Environmental Monitoring Report - adb.org · Kelompok Pemanfaat dan Pemelihara (Operation and Maintenance Team) LCO Local Coordinating Office MDG Millennium Development Goals MPWH

Environmental Monitoring Report

# Annual Report December 2018

Indonesia: Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter

Project – Phase 2

Prepared by the Directorate General of Human Settlements, Ministry of Public Works and Housing

for the Republic of Indonesia and the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 30 November 2018)

Currency unit – rupiah currency name in lowercase (Rp)

Rp1.00 = $0.00007 $1.00 = Rp14,240

ADB – Asian Development Bank APBD – Anggaran Pendapatan and Belanja Daerah (Regional

Budget Income and Expenditure) DGHS – Directorate of Human Settlements

NOTE

(i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Indonesia and its agencies ends on 31 December. “FY” before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 31 December 2011.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

___________________________________________________________________________

1

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report

2017 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT

ADB LOAN 3122-INO: Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project

Phase 2 (NUSP-2)

Bridge constructed at Beting Kuala Kapias Neighborhood

Prepared by

Directorate General of Human Settlements - Ministry of Public Works and Housing

for

Asian Development Bank

November 2018

Annual Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

2

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... 2

List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... 3

List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... 3

ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 4

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 5

CHAPTER 2. KEY PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS ................................................. 7

2.1. Community Contracts ......................................................................................................... 7

2.2. Complex Civil Work Contracts ............................................................................................ 9

2.3. New Site Development (NSD) ............................................................................................11

CHAPTER 3. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AND MONITORING STATUS .......................13

3.1. Requirements of Environmental Safeguards ......................................................................13

3.2. Key Roles and Responsibilities ..........................................................................................13

3.3. Community Contracts ........................................................................................................15

3.4. Complex Civil Work Contracts ...........................................................................................16

3.5. New Site Development Contracts ......................................................................................16

CHAPTER 4. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND DISCUSSION ..................................................17

CHAPTER 5. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ..........................................................................18

CHAPTER 6. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM .............................................................19

CHAPTER 7. PROJECT STAFFING AND CAPACITY BUILDING ...........................................21

CHAPTER 8. KEY ISSUES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ....................................................23

CHAPTER 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................25

APPENDICES

Appendix 1. SPPL of Community Contracts .......................................................................... 27

Appendix 2. UKL-UPL and SPPL of Complex Civil Work Contract ........................................ 29

Appendix 3. UKL-UPL and Environmental Permit for the New Site Development .................. 31

Appendix 4. Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Implementation - Bugul Lor

Neighborhood, Pasuruan City ............................................................................ 32


3

List of Tables

Table 1. Community Contracts Awarded in 2017 .................................................................... 8

Table 2. Complex Civil Works Contracts Awarded in 2017 .................................................... 10

Table 3. Agency and Community Organization Responsibilities ............................................ 13

Table 4. Key Issues and the Corrective Actions .................................................................... 23

List of Figures

Figure 1. NUSP-2 Project Location ......................................................................................... 5

Figure 2. Construction of neighborhood road in Muktiharjo Kidul (Semarang City) .................. 7

Figure 3. Construction of drainage system in Kelurahan Dusun Besar (Bengkulu City) ........... 8

Figure 4. Bridge Construction in Kelurahan Beting Kuala Kapias (Tanjung Balai) ................. 10

Figure 5. Progress of NSD Development .............................................................................. 12

Figure 6. Grievance Redress Mechanism ............................................................................. 19


4

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

BLH Badan Lingkungan Hidup (Local Environment Office)

CA Community Advisor

CAP Community Action Plan

CC City Coordinator

CIO Community Implementing Organization (or BKM Badan Keswadayaan

Masyarakat)

CPMU Central Project Management Unit

DGHS Directorate General of Housing Settlements

EA Executing Agency

EARF Environmental Review and Assessment Framework

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

EMP Environmental Management Plan

EMS Environmental Management System

FY Fiscal Year

IEE Initial Environmental Examination

IPAL

KPP

Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah (Communal Wastewater Treatment Plant)

Kelompok Pemanfaat dan Pemelihara (Operation and Maintenance Team)

LCO Local Coordinating Office

MDG Millennium Development Goals

MPWH Ministry of Public Work and Housing

Muskel Musyawarah Kelurahan (neighborhood assembly meeting)

NMC National Management Consultant

NSD New Site Development

NUSP-2 Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project Phase 2

O&M Operation and Maintenance

PIP Pengembangan Infrastruktur Permukiman (Settlement Infrastructure

Development)

PIU Project Implementing Unit (Satker or Satuan Kerja)

PMU Project Management Unit

RAB Rencana Anggaran Belanja (Budget Planning)

RMC Regional Management Consultant

Satker Satuan Kerja (Project Implementing Unit)

SKS Survey Kampung Sendiri or Village Survey

SPPL Surat Pernyataan Kesanggupan Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan

(Statement Letter for Environmental Management and Monitoring)

TIPP Tim Inti Perencanaan Partisipatif (Core team for Participatory Planning)

UKL-UPL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan – Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan

(Environmental Management Effort - Environmental Monitoring Effort

Document)


5

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

1. Project Background. The Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project – Phase 2

(NUSP-2) is aimed to upgrade basic public infrastructure in slum settlements, and contribute

to meeting Millennium Development Goal (MDG) targets for achieving significant improvement

in the lives of slum dwellers (MDG target 7D) and halving the proportion of urban households

without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation (MDG target 7C).1 The

NUSP-2 also contributes to the implementation of Cities without Slums Program launched by

the Indonesian Government.2

2. The NUSP-2 is an ADB-funded project, particularly upgrading and/or developing basic

infrastructure and facilities for selected slum areas at 209 neighborhoods (kelurahan). These

neighborhoods are distributed in 20 districts (kabupaten) and municipalities (kota) located

across Sumatra, Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Nusa Tenggara and Maluku Islands as shown

in Figure 1. The executing agency of the NUSP-2 is the Directorate General of Human

Settlements (Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya) of the Ministry of Public Works and Housing

(MPWH).

Figure 1. NUSP-2 Project Location

1 The 2015 MDG target for the proportion of the urban population living in slums is 6%; in 2011, 12.6% of the

urban population lived in slums. The 2015 MDG target for the proportion of households with sustainable access to an improved water source is 75.5%; in 2011, 40.5% of urban households had access to an improved water source, 72.5% had access to basic sanitation. The proportion of households with access to safe water and basic sanitation in slum areas is assumed to be much lower.

