Ethics Class 2.1 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    1/43

    What is a voluntary act?

    ETHICS

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    2/43

    Part II

    2. The Person as author ofbehaviour

    y What is a voluntary act?

    y Types of human acts

    y The voluntary act as anintentional act

    y Freedom: its nature anddimensions

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    3/43

    Voluntary act

    y human actions

    y actions we carryout freely

    y our intellect andour will intervene

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    4/43

    Classical definition

    y The voluntary act is theact that proceeds froman intrinsic principle,with formal knowledge

    of the goal

    y Intrinsic principle (refersto the will)

    y

    Voluntary actsoriginate from thepersons will

    y An act is not voluntaryif carried out against

    ones will

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    5/43

    Which is voluntary?

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    6/43

    Which is voluntary?

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    7/43

    Classical definition

    y The voluntary act is the act that proceedsfrom an intrinsic principle, with formalknowledge of the goal

    y Formal knowledge of the goal (refers tothe intellect)

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    8/43

    Knowledge of the goal

    y Formal knowledge of thegoal (refers to theintellect)

    y The goal:

    y the source of the act

    y the object towardswhich the will tends

    y the good thing whichattracts the will

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    9/43

    Knowledge of the goal

    y Every act which is deliberated on (thoughtabout), and executed (carried out), aims atachieving a particular end, goal.

    There is an intention (aim) behind theact, moving the person to act in this way.

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    10/43

    Which is voluntary? Identify theintention

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    11/43

    The voluntary act and violencey The will cannot be

    coerced by an outsideforce (St. ThomasAquinas)

    y In the strict sense, anelicited act of the willcannot be forced: no onecan force me to willsomething

    y Only commanded acts (ofthe will) can admit ofviolence:

    I can willingly walk or

    be forced to walk

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    12/43

    Types of voluntary acts

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    13/43

    Internal vs. externaly Internal: does not

    have any outwardmanifestation

    y

    External- manifestedexternally

    y To feel compassion foranother (internal)

    y To go out of ones wayto help a person in need(external)

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    14/43

    Good, bad and indifferent

    y Good: the object of the action is in accordwith the natural moral law

    y Bad: the object of the action is contraryto the natural moral law

    y Indifferent: the object does not have amoral connotation e.g. walking

    y Strictly speaking there are noindifferent actions because all freeacts have a moral value that is derivedfrom the intention of the person

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    15/43

    Elicited or commanded

    An elicited act is an act that directly comes/originatesfrom the will

    To love, to hate, to desire

    A commanded act is an act commanded by the will to afaculty other than itself

    To think, to understand

    (act commanded by the will to the intellect)

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    16/43

    Perfectly voluntary act

    y Perfectly voluntary full awareness ofthe act

    y There is full knowledge of the goal andthe will consents to the act

    y There is full awareness or consent when theperson realizes perfectly what he is doing and the

    moral value of the act

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    17/43

    Perfectly voluntary act?

    y Nurse caught on CCTV turning offparalysed patient's life support machine

    A paralysed patient has been left severely brain

    damaged after a nurse switched off his lifesupport machine in an incident captured on CCTV.

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    18/43

    Perfectly voluntary act?

    Violeta Aylward, an agency nurse working for the NHS,was caught on camera turning off the ventilator keepingquadriplegic Jamie Merrett alive.

    The 37-year-old, left paralysed from the neck downfollowing a car accident in 2002, had a bedside cameraset up at his home after becoming concerned about thestandard of care he was receiving.

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    19/43

    Perfectly voluntary act?Footage recorded only a few days after it was installedshows Miss Aylward fiddling with the ventilator before ahigh-pitched warning tone sounds, indicating it isswitched off.

    Mr Merrett is then left fighting for life as the nursepanics about what to do next, unable to restart theventilator or properly operate resuscitation equipment.

    It was not until 21 minutes later that paramedics who

    rushed to the scene managed to turn the life supportmachine back on.

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    20/43

    Involuntary act

    y The goal is not known at all

    y Shooting arrows at a tree to practicethe shot and hitting a person behindthe tree whom the person did notknow was there

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    21/43

    Imperfectly voluntary act

    y Imperfectly voluntary

    y Imperfection in the

    knowledge:ignorance or lack ofknowledge

    y Invincible vs.vincible ignorance

    y Imperfect consent

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    22/43

    Imperfectly voluntary?

    For registered nurse Kimberly Hiatt, the horrorbegan last Sept.14, the moment she realizedshed overdosed a fragile baby with 10 times toomuch medication.

    Stunned, she told nearby staff at the CardiacIntensive Care Unit at Seattle Childrens Hospitalwhat had happened. It was in the line of, Oh myGod, I have given too much calcium, recalled afellow nurse, Michelle Asplin, in a statement tostate investigators.

