Extruded Cable Systems for HVDC Transmission - · PDF fileExtruded Cable Systems for HVDC Transmission ... Ø OF-PPLP = impregnated with non-viscous oil ⇒ ... uniform compact layer

HubnetColloquiumStrathclydeUniversity–Glasgow,Scotland(UK)

December7th2016

ExtrudedCableSystemsfor

HVDCTransmissionProf.GiovanniMazzan*

Dept.Electrical,Electronic&Informa5onEngineering“GuglielmoMarconi”AlmaMaterStudiorum-UniversityofBologna,Italy

1

HubnetColloquium-StrathclydeUniversity,Glasgow,Scotland(UK)-December7th2016

Introducingmyself…

1)  MD(1986)andPhDinElectrotechnicalEngineering(1992)atUNIBO

2)  Since1992withDEl-UNIBO.Since2004AssociateProfessorofPowerQualityandHVEngineering.Researchfields:insulaVonaging(lifemodels,SC),RES,EMF

3)  Since2009ConsultantofTERNA(ItalianTSO).HVDCprojects:SAPEI,SACOI, ITA-FRA(Piemont-Savoie),ITA-MON

4)  CoauthorofG.MazzanV,M.Marzino]o,ExtrudedCablesforHighVoltageDirectCurrentTransmission:AdvancesinResearchandDevelopment,PowerEngineeringSeries-Wiley-IEEEPress,2013

5)  Since 2012 Chairman of IEEE DEIS TC “HVDC cable systems (cables, joints &terminaQons)”.Since2015ChairmanofIEEEDEISWG“HVDCcablesystems”fordeveloping IEEE Standard P1732: “Recommended prac5ce for space chargemeasurementsinHVDCextrudedcablesforratedvoltagesupto550kV” 2


3


SUMMARY

1)  FundamentalsofHVDCextrudedcabletransmission[chp.1-2I-B]

2)  Designparameters:HVDCvsHVACcabledesign[chp.3I-B]

3)  MainrealizaVonsworldwide[chp.7I-B]

4





Historyofpowertransmission:fromDCtoACØ  PowerT&DstartedwithDC:

-1879: (T.A.Edison) incandescent lamp+useofdynamo⇒1882,PearlStreetStaVon,NYC(6x100-kW“jumbodynamos”+30kmu.g.cables)

-1882:50-km2-kVDClineMiesbach-MunichinGermany

Ø  From DC to AC (Tesla & WesQnghouse) ⇒ transformers andinducVonmotors⇒ACdominantingeneraQon,T&D,uQlizaQon

Ø  ACsystemvoltageconversionissimple:• transformer (high power and insulaVon, low losses, li]le

maintenance)• 3-φsynchronousgeneratorsuperiortoDCgenerator 5


DisadvantagesofHVACpowertransmissionØ  ACpowertransmissionhasalsodisadvantages,e.g.

1)  NoconnecQonbetweenACsystemswithdifferentfrequencies

2)  Weak connecQon between independent AC systems ⇒ systeminstability(DOMINOEFFECT)orundesirablepowerflow

3)  InducVve & capaciVve elements of OHLs and cables⇒ limits totransmission capacity and distance. Strong limitaVon for HVACcables:inthe40-100kmrange(~70kmat220kV,~40kmat400kV)increasingto50-150kmwithopVmizedreacVvecompensaVon

6


Fig.2.1–Cabletypologiesusedvs.length,powerandvoltage(aQer[7.2.I-B])7


AdvantagesoftransmissionwithHVDCcables(1)1)  lowerlosseswithsamecurrent(conductor≡noskin&proximityeff.,

metallicsheath&armoring≡nolosses,dielectric≅nolosses)2)  higheraverageelectricfield⇒highercableuQlizaQon

8


AdvantagesoftransmissionwithHVDCcables(2)

3)  conductor and insulaVon savings ⇒ HVDC cables cheaper thanHVACcablesforsamepowerraVng⇒lowerp.u.l.linecosts

4)  cable lengths not limited by reacVve power (no reacVvecompensaVonatendstaVonsand/orintermediatepoints)

5)  DC transmission ≡ asynchronous link with ≈ no increase in faultlevel

6)  powerfloweasilyandquicklycontrollable⇒DC linkcan improveACsystemstability

7)  uniqueusageofHVDCcables:subseapowerlinksonlongdistances9


Ø  HVDCtransmissiondisadvantages:AC/DCconvertercosts&losses⇒breakevendistance(BD)≡savingsinlinecostsoffsetconvertercosts

Ø  Total (line + losses) cost ⇒ DC-lesssteepthanAC-curvesdueto•  lower p.u.l. line investment

cost (OHL: narrow ROW &sm a l l t owe r s , 2 v s . 3conductors ; cab les : lowconductor&insulaVoncost,noreacVvecompensaVon)

•  lower capitalized losses cost(noAClosses)

10


ACvs.DCtransmission:economiccomparison

Fig. 2.8 - HVAC vs. HVDC transmission system costs (after [4.2.I-B])

Ø  At500kV:BD≈500kmforOHLs,≈40kmforcables(seeabove)

•  highpowerandvoltageraVngs•  lowlosses•  highreliability•  acceptablecosts•  goodperformances

11


AC/DCconvertersØ  DCtransmissionrequiresAC/DCconverterswith(ideally):

Ø  TwoconvertersmainlyusedforDCtransmission:

•  Line-CommutatedCurrent-SourceConverters(LCC)

•  Self-CommutatedVoltage-SourceConverters(VSC)

12


AC/DCconverters:LCC(1)Ø  Firstdeveloped:LCC(=tradiVonalDCtransmission,HVDCClassicTM)

Fig. 2.11 - LCC with SCR valves arrangement (after [5.2.I-B])

Ø  LCCdevelopment:

1)  MercuryarcrecQfiersinthe1930’s⇒LCCdesignpossible

2)  Silicon Controlled RecQfiers (SCR, or thyristors) in the late1970’s:oil-immersed,parallel/seriesconnecVon

3)  State of the art: air-insulated water-cooled Light-TriggeredThyristors(LTT):highercurrent&voltage,lesscomponentspervalve⇒higherreliability⇒highestpower&voltageraQngs

Ø  Power flow reversal: by reversing voltage polarity⇒ criQcal forHVDCextrudedcableinsulaQon!

13


AC/DCconverters:LCC(2)

14


AC/DCconverters:VSC(1)Ø Morerecent(late1990s)thanLCC,VSC(HVDCLightTM,HVDCPlusTM)

Fig. 2.12 - VSC with IGBT valves arrangement (after [5.2.I-B])

15


AC/DCconverters:VSC(2)

Fig. 2.7 – Operating range for HVDC VSC (after [5.2.I-B])

Ø MaincharacterisVcsofVSC:

•  semiconductors with turn-offcapability:IGBT

•  four-quadrantoperaQon•  highlosses•  powerupto≈1000MW

Ø  Power flow reversal: byreversing current flow⇒ novoltagepolarityreversal⇒okfor HVDC extruded cableinsulaQon!

1)  DisadvantagesofLCC:1)  reacQvepowerdemandfromACnodes2)  injecVonofcurrentandvoltageharmonics⇒capacitorbanksonACside&harmonicfiltersonACandDCside

2)  DisadvantagesofVSC:lessexperience,lowervoltage/powerraVngs

AC/DCconverters:LCCvsVSC

16


Fig. 2.6 – HVDC with VSC (after [5.2.I-B]) Fig. 2.5 – HVDC with LCC (after [5.2.I-B])

17


DevelopmentofLCCandVSCØ  Since VSC-HVDC started (1990s), the increase of voltage &

powerforIGBT-VSChasparalleledthatofSCR-LCCin1970s

Fig. 2.13 – Solid-state converter development (after [5.2.I-B])

