15
K. FLYNN, L. DOLAN, C. DALBY, R. NAGISETTY EVALUATING CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON WATER QUALITY USING MECHANISTIC RECEIVING-WATER MODELS EXPLORATORY – Caveat Emptor

EVALUATING CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON …dnrc.mt.gov/divisions/water/management/docs/training-and-education/...k. flynn, l. dolan, c. dalby, r. nagisetty . evaluating climate change

  • Upload
    ngokhue

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

K . F L Y N N , L . D O L A N , C . D A L B Y , R . N A G I S E T T Y

EVALUATING CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON WATER QUALITY USING

MECHANISTIC RECEIVING-WATER MODELS

EXPLORATORY – Caveat Emptor

OVERVIEW

• Introduction • Summarize potential impacts of climate change on water

quality • How mechanistic water-quality model frameworks can be

integrated to inform climate change science • Example

• Case study – Yellowstone River • GCM downscaling • Climate change emission scenarios in WQ model

• Results • Discussion

12/01/2016 Exploratory 2

BASIC LITERATURE REVIEW

• Anticipated impacts of climate change on surface WQ are widespread (Murdoch et al. 2000; Whitehead et al. 2009) • Warmer water temperatures • Higher evapotranspiration • Flow alteration • Reductions in transport/increased residence time • Reduced dilution • Lower DO and pH • Changes in kinetic/metabolic rates • Increased biological productivity

12/01/2016 Exploratory 3

EVALUATING CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS ON WATER QUALITY

12/01/2016 Exploratory 4

General Circulation Model

Spatial Downscaling

Hydrologic Model

Water Quality Model

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Atmosphere, ocean, land-surface, sea-ice

CLIMATE CHANGE THROUGH THE LENS OF A WATER-QUALITY MODEL

• Two approaches • Empirical • Mechanistic

12/01/2016 Exploratory 5

Morrill et al. (2005)

Meteorology - Air temp - RH/dew point - Wind - Cloud Cover

Boundary Conditions - Streamflow - Temperature - Loadings

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Morrill et al. Mention initial conditions

EXAMPLE APPLICATION

12/01/2016 Exploratory 6

335 km

Location - Upper Yellowstone River

MODEL, DATA, AND CLIMATE SCENARIOS

• Use existing QUAL2K1-D heat/mass transport model • Draft; not fully calibrated (rates from Flynn et al. 2015)

• Evaluate two 2099 greenhouse gas emission scenarios • Representative concentration pathway (RCP) RCP 4.5 (560

ppm by 2100) and RCP 8.5 (1370 ppm by 2100). • Air temperature, dew point, wind speed, cloud cover,

tributary and headwater flows, temperatures, dissolved oxygen, point source inflows

• Downscaled CMIP5 multi-model ensemble median

12/01/2016 Exploratory 7

AIR TEMPERATURE |RH ESTIMATES

• Downscaled CMIP5 BCSD climate/hydro projections (Reclamation 2013; 2014) upstream of Billings

• Air Temp. Median Ensemble (2012-2099) • RCP 4.5 ≈ 2.5°C increase • RCP 8.5 ≈ 5°C increase

• Projected changes in humidity via CMIP5 Pierce et al. (2013) • RH predicted to change

−0.2 to −0.8 percentage points per decade

• 1.8–7.2% from 2010-2099 (9 decades)

12/01/2016 Exploratory 8

http://gdo-dcp.ucllnl.org/downscaled_cmip_projections/

Presenter
Presentation Notes
BCSD (Biased corrected spatially disaggregated) Coupled model inter-comparison project (CMIP) 31 CMIP5 climate models, 97 BCSD5 climate scenarios Current increases are consistent with RCP 8.5. 1/8º resolution or 140 km2 30 year anomaly from 1980-2009

WIND SPEED | CLOUD COVER

• No statistical downscaling procedures have been tested with wind speed (Pierce et al. 2013)

• % cloud cover expected to remain relatively constant (Zelinka et al. 2012)

12/01/2016 Exploratory 9

Apply un-adjusted wind and cloud cover data from 2012 (for now)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Opposing effects Reflects incoming shortwave radiation Reduces outgoing terrestrial/blackbody radiation Complex changes in cloud structure and cover not considered

STREAMFLOW

• CMIP5 projected decadal Aug./Sept. streamflow declines over 2012–2099 from VIC • RCP4.5

• Livingston ≈ 10% • Billings ≈ 7%

• RCP8.5 • Livingston ≈ 20% • Billings ≈ 11%

12/01/2016 Exploratory 10

Billings

Adjust headwater −10/20%; tributaries and groundwater boundaries equitably

T99

T90

T50

T1

T10

Q99Q95

Q90

Q50Q20

Q5Q1

Q80

Q10

OTHER BOUNDARIES

• WQ concentrations same as 2012 synoptic survey • Based on temperature and

streamflow percentiles • Point source flow increases based

on per capita flow and historical population growth (1950–2015) • Billings=2%, Laurel=1%, Livingston = 0% • No treatment improvements

• Other assumptions: • Water temperature scales with air

temperature • DO reduced on a percentage basis • No pH adjustment (right now)

12/01/2016 Exploratory 11

RESULTS

12/01/2016 Exploratory 12

SUMMARY

12/01/2016 Exploratory 13

• Flow ↓ • Temp ↑ • SC ↑ • DO ↑↓ • pH ↓ • TN/TP ↑ • Balg ↑

DISCUSSION

• Water temperature expected to increase roughly proportionally to air temperature (thermal stress)

• Dilution greatly reduced as evidenced by concentration increases at Billings, MT

• Larger GPP cycles should occur • Benthic biomass stimulated when enriched

12/01/2016 Exploratory 14

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Induced variation of hydrogen ion concentration (pH), which must be less than 0.5 pH units within the range of 6.5 to 8.5; Upstream of Billings (B-1, B-2) freshwater aquatic standards potentially not met for DO (> 8 mg/L). Likely would be met downstream (B-3 use class, 5 ppm). Reductions in pH (acidity) partially offset by increases in primary productivity if enriched. pH mostly within DEQ requirements (6.5–9 SU).