Upload
others
View
13
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
) \ Lq r$l
l
I
ORIGINAL: English
COUNTRY/NOTF: NIGERIA Proiect Name: FCT CDTIPROJECT
Approval vear: 1998 Launching ILear: 1998
Reportins Period (Month/Year): JANUARY -DECEMBER 2005
(circteon.) t 13 4 t-C[s s toProiect vear of this report:
bmitted: FEBRUARY 2006Date su NGDO partner: CBM
ANNUAL PROJECT TECHNICAL REPORTSUBMITTED TO
TECHNICAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE (TCC)
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION:
To APOC Management by 31 January for March TCC meeting
To APOC Management by 3l July for September TCC meeting
AFRICAN PROGRAMME FORONCHOCERCTASTS CONTROL (APOC)
; )-*' i'
i ,r, il
!
I
"" $-th[],$t,
'{'}F'?'t
L,.r l\ ,'
Irr6hl,' f5l i
,,,, |*;l' i:' t' *'l' : l,-'.. . . .,If\-1 1 rt- i,r -- -tt t^,i,! r r
I /'llr :B pl,lt-
- .-t.+,
t' .-,1 '.
{-
ktt( ,-1 (.u\ \ "l{t r/n(
"LA h*rlto*ul1*1
,'l-n/h/-,
,4&tllv'l
t{,tAt'
,t l,*lo4;t'"
,!u,"-WIIO/n P()('. 2.1 November 200.1
(L I
Yl"
/t- tlcclbT4
ry"q
)tt altfot
I
ANN TIAL I'IiOJEC'['TE(JI IN ICAI, Ii.E,P0II'I'TO
fEcI INICAL ('oNsul-'l'n-l'lvlr ('oMN,{l',i' I'lllt ( l'('c')
trNDO[RStrh4EI\T
Pleasc confirm you hitve rc:td tliis rellort by siglling ilr the
appropriatc spzlcc.
OI"F ICIIIS to sigrr thc re;lot't:
N IGETIIA/LEBIi,I{IA
Nlttitlltal Coordil',atol' Nlntc: I)r
\, runtryo
'fi
rtaIttt'c
I)atc f).^ )-tr-c(
Zotral ()ncito Coord i t-r,. |oi' Nttitr..:: ill" l:t.l '{Nlll
S igttxttttrc
I)atc: .I b
'l'his rcpoft lias bectr prcplticd lly Ntrnrc'. ilf ulluttt 'lltltut !)ul I tt
sis
I)t'signal.itril
Si:ltltlLtt r
I )ittc
l! r r tj t ft$ t t, !,t' *fi t rt I t t t'
/ / l(,i;zittu:,'iz/af torL
\t, I i{ ) \l}( )( -r6',11'11 1111'1',1 ,]r),)lt
Table of contents
ACROIYYMS............... """""""v
DEFrNrrroNs......... """""""' vr
FOLLOW t]P ON TCC RECOMMEI\IDATIONS .......1
EXECUTTVE ST]MMARY ........2
SECTION 1: BACKGROUI\D INFORMATION...."""" """""""'4l.l. GBuenal INFoRMATIoN
1. 1.1 Description of tlrc project (briefly).....-...-
1.1.2. PartnershiP1.2. Poput-arrox
SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION OF CDTI........ """""""""""8.................... 82.1. TttuBr-wp oF ACTIvITIES ........-.
2.2. AovocacY ... l02.3. MOSTLZATION, SENSITZATION AND HEALTH EDUCATION OF AT RISK COMMI.JNITIES
ENNON! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.
2.4. CounauunY INvoLvEMENT.......'....2.5. CapecruY BUILDING
2.6. TRsarrrleNrs................2.6.1. Treatmentfigures...................2.6.2 What are the causes of absenteeism? --...-.----
2.6.3 What are the reasons for refusalsz ..'.............
2.6.4 Briefly describe all krnwn andverifud serious adverse events (SAEI) that....
2.6.5. Trend of treatment achievemenlfrom CDTI project irrception to the current year
How was the feedback used to improve tle overall pedonnonce of tlrc pmiect?
Enor! Bookmark not deftned
'20
2t2.7 - ORDERING, sroRAGE AND DELIVERY oF IvERMECTIN
2.8. CoutvruNny SELF-MONTTORTNG AND STAKEHOLDERS MeBrrNC ...........22
2.g. SuprnvtstoN """""""'222.g.1. Provide aflow chart of supervision hierarchy. ..Enor! Bookmarh not deftned
2.g.2. What weri the main issues ifuntified during supervision? .....Efior! Bookmark
not defined2.g.3. Was a supervision checHist used? ...Enor! Bookmark not deftned
2.g.4. What were the outcomes at eoch level of CDTI implementation supervision?
Enor! Bookmarh not deJined2.g.5. Wasfeedback given to tlrc person or groups supervised? Etor! Bookmark not
deJined2.9.6.
SECTION 3: SIJPPORT TO CDTI
3.1.3.2.3.3.3.4.
EeurpupNrFnqeNCIAI CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE PARTNERS AND COMMI.,NITIES........
Olupn FORMS OF COMMI.]NITY SUPPORT
E>oeNotruRE PER ACTIvITY ..........
23
23252525
SECTION 4: SUSTAINABILITY OF CDTI.. """"""'264-1. tNrenNAI-; INDEPENDENT PARTICIPATORY MONITOnTC; EvaI-UATION-..... ..............26
4.1.1 Was Monitoring/evaluation carried out during the reporting period? (tick aryof thefollowingwhich are applicable) ...........- """"26
lll WHO/APOC, 24 November 2fi)4
......Error! Bookmark not defined4
7
4.1.2. What were the recommendations?
4.1.3. How have they been implemented? """""""4.2. SuSTRNaSILITY oF PRoJECTS: PLAN AND SET TARGETS (MANDATORY AT""""""""Yn 3) ..
4.2.14.2.2
Planning at all relevont levels
Funds........4.2.3 Transport (replacement and maintenance)
4.2.4. Otherresources...4.2.5.
Bookmarh not defined4.4. OpENAUONAL RESEARCH..
4.3. INrecReuoN .'............."ERRoR! BooxrumxNorDEFINED'4.3.1. Ivermectin delivery mechanisms -.....0nor! Boohmark not deftned
4.3.2. Training.... ..Efior! Bookmark not deJined
4.3.3. Joint supervision and monitoringwith other programs--. Enor! Bookmark not
deJined4.3.4. Release offundsfor project activities................Error! Bookmark not deJined
4.3.5. Is CDTI irrcluded tnine pUC budget? ...............Error! Boohmarh not defined.
4.3.6. Describe other heatth progrommes that are using the CDTI structure and lnw
this was achieved. What have bienttrc achievements? .....Enor! Bookmark nol deftned
4.3.7. Describe others issues considered in the integration of CDTI. Enor!
............. EnnoR! BooKMARK Nor DEFII\IED-
4.4.1. Summarize in not more than orc half of apage tlrc operdional rcsearch
undertaken in the proiect area within the reporting period.."""""' Enot! Bookmark not
dejined4.4.2. How were the resulrs applied in the project? .....Enor! Bookmarh not deftned
SECTION 5: STRENGTHS, WEAKIYESSES, CHALLENGES' AI\DOPPORTTJNITIES....... .....ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.
