EPSAS WG 17/12 EPSAS Working Group To be held in ... - Europa€¦ · the public sector and technical analysis of the suitability of individual IPSAS standards, 2013/S 107-182395,

EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT Directorate C: National accounts, prices and key indicators Task Force EPSAS

EPSAS WG 17/12

Luxembourg, 30 October 2017

EPSAS Working Group

To be held in Luxembourg

on 21-22 November 2017, starting at 09:30

Item 6 of the Agenda

EPSAS issue paper on the national approaches to harmonisation

of chart of accounts

Paper by PwC on behalf of Eurostat

- for discussion

2

Member States' approaches to harmonising charts of accounts for national purposes with a view to financial reporting requirements under the future European Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS)

September 2017

Issue paper on Member States' approaches to harmonising charts of accounts

3

Table of Contents

Member States' approaches to harmonising charts of accounts for national purposes with a view to

financial reporting requirements under the future European Public Sector Accounting Standards

(EPSAS) .................................................................................................................................................... 2

1. Objectives of the issue paper ........................................................................................................ 6

2. Background ................................................................................................................................... 7

3. Description of accounting guidance available in international accounting frameworks and in

statistical rules ...................................................................................................................................... 9

3.1. International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) ................................................. 9

3.2. European Union Accounting Rules (EAR) .......................................................................... 13

3.3. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) ......................................................... 14

3.4. ESA 2010 sequence of accounts .......................................................................................... 15

3.5. Alignment of IPSAS and Government Finance Statistics Reporting Guidelines ................ 18

3.6. Budgetary and financial accounting in governments .......................................................... 21

4. Description of the main types of chart of accounts in selected EU Member States (Belgium,

Portugal, Estonia) ............................................................................................................................... 23

4.1. Selection of countries .......................................................................................................... 23

4.2. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 23

4.3. Belgium ................................................................................................................................ 24

4.4. Portugal ............................................................................................................................... 27

4.5. Estonia ................................................................................................................................. 33

4.6. Comparison of the main features of chart of accounts in selected EU Member States

(Belgium, Portugal and Estonia) ..................................................................................................... 37

5. Benefits of a harmonised chart of accounts ................................................................................ 42

6. Difficulties/issues when implementing a harmonised chart of accounts .................................. 43

6.1. Structure of chart of accounts (CoA) ................................................................................... 43

6.2. Multidimensional aspect ..................................................................................................... 44

6.3. Small versus large entities ................................................................................................... 45

6.4. Consistent use of the chart of accounts across reporting entities ....................................... 45


4

6.5. System design features ........................................................................................................ 46

6.6. Implementation timeline ..................................................................................................... 46

7. PwC’s recommendations on the way forward .............................................................................48


5

Table of Figures

Figure 1: Harmonisation across entities .................................................................................................. 8

Figure 2: Diagram of the sequence of accounts ..................................................................................... 17

Figure 3: Illustration of the categories of accounts ............................................................................... 18

Figure 4: Management of differences between IPSASs and Government Finance Statistics Reporting

Guidelines ............................................................................................................................................. 20

Figure 5: Budgetary accounting, financial accounting, management accounting - Belgium, Federal

Public Service ......................................................................................................................................... 26

Figure 6: Multidimensional chart of accounts - Portugal ..................................................................... 30

Figure 7: Budgetary accounting chart of accounts ............................................................................... 30

Figure 8: Financial accounting chart of accounts .................................................................................. 31

Figure 9: Chart of accounts and fiscal reporting ................................................................................... 31

Figure 10: Adaptability of the harmonised chart of accounts ............................................................... 32

Figure 11: Best practice attributes.......................................................................................................... 44

Figure 12: Implementation of a new chart of accounts ......................................................................... 47


6

1. Objectives of the issue paper

The aim of this issue paper is to explore the approaches taken, and the opportunities and challenges

faced, concerning the harmonisation of charts of accounts with a view to financial reporting

requirements for national purposes in at least three Member States (MSs). The paper addresses

harmonisation of charts of accounts within individual Member States, not at the EU level.

Based on the request from Eurostat, the issue paper addresses the following questions:

The approaches taken to harmonising the chart of accounts in three MSs which have

(re)designed or are looking at the (re)design of their chart of accounts. What aims or purposes

are served? What is the link to the accounting standards in place?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches?

At what stage of the accounting reform were the harmonised charts of accounts developed? For

which types of government entities has the harmonisation taken place? How "deep" is the

harmonisation of the charts of accounts and what harmonised technical guidance is given?

How do the national harmonised charts of accounts link to cash accounting and budgeting and

how can they support consolidation? Also, how the harmonised charts of accounts have been

serving other and different needs, including provision of information needed to generate

accrual data with a view to preparing government financial statistics based on the ESA

methodology?

To what extent has the harmonisation of charts of accounts been accompanied with harmonised

accounting rules and policies across different levels and entities of government?

How were national harmonised charts of accounts implemented in practice?

What are the lessons learnt in the MSs (i.e. in the view of the MSs concerned) regarding

national harmonised charts of accounts?

What conclusions would PwC draw with a view to informing future national public sector

accounting reforms in EU MSs with regard to harmonising their own national charts of

accounts?

Based on the results of the analysis a first approach for organising the future discussion on charts of

accounts in the Member States with the EPSAS stakeholders is developed.


7

2. Background

The Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament COM/2013/0114 final

“Towards implementing harmonised public sector accounting standards in Member States” assessing

the suitability of IPSAS for the EU Member States, outlines with regards to the adoption of European

Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS) that “the development of a new chart of accounts is a

key step in the adoption of accruals accounting. A well-planned chart of accounts can assist in the

efficient generation of financial information for a variety of purposes.”1

As defined in the report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, a chart of

accounts is a systematic coding system for the classification and coding of transactions and events

within the accounting system. It determines the organisation of ledgers used within the accounting

system. The types of classifications provided for by a chart of accounts may include economic,

functional, administrative, and regional classifications as well as more detailed classifications for cost

centres, programmes, projects, outputs, and outcomes.2

The chart of accounts is not used solely in the preparation of external financial statements. It may

also be used to support the preparation of internal management reports, the preparation of

regulatory information, the tracking of expenditure against budgets and the preparation of fiscal

reports for the European System of Accounts (ESA) 2010. In order to eliminate the unnecessary

reclassification of financial data or duplicating the entry of data, it is helpful if the chart of accounts

can support a range of governmental reporting requirements.

Once established, the chart of accounts becomes a fundamental component of the processing of

financial information from simple tasks like paying bills to complex activities such as financial

reporting. Because it is embedded in the processing activities of the entity, it becomes costly to

change. It is therefore essential that the chart of accounts is carefully designed to allow for change

and growth and to meet the various reporting needs of the entity.

In a well-designed system, the chart of accounts should incorporate the budget accounts specified in

the budget classification. If a government elects to report on the accruals basis of accounting, but to

report budget on a cash (or modified cash) basis, a combined chart of accounts will be more

complicated as it will need to be able to generate both reports on both the accruals basis and cash

basis of accounting. 3

Where a number of individual entities are required to provide information to a central entity for the

preparation of consolidated financial statements or for other reporting purposes, a harmonised or

centrally devised uniform chart of accounts may bring many benefits and allow the accounting to be

better linked with other financial management data. For example, a unified chart of accounts can

prove helpful in enabling GFS data to be generated in a cost-efficient manner.4

1 See European Commission, Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Towards implementing harmonised public sector accounting standards in Member States, The suitability of IPSAS for the Member States, COM(2013) 114 final, Brussels, 6 March 2013, p. 83-84. 2 See European Commission, Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, […], p. 83-84. 3 See European Commission, Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, […], p. 83-84. 4 See PwC, Collection of information related to the potential impact, including costs, of implementing accrual accounting in the public sector and technical analysis of the suitability of individual IPSAS standards, 2013/S 107-182395, 1 August 2014, p. 97-98.


8

Figure 1: Harmonisation across entities5

An efficient consolidation process that enables timely and reliable reporting by all entities in the

consolidation scope needs to be put in place. The organisation of the consolidation process implies

the setting up of standard chart of accounts, and procedures such as the elimination of intra-

government transactions and balances. As shown in Figure 1: Harmonisation across entities, best

practices such as the use of standardised reporting formats (22 Member States), a standard chart of

accounts (21 Member States), as well as harmonised accounting policies (20 Member States) are

already widely implemented.

A standard, common or harmonised chart of accounts is a single set of accounts to be used across

central government for financial reporting, it is a multi-dimensional classification framework

providing the method and format for recording and classifying financial transaction information in

the general ledger forming part of the books of account containing a standard list of all available

accounts6 (record-to-report process). Implementing a harmonised chart of accounts means greater

consistency of reporting and easier communication of financial information between departments.7

There are a number of elements which can help maintain the continued efficiency and effectiveness of

the record-to-report process. A well-designed chart of accounts enables clear accountability,

improved transparency and comparability of results. Following the development of a new chart of

accounts, it is necessary to assign responsibilities for the day-to-day management of the chart of

accounts and prevent unauthorised changes. Supporting guidance and monitoring may also be

required to ensure consistent use of accounts.

5 See PwC, Collection of information […], p. 98. 6 See South Africa Government notice, Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003: Municipal Regulations On Standard Chart Of Accounts, p. 9 7 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/common-chart-of-accounts

20

21

22

0 5 10 15 20 25

Harmonised accounting policies

Standard chart of accounts

Standardised reporting formats

Number of EU countries


9

3. Description of accounting guidance available in international

accounting frameworks and in statistical rules

Accounts should be maintained in a way which is appropriate with respect to the nature and the

scope of public sector activities and which takes into consideration the specific legal provisions

applicable to them. Public sector entities must organise their accounting and reporting so that the

reporting requirements applicable to them are complied with, both for the presentation of elements

in the primary statements and the disclosures of certain items/information in the notes to the

accounts. Within this framework, entities are authorised to freely design their own chart of accounts.

