EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - faspselib.denr.gov.phfaspselib.denr.gov.ph/sites/default/files/Publication Files/bayog pcr.pdf(Physical Validation) Year 2 *(Physical Validation Component) 2 units

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Community-Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP) revolutionized

forest development and rehabilitation efforts of the government when it was

institutionalized in 1995 by virtue of Executive Order No. 263.

Before the adoption of the CBFM approach, the sole motivating factor of

contract reforestation awardees was primarily financial gains. With the

implementation of the Forestry Sector Project (FSP) using CBFM as its main

strategy to rehabilitate the upland ecosystem, it empowered beneficiary

communities economically, socially, technically and politically while transforming

them into environmentally responsible managers. The tenurial right to develop

subproject sites alongside the various inputs from the Subproject deepened their

commitment to collaborate with other stakeholders in the implementation of these

subprojects.

The Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject is in Zamboanga del Sur

and covers 11 barangays within the Municipality of Bayog. Sibugay River which is

responsible for irrigating farmlands of Sibugay Province and Zamboanga del Sur is

also within the Subproject site.

The implementation of the Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)

activities stands out among other components as it manifests the People’s

Organization’s zeal and commitment to go beyond targets and work for the success

of the Project. From the original target of 2,020 hectares, the Bayog Watershed

Rehabilitation Subproject Association, Inc. (BAWARSA, Inc.) was able to develop a

total area of 2,164.09 hectares or an excess of 144.09 hectares without the

benefit of any additional budget for nursery and plantation establishment. For this

achievement, an expansion area was granted to BAWARSA Inc. covering an

additional six barangays with a total area of 2,520 hectares. This, too had been

exceeded as revealed in the final validation showing an excess of 20 hectares to

make the overall accomplishment of 2,540 hectares.

Involvement in CSD activities spelled jobs for members of the communities

as it generated 404, 601 man days as compared to a mere 186, 045 man days before

the Project was implemented.

On the other hand, some PHP 2,214 million was generated by BAWARSA Inc.

for its Capital Build-up/Community Forest Development Funds from which financing

of three livelihood projects were drawn.

In terms of income, employment opportunities as well as involvement in

livelihood opportunities raised the annual average household income of the

community from PHP 42,000.00 before the project to PHP 68,400.00 after the

project or an increase of about 63%.

The farm-to-market road and the hanging bridge on the other hand support

the livelihood projects as they facilitate ease in mobility and transport of livelihood

products to places of commerce.

The success of the Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject has become

a household word not only in Zamboanga del Sur but in the entire Region 9 for the

financial and environmental improvement it has wrought on the people and the

ecosystem.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ------------------------------------------------------------ i

I. Subproject Description ----------------------------------------------------- 1

1. Purpose/ Objectives

A. Original

B. Modifications

2. Subproject Scope and Dimension

A. Comparison of Original and

Actual Scope and Dimensions

B. Reasons for Revision/ Modification

Of Scope and Dimensions

C. Contribution of Subproject to

Relevant (Sub) Sectors

II. Subproject Implementation ----------------------------------------------- 14

1. Organizations for Implementing

Subproject

2. Implementation Period

3. Subproject Cost

4. Comments on Performance of

AO, AP, PO, M&E, and Infra Contractors

5. Other Matters Relating to

Subproject Implementation

III. Action taken by the AO, AP, and PO ------------------------------------ 26

Relating to Recommendation(s)

IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance

Of the Subproject Facilities --------------------------------------------- 26

1. Present Condition of Facilities

2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance

3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure

For Operation and Maintenance (by year)

4. Maintenance Method

V. Benefits Derived from the Project --------------------------------------- 35

1. Indirect Effects

VI. Conclusions and Recommendations --------------------------------------- 37

LIST OF TABLES:

Table 1 : Trainings Attended by the PO -------------------------------------- 38

Table 2 : Subproject Performance -------------------------------------------- 39

Table 3 : Subproject Site Management Office Equipments ----------------- 40

Table 4 : Trainings Attended by the SUSIMO ------------------------------- 41

Table 5 : Consumer Store and Rice Trading Livelihood Project ------------- 42

Table 5a : Trucking (Service/Hire) Livelihood Project ---------------------- 43

Table 6 : Subproject Status Report ----------------------------------------- 44

Table 7 : SMP Cost Estimate per Hectare per activity ---------------------- 45

Table 8 : Cost Estimate for Community Organizing per activity ------------ 46

Table 9a : Agroforestry Cost Estimate per Activity ------------------------- 47

Table 9b : Cost Estimate for Bamboo Plantation per Activity --------------- 48

Table 9c : Rattan Plantation Cost Estimate per Activity --------------------- 49

Table 9d: Cost Estimate for Tree Plantation per Activity ------------------- 50

Table 10 : Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate per activity ------------ 51

Table 11 : Infrastructure Project --------------------------------------------- 52

Table 12 : Annual Work and Financial Plan ------------------------------------ 53

ANNEXES:

1. Organizational Structure ---------------------------------------------- 57

1a. SMP

1b1-1b2. CO

1c. PO

1d1-1d2-1d3. M & E Contractor

1e. SUSIMO

1f. Infrastructure

2. Pictures --------------------------------------------------------------------- 66

3. CSD Accomplishment Map ------------------------------------------------- 68

1

SUBPROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

Of

Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject

Forestry Sector Project

Loan Agreement No. PH-P 135

I. Subproject Description

The Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject is located in the Municipality

of Bayog, Province of Zamboanga del Sur. It is geographically situated at 123o

02’ 36.60” to 123o 07’ 2.50” east longitude and 7o 50’ 34.96” to 7o 55’ 18.40”

north latitude and falls within the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) No.

86700 – 87600 north and UTM No. 50400 – 51300 east. The Subproject is

bounded on the north by the Municipality of Sindangan,1 Province of Zamboanga

del Norte, on the east by the Municipality of Kumalarang and Lakewood, on the

south by the Municipality of Buug, and on the west by the Municipality of

Diplahan, Siay and Kabasalan, all of Zamboanga Sibugay. With an approved area

of 2,520 hectares for

Comprehensive Site Development

(CSD), accomplishment reached

2,540 hectares covering 11

barangays: Poblacion, Kahayagan,

Balumbunan, Depase, Matun-og,

Kanipaan, Baking, Conacon,

Datagan, Camp Blessing and

Dagum.

The major access to the Subproject site is through the provincial road

connecting the Municipality of Bayog to the nearby municipalities. This road

system connects Barangay Depase, Poblacion, and Kahayagan where some

portions of the Subproject site are located. The main portion of the

Subproject can be reached through a footbridge from Barangays Kahayagan

and Supon. The other portions of the Subproject within Barangay Balumbunan,

Matun-og, Dagum, Camp Blessing, Kanipaan, Conacon and Baking are accessible

through hiking or horse ride from Barangay Supon across the Sibuguey river.

The Subproject is part of the public domain and declared as timberland under

the government’s legal classification status. A Community-Based Forest

Management Agreement (CBFMA) covering a total area of 3,326.53 hectares

was awarded to the Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association

(BAWARSA) Inc. on April 02, 2003.

2

1. Purpose/Objectives

A) Original (at the time of appraisal)

a. To develop a total area of 2,020 hectares for reforestation, agro

forestry, rattan plantation and stream bank stabilization using

bamboo by the community people themselves within the five (5)

barangays covered by the subproject;

b. To provide employment and alternative livelihood opportunities

for the subproject participants; and

c. To strengthen the local communities to enable them to manage

the watershed on a sustainable basis.

B) Modification

a. Modified purpose/objectives

a. To develop a total area of 2,520 hectares for reforestation,

agro forestry, rattan plantation and stream bank stabilization

using bamboo by the community people within the 11 barangays

of the Subproject;

b. Reasons for the modification

The target area for CSD was originally pegged at 2,020

hectares. However, BAWARSA Inc. was able to establish

/develop a total area of 2,164.09 hectares or an excess of

144.09 hectares. With this performance, an expansion area of

355.91 hectares was granted to the Association, which led to the

inclusion of another six barangays with a total area of 2,520

hectares.

2. Subproject Scope and Dimension

A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope & Dimensions

a.1. Please check: There has been (revision ad/ or modification or

no revision and/or modification) of the Subproject scope and

dimensions.

ITEM Original Scope and

Dimensions (At the time

of appraisal/Planned)

Revised/Modified

(Actual)

1.REFORESTATION/WATERSHED

/CBFM

3

A. Survey, mapping and Planning

1 Year

B. Community Organizing 1

2 years

C. CSD ( 3 years)

1. SOIL EROSION CONTROL

a. Trail and footpath

Graded Trail

Footpath

Model Farm

2. VEGETATIVE MEASURES 2

a. Agro forestry

b. Tree Plantation

d.1. Bamboo

d.2. Rattan

D.3. Plantation Sp.

3. Inventory of residual forest

4. Income Enhancement

Subproject

2,000 ha

(August 28, 1995-

August 28, 1996)

2,020 ha

(April 10, 1997- April

1999)

* IEC Activities

* Assistance to CSD

activities

* Assistance on

Networking and Linkage

* Organizational

Development and

Capacity Building

* Livelihood Project

implementation

* Monitoring and

Evaluation

2,020 ha (1997-2000)

52,504 meters

52,504 meters

550 ha

53 ha

717 ha

700 ha

N/A

N/A

2,000 ha

(August 28, 1995-

August 28, 1996)

2,020 ha

(October20, 1999-

November 2000)

* IEC Activities

* Assistance to CSD

activities

* Assistance on

Networking and

Linkage

* Organizational

Development and

Capacity Building

* Livelihood Project

implementation

* Monitoring and

Evaluation

2,520 ha (1997-2003)

87,213.50 meters

87,213.50 meters

1 h

a

.

789.06 ha

54.75 ha

720.97 ha

955.22 ha

N/A

N/A

4

5. Infrastructure (CSD)

Bunkhouse

Look-out Tower

Fire lines

Fire Breaks

Hedgerows

Nursery Facilities

Shed House

Stock Room

Water tank

3. INFRASTRUCTURE

COMPONENT

Farm-to-Market Road

Rehab.

