Environmental Protection Division · sampling event confirmed a low concentration of PCE (11 ppb) was present in monitoring well MW-11. No other VOCs were detected in MW-il during

C,Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.

May 12, 2011

Ms. Carolyn DanielsResponse and Remediation ProgramFloyd Towers East, Suite 14622 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, S.E.Atlanta, GA 30334

Re: 2’” Semi-Annual Progress ReportFormer Professional Cleaners4800 Redan RoadStone Mountain, Dekaib County, GeorgiaHIS No. 10884

Dear Ms. Daniels,

Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc. (ECT) is pleased to provide oursecond Semi-Annual Progress Report (SAPR) for the Former Professional Cleanerssite located at 4800 Redan Road in Dekaib County, Stone Mountain, Georgia (subjectsite). This SAPR covers activities related to the site’s acceptance into the GeorgiaVoluntary Remediation Program (VRP) that were conducted between November 11,2010 and May 12, 2011.

During the reporting period for the second SAPR, activities were conducted at thesubject site to horizontally delineate on-site soil and groundwater contamination perconditions listed in the subject site’s acceptance into the VRP as outlined in EPD’sletter on May 14, 2010 These activities were conducted during the following fourevents: Event 1) Installed four monitoring wells (MW-7, 8, 9, and 10) along thenorthern property boundary; Event 2) Installed monitoring well (MW-Il and MW-12) south and east of the suspected source area; Event 3) Resample MW-li toconfirm groundwater data and identified potential new on-site release; Event 4)Installed monitoring wells (MW-13 and MW-14) south and east of the suspectedsource area.

Analytical data from these four sampling events indicate that soil and groundwatercontamination on the qualifying property has been horizontally delineated using thecriteria provided in Georgia Voluntary Remediation Act (12-8-108).

6410 Southpoint PkwySuite 120

Jacksonville, FL32216

(904)296-0544

FAX (904)296-2473

Ms. Carolyn DanielsJNV Investment Group, HSI #108842nd Semi-Annual Progress ReportPage 2

Site delineation concentration criteria provided in the Georgia Voluntary RemediationAct 12-8-108, (part (1) Subparagraph (E)) was used to demonstrate that soilcontamination has been horizontally delineated on the qualifying property. Based onthese criteria, soil contamination has been horizontally delineated on the qualifyingproperty.

Site delineation concentration criteria provided in the Georgia Voluntary RemediationAct 12-8-108 (part (1) Subparagraph (C) and 12-8-108 part (7)) were used todemonstrate that groundwater contamination on the qualifying property has beenhorizontally delineated. Based on these criteria, groundwater contamination has beenhorizontally delineated on the qualifying property.

Event 1 - November 2010

On November 17, 2010 four rock wells were installed along the northern propertyboundary of the subject site between the dry cleaner and the adjacent townhomecommunity. The four rock wells (MW-7 through MW-b) were installed along thenorthern property boundary starting in the northeast corner (MW-7) and moving west(See Figures). The monitoring wells were spaced out with approximately 40 feetbetween each well. The monitoring wells were installed to depths ranging from 35 to45 feet below land surface (ft bis). Bedrock was encountered in each well at depthsranging from 3 to 12 ft bis. Boring logs for each monitoring well are included inAppendix A of this report. Based on field observations during the installation of thewells, it appears that the top of bedrock follows the surface topography.

During the well installation, soil samples were collected from each monitoring well atdepths of 2 ft bls and 10 ft bls with the exception of MW-9. No soil sample wascollected at 10 ft bis due to encountering bedrock before this depth was reached. PCEwas detected in soil samples collected at 2 ft bis from MW-7 and MW-10 atconcentrations of 11 ppb and 15 ppb. Soil data from this sampling event aresummarized in Table 1. After each monitoring well was installed and properlycompleted following U.S. EPA Science and Ecology Support Division (SESD)protocols, groundwater was measured in each well. No groundwater was detected inmonitoring wells MW-b (total depth 45 ft bls) and MW-7 (total depth 37.5 ft bls).Groundwater was detected in monitoring wells MW-8 (16 ft water column; 19 ft bls;total depth 35 ft bls) and MW-9 (7 ft water column; 38 ft bis; total depth 45 ft bis).Groundwater sampling logs for each monitoring well are included in Appendix B ofthis report.

Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-8 and MW-9 onNovember 23, 2010. Analytical results indicated PCE concentrations in groundwaterranging from 73 ppb in MW-9 to 1,200 ppb in MW-8. The large variations in thecontaminant concentrations indicate that bedrock is potentially influencing the flow

——

Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.

Ms. Carolyn DanielsJNV Investment Group, HSI #108842d Semi-Annual Progress ReportPage 3

and direction of both groundwater and the groundwater contamination. Groundwaterconcentrations and elevations are provided in Tables 2 and 3. Soil and groundwateranalytical reports are provided in Appendix C of this report. Delineation criteria foreach contaminant detected in both soil and groundwater are provided in Table 4.

In December 2010, monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-b were gauged again for thepresence of groundwater. Sufficient groundwater to collect a groundwater samplewas detected in both monitoring wells.

Event 2 — February 2011

On February 15, 2011, two rock wells were installed to the south and east of thesuspected source area to horizontally delineate on-site groundwater contamination.Monitoring well MW-li was installed to the south and monitoring well MW-12 wasinstalled to the east of the source area. These monitoring wells (MW-il and MW- 12)were spaced approximately 50 feet from the nearest existing monitoring wells in theirrespective direction (See Figures). Monitoring wells MW-il and MW-12 wereinstalled to depths of 30 and 35 feet below land surface (ft bis), respectively.Bedrock was encountered in MW-li at approximately 26 ft bis. A small lens ofbedrock was encountered in MW-12 at approximately 28 to 29 ft bis, with soilcontinuing to the boring termination depth of 35 ft bbs. Based on field observationsduring the installation of these wells, it appears that the top of bedrock becomesdeeper as you move east of the dry cleaner and varies as you move south. Boringlogs for these well are included in Appendix A of this report.

During the installation of each well, soil samples were collected from each well atdepths of 2, 6, and 10 ft bis. No VOCs were detected in any of the soil samplescollected from MW-li or MW-12. Soil data from monitoring wells MW-il andMW-il is provided in Table 1.

After monitoring wells MW-il and MW-l2 were installed and properly completedfollowing U.S. EPA SESD protocols, elevations were measured and groundwatersamples collected from each well. Groundwater was detected in monitoring wellMW-il at 24.3 ft bls (5.7 ft water column) and MW-12 at 34.04 ft bis (0.96 ft watercolumn). During this sampling event, monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-i0 (installedduring the November 2010 field work) were gauged. Groundwater was detected inmonitoring wells MW-7 at 30.1 ft bls (7.4 ft water column) and MW-b at 43.26 ftbls (1.74 ft water column). Groundwater sampling logs for each well are included inAppendix B of this report.

——

Environmental Consulting Technology, Inc.


Analytical results for the groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-10 through MW-12 on February 25, 2011 indicate PCE concentrationsranging from 9.3 ppb in MW-12 to 41 ppb in MW-7. Groundwater elevations andanalytical results from monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-10 through MW-12 areprovided in Tables 2 and 3. Groundwater and soil analytical reports are provided inAppendix C of this report.

Event 3— March 2011

Based on the low levels of VOC contamination detected in monitoring wells MW-iland MW-12 (10 ppb and 9.3 ppb) during the February 25, 2011 sampling event, thesewells were resampled to ensure no cross contamination occurred during this samplingevent. On March 10, 2011, monitoring well MW- 11 was resampled but nogroundwater was detected in MW-12. Analytical results from the March 10, 2011sampling event confirmed a low concentration of PCE (11 ppb) was present inmonitoring well MW- 11. No other VOCs were detected in MW-il during either theFebruary or March 2011 sampling events. Groundwater analytical results areincluded in Appendix C of this report.

During the March 10, 2011 sampling event, staining was observed on the asphaltnorth of the dry cleaner (pictures provided in Appendix D of this report). Thestaining was visually inspected and strong solvent odors were detected. Based on thepresence of the strong solvent odors and visual observations that indicated thedumped material entered the flush mounted storm drain located immediately adjacentof the staining, a soil sample was collected from the asphalt and accumulated soiladjacent to the storm drain. Analytical results from the asphalt and storm drainindicate PCE concentrations of 270 and 9,800 ug/kg respectively. No breakdownconstitutes were detected in either sample indicating that dry cleaning solvent (PCE)was recently dumped into the on-site storm drain located in the parking lot north ofthe dry cleaner.

To address the PCE that entered the storm drain, historic environmental andconstruction documents were reviewed and the outfall for the impacted storm drainwas identified adjacent to the northern property boundary east of the dry cleaner. OnApril 11, 2011, one groundwater and one soil sample was collected from the outfallof the impacted storm drain. With the exception of low concentrations of acetone(0.07 ppm) in the soil sample, no PCE or its breakdowns were detected in eithersample.

ECT notified the owner (Mr. Vaswani) of the shopping center of the potentialdumping activities on the subject site. Mr. Vaswani is consulting with legal counseland has been communicating with the owner of the on-site dry cleaner. No newstaining has been observed in the areas surrounding the dry cleaner on the subject siteduring subsequent site visits.

ECTEnvironmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.

Ms. Carolyn DanielsJNV Investment Group, HSI #108842’ Semi-Annual Progress ReportPage 5

Event 4— April 2011

On April 7, 2011, two rock wells were installed to the south and east of the sourcearea to horizontally delineate on-site groundwater contamination. Monitoring wellMW- 13 was installed to the south and monitoring well MW- 14 was installed to theeast of the suspected source area. These monitoring wells (MW- 13 and MW- 14)were spaced approximately 50 and 60 feet from the nearest existing monitoring wellsin their respective direction (See Figures). The monitoring wells were installed todepths of 35 (MW-13) and 70 (MW-14) ft bls. Bedrock was encountered in MW-13at an approximate depth of 24 ft bls. A small lens of bedrock was encountered inMW- 14 at approximately 51 ft bis, and competent bedrock was encountered at 56 ftbis. Boring MW-14 was terminated at approximately 70 ft bis. Based on fieldobservations during the installation of these wells, it appears that the top of bedrockbecomes deeper as you move east of the dry cleaner. To better understand thegeology beneath the subject site, North to South (A-A’) and West to East (B-B’) crosssections of the subject site’s geology were generated and are included with this report.Boring logs for MW-13 and MW-14 are included in Appendix A of this report.

After each monitoring well was installed and properly completed following U.S. EPASESD protocols, groundwater was measured in each well. No groundwater wasdetected in monitoring wells MW-14 (total depth 70 ft bls). Groundwater wasdetected in monitoring wells MW-13 at 25.45 ft bls. The groundwater sampling logfor MW-13 is included in Appendix C of this report. Analytical results indicated thatno VOCs were present above laboratory detection limits in monitoring well MW-13.Groundwater elevations and concentrations are provided in Tables 2 and 3. No soilsamples were collected from MW-13 or MW-14 since soil has already beenhorizontally delineated on-site. Groundwater analytical reports are included inAppendix C of this report.

Based on the geological conditions encountered east of the on-site dry cleaner (sidegradient of the source area) on-site horizontal delineation of groundwater to the eastof the dry cleaner is technically impractical. During this reporting period, ECTattempted to delineate the eastern boundary of the groundwater contamination plumewith rock wells MW-12 and MW-14. Based on observations during the installationof MW-12 and MW-14, as you move east from the source area the bedrock appears tobecome deeper and sufficient groundwater becomes nonexistent.

When installing MW-12, no competent bedrock was encountered. Groundwater wasobserved around 30 ft bls and the well was installed to a depth of 35 ft bls. Aminimum amount of groundwater was detected in MW-12 during the February 25,2011 sampling event. Analytical results for MW- 12 indicted low concentrations ofPCE (9.3 ppb). No other VOCs were detected in this well. Tn March 2011, ECTattempted to resample MW-l2 to ensure no cross contamination occurred during the

EWC7Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.


February 25, 2011 sampling event. No groundwater was detected in MW- 12 duringthe March 10, 2011 sampling event.

To horizontally delineate the on-site groundwater plume east of the source area, ECTinstalled another monitoring well (MW- 14) approximately 60 feet east of MW- 12.When installing MW- 14, competent bedrock was encountered at 56 ft bis. ECTadvanced 14 feet into bedrock to a total well depth of 70 ft bis with no signs ofgroundwater.

Based on the low concentrations of PCE detected in MW-12 (9.3 ppb), the lack ofsufficient groundwater in monitoring well MW-12 and MW-14, and the topographicalorientation of MW-12 and MW-14 to the source area (side gradient), the on-sitegroundwater contamination plume east of the source area does not represent a threatto human health and the environment and is technically impractical to delineate.

Conceptual Site Model (CSM)

With the exception of the expedited timeframe for the vapor intrusion modeling, theCSM remains unchanged. Based on the analytical results for the groundwater alongthe northern property boundary during the reporting period for the 2’’ SARP andconversations with EPD, the vapor intrusion model will be started immediately toaddress potential vapors issues on the subject site and northern adjacent property.Results of the vapor intrusion model should be provided to EPD no later than July 30,2011. A copy of the updated CSM is included in Appendix E of this report.

Milestone Schedule

As listed in the subject site’s acceptance letter into the VRP dated May 14, 2010, theparticipant must demonstrate complete horizontal delineation on the qualifyingproperty by May 14, 2011. Based on the soil and groundwater analytical results fromthe sampling events conducted during this and previous reporting periods, theparticipant has demonstrated complete horizontal delineation on the qualifyingproperty.

The participant will contact the adjacent property owner north of the subject site andrequest permission to access the property and install monitoring wells to horizontallydelineate the off-site groundwater plume. Since the groundwater is delineated on-siteto the west, south, and east only the property adjacent and north of the subject sitewill be contacted. If access to the northern adjacent property is denied or delayed, theparticipant may contact EPD to request assistance in accessing this property.

An updated Gantt chart illustrating the completed and future milestones for thesubject site is included in Appendix F of this report.

HCTEnvironmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.


Invoices

During the reporting period for the second SAPR, services totaling $42,817.27 wereinvoiced to JNV Investment Group. This total includes $18,714 for professionalservices, $1,442.66 for expenses, and $22,660.61 in subcontractor cost. Costs toprepare this SARP and address the comments in the State’s Notice of Deficiency arenot accounted for in the invoices included with this report. Copies of ECT’s invoicesfor JNV Investment Group are included in Appendix G of this report.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at via e mailat [email protected]

Sincerely

Matthew TrammellProject Manager

Environmental Consulting 8 Technology, Inc.

GROUNDWATER SCIENTIST STATEMENT

I certify under penalty of law that this report and all attachments were prepared by me or undermy direct supervision in accordance with the Voluntary Remediation Program Act (0. C. G.A.Section 12-8-101, Ct. seg). I am a professional engineer/professional geologist who is registeredwith the Georgia State Board of Registration for Professional Geologists and 1 have thenecessary experience and am in charge of the investigation and remediation of this release ofregulates substances.

Furthermore, to document my direct oversight of the Voluntary and investigation RemediationPlan development, implementation of corrective action, and long term monitoring, I haveattached a monthly summary of hours invoiced and description of services provided by me to theVoluntary Remediation program participant since the previous submittal to the GeorgiaEnvironmental Protection Division.

The information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including thepossibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

Signed:.. /

/ ..

.:;‘

——

Environmental ConsultIng & Technology, Inc.

Andrew T. BenoitGeorgia Registration No. 1487


TABLE OF CONTENT

Tables

Table 1 Soil Analytical Results

Table 2 Groundwater Analytical Results

Table 3 Groundwater Elevations

Table 4 Delineation Criteria (Soil and Groundwater)

Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map

Figure 2 Site Layout

Figure 3 PCE Concentrations in Soil (0-3’)

Figure 4 PCE Concentrations in Soil (5-7’)

Figure 5 PCE Concentrations in Soil (8.5-10’)

Figure 6 TCE Concentrations in Soil (0-3’)



Figure 9 DCE Concentrations in Soil (0-3’)



Figure 12 Potentiometric Map (April 26, 2011)

Figure 13 PCE Groundwater Isoconcentration Map

Figure 14 TCE Groundwater Isoconcentration Map

Figure 15 DCE Groundwater Isoconcentration Map

Figure 16 VC Groundwater Isoconcentration Map

Appendices

Appendix A Boring Logs

Appendix B Groundwater Sampling Logs and Calibration Forms

Appendix C Soil and Groundwater Analytical Reports

Appendix D Photographs of Staining


Ms. Carolyn DanielsJNV Investment Group, HSI #108842”’ Semi-Annual Progress ReportPage 9

Appendix E Updated Conceptual Site Model

Appendix F Updated Milestone Schedule (Gantt Chart)

Appendix G ECT Invoices

Environmental Consulting & Technology. Inc.

TABLES

——


Professional Cleaners4800 Redan Road

Stone Mountain, GeorgiaHSI# 10884

Table 1: Soil Analytical Results

Boring Date PCE TCE cis-DCE trans-DCE VCNumber Depth (ft) Sampled (jig/kg) (jig/kg) (jig/kg) (jig/kg) (jig/kg)

HA-I 2 10/12/00 633 232 6 <5 <10HA-2 2 10/17/00 <5 <5 <5 <5 <10

SS-1 (MW-i) 2 10/12/07 53 <4.2 <4.2 <4.2 <8.4SS-2 (MW-2) 2 10/12/07 400 8 3.4 <3.2 <6.4SS-3 (MW-3) 6 10/12/07 13 <3.2 <3.2 <3.2 <6.5

SB-4 2 2/25/08 1210 2/25/08 <3.5

SB-5 2 2/25/08 18SB-6 2 2/25/08 <3.4

10 2/25/08 <3.3SB-7 2 2/25/08 5.2

10 2/25/08 <425 2/25/08 14

SB-8 2 2/25/08 <3.65 2/25/08 6.6

SB-9 2 2/25/08 <3.210 2/25/08 12

SB-b 2 3/10/08 8.410 3/10/08 <4.3

SB-il 2 3/10/08 <3.010 3/10/08 <3.4

SB-12 2 3/10/08 9.410 3/10/08 1225 3/i 0/08 4

SB-13 2 3/10/08 775 3/10/08 49

SB-14 2 3/10/08 3.25 3/10/08 <3.4

SB-15 2 3/10/08 4405 3/10/08 1,10010 3/10/08 7,700

SB-16 2 3/10/08 <3.110 3/10/08 <5.3

SB-17 2 3/10/08 7.510 3/10/08 <3.4

SB-18 2 3/10/08 <3.2SB-19 2 3/10/08 49

10 3/10/08 <4.2SB-20 2 5/14/08 3,500

7 5/14/08 6SB-21 2 5/14/08 590

8.5 5/14/08 4.8

Not Analyzed

SB-22 2 5/14/08 71010 5/14/08 13

Boring Date PCE TCE cis-DCE trans-DCE VCNumber Depth (fi) Sampled iqIkq) (iqIkq) (,.t/kq) (j,qIkg) (/kq)SB-23 2 5/14/08 240

10 5/14/08 360SB-24 2 5/14/08 <3.4

10 5/14/08 9.2SB-25 2 5/14/08 <3.0

10 5/14/08 <3.9SB-26 2 5/14/08 <3.8

10 5/14/08 <3.8SB-27 2 5/14/08 <3.8

Not Analyzed

10 5/14/08 <3.6SB-28 2 5/14/08 <3.4SB-29 1.5 5/14/08 280SB-30 2 5/14/08 8.9

5 5/14/08 690SB-31 2 5/14/08 11

5 5/14/08 560MW-4 2 9/9/09 <3.8 <3.8 <3.8 <3.8 <7.7MW-5 2 9/9/09 17 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <7.9

7 9/9109 <39 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <7.8MW-6 2 9/9/09 160 <6.5 <6.5 <6.5 <13

7 9/9/09 220 <6.8 <6.8 <6.8 <1410 9/9/09 <9.2 <9.2 <9.2 <9.2 <18

SB-32 2 9/9/09 130 <7.9 <7.9 <7.9 <16SB-33 2 9/9/09 110 <6.8 <6.8 <6.8 <14

7 9/9)09 240 <6.9 <6.9 <6.9 <14SB-34 2 9/9/09 31 6.9 <6.0 <6.0 <12SB-35 2 9/9/09 310 110 230 <6.4 <13

7 9/9/09 230 300 180 <6.3 <1310 9/9/09 940 61 170 <6.6 <13

SB-36 2 9/9/09 380 4 <3.2 <3.2 <6.47 9/9/09 200 9.6 5.4 <3.4 <6.9

SB-37 2 9/9/09 1,700 940 220 <6.1 <127 9/9/09 900 480 530 <6.3 <13

SB-38 2 9/9/09 88 65 120 <3.6 <7.17 9/9/09 260 70 180 <3.9 <7.810 9/9/09 48 32 44 — <2.6 — <5.2

SB-39 2 9/9/09 450 9 <4.1 <4.1 <8.27 — 9/9/09 31 <4.1 - <4.1 <4.1 — <8.110 9/9/09 30 <3.8 <3.8 <3.8 <7.6

MW-7 2 11/11/10 11 <3.6 <3.6 <3.6 <7.110 11/11/10 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <8.9

MW-8 2 11/11/10 <6.0 <6.0 <6.0 <6.0 <12.010 11/11/10 <6.0 <6.0 <6.0 <6.0 <12.0

MW-9 2 11/12/10 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <3.7 <7.5MW-b 2 11/12/10 15 <3.9 <3.9 <3.9 <7.7

10 11/12/10 <4.8 <4.8 <4.8 <4.8 <9.7MW-li 2 2/15/11 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <9.0

6 2/15111 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <4.5 <9.010 2/15/11 <5.1 <5.1 <5.1 <5.1 <10.0

Boring Date PCE TCE cis-DCE trans-DCE VCNumber Depth (ft) Sampled (jig/kg) (jig/kg) (jig/kg) (jig/kg) (jig/kg)MW-12 2 2/15/11 <4.2 <4.2 <4.2 <4.2 <8.5

6 2/15/11 <6.1 <6.1 <6.1 <6.1 <12.010 2/15/11 <2.8 <2.8 <2.8 <2.8 <5.5

Type 1 RRS 500 500 7000 [ 10,000 200Type 3/4 RRS 500 500 7,000 [ 10,000 200Notes:jig/kg = micrograms per kilogram



Table 2: Groundwater Analytical Results

Well Date cis-DCE [ PCE [ trans-DCE TCE VCNumber Sampled (igIL) (tq/L) j (j.tg/L) (.tq/L) (.tq/L)

TW-1 10/17/2000 <5 67 <5 <5 <2TW-2 10/17/2000 <5 1,920 <5 — <5 — <2

7/20/2007 69 5,600 <5 320 <210/13/2007 53 3,200 — <5 200 <29/10/2009 81 1,900 <5 140 <2

MW-i 9/10/09 17 <5 <5 <5 <2MW-2 9/10/09 290 94 <5 <5 2MW-3 9/10/09 110 340 <5 18 <2MW-4 9/i 2/09 5.6 210 <5 5.4 <2MW-5 9/11/09 <5 <5 <5 <5 <2MW-6 9/11/09 <5 41 <5 <5 <2MW-7 2/25/il 7 330 <5 10 <2MW-8 11/23/10 <5 1,200 <5 35 <2MW-9 11/23/10 <5 73 <5 <5 <2

MW-b 2/25/11 <5 10 <5 <5 <2MW-il 2/25/li <5 10 <5 <5 <2

3/10/11 <5 11 <5 <5 <2MW-i 2 2/25/11 <5 9.3 <5 <5 <2MW-13 4/26/11 <5 <5 <5 <5 <2

Type 1/3 RRS 70 [ 5 100 5 2Type4RRS 1,020 [ 5 161 34.5 18.2Notes:tgIL = micrograms per liter


Stone Mountain, GeorgiaHSl# 10884

Table 3: Groundwater Elevations

Top of Depth of CorrectedDate casing Screen Water Groundwater

Measured Elev. (ft) Interval (ft) Depth (ft) Elevation (ft)TMW-2 9/12/2009 102.03 10-33 27.84 74.19

11/23/2010 28.21 73.822/25/2011 28.45_ — 73.584/26/2011 27.98 74.05

MW-i 9/12/2009 100.00 20-40 38.01 61.9911/23/2010 20.65 79.352/25/2011 20.52 79.484/26/2011 19.37 80.63

MW-2 9/12/2009 100.40 18-38 35.42 64.9811/23/2010 23.06 77.342/25/2011

— 22.98 77.424/26/2011 22.71 77.69

MW-3 9/1212009 .75 15-45 33.14 67.6111/23/2010 26.94 73.812/25/2011 27.21 73.544/26/2011 26.74 74.01

MW-4 9/12/2009 100.87 19-39 26.78 74.0911/23/2010 27.14 73.732/25/201 1 27.39 73484/26/2011 26.95 73.92

MW-5 9/12/2009 102.77 19-44— 21.29 81.48

11/23/2010 2106 81.712/25/2011 20.65 82.124/26/2011 20.09 82.68

MW-6 9/12/2009 102.57 19-44 25.62 76.9511/23/2010

-_______ 26.56 76.012/25/2011 26.94 75.634/26/2011 21.21 81.36

MW-7 11/23/2010 83.18 17.5-37.5 dry dry2/25/2011 30.10 53.084/26/2011 26.97 56.21

MW-8 11/23/2010 87.42 10-35 19.34 68.082/25/2011 19.41 68014/26/2011 17.99 69.43

MW-9 11/23/2010 92.08 15-45 38.05 54.032/25/2011

- 3025 61.834/26/2011 18.11 73.97

MW-b 11/23/2010 94.35 15-45 dry dry2/25/2011 43.26 51.094/26/2011 29.98 64.37

MW-lI 2/25/2011 102.12 20-30 24.30 77.824/26/2011 23.23 78.89

[ Top of Depth of Corrected

I Date casing Screen Water GroundwaterMeasured Elev. (ft) Interval (ft) Depth (ft) Elevation (ft)

MW-12 2/25!201i 99.46 - 25-35 34.04 65.424/26/2011 dry dry

MW-13 4/26/2011 106.28 25-35 25.45 74.01MW-14 4/26/2011 98.39 50-70 dry dry

Note:

Elevation at MW-i arbitrarily set at 100 ft.



Table 4a: Delineation Criteria (Soil)

PCE TCE cis-DCE trans-DCE VC(.tqIkq) (iiqlkci) (iiri/kn’ (ualkci) (ualka’

Notification Concentration - 180 130 530 530 40Laboratory detection limits (2x) 5 5 5 5 — 10Residential Clean-up Standards 500 500 7,000 10,000 200Delineation Criteria 500 500 7,000 10,000 200

Table 4b: Delineation Criteria (Groundwater)

r PCE cis-DCE trans-DCE

] (pqIL) TCE (g/L) (tqIL) (iqIL) VC (gILINotification Concentration (detection limits) 5 5 5 5 2Laboratory Detection Limits (2x) 10 10 10 10 4Residential Clean-up Standards 5 5 70 100 2IDelineation Criteria 5 5 70 [ 100 2

3UjABOOU4Oe6u1J,nsuoQIUOWUO1!AU3

S3If1DIJ

/t.rw,

0

dnh.ead Dr

Springs

C‘C:

:1t3ice

oun),

t

Sr%

S)

3

4-’,

qtb

CA

Hairstor Park

a

S4%C4.

