Click here to load reader
Upload
vocong
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 1, No 4, 2011
© Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing services
Research article ISSN 0976 – 4399
994
Experimental Studies on Lime-Soil-Fly Ash Bricks
Tabin Rushad S1, Abhishek Kumar
2, Duggal S. K
3, Mehta P. K
4
1- Ph D Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of
Technology, Allahabad
2- P. G. Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of
Technology, Allahabad
3- Prof. & Head, Department of Civil Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of
Technology, Allahabad
4- Associate Prof., Department of Civil Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of
Technology, Allahabad
doi:10.6088/ijcser.00202010085
ABSTRACT
Fly ash is generated in large quantities especially by thermal power plants. A lot of
research has been carried out for effective utilization of fly ash in building industry. Use
of fly ash in manufacturing brick is one such subject which is being studied by
researchers. The aim of the present study is to investigate the strength and water
absorption characteristic of fly ash bricks made of lime (L), local soil (S) and fly ash
(FA). The experiments were conducted both on Hand moulded and Pressure moulded fly
ash bricks. It was observed that none of the L-S-FA bricks satisfy all the requirements of
standard codes. While some of the bricks satisfy the provisions in respect of strength only
the L-FA (40: 60) bricks satisfy the requirement of Indian Standard Code in respect of
strength as well as water absorption characteristics.
Keywords: Lime, Soil, Fly ash, Compressive Strength and Water absorption.
1. Introduction
Fly ash is finely divided residue resulting from the combustion of powdered coal,
transported by the flue gases and collected by electrostatic precipitators. Its proper
disposal has been a cause of concern since long, which otherwise leads to pollution of air,
soil and water. The disposal and utilization of this fly ash is a matter to ponder. The
World Bank has cautioned India that by 2015, land disposal of coal ash would require
about 1000 Km2 of land. To overcome this problem and to encourage the utilization of fly
ash, Government of India in 2003 made it mandatory to use at least 25% fly ash with
soils on weight to weight basis for manufacture of bricks within a radius of 100 Km from
coal or lignite based thermal power plants. Several researchers and organizations have
put forward the methods for use of fly ash in brick making. For last several decades
attempts are being made to find a suitable method for the disposal and proper utilization
of fly ash.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 1, No 4, 2011
© Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing services
Research article ISSN 0976 – 4399
995
Saibulatov (1) confirmed the saving in fuel costs and reported a less variability in
strength with ash bricks. Zhang and Xing (2) undertook an experimental program to study
the individual and admixed effects of lime and fly ash on the geotechnical characteristics
of expansive soil. Its plastic limit increased by mixing lime and the liquid limit, and
hence the plasticity, decreased by mixing fly ash. Based on the results they concluded
that the expansive soil can be successfully stabilized by lime and fly ash. V
Karthikeyan and M Ponni (3) studied the utilisation of fly ash in bricks. The fly ash can
be effectively used for manufacture of bricks using fly-ash, lime, sand and gypsum. The
useful proportion found was 25: 4: 3.33: 1. Tuncer B. Edil et al (4) evaluated the
effectiveness of self-cementing fly ashes derived from combustion of sub-bituminous
coal at electric power plants for stabilization of soft fine-grained soils in terms of
California bearing ratio and resilient modulus (Mr) tests. Tests were conducted on soils
and soil–fly ash mixtures prepared at 7% wet optimum water content (a standardized
condition, representative of the typical in situ condition in Wisconsin), and at 9–18% wet
of optimum water content (representative of a very wet in situ condition). Addition of fly
ash resulted in appreciable increases in the CBR and Mr values of the inorganic soils. Dr.
Robert M. Brooks (5) blended the expansive soil with 12%rice husk ash (RHA) content
and 25 % fly ash contents for strengthening the expansive sub-grade soil, but suggested a
15 % fly ash blending with the same RHA to form a somewhat smaller reduced layer. J.
N. Akhtar et al (6) used ‗C‘ category fly ash as a raw material in FAB and also treated the
fly ash with 10% cement or 5% coarse sand or 15% sand or different combination of sand
and lime stone dust with or without 0.2% geo fibre. He observed that treated fly ash is
superior in strength and the best result is found when the brick is made of 50% of fly ash
and 25% admixture of sand and max tenth part by weight of lime stone dust. They found
that the brick so made achieved the compressive strength that is close to the value of
standard first class brick in India. Kolay, P.K. et al (7) on the other hand investigated the
stabilization of class F pond ash on tropical peat soil. With increase of pond ash content
(5, 10, 15 and 20 %) the maximum dry density (MDD) of peat soil increased while
optimum moisture content (OMC) decreased.
In this paper (8) the suitability of fly ash as raw material treated with lime is studied to
make bricks of local soil. Such bricks termed as FALSB and their components were
tested as per the relevant Indian Standards and results are presented below.