Construction of Bridge

Repair of Bridge

C. MONITORING &

EVALUATION

Year 1 (2000)

(Physical Validation)

Year 2

*(Physical Validation

Component)

2 units

4 units

700 ha

700 ha

Inspection Chart

Mapping (ICM)

Inspection Chart

Mapping (ICM)

4 units

5 units

177,995 sq. m

1,555.91 ha

1,000.00 ha

1 unit

1 unit

1 unit

1 unit

6.76 km.

1 unit

1 unit

2,020 ha

Feb.28, 2000-

February 28, 2001

2,520 ha

May 15, 2002-

November 2002

* Verification of

Boundaries,

monuments, and block

corner posts

* Seedling production

inventory analysis

* Survival Counting

with 20% sampling

intensity, including

mapping of developed

areas

* Height and diameter

measurement,

assessment of overall

health/appearance

5

*(Institutional & Project

Benefit Assessment

Component)

2. SUSIMO

Equipment provided to the

Office 3

* Inspection of

Physical infrastructure

2,520 has

December23, 2002-

June 2003

* Assessment on the

overall development of

the PO

* Assessment on the

capability of the PO to

pursue sustainable

resource management

and sustain its

livelihood initiatives

* Identification of

various

issues/problems/const

raints related to the

development and

strengthening of the

PO and the relevant

support systems

* Identification of

immediate benefits of

the project and

evidences that would

indicate the

intermediate and long-

term socio-economic

and environmental

impacts.

2 units GPS

2 units Forester

Transit

3 units Bruton Compass

3 units Binoculars

3 units Abney hand

level

1 unit Rain Gauge

3 units Radio

Transceiver

1 unit Printer

1 unit Typewriter

6

Equipment Locally Purchased

Researches Conducted

SUSIMO:

Trainings Conducted 4

Manual

1 unit GIS Maptitude

1 unit UPS

1 unit Computer

1 unit Generator

1 unit Polar Planimeter

2 units handheld Radio

1 unit Base Radio

2 units Steel Tape

Nylon

1 unit Charger

1 unit Service Truck

KIA

Office Tables w/

chairs

Drafting Table

Camera Cannon

Steel Cabinet

Tape Recorder

Medicine Cabinet

Fire fighting Equipment

Brush Cutter

Gasullete Lamp

Flashlight

Calculator

Triangular Scale

T-Square

Lettering Set

Diameter Tape

Steel Tape

Steadler Pen

Triangle

NONE

1. Orientation

Course for

SUSIMO staff

of Watershed

Subproject

Sites

2. Orientation

Workshop on

7

Others:

Infrastructure Facilities

Turned-Over to DENR-

SUSIMO

Others

the

implementation

of a Capital

Build-up System

for CBFMP

3. Watershed and

Mangrove

Orientation

Course and

other related

guidelines on

FSP

4. FSP-

Orientation

Course

5. On-The-Job

Training on

GIS/GPS

Operation

6. FSP Phase

out/Phase in

Planning

workshop

1 unit Camera

1 unit Air

conditioner

1 unit Dining Table

3 units Office

Tables

9 units Monobloc

Chairs

1 unit Bamboo Bed

1 unit Bed Foam

1 unit Gas Range

1 unit Gasul Tank

1 unit SUSIMO

Office 1 Please refer to Table 1 for the details on trainings attended by the POs

2 Table 2 Details the subproject performance in terms of area planted

3 Table 3 shows the details of the equipment provided to the SUSIMO

4 Please refer to Table 4 for the trainings attended by the SUSIMO staff

B. Reasons for Revision/Modification of scope and Dimensions

8

b.1. Where there has been “revision/modification” of the Subproject scope

and dimensions.

Revision of the superior plan (e.g. sector development plan, etc.)

Revision of the supply-and-demand estimate

Large fluctuation in the Subproject cost

Substantial revision of design due to the unforeseeable physical

condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil

condition, etc.)

Natural disaster/unseasonable weather

Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing

Agency

Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned

(e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies,

etc.)

Availability of funds (e.g. lack of funds, use of contingency,

fluctuation of the exchange rate, etc.)

Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems

Procurement problems

Performance of contractor/supplier

Performance of consultant

Change in construction period

Others

B.2. Detailed statement of reasons (with background)

Revision of the superior plan

Comprehensive Site Development:

The establishment and development of additional areas by the PO in excess

of original target of 144.91 hectares triggered changes not only in the CSD

scope but in almost all subcomponents as well. The excellent performance

achieved without any additional budget in nursery and plantations

establishment, was rewarded with the grant of additional expansion area of

355.91 hectares or a total revised target area of 2,520 hectares. However,

during the final validation and survey of the established plantations, it was

found out that the PO had even exceeded the revised target area with its

accomplishment of 2,540 hectares or an excess of 20 hectares.

Consequently, other targets of infrastructures like bunkhouses, look-out

towers, graded trails and footpaths were increased for better monitoring and

protection of plantation. Likewise, activities perceived necessary in the

Subproject were also established such as fire lines and model farm for fire

protection.

9

Community Organizing:

There were changes in the contractor for CO. The two-year CO contract was

originally awarded to the Technological Advocates for Agro Forest Programs

Association or TAFPA. However, it was cancelled/terminated due to non-

compliance with the provisions of the contract. The CO contract was then

rewarded to ZAMBAYUGMI for the continuation of the remaining activities

left out by TAFPA. The remaining activities were completed in November

2000.

Infrastructure (added component of FSP):

When the NFDO together with the Technical Assistance team conducted an

assessment of each subproject in 2000, they assessed that inclusion of the

infrastructure support project especially livelihood development within

Forestry Sector Project will provide great help to the PO. This finding led to

the addition of the said component.

SUSIMO Creation

The Project Management Office initiated the Creation of SUSIMO to

provide effective and efficient management of the Subproject on the

field/ground level. The issuance of Department Administrative Order (DAO)

No. 2000-65 entitled “ Guidelines Governing the Creation of Subproject Site

Management Office and its Institutionalization in the Forestry Sector

Project Implementation”, mandated the Regional and the Field Offices to

install the SUSIMO for each subproject site and be manned by competent

DENR permanent personnel. The SUSIMOs were provided with facilities and

other equipment as well as capability building trainings for its staff for

better subproject administration.

Substantial revision of design due to the unpredictable physical condition

at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil condition, etc.)

Some of the identified and recommended species in the original plan were

changed to species preferred by the members of the community themselves

because of suitability of chosen species to the area and economic viability.

Under the reforestation component, Eucalyptus Camaldulensis and Gmelina

species were changed to Mahogany. For the Agro forestry Component, Mango

and Jackfruit species were changed to Durian and lanzones.

C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sector(s)

c.1. (Sub) Sector (s) to which the Subproject belongs

10

Electric power and Gas Telecommunication Social services

(Multipurpose) Dams Telecommunication Water supply

Power Plants Broadcasting Sewerage

Transmission lines Education

Distribution Systems Irrigation and Flood control Health

Gas Irrigation Tourism

Others Flood control

Transportation Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

Roads Agriculture and Forestry

Bridges Fisheries

Railways

Airport Mining and Manufacturing

Ports Mining

Marine Transportation Manufacturing

Others (Foot Bridge and employment)

c.2. Original (At the time of appraisal/Planned)

Item Description

1. Subproject Development Plan

2. Livelihood Projects

Through the Socio-Institutional and

Bio-physical Components of the

Subproject, local communities will

become partners and active

developers in the enhancement and

protection of the watershed

through various activities.

Relatively, improvement in

vegetative cover within the area will

enhance the good quality and yield

of water resources within and

adjacent areas.

Involvement of the community in

plantation establishment will provide

them immediate employment thus

eliminating destructive activities

that contribute to the

deforestation of the watershed

area.

Implementation of viable livelihood

projects will result to an increase in

the household income of the

community. A PO will be organized

and capacitated to establish

11

3. Provision of Community Based

Forest management Agreement as a

Land Tenure Right over the area.

4. Irrigation System Support

linkages with other government and

non-government organizations to

enhance the livelihood projects as

additional source of income while

waiting for the harvest of forest

and non-forest products.

Sense of ownership over the

awarded CBFM area would

encourage active participation of

the community members in deterring

illegal activities and cutting of tree

species within the area. Moreover,

there would be ripple effects as

surrounding communities get

inspired with the showcase and

would want to embark on similar

undertakings. It will create

environmental awareness in adjacent

communities.

Irrigation Systems, downstream key

production areas, farm lands

households, industrial and

commercial establishments will be

serviced by the watershed in terms

of supplying their water

requirements. This will create

positive impact to the community,

thus create awareness and prod

communities to pursue the

protection and continuous

development of the watershed.

c.3. Present situation and outlook for the future

Item Description

1. The community and its Tenurial

Instrument.

BAWARSA, Inc. was organized

primarily to manage and develop the

Bayog Watershed Subproject. During

its implementation, the members were

taught proper management and

sustainable development of the

watershed with the help of DENR-

SUSIMO and NGOs. They were

12

2. Livelihood Projects implemented

by the Association of

BAWARSA5

3. BAWARSA Women’s

Organization

4. Infrastructure

provided several trainings and

workshops on technology aspects,

financial management, livelihood

establishment and effective

organizational management. These

skills are also meant to guide them in

the proper management of their

resources in the future as they were

already awarded with CBFMA area

giving them the right to manage and

develop a total area of 3,326.53

hectares for 25 years and renewable

for another 25 years.

The PO established three livelihood

projects; Consumers Store, Rice

Trading and Transportation Services

with a total CFDF/CBU amounting to

PHP 2,214,987.75. The PO is inspired

to implement other viable livelihood

projects in the future that will ensure

high rate of employment generation

within the community.

The women sector of the subproject

was organized last November, 2003

and registered with the Department

of Labor and Employment (DOLE) on

January 19, 2004 to implement other

possible livelihood. The creation of

Women’s Organization is envisioned to

create more employment opportunities

within the community and it is also

envisioned to conduct community

services like; non-formal education,

information dissemination, facilitate

trainings, among others.

The development of infrastructure

projects (Farm to Market Road and

Hanging Bridge) greatly improved the

mobility and facilitated ease in

transporting agricultural and livelihood

products of the PO to the nearby

market and municipalities.

13

5. Support of LGU

6. Project Development

The support and services rendered by

the Provincial and Municipal LGU to

the Subproject give an assurance that

the project of the PO will be sustained

in the future. Moreover, with the

support, it is envisioned that

maintenance of the farm-to-market

will be sustained.

