CULTURAL CROSSROADS AND OTHER COMPLEXITIES: EXAMINING

CREOLIZATION AT NUESTRA SEÑORA DEL ROSARIO DE LA PUNTA,

ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA

by

Sarah Michelle Bennett

B.A., Flagler College, 2010

A thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences

The University of West Florida In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Master of Arts

2015

© 2015 Sarah Michelle Bennett

The thesis of Sarah Michelle Bennett is approved: ____________________________________________ ________________________ Ramie Gougeon, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ ________________________ Carl Halbirt, M.A., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ ________________________ Jay Clune, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ ________________________ John Worth, Ph.D., Committee Chair Date Accepted for the Department/Division: ____________________________________________ ________________________ John Bratten, Ph.D., Chair Date Accepted for the University: ____________________________________________ ________________________ Richard S. Podemski, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate School Date

iv

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

In the midst of my course completion, financial struggles, thesis writing, and

innumerable, though universal, graduate school obstacles, one person remained by my side. I

owe tremendous gratitude to my mom, Lianne, who offered encouragement and support, who

endured my long-winded, contemplative musings, who performed years of (free!) proofreading,

who enabled me to reach this stage through her kind actions. I offer equal thanks to my brother,

John, who helped me appreciate life beyond archaeology.

Additionally, I send the greatest thanks to Sarah Miller and Amber Grafft-Weiss, the

heart of the Florida Public Archaeology Network Northeast Regional Center’s staff. From you, I

learned abundantly about archaeology, teaching, learning, listening, and laughing. I found my

earliest archaeological inspiration with you. I offer additional gratitude to Robbie Boggs, Emily

Jane Murray, and Ryan Harke, all of who offered assistance upon request. I commend Carl

Halbirt, St. Augustine’s City Archaeologist, for serving as my mentor. He offered guidance

throughout my undergraduate career and during my time at UWF. Without Carl, I would lack so

much—experience, education, insight, ability.

I also extend thanks to Eric Poplin, Dot Moore, Roger Grange, Nick McAuliffe, Chris

Newman, Janet Jordan, and the many people who comprise the kind, thriving, supportive

archaeological community in St. Augustine and throughout Florida. Special recognition goes to

Dr. Michael Butler and Dr. Vincent Puma, whose teachings both enlightened and inspired me, as

well as My Captain, Dr. Carl “Merlin” Horner, whose essence encouraged me to read, to

interpret, to analyze, and, more than anything else, to create myself. Finally, I thank public,

university, and private libraries for providing working environments and the literature I needed.

To La Quinta Hinesville Room 303—interminable gratitude for serving as my productivity hub!

v

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ……………………………………………….……………………... iv

LIST OF TABLES …………..………………………………………………………………..... vii

LIST OF FIGURES …………………………………………………………………………….. ix

ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………………….. xi

CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………. 1 A. Creolization at La Punta……………...……...…………………………… 2 B. Assessing Creolization at La Punta………..…………...………………… 3

CHAPTER II. HISTORIC CONTEXT……...…………….…………….…………………... 5 A. Missions in the Spanish Empire……...……...…………………………… 5 B. The Spanish Mission System of La Florida.…………...………………… 6 C. The Yamasee Confederation….……...……...………………………..… 18 D. The Yamasee and La Florida (ca. 1662-1683)….……...…………..…… 23 E. The Yamasee in Carolina (1684-1715)……...……………………..…… 27 F. The Yamasee War (1715-1717)….………..…………...…………..…… 29 G. The Yamasee Return to La Florida……...……..……………………..… 30 H. Nuestra Señora del Rosario de la Punta………..…………...………...… 33

CHAPTER III. CREOLIZATION...…………………...…………….……………………… 42 A. Introduction………..………….……...………………………………... 42 B. Acculturation and Assimilation……….……………………...…..……. 43

C. Hybridity………………….......….........….……...…….…………….… 44 D. Creolization……………………..…….……...………………………… 46 CHAPTER IV. PROJECT AREA…...…………………...….……...……………….……… 50

A. City of St. Augustine Archaeological Preservation Ordinance……....… 50 B. Urban Archaeology…………………………………………………...... 54 C. The Archaeology of 18th Century Spanish Missions in La Florida…..... 55 D. Nuestra Señora del Rosario de la Punta: Topography and Environs…... 57

CHAPTER V. METHODS……..………..….……..……….…...………………………….. 61

A. 133 Marine Street………………….…………………….……..………. 61 B. 161 Marine Street………………….…..……………….………………. 62 C. Laboratory Methods………………...…………………….……………. 65

CHAPTER VI. RESULTS………………………...………...……………………………… 67

A. Mission Era Features at 133 Marine Street……...……………………... 67 B. Categorizing the Assemblages for Analysis…...……………….………. 76 C. Material Culture at 133 Marine Street…………….……..…….…….…. 77

D. Mission Era Features at 161 Marine Street…….…..….….………...….. 98

vi

E. Material Culture at 161 Marine Street……..………….……….……... 108 CHAPTER VII. INTERPRETATION AND DISCUSSION………..…………………….. 126

A. Assessing Creolization at La Punta………..…….…………………… 126 B. Ceramics…………………………..…………….……………………. 126 C. Architecture………..…………………………….…………………… 130 D. Foodways……....………………………….…………………….…… 137 E. Discussion…………………...…………….…….……………………. 146 F. Future Directions…………………...……...…….………………........ 152

REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………...… 154

APPENDIXES………………………………………………………………………………… 165

A. City of St. Augustine Archaeology Program Artifact Codes………… 166 B. La Punta Artifact Database, 133 Marine Street………………….….... 178

C. La Punta Artifact Database, 161 Marine Street……………..….…….. 246

vii

LIST OF TABLES

1. Yamasee Settlement Populations, 1675…………………………………………………….. 25

2. Eighteenth Century Mission Populations…………………………………………………… 33

3. Population Estimates at La Punta…………………………………………….……………... 38

4. Soil Characteristics of Postholes and Postmolds Associated with the Structure…………… 72

5. Posthole Characteristics…………………………………………………………………….. 72

6. Artifact Groups and Total Counts, 133 Marine Street……………………………………… 78

7. Artifact Groups and Adjusted Total Counts, 133 Marine Street…………………………… 78

8. Activities Group Artifacts, 133 Marine Street……………………………………………… 79

9. Architecture Group Artifacts, 133 Marine Street…………………………………………... 80

10. Architectural Materials Weight Comparisons, 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street.... 80

11. Adjusted Architecture Groups and Counts, 133 Marine Street…………………………….. 81

12. Arms Group Artifacts, 133 Marine Street………………………………………………….. 82

13. Clothing Group Artifacts, 133 Marine Street………………………………………………. 83

14. Furniture Group Artifacts, 133 Marine Street……………………………………………… 84

15. Kitchen Group Artifacts, 133 Marine Street………………………...……………………... 85

16. Aboriginal Ceramics by Sub-Group, 133 Marine Street…………………………………… 86

17. Aboriginal Ceramic Counts and Types, 133 Marine Street…………………...…………… 86

18. European Tableware Types and Counts, 133 Marine Street………....………...…………... 90

19. European Utilitarian Ware Types and Counts, 133 Marine Street…………………………. 91

20. Glass Color, Count, and Form, 133 Marine Street…………………………………………. 92

21. Flora and Fauna Group Artifacts, 133 Marine Street………………………………………. 95

22. Artifact Groups and Total Counts, 161 Marine Street……………………….……………. 109

viii

23. Activities Group Artifacts, 161 Marine Street…………………………...………………. 110

24. Architecture Group Artifacts, 161 Marine Street………………………………………… 111

25. Arms Group Artifacts, 161 Marine Street………………………...……………………… 112

26. Clothing Group Artifacts, 161 Marine Street…………………………………………….. 112

27. Kitchen Group Artifacts, 161 Marine Street…………………………...………………… 113

28. Aboriginal Ceramics by Sub-Group, 161 Marine Street…………………………………. 115

29. Aboriginal Ceramic Counts and Types, 161 Marine Street………………...………….… 115

30. European Tableware Types and Counts, 161 Marine Street………………...…………… 119

31. European Utilitarian Ware Types and Counts, 161 Marine Street…….…...…………….. 120

32. Personal Group Artifacts, 161 Marine Street………………………….…..……………... 122

33. Faunal Group Artifacts, 161 Marine Street…………………………….…..…………….. 123

34. Prevalence of European Ceramic Sub-Groups, La Punta Sites…………………………... 129

35. Prevalence of Native and European Ceramic Sub-Groups, La Punta Sites……...……….. 130 36. Intact and Possibly Disturbed Feature Deposits with Faunal Remains, 133 Marine Street…………..……………………………………...…………………………………... 139 37. Counts and Weights by Species, 133 Marine Street……………...………………………. 140

38. Species Counts Recovered from La Punta Sites…………………………...……………... 141

39. Faunal Categories MNI Percentages, La Punta and Old Field I………………………….. 145

ix

LIST OF FIGURES

1. Yamasee migration toward Carolina between 1684 and 1705…...………………………. 16

2. La Florida in relation to the probable predecessors of the Yamasee Confederacy………. 19 3. The fragmentation of La Tama and ensuing movement of the emerging Yamasee population between 1665 and 1684…………………..…….……….…………………… 24

4. The location of Stuart’s Town, Charles Town, and St. Augustine in 1684…….…...…..... 26

5. Map by Colonel John Palmer, 1730. La Punta is located within the square………...…… 35

6. Antonio de Arredondo Map, 1737………………………………...……………………… 36

7. Pablo Castelló map, 1763…………………………………...……………………………. 40

8. Three zones and seventeen subzones designated through the City’s Archaeological Ordinance…...……………………………………………………………………………. 51 9. Flowchart for evaluating subsurface disturbances, their degree of impact, and the need for

archaeological investigation………………...……………………………………………. 52 10. The six remaining 18th century mission sites beyond the colonial-walled city of St.

Augustine…………………………………………………………………………………. 53

11. Juan Joseph Eligio de la Puente’s 1769 map of colonial St. Augustine with Number 24 marking the La Punta Mission …………………………………………..………………. 58

12. View of La Punta and environs………………………….……………………………….. 59

13. Completed City of St. Augustine Archaeology Program analysis sheet……….………… 66

14. 133 Marine Street site map with only the features related to La Punta included….……... 68

15. Feature types associated with La Punta at 133 Marine Street…………….……………… 70

16. Proposed mission era structures at 133 Marine Street…………….…………………….... 71

17. Feature types at 161 Marine Street……...………………………………………………. 100

18. 161 Marine Street site map………..…………………………………………………….. 101

19. North profile of walk-in well feature……………………….…………………………… 103

x

20. Proposed location and size of structures related to La Punta…………………………... 104

21. Proposed size and placement of the three structures at 161 Marine Street…………….. 135

22. Consolidated faunal counts and percentage of assemblage by group, La Punta.............. 143

23. Comparison of ceramic sub-groups at La Punta, de Hita, de la Cruz, and Ponce de León sites…...………………………...………………………………………………... 148

xi

ABSTRACT

CULTURAL CROSSROADS AND OTHER COMPLEXITIES: EXAMINING CREOLIZATION AT NUESTRA SEÑORA DEL ROSARIO DE LA PUNTA,

ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA

Sarah Michelle Bennett

Nuestra Señora del Rosario de la Punta (La Punta) represents one of six settlements

occupied by native populations (most of whom were Christianized) surrounding St. Augustine

during the second quarter of the 18th century. La Punta developed as an 18th century refugee

mission community settled primarily by the Yamasee. The mission community provides an ideal

point of reference for creolization studies due to the fluid, transient nature of the population.

Rather than providing a narrative limited to cultural mixture, as with assimilation, acculturation,

and hybridity models, a creolization framework enables the examination of a complex cultural

phenomenon in which cultural interfaces may result in the restructuring of a population. Two

archaeological sites that pertain to the mission—133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street—are

considered in order to assess creolization at La Punta. In order to determine the extent of

creolization within La Punta, three lines of archaeological evidence are discussed: ceramics,

architecture, and foodways. The results, though preliminary, suggest manifestations of

creolization, as determined by material culture, within the 18th century mission community of

Nuestra Señora del Rosario de la Punta.

1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

Nuestra Señora del Rosario de la Punta (La Punta) represents one of six settlements

immediately surrounding St. Augustine during the second quarter of the 18th century and

occupied by indigenous Americans, most of whom were Christianized. Missions functioned as a

fixture in St. Augustine’s multiethnic population since the 16th century with the establishment of

Nombre de Dios (Gordon 2002; Waters 2005; Deagan 2011). By the early 17th century, native

populations that allied with the Spanish Crown contracted around St. Augustine and formed a

network of fluid communities which moved within areas peripheral to the colonial city in order

to provide protection as conditions warranted (Parker 1993). La Punta—along with other

comparable mission communities (e.g. Nombre de Dios, Tolomato, and Pocotalaca)—comprised

a portion of the city’s comprehensive defensive system (Sastre 2002; Halbirt 2004), and served

as an essential labor force necessary for the city’s survival during the tumultuous 18th century.

La Punta developed as an 18th century refugee mission community located immediately

south of the colonial city of St. Augustine, as defined by the Line of Circumvallation. The

Rosario Line, a Spanish-constructed defensive earthen berm, separated the colonial town from its

peripheral mission communities. Maria Sanchez Lake bounded La Punta to the west and

Matanzas Bay constricted the site to the east. Those who settled in the mission area—primarily

Yamasee Indians—possessed a heritage intertwined with the Spanish missions in the Guale and

Mocama provinces (Green 1992; Worth 1995b; Milanich 2006) as well as the British in the

Carolinas (Green 1992; Green and DePratter 2000; Oatis 2004). Historical documents suggest

that the Yamassee comprised the primary population at La Punta (Boyer 2005; Halbirt 1996;

2

White 2002), though government census records and Franciscan administrative documents

occasionally list Apalachee residents.

Indian raids, led by the Chichimeco during the 1660s, impacted the Yamasee populations

residing in Spanish mission provinces. Disheartened by continued English and native raids, the

Chichimecos’ slaving successes, and the Spanish military’s inability to sufficiently protect the

mission communities, the Yamasee relocated toward the north, where they formed an alliance

with the Scots at Stuart’s Town in 1685 (Worth 1995b:42-47) and later with the English in

Carolina (Milanich 2006). Once allied, the Yamasee acted as slavers for the English, often

raiding the Spanish missions of La Florida. Following the Yamasee War (1715-1717), the

Yamasee fled the Carolinas and returned to Florida in order to seek an alliance with the Spanish.

Continued epidemics and raids, as well as the arrival of natives from areas further into the

southeastern United States’ interior, enabled the Spanish to situate the native refugees as a

defensive barrier around St. Augustine. The Yamasee who fled the Carolinas comprised the

majority of La Punta’s mission community. A viceregal order issued in mid-June of 1754

consolidated four of the six extant Native American mission communities on the outskirts of the

city—Tolomato, Pocotalaca, Palica, and La Punta—into the two remaining mission communities

(Gonzales 1754). By 1759, only two mission communities remained (TePaske 1964:224):

Tolomato and Nombre de Dios.

Creolization and La Punta

La Punta provides an ideal point of reference for studies of creolization, the process of

forging unique cultural identities which are “not simply the replacement of the indigenous

culture by the colonizing culture, or some piecemeal blend of the two, but which instead

3

manifested new cultural formations” (Worth 2012:1). Cultural identity and practices at La Punta

suggest a people defined by their fluid nature and deteriorating population (White 2002). In

addition to demographic fluidity and the mission’s placement within an urban environment,

transience peppered the community’s existence as the natives relocated in response to

encroachment and associated threats from the English and their native allies. As an 18th century

mission community, La Punta reflects a unique historical and cultural complexity when

compared to 16th and 17th century mission sites.

Rather than providing a narrative limited to cultural mixture, as with assimilation,

acculturation, and hybridity models, creolization studies examine a complex cultural

phenomenon in which two or more cultural traits interact, react, converge, and diverge in unique,

creative, fluid manners. Examining the material culture and features associated with the Yamasee

occupation at La Punta encourages the development and the implementation of a creolization

framework. As a native population, the Yamasee encountered novel experiences, behaviors, and

cultural practices upon encountering and/or interacting with natives of differing ethnic or cultural

backgrounds, as well as experiences shared with the Spanish living within the city confines of St.

Augustine and the Scottish and English settlers of South Carolina. Archaeological investigations

enable researchers to determine how these interactions transferred, translated, intermixed,

altered, or influenced Yamasee culture.

Assessing Creolization at La Punta

In contrast to the evolution of 17th century mission site excavations, interpretations, and

studies, archaeological investigations pertaining to 18th century mission communities in La

Florida have received minimal scholarly attention. Among the few mission sites that emerged

4

during the 18th century and have been located archaeologically, only two, Nuestra Señora del

Rosario de la Punta (Halbirt 1996, 2005; White 2002) and San Joseph de Escambe (Worth et al.

2012), underwent intensive archaeological investigations. La Punta’s population can serve as a

study of a cultural spectrum that ranges from constant to changed, with considerable variation.

Features and material culture recovered from two sites relating to the 18th century La Punta

mission—133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street—provide a lens by which to examine the

creative, unpredictable, fluid process of creolization. Though creolization manifests within

numerous aspects of society and culture, the present study considers three lines of evidence:

ceramics, architecture, and foodways. Discussions concerning each material culture category

involve comparisons to Yamasee sites in South Carolina and criollo and mestizo households in

18th century St. Augustine, as well as intra-site comparisons.

5

CHAPTER II

HISTORIC CONTEXT

Missions in the Spanish Empire

Competition for trade routes, resources, and places to colonize between Spain and

Portugal partially prompted Iberian exploration and invasion of the Americas. Portugal accessed

the rich resources of Africa, particularly gold and slaves, before the Spanish. Columbus’ first

voyage served as Spain’s attempt to rival Portugal’s expanding resources. The Christian

reconquest of Iberia significantly shaped the mentality and directed the methodologies utilized

by the Spanish and Portuguese in the Americas (Chasteen 2006:31-34). Experiences elsewhere

enabled Iberians to repeat procedures and create institutions that effectively diffused the

challenges encountered. Urban centers, central to advancing territorial claims, became

necessities. Utilizing a native person of prominence (e.g. warlord, cacique) as the entity

responsible for Christianizing the native population and receiving tribute from the natives

remained an integral tactic. Iberians sought and measured success according to societal ideals,

which included “riches, the privilege of being served by others, and a claim to religious

righteousness” (Chasteen 2006:25). As with Spanish Florida, religion proved central to the

processes of exploration, invasion, and settlement. Though a crucial structural component of the

Spanish Empire in the Americas, religion offered formal rationalization for the Iberians’

“mundane mix of motivations” in which “the lure of worldly successes was constantly evident in

their actions” and colonization efforts (Chasteen 2006:36).

Mission endeavors accompanied Spanish exploits in the Americas. Spain’s presence, as

well as missionary work, in the Caribbean, Mexico, Central America, and Peru precedes mission

6

development in La Florida. Organized religion reached the New World with Columbus’ second

voyage. To various degrees, and at differing times, members of major religious orders (e.g.

Franciscans, Dominicans, Jesuits, Augustinians, Mercedarians) spread throughout the Americas.

Christianization in the Caribbean, Mexico, Central America, and Peru generally involved

itinerant preaching, mass baptisms, and a focus on eradicating native religious practices, as well

as establishing churches and schools. Franciscan efforts concentrated especially in Mexico,

Ecuador, Bolivia, New Mexico, and La Florida. In contrast, Dominican missionization occurred

in Peru, Colombia, and the Caribbean, while the Jesuits were strongest in Paraguay and Brazil, as

well as in Asia beginning in the 16th century (Taylor 1992).

The Spanish Mission System of La Florida

The Jesuits

Success with converting native groups to Christianity commenced with the second post-

1565 religious order to enter La Florida. Initially, Pedro Menéndez de Avilés, adelentado of La

Florida, petitioned King Philip II for missionaries to initiate an effort to convert the natives.

Philip II looked to the Society of Jesus, an order still in its infancy, and, in 1565, requested

Jesuits begin working in Spain’s new domain (O’Brien 1942). Within the following year, three

Jesuits—Father Pedro Martínez, Father Juan Rogel, and Brother Francisco Villareal—arrived in

the fledgling colony. Obstacles beset the missionaries, beginning with a small group of

Timucuans, who, upon encountering the Jesuit and a handful of sailors stranded ashore, clubbed

Father Martínez to death. Over time, Father Rogel settled with the Calusa as Father Villareal

stayed with the Tequesta. Both men briefly traveled to Havana in mid-1568 and later returned to

7

La Florida in order to join the second wave of Jesuits—eleven in total—who ventured to the

colony (Milanich 2006).

A variety of issues arose during the Jesuits’ tenure. Milanich (2006) describes problems

including the missionaries’ aversion to military cruelty directed toward native populations, their

difficulty with Menéndez’ politics and degree of power, as well as their troubles concerning

native hostilities, especially among the Tequesta and Calusa. Furthermore, the Jesuits possessed

insufficient supplies and personnel to support a large missionary effort throughout the expansive

geographic area of La Florida. Disease and infection among the Jesuits, paired with resistance

and natives killing Jesuits in the Chesapeake Bay region (Hann 1996b), significantly reduced

their abilities and impact upon the native population. As a result, the Jesuits withdrew from La

Florida in 1572.

The Franciscans

Menéndez sought a new religious ministry for the Southeastern natives and requested that

the Crown call upon the Order of the Friars Minor of the Regular Observance of St. Francis of

Assisi, also known as Franciscans (Bushnell 1994:49). The religious community, which emerged

in 1209, directed their efforts to preaching in medieval Europe’s developing cities, to

establishing missions among non-Christians, and to performing charitable work (Gannon 1965;

Hann 1996b; Milanich 2006). In 1573, the Spanish Crown ordered 18 Franciscans to La Florida.

The first group, composed of three individuals, focused their efforts upon the Timucua living

near St. Augustine. Timucuan chiefs residing near the presidio, meaning defensive colony, first

offered their loyalty to the Spanish (Bushnell 1996). As much of the Timucuan population

around St. Augustine, as well as north and west along the St. Johns River, succumbed to disease

8

toward the turn of the 17th century, the friars shifted attention to the Guale region, situated in

present day coastal Georgia. For a time, the Franciscans experienced successes among the

coastal Guale following the baptism and conversion of the chief and his wife (Lyon 1992).

Throughout the 1580s and into the 1590s, additional friars came to La Florida in small

groups, though their abilities to Christianize the natives remained fragile. Father Juan de Silva

led a new group of 12 friars into St. Augustine in 1595. His presence, paired with the burgeoning

pool of missionaries, shifted the missionary campaign in the colony. Between 1595 and 1695,

more than 270 Franciscan friars ventured to La Florida. An increase in available missionaries

occurred simultaneously with an increase in native conversions, which, in turn, provided a much

needed labor force and an ability to develop a defensive barrier for the presidio of St. Augustine.

Developing the Mission System

Within its original design, the mission system functioned as a cooperative product

between the Spanish Crown, the Franciscan friars, and governmental figures in St. Augustine.

The Spanish Crown, initially in response to Menéndez behest, solicited and financed

missionaries, who, upon arrival, became responsible for the political and economic assimilation

of chiefdoms into the developed fabric of St. Augustine. Expectations for both the converted

natives and the Catholic missionaries retained continuity throughout the existence of the Spanish

mission system in La Florida. Native populations offered the ideal source of labor and defensive

reinforcement. The Franciscans developed a legal and moral responsibility for the conversion of

natives in order to meet the needs of St. Augustine (Milanich 2006:104).

St. Augustine’s status as a presidio predicated funding and maintenance as a result of its

strategic purpose (Lyon 1974; Worth 2013) rather than its riches and resources, inadequate as

9

they were. Therefore, settlers in St. Augustine confronted difficulties, including geographic

isolation from the Spanish Empire, perennially inconsistent, irregular supply lines, poor

agricultural conditions, an environment considered unattractive to most settlers, and truncated

development of economic resources. In order to combat these recurring hindrances, the Spanish

mission system matured (Worth 1998a) into a three phase process. First, the friars converted

native populations. Following native acceptance of Christianity, the population was considered

to be a subject of the Spanish Crown and received benefits, often in the form of material goods,

from the Spanish. Finally, by the mid-17th century, the natives, as loyal subjects of the Crown,

were expected to participate in repartimiento, a labor draft which the Spanish imposed upon

native populations.1

Within the system, each mission population contributed a predetermined, though variable

depending on the year and settlement, quantity of young men who traveled to St. Augustine in

order to complete various tasks, often related to agriculture or public architecture. In addition to

expanding the pool of available labor, repartimiento required that each man carry his own rations

(arrobas of corn) to St. Augustine. According to native complaints (Hann 1988; Pearson 1990;

Milanich 2006), abuse (Spellman 1965; Worth 1998a:196-197) and misuse of the labor draft

occurred frequently in the form of overwork, retention beyond contracted work periods, and the

native’s inability to sustain their populations as the men worked in St. Augustine for prolonged

periods of time. The complaints issued by various native populations, resulted in occasional

setbacks for the Spanish (see Rebellions and Raids below); however, the labor draft persisted

1 Repartimiento replaced encomienda as the labor system in the Americas by the mid-1600s. The encomienda system granted Spanish men a number of natives. Within the system, Spanish individuals offered protection and education to natives in exchange for labor. Abusive practices and unethical behavior on behalf of the Spanish eventually led to the decline of encomienda and the implementation of repartimiento (Lockhart 1969; Keith 1971).

10

throughout the existence of the Spanish mission system, linking the mission communities and St.

Augustine economically.

Implementing the Mission System

The secular and the sacred realms of La Florida, though distinct, remained indisputably

intertwined throughout the late 16th century and through the early 18th century. Corn production

(Tasi 2013) and the repartimiento system benefitted St. Augustine economically, yet the success

of these processes relied upon the Franciscan’s abilities to convert natives. Christianized natives

equated to a supplemental population expected to demonstrate loyalty to the Spanish Crown,

primarily through economic endeavors. Missions that thrived were generally comprised of

agriculturalists in close proximity to St. Augustine. Although mission endeavors concentrated

predominantly along the Eastern seaboard, western mission settlements in La Florida proved

integral to providing corn and labor (Milanich 2006:30-33).

In order to convert natives, the Franciscans, with the support of the Spanish government,

employed standard strategies. Superficially, it appeared that the friars simply disseminated the

Christian faith through the lived experience, catechesis, and sacramental administration;

however, the missionaries’ presence also minimized the presence and influence of the military.

The friars considered missions their domain; yet proximity to St. Augustine offered assurance for

rapid military response if necessary. Furthermore, the friars served as advocates for the Republic

of Indians, facilitating cultural learning, implementing sociocultural change, and promoting

tolerance, often in regards to traditional native practices. Beyond their role as cultural brokers,

the Franciscans, with the Spanish government’s oversight and encouragement, developed a

11

mission system structure dependent upon a dynamic social system emphasizing reciprocity,

interconnectedness, and integration (Milanich 2006).

According to Spanish practice, natives who converted to Christianity became allies to and

subjects of the Spanish Crown. For the Spanish, native allegiance denoted obedience, which

served as the catalyst for repartimiento.2 Acting as loyal Spanish subjects, native populations

received benefits, specifically in the form of material goods afforded to the chief, who distributed

the goods as he deemed appropriate. This process increased the chief’s status and positively

influenced the chief’s opinion regarding the Spanish. Ultimately, the plan was designed to

control the people by controlling the chief. Although the Spanish retained the ability to influence

the chief, the Franciscans allowed the chiefs to oversee secular government. Perhaps more than

the aforementioned reasons, the Franciscans approach yielded positive results because it entailed

recognizing, acknowledging, and working within the existing sociopolitical structures, starting

with the provincial chiefs. The friars did not threaten chiefly power and placed minimal pressure

on the population to provide food for consumption or women for use—exploitative or otherwise.

Expanding the Mission System

Missionization occurred to varying degrees at different times in separate regions of La

Florida. The presence of Franciscans frequently depended upon the number of friars available,

the native reception to the missionaries, proximity to St. Augustine, as well as the Spanish and

potentially Christianized native population’s relations and interactions with native groups beyond

the borderlands. The 1597 Guale Rebellion, paired with the ensuing six years of struggle, closed

all missions in the province and nearly resulted in the annihilation of all friars present in Guale

2 Repartimiento, in part, encountered success due to similarities to an existing model of labor within native societies. Milanich (2006:3) cites tribute labor as a recognized duty or tradition among Southeastern natives, which enabled the Spanish to transfer the practice within a modified model.

12

(Francis and Kole 2011). The beginning of the 17th century marked a moderate shift in Guale

reception as some chiefs again allied themselves to Spain, rendering obedience and participating

in retributive efforts against those who instigated the rebellion. By mid-century, the Franciscans

administered seven operating missions in the Guale region. In addition to the Guale, the friars

focused attention on the Timucuans and the Apalachee, a people with considerable population

concentration and a people with whom the Franciscans encountered great success (Spellman

1965:355; Milanich 2006). Religious efforts in these regions occurred at separate times.

Timucuan conversion and westward expansion commenced in 1597; however, alliances and

warfare among the Apalachee to the west truncated missionary efforts at that time. By 1617, the

Franciscans had moved deep into Timucuan territory.

Fluctuating quantities of friars and missionary endeavors that resulted in varying degrees

of success began to stabilize by the 1630s. Though increasingly stable, the mission system could

not, for multiple reasons, retain the population nor provide sufficient missionaries (Spellman

1965; Hann 1996a; Worth 1998a:50-56). Between 1605 and 1620, 70 friars arrived in St.

Augustine and by 1630, 33 missions, served by approximately 27 friars, existed throughout La

Florida. These sites were primarily concentrated in southeast coastal Georgia, the northern

Florida coast, as well as interior Timucua chiefdoms east of the Aucilla River. After 1633, the

friars founded nine missions in Apalachee territory while also encountering significant increases

in the number of Christianized natives in La Florida. Díez de la Calle’s 1655 report (Worth

1998a:75), which surveyed the mission provinces, noted 38 doctrinas3 and determined that, by

1655, the friars converted approximately 26,000 natives (Spellman 1965:355). The high rate of

3 A doctrina indicates a mission site with a resident friar who taught the Christian doctrine. Generally, one doctrina existed within every chiefdom. This differs from a visita, which denotes mission outstations with churches in which friars visited rather than resided.

13

conversion in a progressively larger geographic area continued through 1674. A period (1630-

1674) of apparent growth, however, also harbored relational issues and other strains among the

natives, the Franciscans, and the Spanish in St. Augustine.

Rebellions and Raids

Rebellions and lesser conflicts transpired before4 the so-called “Golden Age” of the

mission system,5 yet the Apalachee rebellions of 1638 and 1647 (Hann and McEwan 1998)

offered early indications of problems that plagued native-Franciscan-Spanish relations until the

mission system collapsed in the early 18th century. Originally, the Franciscans entered

Apalachee territory only when requested, without military support, and without any form of

obligatory tribute. As Spanish soldiers began to arrive in 1638, conditions altered. Two primary

factors—repartimiento commencement and Spanish encroachment on native land—caused a

violent reaction among the Apalachee. In response to the continued Spanish presence and

implementations of repartimiento policies, the Apalachee revolted again in 1647, killing three

friars and destroying seven of the eight mission compounds.6 Spanish soldiers, with the

cooperation of Timucuan soldiers and Apalachee Christians, quelled the uprising; however, the

revolt caused continued unrest in the province and complicated further expansion of the mission

system in Apalachee.

In contrast to the aforementioned uprisings, the 1656 Timucuan Rebellion (Hann 1986;

Worth 1992; Bushnell 1996:71-72; Worth 1998b) stemmed from secular grievances. The

4 The Guale Rebellion of 1597, for example. 5 The idea of the “Golden Age” stems from Maynard Geiger’s 1937 work. His research, compiled through considerable attention to primary documentation, indicated the swell of Christianized mission natives between 1632 and 1674. Charles Spellman (1965) spends much of his discussion discouraging the notion of the idealized “Golden Age.” Jerald Milanich (2006) loosely incorporates the mission successes into his discussion of the mission system. 6 The rebellion happened primarily due to the Spanish, rather than the Franciscan, presence. Though the revolt involved the Spanish, it also pitted Christianized and non-Christianized chiefs against one another.

14

Timucuans directed no aggression toward the friars and, likewise, the Franciscans appeared

content with the power structure at the time. A culmination of factors, including epidemics

impacting the population, the oppressive nature of repartimiento, and the deteriorating political

status of caciques generated an environment of tense, simmering conflict. Governor Don Diego

de Rebolledo’s utilization of goods intended for Timucuan leaders as illicit trade items with other

native populations, however, served as the decisive offense among the Timucua. Though the

Spanish suppressed the rebellion, the process caused movement and consolidation of the

Christian natives to ensure the continued functionality of the camino real. Residual stressors also

appeared as divisions between the friars and the Governor mounted and as disease and fugitism

plagued the missions.

Unstable, discontented native populations in La Florida proved capable of weakening St.

Augustine. Two additional stresses—the English7 and the slave-raiding Indians (Arnade 1996;

Worth 2009a) encroaching onto missionized Spanish land and into St. Augustine—threatened

Spanish security in the New World. During the night in 1668, Robert Searles, an English pirate,

initiated an unexpected raid on St. Augustine, which resulted in extensive damage to the city, the

death of 60 Spaniards, and looting in public buildings, the church, the governor’s residence, and

the monastery. Searles’ raid caused the Spanish Crown to order Governor Manuel de Zendoya to

construct a new defensive structure—the Castillo de San Marcos—which required an extensive

labor force. In great numbers, the missionized natives, conscripted into labor, traveled to St.

Augustine in order to quarry and transport the coquina used for the Castillo’s construction.

7 The French presence also impacted the western area of La Florida; however, their actions affected the entirety of the mission system minimally.

15

English-influenced slaving Indians, enlisted by the English in Jamestown throughout the

1650s, began to raid Southeastern native populations, including the Spanish missions, during the

1660s. Westo8 raiders, who introduced the use of weapons in the Southeast, focused their first

efforts in mission province of Guale in 1661. These raids produced instability and frequent

movement among mission sites and natives. The Yamasee (see below), when allied with the

Spanish, helped to strengthen the rapidly decreasing population within the missions. James

Moore, Governor of Carolina, served as the final factor in the destruction of Spanish missions

(Spellman 1965; Arnade 1996; Milanich 2006). Moore’s forthcoming raids, an offshoot of the

War of Spanish Succession,9 substantially impacted St. Augustine and further weakened the few

existing mission communities. In the winter of 1702, following a series of devastating attacks

along the coastal missions north of St. Augustine, Moore entered the city. St. Augustine residents

and military sought refuge in the stone fort, where they remained until Spanish reinforcements

arrived from Cuba in late December. Before departing, Moore burned the entire city. Two years

later, Moore returned to La Florida with over 1,500 native allies. The raid in Apalachee caused

further damage and dissuaded plans to rebuild the missions.

The Collapsing Mission System

Population loss, the British presence and their ensuing raids, in addition to endemic

Indian slaving, which began around 1659 and continued through 1706, led to economic and

ecclesiastical instability and, ultimately, abandonment of the mission system. As slave raiding

and pirating activities commenced, the perseverance of many coastal mission communities north

of St. Augustine relied upon the influx of natives who fled the Georgia and South Carolina

8 The Spanish called this group the Chichimeco while the British referred to them as the Westo. 9 This approximately 15 year war, fueled by political disagreement among various European powers regarding succession of the Spanish throne, is also referred to as Queen Anne’s War in North America.

16

interior in order to escape the Westo raids. Called the Yamasee (Green 1992; Worth 1995a), the

group likely emerged as an amalgamated confederation of different ethnic groups from the

Georgia and South Carolina area, propelled toward one another in response to depopulation and

the Westo slaving raids (Figure 1). The new ethnic group, to be discussed in more detail below,

resided principally in the Mocama region of the mission system. Although most Yamasee did not

convert to Christianity, their refuge in Spanish territory provided protection and, in exchange, the

Yamasee participated in the labor draft. The symbiotic relationship offered protection to a large

native group capable of replenishing the dwindling mission populations. Initially, the Yamasee-

Spanish alliance benefitted both groups; however, the Yamasee began to question the Spaniard’s

FIGURE 1. Yamasee migration toward Carolina between 1684 and 1705. Source: Adapted from Green (1992:19) and White (2002:29).

17

ability to be the superior allies. The Yamasee departed from La Florida and settled near Scottish

Stuart’s Town in 1684. Then loyal to the British, the Yamasee commenced slave raiding in

Spanish territory, which further deteriorated the condition of the Spanish mission system.

Strife among the missions, paired with external threats and conflict, proved to be

significant factors in the gradual demise of the mission system. An assortment of other elements,

often recurring or reemerging, also influenced the progress, direction, and undoing of missions in

La Florida. The 1674 visitation of Gabriel Díaz Vara Calderón’s, Bishop of Santiago de Cuba,

encapsulates the deprivation of colonial life as well as the religious richness of the missions. As

Spellman (1965:366-371) notes, however, the natives’ appreciation and continued practice of

Christianity became as fragile as the Franciscans’ dedication to their work as missionaries.

Mission implementation and expansion encapsulated extreme poverty and hardship for natives

and friars alike. Cultural voids, such as those between native and Spanish soldier or native tribute

and repartimiento, were rarely overcome. Instead, hostility tended to escalate to conflict.

Disputes and violence erupted, entangling natives, missionaries, and Spanish officials.

Furthermore, epidemics,10 secondary infections, malnourishment, declining birthrate, and deaths

incurred from the oftentimes harsh labor system reduced the native population and weakened the

mission system (Milanich 2006). The convergence of rebellions, raids, depopulation, and

discontent among the Spanish missions led to the abandonment of interior northern Florida, from

the St. Johns River to Pensacola, by the end of 1706. Around 1705, five mission communities—

Nombre de Díos, San Francisco de Potano and Salamatoto, Santa María, and Tolomato—

remained, clustered near St. Augustine. Following the collapse of the mission system, refugee

10 Near the end of the 16th century, approximately 20,000-25,000 Timucuans lived in mission provinces. By the mid-17th century, between 1,000 and 2,000 individuals remained.

18

villages waxed and waned in response to epidemics, raids, and arrival of borderland natives who

sought sanctuary with the Spanish.

The Yamasee Confederation

Archaeological and ethnohistorical investigations and analyses within the past two and a

half decades (Green 1992; Worth 1993, 1994, 1995a, 1999; Green and DePratter 2000; Green et

al. 2002; White 2002; Boyer 2005; Halbirt 2005) provided new evidence and expanded

knowledge concerning this ethnic group. Those who have studied the population describe the

Yamasee in a manner that indicates ethnic and cultural reconfiguration and cohesion following a

period of fragmentation. Green (1992:ii) considers the Yamasee “a multi-ethnic confederation of

Native Americans that came to live in the lower Coastal Plain of South Carolina from 1684—

1715” as White (2002:23) portrays the group as a “conglomeration of multiple native groups

disbanded” as a result of the presence of and interaction with Europeans. Worth (1995b:20;

2004:245) states that, originally, “the Yamasee seem to represent an aggregation of Indian towns

of diverse origins, forced together by necessity,” who later sought refuge “from early Indian

slave raiding” near Carolina and Georgia and ultimately entered the Spanish mission system after

1715. Cultural cohesiveness and elasticity helped to stabilize the various groups who comprised

the Yamasee Confederation. The emerging alliance proffered a means of developing continuity

amidst “upheaval” (White 2002:23), crisis, and change.

Hernando de Soto’s 1540 entrada into the Southeastern interior affords the first account

of the population that would become ancestral to the Yamasee. Though debated, Tama and

Ocute, which formed the Oconee province, “were probably located on the Oconee River within

or near the Piedmont physiographical province of northern Georgia” during the 1540 entrada

19

(Worth 1995b:108). These towns represent the constituent populations whose remnants would

later form the Yamasee’s rudiments (Figure 2). Nearing the end of the 16th century, the

population of Tama and Ocute substantially increased. Worth (1993:41) suggests the Piedmont

portions of the Oconee River possibly served as a “zone of aggregation” from surrounding areas

experiencing depopulation following Spanish military expeditions. Additionally, European-

native politics propelled the coastal Guale and Salchiches of the Coastal Plain11 toward La Tama

and prompted the evolving Yamasee alliance.

Spanish missionaries’ endeavors to return to La Tama following the establishment of

Santa Elena and St. Augustine generally proved unsuccessful or unrecognized. Distance between

the regions impeded travel, attempts to missionize the population, and development of a

FIGURE 2. La Florida in relation to the probable predecessors of the Yamasee Confederacy. Source: Adapted from Green (1992:7) and White (2002:25).

11 The Salchiches, an ambiguous group related to the Guale, likely Tulafina, an important Guale town, as the groups’ administrative center (Worth 2004a). Though elusive in details, it’s probable that there was a relationship between the Salchiches and the town of Tulafina. Worth proposes the possibility that that towns along Guale’s northernmost frontier not yet assimilated into Franciscan missions might have been designated as the undefined “Salchiches.”

20

defensive area in the interior intended for economic prospects and exploration. Ethnohistorical

accounts enabled Green (1992) to tentatively determine La Tama’s location and landscape as

well as to preliminarily construct lifeways, primarily subsistence. Furthermore, the accounts

suggest that, at the turn of the 17th century, leadership and power shifted to La Tama, though

Ocute remained politically linked (Worth 1993:41, 44). By the 18th century, the Yamasee

represent a coalesced group living in South Carolina. Altamaha clearly served as the dominant

power among the Yamasee in South Carolina, which was also recognized by the Carolina

government (Green 1992:13-14). Allying with English Carolinians, however, occurred after

approximately three decades of entanglements with the Chichimeco-Westo, the aforementioned

native slavers, as well as the Spanish and, later, the English.

Chichimeco slave raiders, armed with flintlock muskets and operating under the direction

of the English in Virginia, probably appeared in late 1659 with their first raid directed against

populations in Florida’s western panhandle. Their attacks, however, were not limited to the

panhandle region. By the early 1660s, Altamaha and Ocute, and possibly Ichisi, also endured

Chichimeco slaving raids. As Worth (1999) discusses, the response to these raids would have

been rapid and would result in abandonment of land and a large population of refugees seeking

another area that possessed larger populations and entities able to provide protection. Those who

fled east settled along the coastlines, probably desiring proximity to the Spanish missions and the

protection they could afford while also maintaining sufficient distance from the missions to

avoid complications with the Spaniards.

Chichimeco raids extended into Escamaçu, the region the refugees inhabited, by 1661

and continued throughout the 1690s. This prompted the refugees to flee into Spanish territory

21

further south. Concurrently, the Spanish granted the population permission to occupy unsettled

coastal lands of Georgia and Florida (Worth 1995b). By this time, Altamaha’s collapse and

probable abandonment, the effects of the Chichimeco slave raids, as well as the necessary

resettlement of refugees along the Florida-Georgia coast prompted the once fragmented

populations of Ichise, Ocute, and Altamaha, along with the Salchiches and coastal Guale, to form

the conglomerated Yamasee confederacy. Furthermore, slave raids “diminished and eventually

devastated” Spanish Florida’s colonial system (Worth 2009a:296) and reconfigured Spanish

Florida’s social geography. Once primarily sedentary agriculturalists, slavers became

increasingly mobile commercial hunters who relied upon agricultural activities minimally

(Worth 2009a). Slaving activities yielded fundamental geographical and social reorganization

throughout the Southeast.

Characterizing the Confederacy

Yamasee progenitors, first encountered by de Soto’s expedition into the interior

Southeast, lived during a period of self-contained, self-sufficient Late Mississippian chiefdoms.

Hudson (1997:11-30) describes the natives of the Mississippian period (A.D. 800-1600) as

societies and cultures comprised of complexity, variety, similarities, and differences. Though

Altamaha appears to relate to the Late Mississippian phase, some aspects concerning social

structure and culture retained continuity throughout the Mississippian phase. Agricultural

production and dependency, specifically corn, denotes the beginning of the phase. In addition to

corn, these populations continued to rely upon a combination of subsistence practices, including

hunting, fishing, and gathering (Green 1992). Power, maintained through claims of descent from

deities, and wealth, which came in the form of stored food, was concentrated within the chief.

22

Individuals’ garnered an ascribed status at birth and kinship in their small village societies

(between 300 and 500 people) was likely matrilineal. The Middle Mississippian period witnessed

construction of the largest, most elaborate mounds and implementation of more notable artwork

and motifs. Issues such as soil depletion, declining agricultural production, paired with a cooler,

drier climate, weakened the Middle Mississippian societies, prompting the people of the

emerging Late Mississippian period to reconfigure society and politics.

Lamar culture, a classification that encompasses multiple phases and possesses

distinguishable cultural and material traits, “incorporates over two dozen phases that span more

than 400 years and an area covering most of Georgia and adjacent portions of Alabama, Florida,

South Carolina, North Carolina, and Tennessee” (Hally 1994:144). Natives residing in the

Piedmont province, including ancestral Yamasee, contributed to Lamar culture. Pottery,

specifically decoration and vessel form, serves as the culture’s primary material diagnostic.

These diagnostic features include ceramic motifs of concentric circles, filfot crosses, as well as

figure-8 and figure-9 shapes. Additionally, carinated bowls and jars with outflaring, thickened

rims—often modified with cane punctations, punctated nodes, plain and notched rims—

demarcate Lamar culture (Hally 1994:144-149). Geography shaped settlement and subsistence.

Data recovered from Piedmont sites suggest a heavy reliance on white-tailed deer as well as box

turtle and aquatic turtle. Evidence of black bear, raccoon, opossum, rabbit, turkey, squirrel, and

fish consumption also appear. Other food sources included corn—with “ubiquity and frequency”

(Hally 1994:153)—squash, beans, hickory nut, walnut, acorn, and seasonal fruits such as grape,

plum, maypop and persimmon.

23

Although not universal, architectural components of most Lamar culture sites conform to

a pattern that includes “rectangular floor plan measuring approximately 6-7 meters across,

depressed floors, individual-post exterior wall construction, wall-trench entrance passage, four

interior roof support posts, interior wattle-and-daub partition walls, and central hearth. Exterior

walls may have been thatched or daubed. The majority of known structures have been

dismantled and rebuilt at least one time” (Hally 1994:154). Structural variations include

rectangular structures 5 meters or less in size, circular structures measuring 9 meters in diameter

and possibly associated with habitation, in addition to square and rectangular posthole patterns

necessary for lightly constructed buildings whose use depended upon the season. Large villages

without mounds existed, though usually situated in or near river floodplains. The Piedmont,

paired with the Valley and Ridge and Blue Ridge, physiographic provinces contain 37 multistage

platform mounds ranging from 1 meter to 13 meters in height. Frequently their construction and

use spanned several centuries and phases. Coastal mounds incorporate burials. Otherwise, Lamar

culture populations tended to flex the deceased, with grave goods at times, before burial.

Extended, urn, and cremation burials also occurred. Habitation areas are the best documented,

and presumably most common, burial location.

The Yamasee and La Florida (ca.1662-1683)

By the mid-1660s, the Yamasee, the recently established cultural and ethnic amalgamated

confederation that fled toward the east coast in order to avoid further Chichimeco slaving raids

and to secure potential peripheral protection from Spanish St. Augustine, became a part of the

multiethnic population of La Florida (Figure 3). Endemics, disease, and the Chichimeco raids

impacted the mission provinces (Worth 1995b; 1999), reducing missionized populations and

24

generating need for the labor Yamasee refugees could provide. By 1670, at least two Yamasee

communities appeared in the previously abandoned areas of the Mocama province on Amelia

and St. Simons Islands. Those who inhabited parts of the mission province paid tribute to

Mocama chiefs (Worth 1995b) and participated in repartimiento, though most remained neither

Christianized nor missionized. All labor draft orders issues between 1666 and 1669 “explicitly

state that the majority of Indians drafted for repartimiento labor were pagans,” likely Yamasees

living in Guale and Mocama (Worth 1995b:20-21). Within the following decade, at least 12

Yamasee settlements appeared throughout La Florida, with approximately half established

during 1675 or later. Though the Yamasee paid tribute and contributed significantly to the labor

FIGURE 3. The fragmentation of La Tama and ensuing movement of the emerging Yamasee population between 1665 and 1684. Source: Adapted from Green (1992:16) and White (2002:27).

25

draft, the population remained in separate communities, retaining an identity distinct from their

Guale and Mocama missionized neighbors. As missionized populations continued to

deteriorate,12 the Yamasee served as an utterly necessary, integral source of labor.

Yamasee movement into the Guale and Mocama provinces continued into the 1670s and

through the early 1680s. Those who settled in the region largely remained unconverted and, due

to depopulation among missionized natives, increasingly comprised the greater portion of the

provincial populations. Pedro de Acros’ 1675 mission list (Worth 1995b:28) demonstrates the

integral nature of the refugee Yamasee, then occupying six separate areas of Guale and Mocama

(Table 1). The list indicates 676 individuals living in Guale and Mocama.

TABLE 1 YAMASEE SETTLEMENT POPULATIONS, 1675

Settlement Population

Ocotonico 120 Tip of Amelia Island, one league north of Ocotoque 60 La Tama 50 Ocotoque 40 San Simón 40 Santa María 40 Total 350 Source: Worth (1995b:28).

Of the total population, the 350 non-Christianized Yamasee outnumbered the 326

missionized natives. Resurgence in raiding activities, now a combined effort among the

Chichimeco, Uchise, and Chiluque, along the Georgia coast in the spring of 1680, paired with

French and English pirate raids beginning in 1683, terminated 19 years of “relative calm” in the

missions north of St. Augustine (Milanich 2006:171-172). The slave raiding prompted

12 As Milanich notes (2006:171), in 1675 more Yamasee (350 non-Christians) lived in Guale and Mocama compared to 326 Christianized Guale and Timucua Indians.

26

reorganization of the coastal mission population, as evidenced by some Yamasee converting to

Christianity (Worth 1995b:34-35) in order to relocate to the missions, as well as the

consolidation or closure of various mission sites (Milanich 2006). French pirate Grammont’s

spring 1683 assault on St. Augustine and the Mocama province initiated a period of Yamasee

flight from Spanish territory (Green 1992; Crane 2004:25-25; Worth 2004b; Waters 2005).

Under the leadership of chief Altamaha, the Yamasee, unwilling to relocate within missionized

lands and uncertain of the Spanish ability to provide sufficient protection, migrated to the

interior, settled among the Apalachicola-Coweta, or returned to the Escamaçu area. Following

Scottish settlement at Stuart’s Town in 1684, the Yamasee relocated to the coast, inundating

Stuart’s Town (Green et al. 2002:19; Gallay 2002) (Figure 4). In addition to Yamasee flight, the

1683 and 1684 pirate raids decimated the Guale population and induced Spanish abandonment of

the Georgia coast.

FIGURE 4. The location of Stuart’s Town, Charles Town, and St. Augustine in 1684.

27

The Yamasee in Carolina (1684-1715)

Migratory spurts occurred to the Carolina coast between 1683, following Grammont’s

attack, and 1685, when the majority of Yamasee abandoned Spanish territory. They most often

settled near the Scottish at Stuart’s Town where the Yamasee population divided into upper and

lower towns. Those who occupied the upper town were likely emigrants from the Guale,

Salchiches, and other groups, while residents of the lower town probably descended from the

interior Georgia chiefdoms (Green 1992). Initially tenuous, the Scot-Yamasee interactions

quickly transformed. Yamasees began slaving raids into Spanish mission territories and formed a

trading alliance, primarily in the form of deerskin, with the Scots. The burgeoning partnership,

however, proved to be fleeting. In response to English trade with the Lower Creek and as a result

of the Yamasee’s 1685 raid at Santa Catalina de Afuica, the Spanish decimated the Scots and the

Yamasee Carolina settlements (Worth 1995a:42-50). The Yamasee remained in Carolina,

eventually settling about 80 miles from the English at Charles Town (Green et al. 2002). Their

allegiance to the English persisted through the first decade of the 18th century and is particularly

evidenced by their service as a defensive buffer between the English and the Spanish. Moreover,

their assistance in Governor James Moore’s 1702 Siege of St. Augustine (Green et al. 2002),

itself an offshoot of the War of Spanish Succession, signified a total shift in allegiance.

Allying with the English provided goods, including firearms, alcohol, and trade items

such as kaolin pipes, glass and metal beads, nails, European ceramics (Green et al. 2002), which

were not as abundantly available within the Spanish mission system. By 1707, English

encroachment into Yamasee lands and trader’s recurring tendency to abuse their allies began to

strain the alliance and forced the English government to offer compensation in exchange for the

28

continued abuses.13 Nevertheless, the Yamasee continued to support the English, acting as

trading partners and slave raiders, which, in turn, further facilitated Carolinian expansion.