2. Materials
Lime (L)
The lime was tested as per the provisions of IS: 6932 -1973. The impurities present in
lime were less than 5%. The OMC and MDD were found to be 42.5% and 1080 kg/m3,
respectively.
Soil (S)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 1, No 4, 2011
© Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing services
Research article ISSN 0976 – 4399
996
The soil available in MNNIT Allahabad Campus was taken and tested as per the
provisions contained in IS: 2720 -1983. The specific gravity of the soil was 2.65. In all
the samples, the fraction finer than 2 was maintained as 11%. Its liquid limit (LL),
plastic limit (PL), and plasticity index (PI) were 30%, 21%, and 9% respectively. The
OMC and MDD were 14.5% and 1780 kg/m³. Its unconfined compressive strength was
0.144 N/mm².
Fly ash (FA)
The fly ash for the present investigation was procured from IFFCO, Phulpur, Allahabad.
The specific gravity of fly ash was 2.08. In all the samples, fraction finer than 2 was
maintained as 7.7%. Its LL, PL, and PI were 15%, 15%, and 0% respectively. The OMC
and MDD were 45% and 800 kg/m3 respectively. The chemical composition of fly ash is
presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Chemical Composition of Fly Ash
Chemical
Composition
% By Weight
Unburnt
Carbon
12.00
SiO2 57.77
Al2O3 23.92
Fe2O3 9.56
TiO2 1.63
CaO 2.24
K2O 0.60
MgO 1.28
Mo2O 0.13
3. Methodology
The modular bricks samples of size 190 mm 90 mm 90 (IS: 12894-2002) were cast
in lab using the lime, soil and FA in ratios of: 15: 5: 80 and 10: 10: 80; 25: 5: 70 and 20:
10: 70; 35: 5: 60 and 30: 10: 60 respectively. Similarly modular bricks made of L and FA
in the ratio of 20: 80, 30: 70 and 40: 60 respectively were cast. The sample was mixed
with sufficient quantity of water to obtain working consistency for moulding. The clean
mould was filled with the lime fly ash and soil mixture without allowing any air bubble.
The surplus mix was removed and top surface was leveled. For the hand moulded bricks
no pressure was applied on the mould. The pressure moulded bricks were prepared by
applying load of 10, 30 and 50 kN, respectively. The moulded brick were allowed to dry
for two days, protecting from direct sun light. The specimens were immersed in water at
room temperature for 24 hours and there after, the specimens were taken out of water.
These samples were cured by moist jute bags for 7 and 28 days. The samples were tested
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 1, No 4, 2011
© Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing services
Research article ISSN 0976 – 4399
997
after 7 and 28 days respectively for compressive strength as per the provisions of IS:
3495 (Part 1)-1992. The water absorption of the bricks was tested as per the provisions
contained in IS: 3495 (Part 2)-1992. Before testing, the frogs and voids of the specimen
were filled up with cement sand mortar (1: 1).
4. Experimental Results
The results of the present investigation are presented in Figures 1 to 3 and compared with
the Indian Standards of clay and fly ash bricks (IS: 1077-19992 and IS: 12894-2002).
Figure 1: 7 Days Compressive Strength of Bricks made of L-S-FA (Soil-0%)
Figure 2: 28 Days Compressive Strength of Bricks made of L-S-FA (Soil-0%)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 1, No 4, 2011
© Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing services
Research article ISSN 0976 – 4399
998
Figure 3: 7 Days Compressive Strength of Bricks made of L-S-FA (Soil-5%)
Figure 4: 28 Days Compressive Strength of Bricks made of L-S-FA (Soil-5%)
Figure 5: 7 Days Compressive Strength of Bricks made of L-S-FA (Soil-10%)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 1, No 4, 2011
© Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing services
Research article ISSN 0976 – 4399
999
Figure 6: 28 Days Compressive Strength of Bricks made of L-S-FA (Soil-10%)
Figure 7: 28 Days Water Absorption of Bricks made of L-S-FA (Soil-0%)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 1, No 4, 2011
© Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing services
Research article ISSN 0976 – 4399
1000
Figure 8: 28 Days Water Absorption of Bricks made of L-S-FA (Soil-5%)
Figure 9: 28 Days Water Absorption of Bricks made of L-S-FA (Soil-10%)
5. Discussion
Figures 1 to 6 show that compressive strength of all type bricks having different ratio of
its constituent increase with pressure. With increase in soil percentage, strength of bricks
go down. A comparison of figures 3 and 4 show that of brick of L: S: FA (35: 5: 60)
follows the class 3.5 designation in respect of strength. In all cases studied, hand moulded