All activities set forth in the approved

contract and WFP of the PO were

completed and have exceeded the

target especially in the reforestation

component. With a high survival rate

of the established plantation, it is

expected that the water yield and

quality will improve as a result of good

vegetative cover; thus, further

reducing the risk of flashfloods, soil

sedimentation and soil erosion. It will

also provide enough supply of water to

support irrigation system for

downstream communities. Currently,

the Project supports a newly

constructed irrigation dam of the

National Irrigation Administration

(NIA) for farmlands within the

municipality of Bayog and its adjacent

places.

The construction of CSD

infrastructures more than the

required target shows a strong

commitment of the PO to make the

project successful.

With the continuous maintenance and

protection of their established

tree/reforestation, agro-forestry,

rattan and bamboo plantations, it is

expected that high plantation yield

and sustainability of the project will

be attained in the future.

5 Please refer to Table 5 for the livelihood project being implemented by the POs

14

II. Subproject Implementation

1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject

Function in the Name of Organization Reasons for

Subproject

Implementation

(1) Original (2) Changed Change

1.NGO for SMP

2.AO for CO

3.Assisting

Professional

(AP)

4.PO for CSD

5.NGO for M&E

(Physical&

Institutional

Components)

Year 2

(Physical

Component)

Tungawan

AgroForest

Planters

Association, Inc.

(TAFPA)/Rep.

Danilo Delos

Santos

Technological

Advocates for

Agro-forest

Programs

Association,

Inc.(TAFPA)/Rep.

Danilo Delos

Santos

Evangeline Vidal

Bayog Watershed

Rehabilitation

Subproject

Association, Inc.

Summer

Developer's

Association,

Inc./Rep. Remus

Bersamin

Agro-Forestry

Technology

Zamboanga

(Bayog) Unified

Green

Movement,

Inc./Rep. Felipe

Calipusan

Eduardo

Torralba

Terminated/

Cancelled

Contract expired/

none renewal

15

(Institutional

Component)

6. NGO for

Infrastructure

Services

Association

(AFTECH)

(Rep.Antonio Lao)

Greenshield

Association Inc.

(Rep. Reynaldo F.

San Antonio)

YSL Builder Inc.

(Rep.Joseph Lim)

Please state:

1.1 Reasons for the change

A. For Community Organizing

Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject was organized by two (2) groups

of community organizer. The first Community Organizing activities was

awarded to Technological Advocates for Agro-forest Programs Association

Inc. (TAFPA) represented by Mr. Danilo Delos Santos on April 10, 1997. The

contract was terminated due to non-compliance with stipulated provisions and

abandonment of his obligation as a contractor. The remaining CO activities

were then awarded to a qualified bidder based on the criteria set for CO

contract, the Zamboanga (Bayog) Unified Green Movement Inc.

(ZAMBAYUGMI) represented by Mr. Felipe Calipusan on September 30, 1999.

All activities set forth in the approved WFP of the second AO contractor

were undertaken and accomplished.

B. For Assisting Professional

Two Assisting Professionals (AP) were initially hired by the PO to assist the

SUSIMO in ensuring effective and efficient implementation of the

Subproject components. However, the expired contract service of the first

AP, Evangeline Vidal was not renewed due to attitude problem which resulted

to unsatisfactory performance as complained by the PO and SUSIMO. Mr.

Eduardo Torralba was immediately hired by DENR thru OIDCI whose

expertise is on livelihood development. This time, the second AP successfully

assisted the PO in the implementation of the identified livelihood projects.

1.2 Problems arising, counter measures adopted and results

Problems arising during the subproject implementation:

16

A. For Community Organizing

(1) The Assisting Organizing (AO) TAFPA failed to comply with the provisions

stipulated in their contract.

The DENR-Central Office terminated the contract of the AO (TAFPA)

and re-awarded another contract to the qualified AO based on the

criteria set forth in DENR MC 97-03 for the continuation of the

remaining CO activities. As a result, the POs’ knowledge and skills in

project management has improved.

(2) The AO failed to establish linkages with other agencies or organizations in

providing technical and additional financial assistance particularly for the

livelihood project to sustain the Association while waiting for the

harvestable products in the Subproject area.

SUSIMO and PO coordinated with the LGU and other government

agencies particularly with the Department of Agriculture (DA) to provide

assistance to the PO’s livelihood projects. As a result, the PO was given a

warehouse building, which is used as PO office, incinerator, and Solar

Drier worth Php 2.2 million by Governor Aurora Cerilles (Province of

Zamboanga del Sur).

(3) PO’s Lack of understanding regarding their responsibilities and

objectives during the early stage of project implementation.

The DENR, from top management down to field level facilitated and

assisted the PO in reviewing and reiterating the functions and

responsibilities of the PO BOT’s, Officers and member. As a result,

functions and responsibilities of the PO were clearly understood.

B. For Assisting Professional

The AP assigned in the area was not well versed on the objectives and

concept of the FSP Subproject, particularly the CBFMP.

The AP was invited and requested to attend every IEC activity conducted

in the Subproject. Likewise, leveling off meeting with the concerned AP

was facilitated by the SUSIMO. As a result, FSP and CBFMP concept

were fully understood by the assigned AP.

C. For Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)

Occurrence of El Niño phenomenon between 1997 and 1998 resulted to

the poor plantation survival rate. The PO in coordination with the DENR

17

formulated strategies and counter measures to address the said

problems, such as follows:

Organized an internal quality inspection committee composed of Board

of Trustees and PO Technical Staff to conduct the quarterly

inspection, monitoring and supervision of the plantation.

Conducted training on proper ways of handling/transporting seedlings,

site preparation and planting particularly hole digging with a minimum

diameter equal to thrice the diameter of plastic bag and depth.

Due to far distance and terrain of sites, backyard nurseries were

allowed aside from the main and sub nurseries with close monitoring

and supervision of the technical staff of the association.

Intensive IEC activities were conducted per barangay.

The PO requested the DENR for change of suitable species preferred

by the community.

With the above strategies, the survival rate went up and the quality of

the plantations improved. The PO even exceeded the required target by

144.09 hectares, thus, resulted to the approval of the additional

expansion area of 355.91 hectares or a total revised target of 2,520

hectares from the original target of 2,020 hectares. However, during

the final survey of total plantation area, it was found out that the PO

has again exceeded the revised target by 20 hectares. Said excess

plantations were no longer paid by the DENR. The Association now

garnered a weighted average survival rate of 90.39%.

1.3 The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for the implementation

of the Subproject is ( attached or not available).

Organizational charts are attached as Annex 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 1g, 1h

and 1i for Tungawan Agro-Forest Planner Association, Inc. (SMP

contractor), Technological Advocates for Agro-Forest Programs

Association, Inc. (CO Contractor), Zamboanga-Bayog Unified Green

Movement, Inc. (CO Contractor), Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation

Subproject Association, Inc. (CSD Contractor), Summer Developers

Association, Inc. (M&E Contractor), Agro-Forestry Technology Services

Association (M&E Contractor), Greenshield Association, Inc. (M&E

Contractor), SUSIMO- Bayog, and YSL Builders (Infrastructure

Contractor), respectively.

2. Implementation Period

A. Comparison of Original Schedule and Actual Period

18

ITEM

ORIGINAL SCHEDULE

ACTUAL PERIOD

1.Survey, Mapping and

Planning

2.Contract of AO for CO

3.Contract of PO for

CSD

4.Contract of NGO for

M&E

5.Contract of

Infrastructure

Component

Completion

(Completion of

Subproject)

August 28, 1995-August

28, 1996

April 10, 1997 – April 10,

1999

September 22, 1997 to

December 30, 2000

February 2000-May 2003

February 11, 2002- May

16, 2003

December 2000

August 28, 1995-

August 28, 1996

October 20, 1999 to

November 2000

September 22, 1997 to

June 30, 2003

February 2000- June,

2003

February 11, 20002 –

October 15, 2003

October 15, 2003

Please refer to Table 6 for the subproject status report

Notes: Completion of the Subproject was defined as ( completion

ceremony or final disbursement or other than the above.

The completion date was scheduled for December 30, 2000 (at the time

of appraisal) and is indicated (thus ) in the above Table.

B. Reasons for Delay or Early Completion

b.1. In case of delay or early completion, please choose the reason(s) from

the following list and check.

Change in scope/dimensions

Natural disaster/Unseasonable weather (e.g.

Earthquake, typhoon, etc.)

Shortage of funds/Fluctuation of the exchange rate

Problems in procurement

Inflation

Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the

Executing Agency

Structural and organizational problems of the

19

Agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate

Coordination with other agencies, etc.)

Legislative matters

Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems


Performance of consultant

Others (M&E report improvement)

b.2. Reasons and background for delay or early completion


On Community Organizing

The original contract for CO was only for two years covering the period

from April 1997 to April 1999.The completion of Community Organizing

activities as planned was delayed due to non-compliance of the former CO

contractor (TAFPA) to the provisions stipulated in their contract and

abandonment of his obligation as a CO contractor that resulted to

termination of contract.

Change in scope/dimension

Comprehensive Site development Contract (CSD)

During the early implementation of the Project, the established

plantation suffered from high rate of mortality due to the EL Niño

phenomenon that occurred between 1997 and 1998. This has led to the

extension of the contract duration as approved by the JBIC for the FSP

to improve the quality of plantations and to attain a greater survival rate.

The PO intensified the maintenance activities such as: ring weeding,

cultivation, establishment of firebreaks and fire lines, application of

fertilizer and patrol work.

Structural and organizational problems of the

Agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate

Coordination with other agencies, etc.)

During the early stage of implementation, one site coordinator was

assigned in the Subproject area to assist, facilitate, monitor and evaluate

the performance of the AO, PO, and M&E contractor. Assistance to the

AO and the PO’s performances were ineffective, resulting to backlogs and

low survival rate of the established plantation. In the same manner, the

created Composite Inspection Committee (CIC) was loaded with multiple

20

functions in their respective offices resulting to delays in the conduct of

monitoring and evaluation on the accomplishments of contractors.

Change in scope/dimensions

Infrastructure Component

The completion of the infrastructure project was extended due to the

inclusion of an additional 1.3 kilometers as requested by the LGU. And also

because of the financial management problem of the contractor who had

no sufficient resources to pay its workers. These two situations caused

delay in the completion of the infrastructure project.

