Facility Information Summary AER Reporting Year 2012 ... · company Tennents Glasgow. Relocation of line 4 bottling line off site is scheduled to take place in May 2013. ... If yes

1

2012

P0443-01

DateSignature

Group/Facility manager

(or nominated, suitably qualified and

experienced deputy)

National Grid Reference (6E, 6 N) 0738N 5223E

A description of the activities/processes at

the site for the reporting year. This should

include information such as production

increases or decreases on site, any

infrastructural changes, environmental

performance which was measured during

the reporting year and an overview of

compliance with your licence listing all

exceedances of licence limits (where

applicable) and what they relate to e.g. air,

water, noise.

Bulmers Clonmel is part of C & C group plc. There are 194 employees on site - 128 of which work within the

manufacturing section. The installed capacity on site is 500 million litres. Total production 2012/ 13 was 146

million litres , total production forecasted for 13/14 is 155million litres. approximately 4 millon litres of this is

attributed to contract bottling. Beer bottling commenced on site April 2012 - acting as a contingency for sister

company Tennents Glasgow. Relocation of line 4 bottling line off site is scheduled to take place in May 2013.

Aquisition of Gleesons Bottling & Warehousing took place in March 2013.

Declaration:All the data and information presented in this report has been checked and certified as being accurate. The

quality of the information is assured to meet licence requirements.

NACE Code

Class/Classes of Activity Class 7.3.1 & 7.8

Suzanne Shine 31/03/2013

Facility Information Summary

Licence Register Number

Name of site Bulmers Clonmel - C & C group plc

Site Location Annerville, Clonmel, Co tipperary

AER Reporting Year

2

AIR-summary template Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

Answer all questions and complete all tables where relevant

2

Yes

3Basic air

monitoring

checklist AGN2 Yes

Table A1: Licensed Mass Emissions/Ambient data-periodic monitoring (non-continuous)

Emission

reference no: Parameter/ Substance

Frequency of

Monitoring

ELV in licence

or any revision

therof Licence Compliance criteria Measured value

Unit of

measurement

Compliant with

licence limit Method of analysis

Annual mass

load (kg)

Comments -reason for change

in % mass load from previous

year if applicable

SELECT annually n/a SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECTSELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECTSELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT

SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT

Note 1: Volumetric flow shall be included as a reportable parameter

1

Does your site have licensed air emissions? If yes please complete table A1 and A2 below for the

current reporting year and answer further questions. If you do not have licenced emissions and do not

complete a solvent management plan (table A4 and A5) you do not need to complete the tables

Yes

Licence states that no monitoring of emissions is required other than that stated in 7.5.

There are emissions from boilers & fermentation vessels. All CO2 from fermentation

process is recovered. Bulmers is almost 100% self sufficient in CO2. Plant is operated so

that 100 % of CO2 is recovered. 2.29 kg / HL CO2 used during last financial year (

2012/13). All boilers are tested as part of annual servicing. See report attached

outlining results of boiler testing.

Periodic/Non-Continuous Monitoring

Was all monitoring carried out in accordance with EPA

guidance note AG2 and using the basic air monitoring

checklist?

Additional information

Are there any results in breach of licence requirements? If yes please provide brief details in the comment

section of TableA1 below

Licence states that no monitoring of emissions is required other than that stated in 7.5.

Biogas that is not recovered for use in boilers is flared. Total volume flared is measured.

Almost 95 % of the biogas generated is reused.

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/air/emissions/name,31073,en.html



http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/air/emissions/Air Mon Guid Note _AG2_ - final version2.pdf

3


4No

5No

6No

7 No

Table A2: Summary of average emissions -continuous monitoring

Emission

reference no:

Parameter/ Substance

ELV in licence or

any revision

therof

Averaging

Period

Compliance Criteria Units of

measurement

Annual Emission Annual maximum Monitoring Equipment downtime (hours) Number of ELV

exceedences in

current

reporting year

Comments

SELECT SELECT SELECT

SELECT SELECT

SELECT SELECT

SELECT SELECT

SELECT SELECT

note 1: Volumetric flow shall be included as a reportable parameter.

Table A3: Abatement system bypass reporting table Bypass protocol

Date* Duration** (hours) Location

Did your site experience any abatement system bypasses? If yes please detail them in table 4 below

Continuous Monitoring

Does your site carry out continuous air emissions monitoring? Emissions monitoring are scheduled as part of the 2013/ 14 financial year.

If yes please review your continuous monitoring data and report the required fields below in Table 3 and

compare it to its relevant Emission Limit Value (ELV)

Did continuous monitoring equipment experience downtime? If yes please record downtime in table 3 below

Do you have a proactive service agreement for each piece of continuous monitoring equipment?

* this should include all dates that an abatement system bypass occurred

** an accurate record of time bypass beginning and end should be logged on site and maintained for future

Agency inspections please refer to bypass protocol link

Reason for bypass Corrective actionImpact magnitude

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/licensee/name,25216,en.html

4


8 Do you have a total Emission Limit Value of direct and fugitive emissions on site? if yes please fill out tables A4 and A5

SELECT

Solvent

regulations

Reporting year Total solvent input on

site (kg)

Total VOC

emissions to Air

from entire site

(direct and

Total VOC

emissions as

%of solvent

input

Total Emission Limit Value

(ELV) in licence or any revision

therof

Compliance

SELECT

SELECT

(I) Inputs (kg)

Solvent (I) Inputs (kg)

Organic solvent

emission in

waste gases(kg)

Solvents lost

in water (kg)

Collected waste solvent (kg) Fugitive Organic

Solvent (kg)

Solvent released

in other ways e.g.

by-passes (kg)

Solvents destroyed

onsite through

physical reaction

Total emission of Solvent to air (kg)

Total

(O) Outputs (kg)

Table A4: Solvent Management Plan Summary

Total VOC Emission limit value

Table A5: Solvent Mass Balance summary

Please refer to linked solvent regulations to

complete table 5 and 6

Solvent use and management on site

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/legislation/air/solvents/epa_regulations_emissions_volatile_organic_compounds.pdf

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/legislation/air/solvents/epa_regulations_emissions_volatile_organic_compounds.pdf

5

AER Monitoring returns summary template-WATER/WASTEWATER(SEWER) Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

2

Yes

Location

Reference Date of inspection Source of

contamination

SW2.

7th December 2013. Issue

in discussion with Agency

as per correspondence

CI000134

site

3Yes

4

External /Internal

Lab Quality

checklist

Assessment of

results checklist Yes

Table W3: Licensed Emissions to water and /or wastewater (sewer)-periodic monitoring (non-continuous)

Emission

reference no: Emission released toParameter/

SubstanceNote 1

Frequency of

monitoring Averaging period

ELV or trigger

values in licence or

any revision

therofNote 2 Licence Compliance criteria Measured value

Unit of

measurement

Compliant with

licence Method of analysis

Procedural

reference source

Procedural

reference

standard numberAnnual mass load

(kg)

CS1 Wastewater/Sewer Ammonia (as N) composite Daily 24 hour 10mg/Litre All results < 1.2 times ELV, plus 8

from ten results must be < ELV13 mg/L

no (if no please

enter details in Spectrophotometry (Colorimetry)

APHA / AWWA

"Standard 4500 37078


from ten results must be < ELV12.2 mg/L

no (if no please


APHA / AWWA




no (if no please


APHA / AWWA




no (if no please


APHA / AWWA


Note 1: Volumetric flow shall be included as a reportable parameter

2852185


1

Does your site have licensed emissions direct to surface water or direct to sewer? If yes please

complete table W2 and W3 below for the current reporting year and answer further questions. If you

do not have licenced emissions you only need to complete table W1 and or W2 for surface water

analysis and visual inspectionsYes

Licence requires that there be no emissions to water of Environmental

significance. Storm water emissions require to be monitored weekly as per C3.1

Licenced emissions direct to sewer must be monitored as per C4.1 & 4.2.

Was it a requirement of your licence to carry out visual inspections on any surface water discharges or

watercourses on or near your site? If yes please complete table W2 below summarising only any

evidence of contamination noted during visual inspectionsSee above. All storm water emissions are held in attenuation ponds and treated

via the WWTP ( Anaerobic WWTP ). Ponds are monitored daily to ensure

sufficient capacity to maintain firewater retention capacity and rainfall.

Table W2 Visual inspections-Please only enter details where contamination was observed.

Comments

Holding ponds on site which collect all surface water from the site - SW2 and

sampng chamber no 2 feed into the ponds.

Sump cleaned out and attenuation pond cleaned.

Procedures being reviewed with all site personnel to ensure

spill kit use for all spillages.

Contaminated water was not

discharged to river Suir but was

redirected to WWTP via the

attenuation pond system.

Description of contamination Corrective action

Licensed Emissions to water and /or wastewater(sewer)-periodic monitoring (non-continuous)

Was there any result in breach of licence requirements? If yes please provide brief details in the comment

section of Table W3 below Breach of licence limit in relation to ammonia emissions to sewer.

Was all monitoring carried out in accordance with EPA guidance and

checklists for Quality of Aqueous Monitoring Data Reported to the EPA? If

no please detail what areas require improvement in additional

information box Laboratory used is accredited with INAB.

