Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
- 1 - EPC/GDV MEASUREMENTS DURING SUN ECLIPS 01.08.2008 IN SIBERIA
1. SUN ECLIPSE INFO Souse: http://www.eclipse-2008.ru/eclipse.php Sun Eclipse 1 August 2008 has N 126 in accordance with clasification. First Sun Eclipse of this series was in 1179, but only from 1882 a series of full sun eclipses began1882, 1900, 1918, 1936, 1954, 1972, 1990, 2008, 2026, 2044. Series ends in 2459. The Map of Sun Eclipse 01 August 2008
Table 1 shows parameters for several sites. Time difference from Grinvich time is 7 hours. P1 - the moment of the first contact; U1 - the moment of the second contact (beginning of a full phase); U2 - the moment of the third contact (the end of a full phase); P2 – the moment of the fourth contact
Site Long., min Max Phase P1 U1 U2 P2
Novosibirsk +55 02/82 55 2:21 17 45 9 1,017 16 41 17 17 43 58 17 46 20 18 45 7
Ob +55 0/82 43 2:22,9 17 45 9 1,019 16 41 13 17 43 58 17 46 21 18 45 9
Berdsk +54 47/83 2 2:22,1 17 45 40 1,018 16 41 49 17 44 29 17 46 51 18 45 35
2. PROTOCOL OF MEASUREMENTS
- 2 - Equipment: EPC/GDV Camera with battery power supply. Computer with any type of power supply. Sensor – antenna. Air fan – home appliance or computer. Protocol of measurements:
1. Metal cylinder – test-object is positioned on the electrode. The wire is fixed with a tape – any movement of the test-object will distort results. Fan is placed nearby the Camera for constant ventilation.
2. Instrument warming up. Test-object is connected with grounding jack of the Camera. Regime 1, series of images, 3 s interval, during 1 hour. 3. Test-object wire is connected with Antenna. 4. Background measurement. Regime 1, series of images, 3 s interval, during 1 hour. 5. Measurement during and after solar eclipse in the same regime during 1 hour or more.
Processing: “GDV SciLab” program. 3. ORGANISATION OF THE EXPERIMENT In the process 6 EPC/GDV Cameras have been used. Positions:
1. Novosibirsk Academic City – Hypo-magnet Camera. 2. Novosibirsk Academic City – placebo of the Hypo-magnet Camera (camera without permalloy layer). 3. Novosibirsk – countryside. 4. Berdsk 5. Irkutsk 6. Novosibirsk city center.
Overall organization: K. Korotkov and Oleg Sorokin. Researchers:
- 3 - Research in the Novosibirsk Academic City was done in the frame of the big program under the leadership and with the help of professor Alexander Trofimov. The protocol of measurements in Novosibirsk city center was different from all other sites and results are not included in this report. 4. RESULTS Measurements with antenna started at about 16.30. Signal was very stable for all the measured sites: variability of data was about 3% before the sun eclipse and less than 1% after the sun eclipse. Significant variations in the precise structure of a signal was recorded. Graphs 1-7 demonstrate time dynamics of Area changes, graphs 8-14 time dynamics of Intensity. On the abscise axis the N of point and absolute time in Novosibirsk is given: 163004 = 16 h 30 min 04 sec. Arrows roughly mark the time of full sun eclipse (1743 on Novosibirsk time). As we see from the graphs, they all have two clear phases: before and after the sun eclipse. Before sun eclipse all graphs demonstrate longitudinal waves. After the sun eclipse signal stabilizes. Two types of dynamics before the sun eclipse are recorded: decreasing (for two instruments) and increasing (for five instruments). Time dynamics of graphs fig 