Upload
ormand
View
31
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
E-invoicing uptake in the EU. EU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1. Pieter Breyne – PwC Belgium Jeroen Verheecke – PwC Belgium Sander Van der Meulen – PwC Belgium. March 2012. Agenda. Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoices General Per entity size - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
E-invoicing uptake in the EU
EU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1
Pieter Breyne – PwC BelgiumJeroen Verheecke – PwC BelgiumSander Van der Meulen – PwC Belgium
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 2
Agenda
Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoices
- General
- Per entity size
- Per entity sector
Invoices sent and/or received
- Per type
- Per commerce transaction
E-invoicing technologies used by enterprises
Drivers and obstacles for e-invoicing adoption by enterprises
Process and controls applied by enterprisesMarch 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 3
Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoicesEU: Eurostat 2007 - 2010
March 2012
EU (2
7 countri
es)
Euro
area Ita
ly
Lithuan
iaLat
via
Belgium
Estonia
Denmark
Malta
Luxe
mbourg
German
y
France
Finlan
d
Netherl
ands
Slova
kia
Swed
en
Irelan
d
Portuga
l
Bulgaria
Spain
Romania
Austria
Czech Rep
ublic
Poland
Greece
United Kingd
om
Slove
nia
Cypru
s
Hungary
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2007 2008 2009 2010
E-invoicing uptake in the EU4EU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1
Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoicesEU: Eurostat 2010
March 2012
Leaders (> 40%)
Average (20 – 40 %)
Laggards (< 20%)
N/A
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 5
Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoices
Increasing use of e-invoicing across Europe (only few exceptions)
The data is NOT comparable to the data available for 2011, due to the use of different variables:
- 2010: sending and/or receiving all types of e-invoices
- 2011: sending and/or receiving only in a standard structure
Large differences within EU-countries with Italy, Lithuania and Latvia as leading countries
Euro area ahead of EU 27
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 6
Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoices EU: Eurostat 2011
March 2012
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Enterprises sending e-invoices in a standard structure suitable for automatic processingEnterprises sending e-invoices NOT suitable for automatic processing (e.g. emails, email attachement in PDF format)Enterprises receiving e-invoices in a standard structure suitable for automatic processingEnterprises sending e-invoices (suitable OR NOT for automatic processing)Enterprises sending / receiving e-invoices in a standard structure suitable for automatic processing
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 7
Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoices
Large differences within EU-countries
More structured e-invoices are received than sent (only few exceptions)
More unstructured e-invoices are sent than structured ones
Finland is well ahead, while Hungary is clearly running behind
Remarks:
The data does not include the financial sector
Data for the following variables are not available:
- Enterprises receiving e-invoices NOT suitable for automatic processing is lacking
- Enterprises receiving e-invoices (suitable OR NOT for automatic processing)
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 8
Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoices per entity size EU: Eurostat 2011
March 2012
All enterprises (>= 10 empl)
SE (10-49 empl)
ME (50-249 empl)
LE (>= 250 empl)
SMEs (10-249 empl)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Enterprises sending / receiving e-invoices in a standard structure suitable for automatic processingEnterprises sending e-invoices (suitable OR NOT for automatic processing)Enterprises receiving e-invoices in a standard structure suitable for automatic processingEnterprises sending e-invoices NOT suitable for automatic processingEnterprises sending e-invoices in a standard structure suitable for automatic processing
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 9
Enterprises sending / receiving e-invoices per entity sizeSpain: E-invoicing dissemination plan 2011
March 2012
Total
SE (10 - 49 empl)
ME (50 - 249 empl)
LE (>= 250 empl)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Enterprises receiving electronic invoices in standard format enabling automatic processingEnterprises sending electronic invoices in a format not suitable for automatic processingEnterprises sending electronic invoices in a standard format suitable for automatic processingEnterprises sending electronic invoices
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 10
Enterprises sending / receiving e-invoices per entity sizePoland: Central Statistical Office 2010
March 2012
Total
SE (10-49 empl)
ME (50-249 empl)
LE (>= 250 empl)
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
# enterprises receiving e-invoices # enterprises sending e-invoices
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 11
Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoices per entity size
Use of e-invoices (structured or not structured) sent and received increases with entity size (EU-wide)
