25
Go to: Go to: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 Jan 1. Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008; 32(1): 20–39. Published online 2007 May 18. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.019 PMCID: PMC2235907 NIHMSID: NIHMS36189 Evidence for sugar addiction: Behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake Nicole M. Avena , Pedro Rada , and Bartley G. Hoebel Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA *Send correspondence to: Dr. Bart Hoebel, Princeton University, Department of Psychology, Princeton, NJ 08540, Phone: (609) 2584463, Fax: (609) 2581113, Email: [email protected] Copyright notice and Disclaimer Publisher's Disclaimer The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Neurosci Biobehav Rev See other articles in PMC that cite the published article. Abstract The experimental question is whether or not sugar can be a substance of abuse and lead to a natural form of addiction. “Food addiction” seems plausible because brain pathways that evolved to respond to natural rewards are also activated by addictive drugs. Sugar is noteworthy as a substance that releases opioids and dopamine and thus might be expected to have addictive potential. This review summarizes evidence of sugar dependence in an animal model. Four components of addiction are analyzed. “Bingeing”, “withdrawal”, “craving” and crosssensitization are each given operational definitions and demonstrated behaviorally with sugar bingeing as the reinforcer. These behaviors are then related to neurochemical changes in the brain that also occur with addictive drugs. Neural adaptations include changes in dopamine and opioid receptor binding, enkephalin mRNA expression and dopamine and acetylcholine release in the nucleus accumbens. The evidence supports the hypothesis that under certain circumstances rats can become sugar dependent. This may translate to some human conditions as suggested by the literature on eating disorders and obesity. Keywords: binge eating, dopamine, acetylcholine, opioid, nucleus accumbens, withdrawal, craving, behavioral sensitization, rat 1. OVERVIEW Neural systems that evolved to motivate and reinforce foraging and food intake also underlie drugseeking and self administration. The fact that some of these drugs can cause addiction raises the logical possibility that some foods might also cause addcition. Many people claim that they feel compelled to eat sweet foods, similar in some ways to how an alcoholic might feel compelled to drink. Therefore, we developed an animal model to investigate why some people have difficulty moderating their intake of palatable foods, such as sweet beverages. In this animal model, rats are food deprived daily for 12 h, then after a delay of 4 h into their normal circadian driven active period, they are given 12h access to a sugar solution and chow. As a result, they learn to drink the sugar solution copiously, especially when it first becomes available each day. After a month on this intermittentfeeding schedule, the animals show a series of behaviors similar to the effects of drugs of abuse. These are categorized as “bingeing”, meaning unusually large bouts of intake, opiatelike “withdrawal” indicated by signs of anxiety and behavioral depression (Colantuoni et al., 2001 , 2002 ), and “craving” measured during sugar abstinence as enhanced responding for sugar (Avena et al., 2005 ). There are also signs of both locomotor and consummatory “crosssensitization” from sugar to drugs of abuse (Avena et al., 2004 , *

Evidence for Sugar Addiction_ Behavioral and Neurochemical Effects of Intermittent, Excessive Sugar Intake

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

SUGGAR ADDICTION

Citation preview

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 1/25

    Goto:

    Goto:

    NeurosciBiobehavRev.AuthormanuscriptavailableinPMC2009Jan1.Publishedinfinaleditedformas:

    NeurosciBiobehavRev.200832(1):2039.Publishedonline2007May18.doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.019

    PMCID:PMC2235907NIHMSID:NIHMS36189

    Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintakeNicoleM.Avena,PedroRada,andBartleyG.Hoebel

    DepartmentofPsychology,PrincetonUniversity,Princeton,NJ08540USA*Sendcorrespondenceto:Dr.BartHoebel,PrincetonUniversity,DepartmentofPsychology,Princeton,NJ08540,Phone:(609)2584463,Fax:(609)2581113,Email:[email protected]

    CopyrightnoticeandDisclaimer

    Publisher'sDisclaimer

    Thepublisher'sfinaleditedversionofthisarticleisavailableatNeurosciBiobehavRevSeeotherarticlesinPMCthatcitethepublishedarticle.

    Abstract

    Theexperimentalquestioniswhetherornotsugarcanbeasubstanceofabuseandleadtoanaturalformofaddiction.Foodaddictionseemsplausiblebecausebrainpathwaysthatevolvedtorespondtonaturalrewardsarealsoactivatedbyaddictivedrugs.Sugarisnoteworthyasasubstancethatreleasesopioidsanddopamineandthusmightbeexpectedtohaveaddictivepotential.Thisreviewsummarizesevidenceofsugardependenceinananimalmodel.Fourcomponentsofaddictionareanalyzed.Bingeing,withdrawal,cravingandcrosssensitizationareeachgivenoperationaldefinitionsanddemonstratedbehaviorallywithsugarbingeingasthereinforcer.Thesebehaviorsarethenrelatedtoneurochemicalchangesinthebrainthatalsooccurwithaddictivedrugs.Neuraladaptationsincludechangesindopamineandopioidreceptorbinding,enkephalinmRNAexpressionanddopamineandacetylcholinereleaseinthenucleusaccumbens.Theevidencesupportsthehypothesisthatundercertaincircumstancesratscanbecomesugardependent.Thismaytranslatetosomehumanconditionsassuggestedbytheliteratureoneatingdisordersandobesity.

    Keywords:bingeeating,dopamine,acetylcholine,opioid,nucleusaccumbens,withdrawal,craving,behavioralsensitization,rat

    1.OVERVIEW

    Neuralsystemsthatevolvedtomotivateandreinforceforagingandfoodintakealsounderliedrugseekingandselfadministration.Thefactthatsomeofthesedrugscancauseaddictionraisesthelogicalpossibilitythatsomefoodsmightalsocauseaddcition.Manypeopleclaimthattheyfeelcompelledtoeatsweetfoods,similarinsomewaystohowanalcoholicmightfeelcompelledtodrink.Therefore,wedevelopedananimalmodeltoinvestigatewhysomepeoplehavedifficultymoderatingtheirintakeofpalatablefoods,suchassweetbeverages.

    Inthisanimalmodel,ratsarefooddepriveddailyfor12h,thenafteradelayof4hintotheirnormalcircadiandrivenactiveperiod,theyaregiven12haccesstoasugarsolutionandchow.Asaresult,theylearntodrinkthesugarsolutioncopiously,especiallywhenitfirstbecomesavailableeachday.

    Afteramonthonthisintermittentfeedingschedule,theanimalsshowaseriesofbehaviorssimilartotheeffectsofdrugsofabuse.Thesearecategorizedasbingeing,meaningunusuallylargeboutsofintake,opiatelikewithdrawalindicatedbysignsofanxietyandbehavioraldepression(Colantuonietal.,2001,2002),andcravingmeasuredduringsugarabstinenceasenhancedrespondingforsugar(Avenaetal.,2005).Therearealsosignsofbothlocomotorandconsummatorycrosssensitizationfromsugartodrugsofabuse(Avenaetal.,2004,

    *

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 2/25

    Goto:

    AvenaandHoebel,2003b).Havingfoundthesebehaviorsthatarecommontodrugdependencywithsupportingevidencefromotherlaboratories(Gosnell,2005,Grimmetal.,2005,Widemanetal.,2005),thenextquestioniswhythishappens.

    Awellknowncharacteristicofaddictivedrugsistheirabilitytocauserepeated,intermittentincreasesinextracellulardopamine(DA)inthenucleusaccumbens(NAc)(DiChiaraandImperato,1988,HernandezandHoebel,1988,Wiseetal.,1995).WefindthatratswithintermittentaccesstosugarwilldrinkinabingelikemannerthatreleasesDAintheNAceachtime,liketheclassiceffectofmostsubstancesofabuse(Avenaetal.,2006,Radaetal.,2005b).ThisconsequentlyleadstochangesintheexpressionoravailabilityofDAreceptors(Colantuonietal.,2001,Spangleretal.,2004).

    Intermittentsugaraccessalsoactsbywayofopioidsinthebrain.TherearechangesinopioidsystemssuchasdecreasedenkephalinmRNAexpressionintheaccumbens(Spangleretal.,2004).Signsofwithdrawalseemtobelargelyduetotheopioidmodificationssincewithdrawalcanbeobtainedwiththeopioidantagonistnaloxone.Fooddeprivationisalsosufficienttoprecipitateopiatelikewithdrawalsigns(Avena,Bocarsly,Rada,KimandHoebel,unpublished,Colantuonietal.,2002).Thiswithdrawalstateinvolvesatleasttwoneurochemicalmanifestations.FirstisadecreaseinextracellularDAintheaccumbens,andsecondisthereleaseofacetylcholine(ACh)fromaccumbensinterneurons.Theseneurochemicaladaptationsinresponsetointermittentsugarintakemimictheeffectsofopiates.

    Thetheoryisformulatedthatintermittent,excessiveintakeofsugarcanhavedopaminergic,cholinergicandopioideffectsthataresimilartopsychostimulantsandopiates,albeitsmallerinmagnitude.Theoveralleffectoftheseneurochemicaladaptationsismild,butwelldefined,dependency(Hoebeletal.,1999,LeibowitzandHoebel,2004,Radaetal.,2005a).Thisreviewcompilesstudiesfromourlaboratoryandintegratesrelatedresultsobtainedbyothersusinganimalmodels,clinicalaccountsandbrainimagingtoanswerthequestion:cansugar,insomeconditions,beaddictive?

    2.DEFININGADDICTION

    Throughoutthisreviewweuseseveraltermswithdefinitionsforwhichthereisnotuniversalagreement.Addictionresearchtraditionallyfocusesondrugsofabuse,suchasmorphine,cocaine,nicotineandalcohol.However,recentlyavarietyofaddictionstonondrugentities,includinggambling,sex,andinthisreview,food,havebeeninvestigated(BancroftandVukadinovic,2004,Comingsetal.,2001,Petry,2006).Thetermaddictionimpliespsychologicaldependenceandthusisamentalorcognitiveproblem,notjustaphysicalailment.Addictionisoftenusedsynonymouslywiththetermdependence(Nelsonetal.,1982)asdefinedbyDSMIVTR(AmericanPsychiatricAssociation,2000).Wewillusethetermdependenceinitsallencompassingmeaningtodescribetheresultsofabatteryofanimalstudiesthatmodelhumandrugaddictionineachofitsmajorphases(KoobandLeMoal,2005).

    Drugdependenceischaracterizedbycompulsive,sometimesuncontrollable,behaviorsthatoccurattheexpenseofotheractivitiesandintensifywithrepeatedaccess.Dependenceisdifficulttodemonstrateconvincinglyinlaboratoryanimals,butcriteriahavebeensuggestedusinganimalmodels.Wehaveusedmodelsthatweredevelopedwithratsforstudyingdrugdependenceandadaptedthemtotestforsignsofsugardependence.

    Bingeing

    Thediagnosticcriteriaforaddictioncanbegroupedintothreestages(AmericanPsychiatricAssociation,2000,KoobandLeMoal,1997).Thefirst,bingeing,isdefinedastheescalationofintakewithahighproportionofintakeatonetime,usuallyafteraperiodofvoluntaryabstinenceorforceddeprivation.Enhancedintakeintheformofbingesmayresultfrombothsensitizationandtolerancetothesensorypropertiesofasubstanceofabusethatoccurswithitsrepeateddelivery.Sensitization,whichisdescribedingreaterdetailbelow,isanincreaseinresponsivenesstoarepeatedlypresentedstimulus.Toleranceisagradualdecreaseinresponsiveness,suchthatmoreofthesubstanceisneededtoproducethesameeffect(McSweeneyetal.,2005).Botharethoughttoinfluencethepowerful,acutereinforcingeffectsofdrugsofabuseandareimportantatthebeginningoftheaddictioncyclesincebothcanincreaserespondingandintake(KoobandLeMoal,2005).

    Withdrawal

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 3/25

    Goto:

    Signsofwithdrawalbecomeapparentwhentheabusedsubstanceisnolongeravailableorchemicallyblocked.Wewilldiscusswithdrawalintermsofopiatewithdrawal,whichhasaclearlydefinedsetofsymptoms(Martinetal.,1963,Wayetal.,1969).Anxietycanbeoperationallydefinedandmeasuredinanimalsusingtheelevatedplusmaze,inwhichanxiousanimalswillavoidspendingtimeontheopenarmsofthemaze(Fileetal.,2004).Thistesthasbeenextensivelyvalidatedforbothgeneralanxiety(Pellowetal.,1985)andanxietyinducedbydrugwithdrawal(FileandAndrews,1991).Behavioraldepressioninanimalscanalsobeinferred,withoutreferencetoemotion,usingtheforcedswimtest,whichmeasuresswimmingescapeeffortsvs.passivefloating(Porsoltetal.,1978).Whensignsofopiatewithdrawalareprecipitatedwithnaloxone,itsuggeststhatinactivationofopioidreceptorsisthecause.Whenthesamesignsareproducedspontaneouslyduringabstinence,onecansurmisethatitisduetolackofstimulationofsomeopioidsystem.

    Craving

    Thethirdstageofaddiction,craving,occurswhenmotivationisenhanced,usuallyafteranabstinenceperiod(VanderschurenandEveritt,2005,Weiss,2005).Cravingremainsapoorlydefinedtermthatisoftenusedtodescribetheintensedesiretoselfadministerdrugsinhumans(Wise,1988).Forlackofabetterword,wewillusethetermcravingasdefinedbyincreasedeffortstoobtainasubstanceofabuseoritsassociatedcuesasaresultofaddictionandabstinence.Cravingoftenhasreferencetoextrememotivation,whichcanbemeasuredusingoperantconditioning.Ifabstinencemakestheanimalsignificantlyincreaseitsleverpressing,onecantakethisasasignofenhancedmotivation.

