Upload
mediate-bc
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
1/102
EVALUATION OF THE DISTANCE FAMILY
MEDIATION PROJECT
Report on Phase I I I of the Technology-Assisted
Famil y Mediation Project
March, 2013
Prepared for :
Mediate BC Society
Prepared by:
Catherine Tait
Catherine Tait Consulting
Victoria, British Columbia
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
2/102
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
3/102
iii
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge and extend thanks to the Distance Family Mediation Project team members
who participated in the evaluation. Their contribution of time and insights were essential for this report.
Participants included the Project Mediators, the Mediation Advisor, the Family Justice Services Liaison
(FJSD) Liaison, and the Project Coordinator:
Mediators: Christine Bahr
Peter Baines
Jane Henderson, Q.C.
Carole McKnight
Ayne Meiklem
Andrea Perreaux
Eugene Raponi, Q.C.
Ronald Smith, Q.C.
Mediation Advisor: Nancy Baker
FJSD Liaison: Colleen Shaw
Project Coordinator: Susanna Jani
Thanks, too, to the Project clients who took the time to complete the client survey and provide
important insights into the experience of distance mediation from the point of view of the families
involved.
I would also like extend my thanks to the author of the Phase II evaluation report, Colleen Getz. The
Phase II report was the very useful starting point for this research. I drew on many of the results
presented in that report as a basis for comparison to results for Phase III, and based many of the
interview and client survey questions used in this evaluation on those developed for Phase II.
Finally, I would like to acknowledge and thank the Law Foundation of British Columbia for funding the
Technology-Assisted Family Mediation Project and this evaluation, and Mediate BC Society and Family
Justice Services Division, Ministry of Justice for their guidance and support throughout the evaluation.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
4/102
iv
Evaluation Highlights
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The Technology-Assisted Family Mediation Projectreferred to also as the Distance Family Mediation
Projectwas an ambitious, multi-phase project which spanned the course of six years, from 2007-2012.
While driven by a number of objectives, its primary vision was to demonstrate the potential of using
technology to bring quality mediation services to families throughout British Columbia. This report
presents the evaluation results for the third and final phase of the Project.
Phase III provided mediation services to families undergoing separation or divorce, throughout British
Columbia, using information and communication technologies (ICTs) such as the telephone and web-based conferencing platforms. The Project was operated by the Mediate BC Society in 2011 and 2012.
British Columbias Ministry of Justice, Family Justice Services Division (FJSD), was a key collaboration
agency. Services were provided by a mix of private practice and public sector family mediators.
In most cases mediation parties were separated from each other and the mediator by some degree of
physical distance, leading to the term distance mediation. Interest in distance mediation arose
originally in part because a shortage of family mediation services outside the more populated areas of
the province prevented access to services for many families.
The Project had two prior Phases. Phase I investigated and confirmed the feasibility of using ICTs to
conduct appropriate, safe and effective family mediations. Phase II field tested the use of ICTs to deliver
actual mediations to families residing in remote and rural areas of BC. In almost all cases mediation was
conducted using the telephone. All mediation services in Phase II were offered free of charge. Mediate
BC embarked on Phase III by again offering distance mediation services to families, but changing some
key elements for this Phase:
Distance mediation services were made available to families throughout the province, includingthose living in populated and urban areas,
Fees were charged for services provided by private practice mediators participating in theProject, and
The use of a wider range of ICTs, including a web conferencing platform selected for the Project,was encouraged.
The overall objective of this Phase of the Project was:
to enhance the effectiveness and accessibility of family mediation in British Columbia by
further developing the distance mediation approach.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
5/102
v
Questions related to four specific objectives were investigated for the evaluation of Phase III.
Information for the evaluation was gathered from the following sources:
A review of program documents and practice guidelines developed during the pilot Project; Records regarding inquiries and actual mediation cases maintained by Project team members; A written and on-line survey of clients who participated in Phase III mediations; Telephone and in-person interviews conducted with Project team members, and External data regarding the demographic profile of British Columbians.
PHASE III EVALUATION FINDINGS
Objective One: To further increase knowledge about distance mediation through its application to a
wider range of family mediation cases. This objective was fully achieved.
Phase III of the Project received 153 inquiries which resulted in 46 completed mediation cases.Many potential cases did not proceed because the parties were not interested in mediation,
declined the service, pursued other means to resolve their issues or failed to attend
appointments.
Landline telephones, cell phones, web conferencing and email were used in Phase III cases. Because web conferencing provides real-time visual contact between distant parties it had a
marked impact on the qualitative experience of distance mediation, especially when compared
to the audio-only experience of telephone.
Mediators found assessing safety issues at a distance to be effective for all of the technologiesused, though expressed a preference for video-enabled technologies.
Mediators suggested that cases more suited to distance mediation include those where theparties are comfortable with technology, low conflict cases and, conversely, high conflict cases,
as there is less emotional charge if the parties are not together in the same room. The client
survey also lends support to the particular usefulness of distance mediation in high conflict
cases.
Most of the advantages of distance mediation identified in Phase IIimproved access to service,efficiency and conveniencewere confirmed in Phase III. Additional advantages focussed on
the face-to-face simulation of web conferencing and the ease of use and the creation of a
business-like tone with the telephone. Clients, more than mediators, noted the advantage of
being physically separate from the other party.
Fewer disadvantages were cited in Phase III, particularly because the use of web conferencingovercame some of the limitations of an audio-only ICT.
However, while web conferencing has some advantages over the telephone for conductingmediations, it also introduces some new disadvantages, notably the potential for technical
glitches or difficulties.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
6/102
vi
Project mediators felt that distance mediation compares favourably to traditional face-to-facemediations, a view shared by close to 80% of the client survey respondents who had had
previous experience with mediation.
FJSD mediators were unanimous that joint meetings conducted at a distance with ICTs arebetter, more effective and less time consuming than shuttle mediation.
Full or partial settlement of issues was achieved in 85% of Phase III cases. This compares wellwith settlement rates for other family mediations where ICTs are typically not used.
Just over half of the Project mediators felt that the difficulty of achieving an agreement wasabout the same for distance mediation as for in-person mediation. Some others felt that
parties commitment could be a bit less in distance mediation.
Between 60% and 70% of the client survey respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with themediation process, outcomes and their ability to speak freely and openly during mediation.
They also gave positive ratings to the reliability, effectiveness and ease of use of the ICTs used in
their mediations. Mediators also gave positive reviews to the ICTs; they were particularly
positive about the effectiveness of web conferencing.
Mediators gave positive reviews to Project training and tools, and expressed the view thatdistance mediation should only be conducted by experienced family mediators.
Objective Two: To improve the effectiveness and accessibility of mediation for all British Columbian
families by making distance mediation available province-wide and offering a support structure and
services through the Society [Mediate BC]. This objective was fully achieved.
About a third of client survey respondents would not have been able to use an alternativeservice to resolve their issues if the distance mediation service had not been available. This
supports the conclusion that offering technology-assisted distance mediation improved access
to mediation services in BC.
Clients were more likely to come from small and mid-sized communities, live outside theSouthwest region, be younger and better educated, and have mid-range incomes, than the
British Columbian adult population as a whole.
Parties to mediation cases (versus parties to cases that did not proceed) were more likely tohave access to nearly every form of ICT used in the Project. However, a high proportion of
parties who did not participate also had access to ICTs.
