Upload
barnaby-boyd
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ethics 101
Case Study: Sam, the Patient
• An 85 year-old retired school teacher.
• C/O decreased vision in both eyes.
• Exam = 20/80 best corrected in right eye
20/60 best corrected in left eye
• Biomicroscopy = 3+ nuclear sclerotic cataracts
• Dr. E explains the risks and benefits to Sam of having surgery to improve his vision.
Case Study: Sam, the Patient
• Dr. also explains an alternative option to surgery that is part of a clinical trial.
• Dr. E is the PI in this trial. If this innovative technique proves effective, it may revolutionize cataract treatment. Dr. E could become famous and benefit financially.
• Sam asks Dr. E to do whatever he thinks is best - after all, he’s the expert.
1) What are the Ethical Issues
in Sam’s Case ?
2) How should the ophthalmologist respond when Sam asks him to make the decision?
3) Should the ophthalmologist use therapeutic privilege and make the decision for Sam?
4) Is there a conflict of interest for Dr. E to offer Sam the option of participating in his study?
Overall Ethical Principle
Sanctity of Life
Respect for Life
4 Core Ethics Principles
Autonomy Beneficence Non-maleficence Justice
Respect for Autonomy
Derives from patient’s right to:Self-determinationPrivacy
Imposes responsibility on physician:Veracity - Telling the truthInformed consent
BeneficenceDerives from fiduciary relationship to:Do GoodAct to Help
Imposes responsibility on physician:FidelityAdvocacy
Non-maleficenceDerives from general rule of human
conduct that applies to everyone to:Do No Harm to OthersAct to Prevent Harm to Others
Imposes responsibility on physician to:Analyze the Burdens vs. Benefits of TxMaintain Patient’s Confidentiality
JusticeDerives from general rule of human
conduct to treat others fairly:Like cases are treated alike - fairness.
Imposes unclear responsibilities on
physicians - society has not sorted this out!How well are resources allocated?What is futility?
“People have the right to justice in the distribution of health resources
as opposed to a right to any and allspecific care/treatments
whether or not they need them and/or are likely to benefit from them.
. . . Citizens must acknowledge their responsibility to themselves
to maintain their healthto the best to their abilities.”
- Leah Curtin, RN
Principle Approach• Analyzes problems, identifies
values
• Does not always provide a good mechanism to resolve conflicts
• Helpful to combine with concepts in Ethics of Care
The Ethic of Care
Focuses on patient’s relationships
Recognizes the importance of feelings & emotions
Moral responsibility derived from clinician’s relationship to patient
Need to understand the context
The Meaning of Caring
Doing for Being responsive to Valuing Extending compassion, mercy
& kindness
The Meaning of Caring
Enhancing human dignity Connecting with another Being touched Helping another find meaning Empowering
Platinum Rule
“Do Unto Others As They Would Like To Have Done Unto
Them.”
• Cultural Diversity
• Quality of Life
Sir William Osler, MD
“It’s much more important to know
what sort of patient
has the disease
than what sort of disease
the patient has.”
- Porter (1997) The Greatest Gift To Mankind
Comparison Principle-based Ethics vs.
Ethic of Care
Rights & Duties
Reason & Objectivity
Detachment enhances fairness
Focused on individual
Responsibility from the relationship
Emotions enhance reason
Engagement enhances understanding & fairness
Focused on family
Ethics
How people relate to each other - Ancient Greeks 1960’s movements &
beyond
Trying to decide the “right” thing to do.Requires
deliberation about facts and context reflective analysis of beliefs & values actions to solve moral problems
Ethical Dilemmas When legitimate ethical reasons support
more than one alternative
When moral obligations exist on both sides
When disagreements about the right thing to do exist among patient, family, health care team, institution, and/or 3rd party payers
Why an Ethics Committee?
• Each institution has a responsibility to assure ethical treatment is provided to patients
• Professionals trained and experienced in ethics may provide insight and assistance to those faced with ethical dilemmas
• A multidisciplinary committee provides protection against idiosyncratic perspectives
The Role of the
Ethics Committee
Provide consultation
Educate staff, patients/families, & public
Recommend organizational policy
Ethics Committee Goals
• To assure ethical health care • To improve the quality of
health care• To improve health care
outcomes
Ethics Consultation Approach
Advisory** Collecting pertinent facts.
Making sure everyone’s voice is heard.
Examining benefits & burdens of options.
Attempting to build a consensus.
Honoring the physician’s right to conscientious objection.
* * NOT Authoritarian
Ethical Process
• Identifying ethical issues & conflicts
• Analyzing underlying values and sources of disagreement
• Resolving, if possible, ethical dilemmas in clinical cases
The Ethics CommitteeDoes NOT Respond to:
Clinical Inquires or Questions re: Clinical Care
Director of Clinical Quality Management
Possible Physician Impairment
Chair, Physician Impairment Committee
Billing Issues and Business Conflicts of Interest
Director of the Compliance Program
Have an Ethical Issue ?
Call: