Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Evaluating Specific Modules in a Digital Library Curriculum. Barbara M. Wildemuth School of Information & Library Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [email protected]. Development and Evaluation Process. Development and Evaluation Process. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Evaluating Specific Modules in a
Digital Library Curriculum
Barbara M. WildemuthSchool of Information & Library Science
University of North Carolina at Chapel [email protected]
Development and Evaluation Process
Evaluate in the field
Evaluate via inspection
Analyze needs & context
Design modules
Feedback on strengths & weaknesses
Revise & implement modules
Vision/ plan
Modules ready for use
Development and Evaluation Process
Evaluate in the field
Evaluate via inspection
Analyze needs & context
Design modules
Feedback on strengths & weaknesses
Revise & implement modules
Vision/ plan
Modules ready for use
Evaluate via inspection: Criteria
Objectives: Are the objectives appropriate for the topic?
Body of knowledge: Does the module address all areas of the topic that need to be addressed?
Readings: Are the readings the best and most appropriate for the topic?
Learning activities: Are the learning activities appropriate for the topic?
Logistics: Is it feasible to teach the module as it is currently constructed?
Overall structure: Is the module well-structured?
Evaluate via inspection: Participants
• Members of the project Advisory Board
• Participants in the JCDL Doctoral Consortium
• Additional experts
•Teachers of DL courses identified in earlier analyses
•Authors of DL articles and books
•Members of ASIST SIG on Digital Libraries
Development and Evaluation Process
Evaluate in the field
Evaluate via inspection
Analyze needs & context
Design modules
Feedback on strengths & weaknesses
Revise & implement modules
Vision/ plan
Modules ready for use
Evaluate in the field
Teacher perceptions
Individual interviews based on earlier inspection criteria
Student perceptions
Questionnaires related to course content and student effort and learning
Student outcomes
Evaluation of student work completed during the module
Development and Evaluation Process
Evaluate in the field
Evaluate via inspection
Analyze needs & context
Design modules
Feedback on strengths & weaknesses
Revise & implement modules
Vision/ plan
Modules ready for use
Additional information
Project team:Virginia Tech: Ed Fox, Seungwon YangUNC: Barbara Wildemuth, Jeffrey Pomerantz,
Sanghee Oh
Project website:http://curric.dlib.vt.edu/
Supported by the NSF under grant numbers IIS-0535057 and IIS-0535060.
