Valley CC 4,751 245 173 71% 3Central Carolina CC 5,340 315 272 86% 1Central Piedmont CC 15,324 382 349 91%Cleveland CC 3,203 205 160 78% 2Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 262 231 88%College of The Albemarle 2,448 236 199 84% 1Craven CC 2,891 232 192 83%Davidson County CC 4,067 246 216 88% 1Durham TCC 4,860 393 334 85% 1Edgecombe CC 2,439 42 37 88%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 314 294 94%Forsyth TCC 7,466 324 287 89%Gaston College 5,240 280 248 89%Guilford TCC 10,908 541 480 89%Halifax CC 1,650 119 83 70% 2Haywood CC 1,947 84 72 86%Isothermal CC 2,386 116 92 79% 2James Sprunt CC 1,399 78 69 88% 1Johnston CC 4,391 284 262 92%Lenoir CC 3,655 225 196 87%Martin CC 893 60 52 87%Mayland CC 1,942 87 73 84%McDowell TCC 1,481 92 81 88%Mitchell CC 2,696 218 184 84% 1Montgomery CC 1,002 45 38 84%Nash CC 2,652 98 84 86% 1Pamlico CC 633 16 12 75%Piedmont CC 2,762 37 33 89%Pitt CC 6,459 207 179 86% 1Randolph CC 2,581 137 120 88%Richmond CC 2,171 79 68 86% 1Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 118 98 83%Robeson CC 3,742 185 143 77% 2Rockingham CC 2,158 98 90 92%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 516 420 81% 1Sampson CC 1,927 107 93 87%Sandhills CC 3,928 218 190 87%South Piedmont CC 2,528 124 85 69% 2Southeastern CC 2,575 147 114 78% 1Southwestern CC 2,462 139 122 88%Stanly CC 2,683 153 121 79%Surry CC 3,495 169 156 92%Tri-County CC 1,158 69 50 72%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 202 170 84% 1Wake TCC 13,650 367 338 92%Wayne CC 3,615 168 152 90%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 123 112 91%Wilkes CC 3,042 112 92 82% 1Wilson CC 2,144 127 103 81%

System Total 221,096 10,934 9,391 86%

Page 199: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2008-2009--AVIATION--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 11

GENERAL AIRFRAME POWER PLANTFTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 4,297Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483Beaufort County CC 1,905Bladen CC 1,537Blue Ridge CC 2,275Brunswick CC 1,752Caldwell CC & TI 4,212Cape Fear CC 7,862Carteret CC 1,835Catawba Valley CC 4,751Central Carolina CC 5,340Central Piedmont CC 15,324Cleveland CC 3,203Coastal Carolina CC 4,595College of The Albemarle 2,448Craven CC 2,891 16 100% 16 100% * *Davidson County CC 4,067Durham TCC 4,860Edgecombe CC 2,439Fayetteville TCC 11,018Forsyth TCC 7,466Gaston College 5,240Guilford TCC 10,908 24 96% 28 100% 20 100%Halifax CC 1,650Haywood CC 1,947Isothermal CC 2,386James Sprunt CC 1,399Johnston CC 4,391Lenoir CC 3,655Martin CC 893Mayland CC 1,942McDowell TCC 1,481Mitchell CC 2,696Montgomery CC 1,002Nash CC 2,652Pamlico CC 633Piedmont CC 2,762Pitt CC 6,459Randolph CC 2,581Richmond CC 2,171Roanoke-Chowan CC 946Robeson CC 3,742Rockingham CC 2,158Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760Sampson CC 1,927Sandhills CC 3,928South Piedmont CC 2,528Southeastern CC 2,575Southwestern CC 2,462Stanly CC 2,683Surry CC 3,495Tri-County CC 1,158Vance-Granville CC 4,543Wake TCC 13,650Wayne CC 3,615 * * * * * *Western Piedmont CC 3,334Wilkes CC 3,042Wilson CC 2,144

System Total 221,096 46 98% 49 100% 32 100%

INSTITUTION

Page 200: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2008-2009--BASIC LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 12

BLETINSTITUTION FTE # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 4,297 32 81%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 53 98%Beaufort County CC 1,905 16 88%Bladen CC 1,537Blue Ridge CC 2,275 28 86%Brunswick CC 1,752 10 80%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 27 86%Cape Fear CC 7,862 52 85%Carteret CC 1,835 24 76%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 29 67%Central Carolina CC 5,340 64 91%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 19 95%Cleveland CC 3,203 24 63%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 27 74%College of The Albemarle 2,448 33 96%Craven CC 2,891 28 87%Davidson County CC 4,067 36 83%Durham TCC 4,860 48 88%Edgecombe CC 2,439Fayetteville TCC 11,018 16 100%Forsyth TCC 7,466 22 87%Gaston College 5,240 45 87%Guilford TCC 10,908 47 93%Halifax CC 1,650 27 67%Haywood CC 1,947 27 85%Isothermal CC 2,386 20 96%James Sprunt CC 1,399 21 94%Johnston CC 4,391 26 94%Lenoir CC 3,655 17 89%Martin CC 893 * *Mayland CC 1,942 13 92%McDowell TCC 1,481 14 93%Mitchell CC 2,696 63 88%Montgomery CC 1,002 17 71%Nash CC 2,652 20 100%Pamlico CC 633Piedmont CC 2,762Pitt CC 6,459 59 90%Randolph CC 2,581 32 87%Richmond CC 2,171Roanoke-Chowan CC 946Robeson CC 3,742 48 85%Rockingham CC 2,158 19 95%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 19 95%Sampson CC 1,927 32 91%Sandhills CC 3,928 40 88%South Piedmont CC 2,528 18 89%Southeastern CC 2,575 11 82%Southwestern CC 2,462 33 94%Stanly CC 2,683 22 82%Surry CC 3,495 39 90%Tri-County CC 1,158Vance-Granville CC 4,543 21 95%Wake TCC 13,650 56 88%Wayne CC 3,615 31 94%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 53 98%Wilkes CC 3,042 50 94%Wilson CC 2,144 19 89%

System Total 221,096 1,552 87%

Page 201: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2008-2009--COSMETIC ARTS--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 13

FTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 4,297 11 91% * *Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 * * * *Beaufort County CC 1,905 * * * * * *Bladen CC 1,537 * *Blue Ridge CC 2,275 16 100% * * * * * * * *Brunswick CC 1,752 * * * * * * * *Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 * *Cape Fear CC 7,862 27 100% 11 100% * * * *Carteret CC 1,835 * * * * * * * * * *Catawba Valley CC 4,751 * * * *Central Carolina CC 5,340 41 93% * * * * 13 92% 23 83%Central Piedmont CC 15,324Cleveland CC 3,203 * * * * * *Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 18 94% * *College of The Albemarle 2,448 22 95% * * * *Craven CC 2,891 12 92% * * * *Davidson County CC 4,067 * * 27 100% 15 87%Durham TCC 4,860Edgecombe CC 2,439 * * * * * *Fayetteville TCC 11,018Forsyth TCC 7,466Gaston College 5,240 * * * *Guilford TCC 10,908 * * 11 91%Halifax CC 1,650 * * * *Haywood CC 1,947 * * * *Isothermal CC 2,386 * * 10 100% * *James Sprunt CC 1,399 * * * * * *Johnston CC 4,391 18 100% * *Lenoir CC 3,655 12 92% * * * * * *Martin CC 893 * *Mayland CC 1,942 10 80% * *McDowell TCC 1,481 * * * * * * * *Mitchell CC 2,696 12 100% * * * * * *Montgomery CC 1,002Nash CC 2,652 * *Pamlico CC 633 * * * *Piedmont CC 2,762 * *Pitt CC 6,459Randolph CC 2,581Richmond CC 2,171Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 * * * *Robeson CC 3,742 * * * * * *Rockingham CC 2,158 * * * *Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 112 96% * * 14 79% 55 89%Sampson CC 1,927 * * * *Sandhills CC 3,928 * * * * * *South Piedmont 2,528Southeastern CC 2,575 * * * * * *Southwestern CC 2,462 19 79%Stanly CC 2,683 12 100% 13 85% * * * * * *Surry CC 3,495 14 100%Tri-County CC 1,158 * * * *Vance-Granville CC 4,543 * * * *Wake TCC 13,650Wayne CC 3,615Western Piedmont CC 3,334Wilkes CC 3,042Wilson CC 2,144

System Totals 221,096 244 96% 391 92% 13 78% 82 89% 158 85%

ESTHETICIANINSTITUTION MANICURISTAPPRENTICE COSMETOLOGY COS. INSTRUCTOR

Page 202: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONSDENTAL HYGIENE, 2008-2009 ; PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASSISTANT, 2009

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 14

DENTAL HYGIENE PHY. THERAPIST ASST.FTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 4,297Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 17 94%Beaufort County CC 1,905Bladen CC 1,537Blue Ridge CC 2,275Brunswick CC 1,752Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 12 100%Cape Fear CC 7,862 12 100%Carteret CC 1,835Catawba Valley CC 4,751 22 95%Central Carolina CC 5,340 10 100%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 20 85% 11 82%Cleveland CC 3,203Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 20 90%College of The Albemarle 2,448Craven CC 2,891Davidson County CC 4,067Durham TCC 4,860Edgecombe CC 2,439Fayetteville TCC 11,018 19 89% 12 75%Forsyth TCC 7,466 * *Gaston College 5,240Guilford TCC 10,908 28 89% 16 100%Halifax CC 1,650 15 93%Haywood CC 1,947Isothermal CC 2,386James Sprunt CC 1,399Johnston CC 4,391Lenoir CC 3,655Martin CC 893 * *Mayland CC 1,942McDowell TCC 1,481Mitchell CC 2,696Montgomery CC 1,002Nash CC 2,652 15 100%Pamlico CC 633Piedmont CC 2,762Pitt CC 6,459Randolph CC 2,581Richmond CC 2,171Roanoke-Chowan CC 946Robeson CC 3,742Rockingham CC 2,158Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760Sampson CC 1,927Sandhills CC 3,928South Piedmont CC 2,528Southeastern CC 2,575Southwestern CC 2,462 10 100%Stanly CC 2,683Surry CC 3,495Tri-County CC 1,158Vance-Granville CC 4,543Wake TCC 13,650 12 100%Wayne CC 3,615 22 95%Western Piedmont CC 3,334Wilkes CC 3,042Wilson CC 2,144

System Total 221,096 206 92% 84 89%

INSTITUTION

Page 203: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2009--EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN (EMT)--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 15

EMT EMT-I EMT-PFTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 4,297 87 93% 22 73% 10 50%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 94 95% 26 84% * *Beaufort County CC 1,905 34 88% 12 42%Bladen CC 1,537 * * * * * *Blue Ridge CC 2,275 52 75% * * * *Brunswick CC 1,752 25 84% 15 80% * *Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 105 81% * * 13 77%Cape Fear CC 7,862 121 94% * * 18 89%Carteret CC 1,835 42 81% 15 53% * *Catawba Valley CC 4,751 90 60% 22 55%Central Carolina CC 5,340 38 76% * * 11 36%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 173 94%Cleveland CC 3,203 80 71% 32 59% 26 100%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 129 91% * * * *College of The Albemarle 2,448 114 79% 26 62%Craven CC 2,891 63 75% * * * *Davidson County CC 4,067 74 99% * * 12 50%Durham TCC 4,860 214 87% 16 94% 27 67%Edgecombe CC 2,439 14 93%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 93 90% * * 17 100%Forsyth TCC 7,466 76 95%Gaston College 5,240 100 85% * * 10 70%Guilford TCC 10,908 189 88% 10 80%Halifax CC 1,650 61 69% * * * *Haywood CC 1,947 17 82%Isothermal CC 2,386 25 64% 17 53% * *James Sprunt CC 1,399 16 69% * * * *Johnston CC 4,391 86 81% 29 93%Lenoir CC 3,655 74 93% 53 77% 25 72%Martin CC 893 44 93%Mayland CC 1,942 11 82% * *McDowell TCC 1,481 18 83% * * * *Mitchell CC 2,696 62 69%Montgomery CC 1,002Nash CC 2,652 43 81% * * 14 64%Pamlico CC 633 14 71%Piedmont CC 2,762 * *Pitt CC 6,459 19 47% * *Randolph CC 2,581 57 84% * *Richmond CC 2,171 15 80% 11 64%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 60 73% * *Robeson CC 3,742 51 78% 20 65% * *Rockingham CC 2,158 25 88% * *Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 162 70% 17 65% 46 72%Sampson CC 1,927 13 85% * *Sandhills CC 3,928 65 80% * * * *South Piedmont CC 2,528 61 66% * *Southeastern CC 2,575 52 60% * * * *Southwestern CC 2,462 28 89% * *Stanly CC 2,683 29 76%Surry CC 3,495 21 95% 10 100%Tri-County CC 1,158 28 71% * * * *Vance-Granville CC 4,543 52 83% 13 31% 10 70%Wake TCC 13,650 141 96% 19 79%Wayne CC 3,615 41 83% * *Western Piedmont CC 3,334 * * 22 95% * *Wilkes CC 3,042 16 81% * * * *Wilson CC 2,144 42 71% * * * *

System Total 221,096 * * 3,492 83% 482 64% 370 71%

INSTITUTION EMD

Page 204: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2009--NURSING--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

*Less than 10**Region A Nursing Consortium includes Haywood CC, Southwestern CC, and Tri-County CC.***NEWH Nursing Consortium includes Nash, Edgecomb, Wilson, and Halifax CC. 16

PRACTICAL NURSING REGISTERED NURSINGFTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 4,297 72 89%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 36 100% 76 88%Beaufort County CC 1,905 22 100% 42 88%Bladen CC 1,537 13 100% * *Blue Ridge CC 2,275 20 80%Brunswick CC 1,752 13 100% 17 94%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 34 85%Cape Fear CC 7,862 14 100% 54 100%Carteret CC 1,835 14 93% 12 100%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 60 78%Central Carolina CC 5,340 36 97% 30 93%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 79 89%Cleveland CC 3,203 * *Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 17 100% 31 94%College of The Albemarle 2,448 14 100% 20 100%Craven CC 2,891 14 100% 52 81%Davidson County CC 4,067 18 78% 54 87%Durham TCC 4,860 * * 40 93%Edgecombe CC 2,439Fayetteville TCC 11,018 45 89% 81 98%Forsyth TCC 7,466 48 85% 135 83%Gaston College 5,240 33 100% 64 91%Guilford TCC 10,908 24 92% 87 87%Halifax CC*** 1,650Haywood CC** 1,947 23 91%Isothermal CC 2,386 28 96%James Sprunt CC 1,399 17 100% 16 94%Johnston CC 4,391 30 100% 51 100%Lenoir CC 3,655 * * 21 90%Martin CC 893Mayland CC 1,942 18 100% 25 84%McDowell TCC 1,481 34 100%Mitchell CC 2,696 49 94%Montgomery CC 1,002 28 93%Nash CC 2,652Pamlico CC 633Piedmont CC 2,762 26 88%Pitt CC 6,459 72 86%Randolph CC 2,581 22 100%Richmond CC 2,171 18 94% 35 91%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 24 100% 25 92%Robeson CC 3,742 36 67%Rockingham CC 2,158 23 96% 23 87%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 17 100% 51 84%Sampson CC 1,927 24 100% 22 82%Sandhills CC 3,928 25 96% 46 89%South Piedmont 2,528 16 94% 17 53%Southeastern CC 2,575 33 97% 35 100%Southwestern CC** 2,462 10 100% 20 90%Stanly CC 2,683 40 70%Surry CC 3,495 23 100% 55 95%Tri-County CC** 1,158 20 75%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 36 86% 41 88%Wake TCC 13,650 105 92%Wayne CC 3,615 13 100% 37 95%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 40 85%Wilkes CC 3,042 25 64%Wilson CC 2,144 25 100% 32 91%

Foothills Nursing Consortium 47 100%NEWH Nursing Consortium*** 63 97% 118 90%Region A Nursing Consortium** 63 86%

System Total 221,096 863 96% 2,212 89%

INSTITUTION

Page 205: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, OPTICIANRY, 2008-2009 ; VETERINARY MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2009

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 17

OPTICIANRY VET. MED. TECH.FTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 4,297Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 * *Beaufort County CC 1,905Bladen CC 1,537Blue Ridge CC 2,275Brunswick CC 1,752Caldwell CC & TI 4,212Cape Fear CC 7,862Carteret CC 1,835Catawba Valley CC 4,751Central Carolina CC 5,340 25 100%Central Piedmont CC 15,324Cleveland CC 3,203Coastal Carolina CC 4,595College of The Albemarle 2,448Craven CC 2,891Davidson County CC 4,067Durham TCC 4,860 * *Edgecombe CC 2,439Fayetteville TCC 11,018Forsyth TCC 7,466Gaston College 5,240 11 100%Guilford TCC 10,908Halifax CC 1,650Haywood CC 1,947Isothermal CC 2,386James Sprunt CC 1,399Johnston CC 4,391Lenoir CC 3,655Martin CC 893Mayland CC 1,942McDowell TCC 1,481Mitchell CC 2,696Montgomery CC 1,002Nash CC 2,652Pamlico CC 633Piedmont CC 2,762Pitt CC 6,459Randolph CC 2,581Richmond CC 2,171Roanoke-Chowan CC 946Robeson CC 3,742Rockingham CC 2,158Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760Sampson CC 1,927Sandhills CC 3,928South Piedmont CC 2,528Southeastern CC 2,575Southwestern CC 2,462Stanly CC 2,683Surry CC 3,495Tri-County CC 1,158Vance-Granville CC 4,543Wake TCC 13,650Wayne CC 3,615Western Piedmont CC 3,334Wilkes CC 3,042Wilson CC 2,144

System Total 221,096 * * 40 100%

INSTITUTION

Page 206: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2008-2009RADIOGRAPHY--NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY--

RADIATION THERAPY TECHNOLOGYFIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 18

RADIOGRAPHY NUC. MED. TECH. RADIATION THERAPYFTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 4,297Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 17 100%Beaufort County CC 1,905Bladen CC 1,537Blue Ridge CC 2,275Brunswick CC 1,752Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 * * 12 83%Cape Fear CC 7,862 27 93%Carteret CC 1,835 18 100%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 * *Central Carolina CC 5,340Central Piedmont CC 15,324Cleveland CC 3,203 13 100%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595College of The Albemarle 2,448Craven CC 2,891Davidson County CC 4,067Durham TCC 4,860Edgecombe CC 2,439 13 100%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 28 100% * *Forsyth TCC 7,466 22 100% * *Gaston College 5,240Guilford TCC 10,908Halifax CC 1,650Haywood CC 1,947Isothermal CC 2,386James Sprunt CC 1,399Johnston CC 4,391 25 100% * *Lenoir CC 3,655 * *Martin CC 893Mayland CC 1,942McDowell TCC 1,481Mitchell CC 2,696Montgomery CC 1,002Nash CC 2,652Pamlico CC 633Piedmont CC 2,762Pitt CC 6,459 21 100% * * 25 100%Randolph CC 2,581 18 89%Richmond CC 2,171Roanoke-Chowan CC 946Robeson CC 3,742 * *Rockingham CC 2,158Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 17 94%Sampson CC 1,927Sandhills CC 3,928 16 100%South Piedmont CC 2,528 * *Southeastern CC 2,575Southwestern CC 2,462 * *Stanly CC 2,683 21 86%Surry CC 3,495Tri-County CC 1,158Vance-Granville CC 4,543 21 100%Wake TCC 13,650 26 100%Wayne CC 3,615Western Piedmont CC 3,334Wilkes CC 3,042Wilson CC 2,144

System Total 221,096 341 97% 27 85% 40 97%

INSTITUTION

Page 207: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES OF LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2008-2009--REAL ESTATE--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 19

SALESFTE # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 4,297 * *Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 20 85%Beaufort County CC 1,905 * *Bladen CC 1,537Blue Ridge CC 2,275 * *Brunswick CC 1,752 19 74%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212Cape Fear CC 7,862 * *Carteret CC 1,835 13 46%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 * *Central Carolina CC 5,340 * *Central Piedmont CC 15,324 80 90%Cleveland CC 3,203 * *Coastal Carolina CC 4,595College of The Albemarle 2,448 * *Craven CC 2,891 11 45%Davidson County CC 4,067 * *Durham TCC 4,860 37 73%Edgecombe CC 2,439 * *Fayetteville TCC 11,018Forsyth TCC 7,466 * *Gaston College 5,240 * *Guilford TCC 10,908 52 71%Halifax CC 1,650 * *Haywood CC 1,947Isothermal CC 2,386 * *James Sprunt CC 1,399Johnston CC 4,391 * *Lenoir CC 3,655 * *Martin CC 893Mayland CC 1,942McDowell TCC 1,481Mitchell CC 2,696 21 81%Montgomery CC 1,002Nash CC 2,652 * *Pamlico CC 633Piedmont CC 2,762Pitt CC 6,459 * *Randolph CC 2,581 * *Richmond CC 2,171Roanoke-Chowan CC 946Robeson CC 3,742 * *Rockingham CC 2,158Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 * *Sampson CC 1,927Sandhills CC 3,928South Piedmont CC 2,528Southeastern CC 2,575 * *Southwestern CC 2,462 * *Stanly CC 2,683 * *Surry CC 3,495 * *Tri-County CC 1,158 * *Vance-Granville CC 4,543Wake TCC 13,650 * *Wayne CC 3,615 * *Western Piedmont CC 3,334Wilkes CC 3,042 * *Wilson CC 2,144

System Total 221,096 375 72%

INSTITUTION

Page 208: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

20

CORE INDICATORS OF SUCCESS MEASURE C:

Performance of College Transfer Students

Description/Definition—College transfer programs provide educational experiences that will enable transfer students to make the transition to a baccalaureate program and perform as well as the students who enroll as first-time freshmen at universities. The purpose of this measure is to compare the performance of community college associate degree students (Associate in Arts, Associate in Science, and Associate in Fine Arts) who transfer to public North Carolina universities with students native to the four-year institutions.

Methodology and Data Source—Data on two cohorts of college transfer students entering the public universities each year were analyzed. One cohort analysis compared the performance of college transfer degree recipients (AA, AS, AFA) at the end of two semesters at the public university to the performance of native juniors. The second cohort analysis compared the performance of college transfer students completing at least 24 hours or more of college transfer courses at a community college but not completing the degree to the performance of native sophomores. A cell size of at least 10 students was required for reporting this measure.

Community colleges may elect to work with private colleges and universities in collecting data on students who transfer to those institutions. The data must be consistent with the methodology employed by the UNC GA in calculating the data for transfer to public universities. If colleges submitted data from private or out-of-state institutions, then the System Office would include the data with the public university data. When the total number of students is less than 10, the total number of students in three year and the respective percentage were reported.

Performance Standard— 83% of students in both associate degree recipients and the students who transferred with 24 or more semester hours at community colleges had GPA equal to or greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a university. To be identified as EIP (Exceptional Institutional Performance), performance of community college transfer students was to be equivalent to the performance of native UNC sophomores and juniors: 86% for this year.

Results— For students who completed an AA, AS or AFA degree in 2007-08 and transferred to a UNC institution or a private institution within a year, 89 percent had a GPA equal to or greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a university. For those students who completed 24 or more semester hours in community colleges and transferred to a UNC institution or a private institution, 83 percent had a GPA equal to or greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a university. When the data for both groups were combined, 85 percent of the transfers had a GPA equal to or greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a UNC institution or a private institution. Thirty-seven (37) community colleges met the 83 percent performance standard.

Page 209: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERCENT OF 2007-08COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS WITH A

GPA OF > = 2.0 AFTER TWO SEMESTERS AT A UNC INSTITUTION

* Includes data from private colleges and universities.** Number too small to report due to privacy protection.

21

Number Percent >=2.0 Number Percent >=2.0 NumberPercent >=2.0

Alamance CC 4,297 55 76% 50 86% 105 81%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 57 90% 69 93% 126 92%Beaufort County CC 1,905 13 85% 10 80% 23 83%Bladen CC 1,537 12 75% 4 100% 16 81%Blue Ridge CC* 2,275 34 88% 11 91% 45 89%Brunswick CC 1,752 26 69% 33 88% 59 80%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 121 82% 34 91% 155 84%Cape Fear CC* 7,862 200 78% 205 87% 405 83%Carteret CC 1,835 24 88% 9 100% 33 91%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 25 96% 30 90% 55 93%Central Carolina CC 5,340 22 82% 25 92% 47 87%Central Piedmont CC* 15,324 418 85% 305 89% 723 87%Cleveland CC 3,203 12 83% 9 78% 21 81%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 76 88% 57 90% 133 89%College of The Albemarle 2,448 27 82% 24 88% 51 85%Craven CC 2,891 51 84% 31 90% 82 86%Davidson County CC 4,067 27 74% 19 95% 46 83%Durham TCC 4,860 39 85% 44 93% 83 89%Edgecombe CC 2,439 14 71% 8 88% 22 77%Fayetteville TCC* 11,018 65 78% 24 93% 89 82%Forsyth TCC 7,466 91 89% 34 88% 125 89%Gaston College* 5,240 68 85% 44 95% 112 89%Guilford TCC 10,908 162 78% 61 90% 223 82%Halifax CC 1,650 11 100% 5 100% 16 100%Haywood CC 1,947 14 71% 13 85% 27 78%Isothermal CC* 2,386 23 83% 14 100% 37 89%James Sprunt CC 1,399 ** ** ** ** 12 100%Johnston CC 4,391 42 83% 24 71% 66 79%Lenoir CC* 3,655 64 83% 35 89% 99 85%Martin CC 893 ** **Mayland CC 1,942 ** ** ** ** 12 75%McDowell TCC* 1,481 ** ** ** ** 18 78%Mitchell CC 2,696 51 80% 22 82% 73 81%Montgomery CC 1,002 ** ** ** ** ** **Nash CC* 2,652 ** ** 25 84% 26 84%Pamlico CC 633 ** ** ** **Piedmont CC* 2,762 28 93% 12 83% 40 90%Pitt CC 6,459 94 93% 59 78% 153 87%Randolph CC 2,581 18 94% 12 83% 30 90%Richmond CC 2,171 14 86% 8 88% 22 87%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 ** ** ** ** ** **Robeson CC 3,742 23 70% 10 90% 33 76%Rockingham CC* 2,158 28 93% 15 100% 43 95%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 58 83% 44 86% 102 84%Sampson CC* 1,927 ** ** ** ** 13 77%Sandhills CC 3,928 54 78% 28 82% 82 79%South Piedmont CC 2,528 ** ** ** ** 12 92%Southeastern CC 2,575 19 90% 21 95% 40 93%Southwestern CC 2,462 24 92% 46 98% 70 96%Stanly CC 2,683 18 78% ** ** 24 75%Surry CC* 3,495 55 85% 63 95% 118 90%Tri-County CC 1,158 ** ** 11 100% 16 94%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 24 92% 12 83% 36 89%Wake TCC 13,650 323 83% 127 88% 450 84%Wayne CC 3,615 101 90% 64 83% 165 87%Western Piedmont CC* 3,334 45 82% 52 94% 97 88%Wilkes CC 3,042 29 83% 36 100% 65 92%Wilson CC 2,144 10 80% ** ** 16 75%

System Total 221,096 2,859 83% 1,943 89% 4,802 85%

INSTITUTION

24 or More Semester Hours Associate Degree Recipient Total

TOTAL FTE

Page 210: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

22

CORE INDICATORS OF SUCCESS MEASURE D:

Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses

Description/Definition — Percent of students who complete developmental English, mathematics, or reading courses with a grade of "C" or better.

Methodology and Data Source — At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file to the North Carolina Community College System Office. These student unit record files were loaded into the System data warehouse and were the official data of record for state level reporting. In the CRPFAR file, the number and percent of students completing developmental courses with a grade of "C" or better would be calculated.

Performance Standard—Seventy-five percent (75%) of students who complete a developmental course in English, reading or mathematics will have a grade of "C" or better for that course.

Results—Eighty percent (80%) of the students who completed a developmental course(s) had a grade of “C” or better in 2008-09. Forty-seven (47) colleges met the performance standard.

Page 211: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES OF STUDENTS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES, 2008-2009

23

# Completed % Passed # Completed % Passed # Completed % Passed # Completed % Passed

Alamance CC 4,297 939 89% 1,566 79% 2,505 83%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 636 93% 990 88% 443 95% 2,069 91%Beaufort County CC 1,905 156 94% 341 78% 174 93% 671 86%Bladen CC 1,537 289 90% 478 83% 172 92% 939 87%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 270 88% 629 70% 195 83% 1,094 77%Brunswick CC 1,752 286 72% 567 79% 13 85% 866 77%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 352 90% 942 83% 358 87% 1,652 85%Cape Fear CC 7,862 1,311 78% 1,772 82% 3,083 80%Carteret CC 1,835 162 67% 436 90% 598 84%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 690 83% 1,643 71% 547 80% 2,880 76%Central Carolina CC 5,340 270 86% 728 74% 471 93% 1,469 82%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 3,112 77% 5,898 64% 2,398 77% 11,408 70%Cleveland CC 3,203 312 87% 799 83% 249 79% 1,360 83%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 376 87% 1,690 80% 302 87% 2,368 82%College of The Albemarle 2,448 271 94% 852 81% 199 90% 1,322 85%Craven CC 2,891 407 73% 990 71% 6 83% 1,403 72%Davidson County CC 4,067 416 79% 1,054 73% 244 77% 1,714 75%Durham TCC 4,860 889 81% 1,687 69% 773 78% 3,349 74%Edgecombe CC 2,439 891 78% 876 71% 522 71% 2,289 74%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 1,645 73% 3,517 66% 1,498 77% 6,660 70%Forsyth TCC 7,466 957 82% 1,875 84% 1,074 83% 3,906 83%Gaston College 5,240 648 83% 1,882 81% 587 82% 3,117 82%Guilford TCC 10,908 1,861 77% 3,704 78% 1,868 75% 7,433 77%Halifax CC 1,650 293 87% 512 59% 805 69%Haywood CC 1,947 157 80% 275 82% 128 98% 560 85%Isothermal CC 2,386 374 91% 707 79% 189 90% 1,270 84%James Sprunt CC 1,399 262 82% 403 81% 185 92% 850 84%Johnston CC 4,391 530 72% 733 68% 407 86% 1,670 74%Lenoir CC 3,655 574 82% 904 80% 402 83% 1,880 81%Martin CC 893 65 68% 126 80% 77 99% 268 83%Mayland CC 1,942 110 81% 195 71% 58 59% 363 72%McDowell TCC 1,481 265 95% 426 90% 49 80% 740 91%Mitchell CC 2,696 585 83% 875 81% 1,460 82%Montgomery CC 1,002 124 81% 211 78% 62 68% 397 77%Nash CC 2,652 349 80% 824 70% 204 81% 1,377 74%Pamlico CC 633 33 82% 51 67% 84 73%Piedmont CC 2,762 323 75% 586 75% 192 83% 1,101 76%Pitt CC 6,459 1,480 91% 2,767 69% 4,247 77%Randolph CC 2,581 282 90% 596 95% 135 93% 1,013 93%Richmond CC 2,171 240 83% 527 90% 380 88% 1,147 88%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 178 72% 263 81% 112 85% 553 79%Robeson CC 3,742 647 90% 1,093 68% 515 84% 2,255 78%Rockingham CC 2,158 224 91% 836 83% 207 78% 1,267 84%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 809 74% 2,375 74% 596 79% 3,780 75%Sampson CC 1,927 268 92% 508 73% 157 80% 933 80%Sandhills CC 3,928 782 79% 903 77% 1,685 78%South Piedmont CC 2,528 368 71% 711 83% 403 80% 1,482 79%Southeastern CC 2,575 328 85% 736 81% 486 93% 1,550 86%Southwestern CC 2,462 194 79% 505 85% 178 82% 877 83%Stanly CC 2,683 239 87% 428 88% 667 88%Surry CC 3,495 365 70% 641 91% 257 95% 1,263 86%Tri-County CC 1,158 142 85% 192 94% 334 90%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 544 83% 1,036 85% 325 85% 1,905 84%Wake TCC 13,650 2,007 72% 3,922 71% 995 84% 6,924 73%Wayne CC 3,615 574 95% 918 83% 335 92% 1,827 88%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 442 92% 985 78% 332 91% 1,759 84%Wilkes CC 3,042 341 89% 872 77% 164 84% 1,377 81%Wilson CC 2,144 312 79% 733 70% 243 83% 1,288 75%

System Total 221,096 31,956 83% 63,291 77% 19,866 83% 115,113 80%

ENGLISH TOTALINSTITUTIONFTE

MATH READING

Page 212: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

24

CORE INDICATORS OF SUCCESS MEASURE E:

Success Rate of Developmental Students in Subsequent College-Level Courses

Description/Definition—Performance of developmental students in subsequent college level courses will be measured. Specifically, performance of who took developmental English courses and subsequently took college-level English courses was assessed. Likewise, the performance of who took developmental math courses and then took college-level math courses was tracked.

The purpose of this measure is to provide evidence that developmental courses equip students with the skills and knowledge necessary for success in their college studies. Once students have successfully completed the developmental courses, they should be able to pass curriculum courses.

Methodology and Data Source— At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file to the North Carolina Community College System Office. These student unit record files were loaded into the System data warehouse and were the official data of record for state level reporting. In the CRPFA data file, identify students who took developmental level English, Reading, and Math courses. Then their records were matched with subsequent performance in college-level English and Math courses.

Performance Standard— Eighty percent (80%) of students who completed a developmental course in 2007-08 and completed subsequent college level course in 2008-09 will have a passing grade for the college level course.

Results— In 2008-09, eighty-seven percent (87%) of the students who completed a developmental English and/or Math course(s) had a grade of “D” or better in subsequent college-level English and/or Math courses. Fifty-eight (58) colleges met the standard in 2008-09.

Page 213: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERFORMANCE OF DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENTS IN SUBSEQUENT COLLEGE-LEVEL COURSES, 2008-2009

25

# Completed % Passed # Completed % Passed # Completed % Passed

Alamance CC 4,297 233 97% 263 96% 496 96%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 217 72% 224 88% 441 80%Beaufort County CC 1,905 66 85% 49 90% 115 87%Bladen CC 1,537 107 93% 121 98% 228 96%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 100 86% 108 87% 208 87%Brunswick CC 1,752 57 77% 101 85% 158 82%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 214 92% 208 92% 422 92%Cape Fear CC 7,862 525 79% 366 83% 891 81%Carteret CC 1,835 46 87% 75 92% 121 90%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 307 88% 386 89% 693 89%Central Carolina CC 5,340 143 90% 90 92% 233 91%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 1,394 89% 1,042 86% 2,436 88%Cleveland CC 3,203 145 83% 191 97% 336 91%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 189 92% 391 88% 580 89%College of The Albemarle 2,448 127 93% 139 99% 266 96%Craven CC 2,891 94 85% 211 93% 305 91%Davidson County CC 4,067 140 83% 196 85% 336 84%Durham TCC 4,860 213 95% 201 94% 414 95%Edgecombe CC 2,439 133 83% 91 81% 224 82%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 639 79% 414 88% 1,053 83%Forsyth TCC 7,466 428 86% 355 80% 783 83%Gaston College 5,240 371 83% 402 89% 773 86%Guilford TCC 10,908 688 83% 732 81% 1,420 82%Halifax CC 1,650 65 88% 31 84% 96 87%Haywood CC 1,947 36 86% 36 83% 72 85%Isothermal CC 2,386 130 82% 157 92% 287 87%James Sprunt CC 1,399 74 89% 69 93% 143 91%Johnston CC 4,391 229 92% 147 79% 376 87%Lenoir CC 3,655 150 87% 113 87% 263 87%Martin CC 893 43 80% 22 91% 65 84%Mayland CC 1,942 39 87% 32 91% 71 89%McDowell TCC 1,481 57 96% 75 93% 132 94%Mitchell CC 2,696 221 81% 131 86% 352 83%Montgomery CC 1,002 66 88% 60 95% 126 91%Nash CC 2,652 134 87% 215 92% 349 90%Pamlico CC 633 * * * * 14 86%Piedmont CC 2,762 142 86% 200 86% 342 86%Pitt CC 6,459 331 93% 394 89% 725 91%Randolph CC 2,581 156 86% 189 93% 345 90%Richmond CC 2,171 146 92% 107 91% 253 92%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 55 75% 34 91% 89 81%Robeson CC 3,742 237 95% 149 92% 386 94%Rockingham CC 2,158 79 86% 192 97% 271 94%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 388 83% 300 91% 688 86%Sampson CC 1,927 106 94% 92 96% 198 95%Sandhills CC 3,928 292 87% 169 76% 461 83%South Piedmont CC 2,528 169 83% 111 86% 280 84%Southeastern CC 2,575 179 90% 71 94% 250 91%Southwestern CC 2,462 145 83% 105 79% 250 81%Stanly CC 2,683 101 96% 91 97% 192 96%Surry CC 3,495 177 90% 208 93% 385 92%Tri-County CC 1,158 64 86% 46 87% 110 86%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 188 86% 139 94% 327 89%Wake TCC 13,650 512 78% 658 89% 1,170 84%Wayne CC 3,615 283 89% 216 86% 499 88%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 235 87% 163 93% 398 89%Wilkes CC 3,042 166 89% 165 96% 331 92%Wilson CC 2,144 121 84% 177 90% 298 88%

System Total 221,096 12,098 86% 11,428 88% 23,526 87%

ENGLISH TOTALINSTITUTIONFTE

MATH

Page 214: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

26

CORE INDICATORS OF SUCCESS MEASURE F:

Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-Completers

Description/Definition—This indicator reports the proportion of graduates and early-leavers who indicate that the quality of the college programs and services meet or exceed their expectations.

Methodology and Data Source—Data were collected by survey, with each college using a standard set of questions. For colleges with fewer than 250 non-returning students, a minimum of 25 valid surveys must be obtained. For the colleges with more than 250 non-returning students, a response rate equal to 10% of the total non-returning students or a statistically valid sample size must be obtained.