We summarise below the rules included in various accounting/reporting frameworks/rules which

need to be taken into account when public sector entities reporting under these frameworks/rules

design their chart of accounts:

in international accounting standards applicable to the public sector (IPSAS) (see 3.1) and the

private sector (IFRS) (see 3.3),

in EAR (see 3.2); and

in the statistical reporting rules applicable to European governments (ESA 2010) (see 3.4).

The alignment of IPSAS and Government Finance Statistics Reporting Guidelines is addressed in

section 3.5. Since budgetary accounting is important for government entities, this dimension is also

discussed (see 3.6).

3.1. International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS)

Currently, the existing IPSASs do not foresee a standard chart of accounts. IPSAS 1 ‘Presentation of

financial statements’ includes some minimal presentation requirements relating to the statement of

financial position and statement of financial performance, however it does not impose how to meet

these requirements via the use of specific accounts. This leaves the necessary freedom for

governments to design a chart of accounts as well as reporting formats and templates, that meet local

and management reporting requirements.

IPSAS 1 includes some additional general requirements relating to presentation and disclosures,

while presentation and disclosure requirements in respect of specific topics are included in other

standards dealing with these specific topics. For example, presentation and disclosure requirements

that are specific to items of property, plant and equipment are included in IPSAS 17 ‘Property, plant

and equipment’, disclosure requirements that are specific to inventories are included in IPSAS 12

‘Inventories’, etc.

We successively address below IPSAS minimal requirements relating to the presentation of items in

the statement of financial position, in the statement of financial performance, in the statement of

changes in net assets/equity, in the cash flow statement as well as the disclosure of items in the notes

to the accounts.


10

3.1.1. Statement of financial position

Paragraph 88 of IPSAS 1 lists the information which should be presented on the face of the statement

of financial position. As a minimum, the face of the statement of financial position shall include line

items that present the following amounts:

a) Property, plant and equipment;

b) Investment property;

c) Intangible assets;

d) Financial assets (excluding amounts shown under (e), (g), (h) and (i));

e) Investments accounted for using the equity method;

f) Inventories;

g) Recoverables from non-exchange transactions (taxes and transfers);

h) Receivables from exchange transactions;

i) Cash and cash equivalents;

j) Taxes and transfers payable;

k) Payables under exchange transactions;

l) Provisions;

m) Financial liabilities (excluding amounts shown under (j), (k) and (l));

n) Non-controlling interest, presented within net assets/equity; and

o) Net assets/equity attributable to owners of the controlling entity.

IPSAS 1 does not prescribe the order or format in which items are to be presented. Paragraph 88

simply provides a list of items that are sufficiently different in nature or function to warrant separate

presentation on the face of the statement of financial position. Additional line items, headings and

sub-totals shall be presented on the face of the statement of financial position when such

presentation is relevant to an understanding of the entity’s financial position (IPSAS 1 paragraph 89).

Judgment on whether additional items are presented separately is based on an assessment of (IPSAS

1 paragraph 91):

a) The nature and liquidity of assets;

b) The function of assets within the entity; and

c) The amounts, nature and timing of liabilities.

As per IPSAS 1 paragraph 93-94, an entity shall disclose, either on the face of the statement of

financial position or in the notes, further sub-classifications of the line items presented, classified in a

manner appropriate to the entity’s operations. The detail provided in sub-classifications depends on

the requirements of IPSASs and on the size, nature and function of the amounts involved (e.g. items

of property, plant and equipment are disaggregated into classes).


11

3.1.2. Statement of financial performance

Paragraphs 102-103 of IPSAS 1 list the information which should be presented on the face of the

statement of financial performance. As a minimum, the face of the statement of financial

performance shall include line items that present the following amounts for the period:

a) Revenue;

b) Finance costs;

c) Share of the surplus or deficit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the

equity method;

d) Pre-tax gain or loss recognised on the disposal of assets or settlement of liabilities

attributable to discontinuing operations; and

e) Surplus or deficit.

The following items shall be disclosed on the face of the statement of financial performance as

allocations of surplus or deficit for the period:

a) Surplus or deficit attributable to non-controlling interest; and

b) Surplus or deficit attributable to owners of the controlling entity.

Additional line items, headings and subtotals shall be presented on the face of the statement of

financial performance when such presentation is relevant to an understanding of the entity’s financial

performance (IPSAS 1 paragraph 104). When items of revenue or expense are material, their nature

and amount shall be disclosed separately (IPSAS 1 paragraph 106).

3.1.3. Statement of changes in net assets/equity

Paragraphs 118 of IPSAS 1 lists the information which should be presented on the face of the

statement of changes in net assets/equity:

a) Surplus or deficit for the period;

b) Each item of revenue and expense for the period that, as required by other standards,

is recognised directly in net assets/equity, and the total of these items;

c) Total revenue and expense for the period (calculated as the sum of (a) and (b)),

showing separately the total amounts attributable to owners of the controlling entity

and to non-controlling interest; and

d) For each component of net assets/equity separately disclosed, the effects of changes

in accounting policies and corrections of errors recognised in accordance with IPSAS

3.


12

Moreover, paragraph 119 of IPSAS 1 requires to present, either on the face of the statement of

changes in net assets/equity or in the notes:

a) The amounts of transactions with owners acting in their capacity as owners, showing

separately distributions to owners;

b) The balance of accumulated surpluses or deficits at the beginning of the period and at

the reporting date, and the changes during the period; and

c) To the extent that components of net assets/equity are separately disclosed, a

reconciliation between the carrying amount of each component of net assets/equity

at the beginning and the end of the period, separately disclosing each change.

3.1.4. Cash flow statement

IPSAS 2 sets out requirements for the presentation of the cash flow statement and related disclosures.

The objective of IPSAS 2 is to require the provision of information about the changes in cash and cash

equivalents of an entity by means of a statement that classifies cash flows during the period from

operating (primarily derived from the principal cash-generating activities of the entity), investing

(purchase and sale of long-term investments and property, plant and equipment), and financing

activities (issuance and repurchase of the bonds/stock, dividend payments, etc.).

The cash flow from operating activities can be prepared and reported in two different ways as per

IPSAS:

the direct method which presents the cash flows associated with the actual cash transactions

(cash receipts and payments are presented gross),

the indirect method shows a reconciliation from the reported net surplus/deficit for the period

to the cash provided by operations, i.e. the surplus/deficit is adjusted for non-operating and

non-cash transactions and for changes in work capital.

Separate disclosure of certain types of cash flows (interest, dividends and taxation) is required.

The direct method requires information regarding gross cash flows to be available in the system of

the government entity. Under the indirect method, the cash flow statement includes both cash and

non-cash elements and can be built based on movements in the statement of financial position and

information included in the statement of financial performance.

3.1.5. Notes

IPSAS disclosure requirements related to the disclosure notes may also affect the set-up of a

harmonised chart of accounts, as certain specific accounts may have to be created for fulfilling

information needs. For example, paragraph 88 of IPSAS 1 requires to present ‘Property, plant and

equipment’ as a minimum line item on the face of the statement of financial position. However, a

more detailed breakdown per class of assets should be disclosed in the notes, which requires the

establishment of specific accounts in the chart of accounts.


13

As an illustration, paragraph 88 of IPSAS 17 stipulates that the financial statements shall disclose, for

each class of property, plant and equipment recognised in the financial statements:

a) The measurement bases used for determining the gross carrying amount;

b) The depreciation methods used;

c) The useful lives or the depreciation rates used;

d) The gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation (aggregated with

accumulated impairment losses) at the beginning and end of the period; and

e) A reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period

showing:

i. Additions;

ii. Disposals;

iii. Acquisitions through entity combinations;

iv. Increases or decreases resulting from revaluations and from impairment losses

(if any) recognised or reversed directly in net assets/equity in accordance with

IPSAS 21 or IPSAS 26, as appropriate;

v. Impairment losses recognised in surplus or deficit in accordance with IPSAS 21

or IPSAS 26, as appropriate;

vi. Impairment losses reversed in surplus or deficit in accordance with IPSAS 21

or IPSAS 26, as appropriate;

vii. Depreciation;

viii. The net exchange differences arising on the translation of the financial

statements from the functional currency into a different presentation currency,

including the translation of a foreign operation into the presentation currency

of the reporting entity; and

ix. Other changes.

3.2. European Union Accounting Rules (EAR)

EAR 1 'Financial statements' provides a list of minimum components to be presented on the face of

the primary statements (statement of financial position, statement of financial performance, etc.) and

in the notes. These minimal requirements are based on IPSAS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial

Statements’ and IPSAS 2 ‘Cash Flow Statements’. EAR 2 ‘Consolidation and accounting for joint

arrangements and associates’ section 5 ‘consolidation procedures’ states that all consolidation

procedures require first of all a harmonisation of the financial statements of each consolidated entity.

The financial statements of each controlled or associated entity/joint venture should be prepared

using uniform accounting policies for like transactions and other events in similar circumstances. If it

is not practical to use uniform accounting policies in preparing the consolidated financial statements,

that fact should be disclosed together with the proportion of the items in the consolidated financial

statements to which the different accounting policies have been applied.

Article 152 of the Financial Regulation stipulates that all Institutions and bodies referred to in article

1418 should apply the same accounting rules and methods, adopted by the Commission's accounting

officer. In addition, the Institutions and bodies referred to in article 141 have to apply the same

harmonised chart of accounts.9 A common consolidation chart of accounts is used for the capturing of

8 Article 141 refers to bodies whose accounts are required to be consolidated. 9 See Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the Union and its rules of application, p.285-286


14

information in the reporting package for consolidation purposes. All accounts of the consolidation

chart of accounts have 6 digits.10

As per article 153 of the Financial Regulation “the general accounts shall record, in chronological

order using the double-entry method, all events and operations which affect the economic and

financial situation and the assets and liabilities of the institutions and of the bodies referred to in

Article 141.”

