Upload
janine
View
50
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Evaporation/boiling Phenomena on Thin Capillary Wick. Yaxiong Wang Foxconn Thermal Technology Inc., Austin, TX 78758. How good is the performance of the evaporation/boiling on the thin capillary wick?. First 6 sets of data are from A. F. Mills Heat Transfer 1992 Richard D. Irwin, Inc. pp. 22. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Evaporation/boiling Phenomena on Thin Capillary Wick
Yaxiong WangFoxconn Thermal Technology Inc., Austin, TX 78758
Chen Li G. P. Peterson
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Department of Mechanical, Aerospace & Nuclear Engineering, Troy, NY 12180
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
How good is the performance of the evaporation/boiling on the thin capillary wick?
First 6 sets of data are from A. F. Mills Heat Transfer 1992 Richard D. Irwin, Inc. pp. 22.
Last set of data is from our experiments
3
1510
50
50003000
15000
25
100200
10000
50000100000
250000
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
Free conv(air) Free conv(water) Forced conv(air) Forcedconv(water)
condensing steam boiling water evaporation/boilingon sintered-
copper-mesh
Hea
t tra
nsfe
r coe
ffcie
nt [W
/m2 K
]
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
The porous media coating dramatically improves the Critical Heat Flux
All data are from our experiments
Comparisons among plate-surface pooling boiling, copper-mesh-coating surface pooling boiling and
copper-mesh-coating surface evaporation
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
0 100 200 300 400
Heat Flux [W/cm2]
He
at
tra
ns
fer
co
eff
icie
nt
[W/m
2 K]
Pool boiling on plain surfacePB145-8E145-8
Pool boiling on planesurface Evaporation/boiling on
capillary wick
112
152
217
367
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
He
at
Flu
x [
W/m
2 ]
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Why use a THIN capillary wick?
Dd(mm)
Fritz’s model [1935] 2.884
Cole and Rohsensow’s model [1969] 2.426
Bubble departure diameter Infinite fin length
0 1 104
2 104
3 104
4 104
5 104
0
5
10
15
20
25
h [ W/m^2 K]
Infi
nite
Fin
e T
hick
ness
[m
m]
2
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Objective
Experimental study
εt
Geometric & thermal properties
Properties of fluid
and flowContact conditions
ε
pore size or dwire
σ, hfg, f, etc.
Locate positions of bubble
&meniscus
Heat transfer regime
Heat Transfer Coefficient and CHF of Evaporation/boiling on thin capillary wick
theoretical study
βKeff
Parametric study Visual Study
Predict heff and CHFObtain physical understanding of
this phenomena
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
What we could gain from perfect contact conditions? reduce the heat flux density on the heated
wall due to the fin effect; contact points connecting the wick and wall
could interrupt the formation of the vapor film and reduce the critical hydrodynamic wavelength;
significantly increase the nucleation site density and evaporation area; and
improve liquid supply through capillary force.
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Sintering process development
The use of a sintering process to fabricate the test articles was employed to reduce or eliminate the effect of the thermal contact resistance between the porous wick material and the heating block
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
q" [W/cm2]
K [
W/m
K]
Kcu_sintered
Kcu_solid
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Sintering process development cont.
A sintering temperature of 1030 ºC in a gas mixture consisting of 75% Argon and 25% Hydrogen for two hours was found to provide the optimal contact conditions between the sintered mesh and the solid copper heating bar
sintering temperature at 1030 ºC sintering temperature at 950 ºC
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Sintered copper mesh
Side view
Top view
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Sample design
single layer copper mesh
30 µm copper foil
copper barTC2
TC1
TC3
q’’q’’
center line of bar
multi-layer copper mesh
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Sample fabrication
First, the required number of layers of isotropic copper mesh was sintered together to obtain the required porosity and thickness;
Second, the sintered wick structure was then carefully cut into 8 mm by 8mm piece;
Third, the sintered copper mesh strips were sintered directly onto the copper heating block.