Others (M&E report improvement)

After the completion of M&E activities on May 2003, the concerned M&E

contractors facilitated the submission of respective reports to the

Regional Office and NFDO. However, evaluation showed that there were

some vital information not reflected in the final report and rectification

based on the recommendation made by the Regional Office and NFDO was

suggested. This led to the one-month extension for the

rectification/improvement of M&E report.

C. Remedial Action Taken in Each Case of Delay

Community Organizing

TAFPA’s incompetence led to the immediate termination of its contract.

The remaining activities were awarded to a qualified contractor and the

DENR adhered strictly with the existing guidelines for Community

Organizing contract. Likewise, close monitoring and supervision of the

DENR personnel helped in the accomplishment of the remaining activities

and expected outputs.

Comprehensive Site Development

Pursuant to MC 2000-19 related revision of the WFPs and amendment of

the CSD contracts to update the cost was undertaken.

Infrastructure Component

In the case of Infrastructure, the site engineer together with ISTaF

closely monitored and supervised the activities implemented by the

contractor based on the approved work plan. Corrections on the

contractor’s activities were noted and listed under the watch or punch list

21

to which the contractor agreed to rectify. Likewise, monthly kick-off

meetings were undertaken to immediately address the problems and

issues encountered. Further, remedies and strategies were done in order

to accomplish all activities as set within the given period. One strategy

was the financial assistance extended by PO-BAWARSA to concerned

contractor by lending some amount and guarantees to the suppliers of

materials for the contractor to accomplish all activities as scheduled.

Monitoring and Evaluation

A one-month extension was given to respective M&E contractors for the

rectification of their final reports based on the existing guidelines of

M&E.

3. Subproject Cost

A. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure (by

Component)

Item

Original Cost

(Based on appraisal)

(In M pesos)

Actual Expenditures

(In M pesos)

Survey, Mapping

and Planning

Community

Organizing

Comprehensive

Site Development

Monitoring

and Evaluation

Infrastructure

Dev’t

Subproject

Coordinating

Office

TOTAL

1.350000

5.559378

25.549460

3.471560

19.013561

2.283240

57.227199

1.350000

2.908091

58.495256

3.463480

19.013561

2.283240

87.513629 Please refer to Tables 7,8,9, 10 for the details on cost of SMP, CO, CSD, and M&E.

List of Infra project/s with its corresponding cost is also attached as Table 11

22

B. Reasons for Difference between Original Estimated Cost and Actual

Expenditure

Increase in reconstruction cost arising from natural

disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)

Increase or decrease arising from a change in construction

Period

Increase or decrease arising from inflation

Increase or decrease arising from fluctuation in the exchange

rate

Increase or decrease arising from a change in the

scope/work volume of the Subproject

Decrease arising from keen competition in tender

Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing

Agency

Unrealistic cost estimates/Technical problems

Others

b.1. Description of the detailed reason(s) and background

Increase or decrease arising from a change in the

Scope/work volume of the Subproject

For Comprehensive Site Development

There was an increase in the estimated cost and actual expenditure of

the CSD component due to the expansion area given to the PO for

attaining a remarkable performance and exceeding the original target.

Likewise, the cost increased due to current change in the economic

situation of the country whereby there was an urgent need to adjust the

cost of establishing, maintaining and protecting the established

plantations in the subproject. Thus, MC 2000-19 “Guidelines Governing the

Updating of Cost Estimates and Intensification of Plantation Maintenance

and Protection Activities for DENR” for FSP Watershed Subprojects

under JBIC funding was adopted. This resulted to increase in unit cost of

various activities of different components as well as increase in frequency

of ringweeding, cultivation, application’s of fertilizer, patrolling and

establishment of additional targets for infrastructures; such as

footpaths, graded trails, bunkhouses, look out towers and fire lines.

Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the

Executing Agency (Performance of the Contractor)

23

For Community Organizing

Due to termination of the TAFPA contract, the contractor filed a case in

the court against the DENR. The amount intended for the activities under

the contract of TAFPA was excluded in the total contract cost of the new

AO, tapped by the DENR to continue the CO activities of the subproject.

The intended amount was retained at the Regional Office.

Action taken in Case of Cost Overrun and Results

A revision of the WFP for the CSD components was carried out and

approved due to the additional plantation target and volume of work for

the infrastructure. A supplemental contract was made and approved to

support the changes/revisions made. The additional amount was allotted

and obligated to effect the payment for the accomplishments.

C. Comparison of Original Estimated Expenditure and Actual Expenditure

(by Year)

Calendar

Year

Original Cost

(based on appraisal)

(in M pesos)

Actual Expenditures

(in M pesos)

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

1.350000

-

18.296078

7.229630

3.659751

3.915578

0.470000

2.197360

1.095240

1.350000

-

0.523343

2.772433

8.159079

14.379005

17.108166

24.992024

18.229578

Total 57.227199 87.513629 Please refer to Table 12 for the details of Annual Work and Financial Plan.

4. Comments on Performance of Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP), Assisting

Organizations (AOs), Assisting Professionals (APs), Peoples Organizations

(POs), M&E and Infrastructure contractors.

Please describe the performance of each organization after checking the

item(s) in the relevant lists on which you have any comment.

24

A. Performance of Assisting Organizations & Assisting Professionals (If

any) Peoples Organizations, M&E and Infrastructure contractors

a.1. Overall performance Design

Contract administration Construction supervision

Expertise Staff qualifications

Coordinating ability Compliance with Contracts

Performance related to any other than the Subproject scope, if

any.

Others

a.2 Description (in detail)

Overall Performance

Survey, Mapping and Planning

Tungawan Agro-Forest Planner Association Inc. (TAFPA), represented

by Mr. Danilo Delos Santos, conducted the Survey, Mapping and Planning

Component of the project. It was contracted on August 28, 1995 with a

total contract cost of P1, 350,000.00 covering an area of 2000

hectares. All activities stipulated in the approved contract and WFP

were completed and accepted by the DENR, Regional Office on May 06,

1996. Performance of the contractor was satisfactory for accomplishing

all the activities based on the approved contract.

Assisting Organizations

The first AO contractor TAPFA was rated unsatisfactory for not

complying with the conditions stipulated in his contract and CO

guidelines contained in DAO 97-03, resulting in the termination of its

contract. The performance of the assisting organization ZAMBAYUGMI

was rated satisfactory since all activities stipulated in the approved

WFP were undertaken. AO staff deployed in the Subproject were

foresters and experienced in community organizing and other related

activities. Although some activities like networking and linkages,

assistance in the implementation of identified livelihood were not fully

imparted to POs, the AO exerted efforts in working closely with all the

key actors in order to convey the real objectives of their activity in

relation to Subproject implementation.

Assisting Professionals

There were two Assisting Professionals deployed to assist the

Subproject implementation. Both had the capability to facilitate

technical assistance to PO. The former had expertise in organizational

25

management while the latter’s expertise was on livelihood development

and implementation. The latter AP had assisted and facilitated the

implementation of the identified livelihood of PO and now operating

successfully.

Peoples Organization

The accomplishment of BAWARSA on CSD activities showed a

remarkable performance in attaining the target based on the approved

contract and WFP. The overall performance of the Association was

rated very satisfactory for completing and exceeding its target.

Technically, the PO now possessed all the necessary skills, knowledge

gained from training/seminars conducted. They are now qualified as

forestry skilled leaders and stakeholders in terms of expertise in

implementing CSD activities.

Monitoring and Evaluation

The performance of the contractors for M & E, both Physical and

Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment was satisfactory. Target

activities were accomplished. As to the capability of contractors, most

of the staff/members are technically-equipped and knowledgeable in the

contracted activities.

Infrastructure Contractor

The performance of the contractor was not satisfactory, in the sense

that the scheduled programs of work were not attained as expected

based on the approved contract.

5. Other matters relating to Subproject Implementation

Please choose the item(s) from the following list on which you have any

comment, check it (them), and describe it (them) with measure and

results in (B) below.

A. Technical Financial Institutional Economic

Social/Distributional Others

B. Description (in detail)

Technical

Selection of Personnel to man the project implementation

Monitoring and evaluation of the SUSIMO staff over project

implementation was previously insufficient because some of the staff

26

assigned in the SUSIMO lacked dedication in their work although they

possessed technical knowledge and skills. On this, a special order was

issued by the Secretary to replace the concerned SUSIMO staff. As a

result, the new SUSIMO team worked effectively and efficiently.

III. Action Taken by the AOs, APs and POs relating to Recommendation(s)

1. Recommendation(s) made by SUSIMO

SUSIMO check: This article is ( applicable. The

recommendations are given in Annex – I herewith or not

applicable. There has been no recommendation with regard to the

Subproject).

2. Action Taken and Results

Recommendations Action Taken

by AO’s

Action Taken

by PO’s

Results

Development of

skills and

knowledge of the

PO officers and

members through

trainings on

technical,

financial and

management

aspect.

SUSIMO and

APs conducted

different

trainings and

workshops like

financial system

and

management

seminar,

project

management,

re-orientation

on CBFMP, Fire

brigade

training, among

others.

PO members

and officers

participated

actively in all

trainings and

workshops

that were

conducted to

improve their

management

skills over the

Subproject.

Improvement of

PO’s knowledge and

skills as regards

financial and

project

management were

observed.

IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities

1. Present Condition of Facilities

A. Please check: This article is ( applicable due to problem(s) or not

applicable. No particular problem has occurred since the initial

operation started). If there have been any problems, please check the

relevant space in the Table

27

For the SUSIMO

Item

Status

Initial

Operation

Maintenance

Management

Others

1. ) GPS

2. ) Compass

3. ) Binocular

4. ) Topographic

OSk

5. ) Rain Gauge

Digital Rain

Wise

6.) Radio

Transceiver

7.) Printer

8.) Typewriter

9.) GIS

10.) UPS

Gamatronic

Compact

11.) Personal

Computer

12.) Generator

13.) Polar

Planimeter

14.) Hand held

15.) Steel Tape

16.) Charger

17.) KIA Ceres

18.) Working

Animals

19.) Truck (KIA

-2700)

20.) Motorcycle

Serviceable

Serviceable

Stolen

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Stolen

Serviceable

Stolen

Unserviceable

Stolen

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Unserviceable

Unserviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

/

/

/

/

/

For the PO

Item

Status

Initial

Operation

Maintenance

Managemen

t

Others

1.) Bunkhouse

2.) Look-out

Serviceable

Serviceable

/

/

28

Tower

3.) Incinerator

4.) Solar Tunnel

Drier

5.) PO Building

6.)

