Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TV
Department of EnergyOffice of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management
Yucca Mountain Site Characteriation OfficeP.O. Box 98608
Las Vegas, NV 89193-8608
DEC 2 9 1994
L.-Dale FoustTechnical Project Officer
for Yucca MountainSite Characterization Project
TRW Environmental Safety Systems, Inc.Bank of America Center, Suite P-110101 Convention Center DriveLas Vegas, NV 89109
EVALUATION OF AMENDED RESPONSE TO CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST(CAR) YM-94-073 RESULTING FROM YUCCA MOUNTAIN QUALITY ASSURANCEDIVISION (YMQAD) AUDIT YMP-94-01 OF THE CIVILIAN RADIOACTIVEWASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTOR(SCPB: N/A)
The YMQAD staff has evaluated the amended response to CARYM-94-073. The response has been determined to be satisfactory.Verification of completion of the corrective action will beperformed after the effective date provided. Any extension tothis date must be requested in writing, with appropriatejustification, prior to the date. Please send a copy ofextension requests to Deborah Sult, YMQAD/QATSS, 101 ConventionCenter Drive, Suite 640, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109.
If you have any questions, please contact either Robert B.Constable at 794-7945 or Richard E. Powe at 794-7749.
Richard E. Spence, DirectorYMQAD:RBC-1528 Yucca Mountain Quality Assurance Division
Enclosure:CAR YM-94-073
cc w/encl:T. A. Wood, HQ (RW-14) FORS*bM D~o~Z'-NRC, Washington, DCS. W. Zimmerman, NWPO, Carson City, NVR. L. Robertson, M&O/TRW, Vienna, VARichard Jiu, M&O/Duke, Las Vegas, NVR. P. Ruth, M&O/TRW, Las Vegas, NVD. G. Horton, OQA (RW-3) NVR. M. Nelson, Jr., YMSCO, NV
cc w/o encl:W. L. Belke, NRC, Las Vegas, NV
YMP-5 D. G. Sult, YMQAD/QATSS, Las Vegas, NV
9501120101 941229PDR WASTEWM-11 PDR
THIS It A RED STAMP
OFFICE OF CMVUIAN 8 CAR NO.: OH94073RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PAGE: A OF 2
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY _WASHINGTON, D.C.
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST1 Controlling Document 2 Related Report No.
OCRWH. QARD, DOE/RW-0333P, Revision 01 Yle-94-01
3 Responsible Organization 4 Discussed WithMWO J. Pye/S. Bonabien/J. Naaf
6 Requirement:1) QARD DOE/RW-0333P, Revision 0, Section 3.2.1.3 states- "Design inputs
shalt be identified and documented, and their selection reviewed andapproved by those responsible for the design."
Section 3.2.2.F states: "Applicable information derived from experience,(Continued on next page)
6 Adverse Condition:Desig validation vas not performed on the Starter Tunnel and used as input tothe design of the North Ramp Package 2C. It was also determined that presentlythere is not a plan to use design validation data for making real timedesign modifications to the ground support.
Discussion:
10CFR60.141(a), (b), and (d) requires that the design validation activity beperformed as part of the performance confirmation process. It specificallystates that the geotechnical in-situ conditions found should be compared wilththe original design bases and assumptions. Further, the design validationprocess should be a real time activity that will provide the justification anddocumentation for ground support changes as the excavation is advancing.
9 Does a Significant Condition IO Does a stop work condition exist? 3 Response Due Date:Adverse to Quality exist? YesLX No_ Yes__ NoX_; If Yes - Attach copy of SWO 20 Working DaysifYes,CheckOne:0AK)BOC9EDVE tfYes,CheckOne: CIA OB COc From Issuance
11Required Actions: EIl Remedial [X Extent of Deficiency K1] Preclude Recurrence IE] Root Cause Determination12 Recommended Actions:
Complete the design validation for the starter tunnel. This will includeclassifying the starter tunnel rock mass and comparing this in-SitUclassification with the rock mass classification assumptions used in the Package1A 'Starter Tunnel" design. In addition, all convergence measurements and(Continued on next page)
7 Initiator 1t4 Issuance ApWilliam R. Sublette 79QD w t aets B
15 Response Prompted 6- I I-)-I 16 Resporse Accepted
_ _R`_ C____atei____ADD Date17 Anended Response Accepted 18 Anended 'e Accepted
OR~t~lg ) for ,t i Date / O_ Date?2 I19 Corrective Actions Verified 20 Closure Ap_ by:
QAR Date QADD Date
Exhibit AP-16.1.1E11~LOs ;i
REV. 0&27/94
OFFICE OF CIVIUAN 8 CAR NO.: Y-94-073RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PAGS: 2 OF 2
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYWASHINGTON, D.C.