(From [LW2013]:MarcoMarelli, “Achievement and experience in service of long lengthHVDC electricallinks by insulated power cables”, LaVnAmericanWorkshop 2013, Foz do Iguaçu – September 6th, 2013.CourtesyofPrysmian)

ACvsDCCableTransmissionSystems

18


1)ground/seaelectrodes2) “metallic return”:MVcable grounded at 1converterstaVon3) midpoint grounded12-pulse conv. + 2 1/2-voltagepoles(nogroundcurrent)

19


HVDCcablelineconfiguraQons:(1)monopolar

Fig.2.11-HVDCconfiguraVonsandoperaVngmodes(axer[5.2.I-B])

Ø Monopolarsystems:simplestandcheapestformoderatepower:2convertersand1HVpoleonly.

Ø  AlternaVvesforreturncurrent:

Ø OperaQngmodes:1)  Normal (balanced)

⇒ 0 g r o u n dcurrent

2) Monopolar groundreturn:1poleoutage3) Opposite pole formetallicreturn:outageof1converter(ateachend pole/converterbypassswitch) 20


HVDCcablelineconfiguraQons:(2)bipolarØ  Bipolarsystems:mostcommon,one12-pulseconverterperpole

andterminal⇒2independentcircuits(1/2capacityeach)Fig.2.11-HVDCconfiguraVonsandoperaVngmodes(axer[5.2.I-B])

Ø  ClassificaQonbasedontheinsulaQontype:

q Oil-paperinsulated-  Mass-ImpregnatedNon-Draining(MIND)-  oilfilled(OF)

o  LowpressureOF(LPOF,SCOF,SCFF)o  HighpressureOF(HPOF)

q Polypropylene-LaminatePaper(PPLP)orPolypropylenePaperLaminate(PPL)

q Gasfilledcables

q Extruded(XLPE,thermoplasQc)21


HVDCcabletypes

Ø Usedinmanylinks,highestvoltages&longestlengths: up to 500-600 kV, 1000 MW in 1cable, depths under sea up to 1640 m,≈unlimitedlengths.Structure:1)  compactstranded/segmentedCu/Alconductor2)  carbon-loadedpaperconductorsemicon3)  InsulaVon(Kraxpapertapesimpregnated

withhigh-viscositymineraloils)4)  carbon-loadedpaperinsulaVonsemicon5)  metallic(leadalloy)sheath6)  thermoplasVcjacket7)  steeltapereinforcement(subseacables)8)  bedding(subseacables)9)  armorofsteelround/flatwires(subseacables)

Ø  Conductortemperature:max.55°C⇒limittocapacity 22


HVDCcabletypes:MIND(1)

Fig.2.16(a)-MINDHVDCdeepwatercableforSAPEIsubsealink(aQer[I-B],courtesyofPrysmian)

23


HVDCcabletypes:Oil-Filled(OF)Ø  InsulaVon: paper + low-viscosity oil. Conductor

with longitudinal duct for oil flow along thecable.Otherlayersare≈sameasabove

Ø Oil-filledcablesokforACandDCvoltages:DCvoltagesupto600kV,greatseadepths

Ø Oil flow along cable⇒ lengths limited to<100km,riskofoilleakageintheenvironment

Ø Oil-filledcablesdividedinto:i)single-coreoilfilled(SCOF)=lowpressureoilii)highpressureoilfilled(HPOF)=cableslaidinapipefilledwithhighpressureoil

Fig.2.16(b)SCOFHVDCcable(aQer[I-B],courtesyof

Prysmian)

24


HVDCcabletypes:PPLPØ  Polypropylene Paper Laminate (PPL or PPLP) =

LappedThinFilmInsulaVon

Ø OF-PPLP = impregnated with non-viscous oil ⇒similartoSCOFcables

Ø MI-PPLP=impregnatedwithviscous(non-draining)oil⇒ similar toMINDcables: ok for long&deepsubsealinks

Ø  Claimedtooperatewithconductorat80-90°Candupto60%higherelectricalstressthanMIND

Ø  Technology under development for DC-cables (KiiChannel,Westernlink:England-Scotland)

Fig.2.16(c)–MI-PPLP

HVDCcable(aQer[I-B],courtesyofPrysmian).

25


Fig.3.4–StructureofHVDCXLPE-insulatedcablesforland(leQ)andsea(right)usagewithVSCconverters

(aQer[I-B],courtesyofABB)

Conductor Copper or aluminium

Conductor Aluminium or Copper

Conductor screen Semi-conductive polymer

Conductor screen Semi-conductive polymer

Insulation Dry cured polymer

Insulation Dry cured polymer

Insulation screen Semi-conductive polymer

Insulation screen Semi-conductive polymer

Swelling tape

Swelling tape Lead alloy sheath

Metallic screen Copper wires

Swelling tape Inner jacket Polyethylene

Aluminium laminate Outer covering Polyethylene

Swelling tape

Tensile armour Galvanized steel wires

Outer covering

Polypropylene yarn

HVDCcabletypes:extruded(1)

26


(a) (b)Fig.2.19–TwotypesofHVDCXLPE-insulatedcable:

(a)landcable(aQer[25.2.I-B]);(b)submarinecable(aQer[I-B],courtesyofPrysmian)

HVDCcabletypes:extruded(2)

Ø  Extrusion:uniformcompact layerofpolymer laidaroundconductorbetween2semiconlayers

Ø  Besttodate:•  tripleextrusionofinsulaQonthickness+inner&outersemicons•  X-linkingof insulaVon (if needed,XLPE): dryenvironment (N2) +

DCP X-linking agent⇒ X-linking by-products that store SC⇒degassing--->thisaxernoon

Ø  TripleExtrusionLine:1)  conductorentersTripleExtrusionCrossHead2)  output:insulatedconductor⇒entersX-linkingpipe,catenaryor

verVcal≡highp&T,longenoughforthermo-chemicalX-linking3)  finishedcablecoreviaconVnuousproducVon 27


HVDCextrudedinsulaQontechnology:extrusion

Ø  ExtrudedXLPEinsulaVonadvantagesvs.oil-papercables:•  lowercosts•  easier(faster,cheaper)joinQng•  environmentalcompaQbility(nooilleakage)•  conductortemperature>MINDcables:

o  HVACXLPE:conductortemperature=90°C(service),250°C(shortcircuit)o  HVDCXLPEconductortemperature=70°C(Hokkaido-Honshulink90°C)

Ø  ExtrudedXLPEinsulaVondisadvantagesvs.oil-papercables:•  weakpoints(defects)--->thisaxernoon•  suffers space charges (SC) and polarity reversals ---> this

axernoon•  lessserviceexperience&lowervoltages--->thisaxernoon

28


Extrudedvs.oil-paperDCcables:pros&cons

29



2)  Designparameters:HVDCvsHVACcabledesign[chp.3 I-B]


30


DesignofACcables:(1)thermaldesign

θc=designconductortemperature[known]θa=ambienttemperature[known]Pd=dielectriclosses[notofmainsignificance,preliminaryevaluaVonfromU0,Eave]γ=addiVonallossesinmetalliclayers(screen,armors)Ti=thermalresistancesofcablelayers(T1,T2,T3)+environment(T4).Mainrole:T4[known]Rca=ACelectricalresistanceofconductoratdesigntemperature∝1/conductorX-secVon⇒conductorX-secQon⇒conductorradiusri

P=3U0Iaccosϕ

(5.3ac)

(5.5ac)

Ø Maindesignparameter=maximumtransmissionacQvepowerP

Ø U0=Un/√3=ratedφ-to-groundvoltageofcablesystem⇒Iac=ampacityofunipolarcable⇒thermaldesignaxerIEC60287,seeeq.(5.3ac):

Ø U0+conductorradiusri⇒electricaldesign⇒insulaQonthicknessfromACelectricfield

)])(1([)()(

321

321

TTTRTTTPI

ca

dacac +γ++

++β−θ−θ=

31


DesignofACcables:(2)electricaldesign

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛=

i

oAC

rr

r

UrE

ln)( 0

(3.1)

