Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
John IngramFood Systems Programme Leader
Environmental Change InstituteUniversity of Oxford
Enhancing Food Systems Resilience
Challenges, Future Scenarios,and Research Avenues
Food security…
... exists when all people, at all times, have physical, economic and social access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.
(UN-FAO World Food Summit 1996, 2012)
… is universally applicable
… is more than food production
… is underpinned by food systems
Food Systems: Including a range of ‘Activities’
Material transformation
Value addition
Food System Activities underpin food security‘Outcomes’ …
Food Security, i.e. stability over time for:
FOOD UTILISATION
FOOD ACCESS
•Affordability•Allocation•Preference
•Nutritional Value•Social Value•Food Safety
FOOD AVAILABILITY
•Production•Distribution•Exchange
“… when all people, at all times, have physical, economic and social access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food
preferences for an active and healthy life.”
EnvironmentalOutcomes
• Climate change• Water availability• Water quality• Biodiversity• Biogeochemistry• Soil degradation• …
SocioeconomicOutcomes
• Income• Employment • Health• Social capital• Political capital• Ethics• …
Food Systems: Also including a range ofother ‘Outcomes’
Trade-offs to be aware of!
Synergies to exploit!
Prevalence of hunger …% of world population
FAO, 2018
Overall global food security ‘situation’
Insufficient cals
Insufficient nutrs~ 1 billion
Insufficient nutrs?3 billion
Excess cals (incl. many
with insufficient nutrs)> 2.5 billion
Sufficient cals
Sufficient nutrs?3 billion
“Triple Burden of Malnutrition”
Different, overlapping forms of
malnutrition the ‘new normal’
(IFPRI 2015)
‘Post-farm gate’ Food System Activitiesprocessing, packaging, trading, shipping, storing, advertising, retailing, …
=> Final Cals/Nutrient Quantity and Price at shop
Productivity Diversity & Quality
Local, Regional & Global Production Activitiesfarming, horticulture, livestock raising, aquaculture, fishing, …
=> Basic Cals/Nutrient Quantity and Price at farm
Constraints on dietary choice and diversityaffordability, preference, allocation, cooking skill, convenience, cultural norms, …
=> Consumption by Sub-populations
Food System approach highlights roles of multiple actors
CONSUMERS
PRODUCERS
FOOD CHAIN ACTORS
So
cia
l, P
olit
ica
l, B
usin
ess, S
&T
an
d B
iop
hysic
al E
nviro
nm
en
ts
Insufficient cals
Insufficient nutrs
~ 1 billion
Sufficient cals
Insufficient nutrs
? 3 billion
Excess cals (incl. many
with insufficient nutrs)
> 2.5 billion
Sufficient cals
Sufficient nutrs
Food Systems Activities also have
varied impacts on natural resources
We also know the current global environmental ‘situation’
• Soil 33% degraded
• Fresh water 20% aquifers overexploited
• Biodiversity 60% of loss
• Marine resources 29% over-fished; 61% fully-fished
And 24% of total GHG emissions
And pollution: chemicals, plastics, litter, …
Links between human and animal prophylaxis, e.g. AMR
Increasing risk of disease emergence with the rapid changes at the A-H interface.
And we know the current concerns aboutanimal-human interactions
Child labour
Animal welfare
Workers rights
Inter-generational legacy
Food waste
Farmer welfare and safety
…
And we have a host of current ethical concerns
So what’s coming down the track?
Marked regional differences in projected population growth
And marked regional differences in projected increasing wealth
Proportion of middle
class by region
Middle Class: $6,000-$30,000 p.a.
And we know that per capita daily dietary kCaldemand increases with wealth over time
Tilman and Clark, Nature 2014
Emerging trends:
Heat maps showing
the rates of
prescriptions for
type 2 diabetes in
2012 and 2015
Related news …
Looking ahead ...
“unless trends are
curbed, half the global
adult population will
be overweight in 15
years time”
1
2000
Billions of people
(indicative; not to scale)
2 3 4 5 76 8 109
2040
2018
2028
kcal
/per
son
/day
co
nsu
mp
tio
n
2000
The environmental consequences of meeting this demand under current food system practises and consumption trends are dire
Costs of triple burden of malnutrition (direct, indirect and lost work days) currently 11% global GDP
Looking ahead…Extrapolated calorie consumption
The current global cost of the 425m diabetics is $825b/yr; 700m diabetics anticipated
Manage Demand
MeetDemand
Five qualitative descriptions
of future changes in:
• demographics
• human development
• economy and lifestyle
• policies and institutions
• technology
• environment and natural
resources
FOOD UTILISATION
FOOD ACCESS
•Affordability•Allocation•Preference
•Nutritional Value•Social Value•Food Safety
FOOD AVAILABILITY
•Production•Distribution•Exchange
How high are the risks to different Food Security ‘Elements’ under different SSPs?