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST (CONTINUATION PAGE)
5 Requirements (continued)
as set forth in reports or other documentation, shall be made available tocognizant design personnel.'
Section 3.2.3.1 'Design analyses shall be planned, controlled, anddocumented."
2) 10CFR60.14l(d) 'Confirmation of geotechnical and design parameters. Thesemeasurements and observations shall be compared with the original designbases and assumptions. If significant differences eMist between themeasurements and observations and the original design bases and assumptions,the need for modifications to the design or in construction methods shallbe determined and these differences and the recommended changes reportedto the Commission."
13 Recommended iction(s) (continued)
rockbolt load cell data should be evaluated and documented to validate that theengineered opening (starter tunnel) is performing as intended or as defined bya quantitative performance criteria (design criteria).
Exhb� QAP-1 6.1.2 REV. 2�14/94
ExhibkCLP-16.12 REV. 2/14194
K>.
Amended Response to CAR YM-94-073
The M&O will propose in the FY95 Engineering Plan a design validation plan to developtechnical data and information for possible use in performance confirmation. The plan willbe developed upon DOE approval of the Engineering Plan.
Expected completion date for the FY95 Engineering Plan, November 18, 1994, and the designvalidation plan, January 2, 1995.
Responsible Individual - Robert S. Saunders
{c, j t/4 Ll EM3 S. "41 )JV/5 -A/6
Amended Response To CAR YM-94-073
The M&O will propose in the FY95 Engineering Plan that a plan and procedures be developedfor implementing a portion of Performance Confirmation activities. The plan and procedureswill be developed upon DOE approval of the Engineering Plan. The A/E does not agree aboutthe arbitrary time frame (procedure should be in place prior to Phase 3 TBM Operations)contained in the recommendation section of the CAR. An amended response will be submittedfor the implementation date of the plans and procedures after consideration andapproval/disapproval by the DOE.
Aldevelopment ManagerMGDS Development Manager
Daet"
ql~v/6. C 14 H9/qt4 -7 7k
I - - g 8.OFFICE OF CIVILIAN
RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENTU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
CAR NO. YM-94-073
PAGE I OF I
QA
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST (CONTINUATION PAGE)
EVALUATION OF AMENDED RESPONSE TO CAR YM-94-073
The DOE agrees that the M&O did consider information from construction of design package IA in the development of designpackage 2C; however, the M&O has not developed a plan/procedure for verifying the 2C design by collection of scientific dataduring construction of the ESF. In other words, the portion of this CAR that states 'Design Validation was not performed on theStarter Tunnel and used as input to the design of the North Ramp Package 2C." is no longer an issue; however, the second part ofthe Adverse Condition requires a new response.
The response is unacceptable for the following reason:
The M&O has not committed to development of a plan/procedure that addresses implementing a portion of PerformanceConfirmation activities during ESF construction. The scientific community has documented their activities in Study Plans and thedesign organization has communicated their needs to the scientific community via letters; however, the design organization has noprocedure that describes how they intend to use the data collected by the scientific community. The QARD, DOEIRW-0333P,Revision 1, Section 5 requires that work be prescribed by, and performed in accordance with, written implementing documents.OQA cannot find an M&O implementing document that describes the process of evaluating data from the scientific community todetermine that the Geotechnical design is valid, e.g. when the M&O obtains data from the scientific investigation what M&Oimplementing document describes how they document that they have evaluated that data and determined that no changes to theGeotechnical design are needed? How often is this evaluation done? Daily? Weekly?
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. The response should commit to development of an appropriate implementing document.
2. This implementing document (plan/procedure) needs to be in place within a reasonable time after start of tunnel boring, i.e.tunnel boring operations can begin prior to development of this procedure; however, this procedure should be in place prior toPhase 3: Operation of the TBM and conduct of scientific investigations following installation of the mapping platform.