As the English accrued Indian allies, the Spanish and the French implemented different

colonial tactics to secure resources, specifically in the form of trade goods as well as labor and/or

population. The confluence of colonial powers often prompted reactionary responses by the

opposing powers and, simultaneously, impacted the structure of alliances and interactions among

native groups in the Southeast (Gallay 2002). Conflicts amid the three European powers in the

New World broiled throughout the early 18th century. Approaches to colonialism—Spain’s

intent to convert natives to Christianity, augment labor and economic resources, and multiethnic

population tolerance (Deagan 2003), Britain’s imperialism and interest in securing land, and

France’s design to create trade networks and accept natives as French citizens, paired with

territorial encroachment and fluctuating native allegiances, thrust Spanish, English, and French

colonists into seemingly perpetual rivalries and discord (Crane 2004).

Though the English desired to maintain a positive, productive relationship with the

Yamasee, the competitive nature of European colonization, England’s interest in possessing land,

and continued trade abuses (Crane 2004) significantly deteriorated the English-Yamasee alliance

by 1710. Traders utilized new sources for skins and slaves: the Creeks and the Chickasaw.

Expanding trade networks benefitted the English while also minimizing a primary reliance on the

Yamasee. These changes caused traders to consider the Yamasee expendable; however, the

Carolina government “recognized their importance as a first line of defense and appreciated their

13 For example, Crane (2004:144) describes the emergence of a regulative system of trade as a result of trade abuses. In order to avoid Indian allies (e.g. the Yamasee) from terminating alliances with the English in favor of the French or Spanish, the government more closely investigated English traders and implemented new means of trade enforcement.

29

knowledge of Spanish Florida,” (Gallay 2002:134) and aimed to retain the alliance rather than to

encourage the Yamasee to seek out the Spanish or the French. By 1715, the government’s

attempts to appease the Yamasee failed. The Yamasee and Creek slaughtered the Board of

Commissioners, the delegation designed to regulate trade, upon their arrival in Pocotaligo. The

slaughter initiated a war that also incorporated native groups such as the Creek and Cherokee. At

its conclusion, the Yamasee would leave Carolina and seek refuge with the Spanish in Florida.

The Yamasee War (1715-1717)

Recent historical and cultural reassessments concerning the Yamasee War (Gallay 2002;

Ramsey 2008) offer a complex, varying explanation for the origins of the conflict. Perhaps the

failure to convert natives to Christianity or their fear of enslavement affected relations. Other

points of investigation include the mounting native debts, in addition to diminished slaving

populations and depleted hunting resources, which likely contrasted with the increasingly evident

English wealth (Gallay 2002:329). Traditional possibilities, including trader’s oppression and a

premeditated action designed to shift power and alliances toward the Spanish or French (Crane

2004), also retain credibility. Worth (2009a:305-306) suggests South Florida’s depopulation, the

result of Yamasee and Creek raids (1704-1711), and surviving South Florida natives fleeing to

St. Augustine or to the Keys, removed a significant supply of natives available for enslavement.

Without a population to slave raid, the Yamasee succumbed to debt and endured overt pressure,

which, combined with provocation by the English, sparked a widespread rebellion in 1715.

Though its origins remain nuanced and, perhaps, unclear, the Yamasee War unquestionably

altered the state, structure, and character of colonial America and challenged the dominance of

the English, and the European, presence.

30

To varying degrees, the conflict persisted over two years. Native retaliation occurred with

greatest intensity and cohesion during the early months of 1715. The native confederation killed

hundreds of colonists, initially targeting many of the Carolina traders. In 1716, the Cherokee

allied with the recently created, though successful, English army, and denoted a gradual move

toward peace in Carolina. Although certain native groups refused to declare peace, most tribes

agreed to cease conflict by 1717. The war caused substantial population loss among the Yamasee

and, in the aftermath, the natives fractured their population (Oatis 2004; Ramsey 2008). Some

elected to remain near the Creek, though most decided to seek protection from the Spanish in St.

Augustine. Four Yamasee chiefs, collectively representing 161 villages, journeyed to St.

Augustine to request protection under Governor Francisco de Corcoles y Martínez. Granted

approval, the Yamasee returned to Florida.

The Yamasee Return to La Florida

Life in colonial St. Augustine transformed dramatically following Moore’s 1702 siege.

Cultural diversity, population expansion and changing demography, an end to isolation from

other New World groups, intercolonial conflict, paired with “moral decline” (Deagan 1983:39)

linked to inadequate religious facilities and teachings, reshaped the extent of St. Augustine and

its people. The Yamasee who returned to St. Augustine fulfilled an essential role in establishing

a defensive buffer between the Spanish and the English while also supporting the smaller,

redefined mission system that existed along the city’s periphery.

By the 18th century, the Spanish colonial community remained a presidio. Military

considerations, rather than economic interests, retained their primacy as the situado continued to

provide the primary means of support. Although hardly transformed in terms of purpose, St.

31

Augustine’s population and sociocultural structure altered. Mestizaje, marriage between a

Spanish man and a native woman, and other types of ethnic mixing became an increasingly

common occurrence. The Spanish casta system, which separated the peninsulares, those born in

Spain who relocated to the New World, criollos, those of Spanish descent, but born in the New

World, mestizos, and mulattos ensured social hierarchy while also permitting fluidity (Deagan

1983). Intermarriage among the Spanish, various native populations, and blacks begot cultural

diversity and the multiethnic population that historians and archaeologists recognize.

Struggling to survive with an insufficient or irregular situado (Bushnell 1994), St.

Augustine began to illicitly trade with the French and the English. In addition to needing these

items, British goods “were both cheaper and of better quality than the Spanish goods bought

through the situado” (Deagan 1983:35). When granted legal permission to contract colonial

English goods for St. Augustine after 1740, the Royal Havana Company alleviated the presidio’s

economic stressors. Imported goods also arrived from Mexico, Cuba, and the French colonies.

Additionally, natives provided some items on a limited scale; however, native pottery served as

the primary cooking ware in nearly all Spanish colonial households.

Upon entering St. Augustine, the Yamasee refugees became enmeshed in a multicultural

society in which defensive strategy was of utmost importance. The Church bound the diverse

population together, serving not only as the point for worship, but also as a place for recreational

and social opportunities. While the Church remained intact, the Franciscan’s place in St.

Augustine society disintegrated, partially as a result of disagreements among the various types of

Franciscans (e.g. peninsulares, criollos, colonial-trained) (Gannon 1965:81). Focus instead

shifted toward secular clergy. Threats to native populations (Green et al. 2002), including the

32

Yamasee, in the form of frequent epidemics, British attacks, and the encroachment by hostile

native groups decreased the native population and prompted repeated consolidation of mission

communities. Natives who settled in St. Augustine by 1717 swelled the city’s population; by

1718, Yamasee refugees “comprised approximately half of the refugee missions and mission

populations” (Deagan 1993:93). Initially concentrated in three main settlements—Nuestra

Señora de Candelaria de la Tamaja, Pocotalaca, and Pocosapa—the Yamasee population

relocated within the city’s periphery in response to defensive needs and consolidation efforts. A

portion of those who relocated to Spanish territory settled in La Florida’s interior, near San

Marcos de Apalachee. A number of Yamasee and Apalachee moved to Pensacola following the

1740 English siege of St. Augustine (Worth 2008:7-9).

Franciscan influence upon the refugee missions of the 18th century, while a reality,

proved to be limited. Mission communities became a mixture of Christians and non-Christians

whom might speak different languages and be of a different ethnicity (Milanich 2006:190).

Intermarriage and reduced tribal divisions, possibly related to continuous population fluctuation

as native groups joined St. Augustine, likely facilitated cooperation, perhaps cohesion, within the

mission community. The Yamasee, once key contributors to the decline of the Spanish mission

system, reemerged during the mission system’s final years. Reaching a population zenith of

1,011 natives dispersed among 11 peripheral refugee mission communities in 1726, census data

reveals that only 436 individuals resided in eight mission communities in 1727 (Hann 1996a:

315) and, by 1738, the mission population dwindled to 350 natives (Milanich 2006:191).14 One

hundred and fifty-five individuals remained in five mission villages—Nombre de Dios,

Pocotalaca, La Punta, La Costa, and Palica—by 1752 (Hann 1996a:322-324; Milanich 2006: 14 Some Yamasee retreated to Pensacola following the 1740 English siege on St. Augustine.

33

193). Seven years later, only 95 natives resided at the two surviving mission sites: Nombre de

Dios and Tolomato (Milanich 2006:194) (Table 2).

TABLE 2 EIGHTEENTH CENTURY MISSION POPULATIONS

Census Year Population 1726 1,011 1727 436 1738 350 1752 155 1759 95

Source: Hann (1996a:315, 322-324); Milanich (2006:191-194). Nuestra Señora del Rosario de la Punta

Nuestra Señora del Rosario de la Punta represents one of six settlements occupied by

Native Americans (some of whom were Christianized) that surrounded St. Augustine during the

second quarter of the 18th century. La Punta—along with other comparable mission

communities, including Nombre de Dios, Tolomato, and Pocotalaca—comprised a component of

St. Augustine’s comprehensive defensive system (Sastre 2002; Halbirt 2004), as well as an

essential labor force necessary for the city’s survival during the tumultuous 18th century. Based

on historical documents, the Yamasee were primary residents of La Punta (White 2002; Boyer

2005; Halbirt 2005), although Apalachee are also listed on government census records and

Franciscan administrative documents. At the time of La Punta’s establishment, St. Augustine’s

native population was in decline due to disease and warfare; consolidation and movement

became a component of life in mission communities. Susan Parker described the process of

reactionary movement in response to defensive needs or threats, as well as frequent relocation, as

a “concertina” (1999:47). Reconstitution, prompted by Captain John Palmer’s 1728 raid at

Nombre de Dios Chiquito and the ensuing fragmentation of its population, probably led to the

34

formation of La Punta (White 2002:36; Halbirt 2005:8). Antonio Juta, who first appeared as the

chief of Nombre de Dios Chiquito in 1736, was listed as La Punta’s cacique in 1752 (Hann

1996a:323). Discrepancies in the mission church location between the 1737 Arredondo map and

the 1763 Castelló map also reinforce the possibility of a settlement that shifted toward the city

for protection when necessary and toward fertile fields when not needed (Arredondo 1737;

Castelló 1763; Halbirt 2005:14).

Miguel de Ayala’s census, completed on November 27, 1736, denotes the first known

documentation that references La Punta, in addition to seven other mission communities situated

along St. Augustine’s periphery. The “List of Indians capable of bearing arms divided according

to their towns who are at the service of the Presidio of San Agustín de la Florida,” includes the

cacique, 16 additional men—one of whom was listed as Apalachee—and their ages, which

ranged from 12 to 80 (Swanton 1922:104-105). John Palmer’s 1730 map (Figure 5), created

based upon his recollections of the 1728 raid, predates the 1736 document; however, the “indian

town” noted on the map cannot conclusively be called La Punta (Palmer 1730). Based on its

location south of the colonial walled city and La Punta’s similar proximity on later maps, the

“indian town” likely correlates to the mission community and lends credence to La Punta’s

existence in the late 1720s. Late 1720s occupation is further substantiated by settlement during

Governor Antonio de Benavides term, which occurred from 1717 to 1734 (White 2002:37).

During 1737, Antonio de Arredondo produced a map designed to illustrate his vision of

the city’s defenses (Figure 6). The document also includes a detailed depiction of St. Augustine

and its periphery, including six mission communities. La Punta’s landscape included a church,

listed as 21, and 20 farmsteads dispersed across approximately 30 acres of land. Furthermore, the

35

FIGURE 5. Map by Colonel John Palmer, 1730. La Punta is located within the square. Source: St. Augustine Historical Society.

36

FIGURE 6. Antonio de Arredondo Map, 1737. Source: St. Augustine Historical Society.

37

map delineates two clusters of farmsteads: 16 appear close to the mission church as the

remaining 4 sit further south. Seventeen men and a combined count of 17 women and children

resided in the community in 1737.

Additional population accounts stem from four sources (Table 3). In 1738, Antonio de

Benavides generated a population count based on his tenure as Governor (1717-1734). He

proposed 41 natives inhabited La Punta. This number closely corresponds to Governor Manuel

de Montiano’s report of 43 individuals during the same year.15 Güemes y Horcasitas 1739 report

includes 14 families with a population totaling 51. These families potentially relate to the 16

structures that surrounded the mission church in 1737 (Halbirt 2005:10). It is possible that the

four structures south of the main cluster might relate to another ethnic or different native group,

though the 1739 report considers them collectively (Halbirt 2005:11-12). La Punta essentially

disappears from the documentary record16 during the 1740s17 and reappears in the Gelabert

census (Gelabert 1752). La Punta was, at that time, the largest of the six remaining mission

communities and boasted a population of 25 men, 34 women, and 3 possible infants. La Punta is

last referenced in Pablo Castelló’s 1763 map (Figure 7), which describes the Yglesia arruinada

que la fué del Pueblo de Indios de la Punta (“Ruined church that was the Indian town of La

Punta”).

Ethnohistorical analysis, largely due to insufficient accounts, provides little insight into

daily life at La Punta. Don Pedro Sánchez Griñán resided in St. Augustine between 1731 and

15 Governor Montiano’s report, dated June 4 (Hann 1996a:316) corresponds exactly to Friar Juan Callejas’ Certification, sworn on May 29th of the same year. 16 White (2002:41) notes an exception in James Covington’s 1970 publication. He mentions La Punta in addition to three other mission communities in 1942; however, he provides no source. 17 In 1747, Governor Montiano reported that a group of Yamasee fled to Pensacola as a response to the 1740 English siege of St. Augustine. Documentary evidence (Worth 2008, 2012) demonstrates the Yamasee’s presence as a small community in 1761. The community departed for Veracruz with the Spanish in 1763.

38

TABLE 3 POPULATION ESTIMATES AT LA PUNTA Source Year Men Women Children Total Families Reference

Ayala 1736 17 - - - - Swanton (1922:105) Arredondo 1737 17 17* - 34* - Chatelain (1941:Map 13) Benavides 1738 15 26* - 41* - Hann (1996a:316) Montiano 1738 10 13 20 43 - Hann (1996a:316) Horcasitas 1739 - - - 51 14 Hann (1996a:317) Gelabert 1752 25 34 3 62 - Hann (1996a:323) *Combines Women and Children into one sum. Source: Halbirt 2005:12. 1742. Complying with a request from Spain’s Secretary of State, Griñán issued a report based

upon his recollections of Florida in 1756. Inherently faulted due to cultural biases and

inaccuracies introduced from the time lapse, the report nonetheless offers relatively impartial

information regarding La Punta in a broader context (Halbirt 2005). Griñán wrote

In the environs of Florida (but outside the Circumvallation line and under the cannon of the fortresses), there are five small villages of Christian Indians from the Yamasee Nation that are inhabited by up to one hundred families. Their dwellings are small palm houses, much distant from one another, and they plant corn and legumes on their respective plots. But because of their limited efforts at farming, for they do not put much effort into this work, they produce only a very small harvest. They use most of their time to hunt, for which they have more inclination, and also to wage war. They are brave, but greatly inclined to inebriety, consuming in this vice whatever they earn from their hunting and even from the fruits of their sowing. (Scardaville and Belmonte 1979:11)

Alcoholism and drunkenness pervade colonial narratives concerning the natives in St.

Augustine (Hann 1996a:320-321). In 1738, friars reported to Governor Montiano that

all of the adults were badly addicted to alcohol and that from their drunkenness resulted a great looseness of customs, lack of obedience to the chiefs, and loss of their fear of God. Drunkenness in some cases led men to abuse their wives and even kill them. . . The friars blamed much of the problem with alcohol on their settlements’ proximity to St. Augustine, where it was available.

39

Friars’ concern for the amount of alcohol consumed likely relates to the erosion of

already declining cultural traditions (Halbirt 2005:15) and, possibly, as a means to explain their

inability to convert the natives (White 2002:44). Father Alaña, who lived among the Calusa of

South Florida acknowledged their “incredible passion” for rum in 1743 as English trader

Edmond Atkins stated that “all the indians whatever are so passionately fond of Rum, as to be

able to withstand it” (White 2002:44). While the validity and accuracy of European portrayals of

Yamasee actions may be evaluated with skepticism, alcohol within the mission communities

proved a point of interest and a point of contention.

First inhabited in the late 1720s, La Punta’s population underwent displacement in 1754 as a

result of mission consolidation. Spanish decree relocated the mission population to the two

remaining mission communities—Tolomato and Nombre de Dios. The remaining inhabitants

probably assimilated into the St. Augustine community through kinship, corporate, or

commercial connections (Parker 1993), which classified them as vecinos (legally full members

of Spanish society) rather than members of the mission. Mission communities continued to

collapse into the 1750s as a result of conflict among the Franciscans in response to social status,

possibly due to language difficulties between friars and the Yamasee, alcoholism, insufficient

friars and inadequate instruction among the missionized (White 2002:45-46). Abandonment also

stemmed from administrative decisions made by the Spanish government, which now had

control of Florida’s remaining mission populations (Kapitzke 2001:162), as well as an economic

decision made by the diminishing mission community that faced working infertile land (Hoffman

2002:201). Spain ceded Florida to the British in exchange for Havana at the conclusion of the

Seven Years War. Eighty-six natives, many probably of Yamasee heritage, departed with the

40

FIGURE 7. Pablo Castelló map, 1763. Source: St. Augustine Historical Society.

41

Spanish from St. Augustine in 1763. Yamasee and Apalachee who previously relocated to

Pensacola also departed La Florida with the Spanish during 1763. One hundred and eight

Yamasee and Apalachee natives evacuated from Pensacola and traveled to Veracruz.

42

CHAPTER III

CREOLIZATION

Introduction

Conceptions of cultural mixture within anthropological studies encompass a finite

number of umbrella terms. These expressions, in turn, become dynamic, nuanced, and

operationalized within the specific context of a study. Generally, operationalizing the concept

enables the development of a framework; however, frameworks frequently apply to a limited

number (often one) of circumstances or a specific archaeological assemblage recovered from a

particular site. Discussing cultural mixture frameworks and perspectives—including

acculturation, assimilation, and hybridity—within anthropological contexts demonstrates, in part,

what creolization is and how the term functions in this study. Terms and theoretical perspectives

such as syncretism (Stewart 1999), ethnogenesis (Fradkin et al. 2012; Hill 2013), mestizaje,

transculturation, bricolage, entanglement, and miscegenation (Liebmann 2013; van Pelt 2013)

also provide a theoretical structure in which creolization can be examined. Focusing on three

cultural mixture frameworks—acculturation, assimilation, and hybridity—and comparing these

perspectives to creolization can assist with determining the presence and manifestations of

cultural creolization at Nuestra Señora del Rosario de la Punta. Though situated within the

discourse of cultural mixture and anthropological theory, the following operationalization of

creolization correlates specifically to the material culture recovered from La Punta. Additional

multi-site comparative interpretations or cross-cultural analyses would permit the current

operationalization to move toward an increasingly justified theoretical model.

43

Acculturation and Assimilation

Acculturation and assimilation rest among early cultural mixture models utilized within

anthropology. Scholars concede to (plausibly) appropriate analytical circumstances for the use of

these terms, yet also cite numerous critiques and theoretical deficiencies regarding both

frameworks (Teske and Nelson 1974; Stewart 1999; Russell 2005; Hitchcock and Maeir 2013);

however, historical archaeologists, in specific circumstances, examine the archaeological past

within these contexts (Worth 1998a; Ewen 2000). Concern regarding both theoretical lenses

stems from questions of directionality as well as complexity. Intended to encompass cultural

mixture as a dynamic process, acculturation and assimilation offered anthropologists a

preliminary means of demonstrating and assessing the breadth and degree of cultural mixture

(Teske and Nelson 1974:365).

Acculturation—loosely characterized—requires direct contact between two cultures that

may not necessitate a shift in values, behaviors, or practices. Assimilation incorporates the

process of acculturation and commonly denotes cultural interaction in which one culture

subsumes the other (Liebmann 2013). Scholars consider these interpretive models inadequate

due to the assumption of unidirectional cultural influence. Rather than recognizing the co-

existence of cultural continuity, change, and (re)negotiation, acculturation “treat[s] change as an

aberration” (Gundaker 2000:130). Assimilation presumes cultural change(s) in which a “simple,

passive, subordinate” colonized culture becomes ingrained within the colonizers’ “complex,

active, dominant” culture (Liebmann 2013:27). The frameworks tend to arbitrarily assign static

cultural roles and rely upon accommodation and/or incorporation as the explanation for cultural

interaction, influence, and/or change. Both perspectives preclude multicultural components

44

present in cultural mixture (Stewart 1999:54). Cultural mixture rarely, if ever, involves simple

movement from the “before” cultural composition to the “after” product. Instead, all cultures are

impacted and influenced through individual and group agency.

Hybridity

Scientific notions of hybridity originated in race theory and genetics (Stewart 2011:50).

Anthropology, alongside other social sciences, expanded the metaphor to address cultural

mixture. As with other theoretical perspectives and models, hybridity studies appear within an

organizational and operationalized spectrum. Scholars consider cultural mixture through the lens

of hybridity; the structure, evidence, and interpretations of such studies, however, are as often

dissimilar as they are similar. These inconsistencies contribute to the debate regarding the (most)

appropriate process(es), description(s), definition(s), and circumstance(s) for cultural mixture

and theory among anthropological interpretations.

Criticism regarding hybridity abounds within anthropological theory. Theoretical

applications simultaneously serve as “vernacular definition[s] of hybridity” (VanValkenburgh

2013:305) while also providing a term and perspective that “remains more open and may enclose

multiple influences or ‘inputs’ to form non-uniform outcomes” (Bader 2013:262). Hybridity

permits flexibility in application and interpretation; however, the variable, inconsistent use of the

term within anthropology also encourages tension and conflict when attempting to develop

theoretical frameworks. Furthermore, critical scholars cite an inherent assumption of cultural

purity within hybridity (Hutnyk 2010:61; Pappa 2013:35; Stockhammer 2013:12). Hybridity

studies now acknowledge a pure culture would only be possible through an artificial, arbitrary

cultural construction that a researcher would generate. Culture is nuanced and is in a constant

45

state of flux. Hybridity attempts to analyze cultural mixture by recognizing and studying “what

falls between the analytical categories defined by us . . . [the] in-between . . . [the] unclassified”

(Stockhammer 2013:12). The potential for ambiguity is essential for hybridity (Card 2013:4).

In its infancy, hybridity connoted genetic intermixture through the modified biological

process of cross-breeding two different plant or animal species. When transferred to

anthropological thought, hybridity became synonymous with racial intermixture through

intermarriage and physical reproduction. As its functions expanded, scholars implemented the

term as a means to express “fluidity and negotiation of identities through time” (Beaudoin

2013:48). Biological mixing remains a component of hybridization; however, the concept now

encompasses cultural processes, including “incorporation, blending, adoption, or other form of

mixing of discrete elements” (Card 2013:4).

Homi J. Bhabha, a critical theorist of post-colonial literature, significantly shaped the

early development and use of hybridity within anthropology. His model emphasizes the cultural-

political aspects of cultural mixture and utilizes a perspective of the “in-between” and “third

space” (Hutnyk 2010:60). For Bhabha, hybridity is politicized, often subversive, and symbolizes

the strategies developed in (post)colonial contexts and implemented by subalterns and migrants

(Pappa 2013:33; VanValkenburgh 2013:303). Employing Bhabha’s characterization of hybridity

produces controversy. Frequently the politicized operationalization of the term is misused,

provoking a theoretical chasm between the scholar’s epistemology and that of Bhabha’s.

Deprived of its cultural-political meaning, the terms’ context and substance diminish (Pappa

2013). Alternative perspectives of hybridity, which emerged after Bhabha’s operationalization,

demonstrate VanValkenburgh’s vernacular hybridity.

46

In the simplest term, hybridity signifies a state of mixture. Beyond this, studies recognize

that culture is mixture, pure cultures cannot exist, and that theoretical perspectives must be

multidirectional and diachronic. Egyptian archaeologists utilize the perspective to describe “the

blending of previously (relatively) isolated cultures that settled in each other’s proximity” (Bader

2013:261). Other archaeological interpretations incorporate hybridity to explore reworked—not

combined—cultural elements in addition to instances of “resistance, mockery, and ambivalence”

(Liebmann 2013:41). Hutnyk, in contrast, discusses “all sorts of things to do with mixing and

combining [emphasis added] in the moment of cultural exchange” (2010:60). Hybridity serves a

variety of cultural explanations, ranging from identity formation to language innovations and

creative expression, the latter primarily through technology and production. Regardless of the

nuanced perspective developed by archaeologists, hybridity universally denotes a manner by

which to view culture and agency. Furthermore, hybridity is a process rather than a fixed cultural

descriptor. Simultaneously, the term proffers a means to explain cultural mixture and change that

is useful and often disputed. Interpreting culture through hybridity permits variability, yet these

inconsistencies also threaten to undermine the perspective’s effectiveness.

Creolization

Linguistic creolization models are often considered analogous to or essential to cultural

creolization (Rath 2000:99). Although this study does not interpret creolization at La Punta

within a linguistics framework, the two perspectives possess various parallels. Creolization in

linguistics occurs within a spectrum containing three broad categories: “(a) so-called stable

transmission, (b) language change, (c) creolization” (DeGraff 2001:2). Movement among these

categories depends on exposure to new languages. The linguistic creolization continuum

47

involves questions of agency, primarily in relationship to classifying pidgin and creole

speakers/languages, as well as investigating the presence and role of the superstrate and

substrate (Ferguson 2000; Bickerton 2001; DeGraff 2001). Understanding the function of

lexicon and grammar in linguistics provides an analogous—or “integral” (Rath 2000:99)—

framework of “ambiguity, discontinuity, traces, and remembering,” (Glissant 2008:87) which

permits the assessment of peoples’ “often discordant interaction” (Ferguson 2000:6).

Langauge acquisition marks the beginning of a peoples’ linguistic movement toward

pidginization. In the continuum of linguistic creolization, pidgin speakers represent the elements

of parent languages, generally two, in a reduced form. The language is “elementary . . . [in]

simplified systems, without native speakers, and used in functionally restricted contexts of

interethnic communication” (DeGraff 2001:3). As acquisition crystallizes, the changing language

becomes creolized, which creates an increasingly complex, highly developed speech community

that is functionally unrestricted and distinct from all languages previously and currently in

contact (Degraff 2001:3-4; Lumsden 2001:129-130).18 Impacts of colonialism within linguistic

creolization reflect prevalent binaries (e.g. colonizer/colonized) among cultural creolization

frameworks. Structural linguistic analyses utilize the superstrate and substrate to evaluate

culturally specific “deep structures,” which enclose “underlying [linguistic or cultural] values

and beliefs” with “unconscious grammatical principles” (Rath 2000:102-103). The superstrate

dominates the lexicon and influences the grammar and structure of the language while the

substrate contributes minimally to the construction of the creolized language. Language exists

innately; linguistic transformations render structures into expression.

18 Linguists debate whether children, adults, or both groups are responsible for creolization of language. Agency is, however, more frequently attributed to children.

48

Originating primarily in archaeological investigations of slavery, colonialism, and

plantation society, the use of cultural creolization expanded to encapsulate “a variety of

identities” (Bolland 2006; Bader 2013:259). Nevertheless, as a theoretical perspective,

creolization harbors the attributes of ambiguity, epistemological discrepancies, and

metadiscourse, which are also present in similar processes, including acculturation, assimilation,

and hybridity. Unlike acculturation and assimilation, creolization acknowledges the presence of

conflict resulting from power relations, but also disregards presuppositions concerning the

dynamics of interaction, as well as the potential cultural product, of the cultural mixture.

Creolization is not analogous to assimilation, or its predecessor, acculturation. The former

embraces human agency and avoids sociocultural binaries (e.g. colonizer/colonized,

dominant/subordinate, core/periphery) (Gundaker 2000; Worth 2012:143).

Neither is hybridity analogous. Innovation and creativity, open-endedness, multi-

directionality, and culture(s) in conversation with themselves comprise creolization frameworks.

Hybridity, though fluid, suggests a cultural spectrum that becomes finite and fixed upon reaching

(an admittedly variable) point of cultural cohesion. In contrast, creolization can incorporate

acculturated/assimilated cultures, overlaps with hybridity, and, if ethnogenesis occurs, persists,

though redefined, within a new culture. Creolization requires ongoing dialogue between and

among the elements of all cultures involved in cultural creation (Bolland 2006).

Creolization studies examine a complex cultural phenomenon in which cultural interfaces

result in the “restructuring” of a people (Stewart 2010:18). Neither the original nor the

introduced culture(s) possesses a dominant or subordinate role and the restructuring processes

include, though are not limited to, intermixture, simplification, or reorganization (Stewart 2010).

49

Within the context of this study, creolization denotes a creative, fluid confluence of cultural traits

and processes that emerges from two or more distinctive cultures, neither of which possesses

primacy in relation to the new culture. Creolization dictates the convergence, divergence, and

stability of multiple components of society and culture in varied, complex, and non-predictable

manners. The juncture of cultural mixture commences a process of shared creation leading to a

spectrum of cultural continuity, change, incorporation, and/or modification.

50

CHAPTER IV

PROJECT AREA

City of St. Augustine Archaeological Preservation Ordinance

In 1987, the City of St. Augustine implemented the St. Augustine Archaeological

Preservation Ordinance, which mandates archaeological excavations in specific areas of the city

prior to any type of ground-penetrating activity (City of St. Augustine 1987). In recognition of

St. Augustine’s unique (pre)historical and archaeological resources,19 as well as their

significance at local, state, and national levels, the City Commission determined that the City of

St. Augustine needed to define areas of importance and establish means by which these resources

could be evaluated, studied, and preserved. To regulate and restrict subsurface disturbances, the

Ordinance discusses three zones (Zone I, Zone II, and Zone III) and seventeen subzones

generally defined according to temporal and/or functional criteria (Figure 8).20 Construction

projects occurring within one of the three zones, which also meet or exceed the specifications for

a major or a minor disturbance, must be reviewed by the City Archaeologist, Carl Halbirt, and an

archaeological investigation must ensue (Figure 9). Examining historical documents and the

ensuing excavations enable Halbirt and the City of St. Augustine to accomplish three objectives:

“1) understand the nature of the archaeological remains that are buried on the property, 2)

determine how those remains will be impacted by construction, and 3) integrate the data into

research goals that are intended to address St. Augustine’s growth and development, ethnic

affiliations and interactions, cultural history, and past lifeways” (Halbirt 1999:60-61).

19 Community activism and a push for policies designed to preserve the City’s archaeological heritage provided a sound basis for the 1987 Ordinance. 20 These zones include both private and public property.

51

FIGURE 8. Three zones and seventeen subzones designated through the City’s Archaeological Ordinance. La Punta is in Archaeological Zone IC. Source: Halbirt and Johns (2014).

52

FIGURE 9. Flowchart for evaluating subsurface disturbances, their degree of impact, and the need for archaeological investigation. Source: Adapted from Halbirt and Johns (2014).

Within the past 27 years, the City’s archaeological ordinance resulted in over 650

archaeological investigations. Approximately 200 of these projects relate to mission areas as

defined through historical maps or through archaeological surveys. Mission components

comprise less than 40% of the aforementioned investigations. Furthermore, these sites frequently

consist of “shallow ditches and/or furrows and a light scattering of artifacts and shell debris,”

which likely indicate agricultural activities (Halbirt and Johns 2014:7). These investigations

occur primarily within three of the six remaining mission sites: La Punta, Nombre de Dios, and

Pocotalaca (Figure 10). Evidence of 18th century missions relates information regarding mission

layout, types of structures present, as well as their affiliated features (e.g. smudge pits, trash

pits), special purpose structures or features (e.g. a well and well house at 161 Marine Street),

53

FIGURE 10. The six remaining 18th century mission sites beyond the colonial-walled city of St. Augustine. Source: Antonio de Arrendondo, 1737.

54

farmstead features, as well as possible communal areas (e.g. the church and council house at La

Punta) (Halbirt and Johns 2014).

Urban Archaeology

Four years ago, the Society for Historical Archaeology released a thematic Historical

Archaeology journal issue that focused on urban archaeology in the 19th and 20th centuries.

Scholars consider urbanity and archaeology in two contexts: as “archaeology of cities” or as

“archaeology in cities” (Staski 2008:5). Regardless of which framework the contributing authors

employed to interpret urban archaeology, the authors “examined questions that included

consumer behavior, ethnicity, and spatial and demographic patterns” (Mullins and Warner

2008:1). Archaeology in St. Augustine, however, differs from these studies. Four hundred and

fifty years of intensive occupation and land (re)use, paired with fluctuating, multicultural

populations, uniquely complicate archaeological integrity and context. Investigations within

colonial St. Augustine may yield assemblages with minimal disturbances; however, the

possibility of mixed contexts must also be considered.

As Deagan explains, intermixture of archaeological evidence results from “architectural

traditions, trash-disposal practices, natural and cultural catastrophes, and the very nature of

intensive occupation on restricted lot areas for 300-500 years” (1983:57-61). At the site of La

Punta, 18th and 19th century occupations occurred. Determining the associated time period from

artifacts recovered may, at times, become difficult or impossible. Material culture, such as

ceramics or identifiable metal objects, generally provides temporal information. On the other

hand, ecofacts and faunal remains (e.g. bone, shell, seeds) possess no method for visual dating

and, therefore, their context can be more difficult to ascertain with high probability or reliability.

55

The Archaeology of 18th Century Spanish Missions in La Florida

Mission studies—historical, anthropological, and archaeological in nature—frequently

examine the 17th century component without acknowledging the 46 years of Franciscan missions

and missionary work in La Florida during the early to mid-18th century. Research completed by

Kathleen Deagan and Gifford Waters at Nombre de Dios serves as the exception. Their

endeavors aim to understand multiethnic interactions; however, Nombre de Dios possesses a

lengthy occupation, which spans from the late 1500s to the mid-1700s. Increased collaboration

and synergy between historical and archaeological research should develop the foundation

necessary to enhance breadth and depth of 18th century mission studies (Halbirt and Johns

2014). Although situated within cannon range of the Castillo de San Marcos, 18th century

mission communities existed outside the colonial walled city of St. Augustine. Each community,

a peripheral component, provided the city with military and/or economic resources (Parker

1999). As a result, mission communities consistently resettled, depending on Spanish needs.

Halbirt and Johns (2014:3-6) identified three major, at times interrelated, reasons that

limit scholarly or municipal interest in 18th century mission sites. First, mission sites during the

early to mid-18th century are dispersed across the St. Augustine “frontier.” Settlements consisted

of small farmsteads and a mission church distributed over an area ranging between 5 to more

than 30 acres. Determining building type and number, in addition to related archaeological

deposits, at the various mission sites proved difficult; however, information, though limited,

regarding mission churches is available. In contrast, architectural documentation and dense

archaeological deposits—many documented and/or recovered archaeologically—related to daily

life in colonial St. Augustine facilitate thorough examination of the archaeological record for

56

specific time periods. Secondly, the transitory nature of mission life during the 18th century

leads to a “shifting pattern of occupation [that] has a direct bearing on artifact density, which can

influence site recognition” (Halbirt and Johns 2014:5). Finally, the impact of urbanization

throughout the past two centuries restricts accessibility to mission sites. Formerly open spaces

often associated with agricultural endeavors of mission communities now contain platted,

privately owned lots. Despite these constraints Halbirt and Johns (2014) provide a descriptive

overview of archaeological deposits partially comprising the 18th century mission landscape.

Excavations completed within the three identified mission communities (La Punta,

Nombre de Dios, and Pocotalaca) offer evidence concerning village layout. The 250 survey

postholes excavated at 161 Marine Street, currently the Bayview Nursing and Assisted Living

Facility, in 1996 relates a linear concentration of cultural materials. Combining the artifactual

patterns with culturally sterile sand measurements indicates that the community likely

constructed residential buildings on the low-lying ridge. Agricultural activities and features

possibly occurred on the “bottom land” where “run-off and productivity could have been higher”

(Halbirt and Johns 2014:9). Structures present at mission sites include at least two building

styles: traditional and Spanish influenced. Halbirt documented three circular/ovoid features,

probably associated with traditional native architectural practices, at 161 Marine Street and a

structure with Spanish components, including shallow interior wall posts suggesting a simple

palm thatch design, at 76 Duero Street. Additionally, a two room structure at 133 Marine Street,

paired with affiliated structural features, such as the well at 1 San Salvador, reinforce the

influence of Spanish architectural methods.

57

Core areas (Halbirt and Johns 2014:9), which encompass places of residence, community,

and agriculture, likely appeared at Nombre de Dios and Pocotalaca. Archaeological evidence

from both sites suggests that a barrier entrenchment defined the perimeter of these, and

potentially other, 18th century mission communities. Excavations at Nombre de Dios

documented three portions of the entrenchment, which reaches a distance of 750 linear feet.

Pocotalaca contains an entrenchment similar to that of Nombre de Dios; the former site possesses

250 documented feet of the entrenchment. Communal areas, one element of mission site cores,

represent loci for community congregation. These gatherings frequently transpired in the

community’s church and/or council house. In 2004, Halbirt recorded La Punta’s church in the

approximate center of the community, along the low-lying dune ridge containing a high

concentration of the cultural materials recovered from the site. Four times the size of a farmstead

home, the mission church measured 47 feet (east-west) by 26 feet (north-south). Though Halbirt

and his team excavated a small portion of the total church area (1,200 square feet), he identified

several burials within the structure and one burial located four meters northeast of the structure.

Nuestra Señora del Rosario de la Punta: Topography and Environs

Two and a half decades prompted changes in land use and alterations, often man-made, to

the topography and landscape of the approximately thirty acres identified as La Punta. Historic

maps placed the mission community south of colonial walled St. Augustine, along a low, sandy

peninsula (Figures 11 and 12). Archaeological survey data aligns with these documentary

illustrations. A posthole survey at 161 Marine Street, completed in August 1996, and the

corresponding stratigraphic data delineated the dune ridge. Modern development modified the

existing topography; therefore, calculating the vertical distance between the culturally sterile

58

FIGURE 11. Juan Joseph Eligio de la Puente’s 1769 map of colonial St. Augustine with Number 24 marking the La Punta Mission. Source: St. Augustine Historical Society.

59

FIGURE 12. View of La Punta and environs. Source: Google Earth Maps, November 2014.

60

subsoil from a known elevation—the mean sea level—established the ridge’s extent. The north-

south profiles suggested the ridge’s crest followed an undulating pattern reminiscent of beach

dune ridges. On the east side, the ridge rises roughly 2.5 feet while the west side reaches

approximately 1.5 feet, becoming flatter before dropping into Maria Sanchez Creek (Halbirt

1996, 2005). Archaeological survey and excavation determined the ridge to be the community’s

core area. Plentiful, varied subsistence resources surrounded the mission community (Reitz and

Cumbaa 1983). Forests offered wild game, such as deer, hogs, and turkey, as well as rabbit,

opossum, and raccoon. Rich estuarine environments, including the inner bay, saltmarshes, tidal

creeks, and mud flats, afforded abundant fish and shellfish. Beyond the brackish Maria Sanchez

Creek and San Sebastian River, pine flatwood, occasional swamps, and freshwater streams

comprised the area’s relatively flat interior.

61

CHAPTER V

METHODS

133 Marine Street

Project Background

Between January 2007 and July 2008, three construction projects, each requiring a

separate archaeological investigation, occurred at 133 Marine Street. During November 2007, the

property owners installed a block masonry wall toward the back of the property (BDAC 07-300).

Monitoring the wall foundation trench primarily revealed fill used on the property beginning in

the mid-20th century. Later, the owners constructed a swimming pool toward the rear of the lot

(BDAC 07-0875). The project required between 6 and 12 inches of fill dirt to be added to the

backyard. Pool excavation and construction did not impact 19th century archaeological deposits

and bottles recovered during monitoring dated to the early and mid-20th century. Rubble

appeared throughout various soil zones, which indicated that 133 Marine Street’s backyard, like

that of the adjacent property, 135 Marine Street (BDAC 07-0730), contained fill along the bank

of the Matanzas River. The initial construction project (BDAC 07-1044) on this property, which

required installing new house foundation, yielded the only evidence pertaining to the mission

community of La Punta.

Field Methods

To determine the extent of intact subsurface deposits, Halbirt conducted a shovel test

survey in undeveloped areas of the property. Most of the 13 shovel tests contained material

culture, though the highest density of artifacts, also considered to be associated with La Punta,

appeared in ST 12 and ST 13, which were adjacent to the garage. Construction activities halted

additional archaeological investigation until May 2008. Eighteen 1 m by 1 m units were placed

62

on the property. Halbirt decided to place Test Unit 1 in an area revealed to contain abundant 18th

century ceramics during the posthole survey. Each unit consisted of two basic levels. Level 1

corresponded to recent fill and modern gardening activities. Its contents were tossed. Level 2

consisted of a shallow cultural midden21 dating to the 18th and 19th century. The brown sandy

loam soil was removed until reaching culturally sterile soil and its contents were dry screened

through 1/4” mesh. Features were clearly defined, outlined, mapped, and excavated at the top of

the sterile soil (Level 3). These features related to 18th, 19th, and 20th century occupation and

use of the site.

Generally, the midden encompassed two levels with various features appearing within the

units. Level 2 in Test Unit 2, however, included a relatively square pit that contained a grayish

brown sandy loam with numerous shells and debris in the eastern third of the unit. In contrast,

brown sand comprised the western third of Test Unit 2, Level 2. Despite soil differentiation, the

shallow midden and mixed material culture persisted. Similarly, Test Unit 6, Level 2 showed

signs of disturbance in the east half, while the cultural midden remained intact in the west half.

Mission era features were primarily postholes that likely formed the eastern and southern walls

of a structure. Unit placement aimed to better define the proposed 18th century structure, which

was situated on the dune ridge overlooking Matanzas Bay. Excavation also entailed determining

the variation of artifact types and densities within and outside of the proposed structure.

161 Marine Street Project Background

On August 20, 1996, the City of St. Augustine received an archaeological permit

application (BDAC 95-0633) from the St. Johns County Welfare Federation for 161 Marine

21 The portion of the cultural midden not impacted by recent intrusive activities was between 10 and 15 cm thick. This resulted in a temporally mixed assemblage.

63

Street. The proposed development, the Bayview Nursing and Assisted-Living Facility (BNAF),

would replace the Samantha R. Wilson Nursing Home at 169 Marine Street as well as the

Therapeutic Learning Center at 161 Marine Street. Zone IC, which encompasses the BNAF

project area, likely contained archaeological deposits associated with the 18th century mission

site of La Punta and the Second Spanish period powder house/guard house (1784-1821). Site

specific goals for 161 Marine Street related to “1) historic topography and the corresponding

land-use patterns in the BNAF area; 2) the nature of the native American occupation of the

BNAF area; 3) the effects of a Spanish urban environment on native American culture; 4) the

extent of the powder house debris field within the BNAF area—both the powder house and

associated guard tower are west of the project area; and 5) aspects of military life at the powder

house” (Halbirt 1996:4).

Field Methods

Due to the high probability of archaeological remains in the proposed project area,

Halbirt and volunteers from the St. Augustine Archaeological Association conducted a posthole

survey. Testing for intact archaeological deposits at 161 Marine Street occurred from August 26

through September 27, 1996. Of the 300 postholes excavated, 174 (58%) contained artifacts.

Ceramics comprised the dominant artifact category with native ceramics representing 76.5% of

the materials recovered. The posthole survey yielded 14.6% European ceramics and most

artifacts appeared to associate with La Punta’s occupation. Posthole survey results indicated high

potential for intact subsurface deposits and features, which helped to prioritize areas of

investigation during data recovery (Halbirt 1996).

64

Time constraints, the size of the project area, and the presence of a paved parking lot over

much of the site prompted the use of a backhoe to remove 22 cm of modern overburden. Soil

stratigraphy established during the posthole survey suggests that 7 cm of an asphalt parking lot,

10 cm of fill used during the construction of the Samantha R. Wilson Nursing Home, and 15 cm

of a dark gray sandy loam mixed cultural midden deposit (Level 1) comprised the overburden.

Level 1 contained late 19th and 20th century cultural material. Level 2, a fine rich brown sand

ranging from 10 to 25 cm in thickness, predominantly represents the cultural deposit associated

with the La Punta community.

Phase II data recovery utilized stripping areas in lieu of test units, which were considered

too time intensive and might not yield features related to the mission. Stripping areas totaled five

(SA 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5)22 and ranged in size from 16 to 54 square meters. In total, volunteers

excavated 150 square meters. Each stripping area was then gridded into 2 m by 2 m or 1 m by 1

m test units, numbered sequentially within each Stripping Area, to maintain horizontal control.

Following the overburden removal, each unit was excavated to approximately 50 cm below an

established datum point. Level 2, the cultural midden related to La Punta, was removed in 10 cm

levels according to individual test units within each stripping area for proveniencing purposes.

Volunteers water screened the soil through 1/4” mesh.

Identifying features at the top of and within Level 2 proved difficult; therefore,

excavators removed Level 2 by shovel until they reached culturally sterile sand. Features could

then be clearly defined, outlined, and mapped on a general site map. Each feature received a

unique number, assigned sequentially across the site, and was then bisected, profiled, then

22 Stripping Area 3 only contained evidence of the Second Spanish Period Powder House and is not included on the maps as it is located elsewhere on the property.

65

removed entirely following the feature’s stratigraphy. Features were also water screened through

1/4” or 1/16” mesh. Deposits containing organic material required a float sample. Each distinct

soil deposit received a field specimen number (FS #) that indicated its provenience. Artifacts

were rough sorted in the field based on artifact type (e.g. native ceramics, European ceramics,

bone, metal, glass, or construction material). Generally shell, primarily oyster, was weighed and

discarded in the field.

Laboratory Methods

Cleaning, proveniencing, and processing the artifacts occurred in the City’s archaeology

lab. Trained volunteers analyzed the artifacts, identified attributes that included artifact type,

count, and weight, as well as composition, color, fragment or form, decoration, shape, and

modifiers or comments (Figure 13). Volunteers forwent counts for charcoal, daub, shell, coquina,

tabby, mortar, plaster, brick, rocks/pebbles, rust/iron fragments, and wood, though volunteers

recorded these materials’ weights. Type collections were available for identifying prehistoric and

historic ceramics and faunal material. Ceramics smaller than two cm in size and associated with

native populations were considered aboriginal discards. Though the nomenclature varies,

aboriginal discards refer to sherdlets; therefore, the term sherdlet will be used in place of the

terminology utilized in St. Augustine. Determining vessel count was a priority. Sherds attributed

to the same vessel, or cross-mended, counted as one. Low firing, size, and type of ceramic

created difficulties in assessing the vessel count. Sherd count, therefore, likely differs from the

vessel count; however, the fragmentary nature of the recovered ceramics made this analysis

impractical. Upon completing artifactual analysis, the data was entered into the Florida Museum

66

of Natural History’s Historical Archaeology Database using Microsoft Access. The City of St.

Augustine Archaeology Program curates the recovered assemblages.

FIGURE 13. Completed City of St. Augustine Archaeology Program analysis sheet.

67

CHAPTER VI

RESULTS

Mission Era Features at 133 Marine Street

Investigations at 133 Marine Street occurred during three different phases, beginning in

January 2007 and terminating on July 1, 2008. Only materials recovered from the third stage of

archaeological investigation are included in the present study. The third project related to pool

construction at the rear of the property. Carl Halbirt, St. Augustine’s City Archaeologist,

monitored the site during the construction period and, upon building completion, subsequently

returned to the property in order to resume investigation of the area containing a high quantity of

colonial era materials. In total, the project required 18 test units, all 1 m by 1 m in size, yielded

33 features—25 of which pertain to La Punta’s occupation—and produced over 1,700 artifacts

(Figure 14). Excavation yielded the remains of a post-in-ground structure with one definite room

with a potential ephemeral attachment or second room. Additionally, probable 19th century

features—postholes associated property lines or animal enclosures, features related agricultural

activities (e.g. planting or removing vegetation), and a ditch potentially paralleling one of the

property lines—contained considerable amounts of trash.

In general, two basic levels comprised the units. Level 1, a compacted organic humus

with wood shavings, corresponded to recent fill and was tossed. Level 2 contained a shallow

historic midden with intermixed materials that dated to the 18th and 19th centuries. Brownish

gray to brown sandy loam with shell, ranging from 9 to 17 cm in thickness, comprised the

cultural midden (Level 2).23 Of the 25 features associated with La Punta’s occupation, 17

23 Test Unit 1 and 8 each contained three levels due to the relatively deep midden deposits within these units.

68

FIGURE 14. 133 Marine Street site map with only the features related to La Punta included.

69

(Feature 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 11a, 11b, 14, 14a, 17, 24a, and 25) are postholes; 5 (Feature

5, 8, 10, 14, and 25) of the postholes contained discernible postmolds. Feature 25 represents the

sole postmold that does not pertain to the structure. Location and materials recovered within the

miscellaneous features (9a, 12, 12 North Half, 20a, and 20b) suggest a relationship to the mission

community of La Punta (Figure 15) and offer an opportunity to consider creolization at La Punta.

Rectangular Structure

Archaeological investigations of Yamasee sites in South Carolina indicate that circular

structures represent the standard residential shape (Sweeney 2005; 2009); however, twelve

features (3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 11a, 11b, 14, and 14a) bound a possible rectangular, two-room,

structure at least 6 m long (north-south) and 2.5 m wide (east-west).24 The northern structure,

defined by the eastern wall running approximately 4 m (north-south) and the southern wall

spanning 2.5 m (east-west), includes two series of postholes comprising an entryway (Figure

16).25 Feature 11, 11a, and 11b—all postholes—represent the southern portion of the entrance’s

architectural support; Feature 14 and 14a serve as the northern end of the entry’s foundation.

Gray sandy loam comprised the posthole in Feature 7, 9, and 11b with a dark gray sandy loam

present in Feature 11, 11a, and 14a. Feature 3 consisted of a grayish brown sandy loam while

Feature 4 contained a dark brownish gray sandy loam.

Postholes with postmolds related to the structure also possessed varied soil characteristics

(Table 4). Based upon the features discovered, no distinguishable pattern of post placement can

be determined, nor is it possible to predict where additional post features might occur by using

measured distances between known features. Similarly, posthole diameters differed, ranging

24 Feature 7 is associated with an irregularly shaped depression; therefore, it is tenuously labeled a posthole. 25 As stated earlier, time constraints limited further excavations at 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street. Determining the extent of architectural features, as well as the structure’s shapes, would have been a focus of continued investigations.

70

FIGURE 15. Feature types associated with La Punta at 133 Marine Street.

71

FIGURE 16. Proposed mission era structures at 133 Marine Street.

72

TABLE 4 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS OF POSTHOLES AND POSTMOLDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE STRUCTURE Soil Characteristics Feature Number Post Hole Post Mold Comments 5 Dark brown to brown

sand with some shell Beige sand with little shell

8

Mottled sand with some shell

Dark gray sand with shell

10

Beige to light gray sand

Dark gray sandy loam

Intrusive mole burrow along the west edge

14

Brown-yellow mottled sand

Dark brown sand with heavy charcoal concentrations and some bone

from 20 to 30 cm, and extended between 5 and 30 cm in depth (Table 5). Evidence of post

erection falls into four categories: shallow deposit remains with additional materials likely

included in the general midden above (Feature 3 and 4); post slid into pit with tapered walls

(Feature 5 and 8); vertical post with straight walls and no evidence of sliding in the pit (Feature

9); and posts with sloping walls and tapered bases that were probably slid into their respective

pits (Feature 10, 11, 11a, 11b, 14, 14a).

TABLE 5 POSTHOLE CHARACTERISTICS Shape Feature Number Diameter (cm) Depth (cm) Plan View Profile Comments 3 24 x 20 5 Ovoid Saucer 4 24 x 22 5 Ovoid Saucer 7 28 18 V-shaped 9 24 19 Circular U-shaped 11 12 19 Circular U-shaped 11a 15 16 Circular U-shaped 11b 18 30 Circular U-shaped 14a 30 Circular Shovel test intrusion

73

Feature 5, 8, and 9, all definite postholes, confirmed a corner of the structure. From

Feature 9, Feature 3 and 4 extend to the south and could represent an additional ephemeral

structure adjacent to the primary structure. Ceramic evidence suggests that the structure dates to

the early 1700s and may associate with one of the La Punta farmsteads. Minimal English pottery

(e.g. Slipware and Delft) common to the La Punta mission community was recovered from this

area of the property; however, Native American pottery is abundant and other European ceramics

are also common within the recovered assemblage. Presumably within the interior of the

structure, Test Unit 16 possessed less shell and cultural material than test units straddling

postholes. The high quantities of shell present in test units with postholes could represent tabby

walls supported by in-ground posts while the interior, comparatively devoid of artifacts, could

demonstrate activities occurring along the walls of the structure. Test Unit 9 was placed east of

the proposed wall alignment for both structures, while Test Unit 10, 11, and 12 were placed

within the primary structure’s interior (west of the proposed wall alignment). While Test Unit 10

produced one potential posthole, the other features appeared to be trash pits (Test Unit 6 and 12,

and possibly Test Unit 7) or miscellaneous pits (Test Unit 10). These non-posthole features

occurred within the interior part of the secondary structure.