Note 2: Where Emission Limit Values (ELV) do not apply to your licence please compare results against EQS for Surface water or relevant receptor quality standards

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/water/quality/name,30667,en.html





6

AER Monitoring returns summary template-WATER/WASTEWATER(SEWER) Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012


5 Yes

6

Yes

7Yes Service contract in place with Hanleys & Endress & Hauser

8No

Table W4: Summary of average emissions -continuous monitoring

Emission

reference no: Emission released to Parameter/ Substance

ELV or trigger

values in licence

or any revision

thereof

Averaging

Period

Compliance

Criteria

Units of

measurement

Annual Emission for current

reporting year (kg)

% change +/- from

previous reporting yearMonitoring

Equipment

downtime (hours)

Number of ELV

exceedences in

reporting year

CS1 Wastewater/Sewer pH PH 4 - 10 24 hour

No pH value shall

deviate from the

specified range .

pH unitsno exceedence on ELV - just

downtime on equipment n/a

26th - 30th

November 20120

note 1: Volumetric flow shall be included as a reportable parameter.

Table W5: Abatement system bypass reporting tableDate Duration (hours) Location Resultant

emissions

Reason for

bypass

Corrective

action*

Was a report

submitted to the

EPA?

When was this report submitted?

*Measures taken or proposed to reduce or limit bypass frequency

If yes please summarise your continuous monitoring data below in Table W4 and compare it to its relevant

Emission Limit Value (ELV)

Continuous monitoring Additional Information

Does your site carry out continuous emissions to water/sewer monitoring?

Continuous monitoring on flow, temp and ph on wastewater emissions

Did continuous monitoring equipment experience downtime? If yes please record downtime in table W4 below Loss of communication link only from Scada system to local ph meter. Local ph

meter continued to function but no automatic log could be maintained of ph

due to communication failure. Issue reported to EPA as a licence notification

Do you have a proactive service contract for each piece of continuous monitoring equipment on site?

Did abatement system bypass occur during the reporting year? If yes please complete table W5 below

Comments

No exceedences on ph - ph is neutralised as part of anaerobic treatment process to allow treatment

to continue.

7

Comments

Feb-12

Jun-12

Jun-12

Jun-12

9

Bund/Pipeline testing template Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

Bund testing Additional information

1 Yes

2 Please provide integrity testing frequency period 3 years

3 Yes

Bund inspection check is completed

weekly in both WWTP and on main

site.

4 How many bunds are on site? 20 bunds

One of these bunds is used by Grants

and is monitired as part of Grants

EMS. All plastic bunds / containment

pallets are located in effluent

drainage areas and any leaks are

detected and reported. . Bund

replaced out if damaged etc

5 How many of these bunds have been tested witin the required test schedule?

Plastic bund containment pallets not

inspected as per 3 year integrity

testing schedule but are monitored

weekly. Concrete bund structures are

tesed every 3 years - due in 2013.

6 How many mobile bunds are on site? 10 Containment pallets

7 Are the mobile bunds included in the bund test schedule? No

8 How many of these mobile bunds have been tested witin the required test schedule?

9 7 sumps / tanks

These sumps are pumping statiions

and are inspected by Cantwells every

six months - servivce completed

March 2013. Maintenance work

generated actioned via Pragma.

10 4 sumps Others due in 2013.

Please list any sump integrity failures in table B1

11 No

5 of them have high level alarms -

Factory, apple crushing sump,

warehousing sump and inlet sump

overflow sump in WWTP have high

level alarms

12 Yes

Maintenance programme in place

with Cantwell electrical

Bund/Containment structure ID Type Specify Other type Product containment Actual capacity Capacity required* Type of integrity test Other test type Test date Integrity reports maintained on site? Results of test

Integrity test failure

explanation <50 words Corrective action taken

Scheduled date

for retest

Results of

retest(if in

current

reporting year)

B1 - Outside process room general purpose concrete/masonryCombined bund type Citric acid 30.197 33.216 Hydraulic test n/a 2009 Yes Pass N/A Repaired crack FY 2013 N/A

B2 - Chemical Compound reinforced concrete Remote Brilatol caustic 48 52.8 Hydraulic test n/a 2009 Yes Pass N/A SELECT FY 2013 N/A

B3 - NMU general purpose concrete/masonryCombined bund type Sodium hydroxide 25 50.5 Hydraulic test n/a 2012 Yes Pass N/A SELECT FY 2013 N/A

B4 - CIP station - nmu general purpose concrete/masonryCombined bund type 68 54.8 Hydraulic test n/a 2009 Yes Pass N/A SELECT FY 2013 N/A

Grants - B5 general purpose concrete/masonryCombined bund type whiskey 130 61 Hydraulic test n/a 2012 Yes Pass N/A SELECT FY 2015 N/A

SELECT* Capacity required should comply with 25% or 110% containment rule as detailed in your licence Commentary

14 bunding and storage guidelines Yes

15 Are channels/transfer systems to remote containment systems tested? No all transfer lines overhead - spills / leaks evident

16 Are channels/transfer systems compliant in both integrity and available volume? Yes

1 Yes

2 Please provide integrity testing frequency period 3 years

Structure ID Type system Material of construction:

Does this structure have

Secondary containment?

Type of secondary

containment

Type integrity testing

Integrity reports

maintained on site? Results of test

Integrity test failure

explanation <50 words Corrective action taken

Scheduled date

for retest

Results of retest(if in current

reporting year)

Existing tank farm - zone 5 & zone 6 ( North Tank Farm ) Process pvc Yes

Pipe in channel

CCTV yes Pass N/A

All drains cleaned and surveyed -July 2011.

Remedial work completed on drains around

CIP room and yeast and nutrient room June

2012. Water pooling in area. 2014

Current financial year starts

March 2013

Existing tank farm - zone 3 ( South tank Farm ) Process pvc Yes Pipe in channel CCTV yes Pass N/A Part tested in 2007 on installation 2013

Existing tank farm - zone 5 ( West tank Farm ) Storm water drainage pvc Yes Pipe in channel CCTV yes Pass N/A tested on installation in 2007 2014

process area - Zone 7 Process pvc Yes

Pipe in channel

CCTV yes Pass Report available

Drains rebuild and integrity tested in area in

2006 - rerouting of drains etc completed by

USSR. 2014 SELECT

OMU bottlng hall areas - line 1 ( Zone 7 ) Process pvc Yes

Pipe in channel

CCTV yes Pass N/A

Drain repair work completed by Mulcahy

construction 2012 2014

dropdown menu click to see options

Are you required by your licence to undertake integrity testing on bunds and containment structures ? if yes please fill out table B1 below listing all new bunds and containment structures on site, in addition to all

bunds which failed the integrity test-all bunding structures which failed including mobile bunds must be listed in the table below

Are you required by your licence to undertake integrity testing on underground structures e.g. pipelines or sumps etc ? if yes please fill out table 2 below listing all underground structures and pipelines on site which

failed the integrity test

How many sumps on site are included in the integrity test schedule?

How many of these sumps are integrity tested within the test schedule?

Table B1: Summary details of bund /containment structure integrity test

Does the site maintain a register of bunds, underground pipelines (including stormwater and foul), Tanks, sumps and containers? (containers refers to "Chemstore" type units and mobile bunds)

Has integrity testing been carried out in accordance with licence requirements and are all structures tested in line with BS8007/EPA Guidance?

Do all sumps and chambers have high level liquid alarms?

If yes to Q11 are these failsafe systems included in a maintenance and testing programme?

Pipeline/underground structure testing

Table B2: Summary details of pipeline/underground structures integrity test

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/general/materials storage.pdf

10

Bund/Pipeline testing template Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

Keg line drainage ( Zone 7) Process pvc Yes

Pipe in channel

CCTV No FAIL

Fail - drains rebuilt as

no outlet flow from

line due to blockage -

water pooling in area Drains rebuilt over xmas period 2012/13. 2015 Pass

Empty can warehouse area and Line 2 Process pvc Yes

Pipe in channel

CCTV No N/A N/A N/A Jun-13 N/A

warehouse area ( zone 4 ) Storm water drainage pvc Yes Pipe in channel CCTV yes Pass Completed 2009 2013 SELECT

water room / co2 recovery / chemical stores ( zone 4 ) Storm water drainage pvc Yes Pipe in channel CCTV yes Pass Completed 2009 2013 SELECT

NMU area despatch Process pvc Yes Pipe in channel CCTV yes Pass New area installed 2007 2013 SELECT

nmu area Process pvc Yes Pipe in channel CCTV yes Pass New area installed 2007 2013 SELECT

Factory sump and apple crush effluent lines to WWTP Process pvc Yes Pipe in channel CCTV yes Pass 2013 SELECT

Exiisting old plant and Grant Process pvc Yes Pipe in channel CCTV yes Pass completed 2010 2014 SELECT

Effluent route via can line line 2 and empty can warehouse Process pvc Yes Pipe in channel CCTV yes Pass 2013 SELECT

drainage area at front of offces Storm water drainage pvc Yes Pipe in channel CCTV no N/A NOT COMPLETED 2014

Please use commentary for additional details not answered by tables/ questions above

11

Groundwater/Soil monitoring template Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

Comments

1

yes

As per condition C7 of licence.

