30
Evaluating Sources: Overview

Evaluating Sources: Overview

  • Upload
    chesna

  • View
    88

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evaluating Sources: Overview. Evaluating sources of information is an important step in any research activity. This section provides information on evaluating bibliographic citations, aspects of evaluation, reading evaluation, print vs. Internet sources, and evaluating Internet sources. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Evaluating Sources: Overview

Page 2: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Evaluating sources of information is an important step in any research activity.

This section provides information on evaluating bibliographic citations, aspects of evaluation, reading evaluation, print vs.

Internet sources, and evaluating Internet sources.

Page 3: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Evaluating Sources: OverviewThe world is full of information to be found—however,

not all of it is valid, useful, or accurate. Evaluating sources of information that you are considering using in your writing is an important step in any research activity.

The quantity of information available is so overwhelming that we cannot know everything about a subject. For example, it's estimated that anyone attempting to research what's known about depression would have to read over 100,000 studies on the subject. And there's the problem of trying to decide which studies have produced reliable results.

Similarly, for information on other topics, not only is there a huge quantity available but with a very uneven level of quality.

Page 4: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Evaluating sources is an important skill. It's been called an art as well as work—much of which is detective work. You have to decide where to look, what clues to search for, and what to accept. You may be overwhelmed with too much information or too little. The temptation is to accept whatever you find. But don't be tempted. Learning how to evaluate effectively is a skill you need both for your course papers and for your life.

When writing research papers, you will also be evaluating sources as you search for information.

You will need to make decisions about what to search for, where to look, and once you've found material on your topic, if it is a valid or useful source for your writing.

Page 5: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Evaluating Bibliographic Citations

When searching for information in library catalogues and online article databases such as EbscoHost or Proquest Direct, you will first find a bibliographic citation entry. A bibliographic citation provides relevant information about the author and publication as well as short summary of the text.

Before you read a source or spend time hunting for it, begin by looking at the following information in the citation to evaluate whether it's worth finding or reading.

Consider the author, the title of the work, the summary, where it is, and the timeliness of the entry. You may also want to look at the keywords to see what other categories the work falls into. Evaluate this information to see if it is relevant and valid for your research.

Page 6: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Evaluation During Reading

After you have asked yourself some questions about the source and determined that it's worth your time to find and read that source, you can evaluate the material in the source as you read through it.

Read the preface--What does the author want to accomplish? Browse through the table of contents and the index. This will give you an overview of the source. Is your topic covered in enough depth to be helpful? If you don't find your topic discussed, try searching for some synonyms in the index.

Check for a list of references or other citations that look as if they will lead you to related material that would be good sources.

Page 7: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Determine the intended audience. Are you the intended audience? Consider the tone, style, level of information, and assumptions the author makes about the reader. Are they appropriate for your needs?

Try to determine if the content of the source is fact, opinion, or propaganda. If you think the source is offering facts, are the sources for those facts clearly indicated?

Do you think there's enough evidence offered? Is the coverage comprehensive? (As you learn more and more about your topic, you will notice that this gets easier as you become more of an expert.)

Page 8: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Is the language objective or emotional?Are there broad generalizations that

overstate or oversimplify the matter?Does the author use a good mix of primary

and secondary sources for information?If the source is opinion, does the author offer

sound reasons for adopting that stance? (Consider again those questions about the author. Is this person reputable?)

Check for accuracy.

Page 9: Evaluating Sources: Overview

How timely is the source? Is the source twenty years out of date? Some information becomes dated when new research is available, but other older sources of information can be quite sound fifty or a hundred years later.

Do some cross-checking. Can you find some of the same information given elsewhere?

How credible is the author? If the document is anonymous, what do you know about the organization?

Are there vague or sweeping generalizations that aren't backed up with evidence?

Are arguments very one-sided with no acknowledgement of other viewpoints?

 

Page 10: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Evaluating Print vs. Internet Sources

With the advent of the World Wide Web, we are seeing a massive influx of digital texts and sources. Understanding the difference between what you can find on the Web and what you can find in more traditional print sources is key to evaluating your sources.

Some sources such as journal or newspaper articles can be found in both print and digital format. However, much of what is found on the Internet does not have a print equivalent, and hence, has low or no quality standards for publication. Understanding the difference between the types of resources available will help you evaluate what you find.

Page 11: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Publication processPrint Sources: Traditional print sources go

through an extensive publication process that includes editing and article review. The process has fact-checkers, multiple reviewers, and editors to ensure quality of publication.

Internet Sources: Anyone with a computer and access to the Internet can publish a Web site or electronic document. Most Web documents do not have editors, fact-checkers, or other types of reviewers.

Page 12: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Authorship and affiliationsPrint Sources: Print sources clearly indicate

who the author is, what organization(s) he or she is affiliated with, and when his or her work was published.

Internet Sources: Authorship and affiliations are difficult to determine on the Internet. Some sites may have author and sponsorship listed, but many do not.

Page 13: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Sources and quotationsPrint Sources: In most traditional

publications, external sources of information and direct quotations are clearly marked and identified.

Internet Sources: Sources the author used or referred to in the text may not be clearly indicated in an Internet source.

Page 14: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Bias and special interestsPrint Sources: While bias certainly exists in

traditional publications, printing is more expensive and difficult to accomplish. Most major publishers are out to make a profit and will either not cater to special interest groups or will clearly indicate when they are catering to special interest groups.