3. The M&O should consider use, of the attached terms when developing the implementing document.
-X9 flrcr� , G? A 1�
,.:a ,,tx �,, - I
;Z;C�'0"..X-c
. P0-flooxo�� - ,
Z5 1-116- -
IExlbit CAP- 6.1.2 R7REV. 06/27194
MA
OFFICE OF CIVILIAN CAR NO. YM-94-073
RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PAGE I OF IU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HA
WASHINGTON, D.C.
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST (CONTINUATION PAGE}
A¶TACHMENT TO EVALUATION OF RESPONSE TO CAR YM-94-073
Recommended Terms for Consideraion
DesignVenrfication- Design verification shall be performed using one or a combination of the following methods:
Design Review - A documented evaluation of design output during the design process to determine design adequacyand conformance to specified acceptance criteria
Alternate Calculations - Calculations that are made with alternate methods to verify correctness of the originalcalculation
Qualification Testing - A test that is intended to provide a desired level of confidence that an item meets specifiedcriteria
SOURCE: DOEIRW-0333P, Revision I OCRWM Quality Assurance Requirements and Description (QARD)
Performance Confirmation - The program of tests, experiments and analyses which is conducted to evaluate the accuracy andadequacy of the information used to determine with reasonable assurance that the performance objectives for the period afterpermanent closure will be met. (SOURCE: QARD)
Design Validation - That portion of Performance Confirmation that is used to ensure that geotechnical and design parameters usedfor the design of the ESF/Repository are confirmed (i.e. valid) and the engineered system is performing such that it meets theintended objectives of the performance or design criteria. The process of real time comparison during construction of in-situsubsurface conditions with design basis and assumptions to evaluate the need for design changes. This process also includes thereal time monitoring of the engineered systems to determine if their performance satisfies the objectives of the performance ordesign criteria.* (SOURCE: Proposed definition by R. Powe and W. Sublette)
Changes needed in design of the Repository to accommodateactual field conditions encountered will need to be reported to theNuclear Regulatory Commission (SOURCE: IOCFR60 Subpart F)
Exhibit ClAP-i 8.1.2 REV. O5IZ7I�4Exhibit CIAP-1 S. 1.2 REV. 0B127194
Amended Reseonse to Corrective Action Re0ort YM-94-073
Discussion
10 CFR 60.141.(a),(b) and (d) and the ESFDR 3.2.1.J9 requires that the design
validation activity be performed as part of the performance confirmation
process. It specifically states that the geotechnical in situ conditions found
should be compared with the original bases and assumptions. Further, the
design validation process should be a realtime activity that will provide the
justification and documentation for ground support as the excavation is
advancing. It did not happen in the Starter Tunnel, and the question is
whether it will happen in the North Ramp.
Investigative Action
The adverse condition statement uses the term validation which is not used
in 10 CFR 60.141.(a),(b) and (d) ESFDR Section 3.2.1.J9 or the QARD
Glossary.It is therefore assumed that the auditor is discussing performance
confirmation.
The initial statements made by the auditor concern the starter tunnel and
design package 1A. To address the ESFDR requirement 3.2.1.J the following
were initiated as to develop a geotechnical baseline in support of performance
confirmation:
* Geological mapping - USGS/USBR
* As-builting to record the type and location of ground support
* Deformation monitoring using extensometers
* Support load monitoring of selected rockbolts\
It should be noted that additional analyses will be performed on the existing
box cut and starter tunnel for the purpose of completing the headwall design
at the portal. The final phase of design verification of the 1A design package
will be initiated during the construction of the portal headwall, internal
concrete liner and invert for the starter tunnel. M
.
9/g9 L/? V. 4S!51. G H . g9-3
\- /1 i
The tunneling conditions and the methods of excavation and ground support have )limited bearing on the construction of the North Ramp which will utilize a TBM
mining system. When appropriate, relevant information derived from package 1AJ
has been considered in the Ground Support Scoping Analysis BABEAOOOO-01717-
0200-00008 Rev 01 as indicated on page 54 of 83:
The limited information obtained from NRG boreholes, and mapping in the
Starter Tunnel and Test Alcove 1, indicates that many of the joints are
discontinuous ....