The most common reason that clients chose distance mediation is that they and the other partylived in different communities. Other reasons included a desire to avoid travel or in-person
mediation, the flexibility to access distance mediation outside working hours, reduced fees forthe Project mediations, environmental reasons and a preference for communicating using
technology.
Particular ICTs were often selected for individual cases because the technology was available toboth parties and the mediator and/or the parties were familiar with the ICT. About 75% of
client survey respondents had access to a computer, 70% had high speed internet and 63% had
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
7/102
vii
a webcam. Nearly everyone had experience with email, and two thirds had experience with a
web based meeting platform.
Telephone was used more frequently than web conferencing only for distance mediation among40-49 year olds. Those with lower incomes made use of web conferencing and telephone/cell
phones in nearly the same proportion, while the telephone was used much less frequently
among those of higher incomes.
Most clients who used web conferencing for their distance mediation had both prior experiencewith web conferencing and the necessary equipment, but some lacked one or both of these and
still proceeded with distance mediation using web conferencing. This suggests that some clients
find ways to access equipment that they lack, and are willing to try new technologies.
The Project Coordinator played a key role in implementing the Project, in promoting its servicesand supporting the mediators who participated. The Mediation Advisor role also supported
clients and mediators.
Mediators suggested that a private practice distance mediation service model could include adistance mediation practice group and/or special roster, technical support, inquiry support and
an adjunct, independent distance legal advice servicefor clients.
Objective Three: To work collaboratively with stakeholders in the family justice system to make
distance mediation available to British Columbians and to integrate it with available legal services. This
objective was mostly achieved.
The Project and Mediate BC generally, promoted awareness of the Distance Family Mediationservice widely with the public, family service agencies and the legal and dispute resolution
communities. Project activities such as the blog and Twitter feed proved popular and gained
recognition for the Project.
Just over half of those who contacted the Project had first heard about Project services througha Family Justice Counsellor and about 10% first heard of the service through a friend or family
member. Other sources included the Project pamphlet or advertisements, Legal Aid, other
Family Justice Services Division staff, a lawyer or the Court. This result, combined with the
intensive promotion and information sharing activities of the Project supports the conclusion
that the Project achieved its goals to collaborate with family justice stakeholders.
Most clients who participated in the Project were not represented by counsel. Projectmediators confirmed that they recommended obtaining independent legal advice to every
unrepresented client they served. Nearly two thirds of unrepresented client survey respondents
recalled receiving such a recommendation. While about two thirds of clients responding to the survey had, or intended to, obtain legal
advice, several did not intend to engage a lawyersome because they could not afford to do so.
A recommendation to incorporate a distance legal advice component was made by some
mediators and clients; this could be one means to further the objective of enhancing linkages to
legal advice services.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
8/102
viii
Mediators found that team meetings were highly useful for information exchange within theteam.
Mediators participation in the other activities such as the Project blog and Twitter feed served to sustain their already keen interest in distance mediation and the Project.
Objective Four: To develop and test a financially sustainable, province-wide distance mediation service
delivery model which includes a user-pay feature. This objective was partially achieved.
A discounted Project fee rate applied to the seven mediations conducted by private practicemediators in Phase III. Because a very limited number of paid mediation cases were completed,
Phase III was not a strong test of a financially sustainable distance mediation model.
The discounted fee rate represented 25% to 100% of the m ediators usual fees, dependingonthe mediator. Two out of four private mediators in the Project would be willing to offer
distance mediation services at Project rates in the future and a third may be willing to do so.
Most clients surveyed indicated that they saved time and money by participating in distancemediation, and most who had paid a fee for service felt it was reasonable.
A question remains regarding how features of a private practice distance mediation model(including technical support, inquiry support and legal advice for clients) could be financially
sustained on an ongoing basis.
In conclusion, the Technology-Assisted Family Mediation Project was an ambitious and successful
project that clearly demonstrated the benefits of using technology to bring mediation services to
families. Perhaps the greatest achievement of the Project is its contribution to the body of knowledge
regarding thepracticeof distance mediation. It achieved this through the real life test of technology
assisted mediations, and the subsequent dissemination of knowledge gained through the publication of
the Projects Practice Guidelines1and the dedicated information sharing with the wider legal and
dispute resolution communities.
The future for the practice of distance mediation is positiveand the results of this and the Phase II
evaluation confirm that mediation can be provided safely, effectively and competently at a distance.
1Mediating from a Distance: Suggested Practice Guidelines for Family Mediators, Second Edition, Mediate BC
Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, November 2012, which can be accessed at:http://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-
14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Guidelines_Mediating-from-a-Distance-%28Second-editi.aspx
http://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Guidelines_Mediating-from-a-Distance-%28Second-editi.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Guidelines_Mediating-from-a-Distance-%28Second-editi.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Guidelines_Mediating-from-a-Distance-%28Second-editi.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Guidelines_Mediating-from-a-Distance-%28Second-editi.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Guidelines_Mediating-from-a-Distance-%28Second-editi.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Guidelines_Mediating-from-a-Distance-%28Second-editi.aspx8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
9/102
ix
Contents
Evaluation Highlights .................................................................................................................. iv
Introduction and Background ................................................................................................................... ivPhase III Evaluation Findings ...................................................................................................................... v
Chapter One: Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1
Evaluation Scope and Objectives ............................................................................................................... 3
Methodology and Data Sources ................................................................................................................ 4
Chapter Two: About the Project ................................................................................................. 8
Process Flow .............................................................................................................................................. 8
Project Requirments and Scope................................................................................................................. 9
Project Team ............................................................................................................................................ 10
Features of the Project Service Model .................................................................................................... 11
Use of ICTs ............................................................................................................................................... 13
Deliverables and Outcomes ..................................................................................................................... 13
Chapter Three: Increased Knowledge About Distance Mediation ....................................... 14
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 14
1. Are technology-assisted mediations completed over the course of the Project? ............................ 15
2. How effective is assessment for violence and mediation capacity when ICTs are used in family
mediation? ......................................................................................................................................... 19
3. Which ICTs appear to be best suited to distance mediation generally? Which are better suited to
different parts of the mediation process? ......................................................................................... 25
4. Are particular types of family cases more suited to technology-assisted mediation than others? .. 27
5. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using ICTs? ............................................................ 29
6. How does technology-assisted mediation compare with other approaches when distance is a
factor? ................................................................................................................................................ 33
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
10/102
x
7. How does technologyassisted mediation compare with existing dispute resolution approaches? 34
8. Can the broader benefits of mediation be realized when ICTs are used to conduct mediations? ... 37
9. Are the parties generally satisfied with their experience in mediation with ICTs? ........................... 39
10. Are Project mediators generally satisfied with their experience with ICTs in mediation? ............... 44
11. Do project tools support competent, safe and appropriate methods of technology-assisted family
mediation? ......................................................................................................................................... 47
12. What added skills or training should mediators acquire? ................................................................. 49
13. What are the primary lessons learned regarding the use of ICTs in family mediation? ................... 51
Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 53
Chapter Four: Improved Effectiveness and Access to Mediation .......................................... 56
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 56
14. What is the demographic profile of the Projects clientele?............................................................. 57
15. What factors appear to encourage, or barriers prevent, parties use of technology-assisted
mediation services? ........................................................................................................................... 61
16. What influences the selection of particular ICTs? ............................................................................. 66
17. In what ways does the Mediation Advisor role support the provision of distance mediation? ....... 71
18. In what ways does the Project Coordinator role support the provision of distance mediation? ..... 72
19. Do mediators or clients identify other supports that would be helpful in a distance mediation
service model? ................................................................................................................................... 73
Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 75
Chapter Five: Collaboration with Stakeholders and Integration with Legal Services ........ 77
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 77
20. Do stakeholders in the family justice system direct clientele to the Project? .................................. 77
21. Do Project clients access independent legal advice? ........................................................................ 79
22. Do the opportunities for information exchange increase mediators interest in providing or making
referrals to distance mediation? ....................................................................................................... 82
Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 83
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
11/102
xi
Chapter Six: Financially Sustainable Distance Family Mediation Service ........................... 84
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 84
23. To what extent do fees paid by clients cover the cost of mediator services? .................................. 85
24. To what extent are clients willing to pay for distance mediation services?...................................... 85
25. To what extent are mediators willing to provide distance mediation services at Project rates? ..... 86
Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 87
Chapter Seven: Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 88
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
12/102
1
Chapter One: Introduction
INTRODUCTION
The Technology-Assisted Family Mediation Project2was an ambitious, multi-phase project which
spanned the course of six years, from 2007-2012. While driven by a number of objectives, its primary
vision was to demonstrate the potential of using technology to bring quality mediation services to
families throughout British Columbia. This report presents evaluation results for Phase III of the Project,
which was operated by the Mediate BC Society from May 2011 through June 2012.
