Evolution of spaces With respect to child psychology

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Development stage

Citation preview

  • Evolution of built environment with respect to child psychology

    Devvrat Chowdhary

    2010barc009

  • Structure of the presentation

    AIM

    OBJECTIVE

    SCOPE & LIMITATIONS

    BACKGROUND STUDY

    METHODOLOGY

    LITERATURE REVIEW

    PARAMETERS

    CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

    OBSERVATIONS AND INFERENCES

  • AIM

    The aim of the study is to provide a strategy of built environment for the children catering to their perceptual requirements.

    OBJECTIVES

    To enlist the relationship of form proportion and children.

    To enlist the needs of the children in terms of perceptual space.

    To arrive at possible design strategies to provide an environment for positive cognitive development.

  • SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS

    The study will focus only on cognitive response to space.

    The sample for the study will be children from the age of 0-15 years.

    No live case studies will be considered.

  • BACKGROUND STUDYChildren shape the environment and

    The environment shapes them

    What is the Built environment? The built environment is the urban area around you. Our world is becoming increasingly developed and

    crowded. Much of where we live is man-made from the roads and city parks to the houses and apartments we live in. The built environment includes all of these spaces. The study of the built environment promotes a quality physical environment that protects health and prevents illness and injury. A quality physical environment is one that does not put our health at risk, and encourages activities that promote physical, mental, and social health, such as daily physical activity. Advocates for the built environment promote the idea of Natural Learning, which is the use of the natural environment as a setting for children to learn and play.

    Well-designed spaces can keep children safe as well as enhance their organizational and academic skills. Good design can strengthen families by reducing conflict over personal and shared spaces. The first consideration when designing spaces for children should be safety. Children need safe places to explore and learn.

    Most important is the recognition that children need to be observed and listened to in order for their priorities to be understood within a complex urban environment. Each contributor has this priority in mind, acting as an interpreter of their subtle needs and aspirations, often outside the traditional educational and economic conventions.

  • Children to occupy and use spaces not prioritized by adults.

    Young childrens spatial working memory (SWM) responses are biased toward the center of a homogenous space whereas older children and adults subdivide the space along the midline symmetry axis, and their memory responses are biased away from the center of the space.

    BACKGROUND STUDY

    Three-year-olds produce the spatial terms in, on, and under, whereas 4-year-old children produce more complexterms such as back and front. Very little is known about childrens production of the complex terms between andmiddle. These terms require comparison with two reference objects, which involves considerable conceptual and syntactic complexity.

    What mechanisms might facilitate young childrens mastery of such complexity? One potentialmechanism is scaffoldingthe process by which experts provide support to help children accomplish more than theycould do on their own (Vygotsky, 1978).

    RESEARCH QUESTIONTo identify the key elements in the living environment from the perspective of the children What are the important physical qualities of the environment? What are the important social qualities of the environment? What are the important cognitive qualities of the environment? Are there some design strategies to achieve such qualities

  • ISSUE

    THEORIESPerception Parameters

    Literature Review

    Spatial need

    Literature case study

    Design Strategies

    Observations

    Result

    METHODOLOGY

  • LITERATURE STUDY

    - Striniste and Moore, 1989

    Physical

    Bodily growth

    Maturation

    Interaction of children with surroundings

    Social

    Transaction with peers and elders affords them to assimilate and accommodate the actions of others.

    Cognitive

    the perceptual responses of the children with the spaces and features.

    SPACE

  • LITERATURE STUDY Cognitively, the children will deduce that the architecture developed by adults without their participation as

    two parts: building and outdoor space. They can clearly understand the architecture is man-made and the landscape is natural. In short, they perceive that architecture is not integrated with the landscape.

    In summary, even though we know that experience of childhood in built and natural environments are diverse, but are often characterized by adult control, restriction and helplessness (Pradhan, 2007). And, the design of spaces for children follows the standard requirement by the design authority or institutional agency. Such practices did not allow the views of children to be part of the design process of the architecture.

