Upload
vuongdung
View
218
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
1ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 1
IPIMAR – JANUARY 2005
CARLOS CARDOSO MARIA LEONOR NUNES
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
2ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 2
This project has been funded with support from the European
Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the
author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any
use which may be made of the information contained therein.
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
3ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 3
WHAT IS EMAS?
EMAS means EcoManagement and Audit Scheme
EMAS aims to promote continuous evaluation and improvement in the environmental performance of participating organizations
EMAS does not replace Community or national environmental legislation
EMAS is an environmental management scheme for organizations operating in the European Union and
European Economic Area
EMAS brings together environmental protection and economic development
+
INTRODUCTION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
4ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 4
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EMAS AND ISO 14001
�EMAS REQUIRES A PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
�EMAS REQUIRES A GREATER CONTROL OVER SUPPLIERS AND CONTRACTORS
�EMAS ESTABLISHES THE AUDITS’ FREQUENCY AND METHODOLOGY
�EMAS DEMANDS COMPANIES TO PUBLISH AN ENVIRONMENTAL
STATEMENT
�EMAS PROVIDES FOR A CERTIFICATION SYSTEM WITH INDEPENDENT
ENVIRONMENTAL VERIFIERS AND REGISTRATION BODIES
INTRODUCTION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
5ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 5
THE MAIN STEPS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS
PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
ENVIRONMETAL LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME
OPERATION
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
INTERNAL AUDITS
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM VERIFICATION
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
VALIDATION, VERIFICATION AND RECORDS
INTRODUCTION
ORGANIZATION AND
PERSONNEL
RESPONSIBILITIES
TRAINING
COMMUNICATION
DOCUMENTATION
DOCUMENTATION CONTROL
OPERATIONAL CONTROL
PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
ENVIRONMETAL LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME
OPERATION
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
INTERNAL AUDITS
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM VERIFICATION
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
VALIDATION, VERIFICATION AND RECORDS
ORGANIZATION AND
PERSONNEL
RESPONSIBILITIES
TRAINING
COMMUNICATION
DOCUMENTATION
DOCUMENTATION CONTROL
OPERATIONAL CONTROL
PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
6ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 6
PLANNING: CONDITIONS NEEDED FOR EMAS APPLICATION
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICYConsists of:
Aims
Principles of Action
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Involves:
Thorough examination of all env ironmental aspects
Identification of the aspects with a significant impact
FIRST OF ALL:
THE REAL SITUATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME
Consists of:
All measures required for achieving the objectives and targets
Definition of responsibilities
Detailed and scheduled plan for the measures application
REQUIRE
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL
OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS
Are set considering:
Legal and regulatory requirements
Env ironmental aspects with significant impact
All available technological options
Financial and operational requirements
ENABLES
ENABLE
INTRODUCTION
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICYConsists of:
Aims
Principles of Action
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Involves:
Thorough examination of all env ironmental aspects
Identification of the aspects with a significant impact
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME
Consists of:
All measures required for achieving the objectives and targets
Definition of responsibilities
Detailed and scheduled plan for the measures application
REQUIRE
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL
OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS
Are set considering:
Legal and regulatory requirements
Env ironmental aspects with significant impact
All available technological options
Financial and operational requirements
ENABLES
ENABLE
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
7ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 7
ORGANIZATION AND PERSONNEL: COMPONENTS OF EMAS STRUCTURE
RESPONSIBILITIESInvolve:
Definition of section responsibilities
Constitution of the EMS team
TRAINING
Raising env ironmental awareness
Training employees connected with significant env ironmental impacts
Internal EMS courses
COMMUNICATIONRequires:
Procedures for internal and external communication
DOCUMENTATION
Includes:
System manual
System and Operational procedures
Records, external documents and others
DOCUMENTATION CONTROLEncompasses:
Localization, periodic analysis and removal
OPERATIONAL CONTROLComprises:
Operations and activ ities
Goods and serv ices
PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
Entails:
Identification of accidents and emergencies
Development of plans for emergency response
INTRODUCTION
RESPONSIBILITIESInvolve:
Definition of section responsibilities
Constitution of the EMS team
TRAINING
Raising env ironmental awareness
Training employees connected with significant env ironmental impacts
Internal EMS courses
COMMUNICATIONRequires:
Procedures for internal and external communication
DOCUMENTATION
Includes:
System manual
System and Operational procedures
Records, external documents and others
DOCUMENTATION CONTROLEncompasses:
Localization, periodic analysis and removal
OPERATIONAL CONTROLComprises:
Operations and activ ities
Goods and serv ices
PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
Entails:
Identification of accidents and emergencies
Development of plans for emergency response
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
8ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 8
OPERATION: CONTROL OF EMAS APPLICATION
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
Enables:
To monitor the performance of the relevant operational controls
To verify conformance with env ironmental objectives and goals
NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS
Detection of non-conformances:
From emergencies, audits and monitoring & measurement actions
Definition of the required corrective and preventive actions
ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
The records prove the application of all EMAS requirements
Therefore, must be:
Legible, identified, connected with the respective activity and adequately kept
INTERNAL AUDITSVerify compliance with:
Regulations
Env ironmental goals
INTRODUCTION
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
Enables:
To monitor the performance of the relevant operational controls
To verify conformance with env ironmental objectives and goals
NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS
Detection of non-conformances:
From emergencies, audits and monitoring & measurement actions
Definition of the required corrective and preventive actions
ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
The records prove the application of all EMAS requirements
Therefore, must be:
Legible, identified, connected with the respective activity and adequately kept
INTERNAL AUDITSVerify compliance with:
Regulations
Env ironmental goals
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
9ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 9
VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION OF EMAS BY EXTERNAL ENTITIES
MANAGEMENT REVIEWInvolves:
Thorough analysis of the internal audit’s results
Guidelines for the improvement of EMS in the company
PUBLIC
COMMUNICATION
EMAS requires:
Presentation of an env ironmental statement
VALIDATION, VERIFICATION
AND RECORDS
Encompasses:
Commissioning an independent env ironmental verifier
Validation by the verifier (only if there is full compliance with all EMAS requirements)
Application for registration under EMAS
After a positive evaluation of the EMAS implementation:
Registration is granted
ORGANIZATION
REGISTERED UNDER EMAS
INTRODUCTION
MANAGEMENT REVIEWInvolves:
Thorough analysis of the internal audit’s results
Guidelines for the improvement of EMS in the company
PUBLIC
COMMUNICATION
EMAS requires:
Presentation of an env ironmental statement
VALIDATION, VERIFICATION
AND RECORDS
Encompasses:
Commissioning an independent env ironmental verifier
Validation by the verifier (only if there is full compliance with all EMAS requirements)
Application for registration under EMAS
After a positive evaluation of the EMAS implementation:
Registration is granted
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
10ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 10
APPLICABLE LEGISLATION (PORTUGUESE LAW)
WATER - Law Nº 236/98
Emission Limits (COD, BOD5, SST, etc.)
Requisites for an Emission License
Company’s Control Records
Infraction Penalties
GENERAL ASPECTS- Law Nº 11/87
Quality of natural resources (air, water, soil, etc.)
Pollution prohibition
Attribution of responsibilities to the organizationthat produced the pollutant agent(s)
AIR- Law Nº 286/93- Law Nº 78/2004
Emission Limits (for SO2, NO2, CO and others)
Prohibition of the substances that Deplete the
Ozone Layer (CFCs, Halons, MBr and Others)
Infraction Penalties
Rules for prevention and control of atmosphericpollutants
INTRODUCTION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
11ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 11
NOISE- Law Nº 292/2000
- Law Nº 259/2002
Temporary and permanent noise
Sensible and mixed zones
Establishment of quantified limits for the twozones and distinction between day and night time
Infraction Penalties
Attribution of special noise licenses
APPLICABLE LEGISLATION (PORTUGUESE LAW)
WASTE- Law Nº 239/97
- Law Nº 335/97
- Law Nº 366-A/97
- Law Nº 209/2004
Rules concerning storage, treatment andelimination of waste
Waste Classification and Separation
Waste Transport Regulation
Special Treatment of the Dangerous Waste
Infraction Penalties
INTRODUCTION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
12ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 12
ADVANTAGES OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
COST REDUCTION:Improved operational efficiency (lower consumption of energy and raw materials)
RISK REDUCTION:Reduced likelihood of serious and costly accidents
COMPETITIVE BENEFITS:Improvement of the company’s image with consumers, regulatory authorities and
general public
ACTIVE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE:Advantageous for other purposes (for instance, implementation of quality
management systems)
INTRODUCTION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
13ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 13
�LARGE NUMBER OF SPECIES CONSUMED IN MANY DIFFERENT FORMS (FRESH, FROZEN, SMOKED, CANNED, ETC.)