    Sensitization

    Inadditiontotheabovediagnosticcriteria,behavioralsensitizationisthoughttounderliesomeaspectsofdrugdependence(VanderschurenandKalivas,2000).Behavioralsensitizationistypicallymeasuredasincreasedlocomotioninresponsetorepeatedadministrationsofadrug.Forexample,afterrepeateddosesofamphetaminefollowedbyabstinence,achallengedose,whichhaslittleornoeffectinnaveanimals,causesmarkedhyperactivity(AntelmanandCaggiula,1996,Glicketal.,1986).Animalssensitizedtoonesubstanceoftenshowcrosssensitization,whichisdefinedasanincreasedlocomotorresponsetoadifferentdrugorsubstance.Crosssensitizationcanalsobemanifestinconsummatorybehavior(Piazzaetal.,1989).Animalssensitizedtoonedrugmayshowincreasedintakeofadifferentdrug.Inotherwords,onedrugactsasagatewaytoanother.Forexample,animalssensitizedtoamphetamineshowacceleratedescalationofcocaineintake(FerrarioandRobinson,2007),andanimalssensitizedtonicotineconsumemorealcoholcomparedwithnonsensitizedanimals(Blomqvistetal.,1996).Thisbehavioristhoughttooccurwhendifferentdrugsactivatethesameneuralcircuitry,anditisthereasonwhymanycliniciansrequirecompletedrugabstentionasaconditionoftreatmentforaddicts(Wise,1988).

    Thefirstquestionaddressedbythisreviewiswhetheranyoftheseoperationallydefinedbehavioralcharacteristicsofsubstancedependencecanbefoundwithintermittentsugaraccess.Thesecondquestionexploresneuralsystemstodiscoverhowsugarcouldhaveeffectslikeadrugofabuse.

    3.DRUGSOFABUSEANDPALATABLEFOODACTIVATEACOMMONSUBSETOFNEURALSYSTEMS

    Overlapsinthebraincircuitryactivatedbyfoodanddrugintakesuggeststhatdifferenttypesofreinforcers(naturalandartificial)stimulatesomeofthesameneuralsystems(Hoebel,1985,HernandezandHoebel,1988,Kelleyetal.,2002,LeMagnen,1990,VolkowandWise,2005,Wise,1988,1989).Thereareseveralregionsinthebraininvolvedinthereinforcementofbothfeedinganddrugintake(HernandezandHoebel,1988,KalivasandVolkow,2005,Kelleyetal.,2005,KoobandLeMoal,2005,MogensonandYang,1991,Wise,1997,Yeomans,1995),andmanyneurotransmitters,aswellashormones,havebeenstudiedintheseandrelatedbrainregions(Harrisetal.,2005,Kalivas,2004,LeibowitzandHoebel,2004,Schoffelmeeretal.,2001,SteinandBelluzzi,1979).ThisreviewwillfocusonDA,theopioids,andAChintheNAcshell,whichsofar,aretheneurotransmittersthatwehavefoundtobeinvolvedwiththereinforcingeffectsofintermittentsugarintake.

    3.A.Dopamine

    ItiswellestablishedthataddictivedrugsactivateDAcontainingneuronsinareasofthebrainthatprocessbehaviorreinforcement.Thiswasshownfordrugsdeliveredsystemically(DiChiaraandImperato,1988,Radhakishunet

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 4/25

    al.,1983),andfordrugsmicroinjectedorinfusedlocally(HernandezandHoebel,1988,Mifsudetal.,1989).ThemesolimbicDAprojectionfromtheventraltegmentalarea(VTA)totheNAcisfrequentlyimplicatedinreinforcementfunctions(WiseandBozarth,1984).TheNAcisimportantforseveralcomponentsofrewardincludingfoodseekingandreinforcementoflearning,incentivemotivation,stimulussalienceandsignalingastimuluschange(BassareoandDiChiara,1999,BerridgeandRobinson,1998,Salamone,1992,Schultzetal.,1997,Wise,1988).AnyneurotransmitterthatdirectlyorindirectlystimulatesDAcellbodiesintheVTAreinforceslocalselfadministration,includingopioidssuchasenkephalin(Glimcheretal.,1984),nonopioidpeptidessuchasneurotensin(Glimcheretal.,1987)andmanydrugsofabuse(BozarthandWise,1981,Gessaetal.,1985,McBrideetal.,1999).SomeaddictivedrugsalsoactatDAterminals(Cheeretal.,2004,Mifsudetal.,1989,Niselletal.,1994,Westerinketal.,1987,Yoshimotoetal.,1992).Thus,anysubstancethatrepeatedlycausesthereleaseofDAorreducesDAreuptakeatterminalsviathesecircuitsmaybeacandidateforabuse.

    AvarietyoffoodscanreleaseDAintheNAc,includinglabchow,sugar,saccharin,andcornoil(BassareoandDiChiara,1997,Hajnaletal.,2004,Liangetal.,2006,Marketal.,1991,Radaetal.,2005b).TheriseinextracellularDAcanoutlastthemealinfooddeprivedrats(HernandezandHoebel,1988).However,insatiatedanimals,thisDAreleaseappearstobecontingentonnoveltysinceitwaneswithrepeatedaccess,evenwhenthefoodispalatable(BassareoandDiChiara,1997,Radaetal.,2005b).Anexception,whichisdescribedbelow(Section5.C.),iswhenanimalsarefooddeprivedandfedsugarintermittently.

    ExtracellularDAdecreasesinreactiontodrugwithdrawal(Acquasetal.,1991,AcquasandDiChiara,1992,Radaetal.,2004,Rossettietal.,1992).Thesymptomsofwithdrawalfromdopaminergicdrugsarelesswelldefinedthanthoseobservedduringwithdrawalfromopiates.Therefore,itmaybeeasiertodiscernthesignsofwithdrawalwhenusingfoodsthatreleasebothDAandopioids.Sugarisonesuchfood.

    3.B.Opioids

    OpioidpeptidesareheavilyexpressedthroughoutthelimbicsystemandlinkedtoDAsystemsinmanypartsoftheforebrain(HaberandLu,1995,LevineandBillington,2004,MillerandPickel,1980).TheendogenousopioidsystemsexertsomeoftheireffectsonreinforcementprocessingbyinteractingwithDAsystems(BozarthandWise,1986,DiChiaraandImperato,1986,LeibowitzandHoebel,2004).TheopioidpeptideenkephalinintheNAchasbeenrelatedtoreward(BalsKubiketal.,1989,BozarthandWise,1981,Olds,1982,Spanageletal.,1990)andcanactivatebothmuanddeltareceptorstoincreasethereleaseofDA(Spanageletal.,1990).MorphinealtersgeneexpressionofendogenousopioidpeptideswhileincreasingopioidpeptideproductionintheNAc(Przewlockaetal.,1996,Spangleretal.,2003,Turchanetal.,1997).OpioidsarealsoimportantcomponentsofthissystemascotransmitterswithGABAinsomeaccumbensanddorsalstriataloutputs(Kelleyetal.,2005).

    Repeateduseofopiates,orevensomenonopiatedrugs,canresultinmuopioidreceptorsensitizationinseveralregions,includingtheNAc(Koobetal.,1992,Unterwald,2001).AmureceptorantagonistinjectedintotheNAcwillattenuatetherewardingeffectsofheroin(Vaccarinoetal.,1985),andsystemicallysuchdrugshavebeenusedasatreatmentforalcoholismandheroindependence(Deasetal.,2005,Fosteretal.,2003,Martin,1975,OBrien,2005,Volpicellietal.,1992).

    Ingestionofpalatablefoodshaseffectsviaendogenousopioidsinavarietyofsites(Dumetal.,1983,MercerandHolder,1997,TandaandDiChiara,1998),andtheinjectionofmuopioidagonistsintheNAcincreasesintakeofpalatablefoodsrichinfatorsugar(Zhangetal.,1998,ZhangandKelley,2002).Opioidantagonists,ontheotherhand,decreaseingestionofsweetfoodandshortenmealsofpalatable,preferredfoods,evenatdosesthathavenoeffectonstandardchowintake(Glassetal.,1999).Thisopioidpalatabilitylinkisfurthercharacterizedbytheoriesinwhichthereinforcingeffectisdissociatedintoadopaminergicsystemforincentivemotivationandanopioidlikingorpleasuresystemforhedonicresponses(Berridge,1996,RobinsonandBerridge,1993,Stein,1978).EvidencethatopioidsintheNAcinfluencehedonicreactionscomesfromdatashowingthatmorphineenhancesratspositivefacialtastereactivityforasweetsolutioninthemouth(PecinaandBerridge,1995).Thedissociationbetweenthewantingandlikingsystemsisalsosuggestedbystudiesinhumans(Finlaysonetal.,2007).

    3.C.Acetylcholine

    Severalcholinergicsystemsinthebrainhavebeenimplicatedinbothfoodanddrugintake,andrelatedtoDAand

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 5/25

    Goto:

    theopioids(Kelleyetal.,2005,Radaetal.,2000,Yeomans,1995).FocusingonAChinterneuronsintheNAc,systemicadministrationofmorphinedecreasesAChturnover(Smithetal.,1984),afindingthatwasconfirmedbyinvivomicrodialysisinfreelybehavingrats(Fiserovaetal.,1999,Radaetal.,1991a,1996).CholinergicinterneuronsintheNAcmayselectivelymodulateenkephalingeneexpressionandpeptiderelease(Kelleyetal.,2005).Duringmorphinewithdrawal,extracellularAChincreasesintheNAcwhileDAislow,suggestingthatthisneurochemicalstatecouldbeinvolvedintheaversiveaspectsofwithdrawal(Pothosetal.,1991,Radaetal.,1991b,1996).Likewise,bothnicotineandalcoholwithdrawalincreaseextracellularACh,whiledecreasingDAintheNAc(DeWitteetal.,2003,Radaetal.,2001,2004).Thiswithdrawalstatemayinvolvebehavioraldepression,becauseM1receptoragonistsinjectedintheNAccancausedepressionintheforcedswimtest(Chauetal.,1999).TheroleofAChindrugwithdrawalhasbeenfurtherdemonstratedwithsystemicallyadministeredacetylcholinesteraseinhibitors,whichcanprecipitatewithdrawalsignsinnondependentanimals(KatzandValentino,1984,Turskietal.,1984).

    AChintheNAchasalsobeenimplicatedinfoodintake.WetheorizethatitsoverallmuscariniceffectistoinhibitfeedingatM1receptorssincelocalinjectionofthemixedmuscarinicagonistarecholinewillinhibitfeeding,andthiseffectcanbeblockedbytherelativelyspecificM1antagonistpirenzapine(RadaandHoebel,unpublished).FeedingtosatietyincreasesextracellularAChintheNAc(Avenaetal.,2006,Marketal.,1992).AconditionedtasteaversionalsoincreasesAChintheNAcandsimultaneouslylowersDA(Marketal.,1991,1995).Dfenfluraminecombinedwithphentermine(FenPhen)increasesextracellularAChintheNAcatadosethatinhibitsbotheatingandcocaineselfadministration(Glowaetal.,1997,RadaandHoebel,2000).RatswithaccumbalAChtoxininducedlesionsarehyperphagicrelativetononlesionedrats(Hajnaletal.,2000).

    DA/AChbalanceiscontrolledinpartbyhypothalamicsystemsforfeedingandsatiety.Norepinephrineandgalanin,whichinduceeatingwheninjectedintheparaventricularnucleus(PVN),loweraccumbensACh(Hajnaletal.,1997,Radaetal.,1998).AnexceptionisneuropeptideY,whichfosterseatingwheninjectedintothePVN,butdoesnotincreaseDAreleasenorlowerACh(Radaetal.,1998).Inaccordwiththetheory,thesatietyproducingcombinationofserotoninplusCCKinjectionintothePVNincreasesaccumbensACh(Helmetal.,2003).

    ItisveryinterestingthatwhenDAislowandextracellularAChishigh,thisapparentlycreatesnotsatiety,butinsteadanaversivestate(Hoebeletal.,1999),asduringbehavioraldepression(Zangenetal.,2001,Radaetal.,2006),drugwithdrawal(Radaetal.,1991b,1996,2001,2004)andconditionedtasteaversion(Marketal.,1995).WeconcludethatwhenAChactsasapostsynapticM1agonistithaseffectsoppositetoDA,andthusmayactasabrakeondopaminergicfunctions(Hoebeletal.,1999,Radaetal.,2007)causingsatietywhenDAishighandbehavioraldepressionwhenDAisrelativelylow.

    4.BEHAVIORALSIMILARITIESBETWEENDRUGSELFADMINISTRATIONANDINTERMITTENT,EXCESSIVESUGARINTAKE

    Theconceptofsugaraddictionhasbeenbandiedaboutformanyyears.Clinicalaccountsofsugaraddictionhavebeenthetopicofmanybestsellingbooksandthefocusforpopulardietprograms(Appleton,1996,DesMaisons,2001,Katherine,1996,Rufus,2004).Intheseaccounts,peopledescribesymptomsofwithdrawalwhentheydeprivethemselvesofsugarrichfoods.Theyalsodescribefoodcraving,particularlyforcarbohydrates,chocolate,andsugar,whichcantriggerrelapseandimpulsiveeating.Thisleadstoaviciouscycleofselfmedicationwithsweetfoodsthatmayresultinobesityoraneatingdisorder.

    Althoughfoodaddictionhasbeenpopularinthemediaandproposedtobebasedonbrainneurochemistry(Hoebeletal.,1989,LeMagnen,1990),thisphenomenonhasonlyrecentlybeensystematicallystudiedinthelaboratory.

    AsoutlinedintheoverviewinSection1,weuseafeedingschedulethatinducesratstobingeonasugarsolution,thenapplythecriteriafordrugdependencethatarepresentedinSection2andtestforthebehavioralandneurochemicalcommonaltiesgiveninSection3.Ratsaregiven12hdailyaccesstoanaqueous10%sucrosesolution(25%glucoseinsomeexperiments)andlabchow,followedby12hofdeprivationforthreeormoreweeks(i.e.,DailyIntermittentSugarandChow).TheseratsarecomparedwithcontrolgroupssuchasAdlibitumSugarandChow,AdlibitumChow,orDailyIntermittentChow(12hdeprivationfollowedby12haccesstolabchow).Fortheintermittentaccessgroups,availabilityisdelayed4hintotheanimalsactiveperiodinorderto

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 6/25

    stimulatefeeding,whichnormallyensuesattheonsetofthedarkcycle.RatsmaintainedontheDailyIntermittentSugarandChowregimenenterastatethatresemblesdrugdependenceonseveraldimensions.Thesearedividedintobehavioral(Section4)andneurochemical(Section5)similaritiestodrugdependence.