SECTION 6: LMQUE FEATT RES OF TIIE PROJECT/OTHER MATTERS.------....30
IV WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
Acronyms
APOC
ATOATrOCBO
CDD
CDTICSM
LGAMOHNGDO
NGO
NOTF
PHC
REMO
SAE
SHM
TCC
TOT
UNICEF
UTG
wHo
African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control
Annual Treatnent Obj ective
Annual Training Objective
Com munity-Based Organization
Community-Directed Dishibutor
Community-Directed Treatment with Ivermectin
Community Self-Monitoring
Local Government Area
Ministry of Health
Non-Governmental Development Organization
Non-Governmental Organization
National Onchocerciasis Task Force
Primary health care
Rapid Epidemiological Mapping of Onchocerciasis
Severe adverse event
Stakeholders meeting
Technical Consultative Committee (APOC scientific advisory goup)
Trainer of trainers
United Nations Children's Fund
Ultimate Treatment Goal
World Health Organization
v WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
Definitions(i) Total population: the total population living in mesolhyper-endemic communities
within the project area (based on REMO and census taking).
(ii) Eligible population: calculated as 84%o of the total population in mesoftryper-
endemic communities in the project area.
(iii) Annual Treatment Objective: (ATO): the estimated number of persons living in
meso/hyper-endemic areas that a CDTI project intends to treat with ivermectin in a
given year.
(iv) Ultimate Treatment Goal (UTG): calculated as the maximum number of people to
be treated annually in meso/tryper endemic areas within the project area,
ultimately to be reached when the project has reached full geographic coverage
(normally the project should be expected to reach the UTG at tt e end of the 3d
year ofthe project).
(v) Therapeutic coverage: number of people heated in a given year over the total
population (this should be expressed as a percentage)-
(vi) Geographical coverage: number of communities treated in a given year over the
total ntrmber of meso/hyper-endemic communities as identified by REMO in the
project area (this should be expressed as a percentage)-
(vii) lntegration: delivering additional health interventions (i.e. vitamin A supplements,
albendazole for I-F, screening for cataract, etc.) through CDTI (using the same
systems, training, supervision and personnel) in order to maximise cost-
effectiveness and empower communities to solve more of their health problems.
This does not include activities or interventions carried otrt by community
distributors outside of CDTI.
(viii)
(ix)
Sustainability: CDTI activities in an area are sustainable when they continue to
function effectively for the foreseeable future, with high treaffnent coverage'
integrated into the available healthcare service, with strong community ownership,
using resources mobilised by the community and the government.
Communiff self-monitorine (CSM): The p(rcess by which the community isempowered to oversee and monitor the performance of CDTI (or any community-based health intervention programme), with a view to ensuring that the programme
is being executed in the way intended. It encourages the community to take fullresponsibility of ivermectin distribution and make appropriate modifications when
necessary.
vl WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
FOLLOW UP Oil TGG REGOTTE]IDATIOIIS
Using the table below, fill in the recommendations of the last TCC on the project and describe
how they have been addressed.
TCC session 19
I
Number ofRecommendationin the Report
TCCRECOMMENDATIONS
ACNONS TAKENBY THE PROJECT
FORTCC/APOC MGTASE ONLY
I Project to performoperational research on
incentive options for CDDS
So far we areconsulting withNOCP and
Sociologist to drawup aproposal forthisstudy
2 Assess Onchocerciasisendemicity in FCT satellite
communities.
A research group willbe submitting aproposal to determinethe transmissionpotential in the FCTsatellite communitiessoon.
J Continue !o increasenumber of CDDs
We plan onincreasing thenumber of CDDs as
part of our trainingproposal to APOC
4 Train MOH staffat alllevels on management of
SAEs
Already we have aplan to conducttraining and retraining of all theworkers in theprogramme.
5 Strive to reduce the numberof refusals and absentees
The project isworking hard atsensitizing thecommunity membersto comply withtreatment and forCDDs to be morecommitted to theirduties of getting thecommunity memberstreated.
6 Integrate program activitiesinto PHC and into other
health programs for the sake
of sustainability.
Yes there is alreadyemphasis on this as
conscious effort to re-train all the PHC staffon CDTI and usingthis level effectively.
7 Submit 3 year post APOCsustainability plan to APOC
management as soon as
The project hadsubmitted this
WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
possible. proposal on twooccasions, but have
been recentlyintimated that such
has not been found.We are re-submittingit again to APOC.
l0 No expenditures were
described for the availableAPOC tunds.
It was an oversight.The table presented
was meant for APOCand CBM and notMOH.
Executive Summa4Y
The Federal capital territory GCT) was created from the gerographical centre of Nigeria to
serve as the new capital of the Nation. The area occupies about 8, 000 sqkm and divided into
6 administrative Area councils.
prior to the creation of Abuja as the new Federal Capital Territory in 1976 the whole area was
infested with black flies vector of Onchocerca SPP.
The results of Rapid Epidemiological mapping of Onchocerciasis (REMO) Conducted in 1995
in the area demostrated hyperendemicity.
Mectizan distribution was started in 1995 in collaboration with christofell Blinden Mission
(CBM), an NGDO supporting Onchocerciasis control in FCT A total of 56, 083 people were
treated in 178 endemic communities during the period.
African programme for Onchocerciasis control programme (APOC) approved proposal sent
by FCT in 1998 for 5 -years support (1995-2002). The FCT has assumed full responsibility
oisustaining the programme by providing the enabling enviroment. Under APOC support, the
treatment coverage has increased from 56,083 to 234,895 and from 178 to 559 endemic
communities.
Training was conducted in a targeted manner for all categories of staff involved in the
programme. The local Oncho control Team (LOCT) identified priority needs of the personal
it tfie first line Health Facility (FLHF) and the community Directed Distributors (CDD) who
were trained. A total of 860 programme workers were trained.
Health Education and Mobilization was also carried out in the communities in a targeted
manner. Advocacy visit to politically electoral Chairmen of the Area councils was also carried
out to solicit for support.
2 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
capital Equipment and counterpart funds provided by FCThry been of tremendous assistance
to it "
COff project in the implementation of the scheduled activities. FCT has released 5
million last year and again 5 million this current year 2005'
During the year under review, the project has treated 261, 728 people in 559 communities'
thus achiev ing r7%.Therapeutic and I 00% Geographical coverage' s.
Major challenges remained the population explosion of the satetlite and urban centres as well
u, ior*opolitan nature of the residents. This issue is addressed in the sustainability plan.
3 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
SEGTTON {: Background informdion
1.1. General inf,ormation
1.1.1 Description of the project (briefly)Geograp hical location, topography, clirMetheieteral Capital Terriiof lies-in the centre of Nigeria, just north of the hot and humid
low lands of the Niger/Benul Trough, but south of the drier areas to the north. It lies north
of the wide alluvial plains formed by the confluence of the Niger and Benue Rilers- The
Jama'a Platfornu a continuation of the Jos Plateau, extends well into the middle of the FCT'
It comprises 8,000 square kilometers. Four major rivers flow through the area, all of them
flowing roughiy from north to south, and draining into the River Niger. The rivers often
now siitt/tfriough rocky gorges, providing an ideal habitat for the Simulium fly. The
FCT itself ;onsists of a tilted plain, rising from an elevation of 300 fe€t in the south-west' to
above 2,000 feet at the North-East corner. Rising out of this plain are numerous rocky
outcrops and inselbergs. The predominant vegetation type is park savannah. River banks are
typicaily heavily foreited wiitr tatt trees and thickets, and there are occasional patches ofrain forest r*t"r"d throughout the FCT. Rainfall averages l622mm annually- The rainy
s&ason begins in April and ends in mid October. The dry season lasts from late October to
March.
