26
Extracting Value from Fat, Oil and Grease (FOG) Waste Tom Curran UCD School of Biosystems Engineering UCD Institute of Food and Health Food Waste Seminar, UCD, June 8, 2015

Extracting Value from Fat, Oil and Grease (FOG) Waste · Extracting Value from Fat, Oil and Grease (FOG) Waste Tom Curran ... GTS Installations & Maintenance Compliance 143 139 154

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Extracting Value from Fat, Oil and Grease (FOG) Waste

Tom Curran UCD School of Biosystems Engineering

UCD Institute of Food and Health

Food Waste Seminar, UCD, June 8, 2015

UCD School of Biosystems Engineering

Project 1:

Critical evaluation of Dublin City Council’s Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) Programme and an investigation of the potential to

implement similar initiatives internationally

Researcher: David Gibbons

Project 2:

Development of a National Strategy for Recovery and Utilisation of Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) from Food Service

Outlets (FSOs)

Researcher: Tom Wallace

Industry Mentor: Michael O’Dwyer, Director, Evolution Environmental Services Ltd.

• FOG is a waste residue from food production

• FOG enters the drainage network in solution when performing washing activities on site

FOG = Fat, Oil & Grease

Increasing Global Urban Population

Image courtesy of myhealthylivingcoach.com

• FOG accumulates and forms a hardened solid in sewer infrastructure - leading to a loss of serviceability in the pipeline

• FOG is a contributing factor in an estimated 50-75% of sewerage blockages

• FOG blockages range from minor to major

The Problem with FOG is….

The Problem with FOG is….

2013 – Kingston • “sewer was almost completely clogged

with over 15 tonnes of fat” • 6 weeks to repair

2014 – Shepherd’s Bush • “fatberg formed under an 80-metre

stretch of Shepherd's Bush Road” • 4 days to clear

2015 – Chelsea • “10 tonne fatberg was so heavy it broke

the sewer pipe” • £400,000 to replace the damaged sewer

London’s ‘Fatberg’ problem

©Thames Water

The Problem with FOG is….

• Raw sewage discharged, killing:

• 112 eels

• 200 sticklebacks

• 1000 bullheads

• Estimated 90% of river

invertebrates

• Cause of the blockage: FOG

• Wessex Water fined £25,500

Source: www.gov.uk

The Ultimate Failure – River Trym, Bristol, 2013

The SOLUTION is….

LICENSING & INSPECTION PROGRAMME

Grease Interceptors

National sizing standard:

– I.S. EN 1825-1&2:2004

Grease Recovery Units

National sizing standard:

– None at present

– US PDI-G101 (widely adapted)

Grease Trap Systems (GTSs)

2008

– Increase in the number of food service outlets (FSOs) in previous years

– More than 1,000 blockages per annum

– FSOs are required to apply for a trade effluent discharge licence

Dublin City Council (DCC) - FOG Control Programme

2015

– Over 2,200 licenced FSOs in DCC

– Approx. 7,000 inspections performed per annum

– Less than 50 blockages per annum

– No major blockage since 2010

Category 1 –

Unacceptable • Premises has no GTS installed

Category 2 –

High Risk

• Premises has undersized/unsuitable GTS installed

• GTS is in poor condition and does not meet the required

maintenance standards

Category 3 –

Medium Risk

• GTS is overdue minimum maintenance requirements - but not

in serious breach of requirements

• FOG disposal records are not available for inspection, incomplete,

or inaccurate

Category 4 –

Low Risk

• GTS is in good condition and all required information is available

and up to date

Simplified guidelines for determining an FSOs FOG Risk Category

Case Study

Pre 2008 End of 2008 2012 Nov 2014

GTS Installations & Maintenance Compliance

Pre 2008 End of 2008 2012 Nov 2014

GTS Installations & Maintenance Compliance

Pre 2008 End of 2008 2012 Nov 2014

GTS Installations & Maintenance Compliance

Pre 2008 Nov 2014

GTS Installations & Maintenance Compliance

Pre 2008 End of 2008 2012 Nov 2014

GTS Installations & Maintenance Compliance

143 139 154 159

21

70

113 127

APPROVED GREASE TRAPS INSTALLED IN FSES IN THE SAMPLE YEARS

No. of FSE Premises No. of Approved GT

40,416

95,797 110,157

129,451 145,768

193,600

END OF 2008 2012 2014

TOTAL QUANTITY (L) OF GTW AND UCO RECOVERED IN THE STUDY AREA DURING THE SAMPLE YEARS

Total Qty GTW Total Qty UCO

FOG Recovery

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

2008 2012 2014

LITR

ES P

ER A

NN

UM

FOG Recovery per Facility Type – Grease Trap Waste

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

2008 2012 2014

LITR

ES P

ER A

NN

UM

FOG Recovery per Facility Type – Used Cooking Oil

Next Phase – Phone based Data Collection

FOG as a Resource

Developing a National FOG Management Strategy

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

@FOGWaste

http://ssu.ie/research/fog

Funding Acknowledgement

Irish Research Council’s Employment Based Postgraduate Programme

Further Information