    4.A.Bingeing:Escalationofdailysugarintakeandlargemeals

    Escalationofintakeisacharacteristicofdrugsofabuse.Thismaybeacombinationoftolerance,inwhichmoreofanabusedsubstanceisneededtoproducethesameeuphoriceffects(KoobandLeMoal,2005),andsensitization,suchaslocomotorsensitization,inwhichthesubstanceproducesenhancedbehavioralactivation(Vezinaetal.,1989).Studiesusingdrugselfadministrationusuallylimitaccesstoafewhoursperday,duringwhichanimalswillselfadministerinregularintervalsthatvaryasafunctionofthedosereceived(GerberandWise,1989)andinamannerthatkeepsextracellularDAelevatedaboveabaseline,ortriggerpointintheNAc(Ranaldietal.,1999,Wiseetal.,1995).Thelengthofdailyaccesshasbeenshowntocriticallyaffectsubsequentselfadministrationbehavior.Forexample,themostcocaineisselfadministeredduringthefirst10minofasessionwhenaccessisatleast6hperday(AhmedandKoob,1998).Limitedperiodsofaccess,tocreatebinges,havebeenuseful,becausethepatternofselfadministrationbehaviorthatemergesissimilartothatofacompulsivedruguser(Markouetal.,1993,MutschlerandMiczek,1998,OBrienetal.,1998).Evenwhendrugs,suchascocaine,aregivenwithunlimitedaccess,humansorlaboratoryanimalswillselfadministertheminrepetitiveepisodesorbinges(BozarthandWise,1985,Deneauetal.,1969).However,experimenterimposedintermittentaccessisbetterthanadlibitumaccessforexperimentalpurposes,sinceitbecomesverylikelythattheanimalwilltakeatleastonelargebingeattheonsetofthedrugavailabilityperiod.Moreover,aperiodoffoodrestrictioncanenhancedrugintake(Carr,2006,Carroll,1985)andhasbeenshowntoproducecompensatoryneruoadaptationsinthemesoaccumbensDAsystem(Panetal.,2006).

    Thebehavioralfindingswithsugararesimilartothoseobservedwithdrugsofabuse.Ratsfeddailyintermittentsugarandchowescalatetheirsugarintakeandincreasetheirintakeduringthefirsthourofdailyaccess,whichwedefineasabinge(Colantuonietal.,2001).Theanimalswithadlibitumaccesstoasugarsolutiontendtodrinkitthroughouttheday,includingtheirinactiveperiod.Bothgroupsincreasetheiroverallintake,butthelimitedaccessanimalsconsumeasmuchsugarin12hasadlibitumfedanimalsdoin24h.Detailedmealpatternanalysisusingoperantconditioning(fixedratio1)revealsthatthelimitedanimalsconsumealargemealofsugarattheonsetofaccess,andlarger,fewermealsofsugarthroughouttheaccessperiod,comparedwithanimalsdrinkingsugaradlibitum(Fig.1AvenaandHoebel,unpublished).RatsfedDailyIntermittentSugarandChowregulatetheircaloricintakebydecreasingtheirchowintaketocompensatefortheextracaloriesobtainedfromsugar,whichresultsinanormalbodyweight(Avena,Bocarsly,Rada,KimandHoebel,unpublished,Avenaetal.,2003b,Colantuonietal.,2002).

    Figure1Mealanalysisoftworepresentativeratslivinginoperantchambers.TheonemaintainedonDailyIntermittentSucroseandChow(blacklines)hadanincreasedintakeofsugarcomparedwithonegivenAdlibitumSucroseandChow(greylines).Hour0is4...

    4.B.Withdrawal:Anxietyandbehavioraldepressioninducedbyanopioidantagonistorfooddeprivation

    AsdescribedinSection2,animalscanshowsignsofopiatewithdrawalafterrepeatedexposurewhenthesubstanceofabuseisremoved,ortheappropriatesynapticreceptorisblocked.Forexample,anopioidantagonistcanbeusedtoprecipitatewithdrawalinthecaseofopiatedependency(Espejoetal.,1994,Koobetal.,1992).Inrats,opiatewithdrawalcausesseveresomaticsigns(Martinetal.,1963,Wayetal.,1969),decreasesinbodytemperature(Aryetal.,1976),aggression(KantakandMiczek,1986),andanxiety(Schulteisetal.,1998),aswellasamotivationalsyndromecharacterizedbydysphoriaanddepression(DeVriesandShippenberg,2002,KoobandLeMoal,1997).

    Thesesignsofopioidwithdrawalhavebeennotedafterintermittentaccesstosugarwhenwithdrawalisprecipitatedwithanopioidantagonist,orwhenfoodandsugarareremoved.Whenadministeredarelativelyhighdoseofthe

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 7/25

    opioidantagonistnaloxone(3mg/kg,s.c.),somaticsignsofwithdrawal,suchasteethchattering,forepawtremor,andheadshakesareobserved(Colantuonietal.,2002).Theseanimalsarealsoanxious,asmeasuredbyreducedtimespentontheexposedarmofanelevatedplusmaze(Colantuonietal.,2002)(Fig.2).

    Figure2Timespentontheopenarmsofanelevatedplusmaze.Fourgroupsofratsweremaintainedontheirrespectivedietsforonemonthandthenreceivednaloxone(3mg/kg,s.c.).TheDailyIntermittentGlucoseandChowgroupspentlesstimeontheopenarms...

    Behavioraldepressionhasalsobeenfoundduringnaloxoneprecipitatedwithdrawalinintermittentsugarfedrats.Inthisexperiment,ratsweregivenaninitial5minforcedswimtestinwhichescape(swimmingandclimbing)andpassive(floating)behaviorsweremeasured.ThentheratsweredividedintofourgroupsthatwerefedDailyIntermittentSucroseandChow,DailyIntermittentChow,AdlibitumSucroseandChow,orAdlibitumChowfor21days.Onday22,atthetimethattheintermittentfedratswouldnormallyreceivetheirsugarand/orchow,allratswereinsteadinjectedwithnaloxone(3mg/kg,s.c.)toprecipitatewithdrawalandwerethenplacedinthewateragainforanothertest.InthegroupthathadbeenfedDailyIntermittentSucroseandChow,escapebehaviorsweresignificantlysuppressedcomparedwithAdlibitumSucroseandChowandAdlibitumChowcontrols(Fig.3Kim,AvenaandHoebel,unpublished).Thisdecreaseinescapeeffortsthatwerereplacedbypassivefloatingsuggeststheratswereexperiencingbehavioraldepressionduringwithdrawal.

    Figure3RatsthathavebeenmaintainedonDailyIntermittentSucroseandChowaremoreimmobilethancontrolgroupsinaforcedswimtestduringnaloxoneprecipitatedwithdrawal.*p

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 8/25

    impactofsugarthatpersiststhroughouttwoweeksofabstinence,leadingtoenhancedintake.

    Figure4After14daysofabstinencefromsugar,ratsthatpreviouslyhad12hdailyaccesssignificantlyincreasedleverpressingforglucoseto123%ofpreabstinenceresponding,indicatingincreasedmotivationforsugar.Thegroupwith0.5hdailyaccessdid...

    Additionally,likethedrugsdescribedabove,themotivationtoobtainsugarappearstoincubate,orgrow,withthelengthofabstinence(Shalevetal.,2001).Usingoperantconditioning,Grimmandcolleagues(2005)findthatsucroseseeking(leverpressinginextinctionandthenforasucrosepairedcue)increasesduringabstinenceinratsafterintermittentsugaraccessfor10days.Remarkably,respondingforthecuewasgreaterafter30daysofsugarabstinencecomparedwith1weekor1day.Theseresultssuggestthegradualemergenceoflongtermchangesintheneuralcircuitryunderlyingmotivationasaresultofsugarselfadministrationandabstinence.

    4.D.Crosssensitization:Increasedlocomotorresponsetopsychostimulantsduringsugarabstinence

    Druginducedsensitizationmayplayaroleintheenhancementofdrugselfadministrationandisimplicatedasafactorcontributingtodrugaddiction(RobinsonandBerridge,1993).Inatypicalsensitizationexperiment,theanimalreceivesadrugdailyforaboutaweek,thentheprocedurestops.However,inthebraintherearelasting,evengrowing,changesapparentaweekormorelaterwhenalow,challengedoseofthedrugresultsinhyperlocomotion(Kalivasetal.,1992).Additionally,crosssensitizationfromonedrugtoanotherhasbeendemonstratedwithseveraldrugsofabuse,includingamphetaminesensitizingratstococaineorphencyclidine(GreenbergandSegal,1985,KalivasandWeber,1988,PierceandKalivas,1995,Schenketal.,1991),cocainecrosssensitizingwithalcohol(ItzhakandMartin,1999),andheroinwithcannabis(Pontierietal.,2001).Otherstudieshavefoundthiseffectwithnondrugsubstances.Behavioralcrosssensitizationbetweencocaineandstresshasbeendemonstrated(AntelmanandCaggiula,1977,CovingtonandMiczek,2001,Prasadetal.,1998).Also,increasesinfoodintake(BakshiandKelley,1994)orsexualbehaviors(FiorinoandPhillips,1999,NocjarandPanksepp,2002)havebeenobservedinanimalswithahistoryofdrugsensitization.

    WeandothershavefoundthatIntermittentsugarintakecrosssensitizeswithdrugsofabuse.Ratssensitizedwithdailyamphetamineinjections(3mg/kg,i.p.)arehyperactiveoneweeklaterinresponsetotasting10%sucrose(AvenaandHoebel,2003a).Conversely,ratsfedDailyIntermittentSugarandChowshowlocomotorcrosssensitizationtoamphetamine.Specifically,suchanimalsarehyperactiveinresponsetoalow,challengedoseofamphetamine(0.5mg/kg,i.p.)thathasnoeffectonnaveanimals,evenafter8daysofabstinencefromsugar(Fig.5AvenaandHoebel,2003b).Ratsmaintainedonthisfeedingschedulebutadministeredsalinewerenothyperactive,norwereratsincontrolgroups(DailyIntermittentChow,AdlibitumSugarandChow,AdlibitumChow)giventhechallengedoseofamphetamine.Intermittentsucroseaccessalsocrosssensitizeswithcocaine(Gosnell,2005)andfacilitatesthedevelopmentofsensitizationtotheDAagonistquinpirole(Foleyetal.,2006).Thus,resultswiththreedifferentDAagonistsfromthreedifferentlaboratoriessupportthetheorythattheDAsystemissensitizedbyintermittentsugaraccess,asevidencedbycrosssensitization.Thisisimportantsinceenhancedmesolimbicdopaminergicneurotransmissionplaysamajorroleinthebehavioraleffectsofsensitizationaswellascrosssensitization(RobinsonandBerridge,1993),andmaycontributetoaddictionandcomorbiditywithpolysubstanceabuse.

    Figure5Locomotoractivityinaphotocellcageplottedaspercentofbaselinebeambreaksonday0.Ratsweremaintainedfor21daysonthespecifieddietsregimens.RatsmaintainedonDailyIntermittentSucroseandChowwerehyperactiveninedayslaterinresponse...

    4.E.Gatewayeffect:Increasedalcoholintakeduringsugarabstinence

    Numerousstudieshavefoundthatsensitizationtoonedrugcanleadnotonlytohyperactivity,butalsotosubsequentincreasedintakeofanotherdrugorsubstance(Ellgrenetal.,2006,Henningfieldetal.,1990,Hubbellet

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 9/25

    Goto:

    al.,1993,Liguorietal.,1997,Nicholsetal.,1991,Piazzaetal.,1989,Vezina,2004,Vezinaetal.,2002,Volpicellietal.,1991).Werefertothisphenomenonasconsummatorycrosssensitization.Intheclinicalliterature,whenonedrugleadstotakinganother,thisisknownasagatewayeffect.Itisparticularlynoteworthywhenalegaldrug(e.g.nicotine)actsasagatewaytoanillegaldrug(e.g.cocaine)(Laietal.,2000).

    Ratsmaintainedonintermittentsugaraccessandthenforcedtoabstain,subsequentlyshowenhancedintakeof9%alcohol(Avenaetal.,2004).Thissuggeststhatintermittentaccesstosugarcanbeagatewaytoalcoholuse.Othershaveshownthatanimalsthatprefersweettastewillselfadministercocaineatahigherrate(Carrolletal.,2006).Aswiththelocomotorcrosssensitizationdescribedabove,underlyingthisbehaviorarepresumablyneurochemicalalterationsinthebrain,suchasadaptationsinDAandperhapsopioidfunctions.

    5.NEUROCHEMICALSIMILARITIESBETWEENDRUGSELFADMINISTRATIONANDINTERMITTENTSUGARINTAKE

    Thestudiesdescribedabovesuggestthatintermittentsugaraccesscanproducenumerousbehaviorsthataresimilartothoseobservedindrugdependentrats.Inthissection,wedescribeneurochemicalfindingsthatmayunderliesugardependency.Totheextentthatthesebrainalterationsmatchtheeffectsofdrugsofabuse,itstrengthensthecasethatsugarcanresembleasubstanceofabuse.

    5.A.IntermittentsugarintakealtersD ,D andmuopioidreceptorbindingandmRNAexpression

    DrugsofabusecanalterDAandopioidreceptorsinthemesolimbicregionsofthebrain.PharmacologicalstudieswithselectiveD ,D andD receptorantagonistsandgeneknockoutstudieshaverevealedthatallthreereceptorsubtypesmediatethereinforcingeffectsdrugsofabuse.ThereisanupregulationofD receptors(Unterwaldetal.,1994)andincreaseinD receptorbinding(Alburgesetal.,1993,Unterwaldetal.,2001)inresponsetococaine.Conversely,D receptordensityislowerinNAcofmonkeysthathaveahistoryofcocaineuse(Mooreetal.,1998).DrugsofabusecanalsoproducechangesingeneexpressionofDAreceptors.MorphineandcocainehavebeenshowntodecreaseaccumbensD receptormRNA(Georgesetal.,1999,Turchanetal.,1997),andanincreaseinD receptormRNA(Spangleretal.,2003).Thesefindingwithlaboratoryanimalssupportclinicalstudies,whichhaverevealedthatD receptorsaredownregulatedincocaineaddicts(Volkowetal.,1996a,1996b,2006).