Performance Standard—Ninety percent (90%) of the combined respondents will report to be satisfied with the quality of the college's programs and services.

Results—Ninety-seven percent (97%) of program completers responded that they were satisfied with the academic programs of community colleges, while ninety-four percent (94%) of program non-completers responded that they were satisfied. The total percentage of satisfied (completers and non-completers combined) was ninety-six percent (96%). Fifty-eight (58) community colleges met the performance standard in 2008-09, with three (3) colleges having the response rate for non-completer survey to be too low (statistically invalid sample size).

Page 215: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

SATISFACTION OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS AND NON-COMPLETERS, 2008-2009

*Response rate too low (statistically invalid sample size); not eligible for performance funding. 27

NUMBERPERCENT SATISFIED NUMBER

PERCENT SATISFIED NUMBER

PERCENT SATISFIED

Alamance CC 4,297 213 100% 110 93% 323 98%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 349 97% 207 95% 556 96%Beaufort County CC 1,905 152 100% 28 93% 180 99%Bladen CC 1,537 73 97% 63 95% 136 96%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 103 99% 28 89% 131 97%Brunswick CC 1,752 83 94% 51 85% 134 91%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 280 97% 84 95% 364 97%Cape Fear CC 7,862 850 99% 219 96% 1,069 98%Carteret CC 1,835 140 100% 56 96% 196 99%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 641 97% 75 94% 716 97%Central Carolina CC 5,340 387 97% 128 98% 515 97%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 453 98% 353 96% 806 97%Cleveland CC 3,203 71 96% 77 96% 148 96%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 600 98% 262 97% 862 98%College of The Albemarle 2,448 218 96% 63 95% 281 96%Craven CC* 2,891 46 93% 136 91% 182 92%Davidson County CC 4,067 270 98% 86 90% 356 96%Durham TCC 4,860 218 97% 269 88% 487 92%Edgecombe CC 2,439 200 97% 73 97% 273 97%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 626 99% 182 92% 808 97%Forsyth TCC 7,466 360 95% 240 95% 600 95%Gaston College* 5,240 618 97% 154 95% 772 97%Guilford TCC 10,908 992 96% 254 93% 1,246 95%Halifax CC 1,650 135 97% 81 100% 216 98%Haywood CC 1,947 225 96% 53 96% 278 96%Isothermal CC 2,386 150 99% 52 98% 202 99%James Sprunt CC 1,399 66 95% 42 95% 108 95%Johnston CC 4,391 338 99% 80 91% 418 97%Lenoir CC 3,655 199 96% 144 100% 343 98%Martin CC 893 45 98% 30 78% 75 90%Mayland CC 1,942 267 97% 29 100% 296 97%McDowell TCC 1,481 194 97% 39 100% 233 98%Mitchell CC 2,696 157 98% 85 91% 242 96%Montgomery CC 1,002 61 100% 25 92% 86 98%Nash CC 2,652 180 97% 137 96% 317 97%Pamlico CC* 633 48 96% 11 90% 59 95%Piedmont CC 2,762 167 98% 58 100% 225 99%Pitt CC 6,459 655 98% 262 98% 917 98%Randolph CC 2,581 139 98% 70 84% 209 93%Richmond CC 2,171 220 96% 62 90% 282 95%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 110 96% 37 100% 147 97%Robeson CC 3,742 209 95% 77 95% 286 95%Rockingham CC 2,158 208 100% 56 90% 264 98%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 216 97% 97 92% 313 95%Sampson CC 1,927 141 99% 52 100% 193 99%Sandhills CC 3,928 310 99% 112 94% 422 98%South Piedmont 2,528 186 93% 50 86% 236 92%Southeastern CC 2,575 197 96% 49 94% 246 96%Southwestern CC 2,462 144 99% 76 97% 220 98%Stanly CC 2,683 187 98% 94 96% 281 97%Surry CC 3,495 197 97% 126 98% 323 97%Tri-County CC 1,158 107 99% 34 88% 141 96%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 234 100% 102 92% 336 98%Wake TCC 13,650 535 94% 343 93% 878 94%Wayne CC 3,615 408 100% 98 100% 506 100%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 293 97% 47 91% 340 96%Wilkes CC 3,042 188 98% 63 92% 251 96%Wilson CC 2,144 157 98% 50 98% 207 98%

System Totals 221,096 15,216 97% 6,021 94% 21,237 96%

COMPLETERS NON-COMPLETERS TOTAL

INSTITUTION TOTAL FTE

Page 216: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

28

CORE INDICATORS OF SUCCESS MEASURE G:

Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation, and Transfer

Description/Definition—This composite indicator consists of

1. Number of individuals completing a curriculum program with a certificate,diploma, or degree;

2. Number of individuals who have not completed a program but who are continuingenrollments in either curriculum or occupational extension programs;

3. Number of individuals who transferred to a university or another communitycollege.

This composite indicator will consist of the above three measures, each reported separately for each college. Sum of the three will be divided by the total number of curriculum students in the cohort to compute an indicator of curriculum student progress and success.

Methodology and Data Source: Cohorts would be defined each fall based upon number of students enrolled in degree granting curriculum programs (associate degree, certificate, and diploma). At the end of each semester, colleges submitted a Curriculum Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file to the North Carolina Community College System Office. These student unit record files were loaded into the System data warehouse and were the official data of record for state level reporting. Each college has a minimum of two trained Skilled Knowledge Workers (SKW) with complete access to their data in the data warehouse. Each SKW has the ability to verify the accuracy of the data once loaded into the data warehouse. The cohort was tracked from fall to fall using data from the data warehouse to determine those who have graduated and those who have continued to be enrolled. This number, divided by the initial cohort, is the percentage reported. Transfer rates were calculated using the National Student Clearinghouse data.

Performance Standard—Performance standard for this measure is 65 percent of the fall cohort will have completed their program, still be enrolled the following fall at the community college, or transferred to another community college or university.

Results—Seventy-two percent (72%) of the fall 2008 cohort had graduated, returned to enroll, or transferred by fall 2009. All fifty-eight (58) community colleges met the performance standard.

Page 217: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

CURRICULUM STUDENT RETENTION, GRADUATON AND TRANSFER, 2008-2009

29

College FTETotal

CohortPERCENT

GRADUATEPERCENT RETURN

PERCENT TRANSFER

PERCENT GRADUATE, RETURN OR TRANSFER

Alamance CC 4,297 3,744 15% 53% 6% 74%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 4,196 17% 50% 5% 72%Beaufort County CC 1,905 1,400 16% 54% 5% 75%Bladen CC 1,537 1,275 11% 57% 6% 74%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 1,600 12% 51% 6% 69%Brunswick CC 1,752 1,088 15% 48% 8% 71%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 3,292 14% 54% 8% 76%Cape Fear CC 7,862 6,914 15% 52% 8% 75%Carteret CC 1,835 1,421 14% 49% 5% 68%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 3,987 15% 52% 5% 72%Central Carolina CC 5,340 3,551 21% 44% 5% 70%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 15,801 8% 49% 10% 67%Cleveland CC 3,203 2,494 16% 46% 6% 68%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 4,233 16% 46% 9% 71%College of The Albemarle 2,448 2,014 15% 48% 7% 70%Craven CC 2,891 2,653 12% 48% 8% 68%Davidson County CC 4,067 2,819 16% 52% 5% 73%Durham TCC 4,860 4,002 9% 49% 10% 68%Edgecombe CC 2,439 1,906 13% 57% 4% 74%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 8,465 11% 52% 8% 71%Forsyth TCC 7,466 6,810 14% 51% 7% 72%Gaston College 5,240 4,663 13% 52% 5% 70%Guilford TCC 10,908 10,413 11% 52% 9% 72%Halifax CC 1,650 1,218 20% 47% 5% 72%Haywood CC 1,947 1,463 17% 48% 5% 70%Isothermal CC 2,386 1,625 14% 50% 7% 71%James Sprunt CC 1,399 945 24% 47% 4% 75%Johnston CC 4,391 3,007 16% 52% 7% 75%Lenoir CC 3,655 2,219 14% 53% 7% 74%Martin CC 893 521 16% 51% 6% 73%Mayland CC 1,942 995 27% 41% 4% 72%McDowell TCC 1,481 981 19% 44% 4% 67%Mitchell CC 2,696 2,320 13% 53% 5% 71%Montgomery CC 1,002 794 25% 44% 3% 72%Nash CC 2,652 2,171 12% 53% 7% 72%Pamlico CC 633 364 32% 38% 5% 75%Piedmont CC 2,762 1,804 23% 43% 5% 71%Pitt CC 6,459 5,750 14% 53% 8% 75%Randolph CC 2,581 1,896 13% 54% 5% 72%Richmond CC 2,171 1,534 12% 54% 6% 72%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 647 20% 47% 7% 74%Robeson CC 3,742 2,146 16% 51% 6% 73%Rockingham CC 2,158 1,859 14% 53% 5% 72%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 5,201 13% 51% 6% 70%Sampson CC 1,927 1,144 21% 52% 4% 77%Sandhills CC 3,928 3,094 15% 50% 7% 72%South Piedmont CC 2,528 1,920 16% 51% 7% 74%Southeastern CC 2,575 1,629 14% 52% 8% 74%Southwestern CC 2,462 1,736 17% 49% 5% 71%Stanly CC 2,683 2,235 17% 47% 4% 68%Surry CC 3,495 2,400 15% 53% 6% 74%Tri-County CC 1,158 825 17% 46% 8% 71%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 3,758 15% 47% 5% 67%Wake TCC 13,650 13,277 8% 52% 10% 70%Wayne CC 3,615 2,886 15% 50% 7% 72%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 2,370 16% 56% 5% 77%Wilkes CC 3,042 2,037 15% 54% 6% 75%Wilson CC 2,144 1,519 16% 49% 6% 71%

System Total 221,096 179,031 14% 51% 7% 72%

Page 218: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

30

CORE INDICATORS OF SUCCESS MEASURE H:

Client Satisfaction With Customized Training

Description/Definition— Percentage of businesses/industries who have received services from a community college indicating that their expectations have been met. This measure is intended primarily to determine the satisfaction of organizations that received services from a community college.

Methodology and Data Source—A survey for businesses/industries receiving services from the Small Business Centers was administered by colleges to determine level of satisfaction with their customized training. The data were submitted annually to the System Office at the end of the fiscal year.

Performance Standard—Ninety percent (90%) of businesses/industries surveyed will report satisfaction with the services provided by community colleges.

Results—Total number of survey respondents was 44,116 in 2008-09. Ninety-four percent (94%) responded that the customized training provided by community colleges was excellent, or very good. Fifty-six (56) colleges met the performance standard.

Page 219: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

CLIENT SATISFIED WITH CUSTOMIZED TRAINING, 2008-2009

31

Institution FTENumber of Survey

Respondents% Excellent &

Very Good

Alamance CC 4,297 647 94%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 856 93%Beaufort County CC 1,905 379 96%Bladen CC 1,537 144 99%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 1,755 93%Brunswick CC 1,752 436 95%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 744 92%Cape Fear CC 7,862 1,648 93%Carteret CC 1,835 971 87%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 675 92%Central Carolina CC 5,340 1,047 96%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 839 93%Cleveland CC 3,203 457 94%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 817 94%College of The Albemarle 2,448 1,138 92%Craven CC 2,891 1,091 96%Davidson County CC 4,067 234 93%Durham TCC 4,860 539 93%Edgecombe CC 2,439 2,619 95%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 1,153 93%Forsyth TCC 7,466 1,073 96%Gaston College 5,240 713 93%Guilford TCC 10,908 1,047 95%Halifax CC 1,650 1,148 94%Haywood CC 1,947 320 95%Isothermal CC 2,386 251 96%James Sprunt CC 1,399 1,211 100%Johnston CC 4,391 1,102 95%Lenoir CC 3,655 1,187 94%Martin CC 893 564 95%Mayland CC 1,942 477 96%McDowell TCC 1,481 123 100%Mitchell CC 2,696 468 93%Montgomery CC 1,002 475 93%Nash CC 2,652 932 92%Pamlico CC 633 62 92%Piedmont CC 2,762 527 92%Pitt CC 6,459 1,063 90%Randolph CC 2,581 1,047 94%Richmond CC 2,171 394 96%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 284 95%Robeson CC 3,742 1,015 95%Rockingham CC 2,158 357 91%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 238 90%Sampson CC 1,927 535 83%Sandhills CC 3,928 860 96%South Piedmont CC 2,528 512 93%Southeastern CC 2,575 2,167 91%Southwestern CC 2,462 150 100%Stanly CC 2,683 623 92%Surry CC 3,495 371 98%Tri-County CC 1,158 60 98%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 657 93%Wake TCC 13,650 2,183 97%Wayne CC 3,615 454 95%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 321 97%Wilkes CC 3,042 310 96%Wilson CC 2,144 646 95%

System Total 221,096 44,116 94%

Page 220: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

32

SUMMARY OF CORE INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

A summary of the System's performance on the measures and the number of colleges meeting each standard are presented on the next page.

Recognition of Exceptional Institutional Performance (EIP) is based upon a college meeting or exceeding all performance measures, having no exams for which the college controls who sits for the exam with a passing rate of less than 70%, and college transfer students performing at a level equal to or above native UNC system students.

Page 221: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

33

SUMMARY REPORT ON PERFORMANCE MEASURES, 2008-2009 NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

MEASURE STANDARD SYSTEM AVERAGE

# COLLEGES MEETING

STANDARD

Progress of Basic Skills Students 75% 84% 55

Passing Rates on Licensure/ Certification Exams for First-Time Test Takers

Aggregate = 80% 86% 47*

Performance of College Transfer Students 83% 85% 37**

Passing Rates in Developmental Courses

75% 80% 47

Success Rate of Developmental Students in Subsequent College-Level Courses

80% 87% 58

Student Satisfaction of Completers and Non-Completers

90% 96% 58***

Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation & Transfer

65% 72% 58

Client Satisfaction with Customized Training

90% 94% 56

* 47 colleges met t he 80% standard; 36 colleges h ad no ex am for which they controlled who took theexam with a passing rate < 70%.

** 3 7 colleges met t he 83% s tandard; 28 colleges met o r ex ceeded t he p erformance of n ative U NCsophomores and juniors (86%).

*** 3 colleges have statistically invalid sample size for the non-completer survey.

Page 222: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

STATUS OF NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGES MEETING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, 2008-2009(M = Met Standard)

*Met all measures and exceptional standard on licensure exams and transfer student performance.**Not eligible for performance funding due to a low response rate (statistically invalid sample size).

CollegeProgress of Basic Skills Students

Passing Rates on Licensure

Certif. Exams

Performance of College

Transfer StudentsPassing Rates in Develop. Courses

Success Rate of Develop.

Students in College Level

Courses

Student Satisfaction of

Completers & NonComp.

Curriculum Student Retention,

Graduation & Transfer

Client Satisfaction with Customized

TrainingTotal Standards

Met

Recognition of Exceptional Institutional

Performance*

Alamance CC M M M M M M M 7Asheville-Buncombe TCC M M M M M M M M 8 YesBeaufort County CC M M M M M M M M 8Bladen CC M M M M M M M 7Blue Ridge CC M M M M M M M M 8 YesBrunswick CC M M M M M M M 7Caldwell CC & TI M M M M M M M M 8Cape Fear CC M M M M M M M M 8Carteret CC M M M M M M 6Catawba Valley CC M M M M M M M 7Central Carolina CC M M M M M M M M 8Central Piedmont CC M M M M M M M 7Cleveland CC M M M M M M 6Coastal Carolina CC M M M M M M M M 8 YesCollege of The Albemarle M M M M M M M 7Craven CC M M M M M** M M 7Davidson County CC M M M M M M M M 8Durham TCC M M M M M M M 7Edgecombe CC M M M M M M 6Fayetteville TCC M M M M M M 6Forsyth TCC M M M M M M M M 8 YesGaston College M M M M M M** M M 8Guilford TCC M M M M M M M 7Halifax CC M M M M M M 6Haywood CC M M M M M M M 7Isothermal CC M M M M M M M 7James Sprunt CC M M M M M M M M 8Johnston CC M M M M M M 6Lenoir CC M M M M M M M M 8Martin CC M M M M M M M 7Mayland CC M M M M M M 6McDowell TCC M M M M M M M 7

Page 223: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

STATUS OF NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGES MEETING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, 2008-2009(M = Met Standard)

*Met all measures and exceptional standard on licensure exams and transfer student performance.**Not eligible for performance funding due to a low response rate (statistically invalid sample size).

CollegeProgress of Basic Skills Students

Passing Rates on Licensure

Certif. Exams

Performance of College

Transfer StudentsPassing Rates in Develop. Courses

Success Rate of Develop.

Students in College Level

Courses

Student Satisfaction of

Completers & NonComp.

Curriculum Student Retention,

Graduation & Transfer

Client Satisfaction with Customized

TrainingTotal Standards

Met

Recognition of Exceptional Institutional

Performance*

Mitchell CC M M M M M M M 7Montgomery CC M M M M M M 6Nash CC M M M M M M M 7Pamlico CC M M M** M M 5Piedmont CC M M M M M M M M 8 YesPitt CC M M M M M M M M 8Randolph CC M M M M M M M M 8 YesRichmond CC M M M M M M M M 8Roanoke-Chowan CC M M M M M M M 7Robeson CC M M M M M M 6Rockingham CC M M M M M M M M 8 YesRowan-Cabarrus CC M M M M M M M M 8Sampson CC M M M M M M 6Sandhills CC M M M M M M M 7South Piedmont CC M M M M M M M 7Southeastern CC M M M M M M M 7Southwestern CC M M M M M M M M 8 YesStanly CC M M M M M 5Surry CC M M M M M M M M 8 YesTri-County CC M M M M M M M 7Vance-Granville CC M M M M M M M M 8Wake TCC M M M M M M M 7Wayne CC M M M M M M M M 8 YesWestern Piedmont CC M M M M M M M M 8 YesWilkes CC M M M M M M M M 8Wilson CC M M M M M M M 7

Page 224: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 225: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

37

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

STRATEGIC PLAN, 2009-2011

EVALUATION OF PROGRESS

The Critical Success Factors report is the mechanism employed for assessing the progress of the System in achieving measurable objectives identified in the System's strategic plan. Factors two through five provide measures that monitor the success of the System in meeting its target levels of success.

Most of the data presented in this section of the report are System level data, and where appropriate, college level data are presented for information. These data are to determine the degree to which the System has met its target levels.

The factors that comprise this section of the report are:

Factor II: Workforce Development

Factor III: Diverse Populations' Learning Needs

Factor IV: Resources

Factor V: Technology

Page 226: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

39

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR II: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

Supporting North Carolina's economic development has been an important part of the mission of the Community College System since its beginning. The System is a major tool for providing the state's citizens with the education and skills they need to be productive in the workforce. The System's institutions have traditionally worked closely with the businesses in their areas to insure that the programs offered by the colleges prepare citizens to take the jobs that are available. They have also provided citizens with the skills to be self-employed. North Carolina originated customized training programs for new industries that agreed to come into the state, and its approach has been copied widely. This program remains a strong part of the state's economic development arsenal, along with other categorically funded programs for existing industries and small businesses. Along with these specialized programs, the System's ability to stay current with the job market protects the state from skill shortages and protects its citizens from finding their skills outdated by changing technology and market forces. Measures of the success of the System in staying on the cutting edge are difficult to determine, but important. The State Board of Community Colleges has placed renewed emphasis on the role of North Carolina community colleges for workforce development in recent years. The 1999-2001 Strategic Plan established a new mission statement for the System and a new set of System goals have been adopted by the State Board of Community Colleges which emphasize education, training and retraining for the workforce, including basic skills/literacy, occupational and pre-baccalaureate programs. The measures that have been identified for the success of the System in its economic development role are: A. Percentage of Businesses and Industry Satisfied With NCCCS Training Programs B. Percentage of College Tech Prep Students Enrolling in a Community College C. Number of Employers and Trainees Served by Customized Training for Job Growth

(formerly NEIT), Customized Training for Technology Investment (formerly CIT), Small Business Center Network, and Customized Training for Productivity Enhancement (FIT)

D. Employment Status of Graduates E. Employer Satisfaction with Graduates

Page 227: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

40

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT MEASURE A:

Percentage of Businesses and Industries Satisfied With NCCCS Training Programs

Description/Definition—The percentage of businesses/industries who have received specialized training programs and services through Customized Training for Job Growth (formerly NEIT), Customized Training for Technology Investment (formerly CIT), Customized Training for Productivity Enhancement (formerly FIT), and the Small Business Centers indicating that their expectations have been met. This measure is intended primarily to determine the satisfaction of organizations that received specialized services from a community college.

Methodology and Data Source—A survey of businesses/industries receiving services from the Customized Training for Job Growth, Customized Training for Technology Investment, Customized Training for Productivity Enhancement, and the Small Business Centers was administered by the colleges to determine the degree to which the customized training meet their needs. The data were submitted annually to the System Office at the end of the fiscal year.

Performance Target— A performance target for this measure has not been established. As the data are collected and analyzed, a target will be determined.

Results— In 2008-2009, 671 companies and 19,861 trainees were served by the Customized Training Program. Average ratings of company’s expectation met, training impact, and training effectiveness were 4.58, 4.56, and 4.54 respectively, when 5 being excellent, no improvement necessary and 1 being unacceptable, needs generally not satisfied.

An analysis for the total response of 42,204 on satisfaction with services provided by the Small Business Center Network (SBCN) indicated that services provided were excellent. Ninety-nine percent (99%) of the respondents rated the services as “Good, Very Good,” or “Excellent.”

Page 228: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Customized Training ProgramNumber of Companies and Trainees Served, 2008-09

*Consortium with Craven CC 41

Nunber of Companies

Served

Number of Trainees Served

Nunber of Companies

Served

Number of Trainees Served

Total Nunber of Companies

Served

Total Number of Trainees

Served

Alamance CC 4,297 1 9 14 148 15 157Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 7 369 18 384 25 753Beaufort County CC 1,905 1 52 7 54 8 106Bladen CC 1,537 3 59 4 37 7 96Blue Ridge CC 2,275 4 137 7 256 11 393Brunswick CC 1,752 1 258 6 34 7 292Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 1 9 7 62 8 71Cape Fear CC 7,862 4 141 5 174 9 315Carteret CC 1,835 0 0 18 47 18 47Catawba Valley CC 4,751 10 813 17 211 27 1,024Central Carolina CC 5,340 8 240 10 264 18 504Central Piedmont CC 15,324 5 256 18 88 23 344Cleveland CC 3,203 4 211 7 44 11 255Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 1 5 3 19 4 24College of The Albemarle 2,448 3 76 6 63 9 139Craven CC 2,891 2 0 5 170 7 170Davidson County CC 4,067 3 20 16 240 19 260Durham TCC 4,860 8 1,149 11 218 19 1,367Edgecombe CC 2,439 5 120 6 147 11 267Fayetteville TCC 11,018 1 46 14 141 15 187Forsyth TCC 7,466 3 368 9 792 12 1,160Gaston College 5,240 6 258 13 166 19 424Guilford TCC 10,908 10 1,318 3 135 13 1,453Halifax CC 1,650 1 7 6 26 7 33Haywood CC 1,947 0 0 6 65 6 65Isothermal CC 2,386 7 268 9 36 16 304James Sprunt CC 1,399 0 0 7 127 7 127Johnston CC 4,391 5 349 6 127 11 476Lenoir CC 3,655 3 65 8 56 11 121Martin CC 893 1 95 1 6 2 101Mayland CC 1,942 1 34 0 0 1 34McDowell TCC 1,481 3 66 11 398 14 464Mitchell CC 2,696 3 533 11 210 14 743Montgomery CC 1,002 3 58 5 31 8 89Nash CC 2,652 4 213 3 104 7 317Pamlico CC* 633 0 0 0 0 0 0Piedmont CC 2,762 3 30 3 159 6 189Pitt CC 6,459 2 45 9 180 11 225Randolph CC 2,581 3 272 36 206 39 478Richmond CC 2,171 3 160 11 136 14 296Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 0 0 1 56 1 56Robeson CC 3,742 0 0 11 82 11 82Rockingham CC 2,158 3 97 5 56 8 153Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 5 792 9 196 14 988Sampson CC 1,927 0 0 6 125 6 125Sandhills CC 3,928 6 123 6 33 12 156South Piedmont 2,528 2 169 15 74 17 243Southeastern CC 2,575 1 17 2 6 3 23Southwestern CC 2,462 1 22 3 125 4 147Stanly CC 2,683 1 19 5 28 6 47Surry CC 3,495 4 209 12 340 16 549Tri-County CC 1,158 4 227 2 38 6 265Vance-Granville CC 4,543 1 98 11 313 12 411Wake TCC 13,650 13 1,456 8 99 21 1,555Wayne CC 3,615 2 137 7 84 9 221Western Piedmont CC 3,334 1 69 10 211 11 280Wilkes CC 3,042 4 69 6 50 10 119Wilson CC 2,144 5 245 10 326 15 571

System Totals 221,096 186 11,858 485 8,003 671 19,861

Customized Training Projects

Business & Industriy Support Funds System Totals

INSTITUTION TOTAL FTE

Page 229: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Customized Training ProgramClent Satisfaction Evaluation, 2008-09

42

INSTITUTION Total FTECompany's Expectation Met

(Average Rating)Training Impact (Average Rating)

Training Effectiveness (Average Rating)

Alamance CC 4,297 N/A N/A N/AAsheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 5 5 5Beaufort County CC 1,905 5 5 5Bladen CC 1,537 5 5 5Blue Ridge CC 2,275 4 4 4Brunswick CC 1,752 5 5 5Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 N/A N/A N/ACape Fear CC 7,862 5 5 5Carteret CC 1,835 N/A N/A N/ACatawba Valley CC 4,751 5 5 5Central Carolina CC 5,340 5 5 5Central Piedmont CC 15,324 4 4 4Cleveland CC 3,203 5 5 5Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 5 5 5College of The Albemarle 2,448 5 5 5Craven CC 2,891 4 4 3Davidson County CC 4,067 4 4 4Durham TCC 4,860 5 5 5Edgecombe CC 2,439 4 4 4Fayetteville TCC 11,018 5 4 4Forsyth TCC 7,466 5 5 5Gaston College 5,240 5 5 5Guilford TCC 10,908 4 5 5Halifax CC 1,650 3 2 2Haywood CC 1,947 N/A N/A N/AIsothermal CC 2,386 4 4 4James Sprunt CC 1,399 N/A N/A N/AJohnston CC 4,391 4 4 4Lenoir CC 3,655 5 5 5Martin CC 893 5 5 5Mayland CC 1,942 5 4 5McDowell TCC 1,481 5 5 5Mitchell CC 2,696 4 4 4Montgomery CC 1,002 5 5 5Nash CC 2,652 5 5 5Pamlico CC 633 N/A N/A N/APiedmont CC 2,762 4 4 4Pitt CC 6,459 N/A N/A N/ARandolph CC 2,581 5 5 5Richmond CC 2,171 5 5 5Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 N/A N/A N/ARobeson CC 3,742 N/A N/A N/ARockingham CC 2,158 5 5 5Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 5 5 5Sampson CC 1,927 N/A N/A N/ASandhills CC 3,928 5 4 4South Piedmont CC 2,528 4 5 4Southeastern CC 2,575 4 4 4Southwestern CC 2,462 N/A N/A N/AStanly CC 2,683 5 5 4Surry CC 3,495 5 5 5Tri-County CC 1,158 5 5 5Vance-Granville CC 4,543 5 5 5Wake TCC 13,650 5 5 5Wayne CC 3,615 5 5 5Western Piedmont CC 3,334 5 5 5Wilkes CC 3,042 5 5 5Wilson CC 2,144 4 4 4

System Average 221,096 4.58 4.56 4.54

Page 230: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Small Business Center Network (SBCN) - Client Satisfaction Evaluations, 2008-2009

43

INSTITUTION Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor % excellent, very good and good Total Responses

Alamance CC 432 173 36 4 2 99% 647Asheville-Buncombe TCC 564 232 54 6 0 99% 856Beaufort County CC 263 100 15 1 0 100% 379Bladen CC 110 33 1 0 0 100% 144Blue Ridge CC 1055 585 103 11 1 99% 1,755Brunswick CC 285 129 21 1 0 100% 436Caldwell CC & TI 484 200 51 9 0 99% 744Cape Fear CC 1062 477 100 9 0 99% 1,648Carteret CC 526 323 100 21 1 98% 971Catawba Valley CC 429 195 39 6 6 98% 675Central Carolina CC 847 163 34 3 0 100% 1,047Central Piedmont CC 514 269 31 7 18 97% 839Cleveland CC 315 113 25 3 1 99% 457Coastal Carolina CC 567 203 38 8 1 99% 817College of The Albemarle 730 319 82 7 0 99% 1,138Craven CC 872 176 43 0 0 100% 1,091Davidson County CC 164 54 13 3 0 99% 234Durham TCC 354 146 37 1 1 100% 539Edgecombe CC 1825 656 131 7 0 100% 2,619Fayetteville TCC 828 243 66 13 3 99% 1,153Forsyth TCC 829 203 40 1 0 100% 1,073Gaston College 346 357 0 98 0 88% 801Guilford TCC 911 79 53 3 1 100% 1,047Halifax CC 804 277 56 9 2 99% 1,148Haywood CC 194 110 13 2 1 99% 320Isothermal CC 182 60 9 0 0 100% 251James Sprunt CC 1139 72 0 0 0 100% 1,211Johnston CC 816 226 53 6 1 99% 1,102Lenoir CC 812 307 63 4 1 100% 1,187Martin CC 364 172 22 6 0 99% 564Mayland CC 345 111 17 4 0 99% 477McDowell TCC 96 27 0 0 0 100% 123Mitchell CC 320 114 30 4 0 99% 468Montgomery CC 337 103 29 5 1 99% 475Nash CC 612 244 66 8 2 99% 932Pamlico CC 47 10 4 1 0 98% 62Piedmont CC 341 143 38 5 0 99% 527Pitt CC 645 316 82 18 2 98% 1,063Randolph CC 705 280 56 6 0 99% 1,047Richmond CC 294 86 12 1 1 99% 394Roanoke-Chowan CC 189 82 12 1 0 100% 284Robeson CC 766 199 49 1 0 100% 1,015Rockingham CC 256 70 27 4 0 99% 357Rowan-Cabarrus CC 150 65 20 3 0 99% 238Sampson CC 77 369 88 0 1 100% 535Sandhills CC 623 202 27 8 0 99% 860South Piedmont CC 346 132 32 2 0 100% 512Southeastern CC 1478 502 158 23 6 99% 2,167Southwestern CC 125 25 0 0 0 100% 150Stanly CC 427 149 38 6 3 99% 623Surry CC 265 99 7 0 0 100% 371Tri-County CC 46 13 1 0 0 100% 60Vance-Granville CC 491 123 33 8 2 98% 657Wake TCC 1597 518 52 13 3 99% 2,183Wayne CC 308 124 19 3 0 99% 454Western Piedmont CC 233 77 10 1 0 100% 321Wilkes CC 218 81 8 3 0 99% 310Wilson CC 428 188 29 1 0 100% 646

System Total 30,388 11,104 2,273 378 61 99% 44,204

Overall Rating

Page 231: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

44

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT MEASURE B:

Percentage of College Tech Prep Students Enrolling in a Community College

Description/Definition—Percentage of high school graduates who are in a College Tech Prep program in high school and enroll the following year in a community college. This measure is dependent on the ability of the high schools to identify graduates of a College Tech Prep course of study.

Methodology and Data Source— The data on the number of high school graduates who complete the College Tech Prep requirements will be gathered from the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. The number and percentage of those students who enroll in a community college the year following graduation is determined from the curriculum registration files submitted by the colleges to the System Office.

Performance Target—Performance target for this measure has not been established. As the data are accurately collected and analyzed, a target level will be determined.

Results— In 2008-2009, 30 percent of the 2008 high school graduates who enrolled in a community college had successfully completed the requirements of the College Tech Prep course of study, which was the same as previous year’s figure. The ABCs of public education, as specified in the high school accountability model, require year-to-year comparison of percentages of students completing the college tech prep course of study.

Page 232: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

NUMBER OF 2008 HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES WHO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED TECH PREPAND ENROLLED IN A COMMUNITY COLLEGE IN 2008-2009

45

INSTITUTIONTOTAL

FTE

2008 HIGH SCHOOLGRADUATES ENROLLED

TECH PREPSENROLLED PERCENTAGE

Alamance CC 4,297 703 210 30%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 916 238 26%Beaufort County CC 1,905 229 89 39%Bladen CC 1,537 168 27 16%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 394 191 48%Brunswick CC 1,752 276 120 43%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 484 181 37%Cape Fear CC 7,862 1,304 276 21%Carteret CC 1,835 238 74 31%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 832 386 46%Central Carolina CC 5,340 488 142 29%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 2,774 453 16%Cleveland CC 3,203 367 105 29%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 705 275 39%College of the Albemarle 2,448 374 158 42%Craven CC 2,891 459 140 31%Davidson County CC 4,067 607 204 34%Durham TCC 4,860 483 9 2%Edgecombe CC 2,439 277 84 30%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 1,193 461 39%Forsyth TCC 7,466 1,230 316 26%Gaston College 5,240 886 323 36%Guilford TCC 10,908 1,893 681 36%Halifax CC 1,650 250 96 38%Haywood CC 1,947 273 59 22%Isothermal CC 2,386 437 114 26%James Sprunt CC 1,399 111 53 48%Johnston CC 4,391 595 165 28%Lenoir CC 3,655 458 202 44%Martin CC 893 83 38 46%Mayland CC 1,942 153 58 38%McDowell TCC 1,481 179 51 28%Mitchell CC 2,696 548 275 50%Montgomery CC 1,002 113 44 39%Nash CC 2,652 414 109 26%Pamlico CC 633 17 16 94%Piedmont CC 2,762 272 98 36%Pitt CC 6,459 1,624 439 27%Randolph CC 2,581 412 34 8%Richmond CC 2,171 253 128 51%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 95 46 48%Robeson CC 3,742 337 128 38%Rockingham CC 2,158 351 160 46%Rowan Cabarrus CC 5,760 922 281 30%Sampson CC 1,927 196 78 40%Sandhills CC 3,928 693 295 43%South Piedmont CC 2,528 337 86 26%Southeastern CC 2,575 340 116 34%Southwestern CC 2,462 297 101 34%Stanly CC 2,683 382 81 21%Surry CC 3,495 543 139 26%Tri-County CC 1,158 171 61 36%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 621 162 26%Wake TCC 13,650 2,487 407 16%Wayne CC 3,615 559 211 38%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 473 196 41%Wilkes CC 3,042 466 219 47%Wilson CC 2,144 230 58 25%

System Total 221,096 32,972 9,947 30%

Page 233: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

46

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT MEASURE C:

Number of Employers and Trainees Served by Small Business Centers, and Customized Training Program

Description/Definition—Number of employers and individuals served by categorical programs created specifically to address employers’ needs. This measure is designed to provide information on specific activities of community colleges that promote the economic development of the state.

Methodology and Data Source—Information on the number of trainees, projects, businesses, and individuals served through the categorical programs are collected annually by the Technology and Workforce Development Division of the North Carolina Community College System Office.

Performance Target— The programs were designed to provide specialized services and were not intended to be "numbers driven." Fluctuations in numbers from year to year reflect various factors such as funding availability, scope of the projects, and local demand.

Results—In 2008-09, Customized Training for Job Growth (formerly NEIT), Customized Training for Technology Investment (formerly CIT), and Customized Training for Productivity Enhancement (formerly FIT) were consolidated to Customized Training Program. The number of trainees served by the program increased by 16.2%, and number of companies served by the program was 671 thanks to the consolidation.

For Small Business Center Network, number of seminar participants slightly increased by 1.4 percent, and number of counsels increased by 26.3 percent in 2008-09. However, the number of continuing education and curriculum course participants decreased by 7.4 percent during the same period of time.

Page 234: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

47

CUSTOMIZED TRAINING (*Consolidated in 2008-09)

YEAR TRAINEES COMPANIES

2004-05 12,398 164

2005-06 23,799 197

2006-07 19,380 208

2007-08 17,087 187

2008-09* 19,861* 671*

SMALL BUSINESS CENTER NETWORK

YEAR # OF

CENTERS PARTICIPANTS COUNSEL REFERRAL

EXT./CURR. COURSE

PARTICIPANT

2004-05 58 44,993 7,205 5,310 15,806

2005-06 58 51,312 6,117 4,873 14,591

2006-07 58 55,526 5,333 4,365 14,922

2007-08

2008-09

58

58

55,151

55,929

4,744

5,990

N/A*

N/A*

11,388

10,548

* Information not available.

Page 235: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

48

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT MEASURE D: Employment Status of Graduates

Description/Definition— Proportion of identified community college completers who are employed within one year of last attendance.

Methodology and Data Sources—The North Carolina Common Follow-up System (CFS) tracks students’ employment status after they leave the colleges. The Common Follow-up System (CFS) is a cooperative venture of participating state agencies under the auspices of the North Carolina State Occupational Information Coordinating Committee (NC SOICC). The CFS provides a highly efficient and cost effective method for collecting follow-up information for education, employment, and training program participants statewide. The CFS is maintained by the Employment Security Commission (ESC).

Each year the agencies involved in the CFS submit unit record data on participants to the ESC. Among the agencies included in this process are the public high schools, community colleges, and the four-year public universities. Each agency's data are matched against the Unemployment Insurance (UI) files and the other participating agencies' files. A database containing information on employment, employer, quarterly wages, receipt of unemployment benefits, and participation in other agencies' programs is returned to each submitting agency. The database each agency receives is limited to the participants that the agency submits for the data match. This is to say, the database received by community colleges has information only on community college students.

