December, 2014

Initiatives – Integrity, transparency and anticorruption

Mission

Mobilize, encourage and help

companies manage their business in

a socially responsible way, make

them partners in building a

sustainable and fair society.

Green Inclusive Responsible

Ensuring a

sustainable

relationship

between

society’s

productive

processes and

natural

processes

A new development model demands new processes in the economy

Decent living

conditions for

the entire

population,

poverty

eradication and

reduction of

inequalities

System of

integrity and

transparency,

which is an

essential

condition for the

success of a new

economy

Business Pact for Integrity and Against Corruption

Clean Games Inside and Outside the Stadium

Integrity initiatives

What is the Pact for Integrity and againstcorruption?

A collective action and a voluntary commitment of companies to business

ethics. The pact currently includes over 300 signatory companies and

organizations, and it has a Working Group that shares knowledge and experiences about best business practices regarding improving integrity and combating corruption.

Was launched in June 2006 by Ethos Institute in partnership with PatriGovernment Relations & Public Policy, United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), and the BrazilianCommittee of the UN Global Compact

Business Pact for Integrity and againstcorruption

• 248 companies have signed the pact

• 7 public commitments

• www.empresalimpa.org.br

Business Pact – Commitments

To inform and to raise awareness among workers about applicable legislation

To inform and to raise awareness among all its stakeholders about the applicable legal requirements for its activities

To forbid bribery

In case of funding electoral campaigns, to contribute in a transparent and lawful manner

To disseminate the principles of the Pact amongst its stakeholders

If necessary, to conduct transparent and open inquiries

To promote pact’s values within its supply chain

Business Pact – Strategies

Seminars

Advocacy

Publications

Monitoringplatform

Organizations from the Working Group of the Pact for Integrity

and against corruption

3M, AES Brasil, Alstom, Ambev, ANFAC, Anhanguera Educacional, Banco do Brasil, Bionexo, BMF & Bovespa, BP Biofuels, BRF Foods, Braskem, Controladoria Geral da União, CPFL Energia, Dudalina S/A, EDP Energias do Brasil, Endesa, Fersol, Fibria, FIEMG, FIESC, FIRJAN, Gelita, Great Place to Work, Grupo Libra, Grupo Multi, Iaudit Assessoria Empresarial, Ibrademp, ICDE – Instituto de Combate à Fraude e Defesa da Concorrência, ICTS Global, Infraero, Jonhson Controls BE do Brasil, Mexichem, Natura, Nike, Núcleo Ético Pacto Global (Rede Brasileira – UNDP,) Patri – Políticas Públicas – Relações Institucionais e Governamentais, Petrobras, Philips, PwC, Ponto de Contato Nacional (PCN Brasil), Samarco Mineração S.A., Semp Toshiba, Shell, Siemens, Suzano Holding S/A, Terra Sistemas Brasil, Unimed do Brasil, Unodc, Vale S/A, Fundação Vale, Wal-Mart Brasil, YázigiInternexus, Machado Meyer

Clean Games Project

Clean Games Inside and Outside the Stadiums Project

The Clean Games project seize theopportunity of hosting 2014 World Cupand 2016 Olimpyc Games in Brazil, toempower the fight against corruption.

Taking advantage of the investments made for the games to trulyperpetuate a range of tangible and intangible assets, of structureand values created from a virtuous circle of social development.

Clean Games – Objectives

over infrastructure investments for the 2014 World Cup and the 2016 Olympic Games

Promoting: Through collective actions with the engagement of:

Transparency

Integrity

Social Control

Public Sector

Business

Civil Society

Workers

Academia

Clean Games – Strategies for Action

1. Sectoral Agreements

2. Mobilization

3. Social Control Tools

4. Transparency Pact

5. Transparency Indicators

1. Clean Games Sectorial Agreements

• A tool for self-regulation, to define clear rules between competing within the same business sector, aimed to promote conditions of fair and transparent market and to prevent corrupt practices in their business relations.

