23
1 E U R O P E A N C O M M I S S I O N CLIMATE CHANGE UNIT EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels. Questions to be answered:. What is our legal basis? What are we doing? Who does it? And what happens by when? Institutional arrangements and working procedure What are the products? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

1

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism

Hartmut Behrend European Commission

DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

Page 2: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

2

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

Questions to be answered:

• What is our legal basis?• What are we doing? Who does it? And what happens by

when?Institutional arrangements and working procedure

• What are the products?• Where do we stand today?

Where do we expect to go? • What are the methodologies to prepare inventories from

bunkers?• How much are the emissions from international bunkers

increasing?

Page 3: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

3

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

Legal basis

• UNFCCC (in future KP)– Revised 1996 IPCC Manual on Inventories– Good Practise Guidance on Reporting and Uncertainty

assessment– Guidelines on National Communications and annual

inventories (FCCC/CP/2002/8, decision 18/CP.8)

• EU– Council Decision on GHG Monitoring (Decision

389/93/EEC as amended by decision 296/99/EC)– (internal) guidelines

Page 4: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

4

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

Sharing the EC target of –8%

Germany -21%

United Kingdom -12.5%

Italy -6.5%

Denmark -21%

Netherlands -6%

Belgium -7.5%

Austria -13%

Luxembourg -28%

Finland 0%

France 0%

Sw eden +4%

Ireland +13%

Portugal +27%

Greece +25%

Spain +15%

-300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100

GHG emissions (million tonnes CO2-eq.)

Page 5: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

5

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

ITSummary of current EC Council

decision

• Monitoring the emissions of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases and removals by sinks,

• Annual GHG inventory reporting by MS to the European Commission

• Implementation and annual reporting of national programmes (including policies and measures) and emission projections to the Commission and

• Evaluation of progress and reporting to the European Parliament and Council by the Commission

Page 6: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

6

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

ITData flow EC GHG inventory

Austria

Belgium

UK

Sweden

FinlandGermany

LuxembourgItaly

GreeceDenmark

FranceIrelandNetherlands

Portugal

Spain

EU

European Commission

(ENV, ESTAT, JRC)and EEA

UNFCCC

Parliament Council

Page 7: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

7

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

ITEC GHG inventory institutional

arrangements• Member states prepare inventory according to UNFCCC

Guidelines and participate in EC Monitoring mechanism committee, assisted by two working groups

• European Commission (DG ENV) responsible for submission to UNFCCC, assisted by EEA (and European Topic Centre Air and Climate Change, ETC/ACC) and Eurostat and JRC

• Working group I promotes improvement of all GHG inventory quality aspects (transparency, consistency, comparability, completeness, accuracy and use of good practices)

• Working group II promotes improvement of quality of reporting on GHG emission projections (transparency, consistency, comparability, completeness)

• EC “National Inventory Report” follows UNFCCC Guidelines

Page 8: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

8

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

Preparation EC inventory

1MS submission of inventory to Commission

31 December

2Initial check of submission by Commission

Jan

3Compilation and circulation of draft EC inventory

1 March

4Submission of updated od additional data to commission

Up to 1 April

5 Submission to UNFCCC 15 April

6EC internal review and improvement of inventory

May to December

Page 9: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

9

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

ITAnnual process of submission and review of MS inventories and compilation of the EC inventory

Element Who When What 1. Submission of annual inventory by MS to Commission

Member States 31 December annually

Anthropogenic CO2 emissions and CO2 removals by sinks, for the year n-1 Emissions by source and removals by sinks of the other greenhouse gases; Final data for the year n-2 and provisional data for the year n-1 2)

2. Initial check of MS submissions

European Commission (incl. Eurostat), assisted by EEA

up to 1 March Initial checks (by EEA) Comparison of energy data in MS IPCC Reference Approach with Eurostat energy data (by Eurostat and MS)