2 The Cities without Slums Program is incorporated in the National Long-Term Development Plan, 2005–2025. It

aims to reduce slum areas in cities by 2025 by promoting concerted initiatives by the central and local governments, private sector, and civil society.

Tanjung

Balai

Bengkulu

Serang

Sukabumi

Semarang

Pasuruan

Bima

Tanjung

Jabung Barat

Kapuas

Bandar

Lampung

Makassar

Kendari

Ambon

Batam

Palembang

Banjarmasin

Pekalongan

Palangkaraya

Bone

Palopo


6

3. The NUSP-2 assists the local governments in upgrading and/or developing basic

infrastructure and facilities at selected neighborhoods in order to achieve the following: Output

1: Institutional capacities for managing pro-poor urban development strengthened; Output 2:

Infrastructure in slum neighborhoods upgraded; and Output 3: New settlements for poor

families established.

4. There are seven types of infrastructures and facilities built under the NUSP-2, among

others, construction of road, bridge, basic sanitation facilities, and communal wastewater

treatment plant; installation of clean water supply and street lighting; and provision of

municipal solid waste handling facility and transportation as well as basic fire-fighting

equipment.

5. Objective and Scope of the Monitoring Report. This Annual Environmental

Monitoring Report is developed by NMC Safeguard Team/Project Management Unit of the

NUSP-2 to describe the project activities and associated progress and implementation of the

environmental safeguards requirement of the Environmental Review and Assessment

Framework (EARF) in 2017. Further, this report describes the compliance status of

environmental mitigation and monitoring conducted against the EARF requirements.

Corrective actions identified in the ADB Review Mission in 2017, if any, are elaborated in this

report to improve compliance in the upcoming year.


7

CHAPTER 2. KEY PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS

6. This chapter summarizes key project activities and progress associated with the

NUSP-2 implementation in 2017. These include the community and complex civil work

contracts awarded as well as the construction of neighborhood infrastructure and facilities to

be constructed as part of the new site development (NSD) during the reporting period.

2.1. Community Contracts

7. In 2017 the NUSP-2 awarded 208 community contracts for neighborhood upgrading

civil works (skala lingkungan) to local Community Implementation Organizations (CIO).

Construction works that are considered technically modest and can be conducted by the

community without using specialized or heavy equipment qualify for the community-typed

contracts mentioned earlier. Figure 2 and Figure 3 are examples of the construction works

awarded under the community contract scheme.

Figure 2. Construction of neighborhood road in Muktiharjo Kidul (Semarang City)


8

Figure 3. Construction of drainage system in Kelurahan Dusun Besar (Bengkulu City)

Table 1 provides information on 209 community contracts awarded in 2017 as part of the

NUSP-2 implementation at 20 cities and districts in Indonesia.

Table 1. Community Contracts Awarded in 2017

No City/District (Province)

Number of

Neighborhoods

Involved

Construction and/or Installation Conducted

1 Tanjung Balai City

(North Sumatra Province)

15 Concrete paved road, drainage system, culvert, and

bridge.

2 Tanjung Jabung Barat

District (Jambi Province)

9 Road and drainage system.

3 Palembang City

(South Sumatra Province)

20 Vase, bench and street lighting.

Concrete paved road, bridge, and solid waste

collection area.

4 Bengkulu City

(Bengkulu Province)

10 Street lighting.

Concrete paved road, drainage channel, retaining wall,

and provision of clean water well.

5 Bandar Lampung City

(Lampung Province)

16 Street lighting.

Concrete paved road, drainage channel, retaining wall,

clean water well and toilet.

6 Batam City

(Riau Islands Province)

6 Concrete paved road and drainage channel.

7 Sukabumi City

(West Java Province)

12 Concrete paved road, drainage channel, communal

septic tank and waste water treatment plant, retaining

wall, hand dug and bore water wells.

8 Semarang City (Central

Java Province)

17 Concrete road and bridge, drainage channel, public

toilet, solid waste collection area, and street light

installation.

9 Pekalongan City 7 Concrete road, drainage channel, retaining wall, street


9

No City/District (Province)

Number of

Neighborhoods

Involved

Construction and/or Installation Conducted

(Central Java Province) light, and green open space.

10 Pasuruan City

(East Java Province)

11 Concrete road and bridge, drainage channel,

communal septic tank, and purchase of garbage

collector vehicle

11 Serang City

(Banten Province)

7 Concrete road and bridge, drainage channel, public

toilet, retaining wall, hand-dug well, solid waste

collection area, and purchase of garbage collector

vehicle

12 Kapuas District (Central

Kalimantan Province)

10 Concrete road, wooden bridge, wooden trails road,

public toilet, and drainage channel.

13 Palangka Raya City

(Central Kalimantan

Province)

8 Wooden trails road, concrete and paving road, and

drainage channel.

14 Banjarmasin City (South


11 Installation of culvert, concrete road and bridge, and

drainage channel.

15 Bima City (West Nusa

Tenggara Province)

9 Drainage channel, concrete road and bridge.

16 Bone City (South Sulawesi

Province)

4 Drainage channel and concrete road.

17 Makassar City (South

Sulawesi Province)

12 Drainage channel, concrete road, and communal

septic tank.

18 Palopo City

(South Sulawesi Province)

9 Drainage channel, concrete road, public toilet, retaining

wall, purchasing of waste bins, installation of clean

water pipeline, and green open space

19 Kendari City

(South East Sulawesi)

10 Concrete road and bridge, wooden road, hand-dug

well, drainage channel, and purchase of garbage motor

vehicle.

20 Ambon City

(Maluku Province)

6 Drainage channel, retaining wall, concrete road, and

purchase of garbage motor vehicle and waste bins.

Source: NUSP-2 Management Information System (2017).

2.2. Complex Civil Work Contracts

8. The complex civil work contracts are awarded to companies (instead of community

groups) through bidding process, particularly for construction works involving multiple

neighborhoods and specific materials and heavy and/or specialized equipment that may need

to be mobilized from other areas. In 2017, NUSP-2 awarded complex civil work contracts for

constructing facilities and infrastructure in a total of 16 cites and districts in Indonesia. Figure

4 shows the bridge construction awarded under the complex civil work contract.