�120 MILLION TONNES WORLD PRODUCTION OF FISH IN YEAR 1998
�OVER 80 % OF THE FISH PRODUCTION IS FOR HUMAN FOOD
�ABOUT 60 MILLION TONNES ARE INDUSTRIALLY PROCESSED (FREEZING/THAWING,
CUTTING, FILLETING, COOKING, ETC.)
�A THIRD OF THE PROCESSED QUANTITY ENDS UP AS INDUSTRIAL WASTE
FISH PRODUCTION - 120 M.T.
OTHER USES
17%
HUMAN
CONSUMPTION
FRESH
33%
HUMAN
CONSUMPTION
PROCESSED
50%
INDUSTRIAL WASTE
20 M.T.
Non-food
uses
GENERAL ASPECTS
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
14ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 14
ENVIRONMENTAL BALANCE OF THE FROZEN FISH INDUSTRY
FROZEN FISH
INDUSTRY
WATER
ENERGY
CHEMICALS
FRESH
OR
FROZEN FISH
FROZEN FILLETS NOISE
ODOUR
WASTEWATER
SOLID WASTE
REFRIGERANT LOSSES
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
15ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 15
ENVIRONMENTAL BALANCE OF THE CANNING INDUSTRY
DAMAGED
CANS
WASTEWATER
SOLID WASTE
ODOUR
NOISE
REFRIGERANT
LOSSES
CANS
WATER
ENERGY
CHEMICALS
PACKING
MEDIA
CANNING INDUSTRY
FRESH
FISH
CANNED FISH
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
16ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 16
DESCRIPTION OF THE FROZEN FISH FACTORY (XPTO)
PRODUCES FROZEN FILLETS FROM FROZEN FISH
PROCESSES 10 TO 12 TONS OF FISH PER DAY AND OPERATES 5 DAYS PER WEEK ALL YEAR ROUND
PORTUGUESE FACTORY, LOCATED NEAR LISBON
LISBON
XPTO
PROCESSED SPECIES: HAKE TUNA MACKEREL AND MANY MORE
CHOSEN PRODUCTION LINE:PRODUCTION OF HAKE FILLETS(850 TONS OF HAKE PROCESSED PER YEAR)
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
17ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 17
RECEPTION AND
SELECTION
CUTTING AND
TRIMMING
RAW FISH STORAGE
DESAGGREGATION OF FROZEN BLOCKS
FREEZINGTUNNEL
RAW FISH
GLAZINGCALIBRATION
AND WEIGHING
PACKAGINGFINAL PRODUCT
STORAGE
DISTRIBUTION
FINAL PRODUCT
IN RETAILER
PROCESS DIAGRAM OF THE FROZEN FISH FACTORY (XPTO)
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
18ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 18
RECEPTION
AND
SELECTION
CUTTING
AND
TRIMMING
GLAZING
RAW FISH
STORAGE
DESAGGREGATION
OF FROZEN BLOCKS
FREEZING
TUNNEL
CALIBRATION
AND
WEIGHING
PACKAGINGFINAL PRODUCT
STORAGE
RAW FISH
DISTRIBUTION
FINAL PRODUCT
IN RETAILER
SOLID WASTE
(FISH)
REFRIGERANT LOSSES (AMMONIA)
WATER
WASTEWATERSOLID WASTE
(CARDBOARD, PLASTIC)
LIQUID
NITROGEN
GASEOUS
NITROGEN
ELECTRICAL
ENERGY
XPTO’S PROCESS DIAGRAM & ASSOCIATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
19ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 19
DESCRIPTION OF THE CANNED FISH FACTORY (CCC)
PROCESSES 20 TONSOF FISH PER DAY AND OPERATES 220 DAYS A YEAR
PORTUGUESE FACTORY, LOCATED IN NORTH PORTUGALCCC
PROCESSED SPECIES: SARDINE, TUNA, MACKEREL, OCTOPUS AND SQUID
PACKING MEDIA USED: TOMATO SAUCE, VEGETABLE OIL, OLIVE OIL, BRINE AND HOT PEPPER SAUCE
CHOSEN PRODUCTION LINE:PRODUCTION OF CANNED SARDINES(1500 TONS OF SARDINE PROCESSED PER YEAR)
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
20ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 20
PROCESS DIAGRAM OF THE CANNED FISH FACTORY (CCC)
FRESH SARDINE FREEZING WASHING
GLAZING
STORAGETHAWINGBRINING
HEADING, EVISCERATING,
WASHING AND CANNING
WASHING
COOKING COOLINGTOMATO SAUCE ADDITION
AND CAN SEAMING
CAN WASHINGSTERILIZATION
COOLINGFINAL PRODUCT
STORAGE
DISTRIBUTION
CANNED SARDINE IN RETAILER
BRINE
PRODUCTION
STEAM
PRODUCTION
TOMATO SAUCE PREPARATION
CHLORINATED WATER
PREPARATION
FRESH SARDINE FREEZING WASHING
GLAZING
STORAGETHAWINGBRINING
HEADING, EVISCERATING,
WASHING AND CANNING
WASHING
COOKING COOLINGTOMATO SAUCE ADDITION
AND CAN SEAMING
CAN WASHINGSTERILIZATION
COOLINGFINAL PRODUCT
STORAGE
DISTRIBUTION
CANNED SARDINE IN RETAILER
BRINE
PRODUCTION
STEAM
PRODUCTION
TOMATO SAUCE PREPARATION
CHLORINATED WATER
PREPARATION
FRESH SARDINE FREEZING WASHING
GLAZING
STORAGESTORAGETHAWINGBRINING
HEADING, EVISCERATING,
WASHING AND CANNING
WASHING
COOKING COOLINGTOMATO SAUCE ADDITION
AND CAN SEAMING
CAN WASHINGSTERILIZATION
COOLINGFINAL PRODUCT
STORAGE
FINAL PRODUCT
STORAGE
DISTRIBUTION
CANNED SARDINE IN RETAILER
BRINE
PRODUCTION
BRINE
PRODUCTION
STEAM
PRODUCTION
STEAM
PRODUCTION
TOMATO SAUCE PREPARATION
TOMATO SAUCE PREPARATION
CHLORINATED WATER
PREPARATION
CHLORINATED WATER
PREPARATION
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
21ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 21
CCC’S PROCESS DIAGRAM & ASSOCIATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
BRINE
PRODUCTION
STEAM
PRODUCTION
CHLORINATED WATER
PREPARATION
TOMATO SAUCE
PREPARATION
FRESH SARDINE FREEZING WASHING GLAZING STORAGE
THAWING
BRINING
HEADING, EVISCERATING,
WASHING AND CANNINGWASHINGCOOKINGCOOLING
TOMATO SAUCE ADDITION
AND CAN SEAMING
CAN WASHING
STERILIZATION
COOLING
FINAL PRODUCT
STORAGE
DISTRIBUTIONCANNED SARDINE
IN RETAILER
REFRIGERANT LOSSES
(AMMONIA)
SOLID WASTE
FUEL OIL
PACKING MEDIA
ELECTRICAL
ENERGY
CANS
DAMAGED CANS
WASTEWATER
WATER
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
22ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 22
IMPLEMENTATION OF CLEANER PRODUCTION (CP)
THERE ARE IMPORTANT CLEANER PRODUCTION OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE FISHPROCESSING INDUSTRY THAT ONLY REQUIRE MINOR CHANGES IN THE PROCESS:
♣ TRAIN STAFF IN GOOD CLEANING PRACTICES
♣ REGULAR MAINTENANCE TO AVOID INEFFICIENCIES
♣ KEEP WORK AREAS TIDY AND UNCLUTTERED TO AVOID ACCIDENTS
♣ INSTALL DRIP PANS OR TRAYS TO COLLECT DRIPS AND SPILLS
♣ SEGREGATE WASTE FOR REUSE AND RECYCLING
♣ IDENTIFY AND MARK ALL VALVES TO PREVENT ANY INCORRECT SETTING
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
23ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 23
IMPLEMENTATION OF CLEANER PRODUCTION (CP)
SIMPLE WAYS TO SAVE WATER:
USE OFFAL TRANSPORT SYSTEMS THAT AVOID OR MINIMISE THE USE OF
WATER
INSTALL DEVICES THAT CONTROL WATER FLOW FOR MANUAL CLEANING
USE HIGH PRESSURE WATER TO CLEAN SURFACES
PRE-SOAK FLOORS AND EQUIPMENT TO LOOSEN DIRT BEFORE THE FINAL
CLEANING
REUSE WASTEWATERS (EX.: THAWING WASTEWATERS FOR INITIAL
CLEANING STEPS)
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
24ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 24
AFTER CP PRACTICES
PRE-SOAKAGE
SCRAPING
FINAL WASHING
DIRTY SURFACEWATER DETERGENTS
CLEAN SURFACE
BEFORE CP PRACTICES
MULTIPLE WASHING
OPERATIONS
WATER DIRTY SURFACE DETERGENTS
CLEAN SURFACE
WATER SAVING
IMPLEMENTATION OF CLEANER PRODUCTION (CP)
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
25ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 25
IMPLEMENTATION OF CLEANER PRODUCTION (CP)
THERE ARE ALSO SIMPLE AND EFFECTIVE WAYS TO REDUCE THE EFFLUENTLOADS:
SWEEP UP SOLID WASTE FOR USE AS A BY-PRODUCT
COLLECT OFFAL AND BLOOD IN A SPECIAL BIN
CLEAN FISH WITH VACUUM HOSES
USE DRY CLEANING TECHNIQUES (EX.: SCRAPING FLOOR BEFORE
CLEANING)
FIT DRAINS WITH SCREENS TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF SOLID WASTE IN
THE EFFLUENT
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
26ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 26
SOME EASY WAYS TO SAVE ENERGY:
IMPLEMENTATION OF CLEANER PRODUCTION (CP)
REGULAR MAINTENANCE TO AVOID ENERGY INEFFICIENCIES
IMPROVE INSULATION ON COOLING/HEATING SYSTEMS
ELIMINATE STEAM LEAKS
TRAIN STAFF TO SWITCH OFF EQUIPMENT WHEN NOT IN USE
OTHERWISE USE SENSORS TO TURN OFF LIGHTS AND EQUIPMENT
FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
27ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 27
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS
PLANNING
