20
Event anisotropy of identified Event anisotropy of identified 0 0 , , and and e e compared to charged compared to charged , , K K , , p p , and , and d d in in s s NN NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration x z y Mas as h i K an e ta

Event anisotropy of identified 0, and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Event anisotropy of identified Event anisotropy of identified 00, , and and ee

compared to charged compared to charged , , KK, , pp, and , and ddin in ssNN NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX= 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX

Masashi Kanetafor the PHENIX collaboration

x

zy

Mas

ashi

Kan

eta

Page 2: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 2

USA Abilene Christian University, Abilene, TXBrookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NYUniversity of California - Riverside, Riverside, CAUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, COColumbia University, Nevis Laboratories, Irvington, NYFlorida State University, Tallahassee, FLFlorida Technical University, Melbourne, FLGeorgia State University, Atlanta, GAUniversity of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, ILIowa State University and Ames Laboratory, Ames, IALos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NMLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CaUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NMNew Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NMDept. of Chemistry, Stony Brook Univ., Stony Brook, NYDept. Phys. and Astronomy, Stony Brook Univ., Stony Brook, NY Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TNUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, TNVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

Brazil University of São Paulo, São PauloChina Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

China Institute of Atomic Energy, BeijingPeking University, Beijing

France LPC, University de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-FerrandDapnia, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-YvetteIPN-Orsay, Universite Paris Sud, CNRS-IN2P3, OrsayLLR, Ecòle Polytechnique, CNRS-IN2P3, PalaiseauSUBATECH, Ecòle des Mines at Nantes, Nantes

Germany University of Münster, MünsterHungary Central Research Institute for Physics (KFKI), Budapest

Debrecen University, DebrecenEötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Budapest

India Banaras Hindu University, BanarasBhabha Atomic Research Centre, Bombay

Israel Weizmann Institute, RehovotJapan Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo, Tokyo

Hiroshima University, Higashi-HiroshimaKEK, Institute for High Energy Physics, TsukubaKyoto University, KyotoNagasaki Institute of Applied Science, NagasakiRIKEN, Institute for Physical and Chemical Research, WakoRIKEN-BNL Research Center, Upton, NYRikkyo University, TokyoTokyo Institute of Technology, TokyoUniversity of Tsukuba, TsukubaWaseda University, Tokyo

S. Korea Cyclotron Application Laboratory, KAERI, SeoulKangnung National University, KangnungKorea University, SeoulMyong Ji University, Yongin CitySystem Electronics Laboratory, Seoul Nat. University, SeoulYonsei University, Seoul

Russia Institute of High Energy Physics, ProtovinoJoint Institute for Nuclear Research, DubnaKurchatov Institute, MoscowPNPI, St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, St. PetersburgSt. Petersburg State Technical University, St. Petersburg

Sweden Lund University, Lund

12 Countries; 58 Institutions; 480 Participants*

*as of January 2004

Page 3: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 3

AnnouncementAnnouncement

• The flow and event anisotropy from the PHENIX collaborators in the poster session

* Students

– Shingo Sakai*

• Azimuthal anisotropy of electrons/positrons in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC-PHENIX

– Andrey Kazantsev*

• Elliptic flow of inclusive photons in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV from the PHENIX experiment at RHIC

– Hiroshi Masui*

• Measurement of directed flow in sNN=200 GeV Au+Au, d+Au, p+p collisions at RHIC-PHENIX

– Akio Kiyomichi• Radial flow study from identified hadron spectra in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200

GeV (at PHENIX)– Michael Issah*

• Azimuthal anisotropy measurements in PHENIX via cummulants of Multiparticle azimuthal correlations

– Debsankar Mukhopadhyay• Elliptic flow of mesons in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV (at PHENIX)

– ShinIchi Esumi• Analysis of event anisotropy and azimuthal pair correlation

Page 4: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 4

MotivationsMotivations

• Event anisotropy– Sensitive to the initial state

• Collectivity of hadron/parton thermalization / recombination• Energy loss by Jet quenching dense matter

• 0

– Large pT coverage as an identified hadron– Large contribution of the decay to the following inclusive

measurements

• Photon– Radiation / Compton from hot gas– Photon flow?