Once the CFS database is received, it is matched against the CRPFAR (Curriculum Registration, Progress, and Financial Aid Report) database and the following year curriculum student registration data. This matching is conducted to determine demographic characteristics of the participants, such as students' completion status at the end of the academic year and whether they re-enroll the following year. Students who obtain an associate degree, certificate, or diploma in the year given and do not re-enroll in any of the colleges the following year are defined as "exit completers."

Students who have wages in any quarter during the year are considered employed. Those who are found both in registration records and UI records but have no quarterly wages during the year and have applied for unemployment insurance benefits or job services of the Employment Security Council are considered unemployed. Individuals who are not found in the UI records are omitted from the analysis. This would include individuals who are working out-of-state, who are enrolled in a four-year college or university and not working, who never entered the labor market, etc.

Performance Standard— The standard is 95 percent of completers are to be employed.

Page 236: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

49

Results—Data on 17,046 graduates of the 2007-08 academic year were collected. System average employment rate was 99.22 percent. All 58 community colleges met the standard.

Page 237: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERCENT OF 2007-08 GRADUATES EMPLOYED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF COMPLETION

50

College FTE

Number of Graduates

(minus inmates and missing

students)

Percent of 2007-08Graduates Employed Within One Year of

Graduating

Alamance CC 4,297 423 99.05%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 558 99.10%Beaufort County CC 1,905 146 99.32%Bladen CC 1,537 103 98.06%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 122 100.00%Brunswick CC 1,752 126 100.00%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 274 98.91%Cape Fear CC 7,862 767 98.70%Carteret CC 1,835 143 99.30%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 423 98.82%Central Carolina CC 5,340 432 99.77%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 932 99.25%Cleveland CC 3,203 242 98.35%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 398 98.74%College of The Albemarle 2,448 206 99.50%Craven CC 2,891 187 98.93%Davidson County CC 4,067 485 100.00%Durham TCC 4,860 244 99.59%Edgecombe CC 2,439 201 100.00%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 538 98.88%Forsyth TCC 7,466 734 98.90%Gaston College 5,240 379 99.47%Guilford TCC 10,908 783 98.60%Halifax CC 1,650 148 100.00%Haywood CC 1,947 176 98.86%Isothermal CC 2,386 187 98.93%James Sprunt CC 1,399 193 98.45%Johnston CC 4,391 333 99.70%Lenoir CC 3,655 251 99.20%Martin CC 893 48 100.00%Mayland CC 1,942 166 99.40%McDowell TCC 1,481 127 100.00%Mitchell CC 2,696 149 100.00%Montgomery CC 1,002 123 100.00%Nash CC 2,652 222 99.10%Pamlico CC 633 42 100.00%Piedmont CC 2,762 278 99.64%Pitt CC 6,459 641 99.53%Randolph CC 2,581 180 98.33%Richmond CC 2,171 154 98.70%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 67 100.00%Robeson CC 3,742 230 98.70%Rockingham CC 2,158 206 100.00%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 384 98.96%Sampson CC 1,927 174 98.85%Sandhills CC 3,928 237 99.16%South Piedmont CC 2,528 229 98.25%Southeastern CC 2,575 105 99.05%Southwestern CC 2,462 234 98.72%Stanly CC 2,683 286 99.65%Surry CC 3,495 297 99.66%Tri-County CC 1,158 61 95.08%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 282 99.65%Wake TCC 13,650 901 99.56%Wayne CC 3,615 328 99.70%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 285 100.00%Wilkes CC 3,042 256 99.22%Wilson CC 2,144 220 100.00%

System Total 221,096 17,046 99.22%

Page 238: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

51

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT MEASURE E:

Employer Satisfaction With Graduates

Description/Definition—Percentage of a sample of businesses who employ individuals trained or educated by a community college indicating that they are satisfied with the quality of those employees as it relates to the community college training and education. This measure is intended primarily to determine the satisfaction of organizations whose employees have been trained through a community college.

Methodology and Data Source — Data were collected by a survey developed by System Office, Research and Performance Management section (President’s Office), with each college using a standard set of questions.

Performance Standard — Eighty-five percent (85%) of employers surveyed will report satisfaction with the skills of employees trained or educated by community colleges.

Results— In 2008-2009, 10,707 employers of community college graduates were surveyed. A total of 2,667 surveys were completed and returned by employers, for a 25 percent response rate. Overall, 97 percent of those employers who responded to the survey indicated that they were satisfied with the job preparation of community college graduates. All fifty-eight (58) colleges met the performance standard for this measure.

Page 239: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERCENT OF EMPLOYERS SATISFIED WITH THE QUALITY OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS, 2008-09

52

INSTITUTION FTE

NUMBER OF EMPLOYERS SURVEYED

RESPONSE RATE

PERCENT SATISFIED

Alamance CC 4,297 99 36% 97%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 81 63% 100%Beaufort County CC 1,905 241 55% 97%Bladen CC 1,537 26 50% 100%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 101 23% 91%Brunswick CC 1,752 196 15% 100%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 1,206 7% 98%Cape Fear CC 7,862 235 8% 100%Carteret CC 1,835 96 21% 95%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 75 51% 97%Central Carolina CC 5,340 144 29% 98%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 457 39% 100%Cleveland CC 3,203 227 16% 86%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 181 61% 98%College of The Albemarle 2,448 60 73% 100%Craven CC 2,891 120 13% 100%Davidson County CC 4,067 65 60% 100%Durham TCC 4,860 74 42% 100%Edgecombe CC 2,439 101 75% 96%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 472 32% 97%Forsyth TCC 7,466 743 5% 97%Gaston College 5,240 1,935 9% 98%Guilford TCC 10,908 354 22% 94%Halifax CC 1,650 70 84% 100%Haywood CC 1,947 35 71% 100%Isothermal CC 2,386 54 15% 100%James Sprunt CC 1,399 104 21% 95%Johnston CC 4,391 49 71% 100%Lenoir CC 3,655 63 57% 100%Martin CC 893 21 43% 89%Mayland CC 1,942 64 59% 91%McDowell TCC 1,481 66 30% 100%Mitchell CC 2,696 44 23% 100%Montgomery CC 1,002 20 20% 100%Nash CC 2,652 35 100% 100%Pamlico CC 633 10 100% 100%Piedmont CC 2,762 60 23% 100%Pitt CC 6,459 287 54% 96%Randolph CC 2,581 40 43% 94%Richmond CC 2,171 119 24% 96%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 15 60% 100%Robeson CC 3,742 100 26% 92%Rockingham CC 2,158 37 95% 100%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 210 26% 100%Sampson CC 1,927 49 71% 90%Sandhills CC 3,928 89 90% 95%South Piedmont CC 2,528 261 14% 97%Southeastern CC 2,575 146 8% 90%Southwestern CC 2,462 114 50% 91%Stanly CC 2,683 173 56% 97%Surry CC 3,495 122 17% 95%Tri-County CC 1,158 30 90% 96%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 180 37% 100%Wake TCC 13,650 125 24% 100%Wayne CC 3,615 341 24% 97%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 129 27% 100%Wilkes CC 3,042 125 8% 88%Wilson CC 2,144 31 42% 92%

System Totals 221,096 10,707 25% 97%

Page 240: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

53

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR III: DIVERSE POPULATIONS’ LEARNING NEEDS

At the core of the Community College System's mission is its open door policy. Community colleges, in the words of founding father Dallas Herring, "take people from where they are to where they want to be." The special mission of the community colleges is to serve those who did not have opportunities to learn or who missed out on those opportunities, and to serve people who have special problems to overcome. Thus, there is an emphasis on reaching out to the under-served: dropouts, handicapped, economically or educationally disadvantaged and other groups who are not traditionally included in higher education.

There are many issues facing community colleges today, but perhaps none strike at the core of our mission as hard as does the reality of limited resources in this time of economic uncertainty. How long can the "open door" remain open when personnel, services, and facilities are strained to their limits? As the demands on community colleges continue to rise without a corresponding increase in resources, the "open door" that is the path to opportunity for so many closes just a bit more.

The state needs to raise the productivity of its citizens, and these are times in which people have a harder time being self-sufficient and raising families unless they have an education. Providing access to education, a constitutional duty of the state, is increasingly important to individuals and society. A successful community college system will reach out to under-served groups.

The measures identified as indicators of the System's success in meeting the learning needs of diverse populations are:

A. Number and Percentage of Dropouts Annually Served by Basic Skills Programs

B. Number of GEDs and AHSDs Awarded Compared to the Number of Dropouts Statewide

C. Percentage of Basic Skills Students and Recent High School Graduates Enrolling in aCommunity College

D. Unduplicated Headcount in English as a Second Language (ESL)

E. Number of Under-Represented Students Enrolled Per Category

F. Percentage of Students Receiving Financial Aid and Amount of Aid Compared With Costof Attendance

G. Percentage of Population of Service Area Enrolled

H. Goal Completion for Completers

Page 241: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

54

DIVERSE POPULATIONS LEARNING NEEDS MEASURE A:

Number and Percentage of Dropouts Annually Served by Basic Skills Programs

Description/Definition—The number and percentage of high school dropouts who enroll in a basic skills program at a community college. Basic skills programs include Adult Basic Education, Adult High School, General Educational Development (GED), Compensatory Education, and English as a Second Language.

Methodology and Data Source—Data on last year of high school attendance and number of years of high school completed are gathered at the time a student registers for classes. The last year of high school attendance data is matched against initial enrollment year to determine the number of students who enroll in a community college basic skills program within one year of dropping out of high school.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been established for this measure.

Results—In 2008-2009, community colleges enrolled 16,403 high school dropouts who dropped out of school during 2008-2009, which was a 4.8 percent increase in enrollment for the academic year 2008-2009. This "safety net" feature continues to be an important role played by community colleges.

NUMBER OF RECENT HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUTS WHO ENROLLED IN A BASIC SKILLS PROGRAM

YEAR DROPPED OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL

YEAR ENROLLED IN A COMMUNITY COLLEGE

NUMBER ENROLLED

1/1/04-6/30/05

1/1/05-6/30/06

2004-05

2005-06

12,903

13,359

1/1/06-6/30/07

1/1/07-6/30/08

1/1/08-6/30/09

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

15,064

15,652

16,403

Page 242: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

NUMBER OF HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUTS WHO ENROLLED IN A BASIC SKILLS PROGRAM AT A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DURING 2008-2009

55

INSTITUTIONTOTAL

FTENUMBER

ENROLLED

Alamance CC 4,297 267Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 417Beaufort County CC 1,905 100Bladen CC 1,537 106Blue Ridge CC 2,275 236Brunswick CC 1,752 146Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 373Cape Fear CC 7,862 597Carteret CC 1,835 140Catawba Valley CC 4,751 247Central Carolina CC 5,340 415Central Piedmont CC 15,324 1,608Cleveland CC 3,203 123Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 805College of The Albemarle 2,448 313Craven CC 2,891 198Davidson County CC 4,067 452Durham TCC 4,860 136Edgecombe CC 2,439 192Fayetteville TCC 11,018 425Forsyth TCC 7,466 1,028Gaston College 5,240 303Guilford TCC 10,908 512Halifax CC 1,650 194Haywood CC 1,947 142Isothermal CC 2,386 271James Sprunt CC 1,399 84Johnston CC 4,391 160Lenoir CC 3,655 272Martin CC 893 103Mayland CC 1,942 81McDowell TCC 1,481 69Mitchell CC 2,696 229Montgomery CC 1,002 27Nash CC 2,652 186Pamlico CC 633 20Piedmont CC 2,762 169Pitt CC 6,459 371Randolph CC 2,581 303Richmond CC 2,171 225Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 25Robeson CC 3,742 224Rockingham CC 2,158 174Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 332Sampson CC 1,927 310Sandhills CC 3,928 234South Piedmont CC 2,528 221Southeastern CC 2,575 95Southwestern CC 2,462 369Stanly CC 2,683 283Surry CC 3,495 185Tri-County CC 1,158 49Vance-Granville CC 4,543 415Wake TCC 13,650 578Wayne CC 3,615 322Western Piedmont CC 3,334 206Wilkes CC 3,042 149Wilson CC 2,144 187

System Total 221,096 16,403

Page 243: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

56

DIVERSE POPULATIONS LEARNING NEEDS MEASURE B:

Number of GEDs and AHSDs Awarded Compared to the Number of Dropouts Statewide

Description/Definition—Number of GEDs and Adult High School Diplomas (AHSDs) awarded by community colleges annually compared to the number of public school dropouts. This measure serves as an indicator of the degree to which community colleges reduce the total pool of people in North Carolina with less than a high school education.

Methodology and Data Source—Data on the number of GEDs and AHSDs awarded are gathered and reported annually by the North Carolina Community College System Office. Data on the number of dropouts is provided by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.

Performance Target—By 2001, an increase by 10 percent the number of individuals enrolled in the GED and AHSD programs that complete the program has been set.

Results—Number of GEDs and AHSDs awarded in 2008-09 were 16,705 which was a 9.1 percent increase from the previous year. Number of students added in the dropout pool decreased by 65.2% (4,648) in 2008-09.

NUMBER OF GEDs AND AHSDs AWARDED COMPARED TO THE NUMBER OF DROPOUTS STATEWIDE

YEAR NEW DROPOUTS ADDED

TO DROPOUT POOL GED/AHS DIPLOMAS

AWARDED INCREASE IN

DROPOUT POOL

2004-05

2005-06

20,175

22,180

15,910

14,922

4,265

7,258

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

23,550

22,434

19,184

15,144

15,307

16,705

8,406

7,127

2,479

Page 244: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

NUMBER OF GEDs/AHSDs AWARDED, 2008-2009

57

INSTITUTIONTOTAL

FTE AHS GED

Alamance CC 4,297 33 307Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 499Beaufort County CC 1,905 151Bladen CC 1,537 14 42Blue Ridge CC 2,275 225Brunswick CC 1,752 23 78Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 111 192Cape Fear CC 7,862 142 223Carteret CC 1,835 24 186Catawba Valley CC 4,751 374Central Carolina CC 5,340 103 452Central Piedmont CC 15,324 249 728Cleveland CC 3,203 79 61Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 29 243College of the Albemarle 2,448 71 301Craven CC 2,891 22 122Davidson County CC 4,067 92 343Durham TCC 4,860 37 267Edgecombe CC 2,439 8 271Fayetteville TCC 11,018 53 180Forsyth TCC 7,466 142 516Gaston College 5,240 156 439Guilford TCC 10,908 35 313Halifax CC 1,650 140Haywood CC 1,947 14 52Isothermal CC 2,386 48 229James Sprunt CC 1,399 7 81Johnston CC 4,391 27 146Lenoir CC 3,655 15 241Martin CC 893 5 89Mayland CC 1,942 237McDowell TCC 1,481 221Mitchell CC 2,696 309Montgomery CC 1,002 6 53Nash CC 2,652 19 148Pamlico CC 633 31Piedmont CC 2,762 172Pitt CC 6,459 57 157Randolph CC 2,581 37 379Richmond CC 2,171 15 328Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 112Robeson CC 3,742 73 62Rockingham CC 2,158 211Rowan Cabarrus CC 5,760 557Sampson CC 1,927 233Sandhills CC 3,928 18 285South Piedmont CC 2,528 28 359Southeastern CC 2,575 96Southwestern CC 2,462 4 325Stanly CC 2,683 120 90Surry CC 3,495 207Tri-County CC 1,158 116Vance-Granville CC 4,543 104 555Wake TCC 13,650 87 747Wayne CC 3,615 85 228Western Piedmont CC 3,334 92 407Wilkes CC 3,042 45 164Wilson CC 2,144 12 84

System Total 221,096 2,341 14,364

Page 245: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

58

DIVERSE POPULATIONS LEARNING NEEDS MEASURE C:

Number of Basic Skills Students and Recent High School Graduates Enrolling in a Community College

Description/Definition—Number and percentage increase of basic skills students and recent high school graduates who enroll in a community college. The measure is designed to determine the number and percentage that move directly from basic skills programs into a community college curriculum or occupational extension program, as well as the number and percentage of high school students who directly go to a curriculum program in a community college. The tracking of basic skills students into curriculum or occupational extension is important for determining the success of community colleges in encouraging students to get the necessary skills for today's marketplace.

Methodology and Data Source—The number of recent high school graduates enrolling in a community college is reported annually by the Information Services Section of the North Carolina Community College System Office. The number of basic skills students enrolling in a curriculum or occupational extension course are determined by tracking basic skills students from one year to the next utilizing the registration files submitted by the colleges. This analysis is done by the Research and Performance Management section in the President’s Office, North Carolina Community College System Office.

Performance Target—By 2001, increase the percentage of each target group that enroll in a community college by 10 percent.

Results—Number of basic skills students enrolling in curriculum or occupational extension courses increased by 6.3 percent, from 11,260 in 2007-08 to 11,969 in 2008-09. The enrollment of the 2007-08 high school graduates in community colleges in the academic year of 2008-09 (32,423) represented a 9.5 percent increase from the previous year’s enrollment.

Page 246: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

59

TRANSITION OF BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS TO OCCUPATIONAL EXTENSION/ CURRICULUM PROGRAMS AND HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES TO CURRICULUM

PROGRAMS

YEAR ENROLLED

BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES

NUMBER PERCENT INCREASE NUMBER

PERCENT INCREASE

2004-05

2005-06

12,503

12,039

1.4 %

- 3.7 %

24,323

24,058

6.4 %

- 1.1 %

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

11,549

11,260

11,969

- 4 %

-2.5%

6.3%

25,804

29,603

32,423

7.3 %

14.7%

9.5%

Page 247: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

60

DIVERSE POPULATIONS LEARNING NEEDS MEASURE D:

Unduplicated Headcount in English as a Second Language (ESL)

Description/Definition—The number of individuals enrolled in English as a Second Language (ESL) programs in North Carolina Community Colleges.

Methodology and Data Source—Enrollment data on English as a Second Language are collected and reported annually by the North Carolina Community College System Office. Source of the data is the Data Warehouse.

Performance Target—By 2001, increase the enrollment in English as a Second Language programs by 10 percent.

Results—Total number of students served by ESL program was 35,191, which increased by 0.1 percent from 2007-08 to 2008-09.

UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT IN ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE (ESL)

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

YEAR UNDUPLICATED ENROLLMENT % INCREASE

2004-05

2005-06

36,883

35,258

0.4%

-4.4%

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

37,272

35,154

35,191

5.7%

-5.7%

0.1%

Page 248: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

UNDUPLICATED ENROLLMENT IN ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE, 2008-2009

Source: Data Warehouse 61

Alamance CC 4,297 81 160 112 94 157 118 722Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 66 111 135 180 174 153 819Beaufort County CC 1,905 2 19 35 42 37 24 159Bladen CC 1,537 3 3 9 22 6 10 53Blue Ridge CC 2,275 41 167 116 100 98 122 644Brunswick CC 1,752 10 18 34 54 15 27 158Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 19 41 34 78 48 92 312Cape Fear CC 7,862 62 55 167 198 131 150 763Carteret CC 1,835 4 43 25 17 21 7 117Catawba Valley CC 4,751 57 97 148 233 146 200 881Central Carolina CC 5,340 113 226 461 455 270 295 1,820Central Piedmont CC 15,324 199 313 898 1,295 1,023 1,057 4,785Cleveland CC 3,203 7 10 25 29 34 44 149Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 11 60 42 24 41 42 220College of The Albemarle 2,448 28 55 64 66 23 34 270Craven CC 2,891 26 43 56 87 49 67 328Davidson County CC 4,067 8 34 46 71 75 126 360Durham TCC 4,860 80 564 419 326 471 675 2,535Edgecombe CC 2,439 5 6 16 17 10 8 62Fayetteville TCC 11,018 28 71 133 159 165 231 787Forsyth TCC 7,466 151 163 319 582 273 527 2,015Gaston College 5,240 39 35 95 117 120 182 588Guilford TCC 10,908 461 228 473 502 388 769 2,821Halifax CC 1,650 5 5 4 5 2 2 23Haywood CC 1,947 7 19 29 15 11 9 90Isothermal CC 2,386 9 13 42 67 44 60 235James Sprunt CC 1,399 16 20 37 64 7 12 156Johnston CC 4,391 29 59 75 91 66 77 397Lenoir CC 3,655 45 46 77 116 43 45 372Martin CC 893 5 10 14 28 7 5 69Mayland CC 1,942 10 26 35 27 18 46 162McDowell TCC 1,481 2 9 26 34 18 38 127Mitchell CC 2,696 38 92 132 129 114 177 682Montgomery CC 1,002 3 16 29 36 29 38 151Nash CC 2,652 14 21 23 42 37 67 204Pamlico CC 633 1 1 4 10 7 23Piedmont CC 2,762 9 13 31 37 19 5 114Pitt CC 6,459 43 45 84 91 66 52 381Randolph CC 2,581 8 31 46 97 99 132 413Richmond CC 2,171 9 19 72 107 43 78 328Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 16 5 5 5 3 3 37Robeson CC 3,742 32 36 111 151 29 16 375Rockingham CC 2,158 3 13 23 51 10 10 110Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 105 132 173 178 112 68 768Sampson CC 1,927 5 9 48 34 25 29 150Sandhills CC 3,928 11 24 79 69 56 77 316South Piedmont CC 2,528 32 83 191 306 223 188 1,023Southeastern CC 2,575 7 9 17 12 1 14 60Southwestern CC 2,462 28 49 112 145 60 42 436Stanly CC 2,683 8 11 53 64 18 10 164Surry CC 3,495 25 54 78 111 50 63 381Tri-County CC 1,158 2 10 9 3 15 39Vance-Granville CC 4,543 23 52 33 39 29 15 191Wake TCC 13,650 1,609 596 555 566 620 481 4,427Wayne CC 3,615 33 29 77 140 48 95 422Western Piedmont CC 3,334 55 70 65 64 30 32 316Wilkes CC 3,042 18 34 51 56 44 49 252Wilson TCC 2,144 22 83 101 115 60 48 429

System Totals 221,096 3,788 4,255 6,401 7,853 5,829 7,065 35,191

HIGH BEGINNINGINSTITUTION

SYSTEM FTE

ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGEBEGINNING LITERACY

LOW BEGINNING

INTERMEDIATE LOW

INTERMEDIATE HIGH ADVANCED TOTAL

Page 249: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

62

DIVERSE POPULATIONS LEARNING NEEDS MEASURE E:

Number of Under-Represented Students Enrolled Per Category

Definition/Description— This measure is intended to examine the enrollment of under-represented students in community college programs. Methodology and Data Source—Source of the data for this measure is the Curriculum, Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) files maintained by the System Office. For 2008-09, percentage of each ethnicity group in the total North Carolina population was analyzed based on American Community Survey (Table, B02001), American Fact Finder (U.S. Census Bureau) and 2006-2008 American Community Survey 3-Year Estimates: Data Profile Highlights. Performance Target— Identify populations under-represented in community college programs and increase their enrollment by 10 percent. Results— In 2008-2009, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity group was consistently under-represented in the Curriculum programs as well as Occupational Extension programs, except in the Basic Skills programs, where Hispanics were disproportionately over-represented (23.1%). Asian/Pacific Islander was also over-represented in the Basic Skills program. African-Americans were over-represented in the Basic Skills and HRD programs, while Whites were under-represented in the both programs. Overall pattern of ethnic representation in each category was by and large the same as last year’s.

PERCENT ENROLLMENT OF EACH ETHNICITY GROUP PER CATEGORY

ETHNICITY GROUP

ASIAN/ PACIFIC

ISLANDER

BLACK

HISPANIC/

LATINO

AMERICAN

INDIAN

OTHER

WHITE

% of NC Population*** 1.9% 21.6% 7.4% 1.3% 3.9% 70.3%

Curriculum Associate Certificate Diploma Transitional

2.2% 27.0% 3.8%* 1.6% 4.5% 61.0% 1.6% 26.8% 3.6%* 1.3% 3.7% 62.9% 1.5% 27.7% 2.9%* 1.6% 3.1% 63.3% 2.0% 18.2% 4.4% 1.2% 4.1% 70.1%

Continuing Ed Basic Skills Occupational Extension HRD

3.9%** 32.6%** 23.1%** 1.8% 2.3%* 36.4%* 1.1% 19.2% 3.1%* 1.5% 2.0%* 73.1% 0.9% 41.6%** 4.6% 1.8% 2.0%* 49.1%*

*Under-represented compared to the percentage of its ethnic group in NC total population. **Over-represented compared to the percentage of its ethnic group in NC total population. *** Total percentage of each race/ethnic group exceeds 100% due to the categorization of Hispanic/Latino, which includes two or more races.

Page 250: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

63

DIVERSE POPULATIONS LEARNING NEEDS MEASURE F:

Percentage of Students Receiving Financial Aid and Amount of Aid Compared With Cost of Attendance

Description/Definition—The percentage of curriculum students enrolled in award granting programs who receive some type of financial aid and the average amount of that aid compared with the cost of attendance. For purposes of this measure, cost of attendance includes tuition and fees, books and supplies, and other expenses.

Methodology and Data Source—Beginning 2002-03, data were collected by the System Office and stored in Data Warehouse. Thus the number of curriculum students receiving financial aid and the average amount received were based on the information from the Data Warehouse.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been set for this measure.

Results—Number of students receiving financial aid in 2008-09 increased by 15,527 (15.4%) over last year’s figure. The average amount of aid received also increased by $335.

Page 251: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

64

NUMBER AND PERCENT OF CURRICULUM STUDENTS RECEIVING FINANCIAL AID NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

YEAR NUMBER OF CURRICULUM STUDENTS RECEIVING

FINANCIAL AID*

PERCENT OF CURRICULUM STUDENTS RECEIVING

FINANCIAL AID*

AVERAGE DOLLAR VALUE

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

154,922

128,429

108,065

56.5%

47.8%

51.2%

$1,726

$2,044

$2,372

2007-08

2008-09

100,683

116,210

45.4%

47.4%

$2,955

$3,290

* Number and percent based on number of curriculum students enrolled in associate degree, diplomaand certificate granting programs. Students enrolled in transitional programs (special credit, dualenrollment and Huskins Bill) are not eligible for financial aid.

Page 252: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

65

DIVERSE POPULATIONS LEARNING NEEDS MEASURE G:

Percentage of the Adult Population in Service Area Enrolled

Description/Definition—Percentage of the adult population in each college's service area enrolled in either curriculum or continuing education.

Methodology and Data Source— An unduplicated headcount for each college is determined from the curriculum and continuing education registration data files. The service area population data are derived from population statistics available from the State Demographers office. The population data are for individuals 18 years or older.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been set for this measure.

Results—Percentage of adult population served slightly increased from 12.14 percent in 2007-08 to 12.19 percent in 2008-09. The enrollment figure in 2008-09 increased by 30,273 (3.65 %) over 2007-08.

PERCENT OF ADULT POPULATION IN SERVICE AREA ENROLLED PER COLLEGE (STATE AVERAGE)

YEAR % OF SERVICE AREA

POPULATION ENROLLED (SYSTEM AVERAGE)

2004-05

2005-06

12.34%

12.18%

2006-07 12.05%

2007-08

2008-09

12.14%

12.19%

Page 253: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERCENT OF ADULT POPULATION IN SERVICE AREA ENROLLED, 2008-2009

66

INSTITUTIONTOTAL

FTEANNUAL

ENROLLMENTSERVICE AREA

18 & UP PERCENTAGE

Alamance CC 4,297 16,394 111,791 14.66%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 27,080 195,998 13.82%Beaufort County CC 1,905 7,490 53,839 13.91%Bladen CC 1,537 4,892 24,334 20.10%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 15,386 107,160 14.36%Brunswick CC 1,752 7,970 81,716 9.75%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 15,733 100,647 15.63%Cape Fear CC 7,862 27,909 192,429 14.50%Carteret CC 1,835 8,288 51,587 16.07%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 21,087 146,690 14.38%Central Carolina CC 5,340 20,578 171,447 12.00%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 62,522 648,801 9.64%Cleveland CC 3,203 11,708 74,768 15.66%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 24,046 125,691 19.13%College of the Albemarle 2,448 10,669 116,143 9.19%Craven CC 2,891 16,733 71,804 23.30%Davidson County CC 4,067 17,179 154,314 11.13%Durham TCC 4,860 25,810 299,534 8.62%Edgecombe CC 2,439 10,095 38,583 26.16%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 38,468 226,270 17.00%Forsyth TCC 7,466 33,805 296,462 11.40%Gaston College 5,240 23,718 213,090 11.13%Guilford TCC 10,908 41,524 358,083 11.60%Halifax CC 1,650 7,766 58,669 13.24%Haywood CC 1,947 7,564 45,975 16.45%Isothermal CC 2,386 10,923 64,405 16.96%James Sprunt CC 1,399 8,759 39,568 22.14%Johnston CC 4,391 17,616 120,530 14.62%Lenoir CC 3,655 14,737 68,033 21.66%Martin CC 893 4,258 43,637 9.76%Mayland CC 1,942 6,698 42,894 15.62%McDowell TCC 1,481 7,911 34,847 22.70%Mitchell CC 2,696 13,217 116,776 11.32%Montgomery CC 1,002 4,832 20,830 23.20%Nash CC 2,652 11,488 71,252 16.12%Pamlico CC 633 1,843 10,626 17.34%Piedmont CC 2,762 9,142 47,680 19.17%Pitt CC 6,459 20,222 118,764 17.03%Randolph CC 2,581 12,320 107,548 11.46%Richmond CC 2,171 7,868 62,627 12.56%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 3,742 50,412 7.42%Robeson CC 3,742 13,492 93,649 14.41%Rockingham CC 2,158 10,027 71,240 14.07%Rowan Cabarrus CC 5,760 22,914 233,570 9.81%Sampson CC 1,927 7,944 48,848 16.26%Sandhills CC 3,928 12,916 98,451 13.12%South Piedmont CC 2,528 12,338 160,557 7.68%Southeastern CC 2,575 10,177 41,363 24.60%Southwestern CC 2,462 9,051 68,183 13.27%Stanly CC 2,683 9,705 46,025 21.09%Surry CC 3,495 12,632 85,830 14.72%Tri-County CC 1,158 4,677 36,785 12.71%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 16,598 135,833 12.22%Wake TCC 13,650 61,276 647,729 9.46%Wayne CC 3,615 13,790 86,106 16.02%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 13,638 69,489 19.63%Wilkes CC 3,042 12,502 82,648 15.13%Wilson CC 2,144 10,874 59,383 18.31%

System Total 221,096 859,419 7,051,943 12.19%

Page 254: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

67

DIVERSE POPULATIONS LEARNING NEEDS MEASURE H:

Goal Completion for Completers

Description/Definition—The proportion of graduates of certificate, diploma, and degree programs who report that their primary goal in attending has been met.

Methodology and Data Source—Data are collected by a survey, with each college using a standard set of questions. A response rate of 50% is suggested, and a minimum of 15 respondents will be required to report the data at the institutional level.

Performance Standard—Performance standard for percent of completers who achieve their goal is 95 percent.

Results—In 2008-2009, 56 community colleges met the performance standard. The system average of percent achieving their goal was 99 percent.

Page 255: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERCENT OF COMPLETERS WHO REPORT MEETING THEIR GOAL FOR ATTENDING A COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 2008-2009

68

INSTITUTION TOTAL FTENUMBER OF RESPONSES

PERCENT ACHIEVED

GOAL

Alamance CC 4,297 209 100%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483 347 100%Beaufort County CC 1,905 157 100%Bladen CC 1,537 73 100%Blue Ridge CC 2,275 105 100%Brunswick CC 1,752 81 99%Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 278 98%Cape Fear CC 7,862 969 99%Carteret CC 1,835 144 100%Catawba Valley CC 4,751 642 100%Central Carolina CC 5,340 375 99%Central Piedmont CC 15,324 448 100%Cleveland CC 3,203 70 100%Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 597 100%College of The Albemarle 2,448 223 97%Craven CC 2,891 49 100%Davidson County CC 4,067 270 100%Durham TCC 4,860 222 100%Edgecombe CC 2,439 321 99%Fayetteville TCC 11,018 626 100%Forsyth TCC 7,466 361 99%Gaston College 5,240 608 100%Guilford TCC 10,908 980 100%Halifax CC 1,650 136 99%Haywood CC 1,947 225 100%Isothermal CC 2,386 150 100%James Sprunt CC 1,399 73 93%Johnston CC 4,391 345 99%Lenoir CC 3,655 199 95%Martin CC 893 45 98%Mayland CC 1,942 261 100%McDowell TCC 1,481 192 100%Mitchell CC 2,696 159 100%Montgomery CC 1,002 61 100%Nash CC 2,652 172 100%Pamlico CC 633 49 100%Piedmont CC 2,762 179 99%Pitt CC 6,459 650 99%Randolph CC 2,581 139 99%Richmond CC 2,171 220 99%Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 109 98%Robeson CC 3,742 218 100%Rockingham CC 2,158 208 100%Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,760 221 99%Sampson CC 1,927 143 100%Sandhills CC 3,928 313 100%South Piedmont CC 2,528 181 99%Southeastern CC 2,575 193 100%Southwestern CC 2,462 144 100%Stanly CC 2,683 73 92%Surry CC 3,495 197 100%Tri-County CC 1,158 115 100%Vance-Granville CC 4,543 236 100%Wake TCC 13,650 535 100%Wayne CC 3,615 419 100%Western Piedmont CC 3,334 292 100%Wilkes CC 3,042 189 100%Wilson CC 2,144 157 100%

System Total 221,096 15,353 99%

Page 256: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

69

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR IV: RESOURCES

For any institution, educational or industrial, there is a critical mass of resources necessary for the organization to perform at an optimal level. When resources fall below this critical mass level, or when increased demand outstrips available resources, performance declines and quality suffers. The level of resources can be thought of as an indicator of the health of an organization.

An examination of the colleges' resources will indicate the capability of the institutions in providing quality educational programs. Whereas resources alone do not guarantee that a quality education will be delivered, without appropriate resources, a college cannot provide students with an adequate learning experience.

The measures selected as indicators of the health of the System and the colleges as determined by resources are:

A. Percentage of College Libraries Meeting ALA Standards

B. Total Dollar Amount of Budget Transfers Between Program Areas Made by CommunityColleges

C. Average Nine-Month Faculty Salaries as a Percentage of the SREB Average

D. Retention Rate for Full-Time Faculty With Less Than Five Years of Experience

E. Number of Faculty and Staff Participating in Professional Development Activities

F. Percentage of Facilities Meeting the "Satisfactory" Building Condition

G. Ratio of Occupational Extension FTE Dollar Allotment to Curriculum FTE DollarAllotment

Page 257: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

70

RESOURCES MEASURE A: Percentage of College Libraries Meeting the ALA Standards

Description/Definition— The percentage of colleges meeting the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) standards for community, junior and technical colleges. Specifically, this measure looks at percentage meeting the standards for number of book titles, serial subscriptions, expenditure minus salaries per FTE, library staff, and square footage.

Methodology and Data Source—Library data have been collected by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) in odd numbered year. The data were published in the Statistical Abstract of Higher Education in North Carolina, an annual publication of the UNC-General Administration. Data available from this publication were then compared with the standards set by the ACRL to determine which colleges meet the standards. It should be noted that the ACRL standards vary based on FTE of the college.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been set for this measure.

Results— Library data for 2008-09 were not available at the time of 2010 CSF publication. However, historical data showed that most colleges didn’t meet the measures and a handful of colleges met only minimum level of ACRL standard in the past. This raises serious concerns about under-funding of the community college libraries in North Carolina, and its conditions.

LEARNING RESOURCE CENTERS: COMPLIANCE WITH ACRL STANDARDS, 2006-07

MEASURE BELOW STANDARD

MINIMUM LEVEL

EXCELLENT LEVEL

# % # % # %

# of Books (Paper Volumes)

48 83% 7 12% 3 5%

Serial Subscriptions 53 91% 4 7% 1 2%

Expenditure Minus Salaries per FTE 54 93% 4 7% 0 0%

Library Staff 55 95% 3 5% 0 0%

Square Footage 58 100% 0 0% 0 0%

Page 258: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

71

RESOURCES MEASURE B: Total Dollar Amount of Budget Transfers Between Program Areas Made by Community Colleges

Description/Definition—Purpose of this measure is to serve as an indicator of the effectiveness of the resource allocation model being used by the North Carolina Community College System. The measure is simply the total dollar amount of budget transfers across program areas made by the community colleges.

Methodology and Data Source—Source of the data were the budget accounting records maintained by the Business and Finance Division of the North Carolina Community College System Office. The total dollar amount transferred was calculated by the Business and Finance Division by comparing the initial allocation of funds with final expenditures.

Performance Target—No performance target was set for this measure.

Results—In 2008-09, a total of $3,122,911 were transferred into instructional funds. This transfer figure reflects an amount equal to 0.5 percent of the total curriculum and continuing education instructional salaries and fringe benefits that transferred from other programs.

YEAR TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT

OF TRANSFER BETWEEN PROGRAM AREAS

2004-05

2005-06

$3,590,801

$11,028

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

$9,813

$1,754,355

$3,122,911

Page 259: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

72

RESOURCES MEASURE C: Average Nine-Month Faculty Salary as a Percentage of the SREB Average

Description/Definition— The nine-month average faculty salary for full-time curriculum faculty compared with the nine-month average faculty salary for full-time curriculum faculty at public, two-year institutions in the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) states. To allow comparisons across states, a nine-month salary figure is calculated for full-time curriculum faculty based on a computed nine-month salary.

Methodology and Data Source—Source of the North Carolina community college faculty salaries was the fall staff data file submitted annually by each college. Total monthly salary for each full-time curriculum faculty was selected from the college data files. A nine-month salary for each full-time faculty was then calculated by multiplying the total monthly salary by 9. An average nine-month salary was then calculated for the college and the System. The SREB nine-month average salary was obtained from an annual publication titled SREB (Southern Regional Education Board) Data Exchange. The average nine-month faculty salary was presented by state and an overall SREB average was calculated and presented.