Fabrication of the test articles consisted of three steps:
heater
sintered copper mesh
0.03mm copper foil
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Experimental study of thickness effects
Sample # Thickness(mm) Porosity Wire diameter(μm)
E145-2 0.21 0.737 56
E145-4 0.37 0.693 56
E145-6 0.57 0.701 56
E145-8 0.74 0.698 56
E145-9 0.82 0.696 56
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Experimental Test Facility
Outlet
Vapor
q”
Thermal insulation layer Distilled water
x
Y
Evaporation ZoneSintering copper mesh
TC1
TC2
TC3
Inlet
Pyrex glassAmbientVapor
TC4
TC1
TC5
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Aluminum chamber
Data acquisition system
Power supply
Guarding heaters
Outlet
Water reservoir
Inlet
Voltage meter
Pyrex glass cover Heater
Picture of test facility
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
System calibration
Auracher et al. 139 watt/cm2
Zuber 110.8 watt/cm2
Moissis & Berenson 152.4 watt/cm2
Lienhard and Dhir 126.9 watt/cm2
Present data 149. 7 watt/cm2
0.1
1
10
100
1000
1 10 100
Twall-Tsat [K]
He
at
Flu
x [
W/c
m2 ]
Increaseing [Auracher et.al]
Decreasing [Auracher et.al]
Present data#1
Present data#2
Zuber [1959]
Moissis and Berenson [1962]
Lienhard and Dhir [1973]
Capillary length
Taylor critical wave length
1/ 2
2.505l g
mmg
1/ 2
0 2 15.738l g
mmg
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Data reduction and uncertainty
1 4 5 6 1( ) / 3 '' /w sat TC TC TC TC STC cuT T T T T T q t K
2 1" TC TCcu
hole
T Tq K
t
"eff
w sat
qh
T T
(1)
(2)
(3)
The uncertainty of the temperature measurements, the length (or width) and the mass are 0.5C, 0.01mm and 0.1mg, respectively. A Monte Carlo error of propagation simulation indicates the following 95% confidence level tolerance of the computed results: the heat flux is less than 5.5 watt/cm2; the heat transfer coefficient is less than 20%; the superheat (Twall-Tsat) is less than 1.3 C and the porosity, ε, is less than 1.5%.
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Contact conditions
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 50 100 150 200 250
TW-Tsat [K]
He
at
flu
x [
W/c
m2 ]
E145-8
Plain surface pool boiling
E145-9 Non-sintered
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Contact conditions cont.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
0 100 200 300 400
Heat Flux [W/cm2]
He
at
Tra
ns
fer
co
eff
icie
nt
[W/m
2 K]
E145-8
Plain surface pool boiling
E145-9 Non-sintered
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Thickness Effects
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30TW-Tsat [K]
He
at
flu
x [
W/c
m2 ]
E145-2E145-4E145-6E145-8Pool boiling on plain surface
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Thickness Effects cont.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400Heat Flux [W/cm2]
He
at
Tra
ns
fer
co
eff
icie
nt
[W/m
2 K]
E145-2E145-4E145-6
E145-8Plain surface pool boiling
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Heat transfer curve
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Tw-Ts [K]
He
at
flu
x [
W/c
m2 ]
Convection
Nucleate boiling
Thin film liquid evaporation
Nucleate boiling onset point
A B
C
D
E
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Heat transfer curve cont.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Heat flux [W/cm2]
He
at
tra
ns
fer
co
eff
icie
nt
[W/m2 K
]
Convection
Nucleate boiling
Thin film liquid evaporation
Partial dry-out
Nucleate boiling onset point
A
B
C
D
E
F
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Evaporation/boiling process on sintered copper mesh coated surface
Evaporation
BoilingR
A B C
D E
R, meniscus radius
q”, applied heat flux
Partial dry-out
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Bubbles on thin sintered copper mesh coated surface No bubble departs Bubbles grow from heated wall and broke up at the top liquid-vapor interface Size of dominated bubble decreases and number of bubbles increase with increase heat flux applied from heated wall
A B C
D E
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
What will happen when heat flux reaches CHF?
Temperature increases 20 to100 °C or more in one second
Dying-out area is amplified from about ½ heating area to the whole heating area in just a second
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
CHF as a function of thickness
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Wick thickness [mm]
He
at
flu
x [
W/c
m2 ]
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Main conclusions
The test results demonstrate that a porous surface comprised of sintered isotropic copper mesh can dramatically enhance both the evaporation/boiling heat transfer coefficient and the CHF. The maximum heat transfer coefficients for the multiple layers of sintered copper mesh evaluated here were shown to be as high as 245.4 KW/m2K and 360.4 W/cm2 respectively;
The interface thermal contact resistance between the heated wall and the porous surface plays a critical role in the determination of the CHF and the evaporation/boiling heat transfer coefficient.
Heat transfer regimes of evaporation/boiling phenomenon on this kind of wick structure have been proposed and discussed based on the visual observations of the phase-change phenomena and the heat flux-super heat relationship.
For evaporation/boiling from the porous wick surface with a thickness ranging from 0.37mm to the bubble departure diameter, Db, the ideal heat transfer performance can be achieved and CHF is improved dramatically.
The wick still works during partial dry-out and the capillary induced pumping functions effectively.
Exposed area determines the heat transfer performance when other key parameters are held constant.
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation under award CTS-0312848;
July 18, 2005 Two-Phase Heat Transfer Lab @ RPI
Thanks!! Suggestions and Questions?