13
European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Open Session of the EuFMD - Cascais –Portugal 26-28 October 2016 Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright Ins2tute

Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OpenSessionoftheEuFMD-Cascais–Portugal26-28October2016

Evalua&ngthesurvivalofFootandMouthDiseaseVirusintheenvironment

EmmaBrown

Researchassistant,ThePirbrightIns2tute

Page 2: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

Studyoutline:

q 4xca>letransmissionexperimentstostudyenvironmentalcontamina&onandvirussurvival

q Environmentalsamplingtoes&matethedecreaseinenvironmentinfec&ousnessover&me

q Developmentofenvironmentalsamplingmethodsforsurveillance

Page 3: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OS16

Transmissionstudies#1&2:Experimentalplan

Page 4: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OS16

Transmissionstudies#1&2:Samplingplan

Samplescollected:

q  2Wallswabs(50x50area)q  5Faecalsamplesq  5Floorswabs(10x10area)q  1Foodtroughswab

Temperature:19°CRela&vehumidity:60%

Page 5: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OS16

Transmissionstudies#1&2:Results-Roomhousingdirectcontactdonors

0

1

2

3

1 2 3 4 5 6

Log 1

0PFU

/ml

Dayofstudy

Trough

Wall

Floor

Faeces

Study1 Study2

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1 2 3 4 5 6

Log 1

0PFU

/ml

Dayofstudy

Floor

Wall

Trough

Faeces

N.B.Day1isDay9ofthetransmissionstudies

Page 6: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OS16

Transmissionstudies#1&2:Results-Roomhousinginoculateddonors

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Log 1

0PFU

/ml

Dayofstudy

Floor

Wall

Trough

Faeces

Study2

N.B.Day1isDay5ofthetransmissionstudy

Page 7: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OS16

Transmissionstudies#3&4:Experimentalplan/Samplingplan

AlteraRonstothesamplingplan: q  5WallSwabs(10x10cm)q  2Foodtroughswabs

Page 8: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OS16

Transmissionstudies#3&4:Results:roomhousinginoculateddonors

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

1 2 3 4 5

log 1

0PFU

/ml

Dayofstudy

Trough

Wall

Floor

Faeces

Study3

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

1 2 3 4 5

log 1

0PFU

/ml

Dayofstudy

Trough

Wall

Floor

Faeces

Study4

N.B.Day1isDay6ofthetransmissionstudies

Page 9: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OS16

Transmissionstudies#3&4:Results:roomhousingdirectcontactdonors(Pre-clinical)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

1 2 3 4 5 6

log 1

0PFU

/ml

Dayofstudy

Trough

Wall

Floor

Faeces

Study3

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6

log 1

0PFU

/ml

Dayofstudy

Trough

Wall

Floor

Faeces

Study4

N.B.Day1isDay8ofthetransmissionstudies

Page 10: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OS16

Transmissionstudies#3&4:Results:roomhousingdirectcontactdonors(Clinical)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

log 1

0PFU

/ml

Dayofstudy

Trough

Wall

Floor

Faeces

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

log 1

0PFU

/ml

Dayofstudy

Trough

Wall

Floor

Faeces

Study3 Study4

N.B.Day1isDay10ofthetransmissionstudy

N.B.Day1isDay11ofthetransmissionstudy

Page 11: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OS16

Halflives

Page 12: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OS16

Conclusions

q Liveviruscanbedetectedupto7daysaVerroomhasbeenevacuated.

q Onaverageliveviruswasdetectedhighestandlongestinfaeces.q Onaveragethelowestviruswasdetectedonthewallsandshortestonthefoodtrough.q TherewasnotalargedifferencebetweenvirusRtreandsurvivalRmebetweentheroomscontaminatedbyclinicalemissioncomparedtopre-clinicalemissions.q Theresultsofthisstudywillbecombinedwiththoseoftheriskoftransmissionfromexposuretocontaminatedenvironment.ThiswillgiveabeYerunderstandingoftheeffectofdisinfecRonandwaiRngRmebeforere-populaRononthecontrolofFMDoutbreaks.

Page 13: Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in ... · Evalua&ng the survival of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in the environment Emma Brown Research assistant, The Pirbright

EuropeanCommissionfortheControlofFoot-and-MouthDisease

OS16

Acknowledgments

ThePirbrightIns&tute:DrClaireColenuYDrSimonGubbinsMrNoelNelsonWageningenBioveterinaryResearch(WBR)(formallyCVI):DrJoseGonzalesDrPhaedraEbléDrAldoDekkerAspecialthankstoalltheanimalstaffatbothinsRtutes