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    23/43

    Imperfectly voluntary?

    In Hiatts 24-year career, all of it at SeattleChildrens, dispensing 1.4 grams of calciumchloride instead of the correct dose of140milligrams was the only serious medical mistakeshed ever made, public investigation recordsshow.

    She was devastated, just devastated, said LynHiatt, 49, of Seattle, Kims partner and co-parentof their two children, Eli, 18, and Sydney, 16.

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    24/43

    Invincible vs. vincible ignorance

    y Invincible:

    type of ignorance that

    dominates the personsconscience entirelythat it cannot beovercome withreasonable means

    y Vincible ignorance:

    the person could become

    aware ofhis ignorancebut the ignorancepersists because he didnot take enough interestto clear his doubts out oflaziness, malice, etc.

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    25/43

    Identify the type of acty A journalist writes a defamatory piece

    of news article about a person

    y

    A student throws an empty waterbottle at the landing of an overpass

    y A nurse injects a patient with a drug

    at a level beyond indicated

    y A young lady lies to her parents abouther grades

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    26/43

    Identify the type of acty A terminally-ill patient is given a

    strong dose of a sedative to alleviateher pain; the doctor is aware that thisdosage can shorten the patients life

    y A terminally-ill patient asks for a drugto end her life

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    27/43

    What is a voluntary act?

    Part 2

    ETHICS

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    28/43

    Part II

    2. The Person as author ofbehaviour

    y What is a voluntary act?

    y Types of human acts

    y The voluntary act as anintentional act

    y Freedom: its nature anddimensions

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    29/43

    Types of voluntary acts

    Internal vs. external acts

    Good, bad, indifferent

    Elicited vs. commanded

    Perfectly voluntary, imperfectlyvoluntary, involuntary

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    30/43

    The object of the will

    y Can be considered in 3 ways:

    a. Direct object or indirect objectb. End vs. means

    c. Honest good, delectable good, useful good

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    31/43

    Direct or indirect object

    y Direct object of the will = the goodperceived or understood by the intellect

    y Indirect object =not willed in itself

    but simply foreseen and permitted asinevitably linked to what is willed directly

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    32/43

    End vs. means

    a means to and end

    The end does not justify themeans.

    The human person should notbe used as a means to an end.

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    33/43

    End vs. means

    End =somethingthat is

    desired forits own sake

    Means =something

    that isdesired for

    the sake ofanother goal

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    34/43

    Honest, delectable, useful

    Useful good wanted as a means to an end(either honest good or delectable good)

    Delectable good - wanted because it producesa positive affective response: e.g. pleasure,satisfaction, joy, etc.

    Honest good loved for what it is in itself (itsown sake)

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    35/43

    Honest, delectable, useful?

    The human person

    Friendship

    Money

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    36/43

    Part II

    2. The Person as author ofbehaviour

    y What is a voluntary act?

    y Types of human acts

    y The voluntary act as anintentional act

    y Freedom: its nature anddimensions

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    37/43

    The voluntary act as intentional act

    y Intentionality as characteristic of free acts

    y our acts are directed towards achieving a

    particular goal

    y Conscious, guided by reason, self-referential

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    38/43

    Conscious

    y the person plans the act;

    y establishes the connection between the act andthe goalhe wants to achieve;

    y each personhas the experience that he himselfis the author (source) ofhis own acts.

    y weown

    ou

    r action

    s;hence

    we are resp

    onsib

    lefor them

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    39/43

    Guided by reason

    y the intellect presents the intentionalobject tothe will, that is, the act or the object which thewillwants

    y the rational judgment establishes the motivewhichunites the act to the goal: Iwant to dothis act because it is good, or, because it isuseful, etc.

    y Freedom cannot be separated from the truth

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    40/43

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    41/43

    Self-referential

    We are saying, then, that every free humanact has repercussions in the personwhocarries it out; it modifies the personone

    way or another;

    towant something implies a personalevaluationof the wanted thing which does

    not occur in the case of the act ofknowing.

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    42/43

    Self-referentiality

    The person becomes committed as a personthrough eachofhis free acts;

    when a man decides on something, he is notonly choosing some object which is outsidehimself, rather his decision brings along with it,self-determination; the person determineshimself in some way through that decision.

  • 8/6/2019 Ethics Class 2.1 2011

    43/43

    Self-referentiality

    So to freely want, desire something dishonest,for example, makes the personwhowants itdishonest because he claims it for himselfwithhis free wanting, he wants it for himself5.

    The self-referentiality of the voluntary act isvery important inEthics because each personis, in a certain sense, what he has done

    throughhis actions; the moral value of theacts remains inside the person (immanent).