26
Evaluating Structural Interventions Kelly Hallman “Pushing Forward with Structural Interventions for HIV Prevention – Where Are We Now and How Do We Move Forward” 26 July 2012, IAS Conference

Evaluating Structural Interventions

  • Upload
    hilde

  • View
    38

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evaluating Structural Interventions. Kelly Hallman “Pushing Forward with Structural Interventions for HIV Prevention – Where Are We Now and How Do We Move Forward” 26 July 2012, IAS Conference. The reality. We are hardwired for this. ..and WHY do you want my sex?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Evaluating Structural

InterventionsKelly Hallman

“Pushing Forward with Structural Interventions for HIV Prevention – Where Are We Now

and How Do We Move Forward” 26 July 2012, IAS Conference

Page 2: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

The reality

We are

hardwiredforthis

Page 3: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

..and WHY do you want my sex?

• Intimacy, pleasure• Evolution, childbearing

• Challenge of HIV and STIs

• How do we tackle?• How to measure intervention impact?

Page 4: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Levels of “rigor”

Page 5: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Common HIV prevention outcomes

• HIV• HSV• Condom use• Sexual partnering• Abstinence, frequency

Page 6: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

What’s common to these outcomes?

• Changes at individual-level

Page 7: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

…and the “enabling” environment?

Page 8: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

“Poverty isn’t created by poor people.

It’s created by wrong systems.

And we don’t notice it.”

- M. Yunus

Page 9: Evaluating  Structural Interventions
Page 10: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Structural change

• Transformation that alters flows in• authority• rights• resources • opportunities• information• responsibilities

• Long-term process

Page 11: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Are these amenable to study using an RCT?

Page 12: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

R C T• Randomized• Denial of benefits a concern• Phased-in approach

• Control• All else held constant

• Learning, mid-course correction?• Narrow intervention

• or single bundled package • or expensive multi-arm

• Trial• Limited time to measure change

Page 13: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Perhaps a middle ground

Page 14: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Structural factors likely to impact HIV, health, well-being

• What is the theory of change?• Clear conceptual framework• Causal impact hypothesis

• Identify “proximate determinants”• Outcomes along path to desired change

Page 15: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Theory Study outcomes, Study design

• Did it work?1. Structural level • Organizational theory• Systems analysis• Timeline

2. Individual level• Outcomes: Factors along pathway to

desired change• Design: e.g., case-control with careful

matching (PSM)• Timeline

Page 16: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Methods

• Why did it work (or not)?• Monitoring• Operations research• Institutional change theory• Qualitative approaches• Seasonality analysis• Time use patterns• etc.

Page 17: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Let us move creatively beyond….

Your study was not an

RCT!

Be gone with you!

Page 18: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

“The first rule of social change:

Maximize your impact without being a jerk.

If you maximize impact while being a jerk, it is not worth it.”

- Jacob Harold, Hewlett

Foundation

Page 19: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

The Population Council conducts biomedical, social science, and public health research. We deliver solutions that lead to more effective policies, programs, and technologies that improve lives around the world.

Page 20: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Few girls under age 15 in Burkina Faso reached by peer educators

7

303330

0102030405060708090

100

10-14 15-19 20-24 25+

Age of girls reached by peer educators

Page 21: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Yet younger girls much lower levels of HIV and SRH knowledge than older girls

15

40

2231

4759

0102030405060708090

100

Knows of STIsapart from HIV

Knows a sourcefor contraceptives

Knows ABC(abstinence, befaithful, use a

condom)

12-14 yrs

15-19 yrs

Page 22: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Few girls with little schooling reached by a peer educators

27

54

19

0102030405060708090

100

None Primary Secondary orhigher

Level of schooling of girls reached by peer educators

Page 23: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

And …most girls in Burkina Faso have never been to school

63

1126

0102030405060708090

100

None Primary Secondary orhigher

Level of schooling of 12-19-year-old girls

Page 24: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

And their levels of preventive knowledge are much lower than those who ever attended school

16

46

2941

46

63

0102030405060708090

100

Knows of STIsapart from HIV

Knows a sourcefor contraceptives

Knows ABC(abstinence, befaithful, use a

condom)

NoschoolingEverattended

Page 25: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Siyakha Nentsha impact on self-reported sexual behaviors

Boys Girls

+ p<0.10; * p<0.05; ** p<0.01

Had sex past year

# of sexual partners in past

year

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan28a566028

SN combined (v. control)

(Yt2

- Yt

1) -

(Yc2

- Yc

1)

Had sex past year # of sexual partners in past

year

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan27a566027

0tan28a566028

SN combined (v. control)

*+

Page 26: Evaluating  Structural Interventions

Siyakha Nentsha impact on social and economic

Boys Girls

+ p<0.10; * p<0.05; ** p<0.01

# Social grants

knowledge

Attempted to open bank ac-count in

past year

Is saving

0tan27a566027

0tan28a566028

SN combined (v. control)

# Social grants

knowledge

Attempted to open bank ac-count in

past year

Is saving

0tan27a566027

0tan28a566028

SN combined (v. control)

(Yt2

- Yt

1) -

(Yc2

- Yc

1)

*

*

*