• Electron/positron– Open charm and bottom– Flow and energy loss of heavy flavors?

c c

0DK

0D

+

K

Page 5: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 5

The PHENIX experiment at The PHENIX experiment at RHICRHIC

• Event centrality– BBC and ZDC

PHOENIX

• Electrons– Tracking

• DC, PC hits, vertex by BBC– PID

• RICH (pT<4.9 GeV/c)• Energy/momentum cut by EMCal

• Photons/0

– Tracking : vertex be BBC to EMC hit positions– PID : EMCal

Page 6: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 6

Method of Method of vv22 Measurement Measurement

• Define reaction plane by charged multiplicity on Beam-Beam Counters• Photons

– Obtained the second harmonic coefficient v2 from <cos[2(-r)]>

• 0

– 0 reconstruction and background subtract (combinatorial and the others)– For each pT, azimuthal angle, centrality

– Combine both information– Counting number of 0 as a function of -r and fit by the formula

• Electrons– Both methods are used

]cos[ 21 2

1

1

2

3

3

rn

measuredn

TT

nvdydpp

Nd

pd

dNE

,....3,2,1 where n

event anisotropy parameter measured azimuthal angle of the particlereaction plane angle

vnreal = vn

measured/ (reaction plane resolution)n

Note: the detail of reaction plane definition will be found in nucl-ex/0305013

Page 7: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 7

Reaction plane definitionReaction plane definition

NorthSouth

144.35 cm

⊿η = 3.1 ~ 4.0

⊿φ = 2π

64 elements

Quartz Cherenkov radiator

meshed dynode PMT

• inner ring• middle ring• outer ring

BBC

NorthSouth

144.35 cm

⊿η = 3.1 ~ 4.0

⊿φ = 2π

• inner ring• middle ring• outer ring

- /2 /2-

/2

/2 Correlation of reaction planes

Page 8: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

&& 00 vv22

Page 9: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 9

Inclusive photon Inclusive photon vv22 and and 00 vv22 in 200 GeV in 200 GeV Au+AuAu+Au

• Inclusive photon v2 shows similar tendency with 0

– Need more statistics to see photon v2 after 0 (and also decay effect subtraction

vertical bar : stat. errorcurves, gray box : sys. error

phenix preliminary

Note : Inclusive photon = including all of the decay effect from hadrons

phenix preliminary

phenix preliminary

pT [GeV/c]

, 200 GeV Au+Au , 200 GeV Au+Au , 200 GeV Au+Au

Page 10: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 10

00 decay effect for photon decay effect for photon vv22 (MC) (MC)

• Tool is ready for the decay effect in photons

0 1 2 3 4 5

0.35

0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0

-0.05

v 2

0 1 2 3 4 5pT [GeV/c]

—0 v2 for MC input

• 0 v2 generated

• v2 from 0 decay

Test 1 Test 2

Page 11: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 11

<<vv22> vs. centrality > vs. centrality from 200 GeV Au+Aufrom 200 GeV Au+Au

Vertical bar : stat. errorGray Box : sys. error

Npart26 46 74 114 167 235 325

Npart26 46 74 114 167 235 325

phenix preliminary

phenix preliminary

200 GeV Au+Au 200 GeV Au+Au

Page 12: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 12

The charged and K v2 are shown only with statistical errors

vv22 vs. vs. ppTT vs. centrality from 200 GeV Au+Auvs. centrality from 200 GeV Au+Au

Statistical error is shown by error barSystematic error from 0 count method and reaction plane determination is shown by horizontal bar