This measure also presents data on the ranking of North Carolina among the 16 SREB states in faculty salaries and calculates the percentage of North Carolina faculty salaries as a function of the SREB average nine-month faculty salary.

Performance Target—By 2001, increase the average nine-month salaries of full-time curriculum faculty and staff to 83.3 percent of the SREB average.

Results—In 2008-09, the average nine-month salary of full-time curriculum faculty was $47,594 as compared to the SREB average of $51,452. It was 92.5 percent of the SREB average. The performance target of 83.3 percent of SREB average was achieved, and the SREB rank improved to be 11th in 2008-09.

Page 260: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

73

AVERAGE 9-MONTH SALARY OF FULL-TIME CURRICULUM FACULTY AT TWO-YEAR PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS: A COMPARISON OF NORTH CAROLINA

TO THE SREB AVERAGE, FROM 2004-05 TO 2008-2009

ACADEMIC YEAR

NC 9-MONTH SREB

AVERAGE SREB

AVERAGE SREB RANK % of SREB AVERAGE

2004-05

2005-06

$40,162

$41,517

$45,248

$46,732

15*

15*

88.8%

88.8%

2006-07 $44,008 $48,440 15* 90.9%

2007-08

2008-09

$46,253

$47,594

$50,191

$51,452

12*

11*

92.2%

92.5%

* Ranking of 16 Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) states.Delaware became the 16th state to join SREB.

Page 261: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

74

RESOURCES MEASURE D: Retention Rate for Full-Time Faculty With Less Than

Five Years of Experience

Definition/Description— The number and percentage of full-time faculty with less than five years of experience who are retained the following year. Methodology and Data Source— Source of data for this measure was the fall staff data file submitted annually by each college. A subset of the data file was created which contained data on all full-time faculty members with less than five years of experience. This data file was then compared with the fall staff data file for the following year to determine the number and percentage of full-time faculty with less than five years of experience that were retained. Performance Target— By 2001, increase by 5 percent the year-to-year retention of full-time faculty with less than five years of experience. Results—The retention rate of faculty with less than five years of experience increased by 1.1% from 90.6% in 2007-2008 to 91.7% in 2008-2009.

RETENTION RATE FOR FULL-TIME FACULTY WITH LESS THAN FIVE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

YEAR

TOTAL NUMBER OF FACULTY WITH LESS THAN FIVE YEARS EXPERIENCE

NUMBER WHO ARE RETAINED

PERCENT

RETAINED

2004-2005

2005-2006

1,674

2,319

1,531

2,101

91.5%

90.6%

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2,286

1,931

1,773

2,102

1,750

1,626

91.9%

90.6%

91.7%

Page 262: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

75

RESOURCES MEASURE E: Number of Faculty and Staff Participating in Professional Development Activities

Definition/Description— The number of faculty and staff who participate in TIER A funded professional development activities.

Methodology and Data Source— The data were collected annually by the Academic and Student Services Division of the North Carolina Community College System Office. The data were submitted annually by the colleges to the System Office as a requirement for receiving TIER A professional development funds.

Performance Target— By 2001, to increase the participation of faculty and staff in professional development programs by 10%.

Results—In 2008-2009, 1,902 faculty and staff participated in TIER A sponsored professional development activities, which was an 14.7 percent increase from last year’s figure.

NUMBER OF FACULTY & STAFF PARTICIPATING IN TIER A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

YEAR # OF FACULTY & STAFF PARTICIPATING

% INCREASE

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2,383

2,692

2,568

1,658

1,902

- 2.6 %

13 %

-4.6%

-35.4%

14.7%

Page 263: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

NUMBER OF FACULTY AND STAFF PARTICIPATING IN TIER A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 2008-2009

76

INSTITUTIONTOTAL

FTENUMBER OF

FACULTY & STAFF

Alamance CC 4,297 260Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,483Beaufort County CC 1,905Bladen CC 1,537Blue Ridge CC 2,275Brunswick CC 1,752 6Caldwell CC & TI 4,212 7Cape Fear CC 7,862Carteret CC 1,835 12Catawba Valley CC 4,751 16Central Carolina CC 5,340Central Piedmont CC 15,324 20Cleveland CC 3,203 5Coastal Carolina CC 4,595 6College of the Albemarle 2,448 6Craven CC 2,891 207Davidson County CC 4,067 12Durham TCC 4,860 6Edgecombe CC 2,439 12Fayetteville TCC 11,018 455Forsyth TCC 7,466 26Gaston College 5,240 4Guilford TCC 10,908 64Halifax CC 1,650 7Haywood CC 1,947 10Isothermal CC 2,386 6James Sprunt CC 1,399 6Johnston CC 4,391 96Lenoir CC 3,655 50Martin CC 893Mayland CC 1,942 21McDowell TCC 1,481 74Mitchell CC 2,696 27Montgomery CC 1,002 19Nash CC 2,652 12Pamlico CC 633 16Piedmont CC 2,762 19Pitt CC 6,459 1Randolph CC 2,581 15Richmond CC 2,171 4Roanoke-Chowan CC 946 103Robeson CC 3,742 1Rockingham CC 2,158 36Rowan Cabarrus CC 5,760 24Sampson CC 1,927 14Sandhills CC 3,928 21South Piedmont CC 2,528 38Southeastern CC 2,575 24Southwestern CC 2,462 5Stanly CC 2,683 12Surry CC 3,495 12Tri-County CC 1,158 22Vance-Granville CC 4,543 9Wake TCC 13,650 0Wayne CC 3,615 47Western Piedmont CC 3,334 2Wilkes CC 3,042 21Wilson CC 2,144 4

System Total 221,096 1,902

Page 264: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

77

RESOURCES MEASURE F: Percentage of Facilities Meeting the "Satisfactory" Building Condition

Definition/Description—Percentage of community college facilities that meet "satisfactory" building conditions as measured in the Annual Facilities Inventory and Utilization Study. "Satisfactory" is defined as the facility is suitable for continued use with normal maintenance.

Methodology and Data Source—Data were collected from the colleges and analyzed annually by the Higher Education Facilities Commission housed at UNC-General Administration. The rating of facilities as "satisfactory" was done by the individual colleges. The measure was the percentage of all facilities that meet the satisfactory building condition.

Performance Target—By 2001, improve by 10 percent the statewide percentage of facilities meeting "satisfactory" building conditions, as measured in the Annual Facilities Inventory and Utilization Study.

Results— In 2008-09, 88.1 percent of statewide facilities met the "satisfactory" building conditions, which was 0.8 percent decrease from last year’s figure.

PERCENT OF STATEWIDE FACILITIES MEETING “SATISFACTORY” BUILDING CONDITIONS

YEAR % MEETING “SATISFACTORY”

% INCREASE

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

89.0 %

89.5 %

88.1%

0.3 %

0.5 %

-1.4%

2007-08

2008-09

88.9%

88.1%

0.8%

-0.8%

Page 265: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

78

RESOURCES MEASURE G: Ratio of Occupational Extension FTE Dollar Allotment to Curriculum FTE Dollar Allotment

Description/Definition—Ratio of dollars allocated per occupational extension FTE to dollars allocated per curriculum FTE generated by community colleges.

Methodology and Data Source—Source of the data was the Business and Finance Division of the North Carolina Community College System Office. The measure was simply a ratio comparing the dollar value of an occupational extension FTE to the dollar value of a curriculum FTE.

Performance Target—By the year 2000, to increase the funding level of occupational extension offerings to that of curriculum programs.

Results—In 2008-2009, the ratio of the occupational extension FTE dollar allotment (total requirement) to the curriculum FTE dollar allotment was 1 to 1.147 (1:1.147), meaning that for every dollar generated by an occupational extension FTE, $1.15 was generated by a curriculum FTE.

Page 266: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

79

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR V: TECHNOLOGY

The application of technology to education represents a critical factor in the success of community colleges meeting the education and training needs of the citizens of North Carolina. Whether it is to meet the demands of employers for workers with the latest high-tech skills or to meet the growing demand for education and training from people throughout the state, the community colleges must continue to integrate technology into the way programs are delivered and upgrade faculty on the uses of the new technology.

In order to meet the challenges of the technological challenges of the future, the community college system must focus on three areas. First, the technological infrastructure that supports the delivery of instruction must be fully developed. Second, faculty must be trained in the use of the new technologies. Third, courses and programs that can be delivered by way of these new technologies must be developed and made available.

The measures comprising the critical success factor of technology are:

A. Curriculum Unduplicated Headcount by Course Method of Instruction

B. Number of Colleges Connected to the North Carolina Information Highway

C. Number of Colleges Possessing the FCC License for Wireless Cable Systems

D. Number of Courses and Programs Offered via Tele-course, Wireless Cable Systems, theInternet, Two-Way Video, etc.

E. Number of Courses Offered Through the NC Virtual Learning Community

Page 267: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

80

TECHNOLOGY MEASURE A: Curriculum Unduplicated Headcounts by

Course Method of Instruction

Description/Definition— Unduplicated curriculum headcount of students taking only distance learning courses, taking a combination of distance learning and traditional methods of instruction courses, taking only traditional courses, and unknown. The numbers are curriculum courses only, for this type of information on continuing education doesn’t exist. Methodology and Data Source—Data were maintained by the Data Warehouse at the System Office utilizing curriculum student registration files submitted by colleges each year. The analysis was done by Research and Performance Management section, President’s Office at the North Carolina Community College System Office. Performance Target—No specific performance target for number of curriculum students taking distance education or traditional courses has been set. Results— In 2008-09, 43,811 students enrolled in one or more distance learning courses, which represented 24% increase over 2007-08 figure. The same trend was shown in the courses of a combination of distance and traditional education; 120,538 students enrolled in a combination of the two types of courses, which was a 24% increase over last year. Enrollment in the traditional courses only has decreased by 4.6% in 2008-09: 143,227.

CURRICULUM UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY COURSE METHOD OF INSTRUCTION, FROM 2004-05 TO 2008-09

Academic Year

Distance Learning

Only

Distance and Traditional

Traditional

Only

Unknown

2004-05

2005-06

22,795

31,769

74,543

82,726

169,584 146,690

7,501

7,236

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

27,268

35,299

43,811

76,137

97,017

120,538

156,249 150,125 143,227

36,875

4,774

3,413

Page 268: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

81

TECHNOLOGY MEASURE B: Number of Colleges Connected to the North Carolina Information Highway

Description/Definition— This measure provides information on the number of community colleges connected to the North Carolina Information Highway.

Methodology and Data Source—Data on the number of colleges connected to the North Carolina Information Highway were maintained by Learning Technology Systems section in the Technology and Workforce Development Division of the North Carolina Community College System Office.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been set for this measure.

Results—In 2008-09, all community colleges now have an access to video conference services and/or participate in North Carolina Information Highway (NCIH) – either as full video service sites, per event subscribers, or via a local NCREN site: A total of 115 sites across the state.

Page 269: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

82

TECHNOLOGY MEASURE C: Number of Colleges Possessing the FCC License for Wireless Cable Systems

Description/Definition— This measure is a count of the number of colleges that have been granted a license for wireless cable systems. The measure supports objectives in the 1999-2001 Strategic Plan to increase by 10 percent the number of education and training opportunities available through alternate delivery systems.

Community colleges have applied to the FCC (Federal Communication Commission) for wireless cable or ITFS (Instructional Television Fixed Service) licenses. ITFS is now called EBS (Educational Broadband Service).

Methodology and Data Source— The Learning Technology Systems section in the Technology and Workforce Development Division at the North Carolina Community College System Office maintained the data on the number of colleges who have been granted a license for wireless cable systems.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been set for this measure.

Results— In 2008-2009, 34 colleges have FCC Educational Broadband Service (EBS) licenses.

Page 270: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

83

TECHNOLOGY MEASURE D: Number of Courses and Programs Offered via

Tele-course, Wireless Cable, the Internet, Two-Way Video, etc.

Description/Definition—Number of courses and programs offered and enrollment in courses and programs offered through tele-courses, wireless cable, the Internet, two-way video, and other alternate delivery systems. The measure supports the objective in the 1999-2001 Strategic Plan to increase by 10 percent the number of education and training opportunities available through alternate delivery systems. Methodology and Data Source— Data were maintained by the Data Warehouse at the System Office utilizing ICR (Institution Class Reporting)/FTE files submitted by colleges each year. The analysis was done by Research and Performance Management section, President’s Office. Performance Target—By 2001, an increase by 10 percent the number of education and training opportunities available through alternate delivery systems. Results— In 2008-2009, enrollment in the curriculum and con-ed distance education courses totaled 356,046 students, which was a 16.6 percent decrease from last year. The table below gives the enrollment figure by method of delivery.

ENROLLMENT IN DISTANCE LEARNING COURSES, 2008-2009 NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

DELIVERY MODE

CURRICULUM

CONTINUING EDUCATION

Telecourses & Teleweb courses 4,691 361 Internet Courses 131,688 57,254 Two-Way Video Courses (NC Information Highway)

7,472 1

Hybrid Courses (Blendid online and face-to-face)

59,061 12,511

Web Supported or Web-Assisted Digital Media

71,706

370

5,683

19

Other Courses 236 4,993 Total 275,224 80,822

Page 271: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

84

TECHNOLOGY MEASURE E: Number of Courses Offered Through the NC Virtual Learning Community

Description/Definition—Number of courses offered through the NC Virtual Learning Community. These are courses that have been developed by and accepted for use in the NC Virtual Learning Community.

Methodology and Data Source—The Learning Technology Systems section in the Technology and Workforce Development Division of the North Carolina Community College System Office maintained data on the courses offered through the NC Virtual Learning Community.

Performance Target—No specific performance target level for number of courses offered by NC Virtual Learning Community has been set.

Results— In 2008-2009, 248 curriculum and 38 continuing education courses had been offered through the NC Virtual Learning Community.

Page 272: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 273: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Published July 2010North Carolina Community College System

120 Copies of this document were printed at a cost of $142.80 or $1.19 per copy

Equal Opportunity Employer

Page 274: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

North Carolina Community College SystemResearch and Performance Management

June 2009

2009

CRITICAL

SUCCESS

FACTORS

FOR THE

NORTH CAROLINACOMMUNITY COLLEGESYSTEM

Twentieth Annual Report

Page 275: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 276: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

2009 CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS

FOR THE

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

Twentieth Annual Report

June 2009

Published by

North Carolina Community College System

Dr. R. Scott Ralls, President

Kennon D. Briggs

Executive Vice President & Chief of Staff

Research and Performance Management

J. Keith Brown

Associate Vice President

Dr. Soyoung C. Yim

Research Projects Coordinator

Vivian Barrett

Office Assistant

NC Community College System • Caswell Building • 200 W. Jones Street • Raleigh, NC

Telephone: 919/807-7100 • Fax: 919/807-7164

Page 277: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 278: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

iii

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1

Core Indicators of Success .............................................................................................................................. 1

System Strategic Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 1

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS MATRIX ............................................................................................. 3

FACTOR I: CORE INDICATORS OF STUDENT SUCCESS ................................................................ 5

Measure A: Progress of Basic Skills Students ................................................................................................ 6

Measure B: Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations ....................................................... 8

Measure C: Performance of College Transfer Students ................................................................................ 20

Measure D: Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses ............................................................... 22

Measure E: Success Rate of Developmental Students in Subsequent College-Level Courses...................... 24

Measure F: Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-Completers ........................................................ 26

Measure G: Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation and Transfer .......................................................... 28

Measure H: Client Satisfaction with Customized Training…………………………………………………30

Summary of Core Indicators of Success ....................................................................................................... 32

EVALUATION OF PROGRESS ............................................................................................................... 37

FACTOR II: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................... 39

Measure A: Percentage of Employers Satisfied with NCCCS Training Programs ....................................... 40

Measure B: Percentage of College Tech Prep Students Enrolling in a Community College ........................ 45

Measure C: Number of Employers and Trainees Served by Small Business Centers and

Customized Training Programs (NEIT, FIT, and CIT) .…………………………………………………... 47

Measure D: Employment Status of Graduates …………………………………………………………….50

Measure E: Employer Satisfaction with Graduates ……………………………………………………….53

Page 279: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

iv

FACTOR III: DIVERSE POPULATIONS’ LEARNING NEEDS.........................................................55

Measure A: Number and Percentage of Dropouts Annually Served by Basic Skills Programs ....................56

Measure B: Number of GEDs and AHSDs Awarded Compared to the Number of Dropouts

Statewide .......................................................................................................................................................58

Measure C: Percentage of Basic Skills Students and Recent High School Graduates Enrolling in a

Community College .......................................................................................................................................60

Measure D: Unduplicated Headcount in English as a Second Language (ESL) ...........................................62

Measure E: Number of Under-Represented Students Enrolled per Category ...............................................64

Measure F: Percentage of Students Receiving Financial Aid and Amount of Aid Compared with

Cost of Attendance ........................................................................................................................................65

Measure G: Percentage of Adult Population in Service Area Enrolled ........................................................67

Measure H: Goal Completion for Completers ……………………………………………………………..69

FACTOR IV: RESOURCES .....................................................................................................................71

Measure A: Percentage of College Libraries Meeting the ALA Standards ...................................................72

Measure B: Total Dollar Amount of Budget Transfers Between Program Areas Made by

Community Colleges......................................................................................................................................73

Measure C: Average Nine-Month Faculty Salaries as a Percentage of SREB Average ................................74

Measure D: Retention Rate for Full-Time Faculty with less than Five Years of Experience ........................76

Measure E: Number of Faculty and Staff Participating in Professional Development Activities .................77

Measure F: Percentage of Facilities Meeting the “Satisfactory” Building Condition ...................................79

Measure G: Ratio of Occupational Extension FTE Dollar Allotment to Curriculum FTE Dollar

Allotment .......................................................................................................................................................80

FACTOR V: TECHNOLOGY ..................................................................................................................81

Measure A: Curriculum Unduplicated Headcount by Course Method of Instruction ...................................82

Measure B: Number of Colleges Connected to the North Carolina Information Highway ...........................83

Measure C: Number of Colleges Possessing the FCC License for Wireless Cable Systems ........................84

Measure D: Number of Courses and Programs Offered Via Telecourse, Wireless Cable, the Internet,

Two-Way Video, etc. .....................................................................................................................................85

Measure E: Number of Courses Offered through the NC Virtual Learning Community ..............................86

Page 280: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR THE

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

Twentieth Annual Report

INTRODUCTION

First mandated by the North Carolina General Assembly in 1989 (S.L. 1989; C. 752; S. 80),

the Critical Success Factors report has evolved into the major accountability document for

the North Carolina Community College System. This twentieth annual report on the critical

success factors is the result of a process undertaken to streamline and simplify accountability

reporting by the community college system. The purpose of this report is twofold. First, this

document is the means by which the community college system reports on performance

measures, referred to as core indicators of success, for purposes of accountability and

performance funding. Second, this document serves as an evaluation instrument for the

System Strategic Plan.

Core Indicators of Success

In February 1999, the North Carolina State Board of Community Colleges adopted 12

performance measures for accountability. This action was taken in response to a mandate

from the North Carolina General Assembly to review past performance measures and define

standards of performance to ensure programs and services offered by community colleges in

North Carolina were of sufficient quality. In the 2007 Session, the General Assembly

approved modification to the North Carolina Performance Measures and Standards as

adopted by the State Board of Community Colleges on March 16, 2007. As a result, the

number of performance measures was reduced to 8.

System Strategic Plan

Under the leadership of former President H. Martin Lancaster, the North Carolina

Community College System embarked on a strategic planning process in January 1998. The

purpose of the process was to develop a strategic plan that would focus the efforts of the

system on a set of strategic initiatives. The strategic plan is the vehicle that sets the strategic

direction for the System and guides the development of the biennial budget requests.

The purpose of factors two through five of the Critical Success Factors is to monitor the

progress of the system in achieving the objectives in the strategic plan and to report those

achievements. The measures that comprise these factors are the evaluation of the strategic

Page 281: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

2

plan objectives. Unlike the measures comprising factor one, the measures included in factors

two through five will change more frequently as new strategic plan objectives are developed.

In addition, the measures in factors two through five are meant to be System measures, rather

than individual college measures. When available, individual college data will be presented,

but the intended focus of these measures is the success of the System in achieving some

predefined level of achievement.

A matrix showing the factors and measures contained in the Critical Success Factors can be

found on page 3.

Page 282: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS AND MEASURES, 2007-2008

Factor I:

Core Indicators

of Student

Success

A. Progress of

basic skills

students

B. Passing rates

on licensure &

certification

exams

C. Performance of

college transfer

students

D. Developmental

course passing

rates

E. Success of

developmental

students in

college-level

courses

F. Satisfaction of

program

completers and

non-completers

G. Curriculum

student retention,

graduation and

transfer

H. Client

satisfacton with

customized

training

Factor II:

Workforce

Development

A. Percentage of

employers

satisfied with

NCCCS training

programs

B. Percentage of

College Tech Prep

students enrolling

in a community

college

C. Number of

employers &

trainees served

by various

Customized

Training programs

D. Employment

status of graduates

E. Employer

satisfaction with

graduates

Factor III:

Diverse

Populations'

Learning Needs

A. Number and

percentage of

dropouts

annually served

by basic skills

programs

B. Number of

GEDs and

AHSDs awarded

compared to the

number of

dropouts

statewide

C. Percentage of

basic skills

students and

recent high

school graduates

enrolling in a

community

college

D. Unduplicated

headcount in

English as a

Second Language

(ESL)

E. Number of

under-represented

students enrolled

per category

F. Percentage of

students receiving

financial aid and

amount of aid

compared with

cost of attendance

G. Percentage of

adult population in

service area

enrolled

H. Goal

completion for

completers

Factor IV:

Resources

A. Percentage of

college libraries

meeting ALA

standards

B. Total dollar

amount of budget

transfers between

program areas

made by

community

colleges

C. Average

faculty salaries as

a percentage of

SREB

average

D. Retention rate

for full-time

faculty with less

than five years of

experience

E. Number of

faculty and staff

participating in

professional

development

activities

F. Percentage of

facilities meeting

satisfactory

building

condition

G. Ratio of

occupational

extension FTE

dollar allotment

to curriculum

FTE dollar

allotment

Factor V:

Technology

A. Curriculum

unduplicated

headcount by

course method of

instruction

B. Number of

colleges

connected to the

North Carolina

Information

Highway

C. Number of

colleges

possessing the

FCC license for

wireless cable

systems

D. Number of

courses and

programs offered

via telecourse,

wireless cable,

the Internet,

two-way video,

etc.

E. Number of

courses offered

through the NC

Virtual Learning

Community

3

Page 283: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 284: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

5

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR I: CORE INDICATORS OF STUDENT SUCCESS

In 1993, the State Board of Community Colleges began monitoring performance data on

specific measures identified in the Critical Success Factors report and in the Annual Program

Review report. Standards of performance were established for measures that were identified

as being critical to ensure public accountability for programs and services.

In 1998, the North Carolina General Assembly directed the State Board of Community

Colleges to undertake a review of all performance measures and standards with the intent of

ensuring stronger public accountability. Concurrently, the General Assembly directed the

State Board of Community Colleges to develop a plan for the implementation of performance

funding.

As a result of efforts undertaken by the community college system, a set of 12 performance

measures of accountability was adopted in February 1999. Recognizing the importance of

these measures in the System’s public accountability efforts, the System Planning Council

decided to designate the 12 measures as the core indicators of student success and include

them as the first factor of the Critical Success Factors report. In the 2007 Session, the North

Carolina General Assembly approved modifications to the North Carolina Community

College Performance Measures as adopted by the State Board of Community Colleges on

March 16, 2007. As a result, the number of performance measures was reduced to eight (8).

System summary data on each measure are presented in the report along with individual

college’s performance data. A table is presented at the end of the text section that

summarizes, by measure, whether or not colleges met the performance standard. Any college

not meeting a standard is required to submit to the State Board of Community Colleges an

action plan for improving performance.

The Core Indicators of Student Success are:

A. Progress of Basic Skills Students

B. Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations

C. Performance of College Transfer Students

D. Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses

E. Success Rates of Developmental Students in Subsequent College-Level Courses

F. Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-Completers

G. Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation, and Transfer

H. Client Satisfaction with Customized Training

Page 285: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

6

CORE INDICATORS OF

SUCCESS MEASURE A:

Progress of Basic Skills Students

Description/Definition—Basic skills students include all adult literacy students. Progress of

basic skills students is a composite measure that includes the percent of students progressing

within a level of literacy, the percent of students completing a level entered or a

predetermined goal, and the percent of students completing the level entered and advancing

to a higher level.

Methodology and Data Source—Data on basic skills students are collected by the college

providing the instruction and entered into the Literacy Education Information System (LEIS).

Data on the progression of basic skills students are submitted to the North Carolina

Community College System Office annually. The data are compiled at the system office, and

the composite measure and adjustment for each college were calculated.

Performance Standard—Standard for the progress of basic skills students is 75 percent for

the composite measure. This measure is a required performance funding measure.

Results: For the year 2007-08, 56 community colleges met the required standard. The

average composite measure for the system was 82 percent. The range in the composite

progress measure was from a low of 71 percent to a high of 95 percent.

SYSTEM SUMMARY OF PERCENTAGES IN PROGRESS OF BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS

YEAR

EXIT, NON-

COMPLETER

PROGRESSING

SAME LEVEL

COMPLETED

A LEVEL

MOVED TO

NEXT LEVEL

COMPOSITE

MEASURE

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

20%

19%

18%

20%

18%

49%

49%

52%

50%

50%

9%

9%

6%

6%

6%

22%

23%

24%

25%

27%

80%

81%

82%

80%

82%

Page 286: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PROGRESS OF BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS, 2007-2008

Alamance CC 2,647 10% 58% 22% 10% 90%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 3,489 4% 43% 35% 19% 81%

Beaufort County CC 1,133 2% 40% 32% 25% 75%

Bladen CC 615 7% 40% 29% 24% 76%

Blue Ridge CC 1,612 7% 48% 28% 17% 83%

Brunswick CC 1,073 8% 67% 15% 10% 90%

Caldwell CC & TI 2,301 8% 42% 30% 20% 80%

Cape Fear CC 3,180 4% 53% 19% 23% 77%

Carteret CC 928 11% 46% 20% 22% 78%

Catawba Valley CC 2,860 9% 59% 19% 13% 87%

Central Carolina CC 4,263 7% 50% 28% 15% 85%

Central Piedmont CC 13,289 2% 50% 26% 21% 79%

Cleveland CC 715 7% 43% 22% 29% 71%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,169 5% 36% 37% 22% 78%

College of The Albemarle 2,543 7% 67% 17% 9% 91%

Craven CC 1,430 5% 54% 29% 12% 88%

Davidson County CC 2,959 4% 49% 42% 5% 95%

Durham TCC 4,724 4% 46% 29% 21% 79%

Edgecombe CC 1,773 2% 40% 34% 24% 76%

Fayetteville TCC 4,552 2% 66% 24% 9% 91%

Forsyth TCC 5,601 2% 60% 23% 15% 85%

Gaston College 2,951 6% 37% 34% 24% 76%

Guilford TCC 5,722 2% 51% 24% 23% 77%

Halifax CC 1,228 9% 51% 19% 21% 79%

Haywood CC 764 6% 48% 25% 21% 79%

Isothermal CC 1,508 6% 59% 29% 7% 93%

James Sprunt CC 717 7% 44% 26% 24% 76%

Johnston CC 1,752 7% 42% 27% 24% 76%

Lenoir CC 1,978 2% 47% 27% 24% 76%

Martin CC 918 5% 60% 24% 12% 88%

Mayland CC 1,154 12% 46% 27% 14% 86%

McDowell TCC 689 9% 47% 27% 17% 83%

Mitchell CC 2,121 7% 52% 26% 15% 85%

Montgomery CC 565 7% 41% 28% 25% 75%

Nash CC 1,635 5% 52% 20% 23% 77%

Pamlico CC 272 6% 48% 22% 24% 76%

Piedmont CC 1,004 7% 47% 31% 16% 84%

Pitt CC 2,397 8% 48% 20% 25% 75%

Randolph CC 1,761 8% 42% 29% 21% 79%

Richmond CC 2,342 4% 39% 33% 24% 76%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 654 11% 50% 12% 27% 73%

Robeson CC 2,577 2% 46% 35% 18% 82%

Rockingham CC 1,263 10% 47% 22% 22% 78%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 2,986 15% 49% 15% 21% 79%

Sampson CC 1,277 9% 47% 24% 19% 81%

Sandhills CC 1,532 15% 42% 26% 18% 82%

South Piedmont CC 2,462 8% 48% 34% 10% 90%

Southeastern CC 1,202 5% 48% 23% 25% 75%

Southwestern CC 1,433 5% 37% 38% 21% 79%

Stanly CC 1,494 9% 45% 29% 17% 83%

Surry CC 1,575 5% 48% 32% 15% 85%

Tri-County CC 480 12% 43% 24% 21% 79%

Vance-Granville CC 2,654 14% 42% 27% 17% 83%

Wake TCC 7,984 5% 54% 26% 15% 85%

Wayne CC 2,615 1% 45% 37% 18% 82%

Western Piedmont CC 2,426 14% 56% 12% 18% 82%

Wilkes CC 1,398 3% 48% 35% 13% 87%

Wilson TCC 1,774 6% 52% 21% 22% 78%

System Totals 135,120 6% 50% 27% 18% 82%

MOVED TO A

HIGHER LEVEL

EXIT NON-

COMPLETER

COMPOSITE

PROGRESS

MEASURE

INSTITUTIONTOTAL SERVED

IN LITERACY

COMPLETED A

LEVEL

PROGRESSING

SAME LEVEL

SYSTEM

FTE

Source: LEIS, Data Warehouse, 02/09. 7

Page 287: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

8

CORE INDICATORS OF

SUCCESS MEASURE B: Passing Rates on Licensure & Certification

Examinations

Description/Definition—The percentage of first-time test takers from community colleges

passing an examination required for North Carolina licensure or certification prior to

practicing the profession. A licensure requirement for an occupation is one that is required

by state statute for an individual to work in that occupation. Certification is generally

voluntary but may be required by employers or an outside accrediting agency. Purely

voluntary examinations are not reported.

Methodology and Data Source—Data are collected by the Research and Performance

Management section in the President’s Office of the North Carolina Community College

System Office from the agencies issuing the license or certification. Examination data are

reported only for those licensure/certification exams for which data are available from the

licensure/certification agencies. The data for most examinations are reported on a fiscal year.

However, the data on nursing, emergency medical technician, physical therapy assistant, and

veterinary medicine technology are reported on a calendar year.

Passing rates are calculated by dividing the number of persons who successfully pass an

examination the first time they take the exam by the number of persons who sat for the exam

for the first time. An aggregate institutional passing rate is calculated by dividing the total

number of first-time test takers for all reported examinations by the total number of persons

who sat for the exam for the first time. For privacy and statistical validity, no examination

data are reported when the number of first-time test takers was fewer than 10.

Performance Standard— Performance standard for the aggregate institutional passing rate is

80 percent. To be rated EIP (Exceptional Institutional Performance), a college must meet the

80 percent standard and cannot have any licensure/certification exams for which the college

controls who was eligible to sit for the exam with a passing rate less than 70%.

Results— For the year 2007-08, 45 community colleges met or exceeded the aggregate

institutional passing rate of 80 percent; 28 community colleges achieved the EIP level of

performance. The System average of aggregate institutional passing rate was 86 percent.

Page 288: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

9

PERCENTAGE OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS PASSING

LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

(FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS ONLY)

FIELD

NUMBER OF STUDENTS

TAKING EXAM % PASSING EXAM

Aviation Maintenance

General 22 100%

Airframe 25 100%

Power Plant 25 100%

Basic Law Enforcement Training 1,567 86%

Cosmetic Arts

Apprentice 250 90%

Cosmetology 354 89%

Cosmetology Instructor 29 50%

Manicurist

Esthetics

77

144

84%

83%

Dental Hygiene 161 94%

Emergency Medical Technician (EMT)

EMD

EMT

49

3,097

81%

85%

EMT-I 462 65%

EMT-P 422 75%

Nursing

RN 2,108 90%

PN 833 94%

Opticianry * *

Physical Therapist Assistant 96 83%

Radiologic Technology

Nuclear Medicine Technology 24 92%

Radiation Therapy Technology 36 83%

Radiography 352 95%

Real Estate

Sales 569 71%

Veterinary Medical Technology 44 98%

*Number too small to report without violating students’ privacy.

Page 289: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

AGGREGATE INSTITUTIONAL PASSING RATE AND NUMBER OF EXAMS WITH A PASSING RATE < 70%

INSTITUTION

TOTAL

FTE

TOTAL

NUMBER OF

TEST TAKERS

TOTAL

NUMBER

PASSING

AGGREGATE

INSTITUTIONAL

PASSING RATE

NUMBER OF

EXAMS WITH A

PASSING RATE <

70% *

Alamance CC 3,871 108 86 80% 0

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 389 369 95% 0*

Beaufort County CC 1,821 117 90 77% 1

Bladen CC 1,399 67 60 90% 0

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 174 156 90% 0

Brunswick CC 1,548 188 140 74% 3*

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 195 154 79% 2

Cape Fear CC 7,259 348 322 93% 0

Carteret CC 1,751 151 127 84% 1

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 201 168 84% 1

Central Carolina CC 5,118 290 241 83% 1*

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 376 351 93% 0

Cleveland CC 2,944 189 139 74% 3

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 257 232 90% 0

College of The Albemarle 2,351 219 175 80% 2

Craven CC 2,751 182 165 91% 0

Davidson County CC 3,663 253 211 83% 0

Durham TCC 4,622 386 339 88% 1

Edgecombe CC 2,122 46 37 80% 1

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 424 382 90% 0

Forsyth TCC 6,661 309 286 93% 0

Gaston College 4,691 276 244 88% 1

Guilford TCC 9,882 486 424 87% 0

Halifax CC 1,557 72 48 67% 1

Haywood CC 1,903 97 77 79% 1

Isothermal CC 2,094 84 69 82% 1

James Sprunt CC 1,348 71 60 85% 1

Johnston CC 4,158 233 214 92% 0

Lenoir CC 3,335 220 198 90% 0

Martin CC 899 58 38 66% 1

Mayland CC 1,925 120 94 78% 1

McDowell TCC 1,176 90 84 93% 0

Mitchell CC 2,367 176 150 85% 0

Montgomery CC 1,027 45 38 84% 1

Nash CC 2,655 120 93 78% 0

Pamlico CC 543 15 8 53% 1

Piedmont CC 2,714 46 44 96% 0

Pitt CC 5,876 234 201 86% 0

Randolph CC 2,468 102 88 86% 0

Richmond CC 2,110 73 64 88% 0

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 39 37 95% 0

Robeson CC 3,693 152 118 78% 0

Rockingham CC 2,043 117 104 89% 0

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 374 298 80% 2

Sampson CC 1,696 99 90 91% 1

Sandhills CC 3,732 233 206 88% 0

South Piedmont CC 2,220 149 122 82% 0

Southeastern CC 2,373 99 77 78% 1

Southwestern CC 2,248 177 157 89% 1

Stanly CC 2,435 181 146 81% 1

Surry CC 3,281 252 191 76% 1

Tri-County CC 1,168 74 59 80% 1

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 202 180 89% 1

Wake TCC 12,296 417 374 90% 0*

Wayne CC 3,517 154 133 86% 1

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 117 108 92% 0

Wilkes CC 2,831 90 73 81% 0

Wilson CC 2,082 77 68 88% 0

System Total 205,803 10,490 9,007 86%

*Excludes Real Estate exam, for the colleges do not control who sits for the exam.

10

Page 290: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2007-2008

--AVIATION--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

GENERAL AIRFRAME POWER PLANT

FTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 3,871

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186

Beaufort County CC 1,821

Bladen CC 1,399

Blue Ridge CC 2,105

Brunswick CC 1,548

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135

Cape Fear CC 7,259

Carteret CC 1,751

Catawba Valley CC 4,733

Central Carolina CC 5,118

Central Piedmont CC 14,459

Cleveland CC 2,944

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348

College of The Albemarle 2,351

Craven CC 2,751 * * * *

Davidson County CC 3,663

Durham TCC 4,622

Edgecombe CC 2,122

Fayetteville TCC 10,252

Forsyth TCC 6,661

Gaston College 4,691

Guilford TCC 9,882 13 100% 12 100% 14 100%

Halifax CC 1,557

Haywood CC 1,903

Isothermal CC 2,094

James Sprunt CC 1,348

Johnston CC 4,158

Lenoir CC 3,335

Martin CC 899

Mayland CC 1,925

McDowell TCC 1,176

Mitchell CC 2,367

Montgomery CC 1,027

Nash CC 2,655

Pamlico CC 543

Piedmont CC 2,714

Pitt CC 5,876

Randolph CC 2,468

Richmond CC 2,110

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876

Robeson CC 3,693

Rockingham CC 2,043

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137

Sampson CC 1,696

Sandhills CC 3,732

South Piedmont CC 2,220

Southeastern CC 2,373

Southwestern CC 2,248

Stanly CC 2,435

Surry CC 3,281

Tri-County CC 1,168

Vance-Granville CC 4,237

Wake TCC 12,296

Wayne CC 3,517 * * * * * *

Western Piedmont CC 3,118

Wilkes CC 2,831

Wilson CC 2,082

System Total 205,803 22 100% 25 100% 25 100%

INSTITUTION

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy.

