30
EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel July, 2003

EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel July, 2003

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel

July, 2003

combine 285 hp

light tower 10 hp

mini-trackloader 20 hp

skid steer loader 80 hp

trencher 50 hp

off-highway truck1000 hp

2WD tractor 130 hp backhoe

loader 80 hp

genset 20 hp

utility vehicle 18 hp

Widespread Need for Air Pollution Reductions

Nonroad emissions - 44% total mobile source PM and 12% total mobile source NOx NW

Clean Air Act requires EPA to take steps to remedy regional haze in 156 pristine “Class I” areas

127 million people live in 353 counties that exceed the air quality standard for ozone or fine PM, or both

Diesel exhaust is likely to be carcinogenic to humans

Fine particles from diesel exhaust can remain in the atmosphere for weeks, and carry over hundreds of miles

2000 2010 2020 20300

100

200

Tho

usan

d t

ons

Mobile Source PM

cars &SUVs

trucks & buses

nonroad dieselequipment

Controlling Nonroad Diesel Emissions Presents Some Challenges

Extreme environmental conditions encountered Variety of operating patterns, engine sizes, packaging constraints Ruggedness demanded by users is often achieved by oversizing--

cooler exhaust makes catalyst-based aftertreatment challenging. Nonroad diesel fuel is currently unregulated

contains upwards of ~3400 ppm sulfur problematic for sulfur-sensitive control technologies

~60 nonroad(very global

market)

~10 highway(mostly U.S.)

~800 nonroad equipment makers (many quite small)

~16 truck makers

engine companies OEMs models

~6000 nonroad machine models

~200 truck models

Nonroad Diesel Industry Is More Diverse Than Highway

Tier 4 Program Considerations

Treat the diesel fuel and engine as a system.

Transfer advanced technology from 2007 highway program to nonroad applications.

Provide 6-10 years lead time for fuels and engines.

Include flexibility provisions to minimize costs.

Avoid interference with implementation of 2007 highway diesel program (put in place by EPA in 2001).

nonroad equipment 10%

marine 2.5%

locomotive 3.5%

low sulfur fuel (highway) 67%

regulated since 1993

home heating,etc 17%

not covered

DistillateFuels

covered bythe proposal

Phase-In of Nonroad Diesel Standards

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Tier 3

Similar tohighway

2004

Similar tohighway

1998

Tier 1

Tier 2

2012 2014

Similar tohighway 2007

(advanced aftertreatment)

new Tier 4

proposal

1996

Tier 2

88

77

66

55

44

33

22

11

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

NOxNOx(g/hp-hr)

PM(g/hp-hr)

3400ppm

sulfur

<25 hp 25-75 hp 75-175 hp 175-750 hp >750 hp

Today fuel

PM

NOxNOxTier 1

Tier 1-2

Tier 1

88

77

66

55

44

33

22

11

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

NOxNOx(g/hp-hr)

PM(g/hp-hr)

3400ppm

sulfur

<25 hp 25-75 hp 75-175 hp 175-750 hp >750 hp

2007 fuel

PM

NOxNOx

88

77

66

55

44

33

22

11

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

NOxNOx(g/hp-hr)

PM(g/hp-hr)

3400ppm

sulfur

<25 hp 25-75 hp 75-175 hp 175-750 hp >750 hp

2007 2007

500ppm

sulfur

fuel

PM

NOxNOx

Large immediate reductions in sulfate PM & SOx from existing fleet

88

77

66

55

44

33

22

11

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

NOxNOx(g/hp-hr)

PM(g/hp-hr)

3400ppm

sulfur

<25 hp 25-75 hp 75-175 hp 175-750 hp >750 hp

500ppm

sulfur

fuel

PM

NOxNOxTier 4Tier 4

2008

Achieves early Tier 4 PM reductions

88

77

66

55

44

33

22

11

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

NOxNOx(g/hp-hr)

PM(g/hp-hr)

3400ppm

sulfur

<25 hp 25-75 hp 75-175 hp 175-750 hp >750 hp

2010

500ppm

sulfur

15ppm

sulfur

fuel

PM

NOxNOxTier 4Tier 4

Enables advanced-technology nonroad engine standards.Not applied to locomotive/marine fuel (comment requested).

88

77

66

55

44

33

22

11

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

NOxNOx(g/hp-hr)

PM(g/hp-hr)

<25 hp 25-75 hp 75-175 hp 175-750 hp >750 hp

15ppm

sulfur

fuel

50%

50%

PM

NOxNOx

0.30

0.02

3.5NOx+NMHC

5.6NOx+NMHC

0.01 0.01 0.010.30 0.30 0.30

by 2014 Tier 4Tier 4

95+% reductions in PM and ~90% reductions in NOx

A vivid demonstration of what this is all about

Unused test filter

Typical test filter – current standards

Test filter – Tier 4 PM standards

Provisions to Reduce Economic Impacts

Gradual, coordinated phase-in of the Tier 4 standards to:

maximize technology transfer from 2007 highway program

address redesign workload for diesel engines and machines

Additional lead time for small refiners/engine manufacturers.