Pop ulotion: activities, cultures, lang utgeBefore the construction of Abuja the capital city, the estimated population of the area
comprising the FCT was about j00,000. With the construction, populations have exploded
in ait thJ settlements. The indigenous ethnic groups in the FCT include the Gbagi,
Gwandar4 Gade, Koro, Ganagana, Bassa, tgbirr4 Fulani and Hausa. With the influx ofpeople into the capital tenitory almost all major ethnic groups have representatives in the
tommunities. Therefore, most settlements are muhi-ethnic, and many are multi-lingual.
Most rural communities depend on farming andlar pastoralism. Other occupations include
farming, fishing and pastoralism. Traditionally many crafts are practiced, including iron
smelting, pottet making, etc. Setlements may be either nucleated or dispersed. There are
also numerous nomadii Fulani settlements, which may be either seasonal or semi-
permanent.
C o mm unic dio n sy stem (road.. )There is a good network of roads leading to the major towns, particularly Area Council
headquarters. In the past few years there have been considerable improvement in road
construction, and some communities with poor road network have had their access roads
improved considerably. However, some roads to the smaller settlements are at best
rudimentary. A few of these rmds are not accessible during the rainy season.
There is a multiplicity of channels of communication. The most commonly used in
governmental circles is through the traditional political and community leaders, council of
"tO".r, religious leaders, youth and social groups. Town criers are often used at the
community level to communicate information to the public. Radio (and TV where
available) is also effective.
A dministrot io n str ucl ur eThe FCT is treated as one of the Federal Minishies, under the coordination and supervision
of a Minister appointed by the President and ratified by the National assembly. The Minister
is assisted by Directors who oversee different departments. The FCT is divided into six
administrative areas (Area Councils), under the leadership of an elected Chairman.
4 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
Health system & health care delivery @rovide the number of health posts/centers in theproject area if the information is available).R Frimary Health Care System is in place within the project are4 although the level offunctionality differs from place to place. This system of health care services ensures
community participation as the mainstay with the support of the local govemment/area
council. In this regard, some health care activities have been hansferred to local
govemmenVarea councils for adequate sustainability.
Table l: Number of health staffinvolved in CDTI @lease add more rows f necessary)
District/LGA
Numbcr of hcrlth strff involvcd in CDTI rctivitics
Totrl Numbcr ofhcrhh strfr in thccntirc project rrcr
Br
Numbcr of hcrlthstefr involvcd in
CDTI
B,
Pcrccntegc
B3=B2l 81 *lfi)
AMAC 50 25 50o/o
ABAJI 30 25 83%
BWARI 35 25 7lo/o
KWALI 37 25 680/o
KUJE 45 25 68%
GWAGWALADA 46 25 62%
Total237 150 630/"
1.1.2. PartnershipIndicale lhe parlners involved in project implementation at all levels (MoH, NGDOs -nat io nal, inter notio nal)The FCT project is a partnership involving APOC, NOCB CBM, State Government, the
Area Councils, and the endemic communities.
Describe overall worhing relationship omong partnerc, clearly indicating specilic oreas ofproject activitics @lnnntng, supervision, advococlt, planning, mobilizfiion, etc) where allpartnerc are involvedAPOC provides financial and logistic assistance, and conducts monitoring/evaluation of the
project activities. NOCP coordinates the control efforts and provides guidelines. It also
supervises and monitors implementation of programme activities, advocates for support and
provides technical assistance through the Zonal Office. The State and Local Governments
through the SOCT and LOCTs conduct training of all levels of personnel involved inprogramme implernentation, collects and deliver mectizan to endemic communities, collects
and collates reports/data on CDTI, mobilization and health education of communities, and
supervision/monitoring of CDTI activities. The community selects its distributors, decides
on mode and period of distribution, and provides support for dnrg dishibution, census
update, and recording and reporting of treafinent activities. The assisting NGDO - CBM -assists in advocacy, provides technical assistance and logistic support. It also assists inprovision of tEC materials and funds for various CDTI activities.
5 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2fi)4
Overall relationship among partners has been cordial.
State plans tf any to mobilize the state/region/district/LGA decision-makers, NGDOs'
NGOs, CBOs, to assist in CDTI implementation.As a routine SOCTs and LOCTs Carry out advocacy visits to policy makers at State and
Area Council level before the commencement of the dishibution exercise. This becomes all
the more necessary in view of the fact that elections into the area councils are expected to
hold by March 2004 andnew policy makers will be in place-
6 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
+6lo-oooz+c.l
Uo0.4o
(.)o'a*<o(l)
(HoC)
otro.q)
'o(nPv,L0.)
)a.(l)
(t)
F
CJbI)GI
Lo
tr
ooC)
6o
cntrooCO
Bo)tr(l)
E()bo(o
t<o
trooF()o
ootr0
C)LCg
o>.+i
I
I
I
I
I
I
g'I*do)9k0)
oI
I
I
I
c.. I(I)lol
-O a'TE(o
G)l-ql;l(t!l9tdlrla9=(,tsE8=L Erati oo-Hi(#4 ...e3EEEEa>dzH*
ozI
.l(D
'ooLC)ahI)trir,ogot<o)
bI)tr!:)Eo)troEo(D'al<p.G)tL
€t)
(r)
(l)o(€U)cl
sq)'6.\\Io'
q)\
q)q)
BfF1
F*5I
uI
s(,)sa-}<-$q).a\o
:q)'6rL\q)
sFo
$bo
s)
()
$Lboosoo
\q)
Us!s
6
q)'$
q)
s):\()BIq).o
a)B
dIsq)
a.o
=I
ts)Ls)$bq)
s
s\J
\q)
$\
s)"a
PG
q)
*\q)
I()t\b
v1:oT\q)L
-N
.ooLc)o.o0trEoo(l)Lll)
o0trL
Eor<oEG)
CgoL(l)Ld>.o)!liC)
o)EBGI(l)tc(Jq)
oLaq)tr
q)G)
trJ4U)kGI
oc,
&oA€GI(n(1)
EFtroUc.irorl
-oldtFI
Eo
tflE-3coE
6{I
=
\
t-
dtro
()E
(_)
o(t)(*
(o(.)lidoC)'a3ro.c)P
o(d
aoo.o9
o3(ca(l)L()
(Ho
C6
L.o
t<oo>tdo)rro(t)
ci(l)t<d
OOo=l
O
F-
ooiOo\(\l
()t-DgEs ooo-
oo€ €to
O
oOOo-c.l\t
st:f\oodca
+Oc.t!+(\^l+
r*c.lr:o=t
€r-c.t
o\=F-o\N
+
ilb
.oitr-(l)o.= ANd!.r9\ El
F AEtrtr r-oo€
o\tl.-o\clr-
66
ll<l\ood(a)
+O
Oc{-t:e.l+
c-c.lcro$
€F-6
. ..8 Ei'=e a&E.E;;>iE o () 1E 6 E.E
o
o
oEoCll
aop.{
C)'EcE:E e
?oEo E'=gsio o O
\o c.l o\F-
\o€ \ot-
o\loiA
I
a)a-,
ctN8.eEE
-tr6ooF.