I8 4

S

C, Site

‘4 “ole%mDi’ 4

WhitewhiO*

41’

Ia

•23‘Cw

UC

-J

UC.!30I

0

0

-oh..

aa

If’

Berley Way

Wendover Dr

Weyburn In

— rtflr D4

—a—FIGURE 1—SITE LOCATION MAP


GRAPHIC SCALE0 25 50

SCALE IN FEET

•MW—1 MONFIORING WE

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSES

• MW—1O • uw— MW-B MW—7

STOIUA—WATER

FIGURE 2.

SITE LAYOUT jEnvironmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.

Source: ECI, 2011.


SCE IN FEET

LEGEND

SOIL BORINGNOT SNAPI.EO

DRAiN

FIGURE 3.

POE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (0—3’)

Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.Source: ECT, 2011.


SCALE IN FEET

LEGEND

SOIL BORINGNOT SAMPLED

PROPERlY BOUNDARY

RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSESIfW 10

• • SB—19 • UW—7• SB—17 •

MW—9[NS [NS) [NS) [NS)[N]

[NSJ[NS]

• SB—4• SB—5[Ns][NS]

Source: ECT, 2011.

FIGURE 4.

POE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (5’—7)


fnN

STORM- :/JIERDRAJN

TDRU—WATER


SCALE IN FEE

RESIDENflAl. TOWNHOUSESMW 10• S8—17 . • SB—is

[<34J (<4.6) [NS] • MW—S(NS] [<6.0)• SB—4

(<3.5) • SB—S(NS)

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

•_.___

• SB—19 • MW—7(<4.2) [<45]

LEGEND

SOIL BORINGNOT SAMPLEDPOE CONCENTRATION IN SOIL (ug/kg)EXTENT OF POE/IN SOIL (ug/kg)

FIGURE 5.

PCE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (8.5’— 10’)


GRAPHIC SCALE0 25 54)

SCALE FEET

LEGEND

SOft. BORINGNOT SAMPLED

RESIDENTiAl. TOWNITOUSESMW 10-

•5618• S6-7• —9 [) • MW-B[<J [<3.7j [<6.0)

• SB—4[NA)

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

•____

• 58—19 • MW—7[NA) [<3.6)

FIGURE 6.

TOE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (0—3’)


•SB—24ANHoj2: [NS)

— ‘

S.’‘5, ‘5.

[<4.5)— S..’

sr irORIN _“5

DRAI[


SCALE IN FEETPROPERTY BOUNDARY

RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSESMWIO•

_____ _____ _____ _____

tNSj8 ‘ . • SB—19 • MW—7• W—9 [NS) • MW—8 [NS] [NS][NS) ENsJ [NS)• 58—4[Ns) B—5

INSJ

‘5

5.

.‘v’’5’

STORM-WATER

LEGENDSB—B

SOIL BORINGNS NOT SAMPLED

[9.6) TOE CONCENTRATION IN SOIL (ug/kg)—100— E)(TENT OF TOE /IN SOIL (ug/kg)

NA NOT ANALYZED


SCALE IN FEETPROPERlY BOUNDARY

RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSESMW 10.

______ ______ ______ ______

• SB—17 • SB—18 • SB—19 • MW—7[NA] [<48] • 9 [NS) • Mw—S [NA) [<4.5)[N [<6.0)• SB—4

[NA)

DRYQUEEN

PROPERTY

LEGEND

SOIL BORINGNOT SAMPLEDTCE CONCENTRATION IN SOIL (ug/kg)EXTENT OF TCE N SOIL (ug/kg)NOT ANALYZED I

GRAPHIC SCLE0 25

SCALE IN FEETPROPERTY BOUN,RY

RESIDENTIAL TOWT*1OUSESMW 10.

______ ______ ______

• 5$—17 • • 55-18 ss—ig • I4W-7• MV—9 [NA) • MW—S [NA) [<3.6)[<37i [<6.0)• SB—4

• SB—24MiHoLO

N

•[NA) -.

N

STORM—WATERORAN

LEGEND

SOIL BORINGNOT SMWtED

FIGURE 9.

DCE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (0—3’)Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.

Source: ECT, 2011.


SCALE IN FEET

SB—S.

NS

[530]—100—

NA

LEGEND

SOIL BORINGNOT SAMPLED

DCE CONCENTRA11ON IN SOIL (ug/kg)EXTENT OF DCEI IN SOIL (jig/kg)NOT ANALYZED

FIGURE 10.

DCE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (5—7’)

Source: ECT, 2011.

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSESMW 10

_______ _______ _______ _______

• SB.—17 • 58—18 • SB—19 • W—7[NA, • 9 [NS] • W-8[NSf [Ns] [NsJ [NS)

• 58-4[NS]

[NSJ

w

wEnvironmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.


SCAII IN FEET

PROPERlY B0UN.RY

RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSESMW 10

_______ _______ _______ _______ _______

• B—I7 • • 58-18 • 58—19 • MW—7[NS] MW—8[<4.8)

[NS] [<6.0)[NA] [<4.5)

• SB—4

[NA]

LEGEND

SOIL BORING

NOT SAMPLED

$ wFIGURE 11.

DOE CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL (8—1 0’)Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.

Source: ECT, 2011.

GRAPHIC SCALEo 25 50

SCALE IN FEET

RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSES

•UW1O •MW—9(64.37) (7397)

FIGURE 12.

POTENTIOMETRIC MAP (APRIL 26, 2011)


•(69.43)

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

MW..7(56.21)

MW—4

(73t)

MW 13• (74.01)

- V

I•Mw—I MONITORING WE

(68.08) GROUNDWATER d.EVA11ON (F]


fNFEEr/

// -,-/ RESIDENTIAL_TOWNHOUS9S’

/

_______ _______

-10MW—7

G33t1)

PROPERTY lXWlDARY

// /

I

//

/

STOAM—WI ::RASPHALTDlAN

MW—14

DRAINSTORM—WATER

-.-

)RAIN

STORM—WATERDRAIN

•-1 M0N0NG

(11) PCE CONCENTRATION IN GW (uaJL)

—100— POE IN GROUNtWATER CONTOUR (ug/L)(DASHED WHER INFERRED)

*Monitonng wells TW—2 ahd MW—i through MW—S were sampled in September 2009*Monitoring wells MW—8 ond MW—9 were sampled in Novemeber 2010uonitoring wells MW—7. MW—i 0, and MW—12 were sampled In February 2011Monitoring wells MW—il was sampled in March 2011

wells MW—13 was sampled in April 2011

WMH

,MW—13—- e

(ND)

NN

NN.

NN.

N

FIGURE 13.

PCE GROUNDWATER IS000NCENTRATION MAPF



fNFEEr

MW—13

‘ND)

LEGEND

•IIW—1 MONITORING WE(140) ICE CONCENTRknON IN GW (ug/L)

—100--——- ICE IN GROUNDWATER CONTOUR (ug/L)(DASHED WHE9E INFERRED)

sMonitoring wells TW—2 aId MW—i through MW—6 were sampled in September 2009*Monitoring wells MW—8 and MW—9 were sampled in Novemeber 2010Monftonng wells MW—7, MW—1O, and MW—12 were sampled in Februaly 2011MonitorIng wells MW—Il was sampled in March 2011

*Monitoring wells MW—I 3 was sampled in April 2011

DRAIN

ASPHALTPAVEMENT

QUEENPR0PEY I

FiGURE 14.

TOE GROUNDWATER S000NCENTRATION MAP

Source: ECT, 2011.

,


PROPERTY B0LIDARY

RESCENTW. TOW?*IOVSES

• MW- 10 MW-B MW_7(ND)

(7)

•-1 MON0NO

(81) OCE CONCENTRATION IN OW (uaJL)—100— OCt IN GR0lJNr.ATER CONTOUR (ug/L)

(DASHED WHER INFERRED)SMonftoring wells TW—2 ohd MW—i through MW—B were sampled in September 2009*Monitorjng wells MW—B and MW—9 were sampled in Novemeber 2010eMonitoring wells MW—7, MW—b, and MW—12 were sampled in Februoy 2011:onitong wells MW—il was sampled in March 2011

FIGURE 15.

DOE GROUNDWATER IS000NCENTRATION MAP

Environmental Consulting & Technology. inc.Source: ECT, 2011.

GRAPHIC SCALEO 25 50

fNFEEr

I•Mw-i M0N0RlNG

(2) ‘/C CONCENTRATION IN OW (ug/L)

‘Monitoring wells IW—2 juid MW—I through MW—6 were sampled in September 2009‘Monitoring wells MW—S and MW—9 were sampled in Novemeber 2010‘Monitoring wells MW—7, MW—b, and MW—12 were sampled in February 2011‘Monitoring wells MW—li was sampled in March 2011‘Monitoring wells MW—13 was sampled in April 2011


SCAL.E IN FEET

RESIDENTlA. TOWNHOUSES

•MW—l0•MW—9(ND)

(ND)•

MW-S

(ND)

PROPERlY BOUNDARY

MW-7(ND)

SIORM—WATIRDRAIN

FIGURE 16.

VC GROUNDWATER IS000NCENTRATION MAPEnvironmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.

Source: ECT, 2011.

C:\DOCUME~1\jdouglas\LOCALS~1\Temp\AcPublish_5952\cs 051311.dwg May 13, 2011 - 3:25pm by jdouglas

FIGURE 17

CROSS SECTION A-A'

PRO CLEANERS SITE - STONE MOUNTAIN, GEORGIA

C:\DOCUME~1\jdouglas\LOCALS~1\Temp\AcPublish_5952\cs 051311.dwg May 13, 2011 - 3:25pm by jdouglas

FIGURE 18

CROSS SECTION B-B'

PRO CLEANERS SITE - STONE MOUNTAIN, GEORGIA

APPENDIX A

BORING LOGS

EWC7Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.

SAMPLES DESCRIPTION(l___________________________________

a) a - Q)I. a1

Top of Casing Elevation: 83.18

PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-7‘ROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION AND DATUM:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. DrUling DATE STARTED. DATE FINISHED:11/11/10 11)18/10

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):DRILLING METHOD: Air Rotary 37•5 17.5-37.5DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:

WATER: NA dry 0-17.5LOGGED BY:SAMPLING METHOD: Split Spoon K. Moore

I-Qa)LIJ.

5,8,8,13

12,1616,20

16,20,20,25

20,10,10,13

7,8,6,6

5,6,6,8

WELL CONSTRUCTIONDETAILS AND/OR

DRILLING REMARKS

PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-7PROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION AND DATUM.

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. Drilling DATE STARTED. DATE FINISHED.

___________________________________________ 11/11/10 11/18/10DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):

I________________________________________________37.5 17.5-37.5

DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:

WATER: NA i dry 0-17.5LOGGED BY:SAMPLING METHOD: Split Spoon K. Moore

SAMPLES. DESCRIPTION WELLCONSTRUCTION

:r c______________________________________q,i DETAILSAND/OR

CUZI Top of Casing EIevaon: 83.18 DRILLING REMARKS

L +

. PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-8ROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION AND DATUM:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. Drilling DATE STARTED: DATE FINISHED.11/11/10 11/18/10

DRILLING METHOD: Air RotaryTOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):

35 10-35DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:

WATER: NA 19.34 0-10LOGGED BY:SAMPLING METHOD: Split Spoon K. Moore

SAMPLES

UJ’.- E°(Z‘Cl)

a)

ECl)

DESCRIPTION0I

., I‘Top of Casing Elevation: 87.42

IJ_

1,3.4.4

567,9

8,8,7,6

5,5,6,6

7,7,18,7

Brown orange medium grain sandyS ilt-micaceous


DRILLING REMARKS

0.1

0.1

0

0

0

Orange brown medium grain sandysilt-loose-moist

I

Tan brown fine grain sandy siltloose-micaceous

P

TAYellow brown medium grain sandy siltloose-some PVVRlsaprolite-micaceous

Tan brown fine grain sandy silt-loose-micaceous-toD of bedrock

MW-8 —

io MW-8

17HI 8—j19-2021—22—23—24—25—26—27—2829-30-31-32-33-34135—,36-j38—39-i40H41 -42-i434445-b464748

Bedrock

••1

••i t:•’:‘..‘.

.

• i•*l •‘e. 4*s.,

:‘•‘‘‘,‘1 .j4’..

4 4 b’•. •.

4...4e.•4 .4

• •

.• •44 •4 4

.f

• • .•.

r.

LOGGED BY:

K. Moore


DRILLING REMARKS

PROJECT:

_____ Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-8‘ROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia

GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION AND DATUM:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. DrillingDATE STARTED: DATE FINISHED.

11/11/10 11/18/10JtOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):DRILLING METHOD: Air Rotary 35 10-35

DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:

WATER: NA 19.34 0-10SAMPLING METHOD: Split Spoon

ElevaUon: 87.42

+

Professional CleanersROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. Drilling

DRILLING METHOD: Air Rotary

DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55

Log of Boring No.GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION

DATE STARTED:

10-1112—13—14—15—16—17—18--19—2021

23-h242526272829303132-J3334—I35-

37-38-39-40-41-42-43-44_J

454647 148-4Q_


DRILLING REMARKS

PROJECT

SAMPLING METHOD: SDIitSI

Bedrock

+

“U

+

PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners•1 Log of Boring No. MW-9PROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia I GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION AND DATUM:

IDRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. Drilling DATE STARTED: DATE FINISHED:

11/12/10 11/18/10TOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):DRILLING METHOD: Air Rotary 45 15-45

DRILLING EQUIPMENT CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:WATER: NA 38.05 0-15LOGGED BY:‘SAMPLING METHOD: Split Spoon K. Moore

: SAMPLES0

DESCRIPTION‘.

WELL CONSTRUCTION

IDETAILS AND/OR

E— Top of Casing Elevation: 92.08 DRILLING REMARKS

Co co


DRILLING REMARKS

Professional CleanersROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. Drilling

DRILLING METHOD: AirDRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55

SAMPLING METHOD: Split

0.2

0.1

0.1

0

0

red fine grainqrani

Red orange medium grain sandyclay-dry-tight-some organic

inclusions-some foliation-micaceous

11MW-1(

11-12—131415-1

I4°-H41—42-1

‘PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-I 0‘ROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION AND DATUM.

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. Drilling DATE STARTED: DATE FINISHED:11/12/10 11/18/10

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):[DRILLINGMETHOD: AirRotary 45 15-45DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING.

WATER: NA dry 0-15LOGGED BY:SAMPLING METHOD: Split Spoon K. Moore

! SAMPLES‘ I I DESCRIPTION-Ic

- — a , 0) ‘ DETAILS AND/ORzWELL CONSTRUCTION

Ui E ° —

g Elevation: 94.35 DRILLING REMARKSo Top of Casln

0 0

_

L I___

+

PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-IlPROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION AND DATUM:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. Drilling DATE STARTED: DATE FINISHED:I 2/15/11 2/18/11

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):DRILLING METHOD: Air Rotary 30 20-30DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:

I____________________________________________________WATER: NA i 25 0-20LOGGED BY:SAMPIJNG METHOD: Split Spoon K. Moore

I

SAMPLES DESCRIPTION

_____________

Cl

I Iz

41). ,I

E .z I Top of Casing Elevation: 102.12‘

___________________

Orange red fine grain sandy silt


DRILLING REMARKS

Brown orange loose fine grain sandyclayey silt-slightly micaceous

Tan brown loose fine grain sandy silt

0.3

0

0

0.1

0

0

0

0

0

4,4,6

4,4,4

3,3,4

6,6,5

6,6,6

6,8,6

5,9,8

6,7,13

21,21,18

Partially weathered rock - loose mediumgrain silt-some granite

Black tan peppered coarse grain sandysiIt-PW-Ioose

Foliated coarse grain sandysilt-PWR-salt/oeDoer

ITan brown loose coarse grain sandy

siIt-sarolite-foliatedTan brown loose coarse grain sandy

silt-saprolite-foliated

[: MW11

5MW-il

1MW-11

11—J121314—15-16-17-18-19H20H21—22-23-24-25-26-2728293Q3132-H33Z

34-35-36-37-38-39-4o-41—’42—43-44-45-46-47-48-z—

Black white pepper coarse grain sandy siltmicaceous-quartz incIusions2 cm-foliated

Little to no recovery-granite and quartzencountered weathered bedrock

. . t••.bedrock

‘,•.;.

Terminate boring at 30 ft-bls

+

PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-IlROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia


DRILLING CONTCTOR: Kilman Bros. DrillingDATE STARTED: DATE FINISHED:

____________________________________________________ 2/15/11 2/18/11

DRILLING METHOD:Air Rotary

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):

!____________________________________________________30 20-30

DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:.__________________________________________________ WATER: NA 0-20

LOGGED BY:‘SAMPLING METHOD: Split Spoon K. Moore

SAMPLES. DESCRIPTION WELL CONSTRUCTION

—.

zi jij—jq, DETAILSAND/ORLU E

— Top of Casing Elevation: 102.12 DRILLING REMARKS0

[CO COQu ‘,[

___

+

: PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-12ROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia


DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. DrillingDATE STARTED. DATE FINISHED.

2/15/11 2/18/11

DRILLING METHOD: Air RotaryTOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL(ft):

35 25-35

DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:WATER: NA 34 0-25

SAMPLING METHOD: Split SpoonLOGGED BY:

K. Moore


DRILLING REMARKS

0

Orange red silty clay-stiff

0.1

0.2

0.1

Orange red clayey silt-crumbles easily

Orange red silty clay-tight-fill material



Red orange fine sandy silt

0

0

0

Orange tan loose sandysilt-micaceous-some foliation

SAMPLES —L’ DESCRIPTION

ITop of Casing Elevation: 99.46

2—MW-12 Orange red medium grain sandy clayey

3 , silt moist-loose

4— 3,4,6 Orange red clayey silt-dry-stiff

MW-122,2,5

8- 2,4,5

MW-12•

11-Hl2— 4,6,6

13Hl4i 6,6,4

15—16- 4,4,6

17-18— 6,9,9

19-20— 5,11,11

21-22- 3,4,6

23-24- 6,8,8

25-26-27-28—29—

_______________________

30—31 -32—333435363738—39—4Q

41—42—43—44—45—,46-h47—i48-49z1

0




no spoons

rock lens

no spoons


+

L

PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-I 2

FR0JECTLOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia

GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION AND DATUM.

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. DrillingDATE STARTED: DATE FINISHED.

2/15/1 1 2/18/1 1TOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.): H

DRILLING METHOD: Air Rotary 35 25-35

DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:WATER: NA 34 0-25

‘SAMPLING METHOD:LOGGED BY:

Split Spoon K. Moore

SAMPLES DESCRIPTION,.

I- 0

WELL CONSTRUCTION

o-r- .

r DETAILSAND/OR

TopofCasing Elevation: 99.46DRILLING REMARKS

H’__

+

SAMPLES

zI——o a.

Ic, CI) L1

2-3-4-5-6-7-8—9-

10—

1112

1 3_J

14—15—

16—17—

18—19—20—21—22—23-u24—252627—28—29—30—31—32—33—34—35—36—37—i383940—

41H42-a43444546

47

PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-13ROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION AND DATUM:

DATE STARTED: DATE FINISHED:DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. Drilling 4/7/11 4/11/11

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):DRILLING METHOD: Air Rotary I 35 25-35DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:

WATER: NA 30 0-25LOGGED BY:SAMPLING METHOD:

- Split Spoon K. Moore

0)

•0

Top of CasIng EIevaon:

DESCRIPTION

106.28


DRILLING REMARKS

Orange red clayey silt

red orange sandy silt

bedrock

.. .. .

•,‘:;

.:.

.. .

-

________________________________________


±

PROJECT:

. Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-13‘ROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia 1 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION AND DATUM:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. Drilling DATE STARTED. DATE FINISHED:4/7/11 4/11/11

TOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):DRILLING METHOD: Air Rotary 35 25-35DRILLING EQUIPMENT CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:

WATER: NA 30 0-25LOGGED BY:SAMPLING METHOD: Split Spoon K. Moore

SAMPLES DESCRIPTION WELL CONSTRUCTIONDETAILS AND/OR

DRILLING REMARKS

I ±

PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-14

ROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION AND DATUM:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. Drilling DATE STARTED: •DATE FINISHED:4/7/11 4/11/11

DRILLING METHOD: Air RotaryTOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):

70 50-70DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL, CASING:

WATER: NA dry 0-50.LOGGED BY:SAMPLING METHOD: Split Spoon K. Moore

SAMPLES

I—— G)o_ .LiJ.- Oa.—,

(1)Top of Casing Elevafion:

DESCRIPTION

98.39


DRILLING REMARKS

Orange red clayey silt

I •

4—4—

red orange fine sandy silt

,

I.• :‘.

::‘ 4

•p•••.••••

bedrock

VTerminate boring at 70 ft-bls

PROJECT:

Professional Cleaners Log of Boring No. MW-14ROJECT LOCATION: Stone Mountain, Georgia


DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Kilman Bros. DrillingDATE STARTED: DATE FINISHED:

4/7/11 4/11/11TOTAL DEPTH (ft.): SCREEN INTERVAL (ft.):DRILLING METHOD:

Air Rotary 70 50-70

DRILLING EQUIPMENT: CME-55 DEPTH TO FIRST: COMPL. CASING:WATER: NA dry 0-50LOGGED BY:

SAMPLING METHOD:Split Spoon K. Moore

SAMPLES-

c DESCRIPTIONI________________________________________ WELL CONSTRUCTIONz——— Q) DETAILSAND/OR

cz I Top of Casing ElevaUon: 98.39 DRILLING REMARKS

LJ

+

APPENDIX B

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOGS ANDCALIBRATION FORMS

AEVC7Environmental Consufling & Technology, Inc.

a-

U)

U)

U)

(UG)E-U0a)

a)3c’J0C.,

(0da)a)

J.Cal)E

V00E0a)>a)0(UCo

C-)0E04::a)

Ca)

SdC0-j

Ua)

4.09(UCU00IU)

‘4—0C00t0C)

I

(.4rn.3C-

4-C,)CU1)E‘4-

0-w0—Ca)

00.00)1S0C,,

C.)>a0‘CC.)C

oC00(Na)0)ECo

cia)

04.’0

c4

I.

U)

U)

0a-aa)9

C,1(4.C’U)

C0CU

S.

4.—S/rci

.1

JE—C4>E0C2z0Ca.

a)

-UCa)>0.0(U-cCcl

-CCCU)

(UC-,

(400E-C0a>‘0

0‘1(4(E(ft

>C)

4—:41-tSC‘-4.U)

C(UC)

C

f-i

I

.0a>.—

‘4-4

--CU

0)L4r0)c

1)j10_

=--------a)

—a

,-‘4-

4a-,

J,C

:.a)\

(U4.

-s

40.

1....

‘:p

oC

-i._

--

----

Cift?z

0

E-:

0CuE4

E4>

CU

0(i)

4041)>(UE(I

rf.4

C,-U.04-

I-.z4

)

4—(UC-)CU>4C04

-’(U

C0-44.

(U

U)

C0

C,>a)0)

IC0EIa)

LLa)0.

Ea,

31,

I PrectNo. 1Date: C CWelt Information

Well ID: Location: LVSWell Diameter: 2 Welt Construction: 2 Sch 40 PvcCasing height above gradeWell depth from TOG: L3DGeneral_Condition of Well_‘ jCondition_of surrounding area

WeatherAmbient Temerature 55 -__jPrecipitation Lc t_/c .

Well ObservationsStatic water level below TOC 33 C Method of measure

Method of measure:Height (Fit) of water in well (Well depth from TOG - Static level from TOC) t i1-Volume of water in well (Fit. x K): j, .3 where K O.163for2”welI & K = 0.852 for 4” well

Well Purging Purgin method: Low Flow /0:,, S ij3 c N

CumtativeVölumeWell Vol (Gallons) /Turbidity ,g.ç- (1.•- f)Canthitivity (us/cm) •3?q 3?pH ,•j)4 -€ L (4 b (L ji i (C ,

1emperatiire(F 1f-Ii If4 3 1?jj( :! i( />fl (IRPcø •a zu 4.

Purto Dryness: Q1I 0L -s_SamPle 1nf:CoOnf

sampling ¶t p QE C) PDecon procedures 1+1cc. C F./ 4- 1o’

irnple ID Container Preservative Required Analysis

Sample Transport and_Preseivation:_Ice I_Delivered_to LabSample Destination JS Via CarChain of Custody completed: Yes

Technicians) -jQ 7 4v oJ? IA.t Q i.C IiU p 41’,fr i, c1 peit

c44f,%fI hLC&hi

1PreNo,: IDa: Ii /Veil information

Well lb:yJ1,_—Li Locatior:_4k,’ k(&4-_CA€.c.AaSWell Diameter: Z’ Well Constfudtion: 2 Soh 40 PVCCasIng_height above grade: -1”Well depth from TOC: JGeneral Condition àf W jCondition of swmundinp area:

Weather VAmbient Temperature; IPrecipltation:_p.

Well ObservationsStatic water level below TOG: 30 Method of measure: t L-.1k-

Method of measure: -

Height (Ht) of water in well (WeD depth from TOC Static level from TOC): CVolume of water in well (Ht. x K): G? , where K= 0.163 for 2’ well & K 0,652 for4 wêfl

Neil Purging Purging, method:, Low Flow- I,4L L4’

CumulätlveVolurne 861—

tell Vol. (Gallons) 9. I J. 0 1 0urbidity (. L ajf) ((c 1oncJuótivity(us!cm) 157 C) LS oi pj93 2H Lo S 3 s.. cemperature(F° Lç 34I a’I(RP 1t

r, -I.tt SLt1tPurged to Dryness:

Sample InformationMethod of sampling: J4iLDecon. procedures: 0Sample ID Container ‘ Preservative Required Analysis

&O—U tLL uc’C. c1,

Sample Transport and Preservation:_Ice I Deliver.tq_LabSample Destination; Via:Chain of Custody completed; e

Technlcan(s) Et’r . (ö t1r4

. JPr*ctNo IDate: fs’/i iWell information

Well ID: (\(A —rm Locatian: .f9/ wtWell Diameter 2 Well Construction 7 Sch 40 PVCCasing height above grade:Wefi depth from TOG: 3 / C)General Condition of Well I Condition of surrounding area

Weather• Ambient Temperature: (o ‘P I Precipitation: .j

Well ObservationsStatic water level below TOG__..4 Method of measure_ ..

Method of measure:Height (He) of water in well (Well depth from TOG Static level from TOG):Volume of water in well (Ht x K) ii7 where K0 163 ior2 wella K=0652for4 well

Well. Purging Purging method: Low Flow

_________

Cumulative Volume pyell Vol (Gallons) C

Turbidity 3:14Conductivity (uslcm) ) fQ )-

Hemperature (F°) 3 .