Availability
Poorer nations Wealthier nations Poorer nations Wealthier nations
SSP1: Sustainability
SSP2: Middle of the Road
SSP3: Regional Rivalry
SSP4: Inequality Key
SSP5: Fossil-fueled development VERY LOW RISK
LOW RISK
Availability MEDIUM RISK
HIGH RISK
Poorer nations Wealthier nations Poorer nations Wealthier nations VERY HIGH RISK
SSP1: Sustainability
SSP2: Middle of the Road
SSP3: Regional Rivalry
SSP4: Inequality
SSP5: Fossil-fueled development
Food production Food distribution
Inter-regional trade Intra-regional trade
‘Extending’ the SSPs to Food Availability
Brown et al., Climate Change, Global Food Security, and the U.S. Food System. 2015. USDA
FOOD UTILISATION
FOOD ACCESS
•Affordability•Allocation•Preference
•Nutritional Value•Social Value•Food Safety
FOOD AVAILABILITY
•Production•Distribution•Exchange
How high are the risks to different Food Security ‘Elements’ under different SSPs?
Access
Poorer nations Wealthier nations Poorer nations Wealthier nations
SSP1: Sustainability
SSP2: Middle of the Road
SSP3: Regional Rivalry Key
SSP4: Inequality VERY LOW RISK
SSP5: Fossil-fueled development LOW RISK
MEDIUM RISK
HIGH RISK
Utilization VERY HIGH RISK
Poorer nations Wealthier nations Poorer nations Wealthier nations
SSP1: Sustainability
SSP2: Middle of the Road
SSP3: Regional Rivalry
SSP4: Inequality
SSP5: Fossil-fueled development
Affordability
Food safety Nutritional content
Food allocation
‘Extending’ the SSPs to Food Access and Utilisation
Brown et al., Climate Change, Global Food Security, and the U.S. Food System. 2015. USDA
Food System challenges are interconnected
against a background of stresses and shocks
natural resource depletion
and
many stagnating rural economies
and
changing climate
and
social and socio-cultural changes
To achieve food security for a growing, wealthier, urbanising population while minimising further environmental degradation
“The capacity over time of a food system and its units at multiple levels, to provide sufficient, adequate and accessible food to all, in the face of various and even unforeseen disturbances.” – just relates to Food Security
So what is
‘Food System Resilience’?
Enhanced understanding needed to:
accommodate different perspectives looking at a common problem (esp. concerning multiple societal goals)
be based on use of evidence in a value-laden debate
Defining Resilience
4 Questions
1. Of what?
2. To what?
3. For whom?
4. Over what time period?
Adapted from: Helfgott, European Journal of Operational Research, 2017
Food System OUTCOMES
Food Utilisation
Food Access
Food Availability
Food SecuritySocial Welfare• Income• Employment • Health• Social capital• Political capital• Ethics• …
Environment• Climate change• Water availability• Water quality• Biodiversity• Biogeochemistry• Soil degradation• …
Food System
Activities
to deliver
Outcomes
1. Of what?
Adapted from: Ingram, Food Security, 2011
“Stream Trains” “Black Swans”
Easily perceived drivers and trends that will influence change - direct and indirect
Rare and/or unpredictable events that have a big impact
2. To what?
Food System Stresses and Shocks
2. To what?
Food System Stresses and Shocks
Stresspressure or tensionexerted on a system
[Steam Trains]
Shocksudden surprising event
affecting a system[Black Swans]
Demography Trade wars
Social & cultural norms Election and Referenda results
Natural resource degradation Food scares
Climate Extreme weather
Urbanisation Conflict
Automation Geophysical events
Science & technology
Geopolitics
3. For whom?
Food system ‘actors’