+
I
r)\oOC.l o\t-
\oa \or-
o\larfJ
.eEE'F9eE: Ei!carg>r(DFtr-o N
oCA
O O
Eatt(DaI6l
Ino
o()otoE
z ;tET: Eo E'=
$si o o o
t'-c.lr-O$
@
F-
o\tt'-o\6lt-
€oo
**\o€ *
or)
oc.lqo.l<f
':869rL-s-
? i E.E.! 3g e'F Eti: c
rq
v=V
&
H
H
J
(,
o
rlFoF
E rEcJ El o)
E;'g*.= '- o. c) OLrr-i .<t 9 ctrr ri .!
5:iQ
ca
SEGTIOII 2: tmPlementation of GDTI
2.1. Timeline of activities
Insert Plan of action indicating activities by month, which were implemented'
SAI Activities Time ImplementedI J' 2005
2 Review January 2005
3 February 2005
4 Mectizan February 2005
5 of PHC Staff February 2005
6 Mobilization February - March 2005
7 of CDDs - March 2005
8 Census U March - 2005
9 Mectizan Distribution April - May 2005
10 May - June 2005
1l Treatrnents June 2005
t2 collection & Collation June 2005
l3 Feedback Workshop 2005
8 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
Advocacy
Monitoring & Supervision
+(\o
-oq)
oz+c.l
(.)
o
o\
T,
6)
oILo)5L
trI
.!laxq)q)(n6loq
o
cl
q)
6lq4)cl
c)u6l
6)
oL0);ar)q)
I
6l
(l)
clc)
o)o6l(l)
FiI
-:.ABqhq)()s)
?
Lq)L
EBq)U)Sq)
gt.r((t(;)>.tr(D
Eo(l)
trE(l)(BG)tr9(Ado)Lcl(l)
l<.oV)(I)
o(llqioo
C)trF".iro)l
-oldtt-l
troq,
Loqa
tro
E6EEU
(l)g ()
tro) (l)
trotr=
(l)tr=
.E',eftrGt=T\H ct
=a>.CO RI
2clz
clz
>.(6
z
Eo
ELt)
UI
La
Eo
'c5EEQ
(g
zcla
(d
zcl
>.Gt cl
a
a0_E+IPtr6=aa o La Lo *<o t-A k&
(l)iGIEItrlD\aur,
(l)(J
Eo
a6EEO
l<0.
l-o. L0.
t<o.r<o. L&
.i'e1|.E6=a;a
oLdz
tokdz
oLc,gz
-qoLGt
zoLdz
ol<$
o3.E
GIli
Fr
Eo
=E*oEEQ
oLd
E<)t<dz
.Eok(!tol-<(n
2oLct
ot<GI
A
.Ht.t!. Eld=aE
tr(o
LIC)
frr
t-clLs(l)
trr
Lclt-3(l)t\
>.trRt
t-I(l)14
Lcl
.oc;)t!
La{
L-o(l)tL
vuD-o)E.E6l=Ni
-atrooET C'a
tro-9:a6EEo()
tic,5t<-oo)t\
L6Lp(u
tJr
hGI
LIo)
frr
LGt
t-so)tri
>rkclL-oq)f!
hd
=Lpo
frr
Enottr6=
Ld
trGI
l-
kct5tr(g
l-
hd
=g(€l-
r,(B
=c(€
l-
Lcltrc,
r.GI
trC(l
I{c)L
.2a
O
zl-
o&
o
J
vHi-
v
AFl
B(,
Bo
Fl
Fot'{
State the number of poticy/decision mokerc mobilized at each relevant level during the
current year; tie- ,i^o^ for the sensitizltion and outcomc' Descrtbe
dilliculfie;/constraints beingfaced and suggestions on how to improve advocacy'
At the State level the Hon. Minister, Permanent Secretary, Director Health Service, Deputy
Director Public Health, Director of Finance were sensitized. At the LGA level the Hon'
Chairmen, Council Secretaries, Council Treasures (CT), HODs Chieftaincy Affairs, and
HODs Health of the six area councils were sensitized. This was done to ensure political
commitment to the programme, release of counterpart funds, and logistic support' With the
advocacy and sensitLatlon approval was secured for the released of funds. This was followed
up with ihe actuat releases aiCouncil levels. To achieve this there was need for repeated visits
and fottow up as politicians could be very diflicult to deal with.
2.3. tobilizdion, scnsitizati.rn ard healllr Gducatiorl of at riskGlommunitiea
Provide information on :
The use of media and/or other local systems to disseminde informalion
FCT being the seat of the federal government as well as the HQs of most companies it isdifficult to utilize the mass media without adequate funding. The project therefore could not
make use of the mass media for mobilization and health education of, communities, as it is
expensive. The traditional systems employed for mobilization include:
Direct contact with the community members.
Use of town criersServices of information unit of LGA/Area Councils with vehicles mounted with public
address system.Utilization of the departnent of chieftaincy affairs of LGA/Area Councils to mobilize
officially community leaders and opinion leaders who then mobilized their communities.
Mobiliztfion and heahh education of women and minorities - method and response
The FCT being inhabited by peooni from diverse cultural and religious backgrounds which
provides the Jnabling "nri**ent for easy mix of men and women when the occasion
iemands. During treatttr education and mobilization women do not find it difficult toparticipate with ihe men and to make contibutions. There are however families that are
Muslims who do not allow their women to freely mix. For such families a female health
worker is usually assigned to health educate and mobilize them. As a result of womert
participation **, "ori*unities
have female CDDs who had been found to honest and
io-.itt"d to the work. However, women do not participate in the decision-making apparatus
of the communities. Most decision-making meetings take place at an elder's forum at the
chiefls palace. Women are conspicuously absent at such palace meetings. It is at such
meetings that community decisions on time and mode of treatment are usually taken.
Response of target communitiestTillogesfne Uenefiiof tiking Mectizan in previous years has made communities to respond positively
to health education messages and created a high demand for the drug. However, most
communities are still reluctant in supporting CDDs.
2.2 AdvocacY
Accomplishmerds
l0 WHOiAPOC, 24 November 2004
All communities have been health educated and mobilized. They have accepted CDTI as theirown although there are problems of giving incentives to CDDs.
ll'ea k nes s e s/C o nst r ai ntsThe FCT is a commercial center and seat of power of govemment. Several things are
monetized, and people expect benefits in monetary terms. Communities ane being encouraged
to do what they can for their CDDs. There is however need for gleater interaction with the
communities.
Suggest wuys to improve mobilization of the target communities.At the moment the communities in FCT require general mobilization and sensitization. Thiswill be useful to discuss compliance, community participation and support to the programme.
rherorrowinswavsy",;Hff '"J,li'f, 3'ffi lH#it*rHffi f,ff ::.T#'il:"lna"-i"
communities.o Mobilizing the entire communities at the villageso Talking to the people in the churches and mosques.
