1
EVALUATION OF DIETARY INCLUSION OF INSECT MEAL AND POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL IN COMBINATION TO PLANT PROTEIN-RICH INGREDIENTS ON STRESS RESPONSE AND NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF RAINBOW TROUT Oncorhynchus mykiss 1 ISPRA - Rome, Italy; 2 FEM - S. Michele Adige, Italy; 3 University of Udine, Italy P. Di Marco 1 , T. Petochi 1 , V. Donadelli 1 , A. Longobardi 1 , M.G. Finoia 1 , F. Faccenda 2 , G. Cardinaletti 3 , E. Tibaldi 3 , F. Lunelli 2 and G. Marino 1 FBW SGR FI FCR HSI CV 227.9±3.4 1.57±0.01 a 2.02±0.02 0.80±0.01 a 1.28±0.13 a IM30 239.1±2.3 1.63±0.01 bc 2.04±0.02 0.76±0.01 b 1.27±0.15 a IM60 241.0±4.8 1.63±0.01 bc 2.05±0.04 0.76±0.01 b 1.30±0.18 ab PBM30 240.0±2.4 1.64±0.01 bc 2.06±0.03 0.76±0.01 b 1.48±0.21 b PBM60 244.0±2.0 1.66±0.01 c 2.07±0.03 0.75±0.01 b 1.44±0.21 ab CF 231.2±4.5 1.61±0.01 ab 2.00±0.03 0.78±0.01 ab 1.90±0.29 c Acknowledgments SUSHIN was supported by Project AGER2 grant n. 2016-0112 EXP DESIGN: 6 diets in triplicate FISH: 54.2±1.45 g BW TANKS: 1600 l flow-through TEMPERATURE: 13°C FEEDING: twice a day/6 days a week DURATION: 13 weeks FEEDING TRIAL ANAESTHESIA: 100 mg/l MS 222 BLOOD SAMPLING: caudal withdrawal FISH: 5x3 fish for each diet BLOOD PARAMETERS: COR, GLU, CHO, TAG, TP, ALB, AST, ALT METHODS: chemiluniscence immune assay, spectrophotometric tests 1 References 1 Di Marco et al., 2017. Aquaculture 471:92-105 2 Manera and Britti. 2006. J. Fish Biol. 69: 1427–1434 3 Pinedo-Gil., et al., 2019. Aquaculture 501:32-38. EXPERIMENTAL DIETS CF - control fish diet with 90:10 and 80:20 ratios between fish and a vegetable mix derived proteins and lipid, respectively CV - control vegetable mix diet with inverted ratios respect to CF diet (10:90 and 20:80 respectively) IM30-IM60 - two insect meal (Hermetia illucens larvae) based diets with 30% and 60% replacement of vegetable protein PBM30-PBM60 - two poultry by-product meal based diets with 30% and 60% replacement of vegetable protein CHOLESTEROL All groups <CF (p<0.001) TRIGLYCERIDES TOTAL PROTEIN ALBUMIN All groups <CF (p<0.05, except CV) AST ALT IM60 < PBM60 (p<0.05) IM60 < PBM30 (p<0.05) PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE CORTISOL GLUCOSE No difference – no stress CV <CF (p<0.001) No difference All groups >CF (p<0.05, except PBM30) Kruskal-Wallis p= ns Kruskal-Wallis p<0.001 Kruskal-Wallis p< 0.001 Kruskal-Wallis p= ns Kruskal-Wallis p<0.001 Kruskal-Wallis p<0.001 Kruskal-Wallis p< 0.05 Kruskal-Wallis p< 0.005 GROWTH PERFORMANCE SIX EXTRUDED ISOPROTEIC (42% DM) AND ISOLIPIDIC (24% DM) DIETS GROWTH no significant difference respect to ingredients and inclusion levels; SGR and FCR are better in IM and PBM groups than in CV group PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE Irrespective of the diet fed, cortisol and metabolites are within the normal range, suggesting that fish are unstressed and in a good nutritional and welfare status 2,3 DIET INGREDIENTS Replacing up to 60% vegetable protein in the diet by protein supplied by INSECT or POULTRY by- product meals is suitable for the rainbow trout. Further long lasting feeding trials are needed to refine estimates of optimal inclusion levels of both test ingredients in diets low in fish protein. FBW final body weight (g); SGR Specific growth rate (%/d); FI Feed intake (g/fish*d); FCR Feed conversion ratio; HSI hepatosomatic index. Different letters indicate significant differences among diets (P < 0.05) VEG PROTEIN FISH PROTEIN INSECT PROTEIN POULTRY BY-PRODUCT PROTEIN Montecarlo Test RV=0.169; p=0.001 DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS CF group is significantly discriminated from others CV, IM60, PBM60, IM30, PBM30 are placed along a physiological gradient according to CHO, TP, TAG PBM30 group shows a slight lower metabolic profile than all other group

EVALUATION OF DIETARY INCLUSION OF INSECT MEAL AND … · 1 Di Marco et al., 2017. Aquaculture 471:92- 105 . 2 Manera and Britti. 2006. J. Fish Biol. 69: 1427–1434