Conditions needed for a successful accomplishment of EMAS
ORGANIZATION AND
PERSONNEL Components essential to build up all EMAS structure
OPERATION Control & guarantees of an effective EMAS application
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM VERIFICATION
Validation & verification of the implemented system by
external entities
EMAS APPLICATION
PLANNING
Conditions needed for a successful accomplishment of EMAS
ORGANIZATION AND
PERSONNEL Components essential to build up all EMAS structure
OPERATION Control & guarantees of an effective EMAS application
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
28ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 28
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME
DIFFICULTIES:
Discussion for the assignment of responsibilities
Much intense work in order to construct a detailed plan
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
DIFFICULTIES:
Identification of the aspects with an environmental impact
Quantification and selection of the aspects with a significant impact
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL
OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS
PLANNING: CONDITIONS NEEDED FOR EMAS APPLICATION
EMAS APPLICATION
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
DIFFICULTIES:
Identification of the aspects with an environmental impact
Quantification and selection of the aspects with a significant impact
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL
OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
29ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 29
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY (CCC AND XPTO)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IS THE MAIN KEY TO THE COMPANY’S DEVELOPMENT
THE COMPANY’S PREMISES MUST ADOPT WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICIES
ALL WORKING STAFF MUST ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING:
�RESPECT THE ENVIRONMENT
�FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE LEGISLATION
�SEARCH PERMANENTLY FOR INDUSTRIAL OPTIMIZATION
�REDUCE RAW MATERIALS AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION
�REGISTER AND INVESTIGATE ALL ACCIDENTS AND COMPLAINTS
�ADEQUATE TRAINING FOR ALL WORKERS AND PEOPLE INVOLVED
�GOOD RELATIONSHIP WITH ALL NEIGHBOURS
�COOPERATE WITH ORGANIZATIONS COMMITED TO A HIGHER ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
30ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 30
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
Factory
WASTEWATER
• SST
• COD
• BOD5
•Oil content
• pH
• N/P content
SOLID WASTE
• Fish offcuts
• Cardboard
• Plastic
WATER
TOTAL AND DETAILED CONSUMPTION
500 l
ELECTRICAL ENERGY
• TOTAL CONSUMPTION
• EQUIPMENT CONSUMPTION
9 9 9
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
31ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 31
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (XPTO)
Glazing wastewater parametersGlazing wastewater parametersGlazing wastewater parametersGlazing wastewater parameters ValueValueValueValue
Volume (m3/year) 120
Volume (m3/ton of processed hake) 0.14
COD (mg O2/l) 752 BOD5 (mg O2/l) 200
Nitrogen (mg N/l) 8.78
THE GLAZING WASTEWATER PROBLEM
Environmental aspectEnvironmental aspectEnvironmental aspectEnvironmental aspect Value per yearValue per yearValue per yearValue per year Value per ton of Value per ton of Value per ton of Value per ton of
processed hakeprocessed hakeprocessed hakeprocessed hake
Water consumption (m3) 3240 3.8
Energy consumption (kWh) 709000 834
Detergents consumption (l) 1670 2
Ammonia release (l) 60 0.07 Nitrogen release (l) 170000 200
Fish waste production (ton) 25.4 0.030
Common garbage production (m3) 257 0.30
Plastic production (ton) 11.6 0.014
Cardboard production (ton) 23.6 0.028 Wastewater discharge (m
3) 3240 3.8
QUANTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
MAXIMUM VALUES(Portuguese Legislation)
COD 150 mg O2/l
BOD5 40 mg O2/l
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
32ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 32
XPTO
3.8 m3
WATER
834 kWh
ENERGY
1 TON
FROZEN HAKE
0.97 TON
FROZEN HAKE
FILLETS
3.8 m3
TOTAL WASTEWATER
0.3 m3
COMMON
GARBAGE
GLAZING WASTEWATER
(4 % OF TOTAL)
COD: 752 mg O2/l
BOD5: 200 mg O2/l
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS WITH A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (XPTO)
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
33ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 33
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CCC)
QUANTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Environmental aspect Value per year Value per ton of
processed sardine
Water consumption (m3) 6300 4.2
Electricity consumption (kWh) 110000 74
Fuel oil consumption (ton) 75 0.05
Fish waste production (ton) 600 0.4
Wastewater discharge (m3) 6300 4.2
Parameter Value
Volume (m3/year) 6300
Volume (m3/ton of processed sardine) 4.2
COD (mg O2/l) 7700
BOD5 (mg O2/ l) 3500
Nitrogen (mg N/l) 200
Phosphorous (mg P/l) 27
THE WASTEWATER IMPACTMAXIMUM VALUES(Portuguese Legislation)
COD 150 mg O2/l
BOD5 40 mg O2/l
Nitrogen 15 mg N/l
Phosphorous 10 mg P/l
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
34ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 34
CCC
1 TON
FRESH SARDINE
≈≈≈≈ 0.5 TON
CANNED FISH
4.2 m3
WASTEWATER
COD: 32 kg
BOD5: 15 kg
Nitrogen: 1 kg
Phosphorous: 0.1 kg
0.4 TON
FISH WASTE
4.2 m3
WATER
74 kWh
ELECTRICITY
0.05 TON
FUEL
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS WITH A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (CCC)
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
35ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 35
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL REQUIREMENTS (CCC AND XPTO)
THE COMPANY HAS TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A PROCEDURE
ENABLING:
ACCESS TO ALL LEGAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHERS
http://dre.pt/
SELECTION OF APPLICABLE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS AMONG LEGISLATION
AN UPDATED KNOWLEDGE OF THE WHOLE LEGAL FRAME
NEW LAWS OLD LAWS
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
36ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 36
ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS (XPTO)
OBJECTIVES:
�REDUCTION OF WATER CONSUMPTION
�REDUCTION OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION
�REGULAR MONITORING OF WATER AND ENERGY CONSUMPTIONS
�REDUCTION OF COD AND BOD5 LEVELS IN THE GLAZING WASTEWATER
�REDUCTION OF COMMON GARBAGE PRODUCTION
BUT, HOW MUCH? AND WHEN?
TARGETS:
�3 m3 OF WATER CONSUMPTION PER TON OF PROCESSED HAKE (END 2005)
�750 kWh OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION PER TON OF PROCESSED HAKE (END 2005)
�REGULAR REGISTER OF WATER AND ELECTRICAL ENERGY CONSUMPTIONS (END 2005)
�COD < 380 mg O2/l AND BOD5 < 100 mg O2/l IN THE GLAZING WASTEWATER (END 2005)
�0.20 m3 OF COMMON GARBAGE PRODUCTION PER TON OF PROCESSED HAKE (END 2005)
1
2
3
4
5
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
37ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 37
ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS (CCC)
OBJECTIVES:
�REDUCTION OF WATER CONSUMPTION
�REDUCTION OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION
�REGULAR MONITORING OF WATER AND ENERGY CONSUMPTIONS
�UTILIZATION OF NATURAL GAS INSTEAD OF FUEL OIL
�REDUCTION OF COD, BOD5, N AND P LEVELS IN THE WASTEWATER
�UTILIZATION OF FISH WASTE FOR FISH MEAL PRODUCTION
ONCE MORE, HOW MUCH? AND WHEN?
