Upload
annemarie-de-greeff
View
23
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Validation of the Tensoval Duo Control blood pressure device in adults. Presented as a poster at the European Society of Hypertension Conference - London, UK - 2012
Citation preview
VALIDATION OF THE TENSOVAL DUO CONTROL II DEVICE ACCORDING TO THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION
INTERNATIONAL PROTOCOL REV 2010
Women’s Health Academic Centre
De Greeff A, Hezelgrave N, Shennan AH Women’s Health Academic Centre, King’s College London, UK
OBJECTIVE
CONCLUSION
RESULTS
DESIGN & METHODS
The Tensoval Duo Control II (TDCII) is an automated upper arm device that features a combination of oscillometric and auscultatory measurement technology. This device was evaluated according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 (ESH-IP2) in an adult population. This device is suitable for clinic use or self-measurement and has two cuff sizes available: standard (22-32cm) and large (32-42cm). Additional features include: morning and evening memory function for two persons, including a 7-day and mean value; comfort air technology that inflates the cuff to the individual systolic value of each subject; indication of possible detected arrhythmia; ergonomic cuff shape.
Ethical approval was obtained. Thirty-three subjects were recruited at Kimberley Hospital Complex (Kimberley, South Africa) according to the ESH-IP2 protocol guidelines (Table 1). Two trained observers, who were blinded to each other’s readings, took nine sequential same arm measurements from each patient, alternating between mercury sphygmomanometry and the test device. A supervisor checked that all observer readings were within 4mmHg and performed all device measurements.
The TDCII device achieved 76/91/98 differences within 5/10/15mmHg for systolic BP and 78/94/97 for diastolic BP. Out of 33 subjects, 26 and 28 subjects respectively had a minimum of 2 differences within 5mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure. Only 1 subject had all three diastolic differences >5mmHg. Mean difference±SD was -0.7±5.7 mmHg for systolic BP and 2.4±4.5mmHg for diastolic BP. All observer measurements were within 4mmHg of each other with a mean difference±SD of -0.7±2.0mmHg for systolic BP and -0.3±1.9mmHg for diastolic BP
The TDCII device can be recommended for clinical and home use according to the ESH-IP2. Further studies are required to confirm whether this device could be of particular value in populations where oscillometric measurement alone is known to be inaccurate.
mmHg SBP DBP Overall Range (Low : High) Low (<130/80) Medium (130-160/80-100) High (>160/100)
91 : 203 36 35 28
48 : 126 39 32 28
Table 1. Observer measurements in each recruitment range
Fig 1. Mean-against-difference plot of the mean systolic pressures of the observers and the device plotted against their difference (n=99)
-‐30
-‐25
-‐20
-‐15
-‐10
-‐5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190
Device -‐ Observer M
easuremen
t (mmHg
)
Mean Device and Observer Measurement (mmHg)
Fig 2. Mean-against-difference plot of the mean diastolic pressures of the observers and the device plotted against their difference (n=99)
-‐30
-‐25
-‐20
-‐15
-‐10
-‐5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
Device -‐ Observer M
easuremen
t (mmHg
)
Mean Device and Observer Measurement (mmHg)
Reference O’Brien E, Atkins N, Stergiou G, Karpettas N, Parati G, Asmar R et al.; on behalf of the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension. European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 for the Validation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices in Adults. Blood Press Monit 2010;15:23-28