17
Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK • CSR impedance below cutoff frequency • Not important in practical applications

Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

Error of paraxial approximation

T. Agoh

2010.11.8, KEK

• CSR impedance below cutoff frequency

• Not important in practical applications

Page 2: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

Wave equation in the frequency domain

Curvature

2

Gauss’s law

Parabolic equation

cutoff frequency

Condition

Page 3: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

3Transient field of CSR in a beam pipe

G. V. Stupakov and I. A. Kotelnikov, PRST-AB 12, 104401 (2009)

Eigenmode expansion

Laplace transform

Initial value problem with respect to s

Page 4: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

Generally speaking about field analysis,

Eigenmode expansion Fourier, Laplace analysis

Algebraic

Analytic

easier to describe resonant field = eigenstate of the structure

resonance = singularity,δ-function

easier to examine the structure in non-resonant region

easier to deal with on computer = useful in practical applications

(special treatment needed)

concrete and clear picture to human brain

compact & beautiful formalism

straightforward formulation but often complex & intricate

(orthonormality, completeness)

<abstract, symbolic>

<concrete, graphic>

4

Page 5: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

Field in front of the bunch

Regularity at the origin

Field structure of steady CSR in a perfectly conducting rectangular pipe

5

(byproduct) effect of sidewalls

No pole nor branch point

Imaginary poles

symmetrycondition

e.g.)

Page 6: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

Transient field of CSR inside magnet

• Transverse field

• Longitudinal field

6

s-dependence is only here

Page 7: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

s-dependence of transient CSR inside magnet

in the framework of the paraxial approximation.

7

Assumption: This fact must hold also in the exact Maxwell theory.

That is, froze

n

Page 8: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

• Steady field a in perfectly conducting rectangular pipe

• Exact solution for periodic system

Debye expansion

Olver expansion

Asymptotic expansion

no longer periodic

8

(no periodicity)

contradiction

(para-approx.)

Page 9: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

(+)

( C )

( C )

(+)

Imaginary impedance

9

exact limit

eq.

paraxial approximation

resistive

walltransient, fr

ee

steady, free

cutoff frequency

shielding threshold

transient,

copper

perfectly conducting pipe

( C ) transient,

Page 10: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

Real impedance

10

resistive

wall

transie

nt,

free

steady, free

cutoff frequency

shielding threshold

transient,

copper

transient, perfectly conducting pipe

The lowest resonance

strange structure

Page 11: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

Fluctuation of impedance at low frequency

11

agreement with grid calculation

Page 12: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

Q) What’s the physical sense of this structure?or, error of the paraxial

approximation?

12

Higher order modes

or, due to some assumption?

Page 13: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

Curvature factor

Conventional parabolic equation

Modified parabolic equation

radiation condition

13

Page 14: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

(+)

( C )

36% error

14Imaginary impedance in a perfectly conducting pipe

conventional equation

modified equation

resistive

wall

( C )

exact limit expression

(+)

Page 15: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

15Real impedance in a perfectly conducting pipe

conventional

modified

resistive

wall

Page 16: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

CSR in a resistive pipe16

Imaginary part

Real part

The difference is almost buried in the resistive wall impedance.

somewhat different (~20%) around the cutoff wavenumber

conventional

modified

modified

conventional

resistive

wallresistive wall

Page 17: Error of paraxial approximation T. Agoh 2010.11.8, KEK CSR impedance below cutoff frequency Not important in practical applications

Summary

The imaginary impedance for this parabolic equation has better behavior than the conventional equation.

However, the error is still large (~40%) below the cutoff wavenumber, compared to the exact equation.

The impedance has strange structure in transient state, though the picture is not clear.

17

Modified parabolic equation