ORPgo

.

Purged to Dryness: JSample Information

Method of sampling: .

Decon. procedures:Sample ID Container Praservative Required Analysis

. JcA. LL

Sample Transport and Preservation Ice I Delivered to LabSample Destination: j Via:Chain of Custody completed:

TechnicIan(s) k - PP J-/gJ ncjj

i9’:44 j aAI &S s I&i’t i)dtt t4 I

ProjecLNo.: 1Date 4/3.1 /il_.Well Information

Well ID: i—V Location:

Well Diameter: 2’ Well construction; 2 Sch 40 PVC —

asin height above grade: -1”Well depth from TOC ,. 5General Condition of Well: (j Condition of surmunding area

WeatherAmbient Temperature 75 IPreciitation: j3r

Well ObservationsStáà water level below TOC: ‘. Method of measure: k.n Me4’

‘ Method of measure:

Height (Htl of water in well (Well depth from TOC-Satic level from TOC) (1Volume of water n well (Ht. x K).

.

ç where 0 153 for 2 welI& K G.652 for 4 II

Well Puing Purging method. Low Flow

rq( 1ID f2cCumuiattye Volume 1S

- J .

3.Nell Vol. (Gallons) ( 1 i’ i.

Turbidity!______ 3g7 jq. .( ‘ 1.

Conductiviyws/cm) 2M4I( 1oo qc? &QH cy çt’ S’emperature(F’) 23.qo ).u7 )3q - ‘i3

ORP (‘ :).L7 -L >t?o Lt Ls7

F’.r9i :o Drynesr

Sample InformationMethod of sampling j_ Fi /Decor. procedures i-

Sample lQ___ Container - Preservative — Recuired’Analysis

.

-____.

sample Transport and Preservation: lee / Delivered to. LabSample Destination: Via: CarChain of Custody completed: ‘é ‘

Technician(s) - I :27

Page 1 of I

Pine Environmental Services, inc

4037 Darling Court, Suite D, Lilbum, GA 30047800-842-1 088(Toll -Free)

770-925-2855 (Phone)770-925-2811 (Fax)

pi ne-gapinc-environmcnta1 .com.

HOJ?IBA 11-22 Packing ListPine Ne 10537 Serüil No: 606048

ReceivedSt*ndard Items Prepared QC Check by Return to Pine

Customer

-2000dspbIyProtective rubber boot

_______

Manual ..Quick reference cardAAA alkaline batteries (3)

_____________ ______

9 Valkabnehnttery(1) c-Probe guard

__

Qtl ibrat ion cup

_______

-

Flow cell

______

Flow cell adapter_.______

______________

Flow cell threaded retaining ring (if applicable)

________ _______ _______________

2o1 each barb size(114 318 and 1/2).-....—,,-..-

250 ml Autocal solution

_______ ______________

NIST traceable calibrrniop sheer

Prepared Hy: cQC fly:

Date: ll/l?/201d

ThLipacIdng list is to ensure that every item needed to operate the unit was sent and receiverL Upon receivinga sldpmeut, pleasefill out the “Received by customer” column. Call Pine within 24 (irs. ofreceiving theequpment ifiwypieces are missing, damaged or inalJki:scfwning. Thank you /1w choosing Pinel?nvironmeiital Services, Inc.

For Technical Support call 800442-1 088

http://pinewthapps/ca1ibrepair/rptpackingIistaspx?pincnurn= 1 0537&seriaInum606048... 11/17/2010

Page 1 of 1

4 Pine Environmental Services, inc

4037 Darling Court, Suite D, Lilburn, GA 30047800-842- [088(TolI-Free)

770-925-28 55(Phone)770-925-281 1(Fax)

pine-ga()pine-environ.nicntaI corn

ertfkate ofJIORIBA U-22 Calibration

HORIBA U22 Serial Number 606038 vs calibrated to the manufacturers specifications with NIS f standarck.

Model: U-22Pine No: 10537

Serial No: 606048

lot Number:200321 5-7

Calibration Standard Instrument Output lAllowable Range 1% DifferenceH -Span2: 7PH 7P11 1665-735 PH 10%

lot Nnmber:200255-4

ICalibration Standard jlnrument Output llowab1e Range J% DifferencePH-Span 1: 4P11 f4PH 13.54.2 PH 10%

lot Numher:7862-00

Iallbration Standard Instrument Output lloble Range j% DifferenceImrbidity-Span I ONTU ONTU 10-0 NTU 10%

lot Number:7862-4.49

Calibration Standard jInstrunt.Ouput jAliowable Range % l)ifferenceConductivity-Spun3: I4.49ms/cm I4.274.71 ms/cm 0%.4tns,em I I

Temprature DO Chart:

IWafer TemperatureC) DO(mgIL) Result21 8.68 8.71

Environmental Conditions of Test Area:

Temperature Degree F: 67 %Rclative tumidity

Calibrated By: Robert Hall l)ate: 11/17/2010 11:32:00 AM

All instruments are calibrated by Pine Environmental Sen ices, Inc according to the manufactorcrs specilications. but ii is theCustomer’s responsibility m calibrate and maintain this unit in accordance with the manufacturers specifications and/or theeusromers own specilic needs.

Notify Pine Environmental Services, Juc. of any defect within 24 hours of receipt of equipmentPlease call 8lO-842-i088 for Technical Assistance

See attacheri packing iit

bttp://pinewebappsfealibrepair/calibreport.aspx?pinenum=10537&calibtype-0 1 1/17/2010

INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION REPORT

Pine EnvIronmental Services, inc.

Pine Environmental Services, Inc.

4037 Darling CourtLilburn, GA 30047

Toll-free: (S00) 842-1088

Notes about this calibration

Ca Obration Result calibration Successful

Who Calibrated Otis Halsey

All instruments are calibrated by Pine Environmental Services, Inc. according to the manufacturer’sspecifications, but it is the customers responsibility to calibrate and maintain this unit in accordance with the

matiufacturer’s specifications and/or the customer’s own specific needs.Notii’ Pine Environmental Services, Inc. of any defect within 24 hours of receIpt of equipment

Please call 66-96O-7463 for Technical Assistance

Pine Fn ironmental Ser ius Inc \k mdsor 1ndusri l Park 02 North Main Sett 11d. 20 Windsor NJ 0$ Sb 1 800 3(11 9663Www.Pme—cflvironmenLal.com

Instrument II) 5709

Description MiniRae 2000

Calibrated 2/i420l I

Manufacturer Rae Systems ClassificationModel Number PGM7600 Status Pass

Sria1Number/ Lot 110-005343 Temp C 2:1Nuin her

Location Georiga Humidity % 31Department

Calibration SpecifleationsGroup # I Range Aec % 00000

Group am hot ul kne Reading Ace % 3 0000Stated Aecy PcI of Reading Plus/Minus 0.00

‘4om In ‘vai/ In Vat In L’pe Out Vi Out tpe hid As PtSs/ul100.00/ 100.00 PPM 100.00 - PPM 98.00 100.00 0.00% Pass

Test Instruments Used During the Calibration (As Of Cal Entry Date)Serial Number I Ne%t Cal Date I

Test Stanvhrd ID Descnption Minufi1orr Modcl Number Lot Number I 9%t Cal Date Enration DateGA iSO 100 GA ISO tOO Liquid OP1IOIO LTAOJ IA-MD- 1/3112014LT.A01 IA-MD. Technology CMCM


Pine Environmental Services, Inc4037 Darling CourtLilbunt, GA 30047

Toll.free: (800) 842.l088


instrument ID 16556

Description Horiba US2

Calibrated 3 9201 I

Manufacturer Horiba CiassiticationModel Number U52 Status Pass

Serial Number! Lot 815571 MFM Temp °C 22NumberLocation Georgia Humidity % 55

Department

Calibration Spccifications

Group # I Range Ace % 0,0000Group Name PH Reading Ace % 3.0000Stated Accy Pet of Reading Plus/Minus 0.00

Nom In Vai/ In Vat in Type Out Val Out Type Fnd As IA’t As Dev% Pass/Fail

7,01 /7.01 PH 7.01 PH 7.01 7.01 0.00% Pass4.01 /4.01 PH 4.01 PH 4.01 4.01 0.00% Pass

Group # 2 Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name Turbidity Reading Ace % 3.0000Stated Accy Pet of Reading Plus/Minus 0.00

Noun in Vai/ In Val In Type Out Vat Out Type Fnd As Lft As Dev% Pass/Fall

0,0010.00 NTU 0.00 NYU 0.00 0.00 0.00% Pass00.00 / 800.00 NYU 800.00 NYU 800.00 800.00 0.00% Pass

Group # 3 Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name Conductivity Reading Ace % 3.0000Stated Accy Pet of Reading PhisIMijiu 0.000

Noni In Vai/ In VaJ in Type Out Vat Out Type Fnd As LftA L)ev% Pass/Fail

0.7181 0.718 ms/em 0.718 ms/cm 0.7 18 0.718 0.00% Pass5.000 / 5.000 ms/cm 5.000 ms/em 5.000 5.000 0.00% Pass80000 / 80.000 ms/cm 80.000 ms/cm 80.000 80.000 0.00% Pass

Group # 4 Range Ace % 00000Group Name Redox (ORP) Reading Acc % 3.0000Stated Accy Pet ofReading Plus/Minus 0.00

Nom En Vail In Vai In Type Out Vat Out Type Fnd As LII As Dev% Pass/Fail

240.00/240.00 my 240.00 my 240.00 240.00 0.00% Pass

Group # S Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name Disoived Oxygen Zero Reading Aec % 3.0000Stated Acey Pet of Reading Plus/Minus 0.00

Pine Environnientai Services, inc, Windsor Industrial Park, 92 North Main Street. Bldg 20, Windsor, NJ 08561, 80030l9663www.pineenvironmentaLcorn


Fine Environmental Services, Inc.

4037 Darling CourtUihurn, GA 30047

Toll-free: (800) 842-1082


Instrument ID 13041

Description Floriba U-53

calibrated 2/24/2011

Group # Range Ace % 0 0000Group Name Disolved Oxygen Zero Reading Ace % 10000

Stated Accy Pet of Reading Plus/Minus 0.00

om hi Vail In Val jjjJ2e OjYj1 nLixm. Pass/Fm!0 00 /0 00 mg/I 0 00 tng/L 0 00 0 00 0 00% Pass

Group # 6 Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name Temperature DO Span Reading Ace % 0.0000

Stated Acc Plus / Minus Plus/Minus 0.00

Nom in Val/In Vii 1nTpe Outs l Out ry I’m! ‘s Lit De% P455/Fall

20.00 / 20.00 degrees C 8,84 mg/L 8.84 8.84 000% Pass

Test Instruments Used Durin the Calibration (As Of’ Cal Entry Date)

Serial Number? iext Cal Date /Test Standard ID l>escritiou Manufacturer Model Number Lot Number Last Cal Date EMlirationI)atc

GA 0804 ODO GA DO ZERO Hanna H17040 0804 4/30/2013GA 2-ACOO-8 GA PH 4 Anneal 8596 1/6/2012GA P1-110 VWR PHIO 1007143 1211/2011BDHOI9O2OLGA P117 VWR 2008193 7/31/2012BDHO 1 94-20LGA ORP 2695 ORP SOLUTION 240 Hanna 2695 9/30/2015

mV


Calibration Result Calibration SuccessfiulWho Calibrated Robert Hall

All instruments are caHbratcd by Pine Environmental Services, Inc. according to the manufac:ture?sspecifications, but it is the custome?s responsibility to calibrate and maintain this unit in accordaice with the

manufacturer’s specifications and/or the customer’s own specific needs.Notify Vim’ Tinvirnnmnta1 Services. he, of any defect within 24 hours of receipt of equipment

Please cult 866.-960-7463 for Technical Assistance

Pine Environmental Services, Inc.. Windsor Industrial Park, 92 North Main Street. Bldg 20, Windsor, NJ 08561, 800-301-9663www.pine—environnentaicom

I



4037 Darling CourtlAIhurn, GA 3004?

Toll-free: (800) 842-1088


Instrument II) 13041

Description Floriba 1.1-53

Calibrated 2/24/201 1

Manufacturer floriba ClassificationModel Number U-53 Status Pass

Serial Number? Lot su3pegv Temp C 21Num herLocation Georiga Humidity % 4$

Department

aiThaflon Specifications

Group # I Range Ace % 0.0000

Group Name PH Reading Ace % 3.000(>

Stated Accy Pct of Reading Plus/Minus 0.00

rorn In ‘/aI./ In Vat In Tvoe Out Vat Out.Tvne FndAs Lit As Dev% Pass/Fail

7.01 / 7.01 PH 7,01 P11 3.00 7.01 0.00% Pass4.01 14.01 PH 4.01 P1-I 4.01 401 0,00% Pass

Group # 2 Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name Turbidity Reading Ace % 3.(>000

Stated Accy Pci of Reading PIus/Minus 0.00

Nom In Vail In Vat In Type Out Vat Out Type Futi As LIt As Day% Pass/Fail

0.00 / 0.00 NTh 0.00 NTh 0.00 0.00 0.00% Pass800.00 / 800.00 NTU 800.00 NTh 800.00 800,00 0.00% Pass

Group # 3 Range Ace % 0.0000GrQup Name Conductivity Reading Aec % 3.0000Stated Acey Pci of Reading Plus/Minus 0.000

Narn In . ‘tI / In Val In I pe Outs at Ouj Fod s LiLs Dtv% Pass/F ut

0.718/0.718 ms/em 0.718 ms/cm (>718 0,718 0.00% Pass5.000 / 5.000 ms/cnl 5.000 ms/em 5.000 5.000 0.00% Pass80 000/ 80 000 mc/ern 0 000 ms/cm 80 000 80 000 0 00% Pass

Group // 4 Range 4cc % 0 0000Group Name Redox (ORP) Reading Ace % 3.0000Stated Accy Pet of Reading Plus/Minus 0.00

Nom In Vat/hi Vai in Type Out Vat Out Type Fud As LftAs Dev% Pass/Fail240 00’ 240 00 on 240 00 m 240 00 240 00 0 00% Pass

Group # 5 Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name .Disolved Oxygen Zero Reading Aec % 3.0000Stated Accy Pet of Reading PIus/Minus 0.00

Pine Cnvironrnentd Services Inc.. Windsor Industrial Park, 92 North Main Street, 131dg20. V%indsor,NJ 0861 800-301-9663www pine-ens ironmental corn

. . .‘


Pine Environmental Services, lnii,4037 Darling CourLilbum, GA 30047

ToIl..free: (800) 842’ 1088


Instrument ID 16556

Description 1-loriba U-52

Calibrated 39/20 11

Group;# 5 Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name Disolved Oxygen Zero Reading Ace % 3.0000Stated Acey Pet of Reading Pius/Minus 0.00

Nom In Vat/Ip Vat Ji Out V’il Out rype End s ix4 Pass/Fad

0 00/000 mg/L 000 nig/L 000 0 00 0 00% Pass


Stated Accy Pius / Minus Plus/Minus 0.00

Nom inVal/in Vat In Type Out Vat Out Type Fad As Lft As Dev% Pass/Fail

20.00/ 2000 degrees C 8.84 mg/L 8,84 8.84 0.00% Pass

Test Instruments U d:DIxrinu the Calibration (As Of Cal Entry Date)Serial Number / Next Cal Date I

Test Standard ID Description Manufacturer Model Number Lot Number Last Cal Date Expiration j)atoGA 0804 ODO GA DO ZERO Manna 1-117040 0804 4/30/2013

GA 2-ACOO-$ I Auto Cal Anneal 8569 1/6/2012GA PN7 VWR 2008193 7/31/201213D1 101 94-20LGA ORP 2695 ORP SOLU I ION 240 Manna 2695 9,3012015

rnV(rA 2 A00-8 /hRO JURBIDI IV Anneal 00 U 8596 h6/20120,0 SOLUTION


Calibration Result Calibration SuccessfUl.Whø Calibrated Robert [lal I

All instruments are calibrated by Pine Environmental Services. Inc. according to the manufacturers

specifications, but it is the customers responsibility to calibrate and maintain this unit in accordance with the

manufacturer’s specifications and/or the customer’s own specific needs.

Notify Pine Environmental Services, inc of any defect within 24 hours of receipt of equipmentPlease call 866-960-7463 for Technical Assistance

Pine Environmental Services, inc. Windsor Industrial Park, 92 North Main Street, 131dg20, Windsor. Ni 08561, 800-301-9663 .

www.pine-environrnental.eom

/


Pine Environmental Services, Inc.4037 Darling CourtLilburn, GA 30047

Toll-free: (800) 842-1088

Pine Environmental Services, Inc

Instrument ID 17140

Description Horiha U”53

Calibrated 3/31/2011

Manufacturer Horiba State CertifiedModel Number U-53 Status Pass

Serial Number/Lot .SPXOCFOK TeinpC 20NumberLocation Georgia Humidity % 68

Department

Cilibration Specifications

Group # I Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name PH Reading Ace % 3.0000

Stated Accy Pet of Reading PIus/Minus 0.00

Nom In VaILIn Val In Type Out Val Out T’’pe Fm! As EftAs [>ey% pass/Fail

7.01 17.01 PH 7.0.1 PH 7.01 7.01 0.00% Pass4.01 /4.01. PH 4.01. PH 4.01 4.01 0.00% Pass

Group # 2 Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name Turbidity Reading Ace % 3.0000


Nom In Vai/ In Val In Type Out Val Out iyp Fad As Lit As fly% Pass/Fail

0.00 / 0.00 NTU 0.00 NTU 0.00 0.0() 0,00% Pass800.00 / 800,00 NTti 800.00 NTU 800.00 800.00 0,00% Pass

Group # 3 Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name conductivity Reading Ace % 3.0000Stated Aecy Pet of Reading Plus!Mlnus 0.000

Noni In Vail In Val In Type Out Va! Out Type Fad As Lft As Dev% Pass/Fail

0.778./0.718 ms/cm 0,718 ms/cm 0.718 0.71$ 0.00% Pass5.000 / .5,000 rns1cm 5.000 ms1cm 5.000 5.000 0.00% Pass80 000/80 000 ms m ) 000 ins cm 80 000 80 000 0 00% Pass

Group # 4 Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name Redox (ORP) Reading Ace % 3.0000Stated Acey Pet ofReading Plus/Minus 0.00

Noni In VaI/ tn Vat In Type Out Val Out Type Fad As LftAs Dev% Pass/Fail

240.001 240.00 fly 240.00 mv 240.00 240.00 0.00% Pass

Group # 5 Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name Disolved Oxygen Zero Reading Ace % 3.0000


Pine Environmental Services, Inc., Windsor industrial Park, 92 North Main Street, Bldg 20, Windsor, NJ 08561, 800301-9663www. pine-e.nv ironmenal.corn

INSTRUMENT CALJBTiON REPORT

Pine Environmental Services, Inc.4037 Darling CourtLilburn, GA 30047

ToN-free: (800) 842-1088


Instrument ID 17140

Description Horiba U-53Calibrated 3.G1/201 1

Group # 5 Range Ace % 0.0000Group Name Disoived Oxygen Zero Reading Ace % 3.0000Stated Accy Pet of Reading Pius/Minus 000

Nem In Vai/ inVal InZ[yp Out % al Out hpe End i I ft As De’.% Pass/Fail

0 00 000 mg’L 000 mg’L 001) 000 0 00% t’ass


Stated Accy Plus / Minus PIus/Minus 0,00

Nom In Vail In Val In Type Out VaI Out Typ ind As Lit As Dev% Pass/Fail

20 00 ‘20 00 dLCS( 8 84 mg/I S 54 5 84 0 00% P’tss

Test Instruments Used Duriri the Calibration (As Of Cal Entry Date)

Serial Number! Next Cal Date ITest Standard ID Description Manufacturer Model \uniber Lot Number Last Cal Date!, expiration Date

Opened DateGA 2-ACOO-$ GA PH 4 Aurical 8596 176/2012GA PH7 VWR 2008193 7/31/2012BDHO I 94-20LGA OR1’ 269 ORP SOLUTION 2 tO Han!a 2695 9 392015

mVGA-2-ACOO-8 ZERO TURBIDITY Anneal 0.0 NTU 8596 1/6/20120.0 SOLUTION


Calibration Result Calibration SuccessfulWho Calibrated Robert Hall

All instruments are calibrated by Pine Environmental Services, Inc. according to the manufacturer’sspecifications, but it is the customer’s responsibility to calibrate and maintain this unit in accordance with the

manufacturer’s specifications and/or the customer’s own specific needs.

Notity Pine Environmental Services, Inc. of any defect within 24 hours of receipt of equipmentIicatc call S66-960-7463 for Technical Asitance

IPine Environmental Services, Inc., Windsor Industrial Park, 92 North Main Street, Bldg 20, Windsor, NJ 08561, 800-301-9663

www.pine-enviromnentatcom

APPENDIX C

SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ANALYTICALREPORTS

gc7Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.

ANALYHcAL ENVIRONMENTAL SaRvicEs, INC.

AES

December 01, 2010

Ken MooreSouthern Monitoring and Enviromnental, LLC4255 Prather FarmerCumming GA 30040

TEL: (770) 653-4891FAX:

RE: Pro Cleaners

Dear Ken Moore: Order No: 1011K49

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received 3 samples on 11/23/2010 3:50:00 PMfor the analyses presented in following report.

No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated

Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies

associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a

project Case Narrative.AES’ certifications are as follows:-NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water,

soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/10-06/30/11.

-AIHA Certification ID #10067 1 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics),

Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal)

effective until 09/01/11.

These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full.

If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.

James Forrest

Project Manager

3785 P i;w.w • Au.’’:, 30310 • Tu c770) 1578I77 • FAX: (770)4378iS8

Page 1 of 10

AN

AL

YT

IC

AL

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

SE

RV

IC

ES

,IN

C

3785

Presid

en

tial

Parkw

ay,

Atlanta

GA

30

34

0-3

70

4

AE

ST

EL

.:(770)457-8177

/T

OL

L-F

RE

E(800)

97

2-4

88

9!F

AX

:(770)457-8188

CH

AIN

OF

CU

ST

OD

YW

ork

Ord

er:

()(((‘(

qq

__

lot.

±

Whit

eC

opy

-O

rig

inaI

Yel

low

Cop

y-

Cli

ent

Pag

e2

of10

Date:/t

Pag

e

DM

PA

NY

——

—

——

—

—V

isit

our

web

site

-ei’tL

)({

toch

eckonth

esta

tuso

fH

ON

E.

•4,’

3<

qj

FA

X.

Uyo

urre

sult

s,pl

ace

bott

leSA

MPL

EDB

Y:

S1G

,)L

A

orde

rs, e

tc.

SAM

PLE

D

SSA

MPL

EID

PRE

SER

VA

TIO

N(S

eeco

des)

.

RE

MA

RK

S

DA

TE

TIM

EC)

Sfr1

(1

Ai1/

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

EE

E

8 9 10 11 12

__________

——

__

14I

EL

INIS

DB

Y,

DA

TE

/TIM

ER

EC

EIV

ED

BY

/D

AT

E/T

IMF

PR

OJE

CT

INF

OR

MA

TIO

NR

EC

EIP

T—

iI

I.j

I‘R

OlE

ÂM

E1

(1( 3

%O

J/

/p

Tot

alS

ofC

onta

rner

s

2

::T

DE

SS

.f4

I9ta5B

inessD

a3:

3:L)

Cf

1/1%

jj,

j,

C)2

Bus

ines

sD

ayR

ush

SEN

DR

EPO

RT

TO

&‘)

V’Q

I2.5

jt’iif

“C)

Nex

tBus

ines

sD

ayR

ush

3PB

CIA

LIN

ST

RU

CT

ION

S/C

OM

ME

NT

S:

sHIP

ME

NT

ME

TH

OD

INV

oIC

ETO

:0

Sam

eD

ayR

ush

(aut

hre

q.)

our

//

VIA

(IF

DIF

FER

EN

TF

RO

MA

BO

VE

)Q

Oth

er

IN/

/V

IA:

STA

TEPR

OG

RAM

(ifan

y)C

LIE

NT

Fed

Ex

UPS

MA

ILC

OU

RIE

RE

-mai

l?Y

IN

;Fa

x?V

IN

GR

EY

HO

UN

DO

TH

ER

-Q

UO

TE:

P08:

DA

TA

PAC

KA

GE

:I

IIII

IIV

SA

MP

LE

SR

EC

EIV

ED

AF

tER

3PM

OR

SA

TU

RD

AY

AR

EC

ON

SID

ER

ED

AS

RE

CE

IVE

DO

NT

HE

NE

XT

BU

SIN

ESS

DA

Y;

IFN

OT

AT

ISM

AR

KE

DO

NC

OC

AE

SW

ILL

PR

OC

EE

DA

SST

AN

DA

RD

TA

T.

SA

MP

LE

SA

RE

DIS

PO

SE

DO

F30

DA

YS

AF

TE

RC

OM

PL

ET

iON

OP

RE

PO

RT

UN

LE

SSO

TH

ER

AR

RA

NG

EM

EN

TS

AR

EM

AD

E.

MA

TR

IXC

OD

ES.

AA

ir(3

W=

Gro

undw

ater

SESe

dim

ent

SOSo

ilSW

=Su

d)ic

eW

ater

WW

ater

(Bla

nks)

DW

=I)

rink

ing

Wat

er(B

lank

s)0

=O

ther

(spe

cify

)W

W=

Was

teW

ater

PRE

SER

VA

TIV

EC

OD

ES.

