Upload
owen-adams
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Event anisotropy of identified Event anisotropy of identified 00, , and and ee
compared to charged compared to charged , , KK, , pp, and , and ddin in ssNN NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX= 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX
Masashi Kanetafor the PHENIX collaboration
x
zy
Mas
ashi
Kan
eta
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 2
USA Abilene Christian University, Abilene, TXBrookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NYUniversity of California - Riverside, Riverside, CAUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, COColumbia University, Nevis Laboratories, Irvington, NYFlorida State University, Tallahassee, FLFlorida Technical University, Melbourne, FLGeorgia State University, Atlanta, GAUniversity of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, ILIowa State University and Ames Laboratory, Ames, IALos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NMLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CaUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NMNew Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NMDept. of Chemistry, Stony Brook Univ., Stony Brook, NYDept. Phys. and Astronomy, Stony Brook Univ., Stony Brook, NY Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TNUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, TNVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
Brazil University of São Paulo, São PauloChina Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
China Institute of Atomic Energy, BeijingPeking University, Beijing
France LPC, University de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-FerrandDapnia, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-YvetteIPN-Orsay, Universite Paris Sud, CNRS-IN2P3, OrsayLLR, Ecòle Polytechnique, CNRS-IN2P3, PalaiseauSUBATECH, Ecòle des Mines at Nantes, Nantes
Germany University of Münster, MünsterHungary Central Research Institute for Physics (KFKI), Budapest
Debrecen University, DebrecenEötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Budapest
India Banaras Hindu University, BanarasBhabha Atomic Research Centre, Bombay
Israel Weizmann Institute, RehovotJapan Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo, Tokyo
Hiroshima University, Higashi-HiroshimaKEK, Institute for High Energy Physics, TsukubaKyoto University, KyotoNagasaki Institute of Applied Science, NagasakiRIKEN, Institute for Physical and Chemical Research, WakoRIKEN-BNL Research Center, Upton, NYRikkyo University, TokyoTokyo Institute of Technology, TokyoUniversity of Tsukuba, TsukubaWaseda University, Tokyo
S. Korea Cyclotron Application Laboratory, KAERI, SeoulKangnung National University, KangnungKorea University, SeoulMyong Ji University, Yongin CitySystem Electronics Laboratory, Seoul Nat. University, SeoulYonsei University, Seoul
Russia Institute of High Energy Physics, ProtovinoJoint Institute for Nuclear Research, DubnaKurchatov Institute, MoscowPNPI, St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, St. PetersburgSt. Petersburg State Technical University, St. Petersburg
Sweden Lund University, Lund
12 Countries; 58 Institutions; 480 Participants*
*as of January 2004
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 3
AnnouncementAnnouncement
• The flow and event anisotropy from the PHENIX collaborators in the poster session
* Students
– Shingo Sakai*
• Azimuthal anisotropy of electrons/positrons in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC-PHENIX
– Andrey Kazantsev*
• Elliptic flow of inclusive photons in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV from the PHENIX experiment at RHIC
– Hiroshi Masui*
• Measurement of directed flow in sNN=200 GeV Au+Au, d+Au, p+p collisions at RHIC-PHENIX
– Akio Kiyomichi• Radial flow study from identified hadron spectra in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200
GeV (at PHENIX)– Michael Issah*
• Azimuthal anisotropy measurements in PHENIX via cummulants of Multiparticle azimuthal correlations
– Debsankar Mukhopadhyay• Elliptic flow of mesons in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV (at PHENIX)
– ShinIchi Esumi• Analysis of event anisotropy and azimuthal pair correlation
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 4
MotivationsMotivations
• Event anisotropy– Sensitive to the initial state
• Collectivity of hadron/parton thermalization / recombination• Energy loss by Jet quenching dense matter
• 0
– Large pT coverage as an identified hadron– Large contribution of the decay to the following inclusive
measurements
• Photon– Radiation / Compton from hot gas– Photon flow?
• Electron/positron– Open charm and bottom– Flow and energy loss of heavy flavors?