10

Figure 4. Bridge Constructed at Kelurahan Beting Kuala Kapias (Tanjung Balai)

9. The types of community facilities and infrastructure constructed or installed in 2017

under the complex civil works contracts at more than 20 neighborhoods (kelurahans) and

cities distributed in 13 provinces in Indonesia are presented in the following table.

Table 2. Complex Civil Works Contracts Awarded in 2017

No City/District (Province) Construction and/or Installation Conducted

1 Kelurahan Sungai Pelenggut, Batam City

(Riau Islands Province).

Concrete road and drainage system.

2 Kelurahan Gunung Sulah, Bandar

Lampung City (Lampung Province)

Asphalt road and drainage system.

3 Kelurahan Panorama, Bengkulu City

(Bengkulu Province)

Concrete road and drainage system.

4 Kelurahan Beting Kuala Kapias, Tanjung

Balai City (North Sumatra Province)

Concrete road and bridge

5 Kelurahan Tungkal II, Tanjung Jabung

Barat District (Jambi Province)

Drainage system

6 Kelurahan Kaligawe and Meteseh,

Semarang (Central Java Province)

Paved road, asphalt road and drainage system

7 Kelurahan Sukakarya, Sukabumi city

(West Java Province)

Asphalt road, drainage system, communal IPAL

and public toilet.

8 Kelurahan Mandanrejo and Ngemplakrejo

and Pasuruan (East Java Province)

Drainage system, groundwater reservoir.

9 Kelurahan Bandengan and Kandang

Panjang, Pekalongan City (Central Java

Province)

Drainage system, asphalt road, concrete road,

street lighting and pump house


11

No City/District (Province) Construction and/or Installation Conducted

10 Kelurahan Selat Dalam, Kapuas District,

(Central Kalimantan Province)

Draiange system, 3R integrated waste

management areas, and purchasing of waste

containers

11 Kelurahan Dara, Bima City (West Nusa

Tenggara Province)

Draianage system and asphalt road

12 Kelurahan Lette, Tamarunang and Bunga Eja

Beru, Makassar (South Sulawesi Province)

Paved road, drainage system and perimeter fence

13 Kelurahan Ponjalae, Palopo (South Sulawesi

Province)

Drainage system and installation of concrete plate

14 Kelurahan Lalolara, Kendari (South-East

Sulawesi Province)

Asphalt road, drainage and public open space.

15 Kelurahan Karang Panjang and Rijali, Ambon,

(Maluku Province)

Concrete road, pedestrian, drainage system,

reinforce bridge, retaining Wall, landscaping,

communal wastewater treatment plant, and passive

hydrant.

16 Kelurahan Lonrae, Bone City (South Sulawesi

Province)

Concrete bridge and road.

Source: NUSP-2 Management Information System (2017).

2.3. New Site Development (NSD)

10. As part of the ADB funding, the NUSP-2 plans to construct neighborhood facilities and

infrastructures at four new site developments (NSD) in Purirano (Kendari City), Sampoddo

(Palopo City), Handil Berkat (Kapuas District), and Jatiwangi (Bima City). The facilities and

infrastructure to be constructed include paving roads, drainage system, clean water supply,

solid waste management system and landscape for open green space for the newly built

neighborhood. The NSD construction work is also implemented by contracted firms selected

through bidding process. As of 2017, some houses in the NSD of Kendari and Palopo Cities

have been developed; and land preparation/clearing for the NSD in Kapuas District and Bima

City is being progressed.

11. Figure 5 presents the status of four NSD sites as of 2017. The houses in the NSD are

developed by the DGHS and local governments.

Purirano NSD


12

Sampoddo NSD

Handil Berkat NSD

Jatiwangi NSD

Figure 5. Progress of NSD Development


13

CHAPTER 3. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AND MONITORING STATUS

3.1. Requirements of Environmental Safeguards

12. According to the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009), the NUSP-2 is classified

as the Category B Project, i.e. the project could have some adverse environmental impacts,

but of lesser degree or significance than those in category A, but the impacts are site specific

and can be readily addressed through common mitigation measures. The NUSP-2 creates

positive impacts on the environment and improves the wellbeing of the community through

alleviation of slum areas in emerging cities in Indonesia.

13. The Environmental Assessment and Review Framework (EARF) document has been

prepared in 2014, and it provides screening procedure and checklist to review environmental

implications of the infrastructure and facility to be constructed as part of the NUSP-2. The

EARF requires that:

An initial environmental examination (IEE) document according to the ADB requirement is

prepared and endorsed by DGHS and ADB as part of the new site development (NSD)

proposal; and

Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (UKL-UPL) or Statement Letter to Conduct

Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring (SPPL) is prepared and endorsed by DGHS

according to the Ministry of Environment Regulations No. 5/2012 on Types of Activities

and/or Projects Requiring Environmental Impact Assessment (AMDAL) and No. 16/2012

on the Guidance for the Preparation of Environmental Documents; and Ministry of Public

Work Regulation No. 10/PRT/M/2008 on Types of Activities and/or Projects in the Public

Work Sector Subject to be Completed with the Environmental Management Effort-

Environmental Monitoring Effort (UKL-UPL) document.

3.2. Key Roles and Responsibilities

14. Table 3 summarizes the key roles and responsibilities of the executing and

implementing agencies as well as community organizations involved in the implementation of

the NUSP-2 including their respective environmental responsibilities. Related evidences as an

example on the undertaking of these roles and activities, particularly at the city/district level,

community implementing organization (CIO), and neighborhood level are included in

Appendices 1 to 4.

Table 3. Agency and Community Organization Responsibilities

Institutions and Responsibilities Activities and Status

Directorate General of Housing Settlement (Executing Agency)

Overall coordination, supervision,

monitoring.

The Commitment Officer (Satker PPK) of DGHS conducted

meetings with the NMC’s Team Leader and Safeguard Team to oversee overall implementation of the NUSP-2. The meetings were

conducted on ad hoc basis.

Preparation and submission of quarterly

progress and evaluation reports.

The PMU submitted the mentioned quarterly progress and

evaluation reports to ADB.

Prepare guidelines for the

environmental due diligence and

The DGHS published a Technical Guideline on Social and

Environmental Management in September 2016. This guideline is


14


monitoring of environmental

management plan.

equipped with forms of checklists and templates to assist the

implementing agencies at local government level to screen, assess

and mitigate as well as monitor environmental and social impacts

associated with the NUSP-2 intervention.