3. Compilation and circulation of draft EC inventory

European Commission (incl. Eurostat), assisted by EEA

1 March Draft EC inventory (by EEA), based on MS inventories and additional information where needed Circulation of the draft EC inventory on 1 March

4. Submission of updated or additional data by MS to Commission

Member States up to 1 April Updated or additional data submitted by MS 3)

5. Final annual EC inventory to UNFCCC

European Commission (incl. Eurostat), assisted by EEA

15 April Submission to UNFCCC of the final annual EC inventory. This inventory will also be used to evaluate progress as part of the Monitoring Mechanism

6. Additional review of MS submissions and EC inventory

European Commission (incl. Eurostat), assisted by EEA

June to December

Additional review aimed at improving the next annual MS and EC inventories In November Eurostat makes available to MS energy balance data (1990 to inventory year)

Page 10: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

10

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

ITEC GHG inventory improvement

• Eurostat improvement project for national energy balances and annual estimation of EC CO2 emissions (IPCC Reference Approach)

• JRC compares national estimates for carbon sinks (focus on forests) and coordinates a project for improving GHG emissions from agriculture (focus on N2O from soils)

• QA/QC of EC inventory depends on QA/QC systems for national GHG inventories

• Data gap filling to achieve complete EC inventory is limited to few countries

• Minor differences between EC and Member States’ inventories, which are further being reduced through the UNFCCC review process (centralised review of EC inventory, Sep. 2003)

Page 11: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

11

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

ITAnnual procedure for the EU

Progress Assessment

1. Drafting of technical reports onTrends in emissions / projections andpolicies and measures

15 April until15 J uly

Emission/removal trends for key source sectors at EUlevel and also for each MS./ information on policiesand measures, their effects, and the projectedemissions/removals at EU level and for each MS

2. Drafting of Commission MonitoringMechanism progress report

15 J une until5 Sept.

Evaluation of actual and projected progress, based onMS information. Extended analyses, comparison withCommunity wide projections; Community policies andmeasures based on first draft EEA technical reports

3. Circulation of final draft oftechnical reports on GHG emission(and sinks) trends and on projectionsand policies and measures

15 J uly Final draft of technical reports circulated to MemberStates on 15 J uly. Drafting of the Commission’sprogress report continues in parallel to technicalreview of the EEA technical reports.

4. Review by MS of (EEA) technicalreports. Comments by MS.

15 J uly until29 August

Member States checking data and the variousanalyses in the reports.

5. Revision of (EEA) technical reports 30 Aug. until5 Sept.

Revision of EEA technical reports according to MemberStates comments

6. Draft Circulation to MS /Committee Members

5 September Evaluation of actual and projected progress, based onMS and Community policies and measures.

7. Monitoring Mechanism committeedecision on draft progress report

15 Sept. Inclusion of conclusions and comments by MemberStates; adoption of draft Commission progress report

8. Adoption by European Com. andsubmission to Parliament and Council

Until end ofNovember

Final Commission progress report, formal adoptiontranslation and publication

Page 12: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

12

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

New Monitoring decision (Proposal COM(2003) 51 final) • CO-decision Procedure – in the moment in COREPER to reach 1st

reading aggreement • Basic in decision - further implementing in implementing provision to

be adopted • Greenhouse gas inventory system (KP Art. 5.1)• Procedures for the review process and adjustments (KP Art. 5.2 and

Art. 8)• Reporting on accounting of assigned amounts and national registries

(KP Art. 7.1, 7.2 and 7.4)• Information to be incorporated in the periodic communications to the

UNFCCC• Policies and measures and Projections• details yet to be decided (ongoing procedure in Council and

Parliament

Page 13: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

13

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

Most important changes of new Monitoring Mechanism Decison

• Deadlines of MSs- 15 January: for national inventories- 15 March (biannual): for projected progress

• Reporting on flexible mechanisms (JI, CDM, IET) and sinks

• Additional Reports- Report on demonstrable progress- 4th National Communication- Report on assigned amounts