TARGETS:
�3.4 m3 OF WATER CONSUMPTION PER TON OF PROCESSED SARDINE (END 2005)
�65 kWhOF ELECTRICAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION PER TON OF PROCESSED SARDINE (END 2005)
�REGULAR REGISTER OF WATER AND ELECTRICAL ENERGY CONSUMPTIONS (END 2005)
�EXCLUSIVE UTILIZATION OF NATURAL GAS IN THE BOILER (2006)
�WASTEWATER (END 2005): COD - 3800 mg O2/l, BOD5 - 1700 mg O2/l, 100 mg N/l AND 15 mg P/l
�SELLING ALL SARDINE WASTE TO A FISH MEAL PLANT (END 2005)
1
2
3
4
5
6
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
38ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 38
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME FOR XPTO - EP XPTO-AA
EP XPTO-AA ESTABLISHES WHICH MEASURES MUST BE TAKEN IN ORDER TO MEET XPTO’S TARGETS:
3 Regular Register
�WATER METERS INSTALLATION
�REGISTER ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR MAIN EQUIPMENTS
5 0.2 m3 Garbage/ton�SCREENING OF ALL COMMON GARBAGE
1 3 m3 Water/ton�HIGH PRESSURE CLEANING SYSTEMS
�EFFICIENT CLEANING PRACTICES
�PRE-SOAK FLOORS AND EQUIPMENT
�VACUUM HOSES FOR FISH CLEANING
�REPORT AND FIX LEAKS PROMPTLY
4 380 mg O2/l & 100 mg O2/l
�DRAINS WITH SCREENS AND TRAPS
2 750 kWh/ton
�INSULATION IMPROVEMENT
�REGULAR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
�ELECTRICITY-SAVING SENSORS
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
39ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 39
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Target 1: 3 m3 of water consumption per ton of processed hake until the end of 2005
Acquisition of high pressure cleaning sys tems EMS coordinator Day 15
Training workers in efficient c leaning prac tices
Preparation of work instruction for pre-soakage c leaning
Instal lation of vacuum hoses for fish cleaning
Preparation of operational procedure for finding
and fixing leaks
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 31
Day 15
Day 30
Target 2: Electricity consumption lower than 750 kWh per ton of processed hake until the end of 2005
Commission better insulation of freezing rooms EMS coordinator Day 28
Assuring regular equipment maintenance
Instal lation of energy sav ing sensors
Production & Maintenance
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 15
Target 3: Beginning to register water and electricity consumptions for main equipments until the end of 2005
Instal lation of meters on high water consumption equipment
Preparation of operational procedure for r egistration of electrici ty consumption
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 31
Day 31
Target 4: Until the end of 2005, COD and BOD5 in the glazing wastewater lower than 380 mg O2/l and 100 mg O2/l, respectively
Instal lation of sc reens and traps in the glazing tank drain
EMS coordinator Day 31
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Target 1: 3 m3 of water consumption per ton of processed hake until the end of 2005
Acquisition of high pressure cleaning sys tems EMS coordinator Day 15
Training workers in efficient c leaning prac tices
Preparation of work instruction for pre-soakage c leaning
Instal lation of vacuum hoses for fish cleaning
Preparation of operational procedure for finding
and fixing leaks
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 31
Day 15
Day 30
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Target 1: 3 m3 of water consumption per ton of processed hake until the end of 2005
Acquisition of high pressure cleaning sys tems EMS coordinator Day 15
Training workers in efficient c leaning prac tices
Preparation of work instruction for pre-soakage c leaning
Instal lation of vacuum hoses for fish cleaning
Preparation of operational procedure for finding
and fixing leaks
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 31
Day 15
Day 30
Target 2: Electricity consumption lower than 750 kWh per ton of processed hake until the end of 2005
Commission better insulation of freezing rooms EMS coordinator Day 28
Assuring regular equipment maintenance
Instal lation of energy sav ing sensors
Production & Maintenance
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 15
Target 2: Electricity consumption lower than 750 kWh per ton of processed hake until the end of 2005
Commission better insulation of freezing rooms EMS coordinator Day 28
Assuring regular equipment maintenance
Instal lation of energy sav ing sensors
Production & Maintenance
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 15
Target 3: Beginning to register water and electricity consumptions for main equipments until the end of 2005
Instal lation of meters on high water consumption equipment
Preparation of operational procedure for r egistration of electrici ty consumption
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 31
Day 31
Target 3: Beginning to register water and electricity consumptions for main equipments until the end of 2005
Instal lation of meters on high water consumption equipment
Preparation of operational procedure for r egistration of electrici ty consumption
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 31
Day 31
Target 4: Until the end of 2005, COD and BOD5 in the glazing wastewater lower than 380 mg O2/l and 100 mg O2/l, respectively
Instal lation of sc reens and traps in the glazing tank drain
EMS coordinator Day 31
Target 4: Until the end of 2005, COD and BOD5 in the glazing wastewater lower than 380 mg O2/l and 100 mg O2/l, respectively
Instal lation of sc reens and traps in the glazing tank drain
EMS coordinator Day 31
CHRONOGRAM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EP XPTO-AA
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
40ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 40
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Target 4: Until the end of 2005, COD and BOD5 in the glazing wastewater lower than 380 mg O2/l and 100 mg O2/l, respectively
Preparation of wo rk instruction for removal of thesolid waste retained in the glazing tank drain
EMS coordinator Day 31
Target 5: Common garbage production lower than 0.20 m3 per ton of processed hake until the end of 2005
Preparation of operational procedure for screening all common garbage produced
EMS coordinator Day 30
Training workers in separating all garbage produced
Ra ising workers awareness for environmental issues
EMS coordinator
All EMS team
Day 31
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Target 4: Until the end of 2005, COD and BOD5 in the glazing wastewater lower than 380 mg O2/l and 100 mg O2/l, respectively
Preparation of wo rk instruction for removal of thesolid waste retained in the glazing tank drain
EMS coordinator Day 31
Target 4: Until the end of 2005, COD and BOD5 in the glazing wastewater lower than 380 mg O2/l and 100 mg O2/l, respectively
Preparation of wo rk instruction for removal of thesolid waste retained in the glazing tank drain
EMS coordinator Day 31
Target 5: Common garbage production lower than 0.20 m3 per ton of processed hake until the end of 2005
Preparation of operational procedure for screening all common garbage produced
EMS coordinator Day 30
Training workers in separating all garbage produced
Ra ising workers awareness for environmental issues
EMS coordinator
All EMS team
Day 31
Target 5: Common garbage production lower than 0.20 m3 per ton of processed hake until the end of 2005
Preparation of operational procedure for screening all common garbage produced
EMS coordinator Day 30
Training workers in separating all garbage produced
Ra ising workers awareness for environmental issues
EMS coordinator
All EMS team
Day 31
CHRONOGRAM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EP XPTO-AA
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
41ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 41
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME FOR CCC - EP CCC-AA
EP CCC-AA ESTABLISHES WHICH MEASURES MUST BE TAKEN IN ORDER TO MEET CCC’S TARGETS:
�INSULATION IMPROVEMENT
�REGULAR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
�ELECTRICITY-SAVING SENSORS
65 kWh/ton2
�WATER METERS INSTALLATION
�REGISTER ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION FOR MAIN EQUIPMENTS
Regular Register3
Natural gas4
�INSTALLATION OF A NATURAL GAS BOILER
�DRAINS WITH SCREENS AND TRAPS
�OFFAL COLLECTION IN
SEPARATE CONTAINERS
3800 mg O2/l & 1700 mg O2/l5
�SOLID WASTE SEPARATION ON THE FISH PREPARATION TABLES
Sell sardine waste6
�HIGH PRESSURE CLEANING SYSTEMS
�EFFICIENT CLEANING PRACTICES
�PRE-SOAK FLOORS AND EQUIPMENT
�FIXTURES FOR WATER CONTROL
�VACUUM HOSES FOR FISH CLEANING
�REPORT AND FIX LEAKS PROMPTLY
�REUSE THAWING WASTEWATERS
3.4 m3 Water/ton1
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
42ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 42
CHRONOGRAM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EP CCC-AA
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Target 1: 3.4 m3 of water consumption per ton of processed sardine until the end of 2005
Acquisition of high pressure cleaning sys tems EMS coordinator Day 15
Training workers in efficient c leaning prac tices