Public Works (Local Coordinating Officer) at City or District Level

Provide overall coordination,

supervision, monitoring and approval of

village proposals including

environmental checklists.

In all 20 cities, the LCO at the Local Planning Agency oversees the

overall implementation of NUSP-2 intervention, including approval

of the village proposals.

Prepare quarterly progress reports

including environmental.

The LCO provided inputs to the PMU on the quarterly progress of

the NUSP-2 intervention. No specific progress and environmental

reports are prepared by the LCO.

Provide technical support to community

advisors and BKMs/CIOs.

The technical support provided by LCO through consultation and

coordination when the time BKM/CIO presents their CAP.

Carry out environmental due diligence. For the community contract, the environmental due diligence

was carried out using the environmental screening checklist.

Subsequently, this information is utilized to develop the SPPL for

submission to the local environmental agency.

For the complex civil work contract, the UKL-UPL and the

Environmental Permit are applied for government approval or

SPPL is prepared.

For the NSD, IEE and UKL-UPL are prepared for ADB/DGHS

endorsement and local government respectively.

The list of UKL-UPL, SPPL, and IEE prepared is included in this

monitoring report.

Monitor the implementation of the

environmental management plan.

The LCO has not formally monitored or documented the

implementation of environmental management plan.

Environmental Agency at City or District Level (Badan Lingkungan Hidup/BLH)

Provide guidance on environmental

checklists.

There is no evident suggesting that the BLH provides guidance on

the implementation of environmental checklist.

Coordinate with community advisors to

conduct site visits to validate the

screening/assessment results.

Some BLHs conducted site visits to validate the environmental

screening results during the community meeting, but these

activities are not documented.

Review the engineering design and

environmental checklists and provide

permit for construction of a deep well.

There is no deep well constructed as part of the NUSP-2.

Conduct random checking during

construction and after completion to

inspect environmental procedures and

impacts.

This checking has not been undertaken.

Health Agency at City or District Level

Test collected water quality samples to

determine if collected water sources

meet the drinking water standards.

This water testing was not conducted, except for Sukabumi City, as

most of the clean water supply to be constructed for the NSD sites

will be sourced from treated water from the municipality water

company (known as Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum or PDAM).

Community Implementation Organization (CIO)

Responsible for establishing project

implementation units.

The CIO established the project implementing units in the form of

self-empowered community group (Kelompok Swadaya

Masyarakat) to implement the NUSP-2 activities.

Responsible for conducting

environmental checklists assisted by

The CIO, assisted by the CA and CC, conducted environmental

screening by visual inspection and review of the RKM/CAP using


15


community advisors/safeguard

specialist.

the forms included in the Technical Guideline for Social and

Environmental Management (2016).

Formulate O & M mechanisms.

The CIO established the O & M group (Kelompok Pemanfaat dan

Pemelihara/KPP) to be responsible for maintenance of the

neighborhood facility and infrastructure constructed as part of the

NUSP-2. However, there is no record or documentation suggesting

the conduct of this.

Responsible for monitoring construction

activities and conducting inspection for

completed interventions.

The progress of the NUSP-2 intervention was conducted when the

construction activities achieve 63% and 100% progress, and

reported to the respective LCO/CC.

Disclose, on the neighborhood board,

neighborhood proposals and contracts

including environmental checklists.

The discussion to develop and finalize the neighborhood proposals

was conducted through neighborhood discussion (musyawarah

kelurahan). However, the proposals, contracts, and checklists are

not disclosed on the neighborhood board.

Responsible for taking any negative

feedback related to site, construction,

and operation from other neighborhood

members and organizing meetings to

solve problems.

This responsibility was conducted through neighborhood

discussion.

Responsible for reporting environmental

monitoring to LCOs

The environmental monitoring is reported using the Form SFG-5

completed with the minutes of meeting of the monitoring at 63%

and 100% of construction progress. The minutes and pictures of

this activity were uploaded into the NUSP-2’ website.

3.3. Community Contracts

15. Environmental Mitigation. Prior to construction, the CIO prepared a Community

Action Plans (CAP) including the environmental and social screening using the form/checklist

provided in the the NUSP-2 Technical Guidelines on Social and Environmental Management.

The CA/CIO then conducted a neighborhood meeting to disseminate and discuss the CAP.

The results of the environmental and social screening were incorporated into the SPPL that

was subsequently submitted to the local environmental agency (Badan Lingkungan

Hidup/BLH) for registration. The SPPL contains identified potential environmental impacts and

measures to mitigate these impacts during the construction work. The list of SPPL submitted

for the community contract activities is presented in Appendix 1.

16. Some water spraying for dust suppression, covering the construction materials using

tarpaulin, and providing the workers with personnel protective equipment as well as other

mitigation included in the SPPL were reportedly conducted during the construction activities.

However, documentation with this regard is lacking.

17. Environmental Monitoring. The CA/CIO visually monitored the implementation of the

mitigation measures to make sure that they complied with the SPPL during the project up to

hand over to the LCO and subsequently to the local community as the beneficiary of the

NUSP-2. They monitored the progress of infrastructure being built by visual inspection and

made some documentation pictures of the progress on 0%; 63% and 100%. These processes


16

were being uploaded into the website of Management Information System through application

by the CA. The City Coordinator would check the uploaded files and gave approval.

18. Subsequently, the Safeguard Regional Management Consultant (based in Palembang,

Semarang and Makassar, representing the west, central, and eastern regions of Indonesia)

checked and reviewed the status of the process and made some analysis to be reported to

the Safeguard Team of NMC. The NMC incorporated this report into the quarterly report and

submitted to ADB. However, reporting on the implementation of environmental mitigation

during and after the construction activities were not formally documented.

3.4. Complex Civil Work Contracts

19. Environmental Mitigation. The environmental mitigation implemented for the

complex civil work contracts is similar to that of the community contract in that SPPL is

required for most construction activities of the neighborhood infrastructure and facilities. In few

cases, UKL-UPL document is required instead of SPPL for the mentioned activities. The list of

UKL-UPL and SPPL submitted for the community contract activities is presented in Appendix

2.

20. Some water spraying for dust suppression, covering the construction materials using

tarpaulin, and providing the workers with personnel protective equipment as well as other

mitigation included in the SPPL were reportedly conducted during the construction activities.

However, documentation with this regard is lacking.

