Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Energy Management and Conservation Office
A good start :Energy needs assessments
for rural bioenergy projects
Assoc. Prof. Kanchana Sethanan, Ph.D.Energy management and Conservation Office (EMCO)
Khon Kaen University, ThailandEmails: [email protected], [email protected]
Tel: (043) 362299
Mobile: (081) 5536429
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Outline
Introduction
The energy needs assessment methodology
Case study in a Northeastern community
Conclusion and future research
1
Energy Management and Conservation Office
• Improving access to energy services is a basic requirement to meet basic human needs and achieving sustainable economic development.
• Then, delivering energy services to rural and remote communitiespresents a significant development challenge, because those communities are often far from established electricity networks and lack other basic energy facilitating infrastructure.
• In order to promote rural development by providing wider availability and more timely delivery of energy and its related services; employment; and means to develop alternative means of income generation, a clear need exists for pro-poor concerns to be explicitly incorporated within policy and energy planning at national and regional levels.
1. Introduction
2
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Feasibility study
Implementation
Evaluation
Output: Business model(s)- short term- medium term- long term
Output: Business model(s)- short term- medium term- long term
Implementation- Management (Tailor made)- Technology(low cost, high quality of products, meet demand, create higher income for a community)
Implementation- Management (Tailor made)- Technology(low cost, high quality of products, meet demand, create higher income for a community)
-All components:- Well human being- Financial- Economy- …
-All components:- Well human being- Financial- Economy- …
Evalu
ation
and F
eedb
acks
Make t
he st
anda
rds
Dissem
inatio
n
1.1 Development for Sustainability
Check
Do
Plan
Action
Deming CycleDeming Cycle
3
Energy Management and Conservation Office
1. Select the community by priority: Bioenergy and renewable energy for communities
Regional issues Future community
2.Raw material (Supply) determination
• Types of oil rich crop (oil palm, soy, rape seed)/ biomass
• Location of sources, land uses• Agriculture, Harvest &collection methods
Oil rich crops/biomass
3. Production/Transformation process
Community leaderKey Community members
4. Demand and marketDemand, market development and agriculture
5. Determination of utilization method
Listing the potential alternative options
Feasibility study
Determination of utilization method
6. Reevaluation of the utilization plan by the demand side
Source: Adapted from EX corporation, Japan
Conversion technology
Organization/community engagement
Production Management
Marketing management and mechanism
1.2 Development Cycle of Bioenergy and RE in a Community(Integration among issues to develop the business model )
4
Energy Management and Conservation Office
CommunityCommunity
villagers
Ana
lysi
s
Implementation
“Business model/framework”The project must create a sense of ownership among the community by engaging everyone in the community
with this project (i.e., community participation)
Assessment
Stud
y
SocialSocial
TechnologyTechnologypoliciespolicies
EconomicsEconomics
cultureculture
Raw material
Raw material
Issues
Impa
ct f
rom
Well human being
Make a better economics
Good environment management
Maintain the social base
Develop the technology and managemial knowledge
Team works in a communityan im
plem
enta
tion
Energy Needs Assessmentand data collection
Database
Analysis
Model development
Public hearing
> Geographical conditions& land uses
> Social
> Economics
> Utilization of oil rich crops
> Community policies
> Culture MarketingMarketing
1.3 Conceptual energy needs assessment model
5
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Goal
ObjectiveObjective11
ObjectiveObjective22
ObjectiveObjectivenn
Fig. xx: Logical Framework Analysis for controlling and monitoring the project implementation
Indicators
Process:
Results :
Process:
Results :
Means of Verification
• TechnologyTransfer
• Bank Saving• # of jobs Created• # of work centers• # of new business• # of Knowledge
Centers
• TechnologyTransfer
• Bank Saving• # of jobs Created• # of work centers• # of new business• # of Knowledge
Centers
• Daily• Monthly• Weekly• Quarter• Yearly
• Daily• Monthly• Weekly• Quarter• Yearly
Frequency
• Projectmanager
• Projectcoordinate
• Supervisor
• Projectmanager
• Projectcoordinate
• Supervisor
ResponsiblePersons
1.2.3.4.
