Every Child Matters: Change for Children Programme Structure

Tom Jeffery

ProgrammeBoard

Delive

ry P

rogr

amm

es

Sup

port

ing

Pro

gram

mes

SRO ProgrammeReview

ProgrammeOffice

Mark Davies

Children’s Health Group

Naomi Eisenstadt

Parents, Parenting &Relationship support

Cross CuttingProgrammes

Anne Jackson

Strategy

Anne Weinstock

Youth

Naomi Eisenstadt

Sure Start &Extended Schools

Althea Efunshile

Safeguarding

Sheila Scales

SupportingChange

Jeanette Pugh

Change inPractice

ECM/ Schools forum

Links to OGDs

Home Office

Health

ODPM

DWP

DCMS

Change in Practice Programme

Change In PracticeProgramme

Change in PracticeProgramme board

SRO: Jeanette Pugh

Every Child Matters: Changefor Children

Programme BoardSRO: Tom Jeffery

Change for Childrenprogramme office

SRO Programme Review

Change in Practice SROReview Group

Change in PracticeProgramme Office

ProgM: Richard Watts

IS Index ProjectSRO Jeanette Pugh

RO: Bill LimondPM: Michael Charles

Building CapacityProject

RO: Chris WellsPM: Ike Nwaku

Integrated WorkingProject

RO: Peter MucklowPM: Sharon Pitchford

Children’s trust -Governance andStrategy Project

RO: Andrew SargentPM: Diana Miles

DA(CP)SoS for Education and Skills

“To deliver a solution to facilitate communication between

practitioners from different services and agencies which

will enable them to share information appropriately and

securely for the benefit of children, young people and

families”

Index Project Mission Statement

The IS Index project going forward

OGC Gateway 1Sept 05

DA(CP) Auth. to Proceed next

stageOct 05

Procurement2006

Build & Pilot2007

Deployment2008

Business/Benefits Case

Requirements and Design (incl. UID)

Procurement and Implementation

Stakeholder & Communications

Policy

Phases

Work stream

Key links (existing or planned) with other national initiatives

IS Index

CAF

Connecting for Health

Lead Professiona

l

Multi-agency Working

Government Connects

CJIT

e-Gov

NRUC

Common Core

ICS

TB experience

Children Act 2004 & other legislation

ECM & other guidance / policies

Parliamentary Briefings, Q&A

Other experience

Trailblazers

Public

Project Team

MPs

Legal Advice

Responding to our many stakeholders

Steering Groups

RO’s & SRO’s

Select Committees

Policy Makers

Practitioners & Managers

Other ProjectTeams

Other Gov Depts

DELIVERING THE IS INDEX

Our Key Stakeholders

• Trailblazers

• LAs and other practitioner organisations:

• ISA Project Managers

• IT Manager

• Other Government Depts

• Information Commissioner

• Children’s Commissioner

• Data Suppliers

• Infrastructure Providers

• ISAG & Boards (Index - ECM)

TODAY

Where we have come from

During January and February 160+ stakeholders, across local statutory and voluntary sectors

Senior Managers

Service/Middle/Operational Managers

IT Managers

Front-Line Practitioners

Admin/Operational Staff

Validate case studies, explain work/business processes

Develop high level requirements for an Index

Our process for identifying IS Index requirements involves a series of workshops

Business Scenarios

1st Regional Workshops

Process Steps

Assumptions

Principles

Issues

Queries

Validated Processes

Validated Requirements

Trailblazer Workshops

2nd Regional Workshops

Common Business Processes

Requirements

Issues

What the Trailblazers tell us

Practitioners are enthusiastic about information sharing

An Information Sharing Index has to address the national dimension

Need an Index to share information efficiently and effectively

Stakeholder Engagement to October

TrailblazerEvent 225 July

L.A. (Leeds)Event 113 July

L.A. (Leeds)Event 2

3 August

L.A.(London)Event 115 July

L.A.(London)Event 2

5 August

Health Practitioner Manager Event

OGDs re Data Sources

VCSOs via ISAG

Sub-Group

LA Senior Managers via ADSS

etc.

Strategic Options for DA(CP) Consideration

No National INDEX Project“Do Nothing”

DevelopIntegratedINDEXES

DevelopLocal

INDEXES

Invest inFront-LineResources

Benefits enabled by an Index Practitioners can verify identity of a child

Identification of children missing

universal services

Reduction in wasted visits and searches

when children move away

Fewer children lost / gone missing

following move away

Better intervention and support decisions

Faster decision-making and earlier

intervention

Improved continuity of services for

children

Better understanding of children’s

circumstances, including carers and

practitioner involvement

Prioritisation of practitioner contact

Reduced duplication of effort in

assessment of families

Reduced duplication of information

provided by families

Better informed national and local service

planning