21. Environmental Monitoring. The CCs were responsible for the day-to-day

environmental monitoring during the construction activities, in coordination with LCO. Usually,

they monitored the progress of infrastructure being built by visual inspection, and made some

documentation pictures of the progress (0%; 63% and 100%). The SFG-5 form, provided in

the Technical Guideline, was used to do the monitoring for both social and environmental

safeguard for each activity. The day-to-day monitoring during the construction activities should

be recorded in the logbook. However, reporting on the implementation of environmental

mitigation during and after the construction activities were not formally documented.

3.5. New Site Development Contracts

22. In 2017, the construction of infrastructure and facilities at the four NSD sites in

Kendari, Palopo, and Bima cities and Kapuas District have not been commenced and,

therefore no environmental mitigation and monitoring conducted. The Executing Agency

prepared the UKL-UPL and applied for the Environmental Permit as well as submitted the IEE

of NSD site in Kendari for ADB review. The status of UKL-UPL and Environmental Permit as

well IEE document prepared for the NSD is included in Appendix 3.


17

CHAPTER 4. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND DISCUSSION

23. The NUSP-2 project conducted public consultation as an integral part of the

identification, selection and implementation of neighborhood infrastructure interventions. For

the community contract packages, several stages of neighborhood meetings were conducted

to openly discuss the whole process of development from assessing environmental and social

safeguard checklist, formulating and consolidating the investment plan into community action

plan (CAP), preparing the construction implementation and selecting the Implementing Unit

(Kelompok Swadaya Masyarakat). Through these meetings, all community members and

concerned stakeholders would have such forum to raise their complaints to be resolved. So

far, there is no report of any concerns or complaints addressed to the Implementing Units.

24. For the complex civil works, at the pre-construction phase, the City Coordinator (CC)

and City Satker conducted public consultation with the representatives of local communities,

head of Kelurahan, and the contractor firms to discuss the plan for the infrastructure and

identifying potential impacts by screening and reviewing the checklist forms and later

developed the UKL-UPL or SPPL documents based on the screening results. This event was

documented with the minutes of meetings, list of participants, and some pictures, and

uploaded unto the MIS website by the CC for public viewers. The community members and

concerned stakeholders could have used this forum to raise their complaints to be resolved.

So far, there is no report of any concerns or complaints addressed to the related City Satker.

25. As for the NSD sites, at the pre-construction phase, there would be two types of public

consultation. The first one is for disseminating information about the NSD project to the local

communities, potential beneficiaries, and job or business opportunities for the locals, as well

as seeking for local community’s perception on the NSD project. The second one is for

discussing and reviewing environmental and social screening checklists to prepare the UKL-

UPL document, which later to be further developed as IEE and social DDR documents. This

event would be attended by potential affected communities, the head of Kelurahan, related

agencies or stakeholders, the contractor firms, the CC and Sub-monev assistant, and

facilitated by the City Satker. During this reporting period, there is no public consultation yet

conducted for the NSD.


18

CHAPTER 5. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

26. Information on public consultation, discussion, and neighborhood meetings related to

the the implementation of community and complex civil work contracts are documented and

uploaded into the NUSP-2’s website (www.nusp2.id). However, information related to

monitoring of environmental mitigation measures is lacking.

27. For the NSD, the IEE documents (including the EMP) and the annual environmental

monitoring report would be submitted to ADB for disclosure on ADB’s website. These IEE

documents would have versions in Bahasa Indonesia and would be made available to public

including the affected people and interested stakeholders. As the IEE of NSD is being

reviewed by ADB, no such document has been uploaded into ADB’s website.


19

CHAPTER 6. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

28. The NUSP-2 has established a grievance redress mechanism (GRM), which basically

consists of three levels, i.e. at the neighborhood, at the city/district, and at the national levels

as shown in Figure 6. This leveling system is expected to timely address any complaints

during project implementation. Local communities or affected people will have the right to file

complaints and/or queries related to disturbance/environmental impacts due to the project

activities.

29. The GRM should handle any complaints and/or queries which emerge during

construction process of the subprojects. Any affected people/party will have the right to file

complaints. It is anticipated that all grievances related to benefits and other assistance will be

resolved at the project level.

30. The procedure for filing complaints and/or grievance during construction is established

as follows:

(i) The complaint will be filed to the Community Implementing Organization (CIO) or Badan

Keswadayaan Masyarakat (BKM) members and local government at the neighborhood

level for an immediate solution when possible;

Figure 6. Grievance Redress Mechanism


20

(ii) If the problem cannot be solved, the BKM members and local government staff will

facilitate the APs (affected peoples) to submit their complaints to the Projects’s grievance redress committee (GRC) at the district level, and to the national level if needed.

Community advisor then will record the complaint and report it to the LCOs. The project

will dedicate a staff at city/district and national levels to be in charge of handling and

following up on AP’s complaints.

(iii) The members of the GRC should involve the representatives of vulnerable affected

people (i.e. affected women, poor and minority groups) and other affected people along

with relevant government officials who have functional and legal authority. The committee

will then review grievances involving all land acquisition benefits or issues, except for

disputes related to ownership.

(iv) Grievances will be addressed within 2 to 4 weeks from the date of filing the complaints at

the district level and within 8 weeks at the national levels.


21

CHAPTER 7. PROJECT STAFFING AND CAPACITY BUILDING

31. The consulting services are provided at the national, regional, city and kelurahan level.

At the national level, a team of consultants assist the CPMU, namely the National

Management Consultant (NMC) based in Jakarta. Part of this NMC, a safeguard specialist

and two technical assistants were recruited to assist the CPMU in preparing social and

environmental management guidelines, checking supporting data and documents from the

field in the project’s Management Information System (MIS) website, incorporating environmental monitoring in the quarterly progress reports and environmental survey results

in the monitoring and evaluation framework, prepare reports on annual environmental

monitoring and prepare the IEE for the NSD proposals.

32. At the regional level, a safeguard specialist was also recruited at each of three

regional management consultant (RMC) teams, based in Palembang (for West Region),

Semarang (Central) and Makassar (East). These RMC safeguard specialist are responsible

for assisting the NMC safeguard team in reviewing environmental monitoring management by

BKMs/CIOs, reviewing the completion of safeguard documents, preparing the environmental

monitoring reports, dissemination of the guidelines, assisting and training the city/district

coordinators and community advisors to review the environmental screening carried out by

BKMs/CIOs.