Article 154 of the Financial Regulation specifies that the balances and movements in the general

accounts shall be entered in the accounting ledgers. Further details are provided in the Article 237 of

the Rules of Application stating that each institution and each body referred to in article 141 of the

Financial Regulation shall keep a journal, a general ledger and at least sub-ledgers for debtors,

creditors and fixed assets, unless it is not justified by cost-benefit considerations. The accounting

ledgers shall consist of electronic documents which are identified by the accounting officer and offer

full guarantees for use as evidence. Entries in the journal shall be transferred to the general ledger

and itemised according to the harmonised chart of accounts.

In addition, as per article 238 of the Rules of Application, each institution and body referred to in

Article 141 of the Financial Regulation shall establish a trial balance covering all the accounts of the

general accounts, including the accounts cleared during the year, with, in each case the following

information:

a) account number;

b) description of the account;

c) total debits;

d) total credits;

e) balance (debit or credit).

3.3. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)

As IPSASs and IFRSs standards are principles-based, IFRSs do not prescribe a standard chart of

accounts either. Similarly to IPSAS 1, IAS 1 ‘Presentation of financial statements’ includes some

minimal presentation requirements, however it does not impose how to meet these requirements via

the use of specific accounts. This also leaves the necessary freedom for private companies that apply

IFRS to design a chart of accounts as well as reporting formats and templates.

A common taxonomy, such as the XBRL taxonomy developed and updated by the IFRS Foundation,

can be used as a starting point for the development of a government chart of accounts. To support the

move towards structured electronic reporting, the IFRS Foundation indeed issues a yearly IFRS

Taxonomy™, which is a translation of IFRSs into XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language),

and is considered as a (non-mandatory) global standard to mark up electronic IFRS financial

statements.

A taxonomy is a classification system designed to accurately reflect the presentation and disclosure

requirements of IFRS Standards as issued by the IASB. Its content also includes elements from the

10 See Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the Union and its rules of application, p.285-286


15

accompanying materials to IFRS Standards (Implementation Guidance and Illustrative Examples)

and elements for disclosures that are not required, but that are commonly reported in practice by

entities.

The IFRS Taxonomy updates occur throughout the year in line with the publication of new or

amended standards issued by the IASB. Updates may also be released as a result of common practice

projects or technology updates. Each year an annual compilation of all updates is produced (the

Annual IFRS Taxonomy).11

In analysing how financial statement data can support preparation of statistical reports, the IPSASB

refers to the IFRS Taxonomy as a potential enabler: “A common taxonomy such as the XBRL

taxonomy, which already exists for IFRS, might also be helpful. While the IPSASB is not in a

position to develop such a taxonomy, there may be scope to consider the possibility of contributing

to its development, if initiated by others”.12

3.4. ESA 2010 sequence of accounts

The ESA 2010 framework includes various institutional sectors. These combine institutional units

with broadly similar characteristics and behaviour: households and non-profit institutions serving

households (NPISHs), non-financial corporations, financial corporations, and the government. The

government sector excludes public enterprises and comprises central, state (regional) and local

government and social security funds (ESA 2010 2.111 to 2.117).

Government finance statistics on the general government sector (GGS) are produced by governments

for the purpose of macroeconomic analysis and decision making, whereas financial statements are

issued for accountability and decision making at an entity level, including the whole of government

reporting entity. The European System of Accounts (hereinafter referred to as ‘ESA’) is an

internationally compatible accounting framework for a systematic and detailed description of a total

economy (that is, a region, country or group of countries), its components and its relations with other

total economies. ESA 2010 is the latest and currently applicable version of the ESA framework.

Chapter 1 of the ESA 2010 methodology sets out the principles of the ESA, describes the fundamental

statistical units and their groupings, and gives an overview of the sequence of accounts. The ESA

2010 system is built around a sequence of interconnected accounts. The full sequence of accounts for

the institutional units and sectors is composed of current accounts, accumulation accounts and

balance sheets.13

As explained in chapter 8 of the ESA 2010 methodology, the European sector accounts record flows

and stocks in an ordered set of accounts describing the economic cycle from production and the

generation of income, through its distribution and redistribution, and its use for final consumption.

Finally the ESA records the use of what is left in the form of saving to provide for the accumulation of

assets, both non-financial and financial.14

11 See IFRS Foundation website http://www.ifrs.org/XBRL/IFRS-Taxonomy/Pages/IFRS-Taxonomy.aspx 12 See IPSASs and Government Finance Statistics Reporting Guidelines, Consultation Paper October 2012, IPSASB, p.30 13 See European system of accounts, ESA 2010, Eurostat, chapter 1, p.18 14 See Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of The Council of 21 May 2013 on the European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union, 26 June 2013, p.226

http://www.ifrs.org/XBRL/IFRS-Taxonomy/Pages/IFRS-Taxonomy.aspx


16

European sector accounts record, in principle, every transaction between economic subjects during a

certain period and show as well the opening and closing stocks of financial assets and liabilities in

financial balance sheets. The transactions are grouped into various categories that have a distinct

economic meaning. In turn, these categories of transactions are shown in a sequence of accounts,

each of which covers a specific economic process.15

As mentioned here above, the accounts are grouped in three categories:

1. Current accounts cover production and the associated generation, distribution and

redistribution of income and its use in the form of final consumption. The income not

directly used for final consumption is revealed in the balancing item saving, which is

taken forward to the accumulation accounts as the first entry on the resources side of

the capital account.

2. Accumulation accounts analyse changes in the assets and liabilities of the units and

enable changes in net worth (the difference between assets and liabilities) to be

recorded.

3. Balance sheets show the total assets and liabilities at the beginning and the end of the

accounting period, together with the net worth. The flows for each asset and liability

item recorded in the accumulation accounts are seen again in the changes in balance

sheets account. 16

The sequence of accounts applies to institutional units, institutional sectors and subsectors, and the

total economy.17

15 See European system of accounts, ESA 2010, Eurostat, chapter 8, p.193 16 See European system of accounts, ESA 2010, Eurostat, chapter 8, p.193 17 See European system of accounts, ESA 2010, Eurostat, chapter 1, p.20


17

Figure 2: Diagram of the sequence of accounts18

18 See European system of accounts, ESA 2010, Eurostat, chapter 8, p.20


18

Figure 3: Illustration of the categories of accounts19

3.5. Alignment of IPSAS and Government Finance Statistics Reporting

Guidelines

As part of an initiative launched by the IPSASB ‘Alignment of IPSAS and Government Finance

Statistics Reporting Guidelines’, one of the four goals identified consists in developing an illustrative

chart of accounts that could facilitate the compilation of reports compliant with IPSASs and statistical

reporting standards, acting as a bridge between the two forms of reporting. The Consultation Paper

(CP), ‘IPSASs and Government Finance Statistics Reporting Guidelines’ was issued in October 2012,

with comments due by 31 March 2013. Following the analysis of responses by IPSASB, the IPSASB

approved among others the following policy paper: ‘Process for Considering GFS Reporting

Guidelines during Development of IPSASs’.20

19 See European system of accounts, ESA 2010, Eurostat, chapter 8, p.20 20 See IPSASB Project Status, Alignment of IPSAS and Government Finance Statistics Reporting Guidelines


19

The Consultation Paper (October 2012) issued by the IPSASB defines the Chart of Accounts as

follows: “an organisation’s Chart of Accounts (COA) usually serves multiple purposes, including

both management and financial reporting. The same accrual based information system that

generates data for a government’s financial statements can generate most of the data necessary for

the government’s statistical reports. The term ‘Chart of Accounts’ is used here with its broad sense,

i.e. a chart that encompasses all the codings used by a financial information system to produce

accruals financial statements.”

However, to do this the government’s chart of accounts needs to include the coding necessary for

statistical report classifications, including21:

a) Counterparty information for transactions; and

b) Statement classifications necessary to map items into the correct statistical

categories, where the main additional codes needed will distinguish between:

(i) Transactions and other economic flows.

(ii) Cash, non-cash, and (if necessary) intra-government charges. (The CoA will

need to do this at a reasonably detailed line item level.)

(iii) Different categories of financial assets and liabilities, according to the

residency of the other party to the instruments (debtors for financial assets

and creditors for liabilities) and their currency of denomination (domestic or

foreign).

With extra codes, such as those listed above, the chart of accounts design should be able to address22:

a) Classification differences e.g. statistics needs items to be classified into

resident/non-resident, while IPSASs do not require that items be classified in this

way;

b) Definitional differences e.g. statistics defines certain types of defence weapons to

be inventory, while the same weapons would be defined as property, plant and

equipment under IPSAS;

c) Recognition differences, where IPSASs recognise an item that statistical reporting

does not recognise e.g. statistical reporting does not recognise the up-front

financial impact of concessionary loans, while IPSAS financial reporting does; and

d) Financial statement location differences e.g. Government Finance Statistics (GFS)

reports include an item as an expense in the Operating Statement, while IPSAS

financial statements include the same item as a distribution to owners and include

it in the Statement of Movements in Net Assets/Equity. This type of difference is

basically another type of classification difference.

21 See IPSASB Consultation Paper ‘IPSASs and Government Finance Statistics Reporting Guidelines’, October 2012, p.28 22 See IPSASB Consultation Paper ‘IPSASs and Government Finance Statistics Reporting Guidelines’, October 2012, p.28


20

Figure 4: Management of differences between IPSASs and Government Finance Statistics Reporting Guidelines23

Difference Management

1. Reporting entity boundary Chart of accounts (CoA) design: include additional Government Finance Statistics (GFS) related codes to identify items included in general purpose financial reports (GPFRs) but not in general government sector (GGS) (or vice versa), so that they can be excluded from the relevant reports.

