Erkki Liikanen - Date 2002 - 1

Benchmarking IPv6

and

Forecast by 2005

Benchmarking IPv6

and

Forecast by 2005

Jose Fernandes

European Commission

Brussels

17 January 2003

Jose FernandesJose Fernandes

European CommissionEuropean Commission

BrusselsBrussels

17 January 200317 January 2003

Why?Why?

•• IPv6 is key for the next Generation Internet. IPv6 is key for the next Generation Internet.

•• A number of actions need to be taken to ensure a A number of actions need to be taken to ensure a significant IPv6 uptake by 2005 to cope with IPv4 significant IPv6 uptake by 2005 to cope with IPv4 address space depletion. address space depletion. • A series of recommendations for urgent action to be taken at

European level are drawn in the communication from Commission to the Council and the European Parliament and in the Council Conclusions of 18th June 2002, and

• are addressed to EU Member States, the Industry and the European Commission.

•• Are we moving fast enough?Are we moving fast enough?

•• We Should monitor/measure the progress speedWe Should monitor/measure the progress speed

Today 2005SpeedSpeed == ??????

Indicators to be used (I)Indicators to be used (I)

•• number of IPv6 addresses allocated;number of IPv6 addresses allocated;

•• number of IPv6 native research networks;number of IPv6 native research networks;

•• number of IPv6 native commercial networks, number of IPv6 native commercial networks, including mobile/wireless;including mobile/wireless;

•• number of IPv6number of IPv6--ready routers and switching hubs, or ready routers and switching hubs, or percentage relatively to IPv4;percentage relatively to IPv4;

•• number of vendor independent, training and education number of vendor independent, training and education courses on IPv6;courses on IPv6;

•• number of IPv6 trained people;number of IPv6 trained people;

•• number of new IPv6 applications and services;number of new IPv6 applications and services;

•• awareness raising progress;awareness raising progress;

Indicators to be used (II)Indicators to be used (II)

•• percentage IPv6percentage IPv6 vsvs. IPv4 traffic flow;. IPv4 traffic flow;

•• percentage of households/individuals having access percentage of households/individuals having access to Internet at home using IPv6;to Internet at home using IPv6;

•• percentage of enterprises/organisation/schools percentage of enterprises/organisation/schools having access to Internet using IPv6;having access to Internet using IPv6;

•• percentage of enterprises/organisation that have a percentage of enterprises/organisation that have a web site/home page IPv6 enabledweb site/home page IPv6 enabled

•• percentage of public services IPv6 enabledpercentage of public services IPv6 enabled

When possible, these indicators should be When possible, these indicators should be benchmarked for Europebenchmarked for Europe vsvs. Asia. Asia vsvs. US. US

Can we define specific targets for 2005?Can we define specific targets for 2005?

Reporting/OutputsReporting/Outputs

•• An early report stating the methodologies and An early report stating the methodologies and instruments to use should be available by the end of instruments to use should be available by the end of March 2003.March 2003.

•• A progress report should be issued by the end of A progress report should be issued by the end of 2003.2003.

•• A report stating the IPv6 takeA report stating the IPv6 take--up based on the up based on the indictors, should be issued by the end of 2004 and end indictors, should be issued by the end of 2004 and end of 2005. of 2005.

How to do it? (I)How to do it? (I)

•• IPv6 Task Force II is mandated to:IPv6 Task Force II is mandated to:• Provide a regularly updated review and plan action (“the

European IPv6 Roadmap”)

• Ensure a working liaison with standards and Internet governance bodies such as ISOC, IETF, ICANN, RIPE NCC, 3GPP, ETSI, IPv6 Forum, Eurescom, ETNO, UMTS Forum and GSM Europe,

• Establish collaboration arrangements and working relationships with similar initiatives being launched in other world regions.

•• National or Regional Task Forces should consolidate National or Regional Task Forces should consolidate the Member States efforts to contribute to this the Member States efforts to contribute to this initiative. initiative.

How to do it? (II)How to do it? (II)

•• FP5 initiatives should contributeFP5 initiatives should contribute

• Eurov6 Showcase, 6LINK - IPv6 Projects Linkage Cluster, NGN-Initiative and others.

•• FP6 instrumentsFP6 instruments

• New initiatives will come up under FP6.

• A specific support action to work out the indicators would be most welcome.

•• CoCo--operation from ISOC on education and training operation from ISOC on education and training issues. issues.