Internet Sources: The purpose of the online text may be misleading. A Web site that appears to be factual may actually be persuasive and/or deceptive.

Page 15: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Author qualificationsPrint Sources: Qualifications of an author

are almost always necessary for print sources. Only qualified authors are likely to have their manuscripts accepted for publication.

Internet Sources: Even if the author and purpose of a website can be determined, the qualifications of the author are not always given.

Page 16: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Publication informationPrint Sources: Publication information such

as date of publication, publisher, author, and editor are always clearly listed in print publications.

Internet Sources: Dates of publication and timeliness of information are questionable on the Internet. Dates listed on Web sites could be the date posted, date updated, or a date may not be listed at all.

Page 17: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Give some tips how to evaluate a source:

Page 18: Evaluating Sources: Overview

ArticlesIs biographical information for the author provided?Who is the publisher?How frequently is the periodical published?How many and what kinds of advertisements are present?

For example, is the advertising clearly geared towards readers in a specific discipline or occupation?

For more specific guidelines in identifying periodical types see:Is it scholarly? Distinguishing periodical typesFor help with online articles see: Is it scholarly? Distinguishing periodical types online .

Page 19: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Web pagesWhat is the domain of the page?Who is publishing or sponsoring the page?

Strip back the URL to discover the source of the page.Is contact information for the author/publisher

provided?How recently was the page updated?Be particularly wary of bias when viewing web pages.

Anyone can create a web page about any topic. YOU must verify the validity of the information.

For more specific guidelines in evaluating web pages see: Evaluating Internet Sources

Page 20: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Tips for determining online scholarly sources

Page 21: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Source TitleDon't let the word Journal influence your decision

too strongly. Although the word Journal is often an indicator of a scholarly publication, it doesn't guarantee it. (Think in particular of titles such as Ladies Home Journal, a popular magazine.)

Does the title indicate the periodical is geared toward a very specific and limited audience? These titles are often trade publications and contain information that will assist practitioners in a specific field learn more about their work. For example, Social Studies Teacher and American School Board Journal are both geared toward very specific audiences, as their titles indicate.

Page 22: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Publication FrequencyWinter, Spring, Summer, Fall - Scholarly publications

often have a quarterly publication frequency, so those items that indicate an issue as Winter, Spring, Summer or Fall will most likely be scholarly journals.

Weekly publication date - An indicator that a publication is probably not a scholarly journal would be a publication date that includes a month, date and year. For example: March 4, 2010 or 11/25/2011. A date that appears in this manner generally indicates a periodical that is published on a weekly or bi-weekly basis, which is rarely characteristic of a scholarly journal.

Page 23: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Article LengthScholarly journal articles are longer. Articles in

scholarly journals, particularly research articles, will often be in excess of ten pages. Although there may be articles in scholarly journals that are one to two pages, these tend to be news releases or book reviews, and would not be the type of article you would use in a research essay.

Professional/trade publication articles vary in length. Articles in trade publications have varying lengths, some will be longer research articles, but others may be very short.

Popular magazine articles are shortest. Articles in popular magazines tend to be short (under five pages).

Page 24: Evaluating Sources: Overview

AuthorsAre author names listed? If there is no

author name it is likely a popular magazine.Are there multiple authors? Often articles

in scholarly journals will include a group of authors.

Are author credentials included? (i.e. PhD or MD) Consistent use of credential indicates the likelihood it is a scholarly journal. The inclusion of credentials for some, but not all, articles indicates its is probably a professional publication.

Page 25: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Supplementary ItemsCharts, graphs, tables - Does the record

indicate there are supplementary items such as charts, tables or graphs included? The presence of these items will often indicate scholarly journal articles, particularly if there are multiples of such items.

Photographs - Does the record indicate there are photographs included? Photographs are most frequently included in popular and trade publications.

 

Page 26: Evaluating Sources: Overview

EXERCISE:

You're writing a research paper on the problem of homelessness in your town or city. Which of the following sources would be a primary source for you and which a secondary?

Page 27: Evaluating Sources: Overview

1. A report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: "Drifting Apart: New Findings on Growing Income Disparities Between the Rich, the Poor, and the Middle Class," 1990?

2. An interview with two homeless persons in your town?3. A book entitled "The Undeserving Poor: From the War

on Poverty to the War on Welfare," by Michael Katz, 1989?

4. An article entitled, "The Culture of Poverty," in" On Understanding Poverty: Perspectives from the Social Sciences"?

5. An interview with a sociology professor who teaches a course that explores the problem of homelessness?

Page 28: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Below are five exercises designed to improve your ability to select a good research thesis. Choose the best working thesis among each set for the proposed research paper.

Thesis A: There are many causes of anorexia nervosa.

Thesis B: Anorexia nervosa has both emotional and social causes which work hand-in-hand.

Thesis C: Anorexia nervosa occurs most often in young women aged 13-22.

Page 29: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Thesis A: Business practices in former Soviet Union countries.

Thesis B: Business practices in the countries of the former Soviet Union have changed drastically since the break-up.

Thesis C: Since the break-up of the former Soviet Union, business practices in those countries have changed most in the fields of marketing and customer service, reflecting the changes in government and political philosophy.

Page 30: Evaluating Sources: Overview

Give some tips how to evaluate a source from:ArticleWeb pages