Monitoring is also completed in line

with spring water directive , potable

water standards . Sample collected at

bore hole.

2no

Only as part of Landspreading NMP

submission

3

yes

two aquifers on site - 3 wells in use.

Total usage for 2012 was 4747120hl

4

yes

Contaminated groundwater that ius

no longer used. Two wells were

decommissioned since 2002 due to

odour issue from water and biomass

growth on walls of well

5

yes

Historic and due to well itself - reason

for contamination never detected.

6

7 N/A

8 N/A ELRA completed 2009.

9 no

10 no

11 no

12 no

Table 1: Upgradient Groundwater monitoring results

Date of sampling

Sample

location

reference

Parameter/

Substance Methodology Monitoring frequency

Maximum

Concentration++

Average

Concentration+ unit GTV's* IGV

% change in

average

concentration

previous year +/-

Upward trend in

pollutant

concentration over last

5 years of monitoring

data

07/04/2012 PW3 PH

Method based on “Standard

Methods for the Examination of

Water and Wastewater”, Method

4500, 21st Edition, APHA, 2005.

Daily

7.7

7.6 units 6.5 - 9.5

6.9 - 8.1 lower

limit 6.8.

Extremely high

or low values

may be an

indication of

pollution 0% no

DWD Analysis -

March 2012 PW3 COD

Method based on Standard


Water and Wastewater”, APHA

5220 - D, 21st Edition, APHA, 2005

Quarterly

2

1 mg/l no extreme variations no abnormal change 0% no

Has a Conceptual Site Model been developed for the site?

Are you required to carry out groundwater monitoring as part of your licence requirements?

Are you required to carry out soil monitoring as part of your licence requirements?

Do you extract groundwater for use on site? If yes please specify use in comment section

Is there contaminated land and /or groundwater on site? If yes please answer q's 5-12

Is the contamination related to operations at the facility (either current and/or historic)

Have actions been taken to address contamination issues?If yes please summarise remediation strategies

proposed/undertaken for the site no

Contamination is due to rock type -

opinion of hydrogeologist at the time

of the investigation into odour.

Please specify the proposed time frame for the remediation strategy

Is there a licence condition to carry out/update ELRA for the site?

Has any type of risk assesment been carried out for the site?

Have potential receptors been identified on and off site?

Is there evidence that contamination is migrating offsite?

12


Public analysts lab

report PW3 Nitrate Quarterly

6.7

6.6 mg/l

background range <.0023

- 16.4, interim guideline :

5.65mg/l potable water

directive 50 5.65 0% no

PW3

Total

ammonia Biannually

0.03

0.02 mg/l 0.3 0.116mg/l 0% no

PW3 nitrite

“Standard Methods for the

Examination of Water and Waste

Water (21st edition, 2005) APHA

AWWA WEF Method 4500 – NO2- B Quarterly

0.06

0.05 mg/l 0.5 0.3 0% no

PW3 conductivity

Method is derived from Method

based on Method 2510, 21st Edition,

APHA, 2005.

Daily

602

599 us/cm 1000

Upper Limit

999. Elevated

concentrations

may indicate

saline

Intrusion and

increases with

contamination

generally 0% no

PW3 Chloride Quarterly

18

14.4 mg/l 250 0% no

PW3 fluoride Quarterly

0.09

0.07 mh/LF 0.8 0% no

PW3

Organohalog

ens EN ISO 6468, US EPA 8081, DIN 38407-

2 Biannually

n/a

0.3 ug/l no extreme variations no abnormal change 0% no

SELECT

.+ where average indicates arithmetic mean

.++ maximum concentration indicates the maximum measured concentration from all monitoring results produced during the reporting year

Date of sampling

Sample

location

reference

Parameter/


Maximum

Concentration++

Average

Concentration+ unit GTV's* SELECT**

% change in

average

concentration

previous year +/-

Upward trend in

pollutant



data

Method as detailed in “Standard


Water and Waste Water (21st

edition, 2005) APHA AWWA WEF

Method 4500 – Cl E“.Method as

detailed in HACH Manual

13


rw3 PH





Daily

7.8

7.7 units 6.5 - 9.5

6.9 - 8.1 lower

limit 6.8.

Extremely high

or low values

may be an

indication of

pollution 0 SELECT

rw3 COD





Quarterly

1

1 mg/l no extreme variations no abnormal change 0

rw3 Nitrate Quarterly

12.86

7.6 mg/l




directive 50 5.65 0

rw3

Total

ammonia

(nh3 - n ) Biannually

0.04

0.02 mg/l 0.3 0.116mg/l 0

rw3 nitrite no2

“Standard Methods for the

Examination of Water and Waste

Water (21st edition, 2005) APHA Quarterly

0.06

0.05 mg/l 0.5 0.3 0

rw3 conductivity



APHA, 2005.Daily

655

651 us/cm 1000

Upper Limit

999. Elevated

concentrations

may indicate 0

rw3 Chloride Quarterly 21.2 19.3 mg/l 250 0rw3 fluoride Quarterly 0.07 0.06 mh/LF 0.8 0

rw3

Organohalog


2 Biannually

0.4

0.3 ug/l no extreme variations no abnormal change

SELECT SELECT

Date of sampling

Sample

location

reference

Parameter/


Maximum

Concentration++

Average

Concentration+ unit GTV's* SELECT**

% change in

average

concentration

previous year +/-

Upward trend in

pollutant



data

RW4 PH





Daily 7.6 7.5 units 6.5 - 9.5

6.9 - 8.1 lower

limit 6.8.

Extremely high

or low values

may be an

indication of

pollution 0 SELECT

RW4 COD





Quarterly 3 2 mg/l no extreme variations no abnormal change 0

RW4 Nitrate Quarterly 16 15.14 mg/l




directive 50 5.65 0

Total Oxidised Nitrogen is the sum

of Nitrate and Nitrite Nitrogen.

Nitrate Nitrogen is calculated by

subtracting the Nitrite Nitrogen

from the Total Oxidised

Nitrogen.Documented in-house

method adapted from “Standard











14


RW4

Total

ammonia Biannually 0.04 0.02 mg/l 0.3 0.116mg/l 0

RW4 nitrite “Standard Methods for the

Examination of Water and Waste Quarterly 0.06 0.05 mg/l 0.5 0.3 0

RW4 conductivity



APHA, 2005.

Daily 654 622 us/cm 1000

Upper Limit

999. Elevated

concentrations

may indicate

saline

Intrusion and

increases with

contamination

generally 0

RW4 Chloride Quarterly 21.2 19 mg/l 250 0RW4 fluoride Quarterly 0.16 0.15 mh/LF 0.8 0

RW4

Organohalog


2 Biannually 0.4 0.3 ug/l no extreme variations no abnormal change 0

Table 2: Downgradient Groundwater monitoring results

Date of sampling

Sample

location

reference

Parameter/


Maximum

Concentration

Average

Concentration unit GTV's* SELECT**

% change in

average

concentration

previous year +/-

Upward trend in yearly

average pollutant



data

N/A SELECT SELECT

SELECT SELECT

Surface water EQS

Groundwater

regulations

GTV's

Drinking water

(private supply)

standards

Drinking water (public

supply) standards

Table 3: Soil results

Date of sampling

Sample

location

reference

Parameter/


Maximum

Concentration

Average

Concentration unit

N/A SELECT

SELECT

* please note exceedance of a relevant Groundwater threshold value (GTV) at a representative monitoring point does not indicate non compliance, an exceedance triggers further investigation to confirm whether the criteria for poor groundwater chemical

**Depending on location of the site and proximity to other sensitive receptors alternative Receptor based Water Quality standards should be used in addition to the GTV e.g. if the site is close to surface water

compare to Surface Water Environmental Quality Standards (SWEQS), If the site is close to a drinking water supply compare results to the Drinking Water Standards (DWS)

Where additional detail is required please enter it here in 200 words or less










http://www.environ.ie/en/Legislation/Environment/Water/FileDownLoad,20824,en.pdf




http://www.epa.ie/downloads/pubs/water/drinking/privatewatersupplieshandbook/Section 2.pdf



http://www.epa.ie/downloads/pubs/water/drinking/publicwatersupplieshandbook/Section 2.pdf

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/pubs/water/drinking/publicwatersupplieshandbook/Section 2.pdf

15

Environmental Liabilities template Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

Commentary

1

Submitted and not agreed by EPA;

Residual management

plan rev 1 submitted

to EPA in 2009. Report

revised.