Preparation of work instruction for pre-soakage c leaning
Instal lation of fixtures for water flow control
Instal lation of vacuum hoses for fish cleaning
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 31
Day 31
Day 15
Day 30
EMS coordinator
Preparation of operational procedure for finding
and fixing leaks
EMS coordinator Day 30
Preparation of work instruc tion for collecting thawing was tewaters and use them in cleaning
Day 31
Target 2: Electricity consumption of about 65 kWh per ton of processed sardine until the end of 2005
Commission better insulation of freezing rooms
Assuring regular equipment maintenance
Instal lation of energy sav ing sensors
Production & Maintenance
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 28
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Target 3: Beginning to register water and electricity consumptions for main equipments until the end of 2005
Ins tallation of meters on high water consumption equipment
Preparation of operational procedure for registration of elec tr ici ty consumption
EMS coordinator Day 31
EMS coordinator Day 31
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Target 1: 3.4 m3 of water consumption per ton of processed sardine until the end of 2005
Acquisition of high pressure cleaning sys tems EMS coordinator Day 15
Training workers in efficient c leaning prac tices
Preparation of work instruction for pre-soakage c leaning
Instal lation of fixtures for water flow control
Instal lation of vacuum hoses for fish cleaning
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 31
Day 31
Day 15
Day 30
EMS coordinator
Preparation of operational procedure for finding
and fixing leaks
EMS coordinator Day 30
Preparation of work instruc tion for collecting thawing was tewaters and use them in cleaning
Day 31
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Target 1: 3.4 m3 of water consumption per ton of processed sardine until the end of 2005
Acquisition of high pressure cleaning sys tems EMS coordinator Day 15
Training workers in efficient c leaning prac tices
Preparation of work instruction for pre-soakage c leaning
Instal lation of fixtures for water flow control
Instal lation of vacuum hoses for fish cleaning
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 31
Day 31
Day 15
Day 30
EMS coordinator
Preparation of operational procedure for finding
and fixing leaks
EMS coordinator Day 30
Preparation of work instruc tion for collecting thawing was tewaters and use them in cleaning
Day 31
Target 2: Electricity consumption of about 65 kWh per ton of processed sardine until the end of 2005
Commission better insulation of freezing rooms
Assuring regular equipment maintenance
Instal lation of energy sav ing sensors
Production & Maintenance
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 28
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Target 2: Electricity consumption of about 65 kWh per ton of processed sardine until the end of 2005Target 2: Electricity consumption of about 65 kWh per ton of processed sardine until the end of 2005
Commission better insulation of freezing rooms
Assuring regular equipment maintenance
Instal lation of energy sav ing sensors
Production & Maintenance
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 28
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Target 3: Beginning to register water and electricity consumptions for main equipments until the end of 2005
Ins tallation of meters on high water consumption equipment
Preparation of operational procedure for registration of elec tr ici ty consumption
EMS coordinator Day 31
EMS coordinator Day 31
Target 3: Beginning to register water and electricity consumptions for main equipments until the end of 2005Target 3: Beginning to register water and electricity consumptions for main equipments until the end of 2005
Ins tallation of meters on high water consumption equipment
Preparation of operational procedure for registration of elec tr ici ty consumption
EMS coordinator Day 31
EMS coordinator Day 31
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
43ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 43
CHRONOGRAM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EP CCC-AA
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Target 4: Exclusive utilization of natural gas in the boiler from 2006 onwards
Acquisition of a natural gas boiler Production & Maintenance
Ins tallation of a natural gas line
Day 31
Day 30Production & Maintenance
Preparation of work instruction for removal of thesolid waste retained in the drains
EMS coordinator Day 31Instal lation of sc reens and traps in the drains
Target 5: Until the end of 2005, achieving: COD - 3800 mg O2/l, BOD5 - 1700 mg O2/l, Nit. - 100 mg N/l and Phosp. - 15 mg P/l
EMS coordinator
Day 31
Acquisition of specific containers for blood and offal col lection
Preparation of work instruction for col lecting blood and offal
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 15
Target 6: Selling all sardine waste to a fish meal plant from 2005 onwards
Preparation of operational procedure for separating waste on the fish preparation tables
EMS coordinator
Day 28
Making a deal with a company that produces fish meal from fish waste
Raising workers awareness for environmental issues
EMS coordinator
All EMS team
Day 28
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
TASK RESPONS.PERFORMANCE PERIOD (MONTHS)
Set Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Target 4: Exclusive utilization of natural gas in the boiler from 2006 onwards
Acquisition of a natural gas boiler Production & Maintenance
Ins tallation of a natural gas line
Day 31
Day 30Production & Maintenance
Target 4: Exclusive utilization of natural gas in the boiler from 2006 onwards
Acquisition of a natural gas boiler Production & Maintenance
Ins tallation of a natural gas line
Day 31
Day 30Production & Maintenance
Preparation of work instruction for removal of thesolid waste retained in the drains
EMS coordinator Day 31Instal lation of sc reens and traps in the drains
Target 5: Until the end of 2005, achieving: COD - 3800 mg O2/l, BOD5 - 1700 mg O2/l, Nit. - 100 mg N/l and Phosp. - 15 mg P/l
EMS coordinator
Day 31
Acquisition of specific containers for blood and offal col lection
Preparation of work instruction for col lecting blood and offal
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 15
Target 6: Selling all sardine waste to a fish meal plant from 2005 onwards
Preparation of operational procedure for separating waste on the fish preparation tables
EMS coordinator
Day 28
Making a deal with a company that produces fish meal from fish waste
Raising workers awareness for environmental issues
EMS coordinator
All EMS team
Day 28
Preparation of work instruction for removal of thesolid waste retained in the drains
EMS coordinator Day 31Instal lation of sc reens and traps in the drains
Target 5: Until the end of 2005, achieving: COD - 3800 mg O2/l, BOD5 - 1700 mg O2/l, Nit. - 100 mg N/l and Phosp. - 15 mg P/lTarget 5: Until the end of 2005, achieving: COD - 3800 mg O2/l, BOD5 - 1700 mg O2/l, Nit. - 100 mg N/l and Phosp. - 15 mg P/l
EMS coordinator
Day 31
Acquisition of specific containers for blood and offal col lection
Preparation of work instruction for col lecting blood and offal
EMS coordinator
EMS coordinator
Day 15
Day 15
Target 6: Selling all sardine waste to a fish meal plant from 2005 onwards
Preparation of operational procedure for separating waste on the fish preparation tables
EMS coordinator
Day 28
Making a deal with a company that produces fish meal from fish waste
Raising workers awareness for environmental issues
EMS coordinator
All EMS team
Day 28
Target 6: Selling all sardine waste to a fish meal plant from 2005 onwardsTarget 6: Selling all sardine waste to a fish meal plant from 2005 onwards
Preparation of operational procedure for separating waste on the fish preparation tables
EMS coordinator
Day 28
Making a deal with a company that produces fish meal from fish waste
Raising workers awareness for environmental issues
EMS coordinator
All EMS team
Day 28
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
44ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 44
ORGANIZATION AND PERSONNEL: ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF EMAS
RESPONSIBILITIESDIFFICULTIES:
Discussion for the assignment of responsibilities
TRAINING
DIFFICULTIES:
Changing old practices that are deleterious for the environment
Raising environmental awareness
COMMUNICATION
DOCUMENTATION
DIFFICULTIES:
Organization of the documentation structure
Writing down every detail of the operational procedures
DOCUMENTATION CONTROL
OPERATIONAL CONTROL
DIFFICULTIES:
Identification of operational controls for every target
Convincing suppliers and contractors to comply with all environmental requirements
PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
DIFFICULTIES:
Testing the plans for emergency response
EMAS APPLICATION
RESPONSIBILITIESDIFFICULTIES:
Discussion for the assignment of responsibilities