2. Recognition criteria for some assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses: (a) Item is recognised in IPSAS financial statements and not recognised in GFS reports (b) Item is not recognised in IPSAS financial statements and recognised in GFS reports

(a) CoA design: include code that identifies items that are not recognised in GFS statements, so that they can be excluded from those statements and, where appropriate, included in the appropriate GFS supplementary schedule. (b) Either:

(i) Choice of IPSAS option: where IPSAS allows a GFS aligned accounting option to be chosen for the financial statements, choosing that policy will help to ensure that the necessary data is available for GFS report use. (ii) Produce additional data: generate the necessary data for GFS report needs, outside of the accounting information available for the financial statements.

3. Valuation (measurement) differences for certain types of assets and liabilities

Either: (a) Choice of IPSAS option: wherever possible and appropriate, alignment of measurement for financial statements with that needed for GFS reporting will help to ensure that financial statement data provides a better basis for GFS data needs. (b) Produce additional data: carry out a separate valuation to generate values needed for GFS reporting.

23 See IPSASB Consultation Paper ‘IPSASs and Government Finance Statistics Reporting Guidelines’, October 2012, p.29


21

4. Revaluations and other value changes in some cases

CoA design: include additional GFS related code to identify items that belong in (a) specific GFS statements, (b) aggregate totals, and/or (c) supplementary schedules, so that they can be included in the appropriate place for GFS reports. Where value changes are not included in GFS reports, then additional coding is needed to allow those amounts to be excluded.

5. Presentation CoA design: include code that allows items that belong in specific GFS statements/totals to be directed into those specific statements/totals.

The development of an illustrative chart of accounts would be an important contribution to facilitate

the compilation of both statistical and accounting reports in accordance with the guidance of ESA

2010 and IPSAS. The project would reassert the importance of statistical reporting as a public sector

critical issue. The possibility of the IPSASB developing a Chart of Accounts has been suggested by a

number of preparers and it has also been indicated that such a development might assist the adoption

and implementation of IPSASs and compliance with statistical reporting guidance.

While accounting policy choice can reduce the extent to which additional data is needed, it is likely

that, after further alignment has been achieved through the information system’s chart of accounts

design, further data will still be needed to generate GFS reports. For example, it may be necessary to

carry out a separate valuation of inventory assets, because the inventory is valued at cost for the

financial statements, and the GFS reporting guidelines require current market values (depending on

the amount of inventory and its turnover, this measurement difference may not be material). Subject

to the evaluation of the practicalities involved, the IPSASB project will develop an illustrative chart of

accounts that will facilitate compilation of reports meeting both IPSASs and statistical reporting

guidance.24

3.6. Budgetary and financial accounting in governments

Budget planning and preparation are at the heart of good public expenditure management. The

International Monetary Fund published in 2011 a technical paper highlighting the importance of the

chart of accounts (CoA) as a critical element of the Public Financial Management Framework: “the

CoA, although appears to be just concerned with classifying and recording financial transactions, is

critical for effective budget management, including tracking and reporting on budget execution.

The structure of the budget—in particular the budget classification—and the CoA have a symbiotic

relationship. As such, a mistake in designing the CoA could have a long lasting impact on the ability

of the PFM system to provide required financial information for key decisions.”25

24 See IPSASB Project Brief and Outline, Alignment of IPSAS and Government Finance Statistics Reporting Guidelines, 2011, p.5 25 See International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department, Chart of Accounts: A Critical Element of the Public Financial Management Framework, Julie Cooper and Sailendra Pattanayak, August 2011, p.1


22

Given their different objectives, some governments make a distinction between budgetary and

financial accounting. Indeed, budgetary accounting may require data capture at a different level

(scope difference) and at a different time (timing difference), for example with regard to the

acquisition of a building. Therefore, some countries have traditionally operated separate systems for

budgetary and financial accounting.26

However, in spite of the apparent distinction between the two, the IMF recommends to have a

common and integrated account coding structure for both budgetary and financial accounting. In

most countries, it is generally considered to be good practice for the budget classifications and

accounting classifications to be completely integrated. The two needs to be developed together to

ensure that they are mutually consistent. For example, France has developed a common budget and

accounting code—called ‘nomenclature budgetaro-comptable’—which is used for both budgetary

accounting (which tracks budget execution both on commitment and cash basis) and financial

accounting (which is on accrual basis).

26 See International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department, […] p.1


23

4. Description of the main types of chart of accounts in selected EU

Member States (Belgium, Portugal, Estonia)

4.1. Selection of countries

The following section provides an overview of the approaches taken to harmonising the chart of

accounts in three EU Member States (Belgium, Portugal and Estonia) that have been selected for

illustration purposes. The selection of countries was based on the following assumptions:

Belgium: the central government completed in 2012 the FEDCOM project aimed at

modernising government’s accounting in parallel with the implementation of a new ERP

system. The new accounting system manages in an integrated way financial accounting,

budgetary accounting and cost/analytical accounting.

Portugal: the central government is currently on its way to adopt an IPSAS-based accounting

system, IPSASs standards being adapted to the context of the Portuguese public sector.

Estonia: the central government got the second highest accounting maturity score in the 2014

PwC study27, and is considered to have implemented best practices with regard to applying

accrual accounting/IPSAS. In particular, harmonised and streamlined processes have been

put in place regarding the set-up of the chart of accounts.

4.2. Methodology

To analyse the approaches taken to harmonising charts of accounts for national purposes in selected

Member States, PwC led semi-structured interviews based on a questionnaire. Respondents to the

questionnaire were government representatives (Belgium, Portugal and Estonia). The first series of

questions addressed the structure of the respective chart of accounts used for the purpose of financial

accounting, budgetary accounting and government finance statistics. The questionnaire then

addressed the steps taken in order to harmonise the chart of accounts with a view to financial

reporting requirements for national purposes. The last questions focused on the advantages and

disadvantages of the approach taken, as well as lessons learned.

In the following pages, a summary of the results of the interviews is presented country by country.

27 See European Commission, Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Towards implementing harmonised public sector accounting standards in Member States, The suitability of IPSAS for the Member States, COM(2013) 114 final, Brussels, 6 March 2013.


24

4.3. Belgium

4.3.1. General

The Belgian public accounting system had been modified several times since the law of 15 May 1846

on central government accounting. At first, the public accounting system only consisted of budgetary

accounting, but it then evolved towards a dual system, consisting of budgetary accounting and

financial accounting.

The following laws and regulations govern central government accounting (central government

excluding social security funds):

Belgian legislation on central government accounting:

1. Law of 15 March 1991 reforming the general and provincial accounts;

2. Law of 22 May 2003 on the organisation of the budget and the accounts of the

Federal State;

3. Royal Decree of 10 November 2009 on the harmonised chart of accounts and

the accounting principles;

4. Royal Decree of 29 April 2012 on the notes to the financial statements.

European legislation on the classification of national accounts according to the European

System of Accounts ESA 2010 (Regulation 549/2013 of 21 May 2013 of the European

Council)28.

Legal Framework Governance - Key dates29

1991: starting point of the reform of public sector accounting in Belgium.

1991-2003: legislative work.

2003: new public sector accounting Law - 22 May 2003.

2009: standardised Chart of Accounts published by Royal Decree.

2010: creation of the Public Sector Accounting Commission (CCP-COC).

2010-xxx: regular updates of the Law of 22 May 2003.

The harmonised chart of accounts applies to the central government entities. This does not include

social security funds and state/regional governments. The harmonised chart of accounts is structured

along 10 classes:

Class 0: off balance sheet accounts;

Classes 1 to 5: balance sheet accounts;

Classes 6 and 7: income statement accounts;

Classes 8 and 9: accounts for budgetary expenditures and receipts.

28 The former methodological framework (ESA 95) was replaced in September 2014 with the new European system of accounts (ESA 2010). 29 See Belgium’s transition to accrual accounting, Marc De Spiegeleire, 16th OECD Annual Symposium – Paris 21-22 March 2016


25

The central government entities (CGEs), under the authority of the Federal Public Services (FPSs)30,

can opt to apply the harmonised Belgian chart of accounts for private corporations or the harmonised

Belgian chart of accounts for non-profit organisations. This is because some of the CGEs, other than

FPSs, PPSs and social security funds, already had - at the time of the roll out of the ERP system to the

FPSs and PPSs - their local systems for financial accounting and statistical reporting in place and

running. Consequently, interfaces were created with the ERP system allowing these CGEs to

communicate their data for consolidation and statistical reporting purposes.

If a CGE chooses to keep their chart of accounts for private corporations or for non-profit

organisations, they have to communicate their data by means of a mapping table linked to the

harmonised chart of accounts applicable to public sector entities.

4.3.2. Implementation

In Belgium, the transition from cash to accruals in the central government financial accounting was

achieved through the FEDCOM project, conducted from 2007 till 2012. The budgetary accounting, on

the other hand, passed only partially from cash to accruals.

The scope of the FEDCOM project was limited to the Federal Public Services (FPSs) and Federal

Public Planning Services (PPSs) at central government level, excluding other CGEs and social security

funds. To support central government financial accounting on an accrual basis in the FPSs and PPSs,

the Federal Accounting Department was set up within the Federal Public Service of Budget31 in May

2007.

In September 2007, the pilot phase of the FEDCOM project started. FPSs of the pilot phase were able

to start working in the new ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system as of 1 January 2009. From

2009 until February 2012, the ERP system was rolled out to all FPSs and PPSs, in three waves.

Since then, the Federal Accounting Department has gradually developed its role as:

1) an ERP support and development centre;

2) a helpdesk;

3) a promotor of recommended accounting practices, with regard to the integrated

budgetary, financial and management accounting ERP system.