1 and 2 are quite similar. There are correlations of position of three local extremum. At about 17.39 an increased variability of data is observed. Graphs of fig. 3-5 do not have decreasing trend typical for graphs fig. 1 and 2, but they have local extremums as well. Rough position of the extremis are given in Table 2. As we see from Table 2, the position of some extremums are quite similar. Table 2. Rough position of the extremis on the Area graphs before the sun eclipse. Place Hypo-magnet Placebo Countryside City Center Berdsk Abakan
16_30 16-21 16-31 16-32 16-35 16_35 16-37 16-37 16-38 16-45 16_46 16-42 16-50 16-50 16-55 17_02 17_02 17-15
Rough Time of max
17-25 17-23 17-19
- 4 - GRAPHS OF AREA DYNAMICS
Area Placebo
7000
7500
8000
8500
9000
01 1
6300
4
73 1
6334
7
45 1
6373
1
17 1
6411
4
89 1
6445
8
61 1
6484
1
33 1
6522
5
05 1
6560
8
77 1
6595
2
49 1
7033
5
21 1
7071
9
93 1
7110
2
65 1
7182
6
37 1
7220
9
09 1
7255
3
81 1
7293
6
53 1
7332
0
25 1
7370
3
97 1
7404
7
69 1
7443
0
41 1
7481
4
13 1
7515
7
85 1
7554
1
57 1
8024
5
29 1
8062
9
01 1
8101
2
73 1
8135
6
45 1
8173
9
17 1
8212
3
89 1
8250
6
61 1
8285
0
33 1
8323
3
05 1
8361
7
77 1
8400
0
49 1
8434
4
21 1
8472
8
93 1
8511
1
1065
185
455
1137
185
838
Fig.1. Area time dynamics in the Placebo of the Hypo-magnet Camera
- 5 - Area Berdsk
3500
3700
3900
4100
4300
4500
4700
4900
5100
5300
5500
0001
163
006
0063
163
319
0125
163
632
0187
163
945
0249
164
259
0311
164
612
0373
164
925
0435
165
239
0497
165
552
0559
165
905
0621
170
218
0683
170
532
0745
170
845
0807
171
158
0004
171
528
0066
171
842
0128
172
155
0190
172
508
0252
172
821
0314
173
135
0376
173
448
0438
173
801
0500
174
115
0562
174
428
0624
174
741
0686
175
054
0748
175
408
0810
175
721
0872
180
034
0934
180
347
0996
180
701
1058
181
014
1120
181
327
0032
181
658
0094
182
011
0156
182
325
0218
182
638
0280
182
951
0342
183
304
0404
183
618
0466
183
931
0528
184
244
0590
184
557
0652
184
911
0714
185
224
0776
185
537
0838
185
851
Fig.2. Area time dynamics in Berdsk
Area Hypo-magnet
3300
3400
3500
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
01 1
6310
4
81 1
6351
3
161 163
923
241 164
342
321 164
751
401 165
201
481 165
610
561 170
019
641 170
429
721 170
838
001 171
505
081 171
914
161 172
323
241 172
733
321 173
142
401 173
552
481 174
001
561 174
410
641 174
841
721 175
250
001 180
012
081 180
421
161 180
830
241 181
240
321 181
649
401 182
058
481 182
508
561 182
917
641 183
327
721 183
736
801 184
145
881 184
555
961 185
004
41 1
8541
3
21 1
8582
3
Fig. 3. Area time dynamics in Hypo-magnet Camera
- 6 -
Area Countryside
6500
6700
6900
7100
7300
7500
1163
530
6116
3837
1211
6414
4
1811
6445
1
2411
6475
8
3011
6510
5
3611
6541
2
4211
6571
9
4811
7002
6
5411
7033
3
6011
7064
0
6611
7094
7
7211
7125
4
7811
7160
1
8411
7190
8
9011
7221
5
9611
7252
2
2117
2829
8117
3136
1411
7344
3
2011
7375
0
2611
7405
7
3211
7440
4
3811
7471
1
4411
7501
8
5011
7532
5
5611
7563
2
6211
7593
9
6811
8024
6
7411
8055
3
8011
8090
0
8611
8120
7
9211
8151
4
9811
8182
1
Fig.4. Area time dynamics in the countryside
Area Irkutsk
7500
7700
7900
8100
8300
8500
8700
8900
9100
9300
0 4.5 9 13.5 18 22.5 27 31.5 36 40.5 45 49.5 54 58.5 63 67.5 72 76.5 81 85.5 90 94.5 99 103 108 112 117 121 126 130
Fig. 5. Area time dynamics in Irkutsk In Abakan the amplitude of a signal changed abruptly at 17.35. We do not know the reason of this situation so we present graphs before and after the sun eclipse separately.