: i*:"'il: i:flffiil';Ti#:,'H"HI*unity Serr Monitoring(csM)
l1 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
c.t
Oc.lLq)
-o0)
ztf,c.t
OE
o
c.l
o(t)(l)
o(t)U)
c)
rn
U)oP
trooaoF
troCdr).otCdao)(6
o€d(to
o(l)
o
o
o0
o0
-o
bI)
atro
C)
l-
COo
hCT
o)
o)t)
A)
tq.)
aq)U)v,(J
€Oo
q)sq)
B?)a)
U).3F{t\a\)q)*i3u)Oo
a)q)
b
S()q){S'k\)€q)
q)
s,q)
B.s
(3A\t3q) \)trss)':.s3-9l'SaQtEs3sS'Ess-$.sEEs.s$.:ooErn
o.EooLao.(!
-4..9P
.2q)
.9
s*<
ooBs;'F 0-)
s€IEAEql>SE$.='ss(!-{ell(B
.E^'ts
=os=Sov>qJc$
iE -q
:''.t:olE3sSEgos,Sa'co.$c\5bs$E..qotreo
O Elets-o9SHE\tso(Jr
od.E IJl-9Ed
5eEErBtaEb0
ZF
il I',.iid'
IEOc
I
IFr
so \oo\F-
o\ \o.+
\oo\ o\ s€
FE
=.9 c
i EEEZ?, c.I + <t c t- t
n(J
o
E
z
FE+teIo
FN
CoFr o,o + + c.) o
GTt--
Eq
9oCOE;d
(\ c.lo\ O(\ +
c-l e.lt
FE
aA(J
cl2
a.l +€ $o\oo\
F-o{@
a\t-la
t->oo?bo ^-6=
>o)oo€EoEEE9otr
e=
=oze
oll *EEE
tr
oo0qt
I
r e O O O c
FE
Eae r?'E z .2r;3 iEEE+Zeeo o o o o
Fq
d.E.i Etr'==c-59:.?E E€.5 o
c.) \o \o€ o\r-oc.l \o
r--o\rara
IJ
aca
a
ra
=v
r4Dv
F1
F.oF
-\svaU)q)()p
%:LPo
tq)
riq)
e-v
FoQ()n€Lo.=EtrLOO '.=
o'6-LLd
)tu)-()E.EJ5EEEEo-C' :.st.olt -ol. (lll
NFI
+c-l
C)!ooz+c.l
O
{o
aa
9e og;c!o.tr 6O. r-EEo. bI)*;cl+(t) hE(:-i 0r
epEL
N.E-8Etroo+g .*;(B F>,# HEs o,i-..'(r) t (D
PF(J cEEr.-aF ai)B/\qE HO€ oet(DEb0 E <r.t.v
Ia^OOO
E E H":E.x ki.as5- SHEGoeYslrE; :iaET :.E EE <S ts
-.9.-ct?-a,
E hE sY^Po)H '{ >r.!
$ $Eis H $Eqa.9 s€:!n &.H;FE s"7E.si s aEF; E€!S-*LP'i ( ci €.e=6
Sq-
S; E* ;: g E E-XS€ se *E*s Bii : E: - x s.- bo
8.3 3 H..E "ae'- t s'.= .,
iE; SEE
sgE$3:
2.5. GapaciQr building
The project intend to train within the year 8 SOCTs, 3l LOCTs, 150 PHC staff and 720
CDDs. At the close, the project was able to train 8 SOCTs ,24LOCTs 120 PHC staffand720 CDDs.
t4 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2003
oGIr-
ra(.)\o
GI\o
O
o.
+
o\
-----l
cll I
t.:qv
f .ie,v
a.l
aqo\
o\o.
oclr-
tra)
EIt)q)
o
s
F-o\
o. +
Eq)
ct
oa(.)
oq,)
!
zI
I
I
I
6ll v
L9 =
S.ra<v
c .iev
tra)
q)
€)
C)
\o
oOq)
.EaGfrt- [rerl-i6oq).o
r- Glc.h
z Q?F
eal
ocl
t
c.l
c.l
c..l
a-l
c.l
c.l
c.t
c.l
a.t
c.l
Ua
S.
E.t+F-u' ...l
a.l
GT
EoE(D
e)
I
s
oo
c.l a.l c.loa-.1
oa.l c.t
(D
=6dlg;!soqle3E>-ZE
o() Qofr
t-
t.I
r-
+
a.l
+
L)
E53
+.A<
it
.+
a.l
6l
?a
\o
6loo
()I$eo(D
Eo
oq)EE
z I?F
Fl
t{ot-,i
aa)Ea)
€)
<,
s
\a6
(Jrl(,
oo
C)Jz
atsra
o
H
J
t
oIJ]pv
5
54
C.l
o-oEooz<tc.l
OoA
la)
l'r
Iah(l)
LLq)
E6lotrcil
q)
o
tEgll
xo)ooe!()q
o)
clLoc)B
Oo(l)E6L
olt)Lo
GILLo)
bo
a
e
to
p
sI
*$o
€
7
a
B
F
-\v1v)q)()q)
aa1oq)
-E
q)
vq)
sEodtro)E(l)
o
FoU(Ho(n
o(l)
(l)t<
.c)HH
'ooe6bI)
trclF,iiro,l
-olcllFI
I
I
Table 6: Type of training undertaken(Tick the boxei where spectfic training was carried out during the reporting period)
Any other comments
2.6. Treatm,ents
Total Population 297, 491
Number Treated 261,728Mectizan Used 733,474Coverage 88%o
Total communities - 559Number of communities Treated - 559
Geographical Coverage- 100%
Trainees
Typeof training CDDs
OtherCommunitymembers e.g
Communitysupervisors
HealthWorkers(frontlinehealthfacilities)
MOHstafforOther
PoliticalLeaders Others(speci$)
Programmanagement
{
How toconductHealtheducation
{ ./ ./
ManagementofSAEs
./
CSM ./ {SHM ./ ./Datacollection
./ ./ {
Data analysis ./ ./
Reportwriting
./ {
Others(specifo)
l6 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2003
+c.lLo
-oC)
z+c-.1
O
4{>r1
r=
$"qlLql
I!t
Ea.B
$q)Oo
\9EF*
U-) ltvqrrd\o3hi68(l)'5
9's\f x.I€isE 3:'E.sS
u6.=l!EETH S3.93Si
€EE(1)ciEiP:o.sqtFE S
^sFy,SUI .S 'FaiHr\.8.E s sg\\\H a, Eq,E E SS
ot 9 F 'Itsol * \J q!;13 : Ex-l
o -: Bi
cIB s Ei()l o. .x t\Er S \S.Hl H $ S'::IE b Sl'il E S ISEIE E S*Zlt- I is.= cY
5a Sgs €\.l ss,, _! *.8E i*qr- lo_r EtE SE= s.st-6
Y ! \rE E E$-c s ela.3 s s*!, E tsFrrttSP s pFS \ SE
(dgc!