Other Post Holes

Three additional post-related features appeared in Level 3 of Test Unit 13 and Test Unit

18 (Figure 15). Two of the features—17 and 24a—are postholes while Feature 24 is a later pit

that intrudes into Feature 24a. Measuring 24 cm by 27 cm in diameter, Feature 17 contained a

gray sandy loam with charcoal specks. The posthole began at 33 cmbd and continued for 47 cm

in three distinct deposits. Mottled brown-yellow sand occurred beneath approximately 12 cm of

redeposited sterile soil, which appeared below mottled brown-yellow sand. In profile, the

74

posthole walls appear slightly tapered with a flat base. Feature 17 abuts a trench that relates to

later activities, is similar in depth and cross-section to Feature 15 (a modern posthole), and

occurs within the interior of the proposed primary structure; therefore, it is likely that the

posthole also postdates the mission era structure. Gray brown sandy loam extending from 33 to

47 cmbd comprised Feature 24, the intrusive pit. The intrusive pit truncated approximately the

eastern two thirds of the first 13 cm in Feature 24a. Feature 24a contained mottled brown-gray

sandy loam and reached from 33 to 62 cmbd. Though the upper eastern portion of the posthole

profile is missing, Feature 24a has a sloping western wall and a curved base. Excavators decided

to combine the artifacts, but noted that the majority of the material culture derived from Feature

24—the intrusive pit—rather than the posthole. Consistent with other areas of the site, the

features contained materials from the 18th and the 19th century.

Disturbances within the midden probably reduced visible evidence of two additional

postholes—Feature 2 and 6. Both postholes appeared similar to other shallow postholes (i.e.

Feature 3 and 4) excavated throughout the site. Intensive root disturbances, paired with its

proximity to an existing concrete slab, made defining Feature 2 difficult. The circular feature, a

brown mottled sand with numerous roots, was noted more readily in plan view than in profile.

Feature 2 measured 24 cm in diameter, and due to the feature’s upper deposits’ probable

presence in the general midden, measured 6 cm in depth. Comparably, Feature 6 deposits likely

started higher in the midden. Circular in plan view and saucer-shaped in profile, the feature

spanned 14 cm in diameter and reached from 33 to 40 cmbd. Materials recovered were minimal,

disturbed, and temporally mixed.

Finally, the depth and diameter of Feature 20a and 20b indicate that they may be

postholes. Feature 20a extends 36 cmbd (33-69 cmbd) and measured 32 cm in diameter. The

75

possible posthole contained a grayish brown sandy loam and intruded into the southern portion

of Feature 20b (6 cm at the top of both features). Comprised of brown sandy loam, Feature 20b

emerged 34 cmbd and remained until 55 cmbd. Though the material culture present within both

features was mixed, the assemblage contained greater amounts of later artifacts, such as glass

and nails. Both features also included bone.

Miscellaneous Pits

Of the five miscellaneous pit features (Figure 15) potentially associated with La Punta’s

mission community, three (Feature 9a, 12, and 12 North Half) occur in spaces that likely pertain

to either the primary and/or secondary structure. Adjacent to Feature 7 and 9, Feature 9a was an

oblong stain that spanned 50 by 30 cm with depths varying between 42 cmbd in the northern

portion and 55 cmbd within the southern area. Feature 9a appeared along the southern wall of the

primary structure and contained a dark gray to brownish gray sandy loam with some shell.26

Feature 14, a postmold with two postholes, separated Feature 12 and 12 North Half, which

formed a rectangular trash pit adjacent to the entryway of the primary structure. A gray to dark

gray sandy loam with abundant charcoal—a soil type similar to Feature 12—comprised the

North Half of Feature 12. A small, intrusive pit—probably from a 1979 auger hole survey—

disturbed the northern portion of Feature 12 North Half. The pit measured 1 m by 52 cm, was

saucer-shaped in profile, and lacked the depth of Feature 12. The North Half spanned from 32 to

45 cmbd and intruded into Feature 14. Evidence of intrusion may suggest abandonment activity

associated with the structure. Soil characteristics of Feature 12 correspond to the North Half,

though the southern portion contained more shell debris. Feature 12 measured 75 cm long by 50

cm wide and reached 26 cm in depth (21-47 cmbd). Sloping sides and an uneven base defined its

26 Feature 9a may be situated within or outside of the secondary structure. Excavated areas did not provide sufficient evidence to establish the second structure’s perimeter.

76

profile. As with the North Half, Feature 12 occurred above a small portion of Feature 14, which

may offer evidence of post abandonment activities.

The purpose of Feature 16 remains more ambiguous. Originally considered a posthole,

Feature 16 measured 37 cm in diameter and first appeared 35 cmbd. Comprised of gray sandy

loam with very little charcoal, the feature terminated at 53 cmbd and contained between 1.5 and

4 cm of disturbed soil at its base. Immediately north, Feature 16a impacted Feature 16. Concrete

intrusions from underneath the rear of the garage appeared 35 cmbd and continued until 63

cmbd. Feature 16a extended 12 cm east of the concrete pad and, in plan view, disturbed the

northern 7 cm of Feature 16.

Categorizing the Assemblages for Analysis

Following the precedent of White (2002) and Boyer (2005), the assemblages recovered

from 133 and 161 Marine Street are arranged into categories as follows: Activities, Architecture,

Arms, Clothing, Furniture, Personal, and Tobacco. The Kitchen category includes four sub-

groupings: Aboriginal Ceramics, European Tablewares, European Utilitarian Wares, and Non-

Ceramics. These classifications stem from Stanley South’s (1977) functional groups which

Kathleen Deagan (1983) later modified. Criticisms regarding South’s pattern methodology

(Orser 1989), however accurate, are irrelevant in the current context. An object’s function is

dynamic. Its use and role can change through time and vary by individual. The various patterns

and artifactual indicators proposed by South may limit analysis to a functional, synchronic

framework; however, utilizing the aforementioned set of categories serves as the means to

discuss the assemblages rather than to establish a Yamasee-specific pattern.

Information input into the artifact database is included in Appendix B (133 Marine

Street) and Appendix C (161 Marine Street). Appendix A includes artifact codes as listed in the

77

database as well as the codes’ corresponding artifact description. The codes are listed

alphabetically within their corresponding category. Ceramics appear within the Kitchen

classification, but are then separated according to the four sub-groups. Faunal remains are

included as a distinct group and will be the final analysis component. Forthcoming discussions

regarding the material culture of both sites includes only the data related to the La Punta mission

community.27

Material Culture at 133 Marine Street

Level 2, as well as Level 3 in Test Unit 1 and 8, contained the greatest concentration of

materials associated with La Punta. Although present in the same cultural midden, 18th and 19th

century artifacts are not relevant to this analysis. Intrusive materials, however, complicate

portions of the discussion. Determining whether faunal remains and architectural materials relate

to the mission community or to a later occupation becomes more difficult. Additionally, artifacts

used throughout the 18th century (e.g. furniture tacks) may relate to the mission or to a later

period. Generally, these objects are included within the mission assemblage. Possibly dating

discrepancies are noted. Moreover, artifacts within features fail to further elucidate feature

function or provide possible temporal clarification of the material culture. Nevertheless, based on

depth, materials, and relationships to one another, the features mentioned above appear to

associate with La Punta. As with 161 Marine Street, the artifactual assemblage of 133 Marine

Street that pertains to the mission contains multi-ethnic materials made, traded for, or purchased

by the natives and Europeans, specifically, the English, Spanish, and French. Two thousand five

hundred and forty-nine artifacts, separated into the eight groups modeled after South (1977), are

present within the recovered assemblage from 133 Marine Street (Table 6 and Table 7).

27 Artifacts that may associate with La Punta, but may also post-date the mission, will be included in the analysis. Ambiguity will be noted.

78

Activities

Modified whelk shells (n=7) comprise the largest Activities category (Table 8).

Excavation produced four columella, two tools, and two possible tools. These objects, paired

with the four—possibly five—lead weights, one chert nodule, three utilized flakes, and two chert

fragments indicate that the mission population met their dietary needs partially through

traditionally native methods. Whelks served as bowls, hammers, or axes while lithic materials

enabled mission occupants to produce projectile point/knives and lead weights facilitated net

TABLE 6 ARTIFACT GROUPS AND TOTAL COUNTS, 133 MARINE STREET Artifact Group Count Percent of Total Assemblage Activity 20 0.78% Architecture* 1096 43.01% Arms 52 2.04% Clothing 17 0.67% Furniture 19 0.75% Kitchen 1311 51.45% Personal 2 0.00% Tobacco 28 1.10% Total 2548 99.80% *When adjusted (see Table 7) to exclude unidentified construction materials, metal objects, metal fragments, and nails, the Architecture group contains 125 objects.

TABLE 7 ARTIFACT GROUPS AND ADJUSTED TOTAL COUNTS, 133 MARINE STREET Artifact Group Count Percent of Total Assemblage Activity 20 1.27% Architecture 125 7.93% Arms 52 3.30% Clothing 17 1.08% Furniture 19 1.20% Kitchen 1311 83.13% Personal 2 0.13% Tobacco 28 1.78% Total 1577 99.82%

79

TABLE 8 ACTIVITIES GROUP ARTIFACTS, 133 M ARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Activities Group Shell tools 8 36.84% Chert 6 31.58% Lead weights 4 21.05% Possible lead weight 1 5.26% Slag 1 5.26% Total 20 99.99% fishing in the estuaries surrounding the site. One slag fragment tentatively implies metallurgical

activity within the site, though not immediately within the area investigated. Forty-nine coal

fragments (240.8 g) and thirty-eight proveniences containing 68.4 g of charcoal may suggest

activities related to fire, such as cooking; however, the evidence is sparse. These materials were

not concentrated in a feature (e.g. fire pit) and there is no direct evidence that the coal or the

charcoal associates with the mission. The materials could occur as the result of a natural process

(e.g. fire), a cultural phenomenon (e.g. fire), or may relate to later uses of the land.

Architecture

Differentiating between construction resources utilized by those residing at La Punta and

refuse associated with the 19th and 20th centuries proves difficult. Comparing the largest

quantities of architectural materials recovered from 161 Marine Street—coquina, daub, brick,

tabby, mortar, and plaster—133 Marine Street demonstrates significantly smaller quantities of

each material (Table 9). It is possible, however, that a Second Spanish Period powder magazine

inflates the Architecture counts for 161 Marine Street. According to weight, coquina, daub, and

tabby occurred most frequently at 161 Marine Street and, therefore, are more likely to be related

to La Punta occupation (Table 10). Areas investigated at 133 Marine Street yielded no mortar or

plaster, though 29 unidentified construction materials were present. Forty-two bricks, 3

80

TABLE 9 ARCHITECTURE GROUP ARTIFACTS, 133 MARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Architecture Group UID Nail 629 57.34% Metal objects 147 13.40% UID Metal 74 6.75% Iron fragments 71 6.47% Brick 45 4.10% UID Construction materials 29 2.64% Daub 20 1.82% UID Iron 22 2.01% Wrought nail 22 2.01% Coquina 11 1.00% Tabby 11 1.00% Clinched nail 8 0.73% Slate 3 0.27% Bolt 2 0.18% Spike 1 0.00% Tassel holder 1 0.00% Lead object 1 0.00% Total 1096 99.72% TABLE 10 ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS WEIGHT COMPARISONS, 133 MARINE STREET AND 161 MARINE STREET

133 Marine Street 161 Marine Street Artifact Description Weight (g) Artifact Description Weight (g) Coquina 113.8 Coquina 2569.8 Daub 37.7 Daub > 2500.0 Brick 239.5 Brick 236.1 Tabby 69.6 Tabby 58.5 Mortar — Mortar 22.9 Plaster — Plaster 12.2 Total 460.6 Total > 5399.5 burnished bricks, 13 daub, 9 burnt daub, 11 tabby, and 11 coquina fragments represent building

materials. The 45 bricks may relate to divergent architectural methods for the structure, which

appears to be rectangular rather than circular, within this area of the mission (see Interpretation

and Discussion). Similarly, the bricks could represent intrusive elements related to later land use.

81

Additional architectural elements provide minimal insight into temporal or spatial

associations at 133 Marine Street. Soil acidity often produced highly oxidized metal objects and

nails. Although 1,097 originally comprised the Architecture group, Table 11 illustrates adjusted

counts and percentages of identifiable architectural materials. Six hundred and twenty nine

unidentified nails, 148 metal objects, 74 unidentified metal, 71 iron fragments, and 22

unidentified iron were removed from data analysis. The total number of nails (n=659) at 133

Marine Street, like 166 Marine Street, may suggest their use in mission architecture. Remaining

metal objects do not necessarily pertain to the mission settlement; however, the broad dates of

some materials include the period of mission occupation. One spike, one tassel holder, two bolts,

and three slate fragments formed part of the assemblage, though no conclusive evidence suggests

relationship to the mission. Wrought nails date to the 17th century and throughout most of the

18th century. Twenty-two wrought nails, one with a rose head, nails represent the identifiable

nails produced during the mission era. Eight clinched nails may also correspond with the

mission, though cut nails (ca. 1790-1900) were also clinched in order to secure the bond between

architectural materials.

TABLE 11 ADJUSTED ARCHITECTURE GROUPS AND COUNTS, 133 MARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Architecture Group Brick 45 36.29% Wrought nail 22 17.74% Daub 20 16.13% Coquina 11 8.87% Tabby 11 8.87% Clinched nail 8 6.45% Slate 3 2.42% Bolt 2 1.61% Tassel Holder 1 0.81% Spike 1 0.81% Total 124 100.00%

82

Arms

With guns, the Yamasee and Apalachee residing at La Punta could, if necessary, better

defend colonial St. Augustine and hunt small and large game with expediency. Table 12 displays

recovered materials culture that relates to guns—1 lead sprue, 3 gunflints, 8 musket balls, 40 lead

shot. These objects suggests the people of La Punta utilized these technologies, though whether

the Yamasee brought weapons acquired in South Carolina with them or whether Spanish St.

TABLE 12 ARMS GROUP ARTIFACTS, 133 MARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Arms Group Lead shot 48 88.89% Gunflint 3 5.56% Sabre tip 1 1.85% Knife handle 1 1.85% Lead sprue 1 1.85% Total 54 100.00% Augustine supplied arms to the mission community is unclear. One cross hatched bone knife

handle and one sabre tip indicate other probable forms of personal armament among the mission

natives. Cutlery could account for the bone handle. Hume (1969:178), however, describes the

popularity of curved blade knives throughout the 18th century and of late 18th century knives

frequently made with bone handles. Furthermore, the blade handle could be of native

manufacture or modification (e.g. decoration on a plain handle).

Clothing

Objects comprising the Clothing group are sparse, are not indicative of a particular time

period, and reveal minimal information concerning cultural preferences and practices (Table 13).

The poor preservation of clothing materials manufactured and worn by natives and Europeans

compounds this problem. One brass thimble may suggest that clothing manufacture and/or repair

83

occurred at the mission, though these objects appeared often as modified “tinklers,” which

adorned clothing. “No appreciable difference” exists between thimbles produced during the 18th

and 19th centuries (Hume 1969:255), though Deagan (1987b:204) describes broad, yet

distinctive phases of manufacture. Paired with its provenance—the general cultural midden of

Test Unit 17—the available evidence cannot confirm whether the mission inhabitants used the

thimble. If associated with La Punta, two brass garment hooks served as means to hang clothes.

TABLE 13 CLOTHING GROUP ARTIFACTS, 133 MARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Clothing Group Button 6 35.29% Cufflinks 4 23.53% Buckle 4 23.53% Garment hook 2 11.76% Hook and eye 1 5.88% Thimble 1 5.88% Total 17 105.87% One metal hook and eye, used to fasten clothing, was recovered. Excavation yielded two brass

buckle fragments, one iron buckle fragment, and a fourth metal buckle fragment. Buckles,

however, “fall into two broad categories, dress and harness, and neither is closely dateable”

(Hume 1969:84).

Two of the cufflinks, also called sleeve buttons, form a set; the other two fastener objects

are brass shanks. According to Deagan (1987b:173), “after the middle of the eighteenth century,

metal sleeve links become more common.” Six buttons comprise the largest percentage of the

Clothing group. Button types include: one two hole wood, one five hole wood, one bone, one

four hole shell, one brass shank, and one brass face with no shank. By the 18th century, few

button types were exclusively Spanish; instead, varieties extended to British and French sites as

well. Wooden buttons of the 18th century tended to be flat, plain, one hole disks and were

84

imported and manufactured locally (Deagan 1987b:165). Similarly, individuals frequently

produced utilitarian wood buttons at home throughout the 17th and 18th centuries. The drilled

holes permitted attaching the bone buttons to various garment types (Marcel 1994:2). Mother-of-

Pearl buttons occurred between approximately 1750 until the end of the colonial period (Deagan

1987b:172). “Hollow-cast” brass buttons, often with embossing, reached their popularity during

the first half of the 18th century as “flat copper-alloy disks predominated in the second” (Hume

1969:89-90).

Furniture

Of the 19 artifacts comprising the Furniture group, brass tacks represent the greatest

quantity (Table 14). Used as a technique for anchoring, brass tacks appeared on the back of

chairs during the mid-17th century and secured the exterior leather of coaches and sedans during

the 18th century (Hume 1969:227-228). Two escutcheon fragments could relate to guns, locks

plates, drawer handle plates, clocks, or other types of furniture ornamentation. One drawer pull

and a cog/gear are also included in the assemblage, though no specific time periods or conclusive

associations can be noted.

TABLE 14 FURNITURE GROUP ARTIFACTS, 133 MARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Furniture Group Tack 15 78.95% Escutcheon 2 10.53% Drawer Pull 1 5.26% Cog/Gear 1 5.26% Total 19 100.0% Kitchen

Kitchen artifacts recovered from 133 Marine Street adhere to the expected composition of

an 18th century archaeological site: the Kitchen group comprises the largest percentage (51.47%)

85

of the assemblage. Within the four Kitchen sub-groups (Aboriginal Ceramics, European

Tablewares, European Utilitarian Wares, and Non-Ceramics), aboriginal pottery represents the

most abundant ceramic categorization (23.64%). Glassware and Bottles comprise the largest sub-

group, though the number may be inflated. There is insufficient diagnostic information (e.g.

mold seams, makers’ mark, lip application) to determine chronology among most of the glass

shards and bottles. Table 15 demonstrates the distribution of artifacts within the Kitchen group

and further splits the four sub-groups into seven groupings: Aboriginal Ceramics, Hispanic

Tablewares, Non-Hispanic Tablewares, Hispanic Utilitarian Wares, Non-Hispanic Utilitarian

Wares, Glassware and Bottles, Metal Cooking Vessels.

TABLE 15 KITCHEN GROUP ARTIFACTS, 133 MARINE STREET Artifact Sub-Group Count Percent of Kitchen Group Aboriginal Ceramics 310 23.64% Hispanic Tablewares 93 7.09% Non-Hispanic Tablewares 41 3.13% Hispanic Utilitarian Wares 25 1.91% Non-Hispanic Utilitarian Wares* 19 1.45% Glassware and Bottles 823 62.78% Total 1311 100.0% *Indeterminate coarse earthenwares (n=65) are not included in the Hispanic or the non-Hispanic sub-group count.

ABORIGINAL CERAMICS

Probably produced for personal use or as goods to sell in colonial St. Augustine,

aboriginal ceramics comprise the largest Kitchen sub-group.28 During analysis, aboriginal sherds

smaller than 2 cm qualified as sherdlets. Sherdlets (n=1,740) comprised the largest portion of the

Aboriginal Ceramics group; however, they are excluded from this discussion. Surface treatment

descriptions adhered to traditional classifications: plain, incised, punctated, impressed, stamped

(check, simple, complicated, rectilinear, curvilinear), burnished, and red film. Eroded ceramics

28 No evidence suggests that another native population contemporaneous to the Yamasee occupied the site.

86

demonstrate poorly executed stamping. Red filmed sherds appear commonly within Yamasee

and mission sites in Florida (Sweeney and Poplin [2015]) and were recorded as Mission Red

Film regardless of their temper.

Of the 23 aboriginal ceramic types present at 133 Marine Street (Table 16), San Marcos,

sherds, including Plain, Stamped, Punctated and Indeterminate, represent the largest group

(Table 17). Coarse sand, limestone, and/or shell tempering distinguish San Marcos from other

TABLE 16 ABORIGINAL CERAMICS BY SUB-GROUP, 133 MARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Aboriginal Ceramics Group San Marcos 223 71.94% Non-local aboriginal 18 5.81% Sand Tempered 17 5.48% St. Johns 25 8.06% Sand Tempered Plain 15 4.84% Colonoware 5 1.61% UID Aboriginal 2 0.65% Miller Plain 1 0.32% San Pedro 1 0.32% Grog Tempered 1 0.32% Mission Red Filmed 2 0.65% Total 310 100.0% TABLE 17 ABORIGINAL CERAMIC COUNTS AND TYPES, 133 MARINE STREET Aboriginal Ceramic Type Count San Marcos 204 San Marcos Decorated 192 Rectilinear Stamped 86 Check Stamped 47 Complicated Stamped 27 Simple Stamped 14 Curvilinear Stamped 10 Punctated 1 San Marcos Indeterminate 185 San Marcos Plain 26 St. Johns 25

87

TABLE 17 (continued) ABORIGINAL CERAMIC COUNTS AND TYPES, 133 MARINE STREET Aboriginal Ceramic Type Count

Plain 17 UID 6 Check Stamped 1 Incised 1 Sand Tempered 17 Sand Tempered Plain 15 Sand Tempered Eroded 2 Non-local Aboriginal 18 Colonoware 5 Mission Red Filmed Plain 2 UID Aboriginal 2 San Pedro Plain 1 Miller Plain 1 Grog Tempered Plain 1 Total 310 ceramic types (Otto and Lewis 1975), though the classification varies by region.29 Other

identifications include Altamaha, Sutherland Bluff, and King George (White 2002:73-75).

Whether differences between these types exist is debatable (Sweeney 2009). Saunders (2000)

considers these types to relate to—and presumably to be produced by—the Yamasee and Guale.

Worth (1997:15-17; 2009b:192-207) argues that all coastal groups north of colonial St.

Augustine including the Mocama, produced San Marcos by the late 17th and early 18th century.

Rectilinear stamped (n=86) is the most abundant surface treatment on San Marcos

ceramics. The assemblage includes three rounded rims and two shell tempered beveled rims. One

sherd included shell tempering, one included grog and shell tempering, and four sherds exhibited

grog tempering. Other San Marcos Decorated design applications include 47 check stamped,

29 Volunteers from the Florida Anthropological Society chapter, the St. Augustine Archaeological Association, in cooperation with the City of St. Augustine’s archaeology program, completed the analysis. Their process for determining ceramic types aligns with those presented in Otto and Lewis’ 1975 publication.

88

with 1 shell and grit tempered rounded rim, 1 grog tempered, 2 shell tempered, and 5 sand and

grit tempered; 27 complicated stamped with 3 rims—1 rolled, 1 straight, and 1 unspecified—and

one shell tempered sherd; 10 curvilinear, 2 of which are flat rims; 14 simple stamped with 1

flared and 1 inverted rolled rim; and 1 punctated. One hundred and eighty five surface treatments

were indeterminate, though the category included four rounded rims—one of which contained

shell, one beveled, one rounded rim with a trace of Mission Red Filmed, and one flat rim.

Temper variants include nine grog, six shell, and two grit. San Marcos Plain contains four sand

and shell tempered, three grog tempered, and one shell tempered.

St. Johns sherds comprise the second most abundant ceramic type recovered from 133

Marine Street. Surface treatment types and sherd quantities include 17 plain, 6 unidentified, 1

medium check stamped rim, and 1 cob impressed. St. Johns Plain includes one sand tempered

check stamped and one rounded rim. San Marcos increasingly replaced St. Johns popularity

during the 17th century. By the 18th century, San Marcos represented the only locally produced

utilitarian pottery type (Merritt 1983:134). It is unlikely that the St. Johns pottery relates to the

mission community; instead, these materials suggest an earlier, limited use of the area. One grog

and sand tempered San Pedro Plain sherd also represents probable use of the site before the La

Punta developed.

With 17 sherds, Sand Tempered Plain represents the third largest aboriginal ceramic

category. Vessel forms and surface treatments include two unidentified rims, one rounded rim,

one medium check stamped rim, one medium check stamped, and two eroded. 133 Marine Street

contained five Colonoware (Deagan 1987a:103-104) sherds, which is a pottery description

assigned to vessels created locally, with characteristics common to European wares, and found in

both Spanish and native households. Archaeologists investigating sites in South Carolina tended

89

to associate this ceramic type with African slaves (Ferguson 1992), whereas colonoware

recovered from sites in La Florida appears to relate to native production for Spanish purchase

(Melcher 2011). Colonoware vessels helped supplement the often irregular delivery of supplies

to St. Augustine and served as an alternative to other European, primarily the English, ceramic

goods. Temper, surface treatment, and vessel form noted for the Colonoware fragments include

one sand and grog tempered check stamped, one check stamped, one unidentified stamped, one

curved rim, and one base. Two Mission Red Filmed, two unidentifiable aboriginal, one Grog

Tempered Plain, one Miller Plain, and eighteen non-local aboriginal sherds complete the group.

Non-local pottery included 11 sand tempered plain, 2 of which are rims, 4 sand tempered simple

stamped, 1 sand tempered check stamped, and one unidentified type. The non-local ceramic

category primarily refers to pottery types that do not fit recognizable criteria (i.e. temper, surface

treatment, or shape) that distinguish common Native American pottery types found in the St.

Augustine area (e.g. St. Johns, San Marcos, Altamaha, and San Pedro). Nonlocal types are

generally associated with pottery types that originate in the western or southern portions of the

Florida peninsula.

EUROPEAN TABLEWARES

Tableware types recovered from 133 Marine Street include Spanish majolica, English

delftware, porcelain, Astbury, slipware, stoneware, as well as Oriental porcelain (Table 18).

Spanish tablewares (n=93) occur most frequently. Twenty-nine San Luis Polychrome, which

contains 3 beveled, 1 straight, and 6 unidentified rims, 14 Puebla Blue on White, including 2

beveled rims, 1 excurvate, and 2 unidentified rim types, 6 Puebla Polychrome, 1 Mexican Red

Painted, and 43 unidentified majolica, which contained 2 straight rims, 4 unidentified rims, and 1

handle, comprise the sub-group. Puebla Blue on White pottery represents the “most abundant,

90

widespread, and frequently encountered of the eighteenth-century Puebla majolicas” (Deagan

1987a:83). Its production spans roughly between 1700 and 1850. Significant quantities of Puebla

Polychrome appear in St. Augustine from approximately 1650 to 1725. The date range for San

Luis Polychrome ranges from 1650 to 1750.

English ceramic types and quantities include Slipware (n=3), Delft (n=15), English

Porcelain, including two rims, (n=6), Astbury (n=2), and Elers-type stoneware (n=1). The

Slipware category includes one handle frag and two American Slipware crimped rims. Form was

also determined for the Elers sherd, which is a molded bowl shoulder. Five Chinese Porcelain

TABLE 18 EUROPEAN TABLEWARE TYPES AND COUNTS, 133 MARINE STREET

and nine unidentified Porcelain sherds were also present.30 One beveled rim and one unidentified

rim type comprise the generic Chinese Porcelain classification. Two overglazed porcelain sherds

30 The unidentified porcelain sherd count is included as part of the Oriental Tablewares sub-group in Table 17.

Artifact Description Count Percent of European Tableware Group Spanish Tablewares UID Majolica 43 32.09% San Luis Polychrome 29 21.64% Puebla Blue on White 14 10.45% Puebla Polychrome 6 4.48% Mexican Red Painted 1 0.75% English Tablewares Delftware 15 11.19% English Porcelain 6 4.48% Astbury 2 1.49% American Red Slipware 2 1.49% Elers-type Stoneware 1 0.75% Slipware 1 0.75% Oriental Tablewares UID Porcelain 9 6.71% Over-glazed Porcelain 2 1.49% Chinese Porcelain 2 1.49% Powder Blue Porcelain 1 0.75% Total 134 100.0%

91

and one Powder Blue sherd were also recovered. The assemblage also contains nine unidentified

porcelain sherds, including one rim, one footring, and one with a molded decoration.

EUROPEAN UTILITARIAN WARES

Vessels utilized for storage, transportation, cooking, and washing comprise the Utilitarian

Wares sub-group (Table 19). Spanish types recovered from 133 Marine Street include 11

Unglazed Olive Jar, 2 Glazed Olive Jar, 7 black lead glazed coarse earthenware, 1 blue lead

glazed coarse, 3 interior glazed, 5 unidentified glazed and 10 unglazed coarse earthenware, 1

striped, 1 with a burnished exterior, 1 reworked, and 44 unidentified coarse earthenware, as well

as four El Morro fragments. Spanish utilitarian wares (n=25) are the most abundant sub-group.

TABLE 19 EUROPEAN UTILITARIAN WARE TYPES AND COUNTS, 133 MARINE STREET

Artifact Description Count Percent of European Utilitarian Wares Group

Spanish Utilitarian Wares Oliver Jar 11 10.09% Black Lead Glazed

Coarse Earthenware 7 6.42%

El Morro 4 3.67% Glazed Olive Jar 2 1.83% Blue Lead Glazed

Coarse Earthenware 1 0.91%

Other European Utilitarian Wares

Stoneware English Redware

9 1

8.26% 0.91%

Unidentified Utilitarian UID Coarse Earthenware 60 55.05% Redware 6 5.50% Unidentified Utilitarian UID Glazed Coarse

Earthenware 5 4.59%

Glazed Redware 3 2.75% Total 109 99.98%

English ceramic types present at 133 Marine Street include nine Stoneware and one English

Redware sherd. Stoneware vessel decorations and forms include one rolled Mocha rim, one

92

Royal rim, one lid, one fragment with floral décor, and one sherd with blue and yellow flowers.

10 Redware sherds, 3 of which are glazed and 1 of which is a glazed straight rim, complete the

Utilitarian Ware sub-group.

NON-CERAMIC

The assemblage contains a variety of glass vessels utilized for storage and as a means to

serve beverages, food, and medicine. With 823 shards, glass represents the largest Kitchen

group. Five hundred and fifty eight (67.8%) of the glass recovered offered no information other

than color. Glass colors provide no diagnostic information, though with an identifiable form (e.g.

bottle, tumbler) the color may refine dating. Furthermore, determining glass colors varies based

upon who completes the analysis, thereby potentially conflating quantities. Table 20 exhibits the

TABLE 20 GLASS COLOR, COUNT, AND FORM, 133 MARINE STREET Glass Color Count Form Percent of Glass Sub-Group Window 206 Window 25.03% UID 183 18 bottle glass

3 kick-ups 4 lips

22.24%

Clear 174 1 melted 2 bottle necks 2 bases 2 rims 6 bottle glass

21.14%

Green 111 11 possible window 2 bottle glass 2 lips

13.49%

Light green 68 8.26% Olive green 27 3.28% Amber 24 2.92% White 9 2 bottle glass 1.09% Black 5 1 flat

1 kick-up 0.61%

Dark olive green 4 0.49% Yellow 3 0.36%

93

TABLE 20 (continued) GLASS COLOR, COUNT, AND FORM, 133 MARINE STREET Glass Color Count Form Percent of Glass Sub-Group

Brown 3 1 bottle lip and neck

0.36%

Cobalt blue 3 0.36% Blue 3 1 medicine bottle 0.36% Yellow-green 2 0.24% Light amber 1 0.12% Dark amber 1 0.12% Light olive green 1 0.12% Green-blue 1 0.12% Total 823 100.71% variety of glass colors at 133 Marine Street and notes vessel forms when applicable. The glass

assemblage recovered from 161 Marine Street also demonstrates color and form variety. Colors

and quantities present at 133 Marine Street include 206 window glass, 183 unidentified—

generally heavily patinated—174 clear, 111 green, 68 light green, 27 olive green, 24 amber, 9

white, 5 black, 4 dark olive green, 3 yellow, 3 brown, 3 cobalt blue, 3 blue, 2 yellow-green, 1

light amber, 1 dark amber, 1 light olive green, and 1 green-blue.

Including the 206, and the 11 possible, window glass fragments, identifiable glass forms

account for 33.41% of the glass group. When excluding window glass, identifiable glass forms

represent 7.05% of the total glass assemblage (Table 20). Glass colors attributed to bottles

include 25 heavily patinated, which likely corresponds with olive green glass, 12 clear, 4 green,

2 white, 1 black, 1 brown, and 1 blue. Forms associated with these colors, listed respectively,

include: 18 bottle fragments, 3 kick-ups, and 4 lips; 2 bottle necks, 2 bases, 2 rims, and 6 bottle

fragments; 2 bottle fragments and 2 lips; 2 bottle fragments; 1 kick-up; 1 bottle lip and neck; and

1 medicine bottle fragment.

94

Personal

One brass ring and one barrel bead comprise the Personal group (Table 20). Brass rings,

such as the one discovered at 133 Marine Street, prove common to archaeological sites; however,

no thorough chronology exists. Examples of “posy rings,” betrothal, mourning, and Jesuit rings

occur frequently within colonial contexts (Hume 1969:265-266). The ring recovered from 133

Marine Street exhibits a rose bud décor and likely represents the most frequent type of ring worn

during the 18th century: decorative. The dark blue glass faceted barrel bead likely entered the

mission through trading or gifting activities between the native population and Europeans.

Tobacco

Compared to 161 Marine Street, 133 Marine Street yielded significantly fewer kaolin

pipe stems and pipe bowls (difference n=74). English influence, paired with availability and

affordability, made kaolin pipes a popular good among native populations. Durable in nature, the

pipes served their purpose for a few years. Their popularity is evidenced by recurrent evidence of

their disposal across colonial archaeological sites. Excavation produced 7 pipe bowl fragments,

one of which was molded, and 21 pipe stem fragments, one of which was molded. Decorated

pipe bowl production began as early as 1730. Pipe stem decorations coincided with the

manufacture of tobacco pipes containing makers’ marks and commenced in the 16th century and

continuing early 19th century (Hume 1969:303-304).

Flora and Fauna

Faunal remains recovered from 133 Marine Street suggest the Yamasee preserved

traditional dietary practices, incorporated estuarine food sources, and consumed domesticated

mammals available in colonial St. Augustine (Table 21). Volunteers proficient in faunal analysis

identified remains to the lowest taxonomic level. Count and weight were recorded for the faunal

95

assemblages recovered at 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street. Unlike the analysis of 161

Marine Street, the faunal data from 133 Marine Street does not consider the Minimum Number

of Individuals (MNI) present. The depth of faunal analysis completed at each site will be

discussed more thoroughly in the following chapter.

TABLE 21 FLORA AND FAUNA GROUP ARTIFACTS, 133 MARINE STREET Taxon Count Weight (g) Percent of Faunal Group UID Mammal 176 256.8 32.77% UID Large mammal 4 243.7 0.74% UID Medium mammal 1 6.0 0.19% UID Small mammal 1 0.4 0.19% Bos taurus (domesticated cow) 14 288.2 2.61% Sus scrofa (domesticated pig) 4 3.0 0.74% Odocoileus virginianus (white-tailed deer) 2 11.6 0.37% UID Artiodactyl (even-toed hoofed mammals)

1 1.2 0.19%

Subtotal 203 810.9 37.80%

UID Bird 10 4.1 1.86% Gallus gallus (domesticated chicken) 9 11.9 1.68% Sandpiper 1 0.1 0.19% Subtotal 20 16.1 3.73%

UID Turtle 12 6.3 2.23% Mud turtle 6 2.6 1.11% Subtotal 18 8.9 3.34% UID Fish 231 116.4 43.02% Catfish 37 17.2 6.89% Squaliformes (shark family) 8 4.4 1.49% Mullet 8 0.4 1.49% Sciaenidae (drum fish family) 3 10.5 0.56% Subtotal 287 148.9 53.45%

Shell

Crab claws 2 0.7 0.37% Conch 1 11.3 0.19% Greedy Dove Snail 1 0.5 0.19% Busycon 1 9.4 0.19% Knobbed Whelk 1 5.2 0.19%

96

TABLE 21 (continued) FLORA AND FAUNA GROUP ARTIFACTS, 133 MARINE STREET Taxon Count Weight (g) Percent of Faunal Group

Clam and oyster — 284.7 — Subtotal 7 311.8 1.13%

Coprolite 3 1.8 0.56% Nut Hull 1 0.1 0.19% Total 537 1298.5 100.20% Four hundred and twenty two unidentifiable fauna, which weighed 592 g, are not a component of

this discussion. Nineteen additional indeterminate faunal remains, however, exhibited notable

attributes. 17 of these bones were burnt, 1 was articular, and 1 was butchered. Other types of

faunal and floral remains, and their quantities, present at 133 Marine Street include 287 fish, 203

mammal, 20 bird, 18 turtle, 7 shells, and 1 nut hull. Though all floral and faunal remains

produced during excavation are discussed, it is probable that a portion of these remains relate to

later uses of the site. The Foodways section in the following chapter discusses the fauna present

at 133 Marine Street; furthermore, the analysis offers refined faunal data.

Fish remains comprise the largest portion of the Fauna group with catfish (n=37) serving

as the most abundant type. Identifiable catfish bones included 26 skull fragments, 4 pectoral

spines, 1 dorsal spine, 1 hyomaudefalar, and 2 skull and spine attachments. The assemblage also

contains eight shark vertebrae and eight mullet fragments, including four opercula, two

hyomaudefalar, and one epihyal. One otolith, one maxilla, and one unidentified bone comprised

the black drum sub-group. Of the 231 unidentified fish remains, 99 bones were identified: 71

vertebrae, 11 spine, 8 hemal spine, 2 large fish vertebrae, 2 medium fish vertebrae, 2 fin, 1

quadrabe, 1 dorsal spine, and 1 fish scale.

97

Two species of domesticated mammals contributed to the mission population’s diet: cow

and pig. Fourteen cow remains, including five teeth, two astraguli, one ulna, one phalange, one

tarpal bone, one scaploid, and one butchered bone, were present. One cervical vertebra and one

rib illuminate the presence and probable consumption of pigs within this area of La Punta.

Faunal remains also include two white-tailed deer, four large mammal, one medium mammal,

one small mammal, one calcanium and one phalange related to either pig or deer, and two

mammal teeth likely associated to cow. Unidentified mammal species (n=176) possessed a

variety of identifiable attributes, including eight teeth, five ribs, four tooth fragments, three ear

bones, three burnt bones, two long bones, one centrum, one phalange, one tooth root, one

vertebra, and one butchered bone.

Bird remains (n=20) located at the mission include three unidentified vertebrae, one large

carpometacarpal, and seven additional unidentified bone, as well as nine domesticated chicken

remains and one sandpiper humerus. Chicken bone types and attributes include two synsacrum,

two scapula, one burnt ulna, one left proximal ulna, one left distal radius, one right tibiotarsus,

and one right femur. Six mud turtle carapace fragments, five indeterminate turtle carapace

fragments, and six turtle shell fragments were also recovered. During excavation, clam and

oyster shell from two proveniences (4.03 and 5.03) was weighed and discarded. Other types of

shell present at133 Marine Street include two crab claws, one knobbed whelk, one conch, one

greedy dove snail, and one busycon.

Weight comparisons demonstrate that the identifiable wild (n=308) and identifiable

domesticates (n=27) proportions may indicate preference for domesticates. According to bone

weight, wild mammals, including fish, account for 35.87% of the total identifiable faunal

assemblage. Domesticates comprise 64.13% of the assemblage. Bone weight, however, fails to

98

serve as an accurate indicator of caloric intake or of the quantity of meat various species provide.

Cow and pigs bones, for example, generally weigh more than the remains of other taxa. The

numbers presented, therefore, may not accurately reflect the amount of meat contributed by a

specific species (e.g. cow) within the mission diet. Nevertheless, the presence of cow (Bos

taurus), pig (Sus scrofa), and chicken (Gallus gallus) demonstrate that European foodways

formed a component of the diet among mission occupants, though resources available in the

nearby estuaries appear to be preferred.

Mission Era Features at 161 Marine Street

The 1997 field season led to the investigation of 42 features within 150 square meters of

property (BDAC 95-0633) and yielded over 16,000 artifacts, the largest collection related to 18th

century mission communities in La Florida.31 As White (2002) suggests in her analysis of 133

Marine Street, analyzing and interpreting the collected data provides an opportunity to better

understand Yamasee lifeways and evaluate creolization within the fluid and dynamic,

multicultural environments of St. Augustine and the faltering, though mildly tenacious, Spanish

mission system during the mid-18th century.

Documented features related to the mission community include a well with a supporting

superstructure, at least 1, and possibly 3, structures, 5 daub processing pits—which were later

converted to trash pits—as well as 18 miscellaneous pits and 2 parallel agricultural ditches

(Figure 17). Stratigraphy and feature placement suggest two periods of mission occupation. A

cultural sheet midden, meaning a layer of refuse that extended over portions of the site, is present

as a by-product of site occupation. Fine brown sand, ranging from 10 cm to 15 cm thick

31 Nombre de Dios may outnumber La Punta in material culture quantity; however, this mission community spans an period greater than the 18th century.

99

comprised the sheet midden. Midden concentrations appeared in nine test units around the well:

Unit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 in Stripping Area 1, as well as Stripping Area 5 Unit 4 (Figure 18).

Walk-In Well and Superstructure

Investigating the well (Feature 6), which extended into the water table, necessitated a

system of well points attached to a pump. Lowering the water table permitted excavation. The

feature was bisected, and the south half excavated in its entirety in order to understand the

construction, use, and abandonment of the well. First Spanish Period wells (Deagan 1983)

typically utilized barrels that rested in a U-shaped pit that ranged from one to three meters in

diameter and reached the water table. The Spanish placed a barrel without a top or bottom into

the U-shaped pit, intending to embed the barrel into the water table. Sediment remaining inside

the barrel was removed and stacking additional barrels formed a shaft. Backfilling around the

barrel shaft reinforced the well.

In contrast, the well constructed at 161 Marine Street demonstrates a different

construction technique implemented over an indeterminate period of time, likely ranging from

several days to several weeks as indicated by soil deposit turbation and construction pit walls

undercut by erosion. The initial construction phase opened a circular pit, approximately 2 meters

in diameter (Figure 19). Following the period of exposure, the mission community utilized more

traditional Spanish barrel well techniques. A barrel, comprised of staves, over one meter in

height, and 90 cm at its widest point, was placed into the water table with hoops enclosing

wooden and secured through backfilling. The barrel’s bottom remained intact and the mission

population created no shaft; instead, a shallow U-shaped, saucer-like depression surrounded the

barrel, enabling people to walk into the well and gather water at the barrel’s edge. A footpath

leading to the barrel appeared along the southern edge of the feature.

100

FIGURE 17. Feature types at 161 Marine Street. Source: Adapted from White (2002:51).

101

FIGURE 18. 161 Marine Street site map. Only features related to La Punta appear. Source: Adapted from White (2002:51).

102

Stratigraphy noted in the well shaft suggests two distinct episodes of well use. Fine sand,

accumulated during the initial period of use, covered the wells’ bottom (B in Figure 19). Aeolian

sand (C in Figure 19), which contained the remains of a bird (Passeriformes) and a rat

(Cricitidae), demonstrate a period of abandonment at La Punta.32 Upon returning to the site, the

mission community again utilized the well by placing greenish gray clay from the neighboring

marsh and coquina stones above the original Aeolian deposit (D in Figure 19). While in use for

the second period, the well collected additional Aeolian sands (E in Figure 19). Following the

abandonment of La Punta, and therefore the well, the barrel decayed, resulting in the presence of

deteriorated wood (23.9 g) within the level. Aeolian and fluvial sands entered the well shaft

while also aggregating within the saucer-shaped depression surrounding the well (F in Figure

19). The two meter well depression gradually filled with soil deposits related to later colonial

activity as well as natural formation processes (G-L in Figure 19).

Four circular postholes (Feature 5, 8, 9a, and 11) (Figure 20) suggest that a superstructure

extended over the walk-in well. Feature 5 is the least defined posthole with a profile, a lens of

mottled sterile and gray sands, which may attest to the post’s removal. Feature 8, 9a, and 11

share two characteristics: all have a defined gray charcoal stained postmold within a larger

posthole, are straight sided and taper to a base extending between 74 and 92 cmbd. Their size

ranged from 16 to 25 cm in diameter. Materials associated with these features, however, offered

no significant date range concerning the superstructure’s period of construction.

Circular Structure(s)

Six postholes with postmolds (Feature 29 and 30, 46, 63a, 76, 77, and 92) and Feature 50,

the center support post, form the circular perimeter of Structure 1, which spanned approximately

32 Aeolian sand is essentially sediment eroded, transported, and deposited by the wind.

103

FIGURE 19. North profile of walk-in well feature. Source: Adapted from White (2002:53).

6 meters in diameter (Figure 20). Gray sand represented the postmolds as mottled sterile sands,

comprising the postholes, surrounded the postmolds. Postholes lie approximately 3 meters apart

and their sizes varied; however, postmolds ranged from 13 to 20 cm in diameter and reached

between 73 and 102 cmbd. Feature 29 and 30 abut one another and, paired with Feature 46, 63a,

and 92, had straight walls and rounded bases.33 Feature 76 and 77 incorporate a different method

of post erection: sloping walls with tapered bases. The proximity of these two features and the

divergent post style could indicate a threshold oriented toward the northeast—benefitting from

the river breezes that provided cooler air and a form of insect repellant during the summer.

33 The proximity of Feature 29 and 30 suggests a post replacement to repair the structure.

104

FIGURE 20. Proposed location and size of structures related to La Punta; excavated features associated with the mission community also included. Source: Adapted from White (2002:57).

105

Postholes appearing in a circular pattern define two possible additional structures.34

Feature 110, 112, and 115 represent Structure 2. Feature 110, a 22 cm wide ovoid pit with

sloping walls and a tapered base, contained no postmold. Mottled gray brown sands with

charcoal inclusions and surrounded by mottled light brown deposits characterized the Feature

112 and 115; the strata showed evidence of postmolds that rotted in situ. Furthermore, Feature

112, 9 cm in width, and Feature 115, 20 cm in width, possessed straight walls and tapered bases.

All the post features extended between 68 and 79 cmbd.

Stripping Area 4 contained two probable postholes related to a third circular structure

(White 2002:58). The contractor’s desire to move forward with construction condensed the field

season. These time constraints permitted partial excavation of these two postholes. Exposing a

section of both features yielded no artifacts, though the diameter of the postholes appeared

comparable to those of Structure 1 and Structure 2.

Daub Pits

Five daub processing pits (Feature 1, 3, 14, 21, and 114) are associated with construction

or repair of Structure 1 and Structure 2 (Figure 17). The features contained daub residue on the

bottom and sides of circular, shallow U-shaped pits, ranging from 67 cm to 1 meter in diameter,

and extending between 24 and 40 cmbd. Wattle and daub construction (Gordon 2002) requires

erecting a web of vertical poles and horizontal wattle laced together and affixed, probably by

nails or cordage. Daub, a mixture of clay, water, and occasionally, fiber, is then plastered over

the wattle on each side, smoothed, and hardens while drying. Thatched roofs and earthen floors

generally accompanied this building style. Following their use for construction, the daub pits

were cleaned. Feature 3, 21, and 114 contain minimal refuse and, perhaps, were filled after use.

34 These features appeared in Stripping Area 1 Unit 17.

106

Unlike the other daub features, or any other feature excavated at 161 Marine Street, Feature 1

and 14 yielded a significant amount of intentionally placed trash; their function apparently

shifted from construction to refuse disposal. Spanish trash disposal patterns tend to heavily

utilize pits and wells placed toward the rear of residential structures (White 2002:67-68). The

mission community either determined to dispose of refuse in the marsh or in an area not

excavated during the investigation at 161 Marine Street.

Miscellaneous Pits

Eighteen pits, primarily concentrated near areas of increased activity—specifically

Structure 1—yielded few artifacts and their function could not be determined (Figure 17). Three

features (2, 4, and 106) are located near structures. All three pits are U-shaped with mottled gray

brown sand and minimal material culture present. Their depth varied between 75 and 91 cmbd.

Feature 2 contained 1250 g of shell and spanned 95 cm in diameter. The base of Feature 2

undulated, probably as a result of root disturbance. Both shallower in depth and smaller in

diameter, reaching 88 cm, Feature 4 yielded scant artifacts and shell. Both Feature 2 and 4

experienced 19th century fence posthole intrusions. Approximately 94 cm in diameter, Feature

106 possessed five artifacts and no shell. Although the function of these pits is unclear, the

proximity of Feature 2 and 4 to Structure 1 and daub pit 1 and 3, as well as the nearness of

Feature 106 to Structure 2 and daub pit 114, may indicate the mission community’s utilization of

barrow pits during construction.

Within Structure 1, investigators documented four features—57, 62, 70, and 74. These

shallow, saucer-shaped pits appeared 58-32 cmbd and contained mottled brown and sterile sand.

One glass fragment and 100 g of shell was recovered in Feature 62. These shallow depressions

were possibly created by repeated use or performance, such as placing baskets in the area or

107

kneeling/sitting. Four additional miscellaneous pits within the structure provided little material

culture. Mottled gray sands comprised Feature 49, basin-shaped and 50 cm wide, and Feature 51,

also basin-shaped and approximately 40 cm wide. Feature 71 and 72 contained mottled brown

sterile sands, though the former was an irregular basin shape approximately 50 cm wide while

the latter was basin-shaped and 30 cm in diameter. All interior features demonstrate a discrete

activity area within Structure 1. Activities appear concentrated on the structure’s east side, near

the possible entrance; in contrast, the west side possesses no features.

Outside and to the east of Structure 1 investigators unearthed five additional pits

containing mottled gray brown sand. Like Feature 57, 62, 70, and 74, Feature 91 and 116 profiles

revealed a shallow, saucer-shape depressions likely attributed to repeated use. Feature 80, 88,

and 90 were basin-shaped, irregularly-shaped, and saucer-shaped, respectively. Time constraints

prohibited complete excavation of Feature 90, which complicates determining its function.

Feature 12, a U-shaped pit 77 cm in depth, contained a 5-10 cm carbonaceous layer. The layer

may indicate burned debris or disposal of hearth remains; however, only 8.4 g of charcoal were

recovered. Artifacts present in the pit include three sand tempered sherds, two amber glass

shards, and less than 25 g of shell.

Agricultural Ditches

Two ditches, approximately 11 m apart and running parallel to one another, extended

across the southernmost portion of Stripping Area 1 and 5 as well as the northernmost portion of

Stripping Area 1 (Figure 17). Labeled Feature 36 and 104, respectively, the former measured at

least 7 m and the latter reached more than 19 m, though was not excavated in its entirety due to

time constraints. Feature 115, a posthole, intrudes into Feature 104. Probably utilized for

agricultural purposes, the data recovered cannot help to determine whether their function related

108

to cultivation or irrigation. The ditches’ proximity to two of the proposed circular structures may

indicate agricultural use that predates or postdates the structures and/or the mission.

Feature 36 reaches 96 cmbd and measures between 80 and 90 cm in width. Feature 36c,

the ditch’s original surface, contained mottled sterile sands and displayed evidence of excavation

marks by shovel and digging sticks. After falling into disuse, the ditch accumulated mottled gray

brown Aeolian sand (Feature 36b). Both Feature 36b and 36c yielded minimal artifacts.

Following La Punta’s abandonment, the agricultural feature remained a visible depression.

Individuals used the ditch as a disposal location for refuse and construction debris during the

Second Spanish Period (1783-1821). Feature 36a consists of organic dark gray sand with

charcoal, shell, and material culture related to the Second Spanish Period powder magazine. As

the artifacts recovered from this level concern an occupation unrelated to La Punta, they are not

included in the database.

Material Culture at 161 Marine Street

Materials recovered from 161 Marine Street primarily appeared in the sheet midden

deposits. Features associated with La Punta also produced artifacts; however, the quantity of

artifacts present within features was minimal and complicated determining feature function.