    Similarchangeshavebeenreportedwithintermittentaccesstosugar.AutoradiographyrevealsincreasedD intheNAcanddecreasedD receptorbindinginthestriatum(Fig.6Colantuonietal.,2001).Thiswasrelativetochowfedrats,soitisnotknownwhetheradlibitumsugarwouldalsoshowthiseffect.OthershavereportedadecreaseinD receptorbindingintheNAcofratswithrestrictedaccesstosucroseandchowcomparedwithratsfedrestricedchowonly(Belloetal.,2002).RatswithintermittentsugarandchowaccessalsohavedecreasesinDreceptormRNAintheNAccomparedwithadlibitumchowcontrols(Spangleretal.,2004).mRNAlevelsofDreceptormRNAintheNAcareincreasedintheNAcandcaudateputamen.

    Figure6IntermittentsugaraccessaltersDAreceptorbindingatthelevelofthestriatum.D receptorbinding(toppanel)increasesintheNAccoreandshellofanimalsexposedtoDailyIntermittentGlucoseandChow(blackbars)for30dayscomparedwithcontrol...

    Regardingtheopioidreceptors,mureceptorbindingisincreasedinresponsetococaineandmorphine(Baileyetal.,2005,Unterwaldetal.,2001,Viganoetal.,2003).Muopioidreceptorbindingisalsosignificantlyenhancedafterthreeweeksontheintermittentsugardiet,comparedwithadlibitumchow.Thiseffectwasobservedintheaccumbensshell,cingulate,hippocampusandlocuscoeruleus(Colantuonietal.,2001).

    5.B.IntermittentsugarintakealtersenkephalinmRNAexpression

    EnkephalinmRNAinthestriatumandtheNAcisdecreasedinresponsetorepeatedinjectionsofmorphine(Georgesetal.,1999,Turchanetal.,1997,Uhletal.,1988).Thesechangeswithinopioidsystemsaresimilartothoseobservedincocainedependenthumansubjects(Zubietaetal.,1996).

    1 2

    1 2 3

    1

    1

    2

    2

    3

    2

    1

    2

    2

    2

    3

    1

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 10/25

    RatswithintermittentsugaraccessalsodisplayasignificantdecreaseinenkephalinmRNA,althoughitisdifficulttojudgeitsfunctionalsignificance(Spangleretal.,2004).ThisdecreaseinenkephalinmRNAisconsistentwithfindingsobservedinratswithlimiteddailyaccesstoasweetfat,liquiddiet(Kelleyetal.,2003).AssumingthisdecreaseinmRNAresultsinlessenkephalinpeptidebeingsynthesizedandreleased,itcouldaccountforacompensatoryincreaseinmuopioidreceptors,ascitedabove.

    5.C.Dailyintermittentsugarintakerepeatedlyreleasesdopamineintheaccumbens

    OneofthestrongestneurochemicalcommonalitiesbetweenintermittentsugaraccessanddrugsofabusehasbeenfoundusinginvivomicrodialysistomeasureextracellularDA.TherepeatedincreaseinextracellularDAisahallmarkofdrugsthatareabused.ExtracellularDAincreasesintheNAcinresponsetobothaddictivedrugs(DeVriesandShippenberg,2002,DiChiaraandImperato,1988,EverittandWolf,2002,HernandezandHoebel,1988,Hurdetal.,1988,PicciottoandCorrigall,2002,Pothosetal.,1991,Radaetal.,1991a)anddrugassociatedstimuli(Itoetal.,2000).Unlikedrugsofabuse,whichexerttheireffectsonDAreleaseeachtimetheyareadministered(Pothosetal.,1991,Wiseetal.,1995),theeffectofeatingpalatablefoodonDAreleasewaneswithrepeatedaccesswhenthefoodisnolongernovel,unlesstheanimalisfooddeprived(BassareoandDiChiara,1999,DiChiaraandTanda,1997,Radaetal.,2005b).ThusnormallyfeedingisverydifferentthantakingdrugsbecausetheDAresponseduringfeedingisphasedout.

    However,andthisisveryimportant,ratsfeddailyintermittentsugarandchowapparentlyreleaseDAeverydayasmeasuredondays1,2and21ofaccess(Fig.7Radaetal.,2005b).Ascontrols,ratsfedsugarorchowadlibitum,ratswithintermittentaccesstojustchow,orratsthattastesugaronlytwotimes,developabluntedDAresponseasistypicalofafoodthatloosesitnovelty.TheseresultsaresupportedbyfindingsofalterationsinaccumbensDAturnoverandDAtransporterinratsmaintainedonanintermittentsugarfeedingschedule(Belloetal.,2003,HajnalandNorgren,2002).Together,theseresultssuggestthatintermittentaccesstosugarandchowcausesrecurrentincreasesinextracellularDAinamannerthatismorelikeadrugofabusethanafood.

    Figure7RatswithintermittentaccesstosugarreleaseDAinresponsetodrinkingsucrosefor60minonday21.Dopamine,asmeasuredbyinvivomicrodialysis,increasesfortheDailyIntermittentSucroseandChowrats(opencircles)ondays1,2and21incontrast,...

    Aninterestingquestioniswhethertheneurochemicaleffectsobservedwithintermittentsugaraccessareduetoitspostingestivepropertiesorwhetherthetasteofsugarcanbesufficient.Toinvestigateorosensoryeffectsofsugar,weusedtheshamfeedingpreparation.Ratsthatareshamfeedingwithanopengastricfistulacaningestfoodsbutnotfullydigestthem(Smith,1998).Shamfeedingdoesnotcompletelyeliminatepostingestiveeffects(BerthoudandJeanrenaud,1982,SclafaniandNissenbaum,1985),howeveritdoesallowtheanimalstotastethesugarwhileretainingalmostnocalories.

    TheresultsofshamfeedingsugarforthefirsthourofaccesseachdayshowthatDAisreleasedintheNAc,evenafterthreeweeksofdailybingeing,simplyduetothetasteofsucrose(Avenaetal.,2006).ShamfeedingdoesnotfurtherenhancethetypicalsugarinducedDArelease.ThissupportsotherworkshowingthattheamountofDAreleaseintheNAcisproportionaltothesucroseconcentration,notthevolumeconsumed(Hajnaletal.,2004).

    5.D.Accumbensacetylcholinereleaseisdelayedduringsugarbingesandeliminatedduringshamfeeding

    ShamfeedingrevealedinterestingresultswithACh.AsdescribedinSection3.C.,accumbensAChincreasesinthemidstofamealwhenfeedingslowsdownandthenstops(Marketal.,1992).Onecouldpredictthatwhenananimaltakesaverylargemeal,aswiththefirstmealofasugarsolutionandchow,thereleaseofAChshouldbedelayeduntilthesatiationprocessbeginsasreflectedingradualterminationofthemeal.ThisiswhatwasobservedAChreleaseoccurredwhenthisinitialbingemealwasdrawingtoaclose(Radaetal.,2005b).

    NextwemeasuredAChreleasewhentheanimalcouldtakealargemealofsugarwhileshamfeeding.PurgingthestomachcontentsdrasticallyreducedthereleaseofACh(Avenaetal.,2006).Thisispredictablebasedonthe

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 11/25

    Goto:

    theorythatAChisnormallyimportantforthesatiationprocess(Hoebeletal.,1999,Marketal.,1992).Italsosuggeststhatbypurging,oneeliminatestheAChresponsethatopposesDA.Thuswhenbingeingonsugarisaccompaniedbypurging,thebehaviorisreinforcedbyDAwithoutACh,whichismoreliketakingadrugandlesslikenormaleating.

    5.E.Sugarwithdrawalupsetsdopamine/acetylcholinebalanceintheaccumbens

    BehavioralsignsofdrugwithdrawalareusuallyaccompaniedbyalterationsinDA/AChbalanceintheNAc.Duringwithdrawal,DAdecreaseswhileAChisincreased.Thisimbalancehasbeenshownduringchemicallyinducedwithdrawalwithseveraldrugsofabuse,includingmorphine,nicotineandalcohol(Radaetal.,1996,2001,2004).Mereabstinencefromanabusedsubstanceisalsosufficienttoelicitneurochemicalsignsofwithdrawal.Forexample,ratsthatareforcedtoabstainfrommorphineoralcoholhavedecreasedextracellularDAintheNAc(AcquasandDiChiara,1992,Rossettietal.,1992)andAChincreasesduringspontaneousmorphinewithdrawal(Fiserovaetal.,1999).Whilewithdrawalfromananxyoliticdrug(diazepam)precipitatedbyabendodiazepinereceptorantagonistdoesnotlowerextracellularDA,itdoesreleaseaccumbensACh,whichmaycontributetobenzodiazepinedependency(RadaandHoebel,2005)

    RatsthathaveintermittentaccesstosugarandchowshowthemorphinelikeneurochemicalimbalanceinDA/AChduringwithdrawal.Thiswasproducedtwoways.AsshowninFig.8,whentheyaregivennaloxonetoprecipitateopioidwithdrawal,thereisadecreaseinaccumbensDAreleasecoupledwithanincreaseinAChrelease(Colantuonietal.,2002).Thesamethingoccursafter36hoffooddeprivation(Avena,Bocarsly,Rada,Kim,Hoebel,unpublished).Onewaytointerpretdeprivationinducedwithdrawalistosuggestthatwithoutfoodtoreleaseopioids,theanimalsuffersthesametypeofwithdrawalseenwhentheupregulatedmuopioidreceptorsareblockedwithnaloxone.

    Figure8ExtracellularDA(uppergraph)decreasedto81%ofbaselineafternaloxoneinjection(3mg/kg,s.c.)inratswithahistoryofDailyIntermittentSucroseandChow.Acetylcholine(lowergraph)increasedto157%inthesameintermittentsugaraccessrats....

    6.DISCUSSIONANDCLINICALIMPLICATIONS

    Foodisnotordinarilylikeasubstanceofabuse,butintermittentbingeinganddeprivationchangesthat.Basedontheobservedbehavioralandneurochemicalsimilaritiesbetweentheeffectsofintermittentsugaraccessanddrugsofabuse,wesuggestthatsugar,ascommonasitis,nonethelessmeetsthecriteriaforasubstanceofabuseandmaybeaddictiveforsomeindividualswhenconsumedinabingelikemanner.Thisconclusionisreinforcedbythechangesinlimbicsystemneurochemistrythataresimilarforthedrugsandforsugar.Theeffectsweobservearesmallerinmagnitudethanthoseproducedbydrugofabusesuchascocaineormorphinehowever,thefactthatthesebehaviorsandneurochemicalchangescanbeelicitedwithanaturalreinforcerisinteresting.ItisnotclearfromthisanimalmodelifintermittentsugaraccesscanresultinneglectofsocialactivitiesasrequiredbythedefinitionofdependencyintheDSMIVTR(AmericanPsychiatricAssociation,2000).Norisitknownwhetherratswillcontinuetoselfadministersugardespitephysicalobstacles,suchasenduringpaintoobtainsugar,assomeratsdoforcocaine(DerocheGamonetetal.,2004).Nonetheless,theextensiveseriesofexperimentsrevealingsimilaritiesbetweensugarinducedanddruginducedbehaviorandneurochemistry,aschronicledinSections4and5,lendscredencetotheconceptofsugaraddiction,givesprecisiontoitsdefinition,andprovidesatestablemodel.

    6.A.Bulimianervosa

    ThefeedingregimenofDailyIntermittentSugarandChowsharessomeaspectsofthebehavioralpatternofpeoplediagnosedwithbingeeatingdisorderorbulimia.Bulimicsoftenrestrictintakeearlyinthedayandthenbingelaterintheevening,usuallyonpalatablefoods(Drewnowskietal.,1992,Gendalletal.,1997).Thesepatientslater

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 12/25

    Sugarandobesity

    purgethefood,eitherbyvomitingorlaxativeuse,orinsomecasesbystrenuousexercise(AmericanPsychiatricAssociation,2000).Bulimicpatientshavelowendorphinlevels(Brewertonetal.,1992,Walleretal.,1986),whichmightfostereatingwithapreferenceorcravingforsweets.Theyalsohavedecreasedmuopioidreceptorbindingintheinsulacomparedwithcontrols,whichcorrelateswithrecentfastingbehavior(Bencherifetal.,2005).Thiscontrastswiththeincreaseobservedinratsfollowingabinge.Cyclicbingeingandfooddeprivationmayproducealterationsinmuopioidreceptors,whichhelpperpetuatebingeingbehavior.

    Weusedtheshamfeedingpreparationtomimicthepurgingassociatedwithbulimia.ThefindingdescribedinSection5.C.,thatintermittentsugaraccessrepeatedlyreleasesDAinresponsetothetasteofsugar,maybeimportantforunderstandingthebingeingbehaviorsassociatedwithbulimia.DAhasbeenimplicatedinbulimiabycomparingittohypothalamicselfstimulation,whichalsoreleasesDAwithoutcalories(Hoebeletal.,1992).BulimicpatientshavelowcentralDAactivityasreflectedinanalysisofDAmetabolitesinthespinalfluid,whichalsoindicatesaroleforDAintheirabnormalresponsestofood(Jimersonetal.,1992).

    Theoverallsimilarlitesinbehaviorandbrainadaptationswithsugarbingeinganddrugintakedescribedabovesupportthetheorythatobesityandeatingdisorders,suchasbulimiaandanorexia,mayhavepropertiesofanaddictioninsomeindividuals(DavisandClaridge,1998,GillmanandLichtigfeld,1986,MarrazziandLuby,1986,MercerandHolder,1997,Rivaetal.,2006).Theautoaddictiontheoryproposedthatsomeeatingdisorderscanbeanaddictiontoendogenousopioids(Heubner,1993,MarrazziandLuby,1986,1990).Insupport,appetitedysfunctionsintheformofbingeeatingandselfstarvationcanstimulateendogenousopioidactivity(Aravichetal.,1993).

    Bulimicpatientswillbingeonexcessiveamountsofnoncaloricsweeteners(Kleinetal.,2006),suggestingthattheyderivebenefitsfromsweetorosensorystimulation.WehaveshownthatpurgingleavesDAunopposedbysatietyassociatedAChintheaccumbens(Section5.D.).Thisneurochemicalstatemaybeconducivetoexaggeratedbingeeating.Moreover,thefindingsthatintermittentsugarintakecrosssensitizeswithamphetamineandfostersalcoholintake(Sections4.D.and4.E.)mayberelatedtothecomorbiditybetweenbulimiaandsubstanceabuse(Holdernessetal.,1994).