- 7 - Area Abakan_1
0108
12000
12200
12400
12600
12800
13000
13200
13400
13600
13800
14000
0024
(163
123
0051
(163
247
0078
(163
411
0105
(163
535
0132
(163
700
0159
(163
824
0186
(163
948
0213
(164
112
0240
(164
236
0267
(164
400
0294
(164
525
0321
(164
649
0348
(164
813
0375
(164
937
0402
(165
101
0429
(165
225
0456
(165
350
0483
(165
514
0510
(165
638
0537
(165
802
0564
(165
926
0591
(170
050
0618
(170
215
0645
(170
339
0672
(170
503
0699
(170
627
0726
(170
751
0753
(170
915
0780
(171
039
0807
(171
204
0834
(171
328
0861
(171
452
0888
(171
616
0915
(171
740
0942
(171
904
0969
(172
028
0996
(172
152
1023
(172
316
1050
(172
441
1077
(172
605
1104
(172
729
1131
(172
853
1158
(173
017
1185
(173
141
Fig.6. Area time dynamics in Abakan before the sun eclipse.
Area Abakan 2 010808
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0001
(173
456
0077
(174
125
0247
(175
555
0323
(180
224
0399
(180
853
0475
(181
522
0551
(182
151
0627
(182
820
0703
(183
449
0779
(184
118
0855
(184
747
0931
(185
416
1007
(190
045
1083
(190
714
1159
(191
343
1235
(192
012
1311
(192
641
1387
(193
309
1463
(193
938
1539
(194
607
1615
(195
236
1691
(195
904
1767
(200
533
1843
(201
202
1919
(201
831
1995
(202
459
2072
(203
133
2148
(203
802
2224
(204
431
2300
(205
100
2376
(205
729
2452
(210
358
2528
(211
026
2604
(211
655
2680
(212
324
2756
(212
953
2832
(213
621
2908
(214
250
2984
(214
919
3060
(215
548
3136
(220
217
3212
(220
845
3288
(221
514
3364
(222
143
3440
(222
812
Fig.6. Area time dynamics in Abakan after the sun eclipse.