33. In addition to each NSD subproject, there are four technical assistants (called as “Sub-

monev” consultant) responsible to assist in day-to-day monitoring and evaluation for the

implementation of the NSD. This also includes assisting the City Satker, the LCO and the

related RMC Safeguard Specialist in collecting data for IEE preparation, and monitoring the

implementation of mitigation measures set forth in the EMP of the IEE. They are based in the

NSD sites of Kendari, Palopo, Bima, and Kapuas.

34. There are city/district coordinators (CCs) based in 20 cities/districts of the NUSP-2

project, responsible in assisting the city/district Satker (PIU), the LCOs, and the community

advisors. The CCs also responsible for conducting review and screening of the environmental

and social safeguard checklist using forms of SFG-1 till SFG-5 provided in the Technical

Guidelines of NUSP-2, both for community contracts and complex civil work packages.

Further, they review the completion of necessary safeguard documents, and review the

quality of documentations uploaded by CCs or CIOs/BKMs in the NUSP-2 MIS website.

35. Under the city/district coordinators (CCs), at the kelurahan level there are Community

Advisors (CAs) who may cover up to 3 kelurahans, and responsible for assisting each

BKM/CIO for day-to-day management of the community contract works; facilitating the

establishment of CIO/BKM and user groups; facilitating the preparation of CAPs; providing the

community with technical guidance in book-keeping, documentation and report preparation;

and assisting the user groups in formulating and implementing facility operation and

maintenance. Together with the CCs, the CAs assist the CIO/BKM in reviewing and screening

the environmental and social safeguard checklists. The CAs and CCs also responsible for the

preparation of documentation of each activity and supporting documents as the evidence,

such as minutes of meetings, notes, list of participants, pictures, other related documents. The


22

Technical Guidelines of NUSP-2 also provided various document templates for documentation

purposes. The CAs and CCs were responsible to assist the CIO/BKM to upload all of these

documents and pictures unto MIS website of the NUSP-2 project for further monitoring by the

RMC and NMC safeguard specialists for reporting and public disclosure.

36. The capacity building to enhance and refresh the knowledge and skill in managing the

safeguard requirements were done through events such as regional coordination meeting,

training for trainers and on-the-job trainings. These were held together joining the Capacity

Building Team at the NMC and RMC. The reports or proceedings of these events were

documented and compiled at PMU and NMC offices


23

CHAPTER 8. KEY ISSUES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

37. Based on the information presented in this 2017 environmental monitoring report,

several key issues or gaps identified about the implementation of environmental mitigation

and monitoring against the requirements of EARF of the NUSP-2 (see Table 4). These issues

and gaps should be rectified by related executing and implementing agencies through

corrective actions and reported in the next annual monitoring report.

Table 4. Key Issues and the Corrective Actions

Key Issues / Gaps Corrective Actions Party to Implement Corrective Action

Due Date

Lacking documentation (e.g.

minutes of meeting) on the

monitoring and evaluation of

environmental safeguards

implementation at the

Executing Agency

Evaluate the environmental

safeguards implementation

on a regular basis and

document the results of this

implementation.

DGHS/NPMU

Evaluation to be

conducted

periodically.

The LCOs (local Public Work

office) have not monitored the

implementation of

Environmental Management

Plan (EMP) associated with

the community and complex

civil work contracts.

PMU (assisted by NMC) should conduct an empowering or capacity building event for the LCOs to remind them about this responsibility

LCO at respective local Public Work offices

During site visits, regional workshop or other ad-hoc events in Q4 of 2018 or Q1 of 2019

The Local Environmental

Agencies (BLH) have not yet

conducted random checking

during construction and after

completion to inspect

environmental procedures

and impacts.

The BLHs should undertake

random checking during

construction and after

completion of the construction

works.

PMU/DGHS

LCOs

BLHs

During site visits and

ad-hoc events in Q4

of 2018 and Q1 of

2019

There is no record or

documentation of the O&M

mechanism formula.

The CIO/BKM assisted by CC

and CA should make the

record or documentation of

the O&M mechanism formula.

BKM/CIO assisted by

CA/CC for community

contracts.

City/District Satker for

complex civil works

and for NSDs.

Q4 of 2018 for

community contracts

and complex civil

works.

Q4 of 2018 for

Kendari and Palopo

NSD.

Q1 of 2019 for Bima

and Kapuas NSD.

There is no environmental

safeguard monitoring report

from the RMC to be

incorporated to NMC annual

monitoring report.

The RMC Safeguard

specialists and the CCs in

coordination with City Satker

and LCO should prepare

regular environmental

monitoring reports including

any complaints raised before,

during and after

implementation of

construction works.

RMC Safeguard

Specialists, CCs in

coordination with City

Satker

Q4 of 2018 and Q1 of

2019

Incomplete SPPL, UKL-UPL

and Environmental Permit for

civil work packages in the

The RMC Safeguard



RMC Safeguard

Specialists, related

CCs in coordination

Q4 of 2018


24

Key Issues / Gaps Corrective Actions Party to Implement Corrective Action

Due Date

Palembang City, Tanjung

Balai City, Sukabumi City,

Banjarmasin City and Kendari

City

should recheck the process of

and obtain the incomplete

SPPL and UKL-UPL

documents.

with respective City

Satker of Palembang,

Tanjung Balai,

Sukabumi,

Banjarmasin and

Kendari.

Incomplete SPPL, UKL-UPL

and Environmental Permit for

complex civil work packages

in Bengkulu City and Bone

City

The RMC Safeguard



and LCO should recheck the

process of and obtain the

incomplete SPPL, UKL-UPL

and Environmental Permit

documents.

RMC Safeguard

Specialists, related

CCs in coordination

with respective City

Satker of Bengkulu

and Bone.

Q4 of 2018


25

CHAPTER 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

38. Conclusions. In FY 2017, there were a total of 363 subprojects of NUSP-2 conducted

or being planned in 208 neighborhoods (kelurahan) located in 20 cities and districts. These

include 208 community contracts (skala lingkungan), 24 complex civil work contracts, and four

4 NSD (new site development) packages in Palopo, Kendari, Kapuas, and Bima cities.

39. As of end of December 2017, almost all of community contracts in the first cycle had

completed their SPPL documents, except those from the cities of Ambon and of Palembang,

which were still in the registration process at the BLH (Local Office of Environment). Whereas

for the complex civil work packages, only 3 of 24 kelurahans have not completed of UKL-UPL

documents yet.