H+I

Hyd

roch

lori

cac

id4

iceI

Ice

only

NN

itric

arid

S+I

=Su

lfuric

acid

÷ice

SIK

4+I

=So

dium

Bis

ulfa

te/M

etha

nol

+ic

e0

Oth

er(s

pec

it)

NA

Non

e

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 1-Dec-10

Client: Southern Monitoring and Environmental, LLC Client Sample ID: MW-9Project: Pro Cleaners Collection Date: 11/23/2010 2:50:00 PMLab ID: 101 1K49-00l Matrix: Groundwater

Reporting DilutionAnalyses Result Qual Units BatchlD Date Analyzed Analyst

Limit Factor

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5O3OB)

1,1,1-Trichloroethane BRL 5.0 uWL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

1,1,2-Trichioroethane BRL 5.0 uWL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

1,1-Dichioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

1,1-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 ugIL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

1,2-Dichloroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

1,2-Dichloropropane BRL 5.0 uglL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB



2-Butanone BRL 50 ugJL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

2-Hexanone BRL 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Acetone BRL 50 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Benzene BRL 5.0 ugIL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Bromodichloromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Bromoform BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Bromomethane BR.L 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Carbon disulfide BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Carbon tetrachioride BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Chlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Chioroethane BRL 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Chloroform BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Chioromethane BRL 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Cyclohexane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Dibromochioromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Dichiorodifluoromethane BRL 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Ethylbenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Freon-113 BRL 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Isopropylbenzene BRL 5.0 uWL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

m,p-Xylene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Methyl acetate BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 ugiL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Methylcyclohexane BR.L 5.0 ugIL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

o-Xylene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Quaiifierst * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)

BRL Below reporting limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See case narrative

N Aualyte not NELAC certified NC Not confirmed

B Analyte detected in the associated method blank < Less than Result value

> Greater than Result value

Page 3oflO


Client: Southern Monitoring and Environmental, LLC Client Sample ID: MW-9Project: Pro Cleaners Collection Date: 11/23/2010 2:50:00 PMLab ID: 101 1K49-001 Matrix: Groundwater

Analyses ResultReporting

Qual Units BatchlDDilution

Date Analyzed AnalystLimit Factor


Styrene BRL 50 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SBTetrachloroethene 73 5.0 ugJL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Toluene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Trichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Vinyl chloride BRL 2.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.4 64.7-130 %REC 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 109 80.7-129 %REC 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SBSurr: Toluene-d8 98.4 71.1-120 %REC 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:08 SB

Qunlifierst Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantit.ation range)

BRL Below reporttag limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix


N Analyse not NELAC certified NC Not confirmed

B AnalySe detected in the associated method blank < Less than Result value


Page 4 of 10


Client: Southern Monitoring and Environmental, LLC Client Sample ID: MW-8Project: Pro Cleaners Collection Date: 11/23/2010 3:15:00 PM

Lab ID: 101 1K49-002 Matrix: Groundwater


Limit Factor


1,1,1-Trichioroethane BRL 5.0 ugfL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

1,1,2-Trichioroethane BRL 5.0 ugfL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

1,1-Dichioroethane BR.L 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

1,l-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB


1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB




1,2-Dichioropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB



2-Butanone BR.L 50 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB



Acetone BRL 50 u5/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Benzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Bromodichloromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Bromoform BRI 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Bromomethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB


Carbon tetrachloride BRL 5.0 Ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Chlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Chloroethane BRL 10 ugJL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB


Chioromethane BRL 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 22 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BR.L 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB


Dibromochloromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Dichiorodifluoromethane BR.L 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Ethylbenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Freon-113 BRL 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Isopropylbenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

m,p-Xylene BRL 5.0 ugfL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB


Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Methyleyclohexane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 uWL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

o-Xylene BRL 5.0 isg/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Quaiiners: * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)



N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not confirmed



Page 5oflO


Client: Southern Monitoring and Environmental, LLC Client Sample ID: MW-8Project: Pro Cleaners Collection Date: 11/23/2010 3:15:00 PMLab ID: 101 1K49-002 Matrix: Groundwater





Styrene BRL 5.0 uWL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Tetrachloroethene 1200 50 ug/L 138754 10 11/30/2010 13:31 OK



trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Trichloroethene 35 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Vinyl chloride BRL 2.0 uWL 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 78.2 64.7-130 %REC 138754 10 11/30/2010 13:31 OK

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 96 9 64.7-130 %REC 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 110 80.7-129 %REC 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 113 80.7-129 %REC 138754 10 11/30/2010 13:31 GK

Surr:Toluene-d8 92.5 71.1-120 %REC 138754 10 11/30/2010 13:31 GK

Surr: Toluene-d8 98.9 71.1-120 %REC 138754 1 11/29/2010 19:36 SB

Qualifiers: * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitatlon lunge)






Page 6 of 10


Client: Southern Monitoring and Environmental, LLC Client Sample ID: BLANKProject: Pro Cleaners Collection Date: 1 1/23/20 10

Lab ID: 101 1K49-003 Matrix: Aqueous


Limit Factor

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SWSO3OB)

1,1,1-Trichioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

1,1,2-Trichioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

1,1-Dichloroethane BRL 5.0 uWL 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

1,1-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB


1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB




1,2-Dichioropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ugJL 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB


2-Butanone BRL 50 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB



Acetone BRL 50 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Benzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Bromodichioromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Bromoform BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Bromomethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB


Carbon tetrachioride BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Chlorobenzene BRL 5.0 iag/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Chloroethane BRL 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB


Chloromethane BRL. 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 uWL 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB


Dibromochioromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 10 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Ethylbenzene BRL 5.0 uWL 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Freon-113 BRL 10 ugJL 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Isopropylbenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

m,p-Xylene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB


Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Methylcyclohexane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

o-Xylene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Qualifiers: Value exceeds maximum contaminant level B Estimated (value above quantitatlon range)


H Holding times for preparation or aoalysis exceeded Narr See vase narrative




Page 7 of 10


Client: Southern Monitoring and Environmental, LLC Client Sample ID: BLANKProject: Pro Cleaners Collection Date: 1 1/23/20 10Lab ID: 101 1K49-003 Matrix: Aqueous





Styrene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Tetrachioroethene BRL 5.0 ugfL 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB



trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ugfL 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Trichioroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Trichlorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Vinyl chloride BR.L 2.0 ugJL 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 64.7-130 %REC 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Sum Dibromofluoromethane 117 80.7-129 %REC 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Surr:Toluene-d8 102 71.1-120 %REC 138754 1 11/29/2010 15:26 SB

Qualifiers: * value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)

BRI Below reporting limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix



B Analyse detected in the associated method blank < Less than Result value


Page 8 of 10

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc.

Sample/Cooler Receipt Checklist

Client

__________________________________________——

Work Order Number

Checidist completed by _1iSignaLure Date

Carrier name: FedEx U PS Courier — Client Mail Other

_____________

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No — Not Present —

Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes — No — Not Present

Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes — No — Not Present

Container/Temp l3lank temperature in compliance? (4°C+2)* Yes No

Cooler ill Cooler #2

________

Cooler #3

________

Cooler #4

________

Cooler#5

________

Cooler #6

_______

Chain of custody present? Yes No —

Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes No —

Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes No —

Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes I No —

Sample containers intact? Yes No —

Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes 7 No —

All samples received within holding time? Yes .1” No —

Was TAT marked on the COC? Yes I No —

Proceed with Standard TAT as per project history? Yes No — Not Applicable —

Water - VOA vials have xero lieadspace? No VOA vials submitted Yes No —

Water-

p11 acceptable upon receipt? Yes -“ No — Not Applicable —

Adjusted? Checked by

Sample Condition: Good/ Other(Explain)

(For diffusive samples or AtilA lead) Es a known blank included? Yes No

See Case Narrative for resolution of the Non-Conformance.

Sampte do not have to compty wilt, he 5iven Lange for certain parameters.

\t Qttaliiy Assurance\Checklists Proced,ties Sign-Off Temptates\Checklists\Sample Receipt Checklists\Samp!c_Cooler..Receipt_Checklist

Page 9 of 10

Ana

lyti

cal

Env

iron

men

tal

Ser

vice

s,In

cD

ate:

1-D

ec-1

0

Clie

nt:

Sou

ther

nM

onit

orin

gan

dE

nvir

onm

enta

l,L

LC

Pro

ject

:P

roC

lean

ers

Dat

esR

eport

Lab

Ord

er:

101

1K

49

Lab

Sam

ple

IDC

lien

tS

ampl

eID

Col

lect

ion

Dat

eM

atri

xT

est

Nam

eT

CL

PD

ate

Pre

pD

ate

Ana

lysi

sD

ate

1011

K49

-001

AM

W-9

11/2

3/20

102:

50:0

0PM

Gro

undw

ater

TC

LV

OLA

TILE

OR

GA

NIC

S11

/271

2010

1112

9/20

1010

11K

49-0

02A

MW

-S11

/23/

2010

3:15

:00P

MG

roun

dwat

erT

CL

VO

LA

TIL

EO

RG

AN

ICS

11/2

7/20

1011

/29/

2010

1011

K49

-002

AM

W-S

11/2

3/20

103:

15:0

0PM

Gro

undw

ater

TC

LV

OL

AT

ILE

OR

GA

NIC

S11

/27/

2010

1113

0120

1010

11K

49-0

03A

BLA

NK

11/2

3/20

1012

:00:

00A

MA

queo

usT

CL

VO

LA

TIL

EO

RG

AN

ICS

11/2

7/20

1011

/29/

2010

Pag

e10

of10

ANAimcAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVIcEs, INC.

AES

February 18, 2011

Matt Trammel!ECT6410 Southpoint Pkwv Ste 120Jacksonville FL 32216

TEL: (678) 207-7697FAX: (770) 252-0029

RE: JNV Investments

Dear Mafl Trammell: Order No: 11 02C3 I


No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associatedQuality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepanciesassociated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of aproject Case Narrative.AES’ certifications are as follows:-NELAC/Florida Certification number E875 82 for analysis of Environmental Water,soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/10-06/30/11.-AIHA Certification ID #100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics),Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal)effective until 09/01/11.


If you have any questions regarding these test results, please fee! free to call.

Kathleen Betsill

Project Manager

37S5 pc • [ ( 3Ø34( • fi (770) 4%7..j 77 • p\\: (770)45743188

Page 1 of 18

.A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

SE

RV

IC

ES

,IN

CC

HA

IN

OF

CU

ST

OD

Y

3785

Presidential

Parkw

ay,

Atlanta

GA

30

34

0-3

70

4

‘ES

TE

L.:

(7

70

)4

57

-8

17

7I T

OL

L-F

RE

E(8

00

)9

72

-4

88

9I

FA

X:

(770)457-8188

Dat

e:

Wor

kO

rder

:

Page

-

ON

1PA

NY

AD

DR

ES

S

ëc1

4to

So$iç

——

—

—V

isit

ourw

ebsi

teI.-

ww

w.a

esat

lant

a.co

mD

L(J

1Lei

L%

)to

chec

kon

the

stat

usof

HO

NE

.1

72

o—

ç3jf

rq

your

resu

lts,

plac

ebo

ttle

SA

•

Iri,

orde

rs, e

tc.

SA

MP

LE

D

SA

MP

LE

lID,<

PR

ES

ER

VA

TIO

N(S

eeco

des)

RE

MA

RK

S,

DA

TE

TIM

EC

viw

J—Ic

)JJ

hc’°Z

Erj-lL

’J

SM

tJ—

i.((,‘

)/15E

—S

,,

--

l>

fiii

—

6V

vw

—i-

-Qo

’)jL

:1,L

_,

EE

TW

&k

‘C

QU

IDB

YD

AT

E/T

IME

RE

CE

IVE

DB

YD

AT

E/T

IME

PR

OJE

CT

INF

OR

MA

TIO

NR

EC

EIP

T.

I.P

RO

JEC

TN

AM

E

-1’4

,%Z

/)..

Viu

kJ7s

To

tao

fC

onta

iner

s

2.P

RO

JEC

T#.

ound

Tim

eReq

ucst

SIT

EA

DD

RE

SS

:St

anda

rd5

Bus

ines

sD

ays

3a)

02

Bus

ines

sD

ayR

ush

SEN

T)

RE

PO

RT

TO

.Q

Nex

tB

usin

ess

Day

Rus

h

SPE

CIA

LIN

ST

RU

CT

ION

S/C

OM

ME

NT

S:

SH

IPM

EN

TM

ET

HO

DIN

VO

ICE

TO

:0

Sam

eD

ayR

ush

(auth

req.

)O

UT

IV

IA:

(IF

DIF

FE

RE

NT

FR

OM

AB

OV

E)

QO

ther

INI

/V

IA:

STA

TEPR

OG

RA

M(i

f any

):C

LIE

NT

FdE

xU

PSM

AIL

CO

UR

IER

E.m

ail?

YIN

.Fa

x?Y

/NG

RE

GM

)O

TH

ER

________

QT

JOT

E#

Fog

DA

TA

PA

CK

AG

E:

III

Ill

IVA

MP

LE

SR

EC

EIV

ED

AF

TE

R3P

MO

RS

AT

UR

DA

YA

RE

CO

NS

IDE

RE

DA

SR

EC

EIV

ED

ON

TH

EN

EX

TB

US

INE

SS

DA

Y;

IFN

OT

AT

ISM

AR

KE

DO

NC

OC

AE

SW

ILL

PR

OC

EE

DA

SS

TA

ND

AR

DT

AT

.C

AM

PL

ES

AR

ED

ISP

OS

ED

OF

30D

AY

SA

FT

ER

CO

MP

LE

TIO

NO

FR

EP

OR

TU

NL

ES

SO

TH

ER

AR

RA

NG

EM

EN

TS

AR

EM

AD

E.

MA

TR

iXC

OD

ES

:A

=A

irO

W=

Gro

undw

ater

SE

Sed

imen

tSO

Soil

SW

Sur

tkce

Wat

erW

Wat

er(B

lank

s)O

WD

rink

ing

Wat

er(B

lank

s)0=

Oth

er(s

peci

fy)

WW

=W

aste

Wat

erP

RE

SE

RV

AT

IVE

CO

DE

SH

+I

=H

ydro

chlo

ric

acid

1-ic

eI

=Ic

eon

lyN

=N

itri

cac

idSi

-IS

ulfu

ric

acid

+ic

eS/

lvI±

I=

Sod

ium

Bis

ulfa

te/M

etha

nol

+ic

e0

=O

ther

(spe

cify

)N

AN

oneW

hite

Cop

y-

Ori

gin

al;

Yel

low

Cop

y-

Clie

nt

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 18-Feb-il

Client: ECT

Project: JNV Investments Case NarrativeLab ID: 1102C31

The vials for sample 1 102C3 1 -OO1A were labeled “MW-il” while the ID on the COC was “MW-il (2’).” The samples were

reported according to the COC, as the collection date and time matched.

Page 3of 18

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 18-Feb-li

Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-il (2)

Project Name: INV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 10:00:00 AMLab ID: ll02C3l-00l Matrix: Soil


Limit Factor

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035)

l,1,1-Trichloroethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

l,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

i,1,2-Trichloroethane I3RL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

1,i-Dichloroethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

l,1-Dichloroethene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

l,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

1,2-Dichloroethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

1,2-Dichloropropane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

l,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE


2-Butanone BRL 0.045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

2-Hexanone BRL 0.0090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 0.0090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Acetone BR.L 0.090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Benzene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Bromodichioromethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Bromoform BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Bromomethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Carbon disulfide BRL 0.0090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Carbon tetrachioride BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Chlorobenzene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Chioroethane BRL 00090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Chloroform BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Chloromethane BRL 0.0090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

cis-l,2-Dichloroethene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

cis-i,3-Dichloropropene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Cyclohexane BR.L 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Dibromochloromethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 0.0090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Ethylbenzene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Freon-113 BRL 0.0090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Isopropylbenzene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

m,p-Xylene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Methyl acetate BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Methylcyclohexane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Methylene chloride BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

o-Xylene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Qualifiers: * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)



N Annlyte not NELAC certified NC Not confirmed


> Greater than Result value J Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page4ofl8


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-il (2’)Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 10:00:00 AMLab ID: 1102C31-001 Matrix: Soil





Styrene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Tetrachioroethene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Toluene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dny 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dty 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

trans-i,3-Dichloropropene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Trichioroethene BRL 0 0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Vinyl chloride BRL 0.0090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 56-137 %REC 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Sun-: Dibromofluoromethane 107 73.7-137 %REC 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

Sun-: Toluene-d8 99 69.2-126 %REC 142300 1 02/17/2011 22:58 JE

PERCENT MOISTURE D2216

PercentMoisture 23,7 0 wt% R190749 1 02/17/2011 17:00 AS

Qualifiers: * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level B Estimated (value above quantitation range)




B Analyte detected in the associated method blank < Lens than Result value

> Greater than Result value 3 Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 5 of 18


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-il (6)Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 10:15:00 AMLab ID: 1 102C3 1-002 Matrix: Soil





1,1,i-Trichloroethane BRL 00045 mg/Kg-dty 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

1, l,2-Trichloroethane BR.L 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE


1,1-Dichioroethene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

1,2,4-Triehlorobenzene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE


1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRI. 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 I 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

1,2-Dichioroethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 I 02/17/2011 23:24 JE




2-Butanone BRL 0.045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 I 02/17/2011 23:24 JE



Acetone BRL 0.090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE


Bromodichioromethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE



Carbon disulfide BR.L 0.0090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

Carbon tetrachioride BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE


Chioroethane BRL 0.0090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

Chloroform BRL 0.0045 tng/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

Chloromethane BRL 0.0090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

Cyclohexane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE


Dichiorodifluoromethane BR.L 0.0090 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE







Methylcyclohexane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 I 02/17/2011 23:24 JE



Qualifiers: • Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)


H Holding times for preparatton or analysts exceeded Narr See case narrative

N Analyte nor NELAC rectified NC Not confirmed

B Analyle detected in the associated method blank < i..ess than Result value

> Greater than Result voIce J Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 6 of 18

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 18-Feb41

Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-li (6)Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 10:15:00 AMLab ID: 1102C31-002 Matrix: Soil

AnalysesDilution

ResultReporting

Qual Units BatchlDFactor

Date Analyzed AnalystLimit

Percent Moisture 14.6 0 wt% R190749 02/17/2011 17:00 AS

Qualifiern: * Value exceeds maximum conlamiuanl level

BRL Below reporting limit

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N Analyle not NELAC certified

B Analyte detected in the associated method blank


E Estimated (value above qaantitalion range)

S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

Narr See case narrative

NC Not conErmed

< Less than Result value

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit




Toluene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 0.0045 tng/Kgdty 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

trans-I ,3-Dichloropropene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

Trichloroethene BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 0.0045 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE


Sun-: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99 56-137 %REC 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

Sun-: Dibromofluoromethane 110 73.7-137 %REC 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE

Sun-: Toluene-d8 109 69.2-126 %REC 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:24 JE


Page 7 of 18


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-il (10’)Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 10:30:00 AM

LabID: ii02C31-003 Matrix: Soil





i,i,1-Trichloroethane BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

1,1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

i,1-Dichloroethane BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

i,1-Dichloroethene BRL 0.005 1 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

i,2,4-Trichiorobenzene BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

i,2-Dibromoethane BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

i,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

i,2-Dichloroethane BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

1 ,2-Dichloropropane BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

i,3-Dichlorobenzene BRI 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

1,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 0.0051 lug/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE




Acetone BRL 0.10 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE


Bromodichloromethane BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

Bromoform I3RL 0.0051 tug/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE


Carbon disulfide BR.L 0.010 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

Carbon tetrachloride BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE




Chloromethane BR.L 0.010 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE


cis-i,3-Dichloropropene BR.L 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE



Dichiorodifluoromethane BRL 0.010 lug/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE


Freon-1l3 BRL 0.010 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/201123:49 JE


m,p-Xylene BRL 0.0051 nag/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE












Page 8of18

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 18-Feb-Il

Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-il (10’)Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 10:30:00 AMLab ID: 1102C31-003 Matrix: Soil


Limit Factor


Styrene BRL 0.0051 tng/Kg-dty 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

Tetrachloroethene BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

Toluene BRL 0.0051 tng/Kg-chy 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-cIty 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

Trichioroethene BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

Trichlorofluoromethane BRL 0.0051 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

Vinyl chloride BRL 0.0 10 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.1 56-137 %REC 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 108 73.7-137 %REC 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE

Surr: Toluene-d8 100 69.2-126 %REC 142300 1 02/17/2011 23:49 JE


PercentMoisture 22.6 0 wt% Rl90749 1 02/17/2011 17:00 AS

Qualifiers: * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quanlilation range)

BRL Below reporting limit S Spike Recovery outside limits dae to matrix

H Holdiag times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See case narrative


B Analyte detected in the associated method blank Less than Result value


Page 9of 18


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-12 (2’)Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 10:45:00 AMLab ID: 1102C31-004 Matrix: Soil





1,1,1-Trichloroethane BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

1,1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

1,1-Dichioroethane BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

1,1-Dichioroethene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

l,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE


l,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

1,2-Dichloroethane BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE



l,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE


2-Hexanone BRL 0.0085 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 0.0085 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Acetone BRL 0.085 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Benzene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Bromodichloromethane BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE


Bromomethane BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Carbon disulfide BRL 0.0085 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Carbon tetrachloride BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Chlorobenzene BRL 0.0042 ang/Kgday 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Chloroethane BRL 0.0085 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE


Chloromethane BRL 0.0085 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

cis-l,3-Dichloropropene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Cyclohexane BRL 0,0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Dibromochloromethane BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Dichiorodifluoromethane BRL 0.0085 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Ethylbenzene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Freon-113 BRL 0.0085 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Isopropylbenzene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

m,p-Xylene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Methyl acetate BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Methylcyclohexane BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 I 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Methylene chloride BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

o-Xylene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE






> Greater than Resalt value I Estimated valae detected below Reporting Limit

Page 10 of 18


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-12 (2’)Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 10:45:00 AMLab ID: 1102C31-004 Matrix: Soil


Qual Units BatchiDDilution



Styrene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE



trans- 1,2-Dichioroethene BRL 0.0042 ing/Kgdiy 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

trans-i,3-Dichloropropene BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE


Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 0.0042 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE



Sum Dibromofluoromethane 108 73.7-137 %REC 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE

Sun-: Toluene-d8 102 69 2-126 %REC 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:15 JE


PercentMoisture 20.9 0 wl% R190749 1 02/17/2011 17:00 AS

Qualifiere: * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)

BRL Below reporting limit S Spike Recovery ouEide limits due to matrix

H Holding times for prepamtton or anslysis exceeded Narr See case narrative




Page 11 of 18


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-12 (6)Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 1100:00 AMLab ID: 1102C31-005 Matrix: Soil





1,1,1-Trichioroethane BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 0040 JE

1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane BRL 00061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE

1,1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE

1,1-Dichioroethane BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE

1,1-Dichioroethene BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 0.006 1 tng/Kg-diy 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 0.0061 mg/Kgdry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE


1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/201100:40 JE

1,2-Dichioroethane BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 0040 JE

1,2-Dichioropropane BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE


1,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 0.006! mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE



4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 0.0 12 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE



Bromodichloromethane BRL 0.006 1 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE



Carbon disulfide . BRL 0.012 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE

Carbon tetrachloride BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE




Chioromethane BRL 0.012 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE



Cyclohexane BRL 0.0061 tng/Kgdiy 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE

Dibromochioromethane BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE

Dichiorodifluoromethane BRL 0.012 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE






Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 0.006! mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE

Methylcyclohexane BR.L 0.0061 tttg/Kgdry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE


o-Xylene BRL 00061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE


BRL Below reperting limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H Holding times for preparation or anulysis exceeded Narr See case narrative




Page 12 of 18


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-12 (6)Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 11:00:00 AMLab ID: 1102C31-005 Matrix: Soil


Limit Factor



Tetrachloroethene BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE

Toluene BRL 0.006] mg/Kg-dty 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JEtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE


Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 0.0061 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE



Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 109 73.7-137 %REC 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JESun-: Toluene-d8 99.3 69.2-126 %REC 142300 1 02/18/2011 00:40 JE


Percent Moisture 19.8 0 wt% R190749 1 02/17/201117:00 AS

Qualifiers: a Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)




B Analyte detected in the asseciated method blank < Less than Result valne

> Greater than Resutt value 3 Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 13 of 18


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-12 (10)Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 11:15:00 AMLab ID: 1 102C3 1-006 Matrix: Soil


Limit Factor


1,1,1-Trichioroethane BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BR.L 0.0028 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

1, 1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

1,1-Dichioroethane BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

1,1-Dichioroethene BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BR.L 0.0028 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/201 I 01:06 JE


1,2-Dichlorobenzene I3RL 0.0028 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE


1,2-Dichloropropane BR.L 0.0028 mg/Kg-dry 142300 I 02/18/2011 01:06 JE




2-Hexanone BR.L 0.0055 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE




Bromodichloromethane BR.L 0.0028 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE


Bromomethane BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE


Carbon tetrachloride BR.L 0.0028 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

Chlorobenzene BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-cIty 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

Chloroethane BRL 0.0055 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE


Chioromethane BRI 0.0055 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

cis- i,2-Dichloroethene BR.L 0.002 8 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE




Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 0.0055 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

Ethylbenzene BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 0 1:06 JE

Freon-i 13 BRL 0.0055 mg/Kg-dry 142300 I 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

Isopropylbenzene BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-cIty 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE


Methyl acetate BRL 0.0028 ing/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-cIty 142300 I 02/18/2011 01:06 JE




Qualifiers: Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)





> Greater than Result value I Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 14 of 18


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-12 (10’)Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011 11:15:00 AM

Lab ID: 1102C31-006 Matrix: Soil




TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8Z6OB (SW5035)



Toluene BRL 0.0028 fig/Kg-dry 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

trans-i ,2-Dichloroethene BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-diy 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

trans-l,3-Dichloropropene BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-day 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

Trichioroethene BRL 0.0028 mg/Kg-dty 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

Trichlorofluoromethane BRI. 0.0028 mg/Kg-thy 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE


Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 56-137 %REC 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane lii 73.7-137 %REC 142300 1 02/18/2011 01:06 JE

Surr:Toluene-d8 100 69.2-126 %REC 142300 1 02/18/201101:06 JE


Percent Moisture 19.9 0 wt% R190749 1 02/17/2011 17:00 AS




N Anatyte not NELAC certified NC Not confirmed



Page 15 of 18


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK

Project Name: NV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011

Lab ID: 11 02C3 1-007 Matrix: Aqueous


Limit Factor

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SWS26OB (SW5O3OB)

I,1,l-Trichloroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

1,l,2-Trichloroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

l,1-Dichloroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

I,1-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 uWL 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

l,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

1,2-Dichioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

1,2-Dichloropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK


2-Butanone BRL 50 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

2-Hexanone BRL 10 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 10 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Acetone BRL 50 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Benzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Bromodichioromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Bromoform BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Bromomethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Carbon disulfide BRL 5.0 ugfL 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 (1K

Carbon tetrachioride BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/201122:06 GK

Chlorobenzene BRL 50 ugJL 142233 I 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Chioroethane BRL 10 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Chloroform BRL 5.0 ugfL 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 (1K

Chioromethane BRL 10 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 (1K

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 (1K

cis-l,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Cyclohexane BRL 5.0 tigfL 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Dibromochioromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 (1K

Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 10 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/201122:06 (1K

Ethylbenzene BRL 5.0 uWL 142233 1 02/17/201122:06 (1K

Freon-113 BRL 10 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/201122:06 (1K

Isopropylbenzene BRL 5.0 na/L 142233 1 02/17/201122:06 GK

m,p-Xylene BRL 5.0 ua/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Methyl acetate BRL 5.0 ua/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 (1K

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 na/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 (1K

Methylcyclohexane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 (1K

o-Xylene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 (1K

Quahfiers: Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation rouge)


H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nan See case narrative

N Analyte fbI NELAC certified NC Not confirmed

B Anulyte detected in the associated method blank < Less than Resull value


Page 16 of 18


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANKProject Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/15/2011Lab ID: 11 02C3 1-007 Matrix: Aqueous


Limit Factor


Styrene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Tetrachioroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Toluene BR-L 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

trans-i,2-Dichloroethene BR.L 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

trans-i,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Trichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 I 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Vinyl chloride BRL 2.0 ug/L 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 89.1 64.7-130 %REC 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK


Surr: Toluene-d8 97.1 71.1-120 %REC 142233 1 02/17/2011 22:06 GK

Qualifiers: C Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitalion runge)

BRI. Below reporting limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix




> Greater than Resalt value J Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 17 of 18



A I’ li IAf) 9

Client ‘“ Work Order Number

______________________

Checklist completed by VSignature Date

Carrier name: FedEx — UPS — Courier — Client — US Mail Other

___________

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes — No — Not Present —


Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes No — Not Present —

0 *Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? (4 C±2) Yes — No —

Z (fo/

____ ____ ____ ____

Cooler#l‘ L Cooler#2

_______

Cooler#3

______

Cooler#4

______

Cooler#5

______

Cooler#6

______

Chain of custody present? Yes — No —


Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes — No —

Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes — No —


Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes — No

All samples received within holding time? Yes _‘ No —

Was TAT marked on the COC? Yes — No —

Proceed with Standard TAT as per project history? Yes . No — Not Applicable —

Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? No VOA vials submitted — Yes — No —

Water - p11 acceptable upon receipt? Yes — No Not Applicable —

Adjusted?