During Phase III the Project provided mediation services to British Columbian families undergoing
separation or divorce through the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) such as the
telephone and web-based conferencing platforms. British Columbias Ministry of Justice, Family JusticeServices Division (FJSD), was a key collaboration agency in the Project. In most cases mediation parties
were separated from each other and the mediator by some degree of physical distance, leading to the
term distance mediation. The overall objective of this Phase of the Project was:
to enhance the effectiveness and accessibility of family mediation in British Columbia by
further developing the distance mediation approach.3
Interest in distance mediation arose in part because a shortage of family mediation services outside the
more populated areas of the province prevented access, in practical terms, to mediation services for
many families. This problem led Mediate BC4to embark on the Technology-Assisted Family Mediation
Project to explore avenues for bringing dispute resolution services to those who could not normally
access them.
The Project has had two prior Phases. Phase l, completed in 2007, investigated and confirmed the
feasibility of using ICTs to conduct appropriate, safe and effective family mediations in BC5. Phase II,
which ran from May 2009 to February 2010, field tested the use of ICTs to deliver actual family
mediations. Services were provided by a mix of private and public sector family mediators to families
living in remote and rural areas of British Columbia; all mediation services were provided free of charge.
A total of 23 cases were completed and the ICT used to conduct mediations was the telephone in nearly
2Referred to also as the Distance Family Mediation Project.
3Mediate BC Society, Project Application: Phase 3: Technology-Assisted Family Mediation Project, submitted to
the Law Foundation of British Columbia, May 20, 2010, unpublished.4Known as the BC Mediator Roster Society when the Project began.
5The results of this research are contained in: Colleen Getz, Closing the Distance with Technology: Report of Phase
1 of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediation Project. Victoria: British Columbia Mediator Roster Society,
December 2007, which can be accessed at: http://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-
Services/Closing_Distance.aspx
http://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Closing_Distance.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Closing_Distance.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Closing_Distance.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Closing_Distance.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Closing_Distance.aspx8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
13/102
2
all cases. The evaluation of Phase II6concluded that the Project had demonstrated that it is possible to
provide family mediations that are safe, appropriate and effective using ICTs, and that there is a demand
for these services among families living in remote and rural areas of BC.
One surprising outcome of Phase II was the suggestion that distance mediation may offer advantages
over traditional mediations where parties have difficulty being in the same room together. Distancemediation also allows parties to participate in mediation sessions from the comfort and privacy of their
homes, and the lack of face-to-face interaction helps to bring the emotional tone of mediation down to
a business-like level. These findings, along with the generally positive results of Phase II, raised the
possibility that distance mediation may have appeal for families in all parts of British Columbia, not just
those who cannot access mediation services where they live.
Phase II also left some questions unanswered, or only partially answered, due in part to the small
number of mediation cases completed, the limited client group targeted and the reliance on one form of
ICT in that Phase. Questions of interest that remained at the end of Phase II included7:
What potential is there for the use of ICTs that were not used in Phase II? Do demographicdifferences effect how families choose and use ICTs?
What techniques and practices would provide parties involved in distance mediation with accessto legal advice as needed before, during and after the distance mediation process?
How do settlement rates in distance mediation compare to those for traditional mediation? What skills are required of mediators when conducting distance mediations? Are some kinds of disputes better suited, or not suited, for distance mediations? What level of demand exists throughout British Columbia for distance mediation? What support and services could Mediate BC offer to support the growth of distance mediation?
Mediate BC embarked on Phase III of the Project to examine these and related questions by once again
offering distance mediation services to families, but changing some key elements of the Project for this
Phase:
Distance mediation services in Phase III would be made available to families throughout theprovince, including those living in populated and urban areas,
Fees were charged for services provided by private practice mediators participating in theProject, and
The use of a wider range of ICTs, including a web conferencing platform selected for the Project(Cisco WebEx Meeting Centre8), would be encouraged.
6Colleen Getz, Evaluation of the Distance Mediation Project: Report of Phase II of the TechnologyAssisted Family
Mediation Project, Victoria: British Columbia Mediator Roster Society, May 2010, which can be accessed at:
http://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Distance-Mediation-Project---Evaluation-Report.aspxand
http://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Distance-Mediation-Project-Evaluation-Report---App.aspx.7Mediate BC Society, Project Application, p.10
8Seehttp://www.webex.com/for more information about WebEx. The name of the platform used in the Project
has since changed to WebEx Meetings.
http://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Distance-Mediation-Project---Evaluation-Report.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Distance-Mediation-Project---Evaluation-Report.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Distance-Mediation-Project-Evaluation-Report---App.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Distance-Mediation-Project-Evaluation-Report---App.aspxhttp://www.webex.com/http://www.webex.com/http://www.webex.com/http://www.webex.com/http://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Distance-Mediation-Project-Evaluation-Report---App.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-2-Mediation-Services/Distance-Mediation-Project---Evaluation-Report.aspx8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
14/102
3
A goal of 50 completed mediations9was set for the Phase with the hope that a larger sample of
mediations and clients would strengthen the reliability and validity of the pilots results. Accordingly,
work to prepare for Phase III began in September 2010, and the Project began offering distance
mediations in May 2011. Details of the Phase III project design are described more fully in Chapter Two.
EVALUATION SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
As with Phase II, Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediation Project was a pilot, designed to
test innovative ways to deliver family mediation services using ICTs. The evaluation of this Phase,
therefore, is similar to that of Phase II: it takes more of a formative than a summative approach,
focussing on aspects of the Project design as well as outcomes, and in particular considers the
learnings of mediators, project administrators and clients. While considerable attention is given to the
effectiveness of mediating with ICTs, questions related to the model and tools provided to support thedelivery of distance mediation are also examined.
This evaluation has been guided by the Phase III evaluation framework, developed in consultation with
the Project Coordinator, FJSD, and Mediate BC. The framework addresses the four specific objectives of
Phase III, and identifies 25 evaluation questions which include a number that were also examined in the
Phase II evaluation. Like Phase II, the Phase III of the Project delivered mediation services to families
using ICTs provided by a mix of private and public sector mediators. However, Phase III differed from
the prior Phase because the scope of target clients was expanded, fees were charged for private
mediator services and the ICTs used included a web based meeting platform. Where possible, the
results of Phase III are compared to the Phase II results with a focus on these factors.