1.2.3.4.
Key Activity
1.4 Logical framework analysis for controlling and monitoring the project
6
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Develop the Business models/framework and ImplementationDevelop the Business models/framework and Implementation
Conduct energy needs assessment and develop key actions to accelerate the bioenergy projects
Conduct energy needs assessment and develop key actions to accelerate the bioenergy projects
Identify the community needs and current situations of the communityIdentify the community needs and current situations of the community11
22
33
2. The energy needs assessment methodology
7
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Outcome: What are the significant benefits for all stakeholders ????Data collection:
Workshop(s):
– Knowledge management identified through at least xx workshops with at least xx stakeholders (e.g., contribution to understanding, findings of the current situation from investigation, proposed energy needs assessment models: AS IS)
• Basic data investigation in each aspect: See Table 1
– Contribution to an understanding by all stakeholders in the target community about the project (TO BE)
– Possible stakeholders: local community, policy makers, private sectors, other NGOs, government sectors, donors
– Local community: men, women, elderly, those from different social backgrounds, other exclude groups
2.1 Identify the local needs and current situations of the community
8
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Category Contents
Utilization of rich oil crops • Resources and markets• conversion technology• scale• business solidity
Industry and the economy • primary agriculture industry• secondary industry (manufacturing)• gross production of agriculture• industrial development plan
Geographical conditions and land uses
• location, oil rich crop plantations• geographical features• Climate, weather• opportunity cost (competing uses of land)
Social conditions • change in population• employed population• public transportation, accessibility
Basic policy for the community • basic policies in development community• Master plan• economic development project in the community
Regional issues • quality of life enhancement• environment• creation of new industries, employment creation• energy situationSource: Adapted from EX corporation, Japan
Table 1: Data Collection in each aspect
9
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Energy needs assessment:Assess the data for each issueMay apply various methods
Determine the priorities of community needs by applying Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) or well-suited tools
Appropriate Conversion (major) technology
2.2 Conduct Energy needs assessment and Develop key actions to accelerate the bioenergy project
10
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Assessment Issues Assessment MethodIssue
Social
Technology
Environment
• Employed population•Public transportation, accessibility•Quality of life•Industrial movement (creation of new industries,
new business, entrepreneur)•Gap of income generation (duration to get income)
• Budgets• Maintenance system • Ease of implementation• Reduce NOx emissions• Safety
•Green acres intends to plough its “profits” into the community
•Reduction in the consumption of diesel fuel•Reduction of households using chemical fertilizers• Soil fertility enhancement• Competing usage of land
QuestionnairesSemi-structured interviewDirect observationCost/benefit analysis
Cost/benefit analysisAnalytic Hierarchical ProcessA review of a documentFlue Gas Analyzer (for NOX)
QuestionnairesSemi-structured interviewDirect observation
11
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Assessment Issues Assessment MethodIssue
Team works
Economics
Culture
• Community involvement•Key players (Leader & key community members in
harvesting, production, sales and uses )• Knowledge transfer
• Jobs for villagers (increase their income)•Convert unused land to income generation•Gross production of agriculture•Security
•neutral and culturally-sensitive local learning environment
win-win-win strategyQuestionnairesCost/benefit analysisSemi-structured interview
QuestionnairesCost/benefit analysisSemi-structured interview
Degree of communityinvolvementRate of conflict to livelihood, tradition, or cultureQuestionnairesParticipatory exerciseSemi-structured interview
Management Skill
•Community engagement•Skill of community in management issues• Drawbacks
Degree of communityinvolvementQuestionnairesParticipatory exerciseSemi-structured interview
12
Energy Management and Conservation Office
• A structured technique for dealing with complex decision
• It can assist with identifying and weighting selection criteria, analyzing the data collected for the criteria, and expediting the decision-making process.
• It helps capture both subjective and objective evaluation measures, providing a useful mechanism for checking the consistency of the evaluation measures and alternatives suggested by the team thus reducing bias in decision making.