bricks are not suitable for any use; same is the case with the machine moulded bricks at
load of 10 kN. Increase in proportion of lime at constant amount of soil increases the
compressive strength of the bricks. Figure 3 shows that the 7 days strength of bricks
made of L: S: FA (35: 5: 60) at 50 kN of load, gained strength of class 3.5 brick. The 28
days compressive strength of bricks made of L: S: FA (35: 5: 60) at load of 50 kN belong
to class 5. While bricks made of L: S: FA (35: 5: 60) at a load of 30 kN belong to class
3.5. Figure 6 shows that the bricks made of L: S: FA (30: 10: 60) at load of 30 and 50 kN
and L: S: FA (20:10: 70) at load of 50 kN satisfy the class 3.5 designation. However none
of the brick specimen (Fig. 7, 8 and 9) qualifies the water absorption percentage limits as
specified in IS: 1077-1992. Change in soil percentage from 0 to 10 % does not affect the
water absorption capacity significantly. On application of load the gain in strength is
more in case of bricks with large lime proportion. Lime proportion does not influence the
compressive strength of hand moulded bricks. Bricks having L: FA compositions of 30:
70 and 40: 60 satisfy the requirements of class 3.5 and class 5, respectively, when
compressive strength at 28 days is considered as shown in figure 1 and 2. Bricks with L:
FA composition 40: 60 and moulded at 50 kN of load belongs to class 3.5 when
compressive strength at 7 days is considered. Increase in lime content decreases water
absorption capacity of bricks as shown in figure 7, 8 and 9. Brick with L: FA
compositions 40: 60 is the only one satisfying the criteria of water absorption
requirements of IS: 12894-2002.
6. Conclusion
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 1, No 4, 2011
© Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing services
Research article ISSN 0976 – 4399
1001
1. The compressive strength of bricks increases with lime proportion.
2. The bricks made under pressure has increased compressive strength according as
the pressure was applied
3. As long as the percentage between lime and fly ash is unchanged, the change in
soil percentages does not affect compressive strength significantly.
4. Most of the L-S-FA bricks belong to class 3.5 and 5 in respect of strength only. In
respect of water absorption all L-S-FA bricks fail.
5. Only L-FA (40: 60) brick satisfies the criterion of class 3.5 in respect of both
strength and water absorption.
7. References
1. Saibulatov S. (1984), ―Working Properties of Ash Ceramic Materials for
Building Purpose‖, Glass Ceramics, 41(9), pp 407-409.
2. ZHANG Ji-ru and CAO Xing (2002), ―Stabilization of Expansive Soil by
Lime and Fly Ash‖, Journal of Wuhan University of Technology - Materials
Science Edition, 17(4), pp 73-77.
3. V Karthikeyan and M Ponni (2006), ―An Experimental Study of Utilization of
Fly Ash for Manufacturing of Bricks‖, 22nd
National Conference of
Architectural Engineers Trichur.
4. Tuncer B. Edil, M.ASCE; Hector A. Acosta, M.ASCE; and Craig H. Benson,
M.ASCE (2006), ―Stabilizing Soft Fine-Grained Soils with Fly Ash‖, Journal of
Materials in Civil Engineering © ASCE, pp 283-294.
5. Dr. Robert M. Brooks (2009), ―Soil Stabilization with Fly Ash and Rice Husk
Ash‖, International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, 1(3),
pp 209-217.
6. J. N. Akhtar, J. Alam and M. N. Akhtar (2010), ―An Experimental Study on
Fibre Reinforced Fly Ash Based Lime Bricks‖, International Journal of the
Physical Sciences, 5(11), pp 1688-1695.
7. Kolay, P.K., Sii, H. Y. and Taib, S.N.L. (2011), ―Tropical Peat Soil
Stabilization using Class F Pond Ash from Coal Fired Power Plant‖,
International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 3(2), pp 79-83.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 1, No 4, 2011
© Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing services
Research article ISSN 0976 – 4399
1002
8. Om Prakash (1990), ―Utilization of Pulverized (Fertilizer Plant) Fly Ash as
Low-Cost Bricks and Construction Material‖ M. Tech. Thesis Submitted to
MNREC, Allahabad.
9. IS: 6932-1973, Methods of tests for building lime—Specification, Bureau of
Indian Standards, New Delhi.
10. IS: 2720-1983, Methods of tests for Soils—Specification, Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi.
11. IS: 3495 (Part 1 and 2)-1992, Methods of tests of Burnt Clay Building Bricks—
Specification, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
12. IS: 1077-1992, Common Burnt Clay Building Bricks—Specification, Bureau of
Indian Standards, New Delhi.
13. IS: 12894-2002, Pulverized Fuel Ash-Lime Bricks—Specification, Bureau of
Indian Standards, New Delhi.