Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Exploring the Documents
Decide if the situation is a violation or not a violation.
Cite the page and paragraph number from the document(s) to support your decision.
12/19/2008 1DRAFT
Situation 1
Teacher distributed blank graphpaper for students to use during
themathematics assessment.
Not a Violation
Page 7 - Classroom MaterialsAcceptable, paragraph 6
12/19/2008 2DRAFT
Situation 2
Student used a dictionary whiletaking the social studies test.
Violation
Page 7 – Classroom MaterialsNot Acceptable, paragraph 3
12/19/2008 3DRAFT
Situation 3Testing contractor discovered four StudentResponse Booklets with Post-it notes.Handwriting on Post-its didn’t match studentwriting. Teacher identified writing on Post-itsas her own. Changes in answers appearedto be influenced by notes.
Violation
Page 7 – Administration PracticesNot Acceptable, paragraph 1 & 2
12/19/2008 4DRAFT
Situation 4Scribe wrote answers on sheet of paperfor a student with disabilities who canhave a scribe. Student was required tocopy answers into a Student ResponseBooklet as he had done throughout theschool year.
Not a Violation
Page 18-19 – InclusionsUse of Scribes
12/19/2008 5DRAFT
Situation 5Teacher visually scanned student test bookletsat the end of the day to make sure scrap paperwas removed and to see if students hadanswered all questions. He noticed one
studenthad written about plans to commit suicide. Teacher photocopied the student’s entry andtook it to the principal.
Violation
Page 5 – Test SecurityAcceptable, paragraph 512/19/2008 6DRAFT
Situation 6Student began test then left for adoctor’s appointment. Whenstudent returned she was allowed
tocomplete test.
Not a Violation
Page 10 – Administration PracticesNot Acceptable, paragraph 112/19/2008 7DRAFT
Situation 7
General education students hadaccess to two organizationaltemplates (such as 4 Column)
duringassessment.
Violation
Page 7 – Classroom MaterialsNot Acceptable, paragraph 1 & 5
12/19/2008 8DRAFT
Situation 8
A test booklet was lost due to a lack
of security. Materials were stackedin an unlocked classroom for threehours.
Violation
Page 6 – Test SecurityNot Acceptable, paragraph 4
12/19/2008 9DRAFT
Situation 9Teacher kept rough drafts from the previous year’s On-Demand
Writingtest. The drafts may have been
usedto prepare for the current year’stest.
Violation
Page 5 – Test SecurityNot Acceptable, paragraph 1
12/19/2008 10DRAFT
Situation 10Student hospitalized for severelybroken leg (in traction). Homeboundteacher administered the test to thestudent in the hospital.
Not a Violation
Page 5 – Inclusions Summary, paragraph 4
Page 13 – Section 4, part B12/19/2008 11DRAFT
Situation 11Teacher allowed four middle schoolstudents to go to lunch beforefinishing test. Students finished thetest after lunch.
Violation
Page 9 - Administration Practices Acceptable, paragraph 6
12/19/2008 12DRAFT
Situation 12In a testing session, teacher allowedone group of students to completesections A and B of Reading, whileother classes completed only section A of Reading.
Violation
Page 10 – Administration PracticesAcceptable, paragraph 2
12/19/2008 13DRAFT
Situation 13Students had similar answers, but had
notcopied. It was determined that one hadlistened intently as another dictatedanswers to scribe.
Violation
Page 9 – Administration PracticesNot Acceptable, paragraph 1
12/19/2008 14DRAFT
Situation 14Student has a learning disability thatsignificantly impacts her reading ability.
HerIEP states materials may be presented
orally. The guidance counselor had her come to
hisoffice so he can read the test to her.
Not a Violation
Page 9 – Administration PracticesNot Acceptable, paragraph 1
Acceptable, paragraph 1
12/19/2008 15DRAFT
Situation 15A school needs to use multiple scribesand readers with special educationstudents. The school schedules thesescribes and readers to provideaccommodations at the same time in asingle room.
Violation
Page 9 – Administration PracticesNot Acceptable, paragraph 1
12/19/2008 16DRAFT
Situation 16The district has three new students that havebeen identified as needing specificaccommodations to be included in a 504Plan. The ARC immediately develops a plan,close to testing, which will allow thestudents to use the accommodations forinstruction and during testing.
Not a Violation
Page 6 – Inclusions2a, b, c12/19/2008 17DRAFT
Situation 17Due to a shortage of calculators, a
schoolchanges the testing order to provide allstudents the opportunity to usecalculators for the Mathematics sectionsof the KCCT.
Violation
Page 10 – Administration PracticesNot Acceptable, paragraph 2
12/19/2008 18DRAFT
Situation 18A student routinely uses a wordprocessor with word prediction asoutlined in his 504 Plan and uses bothfeatures for KCCT.
Not a Violation
Page 9 – Administration PracticesAcceptable, paragraph 1
Page 6 – Inclusions 2a, b, c
12/19/2008 19DRAFT
Situation 19Documentation of a student’s IEP
isshared with the proctor that will beadministering the state
assessmentto the student.
Not a Violation
Page 9 – Administration PracticesAcceptable, paragraph 1
12/19/2008 20DRAFT
Situation 20A proctor questions student use of apersonal cueing notebook which seems
tobe very content specific. Additionalinvestigation finds that all specialeducation students have the exact
samenotebook.
Violation
Page 22-23 – InclusionsPrompting and Cueing
12/19/2008 21DRAFT
Situation 21
During the testing window, a mobile
depicting the three branches ofgovernment hangs from a
classroomceiling.
Violation
Page 7 – Classroom MaterialsNot Acceptable, paragraph 112/19/2008 22DRAFT
Situation 22Each day teachers visually scanned testbooklets for good faith effort checklists.While scanning teacher made notes
aboutthe content of items students answeredincorrectly.
Violation
Page 5 – Test SecurityNot Acceptable, paragraph 3
12/19/2008 23DRAFT
Situation 23Student was taking the math portionof the KCCT. He used from hisprompting and cueing notebook, acue card with multiple mathematicalformulas and sample problems.
Violation
Page 23-24 of the Inclusions document Use of Prompting and Cueing
12/19/2008 24DRAFT
Situation 24
A student with illegible handwritingwas given a scribe .
Violation
Page 18-19 of the Inclusions document
Use of Scribes
12/19/2008 25DRAFT
Situation 25Five LEP students were purposelyassigned the same form of the testso one interpreter could work withall the students at the same time.
Not a Violation
Page 11 – InclusionsSection C, 1, paragraph 2
12/19/2008 DRAFT 26