Communication

Equipments

7.) Motorcycle

8.) Truck

9.) Computer

10.) Printer

11.) Air

conditioner

12.) Filing/Steel

Cabinet

13.) Minolta-EP

1054 Copier

14.) Video

Camera

15.) Nursery

Facilities

16.) Electric Fan

17.) Type Writer

18.) Water pump

19.) Television

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

Serviceable

/

/

/

/

/

B. Please check: The Problem(s) has arisen owing to the following

reason(s).

Technical Financial Institutional Economic

Social/Distributional Others

C. Description (in detail)

For the SUSIMO

ITEM ORIGINAL PLAN ACTUAL OPERATION

1 Global Positioning

System (GPS)

For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

2 Compass (Forester

Transit)


from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

29

3 Compass (Brunton

Compass)


from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

4 Binoculars (7x50) For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

5 Abney Hand Level For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

6 Rain Gauge For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

7 Radio Transceivers For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

8 Steel Tape For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

9 Handheld Radio Battery

Charger

For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

10 Printer For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

11 Type writer For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

12 GIS Maptitude For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

13 UPS For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

14 Personal Computer For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

15 Generator For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

16 Two Tunner Truck For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

17 Motorcycles For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

18 Polar Planimeter For the SUSIMO (Downloaded

from NFDO)

For the SUSIMO

19 VHS Player Player For the AO (Assisting

Organization)

Turned-over to DENR-

SUSIMO-Bayog

20 Television For the AO (Assisting

Organization)


SUSIMO-Bayog

21 Tables For the AO (Assisting

Organization)


SUSIMO-Bayog

22 Petronas Gasul (gas

stove)

For the Infra Contractor (YSL

Builders)


SUSIMO-Bayog

30

23 Air Conditioner For the Infra Contractor (YSL

Builders)


SUSIMO-Bayog

24 Beddings For the Infra Contractor (YSL

Builders)


SUSIMO-Bayog

25 Trash Can For the Infra Contractor (YSL

Builders)


SUSIMO-Bayog

26 Office Building For the Infra Contractor (YSL

Builders)


SUSIMO-Bayog

27 Camera For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

28 Tape Recorder For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

29 Steel Cabinet For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

30 Office Tables For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

31 Fire Fighting Equipment For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

32 Chairs (9 pcs. Office

chairs and 10 pcs.

Monobloc Chairs)

For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

33 Brush Cutters For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

34 Gasulette Lamp For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

For the PO

Item Original Plan Actual Operation

1.) Bunkhouse

2.) Look-out Tower

3.) Incinerator

4.) Solar Tunnel Drier

5.) PO Building

6.) Communication

Equipments

7.) Motorcycle

8.) Truck

9.) Computer

10.) Printer

11.) Air conditioner

12.) Filing/Steel Cabinet

13.) Minolta-EP 1054

Copier

14.) Video Camera

15.) Nursery Facilities

16.) Electric Fan

17.) Type Writer

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For The PO

For The PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

For the PO

31

18.) Water pump

19.) Television

2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance

A. Name of PO

a.1. Please give the name of PO and/or Body in charge of O/M.

PO: Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association, Inc.

(BAWARSA, Inc)

SUSIMO: SUSIMO Bayog- Administrative Support Unit (ASU)

a.2. Please check:

The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for O/M of the Subproject

facilities is (attached or not available).

The operation and maintenance of Subproject facilities and equipment of

the PO were done by the organization itself. In case of malfunctions and

loss, it is the organization that will be in charge for the repair and

procurement of such equipment. For the SUSIMO, it is the Administrative

and Support Unit (ASU) that is in charge of the maintenance of SUSIMO

equipment and facilities.

a.3. If the organization chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state

the reason.

B. Number of staff/workers of the PO or Body for Operation and

Maintenance of Subproject Facilities.

PO (BAWARSA): 18

SUSIMO (Bayog): 2

C. Please check and explain the following.

c.1. The number of staff is currently ( sufficient or insufficient).

If “Insufficient”, please describe your estimate of the optimum

number of staff and your plan for providing them.

c.2. Average employment period of the present staff:

PO (BAWARSA): 2 to 3 years

SUSIMO (Bayog): 4 years

32

c.3. Availability of training program to promote the vocational ability of

the staff, its contents and expected effects.

None

3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure for Operation and Maintenance

(by Year)

A. Original Expected Expenditure

For the SUSIMO

(Unit: Mil Pesos)

Item

Calendar year

Maintenance Operation Total

2001

2002

2003

Total

0.144628

0.195973

0.240050

0.580651

0.433884

0.587919

0.480101

1.501904

0.578511

0.783892

0.720151

2.082554

For the PO

Item

Calendar year

Maintenance Operation Total

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

TOTAL

0.114248

0.003770

-

0.030460

0.037884

0.081390

0.124217

-

0.391969

0.342744

-

0.028550

0.060920

0.113649

0.244168

0.372651

0.001270

1.163952

0.456990

0.003770

0.028550

0.091379

0.151531

0.325558

0.496866

0.001270

1.555921

B. Actual and Currently Expected Expenditure

For the SUSIMO (Unit: Mil Pesos)

Item

Calendar year

Maintenan

ce

Operation Maintenance

(For

expanded

&

Operation

portion)

Total

2001

1. Office

2. Motorcycle

3. KIA-Ceres

0.113067

0.030826

0.113067

0.030826

33

2002

1. Office

2. Motorcycle

3. KIA-Ceres

2003

1. Office

2. Motorcycle

3. KIA-Ceres

4. KIA-4x4

2004

TOTAL

0.227080

0.035962

0.282796

0.011400

0.018718

0.720000

0.148750

0.148750

0.026250

0.026250

0.227080

0.035962

0.282796

0.011400

0.018718

0.180000

0.900000

For the PO

Item

Calendar year

Maintenance Operation Maintenance

(For

expanded

&

Operation

portion)

Total

1997

Office

1998

Office

1999

Office

2000

Office

Computer

Typewriter

2001

Office

2002

Office

Computer

Typewriter

Communication

Equipments

2003

Truck

Motorcycle

Water pump

0.001370

0.246510

0.087771

0.103165

0.090627

0.028099

0.028550

0.034350

0.151532

0.029845

0.023251

0.136080

0.028099

0.029920

0.280860

0.239303

0.029845

0.126416

0.226707

34

Office

2004

Cell phones

Video Camera

TOTAL

0.529443

0.027807

0.495514

0.027807

1.024957

Note: Actual and currently expected expenditure for expansion, replacement or

any other improvement purposes

Please describe the basis for the above estimate and your financing plan for

the same.

No amount was given for the expanded portion of maintenance and operation of

facilities for the PO. Cost provided was based on actual disbursement. In the

case of SUSIMO, facilities were maintained depending on the fund allocation

downloaded by the NFDO. However, it will be the responsibility of the

concerned CENRO to oversee and maintain these facilities when it will be

turned over to their custody. Maintenance cost could be sourced out from the

DENR regular funds.

4. Maintenance Method

A. Content of Method

B. Frequency

For the SUSIMO

Kind of Facility Maintenance Method Frequency

1. 2-ton truck Repair/replacement of defective

parts,

Change oil,

Wheels rotation

As the need arises

Every 2 months

As the need arises

2. Motorcycle Repair/replacement of defective

parts,

Change oil

As the need arises

Every moth

For the PO

Kind of Facility Maintenance Method Frequency

Computer * Change of defective lightning As the need arises

Copier * Procurement of office supplies Every Month

Typewriter (Bond papers, ink for typewriter &

Printer Computer, folders, etc.)

Lightings * Payment of Electric and Water Every Month

Bills

35

Shovel, Bolo, * Procurement in case of loss or As the need arises

Water pump, among Wreckage

Others * Repairs of defective equipment As the need arises

PO Building/Office * Improvements As the need arises

* Repair of defective parts

Communication

Equipments

* Repair in case of wreck

As the need arises

* Load for Cell phone Every 1 or 2 Months

Truck * Change oil Every 3 months

* Change of tires As the need arises

* Repair and Improvements As the need arises

* Tune up Every 3 months

Motorcycle * Change oil Every month

* Tune up Every Month

C. Others, if any.

V. Benefits derived from Subproject

1. Indirect Effects

A. Please choose and check the item(s), which are dealt with this Article

by you.

Technological transfer (e.g. application of technology used in the

Subproject to other similar projects and subprojects)

Employment creating (e.g. during construction, contribution to the

sector(s) after completion)

Income-raising (e.g. income of the residents in the region)

Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s) and/or

the region concerned

B. Please give details for each of the item(s) you checked.

Employment Generation

During the implementation of the CSD, participating communities availed

of job opportunities especially plantation establishment, seedlings

production and maintenance activities of the watershed subproject. In

the implementation of the subproject, it generated employment

opportunities to project participants registering 404,601 man-days. As

of now, employment generation programs of the PO are still on-going thru

their established livelihood projects. Livelihood training opportunities are

still being participated in by the communities.

36

Income Raising

Increase in income of the project beneficiaries is the outcome of

employment opportunities generated by implementation of the project as

well as the livelihood projects. At the time of appraisal, the annual

average household income of the community was PHP 42,000.00. After the

project implementation, the annual average household income increased to

PHP 68,400.00 or 63% increased based on the final validation for

Institutional Project Benefit Assessment (IPBA) conducted by Green

shield Association. Indicators of socio-economic improvement can be

observed in the community such as improvement of individual houses,

availing of education opportunities for their children even up to college

level, procurement of household facilities/equipment and implementation

of backyard livelihood income generating projects such as African “hito”

catfish and shrimp culture.

37

VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject’s overall

implementation is very satisfactory. News about its positive socio-

economic and environmental impacts has created awareness not only in

the province of Zamboanga del Sur but has spread in the entire region.

The dedication and commitment of the SUSIMO personnel, LGUs and

most especially BAWARSA, Inc. played a great role in the Subproject’s

success.

It is recommended that policy changes regarding the project must be

consulted with the field personnel down to the PO inasmuch as they are

the primary beneficiaries of any changes.