13
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Goal
Alternatives
CriteriaBenz = x1?BMW = x2?Honda = x3?
Ford = x4?
Benz = y1?BMW = y2?Honda = y3?
Ford = y4?
Benz = z1?BMW = z2?Honda = z3?
Ford = z4?
Eigenvector
x1 y1 z1
y2
y3
z2
z4
style reliability fuel economy
Benz
BMW
x3 z3
y4
Honda
Ford
x2
x4
*
0.319
0.560
0.121
Criteria ranking
=
Benz
BMW
Honda
Ford
0.3280
0.3060
0.2720
0.2940
Alternatives
criteria
• Determine the ranking of the criteria by performing pairwise comparisons (judgment from the representatives of all stakeholders )
• Compute the Eigenvector determining the relatives ranking of criteria and then alternatives under each criterion
14
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Win-Win-Win concept
This project must create a sense of ownership among the community by engaging everyone in the community with this project (i.e., community participation)
Low costs, high quality of products, high incomes for a community
Apply “engineering management and Supply chain & logistics models” to enhance the competiveness
For example: Raw material management:Inventory modelsStoring and warehousing mechanismTransportationPricing
2.3 Development of Business model/framework and Implementation (multi disciplinary)
15
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Long term operations – training & workshop and mentoring/coaching to make sure that the community can perform their operations efficiently in a long run
Training includes management system, and marketing mechanism
Models developed in scenarios for short, medium, and long term plans
Develop the simulation model(s) under the uncertainties (i.e., when key success factors or critical success factors changed)
2.3 Development of Business model/framework and implementation (cont’d)
16
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Possible RM Management Models
Harvest
ing
Collecti
ng
Transport
ing
to the plan
t
Plantin
g
RMdetermination
Economy
culture
Social
CommunityPolicies
Environment
Geographical Conditions(land uses)
RM models:• Private farm• Farmer group• Cooperative• Contract Farming• Mixed strategy
Objectives:• Cost/income• timing• quality
17
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Year Number of communities in the promotion of RE project of DEDE
2006 24
2007 80
2008 162
2009 300
2010 75 (not yet updated)
• The number of communities promoted is increased year by year3.1 Bioenergy and renewable energy projects in Thailand
3. A Case Study in a Northeastern Community
18
Energy Management and Conservation Office
A Case Study in a Northeastern Community
19
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Occupations
Average income : more than 23,000 Bath/person/year
Education
3.2 Background of the Community
20
Energy Management and Conservation Office
• 1 Community leader•2 Assistant Community leaders •7 sub-villages (areas) which has 1 leader in each sub-village• Good leadership • Good collaboration
inside community (Community Engagement)
• 8 Groups
• 5 Groups – economics purpose (mostly is setting for the agricultural products)
• 3 Groups – Health and livelihoods purpose
• Firewood• Charcoal
Social Cooperation Groups Resources
21
Energy Management and Conservation Office
3.3 Methodology
22
Energy Management and Conservation Office
I. Identify the local needs and current situations of the community
23
Energy Management and Conservation Office
1st workshop (Cont’d)
24
Energy Management and Conservation Office
II. Conduct Energy needs assessment
25
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Field surveys and data Collection
26
Energy Management and Conservation Office
2nd Workshop
27
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Item Device ‘s nameEnergy consumption
Quantity unit Kilo-oil equivalent Cost (Bath/y)
1 Lighting system 59,889.47 kWh/y 5,103.63 169,867.92
2Electrical appliances in a Cooking process 116,365.29 kWh/y 9,916.69 314,129.88
3 Other devices (Electricity) 440,775.67 kWh/y 37,563.01 1,232,706.69
4 Stoves using biomass 167,487.80 kg/y 73,825.70 531,000.00
