Upload
otto-wilder
View
72
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Evidence-Based Medicine: introduction. Natapong Kosachunhanun, M.D. Dr. Sydney Burwell, Dean of Harvard Medical School, 1956. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Evidence-Based Medicine:introduction
Natapong Kosachunhanun, M.D.
My student are dismayed when I say to them.
” Half of what you are taught asmedical studentswill in1 0 yea rs have been shown to be wrong
. And the trouble is, none of you rteacher knows whi chhal f . ”
Dr. Sydney Burwell, Dean of Harva rdMedicalSchool,1 9 5 6
3
Rule 31 – Review the World Literature Fortnightly* *"Kill as Few Patients as Possible" - Oscar London
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
Biomedical MEDLINE Trials Diagnostic?
Med
ical
Art
icle
s p
er Y
ear
5,000?per day
1,500 per day
95 per day
Med
ical A
rtic
les
Per
Year
Development of a Research Development of a Research Idea Idea For Application to Clinical For Application to Clinical PracticePractice
Ideas
Bench
Research
Earlyhuman trials
Controlled trials
ClinicalClinicalPracticePractice
ClinicalClinicalPracticePractice
The The ““Evidence Transfer GapEvidence Transfer Gap””
Controlled trials
21
5
101
1 2
8
7
8
12
4
3
1
1
2
8
7
2
1
1
1
2
8
1
5
15
6
No
t M
en
tio
ne
d
Ro
uti
ne
Ex
pe
rim
en
tal
Ra
re/N
ev
er
Sp
ec
ific
M
M
M
M
M
M
Textbook/ReviewRecommendations
ThrombolyticThrombolytic Therapy for Acute MITherapy for Acute MI
Year
1960
1965
1970
1980
1985
1990
RCTs Pts
1 23
2 65
3 149
4 316
7 1793
10 254411 265115 331117 392922 5452
23 5767
27 612530 634633 657143 21 05954 22 051
67 47 53165 47 185
70 48 154
Cumulative 2.02.0
Odds Ratio (Log Scale)Odds Ratio (Log Scale)
0.50.5 1.01.0
Favours Treatment Favours Control
P<.01
P<.001
P<.00001
Many “Leaks” from research & practice
Aware Accept Target Doable Recall Agree Done
ValidResearch
If 80% achieved at each stage then0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 = 0.21
What is evidence-based medicine?
“Evidence-based medicine is the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values”
- Dave Sackett
Patient Concerns
Clinical Expertise
Best research evidence
EBM
Evidence based practice
Information “pull”Steps in EBM process
1. Formulate an answerable question
2. Track down the best evidence
3. Critically appraise the evidence
4. Integrate with clinical expertise and patient values
Good questions are the backbone of practicing EBM. It takes practice to ask the well-formulated question.
The nature of the question asked is critically experience dependent.
GENERAL KNOWLEDGE
SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGETYPE OF QUESTION
CLINICAL EXPERIENCE
What type of question you What type of question you are asking?are asking?
Clinical findingClinical finding DiagnosisDiagnosis PrognosisPrognosis TherapyTherapy PreventionPrevention
Sackett’s “Just in Time” learningAn EBM Approach to Education
Evidence cart on ward rounds - 1995 Looked up 2-3 questions per patient Took 15-90 seconds to find Change about 1/3 decisions Rounds took longer!
Dave Sackett
17
conclusion
Clinical decision should be based on best available scientific evidence, informed by epidemiological and biostatical reasoning.
Clinical problem should determine the evidence to be sought.
Conclusion from identified and critically appraised evidence must lead to changed patient management or health care decision.
Clinical performance should be constantly evaluated.
กาลามสู�ตร กาลามสู�ตรเป็�นหล�กแห�งความเชื่��อที่��พระพ�ที่ธองค�ที่รงวางไว!ให!แก�พ�ที่ธศาสูน$กชื่น ไม�ให!
เชื่��อสู$�งใด ๆ อย่�างงมงาย่โดย่ไม�ใชื่!ป็)ญญาพ$จารณาให!เห-นจร$งถึ/งค�ณโที่ษหร�อด�ไม�ด�ก�อน เชื่��อ
1. อย่�าเพ$�งเชื่��อตามที่��ฟั)งๆ ก�นมา2. อย่�าเพ$�งเชื่��อตามที่��ที่2าต�อๆ ก�นมา3. อย่�าเพ$�งเชื่��อตามค2าเล�าล�อ4. อย่�าเพ$�งเชื่��อโดย่อ!างต2ารา5. อย่�าเพ$�งเชื่��อโดย่น/กเดา6. อย่�าเพ$�งเชื่��อโดย่คาดคะเนเอา7. อย่�าเพ$�งเชื่��อโดย่น/กค$ดตามแนวเหต�ผล8. อย่�าเพ$�งเชื่��อเพราะถึ�กก�บที่ฤษฎี�ของตน9. อย่�าเพ$�งเชื่��อเพราะม�ร�ป็ล�กษณ�ที่��ควรเชื่��อได!10. อย่�าเพ$�งเชื่��อเพราะผ�!พ�ดเป็�นคร�บาอาจารย่�ของตน