• 3 sectors: health tecnology, energy and sports sponsorship

2. Mobilization

3 Colective Action National Committees

• 1 National Committee for Coordination Mobilization

• 2 Thematic National Committees: Legal // Companies and investor

12 Local Committees

• 12 World Cup host cities and Rio de Janeiro, host city of the Olympics

Participation at the Thematic Chamber Transparency - coordinated by the Ministry of Sports, the Comptroller General's Office and Attorney General's Office

3. Social Control Tools

Publication: Fair Game x Foul Game

Guide on How to Read Contracts

4. Transparency Pact

• Document signed by the mayor candidates on the 11 host cities with 05 commitments:

� regulate the Access Information Law,

� improve the transparency of the World Cup budget

� Improve the local level transparency indicators result

� Implement the proposals of the Consocial

� Adopt the Open Government Partnership guidelines

Main results:

• 85% of all candidates signed the commitment letter

• All the 11 elected mayors signed the commitment letter

5. Transparency Indicators

Objectives:

1. Assessing the availability and the organization of information deemed adequate to ensure transparency;

2. Assessing the existence and operation of information channels and participation mechanisms;

3. Defining transparency parameters and standards for public management.

Indicators Methodology

• 90 indicators:

� Content (48 indicators)

� Information channels (30 indicators)

� Participation mechanisms (12 indicators)

� Application of the indicators in host cities within the context of World Cup organization

• Transparency assessment is made based on 4 questions:

� Are there information channels?

� Are they effective?

� Do they provide all the necessary information?

� Do they allow for social participation?

Transparency Indicators – Innovation

What differentiates this new tool?

� Allows practical measurement of public management transparency

� Translates into indicators the key pillars of a transparent administration

What is the use of this new tool?

� Citizens, organizations and business can apply it

� Governments can use it as a reference for their transparency actions.

� Along the process, for instance, some city halls made changes in their web portals based on the indicators.

Comparison 2012 /2013 – Cities

Cidade

Resultado 2013 Resultado 2012

PontuaçãoNível de

TransparênciaPontuação

Nível de

transparência

Brasília 77,26 Alta 14,63 Muito Baixa

Porto Alegre 71,82 Alta 49,92 Média

Belo Horizonte 70,33 Alta 49,86 Média

Rio de Janeiro 50,37 Média 15,36 Muito Baixa

Cuiabá 49,08 Média 10,38 Muito Baixa

Curitiba 45,87 Média 15,57 Muito Baixa

São Paulo 38,15 Baixa 18,81 Muito Baixa

Recife 35,55 Baixa 14,32 Muito Baixa

Manaus 25,18 Baixa 13,23 Muito Baixa

Fortaleza 23,24 Baixa 14,29 Muito Baixa

Salvador 19,48 Muito Baixa 14,82 Muito Baixa

Natal 12,21 Muito Baixa 15,75 Muito Baixa

Indicators Results – Cities

0,00

10,00

20,00

30,00

40,00

50,00

60,00

70,00

80,00

90,00

100,00

Brasília PortoAlegre

BeloHorizonte

Rio deJaneiro

Cuiabá Curitiba São Paulo Recife Manaus Fortaleza Salvador Natal Cidadereferência

2012

2013

States

Estado-sede 2014 2013

Pontuação Nível de Transparência

Pontuação Nível de Transparência

Pernambuco 70,16 Alta 63,37 Alta

Ceará 68,55 Alta 65,22 Alta

Paraná 59,10 Média 42,15 Média

Bahia 54,83 Média 49,23 Média

São Paulo 51,94 Média 24,52 Média

Minas Gerais 50,26 Média 56,20 Média

Mato Grosso 47,14 Média 30,82 Baixa

Rio de Janeiro 37,68 Baixa 30,33 Baixa

Rio Grande do Sul 36,71 Baixa 32,62 Baixa

Rio Grande do Norte 22,25 Baixa 15,74 Muito Baixa

Amazonas 18,88 Muito Baixa 16,20 Muito Baixa

63,37 65,22

42,15

49,23

24,52

56,20

30,82 30,3332,62

15,74 16,20

89,92

70,16 68,55

59,1054,83

51,94 50,2647,14

37,68 36,71

22,25 18,88

89,98

0,00

20,00

40,00

60,00

80,00

100,00

2013 2014

Comparison 2013 /2014 – States

Transparency at the Olympic Games, Rio 2016

Ethos Institute is adapting the transparency indicators applied in the World Cup 2014

to the Olympic and Paralympic Games in Rio, 2016. They will assess the institutions

involved with the Games (Olympic Public Authority - APO, Municipal Olympic

Company - EOM, Government of State of Rio de Janeiro, 2016) to measure the

transparency of these institutions. The indicators will be applied between January

and February 2015, with the release of the results in March 2015.

In addition, they are promoting the Transparency Roundtable, a space where CSOs

meet with members of the 2016 Rio Organizing Committee - responsible for

coordinating sports activities of the Olympics - and Ethos Institute to discuss the

transparency of the Olympic Games.

The first meeting was held in October 2014. In total six thematic roundtables will be

created to help Rio 2016 to meet the commitments set out in the Olympic Games

sustainability reports.

Civil society institutions, with the support of Rio 2016, will lead the roundtables.

Ethos Institute will lead the transparency debate.