Whereas the Public Sector Accounting Commission has been legally assigned to officially address any

question regarding the chart of accounts submitted by one of its members as well as to provide high-

level advise on the general use of this chart by all entities adopting it, it is the Federal Accounting

Department that will support the different CGEs towards a correct and practical use of the chart of

accounts. The same applies to the introduction of international accounting standards32. The Federal

Accounting Department prepares the practical concept, develops the necessary tools or modules for

the ERP system and supervises the subsequent roll-out to all participating CGEs.

30 In Belgium, Ministries are called Federal Public Services (FPSs). 31 The Federal Public Service of Budget has in the meantime been renamed into Federal Public Service for Strategy and Support. 32 Or any other accounting related subjects, such as the introduction of electronic invoicing in public procurement by the European Directive 2014/55/EU.


26

4.3.3. Multidimensional chart of accounts

As part of the FEDCOM project, an integrated chart of accounts was developed at central government

level. The extended accounting system includes automated links between accrual accounting,

budgetary accounting as well as analytical management accounting, as the general accounting allows

to derive the budget accounting codes as well as the ESA 2010 codes.

The harmonised chart of accounts was an essential feature in the FEDCOM project roll-out. The

implemented ERP system integrates budgetary, financial and management accounting, through

derivation of general ledger accounts to statistical reporting and budget codes.

Figure 5: Budgetary accounting, financial accounting, management accounting - Belgium, Federal Public Service33

As highlighted in Figure 5: Budgetary accounting, financial accounting, management accounting -

Belgium, Federal Public Service, the accounting system allows to derive the statistical reporting

codes. For example, the general ledger account 616310 “Repairs and maintenance of machinery and

tools” points to statistical reporting code 12118.

4.3.4. Benefits

A harmonised chart of accounts improves comparability and increases possibilities to share best

practices between consolidated entities. It allows for better consistency of accounting practices.

In addition, it facilitates the consolidation process as everyone speaks the same language.

33 See Belgium’s transition to accrual accounting, Marc De Spiegeleire, 16th OECD Annual Symposium - Paris 21-22 March 2016


27

4.3.5. Recommendations

Based on the recent and ongoing implementation experience, the Belgian Federal Public Service for

Strategy and Support strongly advises to find a good balance between the information needs and the

number of general ledger accounts created, when defining a harmonised chart of accounts. In

addition, it is of uttermost importance to allow for proper maintenance of the general ledger (GL)

accounts, regulate control of new GL accounts creation and periodically check for unused GL

accounts.

4.4. Portugal

4.4.1. General

The Ministry of Finance (MoF) appointed in January 2013 the National Accounting Standards

Commission (CNC) in order to adopt IPSAS-based financial accounting standards in the Portuguese

public sector. Since then, Portugal has also adopted a harmonised chart of accounts as part of its

accrual accounting reform. The financial, budgetary and management accounting standards, as well

as the structure of the chart of accounts, are covered by Decree-Law n°192/2015, 11 September, which

stipulates the creation of the new Accounting Standards for Public Administrations SNC-AP

applicable to all public entities. For financial accounting, SNC-AP is based on IPSAS and the national

standards in force for the private sector - SNC.

The objective of the accounting framework SNC-AP is the financial, budgetary and management

accounting and reporting of all the entities of the public sector (except public corporations if not

reclassified in the General Government). The SNC-AP is a modified cash and accrual accounting basis

system, comprising 27 standards of public accounting and reporting (NCP’s), 25 of which are IPSAS-

based, 1 standard on Budgetary Accounting and Reporting and 1 standard on management

accounting.

Together with the Conceptual Framework and the Multidimensional Accounting Plan (PCM), the

NCP’s standards form the basis to prepare public sector entities’ financial reporting, which is

expected to include four main financial statements in addition to the Notes: Balance Sheet, Operating

Statement (by nature), Cash Flow Statement, and Statement of Changes in Equity. SNC-AP considers

each public entity as a reporting entity, however it foresees a simplified regime for smaller and less

risky ones. The SNC-AP comprises 3 accounting sub-systems: budgetary, financial and management

accounting subsystems. The objective is to fully implement the accrual basis of accounting to the

general government, linking it with the current modified cash basis used in the budget sub-system.

The harmonised chart of accounts applies to all levels of government (central, regional and local). All

entities included in the whole-of government accounts should use the standard chart of accounts.

Local entities can adapt their local chart of account but it should be mapped to the harmonised

central chart of accounts for consolidation purposes.

The content of balance sheet items and statement of financial performance items is defined in the

accounting legislation, namely, in the notes to the chart of accounts (Ordinance nº 189/2016, from 14

July) and in the Manual for the Implementation of the Accounting Standardisation System for Public


28

Administrations. As regards the financial accounts, a total of 38 accounts for the balance sheet and 22

accounts for the income statement have been created.


The implementation of the new accrual accounting standards started in 2013, when pilot entities of

the central government were scheduled to implement the new standards by 2016 and 2017. As from 1

January 2018, all entities within the scope of the general government should have adopted the new

standards.

The objective is to publish whole-of-governments accounts (as in the United Kingdom), including all

entities across government levels (central, regional and local) in the scope of consolidation, which

represents a total amount of more than 5,000 reported entities. It should be noted that the

government is currently investigating the selection of a consolidation software, capable of including

all entities in one consolidation system.

The Accounting Standards Committee (CNC) had a central role in the reform process, as it triggered

the development of the Accounting Standards for Public Administrations - SNC-AP, the new

accounting system applicable to all public entities that would be based on the International Public

Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) and the national legislation in force in this field for the private

sector - SNC.

More recently, the Public Financial Management (PFM) Reform Unit (UniLEO) was created at the

Ministry of Finance with the responsibility to implement the accounting and reporting reform as well

as broader public finance reforms associated with the new budget framework law.

The accounting reform has been combined with the reform of the information systems in place in the

public sector entities in order to respond to the new information needs and to the establishment of

additional internal control mechanisms that allow the monitoring of the accounting process and the

flow of operations which guarantees the transparency and reliability of the system.

As this reform is a public sector wide reform which also considers the budgetary and statistical

aspects of government reporting, other relevant public sector stakeholders, such as the national

statistical authority (INE) and the Court of Auditors have been involved to provide relevant inputs to

the process.


The harmonised chart of accounts which was adopted is multidimensional. It is considered as an

instrument to address different information needs and contributes to the efficient generation of

budgetary, financial, fiscal and management information for a variety of purposes. Therefore, the

chart of accounts includes codes for the budgetary process, along with budget classifications (these

may include economic, functional, administrative, programme and regional classifications), for

financial reporting (assets, liabilities, net worth, revenues and expenses) and for management

reporting (cost centres, types of costs, projects and outputs), although codes are optional for

reporting entities when it comes to management accounting.


29

The multidimensional chart of accounts (PCM) is an essential instrument for public accounting and

for the new Accounting Standards System for Public Administrations (SNC-AP) because it can

address different information needs, namely the classification, recording and reporting of

transactions and events in a standardized, systematic and consistent way. It provides budgetary,

financial and management accounting information.

The PCM comprises:

- A summary table of accounts of classes 1 to 8 intended to record transactions and events in

financial accounting.

- A coded list of accounts (chart of accounts) of classes 1 to 8.

- A correlation table between the chart of accounts and the main accounts of the ESA.

- An entity classifier (complementary classifier 1).

- A classifier for the purpose of the inventory and useful lifetime period from tangible and

intangible assets and investment assets (complementary classifier 2).

The main objective of PCM is to help support the classification, registration and presentation of

comparable, reliable and relevant data for the following purposes:

- Elaboration of general purpose financial statements, through the subsystem of financial

accounting.

- Elaboration of the inventory of assets and rights of public administrations and calculation of

the corresponding depreciation and amortisation.

- Support for the preparation of the management report accompanying the individual and

consolidated accounts.

- Support for the preparation of ESA national accounts (statistical aggregates).

Budgetary accounting and financial accounting are managed in parallel. Budgetary accounting runs

autonomously and independently (class zero). It is applicable only to payable and receivable

accounts, and to payments and receipts. The statistical report shall be obtained from the financial

accounts for assets, liabilities, net worth, revenues and expenses. It is intended that any adjustments

that may be necessary will be made automatically in the central information system.

The chart of accounts incorporates the disaggregation of some of the accounts required to provide the

necessary content of the balance sheet and income statement items, as well as for the purpose of

disclosing relevant information. Instructions recently issued by the PFM Reform Unit establishes the

correspondence of each movement account with the balance sheet or profit and loss account for

which its balance should be considered, as well as the positive or negative effect on the value of the

item.34

When structuring their own chart of accounts, the entities must ensure that:

- The structure of the chart of accounts contained in the above mentioned instructions must be

complied with.

- Any disaggregation on the accounts must respect the nature of the higher grade account, and

its connection with the balance sheet and income statement items.

34 Instructions are available from: https://www.unileo.gov.pt/unileo/normas

https://www.unileo.gov.pt/unileo/normas


30

- The suspension points incorporated in the chart of accounts contained in Annex III of the

Decree-Law 192/2015 may only give rise to new account codes by means of a proposal

submitted to and accepted by the CNC. These new codes will be included in a new version of

the chart of accounts standardised by the PFM Reform Unit, which also prepares the

necessary framework note for harmonisation of its use by all entities applying SNC-AP.

