Evaluation Training 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    1/26

    Photos by Susie Fitzhugh

    Evaluation Training: Student GrowthStandards, Roster Verification, Online Tool &

    Final Conferences

    March 2012

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    2/26

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    3/26

    Todays training includes information about studentgrowth standards, roster verification, the online

    evaluation tool and the final evaluation conference.

    Please read the article Shame Is Not the Solution

    by Bill Gates and be prepared to discuss your views on

    including student growth in teacher evaluation.

    Do Now

    3

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    4/26

    What concerns do you have about linking student

    growth standards to the teacher evaluationprocess?

    Turn & Talk

    4

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    5/26

    The Professional Growth and Evaluation system isabout opportunities for reflection, feedback,

    professional development and support. It is not aboutconsequences; it is about elevating practice.

    Operating Beliefs Part 1

    5

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    6/26

    Evaluation decisions are not based on student growthratings.

    Demonstrated high student growth averaged over twoyears allows for career ladder opportunities.

    Demonstrated low student growth averaged over two

    years triggers additional support and additionalobservations.

    Operating Beliefs Part 2

    6

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    7/26

    CBA Framework for Student Growth Ratings

    Teachers for whom two common assessments are available

    4th thru 8th graders in math/reading (MSP, MAP)

    9th graders in algebra 1 (MAP, EOC)

    Requirements for student growth measures:

    Make adjustments for ELL, FRL, and/or SPED students

    Only count students enrolled 80%+ of time and attended

    80%+ of classes

    Methodology co-developed by SEA and SPS

    Ratings based on a two-year rolling average on 100-point scale

    Low student growth = less than 35

    High student growth = more than 70

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    8/26

    Student Growth Ratings areNOT High Stakes for Teachers

    Evaluations are based on the Danielson teaching framework

    HIGH student growth allows for career ladder opportunities

    LOW student growth triggers additional observations and support

    Student growth is not a weightedcomponent of a teachers evaluation

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    9/26

    Please review the Student Growth Communications

    Plan on yellow paper.

    On the green exit ticket, select which communication

    method(s) you might use to begin to educate your

    teachers about student growth standards.

    Educating our Community

    9

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    10/26

    Who needs to verify rosters?

    Why verify rosters?

    How do I review my teachers rosters?

    When does verification need to be completed?

    Where do I go if I have more questions?

    Roster Verification Overview

    10

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    11/26

    Elementary: 4th & 5th grades

    Middle Grades: 6-8 Math and Reading/LA

    High School: Algebra 1

    Which teachers need to verify rosters?

    11

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    12/26

    The Collective Bargaining Agreement guides the studentgrowth process:Article XI Section G, p. 104

    Roster verification ensures that all teachers are

    accurately linked with the students they teach.

    If teachers do not verify their roster and save changes,it will be assumed that the information in eSIS is correctfor their students and will use that data to calculategrowth.

    Why do teachers need to verify rosters?

    12

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    13/26

    Incorrect or incomplete staff teaching assignmentsexist in eSIS (wrong instructor, co-teacher not listed,etc.)

    Student registration in course is not up to date in eSIS

    Student course registration data is incorrect in eSIS(i.e., incorrect course start date for students)

    Student enrollment data is not up to date in eSIS (at

    the school vs. the course) Some elementary students walk to reading and math.

    Why might a teachers roster be incorrect?

    13

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    14/26

    Elementary staff will verify rosters at the beginningand end of each school year. Secondary staff will verifyrosters each semester.

    Principals will review their teachers roster verificationin June. Look for a notice in Principal Communicatorand a QRD at the April DLT.

    When do teachers need to verify their rosters?

    14

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    15/26

    Email

    Roster Verification

    or

    [email protected]

    For Questions About the Process orStudent Growth Measures

    15

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    16/26

    See blue timeline provided by HR.

    Executive Directors will have the ability to review

    completion rates to help support buildingadministrators.

    All evaluations must be completed by the due dates,

    including those for proficient and innovative teachers.

    Evaluation Expectations & Due Dates

    16

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    17/26

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    18/26

    Accessing the Online Evaluation Tool

    18

    Launching:

    The Online Evaluation Tool must be completed on a

    workstation on the district network or remotely via VPNconnection.From Start menu, select Internet Explorer.In the browser, type the word data to access the AcademicData Warehouse

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    19/26

    Mass delegate function will be available thisspring.

    Goal setting, PIP and Support Plan templateswill be integrated into the system.

    We appreciate your suggestions on additionalfunctions.

    Whats Coming Next?

    19

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    20/26

    Email

    [email protected]

    For Suggestions & Questions About theOnline Evaluation Tool

    20

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    21/26

    Techline

    Hours: Mon-Fri 7AM-4 PM

    email: [email protected]

    Call: X2-0333

    For Tech Support

    21

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    22/26

    What are some of the common characteristics ofthese examples?

    How might you make these examples stronger?

    Final Evaluation Write-Up Examples

    22

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    23/26

    How do you guide the final evaluation conference so

    its focused on growth versus compliance?

    Best Practices in Final EvaluationConferences

    23

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    24/26

    Are asset-based and focused on growth.

    Two-way reflective conversations that are centered on

    the teaching framework. (Typically the teacher will do themajority of the talking.)

    Structured and intentional dialogue with a clear goal.

    (Consider scripting your questions before the conference.)

    Final Evaluation Conferences thatChange Practice

    24

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    25/26

    Final Evaluation Conferences thatChange Practice

    25

    Reference component and element level within the rubricto brainstorm strategies for growth. (Read the level ofperformance theyre striving for and ask them what support

    they need.)

    Identify early goals for next school year.

    Provide an opportunity to gather feedback on yourleadership. (Consider asking: If you were my coach, howwould you push my practice?)

  • 7/31/2019 Evaluation Training 2012

    26/26

    Thank You!

    Please complete the green exit ticket and turn it into

    the box where you picked up the handouts.

    Please write anonymous questions, comments andsuggestions on the white note card.

    26