2 Review required and completed Not submitted to EPA

3 cash in bank

4 Submitted and not agreed by EPA;

5 N/A

6 cash in bank

7 Review required

8 Required but not submitted

9 Review required and not completed

10 Submitted and not agreed by EPA;

11 383513

12 cash in bank

13 N/A

Click here to access EPA guidance on Environmental Liabilities and Financial

provision

Financial provision for ELRA expiry date

Closure plan initial agreement status

Closure plan review status

Financial Provision for Closure status

Financial provision for Closure expiry date

Financial Provision for Closure - type

ELRA initial agreement status

ELRA review status

Amount of Financial Provision cover required as determined by the latest ELRA

Financial Provision for ELRA status

Financial Provision for ELRA - amount of cover

Financial Provision for ELRA - type

Financial Provision for Closure - amount of cover

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/licensee/ELRA Guidance Document.pdf

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/licensee/ELRA Guidance Document.pdf

16

Environmental Management Programme/Continuous Improvement Programme template Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

Additional Information

1Yes

2 Yes

3 Yes

4 Yes

Environmental Management Programme (EMP) reportObjective Category Target Status (% completed) How target was progressed Responsibility Intermediate outcomes

Energy Efficiency/Utility

conservation - lighting

not confirmed. Each

project was justified

payback 77

Site lighting project review energy

usage trends to identify the link

between changes and

consumption. Astranomical timers

fitted , induction lighting fitted in

keg yard and on keg line. K type

fittings installed in full goods

warehouse. Switches in canteen

relocated so easy to Facilities area engineer Reduced emissions


conservation - office area

optimisation project

not confirmed. Each


payback 61

Create an open office procurement

and managers, Installed 7 day

timers on the all domestic boilers,

Fitted thermostatic valves on old

installs Facilities area engineer Reduced emissions


conservation - Line 1 conveyor

projects & CO2 flowmeter

installation not confirmed. Each


payback 100

Modify the control sequence to the

filler and then labeller can be

cleaned without having the

conveyors running

Payback - €2k / year.

CO2 flow meters installation link

up to Energy track system OMU area engineer and Energy repsReduced emissions

Highlighted cells contain dropdown menu click to view

Does the EMS reference the most significant environmental aspects and associated

impacts on-site

Does the EMS maintain an Environmental Management Programme (EMP) as required in

accordance with the licence requirements

Do you maintain an Environmental Mangement System (EMS) for the site. If yes, please

detail in additional information IS014001

Public information file available at security via Q - pulse system

Do you maintain an environmental documentation/communication system to inform the

public on environmental performance of the facility, as required by the licence

17

Environmental Management Programme/Continuous Improvement Programme template Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

Highlighted cells contain dropdown menu click to view


conservation - CO2 recovery

optimisation Project

not confirmed. Each


payback 100

install Fresh water flow meters and

link to chem track, validate the

cooling tower performance against

manufacturers recommendations,

complete optimisation study on

line 1 Pasteuriser OMU area engineer and Energy repsReduced emissions


conservation - OMU area

not confirmed. Each


payback 100

Coaching techs to understand and

use A3 problem solving to deal

with CO2 losses. Analyse the data

colection sheet s and determin

what target levels need to be set

for the percentage of co2 recovery

expected per

fermentation.Orgainise training

with Haffmans on Co2 Collection OMU area engineer and Energy repsReduced emissions


conservation - WWTP -

optimisation of WWTP process to

reduce energy and sludge

generation

not confirmed. Each


payback 100

Reduced usage of aerobic plant -

operation of aerobic only when

beer bottling taking place or when

monitoring dicates requirement . WWTP operator & SHE manager Reduced emissions

Waste reduction/Raw material

usage efficiency

not confirmed. Each


payback 100

reduced glass , glue , raw materials

by increased monitoring and loss

reporting Line managers Reduced emissions

18

Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

1 Yes

2

Noise

Guidance

note NG4

Yes

3 No

4 n/a

5 No

Date of

monitoring Time period

Noise location

(on site)

Noise sensitive

location -NSL (if

applicable) LAeq LA90 LA10 LAmax

Tonal or Impulsive

noise* (Y/N)

If tonal /impulsive

noise was identified

was 5dB penalty

applied?

Comments (ex. main noise sources on site, & extraneous noise ex. road

traffic)

Is site compliant with

noise limits

(day/evening/night)?

4/12/2012 - 9.18 66 58 68

No no

4/12/2012 - 12.23 64 56 66 No No no

4/12/2012 - 15.35 67 59 71No No no

Arithmetic Mean 66 58 68

*Please ensure that a tonal analysis has been carried out as per guidance note NG4. These records must be maintained onsite for future inspection

Date of


Noise location

(on site)

Noise sensitive

location -NSL (if


Tonal or Impulsive

noise* (Y/N)

If tonal /impulsive


was 5dB penalty

applied?


traffic)


noise limits


4/12/2012 - 11.11 53 51 55 No No yes

4/12/2012 - 14.12 53 50 55 No No yes

4/12/2012 - 17:32 52 49 53 No No yes


yes

*Please ensure that a tonal analysis has been carried out as per guidance note NG4. These records must be maintained onsite for future inspection

Date of


Noise location

(on site)

Noise sensitive

location -NSL (if


Tonal or Impulsive

noise* (Y/N)

If tonal /impulsive


was 5dB penalty

applied?


traffic)


noise limits


4/12/2012 - 11.47 64 59 67 No No no

4/12/2012 - 14.50 65 61 68 No No no

4/12/2012 - 18.06 64 58 67 No No no


no

Date of


Noise location

(on site)

Noise sensitive

location -NSL (if


Tonal or Impulsive

noise* (Y/N)

If tonal /impulsive


was 5dB penalty

applied?


traffic)


noise limits


4/12/2012 - 11.11 53 51 55 No No Yes

4/12/2012 - 14.12 53 50 55 No No Yes

4/12/2012 - 17:32 52 49 53 No No Yes


Yes

Date of


Noise location

(on site)

Noise sensitive

location -NSL (if


Tonal or Impulsive

noise* (Y/N)

If tonal /impulsive


was 5dB penalty

applied?


traffic)


noise limits


4/12/2012 - 9.55 61` 54 62

No No

The primary noise audible from on-site activity was from

HGVs entering, exiting, and stalling/reversing at security

barriers (approximately 10 vehicles passed by

during each monitoring period). No noise was

audible from this point of any other operations on-site. Noise was

detected from birds singing in the orchard opposite

the monitoring point. The other noise audible

was the constant passing of traffic on the N24.

no

4/12/2012 - 13.00 62 56 63 No No no

4/12/2012 - 16.21 63 57 63 No No no

Arithmetic Mean 62 56 63 no

Date of


Noise location

(on site)

Noise sensitive

location -NSL (if


Tonal or Impulsive

noise* (Y/N)

If tonal /impulsive


was 5dB penalty

applied?


traffic)


noise limits


4/12/2012 - 23.00 56 40 59 No No no

4/12/2012 - 01:54 57 39 58 No No no

noThe main source of noise was traffic (approx. 50 vehicles during each

monitoring period) passing on the Ferryhouse Roundabout on the N24

which was wet at the time and this elevated noise. Other noise audible

included the constant noise from the stacks at Medite facility, north of

Bulmer’s facility, rustling of trees. Noise generated on the Bulmer’s

facility was beeping from reversing HGVs, faint noise from ventilation

from site buildings and the engine from Waste WaterTreatment Plant

Main source of noise from the site at this location included noise

generated by the hum from a pump at the Waste Water Treatment

plant,employees talking on-site, plastic piping

being dragged along loose gravel. Tractor entered site & parked during 1

survey period.Noise was audible from vehicles pulling out of main site

entrance. Low noise audible from HGVs movement on occasion from the

main facility. Primary noise audible from the monitoring point was the

constant traffic on the

N24 road.

Table N1: Noise monitoring summary

12/04/2012 Day - NML05

The main source of noise during monitoring at this location was

activities from the premises north of the Bulmer’s facility

and noise audible included humming noise from 2 stack units operating

constantly,HGVs and plant activity moving material, scraping noise off

metal and beeping siren from reversing vehicles. On-site noise involved

HGVs movement around thetrailer park,reversing sirens, clanking noise

when trailers were opened/closed,horns blowing,

trees rustling. An occasional car passed by during the monitoring at this

location.


12/04/2012 Day - NML03

Main noise source on-site was from the loading yard

across from the monitoring point and involved 2 electric forklifts

lifting, reversing & loading crates onto HGV trailers, horn & beeping

noise from HGVs reversing and HGVs pulling in/out of yard, clanking

noise of trailers opening/closing and people talking. No other activity on-

site was audible from this location. The offsite noise generated was the

constant movement of traffic on the N24 road, birds chirping, leaves

rustling.

there was no audible noise at this location generated from

on-site activity at Bulmer’s Showerings. The primary source

of noise was from vehicles passing through the N24 Ferryhouse

roundabout creating noise such as the screeching of brakes, revving of

engines and tyres squelching on the wet road

surface. On average during 30 minutes of monitoring at

this location approximately 270 cars and 50 HGVs passed

the monitoring location. Other noise sources audible were

trees rustling in the wind & crows cawing and a horse

passed by with noise generated from the horse shoes on the

road during the final monitoring daytime period.NML01 Day - 12:2312/04/2012


Was noise monitoring a licence requirement for the AER period?

If yes please fill in table N1 noise summary below

Was noise monitoring carried out using the EPA Guidance note including completion of the "Checklist for

noise measurement report" included in the guidance note as table 6?

Does your site have a noise reduction plan


12/04/2012 Day - NML04


12/04/2012 night time NML01

When was the noise reduction plan last updated?