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

EVALUATION OF DIETARY INCLUSION OF INSECT MEAL AND POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL IN COMBINATION TO PLANT PROTEIN-RICH INGREDIENTS ON STRESS RESPONSE AND NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF RAINBOW TROUT Oncorhynchus mykiss

1 ISPRA - Rome, Italy; 2 FEM - S. Michele Adige, Italy; 3 University of Udine, Italy

P. Di Marco1, T. Petochi1, V. Donadelli1, A. Longobardi1, M.G. Finoia1, F. Faccenda2, G. Cardinaletti3, E. Tibaldi3, F. Lunelli2 and G. Marino1

FBW SGR FI FCR HSI

CV 227.9±3.4 1.57±0.01a 2.02±0.02 0.80±0.01a 1.28±0.13a

IM30 239.1±2.3 1.63±0.01bc 2.04±0.02 0.76±0.01b 1.27±0.15a

IM60 241.0±4.8 1.63±0.01bc 2.05±0.04 0.76±0.01b 1.30±0.18ab

PBM30 240.0±2.4 1.64±0.01bc 2.06±0.03 0.76±0.01b 1.48±0.21b

PBM60 244.0±2.0 1.66±0.01c 2.07±0.03 0.75±0.01b 1.44±0.21ab CF 231.2±4.5 1.61±0.01ab 2.00±0.03 0.78±0.01ab 1.90±0.29c

Acknowledgments SUSHIN was supported by Project AGER2 grant n. 2016-0112

EXP DESIGN: 6 diets in triplicate FISH: 54.2±1.45 g BW TANKS: 1600 l flow-through TEMPERATURE: 13°C FEEDING: twice a day/6 days a week DURATION: 13 weeks

FEEDING TRIAL

ANAESTHESIA: 100 mg/l MS 222 BLOOD SAMPLING: caudal withdrawal FISH: 5x3 fish for each diet BLOOD PARAMETERS: COR, GLU, CHO, TAG, TP, ALB, AST, ALT METHODS: chemiluniscence immune assay, spectrophotometric tests1

References 1 Di Marco et al., 2017. Aquaculture 471:92-105 2 Manera and Britti. 2006. J. Fish Biol. 69: 1427–1434 3 Pinedo-Gil., et al., 2019. Aquaculture 501:32-38.

EXPERIMENTAL DIETS

CF - control fish diet with 90:10 and 80:20 ratios between fish and a vegetable mix derived proteins and lipid, respectively

CV - control vegetable mix diet with inverted ratios respect to CF diet (10:90 and 20:80 respectively)

IM30-IM60 - two insect meal (Hermetia illucens larvae) based diets with 30% and 60% replacement of vegetable protein

PBM30-PBM60 - two poultry by-product meal based diets with 30% and 60% replacement of vegetable protein

CHO

LEST

ERO

L

All groups <CF (p<0.001)

TRIG

LYCE

RIDE

S

TOTA

L PR

OTE

IN

ALBU

MIN

All groups <CF (p<0.05, except CV)

AST

ALT

IM60 < PBM60 (p<0.05) IM60 < PBM30 (p<0.05)

PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE

CORT

ISO

L

GLU

COSE

No difference – no stress CV <CF (p<0.001)

No difference

All groups >CF (p<0.05, except PBM30)

Kruskal-Wallis p= ns Kruskal-Wallis p<0.001

Kruskal-Wallis p< 0.001 Kruskal-Wallis p= ns

Kruskal-Wallis p<0.001 Kruskal-Wallis p<0.001

Kruskal-Wallis p< 0.05 Kruskal-Wallis p< 0.005

GROWTH PERFORMANCE

SIX EXTRUDED ISOPROTEIC (42% DM) AND ISOLIPIDIC (24% DM) DIETS

GROWTH no significant difference respect to ingredients and inclusion levels; SGR and FCR are better in IM and PBM groups than in CV group

PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE Irrespective of the diet fed, cortisol and metabolites are within the normal range, suggesting that fish are unstressed and in a good nutritional and welfare status2,3

DIET INGREDIENTS Replacing up to 60% vegetable protein in the diet by protein supplied by INSECT or POULTRY by-product meals is suitable for the rainbow trout. Further long lasting feeding trials are needed to refine estimates of optimal inclusion levels of both test ingredients in diets low in fish protein.

FBW final body weight (g); SGR Specific growth rate (%/d); FI Feed intake (g/fish*d); FCR Feed conversion ratio; HSI hepatosomatic index. Different letters indicate significant differences among diets (P < 0.05)

VEG PROTEIN FISH PROTEIN INSECT PROTEIN POULTRY BY-PRODUCT PROTEIN

Montecarlo Test RV=0.169; p=0.001

DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS

CF group is significantly discriminated from others CV, IM60, PBM60, IM30, PBM30 are placed along a physiological gradient according to CHO, TP, TAG PBM30 group shows a slight lower metabolic profile than all other group