- 8 - Time dynamics of the Intensity
Intensity Hypo-magnet
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
6301
163
104
77 1
6350
1
153 163
858
229 164
305
305 164
701
381 165
058
457 165
455
533 165
852
609 170
249
685 170
646
761 171
043
037 171
657
113 172
054
189 172
451
265 172
848
341 173
245
417 173
641
493 174
038
569 174
435
645 174
853
721 175
250
797 175
647
073 180
356
149 180
753
225 181
150
301 181
547
377 181
944
453 182
341
529 182
737
605 183
134
681 183
531
757 183
928
833 184
325
909 184
722
985 185
119
61 1
8551
6
37 1
8591
3
Fig. 8. Time dynamics of Signal Intensity in Hypo-magnet Camera
Intensity Placebo
5455565758596061626364
01 1
6300
4
77 1
6335
9
53 1
6375
5
29 1
6415
1
05 1
6454
7
81 1
6494
3
57 1
6533
9
33 1
6573
5
09 1
7013
1
85 1
7052
7
61 1
7092
3
37 1
7165
9
13 1
7205
5
89 1
7245
1
65 1
7284
6
41 1
7324
2
17 1
7363
8
93 1
7403
4
69 1
7443
0
45 1
7482
6
21 1
7522
2
97 1
7561
8
73 1
8033
5
49 1
8073
1
25 1
8112
7
01 1
8152
3
77 1
8191
9
53 1
8231
5
29 1
8271
1
05 1
8310
6
81 1
8350
2
57 1
8385
8
33 1
8425
4
09 1
8465
0
85 1
8504
6
1061
185
442
1137
185
838
Fig. 9. Time dynamics of Signal Intensity in Placebo Hypo-magnet camera
- 9 - Intensity Berdsk
53
55
57
59
61
63
0001
163
006
0078
163
406
0155
163
806
0232
164
206
0309
164
606
0386
165
006
0463
165
406
0540
165
806
0617
170
206
0694
170
606
0771
171
006
0848
171
406
0060
171
823
0137
172
223
0214
172
623
0291
173
023
0368
173
423
0445
173
823
0522
174
223
0599
174
623
0676
175
023
0753
175
423
0830
175
823
0907
180
223
0984
180
623
1061
181
023
1138
181
423
0065
181
841
0142
182
241
0219
182
641
0296
183
041
0373
183
441
0450
183
841
0527
184
241
0604
184
641
0681
185
041
0758
185
441
0835
185
841
Fig.10. Time dynamics of Signal Intensity in Berdsk
Intensity Countryside
78
82
86
90
94
98
1163
530
6616
3852
1311
6421
5
1961
6453
8
2611
6490
0
3261
6522
3
3911
6554
5
4561
6590
8
5211
7023
1
5861
7055
3
6511
7091
6
7161
7123
8
7811
7160
1
8461
7192
4
9111
7224
6
9761
7260
9
4117
2931
1061
7325
4
1711
7361
7
2361
7393
9
3011
7430
2
3661
7462
5
4311
7494
7
4961
7531
0
5611
7563
2
6261
7595
5
6911
8031
8
7561
8064
0
8211
8100
2
8861
8132
5
9511
8164
7
Fig.11. Time dynamics of Signal Intensity in countryside
- 10 -
Intensity Irkutsk
85
90
95
100
105
0 5.15 10.3 15.5 20.6 25.8 30.9 36.1 41.2 46.3 51.5 56.6 61.8 66.9 72.1 77.2 82.4 87.5 92.7 97.8 103 108 113 118 124 129 134
Fig.12. Time dynamics of. Signal intensity in Irkutsk
Intensity Abakan 1 010808
100
105
110
115
120
0024
(163
123
0071
(163
349
0118
(163
616
0165
(163
842
0212
(164
109
0259
(164
335
0306
(164
602
0353
(164
828
0400
(165
055
0447
(165
321
0494
(165
548
0541
(165
814
0588
(170
041
0635
(170
307
0682
(170
534
0729
(170
800
0776
(171
027
0823
(171
253
0870
(171
520
0917
(171
746
0964
(172
013
1011
(172
239
1058
(172
506
1105
(172
732
1152
(172
958
1199
(173
225
Fig.13. Time dynamics of. Signal intensity in Abakan before the sun eclipse
- 11 -
Intensity Abakan 2 010808
50
52
54
56
58
600001 (1
73456
0227 (1
75413
0359 (1
80528
0491 (1
81644
0623 (1
82800
0755 (1
83915
0887 (1
85031
1019 (1
90147
1151 (1
91302
1283 (1
92417
1415 (1
93533
1547 (1
94648
1679 (1
95803
1811 (2
00918
1943 (2
02033
2076 (2
03154
2208 (2
04309
2340 (2
05425
2472 (2
10540
2604 (2
11655
2736 (2
12810
2868 (2
13926
3000 (2
15041
3132 (2
20156
3264 (2
21311
3396 (2
22427