40. The implementation of environmental management plan is either hardly implemented

or documented in the NUSP-2 implementation. This explains the low compliance level on

monitoring reports from the CIOs/BKMs, CAs, CCs and LCOs. Therefore, capacity building

activities through learning by doing and close assistance on safeguard compliance should be

conducted until the end of the project for the sake of sustainability.

41. Recommendations. As there are some incomplete data or supporting documents

required to comply with the Environmental Assessment and Review Framework, the

implementation and monitoring activities on this report are still not complied or partially

complied. To improve the compliance, in chapter 8 we already identified the pending issues or

gaps and the corrective actions that need to be done and reported in the next annual

environmental monitoring report. These are:

Ensure that the coordination, supervision and monitoring meetings of the DGHS

(Executing Agency) should be well-documented and recorded, supporting with list of

participants, notes, minutes and pictures of meeting.

PMU (assisted by NMC) should conduct an empowering or capacity building event for the

LCOs to remind them about their responsibility to monitor implementation of environmental

management plan associated with community contract and complex civil works.

The Local Environmental Agencies should undertake random checking during construction

and after completion of the construction works on the environmental impacts and

implementation of environmental management plan.

The CIO/BKM assisted by CC and CA should make the record or documentation of the

O&M mechanism formula.

The RMC Safeguard specialists and the CCs in coordination with City Satker and LCOs

should prepare regular environmental monitoring reports including any complaints raised

before, during and after implementation of construction works.

The RMC Safeguard specialists and the CCs in coordination with City Satker and LCO

should re-check and obtain the incomplete SPPL, UKL-UPL for Palembang, Tanjung

Balai, Sukabumi, Banjarmasin, Kendari; and Environmental Permit documents for

Bengkulu and Bone.


26

APPENDICES


27

Appendix 1. SPPL of Community Contracts

No City / District (Province)

Number of

Neighborhoods

Involved

List of SPPL* for Community Contracts

1 Tanjung Balai city, North

Sumatera

15 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 3 July 2017

(siklus 1)

Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 18 October 2017

(siklus 2)

2 Tanjung Jabung Barat

District (Jambi Province)

9 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 20 June 2017

(siklus 1)

3 Palembang City (South

Sumatra Province)

20 13/20 kelurahan, SPPL telah diterima oleh BLH pada

December 2017

4 Bengkulu City (Bengkulu

Province)

9 8/9 kelurahan, SPPL telah diterima oleh BLH pada

bulan October 2017 (siklus 1)

SPPL untuk siklus 2 telah diterima oleh BLH pada

bulan October dan November 2017

5 Bandar Lampung City

(Lampung Province)

17 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 22 August 2017

(siklus 1)

Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 7 October 2017

(siklus 2)

7 Batam City (Riau Islands

Province)


(siklus 1)

Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 29 September

2017 (siklus 2)

7 Sukabumi City (West

Java Province)

12 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 19 May 2017

(siklus 1)


2017 (siklus 2)

8 Semarang City (Central

Java Province)

17 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 7 November 2017

(siklus 1)

Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 8 November 2017

(siklus 2)

9 Pekalongan City (Central

Java Province)


(siklus 1)


2017 (siklus 2)

10 Pasuruan City (East Java

Province)

11 Semua SPPL diterima pada July 2017 (siklus 1)

Semua SPPL diterima pada October 2017 (siklus 2)

11 Serang City (Banten

Province)

7 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 9 November 2017

(siklus 1 dan siklus 2)

12 Kapuas District (Central



13 Palangkaraya City

(Central Kalimantan

Province)

8 Semua SPPL diterima pada Juny 2017 (siklus 1)

Semua SPPL diterima pada 11 October 2017 (siklus

2)

14 Banjarmasin City (South


11 Semua SPPL diterima pada tanggal 27 September

2017

15 Bima City (West Nusa

Tenggara Province)


(siklus 1)


2017 (siklus 2)


28

No City / District (Province)

Number of

Neighborhoods

Involved

List of SPPL* for Community Contracts

17 Bone City (South

Sulawesi Province)


17 Makassar City (South

Sulawesi Province)


18 Palopo City (South

Sulawesi Province)


(siklus 1)


2017 (siklus 2)

19 Kendari City (South East

Sulawesi)

10 Semua SPPL diterima pada May 2018

20 Ambon City (Maluku

Province)

7 Semua SPPL diterima pada 11 August 2017

Note: *SPPL – statement letter to conduct environmental management and monitoring.


29

Appendix 2. UKL-UPL and SPPL of Complex Civil Work Contract

No Neighborhood Construction/

Installation Works Environmental Documents and Permits

1 Kelurahan Sungai

Pelenggut, Batam City

(Kepulauan Riau)

Concrete road and

drainage system

SPPL receipt No. 679/DLH/SPPL/XI/2017

(dated 24 November 2017) issued by the

DLH of Batam City

2 Kelurahan Gunung Sulah,

Bandar Lampung City,

Lampung.

Asphalt road and drainage

system

UKL-UPL Recommendation No.

660.i/995/III.10/2017 (dated 19 October

2017) issued by the DLH of Bandar

Lampung City.

No evidence indicating whether the

corresponding Environmental Permit has

been secured for this construction work.

3 Kelurahan Panorama,

Bengkulu City, Bengkulu

Concrete road and

drainage system

SPPL receipt No. 660.1/27/KK.SPPL/DLH-

II/IX/2017 (dated 11 September 2017)

issued by the DLH of Bengkulu City.

4 Kelurahan Beting Kuala

Kapias, Tanjung Balai City,

North Sumatra

Concrete road and bridge

(made of reinforced

concrete)

SPPL receipt No.

660/002/VII/DokLH/DISLH/2017 (dated 3

July 2017) issued by the DLH of Tanjung

Balai City

5 Kelurahan Tungkal II,

Tanjung Jabung Barat

District, Jambi

Drainage system UKL-UPL Recommendation No.

660.4/28/DLH/IX/2017 (dated 13 September

2017) and Environmental Permit No.

660.4/29/DLH/IX/2017 (dated 13 September

2017) by DLH of Tanjung Jabung Barat

District

6 Kelurahan Kaligawe and

Meteseh, Semarang,

Central Java.

