27
ENGAGING WITH IN-P ATIENT TEAMS Patrick McNeil November 14 2013

ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

ENGAGING WITH IN-PATIENT TEAMS

Patrick McNeil

November 14 2013

Page 2: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Engaging With In-Patient Teams

• Some strategies that I have found useful

• Some data of effectiveness

• Discussion

Page 3: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Useful Strategies Coal Face

(local/departmental) High level (organisational)

Page 4: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Measure Effectiveness Change-sensitive metric ALOS Access block Discharges

Page 5: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Discussion

Page 6: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

NEAT is

Quality Care

Page 7: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

USEFUL STRATEGIES

Page 8: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Local/Departmental Approaches 1

• Meeting with HoDs and NUMs of each of the six biggest Internal Medicine Teams

– Cardiology

– Geriatrics

– Neurology

– Respiratory

– Acute Medicine

– Gastroenterology

Page 9: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Local/Departmental Approaches 1

• Meeting with HoDs and NUMs of each of the six biggest Internal Medicine Teams

• Education about reason for change (why)

• Providing some data on relative performance

• Finding out Departmental ideas

Page 10: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Why Change – Facility Quality

• Quality patient care is safe, timely, effective,

and personal (patient-focused) (S.T.E.P.)

• Emotional connection to change

– Patient voice – Every patient counts, and to

them, every minute counts

– Creating systems to deliver quality care and

safer patient outcomes

– Being part of a high performing organisation

that produces quality outcomes

Page 11: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Local/Departmental Approaches 1

• Meeting with HoDs and NUMs of each of the six biggest Internal Medicine Teams

– Cardiology

– Geriatrics

– Neurology

– Respiratory

– Acute Medicine

– Gastroenterology

Page 12: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Local/Departmental Approaches 1

• Meeting with HoDs and NUMs of each of the six biggest Internal Medicine Teams

– Cardiology – CCU daily decision making

– Geriatrics – Reduce in-patient numbers

– Neurology – Reduce in-patient numbers

– Respiratory – Winter strategy

– Acute Medicine – Improve MAU performance

– Gastroenterology

Page 13: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Local/Departmental Approaches 2

• Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department

• More formal presentation of relative Departmental performance in plenary sessions

Page 14: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental
Page 15: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental
Page 16: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental
Page 17: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

USEFUL STRATEGIES 2

Page 18: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Organisational Approaches

EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP/SPONSORSHIP

• One Call Admission Policy – Memorandum from General Manager

• Facility-wide daily Journey Board Round (JBR) strategy – Ward audits, HoD/NUM workshop

• Surgical Teams – Text weekend discharge numbers to Director of Surgery

• Options for improvement - Insafehands

Page 19: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS

Page 20: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental
Page 21: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Facility-wide NEAT performance

Page 22: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Local Approaches

• Neurology – ALOS reduced by 1.7 days from 2012 to 2013

– In-patient numbers 30’s rather than 40’s

• Cardiology – Doctor of the day in CCU to make decisions on

colleague’s patients

– Patients awaiting monitored bed in ED rare

• Acute Medicine – Dedicated Director -> dramatic performance

improvement (MAU metrics)

Page 23: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Organisational Approaches

• Journey Board Rounding has become part of the Facility’s default culture

• Insafehands introduced to Orthopedics

• Surgical Friday Text to Director

Page 24: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

Weekend Discharges

200

210

220

230

240

250

260

270

280

290

300

07-A

pr

14-A

pr

21-A

pr

28-A

pr

05-M

ay

12-M

ay

19-M

ay

26-M

ay

02-J

un

09-J

un

16-J

un

23-J

un

30-J

un

07-J

ul

14-J

ul

21-J

ul

28-J

ul

04-A

ug

11-A

ug

18-A

ug

25-A

ug

01-S

ep

08-S

ep

15-S

ep

22-S

ep

29-S

ep

06-O

ct

13-O

ct

20-O

ct

27-O

ct

Friday to Sunday Discharges

Page 25: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

07-A

pr

14-A

pr

21-A

pr

28-A

pr

05-M

ay

12-M

ay

19-M

ay

26-M

ay

02-J

un

09-J

un

16-J

un

23-J

un

30-J

un

07-J

ul

14-J

ul

21-J

ul

28-J

ul

04-A

ug

11-A

ug

18-A

ug

25-A

ug

01-S

ep

08-S

ep

15-S

ep

22-S

ep

29-S

ep

06-O

ct

13-O

ct

20-O

ct

27-O

ct

Friday

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

145

150

21-A

pr

28-A

pr

05-M

ay

12-M

ay

19-M

ay

26-M

ay

02-J

un

09-J

un

16-J

un

23-J

un

30-J

un

07-J

ul

14-J

ul

21-J

ul

28-J

ul

04-A

ug

11-A

ug

18-A

ug

25-A

ug

01-S

ep

08-S

ep

15-S

ep

22-S

ep

29-S

ep

06-O

ct

13-O

ct

20-O

ct

27-O

ct

Sat + Sun

Page 26: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

• Work at the grass roots and at the top levels 1

• Measure how effective your strategies are 2

• Embed successes into the organisational culture 3

Summary

Page 27: ENGAGING WITH IN ATIENT EAMS · •Presentation of individual Departmental performance to HoD (year 1) then (year 2) to whole Department •More formal presentation of relative Departmental

QUESTIONS?