Early credits to encourage companies to meet requirements early.

Averaging, Banking, & Trading provisions for engine companies.

Up to 7 years additional lead time given to equipment

manufacturers for small-volume products.

Companies may petition EPA for relief if the burden of the

regulations would cause severe economic hardship.

Other Key Provisions Nonroad retrofit credit program

Taking comment on allowing retrofitted nonroad engines to generate credits that could be used in ABT program Want to ensure credits are surplus, verifiable,

quantifiable, and enforceable Based on use of advanced emission control

technologies Certification and compliance test procedures

Supplemental transient test Cold start testing component Not-to-exceed requirements

Cost Impacts for Engine & Equipment Manufacturers

Costs vary with engine size and equipment application. For the majority of equipment models, the cost of meeting the standards will be ~1-

2% compared with typical retail prices. Costs could range higher for some equipment. Some typical examples:

Diesel Fuel Refiner, Distributor, & User Impacts

Average fuel cost (refining, distribution, & lubricity additive): 4.8 ¢/gal

Maintenance savings to nonroad equipment operator from cleaner fuel: 3.3

Net consumer cost of fuel change: 1.5 ¢/gal

Fuel costs expected to vary by region of the country (3.0 to 8.9 ¢/gal)

Nationwide PM Reductions From Nonroad Diesels

(PM2.5 tons/year)

with proposedstandards

without proposedstandards

PM

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

1,800,000

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Nationwide NOx Reductions From Nonroad Diesels (tons/year)

with proposedstandards

without proposedstandards

NOx

Estimates of Reductions for WRAP States

In 2030, estimate that reductions from rule will lead to annual benefits in WRAP states of ~ 2,500 premature mortalities prevented ~ 180,000 tons NOX reduced ~ 20,000 tons PM reduced

Visibility benefits estimates for 2030 in Class 1 Areas included in NPRM Change in annual average deciviews:

Southwest – 0.21 California – 0.3 Rocky Mountain – 0.24 Northwest – 0.24

Benefits The program will prevent annually:

9,600 premature deaths 16,000 nonfatal heart attacks 5,700 cases of chronic bronchitis 8,300 hospital admissions 14,000 annual acute bronchitis attacks in children nearly 1 million lost work days

Comparable to benefits of 2007 highway truck program

Will also help improve visibility

Overall, on a dollar basis: $81 billion/year Greatly outweighs $1.5 billion/year program cost$

Other Considerations for Users Healthier workers & families-- Those who live and work around diesels

will especially benefit from greatly reduced exhaust toxicity

Biodiesel opportunity to restore fuel lubricity lost by desulfurization Biodiesel has excellent lubricity and no sulfur E-diesel will also benefit due to its near-zero sulfur content

Better Running Engines (including existing fleet) from sulfur removal Sulfuric acid corrodes cylinder liners, rings, exhaust system Acid also degrades lube oil-- oil change intervals will be extended

Proposal applies only to new equipment; does not mandate retrofits

Nonroad and highway fuel will be essentially identical for the first time in 18 years -- could potentially simplify on-site tankage

Stakeholder Reactions Initial reactions have been quite positive overall

All stakeholder groups support basic program requirements, timing

Expect to work through technical and other issues with stakeholders

Expected key areas of comment: Timing and level of some engine standards Timing and implementation of fuel program Further reductions in sulfur levels for locomotive

and marine fuel, more stringent emission standards

Benefits analysis

Next Steps Public Hearings

New York June 10 Chicago June 12 Los Angeles June 17

Comment period open until August 20

Final rule in Spring 2004 Advance notice for new locomotive and marine

diesel engine standards

Copy of proposal and supporting documents are available from:

www.epa.gov/nonroad/ Specific questions:

Don Kopinski (734) 214-4229 [email protected]

Paul Machiele (743) 214-4264

[email protected]

APPENDIX

Proposed Engine Standards Program 500 ppm NR fuel 15 ppm NR fuel

\ \

hp 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

<25 Tier 1 PM (reductions w/oxidation catalysts or engine-based control)

25-75 PM (reduction w/oxidation catalysts or engine-based control) PM: 100% NOx

existing Tier 2

75-175existing Tier 3

PM:100%

NOx: 50% 50% 100%

175-750PM: 100%

NOx: 50% 50% 50% 100%

>750Tier 1 existing Tier 2

PM &NOx:50% 50% 50% 100%

Percentages indicate portion of sales required to meet advanced emission control technology standards