EAC(r)=ACelectricfieldatradiusrU0=designvoltage(AC:φ-to-ground)[known]ri=insulaVoninnerradius[known]r=genericradiuswithininsulaVonro=insulaVonouterradiusEMAX=maximumfieldEMIN=minimumfieldØ  fieldprofile•  EMAXalwaysatconductor-insulaQon•  EMINalwaysatinsulaQon-screen

Fig.3.5–ElectricfieldinACcableinsulaVon:“Laplace”,or“capaciVve”,or“ε-dependent”field(axer[I-B])

Ø  ACvoltagewithstandproperQesofinsulaQon⇒EMAX⇒outerinsulaQonradiusro⇒insulaQonthicknessd=ro-ri

32


DesignofACcables:≈completedØ  Known:

•  conductorradiusfromthermaldesign•  insulaQonthicknessfromelectricaldesign

Ø  Thesetwodesigns≈donotinteractwitheachother⇒needed

onlyarefinedevaluaVonofampacityfrom:

•  refinedevaluaVonofdielectriclosses•  “finetuning”ofcablelayers(screen/sheath,jacket,etc.)•  deeperstudyofenvironment(route,soil,etc.)

Ø  Ampacityupdated

Ø  ACcabledesigncompleted

33


DesignofDCcables:(1)samestarQngpoint…

θc=designconductortemperatureθa=ambienttemperatureTi=thermalresistancesofcablelayers(T1,T2,T3)+environment(T4).Mainrole:T4[known]Rdc=DCelectricalresistanceofconductoratdesigntemperature∝1/conductorX-secVon⇒conductorX-secQon⇒conductorradiusri

P=2U0Idc(bipolarsystem)

(5.3)

(5.5)

Ø Maindesignparameter=maximumtransmissionpowerP

Ø  1stchoice(non-trivial≡inv.costs,losses,etc.):ratedpole-to-groundvoltageU0⇒Idc=ampacityofpolecable⇒preliminarythermaldesignaxerIEC60287,seeeq.(5.3):

)()(

4321 TTTTRI

dc

acdc +++

θ−θ=

Ø U0+conductorradiusri⇒electricaldesign⇒inprinciple,insulaQonthicknessfromDCfield.Problem:DCfieldofcablesdiffersbymuchfromACfield!

34


DesignofDCcables(2):…butmanydifferences!Ø Maindifference:Maxwell’sequaVons⇒

1)  DCelectricfieldEDCaffectedbyelectricalconducQvityσofinsulaVon,affectedinturnbytemperatureandfield⇒EDCdependsoninsulaQontemperaturedropΔT(∝conductorlossesWc∝cablecurrent∝load)⇒fieldprofileinversionbetweenmin.andmax.loadpossible⇒designfield/insulaQonthicknessforoneloadcondiVon(e.g.zero)notokforanother(e.g.maximum)

2)  ampacityaffectsEDC⇒selecVonofvoltage,ampacity(losses),field,insulaQonthicknessinherentlyinterlinked

Ø 2nddifference:EDCinsteady-stateisnotthesameasintransients

Ø 3rddifference:Maxwell’sequaQons⇒spacecharge(SC)altersEDC---->thisaxernoon

35


Noloadvsunder-loadcondiVonsinHVDC:1)  cableenergizedatzeroload⇒temperaturedropacrossinsulaVon

ΔT=0⇒EDC“quasi-Laplacian”or“quasi-capaciVve”(≈geometricalvariaVononly,similartoEACinFig.3.5)

2)  cableenergizedunderagivenload⇒equilibriumvalueofΔT≠0:

ElectricfieldofDCcablesinsteady-state(1)

)]()(exp[),( 000 EEbTTaET −+−=σσ (3.10)

])/)((exp[),( 000γσσ EETTaET −=

σ(T,E) = σ0 exp(-Ga/kBT) sinh(cE)/E

(3.11)

(3.12)

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛

πλ=−=Δ

i

o

T

Coi r

rWrTrTT ln2

)()(

⇒“Poissonian”EDCdependsonΔTviaσ.