The second part of the auditor's comment concerns relate to design validation
for the Design package 2C. Plans for construction monitoring and design
verification* have been discussed with the WBS 1.2.6 Manager and include for
FY 95 the following:
* Geological Mapping (USGS/USBR)
* Production of geotechnical as-builts (USGS/USBR)
* Construction as-builts Title III AlE
* Geotechnical instrumentation SNL ( Deformation monitoring, seismic
monitoring, blast vibration monitoring, Rock mass classification)
* Verification analyses A/E
Note: The term 'design verification * as used in this context is rot to be
confused with the QARD definition of design verification.
A summary of description of these design verification, construction monitoring
and mapping activities are discussed in the TS North Ramp Ground Support
Analyses BABEAOOOOO-01717-0200-00008 Section 10.12.8 page 74 of 84.
Complete details, can be obtained in the current revisions of:
* Study Plan 8.3.15.1.5 Excavation Investigations Studies
* Study Plan 8.3.15.1.8 In situ Design Verification Studies
* Study Plan 8.3.1.4.2.2 Site Characterization Mapping
to be implemented through Work Plans
2 m
K-
These activities will be performed for the A/E and coordinated by the TCO as
indicated in the referenced correspondence. The data and information needs to
complete design analyses have been identified in a series of letters:
'Meeting Notes For the Meeting Held June 16, 1994, On Sandia National
Laboraties Suport For Exploratory Studies Facility 1.2.6 (SCPB:N/A)
LA-EES-13-LV-06-94-028. H.Kalia/L.Costin to Distribution."
'Ground Support Design Verification Data Needs LV.ESSB.JHP.6/94-674 Sandifer
to Elkins.*
ORequest for Technical Support to provide Geological/Geotechnical data
Collection, Mapping and Reporting During Construction of the Exploratory
Sudies, Facility(ESF)(SCP/NA).LV.ESSB.JHP.3/94-595.0
The testing organizations have in response to the A/E's request for data and
information developed work plans which identify the tests and test activities
to be performed during the construction of the ESF. These plans can been seen
to support the acquistion of baseline geotechnical data and information for
performance confirmation (Ref. 10 CFR 60 140 (d)(2))
The process of ground support selection based on geotechnical criteria which
is subject to verification** by SNL under the Construction Monitoring and
Design Verification work plans, will provide the A/E with the basis to adjust
and/or substitute the ground support categories identified in Drawings
BABEABOOO-01717-2100-40151 through 40161. The real time adjustment of ground 'GD
support is described in Ground Support Scoping Analysis BABEAOOOO-01717-0200-
00008 Rev 01 as indicated on page 74 of 83:
'To meet the data needs of the A/E, technical activities are to be developed
to include:
* Evaluations of rock mass quality and other empirical geo-engineering
parameters will be made near the face continuously during TBM operations. The
evaluations will be made to support the M & 0 field change decisions to modify
ground support at the face during construction."
3
Remedial Action
See investigative action
Root Cause
See investigative action
Corrective Action.
See investigative action
4
Page I of 3
RESPONSE TO CAR NO. YM-94-073
DISCUSSION:
The Yucca Mountain Project" Review Record Memorandum for the ESF Title IDesign Acceptability Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Alternative ESFLocations" document was prepared to determine what 10 CFR 60 requirements applyto ESF construction during site characterization.
This document was prepared in consultation with the NRC. Volume 2 contains anappendix titled "Correlation of Criteria Derived for ESF Physical Elements with 10CFR Part 60 Applicable Requirements". This appendix (pg 1.3-72) indicates thatcriteria 60.140(b), 60.141(a), 60.141(b), and 60.141(d) do not apply to the ESF.
Remedial Action:
Based on our review and investigative action below, no remedial action is necessary.
Investigative Action:
The adverse condition statement uses the term "validation" which is not used in 10CFR 60.141. (a), (b) and (d) ESFDR Section 3.2.1.J9 or the QARD Glossary (exceptfor software validation). It is therefore assumed that the auditor is discussingperformance confirmation.
Subpart F of 10 CFR 60 states in 60.140(b) under General Requirements, that theperformance confirmation program "...shall have been started during sitecharacterization and it will continue until permanent closure."
In 60.141(a) under Confirmation of Geotechnical and Design Parameters, it is furtherstated that "During repository construction and operation, a continuing program ofsurveillance, measurement, testing, and ..... to ensure that geotechnical and designparameters are confirmed to ensure that appropriate action is taken to inform theCommission of changes .......
The example given in the Adverse Condition for this CAR is in 10 CFR 60.141(d),which falls under the section describing the "continuing performance confirmationprogram" that is to be conducted during construction and operation, and therefore doesnot apply to ESF design and testing.