The specific objectives of Phase III examined in this evaluation are:
1. To further increase knowledge about distance mediation through its application to a widerrange of family mediation cases.
2. To improve the effectiveness and accessibility of mediation for all British Columbian families bymaking distance mediation available province-wide and offering a support structure and
services through the Society [Mediate BC].
3. To work collaboratively with stakeholders in the family justice system to make distancemediation available to British Columbians and to integrate it with available legal services.
9The Projects definition of a completed mediation is the same as that used in PhaseII, which is: a file in which
all the participants, including the mediator, signed an Agreement to Mediate and attended at least one mediation
session. Mediate BC Society, Distance Family Mediation Project, Phase 3: Project Map, March 28, 2011,
unpublished, p. 22.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
15/102
4
4. To develop and test a financially sustainable, province-wide distance mediation service deliverymodel which includes a user-pay feature.
Chapters Three through Six of this report each address one objective and related evaluation questions.
METHODOLOGY AND DATA SOURCES
Information examined during the Phase III evaluation was collected and/or provided by Project team
members and the clients themselves. The Project Coordinator, Mediation Advisor and FJSD Liaison were
instrumental in recording information regarding the inquiries received by the Project; they also created
and supplied a number of Project documents, and participated in interviews with the evaluator.
Mediators tracked their distance mediation cases using Case Notes forms developed for the Project, and
provided their views and insights through interviews with the evaluator. Many clients responded to the
invitation to participate in a survey about their distance mediation experience, sent to them after theircases concluded. The following table outlines each type data source and the data collection method and
analysis approach taken for each. Further detail on each source is provided below Table 1-1.
Table 1-1
Data Sources, Collection and Analysis
Data Source
Data Collection and Analysis
Approaches
Project documentation Content review to obtain qualitative
data
Project Inquiry Forms Completed by Mediation Advisor andFamily Justice Counsellors; analysed to
obtain quantitative and qualitative data
Mediator Case Notes forms Completed by mediators; analysed toobtain quantitative and qualitative data
Project Coordinator, Mediation Advisor
and FJSD Liaison
Interviews (telephone and in person) to
obtain qualitative data
Project Mediators Interviews (in person and telephone) toobtain qualitative data
Mediation clients On-line and mail survey to obtainqualitative and quantitative data
External data sources (Statistics Canada
and BC Stats)Accessed to obtain demographic data
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
16/102
5
A.Project DocumentsThe project documentation reviewed for this evaluation provided valuable information on: the Project
design, intended workflows and distance mediation model; Project objectives and activities; and tools
provided to the mediators to support them in their distance mediation cases. Review of this material
informed the development of the evaluation framework, and provided information needed to answerthe evaluation questions related to Objectives Three and Four above, regarding the support structure
and service delivery model tested in the Project.
Specific materials reviewed included: the Law Foundation of BC funding submission and Project Activity
Reports, Project Map, inquiry and referral pathway diagrams,Mediating from a Distance: Suggested
Practice Guidelines for Family Mediators10
, training materials, Think Tank notes, template letters and
forms, technology instructions, policy documents and social media materials (blog and discussion forum
entries). In particular the Evaluation of the Distance Mediation Project: Report on Phase II of the
Technology-Assisted Family Mediator Project, by Colleen Getz, was an important source of information.
Where feasible and appropriate, the current report compares the outcomes and experiences of Phase IIIto those of Phase II.
B.Project inquiry formsIn total the Project received 153 inquiries from individuals seeking information about, and potentially,
services through the Project. An inquiry form was completed by either the Mediation Advisor or the
FJSD mediators11 for each inquiry received. The form recorded information about both parties,
including their particular issues; the ICTs each party could access; whether the case met the criteria for
inclusion in the Project; referrals made to Project mediators, other services and independent legal
advice; and comments about client interest in or barriers to participation. Client demographic
information was also recorded for those cases that were accepted into the Project and proceeded to
mediation.
Inquiry data proved to be a rich source of information about both potential and actual Project clients,
and illuminated evaluation issues related to the characteristics of cases and clients who participated,
and those who did not participate, in the Project. It was an especially important source of information
regarding the reasons why many who inquired about distance mediation ultimately did not participate
in the Project.
C.Mediator Case Note FormsA total of 46 distance mediation cases were completed in Phase III. Mediators recorded information
about each case, including the technologies used during each stage of mediation, the results of violence
and capacity screening and of mediation itself, referrals for independent legal advice and the time per
10June 2010 and July 2012, accessed at:http://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---
FAQs/Mediating_From_a_Distance_2nd_Edition_Nov-2012.aspx11
Family Justice Counsellors, see below.
http://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Mediating_From_a_Distance_2nd_Edition_Nov-2012.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Mediating_From_a_Distance_2nd_Edition_Nov-2012.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Mediating_From_a_Distance_2nd_Edition_Nov-2012.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Mediating_From_a_Distance_2nd_Edition_Nov-2012.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Mediating_From_a_Distance_2nd_Edition_Nov-2012.aspxhttp://mediatebc.com/PDFs/1-14-Family-Mediation---FAQs/Mediating_From_a_Distance_2nd_Edition_Nov-2012.aspx8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
17/102
6
case, on Case Notes forms. These forms were submitted to the evaluator directly. Data from this source
was particularly important for answering questions about the effectiveness of screening using ICTs and
of the technologies themselves, in mediation cases. It also provided quantitative evidence regarding the
settlement rates achieved during the Project, and the qualitative information regarding mediators
views of the advantages, disadvantages, effectiveness and reliability of the particular technologies used.
D.Project Coordinator, Mediation Advisor and FJSD LiaisonThe Project Coordinator, Mediation Advisor and FJSD Liaison supported Project clients and mediators,
and undertook many other activities to develop and implement the Project in this Phase. Interviews
were conducted with each of them to gain their views on the project design features, and factors that
influenced the outcomes of the Project, such as client access to ICTs.
E.Project MediatorsIn-person or telephone interviews were conducted to obtain in-depth information from the mediators
about their experiences during Phase III. Questions delved into screening for violence using ICTs, the
effectiveness and reliability of particular technologies for various phases of mediation cases, comparison
of distance mediation to shuttle and in-person mediations, and the usefulness of various practice
supports and training provided throughout the Project. Private mediators were also asked about the
Project fees and the user-pay model. Seven of the Projectscompleted mediation cases were conducted
by private practice mediators, and 39 by Family Justice Counsellors. This report does not distinguish
information provided by Family Justice Counsellors and private practice mediators unless the distinction
is relevant to the question under discussion.
F.Client Survey
A client survey with 30 questions was developed to obtain the views of the clients themselves. The
Agreement to Mediate form signed by all clients included a section regarding the client survey, and
clients were encouraged to participate in the survey by the mediators. The survey was available on-line
or could be completed in hard copy. For clients with a known email address, an invitation to participate
in the online survey was initially sent, followed by up to three reminders. If the client had not
responded after the third reminder, they were sent a hard copy of the survey with a stamped return
envelope. For clients where an email address was not available, a hard copy of the survey was mailed to
their physical address, followed by up to three subsequent mail-outs. In total, 51 clients responded to
the survey which gave a response rate of 54%, the same response rate achieved in the Phase II
evaluation.