Experimentalexpressionsforσvs.EandTinDC-XLPE:

(3.14)

Mostused

36


Ø Maxwelleqns.inS.S.+(3.10)+simplifyinghypotheses⇒Eoll’sformula:

(3.29)

[inversioncoefficient]

(3.27)

⎥⎥⎦

⎤

⎢⎢⎣

⎡⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛−

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛

=

−

δ

δ

δ

o

io

o

rrr

rrU

rE

1

)(

1

0

( )

( )

( )

( )io

o

io

o

io

io

o

io

o

dT

c

rrbU

rrbU

rrTa

rrbU

rrbUaW

−+

−+

Δ

=

−+

−+

πλ=δ

1

)/ln(

1

2 ,

Ø  (3.29)vs.(3.1)⇒steadyDCfieldfarmorecomplexthanACfield

Ø  From(3.29),(3.27)steadyDCfielddependsnotonTbutonΔTonly⇒onJoulelossesintheconductorWC

ElectricfieldofDCcablesinsteady-state(2)

ElectricfieldofDCcables:steadyfieldprofiles

37


Reference“standard”cable:U0=450kV,1600mm2Cuconductor,ri=23.2mm,ro=42.4mm,ρ0=1x1016ΩmatT0=293K,E0~0kV/mm,a=0.11/°C,b=0.03mm/kV.Underload,inversioncoefficientδ>1fortemperaturedropΔT=10,15,20°C⇒fieldinversion!!

Fig.3.9(b)–SteadyDCfieldprofilesunderno-loadfor“standardcable”using(3.29)(aQer[I-B])

Fig.3.16(b)-SteadyDCfieldprofilesunderloadvs.ΔTfor“standardcable”using(3.29).Inversioncoefficientδ>1⇒fieldinversionoccurs(aQer[I-B])

38

Combinedelectro-thermallifemodel:loadcyclesØ  [GMDC]:24-hloadcyclestd,givendependenceI(≡load current)=f(t), t∈[0,td] ⇒cumul.damageMiner’slawforDCcableinsulaVonatradiusr:

LFDC(r)=loss-of-life fraction within td KDC(r)=number of “cycles-to-failure”

1)()()()(0

==∫ rLFrKrdLFrK DCDC

t

DCDC

d

( ) ( )[ ] )(/1,,,/)()(00

rKtrTtrELdtrdLFrLF DC

t

DC

t

DCDC

dd

=∫∫ ==

Ø DCcablelifefromKDC,min=minimumnumberof“cycles-to-failure”KDC(r)withininsulaVon:

( ) ( ) ( ) )41.6(),('exp)(/),())(),,(( ),('00

0 trTBrEtrEtTtrE trTbnDCt

ET −= −−αα

]}[),(min{ ,min, oiDCdDCdDC rrrrKtKtL ∈×=×=

0 5 10 15 20 2520

22

24

26

28

30

Time of the daily cycle [h]

Elec

tric

field

[kV/

mm

]

inner insulation surface25% insulation thickness50% insulation thickness75% insulation thicknessouter insulation surface

Inner insul. 25% insul. 50% insul. 75% insul. Outer insul.0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Loss

-of-l

ife fr

actio

n [%

]

ZL period (120 days)HL periods (80 days)LC periods (160 days)

Loss-of-lifefracVonsfor360-kV,2000mm2Al,20mmDC-XLPEcableinLC,HL,ZLperiodsandwhole360daysofPQtestsatsame5locaVons(axer[GMDC])

T

E


39




3)  MainrealizaQonsworldwide[chp.7I-B]

40


(From[LW2013].CourtesyofPrysmian)

Ø  ExponenQalincreaseofHVDCcablemarket!Ø  Paper-oilcablesruledunQl2000,thenextrudedcablestookoff!