Noise monitoring summary report

Have there been changes relevant to site noise emissions (e.g. plant or operational changes) since the last noise survey?


12/04/2012 Day NML02

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/noise/name,33264,en.html



19


no

Date of


Noise location

(on site)

Noise sensitive

location -NSL (if


Tonal or Impulsive

noise* (Y/N)

If tonal /impulsive


was 5dB penalty

applied?


traffic)


noise limits


5/12/2012 - 00:45 46 45 47 No No no

5/12/2012 - 03:38 49 48 48 No No no

no

Arithmetic Mean 48 47 49no

Date of


Noise location

(on site)

Noise sensitive

location -NSL (if


Tonal or Impulsive

noise* (Y/N)

If tonal /impulsive


was 5dB penalty

applied?


traffic)


noise limits


5/12/2012 - 01:19 57 42 61 No No no

5/12/2012 - 04:11 53 41 56 No No no

no


no

Date of


Noise location

(on site)

Noise sensitive

location -NSL (if


Tonal or Impulsive

noise* (Y/N)

If tonal /impulsive


was 5dB penalty

applied?


traffic)


noise limits


5/12/2012 - 00:19 54 45 58 No No no

5/12/2012 - 03:03 52 46 53 No No no

no


Date of


Noise location

(on site)

Noise sensitive

location -NSL (if


Tonal or Impulsive

noise* (Y/N)

If tonal /impulsive


was 5dB penalty

applied?


traffic)


noise limits


5/12/2012 - 23:34 51 38 54 No No SELECT

5/12/2012 - 02:28 54 36 52 No No


Nothing

No

Noise audible from this monitoring location was

generated by traffic on the N24 road,constant low

humming noise from the stacks at Medite facility, 3 HGVs

entering and exiting the Bulmer’s site during each

monitoring period and idling at security barriers. The security

van also pulled up by the monitoring location during the

first round of monitoring and engine was left idling

Conclusions

The EPA IPPC Licence P0443-02 states in Condition 8.1 that noise emissions from the site shall not exceed LAeq of 55 dB(A) during the daytime, and LAeq of 45 dB(A) during the night-time. Furthermore, Schedule B.4. states “There shall be

no clearly audible impulsive component in the noise emission from the activity at any noise sensitive location.”Average daytime L(A)eq measurements at monitoring location NML01 measured 66 dB(A),mainly influenced by the frequent

road traffic along the N24 Limerick/Waterford Rd and not to noise generated by the Bulmer's facility. Average daytime L(A)eq measurements at monitoring location NML02 measured 53 dB(A),mainly influenced by Medite Europe Ltd north

of the monitoring location. Average daytime L(A)eq measurements at monitoring location NML03 measured 64 dB(A), mainly influenced by the frequent road traffic along the N24 Limerick/Waterford Rd and activity on-site in the loading

yard across from the monitoring point. Average daytime L(A)eq measurements at monitoring location NML04 measured 63 dB(A),

mainly influenced by the frequent road traffic along the N24 Limerick/Waterford Rd and on-site loading activity across from the monitoring point. Average daytime L(A)eq measurements at monitoring location NML05 measured 62

dB(A),mainly influenced by the frequent road traffic along the N24 Limerick/Waterford Road frequent passage of vehicles along the HGV on-site road entering and exiting the facility.With respect to the above, noise levels at almost all

boundary locations at the facility were significantly influenced by surrounding traffic noise and not from noise generated on-site at the Bulmer’s Showerings facility. This is evident from the LAF10, T values determined at these monitoring

locations.The EPA Noise Guidance (NG4) states that for some noise surveys, the LAF90,T index may be used to give a good indication of the actual noise output from the site, where the noise emissions on site are relatively steady and

extraneous noises may unduly influence the

measured LAeq, T. Assessment of the LAF90 values for daytime measurements at monitoring locations NML01, NML03, NML04 and NML05 indicate that the average noise level is above the 55 dB(A) daytime limit while monitoring location

NML02 is below the 55 dB(A)daytime limit. NML02 monitoring location was the only monitoring point not influenced by noise from the traffic on the N24 road so it can be concluded that the daytime limit breached at NML01, NML03,

NML04 and NML05, locations that are significantly influenced by noise generated during frequent passage of traffic on the N24, is caused by off-site noise attributing to the excess daytime noise above the maximum limit set. Average night-

time L(A)eq measurements at monitoring location NML01 measured 57 dB(A), mainly influenced by the frequent road traffic along the N24 Limerick/Waterford Rd. Average night-time L(A)eq measurements at monitoring location NML02

measured 48 dB(A), mainly influenced by Medite Europe Ltd north of the monitoring location. Average night-time L(A)eq measurements at monitoring location NML03 measured 55 dB(A), mainly influenced by the frequent road traffic

along the N24 Limerick/Waterford Rd and activity on-site in the loading yard across from the monitoring point. Average night-time L(A)eq measurements at monitoring location NML04 measured 53 dB(A), mainly influenced by the

frequent road traffic along the N24 Limerick/Waterford Rd

and HGV on-site loading activity across from the monitoring point. Average night-time L(A)eq measurements at monitoring location NML05 measured 53 dB(A), mainly influenced by the frequent road traffic along the N24

Limerick/Waterford Road frequent passage of vehicles along the HGV on-site road entering and exiting the facility. Night-time L(A)eq noise limits were exceeded at monitoring locations NML01, NML02,

NML03, NML04 and NML05. Again, considering that the LAF90,T index may be used to give a good indication of the actual noise output from the site, where the noise emissions on site are relatively steady

and extraneous noises may unduly influence the measured LAeq, T, the assessment of LAF90 values for night-time measurements at monitoring locations NML01, NML03 & NML05 indicate that the average noise level attributable to the

site is below the 45 dB(A) nighttime limit at these locations. The LAF90 for NML02 and NML04 was above the 45 dB(A) night-time limit but this is due to the low constant sound of engines operating from Medite Europe Ltd influencing

NML02, and engine/ventilation from the Waste Water Treatment facility influencing NML04, during night-time surveys. No tonal or impulsive noise components were detected at any of the noise sensitive locations.



Traffic from the N24 was the most audible noise. Noise

generated from the Waste Water Treatment facility

included once off hissing of vapour, andventilation/engine

running constantly creating a low humming noise from behind the

monitoring location, the Treatment plant’s main gates creaking opening

and closing when the security van entered the area and drove around

the site across gravel for 3 mins during the second round of night time

monitoring at this site. Noise audible from the Bulmer’s main facility

involved occasional movement of HGVs and beeping noise when HGVs

reversing, a constant low hum from ventilation, and a boiler starting up

creating a hissing noise as air was released.

The main source of noise was traffic (approx. 50 vehicles during each

monitoring period) passing on the Ferryhouse Roundabout on the N24

which was wet at the time and this elevated noise. Other noise audible

included the constant noise from the stacks at Medite facility, north of

Bulmer’s facility, rustling of trees. Noise generated on the Bulmer’s

facility was beeping from reversing HGVs, faint noise from ventilation

from site buildings and the engine from Waste WaterTreatment Plant



NML02

The dominating noise was from the woodchip mill, Medite Europe Ltd,

operating 2 stacks constantly. Noise on-site included

low sound from ventilation, HGVs moving around the trailer park on

occasion collecting and dropping off trailers. Other noises

included trees rustling, clanking noise from trailers

opening/closing, crows cawing.



High noise from this location was largely due to the traffic on the N24. A

low humming sound was audible coming from the Waste Water

Treatment Plant across the road from Bulmer’s main site, discreet

warning alarms went off when the main gate of the facility was opening

and closing which rarely occurred, distant noise of occasional HGV

movements could be heard on-site.

Fitz Scientific Bulmers Showerings (C&C)Report


12/04/2012 night time

If noise limits exceeded as a result of noise attributed to site activities, please choose the corrective action from the following options?

12/04/2012 night time

NML05

20

Resource Usage/Energy efficiency summary Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012


1 Yes - March 2012

2

SEAI - Large

Industry Energy

Network (LIEN) yes

Member of SEAI. Site

also accredited to IS

50001

3 n/a Nil

Energy Use Previous year Current year

Production +/- %

compared to

previous reporting

year**

Energy

Consumption +/- %

vs overall site

production* Comments

Total Energy Used (MWHrs) 27648 26302 minus 3.76 4.9

Total Energy Generated (MWHrs) 0 0 N/A N/A

Total Renewable Energy Generated (MWHrs) 0 0 N/A N/A

Electricity Consumption (MWHrs) 11137 9890 3.76 11.2

Fossil Fuels Consumption: 0 0 N/A N/A

Heavy Fuel Oil (m3) 139 N/A N/A

Light Fuel Oil (m3) 0 0 N/A

Natural gas (CMN) 16510 16411 3.76 0.6

Coal/Solid fuel (metric tonnes) 0 0 N/A N/A

Peat (metric tonnes) 0 0 N/A N/A

Renewable Biomass 0 0 N/A N/A

Renewable energy generated on

site 0 0 N/A N/A

* where consumption of energy can be compared to overall site production please enter this information as percentage increase or decrease compared to the previous reporting year.