Paved road, asphalt road

and drainage system

SPPL receipt No. 658.31/443/DPM-

PTSP/R/XII/2017 (dated 29 December

2017) issued by the Dinas Penanaman

Modal Terpadu Satu Pintu of Semarang City

7 Kelurahan Sukakarya,

Sukabumi, West Java.

Asphalt road, drainage

system, communal IPAL

and public toilet

SPPL receipt No. No 660.1/46/SPPL/BID 1-

DLH/2017 (dated 16 May 2017) issued by

DLH of Sukabumi City

8 Kelurahan Mandanrejo and

Ngemplakrejo and

Pasuruan, East Java.

Drainage system

Ground Reservoir

SPPL receipt No.210/423.110/2017

(dated 25 July 2017) issued by DLHKP of

Pasuruan City

SPPL receipt No.211/423.110/2017

(dated 25 July 2017) issued by DLHKP of

Pasuruan City

9 Kelurahan Bandengan and

Kandang Panjang,

Pekalongan City, Central

Java

Drainage system, asphalt

road, and pump house

Concrete road, street

lighting and pump house

SPPL receipt by BLH of Pekalongan City

(dated 20 July 2017).

10 Kelurahan Selat Dalam,

Kapuas District, Central

Kalimantan

Draiange system, 3R

integrated waste

management site and

purchasing of waste

containers

SPPL receipt No. 660/007/Reg/DLH/I/2018

(dated 23 January 2018) issued by DLH of

Kapuas District

11 Kelurahan Dara, Bima City,

West Nusa Tenggara

Draianage system and

asphalt road

SPPL receipt No. 800/60/DLH/XII/2017

(dated 7 July 2017) issued by DLH of Bima

City

12 Kelurahan Lette,

Tamarunang and Bunga

Paved road and drainage

system

SPPL receipt No.428, 429 and 431 (dated 6

March 2017) issued by BLH of Makassar


30

No Neighborhood Construction/

Installation Works Environmental Documents and Permits

Eja Beru, Makassar, South

Sulawesi

Paved road, drainage

system and perimeter fence

City

SPPL receipt No. 430 by BLH of Makassar

City, dated 6 March 2017

13 Kelurahan Ponjalae,

Palopo, South Sulawesi

Drainage system and

installation of plat deucker

SPPL receipt No. 012/DLH-SPPL/VIII/2017

14 Kelurahan Lalolara,

Kendari, South East

Sulawesi

Asphalt road, drainage and

public open space

There is no evidence indicating whether

SPPL has been prepared or submitted to

the Environmental Agency for this

construction work.

15 Kelurahan Karang Panjang

and Rijali, Ambon, Maluku.

Concrete road, pedestrian

and drainage system

SPPL receipt No. 660/276/DLHP (dated 31

August 2017) issued by the DLHP of Ambon

City dated

Reinforce bridge, Retaining

Wall, Landscape,

Communal IPAL, and

Passive Hydrant

There is no evidence indicating whether

SPPL or UKL-UPL and Environmental

Permit have been prepared or submitted to

the Environmental Agency.

16 Kelurahan Lonrae, Bone

City, South Sulawesi.

Concrete Bridge/Road There is no evidence indicating whether

SPPL has been prepared or submitted to

the Environmental Agency.

Note: DLH – Local Environmental Agency (Dinas Lingkungan Hidup)


31

Appendix 3. UKL-UPL and Environmental Permit for the New Site Development

No NSD Sites* UKL-UPL IEE

1 Purirano NSD – Kendari

City (Southeast Sulawesi

Province)

UKL-UPL approval No. 191 year 2016

(dated 29 December 2016), issued by the

Environmental Agency of Kendari City.

Environmental Permit No. 192 year 2016

(dated 29 December 2016) issued by the

same environmental agency.

Submitted to ADB for

review in November 2017.

2 Sampoddo NSD – Palopo

City (South Sulawesi

Province)

UKL-UPL approval No.

660/047/DLH/XII/2017 (dated 16

December 2017) issued by the

Environmental Agency of Palopo City

Environmental Permit No.

660/48/DLH/XII/2017 (dated 16

December 2017) issued by the same

environmental agency.

Being prepared for

submission to ADB in

2018.

3 Handil Jaya NSD, Kapuas

District (Central


UKL-UPL approval No.

660/364/DLH/X/2017 (dated 18 October

2017) issued by the Environmental

Agency of Kapuas District

Environmental Permit No.

627/DPMPTSP/ year 2017 (dated 29

December 2017) issued by the Head

(Bupati) of Kapuas District.

Not yet developed.

4 Jatiwangi NSD, Bima City

(West Nusa Tenggara

Province)

UKL-UPL recommendation No

880/32/DLH/XII/2017 (dated 21

December 2017) issued by the

Environmental Agency of Bima City.

Environmental Permit No. 435/2018

(dated 15 May 2018) issued by the Major

(Walikota) of Bima City.

Not yet developed.

Source: NSD Technical proposals and copies of UKL-UPL documents from NUSP-2 subprojects 2017.

Note: * Construction of neighborhood road, drainage system, clean water supply, solid waste management system, landscape, and street lighting.


32

Appendix 4. Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Implementation - Bugul Lor

Neighborhood, Pasuruan City

4.A. Use of Form SG-1 to Screen Out Negative Investment List Activities


33


34


35


36

Appendix 4.B. SPPL of Kelurahan Bugul Lor, Pasuruan City


37


38


39


40

4.C. Minutes of Meeting on the Project’s Screening Result


41


42

4.D. Community Meeting in Bugul Lor Neighborhood


43

4.E. Monitoring of Construction Progress

Documentation pictures

LOCATION 2

Construction Work : Paving

Location : RW IV /RT 07

Longitude : 112°55'11.35"E

Latitute : 7°38'17.85"S

0%

LOCATION 2



Longitude : 112°55'11.35"E

Latitute : 7°38'17.85"S

25%


44

LOCATION 2



Longitude : 112°55'11.35"E

Latitute : 7°38'17.85"S

50 %

LOCATION 2



Longitude : 112°55'11.35"E

Latitute : 7°38'17.85"S

75 %


45

LOCATION 2



Longitude : 112°55'11.35"E

Latitute : 7°38'17.85"S

100 %


46

4.F. Use of Safety Signage during Construction


47

4.G. Minutes of Meeting on Final Inspection upon Completion of Construction Works (100% Progress)


48


49


50

4.H. Form SFG-5 Potential Impact and Mitigation Matrix


51