The survey consisted of a mix of closed-ended and open-ended questions, and provided information
about the clients themselves, why they had chosen to participate in distance mediations, their views of
the mediation process, outcomes and technologies used, and their use of independent legal advice.
They were also asked about the benefits of mediating at a distance, and for those who had worked with
private mediators, about the fees paid for the service received.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
18/102
7
Although 54% is a very good response rate for a client survey, the numbers of clients involved (51) is still
small and the results must be viewed as indicative of the experience of this particular Project client
group. Inferences about a wider population of distance mediation clients should not be made based on
a sample of this size.
G.External Data SourcesInformation was drawn from Statistics Canada and BC Stats regarding the demographic profile (age,
education, income and residence by geographic area) of the adult population in British Columbia. This
data was used to assess the degree to which the Project had attracted clients from all areas of the
province, and to determine how similar the Project clients were to the adult population of BC as a
whole.
The next Chapter provides an overview of the Phase III Project design and processes. Chapters Three
through Six each address a specific objective of the Project, discussing related evaluation questions and
results.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
19/102
8
Chapter Two: About the Project
This Chapter describes Phase III of the Distance Family Mediation Project. Important features of the
Project, as well as the general flow of cases through the intake and mediation processes, are outlined to
provide context to the subsequent chapters which provide the evaluation results.
PROCESS FLOW
This section describes the flow of clients through the Project, from initial contact through to mediation
itself.
A.Initial ContactClients may have come to the Project by any of a number of means: some were referred by their lawyer
or other legal professional; some read about the Project services on the internet or in a pamphlet,
poster or advertisement; others learned about the Project when they approached a Family Justice
Centre, Justice Access Centre or Mediate BC for assistance. Project promotional materials and Mediate
BC encouraged potential distance mediation clients to contact the Mediation Advisor. Clients who
sought service through FJSD were encouraged to consider distance mediation if their circumstances
warranted it
in these cases, clients were directed to Family Justice Counsellors working on the Projectby other Family Justice Counsellors throughout the Division. Cross referrals between the Mediation
Advisor and Project Family Justice Counsellors also occurred, matching clients with the type of
mediation that would best suit their case characteristics and financial circumstances12. For all inquiries,
the Mediation Advisor or Family Justice Counsellor explained the Project to the potential client and
discussed whether it might meet their needs. Recommendations to obtain independent legal advice
were also provided, and where appropriate, clients were referred to services outside the Project.
B.Assessment and Agreement to MediateOnce initial contact was established, and after confirming that a client was potentially interested in
pursuing distance mediation, clients were screened by the Mediation Advisor or Family Justice
Counsellor to ensure that their case was suitable for mediation and met the mandatory requirements
for the Project (see below). If their case met these criteria and the clients expressed interest in
12See sections below on the Project Team and the features of the service model for information regarding
differences between service provision by private practice mediators and Family Justice Counsellors.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
20/102
9
continuing, the case was screened for family violence issues and capacity to mediate. ICT options, and
the suitability of the clients using them, were also discussed at this time. When this screening and
discussion confirmed the appropriateness of the case for the Project, the clients were either referred to
a mediator by the Mediation Advisor or, if the assessment had been conducted by a Project Family
Justice Counsellor, they continued working with them. The case was then given a Project case number.
The Mediation Advisor conducted only high level safety and capacity screening; accordingly, mediators
receiving these referrals conducted further, in-depth screening of both parties for family violence issues
and capacity to mediate, as well as discussing ICT use with them more thoroughly. Mediators were
required (by both the Project and their professional standards of conduct) to assess for the
appropriateness for mediation by screening for family violence and to assess parties for their capacity
and readiness to mediate. Screening for family violence issues was done by the mediator with each
party individually, in most cases with the use of some form of ICT. Based on the outcome of this
screening the mediator would determine whether the case was, in fact, suitable for mediation within
the Project. Once the mediator and both parties were satisfied that their case was appropriate, clients
were asked to sign an Agreement to Mediate to participate in Project mediation services. Cases did notproceed to mediation until the agreement was signed by both parties. Clients who were screened out,
or decided that distance mediation was not for them, would be referred elsewhere for other services.
C.Distance Mediation Sessions and OutcomesMediators worked with the clients to select ICTs to be used in their case and scheduled individual pre-
mediation sessions to review issues, the Agreement to Mediate, and ICTs to be used for mediation; joint
mediation sessions were then scheduled. One or more mediation sessions were conducted using ICTs
(different technologies could be used at different stages throughout this process). If the clients issues
were partially or fully resolved, mediators could document the areas of agreement for the parties in awritten agreement or Memorandum of Understanding (depending on the mediators qualifications),
again recommending that they obtain independent legal advice. Regardless of the outcome, mediators
recorded information about the case on Case Notes Form submitted to the evaluator, and provided
client contact information for the client survey.
PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AND SCOPE
To be accepted into the Project, potential cases were required to meet all of the following criteria:
The issues requiring resolution are consistent with the Projects definition of familymediation;
The mediation meets the Projects definition of distance mediation; The clients have access to at least one type of ICT which is potentially appropriate for family
mediation;
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
21/102
10
The issues to be resolved are appropriate to mediate using ICTs; and The mediation concerns a matter that would come within the jurisdiction of British
Columbias courts. Generally, this requires one party and when a child is involved, the
childto be resident in the province:
o For non-child issues: one of the parties has to be ordinarily resident in BC for atleast one year before the proceeding began: and
o For child issues: the child must be habitually resident in BC13The Project applied the following definitions14when considering the case criteria:
Family mediation: Mediation of issues relating to the reorganization of the family afterseparation or divorce, and parenting, financial support and property matters connected to
separation or divorce;
ICT: Any range of a range of information and communication tools, including regular landlineand cell phones, teleconferencing, videoconferencing, email, text messaging, custom text-basedapplications and web conferencing;
Distance mediation: Any mediation using information and communication technologies, inwhich one or both parties are not present in the same room as the mediator.
The results regarding the number and type of cases meeting and not meeting the mandatory Project
requirements are examined in Chapter Three.
The Project broadened the scope of clients served in Phase III, with a goal to make dispute resolution
services available to families throughout the province regardless of where they resided, their socio-
economic status, cultural background or disability. The intent was for service to be provided to parties
located anywhere in the province by mediators who also were located anywhere in the province,
thereby increasing access to mediation services.
PROJECT TEAM
The Project team consisted of a number of individuals in a variety of roles. Eight experienced family
mediators participated: four private practice mediators from the Mediate BC Society roster of family
mediators, and four Family Justice Counsellors employed by the British Columbia Ministry of Justice,
FJSD. The mediators were located in the Lower Mainland, on Vancouver Island and in the interior of BC.
Five of the mediators had previously provided services in Phase II of the Project.
13Mediate BC Society, Project Map, p. 22
14Mediate BC Society, Project Map, p. 10
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
22/102
11
The private practice mediators accepted cases on a full range of family issues including child custody,
access and support, spousal support and property division. Family Justice Counsellors accepted cases
with children involved, and provided mediation on the same range of issues as private practice
mediators, except thatproperty division mediation was limited to property of $25,000 value or less.
Family Justice Counsellors provided dispute resolution services without charge, as is their usual practice,
whereas private practice mediators applied the Project fee schedule to their Project cases.
Support for the Project was provided by a Project Coordinator, Mediation Advisor and FJSD Liaison.