General midden levels containing a high quantity of materials post-dating the mission are not

presented in the forthcoming analysis. The sheet midden, which comprised the general midden,

offered no definitive evidence of specific activity areas or designated spaces for refuse disposal.

Material culture entered St. Augustine through the situado (Deagan 1983:35; Bushnell 1994). To

supplement the irregular appearance of supplies from Spain, residents—native and Spanish—

participated in trade—both illicit and legal—with the British, French, and native populations. In

addition to availability, European and Euro-American goods were often priced lower than

109

Spanish goods (White 2002:69). The La Punta assemblage reflects its multi-ethnic economic

composition (Table 22).

TABLE 22 ARTIFACT GROUPS AND TOTAL COUNTS, 161 MARINE STREET Artifact Group Count Percent of Total Assemblage Activity 75 1.50% Architecture 243 4.86% Arms 14 0.28% Clothing 19 0.38% Furniture 2 0.00% Kitchen 4534 90.68% Personal 12 0.24% Tobacco 102 2.04% Total 5000 99.98% Source: Adapted from White (2002:70). Activities

Chert flakes (n=30) represents the most abundant category within the Activities group

(Table 23). In addition to the chert, the investigation yielded one chert core and five imported

flint fragments. These lithic materials suggest the possible production of projectile point/knives

as well as the use of gunflints, and guns, and/or strike-a-lites. One recreational object—a gaming

disk manufactured from a discarded coarse earthenware sherd—may indicate gaming and/or

gambling activities occurred within the mission community. Of the thirteen metal materials

present, seven were identifiable objects: six pieces of iron strapping and one S-hook. Although

their use cannot be definitively determined, these objects could function in a variety of contexts

(e.g. binding or a means to hang objects, respectively). Finally, two lead fishing weights offer

one line of evidence concerning the mission community’s subsistence strategy. Weights attached

to nets and used in the surrounding estuarine environment could augment the mission diet.

110

TABLE 23 ACTIVITIES GROUP ARTIFACTS, 161 MARINE STREET

Artifact Description Count Percent of Activities Group Chert 30 40.0% Copper Fragment 1 1.3% Chert Core 1 1.3% Flint 5 6.6% Gaming Disc 1 1.3% Unidentified Iron 2 2.6% Iron Strapping 6 8.0% Iron S-Hook 1 1.3% Lead Fishing Weights 2 2.6% Metal Alloy Fragment 1 1.3% Slag 25 33.3% Total 75 100.0% Source: Adapted from White (2002:94). Architecture

Two factors complicate the results within the architecture group. First, differentiating

whether the mission population or the Second Spanish Period powder magazine used some of the

objects proves difficult at times. Second, analysis of architectural components encompassed

weighing artifacts without recording the count. These materials, therefore, are not included in the

percentages listed in Table 24. Architectural/construction materials weighed and not counted

include coquina, daub, brick, tabby, mortar, and plaster. They weighed 2569.8 g, over 2500 g,

236.1, 58.5 g, 22.9, and 12.2 g, respectively. Differences in quantity may suggest that the

mission community used coquina and daub as construction materials. It is possible, however, that

the coquina recovered relates to later site use. Significantly smaller quantities of brick, tabby,

mortar, and plaster imply these materials probably associate with later occupations of the site.

Acidic soil convoluted the identification of the highly oxidized and fragmented nails

recovered from 161 Marine Street. White (2002:96) cites, with high probability, that most of

them are wrought. Eight nails are listed are square cut. High nail quantity may denote the

111

TABLE 24 ARCHITECTURE GROUP ARTIFACTS, 161 MARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Architecture Group Eyebolt 1 0.4% Nails 194 79.8% Spikes 17 7.0% Tacks 9 3.7% Tile 22 9.1% Total 243 100.0% Source: Adapted from White (2002:96).

incorporation of nails into mission structures. Tiles, used for floors and roofs, totaled the second

largest sub-category within the Architecture group. Recovered tile types include 3 tejas (Spanish

barrel-style roofing tiles), 6 glazed tiles, and 13 unglazed tiles. Tile styles present at the site

probably correspond with the Second Spanish Period powder house.

Arms

In addition to facilitating the city’s defense, allowing native use of guns offered another

manner in which to supplement the native diet: hunting. Artifacts recovered related to possessing

and utilizing arms include five lead bird shot, three lead buck shot, two lead sprue, and four

gunflint fragments (Table 25). British use of flintlock firearms began in the early 17th century

while Spanish gradually incorporated the guns until the War of Jenkins’ Ear (1739-1743) (Smith

1987). It is possible that La Punta’s population brought the firearms acquired in South Carolina

to the mission site and/or that the mission population received their arms from the Spanish.

Clothing

During the early 18th century, fashion in colonial St. Augustine started to incorporate and

emulate the rising Bourbon regime in France (Deagan 1987b). Clothing that featured buttons and

ornamental buckles gradually replaced clothes fastened by lace or wrapping (White 2002:99).

Documents indicate that the situado provided clothing to refugee mission communities, though

112

TABLE 25 ARMS GROUP ARTIFACTS, 161 MARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Arms Group Gun Flints 4 28.7% Lead Bird Shot 5 35.7% Lead Buck Shot 3 21.4% Lead Sprue 2 14.2% Total 14 100.0% Source: Adapted from White (2002:97). the native populations may have also sought these materials through trade, as gifts, or by

purchase (Archivo General de Indias 1725 and 1726). Although sparse in quantity, the Clothing

group demonstrates attempts to enhance personal appearance (Table 26). Cloth preserved in the

walk-in well, paired with a wire-wound pin, three pin fragments, and a grommet, signify

attempts to manufacture and/or repair clothing at the mission. Excavation yielded three copper

alloy buckles, two of which are complete, four buttons, and one button back. One buckle was

worn by members of the Spanish military. The other whole buckle featured ornamentation and

an iron tang (White 2002:100). Of the three copper alloy buttons, three are plain, flat clothing

buttons with drilled wedged shanks. The last is either an English or a German coin button with a

filed shank. The fourth button, made of bone and possibly burned post-deposition, could serve as

TABLE 26 CLOTHING GROUP ARTIFACTS, 161 MARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Clothing Group Buckle 3 15.8% Button 4 21.0% Button Back 1 5.3% Cloth 6 31.6% Grommet 1 5.3% Pin 4 21.0% Total 19 100.0% Source: Adapted from White (2002:100).

113

a disposable backing for a more valuable English or French button face (Deagan 1987b:166-167;

White 2002:100).

Furniture

Two furniture tacks represent the Furniture group. They account for 0.04% of the entire

assemblage. One tack, which measured 2.5 cm in diameter, featured a gold wash that overlay the

copper alloy. Hume (1969:227-228) cites brass upholstery tacks as an emerging technique for

anchoring the back of chairs during the mid-17th century. Other uses included securing the

exterior leather of coaches and sedans during the 18th century and providing ornamentation.

These uses, however, likely do not correlate with the mission community of La Punta. Though

disputable, tacks could be repurposed as architectural materials.

Kitchen

The assemblage for 161 Marine Street adheres to a well-established expectation for 18th

century archaeological sites: the Kitchen group comprises the largest percentage (90.48%) of

recovered artifacts. Within the four Kitchen sub-groups (Aboriginal Ceramics, European

Tablewares, European Utilitarian Wares, and Non-Ceramics), aboriginal pottery proves most

abundant (69.71%). Table 27 demonstrates the distribution of artifacts within the Kitchen group

and further splits the four sub-groups into seven groupings: Aboriginal Ceramics, Hispanic

Tablewares, Non-Hispanic Tablewares, Hispanic Utilitarian Wares, Non-Hispanic Utilitarian

Wares, Glassware and Bottles, Metal Cooking Vessels.

TABLE 27 KITCHEN GROUP ARTIFACTS, 161 MARINE STREET Artifact Sub-Group Count Percent of Kitchen

Group Percent of Total Assemblage

Aboriginal Ceramics 3498 77.15% 69.96% Hispanic Tablewares 75 1.65% 1.50%

114

TABLE 27 (continued) KITCHEN GROUP ARTIFACTS, 161 MARINE STREET Artifact Sub-Group Count Percent of Kitchen

Group Percent of Total Assemblage

Non-Hispanic Tablewares 174 3.84% 3.48% Hispanic Utilitarian Wares 126 2.78% 2.52% Non-Hispanic Utilitarian Wares 17 0.37% 0.34% Glassware and Bottles 641 14.14% 12.82% Metal Cooking Vessels 2 0.00% 0.04% Total 4534 99.93% 90.66% Source: Adapted from White (2002:71). ABORIGINAL CERAMICS

Presumably produced by the mission occupants for personal use or as goods to sell in St.

Augustine, aboriginal ceramics prove to be the most abundant Kitchen sub-group.35 During

analysis, aboriginal sherds less than 2 cm in size—too small to determine temper and surface

treatment—qualified as sherdlets. Sherdlets (n=11,499) comprised the largest portion of this

Aboriginal Ceramics group; however, they are excluded from this discussion. Surface treatment

descriptions adhered to traditional classifications: plain, incised, punctated, impressed, stamped

(check, simple, complicated, rectilinear, curvilinear), burnished, obliterated, and red film.

Obliterated sherds show evidence of a smoothed stamped design. Eroded ceramics demonstrate

poorly executed stamping. Red filmed sherds appear commonly throughout mission sites in

Florida as well as at Yamasee sites (White 2002:72-73; Melcher 2011). As a result, sherds with

red film were recorded as Mission Red Filmed regardless of their temper.

Of the 35 aboriginal ceramic types present at 161 Marine Street (Table 28), San Marcos,

including Plain, Stamped, and Red Filmed sherds, represents the largest group (Table 29).

Coarse sand, limestone, and/or shell tempering differentiate San Marcos from other ceramic

35 Excavations yielded no evidence to suggest that another native population contemporaneous to the Yamasee occupied the site.

115

types, such as the closely related Irene and Lamar series (Deagan 1993:95-98). Definitions for

this type vary depending on the region. Other identifications include Altamaha, Sutherland Bluff,

King George, and Chicora Ware (Deagan 1993:95; White 2002:73-75). Variation within this

ceramic type may be attributed to ethnicity; however, archaeological investigations and analyses

currently offer evidence that all coastal groups north of St. Augustine utilized San Marcos.

TABLE 28 ABORIGINAL CERAMICS BY SUB-GROUP, 161 MARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Aboriginal Ceramics Group San Marcos 2264 64.65% Sand Tempered 916 26.16% Mission Red Filmed 250 7.12% St. Johns 40 1.14% Grit and Grog Tempered 6 0.17% Grog Tempered Plain 5 0.14% UID Aboriginal 3 0.00% Colonoware 15 0.43% Total 3498 99.92% TABLE 29 ABORIGINAL CERAMIC COUNTS AND TYPES, 161 MARINE STREET Aboriginal Ceramic Type Count San Marcos Plain 813 San Marcos Eroded 730 San Marcos Decorated 640 Check Stamped 361 Simple Stamped 1 Complicated Stamped 105 Rectilinear Stamped 142 Curvilinear Stamped 13 Impressed 1 Indeterminate 17 San Marcos Shell Tempered 81 Sand Tempered Plain 427 Sand Tempered Eroded 283 Sand Tempered Decorated 205 Check Stamped 102 Rectilinear Stamped 69

116

TABLE 29 (continued) ABORIGINAL CERAMIC COUNTS AND TYPES, 161 MARINE STREET Aboriginal Ceramic Type Count

Complicated Stamped 22 Indeterminate 9 Incised 1 Obliterated 1 Punctated 1 Mission Red Filmed Plain 202 Mission Red Filmed Decorated 48 Eroded 19 Check Stamped 14 Complicated Stamped 5 Rectilinear Stamped 5 Curvilinear Stamped 1 Indeterminate 4 St. Johns 40 Plain 26 Checked 9 Simple 5 Colonoware 15 Grit and Grog Tempered 6 Grog Tempered Plain 5 UID Aboriginal 3 Sand and Shell Tempered 1 Total 3498 Source: Adapted from White (2002:74).

Check stamped San Marcos ceramics (n=361) represent the largest surface treatment

group type. Other San Marcos Decorated design applications include 1 simple stamped, 105

complicated stamped, 142 rectilinear stamped, 13 curvilinear, 1 impressed, 2 punctated, 2

incised, and 17 indeterminate. Seven hundred and thirty surface treatments could not be

determined and 813 sherds were plain. Identifiable vessel forms related only to rim sherds.

Curved (n=68) and flared (n=51) appeared most frequently, often with rounded or flattened lips.

San Marcos Decorated forms also included 28 straight, 4 folded, 3 tapered, 1 everted, 1 inverted,

117

and 44 indeterminate rims. In addition to the decorated types, 81 San Marcos sherds contained

grit and shell tempering. Surface treatment quantities included 20 plain, 10 check stamped, 2

complicated stamped, 4 rectilinear stamped, and 45 eroded designs.

Sand Tempered sherds comprise the second most abundant ceramic type recovered from

161 Marine Street. Surface treatment types and quantities include 427 plain, 205 decorated, and

283 eroded. One hundred and two check stamped, 22 complicated, 69 rectilinear, 1 punctated, 1

incised, 1 obliterated, and 9 indeterminate sherds comprised the stamped surface treatment

group. Seven sherds were burnished. One hundred sherds featured a rim. Their forms included

curved, flared, straight, tapered, and indeterminate.

161 Marine Street contained 250 Mission Red Filmed sherds, 48 of which were stamped.

Design treatments included 14 check stamped, 5 complicated stamped, 5 rectilinear stamped, 1

curvilinear stamped, and 4 indeterminate stamped, and 19 eroded. Ninety six rims, many of

which displayed the red filming, were present and 17 were stamped. Rim types include 57 flared,

9 curved, 8 straight, 5 tapered, 2 folded, 2 beveled, and 13 indeterminate. San Marcos became

the primary native ceramic type throughout the 17th century, though St. Johns appears most

often in 16th century contexts (Deagan 1983:117). San Marcos surface decorations present at

161 Marine Street include 26 plain, 9 check stamped, and 5 simple stamped. Similarly, the

presence of four fiber tempered eroded, five grog tempered plain, three grit and grog tempered

stamped, and three indeterminate sherds might indicate the previous occupations of the site.

Determining vessel form proved difficult as a result of the assemblage’s fragmentary

state. Eleven bowls, three jars, four bases—three flat—and two shoulders were identified.

Colonoware, a ceramic type produced by natives that emulates European vessel forms, fragments

118

appeared fifteen times. Their forms include five footrings, one plate fragment, three body

fragments, one flat base, one lug handle, and four additional handles.

EUROPEAN TABLEWARES

Tin glazed coarse earthenwares typically served as tablewares. Types recovered from 161

Marine Street include Spanish majolica, English delftware, slipware, stoneware, French faience,

and Oriental porcelain (Table 30). English tablewares (n=164) occur most frequently with 75

majolicas sherds and 4 faience sherds also present. English ceramic types and quantities include

Slipware (n=83), Delft (n=50), Delft Blue on White (n=22), White Salt Glazed Stoneware (n=7),

and Nottingham (n=2). Circa 1740, White Salt Glazed Stoneware started to replace Delft as the

choice tableware (Hume 1969:115). Availability and affordability ushered in more English goods

during the 18th century, especially at sites encompassing ethnic and economic minorities (e.g.

blacks at Fort Mose and natives at La Punta) (White 2002; Deagan 1987a; 1987b; 2002). French

Faience likely entered the archaeological record through Spanish-French trading. Although small

in quantity (n=4), faience typically appears in 18th century Spanish artifactual assemblages.

Most Majolicas recovered from 161 Marine Street were manufactured in Mexico and

exported throughout the Caribbean region. These ceramics commonly occur at early and mid-

18th century sites in St. Augustine. The high quantities of Puebla Polychrome (n=20) and Puebla

Blue on White (n=20) correspond to contemporaneous sites within colonial St. Augustine

(Deagan 1987). San Luis Polychrome (n=11), Aranama Polychrome (n=6), San Agustín Blue on

White (n=2), Abó Polychrome (n=2), Huejotzingo Blue on White (n=1), and 12 unidentifiable

majolica sherds comprised the remaining portion of Spanish Tablewares whose production dates

to the La Punta era.

119

TABLE 30 EUROPEAN TABLEWARE TYPES AND COUNTS, 161 MARINE STREET

Source: Adapted from White (2002:84). EUROPEAN UTILITARIAN WARES

Used primarily for storage, transportation, cooking, and washing, the utilitarian wares

recovered from 161 Marine Street include 103 Olive Jar, 16 El Morro, 7 Stoneware, 3 Black

Lead-Glazed Coarse Earthenware, 2 Green Bacin, 1 Blue-Green Bacin, and 1 Marineware (Table

31). Olive Jars permitted the transportation and storage of liquids and, if glazed, the jars were

impermeable. With the exception of the English stoneware sherds (1 Gray Salt Glazed and 6 Salt

Glazed Stoneware) and the 10 unidentified coarse earthenware sherds, Spanish utilitarian wares

Artifact Description Count Percent of European Tableware Group

Spanish Tablewares Puebla Blue on White 20 8.03% Puebla Polychrome 20 8.03% San Luis Polychrome 11 4.42% UID Majolica 9 3.61% Aranama Polychrome 6 2.41% UID Mexico City 3 1.20% Abó Polychrome 2 0.80% San Agustín Blue on

White 2 0.80%

Huejotzingo Blue on White

1 0.40%

Reyware 1 0.40% English Tablewares Slipware 83 33.33% Delftware 50 20.08% Delft Blue on White 22 8.84% White Salt Glazed

Stoneware 7 2.81%

Nottingham 2 0.80% French Tablewares Faience Blue on White 3 1.20% Faience 1 0.40% Oriental Tablewares UID Porcelain 7 2.81% Total 249 100.37%

120

TABLE 31 EUROPEAN UTILITARIAN WARE TYPES AND COUNTS, 161 MARINE STREET

Artifact Description Count Percent of European Utilitarian Wares Group

Spanish Utilitarian Wares

Black Lead Glazed Coarse Earthenware

3 2.1%

El Morro 1 0.7% Green Bacin 16 11.3% Blue-Green Bacin 2 1.4% Marine Ware 1 0.7% Oliver Jar 80 55.9% Glazed Olive Jar 23 16.0% Other European Utilitarian Wares

Gray Salt Glazed Stoneware 1 0.7%

Salt Glazed Stoneware 6 4.2% Unidentified Utilitarian UID Coarse Earthenware 9 6.3% UID Glazed Coarse Earthenware 1 0.7% Total 143 100.0% Source: Adapted from White (2002:89). (n=126) were dominant. San Marcos vessels likely served as the primary means of cooking and

storing food. Spanish majolicas supplemented the native ceramics when necessary.

NON-CERAMIC

The assemblage contains two iron cooking vessel fragments used to prepare food and a

variety of glass utilized as storage and vessels to serve beverages, food, and medicine. With 641

shards, glass represents the second largest Kitchen group. Three hundred and eighty three shards

(59.8%) of the glass offered no information other than color. These colors and quantities include

87 olive green, 41 aqua, 33 amber, 33 clear, 25 green, 11 amethyst, 8 dark brown, 6 light yellow,

6 gold, 5 dark green, 5 brown, 4 light green, 3 black, 1 dark blue, 1 yellow and 125 shards too

heavily patinated to definitively determine their color. The patinated glass was generally thicker

and probably related to spirit bottles.

121

Recognizable vessel forms account for 37.9% of the total glass group. Glass colors

attributed to bottles include 137 olive green, 8 dark green, 2 black, 1 clear, 1 aqua, and 92

patinated shards. Olive green, dark, green, and black glass relates to spirit bottles; the patinated

shards likely belong within this group as well. White (2002:92) discusses the possibility that the

frequency of bottles associated with drinking may correlate with the high alcohol consumption

among the native populations, including the Yamasee, noted in the ethnohistorical record. Aqua

and clear glass may be pharmaceutical bottle fragments. Additionally, the site contained two

clear tumbler fragments and one clear cup fragment.

Personal

Eight beads, a tin jewelry fragment, two bell fragments, and one half-real comprise the

Personal group (Table 32). The recovered beads likely entered the mission community through

trade with Europeans. Yamasee sites in South Carolina possess an abundant amount of beads

(White 2002:104) as a result of intensive trade with the British. Bead types in the 161 Marine

Street assemblage include two blue barrel beads, one white glass faceted bead, one black faceted

bead, one blue seed bead, one amber doughnut bead, two heavily patinated doughnut beads.

White (2002:10) suggests that the black faceted bead could be a rosary bead, which would make

it the sole artifact specifically relating to Catholicism within the mission of La Punta. Bells,

though not confirmed as trade items, appear within native and colonial historical contexts. The

two copper alloy bell fragments recovered from 161 Marine Street could vary in purpose and

size. Bells appeared in church steeples, hung on shop doors and on the neck of cattle, and served

as buttons or fasteners on clothing (Hume 1969:58-59). Bells also provided a means to engage

missionized natives in Catholic processions. Worth (1998a:141) notes the supply of 670 bells to

the native children who danced during the annual Corpus Christi celebration in 1687. Markings

122

TABLE 32 PERSONAL GROUP ARTIFACTS, 161 MARINE STREET Artifact Description Count Percent of Personal Group Bead 8 66.7% Jewelry Fragment 2 16.7% Bell 1 8.3% Spanish Coin 1 8.3% Total 12 100.0% Source: Adapted from White (2002:102). on the half-real, whose weight determined its worth, could not be identified due to extensive

wear. Nevertheless, the coin indicates participation in the Spanish economy within the mission

community.

Tobacco

Excavations yielded 102 pipe fragments, all of which were kaolin. English influence

prompted smoking pipes to spread rapidly within the Spanish presidio. Pipes represent 2.03% of

the total assemblage at 161 Marine Street, which is higher than the mean percentage documented

within 18th century St. Augustine (Deagan 1983). Although La Punta’s population tended to

smoke pipes, an affinity perhaps attained as a result of British preference and pipes’ common

usage as trade items during their previous tenure in South Carolina, the Spanish typically elected

to smoke cigars (White 2002:105).

Flora and Fauna

Faunal remains recovered from 161 Marine Street suggest the Yamasee preserved

traditional dietary practices and incorporated select estuarine food sources common to St.

Augustine archaeological sites (Table 33). Volunteers proficient in faunal analysis identified

remains to the lowest taxonomic level and accounted for the Minimum Number of Individuals

(MNI) according to elements paired by sex. Faunal evidence from features and from general

123

TABLE 33 FAUNAL GROUP ARTIFACTS, 161 MARINE STREET Taxon Count MNI Weight (g) Percent of Faunal Group UID Mammal 68 — 234.8 21.25% UID Artiodactyl (even-toed hoofed mammals)

58 — 124.4 18.13%

Sciuridae (squirrel family) 1 1 0.2 0.31% Ursus americanus (black bear) 1 1 9.9 0.31% Sus scrofa (domesticated pig) 16 1 29.5 5.00% Odocoileus virginianus (white-tailed deer)

37 2 71.1 11.56%

Bos taurus (domesticated cow) 7 1 104.1 2.19% Gopherus polyphemus (gopher tortoise) 2 1 4.5 0.63% Serpentes 1 1 0.1 0.31% UID Bird 8 1 2.7 2.50% Cairaina Muscova (Muscovy duck) 1 1 3.5 0.31% Gallus gallus (domesticated chicken) 2 1 0.6 0.63% Squaliformes (shark family) 4 1 2.2 1.25% Bagre marinus (gaffttopsail catfish) 3 1 0.3 0.94% Ariidae (sea catfish family) 29 2 3.4 9.06% Sciaenidae (drum fish family) 9 1 2.1 2.81% Total 320 17 616.8 100.0% Source: Adapted from White (2002:107). levels was not differentiated during analysis. Unidentifiable fauna, which weighed 463 g, are not

a component of this discussion. Muskrat and song bird remains, all located in the walk-in well

feature, and two domesticated cat (Felis domesticus) remains do not appear in the discussion

either. Archaeological assemblages relating to 18th century St. Augustine sites or Yamasee sites

in the Carolinas suggest that none of the aforementioned mammals serve as a common food

choice and, therefore, likely do not reflect the mission population’s diet.36 Though included in

Table 33, the snake vertebra is considered to be unrelated to La Punta occupants’ diet. Snake

36 Reitz and Cumbaa (1983:152; 160) cite horse, dog, and cat consumption as “delicacies” within St. Augustine. The Florida governor, who made this claim, however, could have intended to elicit increased support from the Spanish Crown.

124

contributed to native diet; however, discerning whether the single bone recovered relates to food

consumption or to the snake occurring naturally within the environment.

Mammals, especially wild genera, comprise the largest portion of the Fauna group with

deer serving as the most abundant species. Eight lead shot and four gunflints present at 161

Marine Street demonstrate the presence of arms at the mission. Guns likely served the mission

occupants as a hunting tool and as a means of defense. Three species represent the domesticated

animals contributing to the mission population’s diet: cow, pig, and chicken. Bird remains

located at the mission include turkey, Muscovy duck, and domesticated chicken. Though

traditionally a component of native diets, rabbit, raccoon, and other small mammals are absent

from the 161 Marine Street assemblage. Ariidae (sea catfish) represent the principal type of fish

remains, though drum fish (Sciaenidae) and sharks (Squalifomes) also appeared in the

assemblage. Catfish and drums commonly occur within St. Augustine’s estuarine environments

(Reitz and Cumbaa 1983:151-184) and the net weights recovered from 161 Marine Street

suggest that the people of La Punta used nets to catch fish such as mullet. Hook and line enabled

catfish and drum catches (Shephard 1983:81). Botanical remains, though present, were not

intensively studied. Only squash, corn, and peaches were identified. The two agricultural ditches

suggest cultivation or irrigation within the mission. If used for cultivation, the crops produced

within the ditches could be consumed by mission residents or sold in colonial St. Augustine.

Using MNI counts, wild animals account for 83.3% of the identified faunal assemblage

as domesticated represent 17.6% of the materials recovered. Weight comparison brings the wild

(43.5%) and domesticates (56.5%) proportions within a closer range. Cow and pigs bones,

however, generally weigh more than the remains of other taxa. These numbers, therefore, may

not accurately reflect the amount of domesticates meat within the mission diet. Nevertheless, the

125

presence of cow (Bos taurus), pig (Sus scrofa), and chicken (Gallus gallus) demonstrate that

European foodways formed a component of the diet among mission occupants. Despite the

plentiful estuarine resources available to the La Punta community, fish apparently served as a

supplemental dietary component. Compared to terrestrial species, estuarine species comprising

the sample are lower in count and in MNI. Shellfish refuse (114.59 kg) was also sparse and may

suggest that these species were not consumed or that shell was disposed of elsewhere.

126

CHAPTER VII

INTERPRETATION AND DISCUSSION

Assessing Creolization at La Punta

As an ambiguous, fluid cultural process that emphasizes complexity, creativity and, at

times, unpredictability, forms of creolization vary; therefore, evidence supporting the process

also varies. Depending on the breadth of a study and the primary research question, a

“creolization pattern” akin to the archaeological patterns defined by Stanley South (1977) might

be developed. Regarding La Punta, the analysis focuses on three lines of evidence that each serve

as cultural indicators. The construction, production, purchase, or use of material culture

represents tangible attempts to demonstrate how, what, and where an individual or a group

affiliates oneself with his or her surroundings. “Things” can be attributed to ethnicity, class, role,

gender, political preference, and other sociocultural constructions. Though tangible in nature,

these objects also represent intangible processes that relate information concerning why

individuals or groups selected certain objects to use, or not use, in specific ways. Approximately

70 years of interactions and alliances with the Spanish and the British introduced natives who

would settle at La Punta to new economic, social, and cultural constructs and practices which

include Catholicism, the repartimiento system, slaving, trade items and other goods. Examining

ceramic, architectural, and foodway evidence from 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street

provides a preliminary means to understand whether, and to what extent, the Yamasee and

Apalachee who occupied La Punta participated in and contributed to creolization.

Ceramics

The presence of multiple ceramic types, including those of aboriginal, Spanish, and

British manufacture, as well as different vessel forms with varying functions, provide a lens by

127

which to examine creolization. La Punta’s principal ethnic population—the Yamasee—

experienced continued and diverse cultural encounters with the Mocama, the Guale, the Scottish,

the English, and the Spanish—during two distinct periods. San Marcos, the primary ceramic type

used by native populations and the Spanish, appear frequently within colonial and aboriginal

archaeological contexts. La Punta residents, however, also incorporated European ceramics into

food storage, preparation, and consumption. Affordability, availability, and oft-illicit (Deagan

2007) British ceramic goods endeared them to colonial St. Augustine and its peripheral mission

communities (Hume 1969:102; Deagan 1993:95). The presence Puebla majolica, provided to

colonial St. Augustine through the situado, also persisted within colonial Spanish and La Punta

households. Examining ceramic types, attributes, form, and function within the assemblage

recovered at 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street provides a preliminary understanding of

the mission community’s interest, ability, and desire to retain traditional kitchen practices, to

incorporate new vessels, foods, or practices, or to uniquely combine aboriginal manufacture or

purpose with European-produced goods.

San Marcos represents a utilitarian ceramic type common to most 17th and 18th century

sites in and around St. Augustine. Saunders (2000:170) and Sweeney and Poplin [2015:13-14]

consider the role of Spanish interaction and influence as manifested in stamped designs,

specifically the filfot cross, upon the Yamasee. Electing to simplify the filfot cross paddle stamp

could reflect a shift in functional, ideological, and social use. This manner of change indicates

the cultural complexity that defines creolization. Colonoware (Melcher 2011), native produced

ceramics that incorporated traditionally European vessel forms for traditionally European

functions, serves as another means to examine creolization. Colonoware vessels retain aspects of

128

the San Marcos tradition, such as temper and various surface treatments, while also exhibiting an

appearance reminiscent of European tablewares.

Although it contributes minimally to the overall assemblage, colonoware (n=21), an

“intercultural artifact” (Singleton and Bograd 2000:4), embodies a process of interaction. These

vessels occur on Yamasee sites in South Carolina (Southerlin et al. 2001; Sweeney 2005), within

St. Augustine (Deagan 1983), and at La Punta. Colonial St. Augustine sites yield colonoware,

though with less frequency than mission-related contexts. Whether colonoware was used by the

Yamasee, was produced for the Yamasee, the Spanish, or both, and what socioeconomic role the

ceramic type possessed remains unclear (Ferguson 1992; Vernon and Cordell 1993; Rolland and

Ashley 2000; Melcher 2011). San Marcos vessels served as the major form of utilitarian ware in

18th century St. Augustine, persisting with greater frequency than all same-use ceramic types.

Colonoware, however, adopts the tempering and decorative qualities of San Marcos and also

includes European vessel form attributes. Ceramicists’ willingness to integrate Spanish vessel

forms with aboriginal ceramic characteristics, as well as the Spanish utilization of such vessels,

demonstrates cultural fluidity. Although considerably rarer than San Marcos in La Florida,

colonoware embodies multiethnic production and practices.

Shephard (1983) and Deagan (1983b) compare 18th century ceramic assemblages

recovered from a criollo and a mestizo household in colonial St. Augustine. In contrast to the

mestizo assemblage (Deagan 1983:122), La Punta might demonstrate preference for British

goods. The more frequent occurrence of non-Hispanic ceramics may relate to the Yamasee’s

presence in the Carolina colony. Rather than attaining British ceramics while in La Florida, it is

possible that the Yamasee brought these items to La Punta following the Yamasee War and their

renewed allegiance to the Spanish. As with Spaniards, perhaps the affordability of British

129

ceramics influenced the mission community’s decisions regarding purchase and use. Hispanic

utilitarian and tablewares comprise a greater percentage of ceramics present at 133 Marine Street

than non-Hispanic ceramic types. 161 Marine Street demonstrates a significantly greater

occurrence of aboriginal pottery than 133 Marine Street. Additionally, 161 Marine Street yielded

more tablewares—both Hispanic and non-Hispanic types. British tablewares comprise the largest

sub-group with Hispanic utilitarian wares forming the second largest sub-group. Table 34

illustrates the order of European ceramic sub-groups according to their frequency at 133 Marine

Street and 161 Marine Street. Ceramic categories appear in order of descending quantity. As with

18th century sites related to colonial St. Augustine, the ceramics recovered from La Punta adhere

to a pattern Shephard describes (1983:88) in which aboriginal pottery represents the greatest

abundance of utilitarian wares and Hispanic tablewares predominate over other European

tablewares. Table 35 illustrates the relationship between native ceramic and European ceramics,

as described by Shephard, at the La Punta sites. Most native ceramics, other than Colonoware,

qualify as Utilitarian Wares. These vessel types probably appear frequently within St.

Augustine’s colonial artifactual assemblages for two reasons. First, native Utilitarian Wares

supplemented the supply of European Utilitarian vessel forms available in the city. Second, the

preparation and, in some cases, the consumption of native dishes functioned better in native

Utilitarian Ware vessels.

TABLE 34 PREVALENCE OF EUROPEAN CERAMIC SUB-GROUPS, LA PUNTA SITES

133 Marine Street Count 161 Marine Street Count Hispanic Tablewares 93 Non-Hispanic Tablewares 174 Non-Hispanic Tablewares 41 Hispanic Utilitarian Wares 126 Hispanic Utiliarian Wares 25 Hispanic Tablewares 75 Non-Hispanic Utilitarian Wares 19 Non-Hispanic Utilitarian Wares 17

130

TABLE 35 PREVALENCE OF NATIVE AND EUROPEAN CERAMIC SUB-GROUPS, LA PUNTA SITES

133 Marine Street Count 161 Marine Street Count Aboriginal Utilitarian Wares 305 Aboriginal Utilitarian Wares 3483 Hispanic Tablewares 93 Non-Hispanic Tablewares 174 Non-Hispanic Tablewares 41 Hispanic Utilitarian Wares 126 Hispanic Utiliarian Wares 25 Hispanic Tablewares 75 Non-Hispanic Utilitarian Wares 19 Non-Hispanic Utilitarian Wares 17 Native Tablewares/Colonoware 5 Native Tablewares/Colonoware 15 Architecture

Evaluating creolization within architectural features present at La Punta involves three

lenses of analysis: structures identified at both sites, the walk-in well unearthed at 161 Marine

Street, and the minimal evidence of trash disposal. Perhaps not as traditionally associated with

architecture, wells and refuse disposal commonly relate to spatial placement on individual lots in

colonial St. Augustine (Deagan 1983:111; Shephard 1983:75-77). Additionally, these feature

types occurred in proximity to Yamasee households at Altamaha Town (Sweeney 2009). In order

to recognize architectural influences stemming from another culture(s), the discussion briefly

considers Yamasee architectural practices during the time spent in Mocama territory, as well as

the evidence uncovered at Altamaha Town, and the 18th century architecture of a criollo and a

mestizo household in St. Augustine.

Rebecca Saunders (1993) investigated architecture at two late 17th century mission sites

along the Georgia coast: Santa María de Yamasee and Santa Catalina de Guale. Architectural

remains encountered, however, primarily relate to larger structures that functioned as community

areas (e.g. the convento and kitchen area) at Santa Catalina.37 Of particular interest to Saunders

37 Saunders’ identification of structures and the interpretation that associates the Yamasee with the church and mission site are no longer in favor (Worth, pers. comm. 2015). Although a few intrusive Yamasee burials are present

131

was the convento, built of wattle and daub, spikes, and nails. Architectural influence is evident in

the squared pine wood posts, which necessitated tools and oversight from the Spanish. These

procedures, however, are hardly unique and evidence elsewhere probably relates minimally to

the creolization process and, perhaps, more to land form, environmental resources, the desires of

the population, and the required materials for the building’s function and form. Generally, native

structures incorporated animal or plant cordage as joints, used posts-in-ground rather than square

beams, and wattle and daub served as the primary construction material. Gordon (2002:45) cites

the incorporation of hewn timbers, wrought nails, and spikes as the result of guidance from

friars, or a technique learned through repartimiento tasks.

Upon departing from the Spanish missions, portions of the Yamasee population settled in

Altamaha Town between 1695 and 1715. Brockington and Associates conducted investigations

at the site from June 2006 through January 2007. Investigations yielded postholes relating to six

nearly identical circular structures spaced 60 to 100 m apart. The homes measured approximately

7 m in diameter and contained interior posts that likely served as sleeping platforms or partitions

that provided structural support. Sweeney (2009:18) suggests the analogous shape and size of the

structures at Altamaha Town and Mississippian structures recorded in the Oconee River Valley

could reflect retention of architectural trends within Yamaseee culture. Several features,

including trash pits, linear trenches, various shell piles, and smudge pits, occurred in yard areas

outside of the houses. The structures contained no evidence of hearths, which indicates the

Yamasee occupied these spaces during the summer. Additionally, post holes found in the yard

areas may represent screens or racks used for drying and smoking animal hides and fish

(Sweeney 2009:20). Sweeney (2009), and Sweeney and Poplin [2015], provide no information

at the site, the church and convento relate to the preceding Mocama mission site, not to the Yamasee. The Mocama abandoned the site in 1665.

132

regarding building materials or construction methods. Based on archaeological evidence of

contemporaneous native structures built throughout the 15th and 17th centuries in the Oconee

Valley, the aforementioned Yamasee structures would probably be thatched, wooden structures,

possibly featuring wattle and daub.

Governor Moore’s 1702 siege and devastating destruction within colonial St. Augustine

contributed to a dramatic shift in the use of construction materials. Architecture moved away

from impermanent, fire prone wooden structures and began to integrate coquina and tabby with

frequency. Following Moore’s raid, tabby became the “primary load-bearing material” for

vernacular structures of all types and for all purposes (Gordon 2002:67). Eighteenth century St.

Augustine residents embraced the permanence of stone and the local environment’s abundant

resources. Tabby homes and government buildings utilized the local shellstone and produced

structures better suited to Florida’s climate while also incorporating architectural traditions from

Spain and Spanish America (Gordon 2002:78; 139). Generally, early 18th century architectural

patterns involved “basic block forms, simple volumes, and thick stone walls” that typically

consisted of one to three buildings with one to four rooms (Gordon 2002:141). Floors were often

tabby and roofs were either flat, and made of wood with lime mortar, or gabled with palm thatch

or wood shingles.

Shephard (1983) and Deagan (1983b) describe the architectural components of a criollo

and a mestizo household, respectively. The criollo home, probably constructed in the early 18th

century, featured a rectangular tabby foundation and wall bases with a central partition

separating the space into two rooms. The structure, described as Albert Manucy’s “common

Spanish house” type measured approximately 5.5 m by 7 m and each room measured about 3.5

m by 4.5 m. Five additional activity areas were present: the well area, kitchen area, two major

133

refuse disposal areas, and the “yard” area. These features were primarily located at the rear or to

the side of the house at a distance of 6 to 9 m (Shephard 1983:74-77). Comparably, the mid-18th

century mestizo household also possessed tabby footing and featured two rooms with a dividing

wall. Unlike the criollo structure, the mestizo home included two structures with two rooms of

uneven size downstairs and a second story. Coquina mortared to the tabby supported the second

floor. The north structure measured 10.51 m East-West, 6 m North-South. The southern

component spanned 12 m North-South, and, due to a paved road, an indeterminate distance East-

West. Excavations identified four wells located near the structures (Deagan 1983:111-112).

Two identified types of structures- rectangular and circular—were present within the La

Punta mission community. The possible rectangular structure, presumably a household, at 133

Marine Street diverges from the architectural practices the Yamasee utilized at Altamaha Town

and those used elsewhere in the mission. As stated in the Results chapter, the rectangular

structure included a second component, possibly another room or an ephemeral architectural

component attached to the residential structure. Excavations suggest the entryway faced eastward

and in-ground posts potentially supported tabby walls. Other architectural materials present

include bricks, daub, and coquina; however, no evidence exists to determine whether the mission

occupants incorporated these materials into the structure. Although the features associated with

the proposed rectangular structure appear to form a linear foundation, it is possible that further

archaeological excavations would yield a circular structure.

Differences between construction materials used and the shape of the structures at 133

Marine Street and 161 Marine Street represent two architectural dissimilarities. The 133 Marine

Street household, which has a mean ceramic date of 1718, may also date to an earlier period of

134

occupation than the circular residences.38 A rectangular structure that incorporated tabby

elements and with a mean ceramic date that precedes the inferred mission occupation may not

relate to La Punta. Due to the structure’s location beyond St. Augustine’s town walls, its

proximity to mission structures uncovered archaeologically and noted on various historical maps,

and nature of intact assemblages, primarily within features, the rectangular structure appears

related to the mission community. Evidence of creolization occurs within the shape of the

building, the possible use of multiple construction materials, and the presence of multiple rooms,

or an exterior free-standing addition to the structure. Gordon (2002) cites these architectural

features as common to residences in colonial St. Augustine.

161 Marine Street yielded one definite circular residential structure and two additional

possible circular structures associated with La Punta. Figure 21 illustrates the probable size and

location of all three structures presuming they share similar dimensions. Posts-in-ground

provided structural support for these wattle and daub households. Metal implements, specifically

wrought nails, likely supplemented the wattle and daub. Circular houses discovered at Altamaha

Town measured approximately 7 m in diameter, whereas the La Punta structures spanned

approximately 6 m. Entryways at both sites maximized the benefits of the surrounding

environment by facing toward the water.

Sweeney and Poplin [2015] describe Yamasee communities in South Carolina as non-

nucleated, consisting of buildings spaced 50 to 120 meters apart from one another. Altamaha

households, which were spaced between 60 and 100 meters apart, conform to this pattern. La

Punta structures represent a closely clustered area of occupation. It is possible that other

38 If included, utilitarian wares move the mean ceramic date to 1705. This is due to the broad periods of production of use among European tablewares. Adjusting the formula by removing utilitarian ceramics moves the structure’s date to 1718.

135

Figure 21. Proposed size and placement of the three structures at 161 Marine Street.

136

households occurred at greater distances; however, at 161 Marine Street, Structure 1 is

approximately 6 m southwest of Structure 3. Structure 2 rests roughly 3.5 m northwest of

Structure 1 and 10 m northwest of Structure 3. Although the mission community retained the

circular shape of structures constructed in South Carolina, spatial distribution appears to shift.

Unlike colonial St. Augustine, mission residents do not appear to have defined property with

fences and did not organize or divide space through the use of lots. Similar to the city, however,

mission occupants resided in a seemingly urban environment in which structures, and people,

occurred in close proximity to one another.

Compared to colonial St. Augustine’s dense refuse deposits in trash pits and wells, La

Punta significantly lacks this type of evidence. In contrast to Altamaha Town, La Punta also

displays minimal information concerning trash disposal practices. Perhaps the abundance of

nearby estuaries, rather than abandoned wells or refuse pits, provided more efficient areas to

place garbage. At 161 Marine Street, Feature 1 and 14, which served as daub borrow pits for the

structures, produced large amounts of intentionally placed trash during excavation. Disposal

appears akin to Yamasee practices at Altamaha Town rather than a practice adapted from St.

Augustine. The former group tended to place trash pits in the yard areas outside of households,

while the latter generally positioned refuse away from the home and toward the back of the

property. 133 Marine Street offers no evidence of refuse disposal during occupation. Feature 12

and 12 North Half likely represent a trash pit utilized during abandonment of the structure.

Without evidence of well construction or use at Yamasee sites in South Carolina, no

analogue for discourse exists. The Spanish, however, placed wells, like trash pits, behind the

household and near the back of the property. Barrel wells (Shephard 1983:74; Deagan 1983:111,

247) served as the primary well type throughout the 18th century in St. Augustine. These

137

features tend to appear 12 to15 m from the street edge. Occasionally, the Spanish placed barrel

wells further back on the property for convenience in tending to the livestock or the garden. The

walk-in well discovered at La Punta diverges from the St. Augustine pattern. White (2002:116-

117) discusses the high percentage of cultural midden debris surrounding the walk-in well, which

suggests a frequently used well probably shared by the community. The ability to walk into the

well, the presence of a superstructure covering the well, and the use of a single barrel to generate

the shaft differs from Spanish practices.

Foodways

Dietary practices represent the convergence of tangible aspects of food consumption—the

basic need for sustenance—and intangible factors, including preference, perhaps influenced by

class or ethnic affiliation, availability, method of procurement, environment, and seasonality. To

determine whether the faunal assemblages recovered from 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine

Street represent any degree of creolization, the data was consolidated and compared to evidence

from Chechesy Old Field I site (38BU1605), an 18th century Yamasee site in South Carolina,

(Southerlin et al. 2001) and data compiled by Reitz and Cumbaa (1983:151-185) from six 18th

century sites. In terms of class, the mestizo and three criollo residences included in Reitz and

Cumbaa’s study represent an experience loosely analogous to Yamasee and Apalachee

households at La Punta.39 Data sets from the Old Field I site and the St. Augustine sites are both

more robust and more thoroughly analyzed than the combined faunal remains recovered from

133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street. Botanical remains and estuarine (shell) refuse are not

present within the discussion. Despite differences in sample sizes, comparative analyses provide

information concerning foodways and the manifestations of creolization process at La Punta.

39 Though ethnohistorical research suggests that Apalachee also occupied La Punta, the faunal discussion draws parallels to Yamasee dietary practices as the Yamasee comprised the missions community’s primary ethnic group.

138

Data analysis for the two sites relating to La Punta reached separate levels. Faunal

remains from 133 Marine Street were identified according to either the family or species and

laboratory volunteers include bone counts and weights, as well as notes about bone function.

Analysis involved no attempt to determine the Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI)

represented or to calculate biomass (meat weight). For discussion purposes, the MNI for each

species present at 133 Marine Street is assumed to be one. Remains present at 161 Marine Street

were also classified according to family or species, counted, and weighed; however, laboratory

analysts also determined MNI. Though MNI enables comparisons concerning the importance of

one taxon to another, the estimations include two prominent shortcomings. First, the process

favors small animals. One cow produces a greater quantity of meat than 50 mullet yield, yet MNI

does not illustrate the cow’s significant meat contribution. Second, MNI results vary depending

on whether separate samples are aggregated—as with 161 Marine Street—or remain separated

by another analytical unit (e.g. provenience). The former produces the “minimum distinction”

and the latter illuminates the “maximum distinction,” which yields a smaller MNI count than the

former method (Southerlin et al. 2001:143).

White (2002) determined which faunal remains pertained to the mission community at

161 Marine Street. The data from her thesis, paired with dietary evidence present at 133 Marine

Street, are used here. Bone fragments recovered from the general midden (Level 2 and,

occasionally, Level 3) at 133 Marine Street are not included in the discussion. These remains

may relate to La Punta occupation and foodways; however, the thorough intermixture of dateable

materials within the general midden complicates assessing the association of fauna also present.

If included, the remains from Level 2 and 3 could inflate results and bias conclusions. Bone

concentrations primarily occur within features—postholes and the probable trash pit (Feature 12

139

and Feature 12 North Half)—that correlate with the mission population. Feature deposits

containing bone fall under two categories: Intact Deposits and Possibly Disturbed Deposits

(Table 36). Feature 8, 9a, 11, 12, 12 North Half, 14, 14a, 18, 20b, and 22 represent intact faunal

deposits. These features, with the exception of Feature 18 and Feature 22, relate to La Punta.

Feature 18 and 22 are both unidentified features that likely form part of a property line

TABLE 36 INTACT AND POSSIBLY DISTURBED FEATURE DEPOSITS WITH FAUNAL REMAINS, 133 MARINE STREET

Intact Deposits Possibly Disturbed Deposits Feature 8 Feature 7

Feature 9a Feature 10 Feature 11 Feature 13

Feature 12 Feature 15 Feature 12 North Half Feature 16

Feature 14 Feature 17 Feature 14a Feature 19

Feature 18 Feature 20a Feature 20b Feature 24

Feature 22

post-dating La Punta. The artifacts, including fauna, located in both features are likely disturbed

as a result of the property line construction. Despite probable horizontal and vertical relocation,

the bone appears to remain in context based upon the associated artifacts, none of which are

intrusive. Furthermore, the property line occurs near the mission era structure features, where

mission era faunal remains were concentrated.

Ten features—1 East Half, 1 West Half, 7, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20a, and 24—comprise

the Possibly Disturbed Deposits category. Feature 13 and 15 yielded bottle forms that postdate

mission occupation and appeared similar to Feature 17 in depth and profile. Although these three

features appear to relate to one another, and seemingly postdate the mission, the artifacts present

predominantly date to the mission period. As with Feature 18 and 22, there is a possibility of

140

later activities impacting the spatial distribution of the recovered artifacts, including bone, which

correlate with La Punta; therefore, the faunal remains likely relate to mission occupation. The

remaining Possibly Disturbed feature deposits contain a mixture of primarily 18th century

mission era materials with occasional materials that pre- or post-date the mission, as well as

artifacts (e.g. glass fragments, unidentified nails) with insufficient diagnostic attributes. The

faunal remains present in these contexts are also included in the forthcoming analysis.

Table 37 illustrates species types recovered from both intact and possibly disturbed

contexts from 133 Marine Street. Quantities and weights of species from individual features are

TABLE 37 COUNTS AND WEIGHTS BY SPECIES, 133 MARINE STREET

Intact Deposit Possibly Disturbed Deposit Species Count Weight (g) Count Weight (g) Total Total (g)

Mammal 12 30.1 4 15.0 16 45.1 Large Mammal 1 9.8 2 2.3 3 12.2 Medium Mammal 1 6.0 1 6.0 Cow 1 26.0 1 26.0 Pig 4 0.1 4 0.1 Artiodactyl 1 1.2 1 1.2 Chicken 2 3.9 2 3.9 Bird 6 4.3 6 4.3 Fish 25 4.2 81 94.3 106 98.5 Catfish 3 0.3 13 5.2 16 5.5 Shark 1 0.5 1 0.5 Drum 2 4.6 2 4.6 Mullet 7 3.6 7 3.6 Large Fish 1 1.7 1 1.7 Turtle 1 0.1 1 0.1

Total 43 50.9 125 163.5 168 213.2 aggregated within each group; grand total counts and weights for each species present in both

deposit contexts appear in the final column. Unidentified bone, though a major component of the

faunal assemblage, are not included in the analysis. Similarly, unidentified burned bone does not

contribute to the overall counts and weights. Due to their fragmentary condition, the 75 (19.8 g)

141

and 42 (200.3 g) unidentified and the 4 (6.4 g) and 2 (1.5 g) burned bones produced in the intact

and possibly disturbed deposits, respectively, cannot illuminate evidence of creolization within

foodways. Table 33 displays the counts and weights of the species present at 161 Marine Street.

Unidentified bones associated with 161 Marine Street deposits are also not included in the

foodways analysis.

The combined faunal assemblages from 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street

represent an array of wild and domesticated species (Table 38). Large mammal remains

recovered from La Punta (n=146) consists of cow, pig, deer, black bear, and Artiodactyla (even-

toed ungulates, such as cow, pig, and deer). Other mammal types include an unidentified

medium sized mammal and a squirrel. Seventy-nine mammal remains cannot be attributed to a

wild or a domesticate species. Thirty-eight bones represent wild species (deer, black bear,

squirrel), though deer serve as the dominant wild species, and 28 faunal remains comprise the

domesticate mammal category (cow and pig).

TABLE 38 SPECIES COUNTS RECOVERED FROM LA PUNTA SITES

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

142

In addition to 14 unidentified bird remains, 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street

possessed 3 bird species (n=47): chicken, a domestic species, turkey, and Muscovy duck. Two

bones represent the wild species; 45 chicken remains were recovered. Aquatic species, including

fish, sharks, and turtles, in addition to gopher tortoises, also appear within the assemblage. Shark

(n=4), gopher tortoise (n=2), and turtle (n=1) occurred occasionally. Fish remains (n=245),

however, represent frequently encountered fauna. A variety of factors may inflate the quantity of

remains present and identified: greater amounts of fish remains may not equate to greater or

more frequent fish consumption. Meals related to aquatic resources would likely necessitate a

higher amount of fish, which produces a larger number of fish remains (often their vertebrae).

Vertebrae, however, tend to degrade and disappear more readily than other taxa, which could

result in underrepresented fish species.

Also, species diversity may be greater than the results suggest. During analysis, catfish,

drum, and shark are more easily recognized than other species. Fish species present include 178

unidentified bone, 45 catfish, 11 drum, 7 mullet, 3 Gafftopsail catfish, and 1 large fish remains.