_______________

Checked by V

Sample Condition: Good _‘ Other(Explain)

(For diffusive samples or AHIA lead) Is a known blank included? Yes — No


* Samples do not have to comply with the given range for certain parameters.

\L\Quality Assiirance\Checklists Procedures Sign-Off Templates\Checklists\Sample Receipt Checklists\Sarnple_Cooler_ReceiptChecklist

Page 18 of 18

ANAL’rncAL. ENVIRONMENTAL SERvICEs, INC.

AES

March 07, 2011

Ken MooreECT6410 SouthpointPkwy Ste 120Jacksonville FL 32216

TEL: (678) 207-7697FAX: (770) 252-0029

RE: NV Investments

Dear Ken Moore: Order No: 11 02M 12

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received 4 samples on 2/25/20 11 4:20:00 PMfor the analyses presented in following report.




project Case Narrative.AES’ certifications are as follows:-NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water,


-AIHA Certification ID #100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics),





Kathleen Betsill

Project Manager

37S5 P:IiNr\ An\’rA, Go<; 30310 • Tn: 770)437•8177 • FAX: (7704378L88

Page 1 of 11

AN

AL

YT

IC

AL

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

SE

RV

IC

ES

,iN

C

37X

5P

resi

dent

ial

Par

kway

.A

tlan

taG

A30

340-

3704

AE

ST

EL

:(7

70)4

57-8

177

/T

OL

L-F

RE

E(8

00)

972-

4889

IFA

X:

(770

)457

-818

8

CH

AIN

OF

CU

ST

OD

YW

orkO

rder:_________

Dat/1J

Page

fo

f

OM

PA

NY

rv

ai

Jr

A:

FL—

AN

AL

YSI

SR

EQ

UE

ST

EI)

—-

——

/V

isit

our

web

site

,J

fw

ww

.aes

atla

nta

.co

mI

toch

eck

onth

est

atus

ofH

ON

E.

FA

X

1yo

urre

sult

s,pl

ace

bott

le

SA

wL

ED

k

fwo

sic

ç,_

Ior

ders

,etc

.

SA

I.E

D—

SA

MP

LE

IDS

,.

PR

ES

ER

VA

TIO

N(S

eeco

des)

RE

MA

RK

S

DA

lET

IM

E(

L

i&(,

-I(

3-

‘-

‘‘—

----fl

8 9 10 11 12 ‘3 14

LE

LIN

QtJ

JS

F{E

DB

YD

AT

E/T

IM

ER

EC

EIV

ED

BY

DA

TE

/TIM

EP

RO

JEC

TIN

FO

RM

AT

ION

RE

CE

IPT

IP

RO

JE

CT

NA

ME

:

2

..i—tJ

L)T

otal

4o

fC

on

tain

ers

.

PR

OJE

CT

4.

1ttm

aroandT

ineR

eatet

SIT

EA

DD

RE

SS

AS

tandardS

Bu

sin

ess

Days

3t4

€V

V’

“-

()2B

usin

essD

ayR

ush

SE

ND

RE

POR

TTO

k_.&

0(_2

IQ)

Nex

tBus

ines

sD

ay

Rus

h?P

EC

IAL

INS

TR

UC

DT

ION

s/cO

MM

EN

TSH

IPM

EN

TM

ET

HO

DIN

VO

ICE

TO:

0Sa

me

Day

Rus

h(a

uth

req.

)

OU

T/

/v

I(I

FD

IF

FE

RE

NT

FR

OM

AB

OV

E)

QO

ther

IN/

IV

IAS

TA

TE

PE

OG

RA

M(i

fany)—

NF

edE

xU

PSM

AIL

CO

UR

IER

E-m

aiI

Y/N

;Fa

x?Y

/NG

RE

YH

OU

ND

Oil

IER

._...

QU

OT

E#:

Poe

—

DA

TA

PA

CK

AG

E:

III

III

IVA

MI’

LE

SR

EC

EJV

EI)

AF

TE

R3P

MO

RSA

TU

RD

AY

AR

EC

ON

SID

ER

ED

AS

RE

CE

IVE

DO

NT

HE

NE

XT

BU

SIN

ES

SD

AY

;IF

NO

TA

TIS

MA

RK

ED

ON

CO

CA

ES

WII

.LP

RO

CE

ED

AS

ST

AN

DA

RD

TA

T.

SA

MP

LE

SA

RE

DIS

PO

SE

DO

F30

L)A

YS

AF

TE

RC

OM

PL

ET

ION

OF

RE

PO

RT

UN

LE

SS

OT

HE

RA

RR

AN

GE

ME

NT

SA

RE

MA

DE

.M

AT

RIX

(‘O

DE

SA

Air

GW

Gro

undw

ater

SESe

dim

ent

SOSo

ilS

’S

udsc

eW

ater

V=

Wat

er(B

lank

s)O

WD

rink

ing

Wat

er(B

lank

s)C)

—O

ther

(spe

cit,)

PR

ES

ER

VA

TIV

LC

2OD

ES

.11

+1H

ydrnchlo

rie

acid

•ic

eI

Iceo

nly

NN

itri

caci

dS4

IS

ull

iiric

acid

cc

S/M

IS

odiu

mli

isult

hte

/Met

han

ol.

ice

(1O

thcr

(spec

i1)

NA

Non

eW

hite

Cop

y-

Ori

gin

al;

1S1’

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 7-Mar-il

Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-7

Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 2/25/2011 1:35:00 PM

Lab ID: 1 102M12-001 Matrix: Groundwater





1,1,1-Trichloroethane BRL 5.0 uWL 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK


1,1,2-Trichioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

1,1-Dichloroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

l,l-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 ugfL 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK


1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

l,2-Dichloroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

l,2-Dichloropropane BRL 5.0 oWL 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK


2-Butanone BRL 50 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:3 8 OK

2-Hexanone BRL 10 ug!L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 10 oWL 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

Acetone BR.L 50 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK


Bromodichioromethane BRL 5.0 Ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

Bromoform BR.L 5.0 ugfL 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK


Carbon disulfide BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

Carbon tetrachloride BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Chlorobenzene BRL 5.0 oWL 142852 I 03/02/2011 20:3 8 GK

Chloroethane BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Chloroform BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Chioromethane BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

cis-l,2-Dichloroethene 7.0 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Cyclohexane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Dibromochioromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Dichiorodifluoromethane BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Ethylbenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Freon-113 BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/201120:38 GK

Isopropylbenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

m,p-Xylene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Methyl acetate BRL 5.0 oWL 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

Methylcyclohexane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 OK

Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:3 8 GK

o-Xylene BRL 5.0 uWL 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Qualifiern: Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)

BR.L. Below reporting limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrtx

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nate See case narrative


n Analyte detected in the associated method blank < Less than Result value

> Greater than Resuh value J Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page3of 11




Lab ID: 1 102M12-0Oi Matrix: Groundwater





Styrene BRL 5 0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:3 8 GK

Tetrachioroethene 330 50 tig/L 142852 10 03/03/2011 17:02 GK

Toluene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

trans-i,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 oWL 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Trichioroethene 10 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 Ug/L 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK


Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 84.9 64.7-130 %REC 142852 I 03/02/2011 20:38 GK


Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 93.4 80.7-129 %REC 142852 10 03/03/201117:02 GK

Suit: Dibromofluoromethane 104 80.7-129 %REC 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK

Suit: Toluene-d8 90.1 71.1-120 %REC 142852 10 03/03/2011 17:02 GK

Suit: Toluene-d8 94.4 71.1-120 %REC 142852 1 03/02/2011 20:38 GK





B Analytn detected in the associated method blank < Less than Result value

> Greater than Result value I Estimated vslue detected below Reporting Limit

Page 4 of 11

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 7-Mar-Il

Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-b


Lab ID: 1102M12-002 Matrix: Groundwater


Limit Factor


1,1,1-Trichioroethane BRL 5.0 u5/I. 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

1,1,2-Trichioroethane BRL 5.0 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

1,1-Dichioroethane BRL 5,0 uWL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

1,1-Dichioroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

l,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 oWL 142852 1 03/05/201115:23 NH

1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 50 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

l,2-Dichloroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

1,2-Dichioropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH


1,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:23 NH

2-Butanone BRL 50 ttg/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

2-Hexanone BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Acetone BRL 50 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Benzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Bromodichioromethane BRL 5.0 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Bromoforni BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Bromomethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Carbon disulfide BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:23 NH

Carbon tetrachioride BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Chlorobenzene BRL 50 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:23 NH

Chioroethane BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Chloroform BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Chioromethane BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

cis-l,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Cyclohexane BRL 5.0 oWL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Dibromochioromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Dichiorodifluoromethane BRL 10 ttg/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Ethylbenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Freon-113 BRL 10 ugIL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Isopropylbenzene BRL 5.0 tagfL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

m,p-Xylene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Methyl acetate BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:23 NH

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Methylcyclohexane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:23 NH

Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:23 NH

o-Xylene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:23 NH



H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nun See case narrative




Page 5of 11

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 7-Mar-li

Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-b


Lab ID: I 102M12-002 Matrix: Groundwater





Styrene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Tetrachioroethene 10 5.0 ug/L 142852 I 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Toluene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 1523 NH

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

trans-l,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ugfL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Trichloroethene BRL 5.0 “Wi- 142852 1 03/05/201115:23 NH

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Vinyl chloride BRL 2.0 HE/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Sun-: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 93.1 64.7-130 %REC 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH

Sun-: Dibromofluoromethane 103 80.7-129 %REC 142852 1 03/05/201115:23 NH

Sun-: Toluene-d8 90.8 71.1-120 %REC 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:23 NH



H Holding times for preparatioa or analysis exceeded Nan See case narrative

N Analyte cot NELAC certified NC Not confirmed



Page 6of 11


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-il


Lab ID: 1 102M 12-003 Matrix: Groundwater


Limit Factor


1,1,1-Trichioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane BRL 5.0 oWL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

1,1,2-Trichioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH

1,1-Dichioroethane BRL 5.0 ugfL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH


i,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 oWL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 I 03/05/201115:53 NH

1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

1,2-Dichlorobenzene BR.L 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

1,2-Dichioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

1,2-Dichioropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

l,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 UWL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

1,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH

2-Butanone BRL 50 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

2-Hexanone BRL 10 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 10 uWL 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH

Acetone BRL 50 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Benzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Bromodichioromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Bromoform BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH

Bromomethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH


Carbon tetrachioride BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH

Chlorobenzene BR.L 5.0 aWL 142852 I 03/05/201115:53 NH

Chioroethane BRL 10 ugfL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Chloroform BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Chioromethane BRL 10 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

cis-l,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Cyclohexane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH


Dichiorodifluoromethane BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Ethylbenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Freon-113 BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Isopropylbenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

m,p-Xylene BRL 5.0 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Methyl acetate BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 I 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 uWL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH


Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

o-Xylene BRL 5.0 uWL 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Qualifiers: Value eaceeds maximum contaminant level E Extimated (value above quantitation range)

SRI. Below reporting limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

11 Holding tunes for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See case narrative

N Analyte cot NELAC certified NC Not confirmed

B Analyse detected in the associated method blank < Lets than Renulr value


Page 7 of 11






Limit Factor


Styrene BRL 5.0 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH

Tetrachloroethene 10 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH

Toluene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH

trans-l,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Trichioroethene BRL 5.0 ug/1 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Trich.lorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Vinyl chloride BRL 2.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 88.9 647-130 %REC 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 104 80.7-129 %REC 142852 1 03/05/201115:53 NH

Surr: Toluene-d8 922 71.1-120 %REC 142852 1 03/05/2011 15:53 NH

Qoaiifiers: * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitatioe range)


H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nan See case narrative

N Analyle not NELAC certified NC Not confirmed

B Analyte detected in the nnsociated method blank < Less than Result value

> Gteater than Result vnlue .1 Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 8 of 11






Limit Factor



1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH




i,2,4-Triehlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

i,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH


1,2-Dichioropropane BRL 5.0 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 U5/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH


2-Butanone BR.L 50 ug/l 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

2-Hexanone BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 10 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

Acetone BRL 50 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Benzene BRL 5.0 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

Bromodichioromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

Bromoform BR.L 5.0 ugIL 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Bromomethane BR.L 5.0 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH


Carbon tetrachioride BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

Chlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Chioroethane BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

Chloroform BRL 5.0 tta/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Chioromethane BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

eis-1,3-Dichioropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Cyclohexane BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH


Dichiorodifluoromethane BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

Ethylbenzene BRL 5.0 uWL 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Freon-i 13 BRL 10 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Isopropylbenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

m,p-Xylene BR.L 5.0 ug/L 142852 I 03/05/201116:23 NH

Methyl acetate BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/20 1 1 16:23 NH

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH


Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 u5/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

o-Xylene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Qainidiers: Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above qaantitation range)

BRL Below reporting limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to mairix

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See rose narrative


B Aaalyte detected in the ossociated method blank < Less than Result value

> Greater than Result value S Estimated valae detected below Reporting Limit

Page 9 of 11




Lab ID: I 102M12-004 Matrix: Groundwater





Styrene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Tetrachioroethene 9.3 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Toluene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

trans-1,2-Dithloroethene BR.L 5.0 ugJL 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NI-I

Trichioroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/201116:23 NH

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 ugh.. 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Vinyl chloride BRL 2.0 ug/L 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 87.1 64.7-130 %REC 142852 I 03/05/201116:23 NH

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 107 80.7-129 %REC 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Surr: Toluene-d8 92.8 71.1-120 %REC 142852 1 03/05/2011 16:23 NH

Quaiifiers: Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)

BR].. Below reporting limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix



B Annlyte detected in the ussociated method blank < Less than Result value

> Gceater than Result value J Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 10 of 11



Client 7 Work Order Number

Checklist completed by 2Signature Date

Carrier name: FedEx UPS — Courier — Client Mail — Other

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No — Not Present —


Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes — No — Not Present

Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? (4OCdr2)* Yes No

Cooler #1 3 Cooler #2

_______

Cooler #3

_______

Cooler #4

_______

Cooler#5 Cooler #6

Chain of custody present? Yes No —

Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes V No —

Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes No —

Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No —

Sample containers intact? Yes ..Z No

Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No —

All samples received within holding time? Yes ../“ No —

Was TAT marked on the COC? Yes No —

Proceed with Standard TAT as per project history? Yes — No — Not Applicable

Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? No VOA vials submitted — Yes i-” No —

Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes No Not Applicable —


________________

Sample Condition: Good _/ Other(Explain)

____________________________________________

(For diffusive samples or AIHA lead) is a known blank included? Yes No


Samples do not have to comply with the given range for certain parameters.

\l \Quality Assurance\Checklists Procedures Sign-Off Templates\Checklists\Sample Receipt Checklists\Sarnple_Cooler_Receipt_Checklist

Page 11 of 11

ANAlYTIcAl.. ENVIRONMENTAL SERvicEs, iNC.

AES

March 17, 2011

Matt Trammel!ECT6410 Southnoint Pkwy Ste 120Jacksonville FL 32216

TEL: (678) 207-7697FAX: (770) 252-0029

RE: JNV Investments

Dear Matt Trammell: Order No: 1 103A27

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received 2 samples on March 10. 2011 2:50 imfor the analyses presented in following report.




project Case Narrative.

AES’ certifications are as follows:

-NELAC/Florida Certification number E875 82 for analysis of Environmental Water,

soiL/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/10-06/30/11.

-All-IA Certification ID #100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics),





Kathleen Betsill

Project Manager

3fl35 i’:t.ii-i . Pwv • A 3) 3-O • Ti : (7O 457-8177 • lZ N: 77U437-8 I S8

Page 1 of7

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

Date

:’7\O

i’p

ag

o1

Visit

our

web

site

ww

w.a

esat

lafl

ta.c

omto

chec

kon

the

stat

usof

your

resu

lts,

plac

ebottle

orde

rs,e

tc.

$ 0 U 0 z

RE

MA

RK

S

____—

____—

—

____—

____—

—

____—

—

____—

—

-—

RE

CE

IPT

Tot

alS

ofC

on

taif

lem

Stan

dard

SB

usif

lD

ays

o2

Bus

ines

sD

ay

QN

extB

usin

ess

pay

Rus

h

0Sa

me

Day

Rus

h(a

uth

req

.)

oO

ther—

-

STA

lEPR

OG

RA

M(if

any):—

R.m

ail?

Y/N

Fax

?Y

IN

DA

TA

PA

CK

AG

E.

I

AN

AL

YT

IC

AL

EN

V[R

ON

ME

NT

AL

SE

RV

ICE

S,

INC

3785

Presid

enti

al

Park

way

,A

tlant

aG

A30340-3704

AE

ST

EL

.:(7

70)4

57-8

177

/T

OL

L-F

RE

E(8

00

)9

72

-4

889

/F

AX

:(770)457-8188

‘OIs

4PA

NY -

——

if-’

1

CH

AIN

OF

CU

ST

OD

Y

•A

DD

RE

SS

:

&$c1€o

/!)F

c

HO

770

FAX

.

AM

PL

ED

BY

:(I

IA

.S

IG

i*)tJ

./I

t-e.

&e-

t6

VV

fJ7

Ji—

rL

/’.

—

SAM

PLE

ID

AN

AL

YS

IS

RE

QU

ES

TE

D

SA

MP

LE

D

c-I

0

DA

TE

TIM

E

I‘,

is°

.0

00,

U

PR

ES

ER

VA

TIO

N(S

eeco

des

1Mji

3-IL

,.

?J7/!

o).t

17

2_

t<

——

—tA

-I—

--__________

——

---

5

--__________

——

---

--

-

I0 JL L—

—

-__________

——

14—

—R

EIN

SHE

DB

YD

AT

EfI

ME

RE

CE

IVE

D7

/,.

DA

TE

frIM

EP

RO

JEC

TIN

FO

RM

AT

ION

Il:////

.:

‘2

PR

OJE

CT

#:-

SIT

EA

DD

RE

SS:

:3:

——

SEN

DR

EPO

RT

TO:

kp

cs,-e

d3c

d,.J.

..d-.e

.d’j

4I

‘PE

dAL

INS

TR

UC

TIO

NS

/CO

MM

EN

TS

:S

HIP

ME

NT

ME

TH

OD

INV

OIC

ET

O:

OU

T/

/V

IA-

(IF

DIF

FE

RE

NT

FRO

MA

BO

VE

)

INV

IA:

IF

edE

xU

PSM

AIL

CO

UR

IER

GR

EY

HO

UN

DO

TH

ER

_________

QU

OT

ES

:PO

llA

MP

LE

SR

EC

EW

ED

AF

TE

R3P

MO

RSA

TU

RD

AY

AR

EC

ON

SID

ER

ED

AS

RE

CE

IVE

DO

NT

HE

NE

XT

BU

SIN

ESS

DA

Y;

IFN

OT

AT

ISM

AR

KE

DO

NC

OC

AE

SW

ILL

PR

OC

EE

DA

SS

TA

ND

AR

DT

AT

.A

MP

UE

SA

RE

DIS

PO

SE

DO

F30

DA

YS

AF

TE

RC

OM

PL

ET

ION

OF

RE

PO

RT

UN

LE

SSO

TH

ER

AR

RA

NG

EM

EN

TS

AR

EM

AD

E.

MA

TR

IXC

OD

ES:

AA

irG

WG

roun

dwat

erSE

Sed

imen

tSO

Soil

SWS

uia

ceW

aler

W=

Wat

er(B

Inks)

DW

=D

rink

ing

Wat

er(B

lank

s)0

=O

ther

(spe

cify

)W

WW

aste

Wate

rP

RE

SE

RV

AT

IVE

CO

DE

S:

H+

IH

ydro

chlo

ric

acid

+ic

eI

=Ic

eon

lyN

Nitr

icac

id8+

1=

Sulf

uric

acid

+ic

eS

/M+

ISo

dium

Bis

ultk

te/M

etha

nol

÷ic

e0

=O

ther

(spe

cify

)N

A=

Non

eW

hil

eC

op

y-

Ongrn

al;

Yel

low

CopY

-

Pag

e2of7

/




Lab ID: 1 103A27-00l Matrix: Groundwater


Limit Factor





1,1-Dichioroethane BRL 5.0 uEJL 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

1,1-Dichioroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 uWL 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201115:17 GK




1,2-Dichioropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK


i,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK




Acetone BRL 50 uWL 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK



Bromoform BRL 5.0 ugJL 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK


Carbondisulfide BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

Carbontetrachioride BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

Chlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK


Chloroform BRL 5.0 ugJL 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

Chioromethane BRL 10 ugJL 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

cis-l,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 UE/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

Cyclohexane BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK


Dichioroclifluoromethane BRL 10 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201115:17 GK


Freon-113 BRL 10 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK



Methyl acetate BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GI(


Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201115:17 GK

o-Xylene BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK



H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nurr See case narrative

N Anolyte not NELAC certified NC Not confirmed



Page 3 of 7


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: MW-Il


Lab ID: I 103A27-001 Matrix: Groundwater


Limit Factor



Tetrachloroethene 11 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

Toluene BRL 5.0 ug/l. 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK


trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

Trichioroethene BRL 5.0 ugJL 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 itgfL 143476 1 03/16/201115:17 GK



Sum Dibromofluoromethane 93.6 80.7-129 %REC 143476 1 03/16/2011 15:17 GK


Quahflers: * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)


H Holding times for preparalion or analysis exceeded Narr See case narrative




Page 4 of 7


I Client: ECT Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK IProject Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 3/10/2011 ILab ID: 1103A27-002 Matrix: Aqueous


Limit Factor



1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 I 03/16/2011 14:46 GK


1,1-Dichioroethane BRL 5.0 tig/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK

i,1-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK


1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK






1,4-Dichlorobenzene BR.L 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK

2-Butanone BRL 50 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK





Bromodichloromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK


Bromomethane I3RL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

Carbon disulfide BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

Carbon tetrachloride BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

Chlorobenzene BR.L 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK

Chioroethane BR.L 10 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK


Chioromethane BRL 10 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK

cis-i,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 Ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

Cyclohexane BRL 5.0 uWL 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK

Dibromochloromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK

Dichiorodifluoromethane BRL 10 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK

Ethylbenzene BRL 5.0 ugIL 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK

Freon-113 BRL 10 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK

Isopropylbenzene BRL 5.0 uWL 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

m,p-Xylene BRL 5.0 uWL 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

Methyl acetate BRL 5.0 tg/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK


Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

o-Xylene BRL 5.0 ugJL 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK







Page 5 of 7


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANKProject Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 3/10/2011Lab ID: 1 103A27-002 Matrix: Aqueous





Styrene BRL 5.0 ug,’L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

Tetrachioroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK



trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5 0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

Trichioroethene BRL 5 0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK


Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 93.8 64.7-130 %REC 143476 1 03/16/201114:46 GK

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 91.9 80.7-129 %REC 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK

Surr:Toluene-d8 88.5 71.1-120 %REC 143476 1 03/16/2011 14:46 GK

Qualifiers: * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above qnantitation range)

BRL Below reporting limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to mntrix


N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Noi confirnied

B Analyte detected in the associated method blunk < Less than Result value


Page6of7



Client OflJ(Ij

___________

1Checklist completed by 3 IC) I (

iãture Date

Carrier name: FedEx — UPS — Courier — Client Mail — Other

__________

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes —

Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes —

Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes —

Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? (40C±2)* Yes2(Iv

Cooler #1 3 1 Cooler #2

_______

Cooler #3

_______

Cooler #4

_______

Chain of custody present? Yes —

Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes —

Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes —

Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes —

Sample containers intact? Yes —

Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes

All samples received within holding time? Yes

Was TAT marked on the COC? Yes —

Proceed with Standard TAT as per project history? Yes —

Water- VOA vials have zero headspace? No VOA vials submitted —

Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes


_________________

Sample Condition: Good Other(Explain)

___________________________________________

(For diffusive samples or AIHA lead) Is a known blank included? Yes



\L\Quality Assurance\Checklists Procedures Sign-Off Templates\Cheekl ists\Sample Receipt Checklists\Sample_CooIer_ReceiptChecklist

Work Order Number / 1 0 3A

No — Not Present —



No

______

Cooler#5 Cooler #6

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No — Not Applicable -

Yes No

No — NotApplicable

Noj

Page 7of7

•AALYrIcAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

AES

March 29, 2011

Matt TrammellECT6410 Southpoint Pkwy Ste 120Jacksonville FL 32216

TEL: (678) 207-7697FAX: (770) 252-0029

RE: JNV - Pro Cleaners

Dear Matt Trammell: Order No: 1103L19


No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associatedQuality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepanciesassociated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of aproject Case Narrative.AES’ certifications are as follows:-NELAC/Florida Certification number E875 82 for analysis of Environmental Water,soillhazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/10-06/30/11.-AIHA Certification ID #100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics),Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal)effective until 09/01/11.



Kathleen Betsill

Project Manager

37S5 P ATi,Ni;, (:;i< 303’40 • ri..: (770) 4576177 • FAX: (770)4578i88

Page 1 of9

AN

AL

YT

IC

AL

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

SE

RV

IC

ES

,IN

C•.•

3785

Presid

en

tial

Parkw

ay,

Atla

nta

GA

30

34

0-3

70

4

AE

ST

EL

:(770)

457.8177

/T

OL

L-F

RE

E(8

00

)9

72

-4

88

9I F

AX

:(7

70

)4

57

-8

18

8

CH

AIN

OF

CU

ST

OD

YW

orkO

rdea1

03.)C

Dat

e:3

/ (—P

age

(of

__

__

__

OM

PAN

Y.

)DR

ES

S=

——

——

AN

AL

YS

ISR

EQ

UE

ST

ED

——

—V

isit

our

web

site

—

ww

w.a

esat

lant

a.co

m‘.

toch

eck

onth

est

atus

of‘H

ON

E:

FAX

:

17

c-’?,

tkyo

urre

sult

s,pl

ace

bottl

eA

MP

LE

DS

IG

NA

Tu4E

Jor

ders

, etc

.

SA

MP

LE

D—

—z

tSA

MPL

EID

SP

RE

SE

RV

AT

IO

N(S

eeco

des)

RE

tvL

a.R

KS

RA

TE

TIM

E0

US

?.