Fig.14. Time dynamics of. Signal intensity in Abakan after the sun eclipse . Fig. 15 and Table 3 demonstrate data on Area and Intensity variability before and after the sun eclipse (ratio between Standard Deviation and Average in %%). Table 3. Data Variability Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After
Area Hypo-magnet Placebo Countryside Berdsk Irkutsk Abakan
Average 3778.9 3829.1 7719.5 7411.2 6929.1 6988.7 4482.1 4302.0 8325.7 8632.3 12933.2 3443.2St. Deviation 111.4 51.55 275.22 104.39 141.21 141.16 302.46 73.19 228.7 89.9 234.4 55.8Variability 0.029 0.013 0.036 0.014 0.020 0.020 0.067 0.017 0.0275 0.0104 0.0181 0.0162
Intensity Hypo-magnet Placebo Countryside Berdsk Irkutsk Abakan
Average 57.954 57.84 57.22 58.06 91.20 93.33 59.23 60.25 96.7 100.4 113.7 56.7St.Deviation 1.347 0.44 1.01 0.74 2.41 0.83 1.45 0.48 2.3 0.6 3.9 0.4Variability 0.023 0.008 0.018 0.013 0.026 0.009 0.025 0.008 0.0239 0.0062 0.034 0.008
- 12 -
2.3
0.8
1.8
1.3
2.6
0.9
2.5
0.8
2.4
0.6
3.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Гипомагнит Плацебо Дача Бердск Иркутск Аба
Вариабельность данных по интенсивности %%
До Затмения После Затмения
Fig.15. Area and Intensity data variability before (blue bars) and after (red bars) the sun eclipse.
2.95
1.35
3.57
1.41
2.04 2.02
6.75
1.702.75
1.04
1.81.6
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
Гипомагнит Плацебо Дача Бердск Иркутск Абакан
Вариабельность данных по площади %%
До Затмения После Затмения
- 13 - CONCLUSIONS
1. Seven EPC/GDV positioned in different locations recorded statistically different signal in different phases of sun eclipse. Statistically significant difference of readings before and after with probability 99.99999 (p < 0.00001) both for Area and Intensity was found. For other parameters the difference was clear visible, but was not statistically significant in all cases.
2. Before sun eclipse longitudinal waves was recorded, their origin should be found. 3. Position of extremums concur for several EPC instruments. Some extremums are different. 4. Two instruments demonstrated signal with decreasing amplitude before the sun eclipse, other instruments demonstrated increasing trend of a
signal before sun eclipse. 5. The highest amplitude of oscillations was found for the instrument positioned in the hypo-magnet camera. 6. In the phase after the sun eclipse all the instruments recorded very stable signal with variability less than 1%. 7. It is recommended to make similar measurements for longer time before the sun eclipse. 8. Presented results open up perspectives for EPC/GDV instruments applications for early registration of geophysical anomalies.
We appreciate your comments. Thank you Dr. Konstantin Korotkov [email protected] References
• Korotkov K., Korotkin D. Concentration dependence of gas discharge around drops of inorganic electrolytes. J of Applied Physics, 2001, 89, 9, 4732-4737.
• Measuring Energy Fields: State of the Art. GDV Bioelectrography series. Vol. I. Korotkov K. (Ed.). Backbone Publishing Co. Fair Lawn, USA, 2004.
• Korotkov K., Krizhanovsky E., Borisova M., Hayes M., Matravers P., Momoh K.S., Peterson P., Shiozawa K., and Vainshelboim A. The Research of the Time Dynamics of the Gas Discharge Around Drops of Liquids. J of Applied Physics. 2004, v. 95, N 7, pp. 3334-3338.
• Bell I., Lewis D.A., Brooks A.J., Lewis S.E., Schwartz G.E. Gas Discharge Visualisation Evaluation of Ultramolecular Doses of Homeopathic Medicines Under Blinded, Controlled Conditions. J of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2003, 9, 1: 25-37