Figure 22 illustrates the counts and percentage of the overall assemblage within six categories—

Domesticated Mammals, Wild Mammals, Fish, Wild Bird, Domesticated Bird, and Turtles. The

population occupying these areas of La Punta relied upon diverse foodways that incorporated

domesticated mammals, aquatic resources, as well as terrestrial mammals, birds, and reptiles. By

count, fish comprise the largest component of the assemblage while bird and turtle remains

represent the least frequent species. Domesticated mammals and birds are nearly equal with the

number of wild mammals present. As stated earlier, the MNI for identified remains at 133

Marine Street are assumed to be one. Paired with the data from 161 Marine Street, the faunal

assemblage recovered from these La Punta sites includes three drum fish, two deer, pigs, cows,

143

chickens, sharks, sea catfish, and unidentified fish as well as one squirrel, bear, turtle, gopher

tortoise, Muscovy duck, turkey, gafftopsail catfish, mullet, and catfish.

Reitz and Cumbaa’s (1983) discussion of faunal assemblages recovered from six 18th

century St. Augustine contexts—one peninsular, four criollo, and one mestizo household—

offers points of comparison to La Punta. Rather than count or MNI, the authors’ analysis

considers the biomass of the species present at each site. Although the degree of faunal analysis

completed for these colonial sites, Chechesy Old Field I, 133 Marine Street, and 161 Marine

Street differ, preliminary comparisons can be noted. In terms of biomass, domestic species

contributed majorly to all six St. Augustine sites. Maria de la Cruz and her husband, who

occupied the mestizo site, produced the least domestic biomass and the most estuarine biomass.

Criollo sites yielded the largest quantities of domestic biomass. Use of domestic biomass,

therefore, appeared inversely related to social status within the community as consumption of

wild resources suggested increased prestige (Reitz and Cumbaa 1983:177). Fish and shark

biomass occurred most heavily at the mestizo household, then the peninsular, followed by the

3911%

20%

24968%

31%

288%

4512%

Wild Mammals

Wild Bird

Fish

Turtles

Domesticated Mammal

Domesticated Bird

Figure 22. Consolidated faunal counts and percentage of assemblage by group, La Punta.

144

criollo sites, potentially in order of status. Wild birds and aquatic animals yielded minimal

biomass at all sites except the mestizo household. Faunal diversity is high at the mestizo site,

where evidence indicates dietary practices deviated from purely aboriginal, though wild foods

dominate the assemblage (Reitz and Cumbaa 1983:177; 181). Terrestrial species comprise the

majority of household foodways resource selection, though St. Augustinian households tended to

utilize resources that were easily accessed and readily available. In general, the diversity of the

six faunal assemblages illustrates an abundance of one species supplemented by a variety of

mostly terrestrial, and some aquatic, species.

Southerlin et al. (2001) evaluated remains recovered from Old Field I by broadly

classifying fauna as domestic or wild mammals, domestic or wild birds, fishes, and turtles.

Within these identified groups, the authors assessed MNI and biomass. Wild mammals represent

a varied, though traditional, group in which white-tailed deer comprise the dominant species.

Evidence of one black bear was also present. Capturing both white-tailed deer and black bears

required hunting. Trapping smaller game, which included raccoon, gray squirrel, opossum, and

eastern cottontail rabbit, demanded less effort and could account for the variety (Southerlin et al.

2001:147). Domestic mammal remains present include cow and pig, though both species are

represented by a single animal. Similarly single bones provide evidence of chicken and turkey.

The Old Field I assemblage contains 40 additional unidentified bird remains.

One shark, likely a convenience catch, and an assortment of turtle and fish species

comprise the aquatic resources. Turtle species included chicken, yellow-bellied, and box. Box

turtles appeared high in count and in biomass while chicken turtles and yellow-bellied turtles are

represented by a single bone. Exploited fish species include, in descending order of count,

hardhead catfish, gafftopsail catfish, catfish, black drum, Atlantic croaker, sea trout, red drum,

145

and sheepshead (Southerlin et al. 2001:149).40 Table 39 compares the MNI percentages from La

Punta and Old Field I as Reitz and Cumbaa (1983:175) discuss aggregate groupings for each of

the six colonial St. Augustine sites.

TABLE 39 FAUNAL CATEGORIES MNI PERCENTAGES, LA PUNTA AND OLD FIELD I

La Punta (n=27) Percentage Old Field I (n=48) Percentage Domesticated Mammals 14.81% Domesticated Mammals 4.16% Wild Mammals 14.81% Wild Mammals 27.04% Fish 40.74% Fish 52.07% Wild Bird 7.41% Wild Bird 2.08% Domesticated Bird 7.41% Domesticated Bird 2.08% Turtles 7.41% Turtles 10.41%

Although a portion of the unidentified faunal remains may be attributed to a specific

species if reanalyzed by a zooarchaeologist, the lack of food selection diversity within the La

Punta community is striking. Similar to 18th century colonial St. Augustine households and to

the Yamasee population that occupied Old Field I, fishes comprised a significant portion of the

mission community diet. Fish species harvested in the greatest quantities (e.g. drum, catfish)

represent resources easily accessed available throughout the year for all populations examined.

In contrast to Old Field I and the St. Augustine sites, 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street

demonstrate a more balanced use of domesticate and wild mammals. Additionally, La Punta

residents appear to utilize domesticated birds more frequently, even if marginally, than the

natives of Old Field I. Despite these nuances, all assemblages suggest most resources stemmed

from wild environments rather than from domesticates.

The St. Augustinian diet incoporated greater variety of species, though the sample size

and scope of analysis from the La Punta assemblage may influence the comparison. Overall, the

mission population adhered to dominantly traditional native foodways with evidence of

40 MNI counts reorder the fish species as follows: hardhead catfish (n=9), gaafftopsail catfish (n=6), black drum (n=5), Atlantic croaker (n=2), sea trout (n=1), red drum (n=1), and sheepshead (n=1).

146

European influence. The La Punta assemblage diverges from the evidence recovered from Old

Field I (Southerlin et al. 2001:144-146) when considering the quantity of domesticated animals

and the variety of wild mammals. Unlike the mestizo household, La Punta possesses minimal

faunal diversity and better balanced the meat from mammals and the meat from other food

sources. Compared to the criollo households (Reitz and Cumbaa 1983:175), the mission

community appears quite similar. Heavy utilization of estuarine food sources are supplemented

by domestic and wild mammals. Generally criollo households used domesticated species more

often than wild terrestrial animals; however, the differences, while measurable, are not

significant. In sum, La Punta’s population maintained established Yamasee foodways while

seemingly incorporating greater amounts of domesticated animals into their diet. Although the

assemblage recovered from 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street appears akin to the Old

Field I assemblage, parallels also exist with the criollo household assemblages that Reitz and

Cumbaa examine.

Discussion

The mission community of La Punta, like the mestizo site Deagan (1983a; 1983b)

discusses, represents a component of St. Augustine’s population generally considered less

desirable, even inferior, to criollos or peninsulares (Deagan 1983:68). Persons of direct Spanish

descent, or those with minimal intermixture with ethnicities other than Spaniards, primarily held

an elevated socioeconomic position. Eighteenth century St. Augustine’s continuum of social

identification, however, permitted cultural and racial intermixture. Within the context of La

Punta, cultural creolization is emphasized. Creolization incorporates processes, possessions, and

actions that extend beyond acceptance by or integration into the “dominant” culture. The

purchase, presence, and/or use of resources such as ceramics, architecture, and foodways at La

147

Punta may serve as attempts to alter social identification or to modify sociocultural affiliations

designated by others. Regardless of motivation or intention, analyzing ceramics, architecture,

and foodways at two sites relating to La Punta—133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street—

offers evidence of a culture imbued with fluidity, creativity, tradition, and change.

The presence of colonoware within the mission community suggests potters decided,

probably on an individual basis, to combine aboriginal ceramic production techniques (e.g.

temper and surface treatment) with European vessel form and function, a process which occurred

in other La Florida missions for more than a century. Furthermore, British ceramics served as a

common occurrence within 18th century assemblages located at Yamasee sites in South Carolina

and within Spanish St. Augustine. When examined together, 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine

Street align with 18th century St. Augustine’s ceramic pattern. Aboriginal ceramics, namely San

Marcos, occur most often within assemblages. Furthermore, Hispanic tablewares dominate

European tablewares and British ceramics appear frequently. Intra-site ceramic comparisons,

however, lend further evidence of creolization at La Punta. The ceramic assemblage recovered

from 161 Marine Street diverges from the pattern established within St. Augustine. Ceramic

divergence also holds true at 133 Marine Street.

At 161 Marine Street, Non-Hispanic Tablewares represent to the most abundant

European ceramic sub-group (Table 34). Hispanic Utilitarian Wares, Hispanic Tablewares, and

Non-Hispanic Utilitarian Wares follow in descending order. Perhaps the distribution of cultural

material within the selected excavation areas affected the sample size. Otherwise, differing type

frequencies and, presumably, uses of ceramics at two different households within the same

community suggests the presence of creolization (Figure 23). 161 Marine Street denotes an

148

assemblage more characteristic of 18th century St. Augustine while 133 Marine Street ceramics

align with an intermixed criollo and a native household. Aboriginal pottery comprises the highest

*All Aboriginal Utilitarian Wares, except for 133 Marine Street, contain 3,000 more ceramics than the chart indicates. In order to better represent the remaining ceramic sub-groups, the Aboriginal Utilitarian Wares groups were reduced in Figure 23.

Figure 23. Comparison of ceramic sub-groups at La Punta, de Hita, de la Cruz, and Ponce de León Sites. percentage of the ceramic assemblage at 133 Marine Street. The site yielded non-Hispanic

Utilitarian Wares with less frequency than a criollo household tended to, yet produced more

Hispanic tablewares than non-Hispanic tablewares, as is common to sites of increased economic

status (Shephard 1983:88). Architectural and foodways intra-site variances reinforce the

assertion that the mission community likely accepted, rejected, and modified European and

native practices, products, and traditions in creative manners while also applying these forms of

continuity and change uniquely within individual, familial, or other small group contexts.

Architectural practices and the use of space at La Punta also present evidence to support

creolization. No well features uncovered in St. Augustine or known Yamasee sites in South

0 500 1000 1500

133 Marine Sreet

161 Marine Street

de la Cruz (mestizo)

de Hita (criollo)

Ponce de León (criollo)

Non-Hispanic Tablewares

Hispanic Tablewares

Aboriginal Tablewares/Colonoware

Non-Hispanic Utilitarian Wares

Hispanic Utilitarian Wares

Aboriginal Utilitarian Wares*

149

Carolina provide an analogy to the walk-in well and superstructure at La Punta. The well

illustrates unique design, construction, and communal use. Refuse disposal within the mission

community also demonstrates change. Yamasee residing in South Carolina appeared to dispose

of trash in pits near their homes. Residents of colonial St. Augustine placed garbage in trash pits,

or abandoned wells, toward the rear of the property. Although two daub pit features at 161

Marine Street were likely used as trash pits and 133 Marine Street contains a refuse pit

seemingly associated with the structure’s abandonment, investigations yielded no concentrated,

designated refuse areas. Though the mission population might have placed garbage in the

estuaries surrounding the site, engaging in the act diverged from the cultural practices in Spanish

St. Augustine. Proximity to the colonial city may have shaped waste disposal behaviors among

the Yamasee and Apalachee at La Punta; however, trash pit features and disposal patterns reflect

no European influence or native traditions.

Intra-site architectural variance appears within structure shape and the quantity and type

of building materials used. Excavation at 161 Marine Street yielded three—one confirmed and

two probable—circular structures, whereas 133 Marine Street contains one probable rectangular

structure. Yamasee in South Carolina constructed circular structures in non-nucleated clusters.

La Punta’s population residing on the 161 Marine Street property maintained the structure shape

while adapting the distance between households. Assuming the postholes designated as Structure

2 and Structure 3 relate to households, these circular structures demonstrate a closely clustered

settlement pattern akin to an urban environment. Building materials present at the site included—

in descending order according to weight—coquina, daub, tabby, brick, mortar, and plaster. If the

mission population incorporated architectural construction methods that were becoming popular

in 18th century Spanish St. Augustine into mission households, then coquina represented a new

150

construction material, one to potentially be utilized by the mission population. The construction

of a Second Spanish Period powder magazine, however, may inflate or account for the presence

of coquina, in addition to tabby, brick, plaster, and mortar (Table 9). As with 133 Marine Street,

the site contains an abundant amount of nails, which may suggest use during construction.

133 Marine Street possessed smaller quantities of all building materials identified at 161

Marine Street and the postholes located revealed a possible rectangular, two-room structure.

Additional testing is needed in order to determine whether, and how, the household pertains to

the mission occupation. Its location beyond the town walls and the lack of traditionally Spanish

features (e.g. barrel well and trash pits) lend credence to the structure’s use at La Punta.41

Furthermore, comparisons to a rectangular structure located at Pocotalaca (Halbirt 2014 pers.

comm.) may elucidate who resided in the household at La Punta and what role rectangular

structures possess in regards to creolization. Merritt (1983:131) notes that the Timucuan who

occupied the present-day Fountain of Youth site often housed the cacique in a rectangular

structure. Although cultural and temporal separations exist between the Timucuan and La

Punta’s occupants, the practice or belief that structure shape established, reinforced, or

suggested, status affiliation may have persisted.

As with ceramic and architectural analysis, examining foodways at La Punta provides

evidence for creolization. La Punta foodways appear to incorporate domestic species (e.g. cow,

pig, and chicken) while also maintaining more traditional foods such as fish, turtles, deer, black

bear, rabbits, and other game. Fishes, which served as an easily accessed resource, comprised a

41 Perhaps the seemingly rectangular structure relates to a convento. This scenario is plausible, though no historical maps that include the site of La Punta allude to a friary. Few of these maps, however, displayed great details regarding the location and types of structures at the mission. Determining whether La Punta functioned as a doctrina or as a visita would determine whether a convento would be likely to exist. La Punta’s proximity to the monastery, which now functions as the Florida National Guard Headquarters, may have minimized the need for a friar’s full-time residency at the mission. Additional ehtnohistorical and/or archaeological investigations should determine the nature of the proposed rectangular structure.

151

major portion of the mission diet, aligning well with the foodways at Old Field I and within

colonial St. Augustine. 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street, however, demonstrate a more

balanced use of domesticate and wild mammals, though most resources originated from wild

environments. La Punta residents likely utilized domesticated birds more frequently, even if

marginally, than those occupying Old Field I. The La Punta faunal assemblage embodies trends

found in both the Old Field I and the criollo household assemblages. Faunal variation between

the two mission sites is difficult to determine with the current level of analysis.

According to Deagan (1983:151), “’cuisine’ is usually one of the last areas to be

modified” during times of change. Prolonged periods of interactions and alliances between the

Yamasee, the Spanish, and the British confuse determining how cultural intermixture manifests

within foodways at La Punta. Additionally, local environments and economic factors impact

foodways. The mission population continued to rely upon aquatic resources available in the

surrounding estuaries; however, La Punta’s persistent reliance on convenient and accessible

foodways also included incorporating domesticates. The assemblage of tools used to capture

animals, though sparse, also exhibits evidence of creolization. Lead weights used on fishing nets

possibly replaced shells or other naturally occurring materials while gunflints facilitated hunts

for larger mammals with more convenient kill methods.

Analysis of archaeological remains at 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street not only

indicates the population of La Punta experienced creolization, but also provides details regarding

the ceramic, architectural, and dietary manifestations of this process. Cultural influence and

intermixture occurs in varied, unpredictable manners and its manifestations may remain constant

or may change through time. Creolization ensues within a spectrum; however, the spectrum itself

possesses no singular point of commencement or termination. Creolization may encompass one

152

cultural alteration. Similarly, the process may result from a culmination of sociocultural factors,

shaped by individual and group identities, motivations, preferences, interactions, and ideologies.

La Punta falls within the spectrum of creolization; however, discerning at which point the

mission community is located proves difficult. The Yamasee Confederation itself likely resulted

from creolization processes dating to the 17th century, and continued cultural interactions and

influences from diverse populations created a complex, complicated cultural lineage. Complexity

increases within this analysis if the Apalachee population component were able to be considered

with greater depth as a distinct ethnicity. Instead, the examination of creolization at 133 Marine

Street and 161 Marine Street considers La Punta’s primary population—the Yamasee. Assessing

and understanding creolization within the context of La Punta, and within broader contexts,

requires more nuanced artifact analyses, additional archaeological investigations, and research

questions designed to probe cultural intermixture at multiple scales and through various periods

of time.

Future Directions

The analysis of ceramics, architecture, and foodways that pertain to the mission

community of Nuestra Señora del Rosario de la Punta presented here represent a comprehensive,

yet still preliminary, consideration of creolization in an 18th century refugee mission context.

Expanding the scope of study to include evidence of creolization through religion represents a

vital element of understanding creolization within the mission community. Archaeological

investigations completed at 11 Tremerton Street provide potential evidence for such an analysis

(Boyer 2005; McGee et al. 2005). As stated above, the scope of study should expand to include

the Apalachee also documented within the mission community.

153

Other studies might relate to establishing, defining, and/or refining the Yamasee’s

placement on the creolization spectrum throughout time. The study may consider whether the

amalgamation—the Yamasee Confederation’s formation period—relate and compare to

Yamasee periods spent with the Spanish and the British. Assessing if, and how, creolization

occurred within these situations may help illustrate the fluid nature of culture, as well as the

creative ways in which cultures adapt and change. Furthermore, the investigation may highlight

manners in which and motivations for cultures to elect to maintain/retain practices, behaviors,

and beliefs. Additional analysis of 133 Marine Street and 161 Marine Street also encourages

expanded studies which incorporate other excavated areas relating to La Punta. More data from

La Punta facilitates intra-site comparisons while also enabling far-reaching anthropological

assessments. These studies might consider contemporaneous mission sites in La Florida or the

Southwest; similarly, the scope of study may evaluate creolization process at La Punta and a

site(s) separated from the mission community by both time and space. There is abundant

potential to compare cultural creolization processes to the processes originally identified within

linguistic theory. As historical archaeologists more frequently evaluate artifactual assemblages

using a creolization framework, a need for quantifiable methodologies to identify the process

also emerges. Though determining the presence and manifestations of creolization within

specific cultural contexts expands discourse concerning forms of cultural mixture, historical

archaeology needs to move toward quantified and a qualified forms of creolization.

154

REFERENCES Archivo General de Indias 1725 and 1726 Situado Accounts. AGI SD 854, Archivo General de Indias, Seville, Spain. Documents also available in Worth Collection, Documents 3, 7, 8, 12, 14, 15, 16, University of West Florida, Anthropology Department, Pensacola, Florida. Arnade, Charles W. 1996 Raids, Seiges, and International Wars. In The New History of Florida, Michael Gannon, editor, pp. 100-116. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Bader, Bettina 2013 Archaeology and Cultural Mixture: Creolization, Hybridity, and Mestizaje. Archaeological

Review from Cambridge 28(1): 257-286. Beaudoin, Matthew A. 2013 A Hybrid Identity in a Pluralistic Nineteenth-Century Colonial Context. Historical

Archaeology 47(2): 45-63.

Bickerton, Derek 2001 How to Acquire Language without Positive Evidence: What Acquisitionists Can Learn from Creoles. In Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony, and

Development. Michel DeGraff, editor, pp. 49-76. MIT Press, Cambride, MA. Bolland, O. Nigel 2006 Reconsidering Creolisation and Creole Societies. Shibboleths: Journal of Comparative

Theory 1(1): 1-14. Boyer III, Willet T. 2005 Nuestra Senora Del Rosario de la Punta: Lifeways of an Eighteenth-Century Colonial

Spanish Refugee Mission Community, St. Augustine, Florida. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Bushnell, Amy Turner 1994 Situado and Sabana: Spain's Support System for the Presidio and Mission Provinces of

Florida. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Book 3, No. 74. Athens, GA. 1996 Republic of Indians, Republic of Spaniards. In The New History of Florida, Michael Gannon, editor, pp. 62-77. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

Card, Jeb J. 2013 Introduction. In The Archaeology of Hybrid Material Culture, Jeb J. Card, editor, pp. 1-21. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.

155

Chatelain, Verne E. 1941 The Defenses of Spanish Florida, 1565-1763. Publication 511, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Baltimore, MD. Chasteen, John Charles 2006 Born in Blood and Fire: A Concise History of Latin America, 2nd edition. W.W. Norton and Company, New York, NY. City of St. Augustine 1987 Chapter 6 Archaeological Preservation (Code 1964, § 5 1/2-1), St. Augustine. Crane, Verner W. 2004 Southern Frontier, 1670-1732, 2nd edition. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. Deagan, Kathleen (editor) 1983 Spanish St. Augustine: The Archaeology of a Colonial Creole Community. Academic Press, New York, NY. 1987a Artifacts of the Spanish Colonies of Florida and the Caribbean, 1550–1800, Vol. 1,

Ceramics, Glassware, and Beads. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 1987b Artifacts of the Spanish Colonies of Florida and the Caribbean, 1550–1800, Vol. 2,

Portable Personal Possessions. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 1993 St. Augustine and the Mission Frontier. In The Spanish Missions of La Florida, Bonnie McEwan, editor, pp. 87-110. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. 2002 A New Florida and A New Century: The Impact of the English Invasion on Daily Life in St. Augustine. El Escribano: The Saint Augustine Journal of History 39:102-112. 2003 Colonial Origins and Colonial Transformations in Spanish America. Historical

Archaeology 37(4): 3-13. 2007 Eliciting Contraband through Archaeology: Illicit Trade in Eighteenth-Century St. Augustine. Historical Archaeology 41(4):98-116. 2011 Archaeology at 8SJ34: The Nombre de Dios/La Leche Shrine Site, St. Augustine. University of Florida, Florida Museum of Natural History, Summary Report on the 1934-2011 Excavations, Miscellaneous Reports in Archaeology, No. 62, Gainesville. DeGraff, Michel. 2001 Creolization, Language Change, and Language Acquisition: A Prolegomenon. In Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony, and Development. Michel DeGraff, editor, pp. 1-46. MIT Press, Cambride, MA.

156

Ewen, Charles 2000 From Colonist to Creole: Archaeological Patterns of Spanish Colonization in the New World. Historical Archaeology 34(3): 36-45.

Ferguson, Leland 1992 Uncommon Ground: Archaeology and Early African America, 1650-1800. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 2000 Introduction. Historical Archaeology 34(3):5-9.

Fradkin, Arlene, Roger T. Grange, Jr., and Dorothy L. Moore 2012 “Minorcan” Ethnogenesis and Foodways in Britain’s Smyrnéa Settlement, Florida, 1766–1777. Historical Archaeology 46(1): 28-48. Francis, Michael J. and Kathleen M. Kole 2011 Murder and Martyrdom in Spanish Florida: Don Juan and the Guale Uprising of 1597. American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers No. 95. Gallay, Allan 2002 The Indian Slave Trade: The Rise of the English Empire in the American South, 1670-

1717. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

Gannon, Michael V. 1965 The Cross in the Sand: The Early Catholic Church in Florida, 1513-1870. In Spanish

Borderlands Sourcebooks, David Hurst Thomas, editor, pp. 265-313. Garland Publishing, New York, NY. Glissant, Edouard 2008 Creolization in the Making of the Americas. Caribbean Quarterly 1/2: 81-89. Gonzales, Gregorio 1754 Copia de Capitulos del nuevo reglamento hecho por el Excelentísimo Señor Virrey de Nueva España para el presidio de San Agustin de la Florida publicado el dia quinze de Junio de mil setecientos sinquinta y quatro. AGI SD 2226, Archivo General de Indias, Seville, Spain. Gordon, Elsbeth 2002 Florida’s Colonial Architectural Heritage. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Green, William 1992 The Search for Altamaha: The Archaeology and Ethnohistory of and Early 18th Century Yamasee Indian Town. Master’s Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC. Green, William and Chester DePratter 2000 Ten Years of Yamasee Archaeology in South Carolina: A Retrospective and Guide for Future Research. Paper presented at the 57th Annual Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Macon, Georgia.

157

Green, William, Chester B. DePratter, and Bobby Southerlin 2002 The Yamasee in South Carolina: Native American Adaptation and Interaction along the Carolina Frontier. In Another's Country: Archaeological and Historical Perspectives on Cultural

Interactions in the Southern Colonies, J.W. Joseph and Martha Zierden, editors, pp. 13-29. University Press of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.

Gundaker, Grey 2000 Discussion: Creolization, Complexity, and Time. Historical Archaeology 34(3): 124-133. Halbirt, Carl D. 1996 An Evaluation of Archaeological Resources at the Bayview Nursing and Assisted- Living Facility, 1161 Marine Street, St. Augustine, Florida. Report to Planning and Building Division, St. Augustine, Florida. 1999 “… a Great Farmer and Gardener”: Archaeological Evidence of Governor James Grant’s Farm, St. Augustine, East Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 52(1/2): 57-71. 2004 La Ciudad de San Agustín: A European Fighting Presidio in Eighteenth-Century La Florida. Historical Archaeology 38(3): 33-46. 2005 “...where the sea breezes constantly blow... an ideal place for a home": The 18th Century Mission Community of Nuestra Señora del Rosario de la Punta. Paper presented at the 2005 SEAC conference, Columbia, South Carolina. Halbirt, Carl and MisCha Johns 2014 Seeking Asylum in 18th-Century St. Augustine: The Final Chapter of the Franciscan Mission System in La Florida. Paper presented at the Franciscan Florida in Pan-Borderlands Perspective: Adaptation, Negotiation, and Resistance, St. Augustine, FL. Hally, David J. 1994 An Overview of Lamar Culture. In Ocmulgee Archaeology, 1936-1986. David J. Hally, editor, pp. 144-174. University of Georgia Press, Athens. Hann, John H. 1986 Governor Rebolledo's Reply to the Friars. Florida Archaeology 2: 81-145. 1988 Apalachee: The Land between the Rivers. University of Florida Press, Gainesville. 1996a A History of the Timucua Indians and Missions. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

1996b The Missions of Spanish Florida. In The New History of Florida. Michael Gannon, editor, pp. 78-99. University of Press Florida, Gainesville. Hann, John and Bonnie McEwan 1998 The Apalachee Indians and Mission San Luis. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

158

Hill, Jonathan D. 2013 Long Term Patterns of Ethnogenesis in Indigenous Amazonia. In The Archaeology of

Hybrid Material Culture, Jeb J. Card, editor, pp. 165-183. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale. Hitchcock, Louise A. and Aren M. Maeir 2013 Beyond Creolization and Hybridity: Entangled and Transcultural Identities in Philistia. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 28(1): 51-74. Hoffman, Paul E. 2002 Florida’s Frontiers. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis. Hudson, Charles 1997 Knights of Spain, Warriors of the Sun: Hernando de Soto and the South’s Ancient

Chiefdoms. University of Georgia Press, Athens. Hume, Ivor Noël 1969 A Guide to Artifacts of Colonial America. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia. Hutnyk, John 2010 Hybridity. In Diasporas: Concepts, Intersections, Identities, Kim Knott and Sean McLoughlin, editors, pp. 59-62. Zed Books, London, England. Kapitzke, Robert L. 2001 Religion, Power and Politics in Colonial St. Augustine. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Keith, Robert G. 1971 Encomienda, Hacienda and Corregimiento in Spanish America: A Structural Analysis. The

Hispanic American Historical Review 51(3): 431-446. Liebmann, Matthew 2013 Parsing Hybridity: Archaeologies of Amalgamation in Seventeenth-Century New Mexico. In The Archaeology of Hybrid Material Culture, Jeb J. Card, editor, pp. 25-49. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale. Lockhart, James 1969 Encomienda and Hacienda: The Evolution of the Great Estate in the Spanish Indies. The

Hispanic American Historical Review 49(3): 411-429. Lumsden, John S. 2001 Language Acquisition and Creolization. In Language Creation and Language Change:

Creolization, Diachrony, and Development. Michel DeGraff, editor, pp. 129-158. MIT Press, Cambride, MA.

159

Lyon, Eugene 1974 The Enterprise of Florida. The Florida Historical Quarterly 52(4): 411-422. 1992 The Failure of Guale and Orista Missions: 1572-1575. In Columbus and the Land of

Ayllón: The Exploration and Settlement of the Southeast, Jeannine Cook, editor, pp. 89-104. Lower Altamaha Historical Society, Valona, GA. Marcel, Sarah Elizabeth 1994 Buttoning Down the Past: A Look at Buttons as Indicators of Chronology and Material Culture. Honor’s Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.

McGee, Ray, Antoinette B. Wallace, Mike Tarleton, and Nick McAuliffe 2005 Archaeological Investigations of a Multi-component Spanish Mission/British Hospital Site in St. Augustine, Florida. Paper presented at the 57th Annual Florida Anthropological Society Conference, Gainesville, Florida.

Melcher, Jennifer 2011 More than just Copies: Colono Ware as a Reflection of Multiethnic Interaction on the 18th-Century Spanish Frontier of West Florida. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL.

Merritt, J. Donald 1983 Beyond the Town Walls: The Indian Element in Colonial St. Augustine. In Spanish St.

Augustine: The Archaeology of a Colonial Creole Community, Kathleen Deagan, editor, pp. 125-150. Academic Press, New York, NY.

Milanich, Jerald T. 2006 Laboring in the Fields of the Lord: Spanish Missions and Southeastern Indians. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Mullins, Paul R. and Mark S. Warner 2008 Revisiting Living in Cities. Historical Archaeology 42(1): 1-4. Oatis, Steven J. 2004 A Colonial Complex: South Carolina's Frontiers in the Era of the Yamasee War, 1680-

1730. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. O’Brien, Edward Joseph 1942 The Jesuits in Spanish Florida or an Inquiry into the Circumstances Leading to the Abandonment of the Mission. Master’s thesis, Department of History, Layola University. Orser, Charles 1989 On Plantations and Patterns. Historical Archaeology 23(2): 28-40.

160

Otto, John and Russell Lewis 1975 A Formal and Functional Analysis of San Marcos Pottery from Site SA-16-23, St. Augustine. Florida Department of State, Bureau of Historic Sites and Properties Bulletin 4, Tallahassee, FL. Pappa, Eleftheria 2013 Archaeology and Cultural Mixture: Creolization, Hybridity, and Mestizaje. Archaeological

Review from Cambridge 28(1): 29-50. Parker, Susan 1993 Spanish St. Augustine’s “Urban” Indians. El Escribano 30: 1-15. 1999 The Second Century of Settlement in Spanish St. Augustine, 1670-1763. Doctoral dissertation, Department of History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Pearson, Jr., Fred Lamar 1990 Spanish-Indian Relations in Florida: A Study of Two Visitas, 1657-1678. Garland Publishing, New York, NY. Ramsey, William L. 2008 The Yamasee War : A Study of Culture, Economy, and Conflict in the Colonial South. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. Rath, Richard Cullen 2000 Drums and Power: Ways of Creolizing Music in Coastal South Carolina and Georgia, 1730-90. In Creolization in the Americas, David Buisseret and Steven G. Reinhardt, editors, pp. 99-130. Texas A&M University Press, Arlington. Reitz, Elizabeth J. and Stephen L. Cumbaa 1983 Diet and Foodways of Eighteenth Century Spanish St. Augustine. In Spanish St.

Augustine: The Archaeology of a Colonial Creole Community, Kathleen Deagan, editor, pp. 151-186. Academic Press, New York. Rolland, Vicki and Keith Ashley 2000 Beneath the Bell: A Study of Colonoware from Three Spanish Mission Sites in Northeastern Florida. Florida Anthropologist 53(1):36-61. Russell, Lynette 2005 “Either, or, Neither Nor”: Resisting the Production of Gender, Race, and Class Dichotomies in the Pre-Colonial Period. In The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities, Eleanor Casella and Chris Fowler, editors, pp. 33-50. Springer, New York, NY. Sastre, Cecile-Marie 2002 Defense-in-Depth: The Development of St. Augustine's Defensive System, 1702-1763. El

Escribano 39: 87-101.

161

Saunders, Rebecca 1993 Architecture of the Missions Santa María and Santa Catalina de Amelia. In The Spanish

Missions of La Florida, Bonnie McEwan, editor, pp. 35-61. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. 2000 Stability and Change in Guale Indian Pottery, A.D. 1300-1702. University of Alabama Press, Tuscalooa. Scardaville, Michael C. and Jesús Maria Belmonte 1979 Florida in the Late First Spanish Period: The 1756 Griñán Report. El Escribano: The Saint

Augustine Journal of History 16:1-24. Shephard, Stephen J. 1983 The Spanish Criollo in Colonial St. Augustine. In Spanish St. Augustine: The Archaeology

of a Colonial Creole Community, Kathleen Deagan, editor, pp. 65-97. Academic Press, New York, NY. Singleton, Theresa A. and Mark Bograd 2000 Breaking Typological Barriers: Looking for the Colono in Colonoware. In Lines that

Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class, and Gender, James A. Delle, Stephen A. Mrozowski, Robert Paynter, editors, 3-21. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville. Smith, Marvin 1987 Archaeology of Aboriginal Culture Change in the Interior Southeast : Depopulation

during the Early Historic Period. Univeristy Press of Florida, Gainesville. Staski, Edward 2008 Living in Cities Today. Historical Archaeology 42(1): 5-10. South, Stanley 1977 Method and Theory in Historical Archaeology. Percheron Press, Clinton Corners, NY. Southerlin, Bobby, Dawn Reid, Connie Huddleston, Alana Lynch, and Dea Mozigo 2001 Return of the Yamasee: Archaeological Data Recovery at Chechesey Old field, Beaufort County, South Carolina. Report to Chechessee Land and Timber Company, from Brockington and Associates, Raleigh, NC. Spellman, Charles W. 1965 The "Golden Age" of the Florida Missions, 1632-1674. The Catholic Historical Review 51(3): 354-372. St. Augustine Historical Society 1730 Colonel John Palmer Map. St. Augustine Historical Society, St. Augustine, FL. 1737 Antonio de Arredondo Map. St. Augustine Historical Society, St. Augustine, FL.

162

1752 Population: the Gelabert Report, 1752. St. Augustine Historical Society, St. Augustine, FL. 1763 Pablo Castelló Map. St. Augustine Historical Society, St. Augustine, FL. 1769 Juan Joseph Eligio de la Puente Map. St. Augustine Historical Society, St. Augustine, FL. Stewart, C.C. 1999 Syncretism and Its Synonyms: Reflections on Cultural Mixture. Diacritics 29(3): 40-62.

2010 Creolization: History, Ethnography, Theory. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

2011 Creolization, Hybridity, Syncretism, Mixture. Portuguese Studies 27(1): 48-55. Stockhammer, Philipp W. 2013 Archaeology and Cultural Mixture: Creolization, Hybridity, and Mestizaje. Archaeological

Review from Cambridge 28(1): 11-28. Swanton, John 1922 Early History of the Creek Indians and Their Neighbors. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Sweeney, Alex 2005 Identifying Pocotaligo, an Upper Yamasee Town in Jasper County, South Carolina. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Columbia, South Carolina. 2009 Understand the Yamasee at Altamaha Town. Paper presented at the 74th Annual Society for American Archaeology Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia. Sweeney, Alex and Eric Poplin [2015] The Yamasee Indians of Early Carolina. In South Carolina’s Hidden Heritage: the

Archaeology of the Palmetto Site, Adam King, editor. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia. Tasi, Alexander 2013 Maize in the Political Economy of Spanish St. Augustine. Historic St. Augustine Research Institute, St. Augustine, FL. Taylor, William D. 1992 Christianity Comes to the Americas. Christian History 11(3): 26-27. TePaske, John Jay. 1964 The Governorship of Spanish Florida: 1700-1763. Duke University Press, Durham, NC. Teske, Raymond H.C. and Bardin H. Nelson 1974 Acculturation and Assimilation: A Clarification. American Ethnologist 1(2): 351-367.

163

Van Pelt, W. Paul (editor) 2013 Archaeology and Cultural Mixture: Creolization, Hybridity, and Mestizaje. Archaeological

Review from Cambridge 28(1). VanValkenburgh, Parker 2013 Archaeology and Cultural Mixture: Creolization, Hybridity, and Mestizaje. Archaeological

Review from Cambridge 28(1): 301-322. Vernon, Richard, and Ann S. Cordell 1993 A Distributional and Technological Study of Apalachee Colono-Ware from San Luís de Talimali. In The Spanish Missions of La Florida, Bonnie G. McEwan, editor, pp. 418-441. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Waters, Gifford 2005 Maintenance and Change of 18th Century Mission Indian Identity: A Multi-Ethnic Contact Situation. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida.

White, Andrea P. 2002 Living on the Periphery: A Study of an Eighteenth-Century Yamasee Mission Community in Colonial St. Augustine. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA. Worth, John E. 1992 The Timucuan Missions of Spanish Florida and the Rebellion of 1656. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI. 1993 Prelude to Abandonment: The Interior Provinces of Early 17th-Century Georgia. Early

Georgia 21(1): 24-58. 1994 Late Spanish Military Expeditions in the Interior Southeast, 1597-1628. In The Forgotten

Centuries: Indians and Europeans in the American South, 1521-1704. Charles Hudson and Carmen Chaves Tesser, editors, pp. 104-22. University of Georgia Press, Athens. 1995a Appendix A: The Early Seventeenth Century Locations of Tama and Utinahica. In Historic Indian Period Archaeology of the Georgia Coastal Plain. Chad. O. Braley, author, pp. 59-A8. Georgia Archaeological Research Design Paper No. 10. 1995b The Struggle for the Georgia Coast: An Eighteenth-Century Spanish Retrospective on Guale and Mocama. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History,

Number 75. University of Georgia Press, Athens. 1997 Integrating Ethnohistory and Archaeology among the Timucua: An Overview of Southeast Georgia and Northeast Florida. Paper presented at the 54th Annual Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

164

1998a The Timucuan Chiefdoms of Spanish Florida, Vol. I: Assimilation. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. 1998b The Timucuan Chiefdoms of Spanish Florida, Vol. II: Resistance and Destruction. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. 1999 Yamassee Origins and the Development of the Carolina-Florida Frontier. Paper presented at the 5th Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture Conference, Austin, Texas. 2004a Guale. In Handbook of North American Indians Volume 14 Southeast. Raymond Fogelson and William Sturtevant, editor, pp. 238-244. Smithsonian Institution: Washington, D.C. 2004b Yamasee. In Handbook of North American Indians Volume 14 Southeast. Raymond Fogelson and William Sturtevant, editor, pp. 245-253. Smithsonian Institution: Washington, D.C. 2008 Rediscovering Pensacola’s Lost Spanish Missions. Paper presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina. 2009a Razing Florida: The Indian Slave Trade and the Devastation of Spanish Florida, 1659-1715. In Mapping the Mississippian Shatter Zone: The Colonial Indian Slave Trade and

Regional Instability in the American South, Robbie Ethridge and Sheri Shuck-Hall, editors, pp. 295-311. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. 2009b Ethnicity and Ceramics on the Southeastern Atlantic Coast: an Ethnohistorical Analysis. In From Santa Elena to St. Augustine: Indigenous Ceramic Variability (A.D. 1400-1700), Kathleen Deagan and Daid Hurst Thomas, editors, pp. 179-207. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, No. 90. Athens, GA. 2012 Creolization in Southwest Florida: Cuban Fishermen and “Spanish Indians,” ca. 1766-1841. Historical Archaeology 46(1):142–160. 2013 Inventing Florida: Constructing a Colonial Society in an Indigenous Landscape. In Native

and Imperial Transformations: Sixteenth-Century Entradas in the American Southwest and

Southeast, Clay Mathers, Jeffrey M. Mitchem, and Charles M. Haecker, editors. University of Arizona, Tuscon. Worth, John E., Norma J. Harris, Jennifer Melcher, and Danielle Dadiego 2012 Exploring Mission Life in 18th-Century West Florida: 2011 Excavations at San Joseph de Escambe. Paper presented at the 45th Conference of the Society for Historical Archaeology, Baltimore, Maryland.

165

APPENDIXES

166

APPENDIX A

CITY of ST. AUGUSTINE ARCHAEOLOGY PROGRAM ARTIFACT CODES

167

133 Marine Street

Activities

ABODIS Aboriginal Discard

CHARCOAL Charcoal

CHERT Chert

COAL Coal

FLAKE Flake

IRONFRAG Unidentified Iron Fragment

LEADOBJ Lead Object

THIMBLE Thimble

TOY Toy

SLAG Slag

SPRUE Lead Sprue

TC Terra Cotta

UIDIRON Unidentified Iron

UIDMTL Unidentified Metal

UIDOBJ Unidentified Object

WGT Weight

Arms

BULLET Bullet

FIRING CAP Firing Cap

FLINT Flint

FLNTGUN Gunflint

GUN SHELL Gun Shell

KNIFE HANDLE Knife Handle

MINIBALL Minié Ball

SABER TIP Saber Tip

168

SHOT Lead Shot

Architecture

BOLT Bolt

BRICK Brick

CONST Construction Material

COQUINA Coquina

DAUB Daub

CLINCHNAIL Clinched Nail

GLAS Glass (Window)

IRONUID Unidentified Iron

NAILCLINCH Clinched Nail

NAILSQUID Unidentified Square Nail

NAILUID Unidentified Nail

NAILWRT Hand Wrought Nail

TABBY Tabby

TASSEL HOLDER Tassel Holder

TILEUID Unidentified Tile

SLATE Slate

SPIKE Spike

STAPLE Staple

UIDNAIL Unidentified Nail

WOOD Wood

WIRE Wire

Clothing

BUT Button

CUFFLINKS Cufflinks

GARMENT HOOK Garment Hook

169

HOOK Hook

Faunal

BONE Bone

BOTAN Botanical/Floral

COPRO Coprolite

FISH SCALE Fish Scale

SHELL Shell

Furniture

COG Cog

DRAWER PULL Drawer Pull

ESCUT Escutcheon

TACK Tack

Kitchen

ABORIGINAL CERAMICS

ABODIS Aboriginal Discard

ABOUID Unidentified Aboriginal

CLNO Colonoware

MILLERP Miller Plain

MISSRF Mission Red

NLABO Non-Local Aboriginal

SJDEC St. Johns Deocrated

SJI St. Johns Incised

SJUID Unidentified St. Johns

SMD Indeterminate San Marcos

SMDEC San Marcos Decorated

SMUID Indeterminate Sam Marcos

STDEC Sand Tempered Decorated

170

STP Sand Tempered Plain

EUROPEAN TABLEWARES

DELFT Delftware

CW Creamware

ASTBURY Astbury

ANLRW Annularware

ELERS Elersware

HPIRNSTN Hand Painted Ironstone

IRNSTN Ironstone

IRNSTNTP Transfer Print Ironstone

MEXRED Mexican Red Painted

MOCHA Mochaware

PORCCHI Chinese Porcelain

PORENG English Porcelain

PORMING Ming Porcelain

POROG Overglazed Porcelain

PORPOW Powder Blue Porcelain

PORUID Unidentified Porcelain

PUEBW Puebla Blue on White

PUEPOLY Puebla Polychrome

PW Pearlware

PWANLR Annular Pearlware

PWHP Hand Painted Pearlware

PWLP Gaudy Dutch

PWPP Hand Painted Pearlware (late)

PWSH Shell Edged Pearlware

PWTP Transfer Print Pearlware

171

PWUID Unidentified Pearlware

REDW Redware

REFEW Refined Earthenware

REWANLR Annular Refined Earthenware

SLIP Slipware

SLIPRED Slipped Redware

SLIPREDAM American Slipware

SLPOLY San Luis Polychrome

TPREF Refined Transfer Printed

UIDMAJ Unidentified Majolica

WW Whiteware

WWANLR Annular Whiteware

WWB Beaded Whiteware

WWFB Flow Blue Whiteware

WWHP Hand Painted Whiteware

WWTP Transfer Print Whiteware

WWPP Hand Painted Whiteware (late)

WWSH Shell Edged Whiteware

EUROPEAN UTILITARIAN WARES

CEW Coarse Earthenware

CEWGL Glazed Coarse Earthernware

CROCK Crock Fragment

ELMOR El Morro

GLCEW Glazed Coarse Earthenware

LDGLCEW Lead Glazed Coarse Earthenware

OJ Olive Jar

OJGL Glazed Olive Jar

172

REDWENG English Redware

REDWGL Glazed Redware

STNW Stoneware

UIDCEW Unidentified Coarse Earthenware

GLASS

GLAS Glass

BL Blue

BLK Black

BRN Brown

CLR Clear

CBLT Cobalt

DKOLIVE Dark Olive Green

LTAMB Light Amber

LTGRN Light Green

LTOLIVE Light Olive

YEL Yellow

WITE White

Personal

BEAD Unidentified Bead

RING Ring

WWBEAD Wire Wound Bead

Tobacco

PIPEB Pipe Bowl

PIPES Pipe Stem

Other

PEBBLES Pebbles

ROCK Rock

173

SYRINGE PART Syringe Part

161 Marine Street

Activities

CHERT Chert

COAL Coal

COPOBJ Unidentified Copper Object

CORE Core

GAMDIS Gaming Disc

IROBJ Unidentified Iron Object

LEADOBJ Unidentified Lead Object

NETWGT Net Weight

SLAG Slag

SPRUE Lead Sprue

UIDMET Unidentified Metal

Architecture

GLAS Glass (Window)

NAILSQUID Unidentified Square Nail

NAILUID Unidentified Nail

SPIKEUID Unidentified Spike

TILEBAR Barrel Roofing Tile (teja)

TILEGL Glazed Tile

TILERF Roofing Tile

TILEUID Unidentified Tile

SCREW Screw

SLATE Slate

WIRE Wire

174

Arms

FLINT Flint

FLNTGUN Gunflint

SHOT Lead shot

Clothing

CLOTH Cloth

BUCKLE Buckle

BUT Button

BUTBLNK Button Blank

PIN Pin

Faunal

BONE Bone

Furniture

TACK Tack

Kitchen

ABORIGINAL CERAMICS

ABOGGTP Grog and Grit Tempered Plain

ABOGGTDEC Grog and Grit Tempered Decorated

ABOGROGP Grog Tempered Plain

ABOGRTSHD Grit and Shell Tempered Decorated

ABOGRTSHP Grit and Shell Tempered Plain

ABOSHDEC Shell Tempered Decorated

ABOSHP Shell Tempered Plain

ABOSTDEC Sand Tempered Decorated

ABOSTP Sand Tempered Plain

ABOSTSHDE Sand and Shell Tempered Decorated

CLNO Colonoware

175

MISSS Mission Red Stamped

MISSRF Mission Red Filmed

SJDEC St. Johns Decorated

SJP St. Johns Plain

SM San Marcos Indeterminate

SMDEC San Marcos Decorated

SMINC San Marcos Incised

SMP San Marcos Plain

SMPUNC San Marcos Punctated

EUROPEAN TABLEWARES

ABOPOLY Abo Polychrome

ARANAMA Aranama

DELFT Delftware

DELFTBW Blue on White Delftware

FAI Faience

FAIBW Faience Blue on White

FAEWITE Faenza White

HUEJOT Huejotzingo

NOTT Nottingham

PORUID Unidentified Porcelain

PUEBW Puebla Blue on White

PUEPOLY Puebla Polychrome

REFEW Refined Earthenware

REY Reyware

SEVBB Sevilla Blue on Blue

SABW San Agustin Blue on White

SLBW San Luis Blue on White

176

SLIPRED Slipped Redware

UIDMAJ Unidentified Majolica

UIDMEX Unidentified Mexican City

UIDSLIP Unidentified Slipware

SLPOLY San Luis Polychrome

STODOM Santo Domingo Blue on White

EUROPEAN UTILITARIAN WARES

BGBAC Blue Green Bacin

BLGCW Blue Lead Glazed Coarse Earthenware

ELMOR El Morro

GRNBAC Green Bacin

LDGLCEW Lead Glazed Coarse Earthernware

MARINE Marineware

MXCW Mexican Coarse Earthenware

OJ Olive Jar

OJGL Glazed Olive Jar

SGS Salt-Glazed Stoneware

UIDGLCE Unidentified Glazed Coarse Earthenware

UIDCEW Unidentified Coarse Earthenware

GLASS

GLAS Glass

AMB Amber

AQA Aqua

BLK Black

BRN Brown

CLR Clear

DRKBLU Dark Blue

177

DKBR Dark Brown

GRN Green

LTGRN Light Green

LTOLIVE Light Olive Green

LITYEL Light Yellow

OLIVE Olive Green

PUR Purple

YEL Yellow

POT Metal Pot Fragment

Personal

BEADAMB Amber Bead

BEADGLAS Glass Bead

BEADWW Wire Wound Bead

BELL Bell

COINSPN Spanish Coin

GROM Grommet

Tobacco

PIPEB Pipe Bowl

PIPES Pipe Stem

178

APPENDIX B

LA PUNTA ARTIFACT DATABASE, 133 MARINE STREET

179

133 MARINE STREET

ST. AUGUSTINE, FL FS Provenience Count WT (g) Item Frag/Form Modifier

1.00 Grab Sample 1 6.8 SLPOLY Body

1.00 Grab Sample 1 8.6 SLPOLY Body Variant

1.00 Grab Sample 1 2.4 PUEBW Body

1.00 Grab Sample 1 8.2 CEW Rim Reworked

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 ± 20 143.4 COAL Frag

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 3 182.5 GLASBLK Bottle Kickup R Cooper & Co. Portabello

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 4 47 GLAS Body Flat Collar; Patinated; Opaque

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 5.6 GLAS Lip Flat Collar; Patinated; Opaque

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 4 12.6 GLASDKOLIVE Body Flat Collar

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.4 GLASLTAMB Frag Thin

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 ± 25 9.1 GLAS Flat Frag Flat; Thin; Tinted

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 5 18 GLASCLR Frag Thick

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 3 1.5 GLASCLR Frag Thin; Curved

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 5.2 GLASLTGRN Frag Thick; Curved

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.3 GLASLTOLIVE Frag

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.3 GLASCLR Frag Molded Ridge; Patinated

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 57.4 IRONUID Oxy; Tossed

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 7.8 NAILSQUID L — 7.3 cm; Oxy; Tossed

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 12 67.18 NAILUID L — 5-4 cm; Oxy; Tossed/Manmade

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 17 54.4 NAILUID L — 3-4 cm; Oxy; Tossed

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 10 5.7 NAILUID L — 2-3 cm; Oxy; Tossed

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 4 3.6 NAILUID L — 1-2 cm; Oxy; Tossed

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 2 NAILCLINCH L — 6-7 cm; Oxy; Tossed

180

133 MARINE STREET 1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 9 13.7 NAILUID Frag Oxy; Tossed

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 2 12.5 DAUB

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 5 10.25 SHOT Whole

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3.8 DRAWER PULL

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 11.8 BULLET 33 Cal.

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 2.4 FIRING CAP Frag 33 Cal.

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 4.8 UIDOBJ Frag

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 2.5 BUT Whole Brass; D — 1.8 cm; Eagle "A" design; Military

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.1 GARMENT HOOK

Whole Brass

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 103.4 IRNSTN Rim Dish Pan

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 37.8 PWTP Rim Lidded Bowl; Same Vessel as one Below

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 18.4 PWTP Shoulder of Lidded Bowl

Lidded Bowl; Same Vessel as one Above

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.1 PORCCHI Rim Chinese Exported

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 2 3.5 PORUID Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.4 PORUID Body Molded

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 3 21.8 PWSH Rim

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 2 2 PWSH Rim

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 6 IRNSTN Rim Transfer Print

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 3 3.6 PWHP (late) Rim

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 2 6.5 PWHP (late) Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.3 DELFT Rim

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 4.9 PWHP (late) Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.6 PWTP (late) Body Stripe

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.1 PWHP Rim Stripe

181

133 MARINE STREET 1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 6.2 PWSH Rim

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 2 6.2 DELFT Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.7 UIDMAJ Body Black Line + Blue

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 2 SLPOLY Rim

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3 SLPOLY Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 3 3.8 DELFT Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 6 9.3 PWTP Rim

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 3 10.1 IRNSTN Body Transfer Print

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 4 3.3 PWTP Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.6 IRNSTN Body Transfer Print

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 2 PWHP Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 2.6 PW Handle

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 2 10 PW Ft Ring Base

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 5 6.7 PW Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 2.1 PW Base Possible Makers Mark

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.4 REFTW Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 3 2.8 PWANLR Rim Banded

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 2 5.9 PWANLR Rim and Body Cross mend; Marble

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 3 19.2 REDWGL Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 2 27.1 OJ Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 4.5 CW Ft Ring Base

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 3 29 CW Base

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 14 18 CW Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 2 1.8 CW Rim

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 55.1 BONE L Astragglus Bos taurus

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 71.5 BONE Ulna Bos taurus

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 6.7 BONE Astraggulus Bos taurus

182

133 MARINE STREET 1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 8.3 BONE Phalange Bos taurus

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 7 0.8 BONE Vert. Fish

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.8 BONE Vert. Medium Fish

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.3 BONE Tooth Fragment Mammal CF Bos

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.3 BONE Pectoral Spine Catfish

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.2 BONE Tooth Mammal

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 6 2.6 BONE Carapace Mud Turtle

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 18 12.8 BONE UID Mammal

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.4 BONE Centrum Mammal

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 16 3.4 BONE UID UID

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Vert. Fish

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.2 BONE Vert Avis

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3.6 BONE Otolith Black drum

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 9.4 SHELL Frag Busycon

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.8 CEW Rim

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 73 93.1 ABODIS Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 9 49.5 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated Stamp

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 8 35.8 SMD Body Eroded

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 5.5 SMD Body Eroded; Grog Temp.

