Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    1/47

    INTRODUCTORY COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS

    NAME: AROOJ MUKARRAM

    EXERCISE 2.4:

    SOLUTION:

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    2/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    3/47

    Theta1/ Theta2 = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, . , 1.0 (Angle vs Time)

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    4/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    5/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    6/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    7/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    8/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    9/47

    Theta1/ Theta2 = 0.0, -0.1, -0.2, . , -1.0 (Angle vs Time)

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    10/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    11/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    12/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    13/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    14/47

    Theta1/ Theta2 = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, . , 1.0 (Lissajous curves)

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    15/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    16/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    17/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    18/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    19/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    20/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    21/47

    Theta1/ Theta2 = 0.0, -0.1, -0.2, . , -1.0 (Lissajous curves)

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    22/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    23/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    24/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    25/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    26/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    27/47

    Theta1/ Theta2 = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, . , 1.0 (Trace)

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    28/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    29/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    30/47

    Theta1/ Theta2 = -0.1, -0.2, . , -1.0 (Trace)

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    31/47

    OUTPUT ANALYSIS:

    For positive values of 1 / 2 :

    From angle vs time graphs: At 0.7 both masses move together in same direction and reach their

    maximum and minimum values at same time. At smaller values of 0.0 and 0.1, the motions of masses

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    32/47

    are very different. But as this ratio is increased, masses start moving in sync and at 0.7 they move

    together in same directions.

    From Lissajous figures: At 0.7 it shows, the Lissajous figure shows a straight line (positive slope). At

    other times, the figures cover some area (with particular boundary shapes) in the configuration space. If

    simulation is run for a much longer time, the space inside these graphs will be completely filled.

    From trace graphs: At 0.7 the trace is a nice parabola. For other ratios, the trace is comparatively

    complex.

    This implies that 1 / 2 = 0.7 gives a normal mode (symmetric).

    For negative values of 1 / 2 :

    From angle vs time graphs: At 0.7 both masses move in opposite direction so that when one mass

    reaches its maximum, the other is at minimum. At other ratios the motions of the masses have no such

    relationship.

    From Lissajous figures: At 0.7 it shows, the Lissajous figure shows a straight line (negative slope). At

    other times, the figures cover some area (with particular boundary shapes) in the configuration space. If

    simulation is run for a much longer time, the space inside these graphs will be completely filled.

    From trace graphs: At 0.7 the trace is a parabola, that fills up some area in the figure. For other ratios,

    the trace is comparatively complex.

    This implies that 1 / 2 =- 0.7 gives a normal mode (anti-symmetric).

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    33/47

    EXERCISE 2.4 Part b

    The program is run with following input values (Exercise 2.4-b.py):

    2 = 0.0

    1 = [1.57,1.58, 2.8, 3.8, 4.7, 4.8]

    Keeping 2 constant and changing the 1 values from /2 to 3/2 give the following output for

    Angle vs time graphs

    Lissajous figures

    Trace graphs

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    34/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    35/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    36/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    37/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    38/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    39/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    40/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    41/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    42/47

    OUTPUT ANALYSIS:

    From the above graphs, we see that motion is chaotic for 1 between /2 and 3/2. The angles versustime graphs in this region do not show regular repetitive behavior. Also the Lissajous figures and trace

    do not have a pattern and are rather messy figures.

    Step size effect on evolution of the system:

    If the programs are run by decreasing the step size (for chaotic and non-chaotic regimes), the Lissajous

    figures and traces graphs are no longer smooth curves .

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    43/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    44/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    45/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    46/47

  • 7/29/2019 Ex 2.4 Double Pendulum

    47/47