Figure 6: Multidimensional chart of accounts - Portugal35

Figure 7: Budgetary accounting chart of accounts36

35 See Chart of Accounts: An Instrument to Address Different Information Needs, International Conference Accrual and Standards: the future of the EU MSs public accounting, Luís Viana, 21 November 2016 36 See Chart of Accounts: An Instrument to Address Different Information Needs, International Conference Accrual and Standards: the future of the EU MSs public accounting, Luís Viana, 21 November 2016


31

Figure 8: Financial accounting chart of accounts37

The table below illustrates how the financial chart of accounts has been automatically linked to the

ESA 2010 codes. As such a first draft of the national accounts following ESA 2010 can be directly

derived from the financial statements. After the automated transposition of the financial statements

manual adjustments are required to reflect the differences in scope and measurement basis between

the accrual accounting and the ESA 2010 reporting. Indeed, the criteria for consolidation for IPSAS

and ESA 2010 are not the same. Manual adjustment entries will be necessary to adjust for the

consolidation perimeter.

In terms of measurement, certain transactions such as the accounting for provisions are not

considered under ESA 2010 and need to be eliminated.

Figure 9: Chart of accounts and fiscal reporting38

Entities have the flexibility to adjust the plan to their specific needs and can create lower-level sub-

accounts and mapping them to the central chart of accounts. In addition, cross validations between

the trial balance, budget statements, financial statements and notes have been set up.

37 See Chart of Accounts […], Luís Viana, 21 November 2016 38 See Chart of Accounts […], Luís Viana, 21 November 2016


32

Figure 10: Adaptability of the harmonised chart of accounts39

4.4.4. Benefits and challenges

Completeness: the chart of accounts is comprehensive and enables to capture all the budgetary,

financial, patrimonial (i.e. balance sheet), economic and statistical information which is required. It

facilitates a comprehensive view of the public sector.

Multidimensional set up: the accounts and subaccounts of the chart of accounts are set so as not to

generate overlaps. This means that the same information must not be obtained from different

accounts or sub-accounts to avoid redundancy. For example, classes 1 to 8 provide information for

financial purposes and for ESA national accounts. Class 0 stands for budgetary accounting purposes,

alongside budget classifications. The aggregation of revenue and expenditure is ensured by a

correlation table between the aggregated lines of budgetary revenue and expenditure and the

economic classification for budgetary accounting established in a specific decree-law for budget

classifications. Another table ensures the correspondence between the PCM and the main

codifications of the European System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA). Budgetary

accounting is recorded in parallel with the financial accounting (when applicable), but it runs

autonomously and independently.

Segmentation: the accounts and sub-accounts of the chart of accounts were designed to meet the

information needs of government data users at different levels, as well as other relevant stakeholders

(e.g. parliament, auditors, the press, citizens in general). The management of the chart of accounts is

done centrally.


39 See Chart of Accounts […], Luís Viana, 21 November 2016


33

Based on the recent and ongoing implementation experience, the Portuguese government strongly

advises to keep the structure of the budgetary and financial CoA strictly separate if the budgetary

basis of accounting is cash or modified cash. As both the purpose and the measurement basis of

budgetary and financial accounting differ a separate structure is required to meet both purposes.

Further, it is recommended to keep the management of the chart of accounts centralised and properly

define the use of each account in a manual of accounting for ensuring information consistency across

public sector entities.

4.5. Estonia

4.5.1. General

In December 2003, the Minister of Finance approved the General Rules for Public Sector Accounting

which came into force on 1 January 2004; public sector accounting rules were then brought in line

with IPSASs. In addition, the requirements for a compilation of consolidated statements were laid

down as well as the adoption of common accounting principles and rules for submitting statements to

the Ministry of Finance (from the year 2013 to the State Shared Service Centre (SSSC)) based on a

common chart of accounts. SSSC is the government agency established in 1 January 2013 which

provides human resources, payroll accounting services and financial services (including accounting

and financial reporting services) to the government.

The General Rules for Public Sector Accounting include:

General accounting principles for the public sector entities.

A uniform chart of accounts, obligatory for the reporting by public sector institutions (in

practice all units of the central and local governments use the same chart of accounts as

well as many other public sector institutions); if an institution doesn’t use the uniform

chart on accounts, it should put in place a correlation table between its chart of accounts

and the unified chart of accounts for reporting purposes).

Reporting form and due dates about the reports, inserted via internet monthly (all

institutions belonging to the government sector according to statistical rules (ESA 2010))

or quarterly (other public sector institutions not included in the government sector) in the

public sector financial statements database (below named also as a consolidation

software).

In Estonia, a standard chart of accounts is used by all public sector entities, including all units

belonging to the government sector (central government, local government, social funds). It should

be noted that the State/regional government level does not exist in Estonia.

According to the General Rules for Public Sector Accounting, all public sector accounting entities

insert their financial reports into a public sector financial statements database. The reports are based

on the harmonised chart of accounts and are inserted into the database in the form of a special

unified report. This special unified report consists of balance sheet accounts, revenue, and expenses


34

accounts as well as off-balance sheet information. The latter is presented once a year after the end of

the financial year.40

SSSC is in charge of the management of the public sector financial statements database. Consolidated

financial reports are created on the same software within a very limited timeframe. All public sector

entities have to input their financial information into the consolidation system within 25 days after

the end of the month or quarter. The consolidated financial reports are available at the end of that

month (government sector and its sub-sectors) or quarter (public sector and its sub-sectors) after

some controlling procedures carried out by SSSC, including comparison of intra-group balances and

adding extra reports for proper consolidation purposes. The summarised whole-of-government

accounts (with limited notes) are prepared on a quarterly basis, and the annual whole-of-government

financial statements are prepared by 30 April. Thereafter, they are audited by the State Audit Office

and presented to the Parliament by 30 August.


The unified chart of accounts for national purposes was established in 2003 and negotiated then with

all public sector entities. It was set as compulsory as from 2004 by regulation of the Minister of

Finance. All IT-systems were prepared for the new chart of accounts and explanatory guidelines for

the chart of accounts were distributed, describing every account and explaining when and how to use

each account, including examples of accounting entries. The unified chart of accounts was

implemented during the accrual accounting reform. Many training sessions were organised and a

communication programme took place.


As mentioned here above, all government sector accounting units use the same chart of accounts and

the content of balance sheet and financial performance items is defined in the accounting legislation.

In addition, the same integrated chart of accounts is used for financial accounting, budgetary

accounting and government finance statistics.

The current lists of codes included in the chart of accounts are available under the heading

“Klassifikaatorid” (Classification) on the dedicated web-site41. The uniform chart of accounts

includes42 the following information:

1. List of accounts.

2. List of counterpart codes.

3. List of codes of function (similar to the classification of the functions of government

[COFOG]).

4. List of source codes (used to identify EU funds and other foreign aid).

5. List of cash-flow codes.

40 State Shared Service Center website (Riigi Tugiteenuste Keskus). 41 https://saldo.fin.ee/reportManagement.action 42 Inventory of the methods, procedures and sources used for the compilation of deficit and debt data and the underlying government sector accounts according to ESA 2010, Estonia, July 2015, p.23


35

The list of accounts is hierarchical and presents 6 levels, each account has a 6-digit code. Accounts

can be grouped together to sub-groups, groups, sets, classes and types. There are altogether eight

account types which are identified based on the first digit of the account:

1. Assets.

2. Liabilities.

3. Revenues.

4. Benefits and grants provided.

5. Operating costs.

6. Other expenditures.

7. Net financing from the state budget.

8. Additional information for compilation of financial statements.

The last two types are used only as additional information for the compilation of consolidated

financial statements of the central government.

4.5.4. Benefits

A harmonised chart of accounts facilitates the production of consolidated public sector financial

reports. Accounting units within the public sector speak the same language, which enhances the

communication between entities, and comprehensive guidelines and instructions are made available

to all entities. In addition, budgeting, cost accounting, financial accounting and statistical reporting

are integrated within the same chart of accounts, which makes it easier to meet information needs of

users of government reports.

It should be highlighted that Estonia moved to an accrual-based state budget in 2017, which places it

among the most innovative countries in terms of budgetary accounting. “Accrual-based budget

enables using the taxpayers’ money in a more efficient and transparent manner than the current

cash-based budget,” said the Minister of Finance Sven Sester. Accrual-based budgeting includes

profits and losses that are planned for the budget period irrespective of when the profits accrue or

payments are charged. Unlike a cash-based budget, an accrual-based budget also includes costs that

are not accompanied by cash outflow, for example depreciation of fixed assets.

In this context, setting up a uniform chart of accounts for financial accounting and budgetary

accounting proves even more useful. The majority of international fiscal and financial statistics,

including data regarding budget surplus and deficit, must be prepared on the basis of accrual-based

data. Thus, as cash-based budgeting is discontinued, accrual-based budgeting allows the state to

reduce work because reporting and preparing basic data becomes easier and less labour intensive.43


The Estonian government recommends the setting up of a uniform chart of accounts for financial

accounting, budgetary accounting and government finance statistics, as it enhances the reporting

process and enables the preparers of government reports to better meet information needs of the

43 “Estonia will adopt an accrual-based state budget”, Press release by the Ministry of Finance, 25 January 2016 http://www.fin.ee/estonia-will-adopt-an-accrual-based-state-budget/

http://www.fin.ee/estonia-will-adopt-an-accrual-based-state-budget/


36

primary and secondary users both in terms of quality and timeliness. When it comes to change

management, the Estonian government strongly advises the development of thorough guidelines, as

well as good communication and a robust training programme.


37

4.6. Comparison of the main features of chart of accounts in selected EU Member States (Belgium, Portugal and

Estonia)

The following table presents a comparison of the main features of chart of accounts in selected EU Member States (Belgium, Portugal and

Estonia) and summarises their respective approach to harmonising their chart of accounts.

Belgium Portugal Estonia

Approach taken to

the implementation

FEDCOM is a project conducted

in Belgium from 2007 till 2012 by

the central government, which

allowed the transition from the

cash basis to the accrual basis of

accounting. As part of the

FEDCOM project, an integrated

chart of accounts was developed

at central government level.

Accounting reforms at other

government levels are conducted

independently (Belgium is a

federal country). The structure

and content of the chart of

accounts is however similar for

all levels.