E(l)'g
3o.r< o)c!d€9()d(l).='a^LV
9r!rd
=-o.!v
-td q6oP-.=oCE4AAtrdF6
=o)oe.98A)ts ot E(1) ol =E -l EI "l 8il Et :F sl€
3r &3 8l;lE #lE IlggI.g, tIE tIBol-
=l e o)lE
=I E EIH EI b
EIE EI E EI€r*l 'j r*l i ql Pol ir. ol tr ol -ulo rl5 rl'-813 3l tr -8lEqq qE qEzli zli zl<
al0)lorlcllLI6)l>lololdl()l-clolcll
s(ul
.5trldtol9l
(1)I9IdlLIcll
,qlacl9l
=lolEIol:l€l.cl5lEIol
rI.I
-\(rBcaU)q)()q)
.\w2
oT\po
.xGq)
6q)
SJZ.t)kGIqtdoLcl
(€tr
(,-]otr(t)
E>.sorq
aEc(d(l)tr(Bc)LFr'-tarl
-olcllFI
(l)dL()o0!d^9EoC)
oF
o)#6L(l)bI)((lko)
ooG!.9G
.c 9t-do0o(l)o
o)clk(l)o0dLoooC) /:\
E5(I)q(okc)
F
e BEEe a o <l a -'Ag a Bo;E eEH*EH3;
>ooOE
#HEc)Ao
vobg!EEga.az<o o o O O o
E_ 3;
EaEEEo\rro\N
t-\oc-\o
\oC.l.+ o\
Otr
\o\o
c-6lo\
troI(!
=oo
c
&h
o5o,ooodFbooEOF t-€ o\a \o€ 6
6 a €6
tr€
a
o ---EEgEbs= o€z
e.le.l
F-F-
+6
\o\o
\oo
*CN
+t
e.l
o\r-c.)
$\o€c?)
€c.lr-\o(..l
Eo? 6.2lEoE H.SI<86 +
c.)$€\o
(\o<f\o
(\oo\oce
c.lo\@
t
€++\o$o(.It
c.t\oa.l\o\oc.l
a
.9 ,3E " EHBF €:o:oEu - E€E tsEF
F-F-€€
F-c.lF-o!f
sf<t\o6ca
*o
oNt(\<l
€t-ta
o\sF.-o\e{
<t, Ic)lood
;oEtrtroU
ooltra=d
a6\
6
EF!dEbDaEi e(,
Oo o oO
oo o O
a
E.c .--.= [i 9.3 E SHE E= O,tr>€AOq
c.) \o@ \o
oe.t o\
Fr\or-
o\r)
A
Eo? 6.>,EAxE8 m \oa \o c.t o\r- \or-
o\
>9.,3q o= x ooE c EH
3 E$E.;^. 3E E Eco \o€ \o
oN o\
F..\or-
o\r)
.E<L.lt;q E,
mo
rI]
v=V
oJo
JFoF
il
I
2.6.2 What are the causes of absenteeism?
Temporary relocation by farmers to virgin areas
Movement back to schools"Travel outside the community during distribution
Employment in the citY
2.6.4
N/A
In case the project did not have any cases of serious adverse events (SAE) during this
reporting period, please tick in the box.
No SAE case to rePort
I
I
I
2.6.3 What are the reasons for refusals?
The number of people refusing to take the drugs is almost non existing, but what
we have at the moment is absenteeism due mainly farming activities population
movement and lack of CDD motivation.
Briefly describe all known and verified serious adverse events (SAEs) that
occuried during the reporting period and provide (in table 8) the required
information when available.
l8 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
I
$
(\Lc)-oEq)
oz*e..l
Uoo.
o\
q)
a,s)
Lq)
.a
r.-qJv)*
(\qV)q)$ISvj:
Pa
tq)juq)
U!ot<(l)ro0trEoo.C)rr(l)
eo0trl<
EE()LL
oooI(o
0rq
a(n
tro)
o)(l)U)Lrc.)
!RIa
otrot)+ro(,o(n(nU<iirol-ol(tlFI
0)
;86tak
-EE b<.E E
2a" on(lqPtr'9.E6Ssoo
gtrd.{ 6.=1J.,1 () ()
oo.2E^9E.9 9p
5h.DID-rlr
I
-i H-GtI
9'oq-qqD ^! u'u'i. .= 0)()-q tr&96
ht I
-
;6L;;()-6 o.a -3O E E;e L L.-60a9OE,Ee
llDi,T-
)
I
((
I
o=o>V AEP
= E cd':idESC
I-(l.:(E
)DD
dNoOz
€-999E gEE
II
-a
o.
:ratrE;Xc)jy r
aY o)
a h- 3
oc)b0E
-il>o
0)I
()6
H
dNo6)
z
IC)a()bo
*4a
->
c)bora Gl ^F Us
/o(J
\oo\F-+
-o6\r)@
\oo\r-
\o6\o\F-
-oo\\o€\oo\+o\
\oo\€o\
\oo\o o\
troGI
go
p<
llr
Ei r.l
E]
o_oo9 g.;F O6\4',>!-o
I
1Oo\€r--oo\oo\
1Qo\o\€
\oo\€o\
-oo\\o€1Qo\+o\
yOo\@o\
\oo
\o
o
Ill r-r-i ri
rIl
o\
a'5o500o6gEoo.EqF
\oo\\ora)
\oo\t-c-
\o6\r-t-
\oo\ra)6
\oo\€
-oo\r-€\oo\\oa
\oc-€
s€€
f-l
t.oo(€.oOE4-EEz*'o g
o\C'
t*
o\F-o.t\o
o\\or-tr
o\s
c.l
o\€+oc.r
F-c.t
-i+c.l
o\\o€-+c.l
o\<t
\o(\
Ti
Ua? 5.2IE65ga
ooqOlal
ooqoa
ooo^oocl
oao
c.l
ooo^Oracl
ooqdra)N
oqoc.l
ooqo1r)(\
ooo-ora)(\
_: ilHgE€€EN' d. 39o c-q
r-+aoc.l
tatsoc.l(\
ocidIoc.tcl
6rrl(\\oco(\
6ra)(\.dc.l
\o(\OF-c.t
ra)lr)cliat€(\
ora)alo\c.l
o\+r-o\c.l
c)o0d
q()
tr
E
(,)
all rrd El
r.l
o-boH ES<\>J-o
oo\oo
\oo\o
-oo\oo\oo\oO
o\oo\ooo
o\ooo\oo
o\oo
.co-aoo=E= E::'tt i-Ho gc,iE()orrl
1Oo\oo\oo\oo
\oo\oo\oo\oO
\oo\ooo\oo
\oo\oo\oo\oo
-oo\o
rd
qoO.E ts*g
=-sgE E= o;E-arrz3- O
c'l+@$t
cosf$o\latra
o\ra)ra)
o\ralr/)
o\hral
o\lr,r
o\la)r)
r-1
*a? 6.22EATE8 o
o.l*€s €
$so\lr)
o\ra)lar
o\ralr.)
o\ratrat
o\ratra)
o\ralrat
ood
= ,Bq>Ho
f ts€ *FEE E€ EdT E
6 EIEAooo(\s
€*+€++
o\lalrr)
o\rn o\ta)ra
o\ra)ra)
o\ratral
o\hlal
&trl
r-o\o\
€o\o\
o\o\o\
c.l
o(\
c.loc.l
c.t
Oe.l
+oOe.l
Oc.l
\oOa.t
r-N
6Oet
o\
(\ e.l
+Oc..l!o-oc)
oz+a.l-1
op.