    -Ismail Said , 2010

  • LITERATURE STUDY

    In middle childhood, children are genetically programmed for exploration of the world and bonding with nature. That is, they learnt on how the world works in evocative way, their logical reasoning only about concrete objects that are readily observed. As such the children are active in grasping and understanding the natural world through play

    - Cobb, 1969

    Children

    ExplorationBonding

    with nature

    PLAY

    Cognitive faculties

    Smell

    Sight

    Touch

    Taste

    Audio

  • LITERATURE STUDY There are various concepts of the child-space relation. A widely accepted concept is the "awareness of the

    place", which characterizes a larger scope and higher synthetic level because it includes other concepts describing human relationship towards the space. The most cited concepts of this type are:

    Binding to a place in space

    Identification and

    Belonging to a place

    Trying to define a place that a child is attached to, it is often said that it is the space in which a child is happy, and regrets leaving it and feels dissatisfied when it has to go. However, the real reason for a child's bonding to a certain place in space is that such place has some special attributes.

    -Danica Stankovi, 2008

    Wavy wall line and new structures on it as dividing element in spaces for children and simultaneously a gathering place The little school, San Fransisco.

  • LITERATURE STUDYInfants and toddlers need:

    Safe spaces to explore.

    Lots of care and supervision.

    Interesting things to do and look at.

    Sturdy furniture to hold on to and pull self up with.

    -Sheila Gains, 2008

    Pre-schoolers need:

    Furniture, equipment and environments sized for their success.

    Open space to play.

    Safe environments that promote independence and exploration.

    Responsibility for keeping their space organized (they will need your help).

    Decision-making opportunities.

    Teenagers need:

    Privacy.

    Space to study and store school books.

    Grooming area.

    Some choice, ownership and control of their space and belongings.

    A place to be with friends.

    Elementary Age Children need:

    Space to use study skills and complete large projects.

    Areas to display artwork.

    Storage for collections.

    Privacy.

    Dynamic changing colour preferences

  • LITERATURE STUDY

    Hierarchies of public space and private spaces as defense mechanism (Newman, 1972)

  • Indicators of Local environment quality - Conceptual framework (Chawala, 2001)

    LITERATURE STUDY

  • LITERATURE STUDY

    Perception of a public space -Haifa A. Al Arasi, 2013

  • Perception of a public space -Haifa A. Al Arasi, 2013

    LITERATURE STUDY

  • PHYSICAL SOCIAL COGNITIVE

    COMFORT INTERACTION HOME BASE/SENSE OF PLACE

    Fixtures easy to grip, easy to operate Inbetween spaces in varying scale An increase in the number of places within a

    space with niches, nooks, bays

    Levels easy to climb Introverted spacial planning Flexible spaces

    climatic consideration for living spaces Hierarchy of open spaces place has some special attributes

    QUIET ACTIVITY Spacious enough to avoid crowding

    Away from distractions SAFETY

    Visual connect with nature Defensible spatial planning

    Lot of supervision

    PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IMAGE & SCALE

    Freedom of running and jumping should not be

    hindered

    The exterior of the center appears non-institutional and

    welcoming

    CULTURAL

    Small level differenves meandering paths to

    develop various mental faculties of children Sense of community, bleonging to a society The scale of the interior appears small and cosy

    Veriety of activities to choose from Physical link to the community

    SURFACE TEXTURE

    Reflective surface

    Engaging texture with different finishes

    MESSY ACTIVITY

    SHAPE

    Children can see some indoor childrens activity areas

    OBSERVATIONS

  • CASE STUDY : MUNICIPAL ORPHANAGE, Amsterdam

    Predominant Use: The structure was used as an orphanage till 1968 and now it is being used as a corporate office space for a Human resources firm.

    Period of Construction: 1955 to 1960

    Client : Amsterdam Municipal Corporation

    Architect : Aldo Van Eyk

    Project Area : 14000 sqm

    A house must be like a small city if its to be a real house, a city like a large houseif its to be a real city

    -Aldo Van Eyk

  • PARAMETERS

    The parameters for the assessment of the perceptual aspect of space have been taken from the book Form, Space and Order- Francis D.K. Ching and are as follows:

    Approach and departure

    Entry and egress

    Movement through the order of spaces

    Qualities of light, colour, texture, view and sound

    Proportioning of space / scale with respect to children.