The Accounting Standards

Committee (CNC) initiated the

development of the Accounting

Standards for Public

Administrations - SNC-AP, the

new accounting framework

applicable to all public entities

based on IPSAS and the national

legislation applicable in the

private sector - SNC. A

harmonised chart of accounts for

all government entities has been

developed. The project started in

2013 and by 2019 all government

entities will need to comply with

the new rules.

The unified chart of accounts was

implemented during the accrual

accounting reform in 2003 and

was made compulsory in 2004 to

all government entities.

Communication of detailed

guidance and training sessions

were organised to support proper

application of the newly

harmonised chart of accounts.


38

Level of

harmonisation of the

chart of accounts

The harmonised chart of

accounts applies to the central

government for the first three

digits only.

The harmonised chart of

accounts applies to all levels of

government (central, regional

and local). All entities included in

the whole-of government

accounts should use it. Local

entities can adapt their local

chart of accounts but it should be

mapped to the harmonised chart

of accounts.

All government sector accounting

units use the same chart of

accounts and the content of

balance sheet and financial

performance items is defined in

the accounting legislation.

Multi-dimensional

chart of accounts

The extended accounting system

includes automated links

between accrual accounting,

budgetary accounting as well as

analytical management

accounting. In addition, the

general accounting system allows

to derive the ESA 2010 codes in

order to produce the ESA 2010

reporting.

Budgetary (modified) cash

accounting is kept in parallel with

the financial accounting (when

applicable), it runs autonomously

and independently (class zero).

Statistical reporting is obtained

from the financial accounts and

any required adjustments are

made automatically in the central

IT system. The chart of accounts

also includes codes for the

management reporting.

One integrated chart of accounts

is used for financial accounting,

budgetary accounting (note:

budgets and accounts are both

prepared on an accrual basis) and

government finance statistics.


39

Structure of the

chart of accounts

Financial accounts are split into 9

different classes and each

account has a 6-digit code. Each

account class can be identified

based on the first digit of the

account (ex.: revenue, expenses,

etc.). Whenever a transaction is

booked in the financial accounts,

an additional 12-digits has to be

filled in which enables the link

with the budgetary and ESA 2010

records.

The Multidimensional

Accounting Plan (PCM)

comprises a coded list of

accounts (chart of accounts) of

Classes 1 to 8. The system also

allows to classify the operations

by nature in the budget accounts

and a comparison of these with

budget. A correlation table

between the chart of accounts

and the main ESA 2010 accounts

also exists.

The list of accounts is

hierarchical and presents 6

levels, each account has a 6-digit

code. There are altogether eight

account classes which are

identified based on the first digit

of the account (e.g. assets,

liabilities, etc.).

Advantages (as

reported by the

government)

- Improved comparability and

better knowledge sharing

between consolidated entities.

- Better consistency of accounting

practices.

- Better harmonisation achieved

through centralising the

management of the chart of

accounts and better sharing of

know how.

- Enhanced collaboration

between stakeholders in order to

identify user needs and define

solutions.

- Greater consistency in booking

of transactions and consequent

high quality consolidated public

sector financial reports.

- The set-up of a uniform chart of

accounts for financial accounting,

budgetary accounting and

government finance statistics

reduces the workload, as

reporting and preparing data

became easier and less labour

intensive.


40

Disadvantages (as

reported by the

government)

- The level of granularity of the

harmonised chart of accounts

may be considered as too detailed

by certain public sector entities

(not all accounts are applicable to

each entity).

- Lack of flexibility when it comes

to maintaining the chart of

accounts over time, as the full set

of accounts was embedded as

such in the legal documents.

- None. - None.

Main lessons learnt

and tips (as reported

by the government)

- Find the right balance between

the information needs and the

number of accounts created when

defining the chart of accounts.

- Organise a proper maintenance

of the chart of accounts (e.g. new

accounts creation, monitoring of

inactive accounts, etc.).

- Centralise management of the

chart of accounts (CoA):

determine the entity responsible

for the accounting harmonisation

and the introduction of new

accounts in the CoA, define the

exact use of each account, and

keep a separate CoA for

budgetary and financial accounts.

- Develop and share thorough

guidelines concerning the use of

the chart of accounts, ensure

good communication and deploy

a robust training programme.


41

The comparative table above highlights some of the advantages/disadvantages in the

approach/solution taken by the three selected governments as reported by the governments

themselves, as well as some tips drawn from their own experience in relation to the development of a

harmonised chart of accounts.

It should also be noted that the approach/solutions implemented may vary depending on the

political/constitutional landscape (federal country or not) and on some strategic and/or political

decisions taken (for example budgetary accounting aligned to general accounting or not).


42

5. Benefits of a harmonised chart of accounts

Developing an approach to harmonising the chart of accounts at the national level can bring

significant benefits to Member States, as evidenced by experiences in Belgium, Portugal and Estonia.

The key benefits of a harmonised and well-designed chart of accounts include:

Improved comparability and increased possibilities to share best practices: consistency of

accounting practices, and possibility to develop harmonised accounting guidance and

manuals.

Reduced complexity as ‘everyone speaks the same language’, government entities can

communicate more easily with each other, through common terminology.

Reduced maintenance and administration costs: simplified processes and decrease in the

workload. Additional benefits can also be sought through the setting up of a finance shared

services centre (e.g. as in Estonia).

Improved control over data integrity: delivery of accurate, comparable and consistent

information across entities creates a favourable control environment, positively impacts the

reliability of the reporting and allows for a more efficient audit process.

Reduced closure time through enhanced and streamlined reporting processes.

Facilitated consolidation process, with financial aggregation of Ministries and other

government entities’ numbers and eliminations in consolidation being performed more easily.

Enhanced analysis of management and other reporting information, with the Ministry of

Finance, or other central reporting and/or budgeting units, being able to interpret and analyse

financial information more easily, to support consolidation, budgeting and other economic

analyses.


43

6. Difficulties/issues when implementing a harmonised chart of

accounts

The main challenges encountered when developing the chart of accounts can be summarised as

follows:

6.1. Structure of chart of accounts (CoA)

As already mentioned, the IPSAS framework does not prescribe any minimum chart of accounts.

Public sector entities just need to organise their accounting and reporting so that IPSAS reporting

requirements are complied with, both for the presentation of elements in the primary statements and

the disclosures of certain items/information in the notes to the accounts. Accounts should be

maintained in a way which is appropriate with respect to the nature and the scope of public sector

activities, and which take into consideration the specific legal provisions applicable to them.

The organisation of the whole accounting and reporting chain requires the setting up of a structure of

chart of accounts in order to capture the transactions when they occur and report them according to

the requirements of the applicable accounting framework. All operations should be entered without

delay and accurately in either a single general journal/ledger (GL) or in a number of specific

journals/ledgers (record-to-report process: see Figure 11).

In practice, the structure of the chart of accounts developed for governments at the national level may

be influenced by the structure of the chart of accounts that is applicable to private companies under

the local accounting rules. Alternatively, a common taxonomy, such as the XBRL taxonomy

developed and updated by the IFRS Foundation, can be used as a starting point for the development

of a government chart of accounts.

Whatever the source of inspiration, the following key elements should be taken into consideration

when designing the structure of a standard chart of accounts:

Identification of captions, sub-captions, accounts and account codes.

Number of digits for each account.

A common chart of accounts structure should be put in place identifying specific codes to be used for

making the link to the various financial statement components (see Figure 11 CoA best practice

attributes). The right balance should be found regarding the number of accounts to be created (see

Figure 11 CoA best practice attributes). A greater number of accounts may be created to achieve

greater granularity in the information provided by the accounting system. However if too many

accounts are created, there is a greater risk that the accounts might not be used consistently,

therefore putting at risk the harmonisation objective.

The number of digits for each account should also be determined. Best practice is to use the first

digits of each account to achieve harmonisation between reporting entities. The same accounts and

account numbering provide a direct and consistent link to the reporting requirements. The last digits

can then be used to meet the specific characteristics or additional information needs of each entity.


44

The harmonised chart of accounts should also be set up in a way which permits easy maintenance of

the master data (see Figure 11 CoA best practice attributes). Figure 11 presents best practice attributes

related to the setting up of harmonised chart of accounts and related maintenance.

Figure 11: Best practice attributes

In order to maintain control over new accounts creation at a centralised level (central general ledger),

new accounts creation can be allowed via the creation by users of chart of accounts change requests.

New account codes should be timely communicated to all users (including local finance, purchasing

and staff able to order). In addition, inactive accounts should be regularly monitored to conclude if

they are still relevant to the reporting entity.

6.2. Multidimensional aspect

As previously reported, the chart of accounts can be used for multiple purposes. It is used for the

preparation of external financial statements but it can also be used to support the preparation of the

ESA 2010 reporting, the preparation of internal management reporting and the tracking of

expenditures and receipts against budget.

The challenge consists for each reporting entity in identifying its needs and in determining the extent

to which the design of the chart of accounts can help satisfy those needs.

All government entities must consider the EPSAS requirements in the design of their chart of

accounts, and think about the link with the ESA 2010 reporting. Information needs for management

purposes may also partially be addressed by further tailoring the chart of accounts.

On the budgetary accounting side, the strength of the link/interaction with the chart of accounts used

for the financial reporting in practice highly depends on the level of consistency between the

accounting/financial reporting rules and the budgetary accounting rules. If budget is prepared on an

accrual basis, the link between budgetary accounts and financial accounts is facilitated.

Record-to-Report Master data CoA best practice attributes

CoA maintenance and new accounts creation

1. Establish a common chart of accounts across

the reporting entities.

2. Minimise the number of accounts to meet

information needs.

3. Regulate control of new accounts creation.

4. Periodically check for inactive accounts.

5. Communicate new account codes to all users

(local finance, purchasing and all staff able to

order).