** where site production information is available please enter percentage increase or decrease compared to previous year

Water Emissions Water Consumption

Water use Water extracted Previous year m3/yr. Water extracted Current year m3/yr.

Production +/- %

compared to

previous reporting

year**

Energy

Consumption +/- %

vs overall site

production*

Volume Discharged back to

environment(m3yr):

Volume used i.e not

discharged to

environment e.g.

released as steam

m3/yr Unaccounted for Water:

Groundwater 443508 486327 3.76 increase of 9.6% 285218 201109

Reduced water

consumption to 3.31

hectolitres of water used

per hectolitre (hl/hl ) of

product produced ,

significantly below the

recognised global brewing

benchmark of 4hl/hl

Surface water 0 0 N/A N/A

Not measured - not a

requirement of licence

Public supply 6358 8797 3.76 38%

approximately 80% of the water is used in

canteens & toilets

Town water used for

canteens, welfare facilities ,

Fire protection systems -

safety showers , sprinkler

systems , hydrants. Based

on financial year data ,

achieved a Town water

usage reduced by 14 % .

Leak detection and weekly

monitoring.

7599m3 used in 2012 v

8862m3 in 2011

Recycled water n/a n/a n/a n/a

Total 449866 495124

* where consumption of water can be compared to overall site production please enter this information as percentage increase or decrease compared to the previous reporting year.

** where site production information is available please enter percentage increase or decrease compared to previous year

When did the site carry out the most recent energy efficiency audit? Please list the recommendations in table 3 below

Is the site a member of any accredited programmes for reducing energy usage/water conservation such as the SEAI programme linked to the right? If yes please list them in

additional information

Where Fuel Oil is used in boilers on site is the sulphur content compliant with licence conditions? Please state percentage in additional information

Table R1 Energy usage on site

The reductions here are based on data

from calender year , site energy

performance is reviewed based on

financial year data ( march to fEB ) which

shows the following ; Gas – total gas

increased by 1.6% mainly due to increased

production volume / introduction of beer

bottling, reviewing KWHRS per HL, usage

increased by 3%.

• Total Electricity usage decreased by

9.5%. kwhrs / HL decrease of 8% on FY

11/12.☺

• .

• CO2 usage ( kg /hl ) reduced by 16%.

Table R2 Water usage on site

http://www.seai.ie/Your_Business/Large_Energy_Users/LIEN/



21

Resource Usage/Energy efficiency summary Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

Total Landfill Incineration Recycled Other comments

Hazardous (Tonnes)

Non-Hazardous (Tonnes) 1809.35 0 0 1809.35

It was all either

recycled or sent for

recovery (waste-to-

energy facilities).

Date of audit Recommendations Description of Measures proposed Origin of measures

Predicted energy

savings % Implementation date Responsibility Completion date

Status and

comments

10/11th May 2012

There are some issues with the Integrated

manual e.g. ;

a) Energy planning is not specifically

addressed.

b) Base line is not addressed.

c) Clause 4.4.5 EnPi’s is not specifically

addressed.

d) Section 4.2 does not reference clause 4.5.2

Competence awareness and training.

e) Design and procurement clauses are not

addressed.

There are some issues with the Integrated

Integrated manual reviewed in terms of recommendations in

column d

accredited

programme N/A Completed SHE manager completed closed

10/11th May 2012 Alert/alarm levels have not been set for EnPi’s recommendation included in Energy strategy for 2013

accredited

programme

indirectly - cannot

be measured Jun-13 area engineer 2013 open

10/11th May 2012

A measurement plan for significant users -

boilers , air compressors etc has not been

formalised recommendation included in Energy strategy for 2013

accredited

programme

indirectly - cannot

be measured Jun-13 area engineer 2013 open

10/11th May 2012

Overall verification/calibration of meters on

significant users has not been formalised. recommendation included in Energy strategy for 2014

accredited

programme N/A Jul-13 area engineer 2013 open

10/11th May 2012

The system element of the Internal EnMS

auditing process is not robust at present e.g.

Management representative is doing all the

audits. Energy Auditing now included in housekeeping audits completed by Quality.

accredited

programme N/A Completed SHE manager closed

10/11th May 2012

Procurement procedures do not specifically

address Energy and are in ‘Draft’ only.

Reference made to Energy and procedure approved

accredited


10/11th May 2013

How energy performance evaluation is taken

into account at the design stage of new,

modified and renovated facilities,

equipment, systems and processes that can

have a significant impact on Energy use, has

not been addressed. Change control process on Q pulse ensures an evaluation is completed

accredited


Table R5: Power Generation: Where power is generated onsite (e.g. power generation facilities/food and drink industry)please complete the following information

Unit ID Unit ID Unit ID Unit ID Station Total

Technology n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Primary Fuel n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Thermal Efficiency n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Unit Date of Commission n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Total Starts for year n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Total Running Time n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Total Electricity Generated (GWH) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

House Load (GWH) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

KWH per Litre of Process Water n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

KWH per Litre of Total Water used on Siten/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Table R3 Waste Stream Summary

Table R4: Energy Audit finding recommendations

22

Complaints and Incidents summary template Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012


No

Date Category

Other type (please

specify)

Brief description of

complaint (Free txt

<20 words)

Corrective action< 20

words

Resolution

status Resolution date

Further

information

SELECT SELECT

SELECT SELECT

SELECT SELECT

SELECT SELECT

SELECT SELECT

Total complaints

open at start of

reporting year 0Total new

complaints

received during

reporting year 0Total complaints

closed during

reporting year 0Balance of

complaints end of

reporting year 0


No

What is an incident

Table 2 Incidents summary

Date of

occurrence Incident nature Location of occurrence

Incident

category*please refer

to guidance Receptor

Cause of

incident

Other

cause(please

specify)

Activity in

progress at time

of incident Communication Occurrence

Corrective

action<20 words

Preventative

action <20

words

Resolution

status

Resolution

date

Liklihood of

reoccurence

SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT




SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECT SELECTTotal number of

incidents current

year 0Total number of

incidents

previous year 0% reduction/

increase 0

*For information on how to report and what

constitutes an incident

Complaints

Have you received any environmental complaints in the current reporting year? If yes please complete

summary details of complaints received on site in table 1 below

Table 1 Complaints summary

Incidents

Have any incidents occurred on site in the current reporting year? Please list all incidents for current

reporting year in Table 2 below

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/licensee/Guidance to licensees.pdf

23

WASTE SUMMARY Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

PRTR facility logon

Additional Information

1 No

2 No

3 No

Table 1 Details of waste accepted onto your site for recovery, disposal or treatment (do not include wastes generated at your site, as these will have been reported in your PRTR workbook)EWC code Description of waste

accepted

Please enter an

accurate and detailed

description - which

Quantity of waste

accepted in current

reporting year (tonnes)

Reason for

reduction/increase

from previous

reporting year

Packaging Content (%)-

only applies if the

waste has a packaging

component

European Waste Catalogue EWC

codes

European Waste

Catalogue EWC codes

4 SELECT

SELECT

5 SELECT

6 SELECT

7 Do you have an odour management system in place for your facility? If no why? SELECT

8 Do you maintain a sludge register on site? SELECT

Table 2 Waste type and tonnage-landfill only

Waste types permitted

for disposal

Authorised/licenced annual intake

for disposal (tpa)

Actual intake for disposal in

reporting year (tpa)

Remaining licensed

capacity at end of

reporting year (m3) Comments

Table 3 General information-Landfill only

Total disposal

area occupied by

waste

Lined disposal

area occupied by

waste

Unlined area

SELECT UNIT SELECT UNIT SELECT UNIT

Cell 8

Accepted asbestos in reporting

year

Comments on

liner type

Private or Public

OperatedInert or non-hazardous

Predicted date

to cease

landfilling

Licence permits

asbestos

Is there a separate cell

for asbestos?

SECTION D-TO BE COMPLETED BY LANDFILL SITES ONLY

Area ID Date landfilling commenced Date landfilling ceased Currently landfilling

Does your facility have relevant nuisance controls in place?