The initial statements made by the auditor concern the starter tunnel and designpackage IA. To address the ESFDR requirement 3.2.1.J, the following were initiated:
Z7/4 V L. V. US 6H. Of V Z3 9
s- / -
RESPONSE TO CAR NO. YM-94-073 Page 2 of 3
- Geological mapping - USGSIUSBR-- As-builting to record the type and location of ground support- Deformation monitoring using extensometers- Support load monitoring of selected rockbolts
It should be noted that additional analyses will be performed on the existing box cutand starter tunnel for the purpose of completing the headwall design at the portal. Thefinal phase of design verification of the 1A design package will be initiated during theconstruction of the portal headwall, internal concrete Liner and invert for the startertunnel.
There is no specific requirement to apply the results of design verification fromDesign Package 1A and apply them to Design Package 2C. Clearly the tunnelingconditions and the methods of excavation and ground support have limited bearing onthe construction of the North Ramp which will utilize a TBM mining system. Whatlimited, relevant information derived from package 1A has been considered in theGround Support Scoping Analysis BABEEA0000-0171700200-00008.
The second part of the auditor's comment concern relates to design validation for theDesign package 2C. Plans for construction monitoring and design verification havebeen discussed with the WBS 1.2.6 Manager and include for FY 95 the following:
- Geological Mapping (USGSIUSBR)- Production of geotechnical as-builts (USGS/USBR)- Construction as-builts Title m A/E- Geotechnical instrumentation SNL (Deformation monitoring, seismic
monitoring, blast vibration monitoring, Rock mass classification)- Design verification analyses A/E
A summary of these design verification, construction monitoring and mapping arediscussed in the TS North Ramp Ground Support Analyses BABEA00000-01717-0200-00008 Section 10.12.8 page 74 of 84.
Complete details can be obtained in the current revisions of:- Study Plan 8.3.15.1.5 Excavation Investigations Studies- Study Plan 8.3.15.1.8 In situ Design Verification Studies- Study Plan. 8.3.1.4.2.2 Site Characterization Mapping
These activities will be performed for the A/E and coordinated by the TestCoordination Organization.
The process of ground support selection based on geotechnical criteria and subjectverification by SNL under the Construction Monitoring and Design Verification willprovide the ANE with the basis to adjust and/or substitute ground support categories.
RESPONSE TO CAR NO. YM-94-073 Page 3 of 3
The five ground support categories are identified in the ground support in DrawingsBABEABOOO-01717-2100-40151 through 40161.
Root Cause:
Investigative action has determined that no procedural violation has occurred.
Corrective Action:
Investigative action has determined that no procedural violation has occurred.
CA M0951227REV. 1.0 12/27/94
M E M OConstruction Management Organization (CMO)
Construction Control Group (CCG)
TO: Distribution
FROM: Robert Adams (Phone 702/295-7322)
DATE: 27 December 94
SUBJECT: FY95 Construction Schedule Up-date
The attached ESF construction schedule has a data date of 4 December 94, and a plot date of23 December 94. If you have specific questions related to this schedule, please give me a call.
If you wish to be added or removed from distribution, contact William Blair at 5-4324.
Distribution:
See attached List
. C:SCHDIST1REV. 1.01201/94
Robert Adams
Distribution Mail Stop 523
W. BoyleM. BrodskyR. CraunW. DixonJ. DyerV. loriiJ. ReplogleR. SpenceB Vema
Aovity Ely bonyI Dlttpfols :.:: . *T tstiL1 Xr~rtepE :I Mle PW^ flh .: -
KJL ITiMAUKRWITY M VVKAEi A' 14rJ7TV~ 1WCCESS ROAD
*SECURllTf FENCINO
I I
a ia
I
* a
a 4a
---o I:~~~ZS a
* a
i
I
I
II
III
a
II014
IIIaI
I
J;IU' *UM *JVnL9 I -a Vwr
aStOAAOEIOLtOP FNONS)
cOpmrmxl MC pOtyCI,GENERAToR#OIESEL FUEL SYS
^ WA, .__
aIII
II.