HVDCcablemarket

41


41

Table7.1–MainHVDCextrudedcablesystemsinserviceworldwide(aQer[I-B])MainrealizaQonsworldwide(end2012)

Project Customer Country Sea/land Year Length(km) U0(kV) Power(MW) Cond.(mm2)

Hokkaido-Honshu EPDC Japan Sea 2012 44 ±250 600 600

East-WestInterc. EirGrid Ireland-Wales Land 2012 75 ±200 500 -

East-WestInterc. EirGrid Ireland-Wales Sea 2012 186 ±200 500 -

Valhall BP Norway Sea 2011 292 150 78 -

BorWin1 Transpower Germany Sea 2011 243.3 ±150 400 1200

BorWin1 Transpower Germany Sea 2011 22.6 ±150 400 1600

BorWin1 Transpower Germany Land 2011 155.3 ±150 400 2300

TransBay CaliforniaTSO USA Sea 2010 160 ±200 400 1100

TransBay CaliforniaTSO USA Land 2010 10 ±200 400 1100

Estlink NordicEnergyLink Estonia-Finland Sea 2006 150 ±150 350 1000

Estlink NordicEnergyLink Estonia-Finland Land 2006 62 ±150 350 2000

Troll-A Statoil Norway Sea 2004 284 ±80 2x41 300

Cross-Sound Transenergie-US USA Sea 2002 83.2 ±150 330 1300

Murraylink Transenergie-US Australia Land 2002 223.2 ±150 220 1200

Murraylink Transenergie-US Australia Land 2002 136.8 ±150 220 1400

DirectLink Transenergie-US Australia Land 1999 390 ±84 3x60 630

GotLight GotlandEnergy Sweden Land 1998 140 ±80 50 340

42


SummaryofmainrealizaQonsworldwide(end2012)

Totalinstalledlengthofsubmarinecables(km) 1237

Totalinstalledlengthoflandcables(km) 1119

Grandtotalofinstalledlengthofcables(km) 2356

43


TransBayProject(commissioned2010):thesubmarinecable

Fig. 5.11 - Trans Bay cable design (after [I-B], courtesy of Prysmian)

Ø  ±200kV,400MW,∼2x83km,SanFranciscoBay(USA),commissioned2010(firstextruded200kV-DCattheVme).Cablestructure:

44


TransBayProject:thecablesystem

Fig. 7.16 - Cross Section of HVDC Cable for the Trans Bay Cable Project (after [I-B], courtesy of Prysmian)

Ø  ±200kV,400MW,1100mm2Cuconductor,VSCMMC

45


TransBayProject:thecableroute

Fig. 7.13 – The Trans Bay Project route

(after [I-B], courtesy of Prysmian).

Fig. 1.4(a) – Sketch of cable interconnections of the Trans Bay Cable Project (after [I-B], courtesy of Prysmian).

46


Example,TransBayProject:layingacQviQesFig.7.15–Facili*esusedforthelayingac5vi5esoftheTransBayCableinSanFranciscoBay,USA:b)turntableaboardtheshipGiulioVerne(after [I-B], courtesyofPrysmian)d)Hydroplow(after [I-B], courtesyofPrysmian)

Ø  ±250kV,600MW,commissionedattheendof2012.Mainfeatures:

47


SubmarinecableforHokkaido–HonshuinterQe(commis.2012)

Fig.7.17.±250kV,600MWHokkaido–Honshuinter5e,Japan:(a)route;(b)powercable(aQer[I-B],courtesyofElectricPower

DevelopmentCo.Ltd.&J-PowerSystemsCorpora5on)

•  Max.conductorT=90°C•  okforpolarityreversal

•  DC-XLPEcompound(PolarizedinorganicnanofillersforsuppressingSC,keepingel.resisVvityhighathighT,improveDCbreakdownstrength)

•  SuccessfullypassedqualificaVonaxerCIGRÉ219

•  lightningimpulsewithstand±750kV,withsuperimposedDCvoltage±530kV

(UDC=250kV)∓

48


RecentlyinserviceorongoingHVDCextr.cablesys.projectsTable7.2.a-HVDCLightTMextrudedcablesystems(aQer[22.7.I-B],courtesyofABB)