The data point stays at <pT> in the bin and horizontal bar shows the bin range

• Charged meson v2 consistent with 0 v2 in pT<4 GeV/c

} nucl-ex/0305013

phenix preliminary

200 GeV Au+Au

Page 13: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 13

}nucl-ex/0305013

phenix preliminary200 GeV Au+Au Min. Bias

vv22 vs. vs. ppTT (Min. Bias) from 200 GeV Au+Au (Min. Bias) from 200 GeV Au+Au

• Identified particle v2 up to pT=10 GeV/c

36.3106 [events] = 5.3± [(b)-1]

Also• Similar pT dependence

with charged hadron v2

• Low pT : consistent with hydrodynamical calculation

• High pT : interesting to compare to a jet quenching calculation/ fragmentation-recombination model

0.50.4

Consistent with charged pions

Vertical bar : stat. errorcurves, Gray Box : sys. error

The data point :at <pT> in the bin

Page 14: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 14

vv22 : Identified hadrons at mid-rapidity : Identified hadrons at mid-rapidity

PHENIX , K, pin nucl-ex/0305013and they are consistent with STAR data

PHENIX d+dpreliminary data

STAR K0S ,

in nucl-ex/0306007

Hydrodynamical picture candescribe mass dependence of v2

Difference between meson and baryon

200 GeV Au+Au Min. Bias

Page 15: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 15

200 GeV Au+Au Min. Bias

preliminary

} nucl-ex/0305013

Coalescence pictureCoalescence picture

• It is established for the nuclei cross section

A : nuclear numberP : momentump = P/ABA : coalescence parameter

)()( ,2,2 pAvPv protonA

Page 16: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 16

Quark coalescence?Quark coalescence?• Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 092301, D. Molnar and S.A. Voloshin

• qqmeson, qqq(qqq)Baryon

• What data looks like?

- - - -

• Non-strange and strange mesons and baryons seem to be merged

around pT/nquark 1-3 GeV/c

• With more statistics, we may discuss precisely

200 GeV Au+Au Min. Bias

Page 17: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

ee±± v v22

Page 18: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 18

Non-photonic Non-photonic ee±± vv22

• Non-photonic electron (sorry for jargon) means– Measured electron minus background:

• hadron decay• conversion

– that is, charmed (+bottomed) electronwe think

• Two scenarios in nucl-th/0312100

• thermalized charm + transverse flow

• no re-interaction

• Data is consistent with both scenarios

0 1 2 3

0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0

-0.05

-0.1

non

-ph

oto

nic

ele

ctro

n v 2

pT [GeV/c]

The data point : on <pT> in the bin

horizontal bar : RMS of dN/dpT

– Have a look of the poster for detail discussion–Shingo Sakai•Azimuthal Anisotropy of electrons/positrons in 200 GeV

Au+Au Collisions at RHIC-PHENIX–Takashi Hachiya•Single Electrons From Semi-leptonic Decays of Heavy Flavor in Au+Au Collisions at sNN=200 GeV

Page 19: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

SummarSummaryy

Page 20: Event anisotropy of identified  0,  and e compared to charged , K, p, and d in  s NN = 200 GeV Au+Au at PHENIX Masashi Kaneta for the PHENIX collaboration

Masashi Kaneta, RBRC, BNL 20

SummarySummary• First measurement of 0, , e v2 at RHIC• 0 v2

– Minimum bias data (pT =1-10 GeV/c)• v2 at the highest pT from the identified particle analysis• Non-zero 0 v2 up to pT ~8 GeV/c

– Charged v2 consistent with 0 v2 in pT =1-3 GeV/c– Quark coalescence picture seems to work

• from combining various hadron v2’s at RHIC

• v2

– Centrality (top 20, 20-40, 40-60%) and pT dependence (in pT <5 GeV/c) are consistent with 0

– With more statistics from run4, we hope to reject the decay effect

• e v2

– Minimum bias data (pT =0.4-3.0 GeV/c)– Non-photonic e v2 is consistent with both models:

• charm flow and no-charm flow– We can discuss more precisely with more data.