Their roles were as follows:
Project Coordinator: The Project Coordinator was responsible for overall implementation andmanagement of the Project. Activities included creating the design for the Project, promoting
the Project with the public and stakeholders, and supporting the mediators distance mediation
practice through training, facilitation of information exchange, and providing technical support
when needed.
Mediation Advisor: The Mediation Advisor works within the Vancouver Justice Access Centreand was Mediate BCs primary contact person for clients seeking services under the Project. She
provided potential clients with information about the mediation and the Project, helped to
determine if the case met the Project requirements, and provided clients with referrals to
mediators within the Project and other services, including independent legal advice, as
appropriate.
FJSD Liaison: The FJSD Liaison was a Senior Program Analyst within FJSD who coordinated thework of the Family Justice Counsellors within the Project, liaised with the Project Coordinator
and Mediation Advisor, collaborated on the development of Project policies and documents,and supported the Family Justice Counsellors by providing FJSD-specific policies and tools as well
as technical support.
The effectiveness of the support provided by these roles is examined in Chapter Four.
FEATURES OF THE PROJECT SERVICE MODEL
The Project service model is described in the Project Mapand the Project funding submission. Key
features of the service model that are particularly relevant to the evaluation were the emphasis on the
provision of effective screening for clients entering the Project, on making referrals for independent
legal advice, and on the use of a fee schedule to support a financially sustainable distance mediation
service.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
23/102
12
Mediators were required to screen all Project clients for family
violence issues and capacity to mediate, in accordance with Mediate
BCs Standard of Conduct or, for Family Justice Counsellors, FJSDs
Manual of Operations and policies. Mediators assessed cases for the
appropriateness of mediation, to be satisfied that:
a) there is not now nor has there been any abuse;
b) if there has been abuse, a fair and safe mediation is still
possible;
c) if there has been abuse, any vulnerable participant can be
protected in the mediation process and all of the necessary safety measures to do this are put in
place for the mediation.15
The effectiveness of safety screening conducted in the Project is examined in Chapter Three.
The Mediation Advisor and mediators were also expected to recommend that parties not represented
by counsel obtain independent legal advice. These recommendations were to be made throughout the
mediation process, to make the participants aware of the value of consulting other professionals in
order to make fully informed decisions.16 The requirement to recommend independent legal advice to
clients is in keeping with Mediate BCs Standards of conduct and FJSDs policies. Chapter Five presents
results regarding the provision of such recommendations, and clients actions to obtain legal advice.
The Project also strove to work collaboratively with stakeholders in the family justice system, to make
services known and therefore accessible to potential clients, and to integrate services with available
legal advice. Stakeholders directly involved in the project were Mediate BC and FJSD. Other
stakeholders relevant to the Project included the legal community, private lawyers, Legal Services
Society and the Justice Institute of BC and other organizations serving families in BC. The Projects
collaboration with stakeholders is examined in Chapter Five.
The Project implemented a fee schedule for mediations conducted by private practice mediators to test
a user-pay contribution model that could sustain affordable distance mediation services. In Phase III of
the Project introduced a sliding-fee model based on parties net annual income and household size. The
Project rates applied to the first 10 hours of mediation. Part way through the Project timeframe, the
sliding scale was replaced by a single, discounted fee to be paid by both parties. This change was
implemented in part in response to mediator concerns about the complexity of applying the sliding scale
to individual cases. The use of fees, and mediator and client reactions to the Project rates, are examinedin Chapter Six.
15Mediate BC Society, Project Map, p. 19
16Mediate BC Society, Project Map, p. 20
Ensuring mediation takes
place in a safe
environment is as critical
when using ICTs as it is
when mediations take
place face-to-face.
- Project Map
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
24/102
13
USE OF ICTS
A particularly important feature of the Project was the use of ICTs to conduct mediation cases. As thedefinition above suggests, the Project accepted the use of a wide variety of ICTs. Also, a multi-media
approach was permitted, where more than one ICT could be used within the conduct of a single
mediation file. The Project encouraged the use of ICTs beyond the telephone, which had been heavily
used in Phase II, and selected a web conferencing platform as the favoured ICT for Phase III. Like
many web conferencing platforms, the platform allows participants to have both audio and video
connections, making distance mediation more akin to face-to-face mediation than is possible with
telephone or text alone. It also allows participants to share documents onscreen, a useful tool in the
context of mediation cases. While the web conferencing platform was identified as the Projects
favoured ICT, use of other ICTs was permitted as well, and mediators were responsible for assessing
clients needs, circumstances, skills and preferences when selecting ICTs to use in each case. It shouldbe noted that while the Project did use WebEx Meeting Centre17, this report provides no evaluation of
WebEx as a product and is not an endorsement of WebEx. The use, advantages and disadvantages of
ICTs, and client and mediator satisfaction with ICTs, are examined in Chapter Three; the factors related
to the use of particular ICTs, and the process to select ICTs for mediation cases, are examined in Chapter
Four.
DELIVERABLES AND OUTCOMES
As stated in the Project Map, Mediate BCs vision of success for the
project is that distance mediation is confirmed as a viable, accessible and
affordable dispute resolution option for British Columbian families.
In addition, the Project had three concrete deliverables to produce in
Phase III: a goal of 50 completed distance family mediations, a revision of
Phase IIs Suggested Practice Guidelines for Family Mediators18which
documented the teams learnings, and this evaluation report.
17Note that one Project mediation was conducted using a web conferencing platform other than WebEx.
18Mediate BC Society, Practice Guidelines, 2010.
A further indicator of
success will be the
confirmation that
technology can bring
the power of mediation
to families who need it
- Project Map
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
25/102
14
Chapter Three:
Increased Knowledge About Distance
Mediation
INTRODUCTION
The first objective of the Distance Family Mediation Project, Phase III, is:
To further increase knowledge about distance mediation through its application to a wider
range of family mediation cases.
The wider range of family mediation cases alludes to the greater geographic reach of the Project in
Phase III. In contrast to Phase II of the Project, Phase III did not require that one or both parties to a
dispute live in remote or rural communities; the services of the Project mediators in Phase III were
available to resolve any case as long as at least one party lived somewhere in British Columbia. It was
hoped that the greater catchment area would generate more mediation cases from which to learn
about the practice and effectiveness of distance mediation.
The furtherincrease knowledge about distance mediation refers simply to the continued process of
acquiring experience with, and therefore knowledge and insights into, conducting mediation at a
distance using ICTs. An important change with Phase III was the more widespread use of a web
conferencing platform which provides both visual as well as audio connection between the participants.
Nearly all of the cases in Phase II were conducted using telephone aloneso the increased
knowledge expected in Phase III also refers to the knowledge gained about distance mediation
conducted using a web-based platform.
There are 13 evaluation questions associated with this objective. Many of these questions entail a
comparison to the results of the same or similar questions from the Phase II evaluation. The questions
are:
1.
Are technology-assisted mediations completed over the course of the Project?
2. How effective is assessment for violence and mediation capacity when ICTs are used infamily mediation?
3. What advantages and disadvantages of using ICTs are observed during Phase III?
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
26/102
15
4. Of the ICTs used by the Project, which appear to be best suited for distance mediationgenerally and which are better suited to different parts of the mediation process?
5. Are there particular types of family cases that lend themselves more to the application oftechnology-assisted mediation methods than others?
6. How does technology-assisted mediation compare with existing dispute resolutionapproaches (e.g., shuttle mediation) when distance is a factor?