11

Page 291: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2007-2008

--BASIC LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

BLET

INSTITUTION FTE # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 3,871 16 88%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 72 99%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 24 79%

Bladen CC 1,399

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 16 94%

Brunswick CC 1,548 52 69%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 20 65%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 93 89%

Carteret CC 1,751 22 77%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 16 44%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 45 84%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 18 94%

Cleveland CC 2,944 26 69%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 32 84%

College of The Albemarle 2,351 24 92%

Craven CC 2,751 26 96%

Davidson County CC 3,663 42 83%

Durham TCC 4,622 * *

Edgecombe CC 2,122

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 54 93%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 22 91%

Gaston College 4,691 46 89%

Guilford TCC 9,882 31 94%

Halifax CC 1,557 29 66%

Haywood CC 1,903 20 80%

Isothermal CC 2,094 17 71%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 13 100%

Johnston CC 4,158 26 96%

Lenoir CC 3,335 17 88%

Martin CC 899 * *

Mayland CC 1,925 * *

McDowell TCC 1,176 12 100%

Mitchell CC 2,367 35 74%

Montgomery CC 1,027 13 69%

Nash CC 2,655 24 96%

Pamlico CC 543

Piedmont CC 2,714

Pitt CC 5,876 48 92%

Randolph CC 2,468 28 86%

Richmond CC 2,110

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876

Robeson CC 3,693 40 80%

Rockingham CC 2,043 24 83%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 53 94%

Sampson CC 1,696 * *

Sandhills CC 3,732 55 93%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 31 87%

Southeastern CC 2,373 * *

Southwestern CC 2,248 26 88%

Stanly CC 2,435 50 60%

Surry CC 3,281 48 88%

Tri-County CC 1,168

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 31 90%

Wake TCC 12,296 48 90%

Wayne CC 3,517 18 89%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 50 96%

Wilkes CC 2,831 32 91%

Wilson CC 2,082 39 90%

System Total 205,803 1,567 86%

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 12

Page 292: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2007-2008

--COSMETIC ARTS--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

FTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 3,871

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 * *

Beaufort County CC 1,821

Bladen CC 1,399 * * * *

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 18 100% * * * * 14 100%

Brunswick CC 1,548 * * * * * *

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 12 100% * * * *

Cape Fear CC 7,259 17 94% * * * * * * 16 81%

Carteret CC 1,751 * * * * 11 100%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733

Central Carolina CC 5,118 37 86% 23 100% * * * * 26 81%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459

Cleveland CC 2,944 15 93% * * * * * *

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 34 85% * *

College of The Albemarle 2,351 16 94% * *

Craven CC 2,751 16 94% * * * *

Davidson County CC 3,663 19 90% 15 80%

Durham TCC 4,622

Edgecombe CC 2,122 * *

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 24 83%

Forsyth TCC 6,661

Gaston College 4,691

Guilford TCC 9,882 * * 10 100% * *

Halifax CC 1,557 * * * *

Haywood CC 1,903 11 64% * * * *

Isothermal CC 2,094 * * * * * * * *

James Sprunt CC 1,348 * * * * * *

Johnston CC 4,158 * * * * * *

Lenoir CC 3,335 14 100% * * * * 12 92%

Martin CC 899 * * * *

Mayland CC 1,925 * * * * * *

McDowell TCC 1,176 * * * * * * * *

Mitchell CC 2,367 20 95% * * * * * *

Montgomery CC 1,027

Nash CC 2,655

Pamlico CC 543 * * * *

Piedmont CC 2,714 * *

Pitt CC 5,876

Randolph CC 2,468

Richmond CC 2,110

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 * *

Robeson CC 3,693 * * * *

Rockingham CC 2,043 12 100% * *

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 14 100% 27 93% * * 11 82% * *

Sampson CC 1,696 * * * * * *

Sandhills CC 3,732 * * * * * * * * * *

South Piedmont 2,220

Southeastern CC 2,373 * * * * * * * *

Southwestern CC 2,248 17 94% * *

Stanly CC 2,435 18 94% 11 91% * * * *

Surry CC 3,281 14 100% * *

Tri-County CC 1,168 11 91% * * * * * *

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 11 91% 15 80% * *

Wake TCC 12,296

Wayne CC 3,517

Western Piedmont CC 3,118

Wilkes CC 2,831

Wilson CC 2,082

System Totals 205,803 250 90% 354 89% 29 50% 77 84% 144 83%

ESTHETICIANINSTITUTION

MANICURISTAPPRENTICE COSMETOLOGY COS. INSTRUCTOR

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 13

Page 293: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

DENTAL HYGIENE, 2007-2008 ; PHYSICAL THERAPIST ASSISTANT, 2008

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

DENTAL HYGIENE PHY. THERAPIST ASST.

FTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 3,871

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 14 100%

Beaufort County CC 1,821

Bladen CC 1,399

Blue Ridge CC 2,105

Brunswick CC 1,548

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 19 89%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 * *

Carteret CC 1,751

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 * *

Central Carolina CC 5,118

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 30 100% 20 90%

Cleveland CC 2,944

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 20 95%

College of The Albemarle 2,351

Craven CC 2,751

Davidson County CC 3,663

Durham TCC 4,622

Edgecombe CC 2,122

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 23 87% 10 90%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 10 100%

Gaston College 4,691

Guilford TCC 9,882 31 87% 15 100%

Halifax CC 1,557

Haywood CC 1,903

Isothermal CC 2,094

James Sprunt CC 1,348

Johnston CC 4,158

Lenoir CC 3,335

Martin CC 899 10 80%

Mayland CC 1,925

McDowell TCC 1,176

Mitchell CC 2,367

Montgomery CC 1,027

Nash CC 2,655 10 70%

Pamlico CC 543

Piedmont CC 2,714

Pitt CC 5,876

Randolph CC 2,468

Richmond CC 2,110

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876

Robeson CC 3,693

Rockingham CC 2,043

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137

Sampson CC 1,696

Sandhills CC 3,732

South Piedmont CC 2,220

Southeastern CC 2,373

Southwestern CC 2,248 12 67%

Stanly CC 2,435

Surry CC 3,281

Tri-County CC 1,168

Vance-Granville CC 4,237

Wake TCC 12,296

Wayne CC 3,517 22 91%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118

Wilkes CC 2,831

Wilson CC 2,082

System Total 205,803 161 94% 96 83%

INSTITUTION

*Number too small to publish without violating students' privacy. 14

Page 294: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2008--EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN (EMT)--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

EMT EMT-I EMT-PFTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 3,871 44 84% 18 72%Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 108 96% * * 10 80%Beaufort County CC 1,821 34 47%Bladen CC 1,399 13 100% 15 93% 12 75%Blue Ridge CC 2,105 64 84% 12 80% * *Brunswick CC 1,548 32 96% * * 11 36%Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 72 66% * * * *Cape Fear CC 7,259 91 92% * * * *Carteret CC 1,751 24 95% 20 60% * *Catawba Valley CC 4,733 89 85% * *Central Carolina CC 5,118 55 67% * * * *Central Piedmont CC 14,459 170 97%Cleveland CC 2,944 61 90% 46 50% 19 52%Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 102 92% * * 14 79%College of The Albemarle 2,351 76 84% 31 41% 23 65%Craven CC 2,751 39 89% * *Davidson County CC 3,663 80 92% * * 33 70%Durham TCC 4,622 199 91% 34 64% 12 83%Edgecombe CC 2,122 * * 10 30%Fayetteville TCC 10,252 12 100% 102 91% 32 81% 25 96%Forsyth TCC 6,661 76 93% * * * *Gaston College 4,691 85 88% 16 68%Guilford TCC 9,882 149 85% * * * *Halifax CC 1,557 29 72%Haywood CC 1,903 24 79% * *Isothermal CC 2,094 19 68%James Sprunt CC 1,348 12 100%Johnston CC 4,158 71 83% 27 92%Lenoir CC 3,335 67 92% 37 83% 18 72%Martin CC 899 36 66%Mayland CC 1,925 32 84% 19 52%McDowell TCC 1,176 20 90% * *Mitchell CC 2,367 34 85% 11 100%Montgomery CC 1,027 * *Nash CC 2,655 * * 65 81% * *Pamlico CC 543 10 40% * *Piedmont CC 2,714 22 95%Pitt CC 5,876 47 91% * *Randolph CC 2,468 28 82% * * * *Richmond CC 2,110 * * * *Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 * *Robeson CC 3,693 44 79% * * * *Rockingham CC 2,043 22 81% * *Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 135 65% 13 61% 41 75%Sampson CC 1,696 * * 13 92% 11 63%Sandhills CC 3,732 43 81% * * * *South Piedmont CC 2,220 60 78% * * 12 83%Southeastern CC 2,373 52 67% * *Southwestern CC 2,248 39 92% 11 73% * *Stanly CC 2,435 20 85% * * * *Surry CC 3,281 52 80% 26 57%Tri-County CC 1,168 22 68% * * * *Vance-Granville CC 4,237 43 95% 16 37%Wake TCC 12,296 160 96% 28 71% 10 90%Wayne CC 3,517 26 80% 13 61%Western Piedmont CC 3,118 23 86% 10 100%Wilkes CC 2,831 22 72%Wilson CC 2,082 38 86%

System Total 205,803 49 81% 3,097 85% 462 65% 422 75%

INSTITUTIONEMD

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 15

Page 295: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2008

--NURSING--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

PRACTICAL NURSING REGISTERED NURSING

FTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 3,871 22 95%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 38 95% 86 95%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 21 95% 38 92%

Bladen CC 1,399 14 86% * *

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 23 87%

Brunswick CC 1,548 17 100% 25 60%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 42 88%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 15 100% 55 100%

Carteret CC 1,751 15 93% * *

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 68 88%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 41 93% 15 100%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 50 92%

Cleveland CC 2,944

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 15 100% 25 92%

College of The Albemarle 2,351 16 100% 25 92%

Craven CC 2,751 13 85% 50 92%

Davidson County CC 3,663 50 86%

Durham TCC 4,622 16 100% 56 95%

Edgecombe CC 2,122

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 54 89% 67 88%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 50 94% 101 92%

Gaston College 4,691 38 97% 55 95%

Guilford TCC 9,882 27 96% 89 91%

Halifax CC*** 1,557

Haywood CC** 1,903 28 86%

Isothermal CC 2,094 32 97%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 19 89% 22 64%

Johnston CC 4,158 19 100% 35 100%

Lenoir CC 3,335 * * 32 97%

Martin CC 899

Mayland CC 1,925 18 89% 18 94%

McDowell TCC 1,176 34 88%

Mitchell CC 2,367 42 95%

Montgomery CC 1,027 29 90%

Nash CC 2,655

Pamlico CC 543

Piedmont CC 2,714 20 95%

Pitt CC 5,876 75 77%

Randolph CC 2,468 20 95%

Richmond CC 2,110 18 100% 48 88%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 16 94% 16 100%

Robeson CC 3,693 24 83%

Rockingham CC 2,043 28 93% 20 100%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 20 80% 26 100%

Sampson CC 1,696 31 100% 22 100%

Sandhills CC 3,732 23 100% 63 84%

South Piedmont 2,220 16 81% 19 95%

Southeastern CC 2,373 23 100%

Southwestern CC** 2,248 * * 26 96%

Stanly CC 2,435 34 91%

Surry CC 3,281 19 89% 81 73%

Tri-County CC** 1,168 20 90%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 29 97% 26 100%

Wake TCC 12,296 120 89%

Wayne CC 3,517 15 100% 31 81%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 34 88%

Wilkes CC 2,831 27 85%

Wilson CC 2,082

Foothills Nursing Consortium 69 83%

NEWH Nursing Consortium*** 64 95% 131 91%

Region A Nursing Consortium** 74 91%

System Total 205,803 833 94% 2,108 90%

INSTITUTION

*Less than 10.

**Region A Nursing Consortium includes Haywood CC, Southwestern CC, and Tri-County CC.

***NEWH Nursing Consortium includes Nash, Edgecomb, Wilson, and Halifax CC. 16

Page 296: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS,

OPTICIANRY, 2007-2008 ; VETERINARY MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2008

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

OPTICIANRY VET. MED. TECH.

FTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 3,871

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 * *

Beaufort County CC 1,821

Bladen CC 1,399

Blue Ridge CC 2,105

Brunswick CC 1,548

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135

Cape Fear CC 7,259

Carteret CC 1,751

Catawba Valley CC 4,733

Central Carolina CC 5,118 23 100%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459

Cleveland CC 2,944

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348

College of The Albemarle 2,351

Craven CC 2,751

Davidson County CC 3,663

Durham TCC 4,622 * *

Edgecombe CC 2,122

Fayetteville TCC 10,252

Forsyth TCC 6,661

Gaston College 4,691 12 92%

Guilford TCC 9,882

Halifax CC 1,557

Haywood CC 1,903

Isothermal CC 2,094

James Sprunt CC 1,348

Johnston CC 4,158

Lenoir CC 3,335

Martin CC 899

Mayland CC 1,925

McDowell TCC 1,176

Mitchell CC 2,367

Montgomery CC 1,027

Nash CC 2,655

Pamlico CC 543

Piedmont CC 2,714

Pitt CC 5,876

Randolph CC 2,468

Richmond CC 2,110

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876

Robeson CC 3,693

Rockingham CC 2,043

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137

Sampson CC 1,696

Sandhills CC 3,732

South Piedmont CC 2,220

Southeastern CC 2,373

Southwestern CC 2,248

Stanly CC 2,435

Surry CC 3,281

Tri-County CC 1,168

Vance-Granville CC 4,237

Wake TCC 12,296

Wayne CC 3,517

Western Piedmont CC 3,118

Wilkes CC 2,831

Wilson CC 2,082

System Total 205,803 * * 44 98%

INSTITUTION

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 17

Page 297: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES ON LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2007-2008

RADIOGRAPHY--NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY--

RADIATION THERAPY TECHNOLOGY

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

RADIOGRAPHY NUC. MED. TECH. RADIATION THERAPY

FTE # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 3,871

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 21 100%

Beaufort County CC 1,821

Bladen CC 1,399

Blue Ridge CC 2,105

Brunswick CC 1,548

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 * * * *

Cape Fear CC 7,259 19 90%

Carteret CC 1,751 17 100%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 11 91%

Central Carolina CC 5,118

Central Piedmont CC 14,459

Cleveland CC 2,944 14 93%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348

College of The Albemarle 2,351

Craven CC 2,751

Davidson County CC 3,663

Durham TCC 4,622

Edgecombe CC 2,122 18 100%

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 18 100% * *

Forsyth TCC 6,661 33 91% * *

Gaston College 4,691

Guilford TCC 9,882

Halifax CC 1,557

Haywood CC 1,903

Isothermal CC 2,094

James Sprunt CC 1,348

Johnston CC 4,158 27 100% * *

Lenoir CC 3,335 * *

Martin CC 899

Mayland CC 1,925

McDowell TCC 1,176

Mitchell CC 2,367

Montgomery CC 1,027

Nash CC 2,655

Pamlico CC 543

Piedmont CC 2,714

Pitt CC 5,876 22 100% 14 86% 19 84%

Randolph CC 2,468 14 100%

Richmond CC 2,110

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876

Robeson CC 3,693 * *

Rockingham CC 2,043

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 13 92%

Sampson CC 1,696

Sandhills CC 3,732 10 100%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 * *

Southeastern CC 2,373

Southwestern CC 2,248 21 86%

Stanly CC 2,435 19 95%

Surry CC 3,281

Tri-County CC 1,168

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 27 100%

Wake TCC 12,296 28 93%

Wayne CC 3,517

Western Piedmont CC 3,118

Wilkes CC 2,831

Wilson CC 2,082

System Total 205,803 352 95% 24 92% 36 83%

INSTITUTION

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 18

Page 298: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES OF LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS, 2007-2008

--REAL ESTATE--

FIRST-TIME TEST TAKERS

SALES

FTE # TESTED % PASSED

Alamance CC 3,871 * *

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 21 67%

Beaufort County CC 1,821

Bladen CC 1,399 * *

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 * *

Brunswick CC 1,548 35 66%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135

Cape Fear CC 7,259 10 90%

Carteret CC 1,751 17 76%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 * *

Central Carolina CC 5,118 10 30%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 88 85%

Cleveland CC 2,944 * *

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348

College of The Albemarle 2,351 * *

Craven CC 2,751 14 71%

Davidson County CC 3,663 * *

Durham TCC 4,622 52 81%

Edgecombe CC 2,122 * *

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 * *

Forsyth TCC 6,661 * *

Gaston College 4,691 24 71%

Guilford TCC 9,882 81 77%

Halifax CC 1,557 * *

Haywood CC 1,903

Isothermal CC 2,094

James Sprunt CC 1,348

Johnston CC 4,158 * *

Lenoir CC 3,335

Martin CC 899

Mayland CC 1,925 * *

McDowell TCC 1,176

Mitchell CC 2,367 26 77%

Montgomery CC 1,027

Nash CC 2,655 * *

Pamlico CC 543

Piedmont CC 2,714

Pitt CC 5,876 * *

Randolph CC 2,468 * *

Richmond CC 2,110

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876

Robeson CC 3,693 * *

Rockingham CC 2,043

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 15 100%

Sampson CC 1,696

Sandhills CC 3,732

South Piedmont CC 2,220 * *

Southeastern CC 2,373 * *

Southwestern CC 2,248 15 87%

Stanly CC 2,435 11 91%

Surry CC 3,281 11 9%

Tri-County CC 1,168 * *

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 * *

Wake TCC 12,296 23 65%

Wayne CC 3,517 * *

Western Piedmont CC 3,118

Wilkes CC 2,831 * *

Wilson CC 2,082

System Total 205,803 569 71%

INSTITUTION

*Number too small to report without violating students' privacy. 19

Page 299: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

20

CORE INDICATORS OF

SUCCESS MEASURE C:

Performance of College Transfer Students

Description/Definition—College transfer programs provide educational experiences that will

enable transfer students to make the transition to a baccalaureate program and perform as

well as the students who enroll as first-time freshmen at universities. The purpose of this

measure is to compare the performance of community college associate degree students

(Associate in Arts, Associate in Science, and Associate in Fine Arts) who transfer to public

North Carolina universities with students native to the four-year institutions.

Methodology and Data Source—Data on two cohorts of college transfer students entering

the public universities each year are analyzed. One cohort analysis compares the

performance of college transfer degree recipients (AA, AS, AFA) at the end of two semesters

at the public university to the performance of native juniors. The second cohort analysis

compares the performance of college transfer students completing at least 24 hours or more

of college transfer courses at a community college but not completing the degree to the

performance of native sophomores. A cell size of at least 10 students is required for

reporting this measure.

Community colleges may elect to work with private colleges and universities in collecting

data on students who transfer to those institutions. The data must be consistent with the

methodology employed by the UNC- General Administration in calculating the data for

transfer to public universities. If colleges submit data from private or out-of-state

institutions, then the System Office includes the data with the public university data. When

the total number of students is less than 10, the total number of students in previous three

years and the respective percentage are reported.

Performance Standard— 83% of students in both associate degree recipients and the

students who transferred with 24 or more semester hours at community colleges had a GPA

equal to or greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a university. To be identified as EIP

(Exceptional Institutional Performance), performance of community college transfer students

has to be equivalent to the performance of native UNC sophomores and juniors: 87% for this

year.

Results— For students who completed an AA, AS or AFA degree in 2006-07 and transferred

to a UNC institution or a private institution within a year, 91 percent had a GPA equal to or

greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a university. For those students who completed 24 or

more semester hours in community colleges and transferred to a UNC institution or a private

institution, 86 percent had a GPA equal to or greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a

university. When the data for both groups were combined, 88 percent of the transfers had a

GPA equal to or greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a UNC institution or a private

institution. Forty-four (44) community colleges met the 83 percent performance standard; 30

community colleges met the EIP level of performance.

Page 300: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERCENT OF 2006-07

COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS WITH A

GPA OF > = 2.0 AFTER TWO SEMESTERS AT A UNC INSTITUTION

Number Percent >=2.0 Number Percent >=2.0 Number

Percent

>=2.0

Alamance CC 3,871 61 92% 31 97% 92 94%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 59 92% 82 98% 141 95%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 ** ** 11 73% 20 70%

Bladen CC 1,399 26 81% ** ** 31 78%

Blue Ridge CC* 2,105 35 89% 24 88% 59 88%

Brunswick CC 1,548 14 86% ** ** 22 87%

Caldwell CC & TI* 4,135 124 87% 40 98% 164 90%

Cape Fear CC* 7,259 219 86% 188 86% 407 86%

Carteret CC 1,751 28 89% 15 93% 43 90%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 50 86% 49 90% 99 88%

Central Carolina CC* 5,118 55 86% 23 91% 78 87%

Central Piedmont CC* 14,459 292 92% 183 87% 475 90%

Cleveland CC 2,944 26 73% ** ** 34 77%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 83 94% 46 87% 129 92%

College of The Albemarle 2,351 34 85% 20 90% 54 87%

Craven CC* 2,751 73 84% 30 90% 103 86%

Davidson County CC* 3,663 38 84% 21 100% 59 90%

Durham TCC 4,622 41 93% 41 98% 82 96%

Edgecombe CC* 2,122 16 69% ** ** 24 71%

Fayetteville TCC* 10,252 62 82% 55 95% 117 88%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 96 78% 28 96% 124 82%

Gaston College* 4,691 78 86% 53 93% 131 89%

Guilford TCC 9,882 127 80% 57 91% 184 83%

Halifax CC 1,557 ** ** ** ** 14 72%

Haywood CC 1,903 10 90% ** ** 18 94%

Isothermal CC* 2,094 24 96% 21 95% 45 96%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 ** ** ** ** 13 77%

Johnston CC 4,158 45 87% 22 82% 67 85%

Lenoir CC* 3,335 55 82% 28 89% 83 84%

Martin CC 899 ** ** ** ** ** **

Mayland CC*** 1,925 23 91% ** ** 30 93%

McDowell TCC* 1,176 11 91% ** 100% 18 95%

Mitchell CC* 2,367 47 85% 23 91% 70 87%

Montgomery CC*** 1,027 ** ** ** ** ** **

Nash CC* 2,655 14 93% 14 93%

Pamlico CC*** 543 ** ** ** ** ** **

Piedmont CC 2,714 15 87% ** ** 24 84%

Pitt CC 5,876 99 86% 46 89% 145 87%

Randolph CC 2,468 23 91% 19 95% 42 93%

Richmond CC 2,110 ** ** ** 100% 15 74%

Roanoke-Chowan CC*** 876 ** ** ** ** 15 83%

Robeson CC 3,693 16 88% 10 80% 26 85%

Rockingham CC* 2,043 41 83% ** ** 48 85%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 73 81% 32 97% 105 86%

Sampson CC 1,696 ** ** ** ** 15 74%

Sandhills CC* 3,732 64 78% 46 89% 110 83%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 ** ** ** ** 10 56%

Southeastern CC 2,373 29 86% 14 86% 43 86%

Southwestern CC 2,248 26 96% 40 95% 66 95%

Stanly CC 2,435 19 79% 12 92% 31 84%

Surry CC* 3,281 70 86% 40 90% 110 87%

Tri-County CC 1,168 27 100% 20 85% 47 94%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 38 82% 12 100% 50 86%

Wake TCC 12,296 313 87% 134 94% 447 89%

Wayne CC* 3,517 122 92% 40 93% 162 92%

Western Piedmont CC* 3,118 62 87% 50 92% 112 89%

Wilkes CC 2,831 37 84% 33 94% 70 89%

Wilson CC 2,082 10 40% ** ** 17 53%

System Total 205,803 3,008 86% 1,765 91% 4,773 88%

INSTITUTION

24 or More Semester Hours Associate Degree Recipient Total

TOTAL FTE

* Includes data from private colleges and universities.

** Number too small to report due to privacy protection.

*** 3 year total; printed in bold and italics fonts. 21

Page 301: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

22

CORE INDICATORS OF

SUCCESS MEASURE D:

Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses

Description/Definition — Percent of students who complete developmental English,

mathematics, or reading courses with a grade of "C" or better.

Methodology and Data Source — At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum

Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file to the North Carolina

Community College System Office. These student unit record files are loaded into the

System data warehouse and are the official data of record for state level reporting. In the

CRPFAR file, the number and percent of students completing developmental courses with a

grade of "C" or better is calculated.

Performance Standard—Seventy-five percent (75%) of students who complete a

developmental course in English, reading or mathematics will have a grade of "C" or better

for that course.

Results—Seventy-seven percent (77%) of the students who completed a developmental

course(s) had a grade of “C” or better in 2007-08. Forty-eight (48) colleges met the

performance standard.

Page 302: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PASSING RATES OF STUDENTS IN DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES, 2007-2008

# Completed % Passed # Completed % Passed # Completed % Passed # Completed % Passed

Alamance CC 3,871 699 88% 1,219 80% 1,918 83%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 735 92% 933 90% 404 97% 2,072 92%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 204 98% 264 77% 152 91% 620 87%

Bladen CC 1,399 228 92% 536 88% 155 95% 919 90%

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 185 83% 624 73% 112 79% 921 76%

Brunswick CC 1,548 175 71% 350 84% 525 80%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 314 80% 848 76% 322 95% 1,484 81%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 1,122 76% 1,496 83% 2,618 80%

Carteret CC 1,751 142 59% 436 91% 99 81% 677 83%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 642 84% 1,651 71% 538 78% 2,831 75%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 200 86% 578 71% 323 89% 1,101 79%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 2,509 81% 4,294 71% 2,071 80% 8,874 76%

Cleveland CC 2,944 211 92% 730 81% 158 89% 1,099 84%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 309 86% 1,449 80% 241 89% 1,999 82%

College of The Albemarle 2,351 293 92% 876 83% 251 86% 1,420 85%

Craven CC 2,751 343 65% 864 75% 1,207 72%

Davidson County CC 3,663 317 68% 816 63% 170 82% 1,303 67%

Durham TCC 4,622 733 78% 1,372 64% 636 67% 2,741 68%

Edgecombe CC 2,122 332 73% 507 73% 283 88% 1,122 77%

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 1,518 69% 3,156 62% 1,392 72% 6,066 66%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 751 79% 1,657 80% 864 89% 3,272 82%

Gaston College 4,691 566 76% 1,625 82% 460 80% 2,651 80%

Guilford TCC 9,882 1,326 86% 3,002 81% 1,270 90% 5,598 84%

Halifax CC 1,557 207 86% 416 64% 623 71%

Haywood CC 1,903 145 52% 309 56% 87 87% 541 60%

Isothermal CC 2,094 204 88% 613 80% 97 90% 914 83%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 225 87% 335 83% 148 97% 708 87%

Johnston CC 4,158 463 72% 646 68% 376 88% 1,485 74%

Lenoir CC 3,335 369 81% 677 83% 245 86% 1,291 83%

Martin CC 899 105 61% 105 89% 60 92% 270 79%

Mayland CC 1,925 85 91% 161 78% 60 82% 306 82%

McDowell TCC 1,176 157 96% 238 94% 31 97% 426 95%

Mitchell CC 2,367 493 88% 549 86% 88 87% 1,130 87%

Montgomery CC 1,027 121 75% 214 96% 63 68% 398 85%

Nash CC 2,655 331 76% 862 71% 146 98% 1,339 75%

Pamlico CC 543 17 82% 44 70% 224 97% 285 92%

Piedmont CC 2,714 317 80% 561 79% 224 97% 1,102 83%

Pitt CC 5,876 1,003 91% 2,492 68% 3,495 75%

Randolph CC 2,468 248 93% 540 93% 126 90% 914 93%

Richmond CC 2,110 248 89% 429 89% 311 88% 988 89%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 161 75% 269 65% 113 80% 543 71%

Robeson CC 3,693 499 85% 885 64% 488 78% 1,872 73%

Rockingham CC 2,043 134 84% 654 83% 154 77% 942 82%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 590 82% 1,676 78% 467 82% 2,733 80%

Sampson CC 1,696 187 90% 414 73% 146 92% 747 81%

Sandhills CC 3,732 495 81% 767 77% 363 85% 1,625 80%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 421 76% 692 82% 498 79% 1,611 80%

Southeastern CC 2,373 350 74% 704 74% 456 79% 1,510 76%

Southwestern CC 2,248 195 75% 341 89% 132 98% 668 87%

Stanly CC 2,435 193 86% 294 92% 487 90%

Surry CC 3,281 334 71% 649 84% 234 98% 1,217 83%

Tri-County CC 1,168 94 94% 132 94% 226 94%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 597 74% 1,047 81% 328 84% 1,972 79%

Wake TCC 12,296 1,791 77% 3,475 72% 820 88% 6,086 76%

Wayne CC 3,517 613 94% 940 85% 337 86% 1,890 88%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 394 84% 1,016 53% 251 100% 1,661 67%

Wilkes CC 2,831 311 86% 759 78% 142 84% 1,212 81%

Wilson CC 2,082 303 80% 621 69% 211 90% 1,135 76%

System Total 205,803 26,254 79% 53,809 74% 17,327 84% 97,390 77%

ENGLISH TOTALINSTITUTION

FTE

MATH READING

23

Page 303: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

24

CORE INDICATORS OF

SUCCESS MEASURE E: Success Rate of Developmental Students in Subsequent

College-Level Courses

Description/Definition—Performance of developmental students in subsequent college level

courses will be measured. Specifically, performance of who took developmental English

courses and subsequently took college-level English courses was assessed. Likewise, the

performance of who took developmental math courses and then took college-level math

courses was tracked.

The purpose of this measure is to provide evidence that developmental courses equip

students with the skills and knowledge necessary for success in their college studies. Once

students have successfully completed the developmental courses, they should be able to pass

curriculum courses.

Methodology and Data Source— At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum

Registration, Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file to the North Carolina

Community College System Office. These student unit record files are loaded into the

System data warehouse and are the official data of record for state level reporting. Using the

CRPFA data file, students who took developmental level English, reading, and math course

are identified. These students’ records are then matched with subsequent performance in

college-level English and math courses.

Performance Standard— Eighty percent (80%) of students who completed a developmental

course in 2006-07 and completed subsequent college level course in 2007-08 will have a

passing grade for the college level course.

Results— In 2007-08, eighty-nine percent (89%) of the students who completed a

developmental English and/or math course(s) had a grade of “D” or better in subsequent

college-level English and/or math courses. Fifty-seven (57) colleges met the standard in

2007-08.

Page 304: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERFORMANCE OF DEVELOPMENTAL STUDENTS IN SUBSEQUENT COLLEGE-LEVEL COURSES, 2007-2008

# Completed % Passed # Completed % Passed # Completed % Passed

Alamance CC 3,871 163 98% 186 96% 349 97%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 198 82% 278 88% 476 86%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 76 83% 41 83% 117 83%

Bladen CC 1,399 98 98% 86 95% 184 97%

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 112 88% 116 94% 228 91%

Brunswick CC 1,548 30 90% 60 80% 90 83%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 306 90% 202 94% 508 92%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 300 79% 118 86% 418 81%

Carteret CC 1,751 43 81% 56 89% 99 86%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 394 87% 410 90% 804 89%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 140 94% 82 96% 222 95%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 1,320 91% 993 91% 2,313 91%

Cleveland CC 2,944 66 80% 89 97% 155 90%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 317 97% 377 90% 694 93%

College of The Albemarle 2,351 136 90% 156 96% 292 93%

Craven CC 2,751 125 83% 219 89% 344 87%

Davidson County CC 3,663 76 80% 101 89% 177 85%

Durham TCC 4,622 271 93% 205 89% 476 91%

Edgecombe CC 2,122 160 86% 76 80% 236 84%

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 252 76% 168 89% 420 81%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 335 91% 305 84% 640 88%

Gaston College 4,691 320 81% 303 89% 623 85%

Guilford TCC 9,882 338 87% 237 81% 575 85%

Halifax CC 1,557 71 90% 50 86% 121 88%

Haywood CC 1,903 95 90% 102 91% 197 91%

Isothermal CC 2,094 145 83% 167 94% 312 89%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 52 94% 57 95% 109 95%

Johnston CC 4,158 112 97% 54 98% 166 97%

Lenoir CC 3,335 165 96% 86 97% 251 96%

Martin CC 899 70 71% 32 81% 102 74%

Mayland CC 1,925 21 86% 15 93% 36 89%

McDowell TCC 1,176 53 100% 47 100% 100 100%

Mitchell CC 2,367 46 85% 151 90% 197 89%

Montgomery CC 1,027 62 98% 62 92% 124 95%

Nash CC 2,655 174 86% 159 89% 333 87%

Pamlico CC 543 21 95% 17 94% 38 95%

Piedmont CC 2,714 180 96% 171 93% 351 95%

Pitt CC 5,876 389 92% 434 89% 823 90%

Randolph CC 2,468 54 80% 66 92% 120 87%

Richmond CC 2,110 176 92% 110 95% 286 93%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 62 79% 38 87% 100 82%

Robeson CC 3,693 329 93% 157 85% 486 90%

Rockingham CC 2,043 30 80% 59 98% 89 92%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 225 83% 79 87% 304 84%

Sampson CC 1,696 134 97% 113 95% 247 96%

Sandhills CC 3,732 340 89% 195 82% 535 86%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 188 82% 85 82% 273 82%

Southeastern CC 2,373 219 88% 94 91% 313 89%

Southwestern CC 2,248 76 86% 28 82% 104 85%

Stanly CC 2,435 95 96% 99 98% 194 97%

Surry CC 3,281 179 85% 207 88% 386 87%

Tri-County CC 1,168 35 80% 46 96% 81 89%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 69 84% 56 98% 125 90%

Wake TCC 12,296 209 83% 191 91% 400 87%

Wayne CC 3,517 285 92% 244 91% 529 92%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 92 98% 45 98% 137 98%

Wilkes CC 2,831 154 84% 117 95% 271 89%

Wilson CC 2,082 175 82% 162 92% 337 87%

System Total 205,803 10,358 89% 8,659 90% 19,017 89%

ENGLISH TOTALINSTITUTION

FTE

MATH

25

Page 305: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

26

CORE INDICATORS OF

SUCCESS MEASURE F: Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-

Completers

Description/Definition—This indicator reports the proportion of graduates and early-leavers

who indicate that the quality of the college programs and services meet or exceed their

expectations.

Methodology and Data Source—Data are collected by a college administered survey, with

each college using a standard set of questions. For colleges with fewer than 250 non-

returning students, a minimum of 25 valid surveys must be obtained from non-returning

students. For the colleges with more than 250 non-returning students, a response rate equal to

10% of the total non-returning students or a statistically valid sample size must be obtained.

For graduates, a 50 percent response rate or a statistically valid sample size must be obtained.

Performance Standard—Ninety percent (90%) of the combined respondents will report to

be satisfied with the quality of the college's programs and services.

Results—Ninety-seven percent (97%) of program completers responded that they were

satisfied with the academic programs of community colleges, while ninety-five percent

(95%) of program non-completers responded that they were satisfied. The total percentage

of satisfied (completers and non-completers combined) was ninety-six percent (96%). Fifty-

six (56) community colleges met the performance standard in 2007-08.

Page 306: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

SATISFACTION OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS AND NON-COMPLETERS, 2007-2008

NUMBER

PERCENT

SATISFIED NUMBER

PERCENT

SATISFIED NUMBER

PERCENT

SATISFIED

Alamance CC 3,871 218 100% 133 95% 351 98%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 364 99% 177 93% 541 97%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 120 98% 25 92% 145 97%

Bladen CC 1,399 81 94% 65 94% 146 94%

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 125 100% 32 97% 157 99%

Brunswick CC 1,548 102 99% 45 87% 147 95%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 299 96% 108 94% 407 95%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 652 98% 240 96% 892 97%

Carteret CC 1,751 141 99% 58 95% 199 98%

Catawba Valley CC* 4,733 654 99% 42 88% 696 98%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 370 98% 140 98% 510 98%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 576 98% 356 97% 932 98%

Cleveland CC 2,944 226 97% 129 99% 355 98%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 725 98% 239 95% 964 97%

College of The Albemarle 2,351 202 98% 63 97% 265 98%

Craven CC* 2,751 182 97% 92 94% 274 96%

Davidson County CC 3,663 248 98% 88 96% 336 97%

Durham TCC 4,622 165 99% 143 95% 308 97%

Edgecombe CC 2,122 200 97% 107 100% 307 98%

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 617 97% 167 88% 784 95%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 344 94% 254 92% 598 93%

Gaston College 4,691 666 98% 158 92% 824 97%

Guilford TCC 9,882 772 97% 165 88% 937 95%

Halifax CC 1,557 144 99% 69 91% 213 96%

Haywood CC 1,903 113 96% 70 98% 183 97%

Isothermal CC 2,094 149 99% 63 95% 212 98%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 99 97% 52 92% 151 95%

Johnston CC 4,158 208 99% 92 96% 300 98%

Lenoir CC 3,335 195 95% 143 97% 338 96%

Martin CC 899 37 92% 47 91% 84 91%

Mayland CC 1,925 241 98% 44 100% 285 98%

McDowell TCC 1,176 184 94% 31 81% 215 92%

Mitchell CC 2,367 146 99% 90 91% 236 96%

Montgomery CC 1,027 79 99% 22 100% 101 99%

Nash CC 2,655 138 100% 218 100% 356 100%

Pamlico CC 543 44 95% 26 92% 70 94%

Piedmont CC 2,714 173 95% 72 94% 245 95%

Pitt CC 5,876 408 99% 268 100% 676 99%

Randolph CC 2,468 153 98% 207 98% 360 98%

Richmond CC 2,110 157 100% 58 100% 215 100%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 126 77% 128 89% 254 83%

Robeson CC 3,693 193 97% 86 95% 279 96%

Rockingham CC 2,043 207 99% 64 89% 271 97%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 207 96% 149 95% 356 96%

Sampson CC 1,696 126 97% 35 83% 161 94%

Sandhills CC 3,732 280 100% 151 97% 431 99%

South Piedmont 2,220 238 90% 57 72% 295 87%

Southeastern CC 2,373 151 98% 49 100% 200 98%

Southwestern CC 2,248 173 98% 82 98% 255 98%

Stanly CC 2,435 225 99% 82 98% 307 99%

Surry CC 3,281 262 97% 120 97% 382 97%

Tri-County CC 1,168 80 97% 35 97% 115 97%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 234 98% 151 92% 385 96%

Wake TCC 12,296 289 95% 231 96% 520 95%

Wayne CC 3,517 377 99% 96 100% 473 99%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 268 98% 35 94% 303 98%

Wilkes CC 2,831 202 97% 80 98% 282 97%

Wilson CC 2,082 178 99% 72 99% 250 99%

System Totals 205,803 14,533 97% 6,301 95% 20,834 96%

COMPLETERS NON-COMPLETERS TOTAL

INSTITUTION TOTAL FTE

*Response rate too low (statistically invalid sample size); not eligible for performance funding.