III la -o II
i
C Tpf ITAL PAU id2S"Z§ I ____ _
EXTENSION
| | r. ; .-;*...J_ mm T1a'M w fww:pa
_ N_ N_Uraib 1U~ I rvE¶Ij' I*v mUF-M
STORAGE
P - : ';iMxpmr e
SUONM V CpollRF tvn YEYM aACCESS ROVAD
CONSTRU.CT m-'iKmrt IK A!RACE UTtW M
a_ - I
* a
* .
* I
* . . a
a - iI- I
- r Z |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:0 -l
@ - @ M X
j | -I I
-
.. . .. ........... a- .
I
I I I
I
(1L.LmE a nuV a *IJ a * q3rsp nnS
I *6 ACRES)--- I .-.- I
I-I
__ . , ' :J ::::_FLLwA.I m m lUL % VW OUI.C .1W e----- ---- - - - ... ". Oft wi 4&Wauoat". ^na at. at .£0 tJ-Ff.f. r-flM lYU:k;1#4- 1 WWAO
- t x _11E IRUF1(UlB1 LFLUtLL UtMNKA I sV rs grl
TFTyI,�-11ryXpRu�
II*§'
* _~ -*a _ a. a * a m * *a
V -4 a a
* a= a a @ a* a * - * a
I I I I , a . ,~
. * a a a a a
I I a a
. a a aw... a
)ENERAtORS
Itk.KA, ILP- FR *311 , , =sw
_~~~~wmx~ z7 nss*UtAR j ^iU1 .B)
V _~ IIs^2rre B:
aJVJEJ�t.� auj.Ds�a�., I a'lb IL raxmn-U IrKdV I aI,.ErwraVLCB00STERIEXILE)
lV:uzj-,
* ' 'I'~~~~~~~~~~
_ rr'tE"APItmrM-U LW% bUEI'Ly iJoU'1 a
%NCWM LOADS, lWWW-
II
Id
_ 0
LLI-.
IELOISEPTIC TANK
JSTE FaIROV-0a EIU a TRIEsVPIP 22AUK3 IEEXMtE uAPLAD) I
t1TH bUVUK1P'AGE V"Rm WATERY atK M IfFEwPaNG (OFF PACO
Ile Km.LUN cm1 F I AMP.V"~ MI) 0%' RUAF10 j.zuxmECD
-. .n sfau ur Iirrq ,nh~. f tURP
- I - ~~~~~~~~~~~ - I -~~~~~~~~
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IEM -
I I
to * - 0
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II6II
I
III
I
(
-; . t
I
I
- .-a ai
a a li
: ~ IkwkwiikiE*R
WA^B.R
-1!I I, ~ ~~~~~~~~ _______ Irt _
pblot, nllow a _Iww " Yucca Mountain Project _=
o .,ft "em _ Target Venus Actuat = I
40 ,rftoftm offlk beg, Level 2 Schedule = I
^C' Aw .I .'. , ! = .
MWSIAlSMTM N VEIR Iftia l- a a a
LEAO4 FIELD) . a a a *
VISWNR0 _-E9W-A U31616A_ 'FOOTINIS
SEWER . a a a a a a a a
DwrW~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ie a a , L a a
WA1ER SYSTEM . . - a a
INSTALL STURAGETAWPADSI17U 15AUOI T1J a a a
ERECT WATER TAZETAN1 J11A1w JW3 a ar a
CONM SlRSURFAM VSX1VVEE IUW 9 a a .a . a.**.OOACCESS ROAD
* a a
SEPTIC TANK a - . -- '-
WAMI IESiNG u WIERTUE UrDW" 30 ,0 $§
WAT= HTAN*ACE
Wt- lI X I P C O V A I , _ N P L I N D U - 7 3 N U V 9 4
'PO ER CEWllR
: F" U MP" f ~t l V A 1R C F U m c Iv e m
ULOEAGROD POWR CEWlER ;;*
FIFWLRIT CANE MUST .13r UTEW . ._ M*R **
UPGRAMS - *
MULLA UvcX7nWN "URUIEf 15FE ,
LA80UNOAT'- ON
ncXIeV^:ig HAXP uliffta X1* I
IcHMAK 0= 0 bNEUT VFEU - a a a a a a a
1C(OPRfiSOPrANEfRATR . * **@8 <
a a a a a a a a a a a _
show i (d4 I 'CIL"__m" mjuinIIIIIII y WOm
_g FM" yeeco ow 0tpmow
mO_" 116c"
Yucca Mountain ProjectTarget Versus Actuals
Level 2 Schedule
VOW-- -- 11"Uhms- - IG�11pWw""
I
I.