TRAINING
DIFFICULTIES:
Changing old practices that are deleterious for the environment
Raising environmental awareness
COMMUNICATION
DOCUMENTATION
DIFFICULTIES:
Organization of the documentation structure
Writing down every detail of the operational procedures
DOCUMENTATION CONTROL
OPERATIONAL CONTROL
DIFFICULTIES:
Identification of operational controls for every target
Convincing suppliers and contractors to comply with all environmental requirements
PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
DIFFICULTIES:
Testing the plans for emergency response
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
45ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 45
ADMINISTRATION
Mr. A
QUALITY CONTROL
Mr. B
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
FINANCIAL DEPARTMENT
Mr. C
WAREHOUSE
Mr. D
PRODUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
Mr. E
RESPONSIBILITIES - ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE CONCERNING EMS
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
46ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 46
SECTION RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE EMAS IMPLEMENTATION
Sections EMS Requirements
Adm. Adm./Fin. P & M Warehouse QC
1- Policy R C C C S
2- Environmental aspects R
3- Environmental legislation S C R
4- Objectives and targets S C C C R
5- Environmental programme S C C C R
6- Responsibilities R C C C S
7- Training S C R
8- Communication R C
9- EMS documentation R
10- Document control R
11- Operational control C R C S
12- Emergency plan R C S
13- Monitoring C R C S
14- Non-conformances S R
15- Registers C C C R
16- EMS audits S C C C R
17- EMS review R C
TABLE KEY:Adm. – AdministrationFin. – Finance
P & M – Production and MaintenanceQC – Quality Control
R - ResponsibleC - CooperationS - Supervision
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
47ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 47
PRODUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
WAREHOUSEADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
QUALITY CONTROL
Mr. B
Mr. C
Mr. E
Mr. D
RESPONSIBILITIES - COMPOSITION OF THE EMS TEAM
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
48ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 48
ALL EMPLOYEESRAISING ENVIRONMENTAL
AWARENESS
TRAINING
EMPLOYEES RESPONSIBLE
FOR A SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
SPECIALIST ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING
EMPLOYEES RESPONSIBLE
FOR SOME PART OF THE EMS
EMS COURSE
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
49ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 49
COMMUNICATION
INTERNAL COMMUNICATION
MANAGEMENT
ALL EMPLOYEES
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY,
OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS
INFO
RM
S FE
ED
BA
CK
COMPLAINTS
EXTERNAL COMMUNICATION
DIRECT CONTACTS
PHONE CALLS
VISITS
SPECIFIC FORM
RNW# - Non-Written
Communication
WRITTEN
REPLY
WRITTEN
REPLY
SPECIAL RECORDRCOMP# - Complaints
ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLAINTS
WRITTEN
ANSWER
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
50ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 50
SYSTEM MANUAL
SYSTEM PROCEDURES
OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
RECORDS OTHER DOCUMENTSEXTERNAL
DOCUMENTS
HIERARCHICAL DOCUMENTATION STRUCTURE OF EMS
THE MOST IMPORTANT DOCUMENT FOR EMS:EMS AND ALL PROCEDURES ARE PRESENTED
ACTIVITIES THAT MUST BE CARRIED OUT FOR
A THOROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF EMS
SET OPERATIONAL CRITERIA THAT
ENABLE AN EFFICIENT CONTROL
EFFECTIVE EMS
IMPLEMENTATION
FOR INSTANCE:
RTRAIN#, RNW#
or RCOMP#
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
51ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 51
DOCUMENTATION – SYSTEM PROCEDURES (XPTO AND CCC)
THE SYSTEM PROCEDURES ANSWER TO VARIOUS PROBLEMS:
�Operational control of the most meaningful aspects
�Requirements concerning measurement and monitoring of all operational controls
�Evaluation of conformance with legislation and relevant norms
Procedure Objective
SP 00 – Procedures Preparation Preparation of procedures SP 01 – Environmental Aspects Identification and evaluation of environmental aspects SP 02 – Legislation and other Requirements Identification and access to legislation and other
requirements SP 03 – Training and Knowledge Identification and execution of training and knowledge
actions SP 04 – Internal and External
Communication
Internal and external documentation
SP 05 – Documentation Control Control of documents SP 06 – Operational Control – Operations
and Activities
Identification and control of all operations and activities
with environmental impact SP 07 – Operational Control – Goods and
Services
Identification and control of goods and services with
environmental impact SP 08 – Emergency Preparedness and Response
Identification and preparation of response procedures for accidents and emergencies
SP 09 – Monitoring and Measurement Identification and control of monitoring and measurement operations
SP 10 – Non-Conformances and Corrective and Preventive Actions
Non-conformances record and response
SP 11 - Records Control of records
SP 12 – EMS Audits Execution and calendar of internal audits
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
52ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 52
DOCUMENTATION CONTROL
OBJECTIVES
LATEST
VERSION
AVAILABILITY OF ALL RELEVANT
DOCUMENTS IN THE CRITICAL POINTS
OBSOLETE
IMMEDIATE REMOVAL OF THE OBSOLETE DOCUMENTS FROM ALL UTILIZATION POINTS
IDENTIFICATION OF ALL OBSOLETE DOCUMENTS
OBSOLETE
LOCALIZATION
Opera
ANALYSIS, REVIEWIF NECESSARY, APPROVAL BY
AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
53ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 53
OPERATIONAL CONTROL
OPERATIONAL CONTROL ENCOMPASSES THE WAY XPTO (CCC) CONTROLS ITS
OPERATIONS IN ORDER TO ASSURE:
�THE SYSTEMATIC ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND
TARGETS
�THE ADEQUATE MONITORING OF ALL ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
ADDITIONALLY, OPERATIONAL CONTROL MUST FOLLOW SOME RULES:
�IDENTIFY, AT LEAST, ONE OPERATIONAL CONTROL FOR EACH OBJECTIVE AND TARGET
�CONTROL ALL OPERATIONS CONNECTED WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
�ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR ALL CRITICAL POINTS
�COMMUNICATE THE RELEVANT PROCEDURES TO SUPPLIERS AND CONTRACTORS
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
54ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 54
IMPLEMENTED OPERATIONAL CONTROLS FOR EACH TARGET (XPTO)
2 750 kWh/ton�VERIFY MONTHLY ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION AND CALCULATE THE AMOUNT OF HAKE PROCESSED EACH MONTH
1 3 m3 Water/ton�VERIFY MONTHLY WATER CONSUMPTION AND CALCULATE THE AMOUNT OF HAKE PROCESSED EACH MONTH
3 Regular Register �MANAGEMENT REVIEW EACH TRIMESTER
4 380 mg O2/l & 100 mg O2/l�PERFORM MONTHLY CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE GLAZING WASTEWATER
5 0.2 m3 Garbage/ton�ESTIMATE MONTHLY PRODUCTION OF COMMON GARBAGE AND CALCULATE THE AMOUNT OF HAKE PROCESSED EACH MONTH
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
55ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 55
Number of dumpsters filled each month
Amount of hake processed each month
Garbage production per ton of processed hake
OPERATIONAL CONTROL CONCERNING XPTO’S TARGET 5
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
56ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 56
IMPLEMENTED OPERATIONAL CONTROLS FOR EACH TARGET (CCC)
�VERIFY MONTHLY ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION AND CALCULATE THE AMOUNT OF SARDINE PROCESSED EACH MONTH
65 kWh/ton2
�MANAGEMENT REVIEW EACH TRIMESTERRegular Register3
Natural gas4 �MANAGEMENT REVIEW EACH TRIMESTER
�MONTHLY CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE WASTEWATER GENERATED IN THE PLANT
3800 mg O2/l & 1700 mg O2/l5
�ESTIMATE MONTHLY AMOUNT OF SEPARATED FISH WASTE AND CALCULATE THE AMOUNT OF SARDINE PROCESSED EACH MONTH
�MANAGEMENT REVIEW EACH TRIMESTER
Sell sardine waste6
�VERIFY MONTHLY WATER CONSUMPTION AND CALCULATE THE AMOUNT OF SARDINE PROCESSED EACH MONTH
3.4 m3 Water/ton1
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
57ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 57
OPERATIONAL CONTROL CONCERNING CCC’S TARGET 6
Quantity of fish waste separated on the heading and eviscerating tables
Amount of sardine processed each month
Separated sardine waste per ton of processed sardine
Total sardine waste per ton of processed sardine
0.4 ton/ton of processed sardine
COMPARISON
X ton/ton of processed sardine
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
58ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 58
PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
THE COMPANY MUST:
�ESTABLISH AND KEEP PROCEDURES ENABLING THE IDENTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE
ACCIDENTS AND EMERGENCY SITUATIONS
EX.: FIRES, ACCIDENTAL RELEASES, SPILLS, ETC.