SECTION C-TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL WASTE FACILITIES (waste transfer stations, Composters, Material recovery facilities etc) EXCEPT LANDFILL SITES

Is all waste processing infrastructure as required by your licence and approved by the Agency in place? If no please list waste processing infrastructure required onsite

Is all waste storage infrastructure as required by your licence and approved by the Agency in place? If no please list waste storage infrastructure required on site

Reduction/Incr

ease over

previous year

+/ - %

Disposal/Recovery or

treatment operation carried out

at your site and the description

of this operation

Quantity of

waste

remaining on

site at the end

of reporting

year (tonnes)

Comments -

If yes please enter details in table 1 below

Did your site have any rejected consignments of waste in the current reporting year? If yes please give a brief explanation in the additional information

Was waste accepted onto your site that was generated outside the Republic of Ireland? If yes please state the quantity in tonnes in additional information

Licenced annual

tonnage limit for your

site (total

tonnes/annum)

Source of waste accepted Quantity of waste accepted in

previous reporting year (tonnes)

SECTION A-PRTR ON SITE WASTE TREATMENT AND WASTE TRANSFERS TAB- TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL IPPC AND WASTE FACILITIES dropdown list click to see options

SECTION B- WASTE ACCEPTED ONTO SITE-TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL IPPC AND WASTE FACILITIES

Were any wastes accepted onto your site for recovery or disposal or treatment prior to recovery or disposal within the boundaries of your facility ?; (waste generated within your

boundaries is to be captured through PRTR reporting)

http://aer.epa.ie/reporting/pgLogon.aspx

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/forms/wreport/nwr/EPA_waste_catalogue_hazard_list_2002.pdf




24

WASTE SUMMARY Lic No: P0443-01 Year 2012

SECTION A-PRTR ON SITE WASTE TREATMENT AND WASTE TRANSFERS TAB- TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL IPPC AND WASTE FACILITIES dropdown list click to see optionsTable 4 Environmental monitoring-landfill onlyLandfill Manual-Monitoring Standards

Was meterological

monitoring in

compliance with

Landfill Directive (LD)

standard in reporting

year +

Was leachate monitored in

compliance with LD standard in

reporting year

Was Landfill Gas monitored in

compliance with LD standard in

reporting year

Was SW monitored in

compliance with LD

standard in reporting

year

Have GW trigger levels

been established

Were emission limit values agreed with

the Agency (ELVs)

Was

topography of

the site

surveyed in

reporting year

Has the statement

under S53(A)(5) of

WMA been

submitted in

reporting year Comments

.+ please refer to Landfill Manual linked above for relevant Landfill Directive monitoring standards

Table 5 Capping-Landfill only

Area uncapped* Area with temporary cap

SELECT UNIT SELECT UNIT

*please note this includes daily cover area

Table 6 Leachate-Landfill only9 Is leachate from your site treated in a Waste Water Treatment Plant? SELECT

10 Is leachate released to surface water? If yes please complete leachate mass load information below SELECT

Volume of leachate in

reporting year(m3)

Leachate (BOD) mass load

(kg/annum)

Leachate (COD) mass load

(kg/annum)

Leachate (NH4) mass

load (kg/annum)

Leachate (Chloride)

mass load kg/annum Leachate treatment on-site

Specify type of

leachate

treatment Comments

Table 7 Landfill Gas-Landfill only

Gas Captured&Treated

by LFG System m3 Power generated (MW / KWh) Used on-site or to national grid

Was surface emissions

monitoring performed

during the reporting

year? Comments

SELECT

Please ensure that all information reported in the landfill gas section is consistent with the Landfill Gas Survey submitted in conjunction with PRTR returns

Area with final cap to LD

Standard m2 ha, a Area capped other

Area with waste that

should be permanently

capped to date under

licence What materials are used in the cap Comments

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/licensee/epa landfill monitoring.pdf

Sheet : Facility ID Activities AER Returns Workbook 9/12/2014 16:5

| PRTR# : P0443 | Facility Name : Bulmers Limited | Filename : AER summary

TEMPLATES-v1 xls 2013 xls rev0.xlsm | Return Year : 2013 | 3102 09/12/2014 16:08

Guidance to completing the PRTR workbook

Version 1.1.18

REFERENCE YEAR 2013

1. FACILITY IDENTIFICATION

Parent Company Name Bulmers Limited

Facility Name Bulmers Limited

PRTR Identification Number P0443

Licence Number P0443-02

Waste or IPPC Classes of Activity

No. class_name

7.3.1

Brewing (including cider and perry production) in installations where

the production capacity exceeds 25 million litres per year, not

included in paragraph 7.8.

7.8(b)

vegetable raw materials with a finished product production capacity

greater than 300 tonnes per day (average value on a quarterly basis).

Address 1 Annerville

Address 2 Clonmel

Address 3 County Tipperary

Address 4

Tipperary

Country Ireland

Coordinates of Location -7.64725 52.3606

River Basin District IESE

NACE Code 1103

Main Economic Activity Manufacture of cider and other fruit wines

AER Returns Contact Name Suzanne Shine

AER Returns Contact Email Address [email protected]

AER Returns Contact Position SHE manager

AER Returns Contact Telephone Number 086 8160693

AER Returns Contact Mobile Phone Number 087 8160693

AER Returns Contact Fax Number 0526172280

Production Volume 1447351.0

Production Volume Units hectolitres

Number of Installations 1

Number of Operating Hours in Year 3760

Number of Employees 160

User Feedback/Comments

Web Address

2. PRTR CLASS ACTIVITIES

Activity Number Activity Name

50.1 General

8(b)(ii) Vegetable raw materials

3. SOLVENTS REGULATIONS (S.I. No. 543 of 2002)

Is it applicable? No

Have you been granted an exemption ? No

If applicable which activity class applies (as per

Schedule 2 of the regulations) ?

Is the reduction scheme compliance route being

used ?

4. WASTE IMPORTED/ACCEPTED ONTO SITE Guidance on waste imported/accepted onto site

Do you import/accept waste onto your site for on-

site treatment (either recovery or disposal

activities) ? No

This question is only applicable if you are an IPPC or Quarry site

AER Returns Workbook

| PRTR# : P0443 | Facility Name : Bulmers Limited | Filename : P0443_2013.xlsm | Return Year : 2013 | Page 1 of 10

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/aerprtr/completinguploadingtheprtrworkbook/

http://www.epa.ie/downloads/advice/aerprtr/completinguploadingtheprtrworkbook/name,40732,en.html

4.1 RELEASES TO AIR Link to previous years emissions data | PRTR# : P0443 | Facility Name : Bulmers Limited | Filename : AER summary TEMPLATES-v1 xls 2013 xls rev0.xlsm | Return Year : 2013 | 09/12/2014 16:08

8 10 18 18 26 26 6 6 6 6 6 6 8

SECTION A : SECTOR SPECIFIC PRTR POLLUTANTS

Please enter all quantities in this section in KGs

QUANTITY

No. Annex II Name M/C/E Method Code Designation or Description Emission Point 1 T (Total) KG/Year A (Accidental) KG/Year F (Fugitive) KG/Year

11 Sulphur oxides (SOx/SO2) M EN 14791:2005 3512.0 3512.0 0.0 0.0

08 Nitrogen oxides (NOx/NO2) M EN 14792:2005 83974.0 83974.0 0.0 0.0

02 Carbon monoxide (CO) M EN 15058:2004 1405.3 1405.3 0.0 0.0

* Select a row by double-clicking on the Pollutant Name (Column B) then click the delete button

SECTION B : REMAINING PRTR POLLUTANTS


QUANTITY


0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


SECTION C : REMAINING POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (As required in your Licence)


QUANTITY

Pollutant No. Name M/C/E Method Code Designation or Description Emission Point 1 T (Total) KG/Year A (Accidental) KG/Year F (Fugitive) KG/Year

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


Additional Data Requested from Landfill operators

Landfill: Bulmers LimitedPlease enter summary data on the

quantities of methane flared and / or

utilised

additional_pollutant_no T (Total) kg/Year M/C/E Method Code

Designation or

Description

Facility Total Capacity

m3 per hour

Total estimated methane generation (as per

site model) 0.0 N/A

Methane flared 0.0 0.0 (Total Flaring Capacity)

Methane utilised in engine/s 0.0 0.0 (Total Utilising Capacity)

Net methane emission (as reported in Section

A above) 0.0 N/A

Method Used

For the purposes of the National Inventory on Greenhouse Gases, landfill operators are requested to provide summary data on landfill gas (Methane)

flared or utilised on their facilities to accompany the figures for total methane generated. Operators should only report their Net methane (CH4) emission

to the environment under T(total) KG/yr for Section A: Sector specific PRTR pollutants above. Please complete the table below:

Method Used

Method Used

RELEASES TO AIR

POLLUTANT METHOD

Method Used

POLLUTANT

RELEASES TO AIR

RELEASES TO AIR

METHOD

POLLUTANT METHOD

4.3 RELEASES TO WASTEWATER OR SEWER Link to previous years emissions data | PRTR# : P0443 | Facility Name : Bulmers Limited | Filename : AER summary TEMPLATES-v1 xls 2013 xls rev0.xlsm | Return Year : 2013 |09/12/2014 16:08

8 8 16 23 6 6 6 6 0

SECTION A : PRTR POLLUTANTS


QUANTITY


0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0


SECTION B : REMAINING POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (as required in your Licence)


QUANTITY

Pollutant No. Name M/C/E Method Code Designation or Description Emission Point 1 T (Total) KG/Year A (Accidental) KG/Year F (Fugitive) KG/Year

240 Suspended Solids M MAB 60866.0 60866.0 0.0 0.0

303 BOD M CRM 61549.0 61549.0 0.0 0.0

238 Ammonia (as N) M CRM 1788.0 1788.0 0.0 0.0

308 Detergents (as MBAS) M CRM 71.69 71.69 0.0 0.0

314 Fats, Oils and Greases M CRM 3788.0 3788.0 0.0 0.0

343 Sulphate M CRM 3565.0 3565.0 0.0 0.0

347 Total heavy metals M CRM 1.72 1.72 0.0 0.0

387 Ortho-phosphate (as P) M CRM 336.0 336.0 0.0 0.0


OFFSITE TRANSFER OF POLLUTANTS DESTINED FOR WASTE-WATER TREATMENT OR SEWER

OFFSITE TRANSFER OF POLLUTANTS DESTINED FOR WASTE-WATER TREATMENT OR SEWER

Method Used

Method Used

POLLUTANT METHOD

POLLUTANT METHOD

5. ONSITE TREATMENT & OFFSITE TRANSFERS OF WASTE | PRTR# : P0443 | Facility Name : Bulmers Limited | Filename : AER summary TEMPLATES-v1 xls 2013 xls rev0.xlsm | Return Year : 2013 | 09/12/2014 16:08