5 Stoves using LPG 20,003.43 kg/y 22,113.48 413,921.35
6 Lanterns 1.80 liter/y 1.55 57.60
7 Carbonization stove 25,571.00 kg/y 10,260.34 45,042.00
8 Generator 240.00 liter/y 206.91 7,680.00
9 Transportation 263,492.27 liter/y 220,617.57 8,910,512.00
Total 379,608.88 9,908,212.95
28
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Item Cattles Pigs Chickens Ducks
Quantity 2 10 37,493 294
Energy Potential(kilo of oil equivalent/y)
0.38 1.61 90.79 0.36
Species Rice Corn cassava Sugar cane
rubber tree
Cultivated Area (square kilometer) 0.2736 0.5888 0.6864 4.2096 6.5664
Energy Potential(kilo of oil equivalent/y)
8,149.63 23,591.43 36,933.73 1,700,369.05 4,660,092.00
29
Energy Management and Conservation Office
No Question Outstanding Excellent Good Average Poor
1 How do you understand about energy conservation? 3.92 15.69 51.96 26.47 3.92
2 Do you use any kind of renewable energy in your house? 4.90 8.82 24.51 45.10 4.90
3 Are you interesting in Energy conservation? 42.62 32.79 22.95 1.64 0.00
4 How are you understand on energy conservation? 22.95 39.34 37.71 0.00 0.00
5How did government help you in energy conservation? 26.23 22.95 42.62 8.20 0.00
6How did you contribute in energy conservation of the community? 11.48 34.43 52.46 1.63 0.00
7 How do you want to know about renewable energy and energy conservation to reduce your energy cost? 40.98 40.98 18.04 0.00 0.00
8 Do you think that the energy village will benefit you? 47.54 40.98 9.84 1.64 0.00
30
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Community NeedsEnergy sustainability or Energy security
AlternativesAlternativesAlternatives
Alternative 1Alternative 1 Alternative nAlternative nAlternative 2Alternative 2 Alternative 3Alternative 3
CriteriaCriteriaCriteria
Socio culture
Socio technical
Environ-ment
Local Knowledge
Community Goals
Socio economy
Expected Outputs
31
Energy Management and Conservation Office
GoalReduce Energy consumption in a Community
AlternativesAlternativesAlternatives
Electrical Appliance(0.4025)
RenewableEnergy Devices
(0.5411)
Electricity generation
(0.0564)
Fig. 2: Energy Needs Assessment for a core study community
CriteriaCriteriaCriteria
Access to resource(0.30)
ECO-friendly technology
(0.04)
Respect for local
knowledge(0.07)
Ease of Imple-mentation
(0.38)
Respect for teamwork and management
(0.05)
Economy of scale(0.16)
32
Energy Management and Conservation Office
2nd Workshop
33
Energy Management and Conservation Office
2nd Workshop
34
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Hi-efficiency charcoal stove
The hi-efficiency charcoal stove is developed from the standard stove by reducing the gap and installing an insulation that results in reduction of heat loss.
The advantage of this stove is the variety of firewood.
This is developed from the normal noodle pot by reducing heat loss from the pot.
Renewable energy devices
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Carbonization Stove
This is a carbonization stove that makes from 200 liter tank. This has been developed to improve it efficiency. The advantage of this stove is very simple to make charcoal. The quality of charcoal is high. Furthermore, it is simple to move.
This stove is developed from the standard stove. This stove is designed to reduce heat loss. We can also collect the cooking oil from this stove and use it to be a raw product for bio-diesel.
This stove will convert common bio-mass to combustion gas (gasification process).
Renewable energy devices
36
Energy Management and Conservation Office
LPG CoverThis cover will reduce the heat loss from the LPG stove.This cover will reduce the heat loss from the LPG stove.
Electronic Ballast consume about 1-2 watt or about 10-20% compare to the standard ballast.
Electronic Ballast consume about 1-2 watt or about 10-20% compare to the standard ballast.
Compact fluorescent consume about 20% of electricity compare to incandescent bulb at the same luminary.
Compact fluorescent consume about 20% of electricity compare to incandescent bulb at the same luminary.