FOR EACH IDENTIFIED SITUATION MUST BE DEVELOPED A PLAN FOR
EMERGENCY RESPONSE (PER# - TYPE OF SITUATION) REFERRING:
�IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTIONS
�WHO TO CALL
�WHICH AUTHORITIES MUST BE INFORMED
•BE PREPARED TO PREVENT AND REDUCE ALL CONNECTED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
59ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 59
OPERATION: CONTROL AND GUARANTEES OF EMAS APPLICATION
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
DIFFICULTIES:
Identification of monitoring and measurement actions
Training employees to carry out these actions
NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS
DIFFICULTIES:
Detection of non-conformances
Discussion of the corrective and preventive actions
ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
INTERNAL AUDITS
DIFFICULTIES:
Finding external professional consultants to perform the audits
Collecting meaningful data
Preparation of the audit’s report
EMAS APPLICATION
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
DIFFICULTIES:
Identification of monitoring and measurement actions
Training employees to carry out these actions
NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS
DIFFICULTIES:
Detection of non-conformances
Discussion of the corrective and preventive actions
ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
INTERNAL AUDITS
DIFFICULTIES:
Finding external professional consultants to perform the audits
Collecting meaningful data
Preparation of the audit’s report
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
60ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 60
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT (M&M)
ADEQUATE DOCUMENTATION IS CRUCIAL:
�SYSTEM PROCEDURE, SP 09 –Monitoring and Measurement
�LISTS OF OPERATIONS AND MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENTS
�DOCUMENTS RECORDING ALL MAINTENANCE AND CALIBRATION OPERATIONS PERFORMED IN THE EQUIPMENTS
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT ACTIONS TYPICALLY INVOLVE:
�CALIBRATION OF THE MEASUREMENT DEVICES
�RECORDING THE VALUES ATTAINED IN EVERY OPERATIONAL CONTROL
�COMPARISON WITH ESTABLISHED TARGETS
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT ACTIONS ARE ESSENTIAL FOR AN
ADEQUATE CONTROL OF ALL CRITICAL POINTS
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
61ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 61
M&M ACTIONS FOR EACH OPERATIONAL CONTROL (XPTO)
Operational control M & M action
- Verify monthly water consumption and
calculate the amount of hake processed each month (Target 1)
- Calibrat ion of water meter s and sca les - Record monthly value of water consumpt ion
per ton of proc essed hake
- Comparison with established target
- Verify monthly electricity consumption
and calculate the amount of hake processed each month (Target 2)
- Calibrat ion of electricity meter s and sc ales - Record monthly value of electrical energy
consumpt ion per ton of proces sed hake
- Comparison with established target
- Management review each trimester
(Target 3)
- Record phase of the project
- Record del ays to the schedule (chronogram) - Repor t to the management board
- Perform chemical analysis of the glazing wastewater every month (Target 4)
- Record monthly values of COD and BOD5 in
the gla zing wastewater
- Comparison with established targets
- Estimate monthly production of common
garbage and calculate the amount of hake processed each month (Target 5)
- Moni toring common garbage disposal and calibra ting scales
- Record monthly value of common garbage
product ion per ton of processed hake - Comparison with established target
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
62ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 62
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT ACTIONS (XPTO’S TARGET 5)
RECORD MONTHLY VALUE
OF COMMON GARBAGE
PRODUCTION PER TON OF
PROCESSED HAKE
COMPARISON WITH
ESTABLISHED TARGET
MONITORING COMMON GARBAGE DISPOSAL
Measurement of the
volumetric capacity
Work instruction for
determining the number of dumpsters
filled each month
CALIBRATION OF THE SCALES
1 kg 0.5 kg2 kg
ENABLES
ENABLESENABLES
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
63ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 63
M&M ACTIONS FOR EACH OPERATIONAL CONTROL (CCC)
Operational control M & M action
- Verify monthly water consumption and
calculate the amount of sardine processed each month (Target 1)
- Calibrat ion of water meter s and sca les - Record monthly value of water consumpt ion
per ton of proc essed sardine
- Comparison with established target
- Verify monthly electricity consumption and calculate the amount of sardine processed
each month (Target 2)
- Calibrat ion of electricity meter s and sc ales
- Record monthly value of electrical energy
consumpt ion per ton of proces sed s ardine - Comparison with established target
- Management review each trimester
(Target 3)
- Record phase of the project
- Record del ays to the schedule (chronogram) - Repor t to the management board
- Management review each trimester
(Target 4)
- Record phase of the project
- Record del ays to the schedule (chronogram) - Repor t to the management board
- Monthly chemical analysis of the
wastewater generated in the plant (Target 5)
- Record monthly values of COD, BOD5 ,
Nit roge n and Phosphorous in the wa stewater - Comparison with established targets
- Estimate monthly amount of fish waste
separated on the fish preparation tables and
calculate the quantity of sardine processed each month (Target 6)
- Calibrat ion of scales
- Record monthly value of separated f ish waste per ton of proces sed s ardine
- Comparison with established target
- Management review each trimester (Target 6)
- Record phase of the project
- Record del ays to the schedule (chronogram)
- Repor t to the management board
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
64ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 64
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT ACTIONS (CCC’S TARGET 6)
RECORD MONTHLY VALUE OF
SEPARATED FISH WASTE PER
TON OF PROCESSED SARDINE
COMPARISON WITH
ESTABLISHED TARGET
CALIBRATION OF THE SCALES
1 kg 0.5 kg2 kg
ENABLES
For instance, the
second task of target 6
RECORD DELAYS
TO THE SCHEDULE
REPORT TO THE MANAGEMENT BOARD
RECORD PHASE
OF THE PROJECT
ENABLES
CCCFISH MEAL
PLANT
Fish Waste
Negotiations
€ €€
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
65ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 65
NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS
FOR EVERY DETECTED NON-CONFORMANCE A SPECIFIC DOCUMENT MUST BE FILLED OUT RNC# - NON-CONFORMANCES AND MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
�SECTION WHERE THE NON-CONFORMANCE OCCURRED
�REQUIREMENT OF THE NORM THAT WAS DISRESPECTED
�DESCRIPTION OF THE NON-CONFORMANCE
�CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS PERFORMED
�ALTERED DOCUMENTS
IN XPTO AND CCC, THE DETECTION OF NON-CONFORMANCES RESULTED FROM COMPLAINTS, EMERGENCY SITUATIONS, AUDITS AND ALL M&M ACTIONS
WHAT IS A NON-CONFORMANCE?
WHAT IS A CORRECTIVE ACTION?
WHAT IS A PREVENTIVE ACTION?
ASPECT OF EMAS IMPLEMENTATION STANDING BEYOND THE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
ACTION THAT AIMS AT REESTABLISHING THE CONCERNED ASPECT WITHIN LIMITS
ACTION THAT AIMS TO AVOID ANY SERIOUS DEVIATION IN SOME ASPECT OF EMAS IMPLEMENTATION
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
66ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 66
NON-CONFORMANCES CORRECTIVE ACTIONPREVENTIVE ACTION
NON-CONFORMANCES/CORRECTIVE & PREVENTIVE ACTIONS (XPTO)
NO SPECIALIST ENVIRONMENTAL
TRAINING PROVIDED FOR THOSE
WORKERS WHOSE ACTIVITY HAD A
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Put a specific person in charge of all training actions
Commission external environmental experts
TWO LISTS (LINTC AND LEXTC) WERE
NOT FILLED OUTFill out the lists with the missing information
Explain to workers the documents importance
DELAY IN THE INSTALLATION OF
VACUUM HOSES
Report any serious problem in the installation of new equipments to EMS team
Ask advice from other experts
COD AND BOD5 LEVELS DID NOT DECREASE
Teach workers to remove the solid waste retained in the drain of the glazing tank
Reinstall the drain’s screen
INCREASE IN THE PRODUCTION OF
COMMON GARBAGE PER TON OF
PROCESSED HAKE
Improve workers training for common garbage separation
Appointment of a person for workers supervision in screening the garbage
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
67ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 67
NON-CONFORMANCES/CORRECTIVE & PREVENTIVE ACTIONS (CCC)
NON-CONFORMANCES CORRECTIVE ACTIONPREVENTIVE ACTION
NO SPECIALIST ENVIRONMENTAL
TRAINING PROVIDED FOR THOSE
WORKERS WHOSE ACTIVITY HAD A
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Put a specific person in charge of all training actions
Commission external environmental experts
ABSENCE OF THE OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE FOR SEPARATING SOLID
WASTE
Regular EMAS meetings for analysis of all operational procedures
Special EMAS meeting for preparing the procedure
THE ORGANIC LOAD IN THE
WASTEWATER DID NOT DECREASE
Appointment of a person for supervising workers when they collect offal
Reinforce workers training for collecting offal
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
68ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 68
SYSTEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS APPLIED TO XPTO AND CCC
ESTABLISHED FOLDERS:RECORDS: ELIMINATION:
AFTER:
TRAINING RECORDS
AUDITS RESULTS
REVIEW RESULTS
DEFINITION OF OBJECTIVES & TARGETS
ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN (chronograms)
DEFINITION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
COMMUNICATION LISTS AND RECORDS
LISTS OF DOC. REMOVED, MODIFIED, etc.
LISTS OF WORK INSTRUCTIONS
EMERGENCY PLANS AND RECORDS
LISTS, MAINT. & CALIB. RECORDS
NON-CONFORMANCES RECORDS
REVIEW RESULTS
ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME
RESPONSIBILITIES
TRAINING
COMMUNICATION
DOCUMENTATION CONTROL
OPERATIONAL CONTROL
PREVENTION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
NON-CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS
INTERNAL AUDITS
MANAGEMENT REVIEWS
ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENTS
2 YEARS
3 YEARS
5 YEARS
5 YEARS
5 YEARS
5 YEARS
3 YEARS
3 YEARS
3 YEARS
TO BE DEFINED
TO BE DEFINED
TO BE DEFINED
TO BE DEFINED
TO BE DEFINED
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
69ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 69
INTERNAL AUDITS (IA)
WHY INTERNAL AUDITS HAVE TO BE PERFORMED?