c c
0DK
0D
+
K
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 5
The PHENIX experiment at The PHENIX experiment at RHICRHIC
• Event centrality– BBC and ZDC
PHOENIX
• Electrons– Tracking
• DC, PC hits, vertex by BBC– PID
• RICH (pT<4.9 GeV/c)• Energy/momentum cut by EMCal
• Photons/0
– Tracking : vertex be BBC to EMC hit positions– PID : EMCal
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 6
Method of Method of vv22 Measurement Measurement
• Define reaction plane by charged multiplicity on Beam-Beam Counters• Photons
– Obtained the second harmonic coefficient v2 from <cos[2(-r)]>
• 0
– 0 reconstruction and background subtract (combinatorial and the others)– For each pT, azimuthal angle, centrality
– Combine both information– Counting number of 0 as a function of -r and fit by the formula
• Electrons– Both methods are used
]cos[ 21 2
1
1
2
3
3
rn
measuredn
TT
nvdydpp
Nd
pd
dNE
,....3,2,1 where n
event anisotropy parameter measured azimuthal angle of the particlereaction plane angle
vnreal = vn
measured/ (reaction plane resolution)n
Note: the detail of reaction plane definition will be found in nucl-ex/0305013
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 7
Reaction plane definitionReaction plane definition
NorthSouth
144.35 cm
⊿η = 3.1 ~ 4.0
⊿φ = 2π
64 elements
Quartz Cherenkov radiator
meshed dynode PMT
• inner ring• middle ring• outer ring
BBC
NorthSouth
144.35 cm
⊿η = 3.1 ~ 4.0
⊿φ = 2π
• inner ring• middle ring• outer ring
- /2 /2-
/2
/2 Correlation of reaction planes
&& 00 vv22
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 9
Inclusive photon Inclusive photon vv22 and and 00 vv22 in 200 GeV in 200 GeV Au+AuAu+Au
• Inclusive photon v2 shows similar tendency with 0
– Need more statistics to see photon v2 after 0 (and also decay effect subtraction
vertical bar : stat. errorcurves, gray box : sys. error
phenix preliminary
Note : Inclusive photon = including all of the decay effect from hadrons
phenix preliminary
phenix preliminary
pT [GeV/c]
, 200 GeV Au+Au , 200 GeV Au+Au , 200 GeV Au+Au
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 10
00 decay effect for photon decay effect for photon vv22 (MC) (MC)
• Tool is ready for the decay effect in photons
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
-0.05
v 2
0 1 2 3 4 5pT [GeV/c]
—0 v2 for MC input
• 0 v2 generated
• v2 from 0 decay
Test 1 Test 2
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 11
<<vv22> vs. centrality > vs. centrality from 200 GeV Au+Aufrom 200 GeV Au+Au
Vertical bar : stat. errorGray Box : sys. error
Npart26 46 74 114 167 235 325
Npart26 46 74 114 167 235 325
phenix preliminary
phenix preliminary
200 GeV Au+Au 200 GeV Au+Au
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 12
The charged and K v2 are shown only with statistical errors
vv22 vs. vs. ppTT vs. centrality from 200 GeV Au+Auvs. centrality from 200 GeV Au+Au
Statistical error is shown by error barSystematic error from 0 count method and reaction plane determination is shown by horizontal bar
The data point stays at <pT> in the bin and horizontal bar shows the bin range
• Charged meson v2 consistent with 0 v2 in pT<4 GeV/c
} nucl-ex/0305013
phenix preliminary
200 GeV Au+Au
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 13
}nucl-ex/0305013
phenix preliminary200 GeV Au+Au Min. Bias
vv22 vs. vs. ppTT (Min. Bias) from 200 GeV Au+Au (Min. Bias) from 200 GeV Au+Au
• Identified particle v2 up to pT=10 GeV/c
36.3106 [events] = 5.3± [(b)-1]
Also• Similar pT dependence
with charged hadron v2
• Low pT : consistent with hydrodynamical calculation
• High pT : interesting to compare to a jet quenching calculation/ fragmentation-recombination model
0.50.4
Consistent with charged pions
Vertical bar : stat. errorcurves, Gray Box : sys. error
The data point :at <pT> in the bin
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 14
vv22 : Identified hadrons at mid-rapidity : Identified hadrons at mid-rapidity
PHENIX , K, pin nucl-ex/0305013and they are consistent with STAR data
PHENIX d+dpreliminary data
STAR K0S ,
in nucl-ex/0306007
Hydrodynamical picture candescribe mass dependence of v2
Difference between meson and baryon
200 GeV Au+Au Min. Bias
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 15
200 GeV Au+Au Min. Bias
preliminary
} nucl-ex/0305013
Coalescence pictureCoalescence picture
• It is established for the nuclei cross section
A : nuclear numberP : momentump = P/ABA : coalescence parameter
)()( ,2,2 pAvPv protonA
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 16
Quark coalescence?Quark coalescence?• Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 092301, D. Molnar and S.A. Voloshin
• qqmeson, qqq(qqq)Baryon
• What data looks like?
- - - -
• Non-strange and strange mesons and baryons seem to be merged
around pT/nquark 1-3 GeV/c
• With more statistics, we may discuss precisely
200 GeV Au+Au Min. Bias
ee±± v v22
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 18
Non-photonic Non-photonic ee±± vv22
• Non-photonic electron (sorry for jargon) means– Measured electron minus background:
• hadron decay• conversion
– that is, charmed (+bottomed) electronwe think
• Two scenarios in nucl-th/0312100
• thermalized charm + transverse flow
• no re-interaction
• Data is consistent with both scenarios
0 1 2 3
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
-0.05
-0.1
non
-ph
oto
nic
ele
ctro
n v 2
pT [GeV/c]
The data point : on <pT> in the bin
horizontal bar : RMS of dN/dpT
– Have a look of the poster for detail discussion–Shingo Sakai•Azimuthal Anisotropy of electrons/positrons in 200 GeV
Au+Au Collisions at RHIC-PHENIX–Takashi Hachiya•Single Electrons From Semi-leptonic Decays of Heavy Flavor in Au+Au Collisions at sNN=200 GeV
SummarSummaryy
Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 20
SummarySummary• First measurement of 0, , e v2 at RHIC• 0 v2
– Minimum bias data (pT =1-10 GeV/c)• v2 at the highest pT from the identified particle analysis• Non-zero 0 v2 up to pT ~8 GeV/c
– Charged v2 consistent with 0 v2 in pT =1-3 GeV/c– Quark coalescence picture seems to work
• from combining various hadron v2’s at RHIC
• v2
– Centrality (top 20, 20-40, 40-60%) and pT dependence (in pT <5 GeV/c) are consistent with 0
– With more statistics from run4, we hope to reject the decay effect
• e v2
– Minimum bias data (pT =0.4-3.0 GeV/c)– Non-photonic e v2 is consistent with both models:
• charm flow and no-charm flow– We can discuss more precisely with more data.