Similar results are applicable for PL & ES data, although small enterprises send little more non-structured e-invoices than larger companies in ES
Remarks:
The data does not include the financial sector
Data for the following variables are not available:
- Enterprises receiving e-invoices NOT suitable for automatic processing is lacking
- Enterprises receiving e-invoices (suitable OR NOT for automatic processing)
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 12
Enterprises sending vs. receiving e-invoicesEurope: Itella 2010
March 2012
United Kingd
omEst
onia
Denmark
German
y
Austria
Finlan
dLat
via
Lithuan
ia
Hungary
Romania
Russia
Czech Rep
ublic
Norway
Swed
en
Slova
kia
Poland
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
# of enterprises sending electronic invoices # of enterprises receiving electronic invoices
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 13
Enterprises sending e-invoicesEurope: Itella 2010 & Eurostat 2011
March 2012
United Kingd
omEst
onia
Denmark
German
y
Austria
Finlan
dLat
via
Lithuan
ia
Hungary
Romania
Russia
Czech Rep
ublic
Norway
Swed
en
Slova
kia
Poland
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Itella (2010) Eurostat (2011)
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 14
Enterprises sending (vs. receiving) e-invoices
More e-invoices are received than sent in 2010 (only few exceptions)
When comparing Eurostat 2011 with Itella 2010 data:
- Only invoices sent (all types) could be compared, because of missing variable in Eurostat 2011 data
- Comparison not reliable because of large differences with previously mentioned conclusions, possibly due to:
• Different sample / sampling method
• Description of data not fully clear in Itella 2010 data
Remark:
Only data of 14 EU-countries (+ Russia and Norway) is availableMarch 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 15
Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoices per sector EU: Eurostat 2011
March 2012
Real estate activitiesAccommodation and Food and beverage service activities
Activities for rental and leasing, employment, security & investigation , services to build-ings &landscape, office administrative, office support & other business support
Manufacture of textiles, wearing apparel, leather and related productsAdministrative and support service activities
ConstructionManufacture of computer, electronic and optical products
Professional, scientific and technical activitiesManufacture of furniture and other manufacturing; repair and installation of machinery
and equipmentManufacture of electrical equipment, machinery and equipment n.e.c.
Manufacture of computers, electric & optical products, electrical equipment, machinery & equipment n.e.c, motor vehicles, other transport equipment, furniture, other manufac-
turing, repair & installation of machinery & equipment (10 persons employed or m
Retail trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcyclesManufacture of wood & products of wood & cork, except furniture; articles of straw & plaiting materials; paper & paper products; printing & reproduction of recorded media
Manufacture of products based on: food, beverages, tobacco, textile, leather, wood, pulp and paper; publishing and printing
Manufacture of coke, refined petroleum, chemical & basic pharmaceutical products, rubber & plastics, other non-metallic mineral products
Manufacture of basic metals & fabricated metal products excluding machines & equipments
Publishing activities; motion picture, video & television programme production, sound recording & music publishing; programming & broadcasting
AccommodationTransportation and storage
Electricity, gas, steam, air conditioning and water supplyComputer programming, consultancy and related activities, information service activities
Information and communicationManufacture of beverages, food and tobacco products
Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers, other transport equipmentWholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles
Repair of computers and communication equipmentTravel agency; tour operator reservation service and related activities
Wholesale trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcyclesTrade of motor vehicles and motorcycles
Telecommunications
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 16
Enterprises sending and/or receiving e-invoices per sector
Only small spread between different sectors, however:
- Mapping done based on activities (that are often overlapping and too detailed) rather than sectors
- Not all sectors are covered
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 17
Invoices sent by enterprises per type Europe: Itella 2010
March 2012
Austria
Czech Rep
ublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finlan
d
German
y
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuan
ia
Norway
Poland
Romania
Russia
Slova
kia
Swed
en
United Kingd
omTo
tal0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
In-house Print Outsourced Print Email Fully Electronic
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 18
Invoices received by enterprises per type Europe: Itella 2010
March 2012
Austria
Czech Rep
ublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finlan
d
German
y
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuan
ia
Norway
Poland