7. How does technology-assisted mediation compare with existing dispute resolutionapproaches?
8. Can some broader benefits of mediation be realized when ICTs are used to conductmediations?
9. Are the parties generally satisfied with their experience in mediation with ICTs?10.Are Project mediators generally satisfied with their experience with ICTs in mediation?11.Do the policy/procedural tools developed for the Project support and promote competent,
safe and appropriate methods of technology- assisted family mediation?
12.What additional skills or training should mediators acquire to use competent, safe andappropriate methods in technology-assisted family mediation?
13.What are the primary lessons learned regarding competent, safe and appropriate use of theICTs in family mediation?
The remainder of this Chapter examines the findings and results for each of these questions.
1. ARE TECHNOLOGY-ASSISTED MEDIATIONS COMPLETED OVER THECOURSE OF THE PROJECT?
In Phase III, the Project intended to offer technology-assisted family mediation services to any family in
British Columbia regardless of where they may reside, their socio-economic background status, cultural
background or disability19. This section reviews the inquiries received by the Project and the number of
cases that ultimately resulted. It also looks briefly at the ICTs used to conduct mediation cases to
confirm that cases were technology assisted.
19Mediate BC Society, Project Application, p.7
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
27/102
16
The Project had a goal of 50 completed mediations. To achieve completed mediations the Project
received inquiries that met the Projects mandatory requirements, which then translated into mediation
cases that were completed using one or more ICTs. Each of these aspects, or indicators, has been
assessed through a review of data contained in the Projects Inquiry spreadsheet and mediator Case
Notes forms.
A. Inquiries received, criteria met and cases completedIn Phase III, the Project received 153 inquiries, 89 of which met the Projects mandatory requirements.
These inquiries resulted in 55 cases which were assigned Project case numbers, and a total of 46
completed mediation cases. The Project received nearly 50% more inquires in Phase III than in Phase II,
and double the number of completed cases. A similar proportion of the inquiries met the mandatory
case requirements in both Phases. See Table 3-1.
Table 3-1
Inquiries Received, Requirements Met, and Cases Assigned and Completed
Phase II20
Phase III
Number
% of
Inquiries Number
% of
Inquiries
Inquiries received 103 153
Inquiries meeting
mandatory requirements
64 62% 89 58%
Case numbers assigned 31 30% 55 36%
Cases completed 23 22% 46 30%
Sources: Inquiry/Intake Spreadsheet, Case Notes
The increased number of inquiries in Phase III may be due to one or more factors including:
The relaxation of the remote or rural residence requirement in Phase III; this may haveencouraged a broader range of families to inquire about the Project services;
intensive promotional activities in Phase III; greater awareness of the Project in general; and / or a longer intake period (the intake period in Phase II was 9 monthsMay 2009 to
January 2010; in contrast, Phase IIIs intake period lasted 13 months, from May 2011 through
June 2012)21.
In both Phases roughly 60% of the inquiries met the mandatory requirements. The key difference
between the requirements for cases in Phase II and Phase III relates to the location of the parties. Phase
20Getz, p.16
21Phase II received an average of 11.4 inquiries per month while Phase III received an average of 11.7 per month.
The additional 4 months that Phase III ran likely resulted in about 45 - 50 additional inquiries in Phase III.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
28/102
17
II required that at least one of the parties was in a remote, non-urban area22 and 15% of inquiries
failed to meet this criteria23. In Phase III only two inquiries actually failed to meet the mandatory
criteria. Thus it appears that relaxing the residence requirement in Phase III allowed some additional
cases to proceed.
Data regarding whether a potential case met mandatory requirements was not recorded for 62 cases inPhase III. Notes recorded on inquiry sheets shed some light on why many inquiries did not proceed to
the point where an assessment against the criteria was made. As seen in Table 3-2, a common reason is
that one or both parties were simply not interested in mediation; in other cases, parties were pursuing
other means to address their issues. Safety issues were disclosed in five cases.
Table 3-2
Themes where Mandatory Criteria Assessment was Not Recorded in Phase III
One or both parties not interested in
mediation 18Nothing noted 17
Inquiry only 7
Parties prefer in-person mediation 6
Safety issues disclosed 5
Taking case to court 4
Parties resolved issues themselves 3
Party not comfortable with technology 1
Pursuing another option 1
Total 62
Source: Inquiry/Intake Spreadsheet
Of the 91 inquiries where the assessment result was recorded, 89 met the
mandatory criteria and two did not. One failed to meet the requirement that
the case be within the jurisdiction of a British Columbian court and the child
reside in British Columbia. The other failed to meet the definition of a family
mediation case because the dispute, which involved reorganization of the
family, was not due to separation or divorce.
Of the 89 inquiries that met the mandatory requirements, 55 were assigned a
case number by the Project Coordinator and referred to a mediator. Thirty
four cases that had met the Project requirements did not proceed to this
stage. Again, notes recorded on the inquiry sheets shed some light regarding
22Getz, p. 7. In Phase II, another requirement was that neither party needed an interpreter to participate in
mediation; in Phase III this was not a requirement, though the Project Map (p. 23) indicates that a careful case-
by- case consideration would be undertaken for such inquiries. Phase III inquiry data indicates that interpreters
were not required in any of cases reviewed against the mandatory requirements.23
Getz, p. 16
Party 2 never responded
to any attempted contact -
letters, phone by Family
Justice Counsellor. Party 1
persevered for a year to no
avail.
- Mediator InquiryComment
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
29/102
18
why these cases did not proceed (see Table 3-3). In 10 cases, contact with the second party was not
established. Failure to attend a follow-up appointment or calls, or an outright decision not to pursue
distance mediation were other common reasons that cases did not proceed. Three cases were screened
out due to safety issues. Two cases did proceed to mediation, but after the cut-off date for the pilot
Project.
Table 3-3
Notes for Inquiries that met Project Requirements but were not Assigned to Mediator
No contact by/with second party 10
Party(ies) withdrew or failed to attend
appointments 6
Service was declined by second party 7
Safety issues identifiedscreened out 3
Parties did not want mediation 3
Case proceeded but too late for pilot 2
Need to resolve related issue first 1
Parties reconciled 1
Nothing noted 1
Total 35
Source: Inquiry/Intake Spreadsheet
Of the 55 cases that were assigned a Project case number, distance mediation was begun in 47 cases
and completed in 46 cases. Reasons, noted by mediators, that cases did not proceed to distance
mediation after case number assignment are listed in Table 3-4.
Table 3-4
Cases Accepted where Mediation Did Not Occur: Mediator Comments
Parties withdrew or failed to attend appointments 5
Pursued in-person mediation 2
Parties did not connect with mediator 1
Screened out for safety reasons 1
Total 9
Source: Mediator Case Notes
In summary, Phase III of the Project received 153 inquiries which resulted in 46 completed mediation
cases. Thus, for every three inquiries, slightly more than two did not proceed to distance mediation a
very similar result to that seen in Phase II. Many potential cases did not proceed because the parties
were not interested in mediation, declined the service or failed to attend appointments; in other cases,
parties pursued other means to resolve their dispute (court, in-person mediation, resolving issues
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
30/102
19
themselves). A few cases were not suitable because they involved safety issues. There was only one
instance where discomfort with technology was noted as a reason that the party did not want to
proceed; however, this may reflect some self-selection on part of people who make inquiries of a
technology-assisted mediation service to begin with.