    CASE STUDY : MUNICIPAL ORPHANAGE, Amsterdam

  • APPROACH AND DEPARTURE

    CASE STUDY : MUNICIPAL ORPHANAGE, Amsterdam

    A frontal approach leads directly to the entrance of a building along a straight axial path. The visual goal that terminates the approach is clear.

  • ENTRY AND EGRESS

    CASE STUDY : MUNICIPAL ORPHANAGE, Amsterdam

    The act of entering is more subtle and is achieved through an implied plane established BY colonnades.

  • MOVEMENT THROUGH SPACES

    CASE STUDY : MUNICIPAL ORPHANAGE, Amsterdam

    A Linear path configuration has been used within the building in the form meandering paths attempting to mimic the streets of Amsterdam.

    The integrity of each space maintained Configuration of path flexible

  • QUALITIES OF SPACE: LIGHT

    CASE STUDY : MUNICIPAL ORPHANAGE, Amsterdam

    Views are oriented towards the lawn behind the structure and the glass walls help enhance the connect with natural setting while inside.

    The site has major roads on 2 sides so the adult realms act as buffer and shield the children spaces from the noise on the road.

  • QUALITIES OF SPACE: COLOUR and TEXTURE

    CASE STUDY : MUNICIPAL ORPHANAGE, Amsterdam

    The colour scheme is dominantly grey and brick red for exterior and white and grey for interiors.

    Texture of the exterior walls is of exposed brick which is rough with occasional smooth round columns.

    There are also some reflective surfaces in the form of small ponds and glass embedded in walls

  • QUALITIES OF SPACE: VIEW and SOUND

    CASE STUDY : MUNICIPAL ORPHANAGE, Amsterdam

    Views are oriented towards the lawn behind the structure and the glass walls help enhance the connect with natural setting while inside.

    The site has major roads on 2 sides so the adult realms act as buffer and shield the children spaces from the noise on the road.

  • SCALE AND PROPORTION

    CASE STUDY : MUNICIPAL ORPHANAGE, Amsterdam

    The structures surrounding the circulation area are single floor height and G+1 structures are kept away.

    The proportions of the living spaces for the children have been designed specific to each age group developing a better sense of belonging

    0-4 yrs10-14 yrs14-20 yrs

  • PHYSICAL SOCIAL COGNITIVE

    COMFORT INTERACTION HOME BASE/SENSE OF PLACE

    QUIET ACTIVITY

    SAFETY

    PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IMAGE & SCALE

    CULTURAL

    SURFACE TEXTURE

    Sufrace texture callous and raw

    MESSY ACTIVITY

    SHAPE

    Variation of texture of glass and

    exposed brick with occasional

    Variation of shape done in the ceiling

    in form of domes rest of the shapes

    Small open spaces prescribed for

    imaginative play and larger spaces for

    prescribed play

    Most play areas created void of

    greenery

    The domed roofs give a playful

    rhythm to the elevation

    Scale of the individual rooms and

    overall structure have been reduced

    to suite the children

    Place inside every family unit with

    interesting daylighting create more

    interest in children

    No special provision for

    cultural spaces

    A hierarchy in interaction

    spaces is seen from within

    the house to large open

    There is a segregation

    according to age group

    The spatial planning allows

    for inbetween spaces in the

    for of corners

    Special attributes in form of reflective

    surfaces

    A home layout instead of a hostel

    type arrangement

    Supervision maintained through

    natural survellience achieved through

    tranparent walls intriverted

    courtyards

    DESIGN STRATEGIES

  • INFERENCES and RESULT

    The observations show that the perceptions of children are very different from that of the adults .

    The spatial organization of buildings appear to have an affect on the spatial comprehension of children.

    Their ability to understand a building with strong visual links between spaces and is much greater than a building based on a logical sequence, of cellular arrangement.