High energy efficiency devices
37
Energy Management and Conservation Office
III. Implementation of energy conservation measures
38
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Item devices amount
1 High efficiency charcoal stove 28
2High efficiency fire woods (small) 63
3High efficiency fire woods (medium) 28
4High efficiency fire woods (large) 1
5 200Liter Carbonization stove 31
6 LPG stove cover 60
7 Fluorescent 18 Watts 136
8 Fluorescent 36 Watts 141
9 Compact fluorescent 11 Watts 29
10 Ballast 18 Watts 49
11 Ballast 36 watts 50
Total 616
Item Renewable energy devices amount
1 Gasification stove 3
2 30 kg garbage stove 4
3 200Liter Carbonization stove 10
4 Barbecue stove 2
5 High efficiency noodle pot 3
Total 32
39
Energy Management and Conservation Office
3rd Workshop
40
Energy Management and Conservation Office
• The community getting stronger as a result of higher income.
No. List of equipmentEnergy savings
Kilo of oil /year Baht/year
I. Energy Conservation
1 Lighting equipment 261.14 8,949.00
2 Electrical equipment for cooking 0.00 0.00
3 General Electrical equipment 0.00 0.00
II. Renewable Energy
4 Biomass stove 9,993.12 71,792.00
5 LPG stove 2,380.13 44,550.00
6 Lanterns 0.00 0.00
7 200Liter Carbonization stove 1,384.01 5,691.00
Total 14,018.40 130,982.00
3.4 Outcomes
41
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Energy policy
The original devices must be adapted to suite the community.
Strong community engagement must be observed by yearly.
Reduce an energy cost by promoting the utilization of biomass by the leader,committee, and energy community volunteers.
Use high energy efficiency devices.
Be a pilot village to use high efficiency device and biomass (Disseminate to the neighbor communities).
42
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Advantages
1.The unity of the community
1.High income
2.Strong cooperation groups in the community.
3.Enough background in education to be able to transfer energy knowledge to the other.
Problems of energy community
1. The community don’t have knowledge in renewable energy
2. The community don’t know about high efficiency devices.
3. High energy cost for each household
3.5 Obstacles and means to overcome the Problems
43
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Guideline to overcome problems
1. Knowledge transfer in energy conservation and management
- community’s leaders – to have a site visit in energy conservation and management
- households – training by local person who has expertise in energy conservation
2. Increase awareness and confidence to use high efficiency technologies
- Training in energy conservation and renewable energy by expertise
- Exhibition to display renewable energy technology
- Exhibition to display high efficiency devices
44
Energy Management and Conservation Office
• To achieve the implementation of the RE project in the community:– Good and enough of all related data (GIGO) are needed
(effective techniques are required)– AHP is an effective tool to determine “NEEDS” of the community
– 2-way communication is very important to implement the RE project in a community (WORKSHOPS, Interviews, and Demonstrations)
– Contribution to understanding for all stakeholders (Knowledge management)
– Budgets must be enough to expedite the implementation of the RE project
• Strong teamwork and community policy
4. Conclusion and Future Research
4.1 Project summary and discussion
45
Energy Management and Conservation Office
• Effective techniques to make understanding for all Stakeholders in various related issues (Workshops, interview, demonstration)
• Key Success Factors– Leader and energy committee
– Implementation and adaptation of RE technology to fit in the community culture and resources
– Increase in awareness in RE.– Strong community engagement– Demonstration and holding workshops– Effective tool to determine the “Energy Needs” of a community
• Critical Success Factors– Knowledge in both Energy conservation and RE– Management of the community leader and committee
• Assumptions or Conditions of the model(s) – Resources of renewable energy (Biomass & Biofuel)– Strong community engagement– Leadership of the committee
4.2 Develop the mechanism to promote the technology transfer to the GMS regions
46
Energy Management and Conservation Office
Adm. staff
Func. staff
Communitiesvillager ownership
villager consumersVillager engagement
Overall systems: Business model
Biomass
Biofuels
HRM Raw materialmanagement
systems
Communitiesengagement
ManagementSystem
Expertise
community leader, committee,
energy community volunteers
Training by doingAdvisory
Workshop, demonstration
Bioenergy and RE Implementation model in a community
47
Energy Management and Conservation Office
4.3: Future research
48
Energy Management and Conservation Office50
Thank you !!