�TO OBSERVE WHETHER EMS AGREES WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMME
�TO VERIFY A CORRECT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM
�TO PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR THE MANAGEMENT REVIEW
PROGRAMME – SPECIFIES WHICH ACTIVITIES MUST BE AUDITED
PROCEDURES – SPECIFY THE AUDITS SCOPE AND FREQUENCY, THE MANAGEMENT
RESPONSIBILITIES AND ALSO THE METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES
THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERNAL AUDIT REQUIRES:
XPTO
(CCC)
INTERNAL AUDIT
EACH INTERNAL AUDITSIMULTANEOUSLY ENCOMPASSES
ALL RELEVANT ACTIVITIES
IA IA
AUDIT CYCLE
TIME
1 YEAR
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
70ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 70
INTERNAL AUDITS
THE PREPARATION OF THE INTERNAL AUDITS REQUIRED AN AUDIT’S PLAN:
Issue Content
Objectives Verification of compliance with EMAS norm and the
environmental objectives and targets
Criteria EMAS requirements
Application areas Production & Quality Control, Warehouse & Offices, Auxil iary Operations, Canteen, Env. Records and EMS documents
Calendar Preparation – two months Inspection – six months
Report preparation and presentation – four months
Functions and responsibilities Specific tasks assigned to the members of the audit’s team
Resources localization Where to find the main documents and devices required for measurements and other inspection activities in the critical
areas
Company’s representatives EMS team members
Report’s issues Audit’s objectives; application areas; company's name; audited processes; client’s identification; audit’s team
identification; dates and places of the audits activities; criteria; audit’s results and conclusions
Logistics The planning of all visits and inspection tasks
Confidential issues List of the company’s areas that must receive special care
regarding divulgation
Future audit’s actions Issues that raised some doubts or problems must be followed in the future
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
71ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 71
SUMMARY OF THE AUDIT’S RESULTS FOR XPTO
THE PRODUCTION OF COMMON GARBAGE PER TON OF PROCESSED HAKE DID NOT DECREASE
BESIDES THE GLAZING WASTEWATER, THERE ARE OTHER OPERATIONS THAT GENERATE WASTEWATER WHICH MUST BE ANALYZED
THE MAINTENANCE AND CALIBRATION ACTIVITIES ARE NOT CORRECTLY REGISTERED
Error
THE RESPONSIBILITIES STRUCTURE IS UNBALANCED (EXCESSIVE NUMBER OF TASKS ASSIGNED TO EMS COORDINATOR)
ABSENCE OF ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING FOR ALL WORKERS
?
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
72ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 72
SUMMARY OF THE AUDIT’S RESULTS FOR CCC
ABSENCE OF ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING FOR ALL WORKERS
?
THE ORGANIC LOAD IN THE WASTEWATER DID NOT DECREASE
COD
BOD5
THE MONITORING OF THE FISH WASTE SEPARATION DOES NOT COMPRISE OTHER PROCESS OPERATIONS BESIDES HEADING
AND EVISCERATING
!!!!!
THE LIST OF MODIFIED DOCUMENTS IS MISSING
LMD?
THE RESPONSIBILITIES STRUCTURE IS UNBALANCED (EXCESSIVE NUMBER OF TASKS ASSIGNED TO EMS COORDINATOR)
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
73ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 73
VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION OF EMAS BY EXTERNAL ENTITIES
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
DIFFICULTIES:
Time availability
Reaching conclusions
PUBLIC
COMMUNICATION
DIFFICULTIES:
Preparation of an accurate and clear environmental statement
VALIDATION, VERIFICATION
AND RECORDS
DIFFICULTIES:
Finding an independent environmental verifier
Financial costs
Application for registration under EMAS
ORGANIZATION
REGISTERED UNDER EMAS
EMAS APPLICATION
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
DIFFICULTIES:
Time availability
Reaching conclusions
PUBLIC
COMMUNICATION
DIFFICULTIES:
Preparation of an accurate and clear environmental statement
VALIDATION, VERIFICATION
AND RECORDS
DIFFICULTIES:
Finding an independent environmental verifier
Financial costs
Application for registration under EMAS
ORGANIZATION
REGISTERED UNDER EMAS
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
74ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 74
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
FURTHERMORE, THE MANAGEMENT REVIEW HAS TO CONSIDER:
POSSIBLE ALTERATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, OBJECTIVES AND
TARGETS (AS A RESULT OF MODIFIED CIRCUMSTANCES)
A THOROUGH ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNAL AUDIT’S RESULTS
FOR XPTO AND CCC, THE REVIEW IS PERFORMED IN A MEETING THAT IS HELD
EVERY YEAR
THE MANAGEMENT MUST REVIEW THE IMPLEMENTED EMS, THUS, ENSURING
THAT IT REMAINS ADEQUATE, SUFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE
WHAT IS IT?
ALL DISCUSSED ISSUES ARE RECORDED IN THE REVIEW MINUTES
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
75ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 75
CONCLUSIONS OF THE FIRST MANAGEMENT REVIEW MADE BY XPTO
ALL GENERATED WASTEWATERS SHOULD BE REGULARLY ANALYZED
COD
BOD5
Jan Feb Mar
Apr May Jun
Jul Aug Sep
Oct Nov Dec
THE COMPANY SHOULD SEARCH FOR NEW CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES (FOR INSTANCE FIXTURES THAT RESTRICT WATER FLOW FOR CLEANING)
A COMPLETE AND DETAILED TRAINING PROGRAMME SHOULD BE DEVELOPED
EMS TEAM MEMBERS SHOULD ENTER EMS COURSES
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR EMS SHOULD BE SPLIT MORE EVENLY AMONG EMS TEAM MEMBERS
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
76ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 76
CONCLUSIONS OF THE FIRST MANAGEMENT REVIEW MADE BY CCC
THE COMPANY SHOULD SEARCH FOR NEW CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES (FOR INSTANCE FIXTURES THAT RESTRICT WATER FLOW FOR CLEANING)
A COMPLETE AND DETAILED TRAINING PROGRAMME SHOULD BE DEVELOPED
GAS EMISSIONS FROM BOILER SHOULD BE MONITORED ON REGULAR BASIS
7 5 3
EMS TEAM MEMBERS SHOULD ENTER EMS COURSES
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR EMS SHOULD BE SPLIT MORE EVENLY AMONG EMS TEAM MEMBERS
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
77ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 77
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
EMAS REQUIRES THE PRESENTATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT
SUMMARY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENTS PREPARED BY XPTO AND CCC:
§§§§ Ton of processed hake¶ Ton of processed sardine
XPTO CCC
Company’s description Company’s description
Environmental policy Environmental policy Environmental aspects Environmental aspects
Objectives and targets Objectives and targets
Env. Performance indicators (October 2004): Env. Performance indicators (October 2004):
Water consumption – 3.5 m3/ton§ Water consumption – 4.0 m3/ton¶
Electricity consumption - 790 kWh/ton§ Electricity consumption – 73 kWh/ton
¶
Common garbage production – 0.3 m3/ton§ Fuel oil consumption – 0.05 ton/ton¶
Wastewater discharge – 3.5 m3/ton
§ Fish waste production – 0.4 ton/ton
¶
COD (glazing wastewater) – 400 mg O2/l Wastewater discharge – 4.0 m3/ton
¶
BOD5 (glazing wastewater) – 100 mg O2/l COD (wastewater) – 7700 mg O2/l
Environmental verifier: BOD5 (wastewater) – 3500 mg O2/l
Name - VVV Nitrogen (wastewater) – 200 mg N/l
Accreditation number - ##### Phosphorous (wastewater) - 27 mg P/l
Validation date - ##/##/## Environmental verifier:
Name - VVV
Accreditation number - ##### Validation date - ##/##/##
EMAS APPLICATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAS IN A FISH PROCESSING INDUSTRY
78ETIV - EMAS Technical Implementation and Verification 78
VALIDATION, VERIFICATION AND RECORDS
HOW TO ATTAIN REGISTRATION UNDER EMAS?
SEVERAL STEPS HAD TO BE TAKEN BY XPTO AND CCC:
�COMMISSION AN INDEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTAL VERIFIER (WHICH MUST UNDERTAKE A CAREFUL
EXAMINATION OF THE EMAS IMPLEMENTATION)
�AS XPTO AND CCC FULLY COMPLIED WITH ALL EMAS REQUIREMENTS:
VALIDATION WAS CONFERRED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL VERIFIER
SUBMISSION TO THE COMPETENT ORGANISM (INSTITUTO DO AMBIENTE) OF THE VALIDATED ENVIRONMENTAL
STATEMENT AND A SPECIFIC FORM DULY FILLED IN
PAYMENT OF A REGISTRATION FEE
�XPTO AND CCC REQUESTED REGISTRATION UNDER EMAS
�AFTER EVALUATION OF REQUEST, THE INSTITUTO DE AMBIENTE GRANTED REGISTRATION
AS A RESULT OF THE REGISTRATION, XPTO AND CCC WERE ALLOWED TO USE THE EMAS LOGOTYPE (VERSION 1)
EMAS APPLICATION