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 2 SMD Rim Eroded; Shell Temp.; Rounded

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3.6 SMDEC Rim Rectilinear; Rounded

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3 SMD Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.9 CEW Body

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 1 2 SMDEC Curvilinear

1.02 TU 1 LVL 2 4 8 SMDEC Check Stamp

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 5.08 PWSH Rim Scalloped; Chipped on Rim

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 1.1 CW Body

183

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 1 CW Base

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 3.6 CW Body Marly

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 1.6 CW Rim Straight

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 1.5 PWSH Body Scalloped

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2.4 SLPOLY Rim

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 0.9 PWTP Body

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 3.5 STNW Body Floral Décor

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 0.4 REFTW Body

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 2 2.2 REFTW Body

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 0.1 REFTW Rim Black Stripe, Straight

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 0.5 REFTW Cup Handle Cup

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 0.6 UIDMAJ Body

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2 PIPEB Frag Bore; 3 cm x 1 cm

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 6 2.5 GLASLTGRN Frag Flat

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 5 2.2 GLASCLR Frag Flat

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 2 2.8 GLAS Frag Patinated; Opaque

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 2 2.6 GLASCLR Frags Curved

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 0.5 GLASBRN Frag

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 0.5 GLASYEL Frag

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2.8 GLASYEL Opaque

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 24 25.9 ABODIS Frag

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 3.3 SMDEC Body Check Stamp

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 3 7.9 SMD Body Eroded

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 7.7 SMDEC Body Check Stamp

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 2 6.3 SMD Body Eroded

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 1.4 SMDEC Body Checked; Shell Temp.

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 1.8 SMD Body Eroded

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2 SMDEC Body Checked

184

133 MARINE STREET 1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 3 SMD Body Eroded

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2.8 SMD Body Eroded

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2.1 SMD Body Eroded

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 1.8 SMD Body Eroded

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 3.3 SMD Body Eroded

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 3.1 SMD Body Eroded

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 5.4 SMD Body Eroded; Grog Temp.

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 4.5 SMD Body Eroded

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 9.8 SMDEC Rim- Rounded Rounded; Checked; Shell and Grit Temp.

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 50 SMDEC Body Complicated

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 4 1.1 SJUID Body

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2.5 STDEC Body Eroded

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2.2 STP Body

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 5.3 UIDCEW Body

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 2 6.1 COAL Frag

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 1.4 BUT Whole "Cuba"; Brass; D — 1.7 cm

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2.1 UIDNAIL Whole Square; Bass; Rectangular Head; L — 3.2 cm

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2.3 SHOT Whole Musket Ball; D — 0.7 mm; Lead

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 7 WGT 1 cm Square; Lead

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 2 0.6 TACK Heads; Furniture Hardware

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 4 9.5 UIDNAIL With Head L — 3.5 cm; Oxy

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 2 8.5 UIDNAIL With Head L — 4 cm; Oxy

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 4.2 UIDNAIL Without Head L — 5.5 cm; Sq.; Oxy

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 2 10.6 UIDNAIL With Head L — 4-5 cm; Oxy

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2.4 UIDNAIL Without Head 4cm; Oxy

185

133 MARINE STREET 1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 1.7 UIDNAIL With Head L — 2.5cm; Oxy

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 1 UIDNAIL With Head L — 3.2cm; Oxy

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 16 16.6 UIDIRON Frag Discard

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 4 0.7 BONE Vert. Fish

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 2 3.1 BONE Teeth Mammal

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 1 0.5 BONE Turtle

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 2 2.6 BONE Mammal

1.03 TU 1 LVL 3 22 10.6 BONE UID Mammal

2.03 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 5 1 0.8 SJDEC Rim Checked (med)

2.03 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 5 1 3.3 SMDEC Body Checked (med)

2.03 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 5 5 2.82 ABODIS Body

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 5 0.7 CHARCOAL Frag

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 1 0.1 BONE Vert Fish

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 1 0.1 BONE Skull Catfish

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 3 1.7 BONE UID UID

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 1 1.2 BONE Hemal Spine Fish

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 7 4.7 ABODIS Body

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 1 1.6 CEW Body

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 1 0.4 DAUB Frag Burnt

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 1 0.1 UIDIRON Frag Tossed

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 1 6.5 SMD Rim Round; Eroded

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 2 12.2 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

2.04 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 8 1 4.5 SMD Body Eroded

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 4 31.5 PWSH Rim Different Vessels

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 30.7 PWTP Rim Cover

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 5 39.8 PWTP Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 15.9 PWTP Rim Scalloped

186

133 MARINE STREET 3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 2.2 PWTP Base- Flat

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 5 PWTP Base- Flat Ring

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 1.4 PWTP Rim

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 26.6 PWPP Rim Scalloped; Base Foot Ring

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 0.3 PWPP Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 1.9 PWANLR Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 2 21 PWANLR Body Possible Cats Eye

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 1.1 PWUID Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 2.8 PUEBW Rim

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 2 4.1 PUEBW Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 3 7.8 UIDMAJ Body Striped; Could be PUEPOLY or SLPOLY

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 15 41.6 PWUID Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 2 2.3 PWUID Rim Different Vessels

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 2 7.3 PWUID Base- Flat

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 5 44.4 PWUID Base Foot Ring — Different Vessel

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 34 PWUID Base Complete — Foot Ring; Jar or Bowl

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 4.8 PWUID Frag of Handle

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 2 PORUID Rim

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 6 5.1 PWUID Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 1.1 PWUID Rim

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 57.3 OJ Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 3 19.6 UIDCEW Body Unglazed

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 8.4 CEW Body Top Surface Burnished

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 1.3 UIDMAJ Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 2 6.1 UIDMAJ Body

187

133 MARINE STREET 3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 2 10.5 OJGL Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 3.3 PIPES Frag #5, Kaolin; L — 4 cm

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 1.3 PIPES Frag #5, Kaolin; L — 1.3 cm

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 1.3 PIPES Frag #5, Kaolin

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 10.8 BONE Frag UID Mammal

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 3 0.3 BONE Frag Fish

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 0.7 BONE Frag Turtle

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 1.4 BONE Frag Mammal

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 9 BONE Frag

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 2.9 BONE Frag Mammal

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 2 5.3 BONE Frag Burnt

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 6.4 SHELL Frag Column

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 31 60 ABODIS Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 10.4 SMDEC Rim Complicated

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 6.2 SMDEC Body Curvilinear

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 3 16.2 SMDEC Body Complicated

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 9 SMDEC Body Checked

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 4 14.2 SMDEC Body Simple

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 6 16.5 SMD Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 11.2 SMP Rim

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 2 7.2 NLABO Rim Plain; Non-local

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 3.6 SMP Rim

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 0.7 BONE Frag Burnt

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 3.6 COAL Frag

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 5 19.9 GLASDKGRN Body Opaque; Probably Dark Green

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 2.1 GLASCLR Rim

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 2 1.5 GLAS Flat Flat; Window Pane; Tinted

188

133 MARINE STREET 3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 4 6.4 GLAS Body Tinted

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 11 15.1 GLASCLR Body Opaque

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 20 58.4 GLASDKGRN Body Opaque

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 2.9 GLASCLR Rim

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 4 15 GLASDKGRN Body Opaque

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 1.8 BONE Frag Fish

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 7 61.1 UIDNAIL Frag L — 8 cm; Oxy

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 13 73 UIDNAIL Frag L — 5-6 cm; Oxy

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 12 56.5 UIDNAIL Frag L — 3-4 cm; Oxy

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 21 60.5 UIDNAIL Frag L — 2.5-3.5 cm

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 2 96 MTLOBJ Frag Oxy; Tossed

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 3 20.2 CLINCHNAIL Frag L — 5-7 cm; Oxy

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 4 12.9 UIDMTL Frag Oxy; Tossed

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 17.5 ROCK

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 3.3 REDW Body

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 0.8 TACK Frag Brass

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 3 TOY Whole Figurine; Male BR Figurine; Plastic

3.02 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 E 1/2 1 2 SABER TIP Whole Brass

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 7 20.1 COAL Frag

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 7 48 BRICK Frag

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 5 6.1 CONSTR Frag Construction

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 3 6.6 PEBBLES Frag

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 2.5 COG Frag

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 6.3 CHERT Frag

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 2 GLASBL Frag Thick; Medium Blue

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 9.1 GLAS Bottle Body Bottle; Patinated; Opaque

189

133 MARINE STREET 3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 4 3 GLASOLIVE

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 6.3 GLASLTGRN Bottle Body Bottle

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.9 GLASCLR Frag Small Bottle Neck

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 3 1.8 GLASCLR Frag

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 9.8 GLAS Frag Tint/Misc

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.6 CHERT Frag

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 3 44.8 CEWGL Frag Interior glaze; Different vessels

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 8.5 PIPEB Frag Kaolin; Decorated

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.1 GARMENT HOOK

Whole Brass

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.4 BUT Frag Bone; D — 1.6 cm

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 4.5 SHOT Whole Lead

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 1.8 NAILSQUID Whole Brass; L — 3.2 cm; Flat Head

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.6 TACK Frag Brass

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.1 BUT Frag Missing Shank; Brass

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 3.6 CEW Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 3 POROG Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 7.4 WWPP (late) Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 1.5 WWPP (late) Rim Rounded

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 2.8 WWANLR Body Cats Eye

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 10.5 PWTP Pos. Base

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 4 WWTP Rim and Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.1 CEWGL Body Black

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 1.1 PIPES Frag Kaolin

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 2 UIDNAIL Frag Brass; No Head

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 4 44.1 WRTNAIL L — 5-6 cm; Oxy

190

133 MARINE STREET 3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 3 12.4 UIDNAIL L — 4-5 cm; Oxy

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 10 29.7 UIDNAIL L — 3-4 cm; Oxy

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 13 24.1 UIDNAIL L — 2-3 cm; Oxy

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 13 22.2 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; Tossed

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 5 UIDNAIL Oxy

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 50.8 IRNOBJ Frag Oxy

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.1 BONE Hemal Spine Fish

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 BONE UID Mammal

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 BONE UID UID

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 BONE Carapace Turtle

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 0.1 CHARCOAL Frag

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 2.5 PORUID Frag Decorative Element

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 1.1 WWTP Handle Frag

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 3 5.7 PW Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.4 PORUID Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 4 8.8 CW Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 1.1 WWTP Body and Rim Cross mend

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 5 WW Base

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 1.7 WWB Beaded Rim Beaded

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.2 REFEW Rim

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 1.7 WWSH Rim

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 3.2 WWSH Rim

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.2 REWANLR Body Banded

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 3 5 CW (late) Rim

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 1 WWHP Rim Stripe

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.8 REWANLR Body Cats Eye

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 3.8 WW Rim

191

133 MARINE STREET 3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 2.1 PORUID Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.3 WWHP Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 16 19.4 WW Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 2 CW Flat Base

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 1 TPREFTW Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 1 SLPOLY Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.1 PUEPOLY Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.5 UIDMAJ Rim

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 0.5 UIDMAJ Body 1 side has Blue and Black Line Design

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 1.1 TPREFTW Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 6 3.3 DAUB Frag

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 1.2 BRICK Rim Possibly CEW

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 124 128.2 ABODIS Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 1.2 CEW Rim

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 4 10.4 SMDEC Body Rectilinear

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 3.3 STDEC Body Eroded

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 2 6.2 SMD Body

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 1 3 SMP Body Shell Temp.

3.03 TU 3 LVL 2 FEA 1 W 1/2 3 7.1 SMD Body

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 2 6.2 PWSH Rim Two Different Vessels

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.9 PWPP Body

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 3.1 PWANLR Body Banded

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.3 UIDPW Rim Band on Rim

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 3.4 PWHP Base Flat Ring — Leaf Décor

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 3.3 PWHP Base Flat

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.3 PWHP Base Flat Ring

192

133 MARINE STREET 4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 4 2.4 UIDPW Body

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 2.8 SLIP Handle Frag Cream Paste

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.6 UIDPW Rim

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 2 5.5 PW Base Flat Ring

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 10 13.5 PW Body

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.9 UIDMAJ Body Banded; cf PUEPOLY or SLPOLY

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 11.1 PUEBW Body

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 66 64 ABODIS Body

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 3.8 SJUID Body

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 2 12.8 SMDEC Body Complicated

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 4.3 SMDEC Body Checked

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 2 4.6 SMDEC Body Simple

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 3 8.6 SMD Body Eroded

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 2 34.1 NLABO Body Non Local; Sand Temp.

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.7 NLABO Rim Non Local; Sand Temp.

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 2 2.9 PIPES Frag #4; Kaolin; L — 3 cm

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 16.1 BONE Frag

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 2 3.1 BONE Frag Mammal

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 25 11.5 GLASCLR Body

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 28 7 GLAS Body Tinted

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 6 6.9 GLAS Body Opaque

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 3 2.5 GLASDKGRN Body

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 7 4.4 GLASCLR Body Patinated

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 29.6 MTLOBJ Frag Oxy

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 10.7 UIDNAIL Frag L — 7 cm; Oxy

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 2 10.8 UIDNAIL Frag L — 5-6 cm; Oxy

193

133 MARINE STREET 4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 9 25.1 UIDNAIL Frag L — 3-4 cm; Oxy

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 14 34.4 UIDNAIL Frag L — 2.5-3 cm; Oxy

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 8 9.5 UIDNAIL Frag L — 2 cm; Oxy

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 5.5 CLINCHNAIL Frag L — 4.5 cm; Oxy

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.4 COAL Frag

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 4 19.2 CEW Body Unglazed

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 6 18.6 CONSTR Frag

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.4 UIDPW Body Black inside; White outside

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.4 BUT Whole Wood; D — 1.4 cm; 5 hole button

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 4 10 SHOT Whole Lead; D — 0.7 cm 4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 3 TOY Whole Clay Marble; D — 1.5 cm

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 2 1.1 TACK Whole Brass; Furniture

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.5 HOOK Whole Metal; "Hook and Eye"

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.5 BUT Whole Brass; Shank; D — 1.6 cm

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 3 SLATE Frag

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 2.1 LDGLCEW Body

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.4 MTLOBJ Frag Brass; D — 2 cm

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.1 STNW Body

4.02 TU 4 LVL 2 1 5.6 UIDMAJ Rim

4.03 FEA 4 LVL 3 77.9 SHELL Mix of shell and clam; Tossed

4.03 FEA 4 LVL 3 1 4.2 GLAS Bottle Frag Bottle; Patinated; Opaque

4.03 FEA 4 LVL 3 1 1.1 BRICK Frag

4.03 FEA 4 LVL 3 2 0.8 IRONFRAG Frag Oxy; Tossed

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 2 6.6 COAL Frag

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 1 4 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 1 2.7 SMD Body Eroded

194

133 MARINE STREET 4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 1 4.1 UIDCEW Body

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 2 1 ABODIS Body

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 1 0.6 UIDNAIL Head Oxy

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 2 0.4 GLAS Flat

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 1 0.3 GLASCLR Body Curved

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 1 0.8 ANLRW Body

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 1 0.8 UIDNAIL Frag L — 2.5 cm; Oxy; No head

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 1 13.7 IRNOBJ UID Oxy

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 1 1.1 FIRING CAP Brass; Ammunition

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 2 0.4 CHARCOAL Frag

4.05 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 7 6 0.8 BONE UID

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 10 1.2 CHARCOAL Frag

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 2.1 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; With Head

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 1 MTLOBJ Frag Oxy

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 2 6.2 SMDEC Body Check Stamp

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 0.7 ABODIS Frag

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 4.1 ABODIS Frag

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 0.1 BONE UID

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 0.1 FISH SCALE Round

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 5 0.8 CHARCOAL Frag

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 2 0.4 BONE UID

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 0.2 GLASCLR Flat

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 56.1 LEADOBJ Oxy; L — 7 cm

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 3.5 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 7 6.2 ABODIS Body

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 8 0.1 CHARCOAL Frag

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 1.4 SLPOLY Body Two green spots; two stripes

195

133 MARINE STREET

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 0.1 BONE Vert Fish

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 9.7 BONE Mammal

3.04 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 11 1 3.6 BONE UID

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 22.5 IRONOBJ Frag Oxy

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 3 19.7 NAILSQUID Frag Oxy; L — 6-7.5 cm

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 3 8.5 UIDIRON Frag Oxy; Tossed

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 3 10.9 NAILSQUID Frag Oxy; L — 3-4 cm

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 5 NAILSQUID Frag Oxy

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 2 3.9 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; Tossed

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 13 3.9 GLAS Frag Flat; Window

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 5 12.8 GLAS Body Bottle; Patinated; Opaque

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 3 1.7 GLASOLIVE

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 7.9 GLASCLR Lip Bottle; Patinated

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 4 2 GLAS Thin; Tinted

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 11.3 SHELL Frag Conch

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.6 SHELL Claw Crab

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 1.3 BONE Ear bone Mammal

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 3 1.8 BONE Carapace Turtle

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.6 BONE Tooth Mammal

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Vert Frag Fish

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.7 BONE Phalange Mammal

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 7 2.5 BONE UID

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.4 BONE UID Fish

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 2 3.7 BONE UID Mammal

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 2.6 SHOT Whole Lead; D — 0.8 cm

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 2 ESCUT Whole Brass; L — 2 cm

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 14.5 ELERS Bowl Shoulder Bowl; Molded design

196

133 MARINE STREET 5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.9 PIPEB Frag Kaolin; Bore

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 2 62.7 OJ Body Near Base

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 7.8 IRNSTNTP Rim

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 6.2 PWANLR Body cf Mocha

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 2 3.5 PWANLR Rim Banded

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 1.8 PWSH Rim

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.5 PWHP Rim Stripe

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 2 6.7 CW Body

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 10 11.7 PW Body

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.4 PWHP (late) Body

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 3 11 PW Rim

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 6 PW Base

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.7 PW Rim Molded

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 2 0.4 UIDMAJ Body

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.3 SLPOLY Body

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.7 PORUID Body

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 40 47.8 ABODIS Body

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 6 78.5 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 4.9 CEW Body

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 7 31.4 SMD Body Eroded

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 3.3 SJP Body

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 6 15.7 SMDEC Body Rectilinear

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 3 8.6 SMD Rim Eroded; Different Vessels; Rounded

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 1 SMD Rim Eroded; Flat

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 3.5 SMP Body

5.02 TU 5 LVL 2 1 1.7 SMD Body Eroded

197

133 MARINE STREET 5.03 TU 5 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 0.1 UIDIRON Tossed

5.03 TU 5 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 0.1 CHARCOAL Frag

5.03 TU 5 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 4.1 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 4 cm

5.03 TU 5 LVL 3 FEA 3 206.8 SHELL Mixed Oyster/Clam; Tossed

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 8.5 PUEBW Rim Absd; Exterior Curved

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 10.9 WW Base Foot Ring

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 1.2 SLPOLY Rim

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 4 PWPP Rim Gaudy Dutch

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 5.1 WWTP Base Absd

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 2.3 WWTP Body Absd

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 2 10.6 TC Body Flower Pot

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 10 ELMOR Body

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 3 12 WW Rim Different Vessels

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 4 4.5 WW Body

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 1.9 MOCHA Body Maybe Annularware

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 2 3.3 PWPP Body

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 0.9 WWTP Body

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 3.2 WWB Rim

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 0.3 WWHP Rim

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 7 GLCEW Body

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 3 7.5 CEW Body

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 8 4.4 BRICK Frag

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 3.3 CONSTR Frag

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 7 1.4 CHARCOAL Frag

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 2 2.7 GLAS Frag Thin; Curved

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 5 4.8 GLAS Body Bottle

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 4 11.8 GLASOLIVE

198

133 MARINE STREET 6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 5 5.4 GLASOLIVE Molded Ridges

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 7 3 GLAS Tinted

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 1.5 GLASWITE Patinated

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 3 2.7 GLAS Patinated; Opaque

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 25.9 SHOT Whole Musket Ball; Lead

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 18.2 WRTNAIL Frag Square Cut; Rose head; L — 6 cm; Oxy

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 7 15.7 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 3-4 cm

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 2 10.2 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 4-5 cm

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 3 4.3 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 2 cm

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 6 16.1 IRONFRAG Frag Oxy; Tossed

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 7.1 GLAS Frag Patinated; Opaque

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 2.2 BONE Vert Shark

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 5 0.3 BONE Vert Fish

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 0.1 BONE Skull Catfish

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 2.8 BONE Bos taurus

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 5.8 BONE Scaploid Bos taurus

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 5.9 BONE Tarpal BONE Bos taurus

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 1 BONE Tooth Mammal

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 18 7.5 BONE UID UID

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 0.4 BONE UID Fish

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 0.1 BONE Skull Catfish

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 1 BONE Mammal

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 0.4 BONE Long BONE Small Mammal

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 48 55.6 ABODIS Body

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 1.8 STP Rim Rounded

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 1.8 SMDEC Rim Rectilinear; Rounded

199

133 MARINE STREET 6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 5.5 SMDEC Body Curvilinear

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 4 11.4 SMDEC Body Rectilinear

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 3 12 SMD Body Eroded

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 2.4 MISSRF Body

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 2 7.1 SMP Body

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 1 3 SMD Body Shell Temp.

6.02 TU 6 LVL 2 E 1/2 2 1 TACK Whole Furniture

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 4.4 BRICK Frag

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 4.7 NAILSQUID Frag Oxy; L — 5cm

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 1.2 NAILSQUID Frag Oxy; L — 2.8cm

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 0.7 IRONFRAG Frag Oxy; Tossed

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 3 1.2 GLAS Frag Tinted

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 0.1 GLASCLR Frag

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 0.6 GLAS Frag Patinated; Opaque

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 1.5 BUCKLE Frag Brass to J. Powell

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 2 CONSTR Frag Rock?

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 9 1 CHARCOAL Frag

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 3.8 PUEBW Body

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 0.1 CEW Body

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 18 16.6 ABODIS Body

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 2.2 SMDEC Body Checked

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 3.6 SMDEC Rim Flat; Curvilinear

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 2 4.8 SMD Body UID

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 3 6.5 SMDEC Body Complicated

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 4.5 BONE Tooth Bos taurus

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 1 BONE Hemal Spine Fish

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 6 0.7 BONE Vert Fish

200

133 MARINE STREET 6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 5 1 BONE Skull Catfish

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 2 5.4 BONE Rib Mammal

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 1 BONE Dorsal Spine Fish

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 2 0.2 BONE Fin Fish

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 0.1 BONE Fish

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 0.1 BONE Mullet

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 5 0.5 BONE UID Fish

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 1 0.1 BONE Humerus Sandpiper

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 3 4.6 BONE UID Mammal

6.03 TU 6 LVL 2 W 1/2 7 BONE UID

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 0.1 BOTAN Frag Nut Hull

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 2 CHARCOAL Frag

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 25.6 BONE Tooth Bos taurus

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 4 SHELL Column Whelk — Possible Tool

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 1.2 BONE Calcanium Sus/odocoileus

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 3 0.6 BONE Vert Fish

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 0.1 BONE Skull Catfish

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 0.1 BONE L Radius Dist Gallus gallus

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 0.1 BONE Vert Avis

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 5 0.2 BONE UID Fish

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 12 2.6 BONE UID

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 3 1.8 COPRO Frag

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 0.9 UIDMAJ Body Striped

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 0.6 CEW Body

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 3.5 SMDEC Body Checked

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 2 5.7 SMD Body Eroded; Grog Temp.

6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 2.5 STP Body

201

133 MARINE STREET 6.04 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14 18 11.8 ABODIS Body

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 1 1.4 CW Rim Straight

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 6 6.2 ABODIS Body

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 1 2.3 SMD Body Eroded

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 1 4.2 SMDEC Body Rectilinear

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 1 5.5 UIDCEW Body

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 2 1.1 GLASGRN Frag Flat

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 1 0.9 SLAG

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 2 3.2 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 2-3 cm

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 9 0.4 CHARCOAL Frag

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 2 1 UIDMTL

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 1 0.2 UIDMAJ

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 3 0.4 BONE Fish

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 3 0.5 BONE UID

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 2 0.3 BONE Vert Fish

6.05 TU 6 LVL 3 FEA 14A 1 0.1 SHELL

6.06 TU 6 LVL 2 FEA 14 5 3.7 ABODIS Body

6.06 TU 6 LVL 2 FEA 14 3 7.5 SMD Frag UID

6.06 TU 6 LVL 2 FEA 14 1 2.4 SMDEC Body Rectilinear

6.06 TU 6 LVL 2 FEA 14 19 1.2 CHARCOAL Frag

6.06 TU 6 LVL 2 FEA 14 6 0.2 BONE Vert Fish

6.06 TU 6 LVL 2 FEA 14 1 1.9 BONE UID Mammal

6.06 TU 6 LVL 2 FEA 14 10 3 BONE UID

6.06 TU 6 LVL 2 FEA 14 2 0.1 BONE UID Fish

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 4.9 CHARCOAL Frag

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 2 34 COQUINA Frag

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 13 TABBY Frag

202

133 MARINE STREET 7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 4.6 GLAS Frag Bottle

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 0.1 GLAS Frag Flat; Tinted

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 3 0.8 GLASCLR Frag

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 4 10.4 UIDNAIL Oxy; Tossed; L — 4 cm

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 5 9.9 UIDNAIL Oxy

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 5 2.5 UIDNAIL Oxy; Tossed

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 1 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 2.5 cm

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 7.3 NAILSQUID Oxy; L — 5 cm

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 0.7 DELFT Body

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 0.1 PUEPOLY Body

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 2 UIDMAJ Rim

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 2.2 WW Body

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 2 17.6 CEW Body

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 3 7.8 BONE Long BONE Burnt; Mammal

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 6 0.3 BONE Vert Fish

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 2 0.3 BONE Vert Shark

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 4 10 BONE Skull Catfish

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Tooth Mammal

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Scapula Gallus gallus

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 6 0.9 BONE UID Fish

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 3 4.2 BONE UID Mammal

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 31 10.4 BONE UID

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 2 0.1 BONE Frag Burnt

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 110 105.3 ABODIS Body

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 1.5 SMD Rim UID

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 7 SMDEC Body Complicated Rectilinear

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 2 15.1 SMDEC Body Rectilinear; Grog Temp.

203

133 MARINE STREET 7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 7 32.3 SMD Body Eroded

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 4.7 SMD Body Eroded

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 2.2 SMP Rim Flat

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 2.6 SMDEC Body Checked

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 3.8 SMP Body

7.02 TU 7 LVL 2 1 6.8 DAUB Frag Burnt

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 8 0.4 CHARCOAL Frag

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 1 2.1 COAL Frag

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 1 0.5 GLAS Frag

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 1 0.1 GLAS Frag

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 1 1.5 UIDMAJ Body

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 1 2.8 UIDMAJ Handle Same vessel as previous?

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 4 0.1 BONE Vert Fish

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 1 1 BONE Tooth root Mammal

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 1 0.1 BONE UID Fish

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 5 2.1 ABODIS Body

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 2 8.1 SMDEC Body Rectilinear

7.03 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 12 N 1/2 1 2.2 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 1 2.4 RING Whole Brass; Rose Bud Décor; D — 2 cm

7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 12 1.5 ABODIS Body 7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 1 5.1 SMDEC Body Complicated

7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 1 3.2 SMDEC Body Complicated; Shell Temp.

7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 1 2.2 SMDEC Body Complicated

7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 1 1.2 PWTP Rim Straight; Floral Design

7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 1 4.5 GLASDKAMB Body Curved

7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 1 4.4 FLNTGUN

204

133 MARINE STREET 7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 1 27 GLAS Rim Molded; Molded Stup;

Patinated; Opaque 7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 3 0.9 BONE UID 7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 1 0.8 BONE UID Avis

7.05 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 22 1 0.3 BONE Vert Fish

8.01 TU 8 Grab 1 4.1 SLPOLY Rim Dots

8.01 TU 8 Grab 1 2.9 SMUID Body

8.01 TU 8 Grab 1 18.8 BONE Long Bone Mammal

8.01 TU 8 Grab 1 0.4 WOOD Frag

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 3.4 SLIPRED Rim Crimped

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 12 CROCK Body

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 1.1 PIPES Body Kaolin

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 7.4 ANLRW Body Banded

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.7 ANLRW Body Banded

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 2 0.6 PWPP Body Hand Painted

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 1.7 PORENG Body

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.4 UIDPW Body UID Décor

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 5.7 SLPOLY Body Banded

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 5.5 TILEUID Whole 1.8 cm; Square Terracotta Tile; Modern

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 8.1 LDGLCEW Body Black 8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 4 74.5 WW Body

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.8 WW Rim

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 2 1.3 WW Base

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 6 4.9 CW Body

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 1.7 CW Base

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 5.1 WWFB Rim

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.3 WWFB Body

205

133 MARINE STREET 8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 10.1 CLNO Body Stamped

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 4 10.3 WWTP Body Oriental Design

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 2 4 WWTP Rim Oriental Design

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.5 WWTP Body UID Décor

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 3 5 BONE UID Mammal

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 20 12.3h BONE UID Mammal

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 6.4 BONE UID

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.9 BONE Cervical Vert Pig

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 7 0.9 COAL Frag

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 4 3.3 CONSTR UID Tabby

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 74 22.7 GLAS Frag Flat; Possible Window; Tinted

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 5 10.8 GLASWITE Body Patinated; Opaque

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 1.4 GLASWITE Lip Patinated; Opaque

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 6 5.2 GLASOLIVE Body Bottle

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 2 0.5 GLASLTGRN Body Very thin

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 4 5 GLASCLR Body Possible Bottle Glass

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.7 GLASYEL Body Patinated; Opaque

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 8 20 SHOT Whole Lead; D — 4.5 mm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 1 SHOT Whole Lead; D — 4.3 mm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 6.3 WGT Whole Lead

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.5 TACK Whole Brass; Furniture

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.2 FIRING CAP Whole Brass

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 2 3 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 2 cm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 3 5.5 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 2.4 cm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 2 2.4 NAILSQUID Frag Oxy; L — 2 cm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 1.7 NAILSQUID Frag Oxy; L — 2.3 cm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 3 8.5 NAILSQUID Frag Oxy; L — 2.8 cm

206

133 MARINE STREET 8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 2 8.1 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 3 cm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 2 8.4 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 3.5 cm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 4 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 4 cm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 4.7 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 5 cm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 5 13 NAILSQUID Frag Oxy; L — 3 cm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 3 12.6 NAILSQUID Frag Oxy; L — 4.5 cm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 6.5 NAILSQUID Frag Oxy; L — 6 cm

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 68 72.5 UIDMTL UID Oxy

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 55 37.5 ABODIS Frag

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 4 5.9 SJP Body

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 3 4.2 CEW Body

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 4 13.1 SMP Body Shell/Sand Temp

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2.1 SMD Body Eroded

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 2 4 SMDEC Body Checked

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 6 17.9 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Simple

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 2 13.8 GRGP Body

8.02 TU 8 LVL 2 10 24.5 BRICK

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 7 NAILWRT Intact Oxy; L — 6 cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 4 20.6 NAIL Intact Oxy; L — 4-5 cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 6 19.2 NAIL Intact Oxy; L — 3-4 cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 8 19.4 NAIL Intact Oxy; L — 2-3 cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 8 11.3 NAIL Intact Oxy; L — 1-2 cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 5 14 NAIL Shaft Oxy; L — 3-4 cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 8 14.1 NAIL Shaft Oxy; L — 2-3 cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 15 2.8 NAIL Shaft Oxy; L — 1-2 cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 2.2 NAILWRT Shaft Oxy; L — 2.5 cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 50 + 53.1 MTLOBJ Frag; UID Discarded

207

133 MARINE STREET 8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.8 KNIFE HANDLE Frag Worked Bone; L — 2.8 cm;

Cross Hatched 8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.9 PIPEB Frag Bore; 2.5 cm x 0.7 cm 8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.9 PIPEB Frag Bore; 2.5 cm x 0.7 cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 1.8 PWSH Rim Beveled; Molded Edge

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 1.5 PWSH Marly Marly

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 2 1 UIDMAJ Body

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 2 PORMING Rim Beveled

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 11.8 SLPOLY cf bowl cf Bowl; Curved, Striped

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 2.9 CW Rim

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 2.9 WWTP Body Floral Décor

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 1.8 ANLRW Body Curved

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 2 2 WW Body

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 1.2 UIDCEW Body No Glaze

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 2.5 IRNSTNTP Body Floral Décor

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.6 PW Foot Ring

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 3 2.6 CW Body

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 4 1.5 WW Body

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 14 SHELL Tool? Rubbed Whelk; L — 7cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.5 SHELL Greedy Dove Snail

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 6 9 BONE UID Mammal

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.4 BONE Tooth Mammal

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.1 BONE Dorsal Spine Catfish

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.1 BONE Burnt Ulna Gallus gallus

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 36 12.4 BONE UID UID

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.1 BONE UID Avis

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 2 0.6 BONE UID Fish

208

133 MARINE STREET 8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 3 1 PWTP Body Floral Décor

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.4 REW Rim Beveled

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 1.6 REW Rim Straight

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.5 REW Rim Straight

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.3 PWHP Body Random Décor

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 1 WW Foot Ring

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.9 CEW Body Glaze chipped off

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 2.1 WW Body

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 8.1 IRNSTN Foot Ring

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 1.3 REW Body

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 2 PWHP Body White Leaf Décor

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 8 CW Body

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.2 PWLP Body Design on both sides

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.2 REW Body

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.4 PWHP Rim Straight, Band on Rim

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.9 ANLRW Rim Beveled; Wide Band

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 1.4 ASTBURY Body Variant; Mottled; Dark Paste

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.9 ASTBURY Body Variant; Pebbled; Dark Paste

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 55 61.2 ABODIS Body

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 8 SMD Body Eroded

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 7.4 SMD Body Eroded

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 3.4 SMDEC Body Sand Temp.; Complicated

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.9 SJP Body

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 58 4.8 GLASLTGRN Frag Flat

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 6 6.7 GLAS Frag Patinated; Opaque

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 3 1.5 GLASAMB Frag

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.4 GLASCBLT Frag Cobalt

209

133 MARINE STREET 8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.5 TACK Intact Furniture; Round Head; 1 cm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 3 CONSTR Lump Masonry

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 11 28.7 SHOT Intact Lead; 0.7 mm

8.03 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.1 BUT Intact 4 Holes; Mother of Pearl; Round; D — 1 cm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.6 SLPOLY Rim Beveled 9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.6 SLPOLY Rim Beveled

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.1 SLPOLY Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 5.3 PUEBW Rim Beveled

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.8 PUEBW Rim Beveled

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2.8 PUEBW Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1 ANLRW Rim Straight; Striped

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 3.4 ANLRW Body Striped

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.2 ANLRW Rim Straight; Striped

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.4 PWWRM Body Wormy Finger

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.6 DELFT Rim Straight; Same Vessel; Striped

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.4 DELFT Rim Straight; Same Vessel; Striped

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.8 DELFT Body Same Vessel; Striped

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.7 DELFT Body Same Vessel; Stripes and Dots

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.8 PWHP Rim Straight; Striped

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.5 PWPP Rim Straight; Stipend

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.5 PWPP Rim Straight; Striped

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 11.4 PWSH Rim Shell Edge

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.2 PWTP Rim Straight

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.6 PWTP Body Curved

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.3 PWTP Body Abstract Design

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 4.2 WWTP Body Floral Décor; Curved

210

133 MARINE STREET 9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2.6 WWTP Body Marly

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.8 WWTP Ringed Foot

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.4 WWTP Rim

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1 WWTP Body Abstract Design

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.9 WWTP Body Abstract Design

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.3 WWTP Body Curved

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.6 WWTP Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 2 0.5 WWTP Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 4.4 CW Rim Straight

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.6 CW Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.5 CW Rim Straight

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 4 WW Jar Rim Jar

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 4 14.6 WW Body Different Vessel

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.8 WW Rim Broken

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.2 WW Body Curved

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 4 WW Rim Beveled

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 6.5 WW Rim Straight

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.3 WW Foot Ring

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2 WW Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.8 WW Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.7 WW Rim Curved Edge

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.6 WW Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.6 WWHP Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.9 PORENG Rim Solid Décor

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.5 PORENG Rim Abstract Design

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 5.8 UIDMAJ Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.6 UIDMAJ Body

211

133 MARINE STREET 9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.3 UIDMAJ Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.5 UIDMAJ Rim

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.6 UIDMAJ Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.2 PIPEB Bore; 2.2 cm x 0.6 cm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 24 5 GLAS Flat; Window Glass

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 7 18.6 BONE UID Mammal

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Vert Shark

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 3 0.1 BONE Vert Fish

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 3 0.5 BONE Skull Catfish

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Pectoral Spine Catfish

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.6 BONE Fish

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 N/C 18.8 BONE UID UID

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1 BONE Shell Turtle

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 8 4.2 GLASCLR Different Vessels

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 3 1 GLAS Different Vessels; Opaque

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 7 21.3 GLAS Different Vessels; Patinated

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.7 GLASAMB Body Curved

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 2 0.8 GLASAMB Different Vessels

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 7 GLAS Base Goblet Curved; Patinated; Opaque

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE UID

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 14 4.2 WOOD Discarded

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 9 1.2 CHARCOAL Pieces

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 2 11.4 WRGTNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 5 cm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2.5 WRGTNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 3.2 cm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 4 7 WRGTNAIL Frag Oxy; No Heads; L — 2-3 cm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 3 2.6 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 5-6 cm

212

133 MARINE STREET 9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 3 11.5 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 3-4 cm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 13 24 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 2-3 cm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 6 8.4 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 1-2 cm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 10 12.5 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 2-3 cm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 9 19.9 UIDNAIL Oxy

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 7 5.7 MTLOBJ UID Oxy

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 7 7.8 MTLOBJ Flat Frag

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 2 32.2 COAL Bituminous

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 3.4 DAUB Frag

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 9.8 BRICK Frag

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.2 CHARCOAL Frag

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 28 SPRUE

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2.5 SHOT Musket Ball; 0.6 mm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2.5 SHOT Musket Ball; 0.7 mm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.6 SHOT Musket Ball; 0.5 mm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.8 SHOT Musket Ball; 0.6 mm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 2 2.9 CUFFLINKS Matching Set D — 1.4cm

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 184 2025 ABODIS Frag

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 7.8 SMDEC Body Checked

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 4.6 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 8 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 9.7 SMDEC Rim Beveled; Rectilinear Complicated; Shell Temp.

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 4.2 SMD Body Eroded; Grog Temp. 9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 3 8.8 SMD Body Eroded

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 4.3 SMD Body Eroded; Shell Temp.

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 3 9.4 SMD Body Eroded

213

133 MARINE STREET 9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 7.4 SMP Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 4.3 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated; Shell Temp.

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 3 13.6 SMD Body Eroded

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 4.2 SMDEC Body Checked

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 3.2 SMDEC Body Rectilinear

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.8 CLNO Body Plain; Curved

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2.8 SMDEC Body Curvilinear

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1 SJP Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 2 3.8 STP Body

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 4.2 SJP Body Sand Temp.

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2.8 COAL Frag

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 2 7.6 CEW Frag Plain Décor

9.02 TU 9 LVL 2 2 5.1 TC Flower Pot

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 12 8.1 CHARCOAL

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 11 11.2 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — <2 cm

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 9 7.8 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 2-3 cm

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 12 37.8 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L— 3-4 cm

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 5 6 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 5.6 cm

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 11 9 UIDNAIL Heads Small; Oxy

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 4 3.2 UIDNAIL Heads Large; Oxy

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 5.5 UIDNAIL Bolt? Oxy; L — 3.4 cm

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 3 2 MTLOBJ Frag Flat; Oxy

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 24 36.5 MTLOBJ Frag Oxy

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 40 8.6 GLASGRN Frag Flat

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 11 4.2 GLAS Frag Flat; Opaque

214

133 MARINE STREET 10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 9 8.2 GLASAMB Frag

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 13 23.4 GLASCLR Frag

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 13 GLASCLR Neck Curved

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 2 1.8 GLAS Frag Opaque

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 4 11.1 GLASAMB Body Curved; Opaque

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 9.6 GLAS Body Curved; Patinated; Opaque

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3 GLAS Body Curved; Patinated; Opaque

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 5.9 GLAS Rim Curved; Patinated; Opaque

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 8.8 GLAS Body Patinated; Opaque

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3.4 GLAS Rim Curved; Patinated; Opaque

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 4 3.7 GLAS Frag Patinated; Opaque

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 19 16.2 REW Frag Plain

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 5.2 LEAD Frag

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.2 PIPES Frag Stem Bore; 1720-1750; 2.3 cm

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.2 PIPEB Bowl Frag

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 4.2 PWSH Rim Feathered; Dots

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 2 2.4 PWSH Rim Cross mend

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 7.4 WWANLR Rim Cats Décor

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.5 SLPOLY Rim Black Stripe

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 11 IRNSTNTP Body Sponge Décor

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.5 PORENG Body Floral

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 5.5 PORUID Base Ringed Foot

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.2 REW Rim Straight

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.1 REW Rim Straight, Black Stripe

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.5 UIDMAJ Rim Straight

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.6 UIDMAJ Rim Straight

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.7 REW Rim Straight

215

133 MARINE STREET 10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.5 UIDMAJ Frag

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.1 UIDMAJ Frag Black Stripe

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.1 REW Frag

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.7 PORENG Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.4 REW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.9 REW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.7 PW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1 REW Rim Scalloped

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1 DELFT Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.4 REW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 2 5.3 CW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.7 PW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.5 REW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.3 UIDMAJ Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 2 4.3 WW Base Flat; Different Vessels

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.2 WW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.4 CW Body Curved

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 8.5 OJ Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.6 GLREDW Rim Straight

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.1 CEW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3.8 CEW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 4 CEW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 5.2 TC Frag Flower Pot

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 10.6 IRNSTNTP Handle

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.5 REDW Frag

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 104 126 ABODIS Frag

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 6 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

216

133 MARINE STREET 10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3 SMDEC Body Checked

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3.6 SMDEC Rim Straight; Complicated

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.8 SMDEC Body Checked

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.7 SMD Body Eroded

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 4 SMDEC Body Checked

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 6 SMD Body Eroded

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3.2 SMD Body Eroded; Sand Temp.

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 4 SMD Body Eroded

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.4 SMDEC Body Complicated

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3.2 SMD Body Eroded

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.8 SMD Body Eroded

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.5 SMDEC Body Checked

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.6 SMDEC Body Checked

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3.4 SMDEC Body Complicated

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.4 SMDEC Body Complicated

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.5 SMD Body Eroded

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3.8 SMD Body Eroded

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.2 STP Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 2 2.8 SJP Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.6 CEW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 6 CEW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 6.2 CEW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 5.7 CEW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.2 CEW Body

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 2 3.2 CONSTR

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2 GLAS Body Patinated

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3.8 CEW Body

217

133 MARINE STREET 10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 2 1.8 CHARCOAL

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 19.2 CHERT Knapped

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 9.2 TABBY

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 6 3.5 CONSTR Debris

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2.8 TOY Whole Clay Marble, 1.2cm

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.1 TACK Whole Brass; L — <2 cm; Furniture

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.1 SHELL Frag

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 3 2.2 BONE UID Burnt

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 in 2 22.2 BONE Frag Butchered; Bos taurus

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3.7 BONE R tibiotarsus Gallus gallus

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.8 BONE L Prox Ulna Gallus gallus

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 2 3.2 BONE Tooth Bos taurus

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Vert Shark

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Vert Fish

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 8 16.9 BONE UID Mammal

10.02 TU 10 LVL 2 NC 14.4 BONE UID

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 3 0.4 GLAS Flat Frag Flat; Tinted

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 0.1 GLASCLR Frag

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 0.6 GLASCLR Frag

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 0.6 CW (Late) Rim Rounded

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 2.8 WW Cup Base Cup

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 19.9 CEW Body

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 10 MEXRED Body

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 3 REDW Body

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 6.4 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 5 cm

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 2 4.5 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; Tossed

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 5 4 IRONFRAG Frag Oxy

218

133 MARINE STREET 10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 10 7.5 ABODIS Body

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 4 15 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 2 9.7 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Stamp

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 1.8 MISSRF Body

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 2 8.3 SMD Body Eroded

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 3.3 SMP Rim Beveled

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 9.7 SHELL Column Whelk

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 9.4 BONE Large Mammal

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 6 2 BONE UID

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 0.1 BONE Hemal Spine Fish

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 0.1 BONE Vert Fish

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 1 0.1 BONE Skull Catfish

10.04 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 9A 6 0.4 CHARCOAL Frag

11.01 TU 11 LVL 1 Grab 1 2.6 PWTP Rim Straight; Patterned Décor

11.01 TU 11 LVL 1 Grab 1 23.5 PWHP Body Shield Fether; Tureen

11.01 TU 11 LVL 1 Grab 1 5.6 CW Near Rim

11.01 TU 11 LVL 1 Grab 1 2.1 STNW Body Blue, Yellow Feathers

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 4.2 SLPOLY Rim Beveled

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 2 3.9 SLPOLY Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 7.7 SLPOLY Base Footed

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.5 PWSH Rim Molded

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1 PWSH Rim Molded

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 5.2 PWSH Body Marly

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.6 PWSH Rim Molded

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 3.8 PORENG Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 5 LDGLCEW Body Blue

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.4 PWTP Body Floral Décor

219

133 MARINE STREET 11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.4 WWPP (late) Rim Straight; Striped

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.8 WWPP (late) Rim Straight; Stripe Leaf Décor

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.4 WWPP (late) Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.9 WWANLR Body Banded

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.1 WW Body Curved

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1 WW Rim Straight

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.7 WW Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.9 IRNSTN Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.8 IRNSTN Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1 PW Rim Straight

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 8.5 STNW Lid

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1 REW Rim

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1 REW Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 4 1.4 REW Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.4 REW Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.6 UIDMAJ Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.2 REW Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 9.4 WRGTNAIL Oxy; L — 8.5 cm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 5.2 WRGTNAIL Oxy; L — 4 cm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 2 2 UIDNAIL Heads Oxy

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 23.2 UIDNAIL Split Oxy; L — 5 cm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 10.5 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 7 cm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 3.7 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 6 cm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 4 19.3 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 4-5 cm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 5 5.8 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 3-4 cm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 4 7.2 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 2-3 cm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 3 3.7 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — < 2 cm

220

133 MARINE STREET 11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.2 UIDNAIL No head Oxy; L — < 2 cm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 5 4.3 MTLOBJ Frags Discarded

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 8 2.8 GLASGRN Frag Flat

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 4 1 GLAS Frag Flat; Opaque

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 7.2 GLASCLR Base, Flat

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.6 GLASCLR Vessel

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.5 GLASGRN Vessel

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.5 GLASGRN Vessel Curved

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.5 GLASCLR Vessel Curved

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.4 GLASCLR Vessel Flat

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.6 GLAS Frag Flat; Opaque

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.6 TACK Furniture; Brass, L — < 1.5 cm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.9 SHOT Lead; D — 0.5 mm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.3 SHOT Lead; D — 0.6 mm

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 13 7.4 WOOD Frag

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 43 50.6 ABODIS Frags

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.7 SMD Body Eroded

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.4 SMDEC Body Complicated

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 3.4 SMD Body Eroded

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 4 SMD Body Eroded; With Shell

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 4.4 SMD Body Eroded; With Grog

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 3.4 SMP Body

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 8.4 SMD Body Eroded; Curved

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.6 ABODIS Body Plain

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.5 ABODIS

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 6 1.2 WOOD Frag Discarded

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 7 0.5 CHARCOAL

221

133 MARINE STREET 11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 4.7 GLAS Body Patinated

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.4 GLAS Patinated

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 4 21.1 CONSTR UID

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 16.6 ROCK

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.8 BONE Tooth Bos taurus

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 5 21.8 BONE UID Mammal

11.02 TU 11 LVL 2 20 7.4 BONE UID

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 4.6 BONE UID Mammal

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 3 6 BONE Ribs Mammal

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.3 BONE Spine Catfish

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Vert Fish

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.9 BONE Vert Mammal

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 21 7.5 BONE UID

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 4 0.7 BONE UID Fish

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.6 BONE Tooth Mammal

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.6 BONE scalpal Gallus gallus

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 4.7 CONSTR UID

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 9 3 CHARCOAL Small Frags

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 3 1 WOOD Frags

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 8 2.6 GLAS Frags Flat

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 2 10.8 GLASAMB Body

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 4 3.5 GLAS Body Patinated; Opaque

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.5 GLASCLR Body

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 3 13.3 UIDNAIL Intact Oxy; L — 3-4 cm

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 3 4.2 UIDNAIL Heads Oxy

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 2.8 UIDNAIL Shaft Oxy; L — 3-4 cm

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 1.4 UIDNAIL Shaft Oxy; L — 3 cm

222

133 MARINE STREET 12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.8 TACK Intact Oxy; L — < 2 cm

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 2 3 UIDNAIL Shaft Oxy; L — < 2 cm

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 1.2 PIPES Stem Bore; 1.8 cm x 0.8cm

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 3 0.8 UIDMAJ Frags

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 3 PUEPOLY Body

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 1 ANLRW Rim Straight; Striped

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 46 67 ABODIS Frags

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 10.1 SMDEC Body Rectilinear

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 7.5 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 4.5 SMDEC Body Rectilinear

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 6.8 SMD Body Eroded

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 6 SMP Body Plain

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 4.5 SMD Body Eroded; Shell

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 3.9 SMDEC Rim Beveled; Shell; Rectilinear Complicated

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 4.5 SJP Body Plain 12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 8.2 SMP Body Plain; With Grog

12.02 TU 12 LVL 2 1 2 SMDEC Body Curved; Rectilinear

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 N/C 394.8 SHELL Frags Tossed

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 in 2 61.4 PUEBW Base

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 2.5 PUEPOLY Base

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 2 1.7 PUEPOLY Body

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 2 9 SLPOLY Body

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 N/C 8.7 CHARCOAL Frags

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 8.3 IRONFRAG Frag Oxy

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 2 17.4 CEW Body

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 2 0.1 GLAS Frag Tinted; Thin

223

133 MARINE STREET 12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 1.1 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; Tossed

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 0.2 GLASGRNBL Frag

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 4 4.3 DAUB Frag Burnt

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 2.4 BONE UID Large Mammal

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 4 3.4 BONE UID Mammal

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 0.1 BONE Phalange Possible Suss.

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 1.2 BONE Tooth root Large Mammal

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 4 1.5 BONE Shell Turtle

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 3 1.2 BONE Skull Catfish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 0.2 BONE Articular

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 2 0.8 BONE Bet Skull and Spine

Catfish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 2 0.3 BONE Pectoral Spine Catfish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 8 4.3 BONE Spine Fish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 4 5.6 BONE Hemal Spine Fish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 4 0.1 BONE Operculum Mullet

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 2 0.1 BONE hyomaudefalar Mullet

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 0.1 BONE Epihyal Mullet

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 33 75 BONE UID Fish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 5.2 BONE UID Drum Fish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 1.7 BONE Maxilla Large Drum Fish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 0.2 BONE quadrabe Fish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 0.1 BONE hyomaudefalar Catfish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 0.8 BONE UID Catfish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 in 3 1.1 BONE Vert Large Fish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 42 5 BONE UID Fish

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 3.8 BONE R femur Gallus gallus

224

133 MARINE STREET 12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 2 1.5 BONE UID Avis

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 N/C 18.2 BONE UID UID

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 109 113 ABODIS Body

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 1.6 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 0.2 CHERT Knapped Flake

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 0.8 BONE UID Burnt

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 6.5 BULLET Frag to John Powell

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 2 8.8 SMD Body

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 7 35.6 SMDEC Body Block Rectilinear Complicated

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 3 SMP Body Grog Temp.

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 3.7 SMP Body Rectilinear; Grog Temp.

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 3.8 SMD Body Grog Temp.; Eroded

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 15.4 SPP Body Grog and Sand Temp.