=1

)rii

-f/t3O

43

2::zz::z::

6 7 8 9 10 ii 12 13V

‘3 EL

INU

ISH

EB

YD

AT

EIT

IME

RE

CE

IVE

DB

YD

AT

EIT

IMF

PR

OJE

CT

INF

OR

MA

TIO

NR

EC

EIP

T

‘

PR

OJE

CT

NA

ME

cT

otal

Sof

Con

tain

ers

V

.J_

/72

PR

OJE

CT

8:T

urna

roun

dT

ime

Rea

uest

/‘

/4..L

2?’1

l)5

G4

SIT

EA

DO

RE

S’.

CD”

:3:

r(

lV’’k..

Q2

Bus

ines

sD

ayR

ush

SE

ND

RE

POR

TTO

:Q

Nex

tB

usin

ess

Day

Rus

h

PE

CIA

LIN

STR

UC

TIO

NS/

CO

MM

EN

TS:

SHIP

ME

NT

ME

TH

OD

INV

OIC

ETO

:0

Sam

eD

ayR

ush

(auth

req.

)

OU

TI

IV

IA(I

FD

IFFE

RE

NT

FRO

MA

BO

VE

)Q

Oth

er

INI

/V

IAS

TA

TE

PR

OG

RA

M(i

fany

)C

LIE

NT

FedE

xU

PSM

AIL

E-m

ail’

YI

N.

Fax’

YI

NG

RE

YH

OU

ND

OT

HE

R_

QU

OT

E#-

PO

DA

TA

PAC

KA

GE

.I

IIIl

lIV

SA

MP

LE

SR

EC

EIV

ED

AF

TE

R3

PM

OR

SA

TU

RD

AY

AR

EC

ON

SID

ER

ED

AS

RE

CE

IVE

DO

NT

HE

NE

XT

BU

SIN

ES

SD

AY

,IF

NO

TA

TIS

MA

RK

ED

ON

CO

CA

ES

WIL

LP

RO

CE

ED

AS

STA

ND

AR

DT

AT

.SA

JwIP

LE

SA

RE

DIS

PO

SE

DO

F30

DA

YS

AF

TE

RC

OM

PL

ET

iON

OF

RE

PO

RT

UN

LE

SS

OT

HE

RA

RR

AN

GE

ME

NT

SA

RE

MA

DE

.M

AT

RIX

CO

DE

SA

Air

OW

Gro

undw

ater

SE=

Sedi

men

tSO

Soil

SWSu

rfac

eW

ater

W=

Wat

er(B

lank

s)D

W=

Dri

nkin

gW

ater

(Bla

nks)

0=

Oth

er(s

pecl

t’)

PR

ES

ER

VA

TIV

EC

OD

ES

:H

+lH

ydro

chlo

ric

acid

+ic

eI

Ice

only

NN

itric

acid

Sf1

=Su

llitri

cac

id+

ice

S/M

+ISo

dium

Bts

ulta

e/M

etha

nol

ice

0O

ther

(spec

it)

NA

=N

one W

hite

Cop

y-

Ori

gina

l;Y

ello

wC

opy-

Cli

ent

Pag

e2

Of

9


Client: ECT

Project: JNV - Pro Cleaners Case NarrativeLab ID: 1103L19

The sample container of I 103L19-00 1A has a sample ID of Soil’. The sample ID was reported as “Drain” according to theCOC.

Volatiles Organic Compounds Analysis by Method 8260B:

Due to sample matrix, sample 1 103L19-OO1A and -002A required dilution during preparation and/or analysis resulting inelevated reporting limits.

Page 3 of 9


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: DRAIN

Project Name: JNV - Pro Cleaners Collection Date: 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM

Lab ID: 1 103L19-001 Matrix: Soil


Limit Factor


1,1, 1-Trichloroethane BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

1,1 ,2-Trichloroethane BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

1, 1-Dichloroethane BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

1,1-Dichioroethene BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 330 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 330 mg/Kgdty 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

1 ,2-Dichloroethane BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

1,2-Dichioropropane BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 330 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

l,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

2-Butanone BRL 3300 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

2-Hexanone BRL 660 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 660 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Acetone BRL 6600 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Benzene BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Bromodichioromethane BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Bromoform BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Bromomethane BRL 330 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Carbon disulfide BRL 660 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Carbon tetrachioride BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Chlorobenzene BRL 330 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Chioroethane BRL 660 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Chloroform BRL 330 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Chioromethane BRL 660 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 330 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 330 mg/Kgdry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Cyclohexane BRL 330 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Dibromochioromethane BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Dichiorodifluoromethane BRL 660 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Ethylbenzene BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Freon-113 BRL 660 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Isopropylbenzene BRL 330 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

m,p-Xylene BRL 330 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Methyl acetate BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Methylcyclohexane BRL 330 tng/Kg-dty 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Methylene chloride BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

o-Xylene BRL 330 mg/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB



H Holdiag times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See case narrative




Page 4 of 9

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 30Mar-11

I Client: ECT Client Sample ID: DRAIN II Project Name: JNV - Pro Cleaners Collection Date: 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM I

Lab ID: I 103L19-00I Matrix: Soil


Limit Factor


Styrene BRL 330 mg/Kg-diy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Tetrachloroethene 9800 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Toluene BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 330 mg/Kg-dty 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Trichioroethene BR-L 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/201118:10 SB

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 330 mg/Kg-thy 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Vinyl chloride BRL 660 me/Kg-dry 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 95.5 56-137 %REC 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 104 73.7-137 %REC 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB

Surr: Toluene-d8 91.6 69.2-126 %REC 144053 50000 03/24/2011 18:10 SB



Qualifiers: * Value exceeds maximum contamtnunt level E Esttmated (value above quantttation range)

ERL Below reporting limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

H Holding times for prepurution or unalysis exceeded Narr See case narrative



> Greater than Rmult value J Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 5 of 9


Qualifiers: * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level

BRL Below reporting limit

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded

N Analyte not NELAC certified

B Analyte detected in the associated method blank


E Estimated (value above quautitation range)

S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix

Narr See case narrative

NC Not confirmed

< Less than Result value

Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Client: ECT Client Sample ID: SOURCEProject Name: JNV - Pro Cleaners Collection Date: 3/10/2011 1:15:00 PMLab ID: 1 103L19-002 Matrix: Soil





i,1,1-Triehloroethane BRL 26 mg/Kg-dty 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane BRL 26 - mg/Kg-dty 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

1,1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 26 mg/Kg-thy 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

1,1-Dichloroethane BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

1,1-Dichloroethene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

i,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 26 mg/Kg-thy 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 26 mg/Kg-thy 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 26 tttg/Kg-dty 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

1,2-Dichloroethane BRL 26 tng/Kg-dty 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

i,2-Dichloropropane BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

l,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

1,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

2-Butanone BRL 260 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

2-Hexanone BRL 53 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 53 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Acetone BRL 530 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Benzene BRL 26 mg/Kg-thy 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Bromodichloromethane BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Bromoform BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Bromomethane BRL 26 tng/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Carbon disulfide BRL 53 tng/Kg-dty 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Carbon tetrachloride BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Chlorobenzene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Chloroethane BRL 53 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Chloroform BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Chloromethane BRL 53 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Cyclohexane BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Dibromochloromethane BRL 26 tng/Kgdty 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 53 mg/Kg-dty 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Ethylbenzene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Freon-i 13 BRL 53 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Isopropylbenzene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

m,p-Xylene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Methyl acetate BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Methylcyclohexane BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Methylene chloride BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

o-Xylene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Page 6 of 9


Client: ECT Client Sample ID: SOURCEProject Name: TNV - Pro Cleaners Collection Date: 3/10/2011 1:15:00 PMLab ID: 1103L19-002 Matrix: Soil





Styrene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dty 144053 5000 03/24/201119:35 SB

Tetrachloroethene 270 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Toluene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/201119:35 SB

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/201119:35 SB

Trichloroethene BRL 26 ing/Kgdry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Trichlorofluoromethane BRL 26 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/201119:35 SB

Vinyl chloride BRL 53 mg/Kg-dry 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Sun-: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 90.3 56-137 %REC 144053 5000 03/24/201119:35 SB

Sun-: Dibromofluoromethane 99.8 73.7-137 %REC 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB

Sun-: Toluene-d8 87.9 69.2-126 %REC 144053 5000 03/24/2011 19:35 SB





H Holding timm for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See case narrative


B Analyte detected in the associated method blank < Less than Result valee


Page 7 of 9



Client $oV.rz L Work Order Number /,031J

Checklist completed by M1. 3 Z3HSignature Date

Carrier name: FedEx UPS — Courier _/Client — US Mail — Other

___________

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes / No — Not Present

Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes — No — Not Present /

Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes No — Not Present -,

Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? (40C±2)* Yes No

Cooler#l Cooler#2

______

Cooler#3

______

Cooler#4

______

Cooler#5 Cooler#6

Chain of custody present? Yes / No —

Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes ‘ No —

Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes X No /

Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes / No —


Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No —

All samples received within holding time? Yes“

No —

Was TAT marked on the COC? Yes No —

Proceed with Standard TAT as per project history? Yes No — Not Applicable_/

Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? No VOA vials submitted _ Yes No —

Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes — No — Not Applicable ‘


________________

Sample Condition: Good Other(Explain)

______________________________________________

(For diffusive samples or AIHA lead) Is a known blank included? Yes No



\L\Quality Assurance\Checklists Procedures Sign-Off Teniplates\Checklists\Sample Receipt Checklists\Sample_Cooler_Receipt_Checklist

Page 8 of 9

Ana

lyti

cal

En

vir

onm

enta

lS

ervic

es,

Inc

Dat

e:29

-Mar

-li

Clie

nt:

EC

TP

roje

ct:

JNV

-P

roC

lean

ers

Dat

esR

eport

Lab

Ord

er:

1103

L19

Lab

Sam

ple

IDC

lien

tS

ampl

eID

Col

lect

ion

Dat

eM

atri

xT

est

Nam

eT

CL

PD

ate

Pre

pD

ate

Ana

lysi

sD

ate

1103

L19

-001

AD

RA

IN3/

10/2

011

1:00

:00P

MSo

ilT

CL

VO

LA

TIL

EO

RG

AN

ICS

03/2

4/20

1103

/24/

2011

1103

L19

-OO

1BD

RA

IN3/

10/2

011

1:00

:00P

MSo

ilP

ER

CE

NT

MO

IST

UR

E03

/29/

2011

1103

L19

-002

AS

OU

RC

E3/

10/2

011

1:15

:00P

MSo

ilT

CL

VO

LA

TIL

EO

RG

AN

ICS

03/2

4/20

1103

/24/

2011

1103

L19-

002B

SO

UR

CE

3/10

/201

11:

15:0

0PM

Soil

PER

CE

NT

MO

IST

UR

E03

129/

2011

Pag

e9

of9

ANALytIcAl. ENVIRONMENTAL SERvicEs, INC.

April 18, 2011

Matt TrammellECT6410 Southpoint Pkwy Ste 120Jacksonville FL 32216

TEL: (678) 207-7697FAX: (770) 252-0029

RE: NV Investments

Dear Matt Trammell: Order No: 1104832

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received 2 samples on April 11, 2011 1:25 pmfor the analyses presented in following report.

No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associatedQuality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies


project Case Narrative.AES’ certifications are as follows:-NELAC/Florida Certification number E875 82 for analysis of Environmental Water,







Kathleen Betsill

Project Manager

37i35 I’M lI•’d. * (;w<;i 30340 • T 77(T 457Si TI • F\ (770)457-818t3

Page 1 of 8

Wor

kO

rder

)Ov

t 32..-

CH

AIN

OF

CU

ST

OD

Y

toch

eck

onth

est

atus

your

resu

lts,

plac

eor

ders

, etc

.

FedE

xU

PS

VIA

CO

UR

IER

GR

EY

HO

UN

DO

TH

ER

_________

3PM

OR

ON

SA

TU

RD

AY

AR

EC

ON

SID

ER

ED

RE

CE

IVE

DT

HE

NE

XT

BU

SIN

ES

SD

AY

.IF

TU

RN

AR

OU

ND

TIM

E,M

PL

ES

AR

ED

ISP

OS

ED

30D

AY

SA

FT

ER

RE

PO

RT

CO

MP

LE

TIO

NU

NL

ES

SO

TH

ER

AR

RA

NG

EM

EN

TS

AR

EM

AD

E.

MA

TR

IXC

OD

ES

A=

Air

GW

Gro

undw

ater

SESe

dim

ent

SOSo

ilSW

Surl

ice

Wal

erW

=W

ater

(Bla

nks)

OW

Dri

nkin

gW

ater

(Ula

nks)

0=

Oth

er(s

peci

fy)

WW

=W

aste

Wat

erP

RE

SE

RV

AT

IVE

CO

DE

S:H

+l=

Hyd

roch

lori

cac

id÷

ice

IIc

eon

lyN

Nitr

icac

idS4

-I=

Sulf

uric

acid

+ic

eS/

M4I

=So

dium

Bis

ulfa

t&M

etha

nol

+ic

e0

=O

ther

(spe

cify

)N

AN

one

AN

AL

YT

ICA

LE

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

LS

ER

VIC

ES

,iN

C37

85Pr

esid

entia

lPar

k-w

ay,

Atla

nta

GA

3034

0-37

041E

ST

EL

.:(7

70)4

57-8

177

/ TO

LL

-FR

EE

(800

)97

2-48

89/ F

AX

:(7

70)4

57-8

188

A5’

AN

1.

V’c

t)

Dat

e:

Vis

itou

rw

ebsi

te

SHIP

ME

NT

ME

ThO

D

//

VIA

Tur

naro

und

Tim

eR

eque

st

ØS

tan

dard

5B

usin

ess

Day

s

C)

2B

usin

ess

Day

Rus

h

C)N

ext B

usin

ess

Day

Rus

h

C)

Sam

eD

ayR

ush

(aut

hre

q.)

Oth

er

PRO

GR

AMf

any)

:

_______

ii?Y

IN;

Fax?

Y/N

TAPA

CK

AG

E:I

Whi

teC

opy

-O

rigin

al;

Yel

low

Coj

,y-

Clie

ntP

age2O

f8

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 18-Apr-il

Client: ECT Client Sample ID: OUTFALL

Project Name: JNV Investments Collection Date: 4/11/2011 11:50:00 AM

Lab ID: 1 104832-00 1 Matrix: Groundwater


Limit Factor


1,1 ,i-Trichloroethane BRL 5.0 ugiL 144887 1 04/13/201 I 11:2 I GK

1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane BRL 5.0 ugfL 144887 1 04/13/201111:21 GK



1,1-Dichioroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK


1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 Ug/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 5.0 ugfL 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK




1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 oWL 144887 1 04/13/201111:21 GK




4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 10 tig/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK



Bromodichioromethane BRL 5.0 ugJL 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK



Carbon disulfide BRL 5.0 ug/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

Carbon tetrachioride BRL 5.0 ttg./L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK



Chloroform BRL 5.0 ugJL 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

Chloromethane BRL JO tigil. 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

cis-i,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ug/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

Cyclohexane BRL 5.0 ugiL 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK


Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 10 Ug/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK


Freon-113 BRL 10 ugfL 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK


m,p-Xylene BRL 5.0 ug/L 144887 1 04/13/201111:21 GK

Methyl acetate BRL 5.0 ug/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 ug/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK


Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 ug/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK


Qualifiers: Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantilation range)





> Greater than Result value 3 EsEmated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 3 of 8




Lab ID: 1104832-001 Matrix: Groundwater



Date Analyzed AnalystLimd Factor



Tetrachioroethene BRL 5.0 ugfL 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

Toluene BRL 5.0 ua/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 tag/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

trans-i,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ugJL 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

Trichioroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

Trichlorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 144887 1 04/13/2011 11:21 GK

Vinyl chloride BRL 20 ug/L 144887 1 04/13/201111:21 GK




Qualifiers: * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level B Estimated (value above quantitation range)




B Analyte detected in the associated method blank < Less than Resatt value

> Greater than Result value .1 Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 4 of 8




Lab ID: 1104832-002 Matrix: Soil


Limit Factor


1,i,1-Trichloroethane BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/2011 15:58 JE

1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-thy 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

1,1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE


1,1-Dichloroethene BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/2011 15:58 JE

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

i,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

l,2-Dibromoethane BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/2011 15:58 JE

l,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE


1,2-Dichloropropane BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL. 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

i,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/2011 15:58 JE




Acetone 0.070 0.062 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE


Bromodichloromethane BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE




Carbon tetrachioride BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE


Chloroethane BRL 0.0062 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/2011 15:58 JE


Chloromethane BRL 0.0062 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 0,0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE


Dibromochioromethane BR.L 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 0.0062 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

Ethyibenzene BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/2011 15:58 JE

Freon-I 13 BRL 0.0062 mg/Kg-dry 145008 I 04/15/201115:58 JE




Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

Methylcyclohexane BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE



Qualifiers: Value exceeds maximum coulaminant level E Estimated (value above quanlitalion raage)

BRL Below reporling limit S Spike Recovery oulurde limits due to malrix

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See case narralive

N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Nor confirmed

B Analyte delected in the associaled method blank < Less Ihan Resull value

> Greaten than Result value J Eslrmuted value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 5of8




Lab ID: 1104832-002 Matrix: Soil


Limit Factor



Tetrachloroethene BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/2011 15:58 JE


trans- 1,2-Dichioroethene BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

Trichloroethene BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/2011 15:58 JE

Trichlorofluoromethane BRL 0.0031 mg/Kg-dry 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE


Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 87.6 56-137 %REC 145008 1 04/15/201115:58 JE

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 101 73.7-137 %REC 145008 1 04/15/2011 15:58 JE

Surr:Toluene-d8 103 69,2-126 %REC 145008 1 04/15/2011 15:58 JE


PercentMoisture 27.0 0 wt% R194900 1 04/15/2011 10:00 AS

Qualifiers; * Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated (value above quantitation range)




B Analyte detected in the associated method blank 0 Less Ihan Result value


Page 6 of 8



Client ‘ Work Order Number //O YPz

Checklist completed by Yf/Signature Date

Carrier name: FedEx — UPS — Courier — Client — US Mail — Other

___________

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes -‘ No — Not Present —


/Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes — No — Not Present

Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? (40C±2)* Yes - No

Cooler#l

______

Cooler#2

______

Cooler#3

______

Cooler#4

______

Cooler#5

______

Cooler#6

______

Chain of custody present? Yes /“' No —


Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes /“ No —

Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No —

Sample containers intact? Yes /“ No

Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes / No —

All samples received within holding time? Yes/7

No —

Was TAT marked on the COC? Yes / No —

Proceed with Standard TAT as per project history? Yes — No — Not Applicable

Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? No VOA vials submitted Yes _Z No —

Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes / No — Not Applicable —

Adjusted?

______________

Checked by

_______________

Sample Condition: Good “ Other(Explain)

____________________________________________

(For diffusive samples or AIHA lead) Is a known blank included? Yes No 7



\L\Quality Assurance\Checklists Procedures Sign-Off Templates\Checklists\Sample Receipt Checklists\Sample_CoolerReceipt_Checklist

Page 7 of 8

Ana

lyti

cal

Env

iron

men

tal

Ser

vic

es,

Inc

Dat

e:15

-Apr

-li

Cli

ent:

EC

T

Pro

ject

:JN

VIn

ves

tmen

tsD

ate

sR

eport

Lab

Ord

er:

11

04832

Lab

Sam

ple

IDC

lien

tS

ampl

eID

Col

lect

ion

Dat

eM

atri

xT

est

Nam

eT

CL

PD

ate

Pre

pD

ate

Ana

lysi

sD

ate

1104

832-

001A

OU

TFA

LL

4/11

/201

111

:50:

00A

MG

roun

dwat

erT

CL

VO

LA

TIL

EO

RG

AN

ICS

04/1

3/20

1104

/131

2011

1104

832-

002A

OU

TFA

LL

4/11

/201

111

:55:

00A

MSo

ilT

CL

VO

LA

TIL

EO

RG

AN

ICS

04/1

5/20

1104

/15/

2011

ii04

832-

002B

OU

TFA

LL

4/11

/201

111

:55:

00A

MSo

ilP

ER

CE

NT

MO

IST

UR

E04

/151

2011

Pag

e8of8

ANLYTlcAL ENvIRONMENTAL. SERvicEs, INC.

AES

April 28, 2011

Matt TrammellECT6410 Southpoint Pkwv Ste 120Jacksonville FL 32216

TEL: (678) 207-7697FAX: (770) 252-0029

RE: JNV Investments

Dear Matt Trammell: Order No: 11 04K5 8

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received I samples on 4/26/20 11 2:30:00 PMfor the analyses presented in following report.




project Case Narrative.

AES’ certifications are as follows:

-NELAC/Florida Certification number E875 82 for analysis of Environmental Water,







Kathleen Betsill

Project Manager

3785 J’lLSlD[:Nil.l. PRKWW * Alt, NlA, GFOlA 30340 • Tt.i. 770) 457-6 77 • FA\: (770)437—8188

Page 1 of 5

CH

AiN

OF

CU

ST

OD

YW

ork

Ord

er:_

__

__

__

_

Date

Pag

e

__

__

__

_o

f

‘-O

MPA

NY

.A

DD

RE

SS—

_—

— AN

AL

YS

ISR

EQ

UE

ST

ED

——

—

—vis

itour

web

site

/w

ww

.aes

atla

nta

.co

mto

chec

kon

the

stat

usof

HO

NE

.77

q(

FA

X.

your

resu

lts,

plac

ebo

ttle

AM

P1B

Y,&

Lor

ders

, etc

.

SAM

PLED

‘az

SISA

MPL

EID

PRE

SER

VA

TIO

N(S

eeco

des)

.R

EMA

RK

SD

TE

TIM

E(

(3

E3

IE

LIN

DB

YD

AT

E/T

IME

RE

CE

IVE

DB

YD

AT

E/T

IME

PR

OJE

CT

INF

OR

MA

TIO

NR

EC

EIP

T1g30

1/

/fR

OJE

CT

Tot

al#o

fCon

tain

ers

a-2

PRO

JEC

T#.

umar

ound

Tim

eR

eque

stSI

TE

AD

DR

ESS

ASt

anda

rd5

Bus

ines

sD

ays

3:jcj

LA_’

02

Bus

ines

sD

ayR

ush

SEN

DR

EPO

RT

TO:

q’Q_.-

’LfQ

Nex

tB

usin

ess

Day

Rus

hSP

EC

IAL

INST

RU

CT

ION

S/C

OM

1vIE

NT

S:SH

IPM

EN

TM

ET

HO

DIN

VO

ICE

TO:

0Sa

me

Day

Rus

h(a

uth

req.

)O

UT

//

VIA

(IF

DIF

FE

RE

NT

PR

OM

AB

OV

E)

0O

ther

INV

IATA

TEPR

OG

RA

M(i

fany

):(7

’Fe

dEx

1/PS

MA

ILC

OU

RIE

RE

-mai

l’Y

/N

:Fa

x’Y

(N

GR

EY

HO

UN

DO

TH

ER

—Q

UO

TE

SI:V—

P0)5

:D

AT

APA

CK

AG

E:

III

III

IVSA

.MPL

FSR

EC

EIV

ED

AF

FE

R3P

MO

RSA

TU

RD

AY

AR

EC

ON

SID

ER

ED

AS

RE

CE

IVE

DO

NT

HE

NE

XT

BU

SIN

ESS

DA

Y;

IFN

OT

AT

ISM

AR

KE

DO

NC

OC

AE

SW

ILL

PR

OC

EE

DA

SST

AN

DA

RD

TA

T.

AM

PL

ES

AR

ED

ISP

OS

ED

OF

30D

AY

SA

lTE

RC

OM

PL

ET

ION

OF

RE

PO

RT

UN

LE

SSO

TH

ER

AR

RA

NG

EM

EN

TS

AR

EM

AD

E.

AN

AL

YT

ICA

LE

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

LSE

RV

ICE

S,IN

C37

85Pr

esid

entia

lPar

kway

,A

tlant

aG

A30

340-

3704

1ES

TE

L.:

(770

)457

-817

7I T

OL

L-F

RE

E(8

00)

972-

4889

/ FA

X:

(770

)457

-818

8

MA

TR

IXC

OD

ES.

AA

irO

WG

roun

dwat

erSE

Sedi

men

tSC

)=

Soil

SW=

Surf

ace

Wat

erW

Wat

er(B

lank

s)O

W=

Dri

nkin

gW

ater

(Bla

nks)

0ot

her

(specit

)PR

ESE

RV

AT

IVE

CO

DE

S:H

a-I

=H

ydro

chlo

ric

acid

+ic

eI

=Ic

eon

lyN

Nitr

icac

idS4

1=Su

lfuric

acid

+ic

eS

/M+

ISo

dium

Bis

ulfa

te/M

e(ha

nol

ice

0O

ther

(spe

citi

)N

A=

Non

e Whi

leC

opy

-Origin

al;

Ye)9(oy

01

(Iien1




Lab ID: I 104K58-00i Matrix: Groundwater


Limit Factor


1,1,1-Trichloroethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 5.0 ttg/L 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK

1,1,2-Trichioroethane BRL 5.0 oWL 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK

i,i-Dichloroethane BRL 5.0 oWL 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK

I,1-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ugfL 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 oWL 145527 I 04/27/2011 18:46 GK

i,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 uWL 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK



1,2-Dichioroethane BRL 5.0 oWL 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK

1,2-Dichloropropane BRL 5.0 ugJL 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK


1,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 ttg/L 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK

2-Butanone BRI 50 oWL 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK


4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 10 UWL 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK




Bromoform BRL 5.0 ug/L 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK


Carbon disulfide BRL 5.0 oWL 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK

Carbon tetrachioride BRL 5.0 oWL 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK




Chloromethane BRL 10 ug/L 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK

cis-I,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 oWL 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 uWL 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK

Cyclohexane BRL 5.0 ug/L 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK

Dibromochioromethane BRL 5.0 UgIL 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK

Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 10 ugfL 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK


Freon-113 BRL 10 ug/L 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK



Methyl acetate BRL 5.0 ug/L 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK

Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 oWL 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 GK

Methylcyclohexane BRL 5.0 oWL 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK

Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 oWL 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK







o Greater than Result vatoe 3 Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit

Page 3 of 5

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc Date: 28-Apr-li



Lab ID: 1 104K58-001 Matrix: Groundwater


Limit Factor

TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS 5W8260B (SW5O3OB)


Tetrachloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 OK


trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 OK

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 ugfL 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 OK

Trichioroethene BRL 5.0 ug/L 145527 I 04/27/201118:46 GK

Trichiorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 ug/L 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 GK

Vinyl chloride BRL 2.0 ug/L 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 OK

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 83.1 64.7-130 %REC 145527 1 04/27/201118:46 OK

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 108 80.7-129 %REC 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 OK

Surr: Toluene-d8 94.2 71.1-120 %REC 145527 1 04/27/2011 18:46 OK

Quaiiflers: * Value exceeds maximum contammant level E Estimated (value above qaantilation range)


H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nurr See case narrative

N Analyle not NELAC certified NC Not confirmed



Page 4 of 5


Client


Checklist completed by

___________

Signature Date

Carrier name: FedEx — UPS Courier — Client ZUS Mail — Other

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes

Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes —

Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes —

ContaineriTemp Blank temperature in compliance? (4°C±2)* Yes

Cooler #1 4’- 5 Cooler #2

_______

Cooler #3

_______

Cooler #4

Chain of custody present? Yes

Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes

Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes

Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes

Sample containers intact? Yes

Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes /‘

All samples received within holding time? Yes _J”

Was TAT marked on the COC? Yes

Proceed with Standard TAT as per project history? Yes —

Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? No VOA vials submitted —

Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes

Adjusted?