SUSIMO personnel and Community Organizing contractors should be

deployed in assigned areas at the initial and final phase of the project to

ensure clear interpretation of instructions to be carried out.

The DENR should be strict with the NGO for community organizing on

the matter of staff deployment to ensure that only those with the

necessary knowledge and skills are fielded to satisfactorily develop and

enhance the technical and social capabilities of the POs.

Causes of delay in the implementation of the project should be

immediately addressed and people who are responsible for such should

be meted immediate sanctions and /or be reprimanded.

Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 1. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY THE PEOPLES ORGANIZATION

TRAINORS# OF

PARTICIPANTSINCLUSIVE DATES

1 Pre-Membership Seminar AO 42 Nov. 26-28, 19992 Seminar on Community

Based Forest Management and Comprehensive Site Development on Protection and Maintenance

AO 85 Jan. 7, 2000

3 Sloping Agricultural Land Technology (SALT)

AO 51 May 1-2, 2000

4 Value Formation AO PO Officers/members

June 21-22, 2000

5 Forest Fire Protection, Central Management Seminar

AO PO Officers/members

Oct. 17, 2000

6 Computer Operation and Preventive Maintenance

AO 15 N/A

7 Seminar/Lecture on Community Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP)

AO 44 16-May-97

8 A Training on Initial Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)

AO 46 5-Apr-97

9 Workshop on TNA and Livelihood Opportunities

AO 33 Jun 3-11, 1997

10 Re-echo Orientation on the Creation of SUSIMO

SUSIMO 49 Jan. 23-24, 2001

11 Financial System and Management Seminar

SUSIMO 35 March 22-24, 2001

12 Project Management SUSIMO 49 26-Mar-0113 Fire Bridgade Training SUSIMO 45 June 26-28, 200114 Workshop on Livelihood

Project Monitoring and Evaluation

SUSIMO 115 May14-15, 2003

15 Seminar on Forest Fire Control and Management

SUSIMO PO Officers/members

Sept. 10, 2002

16 Seminar/Workshop on Value Formation and Team Building of SUSIMO staff and PO Officers and Stakeholders of BAWARSA, Inc.

SUSIMO PO Officers/members

Nov. 24-28,2003

17 Re-echo orientation Course on the concept of CBFMA, livestock production & DAO 2000-65

SUSIMO 15 19-Jun-03

TRAINING

FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135

Year Planted Component Species Planted Area Planted Survival(Has) (%)

1998 Reforestation Gmelina 7.19 91.67Mahogany 40.11 91.55Narra 3 91.29

Agroforestry Mango 2.54 89.85Lanzones 63 90.47Jackfruit 2.69 84.92Coffee 32.03 89.27

Rattan Palasan 70.8 91.19

Sub-Total 221.36 90.02

1999 Reforestation Gmelina 19.05 91.69Mahogany 697.88 90.55Narra 87.99 91.29

Agroforestry Mango 197.46 89.85Lanzones 88. 69 90.47Jackfruit 97.31 84.92Coffee 69.43 89.27

Rattan Palasan 650.17 91.19

Bamboo Bamboo 54.75 91.11Sub-Total 1,962.73 90.04

2001 Reforestation Narra 40 91.29Mahogany 80 90.55

Agroforestry Durian 215.91 91.42Rambutan 20.00 91.22

Sub-Total 355.91 91.12Grand Total 2,540.00 90.39Note: During the final validation and survey of the established plantations, the PO hasestablished a total developed area of 2,540 ha with 20 ha excess as compared to the total revised target of 2, 520 ha

Table 2. SUBPROJECT PERFORMANCE

FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT

LOAN NO. PH-P 135

ProcuredDate/year procured

1 Global Positioning System (GPS) 2 units (SN-3F302477, SN-3E302237

Global Positioning System (GPS) 2 units (SN-3F302477, SN-3E302238

2 3/28/2001 210,000.00

2 Compass (Forester Transit) Ushikata Model S2-75 (made in Japan) 2 units

Ushikata Model S2-75 (made in Japan)2 units

2 21-May-01 65,680.00

3 Compass (Brunton Compass) Kataoka Brand, Model BCD-90, 4 units

Kataoka Brand, Model BCD-90, 4 units 4 3/28/2001 19,552.00

4 Binoculars (7x50) 3 units (7x50) 3 3/28/2001 12,168.00 5 Abney Hand Level (Model OSK 17251) 4

units(Model OSK 17251) 4 units 4 5/21/2001 9,568.00

6 Rain Gauge (Digital Rainwise made in USA) 1 set

(Digital Rainwise made in USA) 1 5/28/2001 6,300.00

7 Lettering Set Leroy Set 1 5/28/2001 4,992.00 8 Radio Trancievers (Handheld SN-018-73,

Handheld VHF/FM ICOM model 07822) 2 units

(Handheld SN-018-73, HandheldVHF/FM ICOM model 07822)

2 1/12/2001 29,933.28

9 Steel Tape (Nylon Tape/50 meters long) 2 units

(Nylon Tape/50 meters long) 2 4/23/2001 2,700.00

10 Handheld Radio Battery Charger (ICOM Brand) 2 units

(ICOM Brand) 2 _ _

11 Printer (Inkjet Hawlette Pachard: SN-MX 087IBIF2, LX-300) 2 units

(Inkjet Hawlette Pachard: SN-MX087IBIF2, LX-300)

2 4/27/2001 5,811.52

12 Type writer (Manual, 18 carriage Olivetti Brand) 1 unit

(Manual, 18 carriage Olivetti Brand) 1 28-Mar-01 8,309.60

13 GIS Maptitude (Combination of Software and Geographic date: SN-04-202616) 1 unit

(Combination of Software andGeographic date: SN-04-202616)

1 3/28/2001 44,460.00

14 UPS (Gamatronic Compact: SN-221372) 1 unit

(Gamatronic Compact: SN-221372) 1 4/15/2001 5,720.00

15 Personal Computer (HP Brio PC: SN 10771780) 1 set

(HP Brio PC: SN 10771780) 1 2/20/2001 70,850.00

16 Generator (Gasoline engine: SN 74326) 1 unit

(Gasoline engine: SN 74326) 1 4/23/2001 44,096.00

17 Two Tunner Truck (KIA Crosstruck 4x4 engine: No. J2-3027839) 1 unit

(KIA Crosstruck 4x4 engine: No. J2-3027839)

1 9/30/2002 680,000.00

18 Motorcycles (TS SUSUKI) 3 units (TS SUSUKI) 3 n/a n/a 19 Polar Planimeter (with optical tracer-OSKK,

Koizumi brand) 1 unit(with optical tracer-OSKK, Koizumibrand)

1 10/26/2001 7,800.00

Icom Base Radio Model 01822 Icom 1 _ 64,789.92 20 VHS Player Player (Sony Brand) 1 unit (Sony Brand) 1 n/a n/a 21 Television (Sony Colored TV 21") 1 unit (Sony Colored TV 21") 1 n/a n/a 22 Tables (Office Tables) 2 units n/a 2 n/a n/a 23 Petronas Gasul with Gas Tank 1 set n/a 1 n/a n/a 24 Air Conditioner (National Brand) 1 unit (National Brand) 1 n/a n/a 25 Beddings (Dio Foam Brand) 1 set (Dio Foam Brand) 1 n/a n/a 26 Trash Can (Plastic) 1 unit n/a 1 n/a n/a 27 Office Building (Contractor Office) 1 unit (Contractor Office) 1 n/a n/a 28 Camera (Cannon Prima Jr. and Cannon with

zoom lens) 2 units

(Cannon Prima Jr. and Cannon with zoom lens) 2 n/a n/a

29 Tape Recorder 3 units n/a 330 Steel Cabinet 4 units n/a 4 n/a n/a31 Office Tables 15 pcs. n/a 15 n/a n/a32 Fire Fighting Equipment 1 set n/a 1 n/a n/a33 Chairs (9 pcs. Office chairs and 10 pcs.

Monobloc Chairs) n/a 19 n/a n/a

34 Brush Cutters 2 units n/a 2 n/a n/a35 Gasulette Lamp 4 units n/a 4 n/a n/a

* n/a (no available records)

Table 3. SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTS

Cost (PhP)ITEM Specifications Qty

Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 4. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY THE SUSIMO

TRAINING TRAINORS# OF

PARTICIPANTS

INCLUSIVE DATES

1 Orientation Course of SUSIMO staff of Watershed Subproject Sites

NFDO/TA Team 5 Nov. 14-16,2000

2 Orientation Workshop on the implementation of a Capital-Build up System for CBFMP

NFDO/TA Team 4 Dec. 14, 2000

3 Watershed and Mangrove Orientation and other related guidelines on FSP

NFDO/TA Team 4 Aug. 18, 2001

4 FSP Re-Orientation Course NFDO/TA Team 4 March 19-21, 20025 FSP Phase-out/Phase-in Planning

WorkshopNFDO/TA Team 4 Dec. 10-13, 2002

Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 5a. Livelihood Projects Established

Name of Livelihood Project : Consumer Store and Rice Trading

Implementor

:

No. of Beneficiaries : 441 members

Amount of investment : Php 470, 000.00

Date of Feasibility Study : Apr-02

Date started : Dec. 18, 2002

Status : On-Going

Net Income : Php 120, 000.00

CFDF : Php 2, 214, 987.75

Linkages Developed : Local Businessman/Proprietor

Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association-Multi-purpose Cooperative (BAWARSA-MULCO)

Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 5b. Livelihood Projects Established

Name of Livelihood Project : Trucking Services (For Hire)

Implementor

:

No. of Beneficiaries : 441 members

Amount of investment : Php 574, 625.50

Date of Feasibility Study : N/A

Date started : Dec. 2003

Status : On-Going

Net Income : Php 120, 000.00

CFDF : Php 2, 214, 987.75

Linkages Developed: N/A

Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association-Multi-purpose Cooperative (BAWARSA-MULCO)

FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135Table 6. SUBPROJECT STATUS REPORT

SMP CO CSD M & E INFRA

9Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject

2,520.00 85,230,389.00 c c c c c

PROJECT AREA (ha)

PROJECT COST (mil. Peso)

STATUS OF PROGRESS(O:on going C: Completion)Region

NAME/LOCATION OF THE SUBPROJECT

Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 7. SMP Cost Estimate per Activity