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 3.4 SMDEC Rim Rounded; Rectilinear

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 3.5 MILLERP Body Burnished

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 2.1 SMDEC Body Curvilinear

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 3 12 SMD Body Eroded

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 2 10.6 SMDEC Body Complicated Curves; Different Vessels

12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 3.1 STP Rim 12.03 TU 12 LVL 2 FEA 12 1 4 SMP Body

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 2 30 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 6-7 cm

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 4 21.2 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 4-5 cm

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 5 11.6 UIDNAIL Oxy; L <3 cm

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 7 7.9 UIDNAIL Frag Flat; Oxy

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 3 7.6 MTLOBJ Frags Flat

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 9 SLPOLY Body Curved

225

133 MARINE STREET 13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 2.2 CW Body Flat Base

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 2.4 CW Body

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 0.3 PW Frag

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 1 UIDMAJ Frag Stripe

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 1 PIPES Frag Clay; 2.5 cm

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 0.4 PIPES Frag 1.5 cm

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 2 1.5 UIDMAJ Frag

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 0.1 UIDMAJ Frag

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 2 3 WW Frag Flat

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 1.9 WW Rim Straight

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 4 WW Base

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 10 2.6 GLASGRN Frags Flat

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 3 1.5 GLASCLR Frags Flat

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 5.5 GLASBLK Frag Curved

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 2.2 GLASBLK Frag Flat

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 3 4.7 GLASCLR Frags Curved

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 2 28.9 GLAS Frags Patinated; Opaque; Curved

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 1 GLASGRN Frag

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 3.8 GLASCLR Frag Appears Melted

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 2.3 LDGLCEW Frag Black

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 12.5 OJ Frag

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 3.1 PWSH Body Shell Edged; Raised Décor

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 2.4 DELFT Body English

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 0.5 PW Rim

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 0.5 PW Body Curved

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 3.4 TOY Clay Marble

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 2.2 TASSEL Brass; 1.8 cm x 0.7 cm

226

133 MARINE STREET HOLDER

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 3 17.6 BRICK Burnished

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 2 11.1 COQUINA Pieces

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 11 1.4 CHARCOAL Pieces

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 50 54 ABODIS

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 11 STP Body

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 5.2 SMP Body Sand Temp.

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 2 7 SMDEC Body Checked

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 3.6 SMDEC Body Complicated Check

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 4.2 SMDEC Body Checked; Grog Temp.

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 3 SMP Body Eroded; Sand Temp.

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 4.5 SMD Body Eroded

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 3.4 SMD Body Eroded

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 3.3 SMD Body Eroded; Shell Temp.

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 6 20.1 SMD Body Eroded

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 4.5 SMDEC Body Rectilinear; Grog Temp.

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 2.6 SMDEC Body Checked

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 6.1 SMD Body Eroded

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 3.9 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 4.2 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 2.2 SMD Body Eroded

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 4.7 SMD Body Eroded; Chipped on one surface

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 7.4 BONE R Astragalus Odocoileus 13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 3 0.2 BONE Vert Fish

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 0.5 BONE Vert Large Fish

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 0.5 BONE Vert Medium Fish

227

133 MARINE STREET 13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 5.2 SHELL Frag Knobbed Whelk

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 1.6 SHELL Column Whelk

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 2 2.3 BONE Frag Burnt

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 5 6.4 BONE UID Mammal

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 16 6 BONE UID

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 2 5.7 SMD Body Eroded

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 2 4 ABOUID Body Chipped on both surfaces

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 4.8 SMDEC Body Rectilinear; Grog and Shell Temp.

13.02 TU 13 LVL 2 1 2.2 SMD Body Eroded 13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 6 67.8 COQUINA Frag Tossed

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 71.2 GLASCLR Bottle Kick up D — 8 cm

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 26 2.7 CHARCOAL

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 5.9 NAILSQUID Oxy; L — 4 cm

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 18.8 UIDNAIL Large Head

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 1.6 UIDNAIL

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 0.1 UIDNAIL Oxy

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 9.8 BONE Vert Large Mammal

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 4 0.3 BONE Vert Fish

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 3 0.3 BONE Skull Catfish

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 0.5 BONE Vert Shark

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 6 7.8 BONE UID Mammal

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 6 BONE Rib Medium Mammal

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 7 0.9 BONE UID Fish

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 16 2.5 BONE UID UID

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 10.7 PWTP Bowl Shoulder Bowl

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 3.2 SLPOLY Body

228

133 MARINE STREET 13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 2 4.9 REDW Body

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 0.1 DELFT Body

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 0.9 UIDMAJ Body

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 3 PUEBW Rim

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 0.4 BONE UID Burnt

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 0.1 DAUB Frag Tossed

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 53 38.6 ABODIS Body

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 5 16.4 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 1 5.3 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

13.03 TU 13 LVL 2 FEA 13 6 19.7 SMD Body Eroded

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 1 35.5 TABBY Frag

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 1 6.6 PIPES Frag L — 6 cm; Kaolin

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 2 1 IRONFRAG Frag Oxy; Tossed

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 N/C 2 CHARCOAL

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 3 0.3 BONE Vert Fish

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 5 0.4 BONE UID Fish

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 3 0.9 BONE UID

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 13 7 ABODIS Body

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 1 1 SJP Rim Rounded

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 1 1.5 SJUID Body

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 1 5.9 SMUID Rim Rounded; Trace of MISSRF; Sand Temp.

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 2 7.5 SMDEC Body Rectilinear 13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 3 8.5 SMUID Body

13.04 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 17 1 1.4 SMD Body UID Décor

14.01 TU 14 Grab 1 21 PW Rim Shell Edged

14.01 TU 14 Grab 1 34 PWTP Rim Straight

229

133 MARINE STREET 14.01 TU 14 Grab 1 5.5 CW Rim Queen

14.01 TU 14 Grab 1 38.4 PW Body

14.01 TU 14 Grab 3 4.8 STNWR Rim In three pieces; Royal

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 89 115.9 ABODIS Body

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 4.3 SMDEC Rim Inverted rolled; Simple

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 10.5 SMDEC Rim Rolled; Complicated

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 2.7 SMDEC Body Shell Temp.; Checked

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 6.4 SMDEC Body Complicated

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 2 7 SMDEC Body Checked

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 4 17.6 SMDEC Body Simple

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 5.8 NLABO Body Non Local; Sand Temp.; Checked

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 4 22.1 NLABO Body Sand Temp.; Simple 14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 2.9 NLABO Body Sand Temp.

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 2.2 NLABO Rim Plain; Sand Temp.

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 6 26 NLABO Body Plain; Sand Temp.

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 2.2 PWANLR Rim Banded

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 0.8 PWANLR Body Banded

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 2 1.3 PWANLR Body Banded

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 0.8 PWHP Rim Decorated

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 0.8 PWTP Rim Decorated

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 0.4 PWSH Rim Decorated

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 3 4.5 PWHP Body Decorated

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 0.7 PWHP Body Decorated

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 1 CW Body

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 2 6.3 PW Base Different Vessels

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 2 11 WW Rim

230

133 MARINE STREET 14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 6 11.6 PW Rim

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 7 7.2 PW Body

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 6 7.85 WW Body

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 1.2 PIPES Frag #4; Kaolin; L — 2.6 cm

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 3 0.7 BONE Vert Fish

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 N/C 27.7 BONE UID

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 8.3 SHELL Column Whelk

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 8 10.4 GLAS Body Opaque

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 24 7.7 GLASCLR Body

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 34 9.2 GLAS Body Tinted

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 5 2.8 GLASDKGRN Body

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 N/C 55.4 MTLOBJ Frag Oxy; Discarded

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 7 45.7 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 5.5-6 cm

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 7 30 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 4-5 cm

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 13 46 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 3-3.5 cm

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 7 19.2 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 1.5-2 cm

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 2 8.7 COAL Frag

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 9.8 CEW Body Unglazed

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 0.9 COQUINA Frag

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 1 UIDMAJ Body Blue on one side; White on the other

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 3.3 BONE Frag Worked; L — 2.5-3 cm 14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 2.3 LDGLCEW Body Black

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 7.4 STNWR Rim Rolled; Mocha

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 1.4 SHOT Lead; D — 5 cm

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 2.3 SHOT Lead; D — 7 cm

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 8 ROCK Frag

231

133 MARINE STREET 14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 2 FLNTGUN Frag c/f Honey Tone; c/f Gun Flint

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 0.5 FLAKE Frag

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 0.4 BEAD Frag Glass; Faceted; Barrel; Dark Blue

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 6.8 MTLOBJ Frag Copper Tubing; D — 1.2 cm; L — 4 cm

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 2.1 MTLOBJ Frag UID Compound Interior; L — 2.2 cm; Brass

14.02 TU 14 LVL 2 1 0.5 TACK c/f Furniture Tack; Brass

14.03 TU 14 LVL 3 FEA 10 3 13.5 CONSTR Frag

14.03 TU 14 LVL 3 FEA 10 6 0.4 IRONFRAG Frag Oxy; Tossed

14.03 TU 14 LVL 3 FEA 10 1 0.5 GLAS Flat Frag Flat; Tinted

14.03 TU 14 LVL 3 FEA 10 1 8.3 BUCKLE Frag Brass

14.03 TU 14 LVL 3 FEA 10 1 0.1 BONE UID Fish

14.03 TU 14 LVL 3 FEA 10 4 0.9 BONE UID

14.03 TU 14 LVL 3 FEA 10 2 0.9 ABODIS Body

14.03 TU 14 LVL 3 FEA 10 2 0.1 CHARCOAL Frag

14.03 TU 14 LVL 3 FEA 10 1 0.1 DAUB Frag Burnt

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 7.2 TABBY Frag Tossed

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 7.1 BRICK Frag Tossed

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 1.7 SLATE Frag Tossed

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 3 23 GLAS Bottle Kick up Patinated; Opaque

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 2.4 GLASBL Medicine Bottle

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 4 12.9 GLASOLIVE Bottle Bottle

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 1.2 GLAS Bottle Patinated; Opaque

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 5.4 GLASWITE Bottle Patinated

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 9 14.9 GLASCLR Body

232

133 MARINE STREET 15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 14 GLAS Bottle Base

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 ~30 16 GLASCLR Frag Flat; Thin; Tinted

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 0.4 GLASCLR

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 3 MTLOBJ Frag Copper

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 50.4 SPIKE Frag L — 12.5 cm; Oxy

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 13.1 BUCKLE Frag

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 3 18.1 UIDNAIL Frag L — 4-5 cm

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 14 53.9 UIDNAIL Frag L — 3-4 cm; Oxy

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 13 24.1 UIDNAIL Frag L — < 3 cm

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 7.6 STAPLE Frag

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 6 CLINCHNAIL Frag

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 3 8.5 IRONFRAG Frag Tossed

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 14 21.1 UIDNAIL Frag

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 4.7 CEW Body

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 8.4 GLCEW Body

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 37.8 SLIPREDAM Rim Crimped Edge

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 6.5 LDGLCEW Body Black

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 4 7 PIPES Frag Kaolin

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 3 4.9 PWANLR Rim Banded; May be same vessel

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 3 4.4 PWANLR Body

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 3 PWANLR Body

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 1.8 PWHP (late) Rim Floral Décor

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 2.2 PWHP (late) Rim Stripe

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 0.4 PWTP Rim

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 6.3 IRNSTN Base

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 2.3 PW Base

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 5 8.6 PW Body

233

133 MARINE STREET 15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 3 1.9 PWTP Body

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 1.2 RTW Body

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 4.4 PUEBW Body

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 52.5 BONE molars Bos taurus

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 2.2 BONE Ear Bone Mammal

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 4 2.7 BONE Tooth Frag Mammal

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 10 21.7 BONE UID Mammal

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 1 BONE Spine Fish

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 35 11.1 BONE UID

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 0.1 SHELL Claw Crab

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 0.1 CHARCOAL Frag

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 49 53.9 ABODIS Body

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 7.8 SMDEC Body Punctated

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 9 19.8 SMD Body Eroded

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 5.8 SMDEC Body Checked; Medium

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 2 4.5 SMP Body

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 2.8 SMD Rim Rounded; Eroded

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 4 11.5 SMD Body Eroded

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 4 14.7 SMDEC Body Checked; Medium

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 6.5 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 4.5 STP Body

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 3.4 CLNO Base

15.02 TU 15 LVL 2 1 0.8 SJI Cob Impressed

15.03 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 16 14 1.2 CHARO

15.03 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 16 2 1 BONE UID

15.03 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 16 1 4.2 UIDNAIL No head Oxy; L — 2 cm

15.03 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 16 1 5.8 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 3.8 cm

234

133 MARINE STREET 15.03 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 16 1 0.1 UIDNAIL No head Oxy; L — 1.8 cm

15.03 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 16 10 6.5 ABODIS Frag

15.03 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 16 2 6.5 SMD Body Eroded; Grit Temp.

15.05 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 19 3 7 GLASCLR Frag

15.05 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 19 2 0.2 CHARCOAL Frag

15.05 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 19 5 5.3 ABODIS Body

15.05 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 19 1 0.3 MTLOBJ Frag Oxy; Flat

15.05 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 19 3 2.4 BONE

15.05 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 19 1 5.2 SJP Body Checked; Sand Temp.

15.05 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 19 1 2 REW Blue on both sides

15.05 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 19 1 1 ELMOR Body Glazed

15.05 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 19 1 2.8 DAUB

15.05 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 19 1 1.2 CEW

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 2.6 PIPES Frag 2.2 cm x 1 cm

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 4 PWSH Rim Shell Edged

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 3.7 WWTP Rim Straight; Floral Décor on both sides

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 1.4 PWHP Body 16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 3.2 WWTP Ringed Foot Dots; Wreath Décor

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 0.5 PWHP Rim Straight; Lines

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 2.5 PWHP Rim Straight

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 0.2 REW Rim Beveled

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 0.2 WWTP Body

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 0.4 PWPP Body Brown Stripe

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 3 3.1 WW Body

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 1.2 WW Body Molded

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 3 2.8 UIDNAIL Intact Oxy; L — 3-4 cm

235

133 MARINE STREET 16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 5 9 UIDNAIL Intact Oxy; L — 2-3 cm

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 5 5.8 UIDNAIL Intact Oxy; L — 1-2 cm

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 3 2.6 UIDNAIL Shafts Oxy

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 1.5 UIDNAIL Head Oxy

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 2 32.2 BOLT Intact Oxy; L — 5-6 cm

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 4 22 WRGTNAIL Intact Oxy; L — 3-4 cm

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 5.9 IRONOBJ UID Oxy; 9 cm

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 11 MTLOBJ Frags 10 cm; Discarded

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 30 7.5 GLAS Frags Flat

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 2 6.8 GLASCBLT Body Cobalt

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 4 10.9 GLAS Body Patinated; Opaque

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 0.3 GLASOLIVE Body Molded

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 1.7 GLASGRN Body

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 0.9 GLASAMB Body

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 6 19.2 GLASCLR Body Curved

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 0.1 GLASAMB Body Curved

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 10 2.1 GLASCLR Body Flat

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 1 SMDEC Body Checked; Small

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 31 296 ABODIS Frags

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 3 SMD Rim Beveled; Eroded

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 7.5 CLNO Body Checked; Sand and Grog Temp.

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 4.4 BRICK Body

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 2 1 CHARCOAL Frags

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 3.5 SLATE Frag

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 0.1 BUT 1/2 Button Two holes; Wood

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 3.2 MINIBALL Lead; D — 1.5 mm

236

133 MARINE STREET 16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 20 WGT Lead

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 8.5 COAL Bituminous

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 0.5 CEW

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 4 0.9 CHARCOAL

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 22 BONE Tooth Mammal cf Bos taurus

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 1.2 BONE Rib cf Sussorofa

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 2 2.7 BONE Synsacrum Gallus gallus

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 2 7.7 BONE UID Mammal

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 1.5 BONE UID Butchered Mammal

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 19 5.8 BONE UID

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 0.7 BONE Carapace Turtle

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 4 0.6 BONE UID Fish

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 53.3 SHELL Whelk Column Tool

16.02 TU 16 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Burnt UID

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 11 26.7 UIDNAIL Frag Badly Oxy; L — 3-4 cm

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 15 7 UIDNAIL Frag Badly Oxy; Tossed

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A N/C 6 UIDNAIL Frag Badly Oxy; Tossed

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 5 2.4 BRICK Frag

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 1 0.8 LDGLCEW Body Black

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 1 in 2 4.4 WWTP Body

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 2 3.5 CEW Body

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 9 4.8 ABODIS Body

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 1 4.2 SMDEC Body Rectilinear

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 1 6.8 SMD Body Eroded

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 3 8.5 GLAS Frag Thick Molded

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 5 1.3 GLAS Frag Flat

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 2 2 GLASOLIVE Frag

237

133 MARINE STREET 16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 3 7.2 BONE UID Mammal

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 7 1.8 BONE UID UID

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 1 0.1 BONE Shell Turtle

16.03 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20A 5 0.5 CHARCOAL Frag

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 1 7.3 BUCKLE Frag Oxy

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 1 1.9 UIDNAIL Frag Oxy; L — 3.1 cm

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 1 0.5 UIDNAIL Oxy; Tossed

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 8 6.5 ABODIS Body

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 1 2.5 SMDEC Body Rectilinear

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 2 6.5 SMD Body

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 1 6.8 SHELL Column Whelk; Tool

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 3 0.4 CHARCOAL Frag

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 2 0.3 BONE Skull Catfish

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 2 0.1 BONE Spine Fish

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 2 0.1 BONE UID Fish

16.04 TU 16 LVL 3 FEA 20B 1 0.1 BONE UID UID

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 1.5 PWSH Rim Shell Edged; Straight

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 1.4 SLPOLY Rim Straight; Striped

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 1.4 SLPOLY Body Two Stripes

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.2 REW Rim Flared

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.1 CEW Rim Straight; Stripe

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.4 CEW Rim

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.8 PWHP Body

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 4.9 IRNSTN Body Blue Floral; Square Sided

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 3.5 PWHP Body Rounded; Blue Leafy Décor

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 1.2 DELFT Body

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.5 PWHP Body

238

133 MARINE STREET 17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 2 5.2 CW Body

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.7 CW Footed Base

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.6 PW Frag

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.7 PW Footed Base

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.1 CEW Frag

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.1 CEW Frag

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 3 0.7 REW Frag

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.7 CW Frag

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 1.5 PWANLR Body Stripe

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.1 PWTP Rim Rounded; Color on both sides

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 3 3.6 OJ Body

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 7.2 LDGLCEW Body Thin; Black Glaze on one side

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.1 PIPES 3 cm x 0.9 cm

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 94 83 ABODIS Frag

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 5.6 SMD Body Eroded

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.1 SMDEC Body Complicated Checked

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 3 SMDEC Rectilinear Complicated

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 6.8 SMDEC Checked

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.2 SMDEC Rectilinear

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 1.8 SMDEC Checked; Medium

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 4.2 SMDEC Rectilinear Complicated

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 3.4 SMD Eroded

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.3 SMD Eroded; With Shell

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 1.8 SMD Eroded

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.2 SMD Eroded

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 3.6 SMD Eroded

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 5.1 SMD Eroded

239

133 MARINE STREET 17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.6 SMD Eroded

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 7.1 SMDEC Rim Flared; Simple

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 6.2 SMDEC Simple

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.6 SMDEC Simple

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 3.4 SMD Eroded; Grog Temp.

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 6.2 SMD Eroded

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.8 SMD Eroded

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 3.2 SMD Eroded

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.1 SMD Eroded

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 3 SMP Plain

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 1.5 CEW Red Paste

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 4 0.8 CHARCOAL

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 5.9 THIMBLE Intact Brass; 2 cm x 2 cm

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.2 SHOT Musket Ball

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 8.4 CHERT Nodule

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.2 GUN SHELL

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.9 MTLOBJ Frags Copper

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 38 43.7 IRONFRAG Frags Tossed

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 2 4.6 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 5-7 cm

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 3 6 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 4-5 cm

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 9 17.3 UIDNAIL Oxy; L — 2-3 cm

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 6.2 UIDNAIL Oxy; 4 cm

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 3 1.5 UIDNAIL Oxy; 2 cm

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 13.5 IRONFRAG Oxy; 5 cm

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 2 4.6 IRONFRAG Oxy

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 20.3 IRONFRAG Oxy

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 9 2.5 GLASGRN Frags Flat

240

133 MARINE STREET 17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 10 2.5 GLASCLR Frags Flat

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 6 4 GLASCLR Frags Flat

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.4 GLAS Frags Patinated; Opaque

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 4 3 GLAS Frags Opaque

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 10 11.8 GLASCLR Frags

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 6 5 GLASGRN Frags

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 9.8 GLASCLR Frags Textured one side

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 4.1 GLASCLR Bottom

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.5 GLASCLR Body Rounded

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2 GLASCLR Frag

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 8 35.4 GLASGRN From one bottle

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 2 7.6 GLASGRN From another bottle; Lips

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.2 SYRINGE PART Plunger for Syringe; 6.2cm

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 4.8 COAL Lump

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 3 15.2 BRICK

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 8 1.3 CHARCOAL Frag

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.2 TABBY Frag

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 2.5 IRONFRAG Frag

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 0.5 BONE Catfish

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 2 1.2 BONE Vert Shark

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 2 0.2 BONE Vert Fish

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 2 2.5 BONE Vert Fish (2 parts)

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 1 4.2 BONE Odocoileus Left distal end of Tibia; Unfused Epiphesis

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 3 3 BONE Frags Burnt 17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 2 5.2 BONE Frag Mammal

17.02 TU 17 LVL 2 49 16 BONE Frags

241

133 MARINE STREET 17.03 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 15 1 GLASGRN 22cm D- 7 cm "Beaufont Co" Richmond VA;

Bottle 17.03 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 15 1 GLASGRN Frags 17.03 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 15 1 UIDNAIL Oxy Nail

17.03 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 15 3 MTLOBJ Frags

17.03 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 15 2 SMDEC Body Checked; Sand and Grit Temp.

17.03 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 15 4 ABODIS

17.03 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 15 1 SMDEC Body Checked; Sand and Grit Temp.

17.03 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 15 1 UIDMAJ Body

17.03 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 15 1 BONE UID Mammal

17.03 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 15 30 BONE UID

17.04 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 18 1 0.5 BONE Frag

17.04 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 18 1 0.5 ABODIS Frag

17.05 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 3.5 WW Body

17.05 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 0.6 COAL Frag

17.05 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 2 2 1.4 IRONFRAG Frag Oxy; Tossed

17.05 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 0.1 BRICK Frag Possibly CEW

17.05 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 1.5 GLASCLR Frag Thick

17.05 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 2 2 0.1 GLAS Flat Frag Flat; Tinted

17.05 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 2.5 TABBY Frag

17.05 TU 17 LVL 3 FEA 2 1.5 WIRE Frag 1 mm Thick

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 3.1 PWSH Rim Shell Edged

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 2.6 PWSH Body Shell Edged

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 2.6 PORPOW Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 25.2 HPIRNSTN Rim Floral Décor

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 2 5.4 PWPP Body Floral Décor

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 2.8 WW Base Foot Ring

242

133 MARINE STREET 18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 2.2 WW Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 12 20 REFTW Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 3.4 REDWENG Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 4 3.5 PW Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 3.6 PW Base Foot Ring

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 4 12.4 PWANLR Body Banded

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 5 2.6 PWTP Body Not same vessel

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 2.1 PWTP Rim

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1 PWTP Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 0.9 SLPOLY Rim

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1.3 UIDMAJ Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 2 6.9 ELMOR Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1.4 PIPES Fragment Kaolin; Molded

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1.7 PIPES Frag Kaolin

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1.7 SLPOLY Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 2 4 DAUB Burnt

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 5 15.1 CHARCOAL

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 104 110.1 ABODIS

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 2.25 SMP Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1.9 STP Rim

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 4 6.7 SJP Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 3 45.8 STP Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 2.5 STP Rim Checked; Medium

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 4.4 STP Body Checked; Medium

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 4 37.2 SMDEC Body Complicated Checked

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 4.7 CLNO Body Checked

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 13 32.5 SMD Body UID

243

133 MARINE STREET 18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 4 34.5 CEW Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 3 6.5 SHOT Lead; D — 4.5 mm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 25.2 SHOT Musket Ball; Lead; D — 5.5 mm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 4.1 SHOT Spent; Lead; D— 4.5 mm 18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 5.5 WGT Intact Lead; 4.8 cm x 4.2 cm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 20.8 LEADOBJ Squared Edges; Possible Weight

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1.35 TACK Intact Furniture; 4.6 mm; Brass 18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1.7 ESCUT Brass

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 2 2.5 CUFF LINKS Brass; 5 mm; Shank

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1.8 BUT Armory; Brass; 5.3 mm; Shank with Makers Mark

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 99.3 BRICK 18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1.4 FLINT Worked Chert; European

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 5.1 GLASBRN Lip and Neck

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1.3 GLASBRN Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 6 6.9 GLASCLR Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 2 4 GLASYELGRN Body

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 2.3 GLASAMB Patinated; Opaque

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 7 3 GLASCLR Patinated; Opaque

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 4 6.5 GLASOLIVE

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 0.6 GLASGRN Opaque

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 19 6.9 GLASGRN Flat Frag Possible Window; Very Flat

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 0.7 STAPLE Whole Oxy; L — 2.5 cm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 14 19.7 UIDNAIL Body No heads; Oxy

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 5 7.4 UIDNAIL Head Oxy

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 5.5 UIDNAIL Oxy; Roundhead; L — 7 cm

244

133 MARINE STREET 18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 10.7 NAILSQUID Oxy; Sq Head; L — 6 cm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 2 7.8 CLINCHNAIL Oxy

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 2 8.7 UIDNAIL Oxy; Round Head; L — 5 cm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 3 19.7 NAILSQUID Oxy; Sq Head; L — 4.5 cm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 4 12.6 UIDNAIL Oxy; Round Head; L — 3.5 cm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 3 8.2 UIDNAIL Oxy; Round Head; L — 2.8 cm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 4 11.3 NAILSQUID Oxy; Sq Head; L — 3 cm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 3 8.5 UIDNAIL Oxy; Round Head; L — 2.5 cm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 3 3.9 UIDNAIL Oxy; Round Head; L — 2 cm

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 16 14 MTLOBJ UID Oxy

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 2 0.3 BONE UID Avis

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Vert Avis

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1 BONE Carpometacarpal Large Avis

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 1.5 BONE UID Burnt

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 4 8 BONE UID Mammal

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 2 0.2 BONE UID Fish

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 0.1 BONE Skull Catfish

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 37 123 BONE UID

18.02 TU 18 LVL 2 1 0.3 BONE Long BONE Mammal

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 2 0.4 BONE Frag

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 2 0.2 CHARCOAL Frag

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 1 1.6 CW Body

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 1 0.9 MTLOBJ Frag Oxy

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 2 5.8 SMDEC Checked; Sand and Grit Temp.

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 1 1.8 OJ Body

245

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 1 3.6 SMDEC Body Rectilinear Complicated; Grog Temp.

133 MARINE STREET 18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 4 6.2 ABODIS Frags 18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 1 0.9 CHARCOAL Frags

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 2 0.1 BONE

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 2 1 MTLOBJ Frag

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 1 0.5 UIDNAIL Oxy; No Head; L — 2 cm

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24 1 2.5 REW Body

18.03 TU 18 LVL 3 FEA 24A E1/2

3 2.4 ABODIS

246

APPENDIX C

LA PUNTA ARTIFACT DATABASE, 161 MARINE STREET

247

161 MARINE STREET ST. AUGUSTINE, FL

FS PROVENIENCE COUNT WT. (g)

ITEM FRAG/FORM DECORATION MODIFIER

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3.1 ABOGROGP

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3.7 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 8.4 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.5 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Eroded Lip, Folded

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3.4 ABOSTP

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 14.8 ABOSTP Plain Burnished

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.9 ABOSTP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 6 ELMOR

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 15 28.1 GLAS Bottle Patinated

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.1 GLAS Fragment

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.4 OJ

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3.1 PIPEB Fragment

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 6.1 PUEBW Rim, UID

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.3 SJP

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.4 SLIPRED

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 15 SM Rim, Everted Eroded Lip, Flat

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3 SM Rim, Flared Eroded Lip, Tapered

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 15 54.5 SM Eroded Smoothed

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 10 45.4 SMDEC Checked

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 2 SMDEC Rim, Flared Stamped Lip, Flat

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3.1 SMP Rim, Tapered

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 15.4 SMP Base, Flat

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 12 71.1 SMP

1-1.02 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 2 1 15 SMP Plain Burnished

248

161 MARINE STREET 1-1.03 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 5 1 79 SMDEC Bowl Rectilinear

1-1.03 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 5 1 8.6 SMP

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 3 7.9 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 4 10.4 ABOSTP

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 4.4 ABOSTP Rim, Flared Burnished Lip, Round

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 2 12.6 ELMOR

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 0.9 GLAS Fragment Opaque

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 2 0.8 GLASAMB Fragment Patinated

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 6 28 GLASOLIVE Bottle Patinated

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 0.1 GLASOLIVE Fragment Tinted

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 2.8 MISSRF Eroded

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 1.2 MISSRF Rim, Straight Plain Lip, Flat

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 1.8 MISSRF Stamped

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 2.7 MISSRF Plain

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 2 4.5 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 24.4 OJ

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 0.1 PIPEB Fragment

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 3.8 PIPES Fragment

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 2 20 POT Fragment Oxidized

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 0.9 PUEPOLY

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 3.5 SM Eroded

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 3 11.3 SM Eroded

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 17 69 SMDEC Checked

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 9.7 SMDEC Rim, UID Checked

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 2.8 SMP Rim, UID Plain Lip, Flat

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 15 81.1 SMP Plain

1-1.05 SA 1 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 58.5 SMP Base, Flat Burnished

249

161 MARINE STREET 1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 15.7 ABOGGTP

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 3 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 4 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 4.7 ABOSTDEC Rim, Straight Checked Lip, Round

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 3 21 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3.3 ABOSTP

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.9 ABOSTP Rim, Flared Lip, Round

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 2 6.6 ABOSTP

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.3 CHERT

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.3 GLASDRKBR

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.2 GLASLTGRN

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.1 GLASLTGRN Opaque

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 5.9 MISSRF Bowl Lip, Round

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 4.7 PUEPOLY Base, Footring

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 3.7 SM Eroded

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 1 13.5 SMDEC Checked

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 3 SMDEC Checked

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 4 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-10.02 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 2 6 28 SMP

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 6 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 1.2 CHERT

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 0.9 GLASAQA

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 1.7 GLASOLIVE

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 2.9 MISSRF

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 3 4 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 0.2 OJ

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 0.7 PIPEB

250

161 MARINE STREET 1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 2 1.6 SGS

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 10.6 SLPOLY

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 4 17.6 SM Eroded

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 15.5 SMDEC Rim, Inverted Rectilinear Lip, Flat

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 8 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 SMDEC Complicated

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 4 SMDEC Checked

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 5.8 SMP Rim, Flared Burnished Lip, Round

1-10.03 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 2.4 SMP

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 22.8 ABOGGTP

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 1.8 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Eroded Lip, Flat

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 2 6.8 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 4 28.2 ABOSTP

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 0.1 CHERT

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 3 3.4 GLAS Patinated

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 3 7.8 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 3.8 PIPES

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 1.2 PUEPOLY

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 3 12.3 SMDEC Checked

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 7 29.2 SMP

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 19.5 SPIKEUID Fragment Oxidized

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 0.9 UIDSLIP

1-10.04 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 2.8 UIDSLIP Trailed

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 2 8.6 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 4 17.3 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 4 18.6 ABOSTP

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 1 ABOSTP

251

161 MARINE STREET 1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 0.2 DELFT

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 1.2 GLASCLR Bottle

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 2 21.2 GLASOLIVE Bottle Patinated

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 6.8 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Tapered

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 8.3 MISSRF

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 0.3 PIPEB

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 8 34.8 SM Eroded

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 10 SMDEC Bowl Lip, Round

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 5 29.6 SMDEC Checked

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 11 46.9 SMP

1-10.05 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 2 1 0.2 UIDGLCE

1-10.06 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 W 1/2 1 11.5 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-10.06 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 W 1/2 1 3.8 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-10.06 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 W 1/2 1 4.4 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Rectilinear Lip, Tapered

1-10.06 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 W 1/2 2 6.6 ABOSTP

1-10.06 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 W 1/2 2 1.9 GLAS Patinated

1-10.06 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 W 1/2 1 9.9 MISSRF

1-10.06 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 W 1/2 7 36.5 SM Eroded

1-10.06 SA 1 TU 10 LVL 3 W 1/2 3 8.8 SMP

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.5 ABOSTDEC Indeterminate

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 1 4.8 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 5 8.9 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 1 8.1 ABOSTP Bowl Lip, Flat

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 5 23.1 ABOSTP

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 1 CLNO Plate Red Film or Lip, Flat

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.5 FLNTGUN

252

161 MARINE STREET 1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1 GLASAQA Patinated

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.5 GLASBRN Patinated

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1.8 GLASOLIVE

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 1 MISSRF

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.9 PIPEB Fragment

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.9 SLATE

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 2 5.3 SM Eroded

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 3 13.7 SMDEC Checked

1-11.02 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 2 4 17.1 SMP

1-11.03 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 12 1 2.6 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Folded

1-11.03 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 12 2 2.4 ABOSTP

1-11.03 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 12 2 0.1 GLASAMB

1-11.04 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 94 1 4.6 SM Eroded

1-11.05 SA 1 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 93 2 11.4 SMDEC Checked

1-12.02 SA 1 TU 12 LVL 2 1 4 ABOSTP

1-12.02 SA 1 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.1 GLAS Patinated

1-12.02 SA 1 TU 12 LVL 2 1 2.8 SMP

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 2 7.2 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 3 14 ABOSTP

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 3.1 ABOSTP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 1 FLINT Worked

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 3.7 GRNBAC

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 2 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Flat

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 2 2.1 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 3.1 OJGL

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 0.1 PIPEB Fragment

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 0.5 PIPES

253

161 MARINE STREET 1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 11 57.1 SM Eroded

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 13.3 SM Eroded

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 SMDEC Checked

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 3 SMDEC Complicated

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 2.3 SMDEC Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Round

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 SMDEC Rim, UID Complicated

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 4 22.6 SMP

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 5.8 SMP Rim, Straight Lip, Round

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 28.2 SPIKEUID Head Oxidized

1-16.02 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 3 1 40.8 SPIKEUID Fragment Oxidized

1-16.05 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 4 FEA 104 1 6.2 MISSS

1-16.05 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 4 FEA 104 2 0.1 PIN Fragment

1-16.05 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 4 FEA 104 1 4.1 SMDEC Complicated

1-16.05 SA 1 TU 16 LVL 4 FEA 104 1 13 SMP

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Complicated

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 5 16.4 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 2 4.9 ABOSTP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 5 12.5 ABOSTP

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 1 1.1 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 1 3.2 SLAG

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 1 SM Eroded

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 1 SMDEC Complicated

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 1 40.2 SMDEC Rim, Rolled Punctated

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 1 SMDEC Curvilinear

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 2 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-17.02 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 3 1 SMDEC Checked

1-17.03 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 111 2 4.5 ABOSTDEC Eroded

254

161 MARINE STREET 1-17.03 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 111 5 3.4 COAL

1-17.03 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 111 6 6.3 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-17.03 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 111 1 12.4 NAILUID Oxidized

1-17.03 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 111 1 1.2 SHOT Fragment

1-17.03 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 111 2 4.9 SM Eroded

1-17.04 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 110 1 2.8 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-17.04 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 110 1 0.5 GLAS Patinated

1-17.04 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 110 4 3.8 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-17.04 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 110 1 2.1 SM Eroded

1-17.04 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 110 1 8 SMDEC Rim, Curved Complicated Lip, Round

1-17.04 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 110 2 9 SMDEC Checked

1-17.04 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 110 1 5.5 SMP

1-17.05 SA1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 2.7 MXCW

1-17.05 SA1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 0.4 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-17.05 SA1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 1 PUEPOLY

1-17.05 SA1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 3 SM Eroded

1-17.05 SA1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 SMDEC Checked

1-17.05 SA1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 SMDEC Complicated

1-17.05 SA1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 SMDEC Complicated

1-17.05 SA1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 SMP Lip, Flat

1-17.05 SA1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 SMP

1-17.06 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 1.7 ABOSTP

1-17.06 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 2.4 SM Eroded

1-17.07 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 112 2 4.2 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-17.07 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 112 1 2.4 SM Rim, Straight Lip, Tapered

1-17.07 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA 112 2 4 SM

1-17.08 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 2 5 ABOSTP

255

161 MARINE STREET 1-17.08 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 7.5 CLNO Base, Footring

1-17.08 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 SM Rim, Folded Eroded Lip, Round

1-17.08 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 4 SMDEC Complicated

1-17.08 SA 1 TU 17 LVL 4 FEA ? 1 3.1 SMDEC

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 2 ABOGROGP

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 ABOSHDEC Checked

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 2 ABOSHP

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, Straight Checked Lip, Beveled

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, Straight Checked Lip, Tapered

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 6 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 11 ABOSTP

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 1 BEADGLAS

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 0.1 BEADGLAS Barrel Faceted

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 0.1 CHERT

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 0.2 DELFT

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 6 3.4 GLAS Fragment Patinated

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 10 21.3 GLAS Bottle Patinated

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 0.3 GLASAQA Fragment

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 0.3 GLASCLR Fragment

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 2 1.9 GLASOLIVE Fragment

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 MISSRF Rim, Straight Plain Lip, Round

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 3 5.6 MISSRF Plain

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Round

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 MISSRF Rim, Folded Plain Lip, Round

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 MISSRF Rim, UID Plain Lip, Round

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 MISSRF Rim, UID Plain Lip, Flat

256

161 MARINE STREET 1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 MISSS Rim, Straight Indeterminate Lip, Flat

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 4 12 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 1.9 NETWGT Folded

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 4 21.7 OJ

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 23.5 OJ Neck

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 2 2.9 PIPEB Fragment

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 1 PIPES Fragment

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 1 SHOT

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 1.5 SLAG Fragment

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 9.6 SLIPRED

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 11 SM Eroded

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 1 SM Eroded

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 SM Rim, Folded Eroded Lip, Flared

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 2 SM Rim, Straight Eroded Lip, Flat

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 5 SMDEC Complicated

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Curvilinear

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 5 SMDEC Checked

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 31.7 SMDEC Checked Burnished

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 38 SMP

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 4 32 SMP

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 SMP

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 SMP Rim, Flared Lip, Flat

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 78.7 SPIKEUID Oxidized

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 1 49.1 SPIKEUID Fragment Oxidized

1-2.02 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 2 3 1.2 TACK Fragment Oxidized

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 1 1 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 2 4.4 ABOSTP

257

161 MARINE STREET 1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 1 0.7 FLINT Fragment

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 2 1.4 GLASAQA Fragment Tinted

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 5 9.3 GLASOLIVE Bottle Patinated

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 1 3.5 MISSRF Plain

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 2 3.6 MISSRF Plain

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 1 2 MISSS Eroded

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 1 0.7 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 1 1.4 PIPEB Fragment

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 3 SM Eroded

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 2 SMDEC Checked

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 1 SMDEC Complicated

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 2 5.9 SMDEC Rim, UID Eroded

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 1 5 SMDEC Rim, UID Rectilinear

1-2.04 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 3 4 18.4 SMP

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 28.5 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 3.3 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 7 5.3 GLASOLIVE Fragment Patinated

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 3 MISSRF Eroded

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 2 MISSRF Plain

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 1.4 SLAG Fragment

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 3 SM Eroded

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 12.2 SM Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Folded

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 13.2 SMDEC Rectilinear Burnished

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 SMDEC Complicated

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 4 SMDEC Checked

1-2.05 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 6 7 22.8 SMP

1-2.06 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 11 1 1.3 BLGCE

258

161 MARINE STREET 1-2.06 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 11 1 0.5 DELFT

1-2.06 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 11 1 2.3 MISSRF

1-2.06 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 11 1 6.5 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-2.06 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 11 1 0.9 SJDEC Indeterminate

1-2.06 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 11 2 11.4 SM Eroded

1-2.06 SA 1 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 11 3 4 SMP

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 6.4 ABOSHDEC Checked

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 2 8 ABOSHDEC Eroded

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 2 11.4 ABOSHP

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 8 25.3 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 24 ABOSTP Plain Burnished

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 2 2.8 ABOSTP Rim, Straight Lip, Tapered

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 6 22.5 ABOSTP

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 0.1 BUT Round Indeterminate

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 1.1 CHERT Fragment

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 0.3 CHERT Fragment

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 2 2 DELFT

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 6 8.8 GLAS Fragment Patinated

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 4 2.7 GLAS Fragment Opaque

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 4 5.7 GLASAMB Fragment

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 4 2.1 GLASAMB Fragment

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 0.2 GLASAQA Fragment

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 23.1 GLASBLK Bottle Kick

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 0.2 GLASCLR Fragment

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 6 6.8 GLASOLIVE Fragment

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 1.1 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Flat

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 11.4 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Flat

259

161 MARINE STREET 1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 5.1 MISSRF Plain

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 8 12.1 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 9 20.1 OJ

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 2 1.2 PIPEB Fragment

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 1.8 PIPES Fragment

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 1 PIPES

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 1.7 SHOT

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 1.6 SHOT

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 4 5.3 SLIPRED

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 16 SLPOLY Base, Footring

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 6.1 SM Eroded

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 2.4 SM Rim, Straight Eroded Lip, Flat

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 33 SM Eroded

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 2 4.1 SM Rim, Straight Eroded Lip, Round

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 6 SMDEC Checked

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 SMDEC Rim, Straight Rectilinear Lip, Round

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 17.6 SMDEC Rim, Flared Curvilinear Lip, Round

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 10 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 25 125 SMP

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 3 51 SMP Plain Burnished

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 16 SMP Rim, Curved Plain Lip, Round

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 4.9 SMP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 2 5.6 SMP

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 SMPUNC Rim, Flared Lip, Round

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 1 5.1 TILEUID

1-3.01 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 1 3 2.1 UIDMAJ

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 20 ABOSTP Plain Burnished

260

161 MARINE STREET 1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 13.4 COAL Fragment

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 1.3 DELFT

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 2 0.1 GLAS Fragment Patinated

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 2 3 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 10 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Flat

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 3 MISSS Complicated

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 3 MISSS Eroded

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 1.1 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 3 OJ Glazed

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 0.4 PIPEB Fragment

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 0.5 SLAG Fragment

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 10 SM Eroded

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 17.7 SM Eroded Burnished

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 2 SMDEC Complicated

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Rim, Folded Checked Lip, Flared

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 8 49 SMP

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 2.2 SMP

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 1.5 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 18.8 SMP Rim, Curved Plain Burnished

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 21 SMP Plain Burnished

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 0.1 TILEGL Fragment Glazed

1-3.02 SA 1 TU 3 LVL 2 1 10 TILEUID

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 5 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 4 ABOSTDEC Complicated

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 4 37.9 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 8 45.2 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 14 66.5 ABOSTP

261

161 MARINE STREET 1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 1.9 ABOSTP Rim, UID Lip, Round

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 2 3.1 ARANAMA

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 1.7 BEADWW Barrel

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 6.8 BELL Cup

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 CLNO Base, Footring Plain

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 3.8 DELFT

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 5 6.4 DELFT

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 2 1.2 GLAS Fragment Opaque

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 15 18.5 GLAS Fragment Opaque

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 0.2 GLASAQA Fragment Thin

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 3.8 GLASAQA Bottle

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 3 1.5 GLASCLR Fragment Frosted

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 3 1 GLASOLIVE Fragment

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 3 6.6 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 8 13.1 GLASPUR Fragment Clear

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 27.6 MISSRF Shoulder Plain

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 4 MISSRF Plain

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 2.4 MISSRF Rim, Curved Plain Lip, Beveled

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 5.8 NAILSQUID Fragment Oxidized

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 5 16.4 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 2 4.5 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 0.1 OJ Glazed

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 5 64 OJ

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 1 PIPEB Fragment

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 2 PIPES Fragment

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 1.6 PIPES Fragment

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 0.4 PUEPOLY

262

161 MARINE STREET 1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 1.1 REFEW

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 1.8 SJDEC Checked

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 14 SM Eroded

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 8.5 SM Bowl Eroded Lip, Flat

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 4 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 13 SMDEC Checked

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 4.1 SMDEC Rim, Curved Rectilinear Lip, Flat

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 4.9 SMDEC Rim, Curved Rectilinear Lip, Flat

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 SMDEC Complicated

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 15.5 SMDEC Rim, Flared Simple Lip, Flared

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 6.2 SMP Rim, Flared Lip, Round

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 23 144.5 SMP

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 2 12.3 SPRUE Fragment

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 2 2.4 TACK Fragment Oxidized

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 3 33.3 TILEBAR Fragment Glazed

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 4.1 UIDMAJ

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 8 19.8 UIDSLIP

1-4.01 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 1 1 5.1 WIRE Oxidized

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Complicated

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 8 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 14 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, Curved Checked Lip, Flat

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 2 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Tapered

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 2 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Tapered

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 2 ABOSTDEC Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

263

161 MARINE STREET 1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 ABOSTP Rim, Curved Plain Lip, Flat

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 22 ABOSTP Plain

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 ABOSTP Rim, Straight Plain Lip, Round

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 ABOSTP Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Flat

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.2 CHERT Flake

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.2 COPOBJ Bowl

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 2 3.3 DELFT

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.5 ELMOR

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1 FAEWITE

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 3.7 FLNTGUN Fragment

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 5 0.7 GLASAQA Tinted

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 35.1 GLASCLR Cup

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 3 10 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 21 78 GLASOLGRN Fragment Patinated

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.6 GLASPUR Fragment

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 35.2 IROBJ Strap Oxidized

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.3 LDGLCEW

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 8.4 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Flat

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 2 MISSRF Plain

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 MISSRF Rim, Straight Plain Lip, Flat

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 3.5 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 13.1 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 14 35.8 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 3 39.8 OJ

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.8 OJGL

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 9 4.2 PIPEB Fragment

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 5 4.2 PIPES Fragment

264

161 MARINE STREET 1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 2 1 PUEBW

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 2 2.4 PUEBW Rim, UID

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.1 PUEPOLY

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SJP Rim, Folded

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 2 9 SLAG Fragment

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SM Rim, Straight Eroded Lip, Round

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SM Rim, Curved Obliterated Lip, Flat

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SM Rim, Straight Eroded Lip, Tapered

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 2 SM Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SM Obliterated

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 66 SM Eroded

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SM Rim, Flared Eroded Lip, Tapered

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 10 SMDEC Checked

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 8 SMDEC Complicated

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 12 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Complicated

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Rim, Curved Complicated Lip, Flat

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Flat

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Curvilinear

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 8 SMP Plain Burnished

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SMP Rim, Curved Plain Lip, Round

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 42 SMP Plain

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 4.5 STODOM

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 4 6 UIDCEW

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 7.8 UIDSLIP Base, Footring

1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.4 UIDSLIP Trailed

265

161 MARINE STREET 1-4.02 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 2 2 10.9 UIDSLIP Trailed

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 18.5 ABOGRTSHD Checked Burnished

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 46.5 ABOGRTSHD Checked Burnished

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 4 ABOSHDEC Eroded

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 10.4 ABOSHDEC Rectilinear

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 2 ABOSHP Rim, Inverted Lip, Round

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, Straight Checked Lip, Flat

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 41 194.1 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 2 ABOSTDEC Complicated

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 5 ABOSTDEC Complicated

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 10 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 5 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 20 ABOSTP Plain

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 ABOSTP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 18 96.3 ABOSTP

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 21 ABOSTSHDE Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 0.4 CHERT

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 6.5 DELFT Glazed

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 0.1 ELMOR Glazed

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 0.4 GLASAMB

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 2 0.6 GLASAQA

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 4 10.7 GLASOLIVE Patinated

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 15 MISSRF Plain Burnished

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 3 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Flat

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 3 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Round

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 5 8.7 MISSRF

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Round

266

161 MARINE STREET 1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 3 5.1 NAILUID Oxidized

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 3 18.1 NAILUID Fragment

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 6 12 OJ

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 2 8.5 OJGL

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 6 3.4 PIPEB Fragment

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 1.6 PIPES Fragment

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 0.1 SEVBB

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 2 1.5 SJP Rim, UID

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 SJP

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 16.7 SM Eroded Burnished

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 4 SM Rim, Straight Eroded Lip, Flat

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 19 69 SM Eroded

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 47 SM Eroded Burnished

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 SMDEC Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Round

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 SMDEC Curvilinear

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 SMDEC Complicated

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 9 SMDEC Checked

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 2 SMDEC Rim, Flared Checked

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 2 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 SMINC Rim, Flared

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 2 SMP Rim, Flared Lip, Flat

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 8 59 SMP

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 2 SMP

1-4.03 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 3 1 SMP Rim, Folded Lip, Flared

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 2 ABOSHDEC Complicated

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 3 ABOSHDEC Checked

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 8 ABOSHP

267

161 MARINE STREET 1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 61.2 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear Obliterated

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 3.5 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Eroded Lip, Flat

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 1.7 ABOSTDEC Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Folded

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 3.2 ABOSTDEC Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 5 25.7 ABOSTDEC Complicated

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 3 29.2 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 2 5 ABOSTP

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 11 83.3 ABOSTP

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 5.6 CLNO

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 0.3 FAI Rim, UID

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 2 GLAS Bottle Opaque

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 0.7 GLASAMB

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 0.4 GLASOLIVE

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 9 MISSS Rim, UID Eroded

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 0.1 PIPEB Fragment

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 8.5 PIPES

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 1.2 SLAG

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 2.4 SLPOLY

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 12.9 SM Rim, UID Eroded

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 11 39.9 SM Eroded

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 7 42.9 SM Eroded

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 5 SMDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Round

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 3 SMDEC Rim, Flared Complicated Lip, Flat

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 4.1 SMDEC Rim, Curved Checked Lip, Folded

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 4 SMDEC Checked

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 5 SMDEC Complicated

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 6 SMDEC Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Flat

268

161 MARINE STREET 1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 6 29.5 SMP

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 6.2 SMP

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 4.5 TILEGL Fragment Glazed

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 0.1 UIDCEW

1-4.04 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 14 1 0.1 UIDSLIP

1-4.05 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 5 FEA 14 1 2.3 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-4.05 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 5 FEA 14 1 2 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-4.05 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 5 FEA 14 1 3.4 MISSRF Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

1-4.05 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 5 FEA 14 1 4.4 SM Eroded

1-4.05 SA 1 TU 4 LVL 5 FEA 14 3 5.6 SMP

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 4 16.2 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 3 ABOSTDEC Complicated

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 2 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 3.6 ABOSTP Rim, Flared Lip, Flat

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 7 25.3 ABOSTP

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 2 0.6 CHERT

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 2 8.7 DELFT

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 1.8 ELMOR

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 18 50.1 GLAS Patinated

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 0.6 GLASAQA Tinted

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 0.9 GLASCLR Frosted

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 3 1.3 GLASLITYEL

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 3 0.8 GLASOLIVE

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 9 13 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 2 10 MISSRF

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 2.4 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Round

269

161 MARINE STREET 1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 1.5 MISSRF

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 4 25.1 MISSRF Plain

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 14.4 MISSRF Rim, UID Plain

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 4 11.5 MISSRF Plain

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 5 45.1 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 7 252.3 OJ

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 19.5 OJGL

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 4 0.9 PIPEB

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 2 1.5 PIPES

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 0.1 PORUID

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 2 4.4 PUEPOLY

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 2 2.2 SJP

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 2.3 SLIPRED

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 4 14.4 SM Rim, Flared Eroded Lip, Flat

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 15 78.8 SM Eroded

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 4 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 SMDEC Complicated

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 12 SMDEC Rim, Curved Checked Lip, Flat

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 8 SMDEC Checked

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 2 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 SMP Rim, Flared

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 4 18.6 SMP

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 25 110.6 SMP

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 39.1 SPIKEUID Fragment Oxidized

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 1 59.4 TILERF Glazed

1-5.03 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 3 4 6.9 UIDSLIP

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 3.6 ABOSTDEC Eroded

270

161 MARINE STREET 1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 6 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 3.3 ABOSTP Rim, Curved Plain Lip, Flat

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 6 23.2 ABOSTP

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 18.4 CLNO Base

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 107.4 CORE Nodule

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 1 DELFTBW

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 0.2 FLINT

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 9 22 GLAS Bottle Opaque

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 2 0.1 GLASAMB

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 0.6 GLASAQA

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 10 GLASBLK Opaque

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 3 GLASGRN

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 3 2.1 GLASOLIVE Opaque

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 3 MISSRF

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 1 MISSRF

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 1.9 MISSRF Rim, Flared

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 0.9 MISSRF Rim, UID Eroded

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 1.3 MISSRF Rim, Flared

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 2 1.1 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 9.1 OJ

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 8 PIPES

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 3.3 SM Rim, Flared Eroded Lip, Flat

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 8 35.6 SM Eroded

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 4 SMDEC Checked

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 10.1 SMDEC Rim, Curved Complicated Lip, Flat

