Upload
senona
View
29
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Equity Impact Review Guide NACDD General Member Call June 27, 2013. Quick Poll. Did you take a look at the Equity Impact Review (EIR) Guide prior to this presentation? Yes No. Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Equity Impact Review GuideEquity Impact Review Guide
NACDD General Member Call NACDD General Member Call June 27, 2013June 27, 2013
Quick Poll
Did you take a look at the Equity Impact Review (EIR) Guide prior to this presentation?
•Yes
•No
Objectives• Introduce the Health Equity Impact Review
Guide, an assessment tool designed to help predict the impact of a public health policy or project on health equity
• Help you identify examples in which you can apply the Guide
• This presentation supports domains 1, 2, 3, and 4
“The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition.”
Preamble to Constitution of the World Health Organization
Health as a Human Right
The BIG Picture• HHS National Partnership for Action to End
Health Disparities
• National Stakeholder Strategy for Achieving Health Equity
• HRSA | CDC plans targeting disparities
• WA State Dept. of Health Strategic Plan
• NACDD Strategic Map
Equity Impact Review Guide
Designed to examine proposals and identify actions to reduce health disparities and achieve health equity
King County Equity andSocial Justice Initiative
• Built on a “Fair and Just” principle • County public agencies are required to
consider social justice in all decision-making • Apply a health equity lens in making those
decisions
Helpful Advice on Guide Use
• Intended for internal use• Begin early in the planning process• Assumes a commitment to work with
community groups• Can accompany a Health Impact Assessment
Five Stages of the Guide
1. Summarize the proposed policy or project
2. Identify and assess who will be affected
3. Describe positive and negative impacts
4. Analyze and prioritize potential actions
5. Modify the original proposal and build in evaluation
Stage 1: Summarize proposed policy or project p.4 & 5
• Here you will describe the policy or plan• Discuss your expected outcomes• Which community groups will your reach
with the proposal• Predict determinants of health equity that
will be impacted• Determine level of impact and why
Determinants of Equity p.5-6
Social, economic, geographic, political, and physical environments in which people live. These lead to the creation of a fair and just society.• Healthy living conditions• Fair opportunities in education, jobs, & economic
development• Reliable public services and safety• Non- discriminatory practices
Case Study: Hiring and PromotionStage 1
Public Health King County wanted to examine why there is less diversity in the highest paid classifications within the department of health.
Stage 2. Identify and assess who will be affected p. 7
Gather data about your communities Have discussions with community
members Create maps and detailed descriptions of
populations
Stage 3: Describe positive and negative impacts p. 9 & 10
• Identify potential positive and negative impacts of the proposal on each population.
• Describe what you can do to strengthen the positive impacts and/or ease negative impacts.
Stage 4: Analyze potential actions and prioritize p. 11 & 12
Use the list of actions from Stage 3 to determine criteria to prioritize potential actions to enhance positive impacts or ease negative ones.
Stage 5: Modify proposal and plan evaluation p. 16
Use information from Stage 4 to list priority actions for success
Describe how original proposal needs to be adjusted, modified, or dropped
Identify measures to evaluate impact of proposal on health equity
List names of participants
Recommended action• Countering Bias – one hour training that
provides statistical data on applicants and hires, information on impact bias and the effect it can have on hiring, and measures to counter bias.
• Hiring managers are encouraged to have diverse panels and provide Countering Bias training for panelists
Quick Poll
How likely are you to share the EIR Guide with colleagues at work?
• Very likely• Likely• Unsure• Not Likely
Questions
Other Case Studies
1. Worksite Wellness Programs
2. Public Transportation
3. Smoke Free Public Housing
1. Worksite Wellness Programs (WWPs) The ACA allows employers to lower staff
premium contribution up to 30% of the cost
coverage, if the employee meets specified
benchmarks like lowering blood pressure;
losing weight; increasing physical activity;
smoking cessation; and consuming more
fresh fruits and vegetables.
Worksite Wellness Programs
Reduce health insurance premiums for employees who achieve specified benchmarks like: lowering blood pressure; losing weight, increasing physical activity; quit smoking; and consuming more fresh fruits and vegetables.
Greenlining Institute & Prevention Institute
Completed research to seek equitable, non-
punitive, and functional Worksite Wellness Programs that benefit California small business owners and their staff.
Health, Equity, and the Bottom Line: Workplace Wellness and CA Small Businesses (December 2012)
Potential impacts on the following groups of employees• Low wage earners• Work in multiple jobs & have long commutes• Have limited access to healthy affordable
food and safe places to be active• Have chronic conditions• Under a lot of stress• Do not have access to computers
Recommended actionInvolve staff and employers in creating benchmarks that all employees have equal opportunity to achieve
Employ strategies that look at both individual risk reduction and create a healthy workplace environment and culture
2. Public Transportation
In King County, Washington funding cuts threaten to reduce transportation services to vulnerable populations.
Recommended action• Commit to providing travel opportunities for
populations such as: low-income, people with disabilities, students, youth, seniors, people of color, and others with limited transportation options.
• Set higher target service levels for low income and minority residents
• Use concrete performance measures to track progress
3. Smoke-free public housing
To reduce exposure to second hand smoke,
a local health department partnered with the regional public housing authority to ban smoking in government subsidized housing programs.
Recommended action
• Involve residents in solutions that affect their current and future housing
• Offer smoking cessation resources• Identify safe areas on campus where
smokers can go until they have succeeded in quitting
• Develop a phase-in approach
Feedback• What situations in your work would benefit
for applying the Guide?• What barriers do you see to using the
Guide? • What additional help do you want before
you can apply the Guide?• Who else should know about the Guide?
Quick Poll
If you have access to training and technical assistance, would you be interested in applying the Guide to a project at work?• Yes• No• Not Sure
A few good resourcesEquity and Social Justice Annual Report, King County, August 2012
www.kingcounty.gov/equity
10 Promising Practices to Reduce Social Inequitieshttp://www.sdhu.com/uploads/content/listings/Briefing_10PromisingPractices.pdf
A Time of Opportunity: Local Solutions to Reduce Inequities in Health and Safetyhttp://www.preventioninstitute.org/component/jlibrary/article/id-81/127.html
Social Determinants of Equity, Camara P. Jones, MD, MPH, PhDhttp://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/Assets/pdf/Checked/1/CamaraJones.pdf
Life Spans Shrink for Least-Educated Whites in the U.S.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/21/us/life-expectancy-for-
less-educated-whites-in-us-is-shrinking.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Deteriorating International Ranking of U.S. Health Status
http://www.annualreviews.org/eprint/iESYF775U2Mw
VfrxfAR2/Full/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124649
Questions, Reflections
Email Contact for more information:
• EMAIL: [email protected]