Romania
Russia
Slova
kia
Swed
en
United Kingd
omTo
tal0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Paper process Paper scanned for e-process Email Fully Electronic
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 19
Invoices sent and received by enterprises per type
Majority of invoices are still sent and received on paper
Very small share of invoices is fully electronic or sent via e-mail (EU-wide)
Remark:
Only data of 14 EU-countries (+ Russia and Norway) is available
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 20
E-invoices sent by enterprises per commerce transactionEU: Factuurmonitor 2008
March 2012
B2G B2C B2B0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Total Micro (1-9) Small (10-49) Medium (50-249) Large
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 21
Invoices sent per commerce transactionDenmark: Interoperability of e-invoicing 2007
March 2012
B2B B2B foreign B2G B2C0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
2007
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 22
E-invoices sent by enterprises per commerce transaction
Use of sent e-invoices increases with entity size
No significant differences (EU-wide) between commerce transactions (B2B / B2C / B2G)
However, in DK the large majority of enterprises sending e-invoices operate in the B2B segment
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 23
E-invoicing technologies used by enterprisesEU: PwC Study 2005 & 2009
March 2012
don't know
supplier e-Invoicing portal
email (pdf)
scanning
qualified electronic signatures
advanced electronic signatures
electronic bill presentment and payment (EBPP)
electronic invoice presentment and payment
EDI
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
implemented (2009)implemented (2005)
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 24
E-invoicing technologies used by enterprisesEU: PwC Study 2005 & 2009
March 2012
don't know
supplier e-Invoicing portal
email (pdf)
scanning
qualified electronic signatures
advanced electronic signatures
electronic bill presentment and payment (EBPP)
electronic invoice presentment and payment
EDI
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
will implement before 2013will implement before 2011
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 25
E-invoicing technologies used by enterprises The Netherlands: Factuurmonitor 2008 & 2010
March 2012
email EDI webportal online banking0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2008 2010
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 26
Format of e-invoices used by enterprisesThe Netherlands: Factuurmonitor 2008
March 2012
PDF EDI XML HTML Excel Word0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
2008
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 27
Format of e-invoices sent vs. received by enterprisesCzech Republic: Czech Statistical Office 2011
March 2012
PDF XML, etc. EDIFACT0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Issuer Recipient
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 28
Format of e-invoices sent vs. received by enterprises Austria: Billentis 2011
March 2012
Web
XML/EDI
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Large (250+) Medium (50-249) Small (10-49)
Web
XML/EDI
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Large (250+) Medium (50-249) Small (10-49)
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 29
E-invoicing technologies used by enterprises
The top technologies used (EU-wide) are:
- E-mail (pdf-form)
- Scanning (of paper invoices)
- EDI
Another important technology used is electronic bill (B2C) & invoice (B2B) presentment and payment
Trends:
- Electronic invoice presentment & payment and scanning increases, while EDI decreases from 2005 to 2009
- No data available to analyse the use of e-mail from 2005 to 2009
- Small differences in technologies used from 2008 to 2010 in NL. March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 30
E-invoicing technologies
No clear winner for future e-invoicing technologies
The data related to used technologies is difficult to compare due to:
- Other country-specific data; e.g. split of sent vs. received e-invoices (AT)
- Other variables for used technologies, meaning more generic (country-specific) vs. more specific (EU-wide); e.g. portals
- No clear distinction in channels and formats
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 31
Drivers for e-invoicing adoption by enterprisesEU: PwC Study 2005 & 2009
March 2012
Increase
d efficie
ncy
cost
reducti
on
faster
custo
mer pay
ments
less c
ustomer/
supplie
r disp
utes
custo
mer pref
erence
supplie
r pref
erence
increase
d accu
racy
staff re
duction
impro
ved se
curit
y
better
contro
l and co
mmunication
envir
onmental
benefi
ts
automate
d matc
hing
increase
d tran
spare
ncy
tax effi
ciency
othernone
don't know
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2005 2009
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 32
Drivers for e-invoicing adoption by enterprises(issuer vs. recipient)Austria: e-Rechnung – WKO 2011
March 2012
Savings Efficiency increase
Faster payment by customers
Customer need Less customer/supplier disputes
Seller demand Other No use0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Issuer Recipient
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 33
Drivers for e-invoicing adoption by enterprises
