20
Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Enhancing 9-1-1Location AccuracyA Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015

ROGER HIXSON – NENA

BOB SHERRY – INTRADO

ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Page 2: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Three Challenges around Wireless E9-1-1 Location

•Call Routing Challenge

•Enhanced (Phase II) Location Challenge

•Indoor Location ChallengeAvoid conflating these: they are distinct!

Page 3: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Call Routing Challenge•Cellsite/Sector based routing is used for E9-1-1 today

◦ usually delivered as a street address, sometimes delivered with Longitude and Latitude

•Wireless Traffic Plans are pre-determined routing instructions◦ Agreements between wireless carrier and Public Safety

◦ Infrequent updates to the WTP can cause undesirable (non-final) Rerouting results – (e.g., demographic changes, cellsite adds/changes)

•Non-optimal Routing Results – sometimes RF coverage reaches beyond cell site map boundaries◦ If this boundary condition happens, the result is that the call is sent to the PSAP assigned to the serving cell

site - not where the call is expected to be handled. This is considered a “non-final” routed call, but not a misrouted call.

Location based routing using Longitude and Latitude as inputs to GIS systems is an new development topic within the CSRIC V WG1 and has many facets, including Small Cell (e.g., Femtocells, Picocells) deployments, new emerging location technologies and hybridization, and is dependent on overall accuracy of the position estimate information produced as well as the base map information it is compared to.

Page 4: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Enhanced (Phase II) Location Challenge

•Phase II location, (Long/Lat), takes time to determine, access via E9-1-1 data links

•Call routing, by comparison, has become quicker w/ network and operations changes

•An initial “bid” usually happens automatically, w/o Telecommunicator intervention

•A “Rebid”, often a manual process is sometimes needed to get Phase II location (up to 70% of the time)

•Phase II position information, once determined, is available - cached at the MPC/GMLC (~87%)

•If Telecommunicators (or their CPE) “Rebid” too soon, (e.g., less than standardized ~30 sec interval), updated Phase II location may not be available.

Page 5: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Initial Bid Timing vs. Location Fix

Initial Bid generally <8 sec

…but location fixes can take up to 24 seconds

Washington DCMay, 2013Single carrier

11,585 calls10,812 bids

6.7% abandoned

Phase II on Initial Bids: 258823.9%

~15 sec3-5 sec

23-24 sec

Phase II available in time for Initial Bid data

Page 6: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Importance of Location Rebids

•Rebidding often is not done ◦ Washington DC: Only 1.8% made a Rebid (191 of 10,811 calls)◦ CalNENA policy not to perform rebids: 2006 thru 2014◦ Dispatch info sometimes overwritten by rebids (i.e., CAD/CPE)

On initial bid (by CoS)

75.4% Phase I 0.7% Poor Phase II21.8% Phase II A-GPS 2.1% Phase II AFLT

Rebid after 30 seconds (by CoS):9,614 of 10,811 had a Phase II fix = 88.9%

11.1% Phase I 1.7% Poor Phase II73.3% Phase II A-GPS13.9% Phase II AFLT

87.2%

Page 7: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

NG9-1-1 Improves Phase II Data Retrieval

NG9-1-1 increases ability to get and utilize location• Location data can be pushed - rather than only pulled

◦ SIP Subscribe/Notify◦ No need for re-bid strategy - location information can be presented as it becomes

available

• Multiple location elements can be sent – courtesy of PIDF-LO◦ A-GPS fix (improvements using add’l GNSS, like GLONASS)◦ OTDOA fix (faster than A-GPS)

• Richer set of location for Indoors & Outdoors◦ Better location achievable from new location technologies◦ Additional Data incl. supplemental address info, building floor plans (text and graphics)

Presence Information Data Format - Location Object

18

Page 8: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Indoor Location Challenge• Phase II outdoors traditionally has been A-GPS location

• GPS signals don’t propagate well into deep indoor environments

• FCC 4th Report & Order on Location Accuracy requires carriers to meet several rules, of which 3 are primary, outlined as follows:

Lat/Lon delivered at 50m or better (with Confidence at 90%)

Dispatchable Location, a street address that includes supplemental location data

such as floor, building, unit, etc., where available, stored in the NEAD (National

Emergency Address Database)

Vertical component (Z-axis) required, either altitude or floor number, etc.