________________

Sample Condition: Good /‘ Other(Explain)

____________

(For diffusive samples or AIHA lead) Is a known blank included?


Not Present —

Not Present 7

Not Present -‘

Cooler#5 Cooler #6

* Samples do not have to comply with the given range for certain parameters.V

\L\Quality Assurance\Checklists Procedures Sign-OffTemplates\Checklists\Sample Receipt Checklists\Saniple_Cooler_Receipt_Checklist

Work Order Number //0 cy/1ç

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No — Not Applicable

Yes ,- No

No — Not Applicable —

_______________

Checked by

________________

Yes No

Page 5 of 5

APPENDIX D

PHOTOGRAPHS OF STAINING

HC7Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.

Picture 1 — March 10, 2011

Picture 2 — March 10, 2011

APPENDIX E

UPDATED CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL

——(rff

Environmental Consulting 8 Technology, Inc.

Voluntary Remediation Program ApplicationProfessional Dry Cleaners Site (HSI# 10884) Page 1

Voluntary Remediation Application(HSI # 10884)

Professional Dry Cleaners4800 Redan Road,

Stone Mountain, Georgia

February 2010

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Environmental Consulting & Technology, Inc. (ECT) has prepared this Voluntary RemediationProgram (VRP) Application for the Professional Dry Cleaners (Subject Site) Hazardous SiteInventory (HSI) site number 10884 located in the Redan Village Shopping Center in StoneMountain, Dekaib County, Georgia. This application is submitted on behalf of JNVInvestments Group (JNV) and Mr. and Mrs. Lachman Vaswani the current property owner.This application is based in part on data resulting from prior investigations conducted at thesubject site and ECT’s September 2009 investigation. The Site is comprised of tax parcel I.D.15 22403 005.

This VRP Application is prepared to address volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in subject sitesoils and groundwater that exceed the applicable Risk Reduction Standards (RSS) as requiredby Article 3 of Chapter 8 of Title 12 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. No receptorswere identified downgradient of the Subject Site in a Supplemental Release Notificationsubmitted to Georgia EDP by GLE Associates in November 2007. The Subject Site was listedon the Hazardous Site Inventory in December 2007 due to On-site Exposure Pathway. Basedon review of historical environmental investigations, as well as more recent investigationsconducted by ECT, the primary chemicals of interest are tetrachioroethene (PCE) in soil andPCE and its degradation product trichioroethene (TCE) in groundwater.

Several investigations have been performed at the Site since 2000 to identify the source andextent of soil and groundwater contaminants. In 2009, ECT was contracted by JNV to conductinvestigations at the site and evaluate alternative remedial options. Based on the history andsite conditions, ECT proposes excavation and disposal of all site soils that exceed Type 4 RRSand delineation and numerical modeling of VOC impacted groundwater to illustrate that nohuman or environmental receptors will be impacted by this release.


1.1 Purpose

This VRP Application has been prepared in order to provide for voluntary and timelyinvestigation and remediation of VOC impacted soil and groundwater at the Subject Site. Thegoals of the remedial approach will be to remove contaminant concentrations in soil that exceedtheir respective Type 4 RRS and conduct numerical groundwater modeling to illustrate that nohuman or environmental receptors will be impacted by this release.

1.2 Site Description

The Subject Site is located at 4800 Redan Road in the City of Stone Mountain, Dekaib County,Georgia. The subject property is described as a single parcel encompassing approximately 7.58acres listed in the Dekaib County, Georgia tax registry as Parcel 15 224 03 005. The property iscurrently improved with one single story block construction buildings used forretail/commercial shopping and referred to as Redan Village Shopping Center. The property iscurrently owned and operated by JNV Investments Group (JNV). The shopping center isbordered by residences to the north and east and retail stores to the south and west. Its generallocation is shown of Figure 1. The Professional Dry Cleaners has been located in the westernmost tenant space in the main building on the property since the mid 1990s. The dry cleanerand adjacent properties are illustrated on Figures 2 and 3. The dry cleaner used a 55-gallonsteel drum for storing spent filters from the on-site dry cleaning machine immediately north theProfessional Dry Cleaners tenant space.

1.3 Source Description

This section of the report provides a description of each known source which is suspected tohave contributed to a release as required. The facility has operated as a dry cleaner utilizingPCE since it began operation. Based on historical operations at the site, areas were investigatedwhere solvents were stored or handled and where spent solvents and filters may have beenstaged or disposed. The suspected source areas of the PCE, based on historical subsurfaceinvestigation results, include: soil beneath the former dry cleaner and soil in the vicinity of thearea where spent filters were staged (immediately north of the tenant space).


1.4 Site History

Since 2000, several environmental investigations have been conducted at the subject site byseveral consultants. A brief summary of the dates, investigations, reports, and consultants isincluded below.

Sailors Engineering, October 2000

• Prepared a Phase II environmental investigation - October 1997

Aerostar Environmental Services, Inc., July 2007

• Prepared a Phase I environmental investigation — July 2007

• Prepared a Phase II environmental investigation — July 2007

GLE Associates, October 2007

• Conducted soil and groundwater sampling — October 2007

• Submitted Release Notification to Georgia EPD

ECT, 2009

• Advanced soil borings in and around the dry cleaners for delineating the VOCs in soiland groundwater;

• Installed shallow rock monitoring wells to horizontally delineate VOCs in groundwater;

• Evaluated remedial technologies and prepare a VRP Application.

ECT’s soil and groundwater results and evaluation of remedial technologies are discussed infurther detail below.

1.5 Previous Soil and Groundwater Sampling

Initial environmental investigations started at the site in October 2000 when a previousconsultant conducted a Phase II ESA at the former Professional Cleaners. This investigationincluded the installation of two temporary monitoring wells and two soil borings by hand auger.The monitoring wells (TMW-1 and TMW-2) were advanced in the front and rear of the cleanersfor groundwater sampling. One soil boring was advanced inside the cleaners adjacent to themachine (HA-l), and the other boring outside adjacent to the back door (HA-2) where wastetetrachloroethylene (PCE) solvent drums where stored. Groundwater samples were collectedfrom each well and analyzed for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B.Soils samples were collected from 2 feet below ground surface (ft-bgs) and analyzed for VOCsas well. Analytical results for the groundwater samples collected from TW- 1 and TW-2


indicated the presence of PCE at 67 micrograms per liter (ug/L) and 1,920 ug/L, respectively.Analytical results for the soil samples collected from HA-2 indicated the presence of PCE at633 micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg), trichioroethylene (TCE) at 0.232 uglkg, and cis-l,2dichioroethylene (DCE) at 0.006 mg/kg. Based on the presence of the VOCs in thegroundwater and soil, a Hazardous Site Response Program Release Notification was submittedto GA EPD in November 2000 detailing the investigation. Additionally, a receptor survey wasconducted as part of the notification. Two water wells were identified from one to two miles ofthe site and the nearest residential structure at 300 feet to 1,000 feet from the edge of the plume.Based on the criteria from the receptor survey and the Phase II investigation the groundwaterand on-site pathway score was below the GA EPD threshold for listing the site on theHazardous Site Inventory (HSI). GA EPD issued a No HSI Listing Letter on February 8, 2001.

In July 2007, a phase I environmental assessment was conducted on the subject site by AerostarEnvironmental Services, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia (Aerostar) as part of a potential real estatetransaction. Based on the information obtained in the report, the consultant recommended asubsurface investigation for off-site and on-site recognized environmental concerns (RECs).The offsite concerns included a gasoline station, a dry cleaning facility, and an auto repairfacility. The on-site concern identified was the former dry cleaning operation, ProfessionalCleaners.

Based on the recommendations of the Phase I ESA, Aerostar was contracted to perform aLimited Phase II ESA. On July 20, 2007, Aerostar collected a groundwater sample fromtemporary monitoring well TW-2. The sample was analyzed for PCE, TCE, 1,1 -dichloroethene,cis-DCE, trans-DCE, and vinyl chloride (VC) with analytical results indicating PCE at 5,600ug/L, TCE at 320 ug/L, and cis-DCE at 69 ug/L. Additionally, the dry cleaning equipment wasinspected during the site visit for compliance. Based on the results of the groundwatersampling, Aerostar stated that an additional release of dry cleaning solvent may have occurredand additional assessment activities may be warranted to delineate the dissolved chlorinatesolves in the groundwater. Aerostar also stated that the dry cleaning equipment was incompliance.

Based on the results of the Aerostar Limited Phase II ESA, GLE Associates of Atlanta, Georgiawas contracted to perform an additional subsurface investigation and a Hazardous SiteResponse Program Release Notification for the subject site. On October 12 and 15, 2007, GLEadvanced 31 direct push soil borings from 2 ft-bgs to 29 ft-bgs and collected select soil samplesfor laboratory analysis of dry PCE and breakdown constituents. Additionally, a groundwatersample was collected from TW-2 to confirm the previously identified groundwatercontamination level at the site. Based on the PCE concentrations identified in the soil samplesabove the HSRA notification concentrations, and the confirmation of the PCE and breakdown


constituent sin the groundwater, a PCE release to the soil and PCE, TCE, and cis-DCE releaseto groundwater was reported to the Georgia EPD on November 13, 2007. On December 27,2007, GA EPD listed the site on the HSI.

Based on the listing of the site, GLE proposed to perform additional soil assessment todetermine the magnitude ad extent of soil contamination at the site. The first phase proposedfifteen (15) soil borings to bedrock refusal collecting up to 10 soil samples for laboratoryanalysis. The second phase included an unidentified number of borings (based on the firstphase) with a maximum of eight (8) soil samples collected for laboratory analysis. Based on thesoil sample results from the two investigations, GLE proposed to prepare a remedial strategy.

On November 12, 2008, GLE submitted a request to GA EPD to provide the property ownerwith site specific clean-up levels for PCE in soil. GLE proposed a clean-up level of 0.1 mg/KgPCE be the established clean-up level established for this property.

1.5.1 September 9, 2009 Groundwater Sampling

In September 2009, ECT installed three monitoring wells for horizontal delineation ofgroundwater contaminants. Well installation procedures followed US EPA Region 4 SESDguidance. The borings were installed utilizing a CME-75 drill rig and air compressor advancinga four-inch diameter air rotary hammer. MW-4 was advanced to 39 ft-bgs and MW-5 and MW-6 to 44 ft-bgs. During drilling, soil and bedrock cuttings were recovered from the borings anddrummed for disposal. After boring completion, a two-inch diameter PVC monitoring well wasplaced in each boring. The well for MW-4 was constructed with a 19 foot of solid 2-inch PVCriser and 25 feet of 0.01 inch slotted screen. Eight-inch well vaults were secured to the top ofeach boring with 1½ foot by 1½ foot concrete well pads for protection. After completion of theconstruction of the new wells, the wells were surveyed for top of casing elevations to assess thegroundwater flow at the site. The well elevations were set relative with an arbitrary elevation of100 feet at MW-i.

Prior to sampling the monitoring wells, all wells were gauged for the presence of groundwater.The groundwater elevations were used to assess the groundwater flow direction at the site. Dueto the wells being installed in bedrock, water levels appear to have been influenced and apotentiometric map and groundwater gradient could not be accurately be assessed. Theelevations are shown on Table 3 and Figure 9. Note, during previous investigations conductedby other consultants, three wells, MW-i through MW-3 were installed and subsequently gaugedand determined to be dry. During the September 2009 gauging event, groundwater was presentin all wells. The previously installed wells, MW-l through MW-3, and the three newlyinstalled monitoring wells, MW-4 through MW-6, were developed utilizing a submersible


pump. Based on the previous consultants boring logs and ECT’s observation during theinstallation of MW-4 through MW-6, all wells were installed in competent bedrock. Duringdevelopment of the wells, the pump rate exceeded the recharge rate for each well. The wellswere pumped until dry several times until the turbidity of each well was minimized.Development volumes for each well were as follows: MW-i (15 gallons), MW-2 (12 gallons),MW-3 (10 gallons), MW-4 (15 gallons), MW-5 (5 gallons), and MW-6 (10 gallons).

After monitoring well development and groundwater gauging, all monitoring wells weresampled. Monitoring well TW-2 was purged and sampled utilizing a peristaltic pump withmonitoring wells MW-i through MW-6 being purged and sampled utilizing a bladder pump.All well purging and sampling was conducted following US EPA Region 4 SESD samplingprocedures. The collected groundwater samples were submitted for laboratory analysis ofVOCs by 8260B. One sample, MW-6 was also submitted for analysis of PAHs by EPA Method8270B. The groundwater sample collected from MW-2 was collected for PAHs, but heldpending PAH analysis of the soil sample collected from SB-37. No PAHs were detected in theSB-37 soil samples; therefore, the groundwater sample from MW-2 was not analyzed for PAHs.

Analytical results for the groundwater samples collected indicated the presence of PCE in TW2, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-6. Additional constituents detected from groundwatersamples collected in September 2009 include TCE, cis-DCE, and VC. No PAHs were detectedin the sample collected from MW-6. A summary of the analytical results is included in Table 2and on Figures 7 and 8. Analytical laboratory reports are provided in Appendix IV.

1.5.2 September 9, 2009 Soil Sampling

On September 9, 2009, ECT installed nine soil borings to a maximum depth of 10 ft-bgsutilizing direct push technology on the exterior of the Professional Cleaners and three soilborings by hand auger in the interior of the drycleaners. Soil sampling was conductedfollowing US EPA Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division’s (SESD) samplingprocedures. Soil samples were collected at depths of 2 ft-bgs, 7 ft-bgs, and 10 ft-bgs whereaccessible. Note, competent bedrock refusal was encountered during the advancement of theseborings as shallow as 2 ft-bgs.

Exterior Borings

On September 9, 2009, nine soil borings (SB-35 through SB-39 and MW-4 through MW-6)were advanced by direct push technology on the exterior of the dry cleaners. Soil samples werecollected at the predetermined depths utilizing a macrocore sampling tube with a sterile acetateliner following SESD sampling procedures. The soil sample lithology was noted and thesample split for field screening and laboratory analysis. Soil samples collected were field


screened for VOCs using a Photo Ionization detector (PID). The collected soil samples weresubmitted for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260B.

During field screening, no significant VOC detections were identified with the PD, with allconcentrations being below 10 parts per million (ppm). Laboratory results indicated thepresence of PCE above laboratory detection limits in all samples except MW-4 at 2 ft-bgs,MW-5 at 7 ft-bgs, and MW-6 at 10 ft-bgs. The soil laboratory results are included in Table 1 ofthe Tables Appendix, (Appendix 1). Additionally, the laboratory results relative to the boringlocation are included in Figures 5 through 7of the Figures Appendix (Appendix 2). PCEconcentrations were highest in the immediate area adjacent to the back door of the dry cleanersand downgradient. Elevated concentrations were detected at all three depths (5 ft-bgs, 7 ft-bgs,and 10 ft-bgs). The suspected source area for the PCE appears to be immediately adjacent tothe back door where PCE drums have historically been stored. All Soil Laboratory Reports areincluded in the Appendix IV.

Interior Soil Borings

On September 9, 2009, three additional soil borings were advanced indoors utilizing a handauger (SB-32 through SB-34). The borings were advanced by hand auger following SESDsampling procedures. Borings SB-32, SB-33, and SB-34 were advanced to refusal depths of 2ft-bgs, 8 ft-bgs, and 5 ft-bgs, respectively. The samples were collected from SB-32 and SB-34at 2 ft-bgs and SB-33 at 2 ft-bgs and 7 ft-bgs. The samples were lithologically described, andsplit for field screening and laboratory analysis. Soil samples were field screened for VOCswith a PD. The collected soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPAMethod 8260B. Additionally, the soil samples collected from SB-37 were analyzed forpolynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by EPA Method 8270B.

During field screening, no significant VOC detections were identified with the PD, with allconcentrations being below 10 ppm. Laboratory results indicated the presence of PCE abovelaboratory detection limits in all samples collected. The laboratory results are included inTable 1. Additionally, the laboratory results relative to the boring location are included inFigures 4 through 6. Based on the shallow refusal indoors, only shallow samples could becollected. Accordingly, only horizontal delineation of the shallow soil profile was evaluated.Based on the results of the soil sampling, it appears that slightly elevated PCE concentrationswere detected in the front of the dry cleaner and adjacent to the dry cleaning machine. NoPAHs were detected in the samples collected from SB-37. All Soil Laboratory Reports areincluded in the Appendix IV.

Volun tar)’ Remediation Program ApplicationProfessional Thy Cleaners Site (HSI# 10884) Page 8

1.5.3 November 17-23, 2010 Investigation

On November 17, 2010 four rock wells were installed along the northern property boundary ofthe subject site between the dry cleaner and the adjacent townhome community. The four rockwells (MW-7 through MW-b) were installed along the northern property boundary starting inthe northeast corner (MW-7) and moving west (See Figures). The monitoring wells werespaced out with approximately 40 feet between each well. The monitoring wells were installedto depths ranging from 35 to 45 feet below land surface (ft bls). Bedrock was encountered ineach well at depths ranging from 3 to 12 ft bls. Boring logs for each monitoring well areincluded in Appendix A of this report. Based on field observations during the installation of thewells, it appears that the top of bedrock follows the surface topography. Field Notes for eachevent are provided in Appendix B of this report.

During the well installation, soil samples were collected from each monitoring well at depths of2 ft bls and 10 ft bls with the exception of MW-9. No soil sample was collected at 10 ft bls dueto encountering bedrock before this depth was reached. PCE was detected in soil samplescollected at 2 ft bls from MW-7 and MW-10 at concentrations of 11 ppb and 15 ppb. Soil datafrom this sampling event are summarized in Table 1. After each monitoring well was installedand properly completed following U.S. EPA Science and Ecology Support Division (SESD)protocols, groundwater was measured in each well. No groundwater was detected inmonitoring wells MW-l0 (total depth 45 ft bls) and MW-7 (total depth 37.5 ft bis).Groundwater was detected in monitoring wells MW-8 (16 ft water column; 19 ft bls; total depth35 ft bls) and MW-9 (7 ft water column; 38 ft bls; total depth 45 ft bls). Groundwater samplinglogs for each monitoring well are included in Appendix C of this report.

Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-8 and MW-9 on November23, 2010. Analytical results indicated PCE concentrations in groundwater ranging from 73 ppbin MW-9 to 1,200 ppb in MW-8. The large variations in the contaminant concentrationsindicate that bedrock is potentially influencing the flow and direction of both groundwater andthe groundwater contamination. Groundwater concentrations and elevations are provided inTables 2 and 3. Soil and groundwater analytical reports are provided in Appendix D of thisreport. Delineation criteria for each contaminant detected in both soil and groundwater areprovided in Table 4.

In December 2010, monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-b were gauged again for the presence ofgroundwater. Sufficient groundwater to collect a groundwater sample was detected in bothmonitoring wells.


1.5.4 February 15-25 2011 Investigation

On February 15, 2011, two rock wells were installed to the south and east of the suspectedsource area to horizontally delineate on-site groundwater contamination. Monitoring well MW-11 was installed to the south and monitoring well MW-12 was installed to the east of the sourcearea. These monitoring wells (MW-li and MW-12) were spaced approximately 50 feet fromthe nearest existing monitoring wells in their respective direction (See Figures). Monitoringwells MW-il and MW-12 were installed to depths of 30 and 35 feet below land surface (ft bls),respectively. Bedrock was encountered in MW-il at approximately 26 ft bis. A small lens ofbedrock was encountered in MW-12 at approximately 28 to 29 ft bls, with soil continuing to theboring termination depth of 35 ft bls. Based on field observations during the installation ofthese wells, it appears that the top of bedrock becomes deeper as you move east of the drycleaner and varies as you move south. Boring logs for these well are included in Appendix A ofthis report.

During the installation of each well, soil samples were collected from each well at depths of 2,6, and 10 ft his. No VOCs were detected in any of the soil samples collected from MW-il orMW-12. Soil data from monitoring wells MW-il and MW-il is provided in Table 1.

After monitoring wells MW-i 1 and MW-12 were installed and properly completed followingU.S. EPA SESD protocols, elevations were measured and groundwater samples collected fromeach well. Groundwater was detected in monitoring well MW-li at 24.3 ft bls (5.7 ft watercolumn) and MW-i2 at 34.04 ft bls (0.96 ft water column). During this sampling event,monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-b (installed during the November 2010 field work) weregauged. Groundwater was detected in monitoring wells MW-7 at 30.1 ft his (7.4 ft watercolumn) and MW-iO at 43.26 ft bls (1.74 ft water column). Groundwater sampling logs foreach well are included in Appendix C of this report.

Analytical results for the groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-7 andMW-iO through MW-i2 on February 25, 2011 indicate PCE concentrations ranging from 9.3ppb in MW-12 to 41 ppb in MW-7. Groundwater elevations and analytical results frommonitoring wells MW-7 and MW-b through MW-12 are provided in Tables 2 and 3.Groundwater and soil analytical reports are provided in Appendix D of this report.


1.5.5 March 10, 2011 Investigation

Based on the low levels of VOC contamination detected in monitoring wells MW-il and MW-12 (10 ppb and 9.3 ppb) during the February 25, 2011 sampling event, these wells wereresampled to ensure no cross contamination occurred during this sampling event. On March 10,2011, monitoring well MW-il was resampled but no groundwater was detected in MW-12.Analytical results from the March 10, 2011 sampling event confirmed a low concentration ofPCE (ii ppb) was present in monitoring well MW-li. No other VOCs were detected in MW11 during either the February or March 2011 sampling events. Groundwater analytical resultsare included in Appendix D of this report.

During the March 10, 2011 sampling event, staining was observed on the asphalt north of thedry cleaner (pictures provided in Appendix E of this report). The staining was visuallyinspected and strong solvent odors were detected. Based on the presence of the strong solventodors and visual observations that indicated the dumped material entered the flush mountedstorm drain located immediately adjacent of the staining, a soil sample was collected from theasphalt and accumulated soil adjacent to the storm drain. Analytical results from the asphaltand storm drain indicate PCE concentrations of 270 and 9,800 ug/kg respectively. Nobreakdown constitutes were detected in either sample indicating that dry cleaning solvent (PCE)was recently dumped into the on-site storm drain located in the parking lot north of the drycleaner.

To address the PCE that entered the storm drain, historic environmental and constructiondocuments were reviewed and the outfall for the impacted storm drain was identified adjacentto the northern property boundary east of the dry cleaner. On April 11, 2011, one groundwaterand one soil sample was collected from the outfall of the impacted storm drain. With theexception of low concentrations of acetone (0.07 ppm) in the soil sample, no PCE or itsbreakdowns were detected in either sample.

ECT notified the owner (Mr. Vaswani) of the shopping center of the potential dumpingactivities on the subject site. Mr. Vaswani is consulting with legal counsel and has beencommunicating with the owner of the on-site dry cleaner. No new staining has been observedin the areas surrounding the dry cleaner on the subject site during subsequent site visits.


1.5.6 April 7- 27, 2011 Investigation

On April 7, 2011, two rock wells were installed to the south and east of the source area tohorizontally delineate on-site groundwater contamination. Monitoring well MW-13 wasinstalled to the south and monitoring well MW- 14 was installed to the east of the suspectedsource area. These monitoring wells (MW-13 and MW-14) were spaced approximately 50 and60 feet from the nearest existing monitoring wells in their respective direction (See Figures).The monitoring wells were installed to depths of 35 (MW-13) and 70 (MW-14) ft bls. Bedrockwas encountered in MW- 13 at an approximate depth of 24 ft bls. A small lens of bedrock wasencountered in MW- 14 at approximately 51 ft bls, and competent bedrock was encountered at56 ft bis. Boring MW-14 was terminated at approximately 70 ft bis. Based on fieldobservations during the installation of these wells, it appears that the top of bedrock becomesdeeper as you move east of the dry cleaner. To better understand the geology beneath thesubject site, North to South (A-A’) and West to East (B-B’) cross sections of the subject site’sgeology were generated and are included with this report. Boring logs for MW-13 and MW-14are included in Appendix A of this report.

After each monitoring well was installed and properly completed following U.S. EPA SESDprotocols, groundwater was measured in each well. No groundwater was detected inmonitoring wells MW-14 (total depth 70 ft bls). Groundwater was detected in monitoring wellsMW-13 at 25.45 ft bls. The groundwater sampling log for MW-13 is included in Appendix Cof this report. Analytical results indicated that no VOCs were present above laboratorydetection limits in monitoring well MW-13. Groundwater elevations and concentrations areprovided in Tables 2 and 3. No soil samples were collected from MW-13 or MW-14 since soilhas already been horizontally delineated on-site. Groundwater analytical reports are included inAppendix D of this report.

Based on the geological conditions encountered east of the on-site dry cleaner (side gradient ofthe source area) on-site horizontal delineation of groundwater to the east of the dry cleaner istechnically impractical. During this reporting period, ECT attempted to delineate the easternboundary of the groundwater contamination plume with rock wells MW-12 and MW-l4. Basedon observations during the installation of MW-12 and MW-14, as you move east from thesource area the bedrock appears to become deeper and sufficient groundwater becomesnonexistent.

When installing MW-12, no competent bedrock was encountered. Groundwater was observedaround 30 ft bls and the well was installed to a depth of 35 ft bls. A minimum amount ofgroundwater was detected in MW-12 during the February 25, 2011 sampling event. Analytical


results for MW- 12 indicted low concentrations of PCE (9.3 ppb). No other VOCs weredetected in this well. In March 2011, ECT attempted to resample MW-12 to ensure no crosscontamination occurred during the February 25, 2011 sampling event. No groundwater wasdetected in MW-12 during the March 10, 2011 sampling event.

To horizontally delineate the on-site groundwater plume east of the source area, ECT installedanother monitoring well (MW-14) approximately 60 feet east of MW-12. When installingMW-14, competent bedrock was encountered at 56 ft bls. ECT advanced 14 feet into bedrockto a total well depth of 70 ft bis with no signs of groundwater.

Based on the low concentrations of PCE detected in MW-12 (9.3 ppb), the lack of sufficientgroundwater in monitoring well MW-12 and MW-14, and the topographical orientation of MW-12 and MW- 14 to the source area (side gradient), the on-site groundwater contamination plumeeast of the source area does not represent a threat to human health and the environment and istechnically impractical to delineate.