ACTIVITIESTARGET OUTPUT

UNIT OF MEASURE

UNIT COST TOTAL COST

I. SURVEY AND MAPPING

a. Perimeter survey, area computation, site characterization and map preparation 2,000.00 has 425.0000 850,000.00

b. Field Section and Blocking 2,000.00 has 150.00000 300,000.00

c. Present Land Use Survey and Mapping

d. Topographic Survey & Mapping

e. Soil/Land Capability Survey and Mapping

f. Agro-socio economic studies (ave. 3 household/ ha)

g. Climate, geology and water resourced survey

SUB-TOTAL 1,150,000.00

II. PLANNING 2,000.00 has 100.00 200,000.00

a. Data Synthesis and analysis

b. Report Writing

SUB-TOTAL 200,000.00

GRANDTOTAL 2,000.00 has 675.00 1,350,000.00

Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135

ACTIVITIES TARGET

1. Social Investigation 2,020.00 Has. 82.88 167,418.00

2. Information and Education Campaign

2,020.00 Has. 151.55306,127.00

3. Documentation Process

4. Identification of Possible CBFMA

2,020.00 Has. 18.2236,805.00

5. Organizing Activities 2,020.00 Has. 477.72 964,996.50

6. Community Activities 2,020.00 Has. 322.4 651,245.50

7. Project Management 2,020.00 Has. 386.88 781,498.90

Total 2,020.00 has 1,439.65 2,908,090.90

UNIT of MEASURE

UNIT COST TOTAL COST

Table 8. Community Organizing Cost Estimate Per Activity


MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITYUNIT OF MEASURE

TARGET OUTPUT

Unit Cost TOTAL COST

1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION has 789.06 6,714.14 5,297,862.28 a. Nursery Site Preparationb. Planting Stockc. Bags d. Soil Collectione. Bagging

SUB-TOTAL 5,297,862.28 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT has 789.06 3,940.11 3,108,981.72

a. Strip brushing/clearingb. Staking c. Hole Diggingd. Haulinge. Planting

SUB-TOTAL 3,108,981.72 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION has 789.06 4,340.29 3,424,749.54

a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizerb. Replantingc. Patrol Worksd. Tools and materials

SUB-TOTAL 3,424,749.54 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION

a. First and Second Year has 789.06 597.61 471,549.35 b. Third Year has 789.06 251.30 198,291.14 c. Fourth Year has 789.06 632.14 498,793.32 d. Fifth Year has 789.06 922.53 727,930.69 d. Sixth Year has 789.06 387.25 305,563.88

SUB-TOTAL 2,202,128.38 G R A N D T O T A L has 789.06 17,785.37 14,033,721.92

Table 9a. Cost Estimate For Agroforestry Per Activity



TARGET OUTPUT


1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION has 54.75 3,399.92 186,145.85 a. Nursery Site Preparationb. Planting Stockc. Bags d. Soil Collectione. Bagging

SUB-TOTAL 186,145.85 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT has 54.75 8,649.06 473,535.92


SUB-TOTAL 473,535.92 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION has 54.75 7,001.88 383,352.89


SUB-TOTAL 383,352.89 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION

a. First and Second Year has 54.75 6,707.38 367,228.95 b. Third Year has 54.75 1,716.35 93,970.19 c. Fourth Year has 54.75 129.58 7,094.49 d. Fifth Year has 54.75 3,265.94 178,810.20 e. Sixth Year has 54.75 632.30 34,618.56

SUB-TOTAL 681,722.39 GRAND T O T A L has 54.75 31,502.41 1,724,757.05

Table 9b. Cost Estimate for Bamboo Plantation Per Activity



TARGET OUTPUT







SUB-TOTAL 5,381,100.27 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION

a. First and Second Year has 720.97 658.17 474,520.18 b. Third Year has 720.97 279.15 201,261.97 c. Fourth Year has 720.97 359.19 258,962.52 d. Fifth Year has 720.97 474.90 342,385.46 e. Sixth Year has 720.97 72.83 52,504.95


Table 9c. Cost Estimate for Rattan Plantation Per Activity



TARGET OUTPUT







SUB-TOTAL 11,377,519.25 4. CSD Infrastructure

a. Graded Trail meters 87,213.50 1.13 98,611.76 b. Footpath meters 87,213.50 1.13 98,611.76 c. Bunkhouse units 4.00 94,350.00 377,400.00 d. Lookout Tower units 5.00 10,680.00 53,400.99 e. Fireline/firebreak sq.m/has 177,955 sq. m/ 403,362.48

1,555.91 has.SUB-TOTAL 1,031,386.99 5. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION

a. First and Second Year has 955.00 478.15 456,633.00 b. Third Year has 955.00 192.02 183,375.57 c. Fourth Year has 955.00 5,025.78 4,799,624.11 d. Fifth Year has 955.00 2,759.67 2,635,485.44 d. Sixth Year has 955.00 262.75 250,924.51


Table 9d. Cost Estimate for Tree Plantation Per Activity

Forestry Sector Project

Loan No. Ph-P 135

UnitACTIVITIES of

Measure Physical Validation Component

2,520.00 has 37.02 93,300.00

3. Seedling Production/Inventory Analysis 2,520.00 has 50.04 126,100.00

2,520.00 has 846.75 2,133,800.00

5. Institutional/environmental impacts/project management cost and report preparation 2,520.00 has 355.27 895,280.10

S U B T O T A L 3,248,480.10

Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment

1. Preparatory activities 2,520.00 has 7.94 20,000.00

2,520.00 has 47.62 120,000.00

3. Documentation/Reports 2,520.00 has 29.76 75,000.00

S U B T O T A L 215,000.00 G R A N D T O T A L 2,520.00 has 1,374.40 3,463,480.10

Total Cost

Table 10. Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate Per Activity

Target Output

Unit Cost

1. Development of appropriate tools for participatory M&E

4. Survival Inventory (height and diameter measurements and related observations per area/components and parcels

2. Verification of Boundaries, UTM monuments and block corner post

2. Primary data collection and preliminary assessment

Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 11. Infrastructure Project

Infrastructure Project : Farm to Market Road, 1 unit Hanging Bridge and Repair of 1 Hanging Bridge(Matun-og)

Location : Brgy's. Kahayagan, Supon, Kanipaan, and Matun-og, Bayog, Zamboanga, Del Sur

Contractor : YSL Builders

Contract Cost : Php 19, 013, 561.20

Contract Duration : February 11, 2002 to May 11, 2003

Effectivity of Notice to proceed : 11-Feb-02

Expected Completion date : 30-Jun-03

Revised Completion date : 30-Aug-03

Date of MOA with LGU : 15-Oct-03

Brief description : The infrastructure project implemented is Farm to Market Road Rehabilitation from Barangay's Kahayagan, Supon and Kanipaan, having a length of 6.76 Km., Construction of 1 unit hanging bridge at Barangay Kanipaan (Sitio Licanan) and Repair of 1 unit existing Hanging Bridge at Barangay Matun-og with a total lenght of 100 and 70 meters, respectively. The contract of YSL Builders (Infrastructure Contractor) was extended three (3) times due to negative slippage and Backlogs (due to rainy season). The contract was extended first on June 30, 2003, second on July 27, 2003, and third and last is on August 30, 2003. Finally it was turned-over to LGU on October 15, 2003.

Forestry Sector ProjectLoan No. Ph-P 135Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFMA. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP) 675.00 1,350,000.00 675.00 1,350,000.00 B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2) 2,752.17 5,559,378.00 1,439.65 2,908,091.90 C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD) 252,577.20

1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping 608,596.96 2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path

c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry 6,625.40 3,643,970.40 17,785.37 14,033,721.92 b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation

d.1. Bamboo 28,019.79 1,485,048.76 31,502.41 1,724,757.05 d.2. Rattan 14,085.60 10,099,378.40 18,050.19 13,013,648.55 d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) 14,744.37 10,321,062.44 28,537.73 28,861,954.44 e. Timber Stand Improvement

4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project

Sub-Total 12,648.25 25,549,460.00 23,029.63 58,495,256.12 D. Infrastructure Component 19,013,561.20 19,013,561.20 E. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1

b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4Sub-Total 1,718.59 3,471,560.00 1,374.40 3,463,480.10

II. SUSIMO 2,283,240.00 2,082,553.92 Equipment Provided to the OfficeResearches ConductedTrainings

Others

Sub-Total 2,283,240.00 2,283,240.00 GRAND TOTAL 57,227,199.20 87,513,629.32

Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total CostACTIVITIESPlanned Actual


I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFMA. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP)B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2)C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)

1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path

c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation

d.1. Bamboo d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) e. Timber Stand Improvement


Sub-TotalD. Infrastructure ComponentE. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1

b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4Sub-Total

II. SUSIMOEquipment Provided to the OfficeResearches ConductedTrainings

Others

Sub-Total GRAND TOTAL

ACTIVITIESTarget Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

2,000.00 1,350,000.00 2,000.00 1,350,000.00

1,350,000.00 1,350,000.00

Planned Actual Planned Actual19961995










Others



2,020.00 2,181,600.00 2,020.00 523,343.30 2,020.00 478,369.00 252,577.20

550.00 2,197,948.32 437.47 1,217,283.00 100.26 890,711.92

53.00 826,083.08 39.75 512,042.79 54.75 126,489.57 717.00 6,927,501.32 441.75 2,058,211.08 70.80 486,518.99

700.00 6,162,945.36 575.00 3,442,093.67 50.30 537,767.00

2,294,064.68

18,296,078.08 523,343.30 7,229,630.54 2,772,433.68

Actual Planned ActualPlanned1997 1998










Others



2,020.00 1,454,400.00 2,020.00 168,980.00 2,020.00 1,923,378.00 2,020.00 1,376,956.10

517,484.00

112.51 228,739.08 452.89 834,899.87 1,219,064.89

13.25 146,922.89 414,520.54 809,319.27 275.25 1,113,666.00 650.17 4,485,055.33 3,714,350.74