5 29 Please enter all quantities on this sheet in Tonnes 29

Quantity

(Tonnes per

Year)

Haz Waste : Name and

Licence/Permit No of Next

Destination Facility Non

Haz Waste: Name and

Licence/Permit No of

Recover/Disposer

Haz Waste : Address of Next

Destination Facility

Non Haz Waste: Address of

Recover/Disposer

Name and License / Permit No. and

Address of Final Recoverer /

Disposer (HAZARDOUS WASTE

ONLY)

Actual Address of Final Destination

i.e. Final Recovery / Disposal Site

(HAZARDOUS WASTE ONLY)

Transfer Destination

European Waste

Code Hazardous Quanti ty T/Year Description of Waste

Waste

Treatment

Operation M/C/E Method Used

Location of

Treatment Nam e and L ic enc e / Perm i t No. o f Rec ov erer / Dis pos er / Brok er Addres s of Rec ov erer / Dis pos er / Brok er Nam e and Addres s of Fina l Des tination i .e . Fina l Rec ov ery / Dis pos al Si te (HAZARDOUS WASTE ONLY) Lic enc e / Perm i t No. o f Fina l Des tination i .e . Fina l Rec ov ery / Dis pos al Si te (HAZARDOUS WASTE ONLY)

Within the Country 02 03 01 No 14.92

sludges from washing, cleaning, peeling,

centrifuging and separation R10 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland

KCD Farm Relief ,WCP

/KK/10/438/02 BNM 198 -

1

Cillin Hill / Bord Na Mona

PLc ,Dublin Road / Kilberry

,Kilkenny,Kilkenny,Ireland

Within the Country 02 07 05 No 451.72 sludges from on-site effluent treatment R10 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland

KCD Farm Relief ,WCP

/KK/10/438/02 BNM 198 -

1

Cillin Hill / Bord Na Mona

PLc ,Dublin Road / Kilberry

,Kilkenny,Kilkenny,Ireland

Within the Country 13 02 06 Yes 1.905 synthetic engine, gear and lubricating oils R9 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland

Enva Ireland ,WCP DC 08

1116 01

Clonminam Industrial Estate

,Port laoise ,Co Laois ,Co

Laois ,Ireland

Enva Ireland Ltd ,Licence

WO184 1 Collection Permit

WCP dc 1116 01 ,Clonm

inam Industtrial Estate

,Clonm inam Industtrial

Estate ,portlaoise ,portlaoise

,Ireland

Clonm inam Industtrial

Estate ,Clonm inam

Industtrial Estate ,portlaoise

,portlaoise ,Ireland

Within the Country 15 01 01 No 117.92 paper and cardboard packaging R12 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland

Clonmel waste Disposal

,WFP - TS - 11 -0001 -01

Clonmel ,Co Tipperary ,Co

Tipperary ,Co Tipperary ,Co

Tipperary

Within the Country 15 01 07 No 791.62 glass packaging R12 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland


,WFP - TS - 11 -0001 -01



Tipperary

To Other Countries 15 01 10 Yes 0.03

packaging containing residues of or

contaminated by dangerous substances D10 M Weighed Abroad

Enva Ireland ,WCP DC 08

1116 01

Clonminam Industrial Estate

,Port laoise ,Co Laois ,Co

Laois ,Ireland

Lindenschmidt KG

Umweltservice,04 714

98089,Krombacher

Strabe,42 - 46

,57223,Kreuztal,Germany

Krombacher Strabe,42 -

46,57223,Kreuztal,Germany

Within the Country 16 06 04 No 0.025 alkaline batteries (except 16 06 03) R8 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland

Rilta Environmental ,WCP

DC 12 1192 01

block 402 Grants Drive

,Grenogue Business Park

,Rathcoole ,Dublin ,Ireland

HJ Enthoven & Sons

,BL5598,South Darley

Matlock ,South Darley

Matlock ,Derbeyshire ,GB

DE 4 2LP ,United Kingdom

South Darley Matlock

,South Darley Matlock

,Derbeyshire ,GB DE 4 2LP

,United Kingdom

Within the Country 17 02 01 No 14.5 wood R3 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland


,WFP - TS - 11 -0001 -01



Tipperary

Within the Country 17 04 07 No 145.9 mixed metals R4 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland


,WFP - TS - 11 -0001 -01



Tipperary

Within the Country 20 01 08 No 14.15 biodegradable kitchen and canteen waste R1 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland


,WFP - TS - 11 -0001 -01



Tipperary

Within the Country 20 01 21 Yes 0.87

fluorescent tubes and other mercury-

containing waste R9 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland

Irish Lamp Recycling ,WCP

DC 08 1115 01 Facility

permit WCP : KE 08 0348 01

Woodstock Industrial Estate

,Kilkenny Road ,Athy

,Kildare ,Ireland

Irish Lamps Recycling and

Recovery Services Ltd,WFP-

KE-08-0348-01,Woodstock

Industrial Estate,Athy

,Co.Kildare,.,Ireland

Woodstock Industrial

Estate,Athy

,Co.Kildare,.,Ireland

Within the Country 20 01 35 Yes 2.467

discarded electrical and electronic

equipment other than those mentioned in

20 01 21 and and 20 01 23 containing

hazardous components R12 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland

Rehab Enterprises Limited

T/A Rehab Recycle ,Rehab

Group Mutli - Region Waste

Collection Permit – WCP-DC-

10-1257-01

Rehab Cork Waste

Management Permit –

03/10a

Roslyn Park

,Sandymount,Dublin

4,Dublin 4,Ireland

KMK Metals Recycling

Limited ,113 - 2 ,Cappincur

Industrial Estate ,Daingean

Road ,Tullamore ,Co Offaly

,Ireland

Cappincur Industrial Estate

,Daingean Road ,Tullamore

,Co Offaly ,ireland

Within the Country 20 01 38 No 0.0 wood other than that mentioned in 20 01 37 R3 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland


,WFP - TS - 11 -0001 -01



Tipperary

Within the Country 20 01 39 No 97.49 plastics R3 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland


,WFP - TS - 11 -0001 -01



Tipperary

Within the Country 20 01 40 No 0.0 metals R4 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland


,WFP - TS - 11 -0001 -01



Tipperary

Within the Country 20 03 01 No 156.22 mixed municipal waste D1 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland


,WFP - TS - 11 -0001 -01



Tipperary

To Other Countries 08 03 12 Yes 6.0 waste ink containing dangerous substances R1 M Weighed Abroad

Enva Ireland Ltd ,WTF

Number : TS000839

Smithstown Industrial Estate

,Shannon ,Co Clare ,Co

Clare ,Ireland

Lindenschmidt KG


98089,Krombacher

Strabe,42 - 46




To Other Countries 13 02 08 Yes 161.0 other engine, gear and lubricating oils R1 M Weighed Abroad


Number : TS000839



Clare ,Ireland

Lindenschmidt KG


98089,Krombacher

Strabe,42 - 46




To Other Countries 13 07 01 Yes 7.0 fuel oil and diesel R1 M Weighed Abroad


Number : TS000839



Clare ,Ireland

Lindenschmidt KG


98089,Krombacher

Strabe,42 - 46





packaging containing residues of or

contaminated by dangerous substances R1 M Weighed Abroad


Number : TS000839



Clare ,Ireland

Lindenschmidt KG


98089,Krombacher

Strabe,42 - 46





laboratory chemicals, consisting of or

containing dangerous substances,

including mixtures of laboratory chemicals R1 M Weighed Abroad


Number : TS000839



Clare ,Ireland

Lindenschmidt KG


98089,Krombacher

Strabe,42 - 46




Within the Country 15 01 05 No 99.0 composite packaging R12 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland

Freight team Ireland ,wcp

001

Promenade Road ,Dublin

Port ,Dublin ,Dublin ,ireland

Within the Country 20 01 25 No 0.465 edible oil and fat R1 M Weighed Offsite in Ireland

Frylite Cork GB Business

park Little Island Cork

,WFP - CK -11 - 0092 -01 LN

11/63

fRylite Headoffice ,Orchard

Road Ind Est ,Strabane ,Co

Tyrone ,Ireland

* Select a row by double-clicking the Description of Waste then click the delete button

Link to previous years waste data

Link to previous years waste summary data & percentage change

Link to Waste Guidance

Method Used

http://www.epa.ie/pubs/advice/aerprtr/wasteaerguid/Waste Guidance Final 13_12_11.pdf

Documents

Facility Information Summary AER Reporting Year 2012 ... · company Tennents Glasgow. Relocation of line 4 bottling line off site is scheduled to take place in May 2013. ... If yes