    6.B.Obesity

    ObesityisoneoftheleadingpreventablecausesofdeathintheUS(Mokdadetal.,2004).Severalstudieshavecorrelatedtheriseintheincidenceofobesitywithanincreaseinsugarconsumption(Brayetal.,1992,Elliottetal.,2002,HowardandWylieRosett,2002,Ludwigetal.,2001).TheUSDepartmentofAgriculturehasreportedthatpercapitasoftdrinkconsumptionhasincreasedbyalmost500%inthepast50years(PutnamandAllhouse,1999).Sugarintakemayleadtoanincreasednumberofand/oraffinityforopioidreceptors,whichinturnleadstofurtheringestionofsugarandmaycontributetoobesity(Fullertonetal.,1985).Indeed,ratsmaintainedonthedietofintermittentsugaraccessshowopioidreceptorchanges(Section5.A.)however,afteronemonthonthedietusing10%sucroseor25%glucose,theseanimalsdonotbecomeoverweight(Colantuonietal.,2001,AvenaandHoebel,2003b),althoughothershavereportedametabolicsyndrome(Toidaetal.,1996),alossoffuelefficiency(Levineetal.,2003)andanincreaseinbodyweightinratsfedsucrose(Bocketal.,1995,Kawasakietal.,2005)andglucose(Widemanetal.,2005).Moststudiesofsugarintakeandbodyweightdonotuseabingeinducingdiet,andthetranslationtohumanobesityiscomplex(Levineetal.,2003).AsdescribedinSection4.A.,itappearsthatratsinourmodelcompensateforsucroseorglucosecaloriesbydecreasingchowintake(Avena,Bocarsly,Rada,KimandHoebel,unpublished).Theygainweightatanormalrate(Colantuonietal.,2002).Thismaynotbetrueofallsugars.

    Fructoseisauniquesweetenerthathasdifferentmetaboliceffectsonthebodythanglucoseorsucrose.Fructoseisabsorbedfurtherdowntheintestine,andwhereascirculatingglucosereleasesinsulinfromthepancreas(Satoetal.,1996,Vilsbolletal.,2003),fructosestimulatesinsulinsynthesisbutdoesnotreleaseit(Curry,1989,LeandTappy,2006,Satoetal.,1996).Insulinmodifiesfoodintakebyinhibitingeating(Schwartzetal.,2000)andbyincreasingleptinrelease(Saadetal.,1998),whichalsocaninhibitfoodintake.Mealsofhighfructosecornsyrupcanreducecirculatinginsulinandleptinlevels(Teffetal.,2004),contributingtoincreasedbodyweight.Thus,fructoseintakemightnotresultinthedegreeofsatietythatwouldnormallyensuewithanequallycaloricmealofglucoseorsucrose.SincehighfructosecornsyruphasbecomeamajorconstituentintheAmericandiet(Brayetal.,2004)and

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 13/25

    Fatandobesity

    Brainimaging

    Goto:

    lackssomeeffectsoninsulinandleptin,itmaybeapotentialagentforproducingobesitywhengivenintermittentlytorats.Whetherornotsignsofdependencyonfructoseareapparentwhenitisofferedintermittentlyhasyettobedetermined.However,basedonourresultsshowingthatsweettasteissufficienttoelicittherepeatedreleaseofDAintheNAc(seeSection5.C.),wehypothesizethatanysweettasteconsumedinabingelikemannerisacandidateforproducingsignsofdependence.

    Whilewehavechosentofocusonsugar,thequestionarisesastowhethernonsweet,palatablefoodscouldproducesignsordependence.Theevidenceismixed.Itappearsthatsomesignsofdependenceareapparentwithfat,whileothershavenotbeenshown.Fatbingeinginratsoccurswithintermittentaccesstopurefat(vegetableshortening),sweetfatcookies(Boggianoetal.,2005,Corwin,2006),orsweetfatchow(Berner,AvenaandHoebel,unpublished).Repeated,intermittentaccesstooilreleasesDAintheNAc(Liangetal.,2006).Likesugar,bingeingonafatrichdietisknowntoaffecttheopioidsystemintheaccumbensbydecreasingenkephalinmRNA,aneffectthatisnotobservedwithacuteaccess(Kelleyetal.,2003).Also,treatmentwithbaclofen(GABABagonist),whichreducesdrugintake,alsoreducesbingeeatingoffat(BudaLevinetal.,2005).

    Thisallimpliesthatfatdependencyisarealpossibility,butwithdrawalfromfatbingeingisnotasapparentasitiswithsugar.LeMagnen(1990)notednaloxonecouldprecipitatewithdrawalinratsonacafeteriastylediet,whichcontainsavarietyoffatandsugarrichfoods(e.g.,cheese,cookies,chocolatechips).However,wehavenotobservedsignsofnaloxoneprecipitatedorspontaneouswithdrawalinratsfedpurefat(vegetableshortening)orasugarfatcombination,norhassucharesultbeenpublishedbyothers.Furtherstudiesareneededtofullyunderstandthedifferencesbetweensugarandfatbingeingandtheirsubsequenteffectsonbehavior.Justasdifferentclassesofdrugs(e.g.,dopamineagonistsvs.opiates)havespecificbehavioralandphysiologicalwithdrawalsigns,itmaybethatdifferentmacronutrientsmayalsoproducespecificwithdrawalsigns.Sincecravingoffatorcrosssensitizationbetweenfatintakeanddrugsofabusehasyettobedocumentedinanimals,sugariscurrentlytheonlypalatablesubstanceforwhichbingeing,withdrawal,abstinenceinducedenhancedmotivationandcrosssensitizationhaveallbeendemonstrated(Sections4and5).

    Recentfindingsusingpositronemissiontomography(PET)andfunctionalmagneticresonanceimaging(fMRI)inhumanshavesupportedtheideathataberranteatingbehaviors,includingthoseobservedinobesity,mayhavesimilaritiestodrugdependence.CravingrelatedchangesinfMRIsignalhavebeenidentifiedinresponsetopalatablefoods,similartodrugcraving.Thisoverlapoccurredinthehippocampus,insula,andcaudate(Pelchatetal.,2004).Similarly,PETscansrevealthatobesesubjectsshowareductioninstriatalD receptoravailabilitythatisassociatedwiththebodyweightofthesubject(Wangetal.,2004b).ThisdecreaseinDreceptorsinobesesubjectsissimilarinmagnitudetothereductionsreportedindrugaddictedsubjects(Wangetal.,2001).TheinvolvementoftheDAsysteminrewardandreinforcementhasledtothehypothesisthatalterationsinDAactivityinobesesubjectsdisposethemtoexcessiveuseoffood.Exposuretoespeciallypalatablefoods,suchascakeandicecream,activatestheseveralbrainregionsincludingtheanteriorinsulaandrightorbitofrontalcortex(Wangetal.,2004a),whichmayunderliethemotivationtoprocurefood(Rolls,2006).

    7.CONCLUSION

    Fromanevolutionaryperspective,itisinthebestinterestofhumanstohaveaninherentdesireforfoodforsurvival.However,thisdesiremaygoawry,andcertainpeople,includingsomeobeseandbulimicpatientsinparticular,maydevelopanunhealthydependenceonpalatablefoodthatinterfereswithwellbeing.Theconceptoffoodaddictionmaterializedinthedietindustryonthebasisofsubjectivereports,clinicalaccountsandcasestudiesdescribedinselfhelpbooks.Theriseinobesity,coupledwiththeemergenceofscientificfindingsofparallelsbetweendrugsofabuseandpalatablefoodshasgivencredibilitytothisidea.Thereviewedevidencesupportsthetheorythat,insomecircumstances,intermittentaccesstosugarcanleadtobehaviorandneurochemicalchangesthatresembletheeffectsofasubstanceofabuse.Accordingtotheevidenceinrats,intermittentaccesstosugarandchowiscapableofproducingadependency.Thiswasoperationallydefinedbytestsforbingeing,withdrawal,cravingandcrosssensitizationtoamphetamineandalcohol.Thecorrespondencetosomepeoplewithbingeeatingdisorderorbulimiaisstriking,butwhetherornotitisagoodideatocallthisafoodaddictioninpeopleisbothascientificandsocietalquestionthathasyettobeanswered.Whatthisreviewdemonstratesisthatratswithintermittentaccesstofoodandasugarsolutioncanshowbothaconstellationofbehaviorsandparallelbrainchangesthatarecharacteristicofratsthatvoluntarilyselfadministeraddictivedrugs.Intheaggregrate,thisis

    2

    2

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 14/25

    Goto:

    Goto:

    Goto:

    evidencethatsugarcanbeaddictive.

    Acknowledgments

    ThisreseachwassupportedbyUSPHSgrantMH65024(B.G.H.),DA10608(B.G.H.),DA16458(fellowshiptoN.M.A)andtheLaneFoundation.

    FootnotesPublisher'sDisclaimer:ThisisaPDFfileofanuneditedmanuscriptthathasbeenacceptedforpublication.Asaservicetoourcustomersweareprovidingthisearlyversionofthemanuscript.Themanuscriptwillundergocopyediting,typesetting,andreviewoftheresultingproofbeforeitispublishedinitsfinalcitableform.Pleasenotethatduringtheproductionprocesserrorsmaybediscoveredwhichcouldaffectthecontent,andalllegaldisclaimersthatapplytothejournalpertain.

    References

    1. AcquasE,CarboniE,DiChiaraG.Profounddepressionofmesolimbicdopaminereleaseaftermorphinewithdrawalindependentrats.EurJPharmacol.1991193:133134.[PubMed]

    2. AcquasE,DiChiaraG.Depressionofmesolimbicdopaminetransmissionandsensitizationtomorphineduringopiateabstinence.JNeurochem.199258:16201625.[PubMed]

    3. AhmedSH,KoobGF.Transitionfrommoderatetoexcessivedrugintake:changeinhedonicsetpoint.Science.1998282:298300.[PubMed]

    4. AlburgesME,NarangN,WamsleyJK.Alterationsinthedopaminergicreceptorsystemafterchronicadministrationofcocaine.Synapse.199314:314323.[PubMed]

    5. AmericanPsychiatricAssociation.DiagnosticandStatisticalManualofMentalDisordersFouthEditionTextRevision(DSMIVTR)AmericanPsychiatricAssociationWashington,DC:2000.

    6. AntelmanSM,CaggiulaAR.Norepinephrinedopamineinteractionsandbehavior.Science.1977195:646653.[PubMed]

    7. AntelmanSM,CaggiulaAR.Oscillationfollowsdrugsensitization:implications.CritRevNeurobiol.199610:101117.[PubMed]

    8. AppletonN.Lickthesugarhabit.NancyAppletonSantaMonica:1996.9. AravichPF,RiegTS,LauterioTJ,DoerriesLE.Betaendorphinanddynorphinabnormalitiesinrats

    subjectedtoexerciseandrestrictedfeeding:relationshiptoanorexianervosa?BrainRes.1993622:18.[PubMed]

    10. AryM,ChesarekW,SorensenSM,LomaxP.Naltrexoneinducedhypothermiaintherat.EurJPharmacol.197639:215220.[PubMed]

    11. AvenaNM,CarrilloCA,NeedhamL,LeibowitzSF,HoebelBG.Sugardependentratsshowenhancedintakeofunsweetenedethanol.Alcohol.200434:203209.[PubMed]

    12. AvenaNM,HoebelBG.Amphetaminesensitizedratsshowsugarinducedhyperactivity(crosssensitization)andsugarhyperphagia.PharmacolBiochemBehav.2003a74:635639.[PubMed]

    13. AvenaNM,HoebelBG.Adietpromotingsugardependencycausesbehavioralcrosssensitizationtoalowdoseofamphetamine.Neuroscience.2003b122:1720.[PubMed]

    14. AvenaNM,LongKA,HoebelBG.Sugardependentratsshowenhancedrespondingforsugarafterabstinence:evidenceofasugardeprivationeffect.PhysiolBehav.200584:359362.[PubMed]

    15. AvenaNM,RadaP,MoiseN,HoebelBG.Sucroseshamfeedingonabingeschedulereleasesaccumbensdopaminerepeatedlyandeliminatestheacetylcholinesatietyresponse.Neuroscience.2006139:813820.[PubMed]

    16. BaileyA,GianottiR,HoA,KreekMJ.Persistentupregulationofmuopioid,butnotadenosine,receptorsinbrainsoflongtermwithdrawnescalatingdosebingecocainetreatedrats.Synapse.200557:160166.[PubMed]

    17. BakshiVP,KelleyAE.Sensitizationandconditioningoffeedingfollowingmultiplemorphinemicroinjectionsintothenucleusaccumbens.BrainRes.1994648:342346.[PubMed]

    18. BalsKubikR,HerzA,ShippenbergTS.Evidencethattheaversiveeffectsofopioidantagonistsandkappaagonistsarecentrallymediated.Psychopharmacology(Berl)198998:203206.[PubMed]

    19. BancroftJ,VukadinovicZ.Sexualaddiction,sexualcompulsivity,sexualimpulsivity,orwhat?Towardatheoreticalmodel.JSexRes.200441:225234.[PubMed]

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 15/25

    20. BassareoV,DiChiaraG.Differentialinfluenceofassociativeandnonassociativelearningmechanismsontheresponsivenessofprefrontalandaccumbaldopaminetransmissiontofoodstimuliinratsfedadlibitum.JNeurosci.199717:851861.[PubMed]

    21. BassareoV,DiChiaraG.Modulationoffeedinginducedactivationofmesolimbicdopaminetransmissionbyappetitivestimulianditsrelationtomotivationalstate.EurJNeurosci.199911:43894397.[PubMed]

    22. BelloNT,LucasLR,HajnalA.RepeatedsucroseaccessinfluencesdopamineD2receptordensityinthestriatum.Neuroreport.200213:15751578.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    23. BelloNT,SweigartKL,LakoskiJM,NorgrenR,HajnalA.Restrictedfeedingwithscheduledsucroseaccessresultsinanupregulationoftheratdopaminetransporter.AmJPhysiolRegulIntegrCompPhysiol.2003284:R12601268.[PubMed]