125.00 716,023.41 804.92 2,255,623.25 5,113,709.57

7,990,098.99 11,373,928.47

2,020.00 1,636,200.00 2,020.00 1,628,120.10 356, 000.00

356,000.00 3,659,751.38 8,159,078.99 3,915,578.00 14,379,004.67

Planned ActualPlanned20001999

Actual










Others



360,443.50

235.91 4,492,346.71 5,476,450.57

53,763.11 1,602,315.68 2,040,666.58

120.00 9,953,890.73 6,898,138.65

16,102,316.23 14,415,255.80 8,105,620.94

2,520.00 1,620,360.00 2,520.00 1,620,360.00 470, 000.00 645,406.09 577, 000.00 850,787.66

470,000.00 645,406.09 577,000.00 850,787.66 470,000.00 17,108,165.82 2,197,360.00 24,992,024.40

Planned2001 2002

Actual Planned Actual










Others



2,000.00 1,350,000.00 2,000.00 1,350,000.00 2,020.00 5,559,378.00 2,020.00 2,908,091.90

252,577.20 91,112.96 608,596.96

1,120,247.96 550.00 3,643,970.40 789.06 14,033,721.92

320,664.56 53.00 1,485,048.76 54.75 1,724,757.05 684,741.23 717.00 10,099,378.40 720.97 13,013,648.55

4,102,825.24 700.00 10,321,062.44 955.22 28,861,954.44

6,319,591.95 2,020.00 25,549,460.00 2,520.00 58,495,256.12 10,907,940.26 19,013,561.20 19,013,561.20

215,000.00 215,000.00 2,020.00 3,471,560.00 2,520.00 3,463,480.10 880, 240.00 787,046.25 2,283,240.00 2,082,553.92

880,240.00 787,046.25 2,283,240.00 2,283,240.00 1,095,240.00 18,229,578.46 57,227,199.20 87,513,629.32

Actual (TOTAL)Planned (TOTAL)2003Planned Actual

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART AGRO-FORESTRY TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION, INC.

(M & E Contractor)

ANTONIO T. LAO

President

CELERINO H. ESTEMO

Vice-President

MEMBERS

AUDITOR TREASURER SECRETARY PUBLIC

RELATION

OFFICER

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART SUMMER DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

(M & E Contractor)

REMUS B. BERSAMIN

Operation Manager

SECRETARY

ANTONIO T. LAO

Assistant Operation

Manager

RITA GENTILLES

Auditor

JULIET B. BERSAMIN

Treasurer

Project ID &

Selection Unit

Organizing

Unit

Project

Supervision

Unit

Project

Monitoring

Unit

OFFICE STAFF

LABOR FORCE

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART TECHNOLOGICAL ADVOCATES FOR AGRO-FORESTS PROGRAMS

ASSOCIATION, INC.

(CO Contractor)

Board of Directors

Legal Consultant

Executive Director/President

Executive Assistant

Technical

Support Staff

Administrative

Support Staff

Training Support

Staff

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

MANAGERS

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

COORDINATORS

Community

Organizing-FLMA

Survey, Mapping and

Planning (SMP)

Community Based

Forest

Management

Program

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE TUNGAWAN AGRO-FOREST PLANTERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

(SMP Contractor)

Board of Directors

Legal Consultant

Executive Director/President

Executive Assistant

Technical

Support Staff

Administrative

Support Staff

Training Support Staff

Project Development

Managers

Project Development

Coordinator

CO-FLMA SMP CBFMP

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART BAYOG WATERSHED REHABILITATION SUBPROJECT ASSOCIATION,

INC. (BAWARSA, INC.)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY

PO President

PO Vice-President

Fin. & Appr.

Com.

Education

Com.

Seedlings

Com.

Infra.

Com.

CPO Fund

Com.

Fire Prot.

Com.

Board of Trustees

(Per Barangay)

For. Prot.

Com.

Grievance

Com.

Livelihood

Com.

M & P Com.

CBU fund

Com.

CFDF Com.

Administrative Unit Technical Unit

Technical Head Admin. Officer

Secretary Auditor Treasurer

Bookkeeper Encoder

Utility Security Guard

Survey Team Mon. & Eval.

Team

Survey Aide

BAWARSAMULCO

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ZAMBOANGA (BAYOG) UNIFIED GREEN MOVEMENT, INC.

(CO Contractor)

Project Manager

Assistant Project Manager

Community Organizing

Supervisor

Community

Organizer

Community

Organizer

Secretary

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE YSL BUILDERS

(Infrastructure Contractor)

ERNESTO A. MONDARTE

Project Manager

ARNOLD CUIZON

Surveyor/Quantity

Engineer

ROY JOSE S. QUIMADA

Administrative Officer

REMEGIO QUIMADA

Safety Engineer

NELSON DAIS

Equipment

Supervisor

NOEH PATALINGHUG

Project/Material

Engineer

Operators/Drivers ARMANDO TAC-AN

Chief Mechanic

Materials Lab.

Technicians

Skilled/Semi-Skilled

Laborers

Unskilled Laborers

Helpers Helpers

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE GREENSHIELD ASSOCIATION, INC.

(M & E Contractor)8

Board of Directors

Internal Auditor Board Secretary

Board Treasurer

President

Administrative Staff Executive Secretary

Research, IEC

& Evaluation

CO &

Livelihood

Networking

and Linkages

Special

Concerns

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE (SUSIMO)

Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject

CELERINA D. FLORES

Subproject Management Officer

LEO VILLARUBEN

COSU-HEAD

ROMEO PAGENTE

SDMU-HEAD

MARCELINO MALUNOC

VBU-HEAD

JOEL REALIZA

SDMU-STAFF

YULBRANDO YLLAYA

VBU-STAFF

EFLIDA ROMERO

VBU-STAFF

MYRNA VILLARUBEN

ASU-HEAD

RAMON FABIAN

SUSIMO-DRIVER

IEC conducted in Poblacion and Kahayagan, Bayog, Zamboanga del Sur

New completed Hanging Bridged Rehabilitation of Farm to Market Road with the installation of steel

reinforcement and box culvert.

Rattan Plantation at Brgy. Dagum Gmelina plantation inspected by DENR inspection team.

Lookout tower located at Brgy. Kanipaan.

Consumer Store of BAWARSAMULCO.

Mahogany plantation Agroforestry Plantation

Ring weeding and Fertilizer application conducted by PO personnel.

Sampling activity conducted by Re-gional personnel and SUSIMO staff

Corner DISTANCE (meter)

1-2 N 1 ° 35 ' W 1,302.75

2-3 N 35 ° 9 ' E 857.89

3-4 N 47 ° 51 ' W 336.10

4-5 S 36 ° 16 ' W 223.01

5-6 N 60 ° 24 ' W 1,520.12

6-7 N 30 ° 49 ' W 783.60

7-8 N 37 ° 39 ' E 668.11

8-9 N 9 ° 55 ' E 933.78

9-10 N 24 ° 27 ' E 972.02

10-11 N 24 ° 45 ' E 2,101.52

11-12 N 33 ° 7 ' E 946.85

12-13 S 33 ° 34 ' E 340.24

13-14 N 80 ° 32 ' E 271.15

14-15 N 21 ° 38 ' W 435.99

15-16 N 20 ° 49 ' E 816.73

16-17 N 16 ° 4 ' E 818.83

17-18 N 25 ° 9 ' E 513.76

18-19 N 87 ° 22 ' E 232.06

19-20 N 41 ° 50 ' E 370.32

20-21 S 82 ° 29 ' E 369.07

21-22 S 56 ° 42 ' E 454.47

22-23 S 8 ° 29 ' E 549.33

23-24 S 5 ° 39 ' E 995.89

24-25 S 57 ° 13 ' E 558.31

25-26 S 13 ° 4 ' W 224.26

26-27 S 19 ° 29 ' E 517.76

27-28 S 4 ° 27 ' W 472.16

28-29 S 33 ° 8 ' W 342.78

29-30 S 9 ° 49 ' W 411.77

30-31 S 20 ° 54 ' E 404.63

31-32 S 11 ° 15 ' W 419.86

32-33 S 13 ° 51 ' E 422.32

33-34 S 33 ° 2 ' W 678.30

34-35 S 9 ° 15 ' W 1,090.31

BEARING

TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION

Bayog Watershed Subproject

Corner DISTANCE (meter)BEARING



35-36 S 88 ° 54 ' W 352.42

36-37 S 22 ° 55 ' W 390.27

37-38 S 9 ° 33 ' E 909.25

38-39 S 12 ° 26 ' W 691.77

39-40 S 21 ° 35 ' W 733.56

40-41 S 24 ° 41 ' W 1,190.34

41-42 S 64 ° 13 ' W 891.92

42-43 S 24 ° 15 ' E 269.43

43-44 S 43 ° 4 ' W 1,094.54

44-45 S 55 ° 42 ' W 863.44

45-46 S 4 ° 22 ' E 856.36

46-47 N 85 ° 2 ' W 396.75

47-48 S 28 ° 33 ' W 346.74

48-49 S 71 ° 32 ' E 552.49

49-50 S 18 ° 46 ' W 519.76

50-51 S 45 ° 36 ' W 971.14

51-52 S 12 ° 13 ' W 1,416.26

52-53 S 72 ° 56 ' W 482.16

53-54 S 82 ° 6 ' W 586.21

54-55 S 76 ° 31 ' W 672.04

55-56 N 52 ° 57 ' W 780.74

56-57 S 87 ° 24 ' W 803.53

57-58 S 15 ° 29 ' W 168.88

58-59 N 34 ° 6 ' W 487.39

59-60 N 60 ° 4 ' W 272.49

60-61 N 0 ° 52 ' E 582.38

61-62 N 24 ° 47 ' E 817.70

62-63 N 27 ° 52 ' E 897.97

63-61 N 38 ° 59 ' E 900.59

64-65 N 48 ° 12 ' E 844.81

65-66 N 65 ° 29 ' E 627.11

66-67 S 86 ° 43 ' E 311.12

67-68 N 44 ° 19 ' E 873.77

Corner DISTANCE (meter)BEARING



68-69 S 78 ° 4 ' E 344.44

69-70 N 50 ° 44 ' E 580.09

70-1 N 67 ° 50 ' E 986.75

Reference point:

Corner 1: long-X 123 ° 5 ' 20 "lat-Y 7 52 ' 49 "

Documents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - faspselib.denr.gov.phfaspselib.denr.gov.ph/sites/default/files/Publication Files/bayog pcr.pdf(Physical Validation) Year 2 *(Physical Validation Component) 2 units