(from[PryRL],courtesyofPrysmian)

49


GermanNorthSeaOffshoreWindFarmProjects


50


InterconnecQonSpain-France320kVDC«INELFE»


(From[LW2013].CourtesyofPrysmian) 51


UK:EastWestInterconnector

52


UK:NemoLinkØ  “NemoLink”:

•  1st400-kVratedXLPE-insulatedHVDCcablesystem•  Bipolarlink,1000-MWratedpower

Ø  Cablecontractor:JPS,contractawardedin2015,overallprojectvalue≈500M€

Ø  Cableroute:•  betweenRichboroughEnergyParkinKent(UK)andZeebrugge(Belgium)•  130-kmsubsea•  11.5-kmland

53


UK:WesternLinkØ  HVDCWesternLinkbetweenScotlandandEngland:

•  HVDCbi-polarcablelink•  MI-PPLPcableinsulaVon

Ø  Cablecontractor:Prysmian,contractawardedin2012,overallcablesystemvalue≈800M€(highestattheVme)

Ø  Cableroute:•  400km,mostlysubmarine•  ShortlandsecVoninScotland•  LongerlandsecVoninEngland-Wales

[I-B]G.MazzanV,M.Marzino]o,ExtrudedCablesforHighVoltageDirectCurrentTransmission:AdvancesinResearchandDevelopment,PowerEngineeringSeries-Wiley-IEEEPress,2013.[4.2.I-B]HighVoltageDirectCurrenttransmission:proventechnologyforpowerexchange,SiemensAG–PowerTransmissionandDistribuVon:HighVoltageDivision,Erlangen,Germany,2003.[5.2.I-B]M.P.Bahrman,B.K.Johnson,“TheABCsofHVDCtransmissiontechnologies”,IEEEPowerandEnergyMagazine,Vol.5,N.2,pp.32-44,March-April2007.[7.2.I-B]A.Orini,M.Marelli,E.Zaccone,“IcollegamenVincavoHVDC:statodell’arteeprospe�vefuture”,AEITWorkshop-HVDCTransmission:Technology,StateoftheArtandPracVcalExperiences,Rome(Italy),November27th2008(inItalian).[10.2.I-B]M.Jeroense,“HVDC,thenextgeneraVonoftransmission.Highlightswithfocusonextrudedcablesystems”,Proc.2008InternaVonalSymposiumonElectricalInsulaVngMaterials(ISEIM2008),pp.10-15,Yokkaichi,Japan,Sept.7th-11th2008.[LW2013]M.Marelli,“AchievementandexperienceinserviceoflonglengthHVDCelectricallinksbyinsulatedpowercables”,LaVnAmericanWorkshop2013,FozdoIguaçu–September6th,2013.[25.2.I-B]R.N.Hampton,“SomeoftheconsideraVonsformaterialsoperaVngunderhigh-voltage,direct-currentstresses”,IEEEElectricalInsula5onMagazine,Vol.24,No.1,pp.5-13,Jan.-Feb.2008.[22.7.I-B]DolWin2–900MWHVDCLighttransmissionTheworld’slargestwindpowergridconnecVon,ABBABGridSystems–HVDC,POW-0075rev.0.[PryRL]Reference_List_HVDC_2016_03_17_rev_01.pdf[GMDC]G.MazzanV,“LifeesVmaVonofHVDCcablesundertheVme-varyingelectro-thermalstressassociatedwithloadcycles”,IEEETrans.PowerDelivery,Vol.30,N.2,pp.931–939,Apr.2015[NEMO]h]p://www.jpowers.co.jp/pr/150608/150608e.pdf. 54


REFERENCES

55


THANKYOUFORYOURATTENTION!

Documents

Extruded Cable Systems for HVDC Transmission - · PDF fileExtruded Cable Systems for HVDC Transmission ... Ø OF-PPLP = impregnated with non-viscous oil ⇒ ... uniform compact layer