Evaluation Presentation PowerPoint_ELI August 2012

7/31/2019 Evaluation Presentation PowerPoint_ELI August 2012

1/23

Mary Jane Morris, CEC

Audrey Soglin, IEA

Linda Tomlinson, ISBE


2/23

Performance Evaluation Reform

Act Passed January 2010

In response to Race to the Top

Governors office convened all stakeholders


3/23


4/23

Joint Committees Empowers joint committees at local level

Consensus needed

If no consensus, default to state plan


5/23

Other components Changed evaluation ratings

Required training and pre-qualification process forevaluators

Requires research study

Takes away barrier to peer evaluation


6/23

Changes Made to AssessmentsSelf-assessment:

Teacher and Principal Module 3

Unlimited attempts at assessments Teacher Modules 1,3,4, and 5

Principal Modules 1,2,3,4, and 5


7/23

Other Components Required assistance/professional development plan for

all teachers receiving a needs improvement.

ELL, Special Education, Attendance need to be takeninto consideration.

Implementation dates staggered and dependent onfunding.


8/23

Educator Leadership InstituteAugust 8, 2012

Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE)Linda Tomlinson


9/23

Key Dates: Developing &

Implementing the Systems

2012-2013: All principals & assistant principalsevaluated following new rules

2012-2013: All teacher summative evaluation ratingswill reflect one of the four categories: Excellent,Proficient, Needs Improvement, or Unsatisfactory

2012-2013: Teacher evaluations following new rulesphased in, starting with 300 Chicago schools andall SIG schools


10/23

Key Dates: Developing &

Implementing the Systems

2013-2014: Teacher evaluations following new rules forthe remaining CPS schools

2015-2016: The lowest performing 20% of schools inthe state

2016-2017: All other districts in state implement PERA,Part 50 of administrative rules.


11/23

About PEAC

32 educators, union and association leaders from K-12

and higher education 2-year process and counting

3 subcommittees: teachers, principals, training

8 Educator Forums and online survey, with input from

more than 2,300 educators around the state Regular scheduled meetings open to the public

Comprehensive website:www.isbe.net/PEAC


12/23

TEACHERS: Practice Recommendations

(General Rules)

Districts must adopt instructional framework alignedwith the Illinois Professional Teaching Standards

http://www.isbe.net/PEAC/pdf/IL_prof_teaching_stds.pdf with four performance levels for the summativerating:

unsatisfactory

needs improvement

Proficient

excellent


13/23


(General Rules)

Formal classroom observations District PERA jointcommittee defines characteristics of a formalobservation with the total number of observations

Evaluator required to meet with the individual in a

pre-conference to preview the lesson Required post-conference providing feedback of

evidence collected


14/23


(General Rules)

Informal classroom observations District PERA joint committee defines informal classroom

observations May or may not be announced No requirement of a pre-conference Does not have to include immediate feedback Not subject to a time requirement

Post-conference meeting with self-reflection and written evaluatorfeedback, with relevant evidence

20


15/23


(General Rules)

Non-probationary teachers: at least 2 observations (1formal)

Probationary teachers: at least 3 observations (2

formal)

Professional development must align to National StaffDevelopment Council standards


16/23

TEACHERS: Student Growth

Recommendations (General Rules)

Demonstrable change in a students learning between twoor more points in time

Need data from at least 2 assessments: At least one Type III assessment

And at least one Type I or II assessment (not ISAT or PSAE)

Or two Type III assessments

District PERA joint committee decides metrics and targets,

including for different student groups (ELL, etc.) Must comprise at least 25% of final rating in 2012-13 and

2013-2014, 30% thereafter


17/23

Type I Assessment Type I assessment means a reliable assessment thatmeasures a certain group or subset of students in thesame manner with the same potential assessment

items, is scored by a non-district entity, and isadministered either statewide or beyond Illinois.Examples include assessments available from theNorthwest Evaluation Association (NWEA), ScantronPerformance Series, Star Reading Enterprise, College

Boards SAT, Advanced Placement or InternationalBaccalaureate examinations, or ACT's EPAS (i.e.,Educational Planning and Assessment System).


18/23

Type II Assessment Type II assessment means any assessment developed

or adopted and approved for use by the school districtand used on a districtwide basis by all teachers in agiven grade or subject area. Examples includecollaboratively developed common assessments,curriculum tests and assessments designed bytextbook publishers.


19/23

Type III Assessment Type III assessment means any assessment that is

rigorous, that is aligned to the courses curriculum, andthat the qualified evaluator and teacher determinemeasures student learning in that course. Examples

include teacher-created assessments, assessmentsdesigned by textbook publishers, student work samples orportfolios, assessments of student performance, andassessments designed by staff who are subject or grade-level experts that are administered commonly across agiven grade or subject. A Type I or Type II assessment may

qualify as a Type III assessment if it aligns to thecurriculum being taught and measures student learning inthat subject area (see Section 50.110(b)(2) of this Part).


20/23

Further Information

More information atwww.isbe.net/PEAC Contact:

Vicki Phillips at:[email protected]

Linda Tomlinson at:[email protected]
http://[email protected]/http://[email protected]/http://[email protected]/http://[email protected]/


21/23

Illinois Performance EvaluationPrincipal Evaluation Training & Assessment

Understand Plan Collaborate ReflectMeasure

MeasureEvaluate

ModuleOnlineSelf-paced

Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4 Module 5

Time 2 hours 2 hours 2 hours 2 hours 2 hours

Assessment OnlineAssessment

OnlineAssessment

Self-Assessment OnlineAssessment

OnlineAssessment

Remediation Webinar Online and Face to FaceRemediation

Total Training and Assessment Time: Approximately 15 hours


22/23

Teacher Evaluation Training and Assessment

Understand Plan andValidate CollaborateReflect MeasureEvaluate StudentGrowth(if required)

ModuleOnlineSelf-paced

Module 1 Module 2Teachscape

Module 3 Module 4 Module 5

Time(Approximate)

1-2 hours 15-18 hours 2 hours 2 hours 2 hours

Assessment OnlineAsssessment

2 OnlineAssessmentsStage 1/Stage 2

Self-Assessment OnlineAssessment

Online Assessment

Remediation Webinar Online and Face to FaceRemediation

Total Training and Assessment Time: Approximately 30hours


23/23

23

August 8, 2012

Documents

Evaluation Presentation PowerPoint_ELI August 2012