Page 9: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Indoor Location – NEAD

•NEAD is provisioned with Wi-Fi and BLE identifier information along with a validated civic street address

•Organizations such as CTIA, ATIS, IETF, NENA and others are engaged in building requirements, architectures, and specifications

◦ Several CTIA LA (Location Accuracy) work groups are engaged◦ ATIS WTSC Joint ELOC Task Force is developing an initial architecture

•New Location Technologies will emerge and be tested◦ ATIS ESM is describing testing requirements and methodologies◦ Some early prototypes have been developed, such as a LIS-NEAD and Enterprise

Wi-Fi Positioning

Page 10: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Proposed Standard NEAD ArchitectureLegacy PSAP Delivery

E-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFMSC

NEADWi-Fi (BSSID)

BLE(UUID)

Legacy Emergency Services Network

Incoming Emergency9-1-1 Call ALI

E-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFPSAPCPE

SR

eSMLC

Data ProvisionFunction

[deliver coarse location][deliver dispatchable location]

TargetDevice

9-1-1 LRF/GMLC

AccessNetwork

DetailNot Shown

CarrierData

Sources

OtherData

Sources

Page 11: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Proposed Evolved NEAD ArchitectureLegacy PSAP Delivery

E-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFMSC

NEADWi-Fi (BSSID)

BLE(UUID)

Legacy Emergency Services Network

Incoming Emergency9-1-1 Call ALI

E-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFPSAPCPE

SR

eSMLC

Data ProvisionFunction

[deliver coarse location][deliver dispatchable location]

TargetDevice

CarrierData

Sources

9-1-1 LRF/GMLC

AccessNetwork

DetailNot Shown

E-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFWi-FiProbeData

E-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFE-CSCFWi-Fi

EnterpriseLoc Engine

OTTAddress Database

Interface Development EffortCurrent and Future

OtherData

Sources

Page 12: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Enterprise Indoor Location – Washington DC

(Vendor specific demo/prototype)Wi-Fi AP

Controllers (2 Cisco MSEs)

Dispatchable Location

Indoor Map

Indoor Location

Page 13: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Satellite Overlay for Campus View(Vendor specific demo/prototype)

Satellite Map (Campus View)

Page 14: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Expanded Indoor Location View

(Vendor specific demo/prototype)

Indoor Map (Expanded View)

Dispatchable Location

North Orientation

Page 15: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Multi-Story Enterprise Location

(Vendor specific demo/prototype)

Enterprise Location for Dispatchable

Location using Measured Wi-Fi

Page 16: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Multi-faceted Location – Seattle, WA(Vendor specific demo/prototype)

Enterprise Location (Indoor

Map)

Dispatchable Location

Indoor Map

Other Data Sources

Page 17: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

National Emergency Address Database (NEAD)

(Vendor specific demo/prototype)

NEAD Location (Wi-Fi APs)

NEAD

Wi-Fi Access Points

Dispatchable Location (Address, Floor, Additional Info)

Page 18: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Global Wi-Fi Services (Geodetic Location)

(Vendor specific demo/prototype)Global Wi-Fi

Services (Enhanced Location)

Geodetic Location

Page 19: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Additional Location Data Sources(Vendor specific demo/prototype)

Other Data Sources (Enhanced Location)

Bluetooth

Data from Mobile Device

Billing DataCaller-supplied

Page 20: Enhancing 9-1-1 Location Accuracy A Panel Discussion – Oct 6, 2015 ROGER HIXSON – NENA BOB SHERRY – INTRADO ROGER MARSHALL - TCS

Roger S. MarshallTeleCommunication Systems (TCS)[email protected]

Questions

Bob [email protected]

Roger [email protected]