27

Page 307: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

28

CORE INDICATORS OF

SUCCESS MEASURE G: Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation, and

Transfer

Description/Definition—This composite indicator consists of

1. Number of individuals completing a curriculum program with a certificate,

diploma, or associate degree;

2. Number of individuals who have not completed a program but who are continuing

enrollments in either curriculum or occupational extension programs;

3. Number of individuals who transferred to a university or another community

college.

This composite indicator will consist of the above three measures, each reported separately

for each college. Sum of the three will be divided by the total number of curriculum students

in the cohort to compute an indicator of curriculum student progress and success.

Methodology and Data Source: Cohorts are defined each fall based upon the number of

students enrolled in award granting curriculum programs (associate degree, certificate, and

diploma). At the end of each semester, colleges submit a Curriculum Registration, Progress,

Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) data file to the North Carolina Community College System

Office. These student unit record files are loaded into the System data warehouse and are the

official data of record for state level reporting. The cohort is tracked from fall to fall using

data from the data warehouse to determine those who have graduated and those who have

continued to be enrolled. Transfer rates are determined by matching the students who do not

graduate and who do not re-enroll with data at the National Student Clearinghouse. A

composite success measure is calculated by adding the number of graduates, returning

students and transfers and then dividing that sum by the number of students in the original

cohort.

Performance Standard—Performance standard for this measure is 65 percent of the fall

cohort will have completed their program, still be enrolled the following fall at the

community college, or transferred to another community college or university.

Results—Sixty-nine percent (69%) of the fall 2007 cohort had graduated, returned to enroll,

or transferred by fall 2008. Fifty-seven (57) community colleges met the performance

standard.

Page 308: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

CURRICULUM STUDENT RETENTION, GRADUATON AND TRANSFER, 2007-2008

College FTE

TOTAL

COHORT

PERCENT

GRADUATE

PERCENT

RETURN

PERCENT

TRANSFER

PERCENT

GRADUATE,

RETURN OR

TRANSFER

Alamance CC 3,871 3,547 14% 52% 5% 71%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 3,975 17% 49% 5% 71%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 1,294 16% 52% 5% 73%

Bladen CC 1,399 1,135 11% 57% 7% 75%

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 1,447 11% 49% 7% 67%

Brunswick CC 1,548 1,027 16% 45% 6% 67%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 3,113 11% 53% 9% 73%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 6,484 14% 50% 9% 73%

Carteret CC 1,751 1,350 14% 53% 6% 73%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 4,123 13% 51% 6% 70%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 3,451 20% 45% 4% 69%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 14,597 8% 49% 9% 66%

Cleveland CC 2,944 2,358 14% 46% 6% 66%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 3,780 17% 45% 9% 71%

College of The Albemarle 2,351 1,785 16% 47% 7% 70%

Craven CC 2,751 2,611 10% 48% 8% 66%

Davidson County CC 3,663 2,805 20% 45% 5% 70%

Durham TCC 4,622 3,661 10% 49% 8% 67%

Edgecombe CC 2,122 1,651 15% 53% 4% 72%

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 7,931 9% 51% 7% 67%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 6,265 13% 50% 7% 70%

Gaston College 4,691 4,400 11% 51% 5% 67%

Guilford TCC 9,882 9,738 10% 50% 8% 68%

Halifax CC 1,557 1,161 22% 43% 5% 70%

Haywood CC 1,903 1,405 17% 46% 6% 69%

Isothermal CC 2,094 1,564 15% 46% 6% 67%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 941 25% 44% 5% 74%

Johnston CC 4,158 2,781 17% 49% 7% 73%

Lenoir CC 3,335 2,079 17% 49% 7% 73%

Martin CC 899 545 11% 51% 6% 68%

Mayland CC 1,925 987 32% 38% 3% 73%

McDowell TCC 1,176 877 20% 42% 4% 66%

Mitchell CC 2,367 2,084 9% 52% 8% 69%

Montgomery CC 1,027 820 23% 46% 3% 72%

Nash CC 2,655 2,143 12% 51% 6% 69%

Pamlico CC 543 315 31% 40% 3% 74%

Piedmont CC 2,714 1,754 24% 43% 5% 72%

Pitt CC 5,876 5,170 15% 52% 8% 75%

Randolph CC 2,468 1,805 13% 53% 5% 71%

Richmond CC 2,110 1,495 13% 53% 5% 71%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 778 14% 42% 5% 61%

Robeson CC 3,693 2,088 14% 49% 5% 68%

Rockingham CC 2,043 1,839 14% 50% 5% 69%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 4,900 10% 50% 6% 66%

Sampson CC 1,696 1,065 22% 48% 5% 75%

Sandhills CC 3,732 2,880 10% 51% 7% 68%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 1,750 17% 47% 6% 70%

Southeastern CC 2,373 1,584 11% 52% 6% 69%

Southwestern CC 2,248 1,647 18% 46% 6% 70%

Stanly CC 2,435 2,021 19% 47% 4% 70%

Surry CC 3,281 2,500 14% 52% 6% 72%

Tri-County CC 1,168 748 13% 47% 6% 66%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 3,508 11% 52% 5% 68%

Wake TCC 12,296 11,691 9% 51% 9% 69%

Wayne CC 3,517 2,822 14% 50% 9% 73%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 2,244 17% 53% 5% 75%

Wilkes CC 2,831 1,956 15% 51% 6% 72%

Wilson CC 2,082 1,500 16% 47% 5% 68%

System Total 205,803 167,975 13% 49% 7% 69%

29

Page 309: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

30

CORE INDICATORS OF

SUCCESS MEASURE H: Client Satisfaction With Customized Training

Description/Definition— Percentage of individuals who have received Small Business Center

services from a community college indicating that their expectations have been met.

Methodology and Data Source—A survey individuals receiving services from the Small

Business Centers is administered by colleges to determine level of satisfaction with their training

and services. The data are submitted annually to the System Office at the end of the fiscal year.

Performance Standard—Ninety percent (90%) of businesses/industries surveyed will report

satisfaction with the services provided by community colleges.

Results—Total number of survey respondents was 41,752 in 2007-08. Ninety-four percent

(94%) responded that the customized training provided by community colleges was excellent, or

very good. Fifty-three (53) colleges met the performance standard.

Page 310: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

CLIENT SATISFIED WITH CUSTOMIZED TRAINING, 2007-2008

Institution FTE

Number of Survey

Respondents

% Excellent &

Very Good

Alamance CC 3,871 482 95%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 1,259 94%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 334 96%

Bladen CC 1,399 131 99%

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 715 93%

Brunswick CC 1,548 231 92%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 945 95%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 489 94%

Carteret CC 1,751 354 88%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 1,094 95%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 1,191 96%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 607 93%

Cleveland CC 2,944 723 96%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 852 93%

College of The Albemarle 2,351 1,463 90%

Craven CC 2,751 757 100%

Davidson County CC 3,663 377 91%

Durham TCC 4,622 502 90%

Edgecombe CC 2,122 1,805 98%

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 1,261 96%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 1,120 96%

Gaston College 4,691 860 98%

Guilford TCC 9,882 1,210 80%

Halifax CC 1,557 1,561 96%

Haywood CC 1,903 491 93%

Isothermal CC 2,094 281 86%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 990 99%

Johnston CC 4,158 642 98%

Lenoir CC 3,335 837 95%

Martin CC 899 803 93%

Mayland CC 1,925 371 96%

McDowell TCC 1,176 135 100%

Mitchell CC 2,367 521 93%

Montgomery CC 1,027 444 93%

Nash CC 2,655 506 96%

Pamlico CC 543 126 87%

Piedmont CC 2,714 526 93%

Pitt CC 5,876 703 92%

Randolph CC 2,468 1,113 97%

Richmond CC 2,110 756 89%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 276 93%

Robeson CC 3,693 1,339 96%

Rockingham CC 2,043 418 92%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 135 93%

Sampson CC 1,696 474 96%

Sandhills CC 3,732 983 94%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 437 94%

Southeastern CC 2,373 2,685 92%

Southwestern CC 2,248 222 100%

Stanly CC 2,435 317 95%

Surry CC 3,281 362 97%

Tri-County CC 1,168 390 94%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 668 98%

Wake TCC 12,296 1,916 97%

Wayne CC 3,517 651 92%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 219 94%

Wilkes CC 2,831 284 98%

Wilson CC 2,082 408 95%

System Total 205,803 41,752 94%

31

Page 311: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

32

SUMMARY OF CORE INDICATORS OF SUCCESS

A summary of the System's performance on the measures and the number of colleges meeting

each standard are presented on the next page.

Recognition of Exceptional Institutional Performance (EIP) is based upon a college meeting or

exceeding all performance measures, having no exams for which the college controls who sits

for the exam with a passing rate of less than 70%, and college transfer students performing at a

level equal to or above native UNC system students.

Page 312: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

33

SUMMARY REPORT ON PERFORMANCE MEASURES, 2007-2008

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

MEASURE

STANDARD

SYSTEM

AVERAGE

# COLLEGES

MEETING

STANDARD

Progress of Basic Skills Students

75%

82%

56

Passing Rates on Licensure/

Certification Exams for First-

Time Test Takers

Aggregate = 80%

86%

45*

Performance of College Transfer

Students

83%

88%

44**

Passing Rates in Developmental

Courses

75%

77%

48

Success Rate of Developmental

Students in Subsequent College-

Level Courses

80%

89%

57

Student Satisfaction of

Completers and Non-Completers

90%

96%

56

Curriculum Student Retention,

Graduation & Transfer

65%

69%

57

Client Satisfaction with

Customized Training

90%

94%

53

* 45 colleges met the 80% standard; 30 colleges had no exam for which they controlled who took the

exam with a passing rate < 70; 28 colleges met the Exceptional Institutional Performance level.

** 44 colleges met the 83% standard; 30 colleges met or exceeded the performance of native UNC

sophomores and juniors (87%).

Page 313: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

STATUS OF NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGES MEETING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, 2007-2008

(M = Met Standard)

College

Progress of Basic

Skills Students

Passing Rates on

Licensure

Certif. Exams

Performance of

College

Transfer Students

Passing Rates in

Develop. Courses

Success Rate of

Develop.

Students in College

Level

Courses

Student Satisfaction

of

Completers &

NonComp.

Curriculum Student

Retention,

Graduation &

Transfer

Client Satisfaction

with Customized

Training

Total Standards

Met

Recognition of

Exceptional

Institutional

Performance*

Alamance CC M M M M M M M M 8 Yes

Asheville-Buncombe TCC M M M M M M M M 8 Yes

Beaufort County CC M M M M M M 6

Bladen CC M M M M M M M 7

Blue Ridge CC M M M M M M M M 8 Yes

Brunswick CC M M M M M M M 7

Caldwell CC & TI M M M M M M M 7

Cape Fear CC M M M M M M M M 8

Carteret CC M M M M M M M 7

Catawba Valley CC M M M M M M** M M 8

Central Carolina CC M M M M M M M M 8

Central Piedmont CC M M M M M M M M 8 Yes

Cleveland CC M M M M M 5

Coastal Carolina CC M M M M M M M M 8 Yes

College of The Albemarle M M M M M M M M 8

Craven CC M M M M M** M M 7

Davidson County CC M M M M M M M 7

Durham TCC M M M M M M M 7

Edgecombe CC M M M M M M M 7

Fayetteville TCC M M M M M M M 7

Forsyth TCC M M M M M M M 7

Gaston College M M M M M M M M 8

Guilford TCC M M M M M M M 7

Halifax CC M M M M M 5

Haywood CC M M M M M M 6

Isothermal CC M M M M M M M 7

James Sprunt CC M M M M M M M 7

Johnston CC M M M M M M M 7

Lenoir CC M M M M M M M M 8

Martin CC M M M M M 5

Mayland CC M M M M M M M 7

McDowell TCC M M M M M M M M 8 Yes

*Met all measures and exceptional standard on licensure exams and transfer student performance.**Not eligible for performance funding due to the response rate to be too low (statistically invalid sample size).

Page 314: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

STATUS OF NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGES MEETING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, 2007-2008

(M = Met Standard)

College

Progress of Basic

Skills Students

Passing Rates on

Licensure

Certif. Exams

Performance of

College

Transfer Students

Passing Rates in

Develop. Courses

Success Rate of

Develop.

Students in College

Level

Courses

Student Satisfaction

of

Completers &

NonComp.

Curriculum Student

Retention,

Graduation &

Transfer

Client Satisfaction

with Customized

Training

Total Standards

Met

Recognition of

Exceptional

Institutional

Performance*

Mitchell CC M M M M M M M M 8 Yes

Montgomery CC M M M M M M M 7

Nash CC M M M M M M M 7

Pamlico CC M M M M M 5

Piedmont CC M M M M M M M M 8

Pitt CC M M M M M M M M 8 Yes

Randolph CC M M M M M M M M 8 Yes

Richmond CC M M M M M M 6

Roanoke-Chowan CC M M M M 4

Robeson CC M M M M M M 6

Rockingham CC M M M M M M M M 8

Rowan-Cabarrus CC M M M M M M M M 8

Sampson CC M M M M M M M 7

Sandhills CC M M M M M M M M 8

South Piedmont CC M M M M M M 6

Southeastern CC M M M M M M M 7

Southwestern CC M M M M M M M M 8

Stanly CC M M M M M M M M 8

Surry CC M M M M M M M 7

Tri-County CC M M M M M M M M 8

Vance-Granville CC M M M M M M M M 8

Wake TCC M M M M M M M M 8 Yes

Wayne CC M M M M M M M M 8

Western Piedmont CC M M M M M M M 7

Wilkes CC M M M M M M M M 8 Yes

Wilson CC M M M M M M M 7

*Met all measures and exceptional standard on licensure exams and transfer student performance.**Not eligible for performance funding due to the response rate to be too low (statistically invalid sample size).

Page 315: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 316: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

37

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

STRATEGIC PLAN, 2007-2009

EVALUATION OF PROGRESS

The Critical Success Factors report is the mechanism employed for assessing the progress

of the System in achieving measurable objectives identified in the System's strategic plan.

Factors two through five provide measures that monitor the success of the System in

meeting its target levels of success.

Most of the data presented in this section of the report are System level data, and where

appropriate, college level data are presented for information. These data are to determine

the degree to which the System has met its target levels.

The factors that comprise this section of the report are:

Factor II: Workforce Development

Factor III: Diverse Populations' Learning Needs

Factor IV: Resources

Factor V: Technology

Page 317: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 318: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

39

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR II: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

Supporting North Carolina's economic development has been an important part of the

mission of the Community College System since its beginning. The System is a major

tool for providing the state's citizens with the education and skills they need to be

productive in the workforce. The System's institutions have traditionally worked closely

with the businesses in their areas to insure that the programs offered by the colleges

prepare citizens to take the jobs that are available. They have also provided citizens with

the skills to be self-employed.

North Carolina originated customized training programs for new industries that agreed to

come into the state, and its approach has been copied widely. This program remains a

strong part of the state's economic development arsenal, along with other categorically

funded programs for existing industries and small businesses.

Along with these specialized programs, the System's ability to stay current with the job

market protects the state from skill shortages and protects its citizens from finding their

skills outdated by changing technology and market forces. Measures of the success of

the System in staying on the cutting edge are difficult to determine, but important.

The State Board of Community Colleges has placed renewed emphasis on the role of

North Carolina community colleges for workforce development. The 1999-2001

Strategic Plan established a new mission statement for the System and a new set of

System goals have been adopted by the State Board of Community Colleges which

emphasize education, training and retraining for the workforce, including basic

skills/literacy, occupational and pre-baccalaureate programs.

The measures that have been identified for the success of the System in its economic

development role are:

A. Percentage of Businesses and Industry Satisfied With NCCCS Training Programs

B. Percentage of College Tech Prep Students Enrolling in a Community College

C. Number of Employers and Trainees Served by Small Business Centers and

Customized Training Programs (NEIT, FIT, and CIT)

D. Employment Status of Graduates

E. Employer Satisfaction with Graduates

Page 319: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

40

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

MEASURE A:

Percentage of Businesses and Industries

Satisfied With NCCCS Training Programs

Description/Definition—The percentage of businesses/industries who have received

specialized training programs and services through Customized Training for Job Growth

(formerly NEIT), Customized Training for Technology Investment (formerly CIT),

Customized Training for Productivity Enhancement (formerly FIT), and the Small

Business Centers indicating that their expectations have been met. This measure is

intended primarily to determine the satisfaction of organizations that received specialized

services from a community college.

Methodology and Data Source—A survey of businesses/industries receiving services

from the Customized Training for Job Growth, Customized Training for Technology

Investment, Customized Training for Productivity Enhancement, and the Small Business

Centers is administered by the colleges to determine the degree to which the customized

training meets their needs. The data are submitted annually to the System Office at the

end of the fiscal year.

Performance Target— A performance target for this measure has not been established.

As the data are collected and analyzed, a target will be determined.

Results— In 2007-2008, the average ratings of 77 respondents from Customized Training

for Job Growth program (formerly NEIT) on “Company’s Expectations Met”, “Training

Impact”, and “Training Effectiveness” exceeded the “Very Good” level with average

ratings of 4.60, 4.61 and, 4.61, respectively on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = Unacceptable,

company’s need not satisfied; 5 = Excellent, no improvement necessary, exceeds highest

expectations).

The average ratings of 18 respondents from Customized Training for Technology

Investment (formerly CIT) were 4.61, 4.56, and 4.39, respectively for the same

questionnaire items and on the same scales as in the Customized Training for Job Growth

program.

Customized Training for Productivity Enhancement (formerly FIT) program provided

training to 465 industries. Satisfaction with services provided averaged 4.5 on a scale of

1 to 5. The data indicated that the companies’ needs were met at a highly acceptable

level.

An analysis for the total response of 41,753 on satisfaction with services provided by the

Small Business Center Network (SBCN) indicated that services provided were excellent.

Ninety-nine percent (99%) of the respondents rated the services as “Very Good” or

“Excellent.”

Page 320: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Customized Training for Job Growth (formerly NEIT),

Clent Satisfaction Evaluation, 2007-08

INSTITUTION Total FTE Company's Expectation Met Training Impact Training Effectiveness

Alamance CC 3,871 5 4 4

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 5 5 5

Beaufort County CC 1,821

Bladen CC 1,399 4 4 4

Blue Ridge CC 2,105

Brunswick CC 1,548

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135

Cape Fear CC 7,259 5 4 4

Carteret CC 1,751

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 5 5 5

Central Carolina CC 5,118 4 5 5

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 5 5 5

Cleveland CC 2,944 5 5 5

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 5 5 5

College of The Albemarle 2,351

Craven CC 2,751 4 4 4

Davidson County CC 3,663 4 4 4

Durham TCC 4,622 4 5 3

Edgecombe CC 2,122 5 5 5

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 5 5 5

Forsyth TCC 6,661 5 5 5

Gaston College 4,691 5 5 5

Guilford TCC 9,882 5 5 5

Halifax CC 1,557 4 4 4

Haywood CC 1,903

Isothermal CC 2,094

James Sprunt CC 1,348

Johnston CC 4,158 5 5 5

Lenoir CC 3,335 5 4 5

Martin CC 899

Mayland CC 1,925 4 4 4

McDowell TCC 1,176 4 4 4

Mitchell CC 2,367 5 5 5

Montgomery CC 1,027

Nash CC 2,655 5 5 5

Pamlico CC 543

Piedmont CC 2,714 5 5 5

Pitt CC 5,876 5 5 5

Randolph CC 2,468 5 5 5

Richmond CC 2,110 4 4 4

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876

Robeson CC 3,693 5 5 5

Rockingham CC 2,043 5 5 5

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 4 5 4

Sampson CC 1,696

Sandhills CC 3,732 4 4 4

South Piedmont CC 2,220

Southeastern CC 2,373

Southwestern CC 2,248

Stanly CC 2,435 5 5 5

Surry CC 3,281 4 4 5

Tri-County CC 1,168 5 5 5

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 4 4 4

Wake TCC 12,296 5 5 5

Wayne CC 3,517 5 5 5

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 5 5 5

Wilkes CC 2,831 5 5 5

Wilson CC 2,082 4 5 5

System Total 205,803 4.60 4.61 4.61

41

Page 321: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Customized Training for Technology Investment (formerly CIT),

Clent Satisfaction Evaluation, 2007-08

INSTITUTION Total FTE Company's Expectation Met Training Impact Training Effectiveness

Alamance CC 3,871 4 4 5

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186

Beaufort County CC 1,821

Bladen CC 1,399

Blue Ridge CC 2,105

Brunswick CC 1,548

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135

Cape Fear CC 7,259

Carteret CC 1,751

Catawba Valley CC 4,733

Central Carolina CC 5,118

Central Piedmont CC 14,459

Cleveland CC 2,944

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348

College of The Albemarle 2,351

Craven CC 2,751

Davidson County CC 3,663

Durham TCC 4,622

Edgecombe CC 2,122

Fayetteville TCC 10,252

Forsyth TCC 6,661

Gaston College 4,691 4 4 3

Guilford TCC 9,882

Halifax CC 1,557

Haywood CC 1,903

Isothermal CC 2,094 5 5 5

James Sprunt CC 1,348 5 5 5

Johnston CC 4,158

Lenoir CC 3,335 5 5 5

Martin CC 899

Mayland CC 1,925

McDowell TCC 1,176

Mitchell CC 2,367

Montgomery CC 1,027

Nash CC 2,655

Pamlico CC 543

Piedmont CC 2,714 4 4 4

Pitt CC 5,876 5 5 4

Randolph CC 2,468

Richmond CC 2,110 5 5 5

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876

Robeson CC 3,693 5 5 5

Rockingham CC 2,043

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 5 5 5

Sampson CC 1,696

Sandhills CC 3,732 5 5 5

South Piedmont CC 2,220

Southeastern CC 2,373

Southwestern CC 2,248

Stanly CC 2,435

Surry CC 3,281

Tri-County CC 1,168 4 4 3

Vance-Granville CC 4,237

Wake TCC 12,296

Wayne CC 3,517 5 5 4

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 4 4 4

Wilkes CC 2,831

Wilson CC 2,082

System Total 205,803 4.61 4.56 4.39

42

Page 322: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Customized Training for Productivity Enhancement (formerly FIT), Client Satisfaction Evaluation, 2007-08

INSTITUTION Number of Industries Served Industry Evaluation Summation

Alamance CC 15 4.5

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 11 4.5

Bladen/Brunswick/Southeastern CC 8 4.5

Blue Ridge CC 13 4.5

Caldwell CC & TI 7 4.5

Cape Fear CC 15 4.5

Catawba Valley CC 20 4.5

Central Carolina CC 10 4.5

Central Piedmont CC 10 4.5

Cleveland CC 5 4.5

Coastal Carolina CC 4 4.5

College of The Albemarle/Roanoke-Chowan CC 29 4.5

Craven/Beaufort/Carteret/Pamlico CC 21 4.5

Davidson County CC 18 4.5

Durham TCC 8 4.5

Edgecombe/Martin CC 4 4.5

Fayetteville TCC 11 4.5

Forsyth TCC 10 4.5

Gaston College 10 4.5

Guilford TCC 10 4.5

Halifax CC 4 4.5

Haywood/Southwestern/Tri-county CC 4 4.5

Isothermal CC 15 4.5

Johnston /Wayne CC 6 4.5

Lenoir CC 9 4.5

McDowell TCC/ Mayland CC 5 4.5

Mitchell CC 15 4.5

Nash CC 4 4.5

Piedmont CC 5 4.5

Pitt CC 7 4.5

Randolph CC 36 4.5

Richmond CC 10 4.5

Robeson CC 3 4.5

Rockingham CC 8 4.5

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 9 4.5

Sampson/James Sprunt CC 10 4.5

Sandhills CC 4 4.5

South Piedmont CC 3 4.5

Stanly/Montgomery CC 11 4.5

Surry CC 9 4.5

Vance-Granville CC 17 4.5

Wake TCC 14 4.5

Western Piedmont CC 5 4.5

Wilkes CC 5 4.5

Wilson CC 8 4.5

System Total 465 4.5

43

Page 323: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Small Business Center Network (SBCN) - Client Satisfaction Evaluations, 2007-2008

INSTITUTION Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor % excellent, very good and good Total Responses

Alamance CC 343 116 23 0 0 100% 483

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 886 295 60 15 3 99% 1,260

Beaufort County CC 216 104 14 0 0 100% 335

Bladen CC 110 20 1 0 0 100% 132

Blue Ridge CC 441 223 43 8 0 99% 716

Brunswick CC 158 55 17 1 0 100% 232

Caldwell CC & TI 721 178 41 5 0 99% 946

Cape Fear CC 344 114 26 5 0 99% 490

Carteret CC 236 75 20 20 3 94% 355

Catawba Valley CC 721 313 58 2 0 100% 1,095

Central Carolina CC 884 259 43 5 0 100% 1,192

Central Piedmont CC 381 185 14 3 24 96% 608

Cleveland CC 573 119 28 2 1 100% 724

Coastal Carolina CC 634 156 56 4 2 99% 853

College of The Albemarle 722 601 121 19 0 99% 1,464

Craven CC 458 299 0 0 0 100% 758

Davidson County CC 243 99 28 6 1 98% 378

Durham TCC 328 125 39 9 1 98% 503

Edgecombe CC 1,513 248 41 3 0 100% 1,806

Fayetteville TCC 933 280 47 1 0 100% 1,262

Forsyth TCC 812 265 38 4 1 100% 1,121

Gaston College 667 179 11 2 1 100% 861

Guilford TCC 627 341 164 78 0 94% 1,211

Halifax CC 1,110 385 52 14 0 99% 1,562

Haywood CC 318 139 32 2 0 100% 492

Isothermal CC 166 75 24 11 5 94% 282

James Sprunt CC 912 72 6 0 0 100% 991

Johnston CC 511 115 14 2 0 100% 643

Lenoir CC 533 261 41 2 0 100% 838

Martin CC 512 234 49 8 0 99% 804

Mayland CC 259 97 15 0 0 100% 372

McDowell TCC 113 22 0 0 0 100% 136

Mitchell CC 342 141 36 2 0 100% 522

Montgomery CC 319 96 24 4 1 99% 445

Nash CC 335 151 18 2 0 100% 507

Pamlico CC 79 31 13 2 1 98% 127

Piedmont CC 329 162 31 3 1 99% 527

Pitt CC 457 193 47 5 1 99% 704

Randolph CC 852 224 35 2 0 100% 1,114

Richmond CC 471 204 67 14 0 98% 757

Roanoke-Chowan CC 186 71 16 3 0 99% 277

Robeson CC 963 318 52 5 1 100% 1,340

Rockingham CC 287 98 27 5 1 99% 419

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 104 21 10 0 0 100% 136

Sampson CC 269 185 19 1 0 100% 475

Sandhills CC 706 222 41 9 5 99% 984

South Piedmont CC 318 92 22 4 1 99% 438

Southeastern CC 1,756 706 201 20 2 99% 2,686

Southwestern CC 182 39 1 0 0 100% 223

Stanly CC 223 79 13 2 0 99% 318

Surry CC 262 88 11 1 0 100% 363

Tri-County CC 271 95 17 6 1 98% 391

Vance-Granville CC 528 126 9 5 0 99% 669

Wake TCC 1,444 406 52 8 6 99% 1,917

Wayne CC 425 175 40 11 0 98% 652

Western Piedmont CC 123 82 12 2 0 99% 220

Wilkes CC 227 52 5 0 0 100% 285

Wilson CC 279 109 19 1 0 100% 409

System Total 29,122 10,215 2,004 348 63 99% 41,753

Overall Rating

44

Page 324: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

45

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

MEASURE B:

Percentage of College Tech Prep Students

Enrolling in a Community College

Description/Definition—Percentage of high school graduates who are in a College Tech

Prep program in high school and enroll the following year in a community college. This

measure is dependent on the ability of the high schools to identify graduates of a College

Tech Prep course of study.

Methodology and Data Source— The data on the number of high school graduates who

complete the College Tech Prep requirements are gathered from the North Carolina

Department of Public Instruction. The number and percentage of those students who

enroll in a community college the year following graduation is determined from the

curriculum registration files submitted by the colleges to the System Office.

Performance Target—Performance target for this measure has not been established. As

the data are accurately collected and analyzed, a target level will be determined.

Results— In 2007-2008, 30 percent of the 2007 high school graduates who enrolled in a

community college had successfully completed the requirements of the College Tech

Prep course of study, which was a 0.06 percent decrease over previous year’s figure. The

ABCs of public education, as specified in the high school accountability model, require

year-to-year comparison of percentages of students completing the college tech prep

course of study.

Page 325: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

NUMBER OF 2007 HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES WHO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED TECH PREP

AND ENROLLED IN A COMMUNITY COLLEGE IN 2007-2008

INSTITUTION

TOTAL

FTE

2007 HIGH SCHOOL

GRADUATES

ENROLLED

TECH PREPS

ENROLLED PERCENTAGE

Alamance CC 3,871 671 263 39%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 857 211 25%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 214 94 44%

Bladen CC 1,399 150 29 19%

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 401 190 47%

Brunswick CC 1,548 257 61 24%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 523 172 33%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 1,138 260 23%

Carteret CC 1,751 260 74 28%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 844 342 41%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 494 200 40%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 2,650 445 17%

Cleveland CC 2,944 218 67 31%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 622 215 35%

College of the Albemarle 2,351 360 145 40%

Craven CC 2,751 445 84 19%

Davidson County CC 3,663 461 137 30%

Durham TCC 4,622 424 32 8%

Edgecombe CC 2,122 220 57 26%

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 1,194 478 40%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 1,093 284 26%

Gaston College 4,691 802 296 37%

Guilford TCC 9,882 1,780 599 34%

Halifax CC 1,557 175 66 38%

Haywood CC 1,903 261 121 46%

Isothermal CC 2,094 366 151 41%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 118 37 31%

Johnston CC 4,158 343 89 26%

Lenoir CC 3,335 435 172 40%

Martin CC 899 119 43 36%

Mayland CC 1,925 146 74 51%

McDowell TCC 1,176 136 48 35%

Mitchell CC 2,367 489 282 58%

Montgomery CC 1,027 117 30 26%

Nash CC 2,655 466 152 33%

Pamlico CC 543 17 12 71%

Piedmont CC 2,714 250 74 30%

Pitt CC 5,876 1,357 412 30%

Randolph CC 2,468 399 39 10%

Richmond CC 2,110 224 132 59%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 73 48 66%

Robeson CC 3,693 294 105 36%

Rockingham CC 2,043 392 109 28%

Rowan Cabarrus CC 5,137 874 226 26%

Sampson CC 1,696 165 55 33%

Sandhills CC 3,732 606 244 40%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 289 71 25%

Southeastern CC 2,373 319 102 32%

Southwestern CC 2,248 258 70 27%

Stanly CC 2,435 348 54 16%

Surry CC 3,281 583 198 34%

Tri-County CC 1,168 167 68 41%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 529 135 26%

Wake TCC 12,296 2,122 216 10%

Wayne CC 3,517 610 225 37%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 429 173 40%

Wilkes CC 2,831 448 236 53%

Wilson CC 2,082 263 72 27%

System Total 205,803 30,265 9,076 30%

46

Page 326: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

47

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

MEASURE C:

Number of Employers and Trainees Served by

Small Business Centers and Customized

Training Programs (NEIT, FIT, and CIT)

Description/Definition—Number of employers and individuals served by categorical

programs created specifically to address employers’ needs. This measure is designed to

provide information on specific activities of community colleges that promote the

economic development of the state.

Methodology and Data Source—Information on the number of trainees, projects,

businesses, and individuals served through the categorical programs are collected

annually by the Technology and Workforce Development Division of the North Carolina

Community College System Office.

Performance Target— The programs were designed to provide specialized services and

were not intended to be "numbers driven." Fluctuations in numbers from year to year

reflect various factors such as funding availability, scope of the projects, and local

demand.

Results—In 2007-08, number of trainees in Customized Training for Job Growth

(formerly NEIT) decreased by 11.8 percent over last year’s figure, while the number of

trainees in Customized Training for Technology Investment (formerly CIT) increased by

19.6 percent during the same period of time. Number of trainees in Customized Training

for Productivity Enhancement (formerly FIT) significantly decreased by 42.5 percent in

the fiscal year of 2007-08.

For Small Business Center Network, number of seminar participants slightly decreased

by 0.7 percent in 2007-08. Number of counsels and number of continuing education and

curriculum course participants also decreased by 11 percent and 23.7 percent,

respectively. However, number of projects in Customized Training for Technology

Investment (formerly CIT) grew by 79 percent in 2007-08.

Page 327: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

48

CUSTOMIZED TRAINING FOR JOB GROWTH (formerly NEIT)

YEAR

TRAINEES

PROJECTS

2003-04 10,117 121

2004-05

12,398

164

2005-06 23,799 197

2006-07 19,380 208

2007-08

17,087

187

CUSTOMIZED TRAINING FOR PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT (formerly FIT)

YEAR TRAINEES INDUSTRIES

2003-04 10,559 701

2004-05

11,159

797

2005-06 10,557 623

2006-07

2007-08

10,728

6,170

563

465

Page 328: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

49

SMALL BUSINESS CENTER NETWORK

YEAR

# OF

CENTERS

PARTICIPANTS

COUNSEL

REFERRAL

EXT./CURR.

COURSE

PARTICIPANT

2003-04 58 44,475 6,517 5,831 12,561

2004-05

58

44,993

7,205

5,310

15,806

2005-06 58 51,312 6,117 4,873 14,591

2006-07 58 55,526 5,333 4,365 14,922

2007-08

58

55,151

4,744

N/A*

11,388

* Information not available.

CUSTOMIZED TRAINING FOR TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT (formerly CIT)

YEAR

TRAINEES

PROJECTS

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

297

1,253

1,498

12

19

34

Page 329: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

50

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

MEASURE D:

Employment Status of Graduates

Description/Definition— Proportion of identified community college completers who are

employed within one year of last attendance.

Methodology and Data Sources—The North Carolina Common Follow-up System

(CFS) tracks students’ employment status after they leave the colleges. The Common

Follow-up System (CFS) is a cooperative venture of participating state agencies under the

auspices of the North Carolina State Occupational Information Coordinating Committee

(NC SOICC). The CFS provides a highly efficient and cost effective method for

collecting follow-up information for education, employment, and training program

participants statewide. The CFS is maintained by the Employment Security Commission

(ESC).

Each year the agencies involved in the CFS submit unit record data on participants to the

ESC. Among the agencies included in this process are the public high schools,

community colleges, and the four-year public universities. Each agency's data are

matched against the Unemployment Insurance (UI) files and the other participating

agencies' files. A database containing information on employment, employer, quarterly

wages, receipt of unemployment benefits, and participation in other agencies' programs is

returned to each submitting agency. The database each agency receives is limited to the

participants that the agency submits for the data match. This is to say, the database

received by community colleges has information only on community college students.

Once the CFS database is received, it is matched against the CRPFAR (Curriculum

Registration, Progress, and Financial Aid Report) database and the following year

curriculum student registration data. This matching is conducted to determine

demographic characteristics of the participants, such as students' completion status at the

end of the academic year and whether they re-enroll the following year. Students who

obtain an associate degree, certificate, or diploma in the year given and do not re-enroll in

any of the colleges the following year are defined as "exit completers."

Students who have wages in any quarter during the year are considered employed. Those

who are found both in registration records and UI records but have no quarterly wages

during the year and have applied for unemployment insurance benefits or job services of

the Employment Security Council are considered unemployed. Individuals who are not

found in the UI records are omitted from the analysis. This would include individuals

who are working out-of-state, who are enrolled in a four-year college or university and

not working, who never entered the labor market, etc.

Performance Target— The performance target is 95 percent of completers are to be

employed.

Page 330: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

51

Results—Data on 18,021 graduates of the 2006-07 academic year were collected.

System average employment rate was 99.69 percent. All 58 community colleges met the

performance target.

Page 331: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERCENT OF 2006-07 GRADUATES EMPLOYED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF COMPLETION

College FTE

Number of

Graduates

(minus inmates

and missing

students)

Percent of 2006-07

Graduates Employed

Within One Year of

Graduating

Alamance CC 3,871 539 99.44%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 608 99.84%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 141 99.29%

Bladen CC 1,399 95 100.00%

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 127 100.00%

Brunswick CC 1,548 157 100.00%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 392 99.74%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 718 99.58%

Carteret CC 1,751 140 98.57%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 484 100.00%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 390 100.00%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 753 99.60%

Cleveland CC 2,944 293 99.32%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 352 98.86%

College of The Albemarle 2,351 199 99.50%

Craven CC 2,751 230 99.57%

Davidson County CC 3,663 492 99.59%

Durham TCC 4,622 340 99.71%

Edgecombe CC 2,122 189 99.47%

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 684 99.71%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 731 99.86%

Gaston College 4,691 432 100.00%

Guilford TCC 9,882 791 99.62%

Halifax CC 1,557 199 100.00%

Haywood CC 1,903 193 100.00%

Isothermal CC 2,094 200 99.50%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 202 99.50%

Johnston CC 4,158 366 99.73%

Lenoir CC 3,335 273 100.00%

Martin CC 899 85 100.00%

Mayland CC 1,925 109 100.00%

McDowell TCC 1,176 142 99.30%

Mitchell CC 2,367 190 99.47%

Montgomery CC 1,027 155 100.00%

Nash CC 2,655 215 99.53%

Pamlico CC 543 71 100.00%

Piedmont CC 2,714 269 99.63%

Pitt CC 5,876 650 99.38%

Randolph CC 2,468 202 100.00%

Richmond CC 2,110 155 100.00%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 79 100.00%

Robeson CC 3,693 182 100.00%

Rockingham CC 2,043 232 99.57%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 432 100.00%

Sampson CC 1,696 154 100.00%

Sandhills CC 3,732 302 100.00%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 174 99.43%

Southeastern CC 2,373 164 100.00%

Southwestern CC 2,248 252 99.60%

Stanly CC 2,435 262 100.00%

Surry CC 3,281 354 99.72%

Tri-County CC 1,168 92 97.83%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 349 99.43%

Wake TCC 12,296 909 99.78%

Wayne CC 3,517 303 99.67%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 321 99.69%

Wilkes CC 2,831 281 100.00%

Wilson CC 2,082 226 99.56%

System Total 205,803 18,021 99.69%

52

Page 332: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

53

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

MEASURE E:

Employer Satisfaction With Graduates

Description/Definition—Percentage of a sample of businesses who employ individuals

trained or educated by a community college indicating that they are satisfied with the

quality of those employees as it relates to the community college training and education.