    24. BencherifB,GuardaAS,ColantuoniC,RavertHT,DannalsRF,FrostJJ.Regionalmuopioidreceptorbindingininsularcortexisdecreasedinbulimianervosaandcorrelatesinverselywithfastingbehavior.JNuclMed.200546:13491351.[PubMed]

    25. BerridgeKC.Foodreward:brainsubstratesofwantingandliking.NeurosciBiobehavRev.199620:125.[PubMed]

    26. BerridgeKC,RobinsonTE.Whatistheroleofdopamineinreward:hedonicimpact,rewardlearning,orincentivesalience?BrainResBrainResRev.199828:309369.[PubMed]

    27. BerthoudHR,JeanrenaudB.Shamfeedinginducedcephalicphaseinsulinreleaseintherat.AmJPhysiol.1982242:E280285.[PubMed]

    28. BienkowskiP,RogowskiA,KorkoszA,MierzejewskiP,RadwanskaK,KaczmarekL,BoguckaBonikowskaA,KostowskiW.Timedependentchangesinalcoholseekingbehaviourduringabstinence.EurNeuropsychopharmacol.200414:355360.[PubMed]

    29. BlomqvistO,EricsonM,JohnsonDH,EngelJA,SoderpalmB.Voluntaryethanolintakeintherat:effectsofnicotinicacetylcholinereceptorblockadeorsubchronicnicotinetreatment.EurJPharmacol.1996314:257267.[PubMed]

    30. BockBC,KanarekRB,AprilleJR.Mineralcontentofthedietalterssucroseinducedobesityinrats.PhysiolBehav.199557:659668.[PubMed]

    31. BoggianoMM,ChandlerPC,VianaJB,OswaldKD,MaldonadoCR,WaufordPK.Combineddietingandstressevokeexaggeratedresponsestoopioidsinbingeeatingrats.BehavNeurosci.2005119:12071214.[PubMed]

    32. BozarthMA,WiseRA.Intracranialselfadministrationofmorphineintotheventraltegmentalareainrats.LifeSci.198128:551555.[PubMed]

    33. BozarthMA,WiseRA.Toxicityassociatedwithlongtermintravenousheroinandcocaineselfadministrationintherat.JAMA.1985254:8183.[PubMed]

    34. BozarthMA,WiseRA.Involvementoftheventraltegmentaldopaminesysteminopioidandpsychomotorstimulantreinforcement.NIDAResMonogr.198667:190196.[PubMed]

    35. BrayGA,NielsenSJ,PopkinBM.Consumptionofhighfructosecornsyrupinbeveragesmayplayaroleintheepidemicofobesity.AmJClinNutr.200479:537543.[PubMed]

    36. BrayGA,YorkB,DeLanyJ.Asurveyoftheopinionsofobesityexpertsonthecausesandtreatmentofobesity.AmJClinNutr.199255:151S154S.[PubMed]

    37. BrewertonTD,LydiardRB,LaraiaMT,ShookJE,BallengerJC.CSFbetaendorphinanddynorphininbulimianervosa.AmJPsychiatry.1992149:10861090.[PubMed]

    38. BudaLevinA,WojnickiFH,CorwinRL.Baclofenreducesfatintakeunderbingetypeconditions.PhysiolBehav.200586:176184.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    39. CarrKD.Chronicfoodrestriction:Enhancingeffectsondrugrewardandstriatalcellsignaling.PhysiolBehav2006[PubMed]

    40. CarrollME.Theroleoffooddeprivationinthemaintenanceandreinstatementofcocaineseekingbehaviorinrats.DrugAlcoholDepend.198516:95109.[PubMed]

    41. CarrollME,AndersonMM,MorganAD.Regulationofintravenouscocaineselfadministrationinratsselectivelybredforhigh(HiS)andlow(LoS)saccharinintake.Psychopharmacology(Berl)2006[PubMed]

    42. ChauD,RadaPV,KosloffRA,HoebelBG.Cholinergic,M1receptorsinthenucleusaccumbensmediate

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 16/25

    behavioraldepression.Apossibledownstreamtargetforfluoxetine.AnnNYAcadSci.1999877:769774.[PubMed]

    43. CheerJF,WassumKM,HeienML,PhillipsPE,WightmanRM.Cannabinoidsenhancesubseconddopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbensofawakerats.JNeurosci.200424:43934400.[PubMed]

    44. ColantuoniC,RadaP,McCarthyJ,PattenC,AvenaNM,ChadeayneA,HoebelBG.Evidencethatintermittent,excessivesugarintakecausesendogenousopioiddependence.ObesRes.200210:478488.[PubMed]

    45. ColantuoniC,SchwenkerJ,McCarthyJ,RadaP,LadenheimB,CadetJL,SchwartzGJ,MoranTH,HoebelBG.Excessivesugarintakealtersbindingtodopamineandmuopioidreceptorsinthebrain.Neuroreport.200112:35493552.[PubMed]

    46. ComingsDE,GadeAndavoluR,GonzalezN,WuS,MuhlemanD,ChenC,KohP,FarwellK,BlakeH,DietzG,MacMurrayJP,LesieurHR,RugleLJ,RosenthalRJ.Theadditiveeffectofneurotransmittergenesinpathologicalgambling.ClinGenet.200160:107116.[PubMed]

    47. CorwinRL.Bingeingrats:amodelofintermittentexcessivebehavior?Appetite.200646:1115.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    48. CovingtonHE,MiczekKA.Repeatedsocialdefeatstress,cocaineormorphine.EffectsonbehavioralsensitizationandintravenouscocaineselfadministrationbingesPsychopharmacology(Berl)2001158:388398.[PubMed]

    49. CurryDL.Effectsofmannoseandfructoseonthesynthesisandsecretionofinsulin.Pancreas.19894:29.[PubMed]

    50. DavisC,ClaridgeG.Theeatingdisordersasaddiction:apsychobiologicalperspective.AddictBehav.199823:463475.[PubMed]

    51. DeVriesTJ,ShippenbergTS.Neuralsystemsunderlyingopiateaddiction.JNeurosci.200222:33213325.[PubMed]

    52. DeWitteP,PintoE,AnsseauM,VerbanckP.Alcoholandwithdrawal:fromanimalresearchtoclinicalissues.NeurosciBiobehavRev.200327:189197.[PubMed]

    53. DeasD,MayMP,RandallC,JohnsonN,AntonR.Naltrexonetreatmentofadolescentalcoholics:anopenlabelpilotstudy.JChildAdolescPsychopharmacol.200515:723728.[PubMed]

    54. DeneauG,YanagitaT,SeeversMH.Selfadministrationofpsychoactivesubstancesbythemonkey.Psychopharmacologia.196916:3048.[PubMed]

    55. DerocheGamonetV,BelinD,PiazzaPV.Evidenceforaddictionlikebehaviorintherat.Science.2004305:10141017.[PubMed]

    56. DesMaisonsK.Yourlastdiet!:Thesugaraddictsweightlossplan.RandomHouseToronto:2001.57. DiChiaraG,ImperatoA.Preferentialstimulationofdopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbensby

    opiates,alcohol,andbarbiturates:studieswithtranscerebraldialysisinfreelymovingrats.AnnNYAcadSci.1986473:367381.[PubMed]

    58. DiChiaraG,ImperatoA.Drugsabusedbyhumanspreferentiallyincreasesynapticdopamineconcentrationsinthemesolimbicsystemoffreelymovingrats.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA.198885:52745278.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    59. DiChiaraG,TandaG.Bluntingofreactivityofdopaminetransmissiontopalatablefood:abiochemicalmarkerofanhedoniaintheCMSmodel?Psychopharmacology(Berl)1997134:351353.[PubMed]

    60. DickinsonA,WoodN,SmithJW.Alcoholseekingbyrats:actionorhabit?QJExpPsycholB.200255:331348.[PubMed]

    61. DrewnowskiA,KrahnDD,DemitrackMA,NairnK,GosnellBA.Tasteresponsesandpreferencesforsweethighfatfoods:evidenceforopioidinvolvement.PhysiolBehav.199251:371379.[PubMed]

    62. DumJ,GramschC,HerzA.Activationofhypothalamicbetaendorphinpoolsbyrewardinducedbyhighlypalatablefood.PharmacolBiochemBehav.198318:443447.[PubMed]

    63. EllgrenM,SpanoSM,HurdYL.Adolescentcannabisexposurealtersopiateintakeandopioidlimbicneuronalpopulationsinadultrats.Neuropsychopharmacology.2006Epubaheadofprint.[PubMed]

    64. ElliottSS,KeimNL,SternJS,TeffK,HavelPJ.Fructose,weightgain,andtheinsulinresistancesyndrome.AmJClinNutr.200276:911922.[PubMed]

    65. EspejoEF,StinusL,CadorM,MirD.Effectsofmorphineandnaloxoneonbehaviourinthehotplate

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 17/25

    test:anethopharmacologicalstudyintherat.Psychopharmacology(Berl)1994113:500510.[PubMed]66. EverittBJ,WolfME.Psychomotorstimulantaddiction:aneuralsystemsperspective.JNeurosci.

    200222:33123320.[PubMed]67. FerrarioCR,RobinsonTE.Amphetaminepretreatmentacceleratesthesubsequentescalationofcocaine

    selfadministrationbehavior.EurNeuropsychopharmacol.200717:352357.[PubMed]68. FileSE,AndrewsN.Lowbutnothighdosesofbuspironereducetheanxiogeniceffectsofdiazepam

    withdrawal.Psychopharmacology(Berl)1991105:578582.[PubMed]69. FileSE,LippaAS,BeerB,LippaMT.Unit8.4Animaltestsofanxiety.In:CrawleyJN,etal.,editors.

    CurrentProtocolsinNeuroscience.JohnWiley&Sons,Inc.Indianapolis:2004.70. FinlaysonG,KingN,BlundellJE.Isitpossibletodissociatelikingandwantingforfoodsinhumans?

    Anovelexperimentalprocedure.PhysiolBehav.200790:3642.[PubMed]71. FiorinoDF,PhillipsAG.Facilitationofsexualbehaviorandenhanceddopamineeffluxinthenucleus

    accumbensofmaleratsafterDamphetamineinducedbehavioralsensitization.JNeurosci.199919:456463.[PubMed]

    72. FiserovaM,ConsoloS,KrsiakM.Chronicmorphineinduceslonglastingchangesinacetylcholinereleaseinratnucleusaccumbenscoreandshell:aninvivomicrodialysisstudy.Psychopharmacology(Berl)1999142:8594.[PubMed]

    73. FoleyKA,FudgeMA,KavaliersM,OssenkoppKP.Quinpiroleinducedbehavioralsensitizationisenhancedbypriorscheduledexposuretosucrose:Amultivariableexaminationoflocomotoractivity.BehavBrainRes.2006167:4956.[PubMed]

    74. FosterJ,BrewerC,SteeleT.Naltrexoneimplantscancompletelypreventearly(1month)relapseafteropiatedetoxification:apilotstudyoftwocohortstotalling101patientswithanoteonnaltrexonebloodlevels.AddictBiol.20038:211217.[PubMed]

    75. FullertonDT,GettoCJ,SwiftWJ,CarlsonIH.Sugar,opioidsandbingeeating.BrainResBull.198514:673680.[PubMed]

    76. GalicMA,PersingerMA.Voluminoussucroseconsumptioninfemalerats:increasednippinessduringperiodsofsucroseremovalandpossibleoestrusperiodicity.PsycholRep.200290:5860.[PubMed]

    77. GendallKA,SullivanPE,JoycePR,CarterFA,BulikCM.Thenutrientintakeofwomenwithbulimianervosa.IntJEatDisord.199721:115127.[PubMed]

    78. GeorgesF,StinusL,BlochB,LeMoineC.Chronicmorphineexposureandspontaneouswithdrawalareassociatedwithmodificationsofdopaminereceptorandneuropeptidegeneexpressionintheratstriatum.EurJNeurosci.199911:481490.[PubMed]

    79. GerberGJ,WiseRA.Pharmacologicalregulationofintravenouscocaineandheroinselfadministrationinrats:avariabledoseparadigm.PharmacolBiochemBehav.198932:527531.[PubMed]

    80. GessaGL,MuntoniF,ColluM,VargiuL,MereuG.Lowdosesofethanolactivatedopaminergicneuronsintheventraltegmentalarea.BrainRes.1985348:201203.[PubMed]

    81. GillmanMA,LichtigfeldFJ.Theopioids,dopamine,cholecystokinin,andeatingdisorders.ClinNeuropharmacol.19869:9197.[PubMed]

    82. GlassMJ,BillingtonCJ,LevineAS.Opioidsandfoodintake:distributedfunctionalneuralpathways?Neuropeptides.199933:360368.[PubMed]

    83. GlickSD,ShapiroRM,DrewKL,HindsPA,CarlsonJN.Differencesinspontaneousandamphetamineinducedrotationalbehavior,andinsensitizationtoamphetamine,amongSpragueDawleyderivedratsfromdifferentsources.PhysiolBehav.198638:6770.[PubMed]

    84. GlimcherPW,GiovinoAA,HoebelBG.Neurotensinselfinjectionintheventraltegmentalarea.BrainRes.1987403:147150.[PubMed]

    85. GlimcherPW,GiovinoAA,MargolinDH,HoebelBG.Endogenousopiaterewardinducedbyanenkephalinaseinhibitor,thiorphan,injectedintotheventralmidbrain.BehavNeurosci.198498:262268.[PubMed]

    86. GlowaJR,RiceKC,MateckaD,RothmanRB.Phentermine/fenfluraminedecreasescocaineselfadministrationinrhesusmonkeys.Neuroreport.19978:13471351.[PubMed]

    87. GosnellBA.Sucroseintakeenhancesbehavioralsensitizationproducedbycocaine.BrainRes.20051031:194201.[PubMed]

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 18/25

    88. GreenbergBD,SegalDS.Acuteandchronicbehavioralinteractionsbetweenphencyclidine(PCP)andamphetamine:evidenceforadopaminergicroleinsomePCPinducedbehaviors.PharmacolBiochemBehav.198523:99105.[PubMed]