:\tTr
C\t
,;
.9:s-Icllc)q)ul)6lLooc)
Its)=c
^EIt' '-b*o!9IE.s 'E
$ELGrE8Se: 'S qr)iE TL -- tr
c)-e3;oodlE€N.Zv -{:.3 cl o)592Ecl{<trLrlocJlc)(l)l .El
vtEil.gelo.=tta,iItrLEIr-{(DlH9tatlQbl(Hl
EHIrr(Dl: il i,i'iEt I9el e6gt E.e 9t 'a6-6t LI &.sr!e:96La. a lri8fotsEt-rrEclD9a vEEEE(l):Otr€)Iii-!g<Ecl
'(l)qJViA'E
.L\0 -=ci o\l o,(l)l 0t=l GlHeFl Fr
2.7. Ordering, storage and dclivery of ivcrmectin
Mectizan@ ordered/applied for by - Qtlease tick the appropriate answer)
./uon tr Btro uflcnrNGDOOther (please speciff)
Mectizan@ delivered by - Qtlease tick the appropriate answer)
MOH tr WHOtr T]NICEFtr {NcoCOther (please specifu)
Please describe how Mectizan@ is ordered and how it gets to the communities
Information generated from census update by the CDDs is used to estimate the number of
Mectizan tablets that would be needed for the next treaffnent cycle. This information is made
available to CBM by the FCT team who applies to Merck, Sharpe & Dohme (MSD)' Once the
drug is made availa-ble through the NOTF itore to CBM, the FCT Team is contacted to fetch
thei requirements. The SOCT on collection requests the LOCTs to pick up their
consignments for their respective area councils. The LOCTs present the consignments to the
Area Council Chairmen tosignal the commencement of the distribution exercise. The LOCTs
asks the FLHF staff to pick irp their drug needg and these make the tablets required for the
communities to the CDDs.
Table l0: Mectizan@ Inventory (Please add more rows if necessary)
Sfate activities under tvermectin delivery lhat are being carried out by heolth care
personnel in the proiect areuThe Health Care Personnel uses the data generated by CDDs through Census update to
apply for Ivermectin based on the population figures-
The health staffs collect the supply of Ivermectin from the appropriate point, (the State
from CBM, the Area Council stafffrom the State and the Health facility staffcollects from
Area Council).The health staffalso store Mectizartfor safety at all levels.
Mectizan inventory are also kept by health Staffat all levels for record purposes and
ensure accountability. Monitoring and supervision /Health Education at community level.
State/District/LGANumbcrin stock
Rcqucstcd Rcccivcd Uscd Used/Pcrsontrcetcd
Lost Westcd Erpircd Rcmeining
AMAC 0 250,000 203,000 2r1239 77122
ABAJI 0 97,000 106,000 101840 36 166
BWARI 0 I10,000 106,000 103,744 35 140
KWALI 0 100,000106,000
106,339 37 902
KUJE 0 I14,000 132,000 123,265 44534
GWAGWALADA 0 98,000 90,000 87047 30 864
TOTAL 770,fl)O 743,4m 733474 261 728
2l WHO/APOC, 24 November 2fi)4
Number of tablets
- Any other comment
2.8. GommuniQT self-monitoring and $takeholdenr illeeting
Has any training (of trainerc)for community self-monitoring been done in the proiect
area?No training has been done, but we are requesting that APOC fund this activity to enable us
introduce the concePt in 2006.
Table 1l: Community self-monitoring and Stakeholders Meeting (Add rows if needed)
Describe how the results of the community self- monitoring and stakeholders meetings have
affected project implementation or how they would be utilized during the next treatment
cycle.
2.9. Supervision2.7 .l Provide a flow chart of su hierarchy
1.8.1 What were the main issues identified during supervision.
Issues identified in the process of supervision include:
District/ LGA Total # of communitieVvillagesin the entire project area
No of Communities thatcarried out self
monitoring (CSM)
No of Communities thatconducted stakeholders
meeting (SIIfvD
rln00flI
TOTAL N--
DD/PH
COORDINATOR
SOCTs
LOCTs
DHS
FLHF STAFF
CDDs/Comm unities
22 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
. Poor record keeping
' Lack of logistics at lower level
' Non support of CDDs by communities
. Low involvement of FLHF staff
' Delay in funds release to LOCTs
. Lack of documentation of supervisory visits
. Few health staffhanding several PHC activities
SEGTION 3: Support to GDTI
3.{. Equipmert
Table 12: Status of equipment (Please add more rows if necessary)
*Condition of the equipment (F:Functional, CNFR:currently non-functional but repairable,
WO:Written off;.
IIow does the project intend to maintain and replace existing equipment and othermaterials?
Funds have been set aside for the maintenance of vehicles motorcycles from the counterpart
funds made available by the Government. It is expected that this will continue. The project
will be requesting APOC management to replace existing transport and other capital
equipment.
For other materials the assisting NGDO is willing to assist, and efforts will be made to get
other groups to support. Meanwhile efforts will continue to get government to fund the
replacement of these materials when necessary.
Describe the adequncy of available hnowledgeable manpower at all levels.
Source
Type ofequipment
APOC MOH DISTRICT/LGA
NGDO Others
No Condrtion No Condition No. Condition No. Condition No. Condition
l. Vehicle I F I CNFR2. Motor cycle(s) 20 CNFR 5 wo 3 F
3. Computer(s) 1 CNFR4. Printer(s) I CNFR5. Photocopier (s) I F
6. Fax Machine(s)7. Othersa) Generator I F
b) Television I CNFRc) Video I wo
23 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
Manpower though few compared to overall population of FCT are adequate for CDTI
implementation if all that are trained will be committed.
Where frequent transfers of trained staff occur, state what project is doing or intends to
do to ."."dy the situation' (the most important issues is what measures were taken to
ensure adequite CDTI implementation where not enough knowledgeable manpower was
available or staffoften transferred during the course of the campaign)-
Efforts are made to train new staff whenever transfers occur. But the transfers can be quite
rapid, and sometimes there are delays in re-orienting the new ones. The solutions in the near
future is to consider the training of all PHC workers which could be expensive.
24 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
Contributor
Ye* I ('provde theperiod')
Yerr 2 ('provde thepernd')
Ycat 3 ('provide theperiod')
TOTALAMOUNT
(cASH)Budgeted
(us$)
TOTALCASH
Released(us$)
TOTALAMOUNT
(cASH)Budgeted
(us$)
TOTALCASH
Released(us$)
TOTALAMOUNT
(cASH)Budgeted
(US$)
TOTALCASH
Released(us$)
MOH (Central + ProvinciaUstate) 50,000.00 0 5s,000.00 50,000.00 s5,000.00 50,000.00
MOH @istrict/LGA) 31,000.00 8,000.00 3s,000.00 t 2,000.00 36,000.00 14,000.00
Local NGDO(s) ( if any)
NGDO partner(s) 34,000.00 I1,000.00 20,000.00 10,000.00 35,000.00 21,000.00
Others
a)
b)
APOC Trust Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 84,000.00 19.000.00 l 10, 000.00 72,000.00 126,000.00 85,000.00
3.2. FINA}[CIAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF TIIE PARTIYERS AND COMMT'NITMS
Table 13: Financial contributions by all partners for the last three years
If there are problems with release of counterpart funds, how were they addressed?
Before the current administration headed by Matlam El- Rufai, release ofcounterpart fund was a big problem, but with continuous advocacy and
sensitization, budgetary allocation has been considered yearly for the project
for CDTI and Blindness Prevention Programme of the FCT. This is a
welcome development and is highly commendable.