Input industry
Farmers, fishermen
Con-summers
Waste process, sewage
Subsistence farmers
Retailers, food service
Food industry
Traders, processors
4. Over what time period?
• Short-term interruptions (usually due to shocks) to eg:
• Fishing or agricultural activities (due to e.g. extreme weather)
• Critical ingredient shortfall (due to e.g. disease outbreak)
• Just in time groceries delivery (due to e.g. IT malfunction)
• Consumer shopping patterns (due to e.g. food scares)
• Longer-term disruptions (usually due to stresses) to eg:
• Natural resource degradation
• Energy price
• Low-carbon emission regulations
• Change in dietary preferences
Growing volatility from stressors and shocks needs enhanced resilience
3 Resilience notions
1. Robustness Aim to resist disruption to current outcome
2. Recovery Aim to return to current outcome after disruption
3. Re-orientation Accept alternative outcome after disruption(transformation)
All involve
Re-organisation Make changes to the system(adaptation)
Enhancing Resilience 1
Re-organise the Food System Activities
Do the “doing” words differently
Enhancing Resilience 2
Re-organise the Food System ‘Drivers’
Social: education, media, household structure, social movements, health care systems, …
Sci & Tech: farm inputs, food processing, food preparation, logistics and health technologies, …
Environmental: climate, soil, water, pollution, biodiversity, …
Policy: agri-environment schemes, nutrition, labour, health and safety, …
Markets: preference, market structure, competition, trade, …
Food System
Drivers
• Demography
• Economic
context
• Socio-political
context
• Cultural context
• Science &
Technology
• Environment
Adapted from: The Institute of Medicine & The National Research Council of the National Academies, 2015
FOOD
UTILISATION
FOOD
ACCESS
FOOD
AVAILABILITY
Food Security
Other Societal Interests
• Income
• Profit
• Rural development
• Employment
• Health
• Environment
• Landscape
• Ecosystem services
• Animal welfare
• …
Enhancing Resilience 3
Re-organise our ‘views’ on Food System Outcomes
Providing a healthy, affordable,
and environmentally-friendly diet
for all people will require a
radical transformation of the
system.
This will depend on:
better farming methods,
wealthy nations consuming
less meat and
countries valuing food which is
nutritious rather than cheap.
InterAcademy Partnership: 28 Nov 2018
Enhancing Resilience 3
Re-organise our ‘views’ on Food System Outcomes
Enhancing Resilience 3
Re-organise our ‘views’ on Food System Outcomes
Multiple motives/world views:
environment, animal welfare, health, cost, trendy, …
... exists when all people, at all times, have physical, economic and social access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.
“enough for a particular purpose; as much as you need”
… OED
Enhancing Resilience 3
Re-organise our ‘views’ on Food System Outcomes
DRIVER
Interactions
Socioeconomic
DRIVERSChanges in:
Demographics, Economics,
Socio-political context,
Cultural context
Science & Technology
Environmental
DRIVERSChanges in:
Land cover & soils, Atmospheric
Comp., Climate variability & means,
Water availability & quality,
Nutrient availability & cycling,
Biodiversity, Sea level
‘Natural’
DRIVERS
e.g. Volcanoes
Solar cycles
Environmental feedbacks
e.g. water quality, GHGs, biodiversity
Socioeconomic feedbacks
e.g. nutrition, business, political stability
Food
UtilisationFood
Access
Food
Availability
Food Security
A ‘Complex Adaptive System’Where to intervene, and who does what?
So
cia
l, P
olit
ica
l, B
usin
ess, S
&T
an
d B
iop
hysic
al E
nviro
nm
en
ts
Social Welfare
Environ-ment
Complex adaptive system, many interactive ‘drivers’ and feedbacks
Set of dynamic actors and activities
Interactive socioeconomic and environmental outcomes
Wide range of power and vested interests; fragmented governance
Confused terminology
However…
Many policy, fiscal, social and technical options for change
Multiple options for cooperation among actors
Many plausible futures
Why is it so hard to make progress?
Strong set of policy-related literature relating to different parts of the food system …
Of the ca. 45 UK government departments at least 20 directly relate to food security
Cabinet Office
The Charity Commission
Competition and Markets Authority
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Department for Education
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Department for Exiting the European Union
Department for International Development
Department for International Trade
Department for Transport
Department for Work and Pensions
Department of Health and Social Care
Food Standards Agency
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Home Office
Office of Rail and Road
UK Statistics Authority
UK Trade & Investment
Water Services Regulation Authority
… and food security issues can be ‘scattered’ across government
... exists when all people, at all times, have physical, economic and social
access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and
food preferences for an active and healthy life.
To help policymakers and practitioners optimise
the resilience of the UK’s food system to
environmental, biological, economic, social and
geopolitical shocks.
£14.5m; 2016-2021;10 Projects
Resilience of the UK Food
System in a Global Context
Current Situation: Increasing and systemic failings in food systems; increasing exposure to shocks and stresses
Upcoming Situation: Problems will be exacerbated unless more resilient food systems are developed and implemented
Managing the demand side of equation will help enhance resilience
More social, political and behavioral economics research Identify and promote entrepreneurial opportunities for
food system development Ensure workforce “tooled-up” in systems thinking
Summary:Today and Tomorrow