• Establishment of- national systems (incl. Report) and- registries

Page 14: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

14

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

ITEU greenhouse gas emissions in relation to

the Kyoto target (excl. LUCF)

97,7

92,0

101,6

80

90

100

110

120

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Ind

ex

(ba

se y

ea

r =

10

0)

Greenhouse gas emissions Target path 2010

GHG target 2010 CO2 emissions

Page 15: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

16

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

ITGreenhouse gas emission targets and

changes from base year to 2001

-300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150

Germany

United Kingdom

Italy

Denmark

Netherlands

Belgium

Austria

Luxembourg

Finland

France

Sw eden

Ireland

Portugal

Greece

Spain

GHG emissions (million tonnes CO2-eq.)

GHG targets

Change base year -2001

Page 16: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

17

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

Good Practice in Reporting on aviation fuels 1

Tier 1: top-down methodEmissions = fuel consumption * emission factor10 % of emissions for LTO-cycle

Tier 2: bottom-up methodDistinction between LTO emissions (below 3000 ft) and cruise emissions, only jet kerosene

Tier 2 a: aggregated LTO-data

Tier 2 b: detailed LTO-data

Other approaches:

possible if peer reviewed and well documented

Emission factors

Hardly any national differences

- CO2 +/- 5 %, aggregated or per aircraft type

- CH4 factor 2, only depending on fuel consumption

- N2O factor 100, only depending on fuel consumption

Page 17: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

18

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

ITGood Practice in Reporting on aviation fuels 2

Disaggregation International – domesticDomestic: Every flight inside of the boarder of one country, if

passengers and / or fright are dropped at the destination

International: All other flights in CRF only as memo item

Activity Data- Delivery of kerosene to airports- fuel suppliers- refineries (production + import – export)- individual LTO-data from EUROCONTROL

Military aviationInventory in CRF 1 A 5 ‘Others’Emission factors: the same as civil aviation unless better data are known

Page 18: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

19

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

Changes in GHG emissions from international bunkers, 1990 to latest year

Page 19: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

20

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

Trends in GHG emissions from international bunkers 1990 – 2000

Page 20: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

21

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

ITComparison of aviation data from Eurocontrol and

national inventories

CO2 emissions from aviation for EU-15 (in t CO2-equivqlent)

    1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Domestic aviation tonnes CO2

  Eurocontrol 18.415.864 19.240.431 19.731.081 20.652.900 21.207.390 19.277.218

  CRF 19.663.047 20.300.838 23.940.818 25.658.623 26.010.991 25.537.715

  CRF/Eurocontrol 107% 106% 121% 124% 123% 132%

International aviation  

  Eurocontrol 81.558.247 85.483.967 92.832.199 99.625.723 102.360.940 93.902.916

  CRF 74.989.327 80.096.663 86.320.263 92.177.774 97.267.687 102.220.542

  CRF/Eurocontrol 92% 94% 93% 93% 95% 109%

Total  

  Eurocontrol 99.974.111 104.724.398 112.563.280 120.278.623 123.568.330 113.180.134

  CRF 94.652.374 100.397.501 110.261.081 117.836.397 123.278.678 127.758.258

  CRF/Eurocontrol 95% 96% 98% 98% 100% 113%

No CRF data available for domestic aviation for Italy 1996 and 1997

Page 21: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

22

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

EU-aggregated international bunker emissions

EU aggregated International bunker emissions

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

year

tCO

2-e

q.

aviation navigation

Page 22: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

23

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT

For further information you may look at:

www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climate/home_en.htm

andthemes.eea.eu.int/Environmental_issues/climate

THANK YOU !

Page 23: EU GHG Monitoring Mechanism Hartmut Behrend  European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels

24

EU

RO

PE

AN

CO

MM

ISS

ION

CL

IMA

TE

CH

AN

GE

UN

IT