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 10.8 SMDEC Rim, Curved

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 5 SMDEC Rim, Curved Checked

271

161 MARINE STREET 1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 6 SMDEC Complicated

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 5 28.2 SMP

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 1 44 TILEUID

1-5.04 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 4 5 7.1 UIDSLIP

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 1.2 ABOSTDEC Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 2.3 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 2.8 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 6.8 CLNO Handle, Lug

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 2.8 DELFTBW Rim, UID

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 4 6.2 GLAS Bottle Patinated

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 1.6 GLASAQA

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 2 3.4 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 4 16.9 MISSRF Plain

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 6 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Flat

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 0.9 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 0.4 PUEPOLY

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 2.1 SEVBB

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 6 32 SM Eroded

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 SMDEC Complicated

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 3 SMDEC Checked

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 SMINC Checked

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 3.1 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 5 19.9 SMP

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 8.6 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

1-5.05 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 5 FEA 6 2 4.1 UIDSLIP

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 2 10.3 ABOGRTSHP

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 2.4 ABOSHDEC Rim, Flared Checked

272

161 MARINE STREET 1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 7 44.4 ABOSHDEC Eroded

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 2 9.9 ABOSHP

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 4 20.1 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 8 40.8 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 3.5 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Eroded

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 2.5 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Eroded

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 9 38.6 ABOSTP

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 13 ABOSTP Burnished

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 3.5 ABOSTP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 1 DELFT Unglazed

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 3.6 DELFTBW Rim, UID

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 1.1 DELFTBW Rim, UID

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 3.1 FAIBW Rim, UID

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 2 11.1 GLAS Patinated

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 2 1.5 GLASAQA Tinted

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 0.4 GLASLTGRN Patinated

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 17 50.3 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 3 11 MISSRF Plain

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 2.5 MISSRF Plain

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 2.7 MISSRF Rim, Straight Plain Lip, Flat

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 9.5 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Round

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 11.3 MISSS Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Round

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 5 15.4 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 30.3 OJ

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 2 1.1 PIPEB

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 0.1 PIPES

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 5 15.7 SJP

273

161 MARINE STREET 1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 4 15.4 SM Eroded

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 31.6 SM Eroded

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 4 29.8 SM Eroded

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 2 8.6 SM Rim, Straight Eroded

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 3 SMDEC Checked

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 5.1 SMDEC Checked

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 9 47.5 SMDEC Checked

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 10.5 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 14 6.5 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 0.9 SMP

1-5.06 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 0.5 UIDMEX

1-5.07 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 9 1 7.7 ABOSTDEC Indeterminate

1-5.07 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 9 1 1.6 PIPEB Fragment

1-5.07 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 9 1 2.8 SMDEC Checked

1-5.08 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 7 FEA 9b 1 0.6 GLASOLIVE Patinated

1-5.08 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 7 FEA 9b 1 1 MISSRF Rim, Straight

1-5.08 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 7 FEA 9b 1 16 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-5.08 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 7 FEA 9b 1 5.9 SMDEC Checked

1-5.08 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 7 FEA 9b 1 4.4 SMP

1-5.08 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 7 FEA 9b 1 9 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

1-5.09 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 7 FEA 9a 1 0.1 BEADGLAS Whole

1-5.09 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 7 FEA 9a 1 2.9 SM Eroded

1-5.09 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 7 FEA 9a 2 9.4 SM Eroded

1-5.10 SA 1 TU 5 LVL 6 FEA 10 1 1 GLASCLR Opaque

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 3.9 ABOSTDEC

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 1.8 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 3 6.3 ABOSTDEC Checked

274

161 MARINE STREET 1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 1.5 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Eroded

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 3 6.9 ABOSTP

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 2 3.9 ABOSTP

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 7.9 ELMOR

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 8 4.9 GLAS Patinated

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 0.4 GLASAQA

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 3.8 GLASDKGRN Bottle

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 4 2.5 GLASOLIVE

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 0.1 GLASUID

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 1.1 MISSS Rectilinear

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 2 34.2 OJ

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 2 0.8 PIPEB

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 2.8 PIPES

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 0.1 PORUID

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 20.9 SHOT Fragment

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 6 16.9 SM Eroded

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 4 SMDEC Checked

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 2 SMDEC Complicated

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 17.5 SMDEC Rim, Curved Checked Lip, Flat

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 6 13.1 SMP

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 2.8 SMP

1-6.02 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 3 1 39.2 TILEGL

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 4 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 6 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 3.6 BLGCE

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 2.1 BUT Whole

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 2 1 DELFT

275

161 MARINE STREET 1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 2 2.2 ELMOR

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 0.4 ELMOR Rim, UID

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 8 21.5 GLAS Bottle

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 3 40.7 GLAS Bottle Kick

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 2 0.2 GLASAQA

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 0.4 GLASOLIVE

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 2.8 MISSRF

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 1.8 NAILUID Fragment

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 2.2 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 77.2 OJ

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 0.4 SLIPRED

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 8.5 SLIPRED

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 10 48.9 SM Eroded

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 2 SMDEC Checked

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 2 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 2 SMDEC Complicated

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 7 22.3 SMP

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 36.3 SPIKEUID Fragment

1-6.03 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 4 FEA 6 2 3.1 TACK Fragment UID

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 5.4 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 20.3 ABOSTP

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 4.5 CLNO Base, Footring

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 0.8 GLAS

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 10 31.5 GLAS Bottle Patinated

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 2 0.5 GLASAQA Thin

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 2 4.5 MISSRF

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 1.5 SLPOLY Rim, UID

276

161 MARINE STREET 1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 2 SM Eroded

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 2 19.3 SM Eroded

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 2 SMDEC Checked

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 2 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 4.5 SMDEC Checked

1-6.04 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 5 FEA 6 10 30.5 SMP

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 6.1 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 2 4.3 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 2.8 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 3.6 ABOSTDEC Rim, Straight Rectilinear Lip, Flat

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 3 4.9 ABOSTP

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 2.6 ABOSTP Rim, UID

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 0.1 GLAS Patinated

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 2 0.1 GLASGRN

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 1.3 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 90 IROBJ S-Hook

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 4.3 MISSRF

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 3.9 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Tapered

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 2.2 SM Rim, UID Eroded

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 3 8.7 SM Eroded

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 2.4 SM Rim, UID Eroded

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 4 11 SMDEC Checked

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 3 13.2 SMP

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 6.2 SMP Rim, Flared

1-6.05 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 20.5 SMP Base, Flat

1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 7.4 ABOSTP

1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 2 6.9 ABOSTP

277

161 MARINE STREET 1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 3.5 ABOSTP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 3 GLAS Patinated

1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 1.1 NAILUID Fragment

1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 SJDEC Checked

1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 SJP

1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 2.7 SLPOLY Rim, UID

1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 5 18.9 SMDEC Checked

1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 3 10.5 SMP

1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 2 13 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

1-6.07 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 108.5 SPIKEUID Fragment Oxidized

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 3 ABOGROGP

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 3.4 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Eroded

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 2 11 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 3 10.8 ABOSTP

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 9.8 CLNO

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 22.5 CLNO

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 0.6 GLASAQA Tinted

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 0.3 GLASOLIVE

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 11 28.8 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 2 MISSRF

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 0.6 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 6.2 NETWGT

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 0.1 OJGL

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 2 4.2 PIPES

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 2 0.5 PUEBW

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 2 1.5 SJP

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 2 11.1 SM Eroded

278

161 MARINE STREET 1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 4 22.3 SMDEC

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 8 44.5 SMP

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 5.5 SMP Jar Lip, Flared

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 3 SMP Bowl Lip, Flared

1-6.08 SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 1 1.4 UIDSLIP

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 7.3 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 2 5.5 ABOSTP

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 0.5 ARANAMA

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 3 0.8 GLAS Tinted

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 15 43 GLASOLIVE Bottle Patinated

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Round

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 2 4.6 MISSRF Plain

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 MISSRF Rim, UID Lip, Flat

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 3 43 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 3.6 NOTT

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 2 10.6 OJ

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 0.2 PIN Wound

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 3 1.1 PIPEB

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 3 PUEPOLY Base, Footring

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 0.1 SABW

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 6 1.2 SLAG

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 0.8 SLPOLY Rim, UID

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 10 38.1 SM Eroded

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 2 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 2 SMDEC Checked

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 2 SMDEC Complicated

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 SMDEC Curvilinear

279

161 MARINE STREET 1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 9 33.6 SMP

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 2 1.8 TACK Fragment UID

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 13.9 TILEUID

1-7.02 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 3 1 1.3 UIDMAJ

1-7.03 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 6.4 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-7.03 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 FEA 6 2 6.4 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-7.03 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 FEA 6 4 25 ABOSTP

1-7.03 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 1.4 BUCKLE

1-7.03 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 FEA 6 5 10.8 GLAS Patinated

1-7.03 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 0.1 GLASCLR

1-7.03 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 1.6 SLBW

1-7.03 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 FEA 6 4 19.2 SM Eroded

1-7.03 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 FEA 6 2 4.1 SMDEC Checked

1-7.03 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 FEA 6 1 1.2 TACK Whole

1-7.04 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 1 0.8 GLAS Opaque

1-7.04 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 1 1.5 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-7.04 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 2 3.5 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-7.04 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 1 3.6 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-7.04 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 4 1 2.5 SMP Rim, Straight Lip, Round

1-7.05 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 5 FEA 6 2 5.9 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-7.05 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 1 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-7.05 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 5 FEA 6 1 10.3 SM Eroded

1-7.05 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 5 FEA 6 2 8.8 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-7.05 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 5 FEA 6 3 35.4 SMP

1-7.06 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 1.6 CHERT

1-7.06 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 0.1 GLASOLIVE Patinated

1-7.06 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 5.9 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Round

280

161 MARINE STREET 1-7.06 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 6 FEA 6 3 13.9 SM Eroded

1-7.06 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 6 FEA 6 1 3.9 SMDEC Complicated

1-7.06 SA 1 TU 7 LVL 6 FEA 6 5 24 SMP

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 ABOGGTDEC Rectilinear

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 4.4 ABOGGTDEC Eroded

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 3.3 ABOGGTP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 7.8 ABOGRTSHD Rim, Curved Lip, Flared

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 8 31.5 ABOGRTSHD Eroded

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 2 ABOPOLY Rim, UID

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 5 28.6 ABOSHDEC Eroded

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Round

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Tapered

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 9.7 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Eroded Lip, Round

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 3 ABOSTDEC

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 7 31.6 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 8 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 16 51.3 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 5 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 14 70.2 ABOSTP

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 8.9 ABOSTP Rim, Flared Lip, Tapered

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 1.8 ABOSTP Rim, Straight Lip, Round

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.4 ARANAMA

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 3 7.7 CHERT

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 4.4 DELFT

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 1.1 ELMOR

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 17 35.9 GLAS Bottle Patinated

281

161 MARINE STREET 1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 0.5 GLASAQA Tinted

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 2.5 GLASAQA

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 2.5 GLASCLR

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.1 GLASDRKBLU Patinated

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.9 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.1 GLASYEL

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 23.8 IROBJ Strap Oxidized

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 3.2 MISSRF Plain

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 4 12.3 MISSRF

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 20 MISSRF Plain

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 4 MISSRF Rim, Tapered Lip, Flat

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 4 8.5 MISSS Eroded

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 4 5.9 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 16.1 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 3 12.7 OJ

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 5 76 OJGL

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 1.3 PIPEB Fragment

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2.9 PIPES

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2 PIPES

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2.6 PUEPOLY

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 1.2 SJP

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.3 SLAG

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 10.3 SM Rim, Flared Eroded Lip, Tapered

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 16 SM Eroded

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 17.6 SMDEC Rim, Flared Curvilinear Lip, Folded

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Tapered

282

161 MARINE STREET 1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 SMDEC Rim, Curved Rectilinear Lip, Flat

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 7 SMDEC Checked

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 6 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 4 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 7 SMDEC Complicated

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 3 SMDEC Curvilinear

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Folded

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Curvilinear

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 8 SMDEC Checked

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 13 46.2 SMP

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 6 57.3 SMP

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 32 SMP Burnished

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 39.5 SMP

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 1.8 UIDMAJ

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.3 UIDMAJ Rim, UID

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 5.6 UIDSLIP Rim, Pie Crust

1-8.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 5 10 UIDSLIP

1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 1.1 ABOSTDEC Incised

1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 8 21 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 2 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Eroded

1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 2 7.5 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 3 ABOSTP

1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 11 CLNO Base, Footring

1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 1.6 ELMOR

1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 3 2.7 GLASOLIVE Opaque

1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 2 3.5 MISSRF

1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 1.2 SLBW

283

161 MARINE STREET 1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 3 7.4 SM Eroded

1-8.03 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 2.8 SMP

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 2.9 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 5.5 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 1.3 ABOSTP Rim, UID Lip, Round

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 8.6 ABOSTP

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 5 1.1 GLAS Patinated

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 6.8 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Round

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 2 14.9 MISSRF Eroded

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 4 MISSRF Eroded

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 0.1 PIN Fragment

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 3.4 PUEBW

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 7.5 SLIPRED Rim,UID

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 4 19.1 SM Eroded

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 2 14.9 SMDEC Checked

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 1 6 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Round

1-8.04 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 3 2 20.9 SMP

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 6.2 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 5 8.5 GLASOLIVE Patinated

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 3 4 GLASOLIVE

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 0.5 HUEJOT Taza

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 3 4.8 NAILUID Fragment

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 3.1 OJGL

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 3.8 PUEBW Plato

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 0.7 SJP

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 0.2 SLAG

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 9.6 SLPOLY

284

161 MARINE STREET 1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 46.8 SM Eroded

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 2 7.5 SM Eroded

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 6.1 SM Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flared

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 46 SMDEC Bowl Obliterated Lip, Flat

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 SMDEC Curvilinear

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 2 SMDEC Checked

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 2.2 SMP Lip, Round

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 4 18.9 SMP

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 1 2.3 UIDSLIP

1-8.06 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 6 2 2.3 UIDSLIP Combed

1-8.07 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 1 4.4 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-8.07 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 3 11 ABOSTP

1-8.07 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 1 0.5 GLASAQA

1-8.07 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 3 12.1 SM Eroded

1-8.07 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 2 5.6 SMDEC Checked

1-8.07 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 1 4 SMP

1-8.07 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 1 17.4 UIDSLIP Combed

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 1 0.2 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 5 16.8 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 4 7.6 ABOSTP Rim, UID

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 5 12.8 ABOSTP

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 1 0.3 CHERT

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 1 1.4 GLASDKGRN

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 1 1.1 GLASOLIVE Opaque

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 1 4.1 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 1 0.7 PIPEB Fragment

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 1 2.1 PUEPOLY Rim, UID

285

161 MARINE STREET 1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 1 0.8 SM Rim, UID Indeterminate

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 1 3.1 SM Eroded

1-8.08 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 4 5 13.9 SMP

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 1 14.4 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 1 3.4 ABOSTDEC

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 2 7.5 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 1 4.1 ABOSTP

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 2 0.6 GLAS Bottle Patinated

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 1 10.8 OJ

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 1 8 OJGL

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 1 1.8 PIPES

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 2 23 SM Eroded

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 1 2 SMDEC Rim, UID Checked Lip, Flat

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 2 8.6 SMDEC Checked

1-8.09 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 4 1 15.8 SMP

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 15 83.8 ABOGRTSHD Eroded

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 ABOGRTSHD Checked

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 6.7 ABOGRTSHD Rim, UID Eroded Lip, Flat

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 3 ABOGRTSHD Rectilinear

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 4 28.9 ABOGRTSHP

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 24.5 ABOGRTSTD Checked

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 45.4 ABOGRTSTP Plain

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 7.3 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 9.3 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Round

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 3 9.9 ABOSTP

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.7 ABOSTP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 7 32.6 ABOSTP

286

161 MARINE STREET 1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 1.3 BEADGLAS Whole Opaque

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 5.1 BELL Fragment

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 5 BUT Flat

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.5 CHERT Fragment

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 4.2 DELFTBW Rim, UID

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2.3 ELMOR

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 4.5 FAIBW Rim, UID

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2 FLINT Fragment

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 16 21.2 GLAS Patinated

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 3 0.1 GLASAQA

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 1 GLASCLR

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 0.2 GLASOLIVE

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2.3 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Tapered

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 4 16.1 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Flat

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 4 11.8 MISSRF Plain

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 2 3 MISSS

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2 MISSS Rim, UID Checked

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 20.5 MISSS Rim, Flared Eroded Lip, Flat

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 6 44.1 NAILUID

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 6 4.2 OJ

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 3 6 PIPES

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 6 SJDEC Checked

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 5 SJDEC Rectilinear

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 8.9 SJP

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 3 2.7 SLAG

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 4 3 SLIPRED

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 3 1.9 SLPOLY

287

161 MARINE STREET 1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 39 SM Eroded

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 4 SM Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 4 9 SM Rim, UID Eroded Lip, Flat

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 11 SMDEC Complicated

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 17 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 23 SMDEC Checked

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 9.9 SMDEC Rim, Curved Checked Lip, Flat

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 46 195.6 SMP

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 4 54.8 SPIKEUID

1-9.02 SA 1 TU 8 LVL 2 1 3.2 UIDCEW

1-9.03 SA 1 TU 9 LVL 3 1 12.3 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-9.03 SA 1 TU 9 LVL 3 3 4.9 ABOSTP

1-9.03 SA 1 TU 9 LVL 3 1 2 CHERT

1-9.03 SA 1 TU 9 LVL 3 1 0.6 DELFT

1-9.03 SA 1 TU 9 LVL 3 1 1.8 GLAS Patinated

1-9.03 SA 1 TU 9 LVL 3 1 2.8 MISSRF

1-9.03 SA 1 TU 9 LVL 3 1 1.8 PUEPOLY

1-9.03 SA 1 TU 9 LVL 3 2 7.8 SM Eroded

1-9.03 SA 1 TU 9 LVL 3 10 30 SMP

1-9.03 SA 1 TU 9 LVL 3 1 1.9 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Round

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 1.5 ABOGRTSHP Rim, UID

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 2.2 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Eroded Lip, Tapered

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

5 20 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 4 ABOSTDEC Checked

288

161 MARINE STREET 1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

3 22 ABOSTP

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

3 4.5 ABOSTP Rim, Flared Lip, Flat

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 2 DELFT

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 0.3 DELFT Rim, UID

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 26.2 GAMDIS

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 0.5 GLASAQA Patinated

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

5 1.8 GLASOLIVE Bottle Patinated

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 10.8 GRNBAC

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 2.9 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Round

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

2 4 MISSRF Plain

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 MISSS Rim, Straight Complicated Lip, Flat

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 MISSS Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Folded

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 1.7 MISSS Rectilinear

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 0.6 NAILUID Fragment

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 5.4 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

4 1.6 PIPEB Fragment

289

161 MARINE STREET 1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 0.7 PIPES

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 0.5 PUEBW

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 2.9 SJP Rim, UID

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 0.8 SLBW

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

19 68.8 SM Eroded

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

3 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

6 SMDEC Complicated

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

5 SMDEC Checked

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 2 SMP Rim, UID

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

5 16.7 SMP

1-FEA 104.01

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 4 FEA 115

1 0.4 UIDMAJ

1-FEA 104.02

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 5 FEA 115

1 1.9 SM Eroded

1-FEA 104.02

SA 1 TU 16 & 17 LVL 5 FEA 115

1 2.6 SMP

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.08

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 2 8.4 ABOSTP

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.08

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 2 1.1 GLASOLIVE

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.08

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 2 4.9 SM Eroded

290

161 MARINE STREET 1-FEA 6 N 1/2.08

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 1 4.9 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.09

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 1 10.1 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.09

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 1 2.3 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.09

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 1 0.1 CLOTH

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.09

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 5 0.1 CLOTH

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.09

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 1 0.3 GLASCLR

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.09

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 9 4.5 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.09

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 4 SM Eroded

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.09

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 1 SMDEC Curvilinear

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.09

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 1 SMDEC Rim, Curved Checked Lip, Flat

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.09

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 1 SMDEC Rectilinear

1-FEA 6 N 1/2.09

SA 1 FEA 6 N 1/2 1 8.4 SMP

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.03

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2

1 2 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.03

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2

1 1.3 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Lip, Tapered

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.03

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2

1 9.4 MISSRF Plain

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.03

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2

1 3 SM Eroded

291

161 MARINE STREET 1-FEA 6 S 1/2.03

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2

4 9.1 SM Eroded

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.03

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2

2 11.4 SMDEC Checked

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.03

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2

6 24.9 SMP

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.03

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2

2 6.9 UIDSLIP

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.05

SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2 1 6.8 CLNO Handle, UID

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.05

SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2 3 1.5 GLASOLIVE Fragment

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.05

SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2 1 7.8 OJGL

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.05

SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2 1 0.1 SLATE

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.05

SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2 2 5.5 SM Eroded

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.05

SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2 1 2.9 SMDEC Checked

1-FEA 6 S 1/2.05

SA 1 TU 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 S 1/2 2 4 SMP

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.02

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 3.4 NAILUID Oxidized

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.02

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 6.7 SM Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.02

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 W 1/2

2 29.5 SMDEC Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Round

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.02

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 W 1/2

2 3.3 SMDEC Checked

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.02

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 W 1/2

2 6.3 SMP

292

161 MARINE STREET 1-FEA 6 W 1/2.02

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 2.1 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 2.9 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 4.9 ABOSTDEC Checked

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

3 5.1 ABOSTP

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 7.4 ABOSTP Rim, Curved Burnished Lip, Flat

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 0.6 BUT Fragment

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 0.4 CHERT

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 8.4 COAL

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 1 GLASAQA Tinted

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

5 65.4 GLASOLIVE Bottle

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

4 0.3 GLASOLIVE Fragment

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

5 2 NAILUID Fragment

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 0.2 PIPEB

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 15.4 SM Eroded

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

15 SM Eroded

293

161 MARINE STREET 1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 2.1 SM Rim, UID Eroded Lip, Flat

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

3 SMDEC Checked

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 37.5 SMP

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

8 40 SMP

1-FEA 6 W 1/2.04

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 9 FEA 6 W 1/2

1 2.1 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Round

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

2 6.3 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Folded

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

6 22.6 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 4.1 ABOSTDEC Eroded

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

2 10 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 24.5 ABOSTP

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

2 2.5 ABOSTP

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

10 37.2 ABOSTP

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 0.4 GLASAQA Tinted

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 0.1 GLASGRN Opaque

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 1.3 GLASLTGRN

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

19 16.1 GLASOLIVE Bottle

294

161 MARINE STREET 1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 18.4 LEADOBJ

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 0.5 UIDMET

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 1.2 MISSRF

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 4.3 MISSRF Plain

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 3.2 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Flat

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 4.9 OJ

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 2.8 OJGL

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

4 4.4 PIPES

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

3 10 PUEBW

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

24 98.3 SM Eroded

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 SM Rim, UID Eroded Lip, Flat

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

2 SM Rim, UID Eroded

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 22.2 SMDEC Checked

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 22 SMDEC Checked

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

3 16 SMDEC Complicated

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

25 124.5 SMP

295

161 MARINE STREET 1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 37 SMP

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

2 6.9 SMP Rim, Flared

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

3 7.6 SMP

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 4.5 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 0.1 UIDMAJ

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 1.8 UIDSLIP

1-FEA 6 E 1/2.01

SA 1 TU 5 & 6 LVL 8 FEA 6 E 1/2

1 17.9 UIDSLIP Combed

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 5 19.6 ABOSTDEC Eroded

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 1 6 ABOSTDEC Checked

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 5 14.9 ABOSTP

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 1 0.7 BEADAMB Whole

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 3 1.8 DELFTBW

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 1 0.8 ELMOR

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 1 0.1 GLASAMB

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 9 5.6 GLASOLIVE Bottle Patinated

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 1 2.8 GLASPUR Bottle Molded

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 2 MISSRF Rim, UID Plain Lip, Flat

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 2 4.2 MISSRF

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 1 7.4 MISSS Eroded

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 5 47.8 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 2 2.7 OJ

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 1 0.4 PIPEB

296

161 MARINE STREET 2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 1 2 PIPES

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 2 3 PORUID Base, Footring

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 1 96.9 SLAG

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 7 35 SM Eroded

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 7 31.6 SMDEC Checked

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 9 41 SMP

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 2 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

2-1.01 SA 2 TU 1 LVL 1 1 0.1 WSGS

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 4 13.7 ABOSTDEC Eroded

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 3 14.8 ABOSTP

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 4.3 ABOSTP

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 ABOSTP

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 3 CHERT

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 10 4.7 DELFTBW

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 0.3 FAIBW Rim, UID

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 3 6.4 GLAS Patinated

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 0.8 GLASAMB

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 0.2 GLASAQA Patinated

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 2 1.6 GLASCLR

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 2.8 GLASOLIVE Bottle

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 0.3 GLASWITE Frosted

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Round

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 MISSRF

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 3.9 MISSS Rim, Folded Rectilinear Lip, Flat

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 6.8 MISSS Checked

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 2 3.6 MISSS Checked

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 MISSS Checked

297

161 MARINE STREET 2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 4 32 NAILSQUID Oxidized

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 2 5.7 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 2 0.2 OJ

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 0.8 SJDEC Checked

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 0.5 SJP

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 SM Rim, UID Eroded Lip, Tapered

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 SM Rim, UID Eroded Lip, Flat

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 8 25.5 SM Eroded

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 2.1 SMDEC Rim, Curved Checked Lip, Flat

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 4 16.1 SMDEC Checked

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 16 77.1 SMP

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 2 5.7 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 3 2.1 UIDSLIP

2-2.01 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 1 1 3.6 UIDSLIP Rim, UID

2-2.03 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 116 1 1.5 ABOSTP

2-2.03 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 116 1 0.7 MISSRF

2-2.03 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 116 5 8.4 SMP

2-2.03 SA 2 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 116 1 1.4 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

2-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 1 2 7 ABOSTDEC Eroded

2-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 1 2 5 ABOSTP

2-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 1 2 4.2 GLASAMB

2-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 1 1 4.1 MISSRF

2-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 1 1 0.2 NAILUID Fragment

2-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 1 1 1.2 PORUID

2-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 1 1 1.2 SLAG

2-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 1 4 11.4 SM Eroded

2-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 1 2 10.9 SMDEC Checked

298

161 MARINE STREET 2-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 1 1 3.5 SMP

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.7 ABOSTDEC Indeterminate

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 6 15.4 ABOSTP

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 3 1.6 GLASAMB

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.5 GLASCLR

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.4 GLASOLIVE Opaque

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 2 7.7 MISSRF Plain

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.1 OJ

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 3 7.7 SM Eroded

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 7 18.8 SMDEC Rectilinear

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 4 37.2 SMP

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 1 83.2 SPIKEUID Oxidized

4-1.01 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 2 1 11.6 UIDSLIP Handle, UID Combed

4-1.02 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 3 1 3.2 ABOSTP

4-1.02 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 3 1 0.5 DELFT

4-1.02 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2.5 MISSRF Plain

4-1.02 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 3 1 2.2 SM Eroded

4-1.02 SA 4 TU 1 LVL 3 1 7.5 SMP

4-3.01 SA 4 TU 3 LVL 2 1 2 ABOSTDEC Eroded

4-3.01 SA 4 TU 3 LVL 2 2 7.1 ABOSTDEC Eroded

4-3.01 SA 4 TU 3 LVL 2 1 1.5 ABOSTP

4-3.01 SA 4 TU 3 LVL 2 1 2 GLASAMB Patinated

4-3.01 SA 4 TU 3 LVL 2 1 1.4 GLASCLR

4-3.01 SA 4 TU 3 LVL 2 3 5.4 OJGL

4-3.01 SA 4 TU 3 LVL 2 2 7.1 SM Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

4-3.01 SA 4 TU 3 LVL 2 8 19.8 SM Eroded

4-3.01 SA 4 TU 3 LVL 2 2 4.6 SMDEC Checked

299

161 MARINE STREET 4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 2 18.5 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 4 18.1 ABOSTDEC Eroded

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.3 GLASAMB

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.4 GLASCLR

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.3 GLASCLR Frosted

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 2 3 GLASOLIVE Patinated

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.7 GROM

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.6 MISSRF Rim, UID Plain Lip, Flat

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 2 8.2 MISSS Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Folded

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.2 MISSS Checked

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.2 OJ

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 1 19.1 OJGL

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 1 23.2 SLAG Oxidized

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 6 14.3 SM Eroded

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 4 15.5 SMDEC Checked

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.5 SMP Lip, Flat

4-4.01 SA 4 TU 4 LVL 2 4 25.8 SMP

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 1 2.1 ABOSTP

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 5 19.3 ABOSTP

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 3 1.3 GLASAMB Patinated

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 1 2.5 GLASOLIVE Opaque

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 1 1.6 MISSRF Plain

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 1 2 MISSS Eroded

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 3 30.4 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.8 PORUID Floral

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.7 SLAG

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 21 20.9 SM Eroded

300

161 MARINE STREET 4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 11 SMDEC Checked

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 1 3.5 SMDEC Rim, UID Stamped Lip, Flat

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 4 SMDEC Complicated

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 6 SMDEC Rectilinear

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 2 1.8 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Round

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 11 20.4 SMP

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.4 UIDMEX

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 1 4.8 UIDSLIP Rim, Pie Crust Combed

4-5.01 SA 4 TU 5 LVL 2 1 3.6 UIDSLIP Dot

4-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 2 6 5.7 ABOSTDEC Eroded

4-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 2 5 8.7 ABOSTP

4-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 2 1 0.4 GLASAMB

4-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 2 2 1.8 GLASCLR

4-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 2 1 0.4 GLASDKGRN Patinated

4-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 2 1 0.6 GLASOLIVE

4-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 2 2 5.4 MISSRF Plain

4-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 2 10 SM Eroded

4-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 2 7 SMDEC Checked

4-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 2 2 4.8 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

4-6.01 SA 2 TU 6 LVL 2 1 1.4 SMP

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3.6 ABOSTP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 7.9 ABOSTP

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.4 BUT Fragment Burned

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.1 BUTBLNK Fragment

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.1 CHERT Flake

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 7.9 GLAS

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 78 GLASBLK Bottle Kick

301

161 MARINE STREET 5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 0.2 GLASOLIVE

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 2 5.9 MISSRF Rim, UID Plain Lip, Flat

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 6 10 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 6.8 NAILUID Cinch Oxidized

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 3.8 SGS Cup Molded

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 1.2 SJP

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 2 6.6 SM Eroded

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 3 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 2 SMDEC Checked

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Flat

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 3 13.3 SMP

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 22.8 TILEGL Fragment

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 10.1 TILEUID

5-1.01 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 2 1 8.1 UIDSLIP Rim, Pie Crust Trailed

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 1 4.1 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 3 21.5 ABOSTP

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 3 30.3 GLAS Bottle Kick

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 1 1.6 GLAS Frosted

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 1 90.8 GLASCLR Tumbler

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 1 0.5 GLASCLR

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 3 0.1 GLASLITYEL

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 3 3.8 GLASOLIVE Bottle

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 2 9.5 MISSRF Plain

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 1 3.4 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 2 10.2 MISSS Eroded

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 1 MISSS Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Flat

302

161 MARINE STREET 5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 2 MISSS Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 9 59.7 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 1 4.8 NAILUID Oxidized

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 1 14.5 NAILUID Oxidized

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 3 23.8 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 2 0.6 PIPEB

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 2 10.3 SM Eroded

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 2 SMDEC Complicated

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 2 SMDEC Checked

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 2 6.9 SMP

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 7 36.9 TILEUID

5-1.02 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 3 FEA 36 1 0.1 UIDCEW

5-1.04 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 5 FEA 36b 3 10 ABOSTP

5-1.04 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 5 FEA 36b 1 2.9 DELFT

5-1.04 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 5 FEA 36b 1 4.3 NAILSQUID Oxidized

5-1.04 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 5 FEA 36b 1 4.5 SGS Molded

5-1.04 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 5 FEA 36b 2 7.4 SMDEC Checked

5-1.04 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 5 FEA 36b 1 5.1 SMP

5-1.04 SA 5 TU 1 LVL 5 FEA 36b 1 4.3 SMP Rim, Flared Lip, Round

5-10.02 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 2 3 20.3 ABOSTDEC Checked

5-10.02 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 2 5 13.5 ABOSTP

5-10.02 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 2 1 1.5 BEADGLAS Whole Translucent

5-10.02 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 2 1 2 DELFTBW Decorated

5-10.02 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 2 6 27.8 GLASOLIVE Patinated

5-10.02 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 2 1 0.3 UIDSLIP Rim, UID

5-10.02 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 2 1 5.4 UIDSLIP Combed

5-10.04 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 62 1 0.1 GLAS Patinated

303

161 MARINE STREET 5-10.05 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 63 1 2.6 ABOSTDEC Checked Burnished

5-10.09 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 63a 1 1.9 ABOSTP

5-10.09 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 63a 5 3.3 GLASOLIVE Patinated

5-10.09 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 63a 1 1.9 MISSRF Plain

5-10.09 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 63a 1 1.9 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-10.09 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 3 FEA 63a 1 17.3 SMP Burnished

5-10.10 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 3 1 0.1 GLAS Patinated

5-10.10 SA 5 TU 10 LVL 3 1 0.2 SLIPRED

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 4 17.2 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 4 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Tapered

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 3 10.4 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 4 46.5 ABOSTP

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 1 COINSPN Fragment

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 2 1.6 DELFT

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.4 FLINT Flake

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.1 FLNTGUN Flake

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 2 7 GLASDKGRN Bottle Patinated

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 15.4 MISSRF Plain

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.7 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Flat

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 12.2 MISSS Checked

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 2 2 NAILUID

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.6 OJ

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 10 REY Rim, UID

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 12.1 SHOT Fragment

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 4 24.2 SM Eroded

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.5 SM Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 9 64.6 SMDEC Checked

304

161 MARINE STREET 5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.3 SMP

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 2.7 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 21 TILEUID

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 0.6 UIDMEX

5-11.01 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 2 1 11.6 WSGS Base, Footring

5-11.04 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 69 1 3.2 MISSS Complicated

5-11.04 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 69 2 4.9 SM Eroded

5-11.06 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 71 1 4.7 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Checked

5-11.06 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 71 1 14.8 NAILUID

5-11.06 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 71 1 30 SPIKEUID Fragment

5-11.07 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 72 1 1 PIPEB Fragment

5-11.07 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 3 FEA 72 1 31.3 SMDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear

5-11.12 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 3 1 0.8 MISSS Stamped

5-11.12 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 3 1 3 SLIPRED

5-11.12 SA 5 TU 11 LVL 3 1 1.4 SM Eroded

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 4.4 ABOGROGP

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 32 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 2.4 ABOSTDEC Checked

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 9 42.5 ABOSTP

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.1 ARANAMA

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 4 8.5 DELFT Cup

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 3 10.2 DELFT Rim, UID

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 3 DELFT Base, Footring

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 6 12.6 GLAS Bottle Patinated

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.1 GSGS

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 2.1 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Flat

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 5.4 MISSRF Rim, UID

305

161 MARINE STREET 5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 10.2 MISSRF Rim, Bevel

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 4.1 MISSS Checked

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 2 9 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 2 1.6 PIPEB Fragment

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 1.1 PIPES Fragment

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.4 PIPES Fragment

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.8 PORUID

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 7.2 SM Rim, Flared Eroded Lip, Round

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 12 71 SM Eroded

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 6.8 SMDEC Rim, Flared Stamped Lip, Flat

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 10 49 SMDEC Checked

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 16.6 SMDEC Checked

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 3.3 SMDEC Checked

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 7 29.9 SMP

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 10.9 SMP

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 3.1 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

5-12.01 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 2 1 0.1 UIDSLIP

5-12.02 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 1.3 ABOSTP Lip, Flat

5-12.02 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 FEA 1 2 7.1 ABOSTP

5-12.02 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 0.1 GLAS Fragment Patinated

5-12.02 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 FEA 1 4 14.8 SM Eroded

5-12.02 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 FEA 1 1 8.6 SMP

5-12.06 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 FEA 79 1 0.1 GLAS Patinated

5-12.08 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 1 5.1 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

5-12.08 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 1 7.5 ABOSTP

5-12.08 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 1 0.2 GLASCLR

5-12.08 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 2 3.6 MISSRF Plain

306

161 MARINE STREET 5-12.08 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 1 9.1 MISSRF Bowl Plain Lip, Flat

5-12.08 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 1 7 MISSS Rim, Flared Checked

5-12.08 SA 5 TU 12 LVL 3 1 8.4 SMDEC Checked

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 3 8 ABOSTP

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 1 0.4 CHERT

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 1 5.3 MISSRF Plain

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 1 2.3 MISSRF

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 1 4.1 MISSS Rim, Straight Eroded Lip, Flat

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 1 1.9 NAILUID Fragment

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 1 3.1 PUEPOLY

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 1 6.4 SM Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Round

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 2 6.3 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 1 4.1 SMDEC Complicated

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 4 22.2 SMP

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 1 5.8 SMP Rim, Flared Burnished Lip, Tapered

5-13.01 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 2 1 0.8 UIDSLIP

5-13.02 SA 5 TU 13 LVL 3 FEA 80 1 3.1 MISSS Checked

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 1 2.1 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 1 8.5 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Round

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 6 24.3 ABOSTP

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 1 7.6 CLNO Base, Footring

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 1 9.6 CLNO Handle, UID

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 1 2.4 GLASAQA Molded

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 1 2.2 GLASCLR

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 1 0.4 GLASCLR Molded

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 2 10.9 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Round

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 1 6 MISSRF Plain

307

161 MARINE STREET 5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 1 6.3 PUEBW

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 1 1.1 SJP

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 4 11.1 SM Eroded

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 6 25 SMDEC Checked

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 6 19.8 SMP

5-14.01 SA 5 TU 14 LVL 2 1 5 UIDSLIP

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 2 13.9 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 2 8.5 ABOSTDEC Checked

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 2 ABOSTP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 5 29.3 ABOSTP

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 3 1.6 DELFT

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 6 3.9 GLAS Patinated

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 2 0.8 GLASCLR

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 1 6.2 MISSRF

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 5 22.2 NAILUID Fragment

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 1 0.6 NOTT

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 1 12.1 SCREW Fragment

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 7 12.1 SLIPRED Combed

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 2 13.3 SM Eroded

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 5 22 SMDEC Checked

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 6 31.3 SMP

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 1 SMP Rim, Tapered

5-15.01 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 2 3 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

5-15.06 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 88 4 3 GLASDKGRN Bottle Patinated

5-15.06 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 88 1 20.6 NAILSQUID

5-15.06 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 88 1 0.3 NAILUID Fragment

5-15.06 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 88 1 4.3 SM Eroded

308

161 MARINE STREET 5-15.08 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 90 1 2.9 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

5-15.08 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 90 1 0.9 ABOSTP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

5-15.08 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 90 2 10.7 IROBJ Fragment

5-15.08 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 90 1 0.5 OJ

5-15.08 SA 5 TU 15 LVL 3 FEA 90 1 3.5 SMP Rim, UID

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 3.5 ABOGRTSHP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Complicated

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 3 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Checked

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 2 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 20 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 2 10.9 ABOSTP

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 4 4.9 CHERT Flake

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 10.2 CLNO Handle, UID

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 0.1 GLASAQA

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 2 6.3 GLASCLR Tumbler

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 2 0.5 GLASOLIVE Patinated

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 2.9 MARINE Rim, UID

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 4 MISSRF

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 4 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Round

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 11 30.8 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 5 297.7 OJ

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 0.1 PIPEB Fragment

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 1.7 PUEPOLY

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 0.3 SJ

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 0.4 SLAG

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 7 42.2 SM Eroded

309

161 MARINE STREET 5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Impressed

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Checked

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 2 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Round

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 SMDEC Rim, Straight Rectilinear Lip, Flat

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 7 32.6 SMP

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 44.3 SMP Base

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 SMP Rim, Flared Lip, Flat

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 SMP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 1 75.3 SPIKEUID Fragment Oxidized

5-2.01 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 2 2 13.4 SPIKEUID Fragment

5-2.02 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 3 FEA 34 1 0.8 GLASCLR

5-2.04 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 36b 1 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

5-2.04 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 36b 1 4.9 ABOSTP

5-2.04 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 36b 1 1.6 ABOSTP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

5-2.04 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 36b 1 0.2 CHERT

5-2.04 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 36b 1 1.1 GLASBRN Patinated

5-2.04 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 36b 5 SM Eroded

5-2.04 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 36b 1 1.1 SM Rim, UID Eroded Lip, Flat

5-2.04 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 36b 2 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-2.04 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 36b 1 SMDEC Checked

5-2.04 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 36b 3 11.3 SMP

5-2.04 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 4 FEA 36b 1 1.5 UIDCEW

5-2.05 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 5 FEA 36c 1 2.2 ABOSTP

5-2.05 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 5 FEA 36c 1 11.3 GLASDKGRN Bottle Patinated

5-2.05 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 5 FEA 36c 1 1 MISSRF

5-2.05 SA 5 TU 2 LVL 5 FEA 36c 1 1.2 SHOT

310

161 MARINE STREET 5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 2 ABOSTDEC Checked

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 12 73.7 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 5.6 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Tapered

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 3.4 ABOSTDEC Rim, Tapered Eroded Lip, Round

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 1.1 ABOSTP Rim, UID Lip, Tapered

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 14 89 ABOSTP

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 40.6 BGBAC Rim, UID

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 0.5 CHERT Flake

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 2.7 CLNO Handle, UID

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 0.2 ELMOR

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 2 0.5 GLAS

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 4 10 GLASOLIVE Bottle Patinated

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 3 3.2 GLASOLIVE

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 3.7 MISSRF

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 1.1 NAILUID Fragment

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 1.5 OJ

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 0.3 PIPEB Fragment

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 0.2 SJ

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 2 9.1 SM Eroded

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 2 36 SMDEC Complicated

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 2 SMDEC Checked

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 2 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 6.9 SMDEC Rim, Flared Checked Lip, Round

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 1 1.7 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 2 16 SMP

311

161 MARINE STREET 5-3.01 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 2 3 19.4 SMP

5-3.02 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 21 1 17.2 ABOSTP

5-3.02 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 21 2 2.5 OJGL

5-3.02 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 21 3 21.9 SM Eroded

5-3.02 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 21 2 6.1 SMDEC Stamped

5-3.02 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 21 4 103 SMP

5-3.04 SA 5 TU 3 LVL 3 FEA 23 2 1.4 GLASDRKBR Patinated

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 11 65 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 3 ABOSTDEC Checked

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 4 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 16 100.2 ABOSTP

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 9 ABOSTP Rim, UID

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 ABOSTP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.7 ARANAMA

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 7 CHERT Fragment Worked

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 3 1.4 DEFLT

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.4 ELMOR

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 2 2.6 GLASAMB

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.1 GLASAQA

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 3 1.6 GLASBRN Patinated

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 4.8 GLASOLIVE Bottle Patinated

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 2 0.8 GLASOLIVE Patinated

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.1 GLASPUR

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 2 32.9 IROBJ Strap

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 31 MISSRF Plain

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 MISSRF Rim, Tapered Lip, Flat

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 6.5 MISSRF Plain

312

161 MARINE STREET 5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 8 31.4 NAILUID Fragment

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 15.6 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 3 9.1 OJ

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 8.8 OJ Thin

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 7.9 OJGL

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 2 1.6 PIPEB Fragment

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.4 PUEBW

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 4 1.8 PUEPOLY

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.4 SABW Rim, UID

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 4 SGS

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.4 SLAG

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 1.4 SLPOLY

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 25 189 SM Eroded

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 19 SM Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 18 SM Eroded

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 2 SM Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 3 SM Rim, Straight Eroded Lip, Round

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SM Rim, Tapered Eroded Lip, Flat

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SM Rim, Flared Eroded Lip, Flat

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 11.4 SMDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Flat

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 3 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 5 SMDEC Checked

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 2 46 SMP

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 43 280.3 SMP

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 SMP Jar Lip, Flat

5-4.01 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 2 1 0.4 UIDSLIP

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 3.6 ABOGRTSHD Eroded

313

161 MARINE STREET 5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 24.1 ABOGRTSHP

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 8.8 ABOSTDEC Checked

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 4.1 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 4 16.9 ABOSTP

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 3.4 ABOSTP

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 0.4 DELFT

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 2.2 GLASCLR

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 42.7 IROBJ Strap Oxidized

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 MISSRF Rim, Flared Lip, Round

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 MISSRF Rim, Tapered Lip, Flat

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 1.6 NAILSQUID Fragment Oxidized

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 12.3 OJ Thick

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 1.9 PIPES

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 10 58.8 SM Eroded

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 2 SMP Rim, Flared Lip, Round

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 11 99.2 SMP

5-4.02 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

5-4.03 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 16.7 ABOGRTSHP

5-4.03 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 4 7.8 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-4.03 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 10.8 ABOSTDEC Rim, Straight Eroded Lip, Flat

5-4.03 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 7 25.5 ABOSTP

5-4.03 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 2 6.4 ABOSTP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

5-4.03 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 0.9 CHERT

5-4.03 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 2 SMDEC Checked

5-4.03 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 3 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-4.03 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 3 FEA 14 1 1.9 SMP

5-4.07 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 91 1 2.7 ABOSTP

314

161 MARINE STREET 5-4.07 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 91 1 2.5 SM Eroded

5-4.07 SA 5 TU 4 LVL 4 FEA 91 2 5.8 SMDEC Checked

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 1 2.8 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 2 6.1 ABOSTDEC Rim, Straight Rectilinear Lip, Flat

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 4 13.2 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 2 22.5 ABOSTP

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 4 3.5 GLAS Bottle Patinated

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 1 0.1 SLAG

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 1 10.9 SLIPRED Rim, Pie Crust Trailed

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 1 15.6 SM Rim, UID Eroded

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 4 24.3 SM Eroded

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 3 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 3 SMDEC Checked

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 2 SMDEC Complicated

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 1 3.4 SMP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 5 35 SMP

5-5.01 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 2 3 1.3 WSGS

5-5.03 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 3 FEA 27 1 2.5 SM Eroded

5-5.05 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 3 FEA 29 1 2.1 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-5.05 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 3 FEA 29 1 0.1 GLASCLR Frosted

5-5.05 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 3 FEA 29 1 1.9 MISSRF Plain

5-5.06 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 3 FEA 30 3 10 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-5.06 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 3 FEA 30 1 0.2 PIPES

5-5.06 SA 5 TU 5 LVL 3 FEA 30 1 13.8 SM Eroded

5-6.01 SA 5 TU 6 LVL 2 2 2.1 DELFT

5-6.01 SA 5 TU 6 LVL 2 2 10.2 MISSRF Plain

5-6.01 SA 5 TU 6 LVL 2 1 1.1 OJGL

315

161 MARINE STREET 5-6.01 SA 5 TU 6 LVL 2 1 2.7 PUEBW Rim, UID

5-6.01 SA 5 TU 6 LVL 2 1 3.1 SHOT Fragment

5-6.01 SA 5 TU 6 LVL 2 5 12.2 SMDEC Checked

5-6.01 SA 5 TU 6 LVL 2 1 2.5 SMDEC Rim, Straight Indeterminate Lip, Flat

5-6.01 SA 5 TU 6 LVL 2 5 35 SMP

5-6.01 SA 5 TU 6 LVL 2 1 1.6 SMP Rim, Flared Lip, Flat

5-6.01 SA 5 TU 6 LVL 2 1 1.8 UIDCEW

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 15.4 ABOSTP Shoulder

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 63.7 ABOSTP Rim, Straight Lip, Flat

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 1.4 DELFT

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 0.4 GLASAMB

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 2 2.2 GLASBLK Patinated

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 0.3 GLASCLR Frosted

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 1.1 GLASDKGRN Patinated

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 5.2 MISSRF Rim, Curved Plain Lip, Beveled

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 1.2 MISSRF Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 1.7 MISSRF

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 1 MISSRF

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 0.5 SJP

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 2.2 SM Eroded

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 1 2.4 SM Rim, Straight Eroded Lip, Flat

5-7.01 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 2 6 26.4 SMP

5-7.02 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 45 1 18.9 ABOSTP

5-7.03 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 46 2 0.3 GLAS Frosted

5-7.03 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 46 1 3.4 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Round

5-7.03 SA 5 TU 7 LVL 3 FEA 46 1 1.3 SMP

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 3 15.6 ABOSTDEC Eroded

316

161 MARINE STREET 5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, Straight Checked Lip, Flat

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 3 11.8 ABOSTDEC Checked

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 3 11.9 ABOSTP

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2.1 DELFT

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2.8 GLAS Patinated

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.7 GLASAQA

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2.4 MISSRF Plain

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 3.4 MISSRF Plain

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 2.2 MISSRF

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 MISSRF Rim, Curved Plain Lip, Beveled

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 3 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Round

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Flat

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 4.1 MISSS Rim, Tapered Eroded Lip, Round

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 6.6 MISSS Checked

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 18.4 NAILUID Oxidized

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 0.4 PIPES Fragment

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 1.6 SM Rim, Straight Eroded Lip, Flat

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 4 29.5 SM Eroded

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 6 SMDEC Checked

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 3 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 5 24.5 SMP

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 SMP Rim, UID Lip, Flat

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 SMP Rim, Curved

5-8.01 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 2 1 3.2 UIDSLIP Rim, Pie Crust Trailed

5-8.02 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 50 1 7.6 ABOSTP

5-8.02 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 50 1 0.2 CHERT

317

161 MARINE STREET 5-8.02 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 50 1 0.3 GLASCLR

5-8.02 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 50 2 1.1 GLASDKGRN Patinated

5-8.02 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 50 1 2.9 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Round

5-8.02 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 50 1 8.9 SM Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Round

5-8.02 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 50 1 6.8 TACK Whole

5-8.02 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 50 2 2 WSGS Whole

5-8.03 SA 5 TU 8 LVL 3 FEA 51 1 0.1 GLASAMB

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Eroded Lip, Flat

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 2 ABOSTDEC Rim, Curved Eroded Lip, Flat

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Punctated

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, Flared Rectilinear Lip, Flat

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 ABOSTDEC Rim, UID Rectilinear

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 4 21.5 ABOSTDEC Eroded

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 7 27.2 ABOSTDEC Rectilinear

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 7 29.6 ABOSTP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 15 ABOSTP

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 10 61.8 ABOSTP

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 8.2 BUCKLE Whole

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 2 1.4 DELFT

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2.7 DELFT Rim, UID

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 3 FLNTGUN Flake Worked

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 3 1.1 GLASCLR Tumbler

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.8 GLASCLR Patinated

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 5 8.9 GLASDRKBR Patinated

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 3 1.6 GLASOLIVE Bottle

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.9 GLASPUR

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 12 MISSRF Rim, Curved Plain Lip, Flat

318

161 MARINE STREET 5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 4 MISSRF Bowl Plain Lip, Flat

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 MISSRF Rim, Curved Plain Lip, Tapered

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain Lip, Round

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 4 MISSRF Rim, Flared Plain

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 2 12.6 MISSRF Plain

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 9 MISSS Rim, Flared Curvilinear

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 5 14.9 NAILUID Fragment Oxidized

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 3 4.8 OJ

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 4.1 PIPEB Fragment

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 5.8 PIPES Fragment

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2.2 PIPES Fragment

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.6 PIPES Fragment

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 4 6.8 PUEBW

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2.1 PUEPOLY

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 1.1 SGS

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 0.7 SLBW

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 2 24.3 SLIPRED Rim, UID

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 2 37.5 SM Eroded

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 12 78.7 SM Eroded

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 15 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 15 SMDEC Checked

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 17 SMDEC Checked

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 2 SMDEC Rectilinear

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 3 SMP Rim, Curved Lip, Flat

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 3 8.5 SMP Rim, Flared Lip, Round

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 19.8 SMP Rim, Flared Lip, Round

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 33 204.9 SMP

319

161 MARINE STREET 5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 13.2 TILEGL

5-9.01 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 2 1 2.7 UIDSLIP Combed

5-9.03 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 3 FEA 52a 1 6 ABOSTP

5-9.03 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 3 FEA 52a 1 32.7 BUCKLE

5-9.03 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 3 FEA 52a 1 0.4 DELFT

5-9.03 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 3 FEA 52a 1 1.5 SM Eroded

5-9.11 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 3 FEA 92 2 5.9 ABOSTP

5-9.11 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 3 FEA 92 1 0.8 ABOSTP Rim, UID Lip, Round

5-9.11 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 3 FEA 92 4 0.7 GLAS

5-9.11 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 3 FEA 92 2 7.3 SM Eroded

5-9.11 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 3 FEA 92 1 1.8 SMDEC Checked

5-9.11 SA 5 TU 9 LVL 3 FEA 92 1 5.8 SMP