This measure is intended primarily to determine the satisfaction of organizations whose

employees have been trained through a community college.

Methodology and Data Source — Data are collected through a college administered

survey, with each college using a standard set of questions. The results of the surveys are

submitted to the Research and Performance Management section of the System Office

annually

Performance Target — Eighty-five percent (85%) of employers surveyed will report

satisfaction with the skills of employees trained or educated by community colleges.

Results— In 2007-2008, 9,251 employers of community college graduates were

surveyed. A total of 2,405 surveys were completed and returned by employers, for a 26

percent response rate. Overall, 94 percent of those employers who responded to the

survey indicated that they were satisfied with the job preparation of community college

graduates. Fifty-seven (57) colleges met the performance target for this measure.

Page 333: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERCENT OF EMPLOYERS SATISFIED WITH THE QUALITY OF PROGRAM COMPLETERS, 2007-08

INSTITUTION FTE

NUMBER OF

EMPLOYERS

SURVEYED

RESPONSE

RATE

PERCENT

SATISFIED

Alamance CC 3,871 65 35% 90%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 73 64% 98%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 179 42% 98%

Bladen CC 1,399 30 27% 100%

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 100 25% 95%

Brunswick CC 1,548 96 14% 100%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 1,161 17% 91%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 140 24% 97%

Carteret CC 1,751 50 30% 93%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 115 46% 96%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 142 20% 93%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 249 45% 98%

Cleveland CC 2,944 428 6% 88%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 175 49% 97%

College of The Albemarle 2,351 54 57% 100%

Craven CC 2,751 189 10% 95%

Davidson County CC 3,663 64 58% 97%

Durham TCC 4,622 102 36% 97%

Edgecombe CC 2,122 94 70% 100%

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 99 49% 94%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 652 7% 100%

Gaston College 4,691 1,311 4% 86%

Guilford TCC 9,882 343 15% 100%

Halifax CC 1,557 35 40% 100%

Haywood CC 1,903 54 93% 100%

Isothermal CC 2,094 56 20% 100%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 250 6% 100%

Johnston CC 4,158 71 61% 95%

Lenoir CC 3,335 61 57% 94%

Martin CC 899 15 100% 93%

Mayland CC 1,925 61 54% 100%

McDowell TCC 1,176 63 16% 100%

Mitchell CC 2,367 60 20% 100%

Montgomery CC 1,027 33 27% 100%

Nash CC 2,655 31 100% 100%

Pamlico CC 543 15 67% 100%

Piedmont CC 2,714 45 24% 100%

Pitt CC 5,876 133 86% 98%

Randolph CC 2,468 225 34% 94%

Richmond CC 2,110 101 26% 100%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 20 50% 100%

Robeson CC 3,693 100 33% 100%

Rockingham CC 2,043 33 100% 100%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 164 35% 96%

Sampson CC 1,696 28 54% 100%

Sandhills CC 3,732 100 73% 100%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 296 20% 88%

Southeastern CC 2,373 202 6% 92%

Southwestern CC 2,248 130 62% 99%

Stanly CC 2,435 65 74% 94%

Surry CC 3,281 60 53% 94%

Tri-County CC 1,168 117 13% 93%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 98 98% 99%

Wake TCC 12,296 121 20% 100%

Wayne CC 3,517 125 63% 97%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 136 24% 100%

Wilkes CC 2,831 169 7% 83%

Wilson CC 2,082 67 48% 97%

System Totals 205,803 9,251 26% 94%

54

Page 334: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

55

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR III: DIVERSE POPULATIONS’ LEARNING NEEDS

At the core of the Community College System's mission is its open door policy. Community

colleges, in the words of founding father Dallas Herring, "take people from where they are to

where they want to be." The special mission of the community colleges is to serve those who

did not have opportunities to learn or who missed out on those opportunities, and to serve

people who have special problems to overcome. Thus, there is an emphasis on reaching out

to the under-served: dropouts, handicapped, economically or educationally disadvantaged

and other groups who are not traditionally included in higher education.

There are many issues facing community colleges today, but perhaps none strike at the core

of our mission as hard as does the reality of limited resources in this time of economic

uncertainty. How long can the "open door" remain open when personnel, services, and

facilities are strained to their limits? As the demands on community colleges continue to rise

without a corresponding increase in resources, the "open door" that is the path to opportunity

for so many closes just a bit more.

The state needs to raise the productivity of its citizens, and these are times in which people

have a harder time being self-sufficient and raising families unless they have an education.

Providing access to education, a constitutional duty of the state, is increasingly important to

individuals and society. A successful community college system will reach out to under-

served groups.

The measures identified as indicators of the System's success in meeting the learning needs

of diverse populations are:

A. Number and Percentage of Dropouts Annually Served by Basic Skills Programs

B. Number of GEDs and AHSDs Awarded Compared to the Number of Dropouts Statewide

C. Percentage of Basic Skills Students and Recent High School Graduates Enrolling in a

Community College

D. Unduplicated Headcount in English as a Second Language (ESL)

E. Number of Under-Represented Students Enrolled Per Category

F. Percentage of Students Receiving Financial Aid and Amount of Aid Compared With Cost

of Attendance

G. Percentage of Population of Service Area Enrolled

H. Goal Completion for Completers

Page 335: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

56

DIVERSE POPULATIONS

LEARNING NEEDS

MEASURE A:

Number and Percentage of Dropouts Annually Served

by Basic Skills Programs

Description/Definition—The number and percentage of high school dropouts who enroll in a

basic skills program at a community college. Basic skills programs include Adult Basic

Education, Adult High School, General Educational Development (GED), Compensatory

Education, and English as a Second Language.

Methodology and Data Source—Data on last year of high school attendance and number of

years of high school completed are gathered at the time a student registers for classes. The

last year of high school attendance data is matched against initial enrollment year to

determine the number of students who enroll in a community college basic skills program

within one year of dropping out of high school.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been established for this measure.

Results—In 2007-2008, community colleges enrolled 15,652 high school dropouts who

dropped out of school during 2007-08, which was a 3.9 percent increase in enrollment for the

academic year 2007-08. This "safety net" feature continues to be an important role played by

community colleges.

NUMBER OF RECENT HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUTS WHO

ENROLLED IN A BASIC SKILLS PROGRAM

YEAR DROPPED

OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL

YEAR ENROLLED IN A

COMMUNITY COLLEGE

NUMBER

ENROLLED

1/1/03-6/30/04

1/1/04-6/30/05

1/1/05-6/30/06

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

12,346

12,903

13,359

1/1/06-6/30/07

1/1/07-6/30/08

2006-07

2007-08

15,064

15,652

Page 336: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

NUMBER OF HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUTS WHO ENROLLED

IN A BASIC SKILLS PROGRAM AT A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DURING 2007-2008

INSTITUTION

TOTAL

FTE

NUMBER

ENROLLED

Alamance CC 3,871 257

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 494

Beaufort County CC 1,821 101

Bladen CC 1,399 126

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 307

Brunswick CC 1,548 123

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 326

Cape Fear CC 7,259 556

Carteret CC 1,751 173

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 213

Central Carolina CC 5,118 465

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 1,217

Cleveland CC 2,944 84

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 880

College of The Albemarle 2,351 358

Craven CC 2,751 197

Davidson County CC 3,663 434

Durham TCC 4,622 186

Edgecombe CC 2,122 192

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 344

Forsyth TCC 6,661 811

Gaston College 4,691 315

Guilford TCC 9,882 415

Halifax CC 1,557 193

Haywood CC 1,903 127

Isothermal CC 2,094 232

James Sprunt CC 1,348 103

Johnston CC 4,158 175

Lenoir CC 3,335 224

Martin CC 899 93

Mayland CC 1,925 95

McDowell TCC 1,176 70

Mitchell CC 2,367 228

Montgomery CC 1,027 31

Nash CC 2,655 190

Pamlico CC 543 20

Piedmont CC 2,714 138

Pitt CC 5,876 410

Randolph CC 2,468 286

Richmond CC 2,110 292

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 22

Robeson CC 3,693 162

Rockingham CC 2,043 125

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 183

Sampson CC 1,696 367

Sandhills CC 3,732 244

South Piedmont CC 2,220 199

Southeastern CC 2,373 126

Southwestern CC 2,248 349

Stanly CC 2,435 312

Surry CC 3,281 187

Tri-County CC 1,168 75

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 406

Wake TCC 12,296 527

Wayne CC 3,517 280

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 208

Wilkes CC 2,831 156

Wilson CC 2,082 243

System Total 205,803 15,652

57

Page 337: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

58

DIVERSE POPULATIONS

LEARNING NEEDS

MEASURE B:

Number of GEDs and AHSDs Awarded Compared to

the Number of Dropouts Statewide

Description/Definition—Number of GEDs and Adult High School Diplomas (AHSDs)

awarded by community colleges annually compared to the number of public school dropouts.

This measure serves as an indicator of the degree to which community colleges reduce the

total pool of people in North Carolina with less than a high school education.

Methodology and Data Source—Data on the number of GEDs and AHSDs awarded are

gathered and reported annually by the North Carolina Community College System Office.

Data on the number of dropouts is provided by the North Carolina Department of Public

Instruction.

Performance Target—By 2001, an increase by 10 percent the number of individuals

enrolled in the GED and AHSD programs that complete the program has been set.

Results—Number of GEDs and AHSDs awarded in 2007-08 was 15,307 which was a 1.1

percent increase from the previous year. Number of students added in the dropout pool

decreased by 15.2% (1,279) in 2007-08.

NUMBER OF GEDs AND AHSDs AWARDED COMPARED TO THE

NUMBER OF DROPOUTS STATEWIDE

YEAR

NEW DROPOUTS ADDED

TO DROPOUT POOL

GED/AHS DIPLOMAS

AWARDED

INCREASE IN

DROPOUT POOL

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

20,035

20,175

22,180

14,419

15,910

14,922

5,616

4,265

7,258

2006-07

2007-08

23,550

22,434

15,144

15,307

8,406

7,127

Page 338: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

NUMBER OF GEDs/AHSDs AWARDED, 2007-2008

INSTITUTION

TOTAL

FTE AHS GED

Alamance CC 3,871 44 285

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 4 527

Beaufort County CC 1,821 156

Bladen CC 1,399 13 74

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 2 230

Brunswick CC 1,548 27 87

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 92 184

Cape Fear CC 7,259 157 184

Carteret CC 1,751 34 155

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 341

Central Carolina CC 5,118 121 423

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 276 644

Cleveland CC 2,944 51 71

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 21 269

College of the Albemarle 2,351 55 309

Craven CC 2,751 26 134

Davidson County CC 3,663 49 250

Durham TCC 4,622 42 227

Edgecombe CC 2,122 5 185

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 32 114

Forsyth TCC 6,661 94 380

Gaston College 4,691 155 337

Guilford TCC 9,882 32 230

Halifax CC 1,557 143

Haywood CC 1,903 12 73

Isothermal CC 2,094 72 172

James Sprunt CC 1,348 7 50

Johnston CC 4,158 36 137

Lenoir CC 3,335 11 204

Martin CC 899 6 71

Mayland CC 1,925 228

McDowell TCC 1,176 107

Mitchell CC 2,367 255

Montgomery CC 1,027 3 84

Nash CC 2,655 20 139

Pamlico CC 543 32

Piedmont CC 2,714 162

Pitt CC 5,876 67 183

Randolph CC 2,468 27 282

Richmond CC 2,110 21 293

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 166

Robeson CC 3,693 93 59

Rockingham CC 2,043 207

Rowan Cabarrus CC 5,137 538

Sampson CC 1,696 245

Sandhills CC 3,732 14 294

South Piedmont CC 2,220 26 285

Southeastern CC 2,373 104

Southwestern CC 2,248 13 349

Stanly CC 2,435 120 69

Surry CC 3,281 206

Tri-County CC 1,168 115

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 121 480

Wake TCC 12,296 57 629

Wayne CC 3,517 95 227

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 62 408

Wilkes CC 2,831 35 134

Wilson CC 2,082 29 102

System Total 205,803 2,279 13,028

59

Page 339: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

60

DIVERSE POPULATIONS

LEARNING NEEDS

MEASURE C:

Number of Basic Skills Students and Recent High

School Graduates Enrolling in a Community College

Description/Definition—Number and percentage increase of basic skills students and recent

high school graduates who enroll in a community college. The measure is designed to

determine the number and percentage that move directly from basic skills programs into a

community college curriculum or occupational extension program, as well as the number and

percentage of high school students who directly go to a curriculum program in a community

college. The tracking of basic skills students into curriculum or occupational extension is

important for determining the success of community colleges in encouraging students to get

the necessary skills for today's marketplace.

Methodology and Data Source—The number of recent high school graduates enrolling in a

community college is reported annually by the Information Services Section of the North

Carolina Community College System Office. The number of basic skills students enrolling

in a curriculum or occupational extension course are determined by tracking basic skills

students from one year to the next utilizing the registration files submitted by the colleges.

This analysis is done by the Research and Performance Management section in the

President’s Office, North Carolina Community College System Office.

Performance Target—By 2001, increase the percentage of each target group that enroll in a

community college by 10 percent.

Results—Number of basic skills students enrolling in curriculum or occupational extension

courses decreased by 2.5 percent, from 11,549 in 2006-07 to 11,260 in 2007-08. The

enrollment of the 2006-07 high school graduates in community colleges in the academic year

of 2007-08 (29,603) represented a 14.7 percent increase from the previous year’s enrollment.

Page 340: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

61

TRANSITION OF BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS TO OCCUPATIONAL EXTENSION/

CURRICULUM PROGRAMS AND HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES TO CURRICULUM

PROGRAMS

YEAR ENROLLED

BASIC SKILLS STUDENTS

HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES

NUMBER

PERCENT

INCREASE

NUMBER

PERCENT

INCREASE

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

12,333

12,503

12,039

11.3 %

1.4 %

- 3.7 %

22,858

24,323

24,058

2.5 %

6.4 %

- 1.1 %

2006-07

2007-08

11,549

11,260

- 4 %

-2.5%

25,804

29,603

7.3 %

14.7%

Page 341: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

62

DIVERSE POPULATIONS

LEARNING NEEDS

MEASURE D:

Unduplicated Headcount in English as a Second

Language (ESL)

Description/Definition—The number of individuals enrolled in English as a Second

Language (ESL) programs in North Carolina Community Colleges.

Methodology and Data Source—Enrollment data on English as a Second Language are

collected and reported annually by the North Carolina Community College System Office.

Source of the data is the Data Warehouse.

Performance Target—By 2001, increase the enrollment in English as a Second Language

programs by 10 percent.

Results—Total number of students served by ESL program was 35,154, which decreased by

5.7 percent from 2006-07 to 2007-08.

UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT IN

ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE (ESL)

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

YEAR

UNDUPLICATED

ENROLLMENT

% INCREASE

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

36,740

36,883

35,258

-1.9%

0.4%

-4.4%

2006-07

2007-08

37,272

35,154

5.7%

-5.7%

Page 342: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

UNDUPLICATED ENROLLMENT IN ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE, 2007-2008

Alamance CC 3,871 158 170 78 113 149 140 808

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 117 118 164 220 153 178 950

Beaufort County CC 1,821 5 29 33 66 31 29 193

Bladen CC 1,399 3 2 19 29 5 6 64

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 43 229 100 79 85 97 633

Brunswick CC 1,548 25 31 59 48 20 21 204

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 23 38 51 65 54 101 332

Cape Fear CC 7,259 63 92 158 252 101 167 833

Carteret CC 1,751 15 72 41 28 31 18 205

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 56 143 142 236 151 230 958

Central Carolina CC 5,118 94 247 334 365 205 254 1,499

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 230 337 832 1,077 910 1,177 4,563

Cleveland CC 2,944 6 7 19 21 23 26 102

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 8 65 37 21 43 36 210

College of The Albemarle 2,351 32 73 94 73 21 41 334

Craven CC 2,751 45 31 67 64 32 85 324

Davidson County CC 3,663 9 27 56 78 84 142 396

Durham TCC 4,622 111 552 389 311 499 699 2,561

Edgecombe CC 2,122 3 14 18 21 16 22 94

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 45 89 119 152 172 217 794

Forsyth TCC 6,661 137 177 353 480 273 517 1,937

Gaston College 4,691 50 45 102 125 142 237 701

Guilford TCC 9,882 504 155 374 553 325 743 2,654

Halifax CC 1,557 13 7 7 2 1 2 32

Haywood CC 1,903 7 21 22 17 9 12 88

Isothermal CC 2,094 7 23 37 50 30 61 208

James Sprunt CC 1,348 19 13 26 48 11 21 138

Johnston CC 4,158 52 60 110 132 82 45 481

Lenoir CC 3,335 30 50 77 66 39 45 307

Martin CC 899 5 11 20 25 5 2 68

Mayland CC 1,925 14 24 27 22 33 41 161

McDowell TCC 1,176 6 14 21 31 21 27 120

Mitchell CC 2,367 31 79 132 106 85 175 608

Montgomery CC 1,027 7 23 39 46 43 48 206

Nash CC 2,655 13 31 35 56 32 39 206

Pamlico CC 543 1 1 8 10 20

Piedmont CC 2,714 12 14 25 19 9 9 88

Pitt CC 5,876 36 73 104 85 62 75 435

Randolph CC 2,468 23 55 114 116 88 83 479

Richmond CC 2,110 19 35 73 89 63 115 394

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 15 1 2 1 4 23

Robeson CC 3,693 18 17 62 124 23 20 264

Rockingham CC 2,043 8 15 33 69 22 24 171

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 112 158 150 200 110 66 796

Sampson CC 1,696 5 20 45 46 40 38 194

Sandhills CC 3,732 7 28 67 88 48 74 312

South Piedmont CC 2,220 31 72 213 298 197 160 971

Southeastern CC 2,373 9 13 37 24 1 10 94

Southwestern CC 2,248 25 39 83 102 38 47 334

Stanly CC 2,435 18 19 44 62 11 30 184

Surry CC 3,281 17 40 69 70 27 42 265

Tri-County CC 1,168 3 2 16 15 7 14 57

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 4 72 35 34 31 19 195

Wake TCC 12,296 1,585 758 608 582 578 263 4,374

Wayne CC 3,517 51 36 84 144 40 96 451

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 110 97 42 62 41 28 380

Wilkes CC 2,831 19 39 56 73 36 52 275

Wilson TCC 2,082 15 92 130 99 52 38 426

System Totals 205,803 4,129 4,794 6,282 7,482 5,449 7,018 35,154

HIGH

BEGINNINGINSTITUTION

SYSTEM

FTE

ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE

BEGINNING

LITERACY

LOW

BEGINNING

INTERMEDIATE

LOW

INTERMEDIATE

HIGH ADVANCED TOTAL

Source: Data Warehouse 63

Page 343: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

64

DIVERSE POPULATIONS

LEARNING NEEDS

MEASURE E:

Number of Under-Represented Students Enrolled Per

Category

Definition/Description— This measure is intended to examine the enrollment of under-represented

students in community college programs.

Methodology and Data Source—Source of the data for this measure is the Curriculum, Registration,

Progress, Financial Aid Report (CRPFAR) files maintained by the System Office. For 2007-08,

percentage of each ethnicity group in the total North Carolina population was analyzed based on 2007

American Community Survey (Table, B02001), American Fact Finder (U.S. Census Bureau) and

2005-2007 American Community Survey 3-Year Estimates: Data Profile Highlights.

Performance Target— Identify populations under-represented in community college programs and

increase their enrollment by 10 percent.

Results— In 2007-2008, Hispanic/Latino ethnicity group was consistently under-represented in the

Curriculum programs as well as Occupational Extension, except in the Basic Skills programs, where

Hispanics were disproportionately over-represented (20.7%). Asian/Pacific Islander was also over-

represented in the Basic Skills program. African-Americans were over-represented in the Basic Skills

and HRD programs, while Whites were under-represented in the both programs. Overall pattern of

ethnic representation in each category was by and large the same as last year’s.

PERCENT ENROLLMENT OF EACH ETHNICITY GROUP PER CATEGORY

ETHNICITY GROUP ASIAN/

PACIFIC

ISLANDER

BLACK HISPANIC/

LATINO

AMERICAN

INDIAN

OTHER WHITE

% of NC Population*** 1.9% 21.3% 6.6% 1.1% 4.2% 70.0%

Curriculum

Associate

Certificate

Diploma

Transitional

2.2% 26.8% 3.6%* 1.6% 4.8% 61.0%

1.8% 27.5% 3.3%* 1.4% 4.1% 62.0%

1.5% 27.6% 2.6%* 1.7% 3.0% 63.6%

1.9% 18.9% 4.0% 1.1% 4.7% 69.3%

Continuing Ed

Basic Skills

Occupational Extension

HRD

4.0%** 33.9%** 20.7%** 1.6% 2.1%* 37.8%*

0.6% 15.1% 2.0% 1.6% 1.2%* 79.7%

0.9% 46.0%** 4.4% 2.2% 1.7%* 45.0%*

*Under-represented compared to the percentage of its ethnic group in NC total population.

**Over-represented compared to the percentage of its ethnic group in NC total population.

*** Total percentage of each race/ethnic group exceeds 100% due to the categorization of

Hispanic/Latino, which includes two or more races.

Page 344: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

65

DIVERSE POPULATIONS

LEARNING NEEDS

MEASURE F:

Percentage of Students Receiving Financial Aid and

Amount of Aid Compared With Cost of Attendance

Description/Definition—The percentage of curriculum students enrolled in award granting

programs who receive some type of financial aid and the average amount of that aid

compared with the cost of attendance. For purposes of this measure, cost of attendance

includes tuition and fees, books and supplies, and other expenses.

Methodology and Data Source—Beginning 2002-03, data were collected by the System

Office and stored in Data Warehouse. Thus the number of curriculum students receiving

financial aid and the average amount received were based on the information from the Data

Warehouse.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been set for this measure.

Results—Number of students receiving financial aid in 2007-08 decreased by 7,382 (6.8%)

over last year’s figure. However, the average amount of aid received increased by $583.

Page 345: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

66

NUMBER AND PERCENT OF CURRICULUM STUDENTS RECEIVING FINANCIAL AID

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

YEAR NUMBER OF CURRICULUM

STUDENTS RECEIVING

FINANCIAL AID*

PERCENT OF CURRICULUM

STUDENTS RECEIVING

FINANCIAL AID*

AVERAGE

DOLLAR

VALUE

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

152,332

154,922

128,429

108,065

55.1%

56.5%

47.8%

51.2%

$1,602

$1,726

$2,044

$2,372

2007-08 100,683 45.4% $2,955

* Number and percent based on number of curriculum students enrolled in associate degree, diploma

and certificate granting programs. Students enrolled in transitional programs (special credit, dual

enrollment and Huskins Bill) are not eligible for financial aid.

Page 346: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

67

DIVERSE POPULATIONS

LEARNING NEEDS

MEASURE G:

Percentage of the Adult Population in Service Area

Enrolled

Description/Definition—Percentage of the adult population in each college's service area

enrolled in either curriculum or continuing education.

Methodology and Data Source— An unduplicated headcount for each college is determined

from the curriculum and continuing education registration data files. The service area

population data are derived from population statistics available from the State Demographers

office. The population data are for individuals 18 years or older.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been set for this measure.

Results—Percentage of adult population served slightly increased from 12.05 percent in

2006-07 to 12.14 percent in 2007-08. The enrollment figure in 2007-08 increased by 20,055

(2.45 %) over 2006-07.

PERCENT OF ADULT POPULATION IN SERVICE AREA

ENROLLED PER COLLEGE (STATE AVERAGE)

YEAR

% OF SERVICE AREA

POPULATION ENROLLED

(SYSTEM AVERAGE)

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

11.95%

12.34%

12.18%

2006-07 12.05%

2007-08 12.14%

Page 347: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERCENT OF ADULT POPULATION IN SERVICE AREA ENROLLED, 2007-2008

INSTITUTION

TOTAL

FTE

ANNUAL

ENROLLMENT

SERVICE AREA

18 & UP PERCENTAGE

Alamance CC 3,871 15,901 108,432 14.66%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 26,469 193,994 13.64%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 7,137 53,760 13.28%

Bladen CC 1,399 4,543 24,561 18.50%

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 15,903 105,833 15.03%

Brunswick CC 1,548 7,701 79,549 9.68%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 14,294 99,332 14.39%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 26,828 190,430 14.09%

Carteret CC 1,751 8,669 51,783 16.74%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 21,713 143,883 15.09%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 20,593 166,865 12.34%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 60,566 640,404 9.46%

Cleveland CC 2,944 10,327 73,237 14.10%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 24,276 127,654 19.02%

College of the Albemarle 2,351 10,855 114,775 9.46%

Craven CC 2,751 16,337 73,870 22.12%

Davidson County CC 3,663 16,893 149,755 11.28%

Durham TCC 4,622 25,509 294,936 8.65%

Edgecombe CC 2,122 9,263 38,774 23.89%

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 33,976 230,012 14.77%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 30,337 290,788 10.43%

Gaston College 4,691 22,517 208,681 10.79%

Guilford TCC 9,882 40,595 350,156 11.59%

Halifax CC 1,557 7,475 58,580 12.76%

Haywood CC 1,903 6,772 45,631 14.84%

Isothermal CC 2,094 10,734 63,854 16.81%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 8,263 39,303 21.02%

Johnston CC 4,158 16,167 115,213 14.03%

Lenoir CC 3,335 14,113 67,494 20.91%

Martin CC 899 4,339 43,501 9.97%

Mayland CC 1,925 6,859 42,649 16.08%

McDowell TCC 1,176 8,239 34,202 24.09%

Mitchell CC 2,367 11,696 112,066 10.44%

Montgomery CC 1,027 4,227 20,862 20.26%

Nash CC 2,655 12,464 70,088 17.78%

Pamlico CC 543 1,735 10,566 16.42%

Piedmont CC 2,714 8,906 47,314 18.82%

Pitt CC 5,876 19,762 115,941 17.04%

Randolph CC 2,468 11,762 105,246 11.18%

Richmond CC 2,110 7,689 61,922 12.42%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 3,616 50,166 7.21%

Robeson CC 3,693 13,491 92,885 14.52%

Rockingham CC 2,043 10,187 71,100 14.33%

Rowan Cabarrus CC 5,137 20,559 224,147 9.17%

Sampson CC 1,696 7,552 47,676 15.84%

Sandhills CC 3,732 12,121 96,139 12.61%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 10,932 149,966 7.29%

Southeastern CC 2,373 10,528 41,160 25.58%

Southwestern CC 2,248 8,685 67,621 12.84%

Stanly CC 2,435 9,102 44,982 20.23%

Surry CC 3,281 12,839 84,637 15.17%

Tri-County CC 1,168 4,815 36,640 13.14%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 17,294 47,402 36.48%

Wake TCC 12,296 58,915 617,035 9.55%

Wayne CC 3,517 13,527 85,700 15.78%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 13,873 67,953 20.42%

Wilkes CC 2,831 13,248 81,996 16.16%

Wilson CC 2,082 11,013 58,321 18.88%

System Total 205,803 829,146 6,831,422 12.14%

68

Page 348: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

69

DIVERSE POPULATIONS

LEARNING NEEDS

MEASURE H:

Goal Completion for Completers

Description/Definition—The proportion of graduates of certificate, diploma, and degree

programs who report that their primary goal in attending has been met.

Methodology and Data Source—Data are collected by a survey, with each college using a

standard set of questions. A response rate of 50% is suggested, and a minimum of 15

respondents will be required to report the data at the institutional level.

Performance Target—Performance target for percent of completers who achieve their goal

is 95 percent.

Results—In 2007-2008, 57 community colleges met the performance target. The system

average of percent achieving their goal was 99 percent.

Page 349: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

PERCENT OF COMPLETERS WHO REPORT MEETING THEIR GOAL FOR ATTENDING A COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 2007-2008

INSTITUTION TOTAL FTE

NUMBER OF

RESPONSES

PERCENT

ACHIEVED

GOAL

Alamance CC 3,871 231 100%

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 365 100%

Beaufort County CC 1,821 108 98%

Bladen CC 1,399 81 94%

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 121 100%

Brunswick CC 1,548 102 97%

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 290 99%

Cape Fear CC 7,259 851 99%

Carteret CC 1,751 144 100%

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 659 100%

Central Carolina CC 5,118 363 100%

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 575 100%

Cleveland CC 2,944 220 100%

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 722 100%

College of The Albemarle 2,351 204 99%

Craven CC 2,751 179 98%

Davidson County CC 3,663 242 98%

Durham TCC 4,622 170 99%

Edgecombe CC 2,122 222 99%

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 617 100%

Forsyth TCC 6,661 345 98%

Gaston College 4,691 647 100%

Guilford TCC 9,882 770 100%

Halifax CC 1,557 146 100%

Haywood CC 1,903 139 99%

Isothermal CC 2,094 150 99%

James Sprunt CC 1,348 99 99%

Johnston CC 4,158 217 100%

Lenoir CC 3,335 193 99%

Martin CC 899 37 97%

Mayland CC 1,925 255 99%

McDowell TCC 1,176 190 100%

Mitchell CC 2,367 148 100%

Montgomery CC 1,027 80 99%

Nash CC 2,655 143 99%

Pamlico CC 543 49 100%

Piedmont CC 2,714 175 99%

Pitt CC 5,876 404 99%

Randolph CC 2,468 153 98%

Richmond CC 2,110 161 100%

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 126 98%

Robeson CC 3,693 197 98%

Rockingham CC 2,043 207 99%

Rowan-Cabarrus CC 5,137 214 99%

Sampson CC 1,696 124 100%

Sandhills CC 3,732 280 99%

South Piedmont CC 2,220 237 99%

Southeastern CC 2,373 151 100%

Southwestern CC 2,248 171 99%

Stanly CC 2,435 225 100%

Surry CC 3,281 261 100%

Tri-County CC 1,168 80 100%

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 236 100%

Wake TCC 12,296 439 100%

Wayne CC 3,517 393 100%

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 279 99%

Wilkes CC 2,831 202 97%

Wilson CC 2,082 175 99%

System Total 205,803 14,964 99%

70

Page 350: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

71

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR IV: RESOURCES

For any institution, educational or industrial, there is a critical mass of resources necessary

for the organization to perform at an optimal level. When resources fall below this critical

mass level, or when increased demand outstrips available resources, performance declines

and quality suffers. The level of resources can be thought of as an indicator of the health of

an organization.

An examination of the colleges' resources will indicate the capability of the institutions in

providing quality educational programs. Whereas resources alone do not guarantee that a

quality education will be delivered, without appropriate resources, a college cannot provide

students with an adequate learning experience.

The measures selected as indicators of the health of the System and the colleges as

determined by resources are:

A. Percentage of College Libraries Meeting ALA Standards

B. Total Dollar Amount of Budget Transfers Between Program Areas Made by Community

Colleges

C. Average Nine-Month Faculty Salaries as a Percentage of the SREB Average

D. Retention Rate for Full-Time Faculty With Less Than Five Years of Experience

E. Number of Faculty and Staff Participating in Professional Development Activities

F. Percentage of Facilities Meeting the "Satisfactory" Building Condition

G. Ratio of Occupational Extension FTE Dollar Allotment to Curriculum FTE Dollar

Allotment

Page 351: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

72

RESOURCES MEASURE A: Percentage of College Libraries Meeting the ALA

Standards

Description/Definition— The percentage of colleges meeting the Association of College and

Research Libraries (ACRL) standards for community, junior and technical colleges.

Specifically, this measure looks at percentage meeting the standards for number of book

titles, serial subscriptions, expenditure minus salaries per FTE, library staff, and square

footage.

Methodology and Data Source—Library data have been collected by the National Center for

Education Statistics (NCES) in odd numbered year. The data are published in the Statistical

Abstract of Higher Education in North Carolina, an annual publication of the UNC-General

Administration. Data available from this publication are then compared with the standards

set by the ACRL to determine which colleges meet the standards. It should be noted that the

ACRL standards vary based on FTE of the college.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been set for this measure.

Results— Library data for 2007-08 were not available at the time of 2009 CSF publication.

However, historical data showed that most colleges didn’t meet the measures and a handful

of colleges met only minimum level of ACRL standard in the past. This raises serious

concerns about under-funding of the community college libraries in North Carolina, and its

conditions.

LEARNING RESOURCE CENTERS: COMPLIANCE WITH ACRL STANDARDS, 2006-07

MEASURE BELOW

STANDARD

MINIMUM

LEVEL

EXCELLENT

LEVEL

# % # % # %

# of Books (Paper

Volumes)

48 83% 7 12% 3 5%

Serial Subscriptions 53 91% 4 7% 1 2%

Expenditure Minus

Salaries per FTE 54 93% 4 7% 0 0%

Library Staff 55 95% 3 5% 0 0%

Square Footage 58 100% 0 0% 0 0%

Page 352: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

73

RESOURCES MEASURE B: Total Dollar Amount of Budget Transfers Between

Program Areas Made by Community Colleges

Description/Definition—Purpose of this measure is to serve as an indicator of the

effectiveness of the resource allocation model being used by the North Carolina Community

College System. The measure is simply the total dollar amount of budget transfers across

program areas made by the community colleges.

Methodology and Data Source—Source of the data were the budget accounting records

maintained by the Business and Finance Division of the North Carolina Community College

System Office. The total dollar amount transferred was calculated by the Business and

Finance Division by comparing the initial allocation of funds with final expenditures.

Performance Target—No performance target was set for this measure.

Results—In 2007-08, a total of $1,754,355 of instructional funds were transferred from

personnel to other costs and other program areas by community colleges. This represents 0.3

percent of the total initial allocation.

YEAR

TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT

OF TRANSFER

BETWEEN PROGRAM AREAS

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

$7,710,690

$3,590,801

$11,028

2006-07

2007-08

$9,813

$1,754,355

Page 353: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

74

RESOURCES MEASURE C: Average Nine-Month Faculty Salary as a Percentage

of the SREB Average

Description/Definition— The nine-month average faculty salary for full-time curriculum

faculty compared with the nine-month average faculty salary for full-time curriculum faculty

at public, two-year institutions in the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) states. To

allow comparisons across states, a nine-month salary figure is calculated for full-time

curriculum faculty based on a computed nine-month salary.

Methodology and Data Source—Source of the North Carolina community college faculty

salaries is the fall staff data file submitted annually by each college. Total monthly salary for

each full-time curriculum faculty is selected from the college data files. A nine-month salary

for each full-time faculty is then calculated by multiplying the total monthly salary by 9. An

average nine-month salary is then calculated for the college and the System. The SREB

nine-month average salary is obtained from an annual publication titled SREB (Southern

Regional Education Board) Data Exchange. The average nine-month faculty salary is

presented by state and an overall SREB average is calculated and presented.

This measure also presents data on the ranking of North Carolina among the 16 SREB states

in faculty salaries and calculates the percentage of North Carolina faculty salaries as a

function of the SREB average nine-month faculty salary.

Performance Target—By 2001, increase the average nine-month salaries of full-time

curriculum faculty and staff to 83.3 percent of the SREB average.

Results—In 2007-08, the average nine-month salary of full-time curriculum faculty was

$46,253 as compared to the SREB average of $50,191. It was 92.2 percent of the SREB

average. The performance target of 83.3 percent of SREB average was achieved, and the

SREB rank improved to be 12th

in 2007-08.

Page 354: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

75

AVERAGE 9-MONTH SALARY OF FULL-TIME CURRICULUM FACULTY AT

TWO-YEAR PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS: A COMPARISON OF NORTH CAROLINA

TO THE SREB AVERAGE, FROM 2003-04 TO 2007-2008

ACADEMIC

YEAR

NC 9-MONTH

SREB

AVERAGE

SREB

AVERAGE

SREB RANK

% of SREB

AVERAGE

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

$37,584

$40,162

$41,517

$43,843

$45,248

$46,732

16*

15*

15*

85.7%

88.8%

88.8%

2006-07 $44,008 $48,440 15* 90.9%

2007-08 $46,253 $50,191 12* 92.2%

* Ranking of 16 Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) states.

Delaware became the 16th state to join SREB.

Page 355: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

76

RESOURCES MEASURE D: Retention Rate for Full-Time Faculty With Less Than

Five Years of Experience

Definition/Description— The number and percentage of full-time faculty with less than five

years of experience who are retained the following year.

Methodology and Data Source— Source of data for this measure is the fall staff data file

submitted annually by each college. A subset of the data file is created which contains data

on all full-time faculty members with less than five years of experience. This data file is then

compared with the fall staff data file for the following year to determine the number and

percentage of full-time faculty with less than five years of experience that are retained.

Performance Target— By 2001, increase by 5 percent the year-to-year retention of full-time

faculty with less than five years of experience.