The Netherlands: Factuurmonitor 2008 & 2010
March 2012
Savin
gs iss
uer
Customer
wish
Get paid
sooner
Savin
gs rec
epien
t
Customer
deman
d
Impro
ve w
orking c
apita
l
Maintai
n position
More tra
ffic to w
ebsit
e
More sal
es options
Customer
loyalty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2008 2010
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 34
Drivers for e-invoicing adoption by enterprises
The top 3 drivers for e-invoicing adoption in EU countries are:
- Cost savings
- Efficiency increase
- Faster payment
Another important driver could be customer and supplier preferences
No clear trend between 2008 and 2010 data
EU-wide data is similar to data from Austria and The Netherlands
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 35
Obstacles for e-invoicing adoption by enterprises EU: PwC Study 2005 & 2009
March 2012
don't know
other
reliab
ility o
f the s
ystem
regulati
on/legis
lation/d
ealin
g with
tax a
uthorities
supplie
r compati
bility/r
eadiness
custo
mer co
mpatibilit
y/rea
diness
readiness
/compati
bility o
f inter
nal sys
tems
concer
ns ove
r retu
rn on in
vestm
ent
expen
sive/h
igh in
vestm
ent r
equire
d
complex
ity
system
faults
fraud
securit
y
implem
enati
on problem
snone
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
2005 2009
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 36
Obstacles for e-invoicing adoption by enterprises The Netherlands: Factuurmonitor 2008 & 2010
March 2012
No custo
mer acc
eptati
on
Complexity
Unclear
legisla
tion
No stan
dards
Organisa
tion size (
small
)
No contro
l invo
ice
Add attach
ments/
speci
fications
Different IC
T pack
ages
Control o
ver in
voicin
g
No recep
tion feed
back
Guarantee
confiden
tiality
Big inve
stmen
t
Insufficie
nt retu
rn
Depen
dent o
n 3rd parti
es0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2008 2010
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 37
Obstacles for e-invoicing adoption by enterprises
The main obstacles for e-invoicing adoption in EU countries are:
- Customer and supplier readiness / acceptation
- Complexity / readiness of internal systems
- High investment
Importance of following obstacles has doubled from 2005 to 2009:
- Unclear regulation / legislation
- Supplier readiness
EU-wide data is similar to data from The Netherlands, although other options are given
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 38
Process and controls applied by enterprisesEU: PwC Study 2005 & 2009
March 2012
exch
ange
of ord
ers or d
elive
ry notes
via E
DI
custo
mer e-I
nvoicin
g agre
emen
ts
supplie
r e-In
voicin
g agre
emen
ts
paralle
l exch
ange
of pap
er invo
ices
automate
d matc
hing
automate
d appro
vals
interco
mpany e
-Invo
icing a
greem
ents
don't know
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2005 2009
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 39
Process and controls applied by enterprises
Reduction in exchange of orders or delivery notes via EDI is shown
Increase in parallel exchange of paper invoices between 2005 and 2009
Figures on other process and controls applied by enterprises in 2005 and 2009 are almost identical
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 40
Conclusion
Analysis of the data:
- Increasing use of e-invoicing EU-wide with large differences between countries, although the majority of invoices is still on paper
- More unstructured e-invoices than structured ones
- The main drivers for e-invoicing adoption are cost savings, efficiency increase and faster payment, while important obstacles are the complexity, acceptation and high investment
Data collection:
- Different and incomplete data available country-specific vs EU-wide (not comparable)
- Data too much focused on use of e-invoicing (not on e-invoices)
Collect data centralised + decide on what to collect
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 41
Conclusion of our break-out
Preferred option – Ask Eurostat (on yearly basis – at least till 2020)
Alternatives (can be in parallel with preferred option)
Option 1 – Ask via the national fora
Standard questionnaire (Eurostat + other questions)
Option 2 – Ask an external party to run a yearly surveyMarch 2012
Sending Receiving
Total number of invoices Number Number
Electronic – structured % %
Electronic – unstructured % %
Paper form % %
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 42
Conclusion of our break-out
Activities for Activity 1
Coordinate with Eurostat
Create a standard questionnaire
Continue to collect information from national fora and international studies
Continue to analyse gathered information (deadline September 2012 for first comprehensive monitoring analysis)
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 44
Appendix – Inventory of available data sources
EU/Europe-wide data sources:
Eurostat, 2007 – 2011
Itella, 2011
PwC Study, 2005 & 2009
Factuurmonitor, 2008
March 2012
E-invoicing uptake in the EUEU Multi-Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing – TASK 1 45
Appendix – Inventory of available data sources
Country-specific data sources:
The Netherlands: Factuurmonitor, 2008 & 2010
Spain: E-invoicing dissemination plan, 2011
Poland: Central Statistical Office, 2010
Denmark: Interoperability of e-invoicing, 2007
Austria: e-Rechnung – WKO, 2011 & Billentis, 2011
Czech Republic: Czech Statistical Office, 2011
March 2012