Proposed Echo Street Residential DevelopmentAtlanta, Fulton County, Georgia Page 13

2.0 SUBJECT SITE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

Site geology has been investigated extensively at the Subject Site and was assessed during ECTsinvestigation. Geologically, this site resides in the Piedmont Physiographic Province of theUnited States, which is characterized by Precambrian to early Paleozoic (700 million to 500million year old) crystalline metamorphic rock. The local geology in the area of the site consistsof hard but fractured bedrock overlain by approximately 15 feet of unconsolidated, highlyweathered sediments and soils.

The local bedrock is composed of a slightly metamorphic granite related to the Stone MountainComplex, and a highly metamorphic mica schist that contains biotite and muscovite minerals.Both bedrock types are variably fractured.

The metamorphic bedrock is overlain by a variable thickness of sediment and soil. Thicknessescan vary but are estimated to between 12 to 18 feet in the area of the site. The unconsolidatedsediment is a weathered saprolite composed of red silty sands to silty clays. Clay mineralogy isvariable but the dominant clay type can be kaolin. The water table is found at approximately 25-30 feet below grade, within the fractured bedrock.


3.0 RISK ASSESSMENT

This section presents a summary of RRS and applicability to the site and surrounding properties.RRS were calculated for both soil and groundwater using the methods provided in 391-3-19-.07of the HSRA Rules. The proposed RRS for soil and groundwater were calculated prior to ECT’sSeptember 2009 investigation. The RRS for soil and groundwater were approved by GeorgiaEPD following the 1st Semi Annual Progress Report. The calculated RRS values for soil andgroundwater were compared to concentration data from samples collected at the Subject Site inorder to determine current compliance with RRS. Based on the current and expected use of thesite, non-residential, site specific Type 3/4 RRS are the accepted clean-up criteria. A discussionof the RRS for soil and groundwater for the Subject Site is provided below to.

3.1 Risk Reduction Standards for Soil

PCE was the only COC detected in soil samples above its respective HSRA NotificationConcentration. The detected VOC concentrations in the soil were compared to Type 1 and 3/4RRS as shown on Table 1. Site delineation concentration criteria provided in the GeorgiaVoluntary Remediation Act 12-8-108, (part (1) Subparagraph (E)) was used to demonstrate thatsoil contamination has been horizontally delineated on the qualifying property. The delineationcriteria for each COC are provided in Table 4. Based on the current soil concentration data forthe Subject Site, PCE was the only COC detected above its respective Type 1 and 3/4 RRS. PCEwas detected above its respective Type 1 and 3/4 RRS in two interior borings (SB-30 at 5’ bisand SB-3 1 at 5’ bls) and several exterior borings located north of the dry cleaner at variousdepths ranging from 2 to 10’ bis. All concentrations exceeding the Type 1 and 3/4 RRSs arelisted in bold in Table 1. Soil sampling locations are shown in Figures 4 through 6.

Calculations for Type 1, Type 3/4 RRSs for PCE, TCE, trans-DCE, cis-DCE, and VC in soilwere performed for comparison of the laboratory detected concentrations. The respective RRSsare shown at the bottom of Table 1. A review of the laboratory results for all soil investigationsindicate that PCE was detected in 11 samples exceeding the calculated Type 3/4 RRSs (500ug/kg). Based on the present concentrations of PCE in soil, it appears that a PCE release hasoccurred in the vicinity of the back door (north) of the dry cleaning facility. No PCE breakdownconstituents exceeding their respective Type 3/4 RRS were detected in any of the samplescollected. Based on the concentrations detected, it appears that horizontal delineation of all PCEand breakdown constituents to below Type 3/4 RRSs has been achieved on the qualitfyingproperty.


Based on the PCE concentrations detected in soil in the immediate area north of the dry cleaners,the subject site does not appear to be in compliance with the Type 3/4 RRS. Laboratory resultsfor soil samples collected from all other site borings horizontally delineate PCE to below Type 1RRS in all directions of the suspected source area.

3.2 Risk Reduction Standards for Groundwater

COCs detected in groundwater samples above HSRA Notification Concentrations include PCEand TCE. The detected VOC concentrations in groundwater were compared to Type 3/4 RRSwith concentrations exceeding the RRSs in bold as shown on Table 2. Groundwater samplinglocations are shown in Figures 7 and 8. Specific data concerning the delineation of groundwateris discussed below.

Calculations for Type 1/3 and Type 4 RRSs for PCE, TCE, trans-DCE, cis-DCE, and VC ingroundwater were performed for comparison of the laboratory detected concentrations. Therespective Type 1/3 and 4 RRSs are shown at the bottom of Table 2. A review of the laboratoryresults for the groundwater investigations indicate that PCE, TCE, trans-DCE, cis-DCE, and VCare delineated in each direction of the suspected source area with the exception of north. TCEwas detected above laboratory detection limits in five wells, TW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-7, andMW-8. TCE was detected in TW-2 during three different events and exceeded Type 4 RRSs(34.5ug/L) for each. TCE concentrations detected in MW-3, MW-4, Mw-7, and MW-8 werebelow Type 4 RRSs. VC was detected in one sample, MW-2, at the laboratory detection limit (2ugIL), but below the calculated Type 3/4 RRSs (i8.ugJL). Cis-DCE was detected in TW-2during three sampling events and MW-i through MW-4 and MW-7. All cis-DCE concentrationsdetected were below the calculated Type 4 RRSs (1,020 ug/L). Trans-DCE was not detectedabove laboratory detection limits in any of the groundwater samples collected at the subject site.Groundwater concentrations are shown in Table 2 and on Figures 1 through 3. Based on theconcentrations detected, it appears that horizontal delineation of all PCE to below Type 1/3,Type 4 RRS, and laboratory detection limits to the south and west has been achieved. TCE, cisDCE, and VC have been delineated to below Type 1, Type 4 RRS, and laboratory detectionlimits to the south, east, and west. No wells have been installed to assess the deeper aquifer atthe site; therefore, vertical delineation has not been achieved.

Based on the investigation results for the most recent sampling events conducted at the site byECT, horizontal delineation on the qualifying property of PCE, TCE, trans-DCE, cis-DCE, andVC to below Type 1/3 and Type 4 RRS to the west and south of the suspected source area hasbeen achieved. Access to the adjacent property located north of the subject site will be requiredto delineate the groundwater contamination to the north of the suspected source area.


To horizontally delineate the on-site groundwater plume east of the source area, ECT installedtwo monitoring well (MW-12 and MW-14) east of the suspected source area. MW-14 wasinstalled approximately 60 feet east of MW- 12. Sufficient groundwater for sampling was notdetected in either monitoring well. When installing MW-14, competent bedrock wasencountered at 56 ft bis. ECT advanced 14 feet into bedrock to a total well depth of 70 ft hiswith no signs of groundwater.

Based on the low concentrations of PCE detected in MW-12 (9.3 ppb) in February 2011sampling event, the lack of sufficient groundwater in monitoring well MW-12 and MW-14during the March 2011 sampling event, and the topographical orientation of MW-12 and MW-14to the suspected source area (side gradient), the on-site groundwater contamination plume east ofthe source area does not represent a threat to human health and the environment and istechnically impractical to delineate.

3.3 Vapor Intrusion

Prior to remediation activities, ECT will conduct activities such as modeling or collection of sitespecific data to determine if the subsurface contamination identified on the Subject Site poses athreat for vapor intrusion exposure pathways and an unacceptable risk to human health. Theseactivities will be done following the guidance provided in EPA’s document “Draft Guidance forEvaluating the Vapor Intrusion from Indoor Pathways from Soils and Groundwater (SubsurfaceVapor Intrusion Guidance).”

Based on the groundwater data collected during the November 2010 Investigation, it wasrecommended that the vapor intrusion model be completed immediately to assess possibleimpacts to the residences located along the northern property boundary. At the time the 2’’Semi-Annual Progress report was prepared, the vapor intrusion modeling has not beencompleted. It is anticipated, that the vapor intrusion modeling will be completed and the resultssubmitted to Georgia EPD prior to July 30, 2011. The adjustment in the timeframe for the vaporintrusion modeling is reflected in the updated milestone schedule.


4.0 REMEDIAL DESIGN

4.1 General Scope of Corrective Action

The implementation of the corrective action program will consist of the following components:

(a) Source area remediation by excavation

• TCLP sampling for VOCs,

• Submittal of results to landfill for disposal approval,• Soil excavation,

• Confirmation soil sampling,

• Backfill with clean soil,

(b) Groundwater Delineation and Modeling• Vertical and horizontal delineation of groundwater contamination• Numerical Modeling of VOC impacted groundwater• Routine Groundwater sampling

4.2 Corrective Action Objectives

The corrective action objectives for the site is limited to those substances/constituents present inthe groundwater and soil, attributable to suspected releases from the release of PCE that arepresent at concentrations above Type 1 and 3/4 RRS. The specific constituents are addressed bythis VRP Application are: PCE, TCE, DCE (cis and trans), and VC.

4.3 Professional Dry Cleaners Corrective Action Approach

Prior sections of this document provided a brief historical overview of the Professional DryCleaners contaminant concentrations and a review of the selected remedial technologies. Thissection provides the specific corrective action approaches that will be utilized at the ProfessionalDry Cleaners, excavation and groundwater modeling. Additionally, details of theimplementation of these technologies including permitting, excavation, sampling, and Health andSafety are included in the sections below.

4.4 Permitting

All necessary local permits required for the excavation will be obtained prior to performing thework.


4.5 Excavation

Chlorinated VOC impacted soil has been identified in a suspected source area immediately northof the building on the subject site. ECT proposes to excavate the VOC impacted soils in thissource area as shown on Figure 10. Prior to excavation of soils, all monitoring wells in the areawill be properly abandoned following Georgia Water Well Standards. Additionally, utilitiessuch as power, drainage, water, and sewer may have to be temporarily disconnected and reroutedaround the excavation area. Disconnection and handling of these utilities will be done at thedirection of the respective utility company.

Once the necessary utilities have been addressed, sheet piling may be installed along thesouthern side of the excavation area nearest the building to protect the foundation of the building.The sheet piling will be located along the entire southern wall of the excavation area(approximately 20 feet). The sheet piles will be constructed of steel approximately ½ inchesthick, 1 ½ feet wide, and 15 feet long. Specifications for the sheet pilings were provided by thecompany that will install the sheet pilings. Additionally, if the sheet piling is necessary aGeorgia Professional Engineer will certify that the sheet pilings will be sufficient to protect thefoundation of the building and keep the western wall of the excavation area from caving in.

After the sheeting pilings are properly installed, excavation of soil down to bedrock will begin(approximately 10-12 feet below land surface). Based on previous sampling events, soil in theexcavation area contains PCE above its applicable RRS. The estimated dimensions of theexcavation area are 45 feet x 20 feet to a depth of 12 feet. These dimensions equate toapproximately 400 cubic yards of impacted soil. The VOC impacted soil will be removed fromthe excavation area using an excavator and will be live loaded in dump trucks that will transportthe soil to an approved off-site facility. It is anticipated that the impacted soil will be removedand disposed of at Eagle Point Landfill in Ball Ground, Georgia. As previously discussed, soilsamples will be collected from this area and analyzed for TCLP VOCs prior to the disposal ofany soil. Laboratory results will be provided to the landfill with a profile for acceptance. Ifinclement weather occurs during excavation activities, real time decisions to continue or ceaseexcavation activities will be made by the Site Manager based on site conditions and safetyconsiderations

ECT will collect soil samples for verification of removal of impacted soils above the applicableRRS. The soil sampling regime will be discussed in further detail in the PerformanceMonitoring Plan Section below. In general, soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis onthe side walls of the excavation area at depths of zero to two feet, five to seven feet, and eight to10 feet every 25 linear feet.

Voluntary Remediation Program ApplicationProfessional Dry Cleaners Site (I-ISJ# 10884) Page 19

Once confirmation samples have been collected from the excavation area, backfill activities willbegin. Backfill from an off-site source will be utilized. Prior to accepting soil from the off-sitesource, ECT will collect a sample for VOC analysis from the area of the borrow pit that willsupply the backfill. The backfill will be transported to the site via dump trucks and dumpeddirectly into the excavation area. ECT will selectively screen all backfill material for signs ofcontamination (staining or odors). The excavator will then be used to compact the backfill in 2foot lifts. If additional compaction is warranted due to future site uses, a remote controlledcompactor will be utilized. Any utilities disconnected prior to excavation activities will beproperly reconnected to ensure it function properly. Once the excavation area has beencompletely backfilled, the excavation area and surrounding disturbed areas will be finished withthe appropriate material (asphalt, curbing, or vegetation).

4.6 Groundwater Modeling

After excavation and groundwater delineation activities have been completed, ECT will conductnumerical groundwater modeling using an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approvedgroundwater model. This model will estimate the likely future extent of the dissolved VOCsimpact in groundwater. The data generated during the numerical groundwater modeling will becompared to a map showing potential receptors to demonstrate that no human or environmentalreceptors will be impacted by the dissolved VOCs from this release. Specifics concerning thetype of numerical groundwater model that will be used, will be provided once the groundwatercontamination is delineated and more information is obtained concerning the Subject site’sgeological conditions.


5.0 PERFORMANCE MONITORING PLAN

As the remediation plan is implemented, the remediation process will be monitored continuallyto confirm that the specific remedial action is a success or failure. This determination can bemade in a defensible way only through an adequately designed performance monitoring andassessment process, which includes a clear definition of success. The performance monitoringand assessment process must provide information that is compatible with the agreed uponregulatory framework. In this case, success is defined as obtaining concentrations of PCE belowthe RRS in soil.

5.1 Excavation

During historical investigations, several soil and groundwater samples have been collected in thesource area. The results for the investigations will serve as a base line to determine the successof the remediation. During the excavation, confirmation soil samples will be field screened forVOCs with a PD at various depths and in various locations on the perimeter of the excavation todetermine if significant concentrations are present beyond the proposed excavation area.Additionally, after the removal of the soil, soil samples will be collected at depths of zero to twofeet, five to seven feet, eight to 10 feet every 25 linear ft along the side walls of the excavationarea. Soil samples will be analyzed for VOCs by 8260B. It is expected that bedrock will beencountered in the bottom of the excavation; therefore, confirmation soil samples will not becollected. If bedrock is not encountered, confirmation soil samples will be collected on a 10 footgrid pattern. Based on the baseline concentrations, elevated VOC readings by field screening arenot expected on the excavation walls after source removal. After verification that soilconcentrations are below Type 3/4 RRS, clean soil will be placed back into the excavation.

5.2 Health and Safety

5.2.1 Excavation

Prior to the initiation of on-site activities, a Health & Safety plan will be created for this project.Additionally, the Health & Safety Plan will be provided to each subcontractor for comments andapproval.


5.3 Reporting

5.3.1 Semi Annual Progress Reports

Assessment activities will commence upon approval of this VRP Application by the GeorgiaEPD. A summary of each activity will be provided in Semi Annual Progress Reports to GeorgiaEPD following the milestone schedule listed below in Section 5.3.2 At the completion of theimplementation of the Corrective Actions, Performance Monitoring Plan, and horizontal andvertical delineation of VOC impacted soil and groundwater, the data will be reviewed andsummarized in a Compliance Status Report to GA EPD. The report will provide data collectedduring the excavation, performance monitoring period, groundwater and soil delineation, andmodeling (vapor intrusion and Fate and Transport).

5.3.2 Milestone Schedule

The tentative schedule for implementation of the corrective actions is shown below. Ifdeviations from the proposed milestone schedule occur, ECT will notify Georgia EPD prior tothe due date for that milestone.

Tentative Milestone Schedule

Date Task

March 15, 2010 Submittal of VRP Application

Horizontal delineation of on-site soil and groundwaterMay 14, 2011contaminationCompletion of Vapor intrusion modeling for the subjectJuly 30, 2011site and impacted properties.Horizontal delineation of soil and groundwater on allMay 14, 2012impacted propertiesHorizontal and vertical delineation of all soil and

November 14, 2012 groundwater contamination, finalize remedial plan andcosts

May 14, 2013 Excavation of Impacted soil above Type 4 RRS

Complete Groundwater Numerical Modeling of VOCMay 14, 2014Impacted Groundwater

November 14, 2014 Submittal of Compliance Status Report

Voluntary Remediation Program ApplicationProfrssional Dry Cleaners Site (HSI# 10884)

5.3.3 Correction Action Cost Estimates

Cost estimates to conduct the corrective actions discussed previously in this report (soil andgroundwater delineation, excavation, and groundwater modeling) are provided below.

Cost Estimate for On-site Delineation of Soil and Groundwater

Page 22

Drillina $14000

Equipment $2,500Laboratory (soil and groundwater) $3.200Labor $4,800

OversightSoil Diwosal

DrillingOversicihtSoil Disposal

$8,800$1.500

$6,700$2.400$500

Cost Estimate for Off-site Delineation of Soil and Groundwater

Installation of ShallowRock Wells (6)

Drilling $11,000Oversight $6,300Soil Disposal $1,200ProfessionalServices $3,800

Groundwater SamplingEquipment $2,000Laboratory (soil and groundwater) $1,800Labor $2,800

Estimated Costs $28,900.00

Installation of ShallowRock Wells (8)

_____________________________________________________________

Installation of Deep RockWell

_________________________________________________________________

Groundwater Sampling

____________________________________________ ______________

Estimated Costs $44.400.00


Modeling

Vapor Intrusion Modeling $9,800

Groundwater Fate and TransportModeling $54,500 -‘

Estimated Costs $64,300

Cost Estimate for Excavation of Soil Exceeding Type 4 RRS

Scope ofWork Proposed PriceCharacterization and_approvals

6 hours $500Pre-projectReporting

H&S/work plan prep $1,500BaselineSampling

Laboratory (VOC5-7) $750Laboratory (MNA-7) $2,200Equipment $200Sampling labor (10hours) $800

Sheet PilingDesign (report & PE) If Necessary will be additional costContractor If Necessary will be additional cost

Soil Remediation, backfill, and restorationContractor coordination/scheduling $3,500Soil Removal contractor $9,500Soil Disposal

400 yards/500 tons @ $30 per ton-T&D $15,000Backfill soil

520 yards @ $10 per yard $5,200Site Restoration (asphalt and curbing) $5,000Sampling and Oversight $9,200Soil sampling & Lab Analytical (15 x $160) $2,650Project Oversight & Management (P.E., etc) $3,500

Estimated Costs $59,500.00

APPENDIX F

UPDATED MILESTONE SCHEDULE(GNATT CHART)

——


JNV

Inves

tmen

tG

roup

-C

on

cep

tual

Sit

eM

odel

4800

Red

anR

oad,

Sto

neM

ount

ain,

Geo

rgia

HSI

#108

84

Tas

kN

ame

Sta

rtFi

nish

Phys

ical

%20

1120

1220

1312

014

Com

olet

eA

IMIJ

IJIA

ISJO

INID

JIFI

MIA

IMIJ

IJIA

ISIO

INID

JIFI

MIA

IMIJ

IJ1A

ISIO

INID

JlF

MIA

jMlJ

IJjA

SIO

INlD

JIFI

MIA

.V

.I

--A

sses

smen

t

1.1

--

On-

site

hori

zont

alD

elin

eatio

nof

Soil

1.2

—O

n-si

teho

rizo

ntal

Del

inea

tion

Gro

undw

ater

1.3

--O

ff-s

heho

rizo

ntal

Del

inea

tion

ofSo

il

1.4

--

Off

-site

hori

zont

alde

line

atio

nof

Gro

undw

ater

1.5

—O

n-si

tean

dO

ff-s

iteve

rtic

alde

line

atio

nof

Soil

1.6

—O

n-si

tean

dO

ff-s

iteve

rtic

alde

lien

atio

nof

Gro

undw

ater

1.7-

-Fi

naliz

atio

nof

Rem

dial

Plan

and

Cos

ts

2--

Mod

elin

g

2.1

--

On-

site

Vap

orIn

trus

ion

Mod

elin

g

2.2

—O

ff-s

iteV

apor

Intr

usio

nM

odel

ing

2.3

--

Fat

ean

dT

rans

port

Mod

elin

gof

Impa

cted

Gro

undw

ater

3--

Rem

edia

tion

3.1

--

Rem

oval

ofIm

pact

edSo

ilab

ove

Typ

e4

RR

S

3.2

—Su

bmitt

alof

5114

IIO

5/14

/10.

5/14

/10

5114

111

5/14

/11

5/14

112

5/14

/12

5/14

/12

5121

11

5/2/

11

5/21

11

9/3/

13

1191

13

1/9/

13

2/23

/13

1111

4112

5/13

/11

5/13

/11

5I12

l12

5/12

/12:

11/1

4/12

11/1

4112

.

11/1

4/12

:

3111

14

7/30

/11

7/30

/11

3/1/

14

4181

13.

2/22

/13

4/8/

13.

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%C

ompl

ianc

eS

tatu

sR

epor

t

I—,—

Tas

kM

ilest

one

Ext

erna

lT

asks

---

—-—

—

Split

Sum

mar

yV

.V

.E

xter

nal

Mile

ston

e

Pro

gres

sPr

ojec

tS

umm

ary

‘D

eadl

ine

Dat

e:5/

12/1

1&

wbv

iwne

ntal

\ect

-dcN

ET

WO

RK

\DO

CS

\GD

P-1

1WK

TG

’JN

V.M

PPC

onsu

ltW

ig&

Tec

lmao

inc.

APPENDIX G

ECT INVOICES

ECTEnvironmental Consulting & Technology, Inc.

C Environmental Consulting & Technology, lnc

if

3701 Northwest 98tk Street

_________

Gainesville, FL 32606 - 352•332-0444

JNV INVESTMENTS GROUP Invoice #: 1113722910 MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL BLVD Invoice Date: 4/26/2011TUCKER, GA. 30084 Project: 100976

Project Name: FORMER PROF CLEANERS GW MNTRFed ID: 59-2921038

Client Ref:

For Professional Services Rendered through: 411/2011

CLIENT CONTACT NAME: CLIFF VASWANIPhase : 0100 -- DELINEATE GROUNDWATER

Labor 11,400.00Expenses 6,259.99

Total Phase : 0100 -- DELINEATE GROUNDWATER 17,659.99Subtotal Invoice 17,659.99

Amount Due This Invoice ** 17,659.99

Project Manager: MATTHEW P. TRAMMELL


Billings : 000334

JNV INVESTMENTS GROUPProject: 100976 -- FORMER PROF CLEANERS GW MNTR Invoice #: 111372

Labor & Expense Detail

Phase: 0100 -- DELINEATE GROUNDWATER

Labor Week Ending

Activity I Class / Employee Name Date Hours Rate Amount

GENERAL

STAFF SCIENTIST!ENGINEER IMATTHEW P. TRAMMELL 02/04/2011 10.00 120.00 1,200.00

MATTHEW P. TRAMMELL 02/11/2011 8.00 120.00 960.00

MATTHEW P. TRAMMELL 02/18/2011 17.00 120.00 2,040.00



MATTHEWP. TRAMMELL 03/11/2011 11.00 120.00 1,320.00




Labor 11,400.00

Regular ExpensesVendor Name Doc Nbr Doc Date Cost Multiplier Amount

EQUIPMENT RENTAULJSAGE - DIRECT

PINE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, P03399 03/18/2011 132.50 1.10 145.75

P03656 11/30/2010 482.30 1.10 530.53

614.80 676.28

Total: EQUIPMENT RENTALJUSAGE - DIRECT 676.28

TRAVEL - DIRECTMATTHEW P. TRAMMELL T02068 02/01/2011 350.90 1.10 385.99

MATTHEW P. TRAMMELL T02175 02/17/2011 375.23 1.10 412.75

Total: TRAVEL - DIRECT 798.74

TRAVEL MEALS - DIRECT



Total: TRAVEL MEALS - DIRECT 110.99

FIELDIOPERATING SUPPLIES - DIRECT




Total: FIELDIOPERATING SUPPLIES - DIRECT 211.00

OUTSIDE SERVICESICONSULTANTS

ANALYTICAL ENVRIONMENTAL P02394 11/30/2010 158.00 1.10 173.80

P02422 11/22/2010 553.00 1.10 608.30

711.00 782.10

KILMAN BROS. INC. P02556 02/16/2011 3,346.25 1.10 3,680.88

Total: OUTSIDE SERVICESICONSULTANTS 4,462.98

Regular Expenses 6,259.99

Total Phase: 0100 -- DELINEATE GROUNDWATER Labor : 11,400.00

Expense : 6,259.99

Page: 2

IAC#

For Professional Services Rendered through: 112812011

CLIENT CONTACT NAME: CLIFF VASWANI

Phase : 0100 -- DELINEATE GROUNDWATER7314.00

17843.28

Total Phase: 0100 -- DELINEATE GROUNDWATER

Subtotal Invoice

Amount Due This Invoice **

Project Manager: MATTHEW P. TRAMMELL


Billings: 000334

Environmental Consulting & Technology, lnc. 3701 Northwest 98Th Street

_________

GaInesville, FL 32606 - 352332-0444 JSA

—.,.—,,.—j,,,....,.,. --

..,.-..- -.. ,. —

JNV INVESTMENTS GROUP Invoice #: 110611

2910 MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIAL BLVD Invoice Date: 2/22/2011

TUCKER, GA. 30084 Project: 100976Project Name: FORMER PROF CLEANERS GW MNTR

Fed ID: 59-2921038

Client Ref:

Labor

Expenses

25,157.2825,157.28

25,157.28

JNV INVESTMENTS GROUPProject:100976 -- FORMER PROF CLEANERS GW MNTR Invoice #: 110611

Labor & Expense Detail

Phase: 0100 -- DELINEATE GROUNDWATER

Labor Week Ending

Activity / Class / Employee Name Date Hours Rate Amount

GENERAL

STAFF SCIENTISTIENGINEER IMATTHEW P. TRAMMELL 11/19/2010 18.00 120.00 2,160.00




SENIOR SCIENTISTIENGINEER IANDREWT. BENOIT 11/26/2010 6.00 139.00 834.00

Labor 7,314.00

Regular ExpensesVendor Name Doc Nbr Doc Date Cost Multiplier Amount

TRAVEL - DIRECTMATTHEWP. TRAMMELL T11191 11/12/2010 355.40 1.10 390.94

TRAVEL MEALS - DIRECTMATTHEW P. TRAMMELL T11191 11/12/2010 98.00 1.10 107.80

T11191 11/12/2010 25.76 1.10 28.34

123.76 136.14

Total: TRAVEL MEALS - DIRECT 136.14

FIELDIOPERATING SUPPLIES - DIRECTPINE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, P12262 11/22/2010 212.00 1.10 233.20

OUTSIDE SERVICESICONSULTANTSKILMAN BROS. INC. P12305 11/15/2010 10,635.00 1.10 11,698.50

SOUTHERN MONITORING & P01454 01/12/2011 4,895.00 1.10 5,384.50

Total: OUTSIDE SERVICESICONSULTANTS 17,083.00

Regular Expenses 17,843.28

Total Phase: 0100 -- DELINEATE GROUNDWATER Labor : 7,314.00Expense : 17,843.28

Page: 2

Documents

Environmental Protection Division · sampling event confirmed a low concentration of PCE (11 ppb) was present in monitoring well MW-11. No other VOCs were detected in MW-il during