B.ICTs UsedFour technologies were used in the distance mediation cases in Phase III: landline telephones, cell
phones, web conferencing and email. Many cases used more than one technologyin different stages
of the case, or simultaneously for particular sessions (for example, combined use of web conferencing
and telephone). The use of web conferencing sets this Phase of the pilot apart from Phase II, where
telephone and email were the technologies used in all but one case24. Because web conferencing
provides real-time visual contact between distant parties it has a marked impact on the qualitative
experience of distance mediation, especially when compared to the audio only experience of telephone.
The parties decisions to use particular technologies, and their effectiveness,are explored in more depth
later in this report.
2. HOW EFFECTIVE IS ASSESSMENT FOR VIOLENCE AND MEDIATIONCAPACITY WHEN ICTS ARE USED IN FAMILY MEDIATION?
In Phase II, mediators conducted safety screening during pre-mediation meetings which occurred by
telephone or teleconference. The evaluation report for that Phase suggested that while the mediators
could conduct screening interviews competently using the telephone, the absence of visual cues made
the task more difficult for them, and they expressed a preference for in-person meetings for safety
screening25. Phase III allowed mediators to conduct safety screening with audio and video provided
through web conferencing. This section reviews the Phase III results for safety screening, the mediators
comments regarding screening with various technologies, and client survey data relevant to safety
issues.
A. Results of Safety ScreeningDuring Phase III, safety issues may have been disclosed during the initial inquiry, or in response to high
level screening questions posed by the Mediation Advisor26, or through the safety screening performed
by the mediators themselves. As noted above, safety issues were disclosed or identified in a total of
24One case in Phase II made use of Skype, WebEx, Windows Live Video, chat, telephone and email. Getz, p. 22
25Getz, p.29
26In February 2012, the intake model for private mediations changed so that the high level safety screening was no
longer performed by the Mediation Advisor. After that change, private mediators became fully responsible for
conducting safety screening once clients were referred to them (Source: Project Activity Report, March 31, 2012,
unpublished).
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
31/102
20
nine potential cases that were not ultimately assigned to mediators, and in one case that was referred
to a mediator where the mediator screened the case out of the Project due to safety concerns.
No safety issues were identified for 73% of the clients27. However, mediator records show that some
safety and capacity to mediate issues were identified during the screening process for some of the cases
that did proceed to distance mediation. Past safety issues were identified for 15% of the clients. Verbal
abuse, power imbalance and emotional safety concerns were noted for 4% of clients. In those cases the
mediators made accommodations to ensure continued safety during the mediation process, for
example, by using the telephone instead of web conferencing, and caucusing separately with clients to
review comfort levels and any concerns. Mediators also referred two parties to appropriate services to
address safety issues. Table 3-5 indicates the safety and capacity to mediate screening outcome for the
92 clients who participated in distance mediation cases:
Table 3-5
Results of Mediator Safety Screening
Parties
Screened
% of
Parties
No safety issues identified 67 73%
Past safety issues only 14 15%
Result of safety screen not recorded 5 5%
Some safety issuesreferred to appropriate agency 2 2%
Incidents of verbal abuse noted 2 2%
Power imbalance but no safety issues 1 1%
Emotional safety concerns so client prefers distance mediation 1 1%
Total 92 100%
Source: Mediator Case Notes
These results indicate that screening did occur, and that some safety and capacity to mediate issues
were identified for approximately 20% of the clients, who eventually went on to participate in distance
mediation. While this is a small sample of clients with safety concerns, clearly the mediators in these
cases were aware of their clientsissues and felt that distance mediation remained an appropriate
service for these clients.
27Note that this is a higher percentage of clients without safety issues than reported in a longitudinal study of FJSD
clients who had received in-person mediation services; this difference might be something worthy of further
investigation. See Dispute Resolution Longitudinal Study Phase 3 Final Report, Focus Consultants, March 2008.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
32/102
21
B.Safety Screening ApproachesDuring interviews conducted for the evaluation, mediators were asked to describe their approach to
safety screening, any challenges they encountered and how they dealt with them, and to comment on
the effectiveness of conducting safety screening at a distance using ICTs.
FJSD policy requires Family Justice Counsellors to conduct safety screening for all mediation clients. A
formal assessment tool is used that consists of 22 questions in total, 10 of which address family violence
and safety issues directly. For in-person mediation, clients are given the opportunity to complete the
assessment tool themselves prior to meeting with a Family Justice Counsellor for an intake interview,
and then review their responses in person with the Family Justice Counsellor. In the Distance Family
Mediation Project, Family Justice Counsellors sent the assessment tool to some clients in advance and
reviewed their responses with them using the telephone or web conferencing. Family Justice
Counsellors reported that they always used the assessment tool, sometimes supplemented by additional
questions, to conduct the safety screening.
The Mediation Advisor conducted some high level screening before responsibility for in-depth screening
was passed on to the mediators. She used a set of six standard questions and usually conducted the
screening by telephone. The private mediators reported that they used less formal approaches to
screening for safety issuesthat is, they do not use a formal assessment tool, but instead:
One uses many of FJSDsassessment tool questions, and works through them in aconversational way;
Another always does a pre-mediation meeting and asks questions to determine the degree ofthe clients comfort with the mediation process, whether there are any safety issues, and the
appropriateness of technology. This is the same screening as with face-to-face mediation;
Another uses an informal approach when building rapport with the client and gatheringinformation; this mediator asks questions about safety and if it appears that there are issues,
probes further; and
Another poses questions about the clients circumstances and watches for red flags.As mediation cases progressed from intake to actual mediation, all of the mediators continued to assess
parties for safety and capacity to mediate issues that may not have emerged during the screening.
Techniques that mediators used to assess safety and capacity issues during mediation included:
remaining alert to behaviours that indicated client discomfort or feelings of intimidation, (such as
withdrawal or backing off), observing clients tone of voice and (when using web conferencing) body
language, and watching for major shifts in position for no apparent reason. When these situations
arose, mediators reported that they would check in with the clients individually, to further assess the
situation.
8/12/2019 Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Progect: Report on Phase III of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediat
33/102
22
C.Technologies UsedMediators made use of telephone, cell phone, web conferencing, email and in-person meetings to
conduct safety screening for clients in this Phase of the Project. (Email was used only to send the Family
Justice Counsellor assessment tool to clients). Different technologies were sometimes used to screen
the two parties in a case. Table 3-6 indicates the technologies used for safety screening, as a percentageof the total cases (n=46).
Table 3-6
Technologies used to Conduct Safety Screening
Safety screening
technologies used:
% of
cases
Telephone 72%
Web conferencing 54%
In person 11%
Email (document sharing
only) 11%
Cell phone 9%
Telephone + web
conferencing 6%
Source: Mediator Case Notes
Percentages sum to more than 100% as more than one technology was used in several cases
D.Effectiveness of Safety Screening using ICTsMediators were asked to rate the effectiveness of the technologies they
used at different stages of their cases. Ratings for the technologies used
for safety screening were given using a 1 to 5 scale, with 1 = very poor
and 5 = excellent; average ratings by ICT used are shown in Table 3-7.
All technologies received an average rating of greater than 3, indicating
general overall satisfaction with the effectiveness of the technologies used.
Highest ratings were given to cell phones and the combination of
telephone and web conferencing, though these results should be viewed
with caution due to the limited number of ratings given for these
technologies.
The added layer of
technology between the
mediator and the client is a
hurdle to get by in order to get
information from the parties.
Its a