    89. GrimmJW,FyallAM,OsincupDP.Incubationofsucrosecraving:effectsofreducedtrainingandsucrosepreloading.PhysiolBehav.200584:7379.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    90. GrimmJW,HopeBT,WiseRA,ShahamY.Neuroadaptation.Incubationofcocainecravingafterwithdrawal.Nature.2001412:141142.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    91. HaberSN,LuW.DistributionofpreproenkephalinmessengerRNAinthebasalgangliaandlimbicassociatedregionsofthemonkeytelencephalon.Neuroscience.199565:417429.[PubMed]

    92. HajnalA,MarkGP,RadaPV,LenardL,HoebelBG.Norepinephrinemicroinjectionsinthehypothalamicparaventricularnucleusincreaseextracellulardopamineanddecreaseacetylcholineinthenucleusaccumbens:relevancetofeedingreinforcement.JNeurochem.199768:667674.[PubMed]

    93. HajnalA,NorgrenR.Repeatedaccesstosucroseaugmentsdopamineturnoverinthenucleusaccumbens.Neuroreport.200213:22132216.[PubMed]

    94. HajnalA,SmithGP,NorgrenR.Oralsucrosestimulationincreasesaccumbensdopamineintherat.AmJPhysiolRegulIntegrCompPhysiol.2004286:R31R37.[PubMed]

    95. HajnalA,SzekelyM,GalosiR,LenardL.Accumbenscholinergicinterneuronsplayaroleintheregulationofbodyweightandmetabolism.PhysiolBehav.200070:95103.[PubMed]

    96. HarrisGC,WimmerM,AstonJonesG.Aroleforlateralhypothalamicorexinneuronsinrewardseeking.Nature.2005437:556559.[PubMed]

    97. HelmKA,RadaP,HoebelBG.Cholecystokinincombinedwithserotonininthehypothalamuslimitsaccumbensdopaminereleasewhileincreasingacetylcholine:apossiblesatiationmechanism.BrainRes.2003963:290297.[PubMed]

    98. HenningfieldJE,ClaytonR,PollinW.Involvementoftobaccoinalcoholismandillicitdruguse.BrJAddict.199085:279291.[PubMed]

    99. HernandezL,HoebelBG.Foodrewardandcocaineincreaseextracellulardopamineinthenucleusaccumbensasmeasuredbymicrodialysis.LifeSci.198842:17051712.[PubMed]

    100. HeubnerH.Endorphins,eatingdisordersandotheraddictivebehaviors.W.W.NortonNewYork:1993.101. HoebelBG.Brainneurotransmittersinfoodanddrugreward.AmJClinNutr.198542:11331150.

    [PubMed]102. HoebelBG,HernandezL,SchwartzDH,MarkGP,HunterGA.Microdialysisstudiesofbrain

    norepinephrine,serotonin,anddopaminereleaseduringingestivebehavior:theoreticalandclinicalimplications.In:SchneiderLH,etal.,editors.ThePsychobiologyofHumanEatingDisorders:PreclinicalandClinicalPerspectives.Vol.575.AnnalsoftheNewYorkAcademyofSciencesNewYork:1989.pp.171193.[PubMed]

    103. HoebelBG,LeibowitzSF,HernandezL.Neurochemistryofanorexiaandbulimia.In:AndersonH,editor.Thebiologyoffeastandfamine:relevancetoeatingdisorders.AcademicPressNewYork:1992.pp.2145.

    104. HoebelBG,RadaP,MarkGP,PothosE.Neuralsystemsforreinforcementandinhibitionofbehavior:Relevancetoeating,addiction,anddepression.In:KahnemanD,etal.,editors.Wellbeing:theFoundationsofHedonicPsychology.RussellSageFoundationNewYork:1999.pp.558572.

    105. HoldernessCC,BrooksGunnJ,WarrenMP.Comorbidityofeatingdisordersandsubstanceabusereviewoftheliterature.IntJEatDisord.199416:134.[PubMed]

    106. HowardBV,WylieRosettJ.Sugarandcardiovasculardisease:AstatementforhealthcareprofessionalsfromtheCommitteeonNutritionoftheCouncilonNutrition,PhysicalActivity,andMetabolismoftheAmericanHeartAssociation.Circulation.2002106:523527.[PubMed]

    107. HubbellCL,MankesRF,ReidLD.Asmalldoseofmorphineleadsratstodrinkmorealcoholandachievehigherbloodalcoholconcentrations.AlcoholClinExpRes.199317:10401043.[PubMed]

    108. HurdYL,KehrJ,UngerstedtU.Invivomicrodialysisasatechniquetomonitordrugtransport:correlationofextracellularcocainelevelsanddopamineoverflowintheratbrain.JNeurochem.198851:13141316.[PubMed]

    109. ItoR,DalleyJW,HowesSR,RobbinsTW,EverittBJ.Dissociationinconditioneddopaminereleasein

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 19/25

    thenucleusaccumbenscoreandshellinresponsetococainecuesandduringcocaineseekingbehaviorinrats.JNeurosci.200020:74897495.[PubMed]

    110. ItzhakY,MartinJL.Effectsofcocaine,nicotine,dizociplineandalcoholonmicelocomotoractivity:cocainealcoholcrosssensitizationinvolvesupregulationofstriataldopaminetransporterbindingsites.BrainRes.1999818:204211.[PubMed]

    111. JimersonDC,LesemMD,KayeWH,BrewertonTD.Lowserotoninanddopaminemetaboliteconcentrationsincerebrospinalfluidfrombulimicpatientswithfrequentbingeepisodes.ArchGenPsychiatry.199249:132138.[PubMed]

    112. KalivasPW.Glutamatesystemsincocaineaddiction.CurrOpinPharmacol.20044:2329.[PubMed]113. KalivasPW,StriplinCD,SteketeeJD,KlitenickMA,DuffyP.Cellularmechanismsofbehavioral

    sensitizationtodrugsofabuse.AnnNYAcadSci.1992654:128135.[PubMed]114. KalivasPW,VolkowND.Theneuralbasisofaddiction:apathologyofmotivationandchoice.AmJ

    Psychiatry.2005162:14031413.[PubMed]115. KalivasPW,WeberB.Amphetamineinjectionintotheventralmesencephalonsensitizesratstoperipheral

    amphetamineandcocaine.JPharmacolExpTher.1988245:10951102.[PubMed]116. KantakKM,MiczekKA.Aggressionduringmorphinewithdrawal:effectsofmethodofwithdrawal,

    fightingexperience,andsocialrole.Psychopharmacology(Berl)198690:451456.[PubMed]117. KatherineA.Anatomyofafoodaddiction:aneffectiveprogramtoovercomecompulsiveeating.Gurze

    BooksCarlsbad:1996.118. KatzJL,ValentinoRJ.Theopiatequasiwithdrawalsyndromeinrhesusmonkeys:comparisonof

    naloxoneprecipitatedwithdrawaltoeffectsofcholinergicagents.Psychopharmacology(Berl)198484:1215.[PubMed]

    119. KawasakiT,KashiwabaraA,SakaiT,IgarashiK,OgataN,WatanabeH,IchiyanagiK,YamanouchiT.Longtermsucrosedrinkingcausesincreasedbodyweightandglucoseintoleranceinnormalmalerats.BrJNutr.200593:613618.[PubMed]

    120. KelleyAE,BakshiVP,HaberSN,SteiningerTL,WillMJ,ZhangM.Opioidmodulationoftastehedonicswithintheventralstriatum.PhysiolBehav.200276:365377.[PubMed]

    121. KelleyAE,BaldoBA,PrattWE.Aproposedhypothalamicthalamicstriatalaxisfortheintegrationofenergybalance,arousal,andfoodreward.JCompNeurol.2005493:7285.[PubMed]

    122. KelleyAE,WillMJ,SteiningerTL,ZhangM,HaberSN.Restricteddailyconsumptionofahighlypalatablefood(chocolateEnsure(R))altersstriatalenkephalingeneexpression.EurJNeurosci.200318:25922598.[PubMed]

    123. KleinDA,BoudreauGS,DevlinMJ,WalshBT.Artificialsweeteneruseamongindividualswitheatingdisorders.IntJEatDisord.200639:341345.[PubMed]

    124. KoobGF,LeMoalM.Drugabuse:hedonichomeostaticdysregulation.Science.1997278:5258.[PubMed]

    125. KoobGF,LeMoalM.NeurobiologyofAddiction.AcademicPressSanDiego:2005.126. KoobGF,MaldonadoR,StinusL.Neuralsubstratesofopiatewithdrawal.TrendsNeurosci.

    199215:186191.[PubMed]127. LaiS,LaiH,PageJB,McCoyCB.Theassociationbetweencigarettesmokinganddrugabuseinthe

    UnitedStates.JAddictDis.200019:1124.[PubMed]128. LeKA,TappyL.Metaboliceffectsoffructose.CurrOpinClinNutrMetabCare.20069:469475.

    [PubMed]129. LeMagnenJ.Aroleforopiatesinfoodrewardandfoodaddiction.In:CapaldiPT,editor.Taste,

    Experience,andFeeding.AmericanPsychologicalAssociationWashington,D.C.:1990.pp.241252.130. LeibowitzSF,HoebelBG.Behavioralneuroscienceandobesity.In:BrayG,etal.,editors.The

    HandbookofObesity.MarcelDekkerNewYork:2004.pp.301371.131. LevineAS,BillingtonCJ.Opioidsasagentsofrewardrelatedfeeding:aconsiderationoftheevidence.

    PhysiolBehav.200482:5761.[PubMed]132. LevineAS,KotzCM,GosnellBA.Sugars:hedonicaspects,neuroregulation,andenergybalance.AmJ

    ClinNutr.200378:834S842S.[PubMed]133. LiangNC,HajnalA,NorgrenR.Shamfeedingcornoilincreasesaccumbensdopamineintherat.AmJ

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 20/25

    PhysiolRegulIntegrCompPhysiol.2006291:R1236R1239.[PubMed]134. LiguoriA,HughesJR,GoldbergK,CallasP.Subjectiveeffectsoforalcaffeineinformerlycocaine

    dependenthumans.DrugAlcoholDepend.199749:1724.[PubMed]135. LuL,GrimmJW,HopeBT,ShahamY.Incubationofcocainecravingafterwithdrawal:areviewof

    preclinicaldata.Neuropharmacology.200447(Suppl1):214226.[PubMed]136. LudwigDS,PetersonKE,GortmakerSL.Relationbetweenconsumptionofsugarsweeteneddrinksand

    childhoodobesity:aprospective,observationalanalysis.Lancet.2001357:505508.[PubMed]137. MarkGP,BlanderDS,HoebelBG.Aconditionedstimulusdecreasesextracellulardopamineinthe

    nucleusaccumbensafterthedevelopmentofalearnedtasteaversion.BrainRes.1991551:308310.[PubMed]

    138. MarkGP,RadaP,PothosE,HoebelBG.Effectsoffeedinganddrinkingonacetylcholinereleaseinthenucleusaccumbens,striatum,andhippocampusoffreelybehavingrats.JournalofNeurochemistry.199258:22692274.[PubMed]

    139. MarkGP,WeinbergJB,RadaPV,HoebelBG.Extracellularacetylcholineisincreasedinthenucleusaccumbensfollowingthepresentationofanaversivelyconditionedtastestimulus.BrainRes.1995688:184188.[PubMed]

    140. MarkouA,WeissF,GoldLH,CaineSB,SchulteisG,KoobGF.Animalmodelsofdrugcraving.Psychopharmacology(Berl)1993112:163182.[PubMed]

    141. MarrazziMA,LubyED.Anautoaddictionopioidmodelofchronicanorexianervosa.IntJEatDisord.19865:191208.

    142. MarrazziMA,LubyED.Theneurobiologyofanorexianervosa:anautoaddiction?In:CohenM,FoaP,editors.TheBrainasanEndocrineOrgan.SpringerVerlagNewYork:1990.pp.4695.

    143. MartinWR.Treatmentofheroindependencewithnaltrexone.CurrPsychiatrTher.197515:157161.[PubMed]

    144. MartinWR,WiklerA,EadesCG,PescorFT.TolerancetoandPhysicalDependenceonMorphineinRats.Psychopharmacologia.19634:247260.[PubMed]

    145. McBrideWJ,MurphyJM,IkemotoS.Localizationofbrainreinforcementmechanisms:intracranialselfadministrationandintracranialplaceconditioningstudies.BehavBrainRes.1999101:129152.[PubMed]

    146. McSweeneyFK,MurphyES,KowalBP.Regulationofdrugtakingbysensitizationandhabituation.ExpClinPsychopharmacol.200513:163184.[PubMed]

    147. MercerME,HolderMD.Foodcravings,endogenousopioidpeptides,andfoodintake:areview.Appetite.199729:325352.[PubMed]

    148. MifsudJC,HernandezL,HoebelBG.Nicotineinfusedintothenucleusaccumbensincreasessynapticdopamineasmeasuredbyinvivomicrodialysis.BrainRes.1989478:365367.[PubMed]

    149. MillerRJ,PickelVM.Immunohistochemicaldistributionofenkephalins:interactionswithcatecholaminecontainingsystems.AdvBiochemPsychopharmacol.198025:349359.[PubMed]

    150. MogensonGJ,YangCR.Thecontributionofbasalforebraintolimbicmotorintegrationandthemediationofmotivationtoaction.AdvExpMedBiol.1991295:267290.[PubMed]

    151. MokdadAH,MarksJS,StroupDF,GerberdingJL.ActualcausesofdeathintheUnitedStates,2000.Jama.2004291:12381245.[PubMed]

    152. MooreRJ,VinsantSL,NadarMA,PoorinoLJ,FriedmanDP.EffectofcocaineselfadministrationondopamineD receptorsinrhesusmonkeys.Synapse.199830:8896.[PubMed]

    153. MutschlerNH,MiczekKA.Withdrawalfromaselfadministeredornoncontingentcocainebinge:differencesinultrasonicdistressvocalizationsinrats.Psychopharmacology(Berl)1998136:402408.[PubMed]

    154. NelsonJE,PearsonHW,SayersM,GlynnTJ,editors.GuidetoDrugAbuseResearchTerminology.NationalInstituteonDrugAbuseRockville:1982.