- __ .___ . - . Ia--^caviW
DPIontULL n
; SLWO
NSALL KTEW COFIKE TWARER512 EK
"Uay arny ; ; .T .I- ..- _,-_X
4E I
IJ2FPR3IIII
a I* a a* @ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I
:ONSTRUCTION
,4ANGX1EiJsr. REWIVE 1 .XVS75ONG LEAD ITEMS
:WITAFWFx i I IALL Fs m$ECHAN9CAL)ELECTRICAL
W3EAWUU> .W"rKE FlERK R JIPMSNES
WTOIEAR BURARTj COMLETE I
RAAN40
UANSF;u R wl D5URlns T rJU#ECHA1NCAUELECTRICAL
ONVEYOR SYSTEM
IECOELECTWVACffIRE SYSTM
aMtSHES
1P0"J itHJU AJfMIC ltF
-II I
I I
. . A
I
I
IIa
IIa
IIa
_ J I I ' |_ , |
-, I~~~~~ I
I I II I I I
III
IIIII
of
_ .- ;4 -- i_ - ---- R
I I II ,I .
I 6
0 6 f
a a a II* a a a
* a a a .
* a * a
~~~~~~~~~I I
_ * a a aa a a ,a at a aa a aa a a *
_ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ a
i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ a
a a a. a
, ~a a
a -
f
T1 _ - 1
a - ~ a
~~~~~~~-* t * a
a a I
I I
a a.a a1 -- -
a a~~
I I
I - mm d .
I I
a a |t a arvpw�jc rTI..Ivar- %,W-IUU -r_
..... a. a- _ _ a ,
.A.9-4.& ��F-R.!F� -_..rEVEI.l MUMA~ 5FC ORMAV1IF Offk
YAER
;)MPRESSORS
OMPRESSED AIR SYSTEM
nECI9TMC dI. I " IDtW.ONVEYOR SYS)
_UN~ IRtUu UFAnrJtI* JTN73)UPPESSED AIR SYSTEM
$'R MCONVR SYS)
arovasvrit VW IIA~ ItrWJLM
IIIII
I
I
I
I
I
6
I
I
4
I
II
I
I
I
0
1
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
4
IOIIIO
t
Ia___r_ a
I
NS
I-
- I- .
I011104GIIII
I
a I - I -
, a
.~~~
a a
I
a aa a
W~~~~~~~~~~~
4 a* a* aa aa aa a
a a
a a
** a
q a_ a
. a
I
IIII0I1001104
a a
I a* ' - - - -
* . a
* *E I A
I I I
* .. .a
,_ _ a aaL a_ a _ -I
- I - PNEIII
I
IIAM=$=0
STAifCWw, -R ,"_ ------- I a - I
. ..
ue n"A SW VIw" as e P a m. *at.mft% MM __mwf~w.0_ ne
._,
- s - s - w |
Yucca Mountain ProjectTarget Venus Actuals
Level 2 Schedule
N~~~t4,,,, ~ ~ tu ftub, 1w ;,;b - - &-i -_n-VRTAL
4EWpWnw I . . . . . . - * . - *.WVW ' _ t ~~~~~~~~~~* , a * a a
' j _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~* ,
SUMRVD= Au - _ '
LECT & UEO ''-UMFOR - 05F E , ,.{>K . ' .- _.* , ,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-;UBStRFAW5SEMVLFC(I4P . .6 D-*')ECK a,
4ESUWrNMWTM_ UVfON 'U&IAAW ||
,v w W _ * , | | , *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EX IC WA SoI lo 10 W W
$$ @ - - ; ; * @~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
XCEt iG i h'WIRUt I ~' ' a
XOVEYOR SYSTEM a * * * a.XCAVATIb UHMiU JUAUEUW aaa
IIDGE is MO* KOOa * a
MRS 15~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a a a a S
;s.30"~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ a a a -a -aa
_ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~ a - , a a t.~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ a, ua : a a I. *: :
_~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ a I
.AAM~.w R'U.15 U ~ ~t~a,_ a.. S * I a a a a S a a a a_
*m11 muse u ._.- -T a wom
Wmeat OWN Anmo wfse -a%W cuts
Yucca Mountain 1rJecTaget Ves Actws
Level 2 Scledule -_ -tEH