3,3. ()ther forms of community support
- Describe (indicate forms of in-kind contributions of communities if any)
Different communities have one form of support or the other which can be considered
relative to the people of the area.
3.4. Expenditurc pcr activitY
- Indicate in table 14,the amount expended during the reporting period for each activity
listed. Write the amount expended in US dollars using the current United Nations
exchange rateto local currency. lndicate exchange rate used here
25 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
Expenditure($ us)
Source(s) offunding
Drug delivery from NOTF HQ area to central collection point ofcommunity
Mobilization and health education of communities
Training of CDDs
Training of health staffat all levels
Supervising CDDs and distribution
Internal monitoring of CDTI activities
Advocacy visits to health and political authorities
IEC materials
Summary (reporting) forms for treatment
Vehicles/ Motorcycles/ bicycles maintenance
Office Equipment (e.g computers, printers etc)
Others
4,200
7861
5,100
3,221
3,000
3,891
6,971
10,473
6,921
6,411
CBM/MOH
MOH
CBI\4/MOH
MOH
MOH
CBM/MOH
MOH
MOH
CBM/MOH
CBM/MOH
TOTAL50,000
Total number of persons treated 261,728
Table 14: Indicate how much the project spent for each activity listed below during the
reporting period.
Any comments or explanations?
SEGTIOII + Sustainabilitt/ of GDTI
4.,1. Internall independent pailicipatory monitoring; Evaluation
4.1.1 Was Monitoring/evaluation carried out during the reporting period? (tickany of the following which are applicable) N/A
Year I Participatory Independent monitoring
Mid Term Sustainability Evaluation
5 year Sustainability Evaluation
Internal Monitoring by NOTF
26 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
Activitv
Other Evaluation by other partners
4.1.2. What were the recommendations?
4.1.3. How have they been implemented?
&2. Sustainability of proiectsl plan and set targets (mandatory atYr 3)
Was the project evaluated during the reporting period (NO)
Was a sustainability plan written (YES)When was the sustainabiliry plan submitted (YES)What arrangements have been made to sustain CDTI after APOC funding ceases in terms of,
4.2.1. Planning at all relevant levelsRepresentatives from the state and Area Councils have developed realistic 3 years
sustainability plans based on basic CDTI activities and recommendations made by the
evaluators.
4.2.2 Funds:
In the past 5 years of CDTI implementation, the Government released funds for 3
years. As a result of continuous advocacy and the adding on of the Primary Eye Care
Programme, the FCT authority has released 5m Naira for 2005 activities. At the Area
Council level there was release each year, although the levels were fluctuating. The
project intends to build on this release to continue advocating for continuous funding
of CDTI activities. The project will also approach philanthropic organizations such as
Rotary Club to fund aspects of the project. In the meantime the assisting NGDO has
expressed readiness to minimally support CDTI but in an integrated manner with PEC
activities.
4.2.3 Transport @eplacement and Maintenance):
The available transport has been in the Area Council for the pastT years and require at
the moment replacemeng while the existing ones can be maintained to complement.
The FCT project has in the light submitted proposal to APOC for replacement of
existing capital equipments.
27 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
4.2.4 OthersResources:
There is presently renewed commitment in the additional PEC programme recently
introduced which is also attracting support from both the CBM and the government.
This is a welcome idea as it will greatly support the monitoring and supervision of
CDTI.
4.25. To what extent has the plan been implemented?The plan was implemented from 2004, and extent of implementation reported in this
technical report.
Integration:
Outline the &ent of integration of CDTI into the PHC structure and the plans for
complete integration
CDTI is part and parcel of PHC structure but exist as vertical programme because of
its strategies and technicalities. As long as the health worker are involved, its indeed
an integrated programmme.
4.3
4.3.1 Ivermectin Delivery Mechanisms:
The LGA focal persons who are part of PHC deparfinent normally come to collect the
ivermectin whenever they come to collect NPI vaccine or other PHC logistics for their
area councils. Also at Council level Mectizan collection is within PHC structure
because LOCTs and first line health facility staffare all within PHC deparftnent.
4.3.2 Training:
CDTI training has not been integrated with any other training activity or other
programmes. This activity is being carried out in a targeted manner, but reasons
suggest that the quality is reducing, requiring full scale training and re-training
activities for all programme workers in 2006.
4.3.3 Joint Supervision And Monitoring With Other Programs:
There is joint supervision and monitoring since the LOCT and FLHF staffs are
charged with different activities to execute.
4.3.4 Release of Funds:
Release of funds pass through the same channels within the PHC structure. At LGA
level some impress is made available to PHC Coordinator and from here some
28 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
amounts are given to the LOCT leader for routine supervision. Funds are not
combined and release for two different programmes at a time.
4.3.5 Is CDTI included in the PHC budget?
CDTI activities are included in PHC budget.
4.3.6 Described other health programmes that are using the CDTI structure. What has been
the achievement?
The newly introduced Primary Eye Care programme is utilizing the CDTI structure.
So far, some LOCT and CDDS have been trained in PEC.
4.3.7 Describe other issues considered in the integration of CDTI.
CDTI can be utilized for programme like malari4 guinea worrn, polio etc.
4.4 OperationalResearch
4.4-l Summarize in not more than one half of a page the operation research undertaken in
the project area within the reporting period.
Presently the Kinship study is being undertaken, as preliminary data has been
collected already.
4.4.2 How were the results applied in the project?
N/A
SECTION 5: Strengths, Weakness, Challenges and Opportunities.
- List the strength andweakness of CDTI implementation process
- List the challenge. "Andindicate how they are addressed".
STRE,NGTHS:
* The release of counter part fund forthe year 2005
t?. Availability of Mectizan and its wide acceptability
* Continuous release of counterpart funds by most Area Councils
{. Availability of some, CDD that are dedicated to the programme
* Introduction ofthe Primary Eye Care Programme.
29 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2004
WEAKNESS:
.3. Declining morale of some LOCTs/FLHF staff due to irregular or lack of
support from Area Council executives-
* Delay in release of counterpart funds by Area councils
* Most communities do not support the CDDs Leading to CDD athition
* Massive transfer of trained health staffat the Council level
{. Unstable FCT population particularly at the satellite towns due to urbanization
CHALLENGES:
* Need to redefine satellite towns in FCT where the disease is endemic, and
where treatments can continue
* Nonchalant attitude of the health staffparticularly at the LGA and FLHF level
* Demand of some CDDs for incentives before carrying out CDTI activities in
their communities
* Sustained and regular, release of counterpart funds from state and LGAs
* Replacement of old vehicle(s) and motorcycle
* Sourcing of funds other government in case of shortfall or non release of
counterpart funds.
To address the challenges faced the project has done the following:
.E Re-organized the LOCTs and tried to ensure that committed FLHF staff ate
appointed to handle the programme
* Sensitized communities to select persons that are really willing to work for
them
{. Continued advocacy with policy makers to ensure sustained and early release
ofcounterpart funds
{. Plans are being made to approach relevant organizations to support CDTI
within the project area.
SEGTIOII 6: Unique featutes of the proieeUothermatters
This unique feature of the project is that it is a very fast growing city, that is fast diluting the
original endemic communities' around the capital city.
30 WHO/APOC, 24 November 2fi)4