    155. NicholsML,HubbellCL,KalsherMJ,ReidLD.Morphineincreasesintakeofbeeramongrats.Alcohol.19918:237240.[PubMed]

    156. NisellM,NomikosGG,SvenssonTH.Systemicnicotineinduceddopaminereleaseintheratnucleusaccumbensisregulatedbynicotinicreceptorsintheventraltegmentalarea.Synapse.199416:3644.

    2

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 21/25

    [PubMed]157. NocjarC,PankseppJ.Chronicintermittentamphetaminepretreatmentenhancesfutureappetitivebehavior

    fordrugandnaturalreward:interactionwithenvironmentalvariables.BehavBrainRes.2002128:189203.[PubMed]

    158. OBrienCP.Anticravingmedicationsforrelapseprevention:apossiblenewclassofpsychoactivemedications.AmJPsychiatry.2005162:14231431.[PubMed]

    159. OBrienCP,ChildressAR,EhrmanR,RobbinsSJ.Conditioningfactorsindrugabuse:cantheyexplaincompulsion?JPsychopharmacol.199812:1522.[PubMed]

    160. OBrienCP,TestaT,OBrienTJ,BradyJP,WellsB.Conditionednarcoticwithdrawalinhumans.Science.1977195:10001002.[PubMed]

    161. OldsME.Reinforcingeffectsofmorphineinthenucleusaccumbens.BrainRes.1982237:429440.[PubMed]

    162. PanY,BermanY,HabernyS,MellerE,CarrKD.Synthesis,proteinlevels,activity,andphosphorylationstateoftyrosinehydroxylaseinmesoaccumbensandnigrostriataldopaminepathwaysofchronicallyfoodrestrictedrats.BrainRes.20061122:135142.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    163. PecinaS,BerridgeKC.Centralenhancementoftastepleasurebyintraventricularmorphine.Neurobiology(Bp)19953:269280.[PubMed]

    164. PelchatML,JohnsonA,ChanR,ValdezJ,RaglandJD.Imagesofdesire:foodcravingactivationduringfMRI.Neuroimage.200423:14861493.[PubMed]

    165. PellowS,ChopinP,FileSE,BrileyM.Validationofopen:closedarmentriesinanelevatedplusmazeasameasureofanxietyintherat.JNeurosciMethods.198514:149167.[PubMed]

    166. PetryNM.Shouldthescopeofaddictivebehaviorsbebroadenedtoincludepathologicalgambling?Addiction.2006101(Suppl1):152160.[PubMed]

    167. PiazzaPV,DeminiereJM,LeMoalM,SimonH.Factorsthatpredictindividualvulnerabilitytoamphetamineselfadministration.Science.1989245:15111513.[PubMed]

    168. PicciottoMR,CorrigallWA.Neuronalsystemsunderlyingbehaviorsrelatedtonicotineaddiction:neuralcircuitsandmoleculargenetics.JNeurosci.200222:33383341.[PubMed]

    169. PierceRC,KalivasPW.Amphetamineproducessensitizedincreasesinlocomotionandextracellulardopaminepreferentiallyinthenucleusaccumbensshellofratsadministeredrepeatedcocaine.JPharmacolExpTher.1995275:10191029.[PubMed]

    170. PontieriFE,MonnazziP,ScontriniA,ButtarelliFR,PatacchioliFR.Behavioralsensitizationtoheroinbycannabinoidpretreatmentintherat.EurJPharmacol.2001421:R1R3.[PubMed]

    171. PorsoltRD,AntonG,BlavetN,JalfreM.Behaviouraldespairinrats:anewmodelsensitivetoantidepressanttreatments.EurJPharmacol.197847:379391.[PubMed]

    172. PothosE,RadaP,MarkGP,HoebelBG.Dopaminemicrodialysisinthenucleusaccumbensduringacuteandchronicmorphine,naloxoneprecipitatedwithdrawalandclonidinetreatment.BrainRes.1991566:348350.[PubMed]

    173. PrasadBM,UlibarriC,SorgBA.Stressinducedcrosssensitizationtococaine:effectofadrenalectomyandcorticosteroneaftershortandlongtermwithdrawal.Psychopharmacology(Berl)1998136:2433.[PubMed]

    174. PrzewlockaB,TurchanJ,LasonW,PrzewlockiR.Theeffectofsingleandrepeatedmorphineadministrationontheprodynorphinsystemactivityinthenucleusaccumbensandstriatumoftherat.Neuroscience.199670:749754.[PubMed]

    175. PutnamJ,AllhouseJE.Foodconsumption,prices,andexpenditures,19701997.FoodandConsumersEconomicsDivision,EconomicsResearchService,USDepartmentofAgricultureWashington,D.C.:1999.

    176. RadaP,AvenaNM,HoebelBG.Adiccinalazcar:Mitorealidad?Revision.RevVenezEndocrinolMetab.2005a3:212.

    177. RadaP,AvenaNM,HoebelBG.Dailybingeingonsugarrepeatedlyreleasesdopamineintheaccumbensshell.Neuroscience.2005b134:737744.[PubMed]

    178. RadaP,ColasanteC,SkirzewskiM,HernandezL,HoebelB.Behavioraldepressionintheswimtestcausesabiphasic,longlastingchangeinaccumbensacetylcholinerelease,withpartialcompensationby

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 22/25

    acetylcholinesteraseandmuscarinic1receptors.Neuroscience.2006141:6776.[PubMed]179. RadaP,HoebelBG.Acetylcholineintheaccumbensisdecreasedbydiazepamandincreasedby

    benzodiazepinewithdrawal:apossiblemechanismfordependency.EurJPharmacol.2005508:131138.[PubMed]

    180. RadaP,JensenK,HoebelBG.Effectsofnicotineandmecamylamineinducedwithdrawalonextracellulardopamineandacetylcholineintheratnucleusaccumbens.Psychopharmacology(Berl)2001157:105110.[PubMed]

    181. RadaP,JohnsonDF,LewisMJ,HoebelBG.Inalcoholtreatedrats,naloxonedecreasesextracellulardopamineandincreasesacetylcholineinthenucleusaccumbens:evidenceofopioidwithdrawal.PharmacolBiochemBehav.200479:599605.[PubMed]

    182. RadaP,MarkGP,HoebelBG.Galanininthehypothalamusraisesdopamineandlowersacetylcholinereleaseinthenucleusaccumbens:apossiblemechanismforhypothalamicinitiationoffeedingbehavior.BrainRes.1998798:16.[PubMed]

    183. RadaP,MarkGP,PothosE,HoebelBG.Systemicmorphinesimultaneouslydecreasesextracellularacetylcholineandincreasesdopamineinthenucleusaccumbensoffreelymovingrats.Neuropharmacology.1991a30:11331136.[PubMed]

    184. RadaP,PaezX,HernandezL,AvenaNM,HoebelBG.Microdialysisinthestudyofbehaviorreinforcementandinhibition.In:WesterinkBH,CreamersT,editors.HandbookofMicrodialysis:Methods,ApplicationandPerspectives.AcademicPressNewYork:2007.pp.351375.

    185. RadaP,PothosE,MarkGP,HoebelBG.Microdialysisevidencethatacetylcholineinthenucleusaccumbensisinvolvedinmorphinewithdrawalanditstreatmentwithclonidine.BrainRes.1991b561:354356.[PubMed]

    186. RadaPV,HoebelBG.Supraadditiveeffectofdfenfluramineplusphentermineonextracellularacetylcholineinthenucleusaccumbens:possiblemechanismforinhibitionofexcessivefeedinganddrugabuse.PharmacolBiochemBehav.200065:369373.[PubMed]

    187. RadaPV,MarkGP,TaylorKM,HoebelBG.Morphineandnaloxone,i.p.orlocally,affectextracellularacetylcholineintheaccumbensandprefrontalcortex.PharmacolBiochemBehav.199653:809816.[PubMed]

    188. RadaPV,MarkGP,YeomansJJ,HoebelBG.Acetylcholinereleaseinventraltegmentalareabyhypothalamicselfstimulation,eating,anddrinking.PharmacolBiochemBehav.200065:375379.[PubMed]

    189. RadhakishunFS,KorfJ,VenemaK,WesterinkBH.Thereleaseofendogenousdopamineanditsmetabolitesfromratstriatumasdetectedinpushpullperfusates:effectsofsystematicallyadministereddrugs.PharmWeekblSci.19835:153158.[PubMed]

    190. RanaldiR,PocockD,ZereikR,WiseRA.Dopaminefluctuationsinthenucleusaccumbensduringmaintenance,extinction,andreinstatementofintravenousDamphetamineselfadministration.JNeurosci.199919:41024109.[PubMed]

    191. RivaG,BacchettaM,CesaG,ContiS,CastelnuovoG,MantovaniF,MolinariE.Issevereobesityaformofaddiction?Rationale,clinicalapproach,andcontrolledclinicaltrial.CyberpsycholBehav.20069:457479.[PubMed]

    192. RobinsonTE,BerridgeKC.Theneuralbasisofdrugcraving:anincentivesensitizationtheoryofaddiction.BrainResBrainResRev.199318:247291.[PubMed]

    193. RollsET.Brainmechanismsunderlyingflavourandappetite.PhilosTransRSocLondBBiolSci.2006361:11231136.[PMCfreearticle][PubMed]

    194. RossettiZL,HmaidanY,GessaGL.Markedinhibitionofmesolimbicdopaminerelease:acommonfeatureofethanol,morphine,cocaineandamphetamineabstinenceinrats.EurJPharmacol.1992221:227234.[PubMed]

    195. RufusE.Sugaraddction:astepbystepguidetoovercomingsugaraddiction.ElizabethBrownRufusBloomington,IN:2004.

    196. SaadMF,KhanA,SharmaA,MichaelR,RiadGabrielMG,BoyadjianR,JinagoudaSD,SteilGM,KamdarV.Physiologicalinsulinemiaacutelymodulatesplasmaleptin.Diabetes.199847:544549.[PubMed]

  • 21/04/2015 Evidenceforsugaraddiction:Behavioralandneurochemicaleffectsofintermittent,excessivesugarintake

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2235907/?tool=pmcentrez 23/25

    197. SalamoneJD.Complexmotorandsensorimotorfunctionsofstriatalandaccumbensdopamine:involvementininstrumentalbehaviorprocesses.Psychopharmacology(Berl)1992107:160174.[PubMed]

    198. SatoY,ItoT,UdakaN,KanisawaM,NoguchiY,CushmanSW,SatohS.Immunohistochemicallocalizationoffacilitateddiffusionglucosetransportersinratpancreaticislets.TissueCell.199628:637643.[PubMed]

    199. SchenkS,SnowS,HorgerBA.Preexposuretoamphetaminebutnotnicotinesensitizesratstothemotoractivatingeffectofcocaine.Psychopharmacology(Berl)1991103:6266.[PubMed]

    200. SchoffelmeerAN,WardehG,VanderschurenLJ.MorphineacutelyandpersistentlyattenuatesnonvesicularGABAreleaseinratnucleusaccumbens.Synapse.200142:8794.[PubMed]

    201. SchulteisG,YackeyM,RisbroughV,KoobGF.Anxiogeniclikeeffectsofspontaneousandnaloxoneprecipitatedopiatewithdrawalintheelevatedplusmaze.PharmacolBiochemBehav.199860:727731.[PubMed]

    202. SchultzW,DayanP,MontaguePR.Aneuralsubstrateofpredictionandreward.Science.1997275:15931599.[PubMed]

    203. SchwartzMW,WoodsSC,PorteD,Jr,SeeleyRJ,BaskinDG.Centralnervoussystemcontroloffoodintake.Nature.2000404:661671.[PubMed]

    204. SclafaniA,NissenbaumJW.Isgastricshamfeedingreallyshamfeeding?AmJPhysiol.1985248:R387390.[PubMed]

    205. ShalevU,MoralesM,HopeB,YapJ,ShahamY.Timedependentchangesinextinctionbehaviorandstressinducedreinstatementofdrugseekingfollowingwithdrawalfromheroininrats.Psychopharmacology(Berl)2001156:98107.[PubMed]

    206. SinclairJD,SenterRJ.Developmentofanalcoholdeprivationeffectinrats.QJStudAlcohol.196829:863867.[PubMed]

    207. SmithGP.Shamfeedinginratswithchronic,reversiblegastricfistulas.In:CrawleyJN,etal.,editors.CurrentProtocolsinNeruoscience.Vol.8.6.JohnWileyandSons,Inc.NewYork:1998.pp.D.1D.6.

    208. SmithJE,CoC,LaneJD.Limbicacetylcholineturnoverratescorrelatedwithratmorphineseekingbehaviors.PharmacolBiochemBehav.198420:429442.[PubMed]

    209. SpanagelR,HerzA,ShippenbergTS.Theeffectsofopioidpeptidesondopaminereleaseinthenucleusaccumbens:aninvivomicrodialysisstudy.JNeurochem.199055:17341740.[PubMed]

    210. SpanglerR,GoddardNL,AvenaNM,HoebelBG,LeibowitzSF.ElevatedD3dopaminereceptormRNAindopaminergicanddopaminoceptiveregionsoftheratbraininresponsetomorphine.BrainResMolBrainRes.2003111:7483.[PubMed]

    211. SpanglerR,WittkowskiKM,GoddardNL,AvenaNM,HoebelBG,LeibowitzSF.Opiatelikeeffectsofsugarongeneexpressioninrewardareasoftheratbrain.BrainResMolBrainRes.2004124:134142.[PubMed]

    212. SteinL.Brainendorphins:possiblemediatorsofpleasureandreward.NeurosciResProgramBull.197816:556563.[PubMed]

    213. SteinL,BelluzziJD.Brainendorphins:possibleroleinrewardandmemoryformation.FedProc.197938:24682472.[PubMed]

    214. TandaG,DiChiaraG.Adopaminemu1opioidlinkintheratventraltegmentumsharedbypalatablefood(Fonzies)andnonpsychostimulantdrugsofabuse.EurJNeurosci.199810:11791187.[PubMed]

    215. TeffKL,ElliottSS,TschopM,KiefferTJ,RaderD,HeimanM,TownsendRR,KeimNL,DAlessioD,HavelPJ.Dietaryfructose