Results—The retention rate of faculty with less than five years of experience decreased by

1.3% from 91.9% in 2006-2007 to 90.6% in 2007-2008.

RETENTION RATE FOR FULL-TIME FACULTY

WITH LESS THAN FIVE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

YEAR

TOTAL NUMBER OF

FACULTY WITH LESS THAN

FIVE YEARS EXPERIENCE

NUMBER WHO

ARE RETAINED

PERCENT

RETAINED

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2,051

1,674

2,319

1,851

1,531

2,101

90.3%

91.5%

90.6%

2006-2007

2007-2008

2,286

1,931

2,102

1,750

91.9%

90.6%

Page 356: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

77

RESOURCES MEASURE E: Number of Faculty and Staff Participating in

Professional Development Activities

Definition/Description— The number of faculty and staff who participate in TIER A funded

professional development activities.

Methodology and Data Source— The data are collected annually by the Academic and

Student Services Division of the North Carolina Community College System Office. The

data are submitted annually by the colleges to the System Office as a requirement for

receiving TIER A professional development funds.

Performance Target— By 2001, to increase the participation of faculty and staff in

professional development programs by 10%.

Results—In 2007-2008, 1,658 faculty and staff participated in TIER A sponsored

professional development activities, which was an 35.4 percent decrease from last year’s

figure.

NUMBER OF FACULTY & STAFF PARTICIPATING

IN TIER A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

YEAR # OF FACULTY & STAFF

PARTICIPATING

% INCREASE

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2,447

2,383

2,692

- 11.7 %

- 2.6 %

13 %

2006-07

2007-08

2,568

1,658

- 4.6 %

-35.4%

Page 357: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

NUMBER OF FACULTY AND STAFF PARTICIPATING

IN TIER A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 2007-2008

INSTITUTION

TOTAL

FTE

NUMBER OF

FACULTY & STAFF

Alamance CC 3,871 20

Asheville-Buncombe TCC 6,186 14

Beaufort County CC 1,821 26

Bladen CC 1,399 10

Blue Ridge CC 2,105 16

Brunswick CC 1,548 14

Caldwell CC & TI 4,135 20

Cape Fear CC 7,259 21

Carteret CC 1,751 13

Catawba Valley CC 4,733 39

Central Carolina CC 5,118 45

Central Piedmont CC 14,459 18

Cleveland CC 2,944 18

Coastal Carolina CC 4,348 18

College of the Albemarle 2,351 14

Craven CC 2,751 19

Davidson County CC 3,663 25

Durham TCC 4,622 28

Edgecombe CC 2,122 12

Fayetteville TCC 10,252 128

Forsyth TCC 6,661 18

Gaston College 4,691 41

Guilford TCC 9,882 23

Halifax CC 1,557 16

Haywood CC 1,903 8

Isothermal CC 2,094 10

James Sprunt CC 1,348 16

Johnston CC 4,158 26

Lenoir CC 3,335 31

Martin CC 899 35

Mayland CC 1,925 29

McDowell TCC 1,176 23

Mitchell CC 2,367 14

Montgomery CC 1,027 50

Nash CC 2,655 15

Pamlico CC 543 13

Piedmont CC 2,714 18

Pitt CC 5,876 11

Randolph CC 2,468 29

Richmond CC 2,110 71

Roanoke-Chowan CC 876 36

Robeson CC 3,693 9

Rockingham CC 2,043 68

Rowan Cabarrus CC 5,137 43

Sampson CC 1,696 33

Sandhills CC 3,732 22

South Piedmont CC 2,220 218

Southeastern CC 2,373 11

Southwestern CC 2,248 12

Stanly CC 2,435 9

Surry CC 3,281 19

Tri-County CC 1,168 24

Vance-Granville CC 4,237 7

Wake TCC 12,296 65

Wayne CC 3,517 20

Western Piedmont CC 3,118 16

Wilkes CC 2,831 17

Wilson CC 2,082 14

System Total 205,803 1,658

78

Page 358: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

79

RESOURCES MEASURE F: Percentage of Facilities Meeting the "Satisfactory"

Building Condition

Definition/Description—Percentage of community college facilities that meet "satisfactory"

building conditions as measured in the Annual Facilities Inventory and Utilization Study.

"Satisfactory" is defined as the facility is suitable for continued use with normal

maintenance.

Methodology and Data Source—Data are collected from the colleges and analyzed annually

by the Higher Education Facilities Commission housed at UNC-General Administration.

The rating of facilities as "satisfactory" is done by the individual colleges. The measure is

the percentage of all facilities that meet the satisfactory building condition.

Performance Target—By 2001, improve by 10 percent the statewide percentage of facilities

meeting "satisfactory" building conditions, as measured in the Annual Facilities Inventory

and Utilization Study.

Results— In 2007-08, 88.9 percent of statewide facilities met the "satisfactory" building

conditions, which was 0.8 percent increase from last year’s figure.

PERCENT OF STATEWIDE FACILITIES

MEETING “SATISFACTORY” BUILDING CONDITIONS

YEAR % MEETING

“SATISFACTORY”

% INCREASE

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

88.7 %

89.0 %

89.5 %

88.1%

-1.0 %

0.3 %

0.5 %

-1.4%

2007-08 88.9% 0.8%

Page 359: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

80

RESOURCES MEASURE G: Ratio of Occupational Extension FTE Dollar

Allotment to Curriculum FTE Dollar Allotment

Description/Definition—Ratio of dollars allocated per occupational extension FTE to dollars

allocated per curriculum FTE generated by community colleges.

Methodology and Data Source—Source of the data is the Business and Finance Division of

the North Carolina Community College System Office. The measure is simply a ratio

comparing the dollar value of an occupational extension FTE to the dollar value of a

curriculum FTE.

Performance Target—By the year 2000, to increase the funding level of occupational

extension offerings to that of curriculum programs.

Results—In 2007-2008, the ratio of the occupational extension FTE dollar allotment to the

curriculum FTE dollar allotment was 1 to 1.047 (1:1.047), meaning that for every dollar

generated by an occupational extension FTE, $1.047 was generated by a curriculum FTE.

Page 360: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

81

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTOR V: TECHNOLOGY

The application of technology to education represents a critical factor in the success of

community colleges meeting the education and training needs of the citizens of North

Carolina. Whether it is to meet the demands of employers for workers with the latest high-

tech skills or to meet the growing demand for education and training from people throughout

the state, the community colleges must continue to integrate technology into the way

programs are delivered and upgrade faculty on the uses of the new technology.

In order to meet the challenges of the technological challenges of the future, the community

college system must focus on three areas. First, the technological infrastructure that supports

the delivery of instruction must be fully developed. Second, faculty must be trained in the

use of the new technologies. Third, courses and programs that can be delivered by way of

these new technologies must be developed and made available.

The measures comprising the critical success factor of technology are:

A. Curriculum Unduplicated Headcount by Course Method of Instruction

B. Number of Colleges Connected to the North Carolina Information Highway

C. Number of Colleges Possessing the FCC License for Wireless Cable Systems

D. Number of Courses and Programs Offered via Tele-course, Wireless Cable Systems, the

Internet, Two-Way Video, etc.

E. Number of Courses Offered Through the NC Virtual Learning Community

Page 361: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

82

TECHNOLOGY MEASURE A: Curriculum Unduplicated Headcounts by

Course Method of Instruction

Description/Definition— Unduplicated curriculum headcount of students taking only

distance learning courses, taking a combination of distance learning and traditional methods

of instruction courses, taking only traditional courses, and unknown. The numbers are

curriculum courses only, for this type of information on continuing education doesn’t exist.

Methodology and Data Source—Data are maintained by the Data Warehouse at the System

Office utilizing curriculum student registration files submitted by colleges each year. The

analysis is done by Research and Performance Management section, President’s Office at the

North Carolina Community College System Office.

Performance Target—No specific performance target for number of curriculum students

taking distance education or traditional courses has been set.

Results— In 2007-08, 35,299 students enrolled in one or more distance learning courses,

which represented 29.5% increase over 2006-07 figure. The same trend was shown in the

courses of a combination of distance and traditional education; 97,017 students enrolled in a

combination of the two types of courses, which was a 27.4% increase over last year.

Enrollment in the traditional courses only has decreased by 3.9% in 2007-08: 150,125.

CURRICULUM UNDUPLICATED HEADCOUNT BY COURSE METHOD OF

INSTRUCTION, FROM 2003-04 TO 2007-08

Academic Year

Distance

Learning

Only

Distance and

Traditional

Traditional

Only

Unknown

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

14,086

22,795

31,769

57,122

74,543

82,726

192,565

169,584

146,690

10,756

7,501

7,236

2006-07

2007-08

27,268

35,299

76,137

97,017

156,249

150,125

36,875

4,774

Page 362: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

83

TECHNOLOGY MEASURE B: Number of Colleges Connected to the North

Carolina Information Highway

Description/Definition— This measure provides information on the number of community

colleges connected to the North Carolina Information Highway.

Methodology and Data Source—Data on the number of colleges connected to the North

Carolina Information Highway are maintained by Learning Technology Systems section in

the Technology and Workforce Development Division of the North Carolina Community

College System Office.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been set for this measure.

Results—In 2007-08, all community colleges now have access to video conference services

and/or participate in North Carolina Information Highway (NCIH) – either as full video

service sites, per event subscribers, or via a local NCREN site: A total of 97 sites across the

state.

Page 363: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

84

TECHNOLOGY MEASURE C: Number of Colleges Possessing the FCC

License for Wireless Cable Systems

Description/Definition— This measure is a count of the number of colleges that have been

granted a license for wireless cable systems. The measure supports objectives in the 1999-

2001 Strategic Plan to increase by 10 percent the number of education and training

opportunities available through alternate delivery systems.

Community colleges have applied to the FCC (Federal Communication Commission) for

wireless cable or ITFS (Instructional Television Fixed Service) licenses. ITFS is now called

EBS (Educational Broadband Service).

Methodology and Data Source— The Learning Technology Systems section in the

Technology and Workforce Development Division at the North Carolina Community College

System Office maintains the data on the number of colleges who have been granted a license

for wireless cable systems.

Performance Target—No performance target level has been set for this measure.

Results— In 2007-2008, 34 colleges have FCC Educational Broadband Service (EBS)

licenses.

Page 364: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

85

TECHNOLOGY MEASURE D: Number of Courses and Programs Offered via

Tele-course, Wireless Cable, the Internet, Two-

Way Video, etc.

Description/Definition—Number of courses and programs offered and enrollment in courses

and programs offered through tele-courses, wireless cable, the Internet, two-way video, and

other alternate delivery systems. The measure supports the objective in the 1999-2001

Strategic Plan to increase by 10 percent the number of education and training opportunities

available through alternate delivery systems.

Methodology and Data Source— Data are maintained by the Data Warehouse at the System

Office utilizing ICR (Institution Class Reporting)/FTE files submitted by colleges each year.

The analysis wi done by Research and Performance Management section, President’s Office.

Performance Target—By 2001, an increase by 10 percent the number of education and

training opportunities available through alternate delivery systems.

Results— In 2007-2008, enrollment in the curriculum and con-ed distance education courses

totaled 426,928 students, which was a 14.2 percent increase from last year. Thus the

performance target was achieved. The table below gives the enrollment figure by method of

delivery.

ENROLLMENT IN DISTANCE LEARNING COURSES, 2007-2008

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM

DELIVERY MODE CURRICULUM

CONTINUING

EDUCATION

Telecourses & Teleweb courses 6,138 318

Internet Courses 201,448 45,432

Two-Way Video Courses

(NC Information Highway)

7,802 67

Hybrid Courses

(Blendid online and face-to-face)

57,500 10,375

Web Supported or Web-Assisted

Digital Media

89,332

366

3,558

2

Other Courses 934 3,656

Total 363,520 63,408

Page 365: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

86

TECHNOLOGY MEASURE E: Number of Courses Offered Through the NC

Virtual Learning Community

Description/Definition—Number of courses offered through the NC Virtual Learning

Community. These are courses that have been developed by and accepted for use in the NC

Virtual Learning Community.

Methodology and Data Source—The Learning Technology Systems section in the

Technology and Workforce Development Division of the North Carolina Community

College System Office maintains data on the courses offered through the NC Virtual

Learning Community.

Performance Target—No specific performance target level for number of courses offered by

NC Virtual Learning Community has been set.

Results— In 2007-2008, 256 curriculum and 38 continuing education courses had been

offered through the NC Virtual Learning Community.

Page 366: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance
Page 367: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

Published June 2009North Carolina Community College System

110 Copies of this document were printed at a cost of $134.20 or $1.22 per copy

Equal Opportunity Employer

Page 368: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

1 November 8, 2007

Performance Measures and Standards North Carolina Community College System

Measure Standard Special Notes

Progress of Basic Skills Students

75% demonstrating progress

Passing Rates on Licensure/Certification Exams

80% aggregate institutional passing rate for first time test takers

To qualify for Exceptional Institutional Performance, no exam for which the college has control over who sits for the exam can have a passing rate of less than 70% (Note: Any exam with less than 10 students will not be subject to the 70% rule)

Performance of College Transfer Students

83% of students who transfer to a 4-year institution will have a GPA of 2.0 or higher after two semesters

Students who transfer with less than 24 semester hours of transfer credit will not be included in the analysis. Community colleges can submit data gathered from private 4-year colleges and universities to be included with the UNC System data. To qualify for Exceptional Institutional Performance, the performance of the community college transfer students must equal or exceed the performance of the native UNC System sophomores and juniors for that time period.

Passing Rates in Developmental Courses

75% of students who take a developmental English, mathematics, and/or reading course will pass the course with a grade of “C” or better

Students who withdraw from the course during the year will not be included in the analysis. Course record data submitted by the college to the data warehouse as part of the CRPFAR collection will be used to calculate this measure.

Page 369: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

2 November 8, 2007

Success Rate of Developmental Students in Subsequent College-Level Courses

80% of students who took developmental courses will pass the “gatekeeper” English and/or mathematics course for which the developmental course serves as a prerequisite

To be included in the analysis, a student must take the “gatekeeper” course within one academic year of completing the developmental course that served as the pre-requisite. Course record data submitted by the college to the data warehouse as part of the CRPFAR collection will be used to calculate this measure.

Student Satisfaction of Completers and Non-completers

90% of survey respondents satisfied with college programs and services

To be considered for performance funding, the following conditions must be met: 1. Completer Survey: A 50% return rate or a statistically valid sample size2. Non-Completer Survey: For colleges with fewer than 250 non-returning students, a

minimum of 25 valid surveys must be obtained. For colleges with more than 250non-returning students, a response rate equal to 10% of the total non-returningstudents or a statistically valid sample size must be obtained.

Curriculum Student Retention, Transfer and Graduation

65% of Fall degree seeking students will either re-enroll, transfer or graduate by the subsequent Fall.

The National Student Clearinghouse database will be used to determine student transfer.

Business/Industry Satisfaction with Services Provided

90% or respondents will rate services provided as “Very Good” or “Excellent”

Page 370: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

3 November 8, 2007

§ 115D-31.3. Institutional Performance Accountability.

(a) Creation of Accountability Measures and Performance Standards. – The State Board of Community Collegesshall create new accountability measures and performance standards for the Community College System. Survey results shall be used as a performance standard only if the survey is statistically valid. The State Board of Community Colleges shall review annually the accountability measures and performance standards to ensure that they are appropriate for use in recognition of successful institutional performance.

(b) through (d) Repealed by Session Laws 2000-67, s. 9.7, effective July 1, 2000.(e) Mandatory Performance Measures. – The State Board of Community Colleges shall evaluate each college on the

following 8 performance standards: (1) Progress of basic skills students,(2) Passing rate for licensure and certification examinations,(3) Performance of students who transfer to a four year institution,(4) Passing rates in developmental courses,(5) Success rates of developmental students in subsequent college-level courses,(6) The level of satisfaction of students who complete programs and those who do not complete programs,(7) Curriculum student retention and graduation, and(8) Client satisfaction with customized training.

The State Board may add measures to those identified in section (e), but may not decrease the number. (f) Publication of Performance Ratings. – Each college shall publish its performance on the 8 measures set out in

subsection (e) of this section (i) annually in its electronic catalog or on the Internet and (ii) in its printed catalog each time the catalog is reprinted.

The Community Colleges System Office shall publish the performance of all colleges on all 8. (g) Recognition for Successful Institutional Performance. –

For the purpose of recognition for successful institutional performance, the State Board of Community Colleges shall evaluate each college on the 8 performance measures. For each of these eight performance measures on which a college performs successfully the college may retain and carry forward into the next fiscal year one-fourth of one percent (1/4 of

Page 371: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

4 November 8, 2007

1%) of its final fiscal year General Fund appropriations. If a college demonstrates significant improvement on a measure that has been in use for three years or less, then the college would be eligible to carry-forward one-fourth of one percent (1/4 of 1%) of its final fiscal year General Fund appropriations for that measure.

(h) Recognition for Exceptional Institutional Performance. – Funds not allocated to colleges in accordance withsubsection (g) of this section shall be used to reward exceptional institutional performance. After all State aid budget obligations have been met, the State Board of Community Colleges shall distribute the remainder of these funds equally to colleges that perform successfully on eight performance measures and meet the following criteria:

(1) The passing rate on all reported licensure /certification exams for which the colleges have authority over who sits forthe exam must meet or exceed 70% for first-time test taker, and.

(2) The percent of college transfer students with a 2.0 gpa after two semesters at a four-year institution must equal orexceed the performance of students who began at the four-year institution (native students).

The State Board may withhold the portion of funds for which a college may qualify as an exceptional institution while the college is under investigation by a federal or state agency, or if its performance does not meet the standards established by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, State Auditors Office, or State Board of Community Colleges. At such time as the investigations are complete and the issues resolved, the State Board may release the exceptional performance funds to the college.

(i) Permissible Uses of Funds. – Funds retained by colleges or distributed to colleges pursuant to this section shall beused for the purchase of equipment, initial program start-up costs including faculty salaries for the first year of a program, and one-time faculty and staff bonuses. These funds shall not be used for continuing salary increases or for other obligations beyond the fiscal year into which they were carried forward. These funds shall be encumbered within 12 months of the fiscal year into which they were carried forward.

(j) Use of funds in low-wealth counties. – Funds retained by colleges or distributed to colleges pursuant to thissection may be used to supplement local funding for maintenance of plant if the college does not receive maintenance of plant funds pursuant to G.S. 115D-31.2, and if the county in which the main campus of the community college is located:

(1) Is designated as a Tier 1 or Tier 2 county in accordance with G.S. 105-129.3;(2) Had an unemployment rate of at least two percent (2%) above the State average or greater than seven

percent (7%), whichever is higher, in the prior calendar year; and

Page 372: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

5 November 8, 2007

(3) Is a county whose wealth, as calculated under the formula for distributing supplemental funding forschools in low-wealth counties, is eighty percent (80%) or less of the State average.

Funds may be used for this purpose only after all local funds appropriated for maintenance of plant have been expended. (1999-237, s. 9.2(a); 2000-67, s. 9.7; 2001-186, s. 1; 2006-66, s. 8.9(a).)

Page 373: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors – Performance Measures and Standards

Reported July 2011 (for 2009-2010)

A. Progress of Basic Skills Students FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: Seventy-five percent (75%) of adult literacy students will complete a level, progress within a level, or complete apredetermined goal. (Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: The composite measure of Basic Skills students show that a total of eighty-nine percent (89%) of students have accomplished these requirements. Data shows that thirty-three percent (33%) progressed but did not complete level; also that twenty-nine percent (29%) met their goal but did not progress. One percent (1%) has completed the level but did not go to next, and twenty-four percent (24%) have completed a level and have advanced to a higher level.

B. Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations FTCC MET this standard

NCCCS Standard: Eighty percent (80%) of first-time test takers will pass examinations required for North Carolina licensure or certification.To be rated EIP (Exceptional Institutional Performance); the college will have no exam with a passing rate less than 70%. (Curriculum Programs and Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: FTCC showed an aggregate passing rate of ninety-six percent (96%) for first-time test takers on all licensure and certification exams. All programs showed at least a seventy percent (70%) pass rate.

C. Performance of College Transfer Students FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: Eighty-three percent (83%) of students transferring to a university with an associate degree or 24 articulated collegetransfer credit hours will have a GPA equal to or greater than 2.00 after two semesters at a university. (Curriculum Programs)

FTCC Results: Eighty-five percent (85%) of FTCC students who transferred to a UNC institution with an associate degree or 24 hours of credit had a 2.0 or higher average after one academic year.

D. Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses FTCC did not meet this standard

NCCCS Standard: Seventy-five (75%) of developmental course completers in English, reading or mathematics will complete with a grade of“C” or better. (Curriculum Programs and Student Services)

FTCC Results: The aggregate passing rate for all courses coded as developmental was seventy-four percent (74%).

Page 374: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors – Performance Measures and Standards

Reported July 2011 (for 2009-2010)

E. Success of Developmental Students in Subsequent College Level Courses FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: Eighty percent (80%) of college level English or mathematics course completers with previous developmental courseworkwill complete the college level English or mathematics course with a grade of “D” or better. (Curriculum Programs and Student Services)

FTCC Results: Eighty-five percent (85%) of developmental students had a passing grade for the subsequent college level courses.

F. Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-Completers FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: Ninety percent (90%) of exiting students will be “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the overall quality of the college. (Curriculum Programs and Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment)

FTCC Results: Ninety-six percent (96%) of completers and eighty-four (84%) of non-completers were satisfied with the quality of the College’s programs and services, with an aggregate average of ninety-three percent (93%).

G. Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation, and Transfer FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: Sixty-five percent (65%) of fall credential-seeking students will graduate, remain enrolled at the college, or transfer to auniversity or another community college one year later. (Curriculum Programs)

FTCC Results: Sixty-six percent (66%) graduated, returned, or transferred. en percent (10%) of the students who enrolled in a curriculum program in the previous fall graduated with a degree, diploma, or certificate, forty-nine percent (49%) enrolled the next fall in a curriculum or extension program; and seven percent (7%) transferred to another community college or university.

H. Client Satisfaction with Customized Training FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: Ninety percent (90%) of clients receiving specialized training programs and services through Customized Training andSmall Business Centers will be satisfied with training. (Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: Ninety-two percent (92%) of businesses/industries reported satisfaction with customized training received by FTCC students.

Prepared by Carl Mitchell, July 26, 2011 Source: North Carolina Community College System Report Critical Success Factors Report July 2011

Page 375: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors – Performance Measures and Standards

Reported July 2010 (for 2008-2009)

A. Progress of Basic Skills Students FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least seventy-five percent (75%) of all students will have either, (1) progressed within a level of literacy, (2) completed a level or a predetermined goal, and (3) completed a level and advanced to a higher level. (Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: The composite measure of Basic Skills students shows that a total of ninety-three percent (93%) of students have accomplished these requirements. Data show that sixty-eight percent (68%) are progressing within the same level, three percent (3%) have completed the level entered, and twenty-three percent (23%) have completed a level and have advanced to a higher level.

B. Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations FTCC MET this standard

NCCCS Standard: The aggregate institutional passing rate for first-time test takers on all licensure and certification exams will be at least eighty percent (80%). To be rated EIP (Exceptional Institutional Performance), exams (for which the college controlled) will be at least seventy percent (70%) or greater. (Curriculum Programs and Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: FTCC showed an aggregate passing rate of ninety-four percent (94%) for first-time test takers on all licensure and certification exams. All programs showed at least a seventy percent (70%) pass rate.

C. Performance of College Transfer Students FTCC did not meet this standard.

NCCCS Standard: Eighty-three percent (83%) of students in both associate degrees and students who transferred with 24 or more semester hours must have a GPA equal to or greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a university. To be rated EIP (Exceptional Institutional Performance), the performance of FTCC transfer students must be equivalent to the performance of native UNC sophomores and juniors which was eighty-six percent (86%). (Curriculum Programs)

FTCC Results: Eighty-two percent (82%) of FTCC students who transferred to a UNC institution with an associate degree or 24 hours of credit had a 2.0 or higher average after one academic year.

D. Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses FTCC did not meet this standard

NCCCS Standard: Seventy-five (75%) of students who complete a developmental course in English, Reading or Math will have a grade of “C” or better. (Curriculum Programs and Student Services)

FTCC Results: The aggregate passing rate for all courses coded as developmental was seventy percent (70%).

Page 376: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors – Performance Measures and Standards

Reported July 2010 (for 2008-2009)

E. Success of Developmental Students in Subsequent College Level Courses FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: Eighty percent (80%) of students who completed a developmental course in 2007-2008 and completed subsequent college level course in 2008-2009 will have a passing grade for the college level courses. (Curriculum Programs and Student Services)

FTCC Results: Eighty-three percent (83%) of developmental students had passing grade for the college level course.

F. Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-Completers FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least ninety percent (90%) of responding completers (graduates) and non-completers will indicate satisfaction with the quality of college programs and services. (Curriculum Programs and Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment)

FTCC Results: Ninety-nine percent (99%) of completers and ninety-two (92%) of non-completers were satisfied with the quality of the College’s programs and services, with an aggregate average of ninety-seven percent (97%).

G. Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation, and Transfer FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least sixty-five percent (65%) of the students who enrolled in a curriculum program in the fall of a given year will have completed their program, still be enrolled the following fall, or transferred to another community college or university. (Curriculum Programs)

FTCC Results: Seventy-one percent (71%) graduated, returned, or transferred. (eleven percent (11%) of the students who enrolled in a curriculum program in the previous fall graduated with a degree, diploma, or certificate, fifty-two percent (52%) enrolled the next fall in a curriculum or extension program, and eight percent (8%) transferred to another community college or university.)

H. Client Satisfaction with Customized Training FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least ninety percent (90%) of businesses/industries surveyed will report satisfaction with customized training. (Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: Ninety-three percent (93%) of businesses/industries reported satisfaction with customized training received by FTCC students.

Prepared by Carl Mitchell, July 6, 2010, Source: North Carolina Community College System Report Critical Success Factors Report July 2010

Page 377: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors – Performance Measures and Standards

Reported June 2009 (for 2007-2008)

A. Progress of Basic Skills Students FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least seventy-five percent (75%) of all students will have either (1) progressed within a level of literacy, (2) completed a level or a predetermined goal, and (3) completed a level and advanced to a higher level. (Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: The composite measure of Basic Skills students shows that a total of ninety-one percent (91%) of students have accomplished these requirements. Data show that sixty-six percent (66%) are progressing within the same level, two percent (2%) have completed the level entered, and twenty-four percent (24%) have completed a level and have advanced to a higher level.

B. Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations FTCC MET this standard

NCCCS Standard: The aggregate institutional passing rate for first-time test takers on all licensure and certification exams will be at least eighty percent (80%). To be rated EIP (Exceptional Institutional Performance), exams (for which the college controlled) will be at least seventy percent (70%) or greater. (Curriculum Programs and Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: FTCC showed an aggregate passing rate of ninety percent (90%) for first-time test takers on all licensure and certification exams. All programs showed at least a seventy percent (70%) pass rate.

C. Performance of College Transfer Students FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: Eighty-three percent (83%) of students in both associate degrees and students who transferred with 24 or more semester hours must have a GPA equal to or greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a university. To be rated EIP (Exceptional Institutional Performance), the performance of FTCC transfer students must be equivalent to the performance of native UNC sophomores and juniors which was eighty-seven percent (87%). (Curriculum Programs)

FTCC Results: Eighty-eight percent (88%) of FTCC students who transferred to a UNC institution with an associate degree or 24 hours of credit had a 2.0 or higher average after one academic year.

D. Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses FTCC did not meet this standard

NCCCS Standard: Seventy-five (75%) of students who complete a developmental course in English, Reading or Math will have a grade of “C” or better. (Curriculum Programs and Student Services)

FTCC Results: The aggregate passing rate for all courses coded as developmental was sixty-six percent (66%).

Page 378: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors – Performance Measures and Standards

Reported June 2009 (for 2007-2008)

E. Success of Developmental Students in Subsequent College Level Courses FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: Eighty percent (80%) of students who completed a developmental course in 2006-2007 and completed subsequent college level course in 2007-2008 will have a passing grade for the college level courses. (Curriculum Programs and Student Services)

FTCC Results: Eighty-one percent (81%) of developmental students had passing grade for the college level course.

F. Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-Completers FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least ninety percent (90%) of responding completers (graduates) and non-completers will indicate satisfaction with the quality of college programs and services. (Curriculum Programs and Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment)

FTCC Results: Ninety-seven percent (97%) of completers and eighty-eight (88%) of non-completers were satisfied with the quality of the College’s programs and services, with an aggregate average of ninety-five percent (95%).

G. Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation, and Transfer FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least sixty-five percent (65%) of the students who enrolled in a curriculum program in the fall of a given year will have completed their program, still be enrolled the following fall, or transferred to another community college or university. (Curriculum Programs)

FTCC Results: Sixty-seven percent (67%) graduated, returned, or transferred. (nine percent (9%) of the students who enrolled in a curriculum program in the previous fall graduated with a degree, diploma, or certificate, fifty-one percent (51%) enrolled the next fall in a curriculum or extension program, and seven percent (7%) transferred to another community college or university.)

H. Client Satisfaction with Customized Training FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least ninety percent (90%) of businesses/industries surveyed will report satisfaction with customized training. (Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: Ninety-six percent (96%) of businesses/industries reported satisfaction with customized training received by FTCC students.

Prepared by Carl Mitchell, July 15, 2009, Source: North Carolina Community College System Report Critical Success Factors Report June 2009

Page 379: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

1

End-of-Year Report

NCCCS Critical Success Factors – Performance Measures and Standards

Reported June 2008 (for 2006-2007)

A. Progress of Basic Skills Students FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least seventy-five percent (75%) of all students will have either (1) progressed within a level of literacy, (2) completed a level or a

predetermined goal, and (3) completed a level and advanced to a higher level. (Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: The composite measure of Basic Skills Students shows that a total of eighty-one percent (81%) of students have accomplished these

requirements. Data show that fifty-six percent (56%) are progressing within the same level, two percent (2%) have completed the level entered, and twenty-

three percent (23%) have completed a level and have advanced to a higher level.

B. Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations FTCC MET this standard (See Note Below)

NCCCS Standard: The aggregate institutional passing rate for first-time test takers on all licensure and certification exams will be at least eighty percent

(80%). To be rated Superior, ALL exams (for which the college controlled) will be at least seventy percent (70%) or greater. (Curriculum Programs and

Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: FTCC showed an aggregate passing rate of eighty-seven percent (87%) for first-time test takers on all licensure and certification exams.

All programs showed at least a seventy percent (70%) pass rate, with the exception of EMT-Intermediate which had a fifty-three percent (53%) pass rate.

(FTCC did not meet the Superior performance standard.)

C. Performance of College Transfer Students FTCC MET this standard. (See Note Below)

NCCCS Standard: Eighty-three percent (83%) of students in both associate degrees and students who transferred with 24 or more semester hours must have a

GPA equal to or greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a university. To be rated Superior, the performance of FTCC transfer students must be equivalent to the

performance of native UNC sophomores and juniors which was eighty-seven percent (87%) in 2006-2007. (Curriculum Programs)

FTCC Results: Eighty-six percent (86%) of FTCC students who transferred to a UNC institution with an associate degree or 24 hours of credit had a 2.0

or higher average after one academic year. (FTCC did not meet the Exceptional Institutional Performance standard.)

D. Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses (Not applicable due to collection problem with CIS implementation.)

NCCCS Standard: Seventy-five (75%) of students who complete a developmental course in English, Reading or Math will have a grade of “C” or better.

(Curriculum Programs and Student Services)

FTCC Results: N/A – Data not available due to collection problem with CIS implementation. (CIS problem has been corrected and data will be available

next year.)

Page 380: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

2

End-of-Year Report

NCCCS Critical Success Factors – Performance Measures and Standards

Reported June 2008 (for 2006-2007)

E. Success of Developmental Students in Subsequent College Level Courses (Not applicable due to collection problem with CIS implementation.)

NCCCS Standard: Eighty percent (80%) of students who completed a developmental course in 2005-2006 and completed subsequent college level course in

2006-2007 will have a passing grade for the college level courses. (Curriculum Programs and Student Services)

FTCC Results: N/A – Data not available due to collection problem with CIS implementation. (CIS problem has been corrected and data will be available

next year.)

F. Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-Completers FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least ninety percent (90%) of responding completers (graduates) and non-completers will indicate satisfaction with the quality of

college programs and services. (Curriculum Programs and Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment)

FTCC Results: Ninety-seven percent (97%) of completers and eighty-nine (89%) of non-completers were satisfied with the quality of the College’s

programs and services, with an aggregate average of ninety-five percent (95%).

G. Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation, and Transfer FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least sixty-five percent (65%) of the students who enrolled in a curriculum program in the fall of a given year will have completed their

program, still be enrolled the following fall, or transferred to another community college or university. (Curriculum Programs)

FTCC Results: Sixty-eight percent (68%) graduated, returned, or transferred. (Twelve percent (12%) of the students who enrolled in a curriculum

program in the previous fall graduated with a degree, diploma, or certificate, fifty-one percent (51%) enrolled the next fall in a curriculum or extension

program, and five percent (5%) transferred to another community college or university.)

H. Client Satisfaction with Customized Training FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least ninety percent (90%) of businesses/industries surveyed will report satisfaction with customized training. (Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: Ninety-six percent (96%) of businesses/industries reported satisfaction with customized training received by FTCC students.

Prepared by Carl Mitchell, June 26, 2008, Source: North Carolina Community College System Report Critical Success Factors Report June 2008

Page 381: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

1

End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors – Performance Measures and Standards

Reported June 2008 (for 2006-2007)

A. Progress of Basic Skills Students FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least seventy-five percent (75%) of all students will have either (1) progressed within a level of literacy, (2) completed a level or a predetermined goal, and (3) completed a level and advanced to a higher level. (Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: The composite measure of Basic Skills Students shows that a total of eighty-one percent (81%) of students have accomplished these requirements. Data show that fifty-six percent (56%) are progressing within the same level, two percent (2%) have completed the level entered, and twenty-three percent (23%) have completed a level and have advanced to a higher level.

B. Passing Rates on Licensure and Certification Examinations FTCC MET this standard (See Note Below)

NCCCS Standard: The aggregate institutional passing rate for first-time test takers on all licensure and certification exams will be at least eighty percent (80%). To be rated Superior, ALL exams (for which the college controlled) will be at least seventy percent (70%) or greater. (Curriculum Programs and Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: FTCC showed an aggregate passing rate of eighty-seven percent (87%) for first-time test takers on all licensure and certification exams. All programs showed at least a seventy percent (70%) pass rate, with the exception of EMT-Intermediate which had a fifty-three percent (53%) pass rate. (FTCC did not meet the Superior performance standard.)

C. Performance of College Transfer Students FTCC MET this standard. (See Note Below)

NCCCS Standard: Eighty-three percent (83%) of students in both associate degrees and students who transferred with 24 or more semester hours must have a GPA equal to or greater than 2.0 after two semesters at a university. To be rated Superior, the performance of FTCC transfer students must be equivalent to the performance of native UNC sophomores and juniors which was eighty-seven percent (87%) in 2006-2007. (Curriculum Programs)

FTCC Results: Eighty-six percent (86%) of FTCC students who transferred to a UNC institution with an associate degree or 24 hours of credit had a 2.0 or higher average after one academic year. (FTCC did not meet the Exceptional Institutional Performance standard.)

D. Passing Rates of Students in Developmental Courses (Not applicable due to collection problem with CIS implementation.)

NCCCS Standard: Seventy-five (75%) of students who complete a developmental course in English, Reading or Math will have a grade of “C” or better. (Curriculum Programs and Student Services)

FTCC Results: N/A – Data not available due to collection problem with CIS implementation. (CIS problem has been corrected and data will be available next year.)

Page 382: End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors ...sacs5.faytechcc.edu/5thYearDocs/4.1/performance-measures.pdf · FTCC End-of-Year report on NCCCS Critical Success Factors Performance

End-of-Year Report NCCCS Critical Success Factors – Performance Measures and Standards

Reported June 2008 (for 2006-2007)

E. Success of Developmental Students in Subsequent College Level Courses (Not applicable due to collection problem with CIS implementation.)

NCCCS Standard: Eighty percent (80%) of students who completed a developmental course in 2005-2006 and completed subsequent college level course in 2006-2007 will have a passing grade for the college level courses. (Curriculum Programs and Student Services)

FTCC Results: N/A – Data not available due to collection problem with CIS implementation. (CIS problem has been corrected and data will be available next year.)

F. Satisfaction of Program Completers and Non-Completers FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least ninety percent (90%) of responding completers (graduates) and non-completers will indicate satisfaction with the quality of college programs and services. (Curriculum Programs and Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment)

FTCC Results: Ninety-seven percent (97%) of completers and eighty-nine (89%) of non-completers were satisfied with the quality of the College’s programs and services, with an aggregate average of ninety-five percent (95%).

G. Curriculum Student Retention, Graduation, and Transfer FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least sixty-five percent (65%) of the students who enrolled in a curriculum program in the fall of a given year will have completed their program, still be enrolled the following fall, or transferred to another community college or university. (Curriculum Programs)

FTCC Results: Sixty-eight percent (68%) graduated, returned, or transferred. (Twelve percent (12%) of the students who enrolled in a curriculum program in the previous fall graduated with a degree, diploma, or certificate, fifty-one percent (51%) enrolled the next fall in a curriculum or extension program, and five percent (5%) transferred to another community college or university.)

H. Client Satisfaction with Customized Training FTCC MET this standard.

NCCCS Standard: At least ninety percent (90%) of businesses/industries surveyed will report satisfaction with customized training. (Continuing Education)

FTCC Results: Ninety-six percent (96%) of businesses/industries reported satisfaction with customized training received by FTCC students.

• Prepared by Carl Mitchell, June 26, 2008, Source: North Carolina Community College System Report Critical Success Factors Report June 2008