Chart of

Accounts

change request

Update central

GL

Centre

Outsource

Business Unit

Customer

Centre

Outsource

Business Unit

Customer


45

6.3. Small versus large entities

The question arises on whether a simplified chart of accounts should be foreseen for smaller entities.

The approach for designing a harmonised chart of accounts should a priori not be impacted by this

question. A minimum standardisation should be achieved to address the reporting requirements, i.e.

the first digits of each account may be set up in common, while the last digits may be used to address

the specificities of each entity. Smaller entities may chose not to use the last digits if this does not

provide them with additional relevant and useful information. In addition, not all accounts should be

used by all entities as a number of accounts might not be useful to smaller entities.

As mentioned in the section related to the analysis of the approach taken in Belgium, the harmonised

chart of accounts applies to the central government and the State/regional government levels for the

first 3 digits only. The next 3 digits are further defined by the federal entities and the State/regional

government entities so that they address their own requirements. In this case however, a balance

should be maintained between the information needs and the number of accounts created when

defining the chart of accounts. As mentioned in the analysis of the Belgian approach to harmonising

the chart of accounts, an important number of distinct accounts have been created, which adds

further complexity to the use and maintenance of the chart of accounts.

6.4. Consistent use of the chart of accounts across reporting entities

In order to achieve comparability in financial reporting, transactions should be reported using the

appropriate classification by all entities in the scope of reporting. This can only be achieved if the day-

to-day transactions are recorded in the appropriate accounts.

Measures which can be taken to meet this objective include:

Finding the right balance in the number of accounts to create. Enough accounts need to be

created to meet the information needs as defined by the reporting entity, but too many

accounts increase the risk of error in the posting of transactions.

Documenting the proper use of each of the accounts included in the standard chart of

accounts. Useful guidelines include the definition of the content for each account and

illustrative examples with postings (debit-credit) for the most common and most complex

transactions.

Providing training to the users to ensure they acquire the necessary knowledge to exercise

their day-to-day activities.

Automating the posting of booking entries where possible.

Finding the right balance between centralisation and decentralisation of the accounting

function, with the possible creation of share service centres to allow expert knowledge to be

built within a core team.

Having a proper process in place for the maintenance of the chart of accounts, including to

validate the changes to the chart of accounts (elimination of unused accounts, control over

the creation of new accounts, communication of changes to the users).


46

In addition, the use of intercompany accounts facilitates eliminations in consolidation and makes the consolidation process more efficient.

6.5. System design features

A well-defined chart of accounts, with proper consideration to thin versus thick ledger, supports

financial information for better analysis and decision making. A decision about implementing thin

versus thick ledger directly affects the design of the chart of accounts. With a ‘thin ledger’ approach,

minimum information is stored within general ledger, and information included in specialised sub

ledgers / data warehouse can provide the full picture, as and when needed. Following a ‘thick ledger’

approach, most of the information is stored in the general ledger.

The main features of the two approaches are presented below: Thin ledger Thick ledger Hub Data warehouse is the information

hub General ledger is the information hub

General ledger data entry

Faster and less prone to errors Slower and prone to errors

Reconciliation Requires robust reconciliation mechanisms

Easier reconciliation

Performance Faster general ledger system performance

Relatively slower performance

In addition, the chart of accounts system features should include the following possibilities:

Provide on-line, real time access to the single core general ledger.

Provide efficient copy and editing facilities.

Ensure fast processing of transactions and easy production of reports.

Ensure strong user access security and controls.

When it comes to security, it is recommended to build manual and automated controls around the

chart of accounts. Examples of controls that can be considered around chart of accounts include:

User access to accounts: designing of a user access matrix listing the set of accounts

available / unavailable to specific set of users or a group of users (e.g. users of a local

agency are not allowed to access accounts that are related to transactions that can be only

entered into by the central treasury team).

Control accounts: definition of balance sheet controls accounts to aid reconciliation of sub

ledgers with general ledger (e.g. suppliers and debtors control accounts).

6.6. Implementation timeline

The initial implementation phase consists in designing the key considerations and key principles for

the new chart of accounts. Typical challenges arising during the design phase consist in ensuring all

requirements have been considered and the design is fit for purpose. Best practice is to finalise the

chart of accounts when conceptual analyses regarding the accrual accounting information needs are

done in order to take all relevant input from these conceptual analyses into account. Information


47

needs so determined include information needed to satisfy accounting policies and presentation and

disclosure requirements in a harmonised way across reporting entities, as well as any additional

information needed for other purposes (multidimensional aspect of the chart of accounts).

Subsequently, the mapping phase consists of mapping the new chart accounts values to the old chart

of accounts values for the purpose of migration of financial information from the old chart of

accounts to the new. Challenges which may arise during the mapping phase include managing

changes to the chart of accounts identified during the mapping process, as well as managing the

process when multiple teams are working simultaneously on it. As soon as the mapping is validated,

the configuration of chart of accounts and associated system components in the general ledger can

take place following the sequence described in Figure 12: Implementation of a new chart of accounts.

Figure 12: Implementation of a new chart of accounts

Building accounting integration and interface with other feeder/consumer systems, as well as testing

of chart of accounts and system components are crucial steps. After roll out to all reporting entities,

the identification of potential issues enables to plan subsequent improvements to the harmonised

chart of accounts (continuous improvement process). Finally, a process for managing the routine

changes to the chart of accounts, such as addition of new accounts, should be foreseen after initial

implementation.

In practice, the timeline for designing the chart of accounts may have to be adapted depending on

constraints linked to the overall project timeline. For example, the timeline for designing a chart of

accounts may be impacted by other major changes such as the implementation of a new IT system or

the development of a shared service centre.


48

7. PwC’s recommendations on the way forward

The use of a standard chart of accounts is not an objective in itself but a tool in the whole accounting

and reporting value chain. In practice, developing a uniform chart of accounts is a very good means,

not to say a necessary means, to achieve harmonisation among reporting entities. Comparability in

presentation is indeed greatly facilitated by the use of a standard chart of accounts by all public sector

entities in the scope of reporting. In addition, governments may use the chart of accounts for other

purposes than just financial reporting.

Conversely, the lack of consistency in accounting categories and terms used by different government

entities may cause:

inefficiencies in the reporting process and consequential significant administration costs; and

an inability to aggregate and compare financial data for any purposes, such as for example

public policy development, benchmarking of performance and indications of financial

effectiveness.

The purpose of this issue paper is only to address harmonisation of charts of accounts at the national

level, i.e. within individual Member States, not at the EU level.

At the national level, the following aspects should be specifically considered when developing/

redesigning a chart of accounts:

Setting up one harmonised/common chart of accounts should take into account user needs,

properly addressing the various dimensions of the reporting value chain (EPSAS reporting,

ESA 2010 reporting, budgetary reporting, management reporting).

Consideration of user needs is an important aspect and may vary from country to country. For

example, the government of Estonia recently decided to adopt accrual-based budgeting,

therefore harmonising budgetary and general accounting rules. As a consequence, a uniform

and integrated chart of accounts has been developed. On the contrary, Portugal still uses

(modified) cash budgeting while moving to IPSAS-based accrual accounting and therefore

decided to keep budgetary accounting and general accounting separate.

In terms of management reporting, the system developed by the Belgian central government

integrates budget accounting, general accounting and analytical accounting. Management

accounting is also considered in the accounting system set up in Portugal.

Automated or semi-automated links between the financial accounts and ESA 2010 codes

accounts are organised in the three countries analysed: Belgium, Portugal and Estonia.

Developing integrated IT systems solutions may further facilitate the set-up of a uniform and

integrated chart of accounts. In Belgium for example, the FEDCOM project involved the

development of an integrated accounting system and chart of accounts by the central

government and the implementation of a new ERP system across central government entities.

Harmonisation of the chart of accounts is recommended for all government entities within the

country. This facilitates both the consolidation at a specified government level (central, state


49

and local) and consolidation at the national level. In Estonia and Portugal, the accounting

reform has been organised as such. Belgium is a federal country and different legislations

apply. Accounting reforms are conducted independently by the various governments but the

laws that have been passed implementing the chart of accounts at the central level, at the

state/regional level and at the local level foresee similar minimum requirements in respect of

the structure and contents of the chart of accounts.

Putting in place a plan for data migration will help to minimise the risks inherent in a data

migration project. A clear methodology is an essential part of a successful data migration and

should include among others mapping rules, a recovery plan (recovery options for each stage

of the migration) and a go live plan (actions required to go live).

A rigorous and consistent application throughout reporting entities, including through

development of comprehensive and easy-to-use guidelines on the chart of accounts and

delivery of in-depth training programme to the users. For example, this has proved to be a key

success factor in the implementation of IPSAS-based accrual accounting policies by the

government of Estonia.

Organising a proper maintenance of the chart of accounts and appropriate governance around

changes. Centralising the maintenance of the chart of accounts (as for example in Portugal)

and putting in place a good governance (e.g. responsibilities in terms of new accounts

creation, monitoring of inactive accounts) enables to achieve the required level of controls

over the chart of accounts, as well as the flexibility needed to meet the preparers of

government reports’ needs over time. The right balance should be found regarding the

number of accounts to be created (users may wish to open many accounts to meet their own

needs but too many accounts increase maintenance costs and the probability of errors in the

bookings).

Amending the underlying legislation as appropriate as the new requirements should be

supported by legal texts. In Belgium, Portugal and Estonia for example, the use of a

harmonised chart of accounts by public sector entities in scope is explicitly referred to in the

national legislation. The level of details included/language used in the legislation should

enable the flexibility required when maintaining the chart of accounts over time.

Documents

EPSAS WG 17/12 EPSAS Working Group To be held in ... - Europa€¦ · the public sector and technical analysis of the suitability of individual IPSAS standards, 2013/S 107-182395,